Jan 31, 2008 2:43am

Bill Clinton Undeterred By 9/11 Hecklers

ABC News’ Sarah Amos Reports: Former President Bill Clinton took the phrase "on-message" to a new level in Denver yesterday, when hecklers began shouting about how September 11th was a conspiracy theory that needed further investigation.

Clinton had just begun his speech to the crowd, when a man towards the front of the crowd began shouting about re-opening the 9/11 investigation and the war in Iraq. 

Watch the VIDEO HERE.

When the crowd tried to boo the man into silence, Clinton continued: "Let him talk."

The heckler’s exact wording wasn’t quite audible from the press risers, but the tone was apparent to everyone in the arena, including Clinton. 

“Are you one of those it was an inside job guys?" the former president asked. Continuing, "Hillary agrees we should end the war, but we have heard from you now, now you hear from me.  I let you be rude and interrupt me screaming at the top of your lungs. Nine-eleven was NOT an inside job, it was an Osama Bin Laden job with 19 people from Saudi Arabia, they murdered 3000 Americans and others foreigners including Muslims and we look like idiots, that the people who murdered our fellow citizens did it, when they are continuing to murder other people around the world.  So we heard from you, you go away," Clinton said to the cheering crowd.

(NOTE: Former President Bill Clinton made a mistake when he cited the nationalities of the 9/11 hijackers. In fact, 15 out of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.)

Undeterred, the heckler and his 9/11-sign waving cohorts started up a few minutes later, and Clinton decided to use this opportunity to promote his wife’s record in the Senate.

"One of the reasons you ought to be for Hillary for President, since this has been brought up, is that she helped pass bi-partisan legislation in the Senate to help take care of all those firefighters and police officers who got sick because of 9/11.  You talk to the victims of 9/11, the people who had a dozen surgeries just so that they could go back and their bodies could work again, and you ask them if they think it was an inside job, or whether they are glad they had a Senator like Hillary Clinton who gave them a chance to they could stand up stand start their lives over again," responded Clinton.   

Turns out those were the magic words to finally silence heckler number one.  He silently stormed out of the arena and Clinton, un-rattled, breezed right past the rough start, and delivered an energized speech, selling his wife to the people of Denver. 

A crowd of over four thousand braved an evening deluge of snow to hear Clinton’s speech at Denver University’s Magness arena.  While it was a far cry from the 18,000 people who gathered at the same venue earlier in the day to hear Democratic candidate Barack Obama, the energized crowd was excited to hear Clinton speak.

Clinton made only brief remarks, a departure from his more relaxed town-hall meeting style of campaign stops that were the norm in all four of the early primary states.  He spoke for under 40 minutes, hitting the highlights of Hillary’s platforms on education, healthcare and the war in Iraq. 

Of course, a good heckler loves to have the last word and tonight was no different.  Just when the crowd had finally forgotten the earlier incident and Clinton was hitting what he called "the important reason why people should vote for Hillary," a shout was heard from the last of the 9/11 sign holders.

"How about the real investigation into 9/11?"

Clinton, clearly sick of the entire conversation exchange, "We’ve heard that, we heard you the first ten times." And with that the former President ended the discussion for good. 

User Comments

How about letting Osama bin Laden get out of Africa? This after he was offered up to America on a plate bubba bill?

Posted by: RobertHenry | January 31, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

I don’t know what changed but Sen. Obama and his campaign has taken a real nasty turn.
Let’s get back to talking about Health Care and the Economy – not the negative attacks that I heard from him at his Denver event.

Posted by: Democrat | January 31, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am

How is this heckler’s question any different from Michael Moore’s questions in his movie Farenheit 911? They’re not. Hundreds of millions of people went to see Moore’s questions about 911, and hundreds of millions (including Osama Bin Laden per his video messages) got copies of the DVD. Why? Because people don’t want to face the harsh reality that is the reason for the 911 attacks, the reason for Al Queda’s rebirth in 12/92, and the reason why Osama Bin Laden went from average ranting Islamic extremist to someone out to kill Americans.
pg 48/49 911 Commission Final Report

Posted by: Scott Malensek | January 31, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am

Obama’s negative, really. Apparently you heard nothing of all the race baiting in SC. But okay. Everybody has a right to escape reality every now and then.

Posted by: fraud '08 | January 31, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

The 9/11 “truthers” are lunatics and anarchists, and they deserve to be ridiculed. But Bill Clinton, who refused to take Osama bin Laden from the Sudanese when he had the chance, and failed to take him out when he had the chance later on, bears a LOT of responsibility for 9/11.

Posted by: Stephen A. | January 31, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

Nice of Billy Jeff to finally speak the truth. Its such a rare occasion that he does that.

Posted by: RC | January 31, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am

oh but now we have a 1987 story about Hillary and Wal-Mart.
Where is the 2007 story about Michelle Obama and Treehouse/Wal-Mart?
And now to the excuses Bush gives for 9/11.
If Osama got out of Africa, he was given a red carpet entrance by Bush.
It was his watch. Let’s remember it was also Rudy’s watch. If Hillary had been the mayor of N.Y. all we would have heard about was her imcompetance and lack of judgement in protecting our great city. But it was Rudy, and he’s a superhero, not responsible for policing his own city?
And Bush was only in office a short time. He can’t be held responsible. Oh really? Not ready to be President on day one Porgy?
If it takes more than 10 months to be prepared as President, then why not have left someone else in there until Bush was ready.
Iraq was about daddy, but we had to have 3,942 people die to satisfy an old family feud.
And let’s not forget – the U.S. has to TELL the world we are the only remaining superpower on earth.
Well usually, if you ARE a superpower, your power speaks for itself.
It doesn’t need a cheerleader to remind the world who’s winning the game.
The enemy of Islam they say is Israel. The enemy of Osama is Israel he says.
The enemy of the Palestinians is Israel, they say.
They enemy of Al Qaida is Israel so they say.
So who did they attack? Us. Not their real enemy. And you want to know why? Because the fundamentalist world would not have been around to gloat over 9/11.
It would be 9/12 that the world remembered, when Israel kicked the holy living hell out of most of the Mindless East, without permission from us, or Europe or the U.N. THAT is why WE were bombed and Israel was NOT.
Israel would have put the major points of this war to rest in about a day. Yeah, they have suicide bombers but they don’t have their jets hijacked into their buildings. They don’t have their brave soldiers fighting the wrong battle out of revenge concerning a family feud and being sent home without care or concern.
And all we hear about is Clinton. He is STILL to blame for Bush’s absolute lack of know-how. If Bush had a brain cell it would die from lonliness.
but you all are talking about the Clinton years. Hmmmmm . . .
Cigars.
Sperm on a dress.
Balanced Budget.
Massive SURPLUS.
Low unemployment, higher wages, low gas prices, affordable utilities.
That was also Clinton’s legacy, but we have all you toilet-talking, meth and h00ker using reverend hypocrits forgetting your own truths. Newtie Gingrich was scr3wing HIS own intern while he spoke in the halls of congress about impeaching someone who had an intern.
Ronald Regan is Jesus but he hooked up with Nancy while cheating on his wife and his children, but he is still Jesus.
Now we have a disgustingly poor world image, higher unemployment, a dollar lower than CANADA?, gas prices through the roof, utilities through the roof, no credit, falling home values, falling bridges, torturing people without a trial, veternas hospitals in disgusting filth, veterans pay at an all time low, a trade imbalance that could sink America, poison pet food and poison toys unregulated, China has enough of our debt to send us back into the Dark Ages.
CEOs are making BILLIONS after losing their companies just as much in crooked deals, still waiting for most of the ENRON people to go to jail, the wire tapping illegal mess, Libby pardons while border guards rot in jail, our ports run by the MINDLESS EAST! Oh, and borders wide open. Plus let’s war on Science and choose faith over freedom. Let’s have a theocracy like Iran but with Jesus at the helm rather than nutting Islam. Let’s get rid of the Dept. of Education and turn over teaching to the churches. Let’s tell the world global warming is a myth while praying for the apocolypse and the rapture. That sounds helpful.
Wow, I am so glad we are still bringing up Clinton 8 years later. I am so glad that we have are better off today than our parents were. Our kids are so damn lucky. They are going to owe us BIG TIME for leaving them this perfect world.
(sorry, I had to fix the text from before – typing while on the phone – trying to do 4 things at once :)

Posted by: 2009 Where Are You? | January 31, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

Way to go, Slick.
At least he gets something right – 9-11 Troofers are morons.

Posted by: Good Lt | January 31, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Hillary Clinton is a “Cry Baby”.
Do we need a “Cry Baby” for President?
John McCain best days are behind Him, if he became President what would he do.
The little wife following him around look like she’s 40 years younger than him.
Do we need another 4 years of the Bush era?

Posted by: Boyddollar | January 31, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

Plant. They saw the positive press he got the first time, and decided to orchestrate a much bigger version.
Not impressed.

Posted by: AUA | January 31, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am

I will like to correct the statement someone made about OBL in Africa. He is in Pakistan and not Africa. Please don’t add Africa as one of your ‘axis of evil’
Secondly Clinton did a good job of handling the heckler.Whipping up conspiracy theory will not help the nation moving forward

Posted by: TeeFas | January 31, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am

Responding to Scott’s comment of:
How is this heckler’s question any different from Michael Moore’s questions in his movie Farenheit 911? They’re not. Hundreds of millions of people went to see Moore’s questions about 911, and hundreds of millions (including Osama Bin Laden per his video messages) got copies of the DVD.
Dude, you do realize that there are 300 million people in the U.S., right? So to say hundreds of millions saw his ridiculous propaganda film is…well…a monumental exaggeration.

