Failing to Serve America’s Heroes on the Home Front
In the last two years, generous Americans answering appeals to help wounded and paralyzed veterans have given more than $464 million to charities that have been given an F in a new report card from a leading charity watchdog group. Those failing charities include the National Veterans Services Fund, of Darien, Conn., which took in more than $6 million in contributions last year supposedly to help veterans’ families. It got a report grade of F from the American Institute of Philanthropy, which says the charity gave out only two percent of its money for charity. Good Morning America Video: Veterans’ Charities Fail to Make the Grade "Veterans deserve better from America’s charities," said Daniel Borochoff, the institute’s president and ABC News consultant, who compiled his group’s report card based on his analysis of the charity’s financial data. While the charities’ activities are not illegal, Borochoff says, "spending under 35 percent of your budget on actual bona fide charitable programs will get you an F grade." Of the 27 military and veterans’ charities reviewed by Borochoff’s group, 13 were rated F, including the Amvets National Service Foundation, the Army Emergency Relief Fund, Freedom Alliance, the National Veterans Services Fund, the Military Order of the Purple Heart Services Foundation and the Paralyzed Veterans of America. Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, who has been investigating charities, called that an outrage. "We owe the veterans a great deal, and this shows a lack of respect for what the veterans have fought for, our freedom," he told ABC News. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. But it has meant six-figure salaries and prosperous lifestyles for some of the people running the F-rated charities. As the founder of a charity called Help Hospitalized Veterans, which distributes craft kits to veterans’ hospitals, Roger Chapin of San Diego pays himself and his wife more than half a million dollars a year in salary. Charity is his business. Over the last three decades, Chapin has created more than a dozen different charities for cancer, kids and veterans. "He’s a charity entrepreneur," Borochoff says. "He’s very good at setting up charities that don’t do so much charitable but bring in lots, lots of money." Chapin’s veterans’ charity has produced slick promotional videos about the good they do, with a number of celebrity endorsements, including one from actor Dennis Franz, who starred in the ABC primetime drama "NYPD Blue." But according to their analysis, the American Institute of Philanthropy says of the $70 million Help Hospitalized Veterans took in last year, only 31 percent went to the actual charitable cause. The rest was mainly overhead and fundraising costs, meaning a grade of F. A spokesperson for Dennis Franz said he had no idea the charity gave so little to actual charity. Chapin had agreed to be interviewed for our report but refused to sit down in front of the camera when he learned who would be doing the interview, ABC News’ Brian Ross. Chapin and some of the other heads of charities that got failing grades questioned Borochoff’s analysis of their financial records. They also insist they provide an invaluable service, and it is the high cost of fundraising that eats up the money available for actual charity. Iraq War veteran Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, told ABC News veterans deserve more. "Veterans are not a place to make a buck. Veterans have served our country and have put their butts on the line, and they need these organizations to care for them when they come home," he said. "So if you’re not serious about being in the business of helping veterans, go find something else to do." And Rieckhoff encouraged all donors "to give but to think long and hard about it, and do a little research and find out who you’re giving to so that you know your money’s being used appropriately." See the grades for all military and veterans charities rated by the American Institute of Philanthropy. (Copyrighted material is posted with the permission of the American Institute of Philanthropy.) For more ratings on charities, go to the American Institute of Philanthropy’s Web site. Anna Schecter contributed to this report. This post has been updated. Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
They are a disgrace.The Veterans sacrificed there lives and are not getting the funds due to them.The man in charge is living high on the hog,while the Vets miss out.Jail is to good for him.
Posted by: Phil Pecora | November 9, 2007, 7:20 am 7:20 am
This report disgusts me. I cannot believe the laws regarding starting charities and the small amount that is legal to be given. The laws should be changed!
Posted by: Val | November 9, 2007, 7:23 am 7:23 am
Veterans were heros after WW2 but came to regarded as burdens by the 1950′s and it had only gotten worse. Veterans have served an ungrateful nation.
Posted by: Doug | November 9, 2007, 7:23 am 7:23 am
And to think I was giving to 3 of these F graded organizations. Thought I was helping my fellow vets, it’s a disgrace. Now I will contribute only to those who are actually helping these veterans.
Posted by: Sam | November 9, 2007, 7:24 am 7:24 am
This was very informittive, there should be more investagations carry out on the so-called charities in this country. Please report on the better charities, so that more monies will be directed towards those in need. Thank you.
Posted by: Wilfred McGee | November 9, 2007, 7:26 am 7:26 am
Very Helpful. I’ll cancel my pickup for AMVETS. How about Vietnam Veterans of America? I have a big bag of clothing ready for them.
Posted by: Beverly Ashley | November 9, 2007, 7:27 am 7:27 am
Do you have any information to:
Disabled American Veterans,in Cincinnati Ohio.
Thanks for your time , Frank
Posted by: Frank Goodwin | November 9, 2007, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Regarding veterans charities, I give to Disabled American Veterans. I did not see that one on your list. Hopeing they benefit from most. Thank you for opening our eyes regarding this matter.
Posted by: Kim Emond | November 9, 2007, 7:32 am 7:32 am
Excellent reporting.Now I know what organizations I should no longer contribute to.You should do this also for those organizations serving American Indian charities;abandoned children;etc.
Thanks for providing this most useful service.When they feel the pressure maybe some of those “F” rated groups will mend their way.
Rafael
Posted by: Rafael A Tprrens | November 9, 2007, 7:33 am 7:33 am
not only these charities should be looked into the VA should also. There are some Vet who are employees who being fire from there job instead of being help with there problem for being in iraq
Posted by: jon | November 9, 2007, 7:35 am 7:35 am
Could you supply me a complete Report Card so I do not contribute to the “less than reputable” charities soliciting our money. We believe the Vet’s should be treated with the utmost respect for their outstanding contributions to keeping our nation free and safe.
Posted by: Jeff Peck | November 9, 2007, 7:38 am 7:38 am
I am a regular contributor to an organization called Disabled American Veterans, Cincinnati, Oh , and do not see them listed on your grading scale of f or a, where do they place, how about listing the grade for all 27 organizations that you have mentioned.
thanks
Posted by: don ezrin | November 9, 2007, 7:39 am 7:39 am
Am I Vietnam Vet, U.S.C.G., 1967 all I can say, from my own experiences, is the the ‘charities’ rip up off as bad as the government does! Bottomline folks is that neither the government nor the ‘citizens’ give a damn abt us after the war/s. Check out the high divorce rates & the unwilliness of companies to hire us after combat. Frankly ‘merica is a sick joke. TKU.
Posted by: Craig M. Beck | November 9, 2007, 7:40 am 7:40 am
brian – thank you for exposing another massive scam victimizing all Americans. it seems as if the American moral fiber is slowly dwindling away over the last two decades. since when did we ‘the people’ elect to misspell our Lord GOD with an ‘l’ = ‘gold’?? God Bless America and may HE forgive us for all we do in HIS NAME.
Posted by: gator balough | November 9, 2007, 7:41 am 7:41 am
After hearing your report this morning on GMA, I would hope that you could follow-up with a positive report from lesser known charities contributing 95% of donations to our returning wounded and disabled American Veterans.
Our non-profit, American Love and Appreciation Fund, Inc. dba Veteran Love has helped close to 100 servicemen and women and their families over the past 18 months. We pick up the slack when servicemembers cannot get their disability checks in a timely manner and go without income, therefore on the verge of eviction. We pay for plane tickets for parents or spouses to be with their loved one in the hospitals such as Tampa’s James A. Haley VA.
Please consider highlighting those of us who do not take a salary directly from the organization and how we do provide direct support to our wounded and disabled American heroes.
Posted by: Charlene Riggs | November 9, 2007, 7:47 am 7:47 am
Do you know any rating for Disabled American Veterans out of Cincinnati OH?
Posted by: Susan G | November 9, 2007, 7:47 am 7:47 am
I have given to Disabled American Veterans for years. I did not see this on your report card. How did they rate?
Posted by: Teresa Bohannon | November 9, 2007, 7:47 am 7:47 am
Im SO Furious right now. I have gone through my own hell for the past two years since my husband (a navy Seal) was injured while at war and to hear and read the reports about these so called charitable organizations helping these soldiers makes me sick. These people need to go to war and come back to really appreciate what it feels like to be used the way these men and women have been. They live a properous life while these guys and girls struggle to somehow fit back into a world they left and will never be the same again. My husband received a Purple Heart among many other medals. He has had approx. 6 surgeries and another one on the way. He got addicted to all of the pain meds and had to go thru de-tox. He is never not in pain but has slowly worked his way out of his own hell and is coming back to the strong, competent, responsible, caring man he was before all of this. He loved his job and never regretted fighting for this country but to know that is so easily excused from so many so called proud to be Americans is disgusting.
If there is anything I can do to help in this cause or to help other injured soldiers and families please let me know. Im trying to be a catalyst for the wives when the husbands come home. You see in my husbands job the phone call that my friends have gotten were quite different. There husbands didn’t come home. For some reason my call was different and I feel that if I can prepare anyone for what they might be in for I would love to help. Coming home is great but helping them thru it is a whole other story.
A Very Proud Wife of an American Soldier.
Linda
Posted by: Linda Rhimer | November 9, 2007, 7:48 am 7:48 am
Good start. I’ll be real careful not to send money off to any of those on the ‘F’ list in the future. But what happened to all the charities which
got B-pluses and C-Minuses? Were there none of them? What are their names? It seems that your report, as presented, is missing quite a bit.
You get an ‘incomplete’.
Posted by: Boat Man | November 9, 2007, 7:51 am 7:51 am
as a Amets’ Aux. ember, I am appalled that so much money goes to the CEO’s and other offical of the non-profit organizations in which you must have served in the military yourself to be a member. As ayx. members, you must have had family members that have served. I personally have 2 brothers, grandfather, brother-in-law, etc, and the only reason my father was not accepted was due to asthma. I volunteer a lot of time to the Amets myself but will not be sending any money to these org. that got an F on this list. I just rec. a donation letter from the par. vets which I will not be sending any more money. I personally think that all non-profit org. should base thir salaries to the average salary of their county–plus expenses and that all non-profit org. should only accept cks (no cash) so that they can better be audited. You are going a great job and I do appreciate your time and effort.
Posted by: Rhonda | November 9, 2007, 7:55 am 7:55 am
What about the rest, example, I donate to the Disabled American Veterans, where do they rate?
I would like to see the whole list, could you direct me to a web site that rates all charities? Not just the veteran charities?
Thanks,
Duane
Posted by: Duane Southworth | November 9, 2007, 7:57 am 7:57 am
I find it disgusting and criminal when an organization can call itself a charity when only giving one half of 1% of its earnings to the very people it purports to serve!
Posted by: greg | November 9, 2007, 8:05 am 8:05 am
YOU MENTIONED THE 13 THAT FAILED. DOES THAT MEAN ALL THE OTHERS (NON VETERAN)ARE IN GOOD STANDING? FOR ARGUEMENT SAKE – AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION.
PERHAPS ITS BEST WE STOP SENDING TO ALL CHARITIES OTHER THAN ST.JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN?
Posted by: MARION DORSKIND | November 9, 2007, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Now that the the media has once again exposed the “Evil Doers”, and gain their points for doing so; will these charities be shut down? Will the lawyers and attorneys who set these money making operations up based on the laws and codes passed by our legislaters at the request of their big doners, be condemmed? I doubt that.
Will the serious doners continue to be taxed for donations beyond the limits set by Congress to bleed the rich in the name of true equality in our nation be addressed?
I doubt it.
Posted by: Patrick N. Collier | November 9, 2007, 8:10 am 8:10 am
PLEASE PROVIDE A FULL LIST OF CHARITIES.
I GIVE TO MANY AND WOULD LIKE MORE INFO.
THANK YOU
Posted by: ELLEN | November 9, 2007, 8:11 am 8:11 am
I also donate, regularly, to DAV and would like to know how they rated.
Posted by: Andrew P. | November 9, 2007, 8:13 am 8:13 am
The web-site Give.org evaluates and reports on chartitable organizations.
Posted by: Dave Williams | November 9, 2007, 8:18 am 8:18 am
I also donate to Disabled American Veterans, now I’m wondering where my money goes?? Thanks, karen
Posted by: Karen | November 9, 2007, 8:18 am 8:18 am
I would also like to have additional charity information, since I’ve sent to other charities and am real concerned. Thank you and keep up the good work.
Posted by: kim | November 9, 2007, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Dear Brian et al. In the interest of an informed electorate I should like to point out a few facts that you may want to re-iterate for your viewers. Re: Rudy Guiliani. There are those who think Traditional Catholicism is dead. Let me assure you it is not. Guiliani , an adulterer who openly defies the teachings of his Faith, but still expects members of that Faith to vote for him. He’s a leftist , apostate Catholic. His record ,as federal prosecutor for which he openly brags merits some scrutiny. Remember Michael Milkin ? Well Guiliani railroaded him for crimes he did not commit. As columnist Paul Craig Roberts reported, ” Giuliani was unknown and looking for name recognition and staged a storm trooper assault on the financial firm Princeton/Newport, involving 50 Federal marshals with automatic weapons and bulletproof vests. ” Perhaps you can remember his having 2 NY investment bankers hauled off their trading floor in handcuffs. These 2 had done nothing and were later exonerated. Amazingly, nothing was done to Guiliani fo this misconduct. Guiliani has turned New York into a sanctuary for illegal immigrants. Reported by Heather MacDonald, he went to the US Supreme court to fight a federal ukase, passed in 1996, that said cities could not forbid their employees from helping the Immigration and Naturalization Service. He lost in court but remained defiant to the end. On Sept. 5 2001 his handpicked charter-revision committee ruled that N.Y. could still require that its employees keep immigration information confidential to preserve trust between immigrants and government. Only six days later, several visa-overstayers participated in the most devastating attack on the city and country in history ” I could go on and on, about his record of ignoring the tenets of the Catholic Faith. For instance, unlike other adulterers who marry after a divorce, Guiliani openly carried on his scandalous public behaviour in front of his constituents but by way of the national news media , he paraded his conduct of carnal activities in detail.
