Jan 7, 2008 12:57pm

U.S.: Iranians ‘Were a Heartbeat From Being Blown Up’

The standoff between three U.S. Navy ships and five Iranian speedboats in the Strait of Hormuz Sunday was one step away from turning violent. "They were a heartbeat from being blown up," a Pentagon official, speaking of the Iranians, told ABC News. According to the Navy intelligence report on the incident, the Iranians radioed, "I am coming at you. You will blow up in a couple of minutes." The Navy ships radioed back, presumably transmitting a warning. All three ships also engaged in "evasive action," and according to senior Pentagon officials, the "prepare-to-fire" order had been given and the gun stations manned. Pentagon officials today expressed surprise the Navy ships allowed at least one of the Iranian speedboats to get so close — just 200 yards away — without firing. They say at least one of those speedboats boasted a machine gun, and all were behaving as if they were packed with explosives. Click here to see the video A Navy official told ABC News that while there have been similar incidents in the Gulf, Sunday’s differed because of the "aggressive actions" taken by the Iranians. "I’ve never seen a provocation like this is in international waters," another military official who has served for more than 25 years said. The White House seconded that notion. "We urge the Iranians to refrain from such provocative actions that could lead to dangerous incidents in the future," White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto said. Published reports cite the Iranian Foreign Ministry as confirming the incident but calling it "ordinary." "Yesterday the Revolutionary Guard demonstrated their capacity to act irresponsibly and, in my estimation, well out of the ordinary norms of what we would expect," Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff said in response to Iran’s account of Sunday’s incident. "So hopefully, they’ve learned from this that we’re serious." Defense Secretary Robert Gates agreed, calling the tense standoff "troubling and a matter of real concern." He added, "This is a very volatile area, and the risk of an incident and of an incident escalating is real. I can’t imagine what was on their minds." ABC News’ Luis Martinez and Jennifer Duck contributed to this report. This post has been updated.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

User Comments

The US is getting more scared that ever – some one hits us we then go into a meeting to see what we done wrong – go figure…….

Posted by: Joe | January 7, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Gulf of Tonkin, anyone?

Posted by: Sivan | January 7, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

too bad they didn’t follow through :(

Posted by: David | January 7, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Brings to mind the phrase “walking on thin ice? This is the kind of thing that because of some hot shot boat commander (Iran’s in this case), can start a war by being so damned stupid!

Posted by: LongT | January 7, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

I am suspicious. I’m afraid that Bush WANTS to provoke an incident so that he will have a reason to invade Iran. Since the nuclear weapon scare proved to be a lie, he appears to be looking for other opportunities. I pray that cooler and wiser heads prevail, and this is not allowed to happen.

Posted by: Marilyn | January 7, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Could be these Iranians are just idiots, or maybe it’s a case of practice makes perfect.

Posted by: Mitch | January 7, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

of my god, what is going on, please, teach these wackos a lesson and give your crew some target practice. This is clearly beyond normal behavior for non-threatening encounter. Give them 1000 yards, in a formal diplo. letter and then start firing,

Posted by: 43beenthere43 | January 7, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Sounds like some hyperbole from both sides. Kudos to the Navy commander who DIDN’T fire like the Pentagon wished he had. Obviously it wasn’t necessary, and escalation was avoided. But the Pentagon WANTS escalation against Iran, of course, and I do hope the press is careful not to help them manufacture it.

Posted by: jock59801 | January 7, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

They should have pulled the trigger!!

Posted by: David | January 7, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

There has been no verification that any of this actually happened. ABCNEWS has to quote ANONYMOUS military sources to get their ‘information’? The supposed radio transmission “MAY” have originated from an Iranian vessel? Where are the video tapes of the incident? Where are the audio records of the radio transmission? White boxes were dropped, but the Navy has no idea what was in them?? You mean they didn’t take one as evidence?!
What if US military intelligence broadcast the message in order to frame Iran? What if there wasn’t even a message broadcast, and this is all propaganda? What if no ‘white boxes’ were actually dropped? What if all this is war mongering propaganda, which is extremely likely. Five ‘speedboats’ are hardly a match for a fleet of Navy destroyer vessels, and 200 yards is hardly a threatening distance. This propaganda needs to be stopped now, before the neo-conservative wackos are able to manufacture another conflict in the middle east.
The lead up to the Iraq war saw the same exact kinds of bogus propaganda spewed out by the Pentagon to initiate the conflict. It is alarming that CNN and ABCNEWS would publish these events as fact without independent verification!!

Posted by: Eric | January 7, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Our government WANTS to go to war with Iran.

Posted by: Scott | January 7, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

“…all [Iranian speedboards] were behaving as if they were packed with explosives”
And what is that supposed to mean?? How does a boat ‘behave’ when it is packed with explosives?
The war mongering propaganda reinvigorating itself here today is beyond ridiculous. Please quote some more anonymous military sources who will gladly tell you the Iranian boats were packed with nuclear weapons. Then maybe the neo-conservatives will get their wish to attack another country granted. And the price of oil will rise to $300/barrel, and Blackwater will be able to place another 100,000 employees in Iran, and the defense contractors will be able to build another 3 years worths of missiles, and all of the cronies will get even richer.

Posted by: Eric | January 7, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Merely bravado and this isn’t the first instance. Is a rogue Iranian Naval leader responsible for this or is this Iranian policy?

Posted by: doug | January 7, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Someone please explain to me how a boat speeding towards a ship and telling them they are about to blow up in a couple of minutes is considered ‘ordindary’?

Posted by: Paula | January 7, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

1987-1988 – Opeartion Ernest Will/Operation Praying Mantis – the Iranians tried to do the same thing. Almost to the same exact date 20 years ago. We sunk them then and should do it again.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 7, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Tonkin Gulf

Posted by: Anthony | January 7, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Remember, Islam is a religion of peace…

Posted by: Robert Marley | January 7, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

If you wonder what this is all about Google “the gulf of tonkin”

Posted by: bushrots | January 7, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

This pentagon official sounds brilliant

Posted by: Anthony | January 7, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

they are some lucky morons, all it would take would be about a 2 second burst from those 3 american ships (fairly wimpy as they are comparatively speaking) and there wouldnt be a piece of those iranians bigger than a dime or so to be found ….

Posted by: bah | January 7, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

“I’ve never seen a provocation like this is in international waters,” another military official who has served for more than 25 years said.
Might I remind this military official about USS Liberty? Or maybe your lackeys turning their guns upon you doesn’t count.

Posted by: Kamran | January 7, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Very stupid on the part of Tehran…the Iranians are lucky their boats and crew were not disintegrated…

Posted by: Jazz | January 7, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Maybe the US should stop surrounding Iran with Military! What right does the US have to be in that region? They are doing nothing but bringing war. I can only imagine how radically & violently the US would react if it were surrounded by the Chinese or the Russians on all sides. Iran has every right to protect it’s sovereignty in the region & keep hostile forces at bay.

Posted by: Rubiconski | January 7, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Can anyone say Gulf of Tonkin. This is similar way the United States got into the war with North Vietnam. Iran is flexing there mini boat muscle to attempt to make us look like the aggressor. This was in international waters and thus we should use the UN to show the cause we have before us. Its easy to start a war with anyone its even harder to restrain ourselves from another one that we can not AFFORD. And Iran knows this. Iran wants to keep pushing us to make them look tough against us to there radical segment of people in there country.
Do you have any idea the price of crude would be if we drop even a single bomb on Iran. People our country has put a strangle hold on themselves due to the dependent nature we face with oil.
This is very scary turn of events people. But don’t get me wrong if Iran wants to cross that line and start something with our ships. By all means make parking lots of every major miltary base they have.
But the military must keep a level head like we did during the Cuban missile crisis. We can’t not afford to get into a fight with Iran. Our economy is by no means strong enough.

Posted by: Michael Tucker | January 7, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Wonder how Americans would feel if Iran had ships right off the coast of Florida.
Wouldn’t like it would ya,

Posted by: Langx | January 7, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Bush is praying that he can start a war with Iran this year..He wants nothing better..This is his last year to play tin soldier..Maybe he will send Condi Rice over there and she will straighten every thing out like she has done in the past..Which is absolutely nothing, zero, nada. This is the Gulf Of Tonkin all over again..It worked for LBJ why not the Liar-In-Chief?? He is hoping anyway.

Posted by: Joe MUrphy | January 7, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Good for us… Iran is looking to bait us into violent actions. They want us to react/attack so they can begin the next phase of the plan, which is to play the victims in an attempt to gain more international support and wage war against our troops and our country. They may have had some “behind closed doors” talks with Russia and are hoping that they will get their support. I think we just exposed them and had their plan backfire though. It will be obvious to others that Iran is playing games, so it will be tough for Iran to find the support it needs to even come close to being a real military threat for us. Next time, we won’t show as much restraint, so Iran should consider itself very lucky right now. Please don’t give those good ol’ boys, Bush & Dick, a reason to come over and take a bit of your “texas tea”. They’re on the way out… they’d love a nice parting “bonus” as they exit.

Posted by: Roscoe | January 7, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

There was a misprint in the story– it was Iranian swift boats, not speedboats.

Posted by: GH | January 7, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

THE COLE WAS BOMBED BY A SPEEDBOAT AND IT WAS LETHAL, HOW SOON THE LIBS FORGET! CARRY ON!

Posted by: FLETCH | January 7, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Pay attention “Jazz,” the US has every right to be in those waters seeing as they are INTERNATIONAL waters.

Posted by: BADGE | January 7, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Most of you, I’d bet, have never been in the Strait of Hormuz, so you basically don’t really have a cl;ear idea of what you talk about (Eric). In my experience in the Strait and Gulf, the Iranians do like to taunt and use threatening actions towards the US ships. 200 yards IS very close, btw; it is a threatening distance, and the American crew, from what I’ve heard, responded appropriately.

Posted by: Jazz | January 7, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

It seems the Iranian navy hasn’t learned their lesson since the last bungle. I’m glad these sailors manned the guns rather than surrendering like those Brits awhile back.

Posted by: Mark | January 7, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

We should stay away from them. We are terrorizing the rest of the world and they are starting to fight back and have been for quite some time. Don’t screw this up Washington! Bring our people home.

Posted by: Cory | January 7, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

The speed boats are controlled by the Revolutionary Guards, a militant organization that seized innocent British sailors in international waters several months ago. It is only logical that these nut-cases are testing U.S. limits as well.
The Iranian government’s own propaganda calls themselves an “ascending power” and the U.S. & British “declining powers.” The Revolutionary Guards may be buying into their own BS.

Posted by: Roobert | January 7, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Sounds Like Both sides are on the
verge of War,sounds as if Bush is
wanting a reason to go to War with
Iran,Both sides seem to be getting
trigger happy,it wont be long, some one will slip and cause a major war we may not be able to win that would fire up the tMiddl east were already fighting in other places with troop shortage.

Posted by: Steve | January 7, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

The Iranians are testing us.

Posted by: dianeremarx | January 7, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Does anyone remember the USS Cole. I believe it was a speedboat packed with explosives that rammed the side. 200 yards is entirely too close. Next time i hope they blow em out of the water, and explain later.
And Rubiconski, its called “international waters” meaning our ships have every right to be there. Wake up man.

Posted by: Mark | January 7, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

yep….this is what I expect from the “blame America first” crowd. you people just don’t get it and probably never will. there are people in the world who want us dead, and that includes you.

Posted by: ac | January 7, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Rubiconski….Ummmmm, the difference is the Americans are the GOOD GUYS! I know its hard to believe…..moron

Posted by: dano | January 7, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

The “right” Rubin? So the US should not be in that region? So how big an area should the US not be in? Does it encompass the entire Middle East? So the US should not be in International waters?
My God you are a blithering idiot. BTW Rubin the US was surrounded by Communists on all sides once. Remember West Berlin?
Seems that the Russians and East Germans were doing all the shooting.

Posted by: Roy | January 7, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

What scares me more than the actual incident is that so many commenters “know” what happened, or didn’t happen, or why it happened the way it did. None of us were there. To assume “Gulf of Tonkin” is rediculous; today’s warships have video and other surveillance technology that could easily prove the incident occurred (or didn’t). Why make this public and then not be able to back the assertions?
Sounds like too many blue-staters believe that America would try to begin a war with Iran but that Iran would never try to begin a war with us.
C’mon, folks. Lets let this all play out before we cast aspersions on our government.
We’re never as right as we believe, nor are we as wrong as others believe. The truth is somewhere in the middle.

Posted by: Farid | January 7, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

I think you people talking bad about my America should be arrested for treason.Support this great country or move to Iran ..Its a pitty i must share my air with you .

Posted by: jim in US | January 7, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Remember the USS Cole!!!
I agree with an earlier poster, send a diplomatic note to Iran cc-ing the rest of the world (so no cry babies afterwards) of 1000 yards or bye bye! 200 yards is way to close for boats speeding directly towards you and forcing evasive manuevers.

Posted by: Derek | January 7, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

jesus christ…Bush will not stop until he gets his war in Iran…people we only have 1 yr left of him, and he is more determined to have this war in Iran then the American people are of putting an end to this madness. We can stop him, we have to group together and have him impeached…he’s gonna kill us all!

Posted by: andrea | January 7, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

I’ll see your “Gulf of Tonkin” and raise you one “USS Cole”.

Posted by: oregonjim | January 7, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

International waters mean every nation has access to the area. This would include nations such as the U.S. which has strategic interests in maintaining the free flow of oil for itself and its allies. It is difficult to understand that Iran would seek to provoke the destruction of its military vessels but we need to take action if they miscalculate in order to insure no further incidents like the USS Cole. This recklessness of the Iranian forces could encourage future miscalculations on their own part. The United States Navy should not become a victim and even the surrender vendors from the Libertarian and Democratic parties should not be so fast to look for votes if the Iranians come to harm.

Posted by: Dryden01 | January 7, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

1) They were in international waters. The US has every right to be there.
2) 200 yards is a very threatening distance. The closing rate of a speedboat and a destroyer at that distance is when you factor in that the gunner would only have a few seconds to acquire his target and avert disaster. An explosive vessel within 100 yards would do damage to innocent sailors.
3) To believe that there is no threat in Iran is just ignorant. You don’t have to be a “right wing wacko” to use common sense. Give it a try sometime.

Posted by: Shephert | January 7, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Rubiconski, the US military ships were in INTERNATIONAL WATERS near the Straight of Hormuz. And you think that US ships shouldn’t be there, protecting GLOBAL SHIPPING from harm?? I’m sure most of us here in the US would LOVE if some other country stepped up to the plate FOR ONCE and did something proactive to protect the world from danger. But of course, everyone in other countries talk a good game, and bash America while at it (it’s become such a fun sport), but never step up and act. How long do you think the Straight of Hormuz would remain free and safe without US military in the area?

Posted by: Jennifer | January 7, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Pay attenion, BADGE, the poster’s name is placed BENEATH the post, not at the top of it…

Posted by: Jazz | January 7, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Boy, I hate liberals!!!!

Posted by: Dano | January 7, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

The damn Iranians have been provoking us since they took hostages in 1979. Our ships were in INTERNATIONAL waters and have the right to be there. They also have the right to defend themselves and I imagine they will next round. The Iranians have been poking at us for far too long and if anything nasty happens agin’ them they only have themselves to blame. I love our military damnit!!!!!!Go Buckeyes!!!
I couldn’t resist.

Posted by: Roughrider | January 7, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

When things like this happen the Navy needs to give one warning and then blow them out of the water long before they get within 20 feet
is the navy going to start acting like the english when they let their boats be taken hostage?
Blow them out of the water and let the Iranians explain why they instigated the action.
We dont need to elevate the tensions or activity but our men need to be able to protect themselves

Posted by: Kurkus | January 7, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

I second Marilyn’s,Eric’s's and especially Rubiconski’s posting.Let us not start another war.
Lets build back our Country.

Posted by: Learner260 | January 7, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

I guess by ABC news tonight, it will George Bush’s and the USA’s fault.

Posted by: Jeff Daniels | January 7, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

It’s all propaganda, Iran is not stupid enough to do something so unusual. Bush and his “Keystone Cop” administration thinks that we are dumb enough to believe their BS. I think Bush is trying to get out of going to the mid east. He is supposed to leave tomorrow, only a moron President would go where is is so hated a week after a political assassanation has already occured. I pray that Dr. Ron Paul becomes our Commander in Chief.

Posted by: Truth | January 7, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Wow! It is apparent by the absolutely I hate USA comments, that ABC must be only read by foreigners or Liberals.
People are responding as though Iran has more credibility than our own nation. Good Lord, this David guy responding at 1:41 actually thinks that letting small boats from another country get within 200 yards of our ships is okay. Apparently he doesn’t understand that these scum bags use suicidal scum to blow themselves and other things up. Hey David, how many yards would be sufficient for you? Or is the evidence you need, a sunken ship? No that wouldn’t work for your kind either, you’d blame that on our own military.
Then you have this Jazz person at 2.22, asking of what right do we have for our Navy to be in that region. Hey Jazz, we import oil from that region, we have allies in that region, we have soldiers in that region, etc. Isn’t that enough for you to figure it might be a little important for our Navy to be there for protection.
Wake up people! Stop hating your own country!!!
Chris…OC, Calif.

Posted by: Chris | January 7, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Amazing how shortsighted some of these comments are. “Stop surrounding Iran…”??!! “…who DIDN’T fire like the Pentagon wished he had. Obviously it wasn’t necessary…” ?!
No one could have known that taking out those boats was or was not necessary. Common wisdom suggests that they probably should have been taken out. And YES, kudos for the Navy for not following through on the temptation to take the Iranians out

Posted by: Kevin K | January 7, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

YEAH! More supp Warfunding!

Posted by: joseph | January 7, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

If they think someone is going to blow up their boat,for the safety of the crew they should blow them up first and everyone should applaud them.American lives are at stake.

Posted by: Paul | January 7, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

This blotter is full of FAR left idiots! If you poeple ever get in charge of our country GOD help us all. Wait, that’s right you don’t belive in GOD either…..figures.
If you people would be believe in your own country with the same energy as you hate Bush we would all be better off. By the way, are you people getting your politics from Rosie? “Gulf of Tonkin” you are so insane!!!
I think the Navy should sink any Iranian boat who they feel are threatening them. I would rather read about an Iranian boat being sunk rather than any American being killed by these insane people.

Posted by: Emmett | January 7, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I didn’t realize that “ABC” now stands for “Awfully Bogus Conspiracy”! 9-11 truthers, take your Ron Paul signs and go home!

Posted by: Bozo | January 7, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

The Straits or Hormuz are pretty narrow and a war there or burning or sunken hulks of ships would cause a real problem for navigation of huge oil carrying vessels in or out. Iran is playing with fire but I believe is pretty calculated when it comes to harassing us. Turns out they were cowards this time. No one can predict what they’ll do next time.

Posted by: Bob | January 7, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

I GUESS ALL YOU BRILLIANT MINDS OUT THERE WHO SAY ” GULF OF TONKIN” OR THE U.S. WANTS WAR,WOULD RATHER THEY KILLED OUR SAILORS FIRST,RIGHT?I KNOW THE WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS A INSIDE JOB TOO.

Posted by: SAL | January 7, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

What many of the respondents don’t realize is that in the late 1980s the Iranians did the same thing, but fired missiles at American ships. As a result, we sunk 6 of their corvettes.
What the “Bush-haters” don’t seem to realize is the gravity of the event. Do you believe the Iranians are carrying explosives (i.e. behavior of taunting and dropping boxes in the path of the oncoming ships)? Or do you wait until an instance where the do miscalculate our response?
I am sure the “Bush-haters” will say “it’s a bumper sticker issue” or something similarly brilliant.
Get over it. It’s our ships, our sons and daughters. If you are not interested in protecting our lives vis a vis self defense, please move to France. I am sure they would love to have you.

Posted by: Mark | January 7, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

The Iranians are nuts and it was good to see the Navy not pulling the trigger this time. However, I will say if they come within 1/2 a mile of any US War Ship in the future they should be blown right out of the water. These people need to know we will not accept any more nonsense.

Posted by: jdj | January 7, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

The entrance to the Strait of Homuz is very narrow. Two aircraft carriers andtheir support vessels can barely past each other safely without incidence. This is where Iranian navy think they have a chance of provoking the US into a confrontation. We witness it here now on this story. It happened once before and the Iranian suffered the consequences; but they kept at it knowing the same result will happened. Only this time, if we did fired, they would claimed that only women and children were on board their gunships –for international consumption. Can you imagine the kind of reaction the pro-Iranian and Usama midia here would be. How about that Eric?

Posted by: Kahala | January 7, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Can’t believe how some you libs are defending the Iranians on this issue. Go hug a tree…idiots.

Posted by: Todd | January 7, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Umm, again, chris in OC, the poster’s name is written BELOW the post…pay attention…stop crediting me with Rubiconski’s post…

Posted by: Jazz | January 7, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Amen Chris, who are these people?