Posted by: t5 | January 31, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

why is race playing a role in obama’s campaign?
70-80% of African-Americans in each state that has either held a caucus or an election has voted for Obama.
I think voting for someone based on race is a step backwards.

Posted by: jerry | January 31, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

Bad Lt:
Neither “tour-guide-sans-tourists” Roberts nor the JREF denial specialists can explain the physical evidence of officially impossible high temperatures reported by Jones, by the USGS, by RJ Lee and FEMA.
Perhaps you can.

Posted by: twoofermoron | January 31, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

t5: Hillary Clinton support is coming from white woman and white man, because they want to see a white woman become President qualified or not. Race is and issue because it’s alway been a issue.
Former President Bill Clinton is the biggest fate ever. Playing race against race.

Posted by: Boyddollar | January 31, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Obama’s suport is mainly from black men and black women…if race is the issue, we are doomed…selecting the best individual to run our government should be the driving force behind every citizen…Obama is simply not ready to handle this job. Do not be blinded by the color of his skin.

Posted by: gizmo | January 31, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am

t5: Hillary Clinton support is coming from white women and white men, because they want to see a white woman become President qualified or not. Race is an issue because it’s alway been a issue.
Former President Bill Clinton is the biggest fate ever. Playing race against race.

Posted by: Boyddollar | January 31, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

t5: Hillary Clinton’s support is coming from white women and white men, because they want to see a white woman become President qualified or not. Race is an issue because it’s alway been a issue.
Former President Bill Clinton is the biggest fake ever. Playing race against race.

Posted by: Boyddollar | January 31, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am

“My story was never mentioned in the final [9/11 Commission] report and I felt like I was being put on trial in a court room…I finally walked out. They were trying to twist my words and make the story fit only what they wanted to hear. All I wanted to do was tell the truth and when they wouldn’t let me do that, I walked out.”
Firefighter Lou Cacchioli–Witness before the 9/11 Commission. WTC survivor. Retired 20-year veteran of FDNY, Company 47, Harlem. Injuries on 9/11 and toxic dust inhalation forced retirement.
It was a disgrace to everyone, the victims and the family members who lost loved ones. I don’t agree with the 9/11 Commission. The whole experience was terrible.”

Posted by: zelikowismyhero | January 31, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

So Mr Bill by you not getting OBL when you had the chance…3000 Americans were killed. You sir are the idiot!

Posted by: ed | January 31, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

So, how about a REAL investigation into 911?
The family members are demanding it. Are they idiots, too?
Once the Mainstream stops categorizing all “doubters” as “missles, bombs, bush did it inside job” people, which will never happen, we’d be able to speak openly about the serious conflicts of interests and coverups that have occurred.
It’s common sense.

Posted by: DHS | January 31, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

“selling his wife to the people of Denver”
My God, that sounds awful. How stupid does a journalist have to be to phrase it that way?

Posted by: Craig | January 31, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

LOL, Bill Clinton pwned a troofer. Well, he deserved it. Let the troofers go back to the grassy knoll they came from and hope they camp out and doze off in their tents singing “Kumbaya”. Their heckling and conspiracy theories are getting annoying.

Posted by: LOLatthetroofer | January 31, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

I wonder if ythese “hecklers” were Plants too ?

Posted by: DavidE | January 31, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

9/11 inside job conspiracy theorists aren’t morons… they’re Ron Paul supporters.

Posted by: howard | January 31, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

There has never been a real investigation of 9/11. The Family Steering Committee is still advocating for a real investigation. And Hillary hasn’t done squat for the first responders. Neither has Bush or anyone else.

Posted by: simuvac | January 31, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

There are very too many unexplained inconsistancies in the 9-11 commission report, and an obvious avoidance to finding out what really happened on
Sep 11, 2001. Why for example were not the people at ground zero given their say. They saw, up close what was going on. One might wonder why B. Clinton wouldn’t encourage a real and indefpendent investigation.

Posted by: Philip J Dennany | January 31, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Bill Clinton again and again and again. It’s like that scene from the Brady Bunch when Marcia gets hit in the nose. Please make it stop. Please make him go away . . . forever!

Posted by: brooks of sheffield | January 31, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Whoever typed the transcription made an important ommission. My correction is emphasized in asterisks.
He actually says, “we look like idiots *denying* that the people who murdered our fellow citizens, did it.”

Posted by: ScrewLooseChange on Myspace | January 31, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Bill Clinton knows it is not an inside job. Bill knew where the people are from and who they are. He knew them when he was in office. He had no time to chase them because his involvment with Monica Lewinski was top priority for him. He was more interested in what was under the table than the intelligence papers that were on the table.
Now shamelessly he is saying he knows Hillary is the best person for the job. He didn’t think Hillary was good for the job Monica was doing for him.

Posted by: Markus Nezpick | January 31, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Why are we blaming this heckling of Bill Clinton on the Obama camp? There is no linkage whatsoever.
Bill handled these guys like a pro and good for him for staying on message.

Posted by: N8Ma | January 31, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

9/11 may have not been an inside job but the planting or the hecklers in the audience sure as heck was…

Posted by: citizen for honest government | January 31, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

of course President clinton was the only man that ever?????? Mccain,s past “Marie, the flame of florida” exotic dancer Oh!@ No Not a christian republican, McCain,s rich wife of Anhenser Busch family no mention of this but remember John Kerry rich wife?????? Did they ever let up on her ???Did Bush inhale??/ Clintons stole from the white house when they left. Ronnie got air force one no mention of this steal.

Posted by: de lo | January 31, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

You have to ask yourself, “why do so many people question what happened on 9/11?” It’s simple, the official explanation is obviously flawed and suspect. You can shout a heckler down but reality has a way of winning in the end!

Posted by: allans2k7 | January 31, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Markus Nezpick if your beloved President Bush would have listen to the briefing about Osama when the power of commard was handing over to him I would bet there wouldn’nt even been a 911 to talk about.

Posted by: Bob | January 31, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Despite the unofficial entry of Slick Willey into the race (those of you who think that a vote for hillary is not a vote for bill are in denial), I can not cast my vote for hillary.
consider this:
if Hillary is elected into the white house that will mark the 24 yrs of our country being ran by the same two families. Bush and Clinton. I can’t speak for you guys but a monarchy is as a monarchy does. It’s bad enough our democracy has certainly blurred the line to a oligocracy.
I feel like no matter how obama’s campaign goes barring any serious mishaps his platform is such that we should give a non W.A.S.P. a chance. Its about time a country made up of immagrants have a minority leader.
At this point I cant see how he could make our country worst…

Posted by: Jon | January 31, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

How about the people that feel as if the government is a complete failure in every endeavor that they decide to undertake?? Instead of arguing we need to throw ALL of these bums out into the street and start over fresh with a SMALL government that was framed in the constitution. NOT one that has a “defense” department that just “misplaces” over a TRILLION dollars BEFORE 9/11. WHY GIVE THEM MORE MONEY??? THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO GET IT RIGHT, SO GET THE HELL OUT OF THE PEOPLES PERSONAL LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO UNIVERSAL ANYTHING….IT WILL BE MORE OF A MESS, MORE $2,000 DOLLAR TOILET SEATS…MORE $400 HAMMERS…MORE WASTE, MORE FRAUD.

Posted by: nope | January 31, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Honest and intelligent people understand that the overwhelming preponderance of evidence indicates that the 9/11 attacks were conducted with the complicity and pre-planning of the current administration. The Clintons are a part of the same power structure, and will always stand with the co-religionists, the Bushes. To expect otherwise is folly. Similarly Obama. Similarly McCain. Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. Your children are meat for your masters.

Posted by: Albert Hall | January 31, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Why are they heckling Clinton, it’s the nuts who are in Washington right now that covered up whatever happened.
Building 7 imploded and the 911 commision didn’t even mention it.

Posted by: Fred | January 31, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

i’m black and i’m voting for barack not based on the color of his skin but the need for change in this country.
for years now, america has had to deal w/ the fight between liberals and conservatives, a fight that stems from the baby boomers split in the ’60′s which continues to this day (i’ve heard it called a fight between the hippies and the squares). As a gen X’er I’m sick of this fight. it is time that we work across party lines and ideology to get this country in a better position to address the challenges of the 21st century and to be bettered prepared to deal with the growing military power (China), diplomatic power (EU), and economic power (EU, China, India, Russia) of other nations and regions. we cannot be at our best if we are split. we may not agree on everything but we must work together nonetheless. the issues that are currently being discussed are the same issues that they were talking about when i first started voting in the early 90′s. the 1st clinton did not resolve these issues, bush was not able to do it and i don’t believe clinton will be able to do it either. its not because she is white, its not beacuse she is a woman, it is because she is part of the old way of thinking (us vs. them mentality) that must end for the interest of the country.
if HRC get the nominee, i will vote for mccain. i know he has the ability to work with others, that’s why many in his party hate him so much. in the end, you must vote for the one who you believe will be the best person to put the country in a better position to for the future. i think mccain would do fine for 4 years, then in 2012 we can pass the torch to someone who is not tied to the fight between the hippies and the squares.

Posted by: Michael | January 31, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

HaHaHa Slick Willlie making a fool of himself: he doth protest too much, don’t he? HaHaHa Clinton is one of the September Criminals and he’s a little worried

Posted by: Arthur Fischl | January 31, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Most people in this country are so ignorant and so detached from reality that suggesting anything that might burst their bubble of their perception of America is like telling them their obviously ugly daughter is ugly. She is, but they love her so much, they ignore the imperfections and accept her as she is.

