CIA Bans Waterboarding in Terror Interrogations
The controversial interrogation technique known as waterboarding, in which a suspect has water poured over his mouth and nose to stimulate a drowning reflex, has been banned by CIA director Gen. Michael Hayden, current and former CIA officials tell ABCNews.com. (Image above is an ABC News graphic.) The officials say Hayden made the decision at the recommendation of his deputy, Steve Kappes, and received approval from the White House to remove waterboarding from the list of approved interrogation techniques first authorized by a presidential finding in 2002. The officials say the decision was made sometime last year but has never been publicly disclosed. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Blotter Investigator: ‘High-Value Targets’ Imprisoned by High-Level ‘Cover-up’ Exclusive: Sources Tell ABC News Top Al Qaeda Figures Held in Secret CIA Prisons CIA’s Harsh Interrogation Techniques Described Full Blotter Coverage CIA Secret Prisons One U.S. intelligence official said, "It would be wrong to assume that the program of the past moved into the future unchanged." A CIA spokesman said, as a matter of policy, he would decline to comment on interrogation techniques, "which have been and continue to be lawful," he said. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. The practice of waterboarding has been branded as "torture" by human rights groups and a number of leading U.S. officials, including Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., because it amounted to a "mock execution." Today, in New Hampshire, Sen. McCain told ABC News, "I have sought that result for years. Waterboarding is a form of torture. And I’m convinced that this will not only help us in our interrogation techniques, but it will also be helpful for our image in the world." While new legislation reportedly gave the CIA the leeway to use waterboarding, current and former CIA officials said Gen. Hayden decided to take it off the list of about six "enhanced interrogation techniques." While welcoming the move, some critics say the CIA did not go far enough. "I can say it’s a good thing, but the fact remains that the entire program is illegal," John Sifton of Human Rights Watch told ABCNews.com. As a result of the decision, officials say, the most extreme techniques left available to CIA interrogators would be what is termed "longtime standing," which includes exhaustion and sleep deprivation with prisoners forced to stand, handcuffed with their feet shackled to the floor. "It is a very severe form of torture which causes tremendous psychic toll to people," said Sifton. It is believed that waterboarding was used on fewer than five "high-value" terrorist subjects, and had not been used for three to four years. Its most effective use, say current and former CIA officials, was in breaking Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, known as KSM, who subsequently confessed to a number of ongoing plots against the United States. A senior CIA official said KSM later admitted it was only because of the waterboarding that he talked. Ultimately, KSM took responsibility for the 9/ll attacks and virtually all other al Qaeda terror strikes, including the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. "KSM lasted the longest under waterboarding, about a minute and a half, but once he broke, it never had to be used again," said a former CIA official familiar with KSM’s case. Kappes’ role at the CIA puts him in charge of day-to-day CIA operations. A career intelligence officer, he left the CIA in disagreement with the leadership of Porter Goss, the former Republican congressman, who George Bush chose to replace George Tenet in 2004. When Goss in turn was replaced in May 2006 by Gen. Hayden as director of Central Intelligence, he moved quickly to get Kappes to return. Click Here to Register to Receive Blotter Alerts.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
When another 3,000 Americans are murdered because the weak-stomached politicians could not bear to do what needed to be done, I’d like to see them try soothing the families of those lost with talk of the moral high ground. You know what happens when you turn the other cheek? You get two black eyes instead of one.
Posted by: Ed | September 14, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Next to be banned, yelling.
Posted by: travis | September 14, 2007, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Wow, this is really going to disappoint King George. Maybe he’ll just authourize the use of the Rack instead!
Posted by: Honorfirst | September 14, 2007, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Good news for terrorists. Bad news for the security of America.
Posted by: James | September 14, 2007, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
King George, the dictator, who lets anyone and everyone insult him without taking away their freedom of speech, a dictator who wants to waterboard people and yet it has been banned. The genius who fooled all the dems into buying the “lies” for the Iraq war, who was intelligent enough to pull off 9/11, and yet is really really duuuumb.
BDS is a serious mental disorder, people.
Posted by: MehMeh | September 14, 2007, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Does that include “black site” prisons?
Posted by: Steve | September 14, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Ed, Your attitude is the reason Americans are hated all over the world.
Posted by: norseman | September 14, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
When another 3000 Americans POW’s are tortured by their captors I hope the weak stomached politicians will….
Enjoy.
Posted by: Tim Fuller | September 14, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Ed, gosh, I never thought about torture from the tough-guy perspective before…but you’re absolutely right.
So why do George Bush and Michael Hayden hate America?
Posted by: smintheus | September 14, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“And in the future, all terrorists are to be treated with the utmost respect, and served tea during questioning.”
– from the new CIA training manual
Posted by: dks0442 | September 14, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Hooray! 70 years after the Nazis declared waterboarding too inhumane for their enhanced interrogation techniques, this administration follows suit.
Posted by: Dread Pirate Robert | September 14, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
After he was subjected to waterboarding, KSM also took responsibility for the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
Posted by: Anonymous CIA Official | September 14, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
About time. The use of waterboarding, while doubtless effective and less “disturbing to the conscience” than other torture techniques, has alienated much of the civilized world. It has also made rather a mockery of George Bush’s speeches about “freedom and democracy” – a pretty foolish thing to do during a war that is mostly about ideas and winning hearts and minds. And apparently it was used just “five times”. Glad to hear that, but five terrorists broken versus the good name of the United States sullied for a generation hardly seems like a very good deal.