Posted by: Dennis | January 7, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Shepert said, “An explosive vessel within 100 yards would do damage to innocent sailors…To believe that there is no threat in Iran is just ignorant.”
Shepert — For one, the Iranian boats were apparently not loaded with explosives. The mere speculation that an Iranian broadcast MAY have alluded to the words ‘blown up’ is a byproduct of the fact that ABCNEWS is quoting an ANONYMOUS US MILITARY SOURCE. This is how the propaganda machine starts. The press quotes anonymous sources that float ‘facts’ out into the public domain that may or may not be true.
Early news stories said the Iranians dropped “white boxes” in front of the US vessels. Now even that ‘fact’ is changing, and news stories are no longer publishing that ‘fact’. Why not?? Were there white boxes dropped, or not? When someone hears that ‘white boxes’ were dropped, they immediately think ‘explosives’ because the ANONYMOUS SOURCE throws out that term when they leak to ABCNEWS. So now, we go from ‘white boxes’ being dropped, to ‘Iranian speedboats loaded with explosives’, and ‘Iranian speedboats ‘BEHAVING LIKE’ they were loaded with explosives. What the hell is that supposed to mean — they were ‘behaving like’ they were loaded with explosives?
This is exactly what happened in the lead up to the Iraq war. First we heard the Iraqi’s “definitely” had mobile biological weapons labs. Then we heard Iraq “definitely” had a fleet of UAVs that could drop bombs. Then we heard Iraq was “definitely” going to attack the United States. NONE of that was true! It was all propaganda that was labeled as fact for just long enough to convince the nation to go to war. Discovering these lies 3 years after the fact does us no good. We need to demand that the press independently verify every single ‘fact’ spewed out by these suspicious anonymous sources before we end up in yet another disaster.

Posted by: Eric | January 7, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Uhh…false flag terror? WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Posted by: John | January 7, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

The Iranians have been doing this for years. As for the Americans being there, 40% of the world’s oil travels through the Straight of Hormuz and if Iran thinks they can cause an incident, the price of oil will shoot up again.

Posted by: MARK SMYTH | January 7, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Just dispose of Iran already. What are we waiting on?

Posted by: todd | January 7, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Can someone please tell The President that Johnson already used the Lie about the NAVY being attached in Vietman in order for him to use force to attack Vietmam. JESUS – WHEN WILL THE LIES STOP!!!

Posted by: BronxBoy7117 | January 7, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Why is anyone blaming Bush? Did the ships fire on Iran? No! The US should have blown them out of the water! Proud Army Mom of 2 FOB Warriors, Iraq, 1 Warrior, stateside

Posted by: Irishrose | January 7, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Heck, before you know it, we’re going to start losing fighters from those aircraft carriers over there .. and it’ll be blamed on “mid-air collisions”.

Posted by: William | January 7, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

For those of you that may think the Bush administration somehow engineered this, I hate to disappoint you but you are wrong. The Iranians routinely pull stunts like this hoping that they will provoke US Navy into firing their weapons. The big difference between this incident an other like it in the past is the number of participants and the fact that they were dropping packages in the water as they were making their run at our ships.

Posted by: Mario Majors | January 7, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

The blame America first gang can’t be bothered to know their history, unless it’s the perverted version of Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky. They’re ignorant but they don’t know it.

Posted by: Paul | January 7, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

The Iranian boats should have been sunk the minute they came within 500 yards. Have we not learned anything from the USS Cole? The only meetings we should be having should be to discuss why the boats were not sunk. We were just tested and we failed.

Posted by: Vince Foster | January 7, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

look at a map and tell me what we would do with ships from another nation so close

Posted by: mark | January 7, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

It shouldn’t be to difficult for the USN to prove this actually happened, right?!?!?
I mean its not like the American public has ever been lied to about an event that led to a war or anything:)

Posted by: Ed | January 7, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

They are just doing it to cause a panic andc jack the price of oil up past $100 a barrel.

Posted by: MWright | January 7, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Bush Derrangement Syndrom is running rampart on these pages. Its hard to tell the Americans from the Iranians here.

Posted by: Mark | January 7, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

I see a lot of mindless automatons in these posts, and a lot of great people trying to defend their country. I might suggest that that is a waste of time. These people take marching orders from far left crazy propagandists with no analysis or common sense thought. They could be standing there in the line of fire and would wonder what they had done to deserve it. Poor pathetic, victim-wannabes.
I dare those whiny far-left America-haters to move to the Middle East. Not a nice touristy spot, but move to a regular neighborhood and try and speak your mind. You ladies go out without your coverings. Guys, go down to the pub for a brew with your friends.
Now, to top if all off, refuse to convert. Be the sole American Christian on the block. Tell everyone you are not their enemy.
Last step, see how long your head stays attached, if you made it this far.

Posted by: Scott | January 7, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

We have been extremely reluctant to
allow Iran to goad us into a conflict.
We have exercised this caution til it
is panting-on-the-floor tired.
If Iranian swiftboats get blown out
of the water, rest assured they deserve
it.

Posted by: joni | January 7, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I’m sure the U.S. Navy could use the target practice…..

Posted by: Mike | January 7, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

How do we know that Bush didn’t set this whole thing up for the world to swallow hook, line and sinker (no pun intended)?
Bush wants us to think he’s just some southern hick, but he’s a real schemer who is just itchin’ to pull the nuclear trigger against Iran.

Posted by: Steel Awesome | January 7, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I think I am the last American standing! All of you crazy self-hating Americans need to move to Iran and see how you like it.

Posted by: Basco | January 7, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I guess there will be 3 sides to every story. Unless you were there, you will never know for sure – but for now…
Be happy we showed restraint. Be happy you have fuel to heat your house and power your car or whatever. Be happy we don’t have our sailors being paraded in front of iranian TV.
Since you can read this, thank a teacher, and being it’s in English, thank a Soldier from the United States of America.
vsk

Posted by: vsk | January 7, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

LongT made this comment…”I’m afraid that Bush WANTS to provoke an incident so that he will have a reason to invade Iran.” What is the matter with you? Oh wait…I bet Bush was on the phone with the Iranian people that were driving their boats within 200 yards of US Navy Ships. Even better, I bet Bush was at the wheel in a disguise. How could something like that even cross your mind. What is the matter with you?

Posted by: mikem | January 7, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Who is this Genius?
>>>>What if US military intelligence broadcast the message in order to frame Iran? What if there wasn’t even a message broadcast, and this is all propaganda? What if no ‘white boxes’ were actually dropped? What if all this is war mongering propaganda, which is extremely likely. Five ‘speedboats’ are hardly a match for a fleet of Navy destroyer vessels, and 200 yards is hardly a threatening distance. This propaganda needs to be stopped now, before the neo-conservative wackos are able to manufacture another conflict in the middle east. <<<<<<
200 yards hardly a threatening distance?
That's 600 feet, totally attainable in aabout 15 seconds, traveling at 50 knots.
Remember the USS Cole Mr. Invertebrate?

Posted by: Robert | January 7, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Mario Majors said, “The Iranians routinely pull stunts like this hoping that they will provoke US Navy into firing their weapons.”
Mario — your claim is baseless. Iran is not nearly stupid enough to provoke a US ship to attack them. Iran is in a very strong position in the middle east now that Bush has destroyed their main enemy in the secular government of Saddam Hussein. The LAST thing Iran wants is to have their country attacked by the United States.
The US military, led by some extremely sick neo-conservative planners, is trying their best to manufacture events to allow them to expand an already senseless war into yet another country. This needs to stop now. The press in the United States needs to demand proof of any speculation that might be fed to them through bogus anonymous sources.

Posted by: Eric | January 7, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

These comments are absolutely unbelievable. I’m shaking my head here.
I can just about guarantee you that the Pentagon, and any one in the military who has ever seen action does NOT want to go to war with Iran. Our ships have EVERY RIGHT to be in INTERNATIONAL WATERS, and to repel ANY hostile assault on themselves.
The only mistake here was allowing those boats to get that close.
Oh, and for the fella who asked what suicide boat actions look like, ask anyone on the Cole. Trust me, it’s a known tactic.

Posted by: Uncle Sam | January 7, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Another false flag attempt. Anything new here?

Posted by: pierre | January 7, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Aaah, the clarity!
To watch the “Blame America first” crowd coming out in force!
It truly is a treat- and sad at the same time.
God Bless America!

Posted by: Matt B | January 7, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

This could have turned ugly for the US if Iran had Sunburn supersonic cruise missles just waiting for the US to respond to the provocation. Sure we would’ve sunk the speed boats, but we could also lose a entire aircraft carrier battle group in the process. There is no defense against these Russian supplied missiles – they are designed to sink air craft carriers. The chess analogy would be taking a few pons, but losing your Queen and King in the process.
Unfortuntely, the Persian gulf is geographically shaped like a giant shooting gallery for Iran and the ships that pass through it are the ducks.

Posted by: jbw | January 7, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

I am so impressed by our Navy. To be so cool and calm waiting and making the correct choice! They are to be praised as true heros!

Posted by: Impressed | January 7, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Why do people automatically assume the worst of the US government and military when you have a certified provocateur, Islamic fundamentalist, and holocaust denier like Ahmadinejad running Iran?
If this was a Gulf of Tonkin style ploy, wouldn’t the US ships have fired on the Iranians? Why would one go through all the trouble of setting up a “fake” incident with Iran and then not fire upon them? All of you who are calling todays incident a “Gulf of Tonkin” ploy are about as logical as the muslim fundamentalists or Christian “intelligent designers” you believe yourselves to be superior to. Thats right, YOU are fanatics.
Its sad to see so many Westerners and Americans, in particular, with such a pathological hatred of their own culture and country and, by proxy, themselves. For all the bad Americans have ever done in the world, it has been far outweighed by the good. We came to grips with slavery and hundreds of thousands of AMERICANS sacrificed themselves to end it. We lost hundreds of thousands more fighting for the freedom of Western Europe in two world wars. We invented the aeroplane, the light bulb, and many of the modern medicines and procedures that have saved millions of lives. We rebulit Japan and gave aid and comfort to its people even after the Japanese were ready to slaughter every American they could during WWII. We gave aid to Iran when they were struck by a devastating earthquake even when our governments have not spoken in years. We gave tons and tons of food to stop starvation in North Korea even as its leaders curse us and openly call for our demise. Every year, Americans give more money to international charity per capita than any nation on earth. What Islamic nation; even what European nation can say that?
Unfortunately, the fanatics- whether they be Muslim, right wing or left wing, only see what they want to. So you’ve got it- Bush made the whole thing up.
Morons.

Posted by: TDL | January 7, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

What in the world does Bush have to do with this incident at all? Sometimes I think liberals can blame Bush for the morning commute.

Posted by: Trey | January 7, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

I hope those Tomahawks and F-15s still are fueled and ready.

Posted by: Al | January 7, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

David,
Military sources are often annonymous because they are not authorized to speak. There is limited means for a warship to determine the exact source of a radio transmission, so it would be accurate to say that the boats seemed to be the source of the transmission based on the behavior of the boats and the message being broadcast. Why would the Navy have audio/video records of the occurance? This was not broadcast on Al Jazeera, this is broadcast over open marine radios. There would be no reason Naval Intelligence would transmit a bogus message to themselves. Do you read what you write before you post?
The ships do not have EOD (explosive ordinance dispossal) units attached, so they would not pick up anything that the Iranians are dropping. 5 speedboats are a serious threat to any warship. It took just one tiny rowboat to disable the USS Cole.
A military speedboat can attack with a number of different weapons (guns, missiles, torpedoes, mines, or explosives). Each method of attack would exhibit a different behavior, so yes, it makes sense to say that the boats were behaving like they were packed with explosives.
I am amazed by some of the comments people post. I am saddened that many of my friends and colleagues have willingly given there lives to protect people that would say such things.
LT Mike
USN.

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

The book says it all…….LIBERALISM is a Mental Disorder!!

Posted by: jack | January 7, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Just 200 yards away? 10 years ago the US ship commander would probably have sent a shot across their bow.

Posted by: Antonio | January 7, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

How anyone can relate the incident to bush, is beyond me. The bush-haters probably forgot to read the part where the US ship is stationed in INTERNATIONAL WATERS. Oh wow, why would anyone want to protect and defind the lifesource of modern civilization (OIL) as we know it by being stationed in a gulf where a majority of the worlds oil is transported? I also wish someone to explain why they think US wants a war w/ Iran? Oh yeah, the Bush is in power and is a war monger is not a valid response since its not based on any fact whatsoever. Ahmademacrap wants a war. Why? B/c hes been horrible leader in Iran and the only way for his popularity to increase is to create a war for his people to forget about the fact that they have 11% inflation and no social liberties. He could probably also involke some “emergency war” statute in their law making him supreme ruler of the muslim world. For those of you who hate the US, and do nothing but sit on blogs all day and diss your country and its commander…leave. We want nothing of you. God Bless America.

Posted by: wpd | January 7, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Wow. The crazy conspiratorial comments from those here who think that the U.S. Navy should “prove” that this incident really happened as described should serve as a warning of the sickness that infects the American left. It is becoming all too common to read messages from those with a liberal perspective that are loaded with unsubstantiated assertions, conspiracy theories, and outright fantasies. In contrast, messages by those on the right are generally (though admittedly not always) more on-point, more rational, and usually backed up by something other than feelings.
In the case of this incident, the Navy probably should have blown the Iranians out of the water. The fact that they didn’t illustrates, contrary to leftist hyperventilations, the remarkable restraint our military exercises in the attempt to prevent unnecessary loss of life. What liberals forget in their extremely simplistic worldview is that the world has never seen a military power to rival the United States, and has certainly never seen one that used its unrivaled power with such restraint.

Posted by: Mike | January 7, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

The middle east belongs to islam/muslims, no one else can go there, its their land. The waters belong to them also. Their mosques are the loudest and tallest in the land. And the west who lives there, anyone can come from anywhere and live and build the biggest mosque with oil/saudi money and cover your faces because you are so pure and holy. Can a western person go to the middle east and build a church there as the do here…

Posted by: barba | January 7, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I expect the price of gas to shoot up to $4 per gallon for most of the country because of this planned incident. Well, at least the stockholders of the big oil companies will make some money. Yep, the rich keep getting richer while Bush is in office.

Posted by: Steel Awesome | January 7, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Remind me again why we are in the Strait of Hormuz…Just being provocative, or just acting like idiots to start yet another war?

Posted by: Bramdean | January 7, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Mike said, “The U.S. Navy should “prove” that this incident really happened”
I totally agree with you Mike. Right now all we have is an ANONYMOUS source mentioning a radio broadcast about explosives. That much is pure speculation. The fact that Iranian vessels and US vessels came to within 200 yards of each other would be a non-event. Right?? BUT when an ANONYMOUS source can introduce into that equation the word ‘explosives’, when in fact no explosives were involved, that immediately inflames the fears of the nation and brings strength to the war mongering fools in the Pentagon.
And from that speculation of a radio broadcast about explosives, we have ABCNEWS adding to those fears by saying “the Iranian vessels were ‘behaving like’ they were packed with explosives.” This form of propaganda is dangerous, my friends. This same type of propaganda was ‘leaked’ to the press by ‘anonymous’ sources in the leadup to the Iraq war. We were led to believe Iraq had all manner WMD (biological labs, UAVs, nuclear weapons) ready to attack the United States. The press published this FALSE information as if it were fact, with no independent verification, and we all know the result. We cannot allow this to happen again!

Posted by: Eric | January 7, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

If you truly believe Iran is not a threat to American interests you should maybe visit Iran and see how you are treated. Especially if you are a woman! Women cannot drive or vote or walk around without their head covered. Try questioning government officials about the military and ask them what their policy is toward gay people too (by the way their policy toward gays is public hanging by crane).

Posted by: paulieshere2 | January 7, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

To those people saying, ‘gulf of tonkin’… you’re wrong. First of all, learn to think in detail and read. The Gulf of Tonkin was made up and Democrat Johnson said we WERE fired upon.
This story says we were threatened and did NOT fire.
This story also had a response from Iran which called it ‘ordinary’. Meaning, they acknowledge the confrontation.
So why in the world would you even mention the Gulf of Tonkin? If Iran did fire, I assume you’d deny it and take the Iranians side like good anti-Americans.
Not everything is a conspiracy ok.

Posted by: jake | January 7, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

ummmm….notwithstanding our conspiracy theory imbecile friends on the one hand, or the trigger happy on the other, I am glad for one thing:
THE FIRING DISCIPLINE OF THE AMERICAN NAVY
If you don’t know what firing discipline is, look it up.

Posted by: Tony in Carmel, NY | January 7, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Iran, Iraq Afganistan so on and so one. We can never win against these nuts job. When the military gets a chance, blow them out of the water. They use suicide bombers and blow up innocent men, women and children and not a problem. They blow up their religious places and not a problem but let the Americans shoot someone that is a threat to them and all hell breaks loose. Put them on trial and convict for doing their job that they were trained for. Makes PERFECT sense……….

Posted by: greg | January 7, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

It is strange that so many Americans are willing to give a theocracy led by Mullahs the benefit of the doubt when it comes to provocative behavior or WMD’s. The nation most responsible for the freedom of hundreds of millions is the problem…right. SOME OF US ARE DELUSIONAL. For those convinced the Iranians have abandoned nukes…once they have enriched uranium…they could build bombs with plans purchased from A.Q. Kahn. Maybe they don’t need much of “program.” after all. The same experts believed Iraq HAD such a program. Allowing them to enrich is a mistake. There will never be absolute peace without absolute freedom (only illusions of it). If you aren’t fighting for freedom…you aren’t fighting for peace.

Posted by: Dwayne Keith | January 7, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

They the Iranians were looking for a Starbucks for god sakes. The carriers now come with a starbucks and a trained proffecient barista! What a country!!

Posted by: tman | January 7, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“Published reports cite the Iranian Foreign Ministry as confirming the incident but calling it ‘ordinary.’”
This is completely false and an attempt of propaganda. What Iranian officials said is that there was no harassment and that it was a simply a routine Identification procedure between the fleets in those waters, and THAT is what the Iranian FM called “ORDINARY” in a press interview, not the harassment of the ships.
There is a major sign of propaganda and exaggeration in this article, and I wish everyone would notice it. I am not questioning the incident and nobody is 100% certain what really went on. But we must be sure not to fall for the old propaganda tricks in the media.

Posted by: Shahin | January 7, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Eric, I suggest you learn a bit more about Iran before making outrageous comments on the life in Iran.
I think You really SHOULD go to Iran, because you seem to be confusing Iran with Afghanistan. You are partially right about Iran’s policy towards homosexuality. But completely WRONG about women. Yes women in iran do need to have their hair covered (to a certain extent) but to say they cannot drive or vote is absolutely ignorant, and perhaps you are thinking about the U.S. in the 1800′s. Because Iran’s streets are actually filled with woman drivers and women play significant role in elections by voting, so I have no idea what you are referring to. Even in the hard-line islamic government of Iran women are able to run as politicians.

Posted by: Shahin | January 7, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

We are the United States of America. We are the strongest military power in the world. Why do we keep fighting like we are scared of what our enemies are going to think? We had 3 U.S. Navy SHIPS that were bullied by 5 small boats. What are we doing? We are not willing to act, not to bully them back but to simply stand up for ourselves. We need to give the military back its power. The politicians need to untie the hands of the military so that our brave men and women who server this county can regain the RESPECT the military deserves from the world. God Bless Our Solders.

Posted by: Proud To Be An American | January 7, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

My last comment should have been to paulieshere2, not Eric, I apologize about that.

Posted by: Shahin | January 7, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Steel Awesome writes: “I expect the price of gas to shoot up to $4 per gallon for most of the country because of this planned incident. Well, at least the stockholders of the big oil companies will make some money. Yep, the rich keep getting richer while Bush is in office.”
Well its obvious that you know nothing about economics, oil, or their prices for that matter.
1) The current share price of XOM (Exxon since you obviously dont invest much) is $93 and I’m sure many lower income to middle income familes hold stock in the company (be it thru mutual funds, etc). Thus your statement in regards to the rich getting richer is wrong.
2) If you have ever tracked the price of oil and that of gasoline prices, you will notice that they are not directly correlated whatsoever. Oil companies do not profit from higher prices of oil, its actually vice versa due to politicians increasing taxing oil companies due to the price of oil (they make their money on margins). I could easily explain the laws of supply and demand with you, but thats obviously pointless since you get most of your news information from the daily show and write ignorant posts.

Posted by: wpd | January 7, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Play with the bull and get the horn, the Iranians should be careful what they wish for. The attack on the USS Cole should have taught us a lesson, the engagement rules after the Cole attack should have required American warships to fire. Trillions spent by the U.S on the military and we allow Iran to be belligerent Perhaps we should send Dennis Kucinich to negotiate with Iran ? We are becoming a pathetic power.