I have held off on Hillary Clinton, but intend with your permission to write you , detailing why I think she should never be considered for the Presidency… Thank you for your time.
Posted by: T C Swan | November 9, 2007, 8:22 am 8:22 am
There is only one way to fix this…the government needs to regulate the minimum % amount required for donation in order for a business to be called a “charity” and the maximum income a charity owner can claim. I work with a veteran’s organization that raises funds for scholarships and 100% of our profit goes toward the scholarships. Each and every one of our members volunteers their time and money to make sure monies get raised and go to the correct place. Each of us can go to bed at night with a clear conscience. They should be ashamed of themselves–SHUT THEM DOWN!!!
Posted by: Kathy T. | November 9, 2007, 8:23 am 8:23 am
I too, would love to see the rest of the list as I am a LIFE MEMBER in 3 Veterans Organizations and the list has already mentioned TWO of them.Happy Veterans day to me. I’m glad my 90% disability for wounds from Vietnam means so much to the people running these…”organizations” No more $ from me.
Semper Fidelis
Posted by: Paul Norton | November 9, 2007, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Like Duane S., I would also like to know a site that rates all charities.
Thank you and keep up the good work.
Loss Retired US Air Force
Posted by: Loss White | November 9, 2007, 8:25 am 8:25 am
I understand the neglect of charities giving what they receive, but why are we not looking into the government to see why THEY are not taking care of our veterans. The Government is the reason the vets are how they are, not the charities.
Posted by: MK Byers | November 9, 2007, 8:27 am 8:27 am
I find it disgusting that these organizations can call themselves charities when they are taking advantage of the individuals they purportedly serve. American veterans deserve the best service is possible and every American should be outraged with the outcome of the story.
Posted by: greg | November 9, 2007, 8:28 am 8:28 am
My husband served in WWI and one son in Vietnam. We support several veterans’ organizations and I, too, would like to see the complete list and how each organization rates.
Thanx.
Posted by: Karen Smith | November 9, 2007, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Just like Duane we donate to the Disabled American Vets. If this is a good or bad operation no one knows from your report. I wonder how many people will stop donating because of your incomplete report???? Don
Posted by: Don | November 9, 2007, 8:32 am 8:32 am
I donate to charitable programs as part of the American Legion and VFW organizations. My donations are supposed to go to veteran’s organizations. How does the American Legion and VFW rate?
Posted by: John | November 9, 2007, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Just like Duane we donate to the Disabled American Vets. If this is a good or bad operation no one knows from your report. I wonder how many people will stop donating because of your incomplete report???? Don
Posted by: Don | November 9, 2007, 8:33 am 8:33 am
I, too, donate every month to the Disabled American Veterans and would like to know where they rate also.
Thanks,
Lisa
Posted by: Lisa | November 9, 2007, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Dear Sirs,
I am an Air Force Vet. with 34 years of service. I have donated cloths, household articles and money to several of these organizations on a consistant basis. THANK YOU. You have exposed the wolfs in sheep’s clothing for what they are. I WILL NOT DONATE to them in the future. Perhaps with more articles like this they will go out of business.
Clement
MSGT USAF RET.
Posted by: Clement Lescale | November 9, 2007, 8:34 am 8:34 am
I also donate to Disable Vets …were are they on this???… as a Veteran i find this information very useful keep up the good work. this is a shame for Americans to take advantage for what these folks have done for our nation.
Posted by: rich | November 9, 2007, 8:36 am 8:36 am
I was sickened to hear the horrible veteran charities report this morning on GMA. The responsible ones should be SO ASHAMED! And the absolute worst, the reduction of donations in the future due to a few (or maybe MANY) bad apples. Please continue to update the public of those charities that are worthy of their donations to help our veterans who may need our assistance.
Posted by: Jean Koller | November 9, 2007, 8:36 am 8:36 am
I rarely forward information emails, but I’d love to send this report card to several people I know contribute frequently to these types of charities. It would be great to have the report in a simpler format that could just be easily pasted on to the body of an email.
Posted by: Jan | November 9, 2007, 8:36 am 8:36 am
I have donated to two of the organizations on the “F” list:
Paralyzed Veterans of America and Help Hospitalized Veterans. After hearing and reading about the scams which include these two organizations, neither will no longer be getting any donations from me. What a terrible shame that people like Chapin can “use” our wounded veterans to get rich.
Posted by: Pat Gilley | November 9, 2007, 8:36 am 8:36 am
My family and I strongly support our military veterans. The fact that our donations may have gone into the pockets of executives MAKES ME SICK. But I want to continue to give to organizations that really help our nation’s heroes. I feel that it is every citizen’s duty to contribute to the well being of all of those who put their lives on the line to protect our freedom. Thank you for providing the American people with the charity report card. You can bet I’m going to refer to it before I write the next check!
Posted by: R. Fumi | November 9, 2007, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Here in FL I donate to a non profit group called Veteran’s Action Project, Inc.
How can I check to see if they have a good rating?
Posted by: Pat Boog | November 9, 2007, 8:38 am 8:38 am
I see the list of A’s and F’s but I did not see other well known associations such as VFW or American Legion. Can I trust them?
Posted by: Bob Patschke | November 9, 2007, 8:38 am 8:38 am
You did a great job of highlighting the worst offenders and I appreciate it. You have everyone upset enough so they won’t be donating at all. Please quickly follow-up with those organization that either get the A’s and/or do the most good for our injured soldiers. This is the time of year that many people make donations. Let us know where our money will be well spent. Thank you.
Posted by: Doug Miller | November 9, 2007, 8:39 am 8:39 am
I too, donate to the Disabled American Veterans organization. Would like to know how much help actually goes to the veterans. Would also like to know a website that rates the charities.
Thank you,
Jeanette
Posted by: Jeanette | November 9, 2007, 8:39 am 8:39 am
I would also like to see the full report on all 27 agencies. I donate to several and would like to be more selective in my givings. If you can direct me to the full report, I would be grateful.
Bruce
Posted by: Bruce Due | November 9, 2007, 8:40 am 8:40 am
This is a disgrace! It may not be illegal, but it should be! I would also like to know where the Disabled American Veterans and the VFW rate since I support them. I also supported the Paralyzed Veterans of America – but certainly no longer will. You do a great job on your investigative reports, Brian.
Posted by: Julia Stanley | November 9, 2007, 8:41 am 8:41 am
The people that manage these “charities” have cheated our veterans and stolen from our patriotic citizens. I can’t imagine standing at my judgement day and trying to explain that to God. To steal from people who are in a time of need is the worst of sins.
Posted by: Bill | November 9, 2007, 8:43 am 8:43 am
I also would like to see a complete listing of worthwhile Vets groups.
Posted by: Ralph | November 9, 2007, 8:43 am 8:43 am
How can we know for sure if a charity is an “A” grade? Is there a website that divulges this information? This is very discouraging for all future giving’s from my pocket. :-(
Thanks for the report.
Posted by: Jen | November 9, 2007, 8:44 am 8:44 am
I am always receiving address labels from all kinds of veterans org. and I try to send money to them. But it gets to the point where I can’t send all the time. I get something each month. This makes me very upset about these org. because I thought I was helping them out. The paralazed vets is one of them. I am sorry but I will not be sending to them anymore. I think this is a disgrace to our heros.
Posted by: Carol | November 9, 2007, 8:44 am 8:44 am
The whole country is corrupt; every dog for hisself; these people who have stolen money from the vets should be taken out and shot.
Vietnam Veteran 69-70
Posted by: R.E. Wood | November 9, 2007, 8:44 am 8:44 am
I am a vietnam vet i have always donate to charity to help our borther our war veterans but what i saw on t.v this morning i will STOP…
Posted by: Jose R. Lopez | November 9, 2007, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Thank you for this report-we have always
tried to support our troops and have sent money. We see that we have sent money to the WRONG people! Would it be possible to send or post the addresses for the two A+ charities? We value our freedom and feel these men and women should never have to want for anything.
Posted by: Judy Houglum | November 9, 2007, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Once again Brian Ross uses one watchdsog’s opinion without seeking any other watchdog opinion. Charity Navigators showed the actual audited financial statement of Paralyzed Veterans of America with about 65% of its income spent on program expenses for paralysed vets. That is a far cry from less than 35% and this leads me to believe the AIP is suspect and not accurately rating these vet groups.
I welcome a Congessional probe to bring out the true facts.
In the meantime I will continue to give to PVA as I have for many years.
Jerry
Posted by: Jerry | November 9, 2007, 8:46 am 8:46 am
I have given to several veterans charities since I am a vet. I will no longer give the charities that recieved an “F”. Please continue your investigation and let me know how to obtain a complete list and rating of all veterans charities.
Posted by: louis | November 9, 2007, 8:47 am 8:47 am
I am not able to see the list of charities that you spoke about. Do not have the proper software. Could you direct me somewhere that I could find them listed.
Thank You for a very good report.
Posted by: Earl | November 9, 2007, 8:48 am 8:48 am
We contribute to r major veteran charities each year. None of our charities are on the top or bottom list shown. How do we gt the veteranmilitary list?
Thanks
G. R. Powell
Posted by: G. R. Powell | November 9, 2007, 8:51 am 8:51 am
I believe the Army Emergency Relief and the Army’s … Army Embergency Relief Fund are two separate organizations. It would be good of ABC to distinguish between the two.
Posted by: Otto | November 9, 2007, 8:51 am 8:51 am
This is outrageous. I worked in a veterans hospital for many years and have donated to various fundraisers for at least 20 years and now i see the money doesn’t get there! I am furious. From now on I will only give to the charities you have advised are an A. I have been giving to many of the “F’s” for a long time and it will stop today. Thank you ABC.
Posted by: carol | November 9, 2007, 8:52 am 8:52 am
I have been loyal to Paralyzed Veterans of America for almost 40 years. No more. I am sticking with animals and environment from now on.
Posted by: Gloria Picchetti | November 9, 2007, 8:52 am 8:52 am
You’ve listed Veteran Organizations that have received your grading of “F”, but you have not listed the reasons for this finding. I’m particularly interested in PVA, because my husband is a Service Officer for PVA and works very hard to help every Veteran to receive the highest rating for which they are eligible. He takes great pride in his work, and he was very incensed upon hearing this report because of the bad light it projects on all the hard working Service Officers across this country whose daily job it is to work on behalf of their client to get the highest benefits possible which helps these men and women adjust to life after their disability. Every year Paralyzed Veterans of America helps countless numbers of paraplegics and quadraplegics adjust to a life many thought had ended with their injuries. These Service Officers work to get a variety of benefits that allows these devastated vets to live a more fulfilling life, dealing with their disability at home, at work, in society, and in ways none of us could ever imagine. You might also have reported that the Service Organization side of these institutions are not the same as the Charity side, therefore not alienating veterans from seeking the aid of the Service side of these Organizations that do SO much for our honorable Veterans.
Posted by: Karla | November 9, 2007, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I personally do a lot of work with The Paralyzed Veterans of America and the services they provide for veterans is amazing. What the AIP calculations don’t take into account is the definition of ‘overhead’. In the case of PVA, they have National Service Officers who work with the VA hospitals in ensuring that returning paralyzed veterans get the benefits they deserve for their service. PVA works tirelessly with the VA and other organizations to do so much for veterans that people aren’t even aware of. They have a large architecture department that works around the country to ensure people in wheelchairs have fair accessibility. That’s a service that benefits ALL American’s, not just veterans.
In an easier example, AIP doesn’t distinguish between the gas that gets the food to starving nations and the office space overhead for their base operations, its all ‘overhead’. They only count ‘food’ as giving of the funds raised. That’s unfair.
Posted by: Megan | November 9, 2007, 8:54 am 8:54 am
According to your story the veterans are getting screwed twice.the charities are witholding a lot of the monetary help they have available and a lot of vets are contributing out of their own pockets. Where can I get more reliable information? If what you say is true I’m disgusted.The American public does not deserve the shabby treatment they’re getting. As a former POW and combat wounded vet I can say that the Vetrans Administration has treated me well at all times. This charity thing annoys me since a lot of them are managed by fellow vets. I find it very hard to believe we’re getting screwed by our own.Where can I get more reliable information?
Posted by: John G Nelson | November 9, 2007, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Again the Gov’t has failed , there should not be a need for outside help for the Vet. The Gov’t called, they answered, they served, they gave their all. The gov’t should be providing them w/ all their needs …. Another sad event in American History
Posted by: D.S. | November 9, 2007, 8:55 am 8:55 am
I am Veteran i have always donate to Veterans Charity but what i saw on T.V this morning i will STOP my donation
Posted by: Jose R. Lopez | November 9, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I have given to Disabled American Veterans for years. I did not see that one on your list. Is there a more complete list on the net?