Posted by: AgreeWithFraud'08 | January 31, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

We know now, about state-sponsored false-flag terror ops. See Webster Tarpley, “9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA”

Posted by: Arthur Fischl | January 31, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Ha! America: The obviously ugly daughter…

Posted by: Jon | January 31, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Fraud 08? Don’t you mean Fraud 2000 and 2004?
You tell me what it was about. Sec. of State Rice has herself stated that there is no evidence that there was any credible offer to hand over Bin laden. This is simply a stry that Faux news ran and ran with.
Also, if it was so obvious that Bin laden should have been taken in or taken out, why didn’t the Bush administration do so when they took office?
This is all just examples of the GOP and the Neo-cons trying to scare and confuse the America people, and they are true traitors to everything we hold dear.
So keep kidding yourselves that it’s all Bill’s fault, if that helps you sleep after 8 years of the GOP destroying America.

Posted by: Dan Sarazen | January 31, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

C’mon, if you can’t see that 911 was a least covered up, you are about as dumb as they think you are.
The theories exist because there are no credible official accounts of the story!,
or at least enough of one to counter what some people have discovered.
Terrorists could not pull this attack off today, like they couldn’t on that day because the air defense systems are virtually unchanged !, at a minimum our masters let it happen, period.

Posted by: Fred | January 31, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Bill’s right, 9/11 was perpetrated by al-CIA-duh. (WTC 7 didn’t blow itself up)

Posted by: Dave | January 31, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Dave, WTC didn’t “blow itself up.” It fell down due to have debris from two much larger buildings (that ALSO were not blown up) fall down on top of it.
A little reality goes a long way.

Posted by: HDK | January 31, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Last I heard, lots of 9/11 first-responders are dying from severe respiratory problems. They inhaled air full of asbestos after Christine Todd Whitman declared that the air around ground zero was safe.
C’mon people! Even the former italien president has come out and said 9/11 was an inside job. And ever heard of Robert Baer? The ex-CIA guy who wrote the book which was the inspiration for Syriana said 9/11 looks like an inside job. It’s all not that far-fetched me thinks.

Posted by: Charlie | January 31, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Bill Clinton is too close to 9/11 to be impartial. To ask for a new independent investigation is not crazy, and those who do so are not ‘rioters’. They are ordinary people like myself who have looked at the evidence and find serious reasons to doubt the official story. Until an independent, international investigation is instigated we will continue to call for one.

Posted by: Andrew Lowe Watson | January 31, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

I see the usual comments from the “head in the sand” crowd. Troofers, tin-foil hat name calling. Funny, they never seem to want to talk about the thousands of unanswered questions about 9/11.
Don’t you think it’s odd that all these supposed leaders have the exact same attitude about 9/11? Nothing to see here, move along. The case was solved within hours on 9/11, no need to ask any more questions. Usually, when someone doesn’t want any questions asked, they have something to hide.
The media told you Osama controlled the operation from a cave and his 19 cavemen did the whole operation. We don’t need to provide any stinkin evidence, believe what you’re told.
Case closed.
Yeah right, and Osama made the trillion dollar military STAND DOWN during the 2 hour event. You have to be a COMPLETE SAP to believe this laughable story.
Do your own research people

Posted by: Roger | January 31, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Problem: Millions of Americans are think 9/11 was an inside job.
Why does Clinton mock them, when a real investigation would shut these people up?
Instead we just go on fighting the ’9/11 Wars’.
Kinda makes ya wonder, doesn’t it?

Posted by: Kevin O | January 31, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

“Snake of a Woman” …. I have heard a lot of people say that about HRK…. But when
I ask them why, they can’t explain. One of my friends said that she “looks
cunning”, or she took advantage of the Bill Clinton – Monica Lewinsky episode
(sympathy factor). I would say that it was something that was private to their
family, and even if it is true, taking into account that we are talking about
the first family it was the most pragmatic thing that any one could have done.
She stood by her husband and tried to diffuse the whole issue and get to the
“real” issues concerning the “nation”. And if some one is judging
based on looks or likability factor( sweet, cunning , polite ..whatever), I say
u gotta look at what their polacies than their looks.
Ok, forget the past , the best thing abut HRK that I like is that she explains
her plan, she doesn’t gloss over the whole thing from a very high level and
chant the word “CHANGE”. I agree Obama is an amazing speaker, he can move
people, but, he doesn’t get into the details, this is exactly like John Kerry’s
campaign where he would say that he has a “PLAN” but never explained what the
plan was. Even his website doesn’t support the plans adequately.
HRK is so comfortable in explaining her plan even getting into details, this has happened in every debate, on the other hand Obama delivers amazing one liners – opening statements – and all the stuff which makes an amazing speech without getting into the details – I HAVE TO GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR THAT. And every time when he is posed with a question which needs an explanation he starts chanting “CHANGE”……. COME ON!!!!
And people talk about misrepresentation; I say that the “MEDIA” has got more to
do with this than the candidates or their campaigns.
Finally I would say that we need a “smart and experienced ” president
who can handle the issues at hand and I think Hillary Clinton can do it.

Posted by: VJ | January 31, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

If you think 9/11 was an inside job, then by logic, you are a loser and an intellectual midget. That is scientific fact.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Bill Clinton is undeterred by anything… especially good sense.

Posted by: John T. | January 31, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

as the towers burned, we stood on 6th Ave and 14th street, a group of onlookers. one construction guy mentioned to the others that “if that fire keeps burning like that, the steel foundation will melt and collapse.”
This was by a regular person in the know about construction, commenting BEFORE the towers even fell. Therefore, any moron claiming from their mommy’s basement, that it was not “possible”, is proven to be 100% wrong. These are the weak, timid people of America, who spend time with this idiotic stuff. I wish we could round up all 9/11 inside job conspiracy types, and send them to a island never to return. it’s embarassing to the human race to co-exist with these people.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

There are a lot of unanswered questions about 9/11. I think it was the week of 9/17 that FoxNews’s Brit Hume and Carl Cameron did a 4-part series on how Amdocs and Israeli Mosad were up to their elbows in 9/11; that they fully knew in advance. Those reports were quickly removed from Fox Online without any comment
9/11 truthers are not crazy. There is a lot being hidden from us.

Posted by: TB | January 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Bill might have messed around with a fat chick but Bush screwed the entire world. And disgracefully used 911 and the lives of all those lost to generate HIS war for oil profits at our expense. Why does anyone pay millions to take a Presidential Seat that pays 400k ?
We and our Grandchildrens Grandchildren will get to enjoy the greatest National deficit this world has ever known. While Daddy Warbucks and Richard Cranial sit on easy street with a back pocket packed with your money.

Posted by: bluedot | January 31, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

If you search the ABC site you will find a story about a new book coming out that says that the CEO of the 9/11 investigation met with Karl Rove and that the whitehouse directed the investigation. You may also remember that Bush refused to testify without Darth at his side. Its easy to dismiss someone and their ideas by attacking them, its called an Ad Hominem, meaning attack the person, not the idea or the facts. So keep calling me crazy because I don’t care anymore. The truth is out. If you want to know what it is, you can find out.

Posted by: AJ Fan | January 31, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

“Honest and intelligent people understand that the overwhelming preponderance of evidence indicates that the 9/11 attacks were conducted with the complicity and pre-planning of the current administration.”
How can a “man” be so stupid? Ya, the same administration that can’t deliver a bottle of water to a city after a hurricane, can’t win a war . . . against 3rd World ragheads . . . destroyed the economy . . . screwed up every last thing they attempted . . . but they managed to pull of an “inside job” on 9/11.
It’s scary to have to co-exist with such twits. The intellectual temerity is astonishing. These are the same people who claim bush is “stupid” . . . ya stupid like a clever conspirator! he actually CAN speak in full sentences.
losers is what you are, living in a past that never even existed.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Roger, before speaking tell me something. Have you seen the report I referred to? Those, very detailed investigative reports, were from FoxNews, not some “liberal media”. So if you declare something to be “garbage” without even knowing anything about it, it says a lot about you and your mental capabilities.

Posted by: TB | January 31, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

George W. Bush’s brother Marvin, was on the board of directors of a company providing electronic security for the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, according to public records. The company was backed by an investment firm, the Kuwait-American Corp., also linked for years to the Bush family.
Marvin Bush’s last year on the board at Stratesec coincided with his first year on the board of HCC Insurance, formerly Houston Casualty Co., one of the insurance carriers for the WTC. He left the HCC board in November 2002.
Marvin Bush has not responded to telephone calls and e-mails for comment. If he did, if 9/11 hadn’t been the catalyst for an unnecessary war that enriched Bushites to the entire US treasury; I wouldn’t have doubts about 9/11. I live in Manhattan, and lived here during 9/11. I KNOW the Bushes are in on it.

Posted by: Bill | January 31, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

These conspiracy theories about the WTC have been debunked. It doesn’t matter anyway because these conspiracy theorists wouldn’t accept any evidence, unless it supports, well, their conspiracy theories.