By the way, I am a Canadian. I support the war in Iraq and think that in General Petraeus you may have finally found the guy who can win it. Petraeus, like John McCain and most other patriots, is against torture. Leave torture to Castro, Ahmadinejad and Kim Jong-Il. America should stand for decency and human rights.
Posted by: John | September 14, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Did Alexis Debat consult on this story, too. Why do you go with these half-baked stories when the CIA refused to comment on it?
Posted by: Edward Allen | September 14, 2007, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
I’d like to see how some of the people defending waterboarding and other torture methods would respond if (or when) it happens to Americans captured by hostile forces. I’m guessing they’d be outraged, just like they were when those soldiers taken prisioner by the Iraqi Army were paraded on TV (and yet they were silent about Hussain or others being shown on US TV).
Hypocrisy, anyone?
Posted by: TNY | September 14, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
About time. The use of waterboarding, while doubtless effective and less “disturbing to the conscience” than other torture techniques, has alienated much of the civilized world. It has also made rather a mockery of George Bush’s speeches about “freedom and democracy” – a pretty foolish thing to do during a war that is mostly about ideas and winning hearts and minds. And apparently it was used just “five times”. Glad to hear that, but five terrorists broken versus the good name of the United States sullied for a generation hardly seems like a very good deal.
By the way, I am a Canadian. I support the war in Iraq and think that in General Petraeus you may have finally found the guy who can win it. Petraeus, like John McCain and most other patriots, is against torture. Leave torture to Castro, Ahmadinejad and Kim Jong-Il. America should stand for decency and human rights.
Posted by: John | September 14, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
A good rule for allowed interrogation techniques would be if I wouldn’t mind if they were used on my teenaged daughter or son in my presence while I was tied to a chair and could not move. Why such an unusual rule. Because once you give the government a power it’s living Hell to get them to forget how to use it. The next time my or your kids gets mistaken for a bad guy they might just well recall how to “break” them.
Nothing used on so-called terrorists is off limits to use on American citizens. Just ask John Walker Lindh and Jose Padilla.
The entire upper eschelon of the Bush Administration are war criminals and need to be hauled off to the Hague along with the torturers and murderers of the CIA and U.S. military by Hillary. It would then be my hope they’d be found guilty and hanged.
Posted by: David Walters | September 14, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
You must be joking. Do you really think we are going to fall for this.
Please!
You can’t fool ALL the people ALL the time Brian!
They are just outsourcing this to private contractors.
Posted by: Matt | September 14, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Cheney must be saddened. This was his favorite torture technique.
Posted by: bob | September 14, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Lets hope Brian’s scoop on this story didn’t come from Alexis Debat.
Posted by: Andrew Bryant | September 14, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Anyone who supports torturing suspects is a scumbag.
Posted by: tuckerndfw | September 14, 2007, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
The United States can survive terrorists and terror attacks.
The United States cannot survive the introduction of torture into our culture.
JT
Posted by: JT | September 14, 2007, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
“Posted by: John | Sep 14, 2007 6:34:39 PM”
Hey great, it’s ok to shred terrorists with gatling guns, dismember and spread their guts all over the place with bombs
but the moment somebody uses a technique that leaves no permanent damage to get a terrorist to reveal information that can be vital to saving innocent lives the “civilized world” suddenly gets alienated. This is the precise reason why we WILL lose the war on terror: our population is borderline retarded.
Posted by: Darth Executor | September 14, 2007, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
CIA no longer water what?Hey,Langley where’s the Gimp?Oops!I’m dreadfully sorry I outed yet another state secret.This is America.The country where people have no recourse to justice because they can’t prove that the “invisible government”-the 1%Doctrine that replaced 54/12-is behind the hounding and degradation that they have to endure because it serves a greater good:Hill and Bill’s 3rd term and the Bush dynasty’s royal ambitions.Why don’t you ask your friends at the Hoover building why they don’t follow through when people file complaints,knowing who is really behind some of the stunts you pull.What is Johnny Chung up to these days?How is Norman Hsu doing?There are people at Langley that know very well why this is being posted.Maybe some day Brian Ross will be knocking at your HQ?
Posted by: Luis Rodriguez | September 14, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Torture is the moral equivalent of a nuclear weapon and should be used as rarely. Torture may allow in extremely rare cases, only perhaps once a generation or century outside Hollywood, verification of actionable intelligence to prevent an horrific event. Conversely, when used with public knowledge aforethought, our reputation suffers and our enemies grow and claim righteousness.
Was torturing KSM a responsible use? Maybe, but certainly widespread use of ‘enhanced interrogation techniques,’ is far over the line.
Mostly people will say anything to make torture stop; the technique consists of moral garbage in, material garbage out, as strongly supported by Israeli work. The broad nature of the following claim brings into question the veracity of information obtained from KSM:
“Ultimately, KSM took responsibility for the 9/ll attacks and virtually all other al Qaeda terror strikes, including the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.”
So he says he did it all. Fine. Great. Now what about the future stuff. Remember, he will say anything to make it stop.
And God help our people, whether military, intelligence, or diplomatic, if they fall in the ‘wrong’ hands after our public behavior. Gitmo, Bagram, Iraq/abu-Gharaib, and the black sites have had the moral effect of the unwarranted use of atomic weapons. Everybody deplores us, and objectives have been poorly met.
Posted by: Hunter | September 14, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
The willingness of some to justify the use of government sponsored illegal torture on anyone is disappointing.
