250 Pro-Taliban Dead; Pak Army Calls Ceasefire
A day after Pakistani warplanes pounded villages in the volatile tribal belt, killing as many 250 pro-Taliban militants and civilians, the army called a dawn-to-dusk ceasefire to let residents bury their dead and seek medical attention for the wounded. Thousands of families have fled the Mir Ali district of North Waziristan since the massive bombardment began two days ago. Following on four weeks of sporadic fighting, the militants had holed up in nine villages around the district, according to locals. Mirage fighter jets and Cobra gunship helicopters bombed the militants’ hideouts. No high-value targets were taken out in the strike, said Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad. Rather the attack targeted a group of guerrillas who had been attacking the military. A local shopkeeper described the airstrike as intense and prolonged. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. "The sky lit up, and the whole ground shook," said Mohammed Sharif. Villagers were streaming out of the area on the banks of the River Tochi to Bannu, a town in Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier province that borders the tribal belt. Sharif said as much as 90 percent of Mir Ali’s population, which he estimated to be about 45,000, had fled the area. Mohammed Jamil, a local resident heading to Bannu with his family, said, "we can’t stay here. There is no food, no water, no electricity." Residents were scared, he said, and angry at the Pakistan military. Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad, the military spokesman, said villagers should redirect their anger at the militants who he said were using them as human shields. "The fact is that when the militants use civilian homes to hide in, civilian casualties are going to be a consequence," he said. "It is the fault of the militants that these civilians get killed." Islamabad has been struggling to contain a widening Taliban insurgency across the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, a semi-autonomous region that borders Afghanistan. Critics have complained the Pakistan military normally hesitates to go after the militants and then eventually goes in with too much force, resulting in massive casualties. Click Here to Register for Blotter Alerts.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
People that harbor terrorists and support terrorists by mere are terrorists themselves. These psychos know the media will print that “civilians” were killed and they use that as a cry for help to the uselss left in America. If the press were interested in printing the truth they would write that “civilians harboring and suppoprting the terrorists were killed.” I wont holdmy breath
Posted by: duhize | October 10, 2007, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Quote of the century!
“The fact is that when the militants use civilian homes to hide in, civilian casualties are going to be a consequence,” he said. “It is the fault of the militants that these civilians get killed.”
Posted by: Ed Gruberman | October 10, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
duhize – Right on the button. These “civillians” allow the terrorists to live among them and then don’t expect consequences? The disgusting media attempts to put the blame on those fighting terrorists but any clear thinking person can see right through that bull.
Posted by: Scott | October 10, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Remember, Islam is a religion of peace. And, the “war on terror” is just a bumper sticker slogan…
Posted by: Robert Marley | October 10, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Civilians are threatened by terrorists
who force them to cooperate…
Duhize and scott..did you consider that?
Posted by: Blackie | October 11, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
If “the civilians are threatened by terrorists to force them to cooperate”, then they are already enslaved by them. Can you imagine where those civilians will be if the Taliban is allowed to win and come back into power. Oh yes, we do not have to imagine, we need only look a few years into the past.
Posted by: Ron | October 12, 2007, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Thank you Pakistan! Keep up the good work!
Posted by: S. Braden | October 12, 2007, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
If I were a civilian in this area I think I would be trying to get the terrorists out before my house gets bombed and if I couldn’t do that then I would consider moving… not a time for semantics.
Posted by: BTL musings | October 14, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
im sure all of these people arnt taliban supporting lunatics, if a terrorist threatened your familie with violence unless u cooperated and than the goverment comes in after several months of allowing this and says your supporting terrorist you should blame them. it really doesnt make sense, whenever theres a war the regular people suffer the most
Posted by: hero | October 15, 2007, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Hello!! Does anyone see a possible corollary with the “civilian” deaths the Libs moan and weep over (with crocodile tears) in Iraq???
Posted by: TheOldTrooper | October 15, 2007, 10:07 am 10:07 am