Thanks..
Posted by: R. M. Fazio | November 9, 2007, 9:00 am 9:00 am
As an active member of the American Legion and Adjutant of a local Post, I am appalled at this report. Shame on me for not looking into these more closely and SHAME on those for the gross misuses and neglect of all veterans, many who depend on such donations. The VA may not have to continue to seek so much more funds if these charities cheating the Vets would “pay up” instead of padding their own pockets. Making a living is one thing- living it up is another!
Herb Pratt, Msgt USAF Ret
Posted by: Herbert Pratt, MSgt USAF RET. | November 9, 2007, 9:01 am 9:01 am
I donate Semper Fi charity fund… what is their rate? I understand it is necessary to have overhead for operation but it should be 1% of the money they receive…not 99% to their own pocket… it is crime… Our laws aboslutely need to be reviewed.
I feel so disappointed with lots of law makers and don’t want to vote… what the difference between A from B?
Monica
Posted by: Monica | November 9, 2007, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Brian,
We need a complete list of charities and their ratings so we don’t get taken in the future. I’m tired to giving money to organizations that only provide a big salary to their founder.
Posted by: Patrick | November 9, 2007, 9:06 am 9:06 am
I think this is a disgrace. I have been donating for years to Paralyzed Veterans of America. I will not be donating to them anymore, What about Disabled American Veterans How are they rated. I give to many other charities would you be able to provide a list. Thank you
Posted by: Barbara Vetter | November 9, 2007, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Thank you for this report. I just received a mailing from the Disabled Veterans of America. They included Christmas cards and said I wasn’t obligated to send money but the majority of people usually do. I didn’t respond even though I was very tempted to send money because our veterans are a group of people I support very much. It wasn’t a couple of weeks when I received a reminder letter from them in the mail. If I wasn’t obligated, why are they sending reminder letters out? To be honest-we ripped it up before we opened it because I am so tired of getting these type of mailings. The phone calls from these and other types of organizations are very annoying as well.
Posted by: Jeanette S | November 9, 2007, 9:08 am 9:08 am
I have made donations to the Fisher House and USO. Where are they on the list? How do other orgainzations rate like the Red Cross and the Salvation Army or the United Way?
Posted by: Johnny | November 9, 2007, 9:09 am 9:09 am
This is a terrible thing that charities are ripping off the Veterans. There are some charities who rate 4 stars and one is the Disabled American Veterans. The biggest crime of all though is Congress not passing manditory funding for our Veterans medical care. Right now it is descresionary funding and they get whatever Congress feels they can give and it’s never approved on time so the health care system is always struggling for money to take care of our Veterans. Contact your Senators and Congressmen and demand that they pass a Manditory Funding Bill for our Veterans.
Posted by: Marie | November 9, 2007, 9:09 am 9:09 am
The AMVETS Service Foundation’s IRS 990 Form for 2005 shows the organization returns 77.2 percent of contributions directly to programs to support veterans, not less than 35 percent as suggested by Dan Borochoff of the AIP. This is a matter of public record, and AMVETS will be officially responding to this erroneous news report shortly.
Posted by: Jay | November 9, 2007, 9:10 am 9:10 am
How sad. If the government would take care of the thousands of people they’re using as pawns in the “War on Terror”, these poor vets wouldn’t have to rely on shady, greedy charities.
Way to view the big picture, Washington D.C.! Don’t start a war if you can’t pick up the pieces afterward.
Posted by: Doug | November 9, 2007, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Agree with those wishing there were some information provided on the honest, good and effective charities so that the readers could come away not feeling like they should simply stop trusting any charity. Loopholes that allow scammers to legally steal in this manner do unimaginable damage. As an aside… those who believe that the US has generally treated veterans well might be surprised to read about the WWI veterans ridden down McArthur in the Bonus Soldier protests or even the plight of Revolutionary soldiers. WWII soldiers may be about the only vets the US has treated with the dignity they deserved – and I wonder if even that perception would stand much scrutiny.
Posted by: Euphy | November 9, 2007, 9:13 am 9:13 am
This is a terrible thing that charities are ripping off the Veterans. There are some charities who rate 4 stars and one is the Disabled American Veterans. The biggest crime of all though is Congress not passing manditory funding for our Veterans medical care. Right now it is descresionary funding and they get whatever Congress feels they can give and it’s never approved on time so the health care system is always struggling for money to take care of our Veterans. Contact your Senators and Congressmen and demand that they pass a Manditory Funding Bill for our Veterans.
Posted by: Marie | November 9, 2007, 9:14 am 9:14 am
I was very discouraged and thankful for your report. Like so many I also give to Disabled American Vets and would like to know their status. Sounds like we are all trying to do the right thing, too bad the people initiating these charities are not.
Posted by: Margaret Mudd | November 9, 2007, 9:14 am 9:14 am
While I appreciate the information, how can this be considered complete reporting? How can the individual charitable contributor find this type of information out? Where is the link to the watchdog’s website?
Posted by: lori | November 9, 2007, 9:17 am 9:17 am
There are one million non-profit organizations in the USA. Many good ones, and many bad ones. Choose yours very carefully.
Posted by: KEJ2000 | November 9, 2007, 9:18 am 9:18 am
This is a national disgrace. Our service men and women deserve the best from this nation for which they are willing to give their lives. These charities and probably more should be shut down. Put them out of business today. They are robing all of us.
Audrey, NY
Posted by: Audrey W. Elsner | November 9, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am
I find this disgusting that these organizations are cheating our veterans. you can also donatate your services to help the veterans.\
Ron
Posted by: ron frampton | November 9, 2007, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Donate to local organizations in your home town. that way you know what the money is being used for. i am a member of all the veterans organizations and i dont donat to national headquarters of any of them. I keep my money in my home town and i suggest you all do the same thing.
MSG, US Army, Retired
Posted by: Mike McLendon | November 9, 2007, 9:27 am 9:27 am
I was sort of shocked to see several of the organizations I contribute to listed on the vets F grade. I would like to see a follow up report on those that rate on the upper scale, because I am sure there are a lot of people like myself who will not feel comfortable with giving to any of the vet groups at this time, because the seed of doubt has been planted in our minds. This is not fair to the organizations that do contribute most of the funds raise to the vets in need. Where can I go to see the report on those organizations that were created and are serving their real purpose of raising funds for vets and not lining the pockets of some figure head using a sad cause to live a VERY comfortable life with funds from the soft hearted public. Once again the American public has been taken advantage of and will have to add one more thing to their list of concerns. Between the foods we eat, the products we get from China, one scam afer another, and now our heart felt contributions being miss used, no wonder the average American is becoming cold hearted and suspicious toward everyone and everything.
Posted by: Joyce | November 9, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am
I want to know why these groups/founders have not been investigated by Congress? Some have been in business for so long–shame on the regulators for not exposing and shutting the groups/individuals down. Thanks for a great report. I will now send my donations to Fisher House.
Angry Vet!
Posted by: Mark | November 9, 2007, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I would hope that you will post a list of all the charities so we can find out if the ones we send money to are legit. My wife and I have sent money to the disabled vets for years. Have you noticed that a lot of stuff in our country is nothing but a scam anymore. What has happened to us?
Posted by: tom perry | November 9, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am
I think the real issue here is it illegal? I think you have to be careful not to start closes businesses down at will if it is not illegal. The Fundraisers are getting to much then im all for a law to limit how much the Fundraiser can get. Fundraisers pay for their employees, insurance, legal fees, rent,phones, utilities,letters, so their are a lot of costs for the Fundraiser so keep that in mind. I get what people are saying but if the Charity is doing their best with what they have left then sounds like business to me.Charitys also have expenses it takes money to give money, people who donate 5,10 dollars it takes quite a bit to get it out to the Vets. I say as long as the Charity does what they say they will do with the money then they are fine.Everyone should ask the caller how much the Charity actually gets,I cant work for free but I dont get a large 6 figure income, so I do the best I can for the people we help.
Posted by: ben | November 9, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am
I have been donating to the Disabled American Veterans and the Paralyzed Veterans of America organizations for years. Being a Vet myself and understand what our Veterans who have served in Combat,have done for this Country. I find this to be the most ridiculous scam anyone would possibly come up with. All of the guilty parties should be brought to trial, there personal properties confiscated, sold and shared with the real organizations who are doing the job the right way. Then deport them to Iraq,Iran or some other country. Let them try their scams there. Lots of Luck. I would like to know the names of those organizations that are legitimate. “30″
Posted by: Don. | November 9, 2007, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Can’t believe that all these years I been giving my hard earned money to snakes that use our Heroes to get filty rich…You should all be ashamed of yourselves taking money that was meant to help those who laid their lives on the line serving our Country..You won’t be getting any more of mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: june miller | November 9, 2007, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Until you’ve built a charity and put your life into fundraising, you may want to withhold judgement. Fundraising is a very difficult business and the costs are extreme. You have to sell emotional appeal and contributors get no ‘product’ for their money. Perhaps a report detailing best practices to help those that are failing (not because of greed) perform more efficiently would be a good use of your time.
Posted by: MSP | November 9, 2007, 9:46 am 9:46 am
America has been “failing it’s heroes” since the end of the Korean War. The Vietnam war should be the poster child for America failing it’s “heroes” and what we should not do. We were spat upon, vilified, treated like baby killers, and in the end, America still does not quite know how to deal with Vietnam veterans due to guilt, as far as I can tell. Why would the current wars be any different? We continue to put soldiers in harm’s way, oft times unnecessarily, and when the soldiers return, we leave them to their own devices. Yesterday the popular media reported 1/4 of homeless Americans are veteran’s. This is abysmal and disgraceful. How can this be? Oh, it be, baby. The U.S. Government has failed hospitalized and returning soldiers since the end of Vietnam. Does someone think war is fun and easily forgotten? The government does not make one, single improvement until they are embarrassed by media coverage of dismal conditions in Veteran’s hospitals. We have spent almost $1 trillion dollars in the last six years on failed U.S. policy, but cannot get homeless vets off the streets; why, because there is no money left? It is time for change in this country, serious, significant, long lasting change. If most of the homeless vets were women, I guarantee you something would have been done by now. Men in America somehow are seen as disposable and of less value than women. This must change and men must fight for change until our voice is heard. Men are valuable and deserve better treatment. We focus on women enough in this country as it is and men should recieve their own recognition, support, and badly needed help for the contributions they have made without apology and somehow having to bow to the counter demands of women 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. It seems we cannot do anything specifically for men without some woman simultaneously saying “what about us”? Grow up. American society does more for women than can be listed here. If America did half as much for the men, we would be grateful instead of whining about how much more we “demand”. Are we resentful? You bet, and mad as hell. This story is not only about charities ripping off veterans. It’s about long standing attitudes.
Posted by: SGA | November 9, 2007, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Why only these few organizations? Their should a report card on all veteran charities, printed in every newspaper in america. Some people won’t or don’t care until it hits them right in the face. Its discusting that the goverment doesn’t do more for its veterans. Every singal veteran should be mad as heck about this. Every veteran and there are a lot of us, should send letters, e-mails, phone calls to each and every congressman and senater. Demanding that this problem be taken care of. It looks to me that the veterans of this country who have gone to war or served in the armed forces for this nation declare there own war on the goverment and except nothing more then a complete care package in any and every way that any veteran needs. Its time for vets to stand up and in one voice tell this wonderfull administration and everyone to follow. that we have had it and your going to fix this now.
Posted by: Bill | November 9, 2007, 9:48 am 9:48 am
I ws wounded Three times in the Vietnam Conflict. I do collect disability from the government,but I just barely get by.I live with extreme pane every day and have been for the 40 years in 2008.I worked for non-profit charities my entire work life,until about May of 2006, when I suffered a diabling stroke, which are effects from my war injuries in 1968. My point is: there are some honest good charities out there! It’s too bad that a few greedy indidvuals,make all charities look bad.AS I stated, I am a disabled Vet, who could use some help myself, do you have any suggestion where I could get some finnancial asistance. I am willing to work, but no one will hire a sixty year old disaled Vet, who only has use of one arm and has to use that arm to walk with a cane? Thanks for doing the article, more of this kind of misjustics needs to get exposed.
Posted by: Michael Fredrickson | November 9, 2007, 9:51 am 9:51 am
This report is very helpful as far as it goes. We need a COMPLETE list showing ALL the grades. Mr. Ross, you have only just begun…get busy!
Please don’t stop with the military. Let’s hear about all the other organizations too. Those of us who give want to make certain the individuals we care about are truly receiving the benefit.
Posted by: Rebecca Pipkin | November 9, 2007, 10:01 am 10:01 am
For everyone looking for a list of charities and their “grade,” the Better Business Bureau has a list at give.org. The best charities spend less than 15% of their total take on overhead. It’s unfortunate that so many charities are shams that siphon money away from reputable organizations.
Posted by: kolspur | November 9, 2007, 10:08 am 10:08 am
I have been contributing to Disabled American Veterans (DAV) for decades. I do this to honor my father , a WWII vet and my husband a Vietnam vet. Neither is disabled, there but for the grace of God. Where does this charity fall on your list? I am disgusted by the F charities. Thank you.