Should we not expect our leaders to honor the prisoner of war standards defined by the Geneva Convention, which we helped draft…and of which other nations can and have been held accountable for in international court?
As a nation of the people, should we not insist our government follow a couse of due process and set limits on government sponsored torture?
I believe the opinion of some who favor “preemptive aggression” and “torturing of captives” is a dangerous precept of justice within the free society we cherish.
Posted by: Mark Stephen | September 14, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Back when America used to have integrity, we used to hang Japanese military officers for waterboarding.
Now we are the evil Empire, so it’s OK.
Posted by: Comrade Rutherford | September 14, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
It’s all very well to toss civilised behaviour aside in the name of security, but I wonder how many supporters of waterboarding torture would keep supporting it if the Iraqi resistance or the Taliban captured US troops and sent videos of them being waterboarded to death to Al Jazeera or even to the White House? You think it’s OK to torture people like this, but let’s see how many of you could sit back and watch your own people being waterboarded, locked in rooms and alternately frozen and roasted, deprived of sleep for weeks on end and all those other lovely games that the Americans like to play in contravention of the Geneva Conventions and all the other treaties they deliberately break. Like everything the Americans do, this will come back to bite them. If the USA uses torture, then it can be expected that its own people will be tortured in the same way by its enemies. When the USA starts receiving the bodies of its own soldiers drowned by waterboarding, it will not have a leg to stand on in the way of complaint.
Posted by: Ziggy | September 14, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
So, Dead Pirate, are you talking about the same nazi’s that herded human beings in to gas chambers to kill them? At least those who had not yet starved to death? I don’t think those are the folks we should be taking moral lessons from.
Posted by: boomer | September 14, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Does this ban include the out of country places we end up sending the terrorist suspects as well? … right… I didn’t think so…
Posted by: Deceptive_President | September 14, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Hey Ed, tell to Jesus Christ (who I would bet the farm you proclaim to believe in) … he would tell you that by turning the other cheek you would at least walk away with some since of dignity.
Posted by: Deceptive_President | September 14, 2007, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Yep, its true, Cheney is on record publicly supporting this tactic … a favorite method of those old-fashioned, Christian, freedom loving people, the Gestapo.
Posted by: HotterKisser | September 14, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Hi,
How many times have we heard Pres Bush say “the United States does not torture.”
Perhaps he doesn’t think that waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” are torture!
I thought he exempted the CIA from the ban on torture??
Why did he exempt them? Are they not also Americans? Perhaps the CIA has foreigners actually do the torture so taht they can say the United States does not torture. Would General Hayden care to comment on this?
Who would have thunk only ten years ago that we would be debating this!
Posted by: Lawrence Clarke | September 14, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
I don’t believe Hayden. It is his business to lie when it satisfies the ends.
As to the comment about Bush being called stupid, yet being credited for pulling off 911…
Bush has limited mental capacity. Some say it is a result of fetal alcohol syndrome.
Dick Cheney is the evil brain who likely was directly involved in perpetrating 911. Bush was just brought along for the ride, and told exactly what to say. Bush is the front man. Cheney is the wizard of evil.
They should both be impeached and prosecuted for their crimes.
Posted by: ROBinDALLAS | September 14, 2007, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
I am sure the Bush would tell us that they really don’t do much more than noogies, wedgies, and indian rub burns if could and get away with it!
Posted by: Bill Hicks | September 14, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Torture is torture and unnecessary in the modern world the intelligent nations should have learned that the information gotten is unreliable or contaminated and the come backs are with out question beyond the risks. There are more sophisticated methods by trained individuals that lead to truth gathering information over a short period of time, but that depends on the intelligent nation theory, and the ability to verity facts.
Posted by: Williamwfh | September 14, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
“Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither.”
-Benjamin Franklin
If you think Our Country stands for torture, stand up for your beliefs and put sensory deprivation hood and gloves on the Statue of Liberty.
Bush and his neo-cons have tarnished Our Country long enough. Just ask the CIA.
Posted by: Patriot | September 14, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Its better to ban it, then go ahead and do it. It will make it more difficult for them to beat it if they do not think its coming.
Posted by: Scott | September 14, 2007, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Well, would you listen to that?
“King George, the dictator, who lets anyone and everyone insult him without taking away their freedom of speech”
-MehMeh
Well, MehMeh, NO president LETS me speak. The United States Constitution does. Funny you would say that, though, to prove YOUR “president” is not a king. My entire family is laughing at you.
Posted by: za | September 14, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
We not only need to torture these terrorists, we need to hang them up or shoot them in the head for the world to see what we do to people that kill Americans. Only then will they realize that we mean business.
Posted by: Jerry Mather | September 14, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
I’ve always said “If we are going to BE Americans, then let’s act LIKE Americans!” We cannot sink to the depths of evil by using torture. IT DOESN’T WORK. Sure, you will get the occasional confessor but the majority of people will tell you whatever you want to hear. And honestly, there is NO WAY to know that we are not currently doing far worse things to prisoners, regardless how evil they may be, because it is all in secret. Loving my Constitution means more to me than any information gained from torture.
Posted by: Brent | September 14, 2007, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
They don’t even describe waterboarding honestly. If it’s just about “pouring” water over someone’s head, where does the board come in? They STRAP someone to a board and tip them over backwards in a tub of water. So maybe they don’t pour water over someone’s head any more…that’s not even “Waterboarding”.
And Ed, it DOESN”T WORK. People lie to get you to stop. It’s revenge, and not
effective at all.