Posted by: JRM | January 31, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

“Marvin Bush” lol. what trash this stuff is. sounds like when i was a kid and we’d try and make up mystery movies. except our fantasies were a lot more interesting.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

why was the 9/11 building rubble shipped off to another country to be melted down? Surely you would want to investigate as much of the rubble as you could for any clues, like in any homicide investigation? This point was made in different words by a former CIA agent on TV, dispute it all you want.
Next, why was 0s4ma’s family flown out so quickly after the event? in a homicide investigation, wouldn’t you want to interview the family of the perp as soon as possible?
the real crime is not the tin foil hatters but the lack of any televised debate and open discussion in a logical way about 9/11.
control the media, control the mind
tv brainwashes you and you eat it all, consumers and mental midgets.
what do I believe? nothing, yet, I don’t know who to believe, I sure don’t trust the unknown mouthpieces, nor do I trust a government, any government to tell me the truth.

Posted by: text messages | January 31, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

War criminal Bill Clinton is — of course — one of the prime suspects for creating this fraudulent “war on terror.” He went to great lengths to NOT catch bin Laden in the 90′s, and he partnered with “Al Qaeda” connected Jihadists in Kosovo and Macedonia.
Clinton’s own CIA “bin Laden desk” officer (Sheuer), claims that Clinton denied action against bin Laden on 10 seperate occasions.
We know that a “war on terrorism” was meant to replace the cold war (on communism) and that this is a long erm strategic plan by US elites and their foreign cronies
We live in “fictional times.” -Michael Moore

Posted by: johndoraemi | January 31, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Obama is more than ready, Clintons are ready to continue to line their pockets and screw the country like the did back in the 90′s and like Bush is doing now.
Obama’s not ready is just plain dog-whistle racism coming from a desperate candidate.

Posted by: John From Kansas | January 31, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Idiot:
“where Department of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff’s cousin works!!!”
What in the name of god has that got to do with ANYTHING. his “cousin” “works” there? that has absolutely no meaning whatsoever.
document ONE thing “Michael Chertoff’s cousin” did to effect the investigation. name his job, what role he played in the investigation/report, what is his relationship with chertoff, etc.
Either that . . . or shut up forever.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

have been debunked? yeah with fact that have no basis with reality. Aluminum planes are not going to destroy a STEEL building, and the flames from a petro fire are not going to melt them either no matter how many scientists say it will, or your stove might melt in your kitchen next time you boil water making your pasta.
Building don’t collasp and oh yeah pancake? why would it, with all the concrete turning to dust in the first seconds,.. what was collasping?? 100 stories?? what happened to the building?

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Idiot:
“Surely you would want to investigate as much of the rubble as you could”
Investigate “rubble”? what are you, 12? how do you “investigate” rubble? what exact procedures are involved? every single piece of concrete should have been “investigated”? i assume i must be speaking with high school or college kids who have never seen the real world? please, don’t tell me you are adults, that would be sad.
i have nothing but contempt for you small minded group-think types who buy into any and all “conspiracy” rumors.
here’s another one these wackos embrace:
there were no dinosaurs on earth, it’s all a “conspiracy”. really. they believe that.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Clinton was largely right in insisting 9/11 was not an inside job, but no self-respecting follower of the Constitution could say that this appalling event was anything like the Official Conspiracy Theory has described.
The US has yet to face the fact that it was outsmarted by those it benefited most and that sure wasn’t the Arabs, was it?
Remember Carl Cameron’s 4 part series on Fox News back in 2001? No, didn’t think so, as it was erased and dropped down the memory hole.
An impartial and judicial investigation of 9/11 has yet to be convened in the States. Why is this, despite Commissioners Kean and Hamilton themselves saying their commission was ineffective and manipulated by the White House?

Posted by: JG | January 31, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

It could be an inside job AND still have been done by the people he said. Nobody is saying it was COMPLETELY an inside job, that’s ridiculous. In fact I think most people who doubt the official explanation KNOW that we don’t know the truth….it’s not like they are saiyng ‘no that’s wrong, here’s how it EXACTLY happened’…what they are saying is what the govt. is telling us on 9/11 is clearly bs and we want a real investigation. Which is totally reasonable.

Posted by: boory | January 31, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

25 year old Benjamin Chertoff was the senior science editor that oversaw the original Popular Mechanics article on the collapse of the buildings.
Doesn’t prove anything but its the fact that none of this stuff has been aired by the main stream press.
It looks bad and should have been investigated.
Do a little of your own research regarding Michael Chertoff, DHS director.
And also ask yourself, “where did they get the term “homeland” to name the department. And why is the former head of the east german secret police working as a consultant for DHS.
Fascism didn’t begin or end in WW2 . .

Posted by: AJ Fan | January 31, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

WAKE UP!!! Those who refuse to see the CLEAR evidence that 9/11 didn’t happen as our government declares are keeping themselves blind to a reality that is too difficult for them to digest. Tell me how a building, that wasn’t even hit by one of the planes, came crashing to the ground as if it were imploded. I am disgusted by anyone who accepts the “official” story as the truth when soley based on their own blind-faith in what the government tells them. WAKE UP and quit being such a non-thinking sheep!

Posted by: Steve | January 31, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

haha get yourself all whipped into a frenzy! the only thing we know: the gov’t failed us on 9/11, and somehow they are the only ones who can save us.

Posted by: HAHA | January 31, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Some who protest are wolfs in sheep’s clothing . . . this is my guess.
Lots of money being made making all of us afraid.
Its the oldest con . . . create the disease and then sell people the cure.
Rent V is for Vendetta and/or Children of Men this weekend if you haven’t seen them. The Good Shepherd is also an excellent film.
You don’t need to be afraid, its a very interesting story and finding out the truth is the ultimate liberation from congnitive dissonance . . you know . . like the thing that had been bothering Neo in the Matrix . . . something is wrong but you can’t put your finger on it.
Peace!

Posted by: AJ Fan | January 31, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

This about sums it up:
“finding out the truth is the ultimate liberation from congnitive dissonance . . you know . . like the thing that had been bothering Neo in the Matrix”
exactly, just like in a fictional sci fi movie. And if the feds are so wicked and efficient . . . why haven’t they rounded you dullards up yet? Now THERE’S a conspiracy I could support.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

The devils’ greatest trick was to let people believe he didn’t exist.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 31, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Yes I truly hope the US rounds up all the 9/11 conspiracy types and banishes them. not for political reasons, just to raise the intellectual level of the country a few notches.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

So we are to believe that ONLY 19 guys pulled off 9/11…end of story ,because the political and corporate elite say so?
The Bush/Clinton apologist have apparently done little or no research on this.The so called “twoofers”did not
invent their claims they are only bringing proper emphasis to glossed over
public knowledge.Stories that are inconvenient to the official narrative
that continuously allows the justification of fear,debt,
profiteering,police state measures(such as “real ID”& spying),endless war,resource conquest and the destruction of our cherished civil liberties and Constitution.
Please people,listen to the whistle blowers such as Sibel Edmonds,Cowleen
Rowley and Ken Williams of the FBI.Or
Lt Col.Anthony Schaffer who spilled the beans on the Able Danger program which
identified several Hijackers 1 year prior to 9/11.If you must appeal to authority than listen to these people
they have risked their jobs and family
to expose the fraud of the official story of 9/11 without personal gain.
If you want to avoid “conspiracy theory”and just want a cohesive,chronological analysis of the events of 9/11 please go to the “center for cooperative reaearch”,every claim there is sourced.Please watch the film
“9/11 Press for Truth”.
Asking questions and holding “leaders”
accountable is our civic duty.These are serious issues and bringing answers to light is in the best interest of freedom
around the world.These things should be debated with facts and civil discourse,not personal insults and appeal to emotion.No one is saying the
whole “government did it” ,however there are undoubtedly criminal elements that need to be brought to justice.

Posted by: sqru2 | January 31, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Wtc 7 fell to the ground after not being hit by a plane. Before it fell, several firefighters told the public to move back because the building was coming down. Larry Silverstein ( the lease holder ), can be seen on youtube claiming that he told the fire fighters to “pull it”.
At the time, some wtc 7 tenants included the securities and exchange commission as well as an office shared by the department of defense and CIA and IRS.
The official explanation is that it fell due to fire, thus making it the first steel frame building in history to do so. Does this mean that the U.S. staged the attack? Of course not. Does this mean that further investigation is warranted? I would say yes.
Every western countries media has asked this question except that of the U.S. Why is that? Its because Americas Next Top Model is on.
The average American has got his head so far in the sand the he/she can be attacked by Saudi Arabians who trained in Afghanistan, retaliate against Iraq and then sell 20 billion dollars worth of weapons to the same people who attacked him (Saudis). Then the same people who lied to them about Iraqs WMD’s tell him/her that Iran has them and now there scared of Iran. What the hell is up with you people?

Posted by: gary | January 31, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Has there ever been any disaster in United States history where all of the wreckage was NOT completely reconstructed to determine the factors that caused any failures??? THEY COLLECTED FRAGMENTS OF A SPACE SHUTTLE FROM ALL OVER THE UNITED STATES TO RECONSTRUCT THE DEBRIS TO DETERMINE WHAT CAUSED THE FAILURES TO PREVENT SUCH FAILURES FROM RE-OCCURRING IN THE FUTURE. If I am to believe sky scrapers collapse due to fire, I would be very concerned about setting foot in any of them. Why wouldn’t they reconstruct the debris to prevent future collapses??????????????