Posted by: Carol | November 9, 2007, 10:10 am 10:10 am
It seems reasonable to me if a “charity” donates so little to the actual cause it should not be allowed to operate under the name “charity” and their tax exempt status should be denied. Obviously we don’t have laws firm enough to protect us. No wonder I don’t donate much any longer beyond a couple of areas – I can not trust anybody. I also vote all salaries need to be known. Upfront.
Posted by: Sandra | November 9, 2007, 10:14 am 10:14 am
You guys with questions about what you have been donating to can Google the name of the organization and there are now websites reporting in with where their money goes and their ratings.
Posted by: Sandra | November 9, 2007, 10:19 am 10:19 am
I find it interesting that you didn’t include a charity you have publicized in the past. According to the Combined Federal Campaign, Operation Homefront has an AFR of 34.6% in the 2007 directory. And, yet, you make no mention of them on your list. Is it because you have publicized them in the past and promoted the christmas event last year? I certainly hope you have reconsidered for THIS year based on their listing with CFC. Or is that why you failed to mention them? You can go to their own site for a thread where people have questioned them about their practices and been left without answers. I’m surprised that GMA would not support an organization like The Fisher House rather than one with such high overhead.
Posted by: Matilda | November 9, 2007, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I just searched and the American Institute of Philanthropy’s website is charitywatch.org. It has all the information many of you are asking for.
Posted by: Kelli | November 9, 2007, 10:20 am 10:20 am
charitywatch.org is the website for the American Institute of Philanthropy from this story…. it provides an alphabetical listing of organizations and how the institute rated them.
Posted by: BethAnn | November 9, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Is the Army Emergency Relief and the Army Emergency Relief Fund one and the same. I think not. It would be good if ABC made a distinction between the legitimate charity and the phony!
Posted by: Otto | November 9, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am
I, TOO, AM INTERESTED IN HOW THE DISABLED VETERANS RATED. ALSO, MAYBE IF THE PARALYZED VETERANS WOULD SPEND LESS ON MAILING RETURN ADDRESS LABELS EVERY WEEK, THEY’D HAVE MORE MONEY TO SPEND ON THE VETERANS.
Posted by: THOMAS | November 9, 2007, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Mr. Ross, your “Blotter” story on charities “Failing to Serve America’s Heroes on the Home Front” seriously distorts the intent and services provided by the Air Force Aid Society. The Society has been in existence since 1942 and for the past 65 years has been providing emergency assistance to America’s Airmen. In 2006 we provided direct assistance to over 33,000 Air Force members and their families thru emergency assistance loans and grants, education grants and thru many additional AFAS sponsored community assistance programs The facts are the Air Force Aid Society last year spent $11.2 million in direct support and an additional $8.1 million in no-interest loans to support Airmen and their families. Our donations for the year totaled $6.4 million. Air Force Aid in fact provided $3 in support for every $1 donated. This three for one spending is only possible thanks to our endowment which generates sufficient funds from prudent long term investments to cover all our operating expenses and ensures that we can continue to provide the current level of support to airmen around the world. The mainstream charity rating organizations such as Charity Navigator and Guidestar all give the Air Force Aid Society as well as our sister military relief agency, Army Emergency Relief, consistently high ratings. The “F” for us by the American Institute of Philanthropy (AIP) is based upon the size of our endowment. AIP makes the assumption that endowments are bad and that the only reserves that a charity should maintain would be approximately three years of reserves. Yet it is through our endowment, that our investments provide the major source of funds for on-going support to our airmen and their families. If you refer back to the AIP website you will see they caveat their grades when they state “…if you agree with these charities that reserves greater than three year’s budget are necessary to enhance their long-term stability, you may wish to disregard the lower grades that AIP assigns based on the basis of high assets.”
At the Air Force Aid Society we take the long view that America will always have an Air Force and there will always be Airmen that need our help. We take pride in keeping a very lean organization with only 23 paid staff members despite worldwide responsibilities. We take pride that the great majority of our donations come from the very Airmen we serve. We are proud of our motto – - “Airmen helping Airmen.” We have a long history of helping our wounded veterans; but, just as we have in the past, we are also ready to help active duty Airmen, Guardsmen, Reservists, their dependents and widows during the next Katrina or Mount Pinatubo. ABC News’ failure to present “the rest of the story” will not deter us, but make no mistake – - it will make our work more difficult.
John D. Hopper Jr.
CEO, Air Force Aid Society
Posted by: John Hopper | November 9, 2007, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I donate to the DVA also, and didn’t see the report card. When I went online to check, the report card wanted $3 to send me the results…
Posted by: Allison | November 9, 2007, 10:32 am 10:32 am
One thing people need to be aware of, before giving to any charity, is that charities are required to disclose how much of the contribution goes to veterans or any other group the charity is supposed to support. I advise any good person who wishes to help out our vets to do their homework before donating any money.
I retired after serving 23 years in our Army. What I have always found more alarming than the Veteran’s charities is the fact that our government turns a blind eye to those still on active duty who live below poverty and have to rely on welfare and food stamps to get by.
Something I suggest that everyone who appreciates our veterans and service member can do to show support is tell us/them “Thank You,” and let their elected officials know that veterans issues are important.
Posted by: Rick | November 9, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am
This report is incomplete and misleading. It does not explain how AIP comes up with its rating system and how an “F” may not equal a poorly run charity. It also lacked investigations into firm’s Form 990′s and other rating sites such as Charity Navigator and Guidestar.
Posted by: Ginny March | November 9, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am
This is just another prime example of the money mongers greed because of tragedy. Our government IS responsilble for our vets. These men and women were either drafted or signed up to protect their (our) country and this is just the tip of the iceberg of the shoddy treatment they’re receiving. Its a good thing that someone went out and exposed them for what they are – how about the veterans hospitals – time to check into them too. Remember Willowbrook? This is another disgrace for the USA.
Posted by: etchanga3 | November 9, 2007, 10:43 am 10:43 am
A sleepy nation awakes to see the truth and does not like it. Should we expect the same distribution from all the faith based initiatives by bush? The DID NOT SERVE administration is a tad bit greedy folks, sorry to say many told you through the years and yet you clinged to their fruition. SAD…
Posted by: daddy | November 9, 2007, 10:47 am 10:47 am
I have also, been donating to Par. Vets of America at least for 40 years or so. I no longer will send them a cent! Can you update with a list that I/we can send our monies to?
Thanks and I really appreciate your work on this!
Crayton
Posted by: Crayton Morris | November 9, 2007, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Thank you Brian Ross for bringing this to our attention. Like many others who have commented here, I too donate regularly to 2 of the charities on your “F” list, but will no longer do so. I donate to help our veterans and to let them know they’re not forgotten, not to give some creep a six-figure income. This is an outrage. I hope Congress does investigate this and sets penalties and fines for those agency that are falling below the 35% margin. I’d also like to see how other similar agencies measure up. In response to a few comments about “what has happened to us” (as a nation) I can tell you what has happened – materialism and greed have taken control. Also, we do not regulate businesses, charities, etc the way we used to. I’m sure these are not the only charities that are scamming us. I’m done with the lot of them…as the saying goes, charity begins at home!
Posted by: George Smyser | November 9, 2007, 10:50 am 10:50 am
I would like to thank you for exposing these so called charitable organizations that collect money to help Veterans. I’m a 100% service connected disabled Vietnam Veteran and I with the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and the American Legion two of tha Nations largest veterans service organization do help and make hospital visits as part of our programs to visit and assist hospitalized vets, homless veterans, their families, orphaned children of vets, widows and more all of this is done through the “Fundraising” projects we organize. all funds are distributed to the projected programs. The VFW & the American Legion organizations are supported and maintaianed through the membership dues of each member and we do hold individual Post/hall funraising programs specifically advertised through our local Post/hall events for this purpose when funds are needed to help maintain that perticalure Post/hall to remain open for its veteran membership to have a place to meet. Again, each Fundraising program we hold is designated for a particular project and when completed the funds are distributed to that perticular program. We take pride and honor to help our fellow Veterans and their families who may be in need because of these two Veteran’s organizations 99.9% of them have served in combat and know the perils and plight one goes through when leaving their family and friends to go off to some far off land into war! and what the family can and has suffered, especially if that person was the main bread winner of that family. I in perticular help and assist the Marine Corp “Toys for Tots” each year to obtain a few toys to help as many holess women vets with children so they can give their children some assemblance of decent Christmas, I dont request much money, the funds I do get go to purchase food basketsc clothing and other hygen items for them and also hold a Christmas party for them at one or another Veterans Hall by using this money to purchase the food to cook and serve them through the Volunteer womens Auxiliary who cook and the men and local youth organization such Boys & Girls Scouts serve these meals, all done gratis and volunteers no paid services our pay is the happy faces & cheer we are able to bring to these people and families…as my own motto states, “Veterans Helping Veterans & their Communities”
Thank you
Auggie
Posted by: Auggie Galaviz | November 9, 2007, 10:54 am 10:54 am
I too was shocked about this report. I’ve donated to Paralyzed Vets and Disabled Vets for years. I’d like to know how to properly vet these organizations, so that I can feel good about giving, rather than feel like a fool.
Posted by: Pam Rucker | November 9, 2007, 10:55 am 10:55 am
What is the grading scale for the charities? What we need is a rating system for charity givers to have when deciding to give to charities. How do the veteran charities compare to all other charities (such as American Red Cross); what portion is used for expenses? What does the “pie chart” or expense & income sheet look like? Need to see the numbers! Your report is not complete and doesn’t give us a clear picture – it’s sensational (insites emotions)and incomplete reporting.
Posted by: Luckerama17 | November 9, 2007, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I use Charity Navigator and the WA Sec of State’s Charity Review as the basis for my donating. Any charity using less that 80-85% for the purpose espoused is on my discard list. I keep a notebook with the date, charity, and amount on hand. This way I keep track of who, when and how much is given. This is necessary to keep track of the deluge of reguests, cards, blankets, flags, key chains, pencils,calendars, etc. ad infinitum that are received. Next year, only those with a passing grade get anything, the rest are going into a trash bucket just to see how many are actually received. Will probably need a hand truck by the end of the year to move it.
Posted by: Bob G, USAF Ret, SMSgt | November 9, 2007, 10:57 am 10:57 am
My response is to the comment made by Ben: “I think the real issue here is it illegal?”. That’s the problem with these scammers. They seem to know how to skirt the laws and have creative accounting practices that will make your head spin. Enough is enough. Let’s get the laws changed. Just because it may be “legal” does not mean it’s right! If you work for a group that cheats the vets (or other folks in need) and donors, you’re part of the problem regardless of how you justify the means to the end.
Posted by: Mark | November 9, 2007, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Please give us a complete list of all
the military charities you investigated.
I have given to DAV for many years and
would like to know where they fall
between A-F.
Virginia
Posted by: Virginia | November 9, 2007, 11:02 am 11:02 am
When I was a single parent I would give my last dollar to support the veterans.The men and women who protect our country are the greatest and should received more. The people who run the organizations for the vets should be ashamed of themselves for giving such little amounts to the vets. How could they take all that money and keep it. I will never give to an organization again. I will try to give direvtly to the hospitals etc. The government should do something and demand this money back and the government should do all it can to support the vets after all who will support and protect the United States if we didn’t have those brave men and women fighting for us. We should all be on this crusade to see to it that our vets are taken care of!!
Posted by: christine | November 9, 2007, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I also give to vet organizations and would like to know where I can get alist of “f” ccharities
Posted by: Howard Jones | November 9, 2007, 11:17 am 11:17 am
I would like a list of charities that we can depend on. with the Veterans giving so much for our country, this year I gave more than usuall to the Paralyzed Veterans of America, and Disabled American Vets. Now I feel guilty that they will not get the help they need. just how to we give to the veterans that deserve much more. Hope that Congress can make a new law to stop this. thanks for Good Morning America for opening our eyes, and boo to the Am Vets thrift stores to, no more will I give my things to them.
Posted by: D. Elliott | November 9, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Yes, it’s about time we forced some standards to charities and to those cold-calling organizations who “collect on the behalf of” charities and pass on a tiny percent to them.
We need to legislate a minimum of 50% of all proceeds go to the cause. We need to legislate maximum allowable salaries for executives in charitable organizations. We need to mandate that anyone found guily of misappropriating charitable funds be forced to repay 100%, though repayment or community service, even if that leaves them sleeping in a cardboard box for the remainder of their lives. We need to mandate that cold-callers MUST turn over 90% or more of their collections to the charity and that NO-ONE can be paid. There are plenty of volunteers, or white collar criminals who need some community service, to staff charities at all levels.
Posted by: Neal | November 9, 2007, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I would like to encourage you to learn more about Operation Homefront – a national charity that supports the troops and their families, and our returning wounded. I’m sure they would have received high marks for low overhead and serving many military families and wounded in crisis.
Posted by: Beth | November 9, 2007, 11:27 am 11:27 am
THANK YOU to all who wrote in, to YOU MR. BECK AND OTHERS who fought for our freedoms. I think that only vets themselves should be running these charities. Those who won’t support and stand behind our troops ought to stand in front of them. GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS!
Posted by: Lisa | November 9, 2007, 11:29 am 11:29 am
I have been in a VA for several months now and have had my bills paid for by National Veterans Services Fund. They have never said no to me. I have referred other vets and they also get the help they need. I can’t imagine your numbers are correct as I checked the website and this organization hasn’t filed this year’s return yet……………so where do you get your info GMA?