Posted by: LizDexic | September 14, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
What a bunch of liberal crybabies are posting here! Let’s all join hands and sing songs of peace to the terrorists who want to kill every American man, woman and child. We certainly mustn’t cause them any trouble at all or inconvenience them, or heaven forbid, pour water on their heads.
After all, according to you idiots, the real bad guys are American Christians, not Islamist fundamentalists. That danged George Bush, why he’s worse than bin Laden. My gosh, he doesn’t believe in giving sworn enemies of the American people $50.00 and a free pass to Disneyland. How awful. Too bad there isn’t a cure or at least some kind of treatment for all you sick liberals. You need it.
Posted by: Ofendi | September 14, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Look, people, get real. We use torture because torture works. I know it works because I saw it work on 24.
Posted by: bob | September 14, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Now we just need to arrest all the CIA agents who have tortured people, put them on trial, find them guilty, and exectute them.
Posted by: Lizzard Lipps | September 14, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Then we’ve got to allow for the fact that we will NOT know every attack that is coming our way…and that people are going to die because of it. We’re fighting a war by playing by some set of rules against an enemy that doesn’t go by any rules. It is obviously easier and cheaper to avoid having to house alQaeda at Gitmo or anywhere else…and we won’t listen to anybody’s phone conversations, etc. – We just have to then deal with attacks happening once in a while and get over it. If that’s ok with everybody, then I’m all for it as well.
Posted by: parkerknoll | September 14, 2007, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Think of it…All of Gitmo full of detainees with hoods, handcuffs, chains..Iraqis caught by Americans, turned over to Americans by competing sects…..denied visitors, communication, attorneys, tortured.
Iraqi…who did not have the WMD, could not produce them, had disarmed as per sanctions and Un directives, could not defend themselves… falsly accused of being terrorists responsible for 9/11.
A special place in ell waits for the liars.
Posted by: Lewis | September 14, 2007, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
What asses you republicans are. The U.S. is a country that has taken pride in our integrity and decency. With Bush and Cheney everything has been thrown out and we are supposed to be the ruthless thugs and torturers. That is not what most of us want from our leaders. You people should think about how much you would like to be water boarded and tortured and then be found to be innocent. Fools are fools are fools.
Posted by: Vicki | September 15, 2007, 12:43 am 12:43 am
well, there goes our moral advantage, along with the special intel. we’re really screwed now.
Posted by: ked | September 15, 2007, 1:06 am 1:06 am
“CIA Bans Water-Boarding in Terror Interrogations”
This is IMPOSSIBLE!!! How could the CIA ban water-boarding when the CIA wasn’t using water-boarding? This must be a commie leftist liberal Demon-o-crat fake story to give comfort to the enemy.
Posted by: Mark In Irvine | September 15, 2007, 2:52 am 2:52 am
Torture is an excellent way to get false confessions.
Posted by: mdell27 | September 15, 2007, 3:02 am 3:02 am
im a proud scumbag!!!!!!!!!!! i support torture if its going to save innocent lives and catch the bad guys.
Posted by: stephen | September 15, 2007, 3:37 am 3:37 am
After WWII Japanese officers were tried and given long sentences of hard labor for what?
Waterboarding
By who?
The United States
_Any_ of the so called “enhanced interrogation techniques” are a violation of the Geneva Convention.
Posted by: Belay That | September 15, 2007, 7:04 am 7:04 am
They should have Waterboarded Sandy Berger to find out the REAL Story.
Posted by: Dennis D | September 15, 2007, 7:46 am 7:46 am
Decency lol?
60 Minutes-Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
05/12/1996 Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it
Posted by: Dennis | September 15, 2007, 7:49 am 7:49 am
Geez look at all the whiny little crybabies that crawled out from under their rocks for this one.
Waterboarding is torture? Since when?
Before you start whining about torture show me someone with their ears cut off, their eyes put out, their fingernails ripped out. Show me someone who has had the skin slowly peeled off of their limbs. Show me someone who has had their joints crushed. Their fingers burned off with a blowtorch. Show me someone who has had the flesh boiled off of their feet. Someone who has been scourged. Someone who has been coated with honey and left for the bugs to eat. Show me anything that involves destuction of the body and results in agonizing pain.
Do NOT show me some terrorist who was made to think he was drowning for a minute and a half and who broke down and spilled his pathetic little guts and attempt to tell me that he was tortured.
Because then you lose all credibility.
Posted by: Dave | September 15, 2007, 8:12 am 8:12 am
TORTURE DOESN’T PROVIDE ACCURATE INFORMATION
THE US SHOULD BE ABOVE TORTURE
No wonder the world hates our guts, we say we don’t torture and then we turn around and do it.
How embarrassing, and how scum-like.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 15, 2007, 8:13 am 8:13 am
America tortures people, that is a surprise. I thought America usually used proxy states to do their work for them. You know Egypt Uzbekistan Poland Czech Republic.
However by admitting everything after being tortured Sheikh Khali mohammed has called into question the trial of at least one alleged terrorist who said he chopped off Pearls head.
How many terrorists are running around because those who were tortured hve taken the rap?