Posted by: Ron | January 7, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

So much conjecture. So few facts.
But, all we have to go on is the word of the news media (and that ecompasses “All” the media, not just the civilian).
Granted, (from what we are being told) the Iranians seem to be provoking us and our allies when in close proximity to their sovereign land mass. But they have done this for centuries to anyone who does not agree with them and their ideals (sound familiar?).
Agreed, 200 yards is very close indeed – to close. It should be 1000 – 1500 yards as the “Dead Zone” limit (given the respected terrain or situation). The logic: The closer you are to your target, the easier it is to actually hit it. Now days, most ships have the Phalanx Gun system or it’s equivalent, on them. This system is designed as the last defense for ships. These systems can take out a variety of very fast moving targets (this would include “Swift” boats), in mid-flight or otherwise. They are very effective at close range. These sytems were probably fully operational, but they were not used.
While the Captains of the US military ships did restrain themselves, they are not supposed to, in this type of situation. They are supposed to defend the space around their floating piece of USA – at any cost. They did not do this. They allowed the boats to get too close. That itself, is highly unusual. Could it be that they were being (now here is a good word grouping) “Micro-Managed” from afar? Say Washington? Again, anything is possible.
Will this happen again?
Yes, there will be a next time. Do not be foolish to think that there will not be. The british can tell you that. They had one of their ships boarded and the crew were taken captive (look it up).
Q: What to do about “Them”?
That is the ultimate $64,000,000 question. Obviously, no one can ignore them now. We have done this in the past, but no more. Someone will have to deal with this problem, and soon.
Q: Nuke them Morbid?
Not the brightest idea. The ramifications of this line of thought is, for lack of better words, ignorant. There will be fallout of all kinds (not just the radioactive type). But there is always Israel, they have voiced their opinion and they have no problem with this option. Great, let them take the flak while the rest of us deal with the nuclear fallout.
Q: If not the Nuke option, how about conventional?
While this is possible, it would be akin to Iraq and the logistical problem faced there. We did do it, but was it easy? No. It took a lot of manpower, machines and money to pull that one off – and look, we are still there.
Is it reminicent of Tolken Bay?
Of course. Every tactician is supposed to learn from the past, the Irains are really no different in that respect. They have taken a tactic from our past and are using it now.
In closing, George Santayana said it best:
“Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
I’ll be here, waiting, and Watching…

Posted by: Watcher | January 7, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

We have US warships in the Gulf for many reasons, not solely for the purpose of surrounding and harrassing Iran.
ROBERT — It is a fact that Iranians harrass US warships, as well as ships of ther countries. Remember the UK sailors not too long ago? There are many other incidents that you don’t hear about because you don’t need to. The purpose of the US Military is to keep you comfortable sipping your Chai Latte, ignorant of what threats are really out there.
Standard procedure is to keep ships 2000+ yards away. At 1000 yards, measures are taken. The problem is that the Straits are narrow and crowded, so that kind of barrier is not always feasible.
If I were in command, I cannot say how I would have acted. Being responsible for 300+ you sailors and officers, it becomes difficult. The issue is, had the CO fired, while he would have been in the right, would have been brought to Congress and Democratic Congressmen and Senators would have crucified him. He would never make Admiral, likely lose his career altogher, and possibly lose his retirement. He has a family to care for and must consider that too.
Had he protected his people and sank the boats, fired and crucifired. Had he ignored the threat, not acted, and something bad happened, many US sailors would have died, he would have been brought up on charges and stripped of his retirement. Then there would be liberal bloggers saying that Bush knew about the Iranian plot and helped plan the destruction of the ship.
LT Mike
USN

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Also, to all the people going off about the Gulf of Tonkin incident: The best historical evidence (i.e., neither the Johnson administration’s propaganda, nor the Zinn/Chomsky propaganda) indicates that of the two reported attacks on the USS Maddox by North Vietnamese gunboats, the first reported attack probably happened, and the second one probably didn’t. (It’s not clear, though, that the North Vietnamese crews knew they were firing on American ships and not the South Vietnamese ships in the same area.)
The incident was certainly not “made up.” Exaggerated in its extent and import, maybe, but the Maddox did get shot at that night.

Posted by: TheProudDuck | January 7, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Well, oil futures have declined the last few days. I believe the Iranians are trying to create some controversy to run up the futures, and hence their income. That is the root reason for most of their actions.

Posted by: Greg | January 7, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

The U.S.Navy could have cleansed the gene pool if they had follwed through.
Nothing Wrong With Shooting as Long as the Right People Get Shot.

Posted by: Tom Koper | January 7, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

“If you wonder what this is all about Google “the gulf of tonkin”"
Why would we google gulf of tonkin? Oh, wait, I get it. Because the military *may* have faked a confrontation one time in the past, then every confrontation from then on until the end of eternity has to also be fake.
Reading some of these posts, I honestly don’t see how these people make it through life day to day.

Posted by: Kevin | January 7, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Some of you have stated that this is a result of Bush’s desire to attack Iran. Are you serious? Was Bush at the helm of these Iranian speed boats? The order came from Iranian leadership, dolts. Even after the verbal threat came over the radios, our boys stood down. Now reread the article and tell me who is hungry for a war. We get it…you hate Bush. But, this is a clear indication that it is Iran that seeks to destabilize the region, not the evil US president.

Posted by: Blake | January 7, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Gulf of Tonkin?? Why go back that far? How about USS Cole? That is probably another Bush lie to you conspiracy mongers. Any chance you can relocate to a country with out a government that is so against you? I can’t think of one that would take you though. Do not jeapardize another military life. Since the beginning of time these people have revered one thing only, force. Give it to them so they stop baiting you.

Posted by: John | January 7, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Let’s not forget what happened the last time a small boat came at a US Warship…dozens of Navy men died in Yemen… You can’t be too careful. If these Iranian speed boats are stupid enough to radio an aggressive message like that and charge at a US Warship, then they have to be prepared to be blown up. It’s self defense.

Posted by: Jeff | January 7, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

What is really funny is all of the Bush-haters and oil-conspiracy theorists who don’t know spit about economics or commodity pricing.
Just because the spot price of a barrel of oil goes up doesn’t mean that Exxon and Shell made more money. They have contracts to sell oil at a specific price, regardless of what the spot price does.
And when there is turmoil in a region, the cost to produce, ship, insure, process, etc the oil only goes up, making their profit less.
For all the LWNJs, just remember that each candidate for President from the Dems owns more shares of Exxon than the President and Vice-President combined.

Posted by: BTB | January 7, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Don’t think the US Navy doesn’t have audio and video of this provocation. Those who think they don’t are pretty naive, or too young to not know what our enemies are capable of.
Gulf of Tonkin? Pish-tosh–Liberals will destroy this country, just as they destroyed the black community.

Posted by: Ron | January 7, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Poster Shahin may be right concerning this ABC News article and possible propoganda angle. What better way to take people’s minds off of the Hillary wreck-in-progress than to beat the Iran war drums? Brilliant!

Posted by: Steel Awesome | January 7, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Ya bring bush into the equation you moron. Im sure George Bush was over looking this situation as it happened. Irs the crazy Iranians who want war more than we do. They are trying to provoke a War.

Posted by: Jake | January 7, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

The Navy should have blown those boats right out of the water!

Posted by: Wally | January 7, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

RE you conspiracy kooks, if Bush/the Pentagon really wanted to start a conflict, the USN would have simply fired on the boats. DUH

Posted by: Bubba | January 7, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Shahin: Thank you for the explanation. If Bush goes to war with Iran before he leaves office, I’m moving to Canada.

Posted by: Paula | January 7, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Useful idiot leftist morons forget all about the USS Cole back when when their hero was sitting at the desk in the oval office. What part of “US Navy sailors died” is it that they cannot comprehend? They are so busy hating themselves and their own country that they forget that without the superior firepower of the USA and her allies there would be no free world at all and certainly not one that forces anyone to tolerate their lies and stupidity.

Posted by: Mike M. | January 7, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

That, too, is Bush’s fault.

Posted by: David | January 7, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

The Phalanx system (CIWS) typically cannot aim/fire in the downward(negative) angle. They are designed as anti-missile systems. A small boat would not be engaged by the CIWS. Granted, there are some ships that have a new version of the CIWS, but the CGs and FFGs certainly would not. Also, there is no way the CIWS would be on full auto. The system will track and fire on a flock of birds flying miles away. There would be too much risk of firing on a ship or towards land.

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

The Iranians have had a history since 1979 of provoking western democracies with irrational or illegal actions. Their entire society revels in this. Does no one remember last year when they pirated a British boat and held Royal marines hostage who held fire so as not to provoke an international act; and then were treated to the farce of being held as ‘invaders’? The Iranian press went wild with these pirates being hailed as heroes to the ‘revolution’. If the British had shot up the Iranian boats and captured these pirates instead, there would have been an international press condemning the poor Marines for protecting themselves.
I agree that the Iranians should be given clear notice that approach beyond a certain radius will result in being fired upon and that there will be no ‘second chances’. The “Cole” incident should be all the excuse we need for this precaution.
Gulf of Tonkin comparison? In this age of digital electronics, memory storage etc, surely the radar images of this action was recorded by the ship’s systems, if not probably also transmitted to one of the Navy tactical and strategic commands. I also wonder if this action is not recorded on video by the Navy or at least by a sailors’ cell videocam? If so, why didn’t the Navy release that evidence?

Posted by: JD | January 7, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

I’m getting realy tired of the FoxNews hounds branding anyone who thinks for themselves as a “liberal”. Everyone skeptical about Bush’s motives is NOT a liberal. I voted for him twice and even worked for him in his re-election campaign. He has lied to us repeatedly about the reason we’re in Iraq, he has absolutely no respect for the Constitution of the United States and he has caused the deaths of thousands of innocent people in his quest for his new world order. You imply that everyone who disagrees with the Bush/neo-con agenda is unpatriotic. In fact, it is you who blindly defend him who are contributing to the destruction of my country and yes it is MY country. If you prefer a fascist/totalitarian government, I suggest you move to Russia or somewhere similar and leave the US to those of us who prefer peace and liberty.

Posted by: Dena | January 7, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

“What is really funny is all of the Bush-haters and oil-conspiracy theorists who don’t know spit about economics or commodity pricing.”
Well, that’s a given. It’s why they believe the free health care promised by Democrats is really free.

Posted by: Kevin | January 7, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

If anyone is that stupid to taunt a US Navy war vessel, or any war vessel for that matter, there is just one answer. Let Darwin rule…. and sink them!

Posted by: John F | January 7, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

“… 200 yards is hardly a threatening distance”
Haven’t spent much time in the military, I see. 200 yards is very, very close for armed, opposing surface vessels.

Posted by: tamdar | January 7, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

I love how Americans think the world is theirs… give me a break! Well, I guess we can look at all of the great things Bush has done for America.

Posted by: Matt | January 7, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Bubba,
Respectfully, now is not the time for name calling.
And, now is not the time to go into another war with someone else. This is just a prelude…
There will be time for the actual one. Just wait, it will come

Posted by: ToungTyded | January 7, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Yep Bush wants to start something

Posted by: Emma k | January 7, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

The commanders of our naval fleet probably have a safety boundry around their ships. If our ships were in international waters, hostile territory and the safety boundry was compromised then the commander, without hestitation, should destroy the target.

Posted by: B. Davis | January 7, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

This should be the only warning the Iranian military gets. They cannot continue to act in such away without consequences.
Why are they trying to provoke the U.S. now? If they keep it up, they are only making an American response more clearly justified.

Posted by: mod baker | January 7, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

200 yards is way to close for comfort! A high speed boat can cover that distance in less than a minute. Good thing I was’nt the captain of that US warship. There would have been blood in the water and scrap iron on the bottom.

Posted by: Rip | January 7, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

To you anti-Bush ney-sayers:
In evaluating a president, you must look at the hand he was delt.
In 2000, every time the votes were counted, Bush won every time. The opposition tried to steal the election but failed.
Bush inherited an intelligence organization, supported by the world, claiming stockpiles of WMD’s in Iraq. Bush acts responsibly and governs by doing what is right, living by the creed “The buck stops here”. The previous president governed by polls and acted like “The buck never got here!”. Had Bush not invaded Iraq he would have been as irresponsible as Clinton.
Foreign policy under Bush has not created more terrorist. On the contrary, it has reveled them!
Weather you admit it or not, oil is the fuel of democracy. There is nothing wrong with stopping our enemies from dominating it.
When it comes to the three big issues of President Bush’s presidency, the economy, national security and terror, and federal judges,..Bush got them all right!
Iran’s govt. supports radical Islamic terrorist. The same who sanctions the murder of women who have been raped. The same people who issue murderous fatwas, celebrate murder of artists, mobilize sword-welding mobs to demand death for a female teacher who allowed children to name a teddy bear ‘Mohammed’. And the same people who proudly exhibits videos of throat-cutters torturing helpless victims.
Do you really want the current Iranian govt. to succeed against America?

Posted by: Rea Ality From Columbus, GA. | January 7, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Many people on here have said that since the Straight of Hormuz is international waters that US ships have every right to be there.
Just because we have the RIGHT to be there, doesn’t necessarily mean we SHOULD be there. I mean, with all the instability in the region, is it smart to be parading around simply because we have the right? What’s right isn’t always what’s smart.

Posted by: Doug | January 7, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

American ships are 7000 miles fromtheir home port. What are they doing off the coast of Iran?
This is not the 1950s, the world no longer fears us, no longer respects us. We are on their turf being a bunch of provocative nut jobs, foolishly playing with fire. This is Iran we are talking about, not Iraq, a failed Arab state!
Those sailors need to get their butts home to Peoria where it belongs. One thing is for certain, they are not “keeping the world safe” in the Persian Gulf!! Anyone who believes that they are there for any other reason but to provoke an incident belongs on the Bush foreign policy team (or the American Enterprise Institute) or the local Asylum!

Posted by: Bramdean | January 7, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

David.. You promise?

Posted by: Brad | January 7, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Posted by: Sivan: “Gulf of Tonkin, anyone?”
My thoughts exactly. Baaaaa baaaaa to both the democrat and republican sheep that refuse to see and stand up for the truth of how our government is misleading us.

Posted by: Steve | January 7, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Lt Mike,
Thanks for clearing that up on the CIWS.
I didn’t realize that it would not track in negative angle.
It should.
Thx

Posted by: Watcher | January 7, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

LOL. The Iranians are not smart. It would have been better if us navy fired that would, have been less iranian threats to deal with. Go america we must do what it takes to protect our great nation and deal with threats to democracy and islam.

Posted by: Gabe | January 7, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

If anybody was coming towards my ship saying “I’m going to blow you up” and dropping things that could possibly be explosives I would say to my crew remember the hostages they held for over a year and the Cole, fire till your empty!!!!!!
I would like to reply to some of the comments by the libs but I think it would be like talking to Hillary, Duh!!!

Posted by: nunya | January 7, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

listen up folks, this is the ‘opening shot’ of our next war. If this really did happen, we should have opened fire and blown them away. That is what Israel would have done. We need to be bold when under threat.
If it did not happen, it’s just a smokestream from Bush to create a reason to attack Iran.
Let’s hope that we are not ‘manufacturing’ the next war.

Posted by: dave xeriatis | January 7, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Iran has always been a dog that is all bark and little bite. That is probably what saved this situation is the fact that these CO’s know the games that Iran plays and that they would likely not do anything. However, this leads to complacency, and that can lead to error.
LT Mike
USN

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Chess people, not checkers. They were trying to assess the US Naval response to odd, erratic maneuvers. Hopefully they learned very little from this gambit.

Posted by: abc abc | January 7, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

wpd – I’m sorry I’m not as smart as some of the posters here. I did manage to get through 10th grade of a public school, but once I turned 16 I was able to quit school and enter the workforce and become a productive member of society.

Posted by: Steel Awesome | January 7, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

“Well, at least the stockholders of the big oil companies will make some money. Yep, the rich keep getting richer while Bush is in office.”
Maybe that’s because the “rich” keep doing what made them rich in the first place. Likewise, the poor keep doing what made them poor in the first place. It’s not Bush’s(or any President’s) fault that you keep making bad decisions.

Posted by: Kevin | January 7, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

The ships captain that was within 200 yards should be heading back to a desk in Alaska where he belongs. He recklessly endangered the men and women under his command. Shame on you sir.

Posted by: jim | January 7, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

“The fact that Iranian vessels and US vessels came to within 200 yards of each other would be a non-event. Right??”
————
Uh, they just didn’t “come within 200 yards” you blathering idiot.
Wow, you ignorant leftists never cease to prove what idiots you are.

Posted by: The Ace | January 7, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I love my country. I hate the private
profiteers who sustain this high
margin of terror.

Posted by: joseph | January 7, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

The Iranians confirmed the incident, and still, the numbskull liberals start their “blame it on Bush” conspiracy theories. Go Figure.

Posted by: Rusty | January 7, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

I seem to be unable to speak my mind, a little censorship has me retyping for effect.
Try this, the world is beginning to take shipment of gold. That means currency collapse protection.
The value of oil to the Euro has less percentage movement than the dollar. Iran is threatening to start accepting other currencies for oil.
Them’s fightin words. If the dollar ain’t the defacto fiat currency for international transactions, then the US dollar collapses overnight.
If you see a really nice Lexus scraping the ground as it drives by, its because wise investors are moving to gold.

Posted by: Earl E | January 7, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Desperate for a Gulf of Tonkin style incident to reinvigorate momentum for an attack on Iran after the National Intelligence Estimate derailed the push for war, the Pentagon is crying foul over the alleged hostile intent of Iranian Revolutionary Guard boats after an incident in the Strait of Hormuz this weekend.

Posted by: paul smart | January 7, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Are we really supposed to wait until they attack before we are allowed to protect ourselves. Which idiot was it that posted…”At 200 yards the speed boats were not a threat” At 12 miles an hour it would take roughly 10 seconds to go 200 yards…I imagine these SPEED boats were probably doing closer to 50 MPH. These morons need to put the blinders back on and let the military do what they do best.

Posted by: Dadog | January 7, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Do you not remember your history people?!? The USS Vincennes was itching for a fight with the Iranians, when they blew up a commerial Iranian airliner out of the sky! They blamed it on the same Revolutionary Guards harrassing them, but the truth came out after, that it was US, yes, that’s right, the good ol US of A, intentionally violating Iranian coastal boundaries, to bait the Iranians and make them respond. We provoked it and then we murdered a bunch of civilians. Good Job, Pentagon. You believe everything they tell us, the American people, and the Press? Sure, like there were WMDs in Iraq. Idiots…just swallow everything hook, line and sinker don’t you!?

Posted by: Tom N. | January 7, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Tell the Iranians that they should not bring their boats any closer than 500 yards. If they do, they risk being fired on. From 500 yards the Iranians can perform whatever identification they need to of the ships in question. We don’t know yet all the specifics of this particular event. Let’s communicate with Iran and others in the region now so that nothing more serious happens in the future. Keep a safe distance from these boats as they may be manned by terrorists trying to provoke a fight between the U.S. and Iran.

Posted by: Flying Flapjack | January 7, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Rea Ality – Come on now, you can’t believe everything you read about Iran. On a different tangent, are you going to sit there are deny that our neighbor to the south, Cuba, has better health care than the U.S.? I’m sure that’s what you read about in the right-wing gossip rags, but the reality is much different, comrade.

Posted by: Steel Awesome | January 7, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Doug, the US Navy ensures the free flow of oil from the Gulf to you…nobody’s “parading”, that’s silly. These ships are there to provide security to the tankers that ship oil to the rest of the world…get it? The only beligerent in the Gulf is Iran, and from time to time, they carry out these stupid, dangerous tactics…

Posted by: Jazz | January 7, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Nice try Darth! We ain’t falling for it!

Posted by: Wink Dinkerson | January 7, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Wow, Another news source I will no longer see as credit worthy. Nice going ABC. way to spew out war-mongering propaganda with no proof whatsoever that it ever happened.
It’s sad that 70% of Americans are stupid enough to still believe this crap and vote republican for four more years out of fear for their lives against the “terrorists”. Who are the REAL terrorists ABC? I think YOU are.

Posted by: Satan | January 7, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Hillary wept.

Posted by: Edward Sibley | January 7, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

The fools here who want a war with Iran are the idiots, who will be drafted to their death to fight in Iran or Pakistan,
The truth is so many comments here are stupid like the people who are writing them if Ron Paul had been in office this wouldn’t be an issue.

Posted by: susan | January 7, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

200 yards is ridiculously close and I would have to question the US Navy’s commander’s lack of more definitive action. Say what you want about conspiracy theories, but given the idiotic statements made by the leaders in Iran, this incident is entirely believable as described

Posted by: andre | January 7, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

The US Navy should have sent those Iranians to meet their virgins.

Posted by: Jasper | January 7, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

After reading all of the comments, valid question is :
Who should I hate more ?
Liberals or Iranian Wacko’s ?

Posted by: Sasha | January 7, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Desperate for a Gulf of Tonkin style incident to reinvigorate momentum for an attack on Iran after the National Intelligence Estimate derailed the push for war, the Pentagon is crying foul over the alleged hostile intent of Iranian Revolutionary Guard boats after an incident in the Strait of Hormuz this weekend.

Posted by: lynn | January 7, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I have always found it amusing that the same people calling Bush an idiot so freely accuse him of planning some pretty far fetched schemes to ruin America or go to war or make money for his homies.
I’m not 100% happy with Bush’s job as president either, but I think he may be one of the only people in Washington who understands the nature of the conflict in the Middle East.
People who have no faith can never truly understand the motivations of someone who is fighting for their god. To the Islamic extremists, the crusades never really ended.

Posted by: HAS | January 7, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

I have never seen so many apologists, conspiracy kook, hate america, traitors in one place before this thread.
The US showed complete restraint. The US did not pick a fight the iranians did. We did not invite them to bring their boats out.
Yet post after post blame america, gulf of tonkin, You are all liberal trash – an std in our country’s blood. Shame shame shame on you.

Posted by: AC | January 7, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

The Iranian ships should have been blown out of the water as soon as that message was transmitted!

Posted by: Dave | January 7, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

When we are at the end of WWIII will there be anyone left to remember that it started by something as concocted as this? Have we learned NOTHING from Iraq?

Posted by: TRUTH-B-TOLD | January 7, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

TOO BAD THEY LAUNCHED A COUPLE SEA-SPARROWS TO THOSE IRANIAN CHICKENS OR LIT THEM UP WITH THE PHALANX…OH YEAH LET’S JUST BLAME BUSHIE THERE….