Posted by: nope | January 31, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

9/11 has always been an important subject for me as I often had business at the WTC and had many friends who passed away there on 9/11. I was in a conference on the 106 floor on the Thurs/Fri before the fateful Tuesday.
Anyone who looks at the evidence would have to admit that there are are lot of suspicious looking details especially with the collapse of WTC7, which collapsed later in the day on 9/11. WTC7 was furthest of the WTC builds away from the towers. It wasn’t hit by a plane and didn’t have any major fires, yet is suddenly collapsed late in the afternoon of 9/11. No study has been able to explain this collapse. The 9/11 commission report said it need further investigation – but that hasn’t been funded.
Given that, what would be wrong with a proper investigation. The 9/11 commission was way underfunded compared to other investigations such as TWA 800.
If the suspicious details can be soundly explained in a proper investigation, then we’d be able to put this behind us. Otherwise there will always be some significant doubt.

Posted by: Mark | January 31, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

How about some REAL answers to REAL questions about 911 Billy. You can’t do that because you and your ilk have told so many lies your up to your arse in them. Bldg seven has yet to be explained by the NTSB.They don’t even have a good excuse for not having a good excuse!
Its time for REAL answers to hard questions. I think we must conclude that the ONLY defenders left of the government story line is a right wing magazine. (see all the 911 professionals for truth web sites) Its pathetic that so many Americans cannot be heard in mainstream media. The weight of evidence is on the truthers side.

Posted by: 4TruthNmedia | January 31, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

investigate the rubble losers.
not a SINGLE fact has been presented that would make this “theory” marginally coherent. these are the same people who are walked all over on in life, by insurance salesmen, lovers, teachers, bosses, everyone. they are so meek and small minded, any little mental trick can paralyze them into a frenzy of irrational thoughts.
such as, “cousin”. ya, if MY cousin was responsible for 9/11 I know i’d lie for him, riiight. doesn’t even make sense. go investigate some rubble, schmucks, the rest of us have moved on. 9/11 is sooooo boring.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

The reason the investigatio didn’t report everything is because they didn’t want people to know the towers were built with thermite in them in case they ever needed to be demolished. The energy from the impact ignited the thermite allowing it to melt the beams.

Posted by: Lee | January 31, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I don’t believe Obama is playing the race card — when eveyone, including Bill Clinton continues to ‘remind’ us that he’s African American. For those who incorrectly assert that Obama plays the race card because he’s getting the majority of the African American vote, should consider that African Americans generally vote for a democrat – and maybe all the individual voters are picking the best democrat… and secondly… although he may be getting 70-80% of the African American vote, he did not win Iowa (98% of the state’s population is white) or South Carolina or come in a very close second in NH and Nevada on the African American vote alone… look at the data, he’s carrying the majority of the state.

Posted by: IOWAN | January 31, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

I read all of the comments so far concerning 911. AGAIN…. When confronted with hundreds of pieces of evidence contradicting the official story on 911, the responses are nothing but name calling. It has been said “You get the government you deserve”. Enjoy.

Posted by: Bruce | January 31, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

you have not named a SINGLE “piece” of evidence of any import at all. You think the inept feds are so shrewd and efficient they could pull of 9/11 . . . but couldn’t coorinate a water delivery after a Hurricane.
ya, bush can’t speak in full sentences but he can orchestrate massive conspiracies involving TENS OF THOUSANDS of people, all covering up for him.
you are getting older now, you really haven’t accomplished much (of course that’s the “government’s fault in your mind). you have no credibility, no momentum, nothing is really working out for you. instead of parading around as conspiracy losers, did you ever think of contributing something to your family, to your community, to your government? i didn’t think so. easier to sit around eating corn puffins and blogging in your underwear from mom’s basement.
Go investigate some rubble. LOL! and I mean OL!

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

I’m concerned about Concerned. I mean hey, if you want to round up law-abiding Americans because of what they believe you are about 70 years too late. You see, your idea fits in real well with the philosophy of Nazi Germany under Hitler, we would have appreciated your support. What you need to do now is research how the common people of that country gradually accepted those principles, in hopes that you will wake up and see the error in your statements.
Peace

Posted by: Kansas Farmer | January 31, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Correction
…your idea fits in real well with the philosophy of Nazi Germany under Hitler, he would have appreciated your support.

Posted by: Kansas Farmer | January 31, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

yes i would love it if you were all muzzled, you are nothing but static on the line.
free speech is soooo over-rated. you used to have to put yourself on the line, stand on a soapbox in public, or print pamphlets and hand them out, or appear at public meetings and state your name.
now all you have to do is roll out of bed, hit a switch, and then start rambling like a madman.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

As your own eyes witness — WTC Building #7 (a 47 story high-rise not hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives:
1.
Rapid onset of “collapse”
2.
Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a full second prior to collapse (heard by hundreds of firemen and media reporters)
3.
Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at nearly free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
4.
Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, at the upper 7 floors seen in the network videos
5.
“Collapses” into its own footprint – with the steel skeleton broken up for shipment
6.
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
7.
Tons of molten Metal found by CDI (Demolition Contractor) in basement (no other possible source than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate)
8.
Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
9.
FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
10.
Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
11.
Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1.
Slow onset with large visible deformations
2.
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3.
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4.
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.

Posted by: bofors | January 31, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Good God, thank you for the truthers. It’s proof you’ve got a demented sense of humor at times. lol.
Seriously. I love how some believe because they know the definition of “cognitive disonance” that they are somehow thus impervious to it.
What’s especially galling is how so many ostensibly “bright” individuals can’t use their heads and figure out the truth….but it’s not because they can’t. It is simply because they won’t.
Of course, what I’D like to know from the “truthers” is this: HOW MANY INDIVIDUALS DOES IT TAKE TO PULL OF SUCH AN EVENT LIKE THIS?!?
Think about it…the guy said “pull it” (a non-existent term for controlled demolitions). This means the firemen/policemen MUST have been in on it too if they knew to get out. Of course, MAYBE the firemen who were in the building could clearly SEE the signs that the building was in duress. When reported to the leasee, maybe he clearly understood that there was no point in trying to save the building (alot of lives had already been lost, you know?).
Now, OF COURSE something fishy must have been up…the IRS, CIA, FBI, heck, probably even the iluminati had offices in building 7. THAT’s WHY they had to destroy it!
But wait! They weren’t CENTRAL offices! They don’t contain the ONLY copy of records. WHAT WOULD BRINGING THE BUILDING DOWN THEN ACCOMPLISH?!?
I loved a “Rebutal to PM” book regarding 9/11…it’s even loonier than expected. One guy ridicules a statement by an FAA investigator who said he picked up part of a tail section at the pentegon. Of course, this is a silly statement contended the book…tail sections are 20 feet tall! Of course, it couldn’t be that the tail section wouldn’t survive a 500+mph crash into a reinforced building in one pieces, NO! The FAA investigator MUST be in on the conspiracy!
On and on ad nauseum. Thankfully their lunacy is at least entertaining…but so very sad at the same time. Did I say that the “truthers” are bright? Sorry…I meant to say moronic.

Posted by: Chris | January 31, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

eejits.
Jet fuel is kerosene. It does not burn anywhere near hot enough to melt or weaken steel.
That is the fact that nobody wants to discuss.
And, how come there has NEVER been a skyscraper collapse from fire – hell, years ago an airliner crashed into the Empire State Building. AS of last weekend it was still standing.

Posted by: realist | January 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Well, the real interesting stuff about 9/11 was that the only connection between the hijackers and anyone else was a $100,000 payment wired from a chief of Pakistan’s ISI to Mohammad Atta and Atta actually wired back the portion he didn’t use to the same guy! ISI and CIA are very close since the Soviet war in Afghanistan.
How about two of the hijackers being interviewed in Saudi Arabia AFTER 9/11 and claiming that it wasn’t them (clearly) because they were still alive? They claimed someone must have used their identities and that they hadn’t left Saudi at all.
The administration and Congress resisted the 9/11 commission and only held it after people got angry – especially surviving spouses.
Look at that Tilghman guy. These people do make up stories and hide things. I’m not saying the government was involved, but the investigation was clearly inadequate and ZERO effort was made to uncover any facts that did not fit with the narrative that the people running this circus chose to promote.

Posted by: Curious | January 31, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Concerned,
just explain in your best popular science debunking language,….
where did the bottom floors and basement of WTC 1 & 2 go?

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

IF, the Clinton’s(Co-Presidency,right?)
Administration was NOT so inept, since
being offered BinLaden several times on a silver platter and NOT knowing what to do, we would NOT have faced yet another attack on the WTC. It was on “their watch”, that we had a first WTC and they wrongly treated it as a police matter, rather than “Terrorism”,
and since we looked weak and vulnerable,
they tried for the bigger & better bang
on 9/ll. Remember how the Clintons tried to get the tv film squashed?-”Path
to 9/ll”. Why do you suppose that was-
IT WOULD SHOW THE INEPTNESS OF THEM AND THEIR ADM. – THAT’S WHY. ALSO, DO YOU THINK SANDY BERGER WOULD HAVE BEEN STEALING N.A. INCRIMINATING PAPERS ON THIS FOR THE CLINTONS, IF THEY WERE NOT TRYING TO HIDE THE FACTS? THEY “ALL KEEP
TRYING TO REWRITE THEIR HISTORY, BUT IT WON’T WORK, AS PEOPLE ARE FINALLY STARTING TO LOOK AT THE CLINTON’S AND THEIR DIRTY ADMINISTRATION WITH MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS.
THEY, WITH THEIR DUBIOUS PASTS, ARE MERE
“POWER/MONEY MONGERS” IN THEIR LUST FOR
A RETURN TO THE WHITEHOUSE, AND AMASSING
THEIR PERSONAL FORTUNES-NO MATTER WHERE THE CONTRIBUTIONS COME FROM, WORLDWIDE.
THE ‘MONEY LAUNDERING FUNDS THROUGH THEIR LIBRARY’ AND HIDING BEHIND THOSE DONORS AND THE PAPERS THEY WON’T DISCLOSE, SAYS WHAT THESE TWO ARE ALL ABOUT—-”THEMSELVES”, NOT THE COUNTRY
THEY HAVE RAPED, IN MANY WAYS FOR THEIR
PERSONAL LUSTS AND WEALTH.