Signed, Jerry — a very grateful vet
Posted by: Jerry | November 9, 2007, 11:30 am 11:30 am
I would like to encourage you to learn more about Operation Homefront – a national charity that supports the troops and their families, and our returning wounded. I’m sure they would have received high marks for low overhead and serving many military families and wounded in crisis.
They are a certified 4 star charity by Charity Navigator. Be sure to use the available resources like charity navigator when you donate your money!!!
Posted by: Beth | November 9, 2007, 11:34 am 11:34 am
We need a list of honest charities
Posted by: robert | November 9, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am
I thought something like this might come up someday.
When I was in high school, a classmate recruited a bunch of cute girls to help the Disabled American Veterans by asking shoppers for spare change outside local stores and restaurants. When we were done, they gave us 10% of everything we had collected. O tried to refuse the money and donate it back to the DAV, but they would not accept it. They said that money was already figured into their budget as “overhead” and we’d screw up their accounting if we gave the money back.
Posted by: my_own_person_too | November 9, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Wake up America,this is problem that go far beyond veteran’s groups. America’s so called charities are a cess pool that should to be regulated far more effectively. do you really consider 35% of your donation be used for the stated purpose to be a passing grade. do some research on the businesses that you are donating to. contact your goverment for more regulation, the IRS can regulate these companies easily.
Posted by: Val Brandt | November 9, 2007, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Its very sad to say the least.
Have suspected this for some time and now check 1st w/ Charity Navigator for ratings. If 2 stars or less advise that they should improve rating first before I give.
In some cases I have requested to be removed from mailing list. The worse are those who send money (dollar Bill) or gifts.
The real bad ones are those who are religion connected.
I have notice a large increased in new charitable type of organizations recently so have to suspect that the government tax and nonprofit rules are very loose and make it is easy to set up.
Next tax year I will be using a very restricted list when giving. Better to give more to fewer.
Keep up the good work
Posted by: Bill Gage | November 9, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
G M A Thank God you are with us, Ive learn so much from your program
Signed ,
George
Viet Nam Vet
Posted by: George Fatino | November 9, 2007, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
PLEASE PROVIDE A FULL LIST OF CHARITIES.
I GIVE TO MANY AND WOULD LIKE MORE INFO.
THANK YOU
This is outrageous!!!
First the VA hostpital issue and now this!!!
Shame on you with your lavish lifestyle,
kicking a veteran down when they needed it more!!
Posted by: Mike H | November 9, 2007, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Add Rush Limbaugh to the list. Lush’s “Adopt-a-soldier” program “where service members can register to receive a Rush 24/7 membership from a pool donated by Dittoheads.” Wonder how much he’s made… Note that the soldiers must register to receive their “free” membership. Utterly disgusting.
Posted by: Art | November 9, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
In today’s ABC News story, “Failing to Serve America’s Heroes,” ABC has unfortunately chosen the eve of Veterans’ Day to attack the AMVETS National Service Foundation and some other very reputable service organizations using highly questionable statistics.
Citing the research of Dan Borochoff of the American Institute of Philanthropy, the report gives the AMVETS National Service Foundation a failing grade for allegedly spending less than 35 percent of its charitable donations on “bona fide charitable programs.” However, the AMVETS National Service Foundation’s 2005 Form 990 on file with the Internal Revenue Service, which is a matter of public record, clearly states the Foundation spent 77.2 percent of all contributions on programs directly benefiting our veterans. In fact, the AIP itself only returned 70.7 percent of its public support revenue to programs in 2005, according to its own 990 filed with the IRS. The AIP only offers high marks to charities spending more than 75 percent on programs, and fails to appear in its own online charity rating guide.
Borochoff, who provided the ratings for today’s ABC News story, has not yet responded to an AMVETS query about the AIP’s rating system.
AMVETS National Service Foundation is a recognized member of Independent Charities of America, whose eligibility requirements provide that an organization may not spend more than 25 percent of public support and revenue on operating overhead (administrative and fund raising costs). Members of the public who generously give to the Foundation may rest assured their contributions directly enable AMVETS to continue its mission of service to our nation’s heroes in uniform. From Sept. 1, 2006 through Aug. 31, 2007, AMVETS National Service Officers completed 65,835 VA claims on behalf of veterans, resulting in $323,964,340 in retroactive and claims benefits paid to those veterans. This is just one service AMVETS is able to offer free of charge to veterans though the support of the AMVETS National Service Foundation.
ABC’s story, carefully timed to coincide with Veteran’s Day, is undoubtedly designed to provide a timely hook and salacious, head-turning copy, but only takes advantage of and disrespects this holiday’s honorees, American veterans. AMVETS remains at the forefront of America’s leading veterans service organizations as it has since its inception in 1944. AMVETS is committed and resolute in its mission of service to our veterans through advocacy, representation, legislative reform, and award-winning national programs.
Veterans Serving Veterans and the Military,
John
AMVETS National Commander
Posted by: JP Brown III | November 9, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
I think I am happy to see that “Wounder Warriors” on your list. Here is their link as I do think they are the real deal but then one can never know until someone looks at their books.
Posted by: Chris Horne | November 9, 2007, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
This is the saddest thing I could have read….! I have a son that just returned home from IRAQ (safely..thank God) and I have a personal love for our military. I have always believed that no matter what our political views are, our military must be backed at all costs! I am not a rich woman, but have been contributing to the Paralyzed Vets of America for over a decade! I am sick to think that all the monies given were in vain. I am not living a rich life, but gave what I could to help our vets! I did not intend for the charity workers to become rich!! I am angry!
Our military are not putting their lives on the line, with a pittance of a salary for people like this!!
Posted by: Valerie | November 9, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
A disgrace – and I’m buying address labels from PVA.
Why? I’m a NASCAR fan and I used to contribute to their organization when it used to be run out of New Hampshire.
I had my doubts about them then, but when I saw their new name in NASCAR, I figured they were legit.
No more money from this fan.
Posted by: john | November 9, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Click on the link to see the list of other organizations. Everyone asked about “Disabled American Veterans” (DAV). They got a D rating. Probably a lot of overhead is used to send out all those address label stickers.
Posted by: Eric G | November 9, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
DAV is listed in the report as receiving a “D”. I discovered 2 out of the 3 I contribute to got a D and the other got a C-.
Posted by: DawnH | November 9, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I would like to know where all the veteran’s organizations stand. Please list them in order of the percentage given to the veterans. What is a normal expense percentage to take off the top?
Thanks,
Jack
Posted by: Jack Main | November 9, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
quote:
Chapin’s veterans’ charity has produced slick promotional videos about the good they do, with a number of celebrity endorsements, including one from actor Dennis Franz, who starred in the ABC primetime drama “NYPD Blue.”
But according to their analysis, the American Institute of Philanthropy says of the $70 million Help Hospitalized Veterans took in last year, only 31 percent went to the actual charitable cause. The rest was mainly overhead and fundraising costs, meaning a grade of F.
A spokesperson for Dennis Franz said he had no idea the charity gave so little to actual charity.
Chapin had agreed to be interviewed for our report but refused to sit down in front of the camera when he learned who would be doing the interview, ABC News’ Brian Ross.
why are people donating to his charities if he is only giving a third to the actual charities – he needs to be brought before Congress and exposed to all!
Posted by: bruce | November 9, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Your story was misleading. As a result of this unfortunate report, some excellent “Service Organizations” will suffer significantly. The true meaning of a “Service Organization” is to provide service to the men and women in need of help. Service can be in the form of assistance in obtaining benefits and health care; it can be in the form of publishing clinical guidelines to assist medical staff in the treatment of serious injuries or illness; it can be in the form of sporting events to boost a recently injured Veteran’s morale and confidence: it can be in the form of design guides for accessibility to public and private buildings. Service does not necessarily mean a direct money donation to an individual. Unfortunately because you have established your own definition of charity with a bench mark that apparently does not include “service”, these long established organizations will suffer. I encourage everyone to learn more about the organizations they support, not just listen to the media. Talk with someone that has been helped by that organization and then decide where to donate your time and resources.
Posted by: Jim | November 9, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
A week or so ago my VA doctor left on vacation to Spain but said to me see you in a year for your next medical visit. A week earlier I was in the Hospital’s Emergency’s Room with chest pains, and now with my VA doctor for follow-up. For years I had been complaining of chest and head paining and dizziness, etc., finally I returned I returned to my private sector doctor and forced a heart evaluation, and yesterday by it was discovered I am in sever neck artery failure, and the remainder of the tests are not yet completed. I am most happy this article is printed. None of the organizations that I have come into contact with and are in place to assist the veteran are of any value to the veteran, and in the past they have said, only the squeaky wheel gets the grease. We are in the 21st century practicing medicine and civilization policies of this evolved age, and the veteran is amongst the most valuable human resources our nation has for whom they should become an instrumental part of our fabric injured or not. For these weak minded so called heroes who pretend to represent our wounded veteran and are disloyal to them, they are the lowest of the low, I have met a few, and I gave them their warning change or else your day is coming that the nation will recognize you for what you are. For myself, I am a care giver to another veteran who suffers from Alzheimer’s with mild dementia and I do not charge for my services. While it is true I live here for free, but I could have moved and lived elsewhere, but he is my friend and charge and a veteran — in my life’s stresses he is not a stress factor.
Posted by: Williamwfh | November 9, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
What a disgrace, to ask of our own kids to give their lives and then treat them like beggars when they return. Every last soldier who had to go into bush’s cherry-picked conquest should be millionaires when they return home.. every last one of them!
Posted by: RW | November 9, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
With all due respect to the soldiers, when you abuse the word HERO by labeling every soldier who goes to war as a hero, it really diminishes it when it comes down to recognizing someone who has truly gone above and beyond the call of duty. The fact is that these soldiers are simply doing their job (as great a sacrifice as that is in and of itself).
Posted by: RW | November 9, 2007, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
What about the gov’t? If they where treating the vets the way the should these so called charities wouldn’t need to exist.
Posted by: nonya | November 9, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
According to the 2005 Form 990 on file with the Internal Revenue Service: The American Institute of Philanthropy returned 70.7 percent of its public support revenue to programs, the AMVETS National Service Foundation returned 77.2 per cent.
AIP considers 75 per cent a failing grade.
Something is wrong with this story.
Maybe more fact checks are in order.
Posted by: EldonH | November 9, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I am retired from the military.. Belong to the DAV, American Legion… Do not pretend to know the answer to these rip-offs.. All I can say,, if you scam any charity,, you will surely have a special place in HELL.
Posted by: Sgt. Mc D | November 9, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
I was never in the service and felt that my donations would help to ease the pain of those who were there to support our great country. This afternoon I halted my monthly dontations to one of the charities identified. Now I need to find one that I can support that grades out very well.
Posted by: Kizzme | November 9, 2007, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I’ll bet the people in charge of these F rated charities are big GOP supporters. Wealthy GOP supporters will gladly send your kids to wars they start,and then forget them,except for phony catchy phrases saying they “support the troops”. It’s all about greed in the end.
Posted by: AJ | November 9, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
OMG.Is everyone just now figuring out that vets are kicked to the curb as soon as they have completed their TOD? All of a sudden everyone is worried about the Vets. What about the Vietnam Vets, they have suffered in silence for over 40 years and no one has give a damn. Now the Bush era vets are getting all the attention. America you have let your protectors down. Shame on you!!!
Posted by: 7lvdragonlady | November 9, 2007, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Shame on all of you who assume the worse! The fact of the matter is this story is full of holes. The facts aren’t put out there for you to read. Why grade F? have any of you who post comments go into detail or just assume what the media tells you is true. These Veteran Organizations have done more good than most people who have critized them in these posts could ever do. To all of these organizations who are right now are preparing to honor their past and present veterans, I thank you for the work you do!
Posted by: Sara | November 9, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Oh boy, on the eve of Veterans Day, another wedge into our nation and into our hearts. I am curious about the grading scale used for this story, aren’t you? Please do not stop your donations. Yes, mr. chapin appears to be a brilliant crook. Yes, Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley needs to make changes in his area of influence. YES, THE VA HAS A DUTY to care for those returning from military service! We should not have to depend upon these ‘charitable’ orgs to cover for the VA, but we do. 1/4 of our nation’s homeless are veterans! These are our brothers, our sisters, and our children. Since the VA can’t or won’t fulfill its duty, it is up to each of us to somehow fill that void. We should all be attentive givers.
Posted by: NorCalVet | November 9, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I saw this article today and the video. It wasn’t mentioned that Roger Chapin also founded the Coalition to Salute America’s Heroes based, at present, in Ossining, NY. He pulled his same tricks there and fired three people when they tried to do something about it. CSAH continues to do business with the same fund raiser’s Mr. Chapin claims are responsible for the high cost of Charity work. We found this charity to be giving less than .35 cents of every dollar to the troops when they advertise .92 cents. I hope this organization can be investigated and that Mr. Chapin and his ilk are put out of business for once and for all. Our wounded troops deserve better. We did our best and were terminated for trying to fix the problem. Tell the Senator he can contact me anytime and I have plenty for him.
Posted by: John Clifford | November 9, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
I am not suprised at any thing that is going on,I spent 27 years in the military and have great respect for our soldiers in uniform the always come first, in my book. Who can you trust anymore.