Posted by: MARINE4EVER | January 7, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Do you think it’s a coincidence that this happens right before Bush’s trip the the Middle East. It doesn’t matter which side you believe (I believe the US millitary account for the record), one of them is trying to help shape the context of those discussions.

Posted by: Steve | January 7, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

CORRECTION A COUPLE OF HARPOON ANTI-SHIP MISSLES WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER…

Posted by: MARINE4EVER | January 7, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I’m sure the credibly sane leadership of Iran would never think of provoking the US on purpose now, would they? Is it possible that they may actually want to start a conflict with the US so that Russia will come through with their promise for nuke fuel? You bet it is! It’s not always the US provoking conflict (I’m trying to think back on a date in Sept. of 2001 that seems to be largely forgotten by the left).

Posted by: Gene | January 7, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

How sad our founding fathers would be to read so many of these left wing posts that doubt our nation and mention sympathy for Iran. You lefties might wonder how we would feel if Iran had ships off our coast, but then again, we haven’t threatened to “wipe” (them or another ally) “off the map” as has Iran’s facist leadership. This moral relativism is either stupidity or intellectual dishonesty, at best.

Posted by: Dustin | January 7, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

How could GWBush understand the conflicts in the Middle East and the motivations of Islam when he morally equivocates it with all other religions?

Posted by: Randy | January 7, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I wish they would have fired and provoked a war then we could use those 10,000 nukes gaining dust.
The sooner we wipe these countries clean the better.
Pro-War all the way

Posted by: G | January 7, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

If you people think that anyone in the military wants war with anybody, you are crazy. We fully believe in what we do and we are willing to sacrifice everything for what we believe in, but war is never something we desire. Our job is a lot more relaxed and enjoyable during times of peace. Since 9/11, our port visits have gone to crap…
Again, I would not criticize the CO of the ships. He is screwed either way.
SATAN – It is open source knowledge that the leaders of Iran wish to see the US destroyed, that they sponsor suicide bombers, and they support terrorsts. As much as I wish ABC and any other news agency was a terrorist Republican entity, I don’t believe that will happen any time soon.
Jaspar — And wouldn’t it be great when they find out their virgins are a bunch of ugly guys.
It isn’t up to the military to decide when to send terrorists on their magic carpet ride to Allah. That decision is best left up to God.
LT Mike
USN

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Damned…This is serious…We’re carry essentially the same offensive weapons as they are on multi-million dollar ships and they’re using 35-foot yachts….

Posted by: Joe | January 7, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

HERE WE GO AGAIN, BUSHIES WITH THEIR ” THE SKY IS FALLING, WE’RE GONNA GET ARMAGGEDON BEFORE BUSH IS DONE…

Posted by: TRUTH-B-TOLD | January 7, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

The liberals will be the death of this country.

Posted by: anon | January 7, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Rubiconski said:
“Do you have any idea the price of crude would be if we drop even a single bomb on Iran. People our country has put a strangle hold on themselves due to the dependent nature we face with oil.”
I would say if that single bomb is the nuclear type, you know, then the price of oil would take a big hit :-)

Posted by: 123 | January 7, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Fish need food.

Posted by: harry | January 7, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Iranian has some guts doing this… Those who accuse Americans of being aggressors are trying to find some way of blaming the US once again.

Posted by: sheryl norman | January 7, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Iran’s days are numbered…can’t wait.

Posted by: Matthew | January 7, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

The Chinese ARE off our coast, you fools. 45 miles off our coast – drilling for oil that our own lefties prevent through environmental legislation. Don’t whine about our dependency on foreign energy sources – just stop voting for Democrats that protract and exacerbate the problem by standing in the way of ANWAR, off-shore drilling, and other domestic sources for oil.

Posted by: Dustin | January 7, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Marilyn, go take a Physics class. The Iranians are making pure Uranium. Put a lump of uranium together the size of a small tangerine and voila! you have an atomic bomb. The tricky part is just slamming it together fast enough to get the maximum fission effect of about 110 Kilotons. Do it slower, less bang, but even thirty kilotons in a city would spread the rest of the Uranium around several square miles and make the place useless for generations. The other problem is size, but if you don’t need to fit in on a missile or plane any engineer can make one in a warehouse near downtown anywhere.

Posted by: boone | January 7, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

TRUTH — What is concocted here? Iran’s systematic testing of our procedures and responses? Their numbing of our reactions? Or the continued dissent of military operations and procedures by extremists?
LT Mike
USN
“No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation.”
- General Douglas MacArthur

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

They just need to take a .50 cal Barrett and a sniper to put a slug through the Iranian speed boat engines. The Navy usually has Marines onboard. You could also use a Phalanx but you are better off shooting out their engines. I see lots of lib IslamoFacist pacifiers are posting today.

Posted by: Franc | January 7, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

AAAHHH the democrats / libs / leftist were a heartbeat from turning on our troops again.

Posted by: SteveLtColUSMC | January 7, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

I commend the restraint of the Naval officers in recognizing a clear attempt by the Iranian “navy” to goad them into a rash action. The result of any retaliation would have been subject to such scrutiny that the US would be further villified in the Arab world. Only at that point that they strike first will we have the blessing of the world powers to swat the mosquito that is Iran. It is sad that our military will have to suffer injury before any action is justified, but it is the state of foreign affairs created by Bush’s misteps in Iraq.

Posted by: JLS | January 7, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Forget about politics.
Anyone in their right mind would defend themselves.
If there was a person in your front yard threatening you would you not take action?

Posted by: Harry Dietrich | January 7, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Interesting, In My opinion, we should have lit them up. Sure, this would likely have a negative effect on gas prices, but it would be nice to use true force against Iranian aggression and demonstrate our DEADLY seriousness in this situation.

Posted by: Robby | January 7, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Having been through the Straits of Hormuz before as a Radar Navigator on the USS Constellation CV 64 – an Aircraft Carrier – I can tell you with the exception of the Straits of Malacca – just out of Singapore – this is one of the most congested water ways in the world. The Iranians are doing what they do best – provacation – I commend the actions of our Naval Officers – restraint – at this point, but you can bet that the word will get back through the Swiss Embassy to the Iranians that playing these types of games can be very dangerous. Although the Iranian Government could care less for the lives of their Naval Personell, and would be more than willing to sacrifice them to provoke an incident. We are utilizing the Straits as per our rights in International Waters, and we have the right to protect our vessels. Many of you would rather let the Iranians strike the first blow, and then complain that we didn’t protect our Sailors. Instead we should let the Iranians know in no uncertain terms that they are to stay 500 yards away from our ships, or they will be fired on without warning. You can also bet that every radio transmission is taped – every radar track is taped, and that film is being shot of every vessel that approaches our ships. With so many eyes on our actions; any action will be well documented

Posted by: Gene | January 7, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

LOOKING FOR A FIGHT, WANT AN ICIDENT TO DETRACT FROM SOMETHING MORE IMPORTANT?
THEN TRY PICKING ON THE USN IN INTERNATIONAL WATERS, IT’S A SURE FIRE WAY TO GET SOME ATTENTION YOU MAY HAVE ASKED FOR THEN FOUND IT WAS NOT WHAT YOU WANTED.
SMART AS CHICKENS THEM IRANIANS.

Posted by: ONTIME | January 7, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

I can’t believe how silly this sounds. Does anyone really believe we did the right thing? We need a half mile of open water around our ships or we’re going to end up with sunk ships and dead sailors.
We also didn’t show them not to mess with us. We demonstrated that we’re soft and that we don’t have the guts to pull the trigger. We should have blown up all three boats the second they stepped within a half mile of our boats.

Posted by: Marc | January 7, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

AMERICA LOVE OR LEAVE IT!

Posted by: alain | January 7, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Franc – most ships don’t have Marines onboard, typically only amphibious ships, not shooters. Those that do have Marines, may or may not have snipers. If they did, they would not have time to retrieve their equipment, load it and disable 5 high speed vessels. That is not what they are best suited for and there are far better responses. They do have .50 cal Bushmaster canons that would do a perfectly acceptable job of disabling a ship. Those canons were manned during this event.
LT Mike
USN

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

It is interesting to read how many of you believe, without question, the US govt version of events. I have no idea what really happened out there, but I doubt it was as clearcut at the US is claiming. I am certainly not going to believe the Iran version, though.

Posted by: Jim | January 7, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

If their boat comes too close, sink it! If they want to play hardball, strike them out. If they want a nuclear weapon, I say give them one….right out of the bomb bay of a B52. The United States gives these fools help when ever they ask for it, then they stick in in our back…It must end soon, the left would like us to be the parent of the world, when the “kid” acts up don’t deal with it, don’t be a parent, look for an excuse or someone else to deal with them, (like the UN)..It’s time to be the parent, Spank their behind and send them crying to their room. oh one last thing… ship the dam UN over there before the B52 arrives……

Posted by: 1Vtboy | January 7, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

The IRG clowns should be crab chow right now. My suspicion is the next pack of bozos that try this crap again WILL be.

Posted by: Frank Morris | January 7, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Let’s forget all the nicey-nice baloney
about creating democracy in the Middle East and nation building. I don’t care to pay for boatloads of $200 hammers so some multi-national contractors can ream the American public for the next ten years. Secure the oil fields, pump the darn oil, and if we want to be nice about it, toss the Iraqis a percentage and let them build whatever kind of country they want with it. Or let them have the civil war they are so looking forward to. If it’s not about oil, we have no business there. A Muslim democracy is about as likely as Al Gore giving a flying flip at a rolling doughnut about his carbon footprint.

Posted by: IrateTaxpayer | January 7, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Seems like a warning shot -through- the bow is in order. Are we so into safeguarding ammo we can afford letting these nuts get that close? What are the ROE for these potential suicide boats? It isn’t possible that -someone- does not want to draw attention away from the Clinton meltdown, is it?

Posted by: DJA | January 7, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The appearance of weakness is dangerous place to be.

Posted by: sscl | January 7, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The commander should be relieved for putting the lives of his crew at risk by letting hostile boats get within 200 meters of the ship.

Posted by: Chris | January 7, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

To those who claim this is our fault for having boats off of the coast and asking how we would feel if we had Iranian boats off of our coast I say this:
1. The United States is not the country that openly denies the holocaust. That claims Israel should be wiped off the map.
2. The United States military and citizens do not strap bombs to themselves and run into crowded civilian areas to kill innocent people.
3. The United States, to my knowledge, does not provide suicide bombers with the means to carry out attacks.
4. The United States does not violate UN Resolution after UN Resolution.
5. The United States does not oppress women.
6. The United States does not impose radical beliefs upon it’s people.
7. When the our military does things that are inappropriate, they are held accountable, not praised.
The US may not be perfect, but this list could go on forever. To claim our presence in the region isn’t justified is pure ignorance. I find contradiction in a radical liberal defense of a country that practices the complete opposite of core liberal principles. To those who defend Iran, I say move there and see how you like it.

Posted by: doc_dosman | January 7, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Jim – There are always three sides to every story, and never doubt that the media will spice up the story to attract more readers/viewers. The US Navy committed no actions and therfore has no reason to fabricate a story.
However, ask ANY sailor who has gone throught the Straits of Hormuz. This incident is not out of the norm or made up. Incidents like this occur with some frequency. It isn’t always Iran either. I have had issues with Russian ships, Chinese ships, and others. This is likely one of the more intense and provocative occurances though.
LT Mike
USN

Posted by: LT Mike | January 7, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

When she was still on TV last year Rosie O’Donnell once shouted out “Tonkin Gulf…Google it!”, shortly after the Iranians seized that British boat. All those commentators who scream about the Tonkin Gulf must get their ideas from Rosie. Course, she was wrong then, just as the Rosie clones are wrong now.

Posted by: johnbrown | January 7, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
-George Washington, a forefather if I ever heard of one
this is dedicated to those of you who think the “bushies” or the “lefties” should shut up or move.

Posted by: Lo | January 7, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Hey Jazz: What makes you think we aren’t surrounded by hostiles? Is it because their names are Canada and Mexico?
If you really want to see a Jihad up close and personal, pull out of the middle east altogether and wait about 12 months. They’ll be knocking at your door for dinner.

Posted by: Street Talk | January 7, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

All of you Gulf of Tonkin chicken Little’s have it wrong. Moreover, you show dislike for your homeland by assuming the worst. Why don’t we just wait and see. I am by no means defending the Gulf of Tonkin action, but this is a much different world. Those of you who suggest we work through the UN are just plain stupid I am sorry to say. The UN is the most ineffective body of governance ever. Add to that its anti-American bias. Please tell me what good you think could possibly come of that. We all need to wait and hear the official transcripts (yes, I trust my government to provide honest information) before we make snap judgements.

Posted by: Rufus | January 7, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

This post of comments is much like politics and government in America today: most people don’t realize that what they are saying (in the case of politics, who/what they vote for) is pure ignorance. Of course you yahoos don’t even understand what the term INTERNATIONAL WATERS means and that anyone has a RIGHT to be there as long as they are not endangering another craft. 200 yards is not in proximity huh, tell that to those killed on the USS Cole by a speedboat filled with explosives. Where is my George S. Patton when I need him?

Posted by: Jim | January 7, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Serious?? Some of the comments on here are blaming Bush for this, using the same old line saying he only wants war with Iran and blah blah blah… for all you, remember it is the Iranians speedboats who were advancing the US ships, and in case you haven’t figured it out yet, those muslim extremist want Americans dead (that includes you idiots who do not understand the threat and do not support our troops and prefer us to be a vulnerable nation), so put two and two together.
How is this the fault of a president sitting in the White House?? Maybe Bush sent a memo asking Ahmadinejad to deploy those speed boats, right?? hahaha We have some bonafide morons in our country you know.

Posted by: Tony | January 7, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

This will be so much more simple when the Dems take the White House. When another Cole is pulled off by some raicals we will have a very scolding talk with them. And then it shouldn’t happen again…for a while.

Posted by: chipfaced | January 7, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Cry Havoc!!! AND LET SLIP THE DOGS OF WAR! Remember the hostage situation, this regime must be CHANGED!!!
What’s wrong with this country, when we lamely complain to the media??? Send them some pics of smoking Iranian boats!!!

Posted by: Bombastic | January 7, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Those calling this “Tonkin Gulf” are poorly informed besides being unpatriotic. The benefit of the doubt should ALWAYS go to our own military forces. This incident took place in one of the worlds busiest and narrowest passages with hundreds of visual witnesses as opposed to “Tonkin” which happened in a backwater where no American sailor ever laid eyes on the alleged attackers. Americans who are so willing to imply that our commaders are liars should take a hard look at their lack of loyalty to their country. The American at fault here is the captain who let hostile forces approach his ship so closely. His first responsibility is to his ship and his men.

Posted by: Doug W | January 7, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Jazz et al
Do you understand International Waters?
If someone walked up to you in the mall and said I plan to shoot you, what would you do? I would assume anything but no action whatsoever.

Posted by: packrat | January 7, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

GWB WANTS WAR WITH IRAN… he (the necon movement) will do all in his power to make that come about before he leaves office. I do NOT trust ANYTHING I hear these days, especially from the Pentagon, let alone the Whitehuose. Too many dirty irons in the fire. Too easy for government insider neocons to pay Iranians to assault our ships. This tactic is the SAME tactic used by President Polk to instigate a war with Mexico. He sent in a small infantry into a hot zone knowing it would come under attack, and then bent the news to make it sound as if Mexico had invaded us… all because he wanted California. Well folks… now it is oil and GW is doing the same thing on behalf of the neocon movement.

Posted by: RW | January 7, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Iran’s leadership will without hesitation give up the lives of these few motor boat junkies to attempt to raise the price of oil above $100. It’s a cheap way to harm our economy and nothing else.

Posted by: Craig | January 7, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

More propaganda to find an excuse to go to war. You think stuff like this is anything new? I feel sorry for all you gullible.

Posted by: Tcf | January 7, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

As I commented in my earlier entry, the conspiracy theorists are out of control. I have just one question for those who automatically disbelieve anything that our military says. What would it take for you to believe the Navy’s account of this incident? Is it even possible for your fevered little minds to comprehend the fact that in all likelihood the incident took place exactly as described?
The problem is, those on the far left have become so irrational that even if they were right there in the gulf, and personally witnessed the event take place just as the Navy described, they would somehow attribute it to a deception by the evil right-wing and/or President Bush. They would base this opinion, of course, on exactly ZERO facts as they always do. But I can hear them now concocting some insane theory about “holographic projections” or “mind control” (don’t laugh, they’ve actually tried to use these before).
Just look at their nutty theories about 9/11 and how they’ll believe any unknown leftist crackpot. Simply because the self-apparent truth about 9/11 didn’t fit their political agenda, they immediately set off to contrive an alternate reality for themselves wherein George W. Bush was an evil, manipulative dictator who flew the planes into the World Trade Center by remote control, but used a missile to demolish the Pentagon, yet inexplicably decided to shoot down Flight 93 over Pennsylvania, etc., etc., etc… The fact that their various “theories” conflict with one another and don’t remotely match up with the facts never bothers them. They just invent other conspiracies to attempt to explain the initial conspiracy.

Posted by: Mike | January 7, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

It’s funny how everyone mentions the gulf of tonkin. Look at history you silly libs. The Vietnam War was a Kennedy / Johnson war and it was all lib. propaganda. Keep up all the lies. Bush called you all and the European girly’s out on Iraq and is getting something good done and soon to be finished over there. I now understand why you would want an un-American president like Obama. He’s afraid to wear an American flag on his jacket or even put his hand on his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance. I’m sure he doesn’t even know the words. Folks, we are doomed if you freaks elect an anti America president like Barak Hussein Obama. And I don’t care if I spelled it wrong. So there!!!!!

Posted by: Chris A | January 7, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

wasn’t the USS Liberty attacked by Israel in the late 60′s, close to 40 years ago, more than 25.

Posted by: MikeD | January 7, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

This is another example of our dire need to reduce our dependence on oil. The recent energy bill doesn’t cut it. We need to move quickly towards energy independence. Even a short term cutoff of oil flow from Strait of Hormuz waters would be a disaster in the US. We need to fix this dependency with urgency.
As for the posters who are cynical of our own leaders and military, I understand that our invasion of Iraq may have caused such cynicism. The White House & Congress has lost credibility as a result. Don’t allow yourself to become so cynical that you refuse to believe information coming from US sources is factual. The actions of Iran should be a concern to all Americans and others.

Posted by: concernedcitizen | January 7, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Iran is like a naughty little boy that needs to be spanked. By the way, The MIGHTY UNITED STATES NAVY would welcome an engagement between any nation’s navy. Lets compare the might:
Number of Carrier Strike Groups
United States……………….11
United Kingdom………………02
France……………………..01
India………………………01
Iran……………………….00

Posted by: SEMPER FI | January 7, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

This has been going on for a long time. I was in the gulf aboard the aircraft carrier Eisenhower in the mid 90′s. As we passed through the straight, I stepped out on to the catwalk. The first sight I saw was a non-US gunboat no more then 300 yards off starboard. I assumed it to be Iranian considering our location, and quickly ducked back into the ship, so I didn’t provide a target. I was not happy with how close that boat came.

Posted by: FormerNavy | January 7, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

The U.S. Navy should have pointed speakers at the Iranian vessels and played speeches of Hillary Clinton at full blast. They would have hightailed out quicker than you can say Mahmoud Imadinnerjacket and believe me, they would never pull these shenanigans again.

Posted by: Yossel | January 7, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I see all you General Jack Ripper wannabes are in fine form. We’ve been threatening to attack Iran for years now.. Only an idiot would be surprised that the Iranians are inching closer to the button.

Posted by: Dutch | January 7, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Remember folks, the press has the right not to report the truth. The speedboat harassment has not been confirmed. Flies cicling the head of the Lion. No more No less. get a grip…

Posted by: Walt | January 7, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

All of you quick to cite the Gulf of Tonkin and blame this on the US…if that were the case wouldnt we be reading about three destroyed Iranian boats and their alleged attack, not three Iranian boats and their annoying tactics? Wouldnt we have read about the heroic acts of warriors and not the composed leaders at the helm?
Of course…blame the US. Dont look at the enemy. Dont look at radical Islam.

Posted by: G Man | January 7, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Some folks need to learn the hard way. In the end, they’ll be sorry….

Posted by: Cocobean | January 7, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Our navy should have opened fire at 1000 yards due to the agressive display from the Iranians. Those small Iranian boats can do enormous damage. Remember the USS Cole. A small boat came along side and blew up and killed 17 or more US sailors. They are also equipped with 50-cal. guns that are lethal at 1000 yards. And anybody who thinks Pres. Bush is trying to get us in a war with Iran is an idiot. I must say however it is long overdue. We get no oil from Iran. Its time for America to wake up and see that we will soon lose our country to islam freaks unless we do them in NOW. Stand up and fight for your country. America,Love it…or Leave it!

Posted by: Big Ed | January 7, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

FIRE AT WILL!

Posted by: JV | January 7, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

The Libs,Bush Bashers, and conspiracy people are going to get us all annihilated if they keep this nation divided. The Navy should have sent the Iranians to Davey’s Locker. Showing weakness to the Muslim world is suicidal. Remember, a divided nation will not stand.