Posted by: Jo | January 31, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

“where did the bottom floors go”?
who the hell cares where they went?
you are all delusional at psychiatric levels. if you actually think ANY of this is true, you should be labatomized. yes, every italian and irish and puerto rican and jamaican firefighter and cop was in on this and none has said a WORD about it.
you are third rate intellectuals, a veritable five and dime store for ideas.
why don’t you tell ME, why a construction worker in my presence, PREDICTED the fall of the towers AFTER the crash and before the towers fell, as the natural consequence of all the heat from the fire?
i guess these idiots never even saw the vidoe of 9/11 itself, what else explains a moronic comment like that fire wasn’t “that hot”?

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

why is race playing a role in obama’s campaign?
70-80% of African-Americans in each state that has either held a caucus or an election has voted for Obama.
I think voting for someone based on race is a step backwards’
Why is it a step backwards, Jerry? Are you not African-American? Why are you hating? White folks have stood behind their people whether they were right or wrong, and even for no other reason because they were white, and have control over this country. You, the media,and eveybody is trippin cause Black folks are getting out to vote and voting for Obama. Obama is qualified, and not because he is Black. Hillary can’t control Bill, how she gonna control this country. Plus it would be just like him being President again. That’s what the Bush administration was about. GWB finishing off his father’s dreams. Enough of the recycling of presidents.

Posted by: Roscoe | January 31, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

On the note of the structural failure of the WTC towers – fire won’t “melt” the beams. However, steel is a hardened material. This hardening process is what creates the immense rigidity within steel. It is the rigidity that allows us to use it as a building material in skyscrapers like the towers. The problem with steel is that, while it doesn’t melt, it looses 60% or more of its rigidity once it has reached 1000 degrees Fahrenheit. A typical fire, especially a fire that was flashed with jet fuel early will for sure burn well over 1000 degrees Fahrenheit. How do we counter this now? We spray the steel in a fireproofing material that adheres to the steel and also acts as an extinguishing agent to the fire thus putting the fire out the same way a fire extinguisher would by smothering the fire. This material is not light by any means, so, to reduce the weight of the building a new spray-on lightweight fireproofing material was utilized. This material had not gone through as extensive of testing as existing methods of fireproofing.
Now, onto more specific information about the design of the WTC towers – they were not a typical skyscraper structural system. Typically we build skyscrapers on a structural system that creates “bays” within the structure which yields columns in the interior plan of the building. Instead, the design of the WTC towers was a new design concept by Yamasaki (the architect). The building consisted of a central high compression concrete core that housed the lavatories and the elevators. The exterior was a steel “cage” that consisted of heavy duty wide-flange columns (I-beams used as columns with very thick pieces of material to make them) and cross support by other structural steel members. These two elements were then connected by open web joists – the type of roof structure you see in your local Wal-Mart. Each open web joist was pinned by 2 bolts at each end – 2 bolts at the exterior steel structural “cage” and 2 bolts connecting the open web joist to an L-flange that embedded in the central concrete core. These joists also now create the lateral support between the central core and the exterior “cage,” creating a column free interior space which yields more usable (read as rentable or money intake) space. Then, as a final decorative element, the exterior columns were wrapped in an aesthetic trim panel. Aluminum if I remember correctly, but I might be incorrect on the material. Also, something to note is that when the structure was designed for the building by the structural engineering firm it was designed to take a hit from an airplane. They figured for the largest plane at the time which was considerably smaller than what did hit the WTC towers. And by considerably smaller, I’m talking the wingspan primarily. The wingspan of the largest plane at the time, no matter where it would of hit the towers would of never been able to reach the central core. But, in our bigger is better society we had to build larger aircraft with a larger wingspan – so large that it could indeed hit the central core no matter WHERE it hit the tower.
Now, for why the towers fell – When the planes hit the towers they hit the towers with such great velocity and force the fireproofing was blown off of the steel structure. This already puts the entire building at risk. Once the fire started and the jet fuel was ignited and created the explosion that has been talked about in this lengthy list of user comments, the temperature of the fire reached well over 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. This caused the steel in the open web joists to loose its rigidity and start to deform. The deformed in the effect that mid point of the open web joist began to sag creating a longer distance from pin connection to pin connection. (We all know a curved line from point A to point B is longer than a straight light from point A to point B) As this open web joist sagged it placed a tremendous shear force on the pins that connected the open web joist to the central core and the exterior “cage.” These pins finally failed once they reached their maximum shear force causing the open web joists closest to the original impact to fall straight down and initiate the pancake effect. As the pancake effect too its course down the building the lateral support was now devoid causing the cage to be pulled inward from the reactionary forces taking place from the pancaking. This caused the exterior walls to fall inwards and make it look like the building was imploded.
If you do general searches on Google for images of the failed steel from the WTC you will see pictures of steel and how it is bent inwards from this effect as well as mangled open web joists. It is quite a sight to see. The original building design was absolutely ahead of the time – creating a column free interior in a building as large as that. Looking back at it now, as much of a great idea as it was at the time, it was most likely ahead of the time, hence the reason we don’t see it anymore and we have (for the most part) gone back to the traditional bay system of structural design.

Posted by: Architect in NV | January 31, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Architect in NV
you logic is good but if a large precentage of the concrete making up the upper floors is turned to dust and the steel beams ejected, what made up the mass that carried the pancake collaspe to the lobby level?? and then left no recongisible sign that it was in fact the upper floors?

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Every single bad act done in history that wasn’t done by an individual acting alone, was done by two or more persons acting in concert; would properly be referred to as a ‘conspiracy’. So how come ######### keep throwing out the ‘C’ word, and then congratulating themselves? Because the only thing the loons can do is mock out their opponents or ignore them. Their attempts at counter argument don’t meet the smell or laugh test.

Posted by: JoeRyan | January 31, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Once everyone (including the “truth movement”) gets past Controlled Demolition, etc…. we can move on to the more poignant topics, like foreknowledge, criminal negligence, perjury, and treason.
Until then we’ll just be debating the same old magic bullet/grassy knoll nonsense for decades.
So let’s grow up, together.
Why is it wrong to demand accountability from our elected officials? It’s their job to answer to us, not to chastise us for questioning them.
Simple.

Posted by: DHS | January 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

jet fuel burns at 495 Fahrenheit
structural steel has to be heated to 1600 degrees to weaken it by half – but recent experiments in Britain say 1700 degrees Fahrenheit is needed.
where did the extra 1200 degrees come from? paper and plastic and carpet burning do not get anywhere near hot enough. Maybe it was the concrete burning?

Posted by: realist | January 31, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

LOL! Now added to the conspiracy is that the government placed fake “construction workers” on various street corners during 9/11, such as on 6th Ave and 14th Street, to make statements suggesting the impending fall of the towers was due to the explosion . . . and not a “com-spiracy”. you people are a sad bunch. this was a RANDOM person to me, and that statement alone is far greater evidence than ANYTHING ever put forth by your schmucks.
i’ve seen the video a million times. it appears as if the building is crumbling under it’s own weight after giving in due to fire. any other interpretation is delusional.
it’s a shame people can put letters and words together that technically form sentences, but are so devoid of intellect they are for all purposes meaningless.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Greg – You bring up a good point. You may not be aware of the construction of buildings though. On top of these open web joists that created the lateral support as well as the floor structure is a layer of corrugated metal decking with L-flange steel sections at the edges and then concrete is poured into these “forms,” thus causing the floor of the building that is then covered with your finish floor material. The steel structure did not magically disintegrate, nor did that concrete. In a fight between lightweight concrete (the floor slab – 75-100lbs/sq.ft.) and aluminum the concrete is always going to win – even if it is lightweight concrete. These steel open web joists and concrete floor slabs are what fell and created the pancaking effect. They then pulled the exterior wall in, on top of the floor slabs that were pancaked at the bottom creating a “structural lasagna” if you will. Starting with the basement floors and walls (concrete) that were shored up to hold back the water of the harbor (yes, the hydrostatic pressure is great enough to effect the basement walls that far inland), then the floor slabs, then the exterior wall, with a fine mix of fireproofing material dust scattered in there (most likely the toxic dust in the air for months following), and also a final sprinkling of concrete rubble from the central core mixed in. I will look at the photo you posted when I get home this evening Greg and add some comments to it and repost. There was a private, individual investigation performed on the structural failure of the towers – just it wasn’t as publicly pronounced as everything else. There was a video that accompanied it as well – I will have to get the video title from a friend and let you know. The video shows computer generated models of the collapsing building, up close footage of the debris, original drawings, etc. Feel free to contact me at the e-mail address provided on my name for further discussion.

Posted by: Architect in NV | January 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

i certainly didn’t vote for any “elected official” to waste time muddling around with the insane rantings of a conspiracy group.
get your own investigation, get some SERIOUS people on your side, with credibility, and file your own report, and see if the public gives it any more credence than the tripe you have to date offered. a bunch of kids asking silly “questions” does not constitute an alternative theory.