Posted by: SFC D.noko | November 9, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Help Hospitalized Veterans provides a valuable service to those veterans that are wounded and in the hospital receiving care!!! This story is incredibly one sided, get your facts right!
Posted by: Cheri | November 9, 2007, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I meant to say “Wounded Warriors” this one is set up by and run by an ex Marine.
ABC wont let me post the link so just google “Wounded Warriors” and you will find it. I have donated to them and they really seem crediable. The have purchased a condo newr Disney workd and treat vet families to all paid vacations at Disney World. Good organization.
Posted by: Chris Horne | November 9, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
This is not news. Any vet who falls ill or needs help will tell you never to go to a veteran’s charity. They all want your money, but don’t you dare ask for anything. If you do, you’re not a disabled vet, but another piece of street trash looking for a handout.
Posted by: D.Vet | November 9, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
As a member of two Air Force Enlisted Associations and several Veterans Organizations, I find this one fact: There will ALWAYS be some SOB that will do anything to line their pockets even those that are good intentions. HOWEVER, you have to check out those ads who target you and if you have a doubt, ask questions. I did notice that some organizations had initials of soem of my organizations but I had not heard of those orgs. PT Barnum put it best when he said “You can fool everyone part of the time but you can’t fool everyone everytim.”
Posted by: MSgt Merrill Vaughan, USAF (Ret) | November 9, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Freedom Alliance gets an F. That’s the one hosting those ‘Freedom Concerts’ with Hannity and Oliver North. From the website it looks like they wouldn’t even supply their information.
Posted by: TheWarOnScienceIsReal | November 9, 2007, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Unfortunately, I have contributed to one of the organizations that received a grade of an F. I have sent this article to them and have asked them to tell the entire organization why and what happened. Some of them have taken initials of legitimate Veterans Service Organization (VSO)and have used it to line their own pocket. I wish I had a nickle for each organization that I have checked on both BBB (Online and those with mailing addresses) and in some cases with SNOPES; only to find that they might not be exactly 100% legit.
To my fellow Viet Nam Vets, WELCOME HOME MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS.
Posted by: MSgt Merrill Vaughan, USAF (Ret) | November 9, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Disabled American Vets is on page 2:
they got a “D” grade!!!
I have been giving to them for years!
OH NO
To all the good charities out there:
Start advertising your grades, your helpful activities and give us a link to look this up.
Posted by: Rebecca | November 9, 2007, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Protecting the troops – Republican style.
Posted by: Samantha Stickers | November 9, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
For 62 years, Paralyzed Veterans has been doing A-plus work for all veterans, people with disabilities and their families 24/7. This year alone we broke the billion-dollar barrier in benefits secured over the past decade for our brave service members and veterans and awarded grants of nearly $1.5 million for spinal cord injury research and education projects. Nearly 73% of all donations received directly benefit our veterans – we report 64.5% because we absorb the overhead costs of the program work for our three foundations. This Veterans Day, we encourage everyone to do something good for all veterans and their families.
Posted by: Randy, National President, Paralyzed Veterans of America | November 9, 2007, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I’m really confused.
Sadly (maybe), for years we have given to PVA. If this money isn’t reaching those we are trying to help, that is a shame. That charity will get no more (maybe).
Secondly, We give to Disabled Veterans of America. I have looked them up in several places and they have been shown as being a reputable charity. Then I read here that it was rated D.
I went out to the report you sited and they were not mentioned.
What is truth and what is just hype? And, how do we REALLY tell the right charities to support our service people?
All this has done is give me more questions. What report is correct? What is real?
Posted by: LoAnne Hogan | November 9, 2007, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
I have been sending money to several of these orgainizations because my daughter is in her 5th year with the Air Force and my father served in WWII
I donated money to Vets First and was supposed to get a throw blanket. they cased my check but I did not get the throw. I have also donated to the disabled vets. this is very distrubing, I really wanted to take care of the vets not the CEO’s lifestyle.
Posted by: Judidical512 | November 9, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
For many years, I have been involved with the American Legion. I didn’t see then listed with the other VSO’s that received such poor grades, which makes me believe that they are doing MUCH better. Thank GOD someone is tending to the needs of our veterans … without making a profit from their suffering. Keep up the wonderful work American Legion!!!
Posted by: Butch Miller | November 9, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
For 62 years, Paralyzed Veterans has been doing A-plus work for all veterans, people with disabilities and their families 24/7. This year alone we broke the billion-dollar barrier in benefits secured over the past decade for our brave service members and veterans and awarded grants of nearly $1.5 million for spinal cord injury research and education projects. Nearly 73% of all donations received directly benefit our veterans – we report 64.5% because we absorb the overhead costs of the program work for our three foundations. This Veterans Day, we encourage everyone to do something good for all veterans and their families, and to go to pva.org to find out more about the A-plus work we do.
Posted by: Randy | November 9, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
The methodology used by the “leading charity watchdog group”, is all skewed up. They treat ALL overhead as bad. It DOES cost money to raise money. It costs money to let the general public know that smaller Veteran Service Organizations like the PVA even EXIST. It cost money money to produce The Independent Budget every year on the state of the VA. It costs money to produce “Clinical Practice Guidelines”, for the proper medical care for individuals with spinal cord injuries, and diseases, (which have become the generally accepted medical practices worldwide).
It costs money to pay attorneys to represent paralyzed vets before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. It cost money to train and pay the best National Service Officers, in 61 offices across the country to represent veterans with the VA, (by law the must represent ANY disabled vet).
It costs money to organize wheelchair sports. PVA began as a group of WWII wheelchair athletes who realized that they knew more about living in wheelchairs than the doctors at the VA.
It cost money to fund spinal cord research at places like Yale and and fund a chair in Neurology at the U. of Wash.; but all of this is considered OVERHEAD by the “leading charity watchdog group”, because it isn’t going to services DIRECTLY to the vets, and the people involved are receiving paychecks, (shudder)!!!
Yes, the PVA hires the best people that they can find. All positions are offered to members first, and all primary decision making slots are vets in wheelchairs.
Having said all of that in PVA’s defense, I will also say that I’ve been on National PVA’s sh*t list for some years, and that I don’t agree with all of their some, (many), of their decisions and positions. Still it IS an organization OF paralyzed vets working FOR paralyzed vets, since 1947, that invented.
Posted by: chiefkent | November 9, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
First I’d like to thank our vets and their families for their sacrafice for us and our great nation! These guys should be ashamed of themselves. We all have an obligation to help our wounded heroes when they return home. How dare they steal from them and us! I’d like to shed some light on Mr. Chapin’s claim that his costs of fund raising are so high that he can’t give more to our wounded. Did you know that Mr. Chapin does business with a direct mail company that is incented to be ineffecient? What kind of business person negotiates that deal? The direct mail company is compensated for each piece of mail sent out. That is right. That is why many of you are receiving up to 10 pieces of mail a week from the same organization.
Posted by: Enough! | November 9, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
This is just a copycat scam used by so many televangelists. I also remember the Red Cross scam in the 80s. I was sending money to the 700 Club until yesterday when Pat Robertson endorsed Rudy Giuliani. I already knew he was a wolf in sheeps clothing. From now on I’m only giving to people I know, who are deserving.
Posted by: kenny | November 9, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
One more thing. People have been asking why doesn’t the government do something to stop these scam artists? Guess what. We at the Coalition to Salute America’s Heroes, who were terminated by Mr. Chapin for trying to straighten out his carnival huckster act, asked for assistance from the New York State Attorney General’s office and were brushed off. We also asked for help from newly elected NY Congressman John Hall. Never even got a reply from his office, but isn’t that so typical of a politician? Run for office promise the vets this and that, get elected, and go into the cave until next election when they can emerge and make some brand new promises. The woods are lovely, dark, and deep and I have promises to break before I sleep. Step up Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Hall.
Posted by: John Clifford | November 9, 2007, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
As a long time contributor to the Air Force Aid Society, I was initially shocked to see they received an F grade, and your blog made me think I had been giving money to a bunch of thieves. But then I read the actual report. The Army, Navy-Marine Corps, and Air Force Aid Society’s all received A+ grade from spending $0.93 of every dollar on charity and for their costs of raising funds at $0.03 per dollar raised. The report then adjusted this A+ to an F (or C+ for the Navy-Marine Corps) because despite paying out such a huge percentage of money, they have large reserves. Shame on you for making them look like thieves getting rich off of charity. The irony of this report is had the boards increased their salaries and bled the reserves dry, they could have kept the A+ they otherwise earned.
You should edit your report to show some of the F grades resulted solely from high reserves for very well run charities that otherwise receive an A+!
Posted by: Proud To to Give | November 10, 2007, 7:01 am 7:01 am
All charities should be regulated by the government in order to gain “charity” status. CEO’s of these organizations shouldn’t be earning more than the President of the United States either. How can we allow them to take the tax deductions intended for a charity when they seem to be big business? Don’t stop with just the veterans organizations – look at the American Red Cross. My only personal encounter with them was after an apartment fire when they called non-stop for two days, only asking the same question repeatedly, “Is the media there yet?” It seemed to me that as long as the media wasn’t showing up – neither were they. My son is in the military and tells me that even USO would offer coffee at various events (that the military guys had to pay for). It is a disgrace and these organizations need to be accountable to the citizens of the U.S. if they want the tax credits.
Posted by: GHarrison | November 10, 2007, 7:43 am 7:43 am
I found it interesting that Army Emergancy Relief was lumped into the “F” category. Over my years, it was always there to support my soldiers, and the current Charity Navigator Site shows it with a 4 Star Rating (one of the highest). You need to review what when into that rating and why.
Posted by: J.D.Wisenbaker, COL USAR (Ret) | November 10, 2007, 8:12 am 8:12 am
WOW! What a distorted and shameful use and I am not talking about the VET groups. One of the organizations mentioned was AMVETS. If the idea was to present the fact that the money was not getting to the hands of Veterans, that may be true. I believe the distortion lays (lies)there. I am an employee and assist those Veterans on a daily basis. My office is on a military base and I assist those leaving military service in submitting their claims to the VA. This service is provided at no charge/fee to the military member or Veteran. Also, there is no requirement to join our organization to receive this service. This is not only a VA directive, but is firmly embraced by AMVETS. This service allows Veterans to receive EVERYTHING they are legally entitled to receive. Can the VA do this, yes. AMVETS is the ADVOCATE for that Veteran. Using this service, we build a valid claim, answering VA’s questions and shorting process time for the Veteran. A valid claim with supporting documention ensures a well informed Veteran and a VA decision that reduces appeals. Again, at NO CHARGE TO THE VETERAN! The Veteran is able to receive this service because of AMVETS use of the National Service Foundation. I have seen the pay scales and I truely don’t beleive there is any “six figure” pay anywhere. Here’s a little fact that you FAILED to mention. AMVETS, while being one of the smallest Veterans organization is also one of the lowest paid. Also, AMVETS seems to one of the few Veterans organization that, I like to say, doesn’t discriminate. Most others require for membership certian conditions above military service. Must have a certain award, served in a certain place/time or achived a certain rank. For those reading that have served in the military, you know that very few get to choose where we go. In the military you go where you are told, when you are told. AMVETS only asks two questions. In a time when many will not serve their country, AMVETS only askes, “Did you serve?? and “Did you serve honorably?”
ABC, you aired this distorted piece on near Veterans Day for ratings. AMVETS will continue to stand up for our fellow Veterans. We will continue to provide the much needed services to our fellow Veterans, and do so without “selling insurance” or using “membership dues” to fund this. For those reading this. Do you want Veterans to continue to have representation to the VA and not have to pay a lawyer? Support that Service Officer, buy something from the AMVETS Thrift Store or make a donation. Is it supporting ADMIN costs, yep. It’s keeping that Servce Office open and helping Veterans.
SR Smith
Posted by: Stephen R Smith | November 10, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am
another failure of “privatization”… this is what happens when you leave social services to private industry. with government agencies you have a voice… its called a vote. with private industry they only answer to profit.
Posted by: tomulcak | November 10, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
In response we have to ABC’s assault on our fundraising program. It was not considered in their presentation and we have received no acknowledgement of its receipt, although the investigative reporter acknowledged the error made in their presentation.
The MOPH Service Foundation supports the many programs of the Military Order of the Purple Heart and other veteran’s programs. As the fund raising organization we are asked to provide over 10 million dollars a year. Since the MOPH Service Foundation deals in Car and Thrift Store programs that bring in the bulk of the money needed; we are not like other cash contribution non-profit organizations.
We are required to advertise both the car and thrift store operation in a wide variety of media across the country. Our attempt to obtain free advertising space in both print and electronic media has consistently fallen on deaf ears. As a result, we pay these media outlets a large sum of money which would be better utilized in supporting the programs we sponsor, in particular those of the MOPH.
Needless to say if such a program existed, the percentage of funds received that were then used to directly support our programs would increase considerably. For the record, the percentage attributed to us by ABC news is much lower than the actual figure, a product of our recently completed audit.
The MOPH Service Foundation is proud of our contributions to both the veterans and active duty military communities over the past 50 years.
Posted by: TJ Thompson | November 10, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
In today’s ABC News story, “Failing to Serve America’s Heroes,” ABC has unfortunately chosen the eve of Veterans’ Day to attack the AMVETS National Service Foundation and some other very reputable service organizations using highly questionable statistics.