Posted by: Charlie | January 7, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Most of the people here that blame the US for the incident will also fully back the next democrat president in every military action they engage in…just like they backed Clinton. When it was Clinton declaring war on a sovereign nation they deemed it justified. When it was Clinton launching attacks against Iraq, they deemed it justified. when it was Clinton that cited Iraqs WMD programs and ties to terrorism they agreed and applauded.
When it is Bush, they claim it all warmongering and lies.
Hypocrites in the name of partisan politics. Selling out your country in the name of political ‘power’ (knowing all the while there isnt a dimes difference between the two parties). Disgusting.

Posted by: G Man | January 7, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Don’t believe any of it. You dumb stupid mindless sheep will believe anything.

Posted by: whocares | January 7, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

A fascist/totalitarian government is what we are facing if we elect Hillary or Obama or any of those liberal Marxists Socialists as President.
I’m sick of all the liberal drivel on this thread. Please people move to Canada, Russia or maybe Venezuela would be good! You people think if we play nice the Islamic fascists won’t attack us? They already did on 9/11 and 3,000 died. So soon we forget! Liberals made a big to-do about 3,000 dying in Iraq. Please!!! It’s time we stand up and fight for our Country and stop bowing to the politically correct minority who choose weakness over strength. If you don’t love this Country…then by all means, LEAVE IT!
The Iranian president calls for America’s and Israel’s destruction in every speech he makes even under the banner of the UN in New York City. Personally, George Bush should have hit Iran, not Iraq…Iran funds and supports most of the terrorists in the middle east and globally. There is no appeasing an Islamic extremist. American liberals just make them smile.
It’s time to untie the hands of our military to strike anyone and anywhere our Country is threatened. We need another Ronald Reagan!!!!

Posted by: RealityCk | January 7, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I saw a few people say this and it was quite refreshing. W H E R E I S T H E E V I D E N C E? Honestly people, you are just going to listen to what the news reporter says and not ask “Where did you hear that? Who did you hear that from?” COME ON!!! It’s happening again! Something like this happens and there’s NO radio chatter? NO video? And IF there is, then why not release it? Huh? What’s so secret? How is it a threat to national security to release the footage or radio chatter of this alleged “Close Encounter”? In short, this whole story is is BS to make americans distrust Iran more and more and further support nazification of yet another country. (There…patriotic enough for ya?)

Posted by: Andrew | January 7, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Too bad the US Navy wasn’t on such a high state of alert when israel attacked the USS Liberty… killing 34 US sailors and wounding 174 in air and surface attcks.

Posted by: Dutch | January 7, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Maybe the Iranians though the ships were British!!!!

Posted by: fed3rd | January 7, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

This is just like a playground fistfight. Fake a punch to see what the other guy is going to do.
This reminds me of the flying imams, and others who board planes with fake bombs.
They are probing our weaknesses.
Next time take them out.

Posted by: Smash Liberals | January 7, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

If Bush can start a war with Iran it is his and “DICKS” GOLDEN PARACHUTE..Halliburton will make billions and oil will be $200.00 a barrel and daddy Bush will open another bottle of wine for junior. Bush cant wait to attack Iran.

Posted by: Joe MUrphy | January 7, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Only fools believe that we will “invade” Iran……….a few well aimed ICMB loaded with bunker busting conventional paylods should do just fine….history will show that Bush was a military genius for flanking Iran with minimal casualties;)

Posted by: Ron | January 7, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

It’s so sad to read all these US basher/haters comments on this incident in the straits. It seems America needs a dose of “good old common sense” which we seem to have lost. I think that many of those people who are saying those nasty things, would think twice if there son or daughter was in harm’s way!n

Posted by: John | January 7, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Reading these post’s one would imagine that the Iranian inflatables were 200 metres off the shores of America. Get real and wake up this is their waters they have every right to be there protecting their country from provocation by a hostile force. This has all the hallmarks of a directive from Washington, for an Vice Admiral to be on escort patrol in a mundane convey throws a sinister shroud over this operation. I have no reservations that this type of harassment will continue until the American navy will open fire on these unfortunate Iranian sailors and claim provocation from the Iranians.
The papers will support the lies as usual and this strenghten the cause for war. Same old story and ye fools suck into it.

Posted by: Patrick Fulham | January 7, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Very good level headed analysis by Michael Tucker in this block… outstanding and first class… he deserves to be in the mainstream media making at least 250,000 to start… replacing the phoney Hanity who makes much more… whose crediblity is soaked…

Posted by: RSW | January 7, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

We must protect the region and keep the peace in the middle east! The World depends on us to do so!
We must not stand down from the radical evil ones!
They want US ALL dead because we don’t believe what they believe!
SOME OF YOU JUST DON’T GET IT!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: c them run | January 7, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

OK…..I am tired of the USS Cole references to this incident. Let us clear this up.
October 12 the U.S.S. Cole was in Aden Harbor in Yemen for refueling and was attacked by a lone small craft (not a swift boat…not a speed boat) at 11:18am local time. The ship was moored and stationless (not moving for the less nautically inclined). Now I wasn’t there personnaly, but I suspect a fraction of the crew was on shore-leave, and I’m pretty sure that main stations weren’t manned. Easy sitting target.
Todays report 3 U.S. Detroyers (maybe 4 depending on news agency you read) on active (moviving for the less nautically inclined) exercises. I’m quite sure all satations were manned and any threat to them, short of a nuclear fast attack (bad ass submarine for the less nautically inclined)or a bogey (unidentified aircraft, possible hosilte)or an incoming “sunburst” missle (bad ass russian made missle)posessed no threat to these 3 (or 4) ships what so ever…..speed boat, swift boat, tug boat, pontoon boat……hey, we’re talking about Iran right. They’re inferior to us. What are we afraid of…..we are the USA. So why the need….just to prove we can? These detroyers were on active patrol….there was no danger to them (we could have killed the incoming in as little as 50 yards away…NP).

Posted by: Ed | January 7, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Tell the familys of those that died on the USS Cole how the US is over reacting

Posted by: Randy | January 7, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

I would not mess with Iran. Those people are crazy! How can u fight a war with people who strap bombs to themselves and drive ships to the Navy to blow them up, they are crazy people. I think we should stay away from any confrontation with ALL the middle eastern countries.

Posted by: Warrior | January 7, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

The United States has every right to be in international waters and project our Navy around the globe. If you don’t like that idea, then go get your own navy and do something about it. Or, you can let the Iranian navy do your bidding for you. Just make sure you are on one of the Iranian boats mouthing off when the shooting starts.

Posted by: Real American | January 7, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Today we the Americans have shown restraint. The Middle East is always going to be a War Zone. I see a war with Iran inevtable. With the Russians and other countries helping them with technology and nuclear plants. Today is the start of the upcoming war. We must prepare in all angles even if we lose some Military Satellites. We must work as one. Today we have friends tommorow who knows.

Posted by: Q | January 7, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

First, the Leftoons who are saying “Gulf of Tonkin” are mentally unstable, not understanding the true Hitler-like mentality of Ahmadinejad. Second, it is clear that the U.S. Navy is led by dhimmi castrati.
Talk radio-host Michael Savage nailed it this evening when he called out the Navy for blinking at some pathetic speed boats.
As Savage says, this, “Oh, we were just about ready to shoot, but they turned away in the nick of time….” malarky is the verbiage of a coward.
Once that one boat expressed the intention to blow up one of our vessels, it was cowardly, immoral, and negligent of the US battle group commander to allow those hostile Iranian boats to escape destruction.
The Navy is leading the way to Dhimmitude and surrender: The recent firing of leading Pentagon anti-terrorism expert Coughlin to appease the Pentagon’s resident terrorist-sympathizer, Hashem Islam is another prime example.
The left calls the President “Bushitler.” They have it exactly wrong: He is Bus(c)hamberlain.” He is weak in the extreme. He is Jimmy Carter weak.

Posted by: m. r. o'donnell | January 7, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

The ranking officer of this little floatilla needs to lose his commission. Such inaction and an unwillingness to protect the lives of the seamen aboard those vessels is what led to the deaths and injuries aboard the USS Cole not so long ago.
When a chicken taunts a lion, he should be prepared to be eaten.

Posted by: Dazz | January 7, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

immediately courts marshall any commander who’s ship is threatened and does not take military action, (blow them to mars). remember what happened in yemen. those people over there only understand and respect brute force. a sharp stick in the eyeball.

Posted by: rj conklin | January 7, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

A quick question for all my lefty friends out there: How does a “moron” manage to keep planning and pulling off all of these incredibly intricate conspiracies?

Posted by: Bennet Marco | January 7, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

I cannot believe or understand some of these anti-America posts. Personally I think that both sides of the political spectrum are extemely lacking in leadership. However, that does not mean that I love America any less.
And for those that think what would the USN lose by a five speedboat/light craft attack on us:
1st – Remember the USS Cole
2nd – A single ship board IED can kill more Americans in a single attack then those used on the streets of Iraq. Just take a look at history! Can any of you that think a small craft cannot cause massive damage to a warship remember the kamikaze attacks used in WWII. If you cannot, then I suggest you google the battle of Okinawa and see how many sailors were killed during that campaign.
Check out the following:
CG-47 Ticonderoga
DDG-51 Arleigh Burke
FFG-7 Oliver Hazard Perry
The amount of money that the United States has invested in the building/training of these ships and sailors, not to mention the future loss of human potential is mind blowing.
My job requires me to study/research/report on the effects of war on a daily basis, however this does not take away the amount of respect of the men and women who serve in uniform on a daily basis. It only reminds me of the incredible things that Americans do on a daily basis. I am not a fan of war, but I am a huge fan of those that do their jobs on a daily basis to protect and defend me and my family.
God bless those that serve.
Chris in VA

Posted by: chris | January 7, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Got to get gas up to 5 bucks a gallon before Bushco leaves office. That is IF they leave office…

Posted by: Toad the Wet Sprocket | January 7, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

So wonderful to see those on this site so very sure that Bush, the Pentagon, Navy or corporations want to start a war with Iran when Iran is the one provoking us. Need to get your information from somewhere other than move.org. The US has shown remarkable restraint in dealing with these nuts.

Posted by: Jerryemt2001 | January 7, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

What is US Navy policy with respect to hostile action? How close to our Navy ships do the Iranians get to go before we fire?
Gulf of Tonkin…maybe? USS Cole more likely.

Posted by: carey curelop | January 7, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

I’m sure Bush called the Iranian PM and ordered him to send the boats out there. Every time I think I heard the most stupid comments from libs, this kind of thing appears, and I have to lower my standards. Everyone is anti-war. It’s just that many of you are anti-America. God bless America

Posted by: JC | January 7, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

The commander should of blown them out of the water no questions asked.
we cannot full around with these ####### anymore. THANK GOD WE HAVE PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH. PROTECTING US.

Posted by: pete | January 7, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

For those who want to defend Iran and their actions, then go..this is America…. A few bursts of Sea Whiz, those Cowards when have been with allah right now….Iran had better remember, Our Naval Force in the Gulf can Eliminate them from the Face of the World Really quick, they will not have a chance to start WWIII!

Posted by: pathlo | January 7, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

INTERNATIONAL WATERS DO HAVE IRANIANS, RUSSIANS AND CHINESE IN THEM (to the idiots who implied we have no right to be in internaional waters) Even I am smarter than that. Want some chocolates? I ate some.

Posted by: forrestgump | January 7, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

There’s seriously something wrong with this country when its citizens are more suspicious of our government than that of an Islamofascist dictatorship that happens to be the foremost state sponsor and exporter of terrorism. Some of you are so blinded by your incredible hatred for Bush that it completely clouds what little common sense you have. Those comparing this incident to the Gulf of Tonkin need to learn the difference between things like apples and oranges. There was no exchange of fire (alleged or otherwise) and it is not and will not be used as a pretext for war. Get it?
For starters, there was no assassination in the Middle East last week. Pakistan is NOT in the M.E. And if you’re going to discuss assassinations, at least learn how to spell the word correctly.
I think that the US military should be congratulated for showing such restraint. They had more than enough justification to blow those Revolutionary Guardsmen right out of the water. Unfortunately, some of you would rather make apologies and excuses for terrorists than make an honest assessment of the situation as it has been presented.

Posted by: Marc | January 7, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

From a number of “I hate America” posts on this blog, I agree that it is time to stop making war overseas. It is time to turn our attention inward. It’s time to kick out the illegals that, up to now, we’ve been to wimpy to stop from invading our country. Why we are at it, let’s kick these Anti-American scums out too.
Unlike most of you, I’ve been in the Persian Gulf with the U.S. Navy and this is not at all surprising behavior on the part of the Iranians. Kudos to our Navy for once again displaying the utmost professional behavior. If this country has any hope, it will rest in the hands of the type of quality men and women that are protecting us now by serving in our armed forces. If we still had a draft, we’d see a lot less of the ignorance that is currently displayed by so many American citizens because they would understand what we’re up against.

Posted by: America Lover | January 7, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

What will the Iranians try next? Dive a passenger plane full of pilgrams at a US Destroyer? Hmmmm, I think that happend in the not so distant past, and it wasn’t pretty.
People are saying we shouldn’t be there and that there is only one reason we’re there. OIL!
Why not just get rid of our dependency and the rest of the world from that old Black Gold, Texas Tea.
How?
Have you heard of HHO?
No? It’s Water (H2O)that has been broken down into 2 Hydrogen, and 1 oxygen molecules, in the form of a gas with very special properties. It has 3 times the power of gasoline and the by product is?
That’s right! Water (H2O)
There is so much information on the internet about it and people around the world are working to bring technology to everyone. The really cool thing about this is, that the technology is all “Open Source”! None of the discoveries can be copy righted or patented.

Posted by: DrGoodFeel | January 7, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

A couple of issues with the story and the responses above:
The Iranian speedboats are in the hands of the Revolutionary Guards who have a different agenda to the Government of Iran. The US Navy personnel on the scene behaved correctly and avioded escalating the issue to a crisis unnecessarily.
The President of Iran is in political trouble at home and is unlikely to be reelected come election time UNLESS he can engineer a crisis with the US and dress up voting for him as the correct response to the country being threatened – pretty much like Bush did for his reelection campaign with 9/11 so it does work!
People wanting to blow the speedboats out of the water if they get within 500 yards of your ships need to notice they were in International waters and had as much right to be there as the US Navy. The tactic of approaching the other side is a tried and trusted approach – the Russians do it with their Aircraft, and I’m sure the US does it as well. Remember, you shoot first and you are the aggressor. My bet would be that there would be dead children in the water and wailing mothers on TV in seconds lamenting those lost fishermen. The US would lose yet another propaganda war in the Middle East and Al Quaida would have yet another recruitment boost.
In effect this is the same problem the US army has on the ground in Iraq – how do you police something where the enemy is impossible to identify?

Posted by: kiwijonathan | January 7, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

LIBERALS WILL BE THE DEATH OF THIS GREAT NATION. WAKE UP YOU IDIOTS.

Posted by: BOBBY | January 7, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

The Navy acted appropriately in this situation. But this can’t continue and I expect that the enemy will be obliterated if it continues with these hostile actions. These are international waters and there’s a right of free passage. I don’t expect you America-haters to understand that but it’s the way it is. Just move to Canada or some other country that doesn’t pay for their defence. Because America does it for them. Wimps.

Posted by: Larry Moore | January 7, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Bravado on Iran’s part trying to show themselves brave and demonstarte us as weak. Restraint in the face of idiots is not weakness.
If they get that close in future, though, I vote we give ‘em an all-new haircut from every gun on deck.
Good discipline guys.

Posted by: Geneva | January 7, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

This is another reason America must cleanse and fumigate the White House of lying invertebrates. You can’t believe Bush or anything that comes from a military pandering to him.
If we had a president who we could believe, respect and have confidence in his leadership; I would be incensed by provocative acts against an American ship.
I’m not failing for a loser telling me the sky is falling. We have 11 months left. We have too many Dido headed fools.

Posted by: Mike J | January 7, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

For all You who think President Bush is starting another war. Please read other news sources around the world. Iran has already admitted the incident and there mistake.

Posted by: R brydge | January 7, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

What is the range of the guns on the deck of the US Ships?

Posted by: Dave | January 7, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Golf of Tonkin II

Posted by: DJE | January 7, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Me thinks Eric asks too many questions. Think Occam’s Razor.

Posted by: Infidel2008 | January 7, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Do we now believe ANYTHING the Bush administration says? Looks like Bush and company, now realizing that he can’t lie about nukes and wmd’s might find a new excuse for starting a war. Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t that gulf as close to Iran as the East River is to NYC? Every bullet that’s fired, some Bush crony makes money, and WE pay for it.
Get ready ya’ll, Bush gonna start a new war ANY WAY HE CAN.

Posted by: Zcat | January 7, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

The boards are full of liberals that believe the no one should own a gun, only police officers, there is never a case where you should defend yourself, and no absolute right/wrong. 9-11, in your eyes, was no excuse for us to go to War. The even greater stupidity is the internationally documented wealth of history of Iran being the #1 sponsor or terror, globally (note: for dozens and dozens of years such as hijacking airliners, cruise ships, sponsoring attacks globally) and now they have a “leader” that has stated at numerous U.N. conferences his hatred for and the objective of the utter destruction of the United States and Israel and his goal of starting that conflict – and you Liberals STILL blame the United States! Amazing. My gut tells me most of you that post railing against the United States or for Iran still believe it’s a valid excuse to blame your parents for your failures as a human being.

Posted by: Frank | January 7, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

“Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t that gulf as close to Iran as the East River is to NYC?”
Go grab a map Yahoo…
Also, is the East River “International Waters”? No. The Gulf IS. The Gulf IS NOT Iranian water. The Gulf IS International Waters as International Trade occurs through those waters.
Might I remind you it was the United States that was attacked – NOT the poor terrorists. It was THEY that declared war YEARS before Iraq.

Posted by: Frank | January 7, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Is this really a surprise? MockMood Imanutjob has demonstrated that he is a treat verbally and Iran has been aiding the enemy in Iraq. I hope next time we blow the enemy off this planet. All of you whom are blaming gw for this incident and all of you who are saying they do not believe that this occurred are blind and stup*id (typical of radical dems and libs)

Posted by: MarinesCallmeDoc5 | January 7, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Why didn’t our Navy blow those religion of peacers into allah’s kingdom of virgins? Can’t think of a better place for those scumbags. Have we forgotten the American hostages those ROP’s took back when Jimmah Cawter was ruining our country? How about the USS Cole,etc. etc.etc.? Come on, Pentagon, teach those morons a lesson for what happens when you screw with our people. The Commander(s) of the ship(s) should be demoted.

Posted by: ivehadenuff | January 7, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Sounds more like a nuisance than actual threats, Hackmadinajad is itching for Bush to pull the trigger so He can start a PR war, cuz He really don’t want a conventional war.

Posted by: Harold | January 7, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

We all need to be very carefull on how we access events without jumping to immediate conclusions. In 1898 American KNEW that the Spanish sunk the USS Maine in Havana Harbor….causing the Spanish/American War. But come to find out not true at all. It was an internal fire in a coal bunker.
WE ALL (left wing tin-foil hat wears and right wing flag waving gun clutchers) need to step back and access the REAL situation.

Posted by: Ed | January 7, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

It astounding to read ignorant rants on here somehow blaming America because Iran was charging it with weapons.
Common sense to answer the person who asked how does a boat loaded with explosive act? Duh, it runs at high speed pointed at the broadside of a ship.
What the ignorant do not know is Iran has fired at American troops and Iran has INVADED IRAQ several times the past year.
For the ignorants again, the attack was meant to portray “unarmed” Iranian boats being sunk by America BEFORE PRESIDENT BUSH’s VISIT TO THE MIDDLE EAST, so riots would occur and America would look like aggressors again.
Finally for the blogger who asked why America “has to have troops in the gulf”. It is called oil that all the people use or is everyone here walking to work, living under a blanket and eating bugs for supper.
This blog by ABC should be ashamed in all the absolutely unintelligent things posted. Great audience Brian Ross which you appeal to.

Posted by: LC | January 7, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

You people are so funny! GW doesn’t need an excuse to start a war. If he wants it, he will get it. If he wants it with Iran, I wish he would hurry up!

Posted by: Disgusted_1 | January 7, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Al Franken, Bill Maher and Michael Moore were seen clearly on one of the Iranian speedboats. What does that tell you?

Posted by: Pog Mahone | January 7, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Well, first – I remember over 90% of the country being in support of the invasion of Iraq when it started. Americans are turning senile and can’t remember before 9/11 – can’t remember a decade of Iraq thumbing its nose at the UN over weapons inspections; don’t remember that France, Germany and Russia opposed our actions because they had the same oil interests as we do. America made mistakes in Iraq, but the rest of the world did too in failing to enforce unanimous UN resolutions. WW2 was a direct result of failure to enforce the Versailles Treaty. No one learns. As for Iran…
You really think we’re in Iraq by accident? heh…

Posted by: Mark | January 7, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

The navy ships didn’t attack because the military knows that Russia stands behind Iran. It’s better to get a Navy ship wasted than start a nuclear WW3 with Russia. Why do you think the Iranian president always acts so cocky?

Posted by: dan | January 7, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

According to Islamic sites, the incident did occur and they are celebrating it. Iran has been fighting a proxy war against us in Iraq and it’s time to lower the boom. For all of you Bush conspiracy theorists, that would have been the opportune moment. Something has to happen before a democrat takes office and leaves Iran to assume the power vacuum.