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

it took 3 weeks of bird dogging by former NYC police and fire dept. employees to force Guilliani to see the light of day and drop his presidential campagin.
every candidate should be forced to take a stand on the validity of the 9/11 commission report and any of them that do not call for a NEW investigation should be run out of town just like Rudy was.
it’s amazing that in 2008 anyone who stepped up and ran on a platform of getting to the truth about 9/11 would have the support of about 62% of the American public, since that’s about the number who don’t believe the official CONspiracy story they’ve allowed the media to create

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Good job President Clinton. Counteract with facts. I loved you when the right wing, whacked, Crucible freaks went after you relentlessly, I loved you as President, I love you talking to the crowds daily, but I love you so much more now that you are stumping for HILLARY! You are both good people in regards to public service, and that is all I need. HILLARY ’08!

Posted by: inkrun | January 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

@Architect in NV
Your post excludes the idea that 47 interior steel core columns would provide resistance against the inward sagging of floor trusses.
Your statement about fireproofing is unproven.
NIST tested this theory by simply
shooting shot gun rounds at a fireproofed steel sample in a box.
“This already put the WHOLE building at risk”How?You fail to explain the manner in which the top 30 or so floors can
power through 80 undamaged intact floors
all the while outwardly ejecting the debris needed to the provide energy necessary to overcome the path of most resistance.
I am not qualified to discuss this with any authority but several rebuttals have been made by profesionals in your field at ae911truth.

Posted by: sqru2 | January 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

realist – you are incorrect in your numbers about jet fuel burning and steel failing. Jet fuels maximum burning temperature is 980 degrees Celsius which is equivalent to just under 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. And steel starts to notice structural failure at 1000 – 1200 degrees Fahrenheit – dependant on the amount of carbon in its makeup. Common structural steel is A36 steel. Typical carbon steel (no more than 2.1% carbon – anything over this is now considered “cast iron” and no longer steel) will begin to melt at 1130 degrees Fahrenheit and is completely liquid by 1315 degrees Fahrenheit.
You really need to trust the architect who is a fidiciary, and this architect specializes in structure.

Posted by: Architect in NV | January 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

62% of americans are NOT conspiracy loons. why would anyone take a report as 100% true? ever heard of . . . mistakes? as if that equates with believing in an “inside job”. in fact only a tiny percentage of unstable types with access to computers fall for this comic book fantasy stuff.
i do not want any elected official wasting time with a fringe conspiracy group. move on to the man never walked on the moon bit or something, this bit is getting old

Posted by: Concerned | January 31, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

sqru2 – I appreciate your information. The material that was used on that particular project is no longer available. They did not use the exact same product – they used a similar product in their tests. And, to say the least – I don’t trust their test. A shotgun to a small piece of steel compared to an extremely large (larger than necessary in my opinion, but thats for another day) flying into a building … better yet, clipping one floor of a building. Thats comparing apples to watermelons – sorry to say.
And to your question about how do the top 30 floors power through 80? It’s a result of a chain reaction. You have to take into account the amount of force that a multi-ton assembly of steel and concrete will gain over the 14 or 16′ floor to floor height. The first floor that falls gains its momentum and hits the next floor down which slows it down, but the force is still enough to cause shear failure across the pins that connect the open web joists to the core and the exterior. Well, now you have twice the force (weight) which is going to pick up velocity faster creating an even larger force on the next floor down, and on and on, all the way down. Once you get through the first several floors there is no hope for any of the floors underneath since the building is devoid of interior columns there is no resistance except at the end pin connections which aren’t nearly strong enough with only 2 bolts. Once you have a large enough span of unsupported exterior cage (after a series of floors have failed and started to pancake) the exterior cage becomes structurally unsound and becomes wobbely since it is now devoid of the lateral support to support the floors above the initial impact. Now, these floors fall the even larger distance until they catch up with the floors that have already started to pancake adding even more force at a tremendously higher velocity to power on through the remaining floors with ease.
Make sense? It was really a combination of a lot of smaller things that created an almost unimaginable chain reaction that in the end caused the buildings to fail structurally. Everyone that is interested in this, and questions this, should really read the book “Why Buildings Fall Down.” It explains this same phenomenon in greater detail than I care to go into on a user comments board.

Posted by: Architect in NV | January 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

What will it take?

Posted by: Patriotsact | January 31, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

i never said, 62% believed ANY conspiracy, I said,… 62% of the American public don’t believe the finding of the 9/11 Commission….
and Mistakes are one thing,… Obstruction and misrepresentation and delibratly leaving out facts and wittness’s testimony are another,
it’s called LYING!!!!!

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Concerned
a bunch of kids asking silly “questions” does not constitute an alternative theory.
and 15 million dollars and the 9/11 Commission report does not constitute the TRUTH or the FACTS of what happened that day. “not any kind of truth”
when Bush got on TV and warned us not to believe in conspiracy theories, i knew there was a stink to be stunk

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Architect, thank you for your lengthy analysis. Have you tried submitting your findings to refute the research done at Architects and Engineers for Truth? I think they would welcome your input. Not being an engineer myself, but having worked in a steel foundry and as a welder, I can tell you that the dispersion of heat through the virtual network of metal at WTC1, WTC2, WTC7 would have been great. (Remember the famous pictures of that woman standing unscathed in the gaping plane-hole?) In other words, what little fuel there was to burn after the impact explosion would transfer precious little heat capable of deforming any beams. Also, please explain why the core columns at no time remained visibly standing, as though they had been destroyed from a different force altogether. Too, I wonder why explosives were never seriously considered by NIST as a source of the three buildings’ collapses, so thoroughly similar to a controlled demolition (sudden, symmetrical) as they were. Especially the inexplicable Building 7. Why did they start with the “reason” for the collapses and then try (quite unsuccessfully) to force the computer model to fit their “reason” — why did they not simply use scientific methodology? I think you can appreciate that.

Posted by: tman | January 31, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Concerned
you have any idea of who Michael Chertoff is? or what he was doing on and around 9/11/2001?
and if you’re intrested in learning some of the real facts, you should take a look at the Greame Macqueen review of the statements taken of the NYFD personel in the weeks after 9/11, it’s very understandable why the 9/11 Commission didn’t want to hear any of their testimony in the hearings live on CSPAN

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Architect in NV — just noticed a huge error you probably want to be corrected on — “Typical carbon steel will begin to melt at 1130 degrees Fahrenheit and is completely liquid by 1315 degrees Fahrenheit.”
This is accurate: “Typical structural steel’s melting point is about 2750 degrees Fahrenheit (twice what you state); 1517 degrees is the highest attainable temperature of hydrocarbon fuels, absent a premixing mechanism; a far lower temperature.”

Posted by: tman | January 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

sorry — some from a different post, but true nonetheless.

Posted by: Jack | January 31, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

It’s funny that someone mentions the grassy knoll. Did you know who was chair of the Warren Commission? Gerald Ford. Do you know when Spiro Agnew was pushed out of office for his tax peccadilloes? It was well into the Watergate investigation/scandal and at a point when insiders knew they needed a reliable guy to hand out pardons and who the country wouldn’t freak out about if he became president (Agnew was a Greek Orthodox Catholic, which would have really freaked people out).
Agnew was out and Ford was in. It was Alexander Haig, Cheney, Rumsfeld, all of them in the Nixon White House planning out the end game because Nixon was caught.
Ford played that bull about issuing pardons and stopping any investigation of how deep the Watergate scandal went to “help the country heal.” I wonder why burglars and robbers don’t use that logic at their trials, “I think that you should drop the charges so that we can have a time to heal.”
The idea that something as heinous as a sitting president using power to break into the offices of political adversaries and that an investigation was purposely ended that could have revealed involvement by CIA and FBI and perhaps other agencies is truly criminal. Even though Ford said to the American people that they “needed to heal” they wanted blood. Most Americans were stunned and extremely pissed off and they, just like French revolutionaries would have loved to see someone publicly executed.
If you make the assumption that this place is run by ethical people who seek to further the best interests of America rather than their own interests or the interests of their benefactors and contributors, you are applying a standard to them that you would not apply to anyone else – not coworkers, not bosses, not anyone in private industry. The entire society operates on self interest, but these people are assumed to have pure motives and then once you make that assumption, all they have to do is present a fabricated justification consistent with your expectations to justify anything. Iraq’s a great example of that.

Posted by: Gerald | January 31, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

“Concerned” wrote:
“this message board should be deleted. NOW. take it down ABC, you are a fraud.”
When bullying, insulting and name-calling doesn’t intimidate – and the truth continues to emerge – that’s when “concerned” people try to get others to shut off the lights to try to keep us all in the dark.
Too late. We saw. We know.

Posted by: tman | January 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

All you need to know??
No the problem is,… once you know, then what do you do, as seen here even confronting them publicly doesn’t get you any answers, the best part of this is that it’s gotten the questions of 9/11 into the spotlight. All of the candidates need to be asked these kind of questions at every public appearance. the only way to fix what’s wrong is to elect people who will do something, not just talk about it, there must be a full independent investigation into the failures of the 9/11 Commision and the continuing obstruction of justice by the FBI for witholding video tape evidence of the attack on the Pentagon

Posted by: Greg | January 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Well it’s “Concerned” or is that really cornered misspelled against the rest of us Idiots. Gee he is the smartest guy I’ve ever read. Ricky Bobby would be proud. He seems to believe the finiacial crisis and all the other problems are accidental where the government is concerned.
Concerned for President for a better America. Oh excuse me, it would actually be the same America.
Americans in my opinion are the greatest people on earth with possibly one of the worst governments. How does this happen?