Citing the research of Dan Borochoff of the American Institute of Philanthropy, the report gives the AMVETS National Service Foundation a failing grade for allegedly spending less than 35 percent of its charitable donations on “bona fide charitable programs.” However, the AMVETS National Service Foundation’s 2005 Form 990 on file with the Internal Revenue Service, which is a matter of public record, clearly states the Foundation spent 77.2 percent of all contributions on programs directly benefiting our veterans.
Posted by: JP Brown III | November 10, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Let’s stand up..earthling people and seek and bring peace to the world.Many decent and upright US soldiers from Generals to the foot soldiers who knew it was wrong and a mistake to fight in the Bush’s War have either resigned, retired,been fired or courtmartiled or who knows what else, to Them I salute for their honesty, bravery and being a True Patriot of the Planet Earth, God bless you all with peace and joy .
Posted by: PeaceMakers, Japan | November 10, 2007, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Judging from the prior comments from your viewers, your slanted has caused many viewers to stop supporting these organizations. Who will now step in and help, ABC? My wife was helped by the DAV in filing her claim for disability. We tried for 4 years to get the VA to recognize she was really disabled without luck. Finally, with the help of the DAV, she was awarded a 70% medical disability and a 100% unemployability rating along with the benefits due to those rating. It takes money to run any program. There is no such thing as a free lunch. ABC, make it right. Report the truth!!!
Posted by: Glenn | November 10, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Did you all know? The last stand by General George A. Custer ,defeated by Chief Crazy Horse of the Sioux Nation at Little Bighorn, when the then commander in chief-President Grant , who along with his adminsitration and brother willfully sent General Custer to his dealth and defeat…becasue General Custer was decent and upright enough to testify against President Grant ‘s corrupt admisntration .Nothing much has changed and now with the Bush’s war…raging ,babies, children,civilians,resistenace-defenders and invaders are dying everyday for Bush’S private war and we the world citizens too are suffering….so much for global family.Let’s stand up..earthling people and seek and bring peace to the world.Many decent and upright US soldiers from Generals to the foot soldiers who knew it was wrong and a mistake to fight in the Bush’s War have either resigned, retired,been fired or courtmartiled or who knows what else, to Them I salute for their honesty, bravery and being a True Patriot of the Planet Earth, God bless you all with peace and joy .
Posted by: highpriest-temple of the Pecemakers | November 11, 2007, 7:23 am 7:23 am
I agree with other posters, I too would like to see the “Good List”.
As far as the DAV, I was listening to someone on NPR on the Diane Riehm Show talking about the plight of veterans. This person said that many disabled vets received more support from the DAV than from the VA when it came to getting their disability ratings and medical care. I have personally seen their vans in the area I live in, presumably shuttling vets to the VA Hospital 30 miles away.
DAV seems to be a bonafide and effective veterans’ charity.
Posted by: War Is Not Pro-Life | November 11, 2007, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Job well done. More people need to understand where their money goes. Could you please send me a list of these ratings? I am Pres. of Amvets #47, Aux. We do LOTS of LOCAL charitable
work and account for all monies. Keep in mind, there are many good organizations also. Please Support our Troops, WE DO.
Posted by: susan Majcher | November 11, 2007, 9:57 am 9:57 am
so sad that we have to have a watchdog watching what we do but unfortunately there are too many greedy people out there – I contribute now to a local Blue Star Mothers group and will ask them about these reports and how they measure up – thanks for the investigative reporting
Posted by: Barbara | November 11, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
I have worked directly with several organizations that received poor grades. As others have pointed out, the methodology of the grading is highly suspect and can greatly distort the good work these organizations do. And ABC, shame on you for implying that all the organizations receiving poor grades are somehow dishonest and scamming people. The damage you have done to good and upright organizations here… shame on you!!
Posted by: Beth | November 11, 2007, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
In Response to Mark, dont get me wrong I am not saying its ok to be legal and cheat, what im saying is that if the Laws are being followed by the Charities and The Fundraisers, and the costs of the people, buildings, services are needed to help Vets I think that is great, whats sad is that the Vets shouldnt be in this shape in the first place. Im not saying that people who work full time to raise funds to help Vets, and the Charity personal that gets the funds to the Vets should be making BIG SALARIES, but truth be said Mark no one pays the bills for them and this is a job, and I am not in favor of anyone making lots of money off the Vets, but they do deserve to make a reasonable living, reasonable. The Vets I have seen being helped have been over 300 in the last 2 years are they not important? no one else would help them? I think the laws should change to the Fundraisers and let them make no more than 40% then that would be better I again want to make it clear, its not ILLEGAL I feel that a reasonable salary to people who are helping the Vets full time,is fair. The facts also on this report were very lacking, and as usual one sided The BBB you have to pay to have them say you are not good or bad, does that make sense? and the watch dog CEOS make great money also, American red cross/United way ceo make great money check them out also.
Posted by: Ben | November 12, 2007, 2:17 am 2:17 am
Ben, you cannot campare the United Way and the American Red Cross to a group that has assisted 300 soldiers in two years. Not to dis your support, that is not my intention–if you help just one vet you are making a difference. Thanks. What I’m talking about is efficient fundraising. I have recieved dozens of letters from multiple organizations (many in the same week). These folks are more concerned with spending money on the fundraising “machine” then with optimizing mission delivery and controlling overhead. The folks that make the pencils, calendars, magnets, and other “stuff” included in these mailing are really cleaning up, as are the businesses that are doing all the mailings! Business is business, Ben, but charity is supposed to be “non-profit”. If folks want to make a confortable living raising money to support a cause, great, but they should not be entitled to play both sides and qualify for tax-exmept status if they continue to run the organization as if a for-profit. Hiding behind loopholes and creative accounting may be legal (at least for now) but these tactics are against the entire concept of giving–it’s not about taking. When someone donates to support a service member,family or child of a fallen soldier, they expect at least a majority of their contribution will go to where they intended it to go in the first place. They did not intend their contribution to end up as crumbs that are left once the “cost” of doing business has been deducted. If organizations continue to claim high overhead and fundraising costs as a part of “doing business as usual”, they should take a long, hard look at their business model. Something is broken. Regardless, thanks for making a difference with the 300 you assisted.
Mark
Posted by: Mark | November 12, 2007, 9:55 am 9:55 am
What is truly a shame here, is that the American public is ready to believe anything that the media tells them. Brian Ross makes his living off of “exposing” people and organizations. I am sure that he is most interested in the sensational side of journalism, because that is what pays his bills. Perhaps Ross should speak to some of the veterans that have actually benefitted from these organizations, and see what they have to say. Afterall, it is the veterans that everyone here on this blog is arguing about. If there was an investigative story on every charity in America, I am sure that ABC would uncover some dirt in the cracks of each organization. It takes money to raise money. If no one knows about your organization, how do you think they are going to donate? Sure fundraising costs can be high, and yes it stinks that every dime donated doesnt go directly to the vets in need, but without fundraising there would be NO FUNDS going to the vets. Perhaps Brian Ross should actually call these organizations and speak with the men and women they have helped. then he might chnange his tune.
Posted by: Judy Lane | November 12, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Maybe we need to all take a deep breath and scold the author for not taking a deeper look into these reports. After all, a report is only as good as the criteria of it being generated. I personally work with Soldiers’ Angels and even run the Louisiana website for them. I spend so much of my “free” time working to make sure that soldiers’ and their families get what they need.
Before anyone starts throwing mud and insulting the thousands of Americans who work with and for these fine Veteran’s charities, let’s do this the proper way and get ALL sides of the story, not just that of the “grader.”
I am truly insulted and am more than willing to discuss the facts with anyone!
Posted by: Greta (Hooah Wife) Perry | November 12, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Hi Mark Thank you for the time and your response, I feel you do make very good sense I really do and I thank you. I can only say it is so hard for me to see our Vets in this bad way some have nothing and is their fault? maybe, maybe not.I dont want to boast about me at all, but funds have been low at times and Vets have still gotten some much needed bills paid by a unknown source…..anytime anyone calls and has problems I make sure that we do all we can to solve it,even returning a donation if they are unhappy.I again feel you hit it right on the Fundrasiers need to be regulated in some way or to show a valid reason for the need of such high costs to raise funds.Mark I appreciate your comments and rest to sure i am not making a unreasonable amount of money off our Heroes, our Vets and with a new year coming it is time for ALL charities to look to reducing the Fundrasiers costs, and get the more funds to our Vets. Best wishes Mark and to you all.
Posted by: Ben | November 12, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
What would one expect with the divisions in our society on almost every subject. Plus the greed/selfish factor that people exhibit throughout most functions in their life. Unless there is honesty brought back into the mainstream of US Society this will only get worse. I don’t see that occuring anytime soon.
Posted by: Roger Ramjet | November 12, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
I think you give them tooooo much charity to even call them a charity in the first place, when what they Are is a Fraud!
Why is it NOT illegal to be a ‘charity’ and give only 2% of your take to the people you say you are helping????
Can we make a new law governing charities that the are required to provide assistance to the group they say they are to help, in the amount of no less than 51% of all proceeds. Period. And No less than 40% must be in the form of Cash or Medical payment assistance.
Posted by: Steve | November 12, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Brian Ross like a lot of other so called media news groups love this stuff where are they in the front to help the vets? why isnt Mr Ross talking with high ranking military people about our Vets and how to get them better help? Mr Ross like the rest are interested in the dirt, im sure he could run a special on the same charitys and show they are helping the Vets, I for one never believe everything I see on the media it is their own view and they want ratings, and if they show bad things and be on the record!!! then they pat them selves on their backs,and make their 6 figure income on bashing Charities that really help.Mr Ross didnt want to hear from these Charities because his mind was already made up, his agenda was clear RATINGS, and now he will go to something else until next Veterans day then he will come back again if he is sucessful and be the Reporter on the scene for the day then gone again. If a Charity gets less than 20 cents for every dollar, but spends 11 or 13 cents on the Vets then really they are spending more on Vets with the money they have left.The Big picture here Fundrasiers raise a lot more than volunteers, thats a fact in our case you try to get 20 people to work 8 hours a day 5 days a week for free? good luck. Fundraisres bring more money in a week then 10 volunteers could bring in a month.Donate to your favorite Charity ask for the main office phone number and donate directly, if you use a paid fundrasier than they should get their money they were the ones contacting you, sending you imfo, using their phones,office space,paying their employees. Happy Veterans Day to all that served. and to the families of lost loved ones thank you for your Heroes who paid the ultimate price.God Bless you all and America
Posted by: Ben | November 12, 2007, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
I commend Brian Ross for exposing these charities for what they are doing and holding them accountable. There are some good organizations out there and I hope Brian will educate his viewers on where they can find this information.
Posted by: CJ West | November 12, 2007, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Only in America can a person raise 70 million dollars to help our soldiers, pay himself 500K for doing it and still manage to waste almost 50 million in the process.
Posted by: Terry Reeves | November 13, 2007, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Railing against these con artists is totally deserved, but what about the government’s failings in their obligations to these veterans? All these untold billions in tax revenue being frittered away. Lets hold these, the champion con artists, to account. Despicable as these private charities’ actions are, they pale in comparison to the massive fraud being perpetrated by our government. Don’t get distracted by a sleazy side-show!
Posted by: Ed | November 13, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Thank you for exposing fraud.
Also, can you please do an article with the names of good Veteran charities so we all know where to donate?
Posted by: Silly Allah (exposing Islam) | November 13, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
While I think this is disgusting. There is a comment I must make..
Everyone talks about the sacrifices our soldiers make for our freedoms..
Do you think our soldiers fight and die for our freedom? I mean really? They are tools fighting for a corporate fascist agenda. They are not “defending” our country, or our freedoms for that matter. They should all quit until our government changes it’s policies.
Posted by: K | November 13, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
I want everyone to know that I have sent three (3) responses to this blog. Not one has made it in as a response which tells me all 3 responses hit a chord with ABC and it is screening and refusing to make my responses known. I am appalled at ABC for first not researching the information that was given by this watch dog group be fore opening their mouths so-to-say. Go to this “watch dog’s” site and see what they do for our people. I see they have an add for a book and state that it includes all the information you need to find out about various charities. Just to let you know charity is not about putting money into the pockets of veteran’s. It is about what you do for the veteran’s. It is representation, research and assisting those with disabilities return to a reasonable lifestyle. There are organizations out there that literally steal representation from other organizations only for membership purposes. DAV, American legion, VFW are some of those organizations. Ask those veteran’s being represented by those organizations how often they have to call (if they get through) to find out what is going on with their claims. The bottom line is that you can obtain representation from thousands of veteran’s but the question at hand is how are you being represented. Again I am saying BOO to all of you jumping on the band wagon of those who think what ABC or this watchdog group says is gospel yet they have not done their research. Ignorance is stupidity. Stupidity is costly and reflects on how America thinks and how bad we look when “taking care” of our own. Want to point the finger? Point it at the politicians and those who report the News. Bottom line is if you do not do your research it will be the politicians and the news that will be the downfall of America. I heard a representative once make a statement that an issue, which came up, was what his constituants voted for. Personally I do not remember the last time some poilitical type came to me and asked my to vote on an issue or asked my opinion. This is coming from not only someone who was born and raised abroad in a political (American) family but also served his country (America) for over 20 years and is 100% disabled. Stop whining. Clean up your act and your own back yard before pointing the finger. I did not move to the US until I was 16 years old. I did not learn about discrimination or prejudice until I moved to the US. I am disgraced by the ingnorance of those who live in America and have not lived in a country that is less fortunate than theirs. Just to let you know going on vacation somewhere does not constitute knowledge in living or understanding another countries way of life.