Posted by: Steve M | January 7, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

After reading the absolutely insane comments from so many Bush-hating liberal morons, it’s clear to me that America has indeed began it’s slide down the tubes.
To those of you with two frontal lobes: cut & paste as many of these wacko posts as you can – they not only make for good belly-laughs, they are concrete evidence that the liberal mind is truly a sick, twisted mess of cat litter.

Posted by: Chelsea | January 7, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Coming within 2/3 the length of a football field is much too close in the military! They could have taken out the ship and then what? Someone would be calling for heads to roll since it was not stopped. And most likely the underlings would suffer the consequenses. The problem is the war is too political. We worry about world and public opinion whene we shouldnt. They should have sunk the boat, but mind you, in this day and age it should all be on video so we all can see that yes, they did provoke the incident. We don’t have to go to war over it, but just sink them so that in the future they understand we do in fact mean business militarily. What would the Israelis do?

Posted by: Hog_Wild | January 7, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hey DrFatHead,
America’s Navy is in the Persian Gulf for the same reason they are everywhere else – protecting maritime commerce.
BTW, when it becomes economically feasible to use alternative energy sources, we will. Also, water is a limited resource. I’d rather use oil until we run out of it than to use up the world’s water supply producing power.

Posted by: America Lover | January 7, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

It is a gross insult to every officer and sailor to suggest that they would provoke an incident just to provide G.W. Bush with justification to start a conflict with Iran.
The U.S. Navy can not cede one inch of international waters to the Iranians. To do so would give them the ability to act as toll keeper for the sea lane through which %50 of the worlds oil must flow.
Do you really want this rogue regime to control this spigot.

Posted by: Don | January 7, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Very productive and intelligent post “MarinesCallmeDoc5″. Thankyou. The ladies call me Mr. Ed :)

Posted by: Ed | January 7, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Boy, I’ll be so glad when Ron Paul finally gets booted out of the US election process, so all of the ignorant crazy troofer freaks who support him will go climb in their greasy holes again.
Thank you, all involved in Armed Services! God bless America!

Posted by: Gayle | January 7, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Why fire any shots? Why not just bring 2-3 F/A-18 Super Hornets in at supersonic speed right on the deck over top of the Iranian boats. They’d crap their pants and head for home with splitting headaches and broken ear drums. Stupid Iranians.

Posted by: David | January 7, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Oh I think 08 will be quite the year. [asks for a bag of popcorn]

Posted by: R.B. | January 7, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Fire When Ready! We should have blown’em out of the water. Had our ships been hit, you libs would’ve been singing another song. There shouldn’t have been another next time!

Posted by: John Bunion | January 7, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

We are all lucky nothing happened. I think Iran did this to provoke a shooting so they can claim to their people that the US hunted them down in international waters. And it wouldn’t matter what the US would say in response. US knows this and that is why they didn’t fire. They wouldn’t fire until it got within a distance to do real damage.

Posted by: Brian | January 7, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Two Documentaries came out recently, “No End in Sight”, and “Rush to War”. They should be mandatory for insight before you make weird comments about things you clearly don’t comprehend.

Posted by: able | January 7, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Some of you idiots want to blame the United States first. And when one of these whack job Iranians kill thousands of our citizens…blame Bush, blame the U.S., blame your neighbors, blame the cops, blame all of us. For the love of God move out of the U.S. if you hate this country so much. Our ships were in “international waters” with every right in the world to be there. Iran is whacked country with nutcase leaders. We better keep a close eye on them. Wake up!

Posted by: Sparky | January 7, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Posted by: Michael Tucker | Jan 7, 2008 2:34:38 PM
Wonder how Americans would feel if Iran had ships right off the coast of Florida.
Wouldn’t like it would ya,
Michael John F. Kennedy allowed the Soviet to put Nuclear Weapon in Cuba…
and I still remember being made to get under my school room desk!!!
Yet you lefties call his Presidency Camelot!!! I think NOT…
Under a Bush presidency that would have NEVER happened!!!!

Posted by: Roy | January 7, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

It’s amazing how fast liberals mouth opinions with so little facts.
Gulf of Tonkin II? You gotta be kidding! Tonkin was a total fabrication by Democrat Lyndon Johnson to justify war buildup.
This is NOT Tonkin II.

Posted by: James | January 7, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Once again the fringe left spews out their conspiricy garbage about this being made up by right wing war machine. It may be time to get the foil hats out for the libbies and maybe a tall glass of koolaid.

Posted by: Nuke Iran | January 7, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Eric: It is obvious you know nothing about any sort of military operation at all. Audio and video tapes don’t run 24 hours a day and recording equipment is the last thing anyone picks up on the way to a battle station.
Where are the white boxes? How stupid do you think our military commanders are that they would pick something up from the water that had been left by a hostile force and bring it onboard the comfined areas of a ship?
200 yards is a very lethal distance in combat operations since the max effective range of a machine gun is 400 yards, 1200 to 1500 for a small shoulder fired surface-to-surface missile.
Like most anti-US/anti-US military loud mouths, your hatred and cynicism have clouded any logical thought pattern you may tend to develop. You know nothing about the things you speak of and demonize.

Posted by: regis49 | January 7, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

It seems most people commenting on this article (with a few exceptions) seem to know all the facts. I would argue there a couple of hundred U.S.sailors and a couple of dozen Iranians that actually know what happened. The rest of us are just guessing, but those guesses point out an unfortunate flaw in how we Americans view foriegn policy about the area today.
Seems like half the comments suggest this is another conspiracy by the current administration to involve us in a war with Iran. Hmmm. Doubtful, but not impossible. Should that be truly the case, I suggest those that support that view find evidence to support that assertion. Bring it forward. Should you have something even resembling proof of a conspiracy to invade Iran, I’m quite sure ABC and the rest of the media would take to it like sharks in bloody water.
On the flip side, there are those of us that are already second-guessing the combatant commander on his decision not to fire upon the enemy. Must be nice to be sitting in your livingroom, safe and sound, suggesting that our Navy should have engaged the threatening boats with gunfire. My limited knowledge of the military, especially since the Cole incident, makes me think those Iranian boats were on the razors edge of destruction. But again, I amn only guessing, as I wasn’t there.
What I do know is this: When General Quarters is sounded on a United States warship and there are targets in the water, those targets better be praying on a pretty thick rug that they get to go home that night. I for one, do not believe there is a ship’s captain in the Navy today willing to suffer another “Cole incident”. Conversely, there probably aren’t many commanding officers interested in starting a shootout when it can be avoided.
So here’s my take: Thank goodness we have officers in command of our ships that are not of a shoot first and ask questions later mentality. I assure you all, once the decision to shoot is made, there would only be survivors on the other end…if they were lucky.
Also, from what has been reported (assuming it is accurate), the Iranians were trying to be provacative and failed to get the reaction they desired. Smartly, they departed the area when 5″ naval rifles began to point in their direction.
Apparantly, not ALL Islamics are interested in obtaining 72 virgins in the afterlife. Or, as Robin Williams pointed out; perhaps they misunderstood and there are 72 VIRGINIAN’s awaiting their arrival in the hereafter. Either way…they skeedaddled and the U.S. Navy won the day…without provoking an international incident.
Once the real players retire and can speak freely, we may one day know the truth. Until then, I am pleased that cooler heads prevailed on both sides…but I have no doubt the US NAVY owns the GULF, the Atlantic and a good portion of the Pacific…and all of it, should national intrests dictate.
Be proud of your sailors, Marines, soldiers and airmen. They are doing a great service to us…and the world as well. Those of you with the conspiracy theory going on…prove it. Otherwise, grab a rifle or a megaphone, or shut the hell up. I’m proud to be a citizen and I’m proud of the USA and those sailor’s that represented us in this difficult situation.

Posted by: Luke | January 7, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I’m scared too. Scared that all those virgins and Allah will have to wait.
Open fire when ready!

Posted by: Richard | January 7, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

“Standoff” is not the correct word for this incident. But then, we’re dealing with “journalists.”
And as I read the liberal comments, donning their tinfoil helmets, I’m reminded that they really can’t help themselves. After all, liberalism is a mental defect.
RAT.

Posted by: RAT Poison | January 7, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

What does it take to wake us up? To get within 100 yards, 50 yards of one of our naval vessels? This was a provocative act and it should have been dealt with. They are testing us. What about next time….if we choose not to fire on them?…. and their speedboat is packed with hundreds of pounds of explosives?

Posted by: Greg | January 7, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Its funny how many people don’t watch the news anymore, especially about Iraq. FYI by the time the new president comes into office the Iraq war will have ended ITSELF, and issues like these won’t start up stupid responses like “Gulf of Tonkin”. And if your wondering how the Iraq war will end itself, just watch what the Iraqi people are doing, they’re fed up with both parties of the fighting being there.

Posted by: Forget | January 7, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

OUR NAVY NEEDS SOME TRIGGER TIME!TAKE THEM O U T !!!

Posted by: ron weindorf | January 7, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

It takes 13 seconds for a 30mph “speedboat” to cover 200 yards. Those boats probably go faster than that. Can a destroyer destroy five speedboats moving 30+ mph in 13 seconds? Probably not.

Posted by: RebateMonger | January 7, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

We should meet the threat of force on the high seas with overwhelming force. People in the middle east understand and respect one thing over all else: Power. The muslim religion itself is a cult of submission. We need to give these guys the opportunity to submit to our power, and to become glorious martyrs to allah.

Posted by: RAT Poison | January 7, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

THE COLE WAS BOMBED BY A SPEEDBOAT AND IT WAS LETHAL, HOW SOON THE LIBS FORGET! CARRY ON!
Excellent point!
Never again! Remember Pearl Harbour!

Posted by: ron c | January 7, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

How dare you people who encourage or even joke about our Sailors being shot at, fish food or any of your other tastless reteric. I am a Navy wife, my husband is on one of those ships. Walk a mile in our shoes then lets see how you feel! A VERY PROUD NAVY WIFE!

Posted by: Sailor's wife | January 7, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

IT’S ALL B.S.

Posted by: JIM | January 7, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

“Eric” obviously doesn’t believe that this actually happened, and wants the rest of us to conclude that our government made the whole thing up so that we can go to war with Iran. Well, Eric, Iran does things like this all the time. I was on board USS Enterprise when it happened before and we came to blows (April, 1988). The circumstances were different, however… we sunk everything that came at us that time. I’m sure that the CO of the ship that allowed the Iranians to come within 200 yards may not have a job much longer.

Posted by: Ken | January 7, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Lets not forget about What happend aboard the U.S.S.COLE October 12th 2000, How soon we forget.. It’s not war mongering propaganda thats going on people, this is REAL, whether you choose to ignore it is up to you. As for me I’m ready to go to answer the call to Arms once again, when the trumpet sounds by my Government. I love this Country U.S. and Im proud to serve along side my fellow Soldier/Marine into Combat any place in the world on just cause. You have to believe those commanders acted in the best way they could in the sitution that took place with those speed boats coming towards them. The U.S. did another outstanding job avoiding a potential Melt down with Iran for lack of better words. God bless my fellow Service Memebers.
Semper Fi

Posted by: Phillip | January 7, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Wikipedia? lol … Using Wikipedia as a source of information is about as intellectually lazy as it gets.
But then liberalism is defined by its intellectual dishonesty and laziness. That’s why so many young mush-heads are so easily swayed by it.

Posted by: regis49 | January 7, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

JIM WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THAT IT’S ALL BS? None, right? Some sailors videotaped the whole thing and have audio, after analysis they say it will be out by tomorrow. SORRY JIMBO

Posted by: forrestgump | January 7, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

At what point does the insanity end? Bush is blamed for everything including global warming, hurricanes, and the idiotic actions of people who have been aggressive since taking hostages in the 1970′s. Somehow he is being blamed because our military didnt fire on these threatening individuals who have in the past taken British soldiers captive? In an area of the world where suicide bombings are a daily concern? Look people they have been bombing, killing, and having war over there centuries before there were any oil interests and they will continue even after we move on to new fuel sources and dont need their oil anymore. You can wake up each day and blame Bush for everything wrong in your life and in the world but those same problems were there before he took office and will be there when he leaves. Just take a look at world or Iranian opinion of the US when Carter was in office and tell me how it is any different now. It is nice to have someone or something to blame for your clinical depression. I fear that after his term when you no longer have someone to blame and all the problems are still there that only then will you realize where your depression comes from. Pelosi taking the house and not changing the foreign landscape as promised should have been an indication that countries will hate us until we are weak, poor, and beaten…then move onto the next successful country to blame. They hate the US, and what they hate most in the US are the liberals far more than the conservatives- but you will defend them and attack the US right up to the point where they will come to convert or kill you and then you will beg for a gun toting conservative to protect you. You know it is true- this has happened so many times in history in so many countries.

Posted by: nifty | January 7, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

kudos to the sailors. it seems to me that the sailors did what their training dictated. the Pentagon was just doing a little posturing to discourage another encounter. discretion is the better part of valor and discernment is the harder part

Posted by: Rich | January 7, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Stand a watch on a ship in Harm’s way and then comment. Otherwise continue living with your head in the sand. 200 yards is too close for an aggressive speed boat shadowing your ship. Its only seconds away. The Iraninans have been doing this for 30 years. They know the rules and which ones they are breaking. No reason to nuke them. Just trim their navy down by a few speedboats. I don’t know if they can get another ‘Tonkin Incident’ passed us. You never know though…

Posted by: William | January 7, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

One more time, because the folks that get the most irrate and violent about this situation don’t read previous posts. Look and READ the entire story kiddies before you want us to run off and kill folk.
OK…..I am tired of the USS Cole references to this incident. Let us clear this up.
October 12 the U.S.S. Cole was in Aden Harbor in Yemen for refueling and was attacked by a lone small craft (not a swift boat…not a speed boat) at 11:18am local time. The ship was moored and stationless (not moving for the less nautically inclined). Now I wasn’t there personnaly, but I suspect a fraction of the crew was on shore-leave, and I’m pretty sure that main stations weren’t manned. Easy sitting target.
Todays report 3 U.S. Detroyers (maybe 4 depending on news agency you read) on active (moviving for the less nautically inclined) exercises. I’m quite sure all satations were manned and any threat to them, short of a nuclear fast attack (bad ass submarine for the less nautically inclined)or a bogey (unidentified aircraft, possible hosilte)or an incoming “sunburst” missle (bad ass russian made missle)posessed no threat to these 3 (or 4) ships what so ever…..speed boat, swift boat, tug boat, pontoon boat……hey, we’re talking about Iran right. They’re inferior to us. What are we afraid of…..we are the USA. So why the need….just to prove we can? These detroyers were on active patrol….there was no danger to them (we could have killed the incoming in as little as 50 yards away…NP).
Posted by: Ed | Jan 7, 2008 7:29:01 PM

Posted by: Ed | January 7, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Iran will do well not to provoke the big brother. You remember the fox and lamb story when fox was drinkining water in the river and a little lamb down the stream was accused by fox of dirtying his drinking water. You know the moral of the story, the little lamb ended up in the stomach of the fox. Pakistan may hide Bin Laden and still get along with Bush, but Iran cannot afford to provoke Bush for Iran has OIL !!! Iran should avaoid any conflict to avoid the eventual occupation, after all Mr.Bush has almost one more year to serve as President

Posted by: sivasaiva | January 7, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

There are plenty of American sailors on those boats who know what happened. They are not going to lie about it. I’m glad they were ready to shoot and didn’t let them get any closer.

Posted by: Citizen | January 7, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Turner Joy

Posted by: Frank | January 7, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Take’em at their word and then blow’em out of the water and dare some more to try it.

Posted by: Pete | January 7, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

That’s what makes this country so great. Everyone can say and think what they want and our brave young women and young men in our armed forces continue to protect our rights to do so.
I guess if we were in Iran, we couldn’t post negative comments about our government or acuse them of conspiring to start a war.

Posted by: jb | January 7, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

they should of boarded the boats and looked for terrorist/ da!

Posted by: PATRICK THE PAINTER | January 7, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

So let me get this right, a slanted and unsubstantiated view with no evidence to support it is always correct if it takes a stand opposite to that of the US president? Since Iran only disputes the details of the incident, I think I’ll ignore the inflammatory rhetoric of the uninformed and politically biased opinions above.

Posted by: DaveM | January 7, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Tinfoil hat? Why wouldn’t Sunni Al Qaeda be just delighted for the Far Enemy(US) to fight the near enemy (Shiite Iran). Whose boat did you say that was?

Posted by: Jane | January 7, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

typical, the commander had to call Washington to check and see if the could fire if the iranian boat got any closer.

Posted by: tansi | January 7, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Ever hear the saying “united we stand or divided we fall”? It sounds like our country is divided. I do not support the idea of war. Did I just imagine that our country was attacked on 911 or did that actually happen? I definitely think there are some real hot heads running our country. Obviously unlike some of the past leaders very few probably practice the art of prayer. It’s free, you don’t need an appointment, it reliable. From the little knowledge I actually have of our country’s history in war times. One thing seem to be apparent We were the most blessed because our leaders and our nation spent more energy on their knees praying for guidance wisdom and mercy. Although It sucks!!! to have our kids over seas fighting for freedom and the greed of companies that actually profit off of war(talk about a conflict of interest) goes kinda against what the founding fathers were going for when they wrote the constitution and laid out the blueprints for this country. But I do whole heartedly support our troops. They are only 18 year old kids fighting and dieing some come back in boxes some never coming home at all. I am all about protecting those kids. I don’t know if I am a liberal or a conservative I just know I am an American. It’s time to close our mouths and bend our knees. When You pray ask God to guide our leaders to take the necessary risks and to avoid any unnecessary ones. That they would consider the everyday threat on the American people by it’s own citizens. Gangs and such. Are they not daily committing an act of terrorism on this nation against innocent people. Creating fear. Should we not consider them terrorist. I sadly find myself agreeing with Toby Keith and Willie Nelson about freedom being the one thing we should always find saddling up our horses and drawing a hard line. Perhaps if our leaders had the wisdom to treat them like terrorist sending the big guys (gang members) to Guantanamo Bay. Start dissolving any group of people who attack innocent people trying to find shelter from accountability under our constitution. What happen to our moral compass? Right and just plain wrong? How do can we defend the rights of child predators? Is that not an act of terrorism on the innocent? Perhaps it is beyond fixing? Prayer is not just and option it sound like the only solution. So I challenge those who believe there is a God to spend the energy to step out in faith and pray. God bless .

Posted by: PrayMuch? | January 7, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

To rebatemonger: Had they continued…it seems from the reports coming out that there would have been a lot of pretty pyrothechnics Iluminating their stupidplan to attemt to take on the U.S.Navy. Nonetheless, I admire the restraint the commanders showed.
To navywife: We will forever be indebted to you, your family and your husband for the sacrafices you are all making on our behalf. Rest assured, should the bad guys want to square-up with the Navy, I have no doubt about the outcome.
In many ways it is seniorNaval officers that get to make the shoot or don’t decision for our sailors. I wish it were such for our soldiers too. Many young kids with M-16′s make those decisions on a day to day basis.
But, that is the nature of warefare and the service to which your husband has sworn. I will sleep better tonight knowing he is amongst men who are of a level head…and trust that they are of a warriors mindset as well. Sleep well yourself. Your husband serves with the moth lethal and professional navy the world has ever seen.
And to those of you that think I am a pacafist…you are idiots. I am all for giving the benefit of the doubt. However…mess with our troops and be advised that your country, your, government, your very way of life will be at severe risk. And those you send into harms way on your behalf will be doomed to suffer the wrath of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. Our people may be civillians at heart, but by God, the are killers by profession. Do not mess with them unless you are ready to meet your maker! Mess with the U.S. and almost surely die.

Posted by: Luke | January 7, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

It is truly amazing how easy it is for people to become anti american, especially americans themselves. But imagine if you were on one of those naval ships and you saw a potential enemy approaching that close to you, how would you feel? Would you want to play it safe hold fire? Doubt it. I served as a Marine and make no mistake about it, when your own life becomes the one that’s threatened, your ideas on peaceful solutions may change. It’s a shame that so many people never had to spend a day seeing how screwed up the world can be, or fearing for their own lives. Maybe more americans would appreciate their freedoms and liberty if they began to understand that it’s not a God given right, and most people don’t have what americans are so lucky to have. But none of them have to worry because luckily theres still a good minority that understand and we’ll stand in harms way for the majority.

Posted by: Mike | January 7, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Lots of dumb sheep here, LOL.
Amazing how easily it is to goad you idiots into hating other people. Maybe we need home euthanasia kits for all you self loathing freaks that are so easily duped into fear. Suicide means your suffering ends and won’t effect others with your neurotic pathological thoughts.
After all the lies fed to you by the current US administration, and many are still so damn dumb as to keep believing the same old crap.
When the economic depression hits, then you shall see how stupid you really are. Fools and their money shall soon part.

Posted by: GIJOE | January 7, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Cool Cool. This is only the beginning. Iraninans provoked US ? Where in the waters of washington or Newyork? Oh in gulf very near Iran ? Cool Cool. Bush can consider invasion of Iran now, after all they have OIL.

Posted by: Sivaram | January 7, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Where were all you hypocritical liberals when Bill Clinton was lobbing bombs on an aspirin factory, an act even the liberal media had to admit was suspiciously timed? Just happened to have been called by Clinton in the midst of his greatest scandal. He bombs innocent people in and around an aspirin factory and you liberal toadies, like the good “useful idiots” Lenin spoke of, turned the other way. You’re all a joke, blinded by hatred of Bush and the right to the extent that it’s spilled over into hatred of your own country. That’s why you’re still not going to win the White House!