Posted by: Jim | January 31, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

As a non-conspiracy theorist, I’m flabbergasted to hear Bill Clinton going-off on the question about whether he’d look into 9-11. Me thinks Bill doest protest too much. It was an honest question, but he sure took it personally. Bill’s reply, that Al Qaeda is killing people all around the world, was a non sequitur as well – being that 9-11 took place in New York City – not around the world. I say I’m not a theorist, nor will you be:

Posted by: Peggy McGilligan | January 31, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

ROBERT BOWMAN – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.
GENERAL WESLEY CLARK – U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. European Command, which included all American military activities in the 89 countries and territories of Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Additionally, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), which granted him overall command of NATO military forces in Europe 1997 – 2001. Awarded Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart for his service in Viet Nam and numerous subsequent medals and citations. Graduated valedictorian of his class at West Point.
MAJOR GENERAL ALBERT STUBBLEBINE – U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 – 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) – Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense during the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart). Appointed by President George H.W. Bush to serve on the American Battle Monuments Commission (1990 – 1994), and on the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces. Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, D.C. 1990 – 1994.
Just a small sample of the people that have been labeled idiots by Billy Boy and some here.
Wake UP!

Posted by: wakeup | February 1, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

An architect above makes a case for the “pancaking” of floors, which the official NIST study originally supported but has since backed away from. The NIST has presented no arguments about why the complete collapse took place, as the mandate of its investigation was the ONLY look at what they thought INITIATED the collapse sequence. In a letter from NIST it is clearly stated, “…we are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse…” Catherine S. Fletcher, Chief, Management and Organization Division is response to a request to correct errors in the original report.
I appreciate the architects concern and knowledge of building structure, but he is operating with a faulty premise. The explanation offered by the FEMA and NIST studies refused to take into their working hypothesis the possibility of cutter charges and/or explosive incendiaries being used to assist with the destruction of the towers. Hence, their analysis fails to account for explosives residue found in micro-spheres of once-molten iron, or the presence of once-molten spheres of molybdenum and aluminosilicates, both of which require temperatures well in excess of ANY hydrocarbon fires present in the WTC buildings, according to the FEMA and NIST studies, as well as other highly qualified opinions such as that of MIT Prof. Thomas Eagar. The temperatures necessary to melt molybdenum and create micro-spheres is about 2600C, much higher than a hydrocarbon fire whose highest, most optimum temperature is about 1100C, a condition not generally found in the WTC fires, according to NIST and FEMA.
Also not taken into account is the three generalized pools of molten iron and steel, “flowing like lava” in the basements of WTC 1, 2, and 7, which persisted for up to 100 days, and seen and documented by many people, including folks from the CDC, NY Air National Guard, engineers, rescue workers, Leslie Robertson, a structural engineer who worked on the design of the building.
Taken together, the tremendous heat necessary to melt iron, steel, molybdenum and aluminosilicates to create large quantities of micro-spheres found in dust samples from the WTC site, explosives residues indicated by the sulfidation reported by FEMA, and the basement pools of molten iron, there is prima facea evidence of the use of explosives were used in the destruction of the buildings. With all due respect to the architect above, this observed evidence must be included in ANY analysis of what caused the towers to collapse.

Posted by: sdemetri | February 1, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Dear Concerned,
Is it not right, at least here in America, that even “that tiny frindge” has a right to speak their mind, witnessed by your ongoing statements, you seen to be part of an ever shrinking fringe group yourself, that of people who still believe whole heartly that 19 lucky arabs and a man in a cave made all of the events of 9/11 happen.

Posted by: Greg | February 1, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

Actually, YoMamma, a peer reviewed scientific journal has accepted a paper based on parts of what I have said for publication. It is expected to be in print in a couple of months. Educate yourself.

Posted by: sdemetri | February 1, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Wow. Just wow.
I love how people who don’t know what the hell they’re talking about go on some website grab some ‘facts’ and become experts.
Concerned, these idiots cannot be reasoned with. They can’t be convinced. This conspiracy theory is just like a strongly held political opinion that is emotionally and not intellectually informed.
Reading your back and forth with these kooks reminds me of my conversations with my mother. She feels free to spout off about things that she has no way of being informed about. Like the mental state of others… e.g. “George Bush doesn’t care about black people”, “George Bush’s motives are x”. This woman is a Christian who should know better about hating people, much less people she doesn’t know. Her politics skews everything.

Posted by: Mike | February 1, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Mike and YoMama,
you seem to have thought this trough very extensivly so why don’t you inform me of your reasoning as to why i should believe the Official story line here?
and please spare me and your keyboard the time of typing in the de-bunking Popular Science story

Posted by: Greg | February 1, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Here is how it works. Take a fact, such as that terrorists flew planes into buildings causing them to crumble, killing thousands. Now, label this fact as merely the “official” version. This raises the spector of “officials”, you know those creepy government agents hiding in the shadows.
Then tell people who understand the truth that they are merely “following” the “official” view. Then call them “pawns” . . . even if their views have nothing to do the some stupid commission report.
i never read a damn page of that crap, nor would i, and my views on this matter lead me to conclude these conspiracy theories are 100% BS, making you people, quite lame.

Posted by: Concerned | February 1, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

let me get this,… the planes caused the building to crumble and then collaspe? i could have sworn i saw them standing there after the planes hit them,… at least i thought that’s what i was watching with black smoke pouring from the top of it. SO the planes did not cause the buildings to collaspe as you state, try again please

Posted by: Greg | February 1, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

yoMama,
you know for a fact that there were 19 hijackers of those planes? how so? you’ve seen pictures of them? have you? or you believe one of thier passports managed to fly out of one of their pockets and fall to the street below? how do you know they were on the planes? the GOVERNMENT said so? do tell?

Posted by: Greg | February 1, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

not one shred of evidence points to an inside job? I’m not trying to prove it was an inside job here, my evidence simply shows that the causes of the building collaspe are not from plane crashes and jet fuel melting steel beams. you explain to me how there were puddles of molten steel in the basements of three of the buildings 3 months after 9/11. you can’t have the truth or the facts if you don’t investigate all of the evidence.

Posted by: Greg | February 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Regardless of whether or not they believe this was an inside job, Patriotic citizens should demand a new investigation that addresses concerns of the victims famlies.
FBI agents have stated that investigations were deliberately thwarted by their superiors that may have helped prevent the attacks. Furthermore, instead of being reprimanded, they were promoted. This info is available on TIME.com.
Also, the NY Times reported that tape recorded individual accounts of what happened that day from FAA employees were mysteriously destroyed, and that the vast majority of the steel from the trade center buildings(evidence from a crime scene) was hauled away for recycling prior to investigation.
George Bush and Condi Rice both stated they had no advance warning that Bin Laden was going to attack in the US, yet they received an intelligence report on August 6th,2001 titled ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside the United States.’
The list goes on and on.. You don’t have to be insane to think something is not right here. The victims families have legitimate questions that the 9/11 commission did not answer.
Rather than label and discredit those who seek a new investigation, why not support an independent investigation that could settle the issue?

Posted by: wakup | February 1, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

A poster remarked “911 truthers are lunatics and anarchists and deserve to be ridiculed”
along with the comments from the article such as “hecklers always love to have the last word”
Can you smell the familiar rot of fascism? People who’ve sold their souls to the new world order and who’s heart and mind has been enslaved talk like this.
More doublespeak, fraud and outright evil, and the sign of our times. There’s a part of me that wishes to smack the diatribe right off their faces but I would only sink to their level and just by doing so I would have lost.
Despite the invidious and myopic ad hominem (if not intentional LIE), it offers tremendous hope for me to see that those type of comments are in the gross minority, rather so many comments by concerned, observant, highly intelligent, compassionate and well spoken individuals who can see through the lies of the quasi fascist/modern feudalism and promulgated through it’s propaganda organs,including ABC who shares the agenda .
Despite this blatantly slanted condescending piece of “journalism” thankfully we can still chime in and express ourselves, that is, until ABC cuts the undersea cables.

Posted by: Jon | February 3, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Give me a break.
This exchange looks staged to me. How cooperative the heckler is once Clinton starts speaking. How confident Clinton is that he will stop. How prepared Clinton’s remarks seemed.
Please remember that Bill Clinton arranged to be in Australia on 9.11 and arrived there with no advanced knowledge by any Australians, who didn’t know what to do with him.
In my opinion, Clinton knew about 9.11.
Don’t forget that Condoleeza Rice warned San Francisco mayor Willy Brown not to fly on 9.11. If she would warn a mayor, why would the administration not see that the former U.S. President was not asking questions and demanding an investigation once 9.11 happened?
Clinton knew. Giuliani knew. Bush Sr. knew. Everyone who needed to know knew.
9.11 was an inside job and Clinton was at least complicit in it.

Posted by: Brother Anonymous | February 26, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

and nobody wants to tie the Bush bought and run CIA into all the scandals of the last 55 to 60 years Sam, Prescott Bush, George Herbert Walker, Avreill Harriman, Root and Brown bros really set things up for the CIA and the industrial military complex TEAR IT DOWN BARAK OBAMA

Posted by: wah | September 3, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

and nobody wants to tie the Bush bought and run CIA into all the scandals of the last 55 to 60 years Sam, Prescott Bush, George Herbert Walker, Avreill Harriman, Root and Brown bros really set things up for the CIA and the industrial military complex TEAR IT DOWN BARAK OBAMA

Posted by: wah | September 3, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.