Posted by: Pappi (retired veteran) | November 13, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Did anyone notice the message here? We need the Big brother Govt to come in and regulate, we have a war going on costing Billions of dollars and our vets from other wars, are starving and left out in the streets shame on Brian Ross for not exposing the way OUR country treats OUR vets.I dont care what administration you favor when was the last time a President did something and other Presidents followed to put our vets first? Explain to me why it is so expensive to help our Heroes? once and for all a place or places where the vets can be helped period….Not a socialist thing, but just for the vets only.Everything else should be left to free enterprize I dont want the Big Brother Govt in every little thing that goes on here, very scary when you do that.Patriot Act already takes away some freedoms. I think that Mr Ross was right to show the bad charities what about the good ones? fair and balanced? there Mr Ross?
Posted by: Tim | November 13, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
To the one who asked about Disabled American Veterans – they got the grade “D” – just read the ratings in the link at the end of the article.
I am really pissed off about this. This is more or less the first charity I have given to (Disabled American veterans), because I can really support the idea behind it. And then to find out they also use most of the money on advertising, overhead, etc. etc. If other organizations can get an A then these can too, but they must be ineptly and incompetently managed. I am so furious thinking that maybe less than half of what I gave actually ever benefited a veteran.
These people should be ASHAMED of themselves. And YES, we need some oversight of these organizations and some rules that require a minimum amount of money to be given out if you want to be called a charitable organization.
Posted by: Jacob | November 13, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
It’s a terrible disgrace to do this, but our government screws the veterans everyday of the week so this is nothing out of the ordinary.
With that said I want to address another issue, the issue of using the word “hero” to describe anyone that serves in the military.
A “hero” is defined as someone that goes far above and beyond the call of duty.
A soldier is not a “hero” for doing his job, or for being wounded in the course of his duty, unless it was PERFORMING AN ACT OF BRAVERY ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY.
You people that constantly throw the word “hero” around have cheapened the acts of men and women who really are “heroes” and who have really gone above and beyond the call of duty.
Stop using the word “hero” to describe any soldier and use it when it is appropriate.
Posted by: Version2 | November 13, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
It is a sad commentary, but it only typifies what’s going on in this country today, with corporate rule, and blood for profit mentality. The criminals should be tried and hung. They have cost us billions (now trillions) and thousands of American lives and a million or more of Iraq lives.
Posted by: DAVID GREGORY | November 13, 2007, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Good lord… can they be arrested for this?
ABC please run this story multiple times so that many many people can hear and see about these monsters.
Posted by: Inder | November 13, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Version2 get over yourself Heroe!!! who died and made you the spokesman, get a life. Military people are true Heroes dork
Posted by: jay | November 14, 2007, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
You guys, this is NOT the only place you can get ratings on these charities, and NOT the final word.
I won’t defend the real offenders, but some of the organizations that got a “D” are much higher rated elsewhere. Don’t be blinded by one simple little two page list. DO THE RESEARCH YOURSELVES–the information is out there.
Posted by: Beth | November 14, 2007, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
I suggest looking at Charity Navigator and also the BBB Charity ratings.
For example, the DAV got a four-star rating from Charity Navigator (four stars is the highest rating). It’s a FAR cry from the “D” rating given by AIP.
Like I said, do the research. The different rating groups don’t rate the same things, and their results are often completely different.
Posted by: Beth | November 15, 2007, 12:48 am 12:48 am
I have a copy of the donnations that our service men are being cut off. I hope something will be done. If this gets out it will hurt aLL THE NvETERANS.
Posted by: Robert Bianchi | November 16, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am
This just really makes me mad. I have been giving to the DAV for years and now I find out it is just another scam for someone to get rich on. But I salute ABC for letting the American people know the truth. From now on it will be Fisher House, and Intrepid Fallen Heroes fund that will get my support.
Posted by: Stevie SLC Utah | November 17, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
I am very acquainted with IL state AMVETS Hdqtrs and procedures. Each year they spend less and less money on veterans sevices. They have cut their service staff over 50%, and their State Dir has stated that it is object of the state organization to be run like a business, for profit, not for services to veterans and their families.
Posted by: Janice | November 18, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Janice, I challenge you to back up your statments. Call AMVETS’ national headquarters and report such comments if they were indeed made. You have a morale obligation to do so if what you say is true. Don’t come on here, hiding behind your keyboard, making accusations if you aren’t going to actually do something about this.
Posted by: Joe | November 21, 2007, 8:01 am 8:01 am
no suprize at all to me it is to easy to get charitable license and no rules no one goes to jail
Posted by: RaymondDaleBabcock | November 21, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Hi Raymond no it is NOT easy to get a tax exempt charity, you have to go through quite a bit and need some finanicial backing, I have to tell you the research I have done on a lot of Charitys, and most are fine. I wish you could see the good things being done for the Vets by the charity that I help. The jobs we find for them the food we supply, the transportation to their medical needs, and food. I guess you know it alls think because of Brian Ross and his biased views of these charitys? We should go to jail? its a crime? I get paid a very reasonable salary for 50 hours sometimes 6 day weeks, and 2 weeks off for vacation a year, and a my car is 7 years old, and I rent, with no medical insurance and all I see is Jail, corrupt? get your facts straight.Wheres your help? anyone want to help about 300 vets a year? with jobs, medical, food, or is that too much to ask? ABC is a joke and thats why their rateings are failing people dont trust them.
Posted by: Ben | November 23, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Extremely sad. I think the internet will help cure some of these woes by encouraging more open and accessible bookkeeping.
Posted by: David Mackey | December 1, 2007, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Incrediable! I am a veteran of 27 years of service with deployments to both Viet Nam and the Desert Storm with an 80% disability rating from the VA. My son is currently in the Army in Iraq serving as a combat medic. I have personally supported two of the groups listed being a life member of the VFW and giving cash donations to the Army Emergency Relief fund. I would strongly support a through investigation of these groups. I am sure there is more to this. I am curious as how the ratings are conducted. Obviously if there has been criminal fraud the managers of the groups should be required to answer up and spend some time behind bars. Thanks for keeping us informed.
Posted by: Jim | December 14, 2007, 9:31 am 9:31 am
I give to the DAV in Cincinnati, OH. How do they rate? I see this is a frequent question of others that support veterans organizations.
Posted by: John | December 14, 2007, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I was personally very active in a group given a very negative review on the mentioned watchdog site. I walked away from the group (before seeing the article, btw) after seeing close-up the waste and foolish financial (mis)management. Now I feel dirty for having promoted the group. They do good things for many soldiers, vets and their families. But they also waste a huge amount of money, misrepresent to volunteers and donors how they actually use the money, mis-manage the organizations resources, and spend far too much time chasing awards and publicity for their leaders and charitable activities. And while they claim that no leaders are paid, they have free use of the funds received in donations.
My advice: Join organizations that allow you to send care packages, cards, etc DIRECTLY to veterans or soldiers and their squads or units. Dont donate for or buy premade “care packages” and goods from an organizations website unless you know they give at least 75% of donations to soldiers. Check with charity monitoring groups. If your organization isnt listed, ask for it to be checked out.
Yes, it takes time and ongoing commitment to personally create and send packages but it makes a huge difference in the veterans or soldiers mental health and morale. Plus its very satisfying personally. You make a difference and you know EXACTLY where your money is going.
If you prefer to donate much-needed money, then check the charity rating organizations before making a decision. Google the term “charity ratings” for organizations.
Be sure to tell all your family, friends, church members, community organizations, political representatives, and volunteering buddies which charities do and dont make the grade. Print the lists or share the links. Just pointing people away from the scumbags and toward the deserving charities is a big help to everyone.
Posted by: Sam | December 29, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
There seens to be a great injustice going on here. Army Emergency Relief has had 66 years of history supporting our Soldiers in time of emergency. AER has asisted in very timely loans with no interest for emergency travel and continued to become more innovative in ways to help our Soldiers and their Families, Retirees and especially Widows. Sure much of the assistance is in the form of interest free loans paid back at very low monthly payments. Also Grants are allowed in some emergencies too. The AER education Scholarship program for Soldier Spouses and children is another biggie. The new Soldier Education on Financial Money Management Training for Soldiers in Advanced Individual Training that helps the Soldier to be informed on ways to prevent financial failure and contract rip-offs and the like is commendable. AER is a well respected Charity that didn’t deserve to be misunderstood and misrepresented in the “F” grade article. When you read the annual fund drive pamphlet clearly states that the kind of assistance provided and that the Soldier can expect is: An interest Free Loan, a Grant if the repayment of loan will cause undue hardship, or Part Loan and Part Grant. AER helps the Spouse if the Soldier is deployed as long as she has a Power of Attorney, a Military ID Card ans Substantiating documents. I know AER has considerable money in the bank but the brochure accounts for this saying that in order for AER to keep its tax exemot status, it must raise at least 1/3 of their funds by donations. There should be some slack in this issue though for organizations life AER to go to alternate fund drive years and not lose their Tax Exempt status.
Lets not forget the Hurricane Katrine support that AER wrote off when Families needed emergency assistance that initially was as a loan but afterwards rolled over to a grant and refunds to Families that had already began repaying their AER loans. There was an even bigger write off of loans during Desert Storm too I believe. I could go on and on but what I am trying to say is this Article and Grade is Phoney and will do much more HARM than good to Organizations that were misrepresented in it. The Air Force Aide Society is another Harmed organization too. Shame on reporting before you do your homework and verify your sources and facts.
I am a Viet NAm Vet and retired from the Army. I’m a life member of VVA and VFW. I have used AER when I was a young Soldier and had to go home on emergency leave to be with my Father when he died, I was a Commander who relied on AER to support my Soldiers in time of emergency and I am presently a Assistant AER Officer at Fort Sill Oklahoma. I make no salary from AER , I assist Soldiers in obtaining AER assistance in the form of loans and grants. I process Retirees cases and widow cases too. Oh yea, Widow assistace is always in the form of a Grant. Many Widows receive monthly Grants to boost there incomes to 130% of the FDA Poverty line too. I know what AER has done for our Active Duty Soldiers, Our Retiree’s and our Widows in the past 42 Years I have been associated with the Army and the AER has always been there helping our Soldiers and Families.
Posted by: Tim Flockoi | January 17, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I am terribly disappointed in the the shoddy research done regarding the rating for Soldier’s Angels. I am a member of their letter writing team and have been for some time. All the officers and people working for Soldier’s Angels are volunteers. They are the moms & pops of America who spend their time sewing, writing letters, sending packages etc. to our deployed troops. There isn’t a finer organization run by a better person than Patti Patton Bader. It’s a sin that a misleading article has hurt this organization with it’s fundraising.
Posted by: Cynde Durnford-Branecki | January 19, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
In response to the failure to serve piece, I learned many years ago about the fund raising companies and their scams and skimming practices. I personaly will not donate even one dime to any national fund raising effort, no matter who the group is. I much prefer to donate to the local chapter or post or whatever the group calls it’s local org. In case you don’t know most groups must share their local donated funds with the state and national enities but it is a percentage and the bulk stays local to help people you may know.
Posted by: R.Hough | February 1, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
I think that every soldier, sailor, airman (&woman), marine & coastie is a HERO when in the AMERICA OF TODAY, 99% of the population DELIBERATELY CHOOSES to look the other way and not serve due to pure selfishness!
Posted by: P. Tough | May 15, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
I guess the traditional service organizations such as the VFW and American Legion fell asleep at the switch. I guess they thought it was less important to look out for veterans and more important to direct their efforts at telling Vietnam and younger veterans that they weren’t real soldiers, veterans, Americans or even real men!
Funny, I regularly contibuted to Help Hospitalized Veterans and thought my money was buying model and craft kits when it was actually going toward Chapin’s yachts, seven-course dinners, and prostitutes!
Posted by: A Young (not real) Vet | May 15, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
TOM HANKS AND THE WELCOME BACK VETERANS.ORG IS JUST ANOTHE SCAM IT SHOULD BE BANNED FROM TV IT IS VERY MISLEADING ALL THEY WANT IS MONEY FROM SUCKERS THAT THINK THEY ARE HELPING RETURNING VETS THE VA ALREADY HELPS THEM
Posted by: USMC VET | October 28, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
I am a disabled vet and my disabled wife and our two small children are desperately trying to move to a safer home.
Posted by: Jerold | January 6, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Substitute who you presently donate to with the following
Top rated fund raisers:
VETERANS & MILITARY AIP GRADE
Armed Services YMCA of the USA A–
Fisher House Foundation A+
Homes For Our Troops A
Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund A+
National Military Family Association A+
Operation Homefront – N.O. B+
Posted by: Sharon | December 19, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
As a disabled vet, I’ve been trying to join the Paralyzed Vets of America. It seems that I can get in touch with the donations people quite easily, but when attempting to contact the membership department to join and seek some help, I get forwarded to someone’s voicemail and no calls get returned. About the only Vets organizations that actually helps veterans that I’ve found are the VFW & the American Legion.
Posted by: Needing Help in Texas | July 7, 2010, 9:27 am 9:27 am