Posted by: joeyb | January 7, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

To all the armchair admirals, you werent there. 200 yards can break the bow of a ship with enough explosives. Ya poke a snake, ya get bit.

Posted by: LRRP | January 7, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

We’re becoming as sissified as the euros over here in the US. We need to have a 500 yd kill radius around our ships before we get another USS Cole

Posted by: rick | January 7, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

“David”: 200 yards is certainly more than a threatening distance…what do you think? Serve and sleep on a ship in the Gulf, or anywhere else and tell me how close is a threatening distance. You are an armchair patriot…a Monday morning quarterback. While I admire the on scene commanders for their restraint, I’d have to say that I would have opened fire at a much longer range. I’d bet that if you had a child serving aboard my ship, you would have hoped I’d done the same. It was a very brave decision to stare them down at that range. People of lesser nerve might have shot them up at a much more comfortable distance. A fine line that we ask our officers to walk in the Navy…and a much finer line we ask of our soldiers on the ground. Tread gently, when you question our people in harms way. Some day, it may include someone you care about.

Posted by: Luke | January 7, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I find it interesting, no maybe humorous that the far left side has repeated over and over that this reminds them of the Gulf of Tonkin matter.
Now, let me get this straight. The Gulf of Tonkin lie was perpetrated by a sitting Democrat, i.e., Liberal President.
Have I got that right?

Posted by: Dennis Patterson | January 7, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

When I came home from Vietnam, I remember many of my fellow citizens demanding victory for the peace loving patriots of the National Liberation Front. I guess the peace loving patriots of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard have taken the place of the NLF in the hearts of progressive Americans.

Posted by: William Watson | January 7, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

“And what is that supposed to mean?? How does a boat ‘behave’ when it is packed with explosives?”
I don’t know! The boats sat low in the water? Go visit a Navy man in a VA hospital and ask him. A thank him for the fact that you’re still free.

Posted by: RMS Dave | January 7, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

there are more than 7 countries that patrol in the straight.It was international waters.Iran needs to be taught a lesson.Your an enemy sympathizer and chould be treated as such.

Posted by: Jeff | January 7, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

I’m really tired of these cynical, humorless liberals posting about all this conspiracy theory crap. another country threatens our military and your first assumption is that it must be our fault and we want a war badly. You people are sheep, idiots for hating your own country. I’m not saying to implicitly trust everything the Feds say, but that doesn’t mean you should explicitly distrust everything either. You people are useless and should just shutup if you have nothing productive to add.

Posted by: SickofCynicalPeople | January 7, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

OK Bush after occupying Iran what next? Pakistan?

Posted by: sivasaiva | January 7, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Wow, I see all the U.S. haters are out in force. Dir Sirs and Madams, if we were surrounded by Iranians, they would disintegrate in short order. And to answer your question, yes, we would not like it. But we would have something bigger than speed boats encountering their forces. Use your heads people. This was nothing more than Iran trying to provoke us. The commanders of the U.S. ships we very cool-headed… lucky for the Iranians. They could be fish food right now!

Posted by: Eric S | January 7, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Hmm, International waters, speedboats heading towards American ships, sounds familiar? THE COLE WAS BOMBED BY A SPEEDBOAT and Pres. Clinton did nothing about it.
Nice job of showing restraint now, but what happens the next time and the time after that and that…after all you are only provoked so many times be4 you fight. The bully (Iran in this case) eventually gets the fight he was looking for.

Posted by: Brian | January 7, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

I hate to say this, but it’s coming down to ISLAM DELENDA EST.

Posted by: Macker | January 7, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

The Bush hating ideologues are dead wrong here. Bush is obviously going well out of his way to AVOID getting into it with these Islamic idiots from Iran, but, the ignorant and small minded non-thinkers in the USA and Europe are so consumed with following leftist ideology that they cannot see the the truth anymore. And that comes from someone who is not a great fan of Bush 2.
The navy should open fire next time . Then they’ll be with that pederast they call a prophet, mo-HAM-ed.

Posted by: Vink | January 7, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Hurray for Bush and his fine military machine! The U.S. will NOT BACK DOWN from twisted Iranian idiots! Hurray for our armed forces! Thank you for being strong and protecting U.S. rights in international waters!

Posted by: ez | January 7, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

lol bull, this is the government media giving the dumb gentiles more lies

Posted by: taylor | January 7, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Hurray for President Bush and our fine military who take a stand against ruthless people in international waters! Hurray for our U.S. Navy! Thanks to all our military who protect and serve! The U.S. will not be intimidat!ed by radical Iranians!

Posted by: ez | January 7, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

The US Navy showed great restraint, not an easy thing to do when you are facing a possible disaster. The commanders wouldn’t have been faulted had they blown those idiots to Allah. I bet they have since tightened up their ROE. They were lucky this time. Next time, the s*** will fly. Count on it. Oh I forgot, it’s all Bush’s fault!

Posted by: john | January 7, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

It comes down to who do you trust again. Bush or the Iranians. Bush is a proven liar so trusting the Iranians is the logical option.

Posted by: bushrots | January 7, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Hmmm…. 200 yards and a Sunfire or better

Posted by: Jim | January 7, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Gulf of Tonkin? Maybe you gentlemen and ladies should pick up a history book now and then. You shouldn’t base your entire world-view on John Stewart’s opinion. Try forming one of your own based on actual fact and not emotion. Failure to do so is a perfect recipe for amazing, outlandish paranoia and a screaming hatred that cripples your ability to see the truth. As a Brit, and one who has wide traveling experience, I can tell you that there is no finer, more just or compassionate nation on the face of the Earth than your own United States. Whether you are or not, you sound like shouting, naive spoiled children who have no apprecation for any of the gifts they’ve been given, and I mean “given” not earned. With regard to the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Johnson did actually over-dramatize a minor confrontation to justify a larger conflict but direct aggression by rogue Iranians toward U.S. warships halfway across the world and forty years later has absolutely no relevance. First, no one fired at anyone. The Iranians were actually given the benefit of the doubt and not erased. Due to the excellent judgement of the Naval commander on the scene, no one was harmed in any way. The Revolutionary Guardsmen escaped martyrdom but not through any genius or tactical brillance of their own. They exist to martyr themselves another day because of the mercy and wisdom of an American who was raised to believe in caution and the purity and sanctity of life. Unlike the savages he confronted, who were itching for a lopsided fight that would immediately earn them seven virgins, he chose a more judicious approach. The Americans were not aggressive. The Iranians were. If the entire incident was manufactured, I imagine someone on the D.C. side would be beating war-drums. I don’t hear any. All I hear is surprise that the Iranians acted so aggressively. The pols in the U.S. didn’t even file a diplomatic protest, which they were certainly entitled to do. Ah, I see. Probably part of that fiercely clever U.S. president’s smokescreen and plan to nuke the Iranians when no one is looking. He’s a dodgy one, that Bush. I wonder how since he is also apparently completely retarded. How does he manage such brilliance sans a brain? Come to your senses, all of you. When someone steps on your cat you don’t run to the blogs to flame Bush or go and grab your long and wearying list of U.S. political and social failures to try and sort out blame. Or do you? Maybe, just maybe, your collective foolishness and lack of vision is the reason that he world appears to be ganging up on you. I’m not sure what world view you intendto embrace but you ‘infidel’ are not entitled to seven virgins even if you convert to Islam. I’d stick with the devil you know because that other one won’t rest until your throat is cut and your blood waters the American soil you stand on. Good luck.

Posted by: Edward | January 7, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

This is obviously an attempt by Bush to provoke Iran. We can’t believe anything our government does as long as a proven liar like Bush is president.

Posted by: Mikey | January 7, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

allright people, you have all had your fun. Now get serious, look up; Sebel Edmonds and her disclosures to the Times on Line in the UK over the last couple of days. (just as a start!)
Ma.

Posted by: MA | January 7, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

As a wife of an active duty Navy man, the Iranians should count themselves lucky. I personally am surprised that the people in the speedboat that approached our ship within 200 yards isn’t now sharkbait.
I had my best friend come to my job today, in tears, worried that one of the ships involved was the one her husband is on. Can you imagine that? I can, my husband was on the USS JFK when they hit a boat in International waters in 2004. He was aseep at the time but the boat hit the Carrier literally right where he was sleeping. Thank God, that boat didn’t have explosives on it. Luckily my friend’s husbands ship was not involved but it still doesn’t calm the fears that a military family faces daily when their loved one is deployed.
That boat should not have come that close…period. Did they have explosives? We should never take that chance.

Posted by: Proud Navy Wife | January 7, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

You lefties are something else. You say Bush is trying to provoke? It was the IRANIANS that charged our ships idiots. I’m sure you also blame your zits on Bush. It is also Bushs’ fault that the sun comes up every morning and goes down every night.
This incident happened, and it was the Iranians that were being foolhardy. But you scum sucking liberals are total nut jobs.

Posted by: MarineSarge | January 7, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

How dare you. How dare you accuse the United States Miltary of lying. You hippy communists who don’t have a lick of respect for those who have earned the right to wear the uniform should move to Europe. I’m proposing a plan, to my Congressman, in which all those who treat the American military in this way would receive government “assistance” with their move.
Do us all a favor and stop spouting your conspiracy garbage. I don’t want to hear another word about the goverment lying. The government is not just an entity, it is people. Stop accusing them of lying unless you have evidence.

Posted by: jrmengineer | January 7, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

I see only a few people posting that appear to be both rational and knowledgable. The rest exhibit their liberal lunacy repeatedly. Liberalism has done more to divide this nation than any other radical group. Most of you are anti-military and most probably never served in the military. While I and millions of others were in Vietnam, the socialist hippies were getting a college education and joining socialist/communist groups. They spent more time protesting and taking over administration buildings, burning ROTC buildings, etc. Now these same anti-capitalists are some of the richest in our nation. Some are teachers poisoning our young minds, both in elementary, mid, and secondary educational levels, as well as colleges and universities. I sacrificed for you. What a shame! I am just thankful that we have enough young people that are patriotic and continue to serve our nation. If the liberal/socialists gain total control of this nation, what will you do when the terrorists and illegals have overtaken our nation, exhausted our funds, and turns us into a second rate nation? Oh…will you fight if attacked? Will you deny your creator and convert to islam at the threat of beheading? You people make me sick. Go drink your appletinis, drive your foreign status cars, and feed off true Americans who actually work for a living. Open your eyes people! God save America from itself!

Posted by: Earl | January 7, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

What has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Iranians is that the presumably great and powerful United States is really afraid to get into a knock down dragout with anyone. It is all bluff.
The Iranians gave us the opportunity to demonstrate that we are very dangerous to play games with. At 200 yards the Iranians could have loosed a torpedo or a floating mine. They should have been blown out of the water.
As Ronald Reagan demonstrated in Lybia, a display of the ability to reach in and destroy, tends to tame the blustering tyrants.

Posted by: X L Xenocrates | January 7, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Forget Tonkin Gulf. Forget staging an incident to allow the current admin. to go to war. Does anybody remember a ship called the USS Cole? Anybody remember how that ship got attacked? By a boat packed with explosives that was allowed to get too close. So, it would be prudent that if someone in say a small boat began making provocative manuevers, looked like they were packed with something and perhaps radioed their intentions. To take precautions. Better to be safe than sorry. And it is not as if the Iranian Revolutionary Guards haven’t done stupid things in the past. So instead of seeing boogey men under the bed like a number of posters. Realize that there are real boogeymen out there. Some who want you dead. And if they can not kill you directly any old American will do. For a start.
But then again there are a whole lot of stupid people, American and others, out there who will end up getting us into a war. Mainly because they haven’t got the slightest idea what is at stake. Or what is involved.
Or more importantly who is behind it.

Posted by: Richard | January 8, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Should have pulled the trigger. Ler em have it!!!

Posted by: rd | January 8, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

It seems to me that a lot of these libs won’t get it till there is a mushroom cloud over New York, or LA, or Chicago, or anywhere in America.

Posted by: john meyer | January 8, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Another casualty of the Iraq occupation: We can’t fight when there IS cause. And Iran knows this!

Posted by: mike | January 8, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Golden oppurtunity for Mr.Bush to rush his militsry into Iran. Lot of Oil !!!

Posted by: sivasaiva | January 8, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

The little boats got within 200 yards and had threatened the convoy? Why weren’t they blown out of the water. I guess GWB doesn’t want a war with Iran after all.

Posted by: Bob Stanford KY | January 8, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

You know, the last time I was in the Persian Gulf was 1997 and the Iranians did the same exact thing by hassling the carrier patrolling the Gulf just before Ramadan. Our ship made tracks there and it almost came to gunfire before the Iranians went home that time also. Provocation is what the islamofascists do, it’s page 1 in their playbook. If I were CO, once the threat came over the radio the 5 inchers would have been unleashed. No questions. For you lefties who think Bush fabricated this to start a war with Iran, understand that the Islamofascists want to kill you also regardless of your PC idiocy.

Posted by: Navy Vet | January 8, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Uhh, I’m sorry, but people are buying this? Let me get this straight. You, the public, believe that a bunch of little Iranian speedboats raced at a destroyer and literally said “I am coming at you. You will blow up in a couple of minutes.” (in whatever language)? Wow. Just. Wow. I guess those who forget history (even from 5-6 years ago) are doomed to repeat it.

Posted by: John Q | January 8, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Can anyone say, crazy as a loon.
The Gulf Of Tolkin, the Gulf of Tolkin,
There are no Democrats in the White the hhouse, and not enough in congress to
make a Gulf of Tolkin possible.
Oh how soon you looney stalin lovin lefties forget. So I’ll try again. I know that consumed in your rabid illogical hatred for the current president, you dulude yourselves into thinking that Iran and the global terror network it supports and supplies is not at war with this Nation.
You fall into what can only be described as some strange Bushaphobic rant, he’s dumb, he lies, he does not recycle!
How about you take the day off from caffine or something, walk the beach looking for stranded marine life, or whatever it is leftists do when their not protesting, and be thankful for those guy’s on that Ship, and that they wwere well lead. And for all the guy’s and gals like them that put their lives on line every single day, to protect your right to carry on with your lockstep radical leftist life.
It is amazing how many of the good folks here seem to hate this nation and what it stands for, I can only hope it’s a scattered collection of lost troubled, maloderous, lovers of lennin, ssitting by their computers in their “I love Che” t-shirts hitting send over, and over again. But then again, perhaps some of these folks are Not citizens of this nation.
uummm.

Posted by: CHUCK | January 8, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Just another GoldenOppurtunity for Mr.Bush to invade Iran and grab its OIL !!!!

Posted by: sivasaiva | January 8, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

It’s too bad that the military has to protect these anti-American traitors along with genuine Americans.
Well, that’s probably not fair. Some aren’t anti-American. Some are just nut cases. Pretty sad when Bill Clinton himself calls you 9-11 “truthers” nut jobs.
That would be called “a clue”. But there is no sense arguing logic or common sense to someone who isn’t interested in either facts or information. Just nursing their own sickness.

Posted by: Tom | January 8, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

Amazing, no matter how evil the enemy, Democrats hate America so much they’ll blame us.
Democrats helped the Viet Cong win in Vietnam (and, of course, turned their backs on millions of innocent people massared by their allies afterwards), wanted the Soviet Union to win the Cold War, and now roots for the Islamic terrorists to burn more Americans alive. Vote Democrat, vote for people who hate America.

Posted by: Evan Sayet | January 8, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Iranians would do NOTHING without a directive from higher ups, in this case I wouldn’t be surprised if it came straight from Ahmadenijad. Don’t forget that it is an ideologically driven country that is as close to dictatorship as it gets. No hotheaded commander of a speedboat would have done this, lest he risked having his family hang off those little gallows.
Iranians do the same sh*t as with nukes. They play games and see how far they can push.

Posted by: Kevin | January 8, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Lets see….
Iranians dumping what look like explosives into the water.
They then radio to our ships, “We are going to blow you up!”
This a few months after they took several British sailors hostage.
Yet some waterheads say that the US is at fault.
How?
As far as America “wanting” to invade Iran…uh, why? What would it serve us? If our intention were to remove Festus and his Gap jacket from power, we can do it with airpower and submarines. One Ohio-Class and a B-52 could blot out all of our opposition in the middle east from existance. Just a little something for you to keep in mind.

Posted by: Austin Milbarge | January 8, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

I can’t seem to understand why so many liberals always attack their own country. I can see for my self how ridiculous and blatantly stupid your statements are. Do you forget where you live? I mean can’t you people just grow up and stand by your commander in chief that YOUR COUNTRY AND COUNTRYMEN ELECTED to lead us?? Those Iranians Should have been blow to pieces, if I were commanding either one of those vessels there would be no more Iranian attack boats in those waters.

Posted by: Jeff P | January 8, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

1,000 yards sounds reasonable to me, especially for a fast enemy gunship.
But in the Straits of Hormuz, 500 yards is a reasonable perimeter for a small vessel that is not displaying hostile intentions.
200 yards? That’s inexcusable. They should fired on a sailing dhow at that range.

Posted by: Mister Tee | January 8, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

200 yards? Why were the Iranian boats not vaporized? In the middle east, this will be considered an Iranian victory and those clowns will be emboldened.

Posted by: Question Why | January 8, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

This is just a set up for when we do ALLOW one of our ships to be attacked so that we can have “justification” for beginning the Iranian war. I feel sorry for the service members that will be sacrificed for the corporatocracy and the countless Iranian civilians that will be slaughtered by Bush’s bombs.

Posted by: usiscrazy | January 8, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am

HA HA HA.scared. glory of RussiA!!!

Posted by: Stepanich | January 8, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

We blew one of their boats out of the water and killed all aboard when we were over there in ’80-’81 – during the hostage crisis. They had harpoon missles -
not something you want to fool with.
They are stupid people. If they want to attack us, then we need to blow them up. It’s that simple.
Who cares? There will be no repercussions – other than the sound of their sinking ships.

Posted by: markustee | January 8, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

Trying to provoke an event to draw the US into a conflict. Good idea for Iran as each day brings the U.S. closer to victory in Iraq and lessens Iranian influence in the region. In short, they are getting desperate. We have all the force and they are sandwiched between two countries that are under U.S. control. Teetering in the balance are the youth of Iran seeking Western culture and democracy, who we wish not to alienate, otherwise we would have already invaded. Bush is playing the long hand. Left alone, Iran will implode from within at the hands of it’s own elite youth.

Posted by: Chuck | January 8, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am

Iran Navy harassed & provoked in New York Harbor!
The Strait of Hormuz is part of Iran — in fact, it actually takes a detour into the country. In other words, this “serious provocation” would be like Iran calling foul if their ships were “harassed and provoked” in New York Harbor.

Posted by: Rick Gordon | January 8, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am

What would the American Navy do if some other navy ship was that close to OUR shores?

Posted by: Eric | January 8, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am

What in the hell are they waiting for blow them out of the water and be done with it. What are we cowards?

Posted by: Kenneth | January 8, 2008, 4:51 am 4:51 am

This is to those on the political left, who have risen to the defense of America’s every enemy, who have imagined the worst of any government elected official not of their choice or party, who have impugned the service of so many good young men and women in the U.S. armed services: “A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand” – Abraham Lincoln. Think back over the last 225+ years of American history, and tell us which great American leader would side with America’s enemy during time of war? JFK? Truman? FDR? Lincoln? Washington? Which American tradition are you following? Defining America as “evil” against all evidence to the contrary, does not benefit Americans. I’m a military vet, and happen to be in contact with many young Marines. Some are discouraged, not by their duty assignments, not by the fact that they’ve been to war and back 2 or 3 times. Not by their injuries, multiple concussions, PSTD, or the friends they’ve lost. The most damning indictment I make against the political left is that these kids picked up the BIPARTISAN call to arms after 9/11, they put themselves in harms way for their country, for YOUR country (for those readers who are Americans here), only to come back from war to a “redefined reality”, a “politically inoperative” truth, to a America divided by left-wing political opportunists who were “against the war before they voted for it..”. The lazy, the cowardly, the self-absorbed of the “patriotic” political left can’t hold a candle to these kids, these noble warriors … who are just like those kids on those three ships that just put their lives on the line for you ingrates again. Again, which great American are you following? JFK? FDR? or is it perhaps Trotsky or Lenin? If you glory at the prospect of America’s defeat, you may very well realize your desire, because the “right wing”, the “neo-con’s”, the “red states”, the “southern red-necks”, or whoever it is you image our defenders to be – can’t defend a divided country. Remember that, when you say that the President, the DOD, the Navy Commander of that battle group, or the kids manning the guns, were all a part of your imagined conspiracy. Actions have consequences, your own included.

Posted by: Scott from Oceanside, CA | January 8, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am

This is utter BS. In 1994, during southern watch, iranian speedboats would routinely touch up against our ship. No 200 yards, I mean touching the ship, and the real kicker, they were carrying tomohawks on the tuna towers.
That means that even touching, they could have struck from a long way off. WE had an iranian p3 fly down our flight deck and give the admiral the finger, and thanks to the president back then, we weren’t allowed to do anything. This is old news. Put on a uniform and go back a couple of decades. While sensational to the masses, this story is lazy journalism, exploitation, and announces the authors ignorance of the realities of war and the persian gulf.
Thanks to stupid journalists, American sailors will have to die before they can defend themselves. Why? Because you would use the same ignorence displayed in this article, to blame the US Navy for actions being carried out by the iranians for close to two decades. When it happens, I hope you toast their deaths, it will be because people like you dont have a clue, and will never leave your world, for the one required to provide you your fantasy of safety.