Posted by: Chris | September 15, 2007, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Wow, We are really close to the bottom to endorse torture for any reason. To speak of banning one technique is missing the bigger point – torture results can’t be trusted at all, and especially if the prisoner is completely innocent! They will say anything to get the torture to stop. That includes making stuff up! That info is often used to dig a deeper hole for the USA. e.g., the false atomic bomb plot info that was extracted and then acted upon as if it was accurate. It was a completely made up confession to stop the torture (and even welcome a more humane death). Our military invasion actions based on that false info has damaged us on many levels: morally here at home, taken the lives and (minds) of our (young) troups and our world reputation. The lie that torture works (and provides reliable intel) gives the green light for more of the same. All this to impose our fiat money-for-oil will on other contries. This last decade was the beginning of the dark ages for the USA. Save us from this madness – Elect Ron Paul.
Posted by: FindLiberty | September 15, 2007, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Finally a move in the right direction. Historically the use of torture has never been shown to have provided any useful information. As a former member of the intel community I would agree. It results in poor information, misinformation, and just plain bogus info. In the 1980′s our proxy forces in Central America used it often and I never saw anything good come out of it other than increased hatred towards the U.S. Torture creates more terrorists and insurgents. It is a bad idea. The people who are posting all the crap about weakening our intel have never been in the Intel community and have never seen the real result of torture. All a bunch of arm-chair warriors.
Posted by: David Bradley | September 15, 2007, 9:44 am 9:44 am
It always amazes me how there can be rules for torture and warfare…but we always fall short of banning both…so why bother with rules you’ll never be sure were adhered to ? I guess it looks better as a nation….so just keep my family safe…I really don’t care.
Posted by: Doug | September 15, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am
The real torture is hearing these armchair tough guys defending it. I’ll be most of them have trouble killing a spider that is scaring their daughter. Losers. Granted, if there was any credence to the idea that torture actually worked, there might at least be an intellectual argument about it. But it’s more an issue of self-righteous weaklings wanted to feel important and dominant, when in fact, they are probably ineffective, boring, lockstep suburban geeks.
Posted by: Dan Bernard | September 15, 2007, 10:50 am 10:50 am
So if Khalid Sheik Mohammed confessed to all these crimes, whens his trial start? Oh, thats right, evidence brought by torture is inadmissable and grounds for dismissal, so he will NEVER be brought to justice like the cleric who masterminded the first World Trade Center bombing and is serving a life sentence.
Posted by: kev | September 15, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am
I don’t understand the comments of the first two posters here – Ed and travis – and those like them, who seem to be operating purely on a primitive emotional level. It used to be that America was trying to set a better standard for the world, a benchmark for goodness and respect for human dignity that the world would look to. These posters are on the side of the terrorists when they advocate stooping to the level of the terrorists in our tactics. By the way, KSM’s confessions are – if true, which many are not – an exception to the rule. Most career interrogators concur that torture lessens the reliability of confessions, because people say what they want you to hear, rather than what is true. We should be better and smarter than that. We don’t need to stoop to the level of the terrorists to win.
Posted by: Gogi | September 15, 2007, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I have no problems with waterboarding. If we gain any little bit of intelligence through this process, I am all for it. These people aren’t maimed. They don’t lose the use of their eyes or limbs. Their heart may jump a little if they ever go near a pool, but oh well. Sometimes confessions are lies, whether it’s through waterboarding or other interrogation techniques. Any decent intel collection asset is going to seek corroborating info prior to saying that what Ahmed said while being waterboarded is the 100% honest-to-god truth. That’s just common freaking sense. A congressman whose name I can’t recall at the moment once said something to the effect of “If hooking a prisoner’s testicles up to a battery is going to save just one American life, I only have two things to say – Red is positive and black is negative.” I agree with that 100%.
Posted by: Dan | September 15, 2007, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Here’s what I want to know from FindLiberty and other Ron Paul advocates. When he does not get the nomination, which he won’t because the rest of the Republican Party and their followers are INSANE and DANGEROUS … will you hold your nose and vote for Hillary like we Kucinich, Dodd or Edwards Democrats will? Or will you stay home, or what? I really believe that thinking people on both sides of the aisle must admit we need a major cleanup of a government out of control and a restoring of habeus corpus, etc. At least a change of party means a certain sweeping out of entrenched corruption. Your thoughts?
Posted by: Gogi | September 15, 2007, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Liberalism is a mental disorder!!! If this exchange does not prove it, I do not know what does!!
Posted by: Joe V | September 15, 2007, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Wow, there are a lot of liberal nut jobs posting.
Torture?
Place underwear on someone’s head or pour water on them, it is not torture.
Let’s not forget they are terrorists. I think the liberals need to learn what torture is. If pouring water on terrorists head saves 1 American life it’s worth it.
Posted by: Dizzy | September 15, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
I think it’s clear the CIA should pick up Ed and apply some of the now admittedly weakened “enhanced interrogation techniques” on him. He clearly seems to have some valuable information about imminent American murders, and you know, you just can’t be too careful these days. THAT’S what support for torture means, after all.
Posted by: j@ne futzinfarb | September 15, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
As an American; I would rather die, from a terrorist attack as a free man, rather than live in a state of fear and loss of my freedom. live free or die as the saying goes is all American. allowing rendition or water boarding is a threat to my consitution and that I can NEVER allow. So if you think The the bush admistration is on que, then you too; are hoplessly, lost in the Meaning of AMERICA
Posted by: Adeeb N. | September 15, 2007, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Not saying what he did or didn’t do, I bet mr. KSM admitted to everything and anything to make those responsible for torturing him stop the torture.
ABC reports “A senior CIA official said KSM later admitted it was only because of the water-boarding that he talked.
Ultimately, KSM took responsibility for the 9/ll attacks and virtually all other al Qaeda terror strikes, including the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.”
