By Justin Rood

Oct 30, 2007 9:58am

Did Congress Mistakenly ‘Out’ Secret Whistle-Blowers?

A clerical error by a congressional staffer may have revealed the e-mail addresses of government whistle-blowers. The addresses were from a list of respondents to a congressional "anonymous" tip line set up to ferret out malfeasance within the Department of Justice. This summer, after a series of explosive allegations of wrongdoing by Justice Department officials, the Democrat-controlled House Judiciary Committee set up the online tip system to encourage Justice employees to come forward if they had any more information. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. Last week, a nonpartisan clerk involved in administering the project sent an e-mail to the people who had written in — inadvertently including all of the roughly 150 e-mail addresses in the "To" line of the message. The clerk compounded the error, which was first reported by the Web site TPMmuckraker.com, by sending a second "recall" message after the first. That note, too, included all of the addresses. A statement released yesterday by Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., explained the clerk’s error and apologized for it. "The Committee. . . is making every effort to protect the confidentiality of those who chose to provide information," the statement said, noting that the whistle-blowers "are entitled to full
legal protection," and that the panel was "determined to ensure they receive that protection[.]" A copy of the e-mail provided to ABC News showed a number of e-mails that used individuals’ full names. The public e-mail address of Vice President Dick Cheney was also on the list, as well as Conyers’ own address. Several other addresses "contained profanity," as Conyers’ statement described them, and appeared to be "fictitious." Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?

User Comments

The Dems are just as useless as the GOP.
VOTE FOR 3rd PARTY CANDIDATES.

Posted by: Mike | October 30, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

It seems as though our government is unreliable and untouchable. But what’s even worse is that the American public in the intensely competitive and divisive partisan atmosphere is really disconnected and disenfranchised about how to get things changed.
Most of government is unresponsive to the will of the people, who in effect are only concerned with their personal lives.

Posted by: Charles | October 30, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

are people less intelligent these days? seems that way to me!

Posted by: Tommy Darcy | October 30, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Wouldn’t it be nice if we had anyone with an IQ over 80 in the gov’t? *snort* Idiots!

Posted by: Lana | October 30, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

How do these clerks get the jobs in the first place. Even a child could do a better job than that.

Posted by: angelheart80153 | October 30, 2007, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

I remember a famous quote that says, “Nothing in politics happens by accident.” Although there is plenty of anecdotal evidence to assume our government is comprised entirely of bumbling, self-serving fools, I suspect the incompetence ploy is often used to disguise intentional and calculated wrongdoing by our elected officials. By the way, did they ever manage to find those millions of “lost” emails about the politicaly-motivated firings of US attorneys?

Posted by: h5mind | October 30, 2007, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Many of these “Whistleblowers” would rather run straight to the press than go through official channels to report something amiss. The media hypes the story up like its some mass conspiracy so eventually the whole world gets to read about it. Then its media attention and public misconceptions that drive the event. Many of the current “Whistleblowers” want attention mostly because they are disgruntled workers, not getting the attention at work they try and get it elsewhere. The media does not make a distinction, its news and they can make money. Once the “Whistleblowers” go through their chain of command about something illegal, then they should go to the press, not before. They should never go to the press because they disagree with some internal policy that is not illegal. That is a publicity hound.

Posted by: Porky Pig | October 31, 2007, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.