Posted by: Dave | January 8, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am

jock59801, There you go again, bashing Bush for some OBVIOUSLY he had/has nothing to do with.
You Bush haters are gonna be lost when Romney takes power… or I guess you’ll just change targets, heh?
The Iranians have LONG been are provovateurs (remember the crisis mis-0managed by your bud, Jimmy Carter – what a failure that dude was), you should know that. But then again…

Posted by: TheWiseOne | January 8, 2008, 6:30 am 6:30 am

I say give a warning of 1000 yards. If any boat come within that range blow them up. We need to show some backbone and that the US will not take bulling from a weaker country any longer.
If the boat was packed with explosives would they have been able to stop it in time. 200 yards is not that far from a speeding boat bearing down on you.

Posted by: Ed | January 8, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

My God! Do any of you moron’s listen to yourselves? Conspiracies? NeoCons? If you are truly that dissatisfied with your country maybe it’s to emigrate to France! 8 out of 10 of these posts are a perfect example of why the electoral college exists. What really scares me is that all you morons VOTE!

Posted by: WhozDan | January 8, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

All you nay sayers ought to watch the news, other then the liberal networks or CNN. Iran ADMITTED to this event although they claimed it to be a “normal” happening. Clearly it is not and it is becoming about time the Iranians were reminded of just what their distant “Uncle Sam” can do when provoked.
You liberal weenies who live such a frightened existence and would as soon remain on your knees in supplication to aggressors as stand and defend yourselves should go hide in a corner somewhere and allow the adults among us to take care of business.

Posted by: JOE | January 8, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am

To allow a hostile craft, with announced intentions of blowing up the ship, within 200 yards is the height of incompetence on the part of the U.S. captain. 200 yards can be crossed in a flash, and if he doesn’t know that then he has no business in command. He recklessly hazarded his ship and should be removed from command.

Posted by: Bob M | January 8, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

A lot of paranoid people here… get a grip. This stuff has been happening for years. And those of you moronic “blame America first” twits need to take a look at where your allegiance lies. Iran has done these types of provacative actions before… Oh, and by the way, the Iranians admitted to doing this. It’s not a cover-up, it’s not war-mongering by the U.S. or George Bush… It happens… in real life… it’s not fantasy or someone’s agenda at the White House. Get a grip morons…

Posted by: AJ | January 8, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

As is normal with this administration, they only start wars with small countries that do not pose a threat. WE DO NOT BELONG IN THE MIDDLE EAST, WORRY ABOUT HOME. CAN YOU PEOPLE IMAGINE IF THE TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS USED TO FUND WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST WAS USED INSTEAD HERE AT HOME. RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE.

Posted by: Truth Hurts | January 8, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am

all the brave comments on here and not one willing to join the military. events such as this one happen every day in the real world.

Posted by: Wilco | January 8, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

To all the Americans who want to blame the United States for events like this: Why do you trust the good intentions of renegade soldiers from a maniacal regime over the intentions of your military and your president? If America is so imperialistic, and Iraq was all about oil, why aren’t we taking their oil and driving our gas prices down to 50 cents a gallon? Why do you think Bush is more dangerous than a tyrant whose stated policy is the destruction of Israel and the West?
It frightens me that Americans who despise their country and distrust their military so much will actually have some say in choosing our next president… Just try and remember to take off your tin-foil hat before you head to the polls!

Posted by: Matt | January 8, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

Wow! This story really brought out the conspiracy theorists and America-haters! They took an incident of aggression by Iranians and turned it into a ploy by George Bush as an excuse to attack Iran. Incredible.

Posted by: Skepticus | January 8, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Set against the backdrop of the pending summit meeting in Jerusalem with Presidents Bush and Abbas, and Prime Minister Olmert, I believe this Revolutionary Guards operation had political objectives that were a no-lose situation for the Iranians, and a lose-lose for us. If our ships did nothing at all (which is what happened), we’re shown to be a “weak sister” in the area who can’t influence the future for Israel and Palestine. If we sank the “harmless” Iranian boats (which Iran’s UN Ambassador would have then claimed were only “fishing”, and probably had rods and reels on board as cover for their presence and status), the resulting brouhaha would have overshadowed the conference and embarrassed the Sunni Palestinian Prime Minister Abbas for meeting with the “war mongering” USA. The timing of this operation is no accident and was probably approved at the highest levels of the Shiite Iranian government in support of their Hamas proxy in the Gaza Strip.
That said, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards speedboat skipper did the United States a favor by showing us which of our destroyer captains in this group of three ships was slow to respond to a rapidly developing threat. None of the armed Iranian speedboats should have been permitted to close within even 2000 yards of any of these ships, much less 200! With a more aggressive defensive posture from our Navy, this Iranian political stunt would have fallen apart, showing us to be a “strong horse” in the area.
Iranian political operation or not, when our Nation places in harm’s way a multi-billion dollar armed destroyer with hundred’s of Sailors and Marines on board, we expect that the ship’s Captain will not flinch in exercising his responsiblity to protect his ship and crew. The captain should be reprimanded, and possibly relieved, for apparently not being at battle stations when he initiated the passage of the Straits of Hormuz, and for failing to place a cannon shot across the bow of the lead speedboat at a range of say, 3000 yards. With the RADAR, SONAR, Night Observation Devices, Helicopter, and computerized weapons systems and illumination rounds at his disposal, the Captain’s negiligence in protecting his ship is glaring.
The Iranians should not take comfort in their succesful probe of our security in these troubled waters. I suspect that the next time the Iranians present one of our warships with a live fire target opportunity like this, we’ll take full advantage of it.

Posted by: Concerned Vet | January 8, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

I think that a warning shot would have been in order. …Or Yosemite Sam mudflaps on our ships with the message, “Back Off, I Say!”. Damn Iranian varmints.

Posted by: Skepticus | January 8, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

I’m amazed at the sheer stupidity revealed in some of these comments. Gulf of Tonkin? Yeah and Jane Fonda is an ardent patriot right?
The USS Cole should paint a very clear and adequate portrait of how serious this threat was. Yet the libs will fall back on their tired comparisons to Vietnam as they wish for our failure in Iraq. After all AMERICA IS EVIL according to every liberal mind; greedy, excessive, violent and small-minded, we need to be taught a lesson, right?
The slogan, “America Will Never Forget” has faltered in the wake of liberal acquiesecence to the whims of a small group of global thugs. We are encouraged to forget the lessons of 9/11 through the constant bombardment of “facts” that prove how evil America is in the world.
From where does most of the foreign aid for underdeveloped nations come? America.
Who gives more money, resources and people to the causes of international diplomacy and goodwil than any other country? America, again.
When the Tsunami hit Sri Lanka, who sent more aid to the region than any other nation, by 500%? Yep, America.
The libs must be right though, they’ve said it so frequently and for so long. Say it with me.. “America is EEEEEVIL.” What a bunch of rubes.

Posted by: Dean | January 8, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

The Navy did not fire because there was no reason to start a war over normal incidents in that area. Does anyone remember the US was once friends with Iran?

Posted by: Wilco | January 8, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

Inevitable! Surely some lame, political jerk has to make this a BUSH PROVOCATION. Where do you people come from? This is a plain and simple case of Iran pulling another attempted suicide bomging of a U S Navy ship and being warned awsy. I wish our gunners had blown them out of the water!

Posted by: Manshadow | January 8, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

They used restraint that could have proved deadly for American lives. Next time they should remove the threat. The Iranians have been warned. Enough said. God bless our troops.

Posted by: Joe Pepe NYC | January 8, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Let’s face it – you cannot patty-cake with these Islamic Fascists. We should’ve bypassed Iraq, turned Afghanistan into a sheet of glass, then looked at the rest of the extremists and posed the question “Who’s next?” Unfortunately, our leaders don’t have the stomach to do what needs to be done.

Posted by: Ian | January 8, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Has there been any independent verification of any provocation?
I’m sorry but, we cannot take our governments word at face value any longer.
As others have indicated previously.
Remember the “Gulf of Tonkin”?
Bush is saber rattling once again!
Bush should be impeached for not upholding the Constitution of the United States.

Posted by: Kevin | January 8, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

It was obviously a test run to gauge the reaction from the international media and Iran’s support in the U.S. Next time they’ll probablty try for the real thing. The left-wing is going to bray “Gulf of Tonkin” (or whatever) regardless. The President will, as usual, pay little heed and orders will have been previously given to blow them out of the water. Joy Behar, as one of the left’s chief spokespeople, will make some sort of asinine statement. Harry Reid will say something stupid again and life will go on.

Posted by: countrycuz | January 8, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Way to close for comfort. It sounds to me like they were probing just to see how close they can get.
C’mon Captain, time to Man Up and greenlight a 500 meter “no-go” zone for all fast boats showing hostile intent.
Or tell them it’s 500 meters, but actually start shooting when they’re 550 meters out. Just so they don’t get think we’re pushovers.

Posted by: Mister Tee | January 8, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Of course the government would never fabricate or embellish an incident like this. *cough* Gulf of Tonkin.

Posted by: Drink the Koolaid | January 8, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

can anyone say FALSE FLAG??

Posted by: J.S. | January 8, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Al Gore and Greenpeace should be ###### that the Iranians were throwing trash in the water.

Posted by: Grogan | January 8, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Iran isn’t trying to build a nuclear bomb you silly gooses. Osama bin Laden IS! I mean, all he needs is some weapons grade uranium and then actually making the bomb is easy. The kind of weapons grade uranium that Iran now has because of their centrifuges. Do I need to do the math for anyone, or should I just spell it out in crayon for you?

Posted by: William | January 8, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Leave it to some wackos to accuse the U. S. of provoking Iran. Blame Bush for everything. Get a brain you idiots the incident happened in international waters any fool would realize getting that close to Navy Warships is asking for a destruction.

Posted by: Rick | January 8, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

“How can u fight a war with people who strap bombs to themselves and drive ships to the Navy to blow them up, they are crazy people. I think we should stay away from any confrontation with ALL the middle eastern countries.”
That would be fine, but when we tried that they flew planes into our buildings on our soil. Keep the fight over there, and God bless the soldiers that are keeping us safe here at home by taking the fight to them.

Posted by: Pat | January 8, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

It isn’t just some US neocons that want a confrontation. The Iranians may want a real military confrontation also very soon. Iran’s oil exports are declining, and the subsidies to its population is becoming much more of a burden. The Iranian regime may soon need an “Islamic Cull” in order to keep its own population in line. And that means war.

Posted by: Andrew P | January 8, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

It’s too bad catapults have gone out of style, we could use a few to throw liberals at the Iranian speedboats. That would raise the IQ of both nations provided they survived the flight. If not, then the liberals would support the food chain of the Persian Gulf. It’s a win-win situation!

Posted by: Kyle V | January 8, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

The only thing more disturbing than Iran provoking the US ships (which I think our Navy acted supperb and made the US look good) are the anti-american Americans blaming the US and believe that Bush WANTS another war.
Take off your tinfoil hats, put down the kool-aid, wakeup, and realize those people are a threat!

Posted by: Right Wing Red | January 8, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

packrat, you don’t know much about naval operations…

Posted by: Jazz | January 8, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

It was not a test of our military prowess, or of our Government’s abilitiy to deal with Iranian aggression and provocation…it was a test to see how our people would react to such an incident … to test the water of our discontent. Iran and the radical Muslim movement is very clever and to them, weakness in the minds of their opponents people is like blood in the water for a shark.
If Bush had wanted a war, as so many weak minded people in ehre seem to think he does, is this incident not the perfect opportunity to get into it? U.S. ships assaulted in international waters by Iranaian provocatuers repeating the actions that damaged the USS Cole and killed so many American sailors! Yet, the Bush men held fire at great risk to themselves and thus, some how, thwarted Bushes “plans”. My God! Do you not have any powers of logic at all? Are the America haters and Iranian sympathizers so brain washed their God given powers of deduction have been removed?

Posted by: Jin | January 8, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

What’s on their minds? Well, they hope to start a holy war, create one where there is not, and rally the middle east under their banner. The increase soldier numbers in Iraq are effective and they are looking for other ways to create trouble. I think it speaks volumes in the restraint that the US has shown and will only prove to the world how immature and small minded Iranian leadership is.

Posted by: Kaitlyn | January 8, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Four actions.
(1)Radio that you are too close to us.
(2)Bullhorn that we will fire if you persist.
(3)Warning fire across their bow.
No retreat?
(4)Then create shark food.
There is a lot of space out there.
Invade ours purposely,
Then face the consequence’s.
U.S. veteran, Vietnam
Navy 1971 and Army 1980

Posted by: Gary Jones | January 8, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I can’t believe all the anti-American comments here!!! Does anyone remember the USS Cole? Also who’s supplying IED’s to insurgents ? (Iran)…. All you left wingers live in a Disney Land state of mind. I bet if you were on that ship and someone threatend to blow you up you would start shooting!! I think the U.S. waits to long to respond to situations like this. Look at the USS Cole, everyone hesitated to make the ‘use of force’ call and look what happened. I’m certain that if we had blown those Iraninan boats to bits that no one would try to approach our Naval ships again! Like the ‘ol saying goes “give them an inch and they will take a mile.” They will continue to push the envelope until we respond with force. Next time don’t wait until they are within 200yds – take them out at 2000 yds.

Posted by: Stumper3 | January 8, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

bushrots, you possess a crippled logic…it’s not “either or”, and the world does not exist in some sort of simple dichotomy…it’s very likely that the Iranians tested the US Navy, as they have before, and attempted to provoke a military response on the part of the Navy ships…

Posted by: Jazz | January 8, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

**Why are they trying to provoke the U.S. now? If they keep it up, they are only making an American response more clearly justified.**
That is what the Iranian president Ahmadinejad was hoping for. Remember he is as wacko as Bush is.
Fortunately the people in charge used their brains and nothing happened but a news story.

Posted by: WDRussell | January 8, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

This to the person who makes the most sense of this situation.
LT Mike
Kudos to you.
Keep them straight, keep them thinking, keep them safe.
“We will be here. Waiting, and Watching…”

Posted by: Watcher | January 8, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Maybe the Iranians didnt want the US ship to enter their territorial waters. The last time a US ship entered Iran’s waters, 300 innocent civilians in an Iranian Civilian Airbus were murdered by a US missile…in what i would say is one of the worst acts of terror ever.

Posted by: joe | January 8, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Maybe the terrorists spoofed the communications of the Iranian ship to try to escalate tensions and to possibly cause an international incident. I would want to know more from a signals perspective to be sure that it was indeed a revolutionary guard Captain or Signalman that made the remarks. JW

Posted by: JW | January 8, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

We should just go destroy Iran ,Iraq, and Afghanistan, they are nothing but a deadly disease on the World. And how is Islam a nation of peace when all they want do is hurt everyone? Everyone would love the war to be over, but what would really happen if we pulled out and went home? I am sure there would be major retaliations from the Middle East towards us, they would see us as cowards and assume that they can come over here and destroy us. If they want to destroy us, why don’t we do it to them first? I know this is very radical, but honestly, the world would be a better place without those countries.

Posted by: Tera | January 8, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I’ve got it!
Bush wants to start a war with Iran before the election. Once the war is started, he’ll claim there are thousands of undercover Iranian militants in the country, delcare martial law, suspend the constitution, and declare himself supreme ruler of the world forever and ever.
All this will be announced, of course, from his pillow fort in the living room of his Crawford ranch while wearing a newspaper hat.

Posted by: Eureka | January 8, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Yeah, you want reality? Check the video of the harassment, which I hadn’t seen before. The speedboats were certainly provoking the US ships, and were posturing offensively…very clearly attempting to draw fire…and within very close range. From my naval experience in the Strait, the boat crews almost got what they wanted. The skipper of the US ships displayed a HUGE amount of restraint, and would have been more than justified in dusting the Iranian boats…

Posted by: Jazz | January 8, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I don’t know. That blue boat looked
an awful-lot like a 19-21ft sea-ray.

Posted by: joseph | January 8, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Eurika-Bush already declared marshal
law aka. Homeland Security.
Remember when the newly former cnfederate states were dis-comforted
by the presence of pinkertons and
blue-coats. Posse Comitatus.
Only now it’s NI and blackwater.

Posted by: joseph | January 8, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

What if it was a diversion to see what we would do in order to practice a strike with their Submarines. Of course it could be just plain stupid too, who knows what goes through the minds of children. Hopefully we’re watching all angles of the situation.

Posted by: Bluestreak 327 | January 8, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

No suicide Iranian martyrs today. Maybe next time.

Posted by: benjo | January 8, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

For those who are old enough, this is not the first time US Navy is flexing in the Persian Gulf. USS Vincenne shot an Iranian passenger plane and killed all 300 something on board, including children, women, and crew in 1988. We backed the Shah’s dictatorship for decades and staged a coup there in 1953. Did we expect to be welcome in the Persian (not American) Gulf with flowers and champagne?

Posted by: Mark | January 8, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

To all the anti Bush comentators and the naive comments about how benein the provocation by I ran was:
These are warships in international waters being harrassed by a beligerent nation
Wake idiots

Posted by: Volunteer | January 8, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

The leaders of Iran are suuper stupid. If we let them get away with acts like this, no nation in the world will respect us. I think it would endanger more of our soldiers and seamen.

Posted by: Laroy | January 9, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

i am a sailor abord one of the ships from that day, i know what happened. this was the just the other day. yea after a sailor of the hopper was lost at sea. respects go out to the family of the petty officer 2nd class who was lost. we are here for a reason.we are here to make sure nothing happens back home and keep order here. please keep all criticism out the door. i never thought as a sailor we would actually come close to another combat with another country in international waters.

Posted by: US SAILOR | January 9, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

The incident did happen!. My son is on the USS INGRAHAM. They were armed and ready. In fact he said that at one point, he could see the color of the mans eyes driving one of the speed boats. Hooray for the U.S. navy!!! What a bunch of courageous young men and women. Keep up the good work!!

Posted by: kim | January 9, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

If this is true, than the Iranian Revolutionary forces are far more stupid than I imagine; unless it’s their plan to start a ‘war of attrition’ against the U.S. They could be just testing the resolve of our Navy, however- with their half-baked threats. Unless, we see a confrontation between our Naval forces and something more formidable, [say a cruiser or some subs]; I don’t think it will amount to much. However, their small boats may be used as suicide boats [fitted with high-yield explosives] if a war breaks out in the Gulf between the U.S. and the Iranian navies. We’ll have to keep domination of the air and screen our capital ships with destroyers and subs. Either way, it would be interesting to see Iranian naval tactics.

Posted by: K Thibault | January 9, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Oh please; the stupid ship commander why did’t you just shoot. It is a navy for God’s sake it was not a fishing vasel, it was NAVY. Should’t the navy be responsible for security?? 200 yard? Remember what 007 did to that troop in Azarbaijan?.

Posted by: Mikey From Isfahan | January 10, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Think. US ships have right of free passage in international waters. Iranian speedboats who make threatening moves towards anyone’s warships better be prepared to face the consequences of their actions.
I can’t believe that anyone would defend a dictator who proudly proclaimed that Israel should be wiped off the face of the earth. Jeez, that’s like defending Nazis.
Think.

Posted by: Duke | January 10, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

I can’t beleive that Iranian Navy should have done something like that. They are idiots. Our government is about at war with Iran in the near future. I agree with Duke that we need to take out the threat of a dictator who proudly proclaimed that Isreal should be wiped off from the world map, and support terrorists that kill our soldiers in Irag.

Posted by: david | January 11, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

What are american warships doing in the persian gulf in the first place? That trumped up war in Iraq is about the dumbest conflict since I fought with my brother over a Barbie doll. But ok, now they are there. Bush has all but declared war on Iran, God only knows why. Bush and Cheney, known as the worst leaders in the history of these United States of America. Do they have the capacity in their pea brain to understand anything beyond, “they have oil, we want it”? WWII started with Polish Soldiers invading cross border Germany. Turns out these “Polish Soldiers” were germans in polish uniform. With all the controversy and conspiracy surrounding certain September 11 2001 demolitions in New York, I’d be surprised if the boats weren’t sponsered by some American agenda; namely the invasion of a soveriegn foreign country. Instead of trying to push biast “democratic” views (which aren’t working so well here) on them, why don’t we try perceive and understand their culture better. Maybe we could even learn something. Otherwise, let’s go home, Dr Phil is on. Does anyone see a pattern here? Or do we need a lecture on what the world may be like after a war which could destroy the planet?

Posted by: Rueben | January 13, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

LOL hang on tight , Americans are believing thier government again.
I bet way more inocents die in Iran than did in Iraq.
If the United states plan is to take over Earth and all it’s resources then I just wish they’d hurry up. All the lies are so tiresome , just kill more people faster please , it’s insulting to our intelligence to suffer this steady diet of bovine residue year after year. JUST DO IT

Posted by: William | January 21, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am

Pure Iranian provocations. We will squash them like roaches. Iran is the beast of the East.

Posted by: The Who | April 26, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Notice how those filthy little leftist tries to twist things around to blame this on America.

Posted by: Wayne | July 1, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.