For authorizing the CIA to use these so called advanced interrogation techniques King George of Carlyle is obviously guilty of “Crimes Against Humanity.”
In all fairness this Constitution, domestic law, international law and Geneva Convention breaking President should meet the same demise as other lawless leaders like Slobadan Melosivich have for their criminal and war crimes.
America must prosecute Bush and Cheney in order to regain our integrity and moral standing previously appreciated.
Posted by: SacrAmerican | September 15, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
But if we don’t violate the Geneva Conventions and torture people we think might be terrorists, then how can we protect our freedoms.
Posted by: Tammy Stickers | September 15, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Consider this hypothetical scenario:
Suppose the US government had their act together and had got their hands on Muhammed Atta before 9/11 but he refused under questioning to give the names and locations of his co-hijackers or which flights they intended to hijack? Are you suggesting that the application of high voltage cables to his testicles or pulling a few of his teeth out with a pair of pliers to make him sing would be unjustified?
Posted by: Richard | September 15, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
In a “ticking bomb” scenario it is extremely irresponsible & childish not to use a very effective interrogation tool like waterboarding in he hands interrogation experts. One can see this childishness in Sen. McCain who argues against torture like a ten year old saying that it would encourage our enemies to use it on us – as if our enemies don’t already mutilate & kill for information without hesitation. Some people cannot endure to leave childhood!
Posted by: Fred M | September 16, 2007, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Gogi wrote, “I have no problems with waterboarding. If we gain any little bit of intelligence through this process, I am all for it.”
Posted by: cowbot | September 16, 2007, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Why is it that every time an article about subjects such as “waterboarding” which does not harm the subject in any way, and is very effective, all the KOOKs come out in droves?
Apparently, few of those making comments read the other article on ABCNews about “waterboarding” which contains the following:
“Then [After waterboarding for two minutes] he [Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mastermind of the 9/11 operation ]started talking, and he never stopped,” this former officer said. KSM was never water-boarded again, and in hours and hours of conversation with his interrogators, often over a cup of tea, he poured out his soul and the murderous deeds he committed.
Well it worked, so lets stop it – that may make sense to you KOOKs but my grandchildren mean more to me than the comfort of some Islamic terrorist bent on klling them.
Posted by: TheOldTrooper | September 16, 2007, 10:44 am 10:44 am
I’m ashamed that my country has resorted to torture and sad that so many people can’t see what we’ve become. Our children want and need parents with courage who will take great risks for worthy ends, not cowards who will do anything to save themselves or their kids or even just their lifestyles.
Posted by: Andy | September 16, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Continue eviscerating our defense agencies, and you will get what you deserve. Jimmy the peanut farmer did it and now asks “How come the CIA did not stop 9/11?” Because you cut their budget, humiliated their best people, and allowed churchladies define their procedures. Duh!
Posted by: Andy Jozan | September 16, 2007, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
What difference does it make what we do to the perpetrators 9/11, if it were me in charge, I would see them quartered in the same Barbaric way thay’ve treated us. The Democrats in Congress are hoping we lose the WAR on Terror. If we do, the Liberals in this country will be the ones that suffer under the Tyranny brought forth by Islamic Extremist.
AlQaeda should know we will not stop until we extinguish the very light that has brought them from the bowels of evil.
To all those that refer to the Constitution of the United States, I would ask, just what article of this document do the Terrorist refer to when they applied their justice to David Pearle or the victims of 9/11. Give me a break. Above all give us a break from more Liberal Babbling.
Posted by: RICK SPENCE | September 16, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
You liberals are bunch of fools! You obviously don’t even know the definition of torture. Putting underwear on a scumbag islamo-facsists head is not torture. Piling three naked terrorists in a pyramid is not torture. Getting someone a little wet is not torture. Torture, my misguided liberal friends is gouging someone’s eyes out, cutting there hands off and then beheading them while they are still alive, that is tortue. All of those things is what the islamo-facsists use. You liberals need to grow some backbone for crying out loud!
Posted by: Rightwinger | September 16, 2007, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Oh good. Now the terrorists will no doubt feel morally obligated to stop flying airplanes into buildings, bombing public places, and cutting heads off.
Nevertheless, if someday I find myself clamped within the jaws of a set of Vise Grips, I will most likely divulge exactly where and when the ambush will take place (if for no other reason than the sake of myself).
The USA has become a nation of silly, spineless wussies. We will not last another decade. Especially if we are stupid enough to elect the likes of Hillary.
If we are to avoid another 9/11 or much worse, we must ignore the fools amongst us.
Posted by: Happy Trails | September 16, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
If you waterboard Karl Rove long enough, he will admit to killing John Kennedy. What does that have to do with getting to the truth?
Posted by: WDRussell | September 17, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am
I must say that almost half of these posts make me sick. I am not sure if you fail to realize or if you are too consumed with hatred to see but the fact of the matter is this:
Torture is unacceptable. To derive information from torture subjects opens the door for every other country to detain Americans and under the guise of “national security” torture at will. To circumvent the Geneva convention also puts at risk every soldier in our military as anyone could be labeled as an “enemy combatant” and therefore each and every one of our soldiers could be legally (under our understanding of the rules of war ~courtesy of George W Bush)refused counsel, taken to secret prisons and not even acknowledged, leaving the families of these soldiers to languish, never knowing the fate of their loved ones. To those who would say that we should torture and kill the terrorists or “hang them and shoot them in the head” consider this, as uninvited guests in a country where we have destabilized the government, To these people we have become the terrorists. it does not matter that we are there to “help them”, consider that this was also the tactic of our enemy, to cleanse us and “help us” rid ourselves of “evil”. Therefore, using your thinking, should these people decided to act as you wish we would, you could conceivably see Americans impaled on wooden posts as a “lesson”. your shortsightedness disgusts me. And before you get all riled up, its worth a mention that I served this country’s military as an NBC (Nuclear Chemical Biological) Soldier. Your way of thinking puts my soldiers, my friends and my colleagues at grave risk.
Posted by: Adam | September 17, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
This is in response to Dennis’s comment:
“…Before you start whining about torture show me someone with their ears
cut off, their eyes put out, their fingernails ripped out. Show me someone
who has had the skin slowly peeled off of their limbs. Show me someone who
has had their joints crushed. Their fingers burned off with a blowtorch.
Show me someone who has had the flesh boiled off of their feet. Someone
who has been scourged. Someone who has been coated with honey and left for
the bugs to eat. Show me anything that involves destuction of the body and
results in agonizing pain.
Do NOT show me some terrorist who was made to think he was drowning for a
minute and a half and who broke down and spilled his pathetic little guts
and attempt to tell me that he was tortured….”
Torture is all about giving a person more pain than *that person* can
take. Pain is in our heads. It is in the way our central nervous systems
(CNS) respond to stimuli; and everyone is different. It matters not
whether I rip a subject’s foot off or simply touch him with a feather if
both give him, the individual I’m trying to torture, unbearable pain.
There are people who can stick knives in their arms without flinching; for
these people, a knife in the arm is *not* torture, though it may
permanently damage the nerves in their arm. But for others this is
torture. Likewise, the mind is very powerful, and can torture a person
even when the body is not in risk of any permanent damage. Some people are
deathly afraid of high places (acrophobia); simply making them ride in an
airplane is torture to them. Do not think their pain is any less real than
someone who gets stabbed in the arm; it is absolutely as real and often
greater in intensity and duration.
And who said anything about a minute and a half of water-boarding? Did the
government say at some point that they were only using water-boarding for
1’30″ periods or less? I don’t believe it. That wouldn’t be very
“effective” now, would it? To be effective they must torture until the
person “confesses” or is on the verge of death or permanent body damage.
The idea behind torture is to give someone more pain than they can handle,
and not a drop less. Torture has nothing to do with permanent body damage;
torture may be inflicted via the body but its goal is pain, and pain is in
the mind. And the trouble with using a torture technique that inflicts
permanent body damage is that you can only do it *once*; once used, you
can’t permanently damage the same part of the body in the same way again,
can you? An arm once cut off is cut off; you cannot cut it off again–at
least, not with the same level of resultant pain. (You could reattach it
and then cut if off, but it’s going to come off rather quickly, and the
nerves won’t be as well attached or numerous so there won’t be as much
pain, and so on…) In fact, it is the torture techniques that do *not*
seriously damage the body that are the most effective at delivering pain
because the body remains healthy enough to supply the brain and CNS with
enough oxygen, blood and nutrients it needs to go right on torturing the
mind of the individual. Once these resources drop to low-enough levels (as
they can for serious, permanent injuries) the subject begins to lose
consciousness. Ask yourself a question: Can you torture an *unconscious*
person? The answer is No.
Posted by: Mike | September 18, 2007, 4:15 am 4:15 am
Adeeb, are you REALLY “living in a state of fear and loss of your freedom”? lol that is hilarious, man…where do you live? ha ha …live without fear; only then are you free…
Posted by: Jazz | September 19, 2007, 9:46 am 9:46 am
yeah Iam scared We have Terrorist’s here, Look at Black Water, You bet I am in Fear I fear this Country is having a hart attack and letting it self go. Yes, we are not the America we once were were nothing more than a bunch of hot headed Hill billies like Bin-Ladin.
Posted by: Adeeb N. | September 21, 2007, 1:00 am 1:00 am
An Eye for An Eye doesnt work in the fight against Terrorism. Any means necessary does work. Please allow
our nation full use of resources to do their job to defend us. Human rights. What happened to the rights of the people in the Pentagon, Flight 93, and the World Trade Center? All fairness is out the window. Let us not forget 9/11 so quickly!!!!!!!!
Posted by: CT | September 23, 2007, 8:15 am 8:15 am
So you mean if I don’t Keep the Higher moral ground I am forgetting about the Victums of 9/11, So if I don/t abuse Humans I am forgetting about the victums
If I decide to follow Human rights I am insulting the victums. Is that what you mean. What I here is America is not above the Terrorist it should stoop down low and become equal to a terrorist. Hmm sounds good to Me If dont believe in the Meaning of America.
Posted by: Adeeb N. | September 23, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
In reply to WDRussell:
“Torture is unacceptable.”
Couldn’t have said it better, but torture isn’t the PG-13 methods we use. Torture is what the terrorists put the people through to force the people into submission.
“as uninvited guests in a country where we have destabilized the government, To these people we have become the terrorists. ”
What government? Saddam? Glad we destabilized that government. No one likes being occupied by another nation, but you obviously must have failed to see pictures of their people after the election smiling with the ink on their finger. If we are terrorists then damn, I hope all other terrorists follow suit and give nations a chance for democracy like we have.
Posted by: Shaun | October 1, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
As republicans fail and cling to their zero talking points that are ladled out to them by HUSH BIMBO and BILE OHREALLY, most people need to remember the eternal truth…do not argue with idiots as they bring you down to their level and then they beat you with experience. Most of my republican friends have pursed lips and furtive glances to guide their way currently and a plethora of doting MAINSCREAM media to pump up their positions so as not to hurt their frailties.
Posted by: daddy | October 4, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I was a republican but these comments suggests they are all who are armchair torturers. I think I will vote democrat from now on.
Posted by: big guy | October 4, 2007, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
The rule for a christian is do unto others as you would have them do unto you. There is a difference between interrogating and torturing.
You notice John McCane is at the forfront of this. He was a prisoner.
What level of interrogation we use ourselves is the level at which we should be alarmed at when others use more. I for one do not think that one American should go through any of these torturous methods or that I should be accepting of these methods by others on our citizens.
Posted by: david | October 5, 2007, 8:02 am 8:02 am
If this is the evil emmpire leave it. Go find a better one if you can. I heard no out cry from any one when our soldiers where beheaded. I say do what ever it takes to win. They drew frist blood,and as I remember my father and father-in-law that gave thier blood in world war 11, we owe nothing to the civilized world. When things go wrong in the world, who do they call, the evil empire for help and we give it willing. I think the media should report on why do people worry so much. On why we how should treat this terrorist or as I call them cowards. The name terrorist is to good for them. As a Veitnam Vet. I know what John McCane is saying,but I also saw what the ememey did to some our soliders that where not taken prisoners. Why is it we are the only ones that have to follow the Geneva Convention. I say if they don’t have a uniform on and are trying to kill our soliders,they have no rights.They drew frist boold, so all you people, whom defend these cowards.I suggest you all find ways to help our troop and pray for them.
Posted by: HM | October 5, 2007, 10:06 am 10:06 am
I think it is absurd to believe that torture is acceptable. Some of you say that we should not care, that we should do “whatever we have to do”. That is ridiculous, as Americans we should set a higher standard for the world to follow, the reason the Geneva conventions were put in place is to insure that soldiers from all countries are treated properly if taken as prisoners of war. We should set a higher standard if we are to demonstrate our leadership to the world. The majority of experts seem to agree that when being tortured, the victim of the torture will say whatever he thinks we want to hear to end the torture, whether it is true or not… This can and does lead to incorrrect intelligence. John McCain was tortured and held as a prisoner of war, and he has confirmed these statements, it is not something that our country as the leader of the free world should condone. We don’t want our soldiers tortured, so we shouldn’t torture others. Torture hurts our image worldwide, and with the blow we have taken in popularity due to the current administration’s idiocy, we cannot afford to have our image tarnished any further… Especially not if we stupidly are headed for World War 3 as our mentally incompetent president seems to believe…
Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2007, 11:12 am 11:12 am
I am disgusted by someone using my name supporting some completely immoral actions by an administration that lectures us on being moral. Can you imagine Jesus and his deciples nailing any human to a cross? That should be enough but it is also making this nation a periah just when we are most in need of friends. Is this administration so stupid that it believes that our military-industrial complex can defeat everyone else in the world? Is that they mean by WWIII?
Posted by: Edward George | November 2, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
“Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither.”
-Benjamin Franklin
First you accept torture of the ‘enemy’. Then through the Military Commissions Act of 2006 you can be named by the prez as an ‘enemy combatant’. Sure, everyone who is saying use torture may regret when it is used on them.
let freedom ring
Posted by: son of jamin | December 10, 2007, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
what are the difference between CIA and Terrorist,all are the same
Posted by: king,gospa | December 11, 2007, 4:45 am 4:45 am
why are you people talk for the Americans?
CIA is a kind of terrorist who invade into other country secretly and do all the bad things.
Posted by: kenny | February 12, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am
if we play nice on the play ground we are going to be beet up by the bully!!! we should aske them nicly to tell us what thay know, put a roof over thare heads give them all thay can eat in heated rooms or ac and wight till there people atack.
ya right
Posted by: kip | March 1, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Surf’s Up! Dudes – grab your waterboards! The big mama is mackin’ some gnarly grinders!
Read: IS THIS REAL WORLD OR IS IT EXERCISE?
Posted by: Xanadu Xero | March 14, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
So now I understand. Waterboarding OK. Naked Pyramid twister, inhumane. Makes scense.
Posted by: Dude404 | April 16, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
this should not be banned its a perfect way to get terrorists or individuals to give information when there not speeking when the the interrogators are giving them the easy way. this should not be banned at all.
Posted by: keith | May 9, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
You idiots with your King titles for the president, don’t you see how if Los Angeles goes boom, and we could’ve gotten the info but ya’ll were complaining so loudly that torture is wrong, so Bush got rid of torture, then thousands die and you complain about why didn’t they torture the terrorist?
Either way, you people shout at bush when the man is doing the best he can. I’d like to see what happens if one of you were president, under all that pressure. How could you do better?
Posted by: Silver | January 14, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
So now these war criminals at ABC are outing the people who have been working to protect us! Count another citizen as a new right wing extremist and proud of it!
Posted by: Lee | April 30, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
McCain made some lofty statements about torture and thats fine.
But didn’t McCain reveal all sorts of to the North Vietnamese? Isn’t he a living example that torture does work.
Or does the Senator contend all of his information was disinformation?
Posted by: Dave | May 1, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
It’s exhausting to seek out knowledgeable people on this subject, but you sound like you realize what you’re speaking about! Thanks
Posted by: Geox | August 31, 2011, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm