Joint Chiefs Chair Warns Obama & Clinton on Iraq
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl Reports: The Joint Chiefs chairman has a word of warning to Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton: A rapid of withdrawal from Iraq would lead to a "chaotic situation" and would "turnaround the gains we have achieved, and struggled to achieve, and turn them around overnight.
Admiral Mullen’s comments came in a response to a question about what the Joint Chiefs are doing to prepare for a new president, given that two of the candidates have called for a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.
"We need to be prepared across the board for what a new president will bring," Mullen said. "I do worry about a rapid withdrawal. . . [that would] turn around the gains we have achieved and struggled to achieve and turn them around overnight."
Asked to define a "rapid withdrawal," Mullen said, "a withdrawal that would be so fast that it would leave us in a chaotic situation and the gains we have achieved would be lost."
That said, Mullen added: "When a new president comes in, I will get my orders and I will carry them out."
Mullen, of course, will still be the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when the next president is sworn in. His term goes until September 2009 and could be renewed for another two years after that.
Mullen, however, also made it clear that the large commitment of U.S. forces in Iraq is coming at a steep price.
He said that another 3,000 to 4,000 trainers are needed in Afghanistan. But those trainers cannot be sent, he said, until there are further drawdowns in Iraq. There simply aren’t enough available troops.
"We’d like to get those trainers out there as fast as we can," he said. "Clearly in Afghanistan the training mission is at the top . . . we need more trainers than we need anything else. . . Clearly it will take forces drawing down in Iraq to provide the headroom to meet that mission."
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Who cares? It’s costing way to much to keep it “stable.”
Get out before we are completely …..ed
Posted by: Tor | February 28, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
And I believe they said they would meet with the joint chief chair
Posted by: Bishop | February 28, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
First order of business on 1/21/09 – replace Mullen
Posted by: Tor | February 28, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I think we should pull the troops out and move the Obama campaign headquarters there.
Posted by: jim | February 28, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Hey can anyone tell me how can MCCain poll so high in the GE if the republicans are voting with us
Posted by: Bishop | February 28, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Couldn’t Obama give one of his “change” speeches to the people of Iraq and make them delusional? It worked in the U.S.
Posted by: Jeff | February 28, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
lol
Jim’ you are funny”
I am employing the gov to listen to my g.o.d.’s plan if they did they could pay for ten”
Of those Iraq war’s rebuild them all and still leave us smelling like Saints as a nation under god;’
Posted by: richard sievert | February 28, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
here yee, here yee, This “front runners” use the Iraq war just to advance themselves to the pulpit.These arm chair generals know that are just bluffing and un informed americans believe their story. I’ll bet my house and salary that if they make it to the Presidency their words will be nothing but that words. Bluffers !!!
Posted by: Frank Soto | February 28, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
“Bishop”
It’s a Clinton conspiracy. Just ask any Obama supporter. It’s all her fault.
Posted by: J | February 28, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Drawing down in Iraq to address the situation in Afghanistan is the only thing that makes sense. Our mission has been accomplished in Iraq. Time for the Iraqi people to take care of themselves. We’ll still have a presence there and and will be close by. There will be some chaos whether we redeploy now, a year from now or 50 years from now. You have to take the training wheels off some time
Posted by: Louis | February 28, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Whatever the generals believe I trust Hillary to do the right thing. Obama has no idea what he is doing in what has to do with Foreign Policy. He thinks the President of the United States, the leader of the Free World is at the same level as Dictators…Pathetic
Posted by: Gabriel | February 28, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Are Bush&Cheney Now Politicizing Military? Neither Bush nor McCain know Difference between Defensive War and War of Aggression, of Choice?
When he said the U.S. might stay in Iraq for 100 years, Senator John McCain(R-Ariz.) explained he was referring to the kind of military presence the U.S. has had in Japan, Germany, and South Korea since the mid-20th century.
Does this mean McCain fails to grasp the very different circumstances that caused the U.S. to occupy those countries as opposed to Unprovoked War on Iraq, and present Occupation?
The Axis nations had made aggressive war on America and the U.S. had every right to occupy them after it conquered them. It also had a U.N. mandate to defend South Korea from the aggression of the Communist North. It was America’s responsibility to “Maintain the Peace” to be in those countries.
America was defending itself or, as in the case of South Korea, a nation that had been the victim of aggression.
But the U.S. is the aggressor against Iraq. Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan called the war “illegal.” The preponderant majority of Iraqis, surveys report, want the U.S. to get out now.
Posted by: Prevere | February 28, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Gains? Please explain. Exactly what have we gained, or hope to gain, in Iraq that would even come close to justifying the one million innocent lives lost (men, women, and children) including our brave warriors? There is no honor to be gained from a dishonorable invasion and all the patriotic smoke grenades in the world will not hide this truth.
Posted by: Citizen1960 | February 28, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
who doesnt know that democrats have a vested interest in giving Iraq up day 1 they have to just litsen to harry “the war is lost” reid, they have no guts for the fight and they want america to lose they have been saying that for years. when have you ever heard them or their minions say anything else but our tropps are killing innocent civilians, heck look the code ponk hags sent over 250,000 doallrs to the insurgents to help them fight against america, code pink and other liberal orgs, treat our troops like crap all the time back here at home, not letting then deplane at airports, not letting then do urban training, allwoing them to harass recruiters, and the termination of ALL jrotc programs at ALL california schools. liberals hate america plane and simple.
Posted by: Mr American | February 28, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Well, what is the alternative?? Stay until we go bankrupt?? There has been a virtual news blackout towards any information from Iraq. We don’t have a clue to when the Iraqi military can do the job. If we leave right away, yes things might go crazy but how much longer can we keep the military deployed??
Posted by: Brent | February 28, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
I am wondering if this administration has ever taken a look at itself in the foreign policy mirror and the picture is not pretty. What the hell are they doing in someone’s else country bulling them and meddling in their affairs. This is complete violation of the sovereignty of another nation under international law. Nothing justifies it. The blood that continues to be shed is being shed for capitalist gains.
Posted by: Uretha | February 28, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I love it. I wonder how the media will ‘damage controll’ all this in the general election. Not only will the GOP do anything to continue winning in Iraq to help Mc Cain, certainly all the military commanders will as well.
Cmon Obama backed media -SPIN IT. Obama should goto Iraq and tell all the people about ‘hope and dreams’ ……then pull out all the troops …….LOL
Posted by: tomdavie | February 28, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
“tomdavie”
That is a good idea but most other countries wouldn’t be duped by Super Obama…lol
Posted by: J | February 28, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
blank – i think we can quote the great BILLY MADISON in saying “what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.”
You say 9/11 could happen again if Barack was voted in? Well you know what, If Bush actually paid ANY attention to the NUMEROUS reports about Osama and the threat of planes being used to attack our country, it would have NEVER happend in the first place.
Bush has used 9/11 as an EXCUSE to go into war in Iraq, even though NOT ONE of the attackers was from Iraq. Barack will go after the REAL TARGET – OSAMA. Something that should have been priority number 1, seven years ago.
Posted by: J | February 28, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
GW Bush used scare tactics and cheating to win a second term. McCain will use the same scare tactics and cheating.
Posted by: kimberlygwade | February 28, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
McCain/Rumsfeld in 08
Experience to Die For. Let’s keep fighting. Withdrawing from Iraq = surrender. Iraq will be stable and safe in no time. Hang in there another decade folks. 12 billion per month spent in Iraq is not needed in America.The Bush economy is doing fine. We need more tax cuts, but, this time, let’s make them for the even-richer.
Iraq = good. Question it and you are a traitor. McCain/Rumsfeld. What me worry?
Posted by: Billy Smith | February 28, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Chaos if we pull out? There’s chaos NOW! The “surge” wasn’t exactly working last Sunday when another 56 innocent Iraqi’s were killed because Bush and Cheney lied us into a war. THE NEOCONS CREATED THE CHAOS. THEY were warned and warned and warned NOT to attempt to take Baghdad with less than 450,000 troops. The FULL blame for this insiduous war is BUSH AND HIS LYING VP AND RUMSFELD AND RICE. We won’t get fooled again!
Posted by: eric | February 28, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
i’m sure Clinton will get us out of Iraq in a timely fashion and help the Iraqi’s return to their country and build a great nation..
Posted by: emmy | February 28, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
So what? Let Iraq deal with its own shiz-it. Let’s spend our $265 Million per day in another way, or better yet, stop borrowing the same $265 Million per day from Communist China and Saudi Arabia, home of the murderers of 9-11. If they want U.S. miltary, let them pay for Blackwater directly, instead of the American taxpayers paying for Blackwater.
Posted by: Frank | February 28, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
AJ
…and we thought that was Obama…lol
Posted by: J | February 28, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Obama – Farrakhan 08!
No need to worry – McCain will defeat either one of the Democraps ..
Posted by: Bruce | February 28, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
I would think that the Admirals tone will change once a new administration is in place. The current one is very vindictive and has no problems tossing out career officers who’s assessment of the situation runs counter to W’s view.
Posted by: Russ G | February 28, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
If they are truly a good people and are employed to succeed Jesus Christ then god will protect them if not let the cards fall where they may;/
There are issues far greater here than there”
Posted by: richard sievert | February 28, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
It would be preferable and more appropriate if the current president kept out of the election frivia, and gracefully leave office.
Posted by: Uretha | February 28, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
It is time to come home and start taking care of our own, it makes no difference how long we are there or how fast we start pulling back, they will go right back to fighting each other and someone like Sadam will be right back in power.
The military knows the U.S. is not trained nor can we fight Urban warfare. Our Military is designed to Destroy everything in its path and then start over. We are not Policemen.
Politicians need to wake up, War is an extension of what they cannot handle, when our Military is called on, we need to quit sacrificing our troops, and use our High Tech Firepower.
Posted by: pathlo | February 28, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Hillary is the only one who said 60 days. Barack was a lot more realistic and said that with gradualy withdrawal over the course of a few years after careful CONSIDERATION of the stability. Hillary is the I WANT THEM OUT NOW crazy person. Barack is the let’s take it ONE STEP AT A TIME, and WE CANNOT JUST START PULLING OUT TROOPS WITHOUT MAKING SURE THAT THE AMERICAN CIVILIANS in Iraq are protected. Barack is careful and thorough. Hillary is crazy lady.
Posted by: Angie | February 28, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
This is only to be expected from an admnistration that lied its way into office and into an Iraq war that is ruining our economy and taking resources away from the real “war on terror.”
As others have said, the Joint Chiefs will be singing a different tune come January 2009, as they can’t speak freely under Bush! Heckuvajob Admiral Mullen!!!
Posted by: Jackt51 | February 28, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
OF COURSE there will be chaos… but let me remind this silly right wing that THEY should have KNOWN THIS BEFORE they charged in WITHOUT A PLAN! This entire invasion was STUPID and ILL THOUGHT! It should have NEVER been necessary to topple an entire nation! The blood of hundreds of thousands are on the very hands that now scream that chaos will prevail if we pull out! HYPOCRITES!
Posted by: RW | February 28, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Admiral Mullen needs to be replaced IMMEDIATELY! He lacks vision and knowledge of history.
SUNNI & SHIA MUSLIMS ARE ALWAYS GOING TO FIGHT EACH OTHER.
Maniac muslims (shia and sunni) have been fighting each other for 1400 years.
So unless American can afford the lives, limbs, mental health and more trillions of dollars to KEEP SUNNI & SHIA APART, we need to GET THE HELL OUT OF IRAQ NOW!
If troops (notice the deceptive ‘trainers’?) are needed in Afghanistan to deal with the maniac muslims of 911, THAT IS WHERE AMEIRCAN TROOPS SHOULD BE!
Sunnis will be too busy fighting Shia in Iraq to be concerned with striking other countries out of the area.
Posted by: New Yorker | February 28, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
The neocons have done their focus groups and have found that, above all else, people TRUST Obama. So, get ready for anything and everything including the kitchen sink to be thrown at his TRUST. “You can’t trust him.” Oh really? But we CAN trust Bush and McBush? Give me a break! Neocons, you are on your way OUT. Wait and c!
Posted by: rick | February 28, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
You cannot gain honor from a dishonorable war. NEVER trust a government that doesn’t trust you.
Posted by: don | February 28, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
So what if Iraq is in Chaos. Neo-cons loved the specious argument that it is better to fight ‘them’ over there than here. By that logic it would be even better for ‘them’ to fight each other over there without America spending our children’s money and sacrificing American lives and destroying American families doing so.
Posted by: Sean | February 28, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Okay, let there be chaos. Sixty percent of americans want us out of Irag. Its not our country to worry about anyway. Having spent trillions of dollars already to protect the republicans egos and oil company profits is enough. All the republicans who elected Bush into office should split the bill for bankrupting our country. I would rather be a liberal who gives too much to the poor than a republican who invades soveriegn countrys for profits.
Posted by: Joe | February 28, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
HOW MUCH BENEFIT HAVE AMERICANS REAPED FROM THE IRAQ WAR? LOL
HOW MUCH HAS THE IRAQ WAR COSTS?
McCain does not know economics, does not know COST vs BENEFITS ANALYSIS!
And McCain does not care about cost of war vs benefit of Iraq war because McCain is a warmonger.
Warmongers CAN NEVER envision non-violent solutions to problems; because they are too addicted to violence!
Babylonians have been building societies while Europeans were still cave dwellers.
So the Iraqi people WILL manage!
All the Iraq war is doing for Americans IS TO COST US!
We can stay in Iraq until we are flat broke; or WE CAN CUT OUR LOST NOW!
There will never ever be any benefit for Americans from the Iraq war.
And the ‘honor’ of American troops is in doing what has been asked of them.
Posted by: New Yorker | February 28, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
BULL. Get us out of there. They are breaking the Treasury. Stop these insane generals, or better yet, if they want to stay, let them pay for it.
Posted by: 4cryingoutloud | February 28, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
‘WIN THE BATTLE BUT LOSE THE WAR.’
WIN THE SURGE BUT LOSE THE IRAQ WAR.
IRAQ UNPROVOKED WAR WAS LOST FROM GET GO; because AMERICANS HAVE NEVER BENEFITED FROM IRAQ WAR!
Bad enough that some Americans allowed the bungling Bush to lead them into a hole. Bad for Americans to remain in the Iraqi hell hole, where BENEFIT IS NON-EXISTENT!
Posted by: New Yorker | February 28, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
As Johnny would say… ” I got news for you Joint Chiefs.. there is a chaotic situation in Iraq right noiw !!!
Posted by: spiritguide | February 28, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
The Democrats don’t care about either Iraq or the USA as long as they can grab power.
They’ll sacrifice any number of American soldiers and any number of innocent Iraqis for their hypocritical politics.
Posted by: Neo Politicus | February 28, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
OKAY. SEND YOUR KIDS TO FIGHT IT. ROMNEY HAS 5 SONS WHO ARE ELIGIBLE. BUSH HAS TWO DAUGHTERS. PUT YOUR KIDS WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS. WE’LL BE WAITING. McBush – how about sending your kids in there…or your grandkids? Let’s see how much you REALLY support this war!!!
Posted by: Robert | February 28, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Is al-Queda in Iraq?…lol
Posted by: J | February 28, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
We should round up every single last neocon and send them to Iraq as security guards.
Posted by: RW | February 28, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Good evening,
I’m going to preface this by stating I am an independent. I’m so tired of listening to democrats cry about the war in Iraq. Do me a favor open a history book or peek your head out of the democratic party for a second. Lets see so far I have read that Iraqis want American’s out, the war is illegal, and America was the aggressor. First off in every single report or news cast that I have seen I have yet to hear an Iraqi say they want America out. In fact what I do see is many Iraqi’s thanking our troops for getting rid of a ruthless dictator. Second, the only thing illegal about Iraq is the former regime’s genocide. Thats right Saddam Hussein butchered people, you can probably turn on the history channel to see the two hour documentary they did on that “ruler.” Third, if I remember correctly the President offered an alternative to war, and I believe it was something like this, Saddam Hussein to avoid conflict allow the UN inspectors to observe your weapons and come clean about your chemical and biological weapons. But democrats seem to have a short memory of the six months leading up to war. People really have to start generating ideas for themselves based on facts instead of listening to your political party’s 30 second soundbyte on the news. I would be willing to bet that if Hilary said the sky was green you would see people checking the sky and more than likely they would argue that you can see green in the sky. Ridiculous.
By the way under the former Clinton the trade centers were bombed, a US warship was bombed, two embassies were bombed- but I guess that is good foreign policy. I love it the stick our heads in the sand and pretend it doesn’t exist.
Posted by: Brian | February 28, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Steppenwolf the 60′s rock group band had a song that fits so well with this crappy War, Bush, McCain and all whom support this Repubican Goverment in charge. “The Monster” Song verse, “Ah America where are you Now? We can’t fight along against the Monster!”
Posted by: buddhabear82 | February 28, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
No wonder the world doesn’t trust America. We take a country down and don’t give the people time to rebuild it. Cut and run seems to be the mantra. Americans never learn from history. Look what happened when we abandoned Vietnam. The Khmer Rouge set up shop in Cambodia and the people that lived had a horrible experience. We have made a commitment to the people of Iraq and I can’t see how walking out will benefit anyone except the liberals that have a vested interest in failure and the bad guys in the middle east.
Posted by: boulderhippie | February 28, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Ah, JEEZ! Is he “warning” the REST of the Senate??
Looks like the General Election is underway a little early.
Posted by: @T | February 28, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
I really don’t know why the JCC is waring Clinton about Iraq, Obama is the man he is the one that is going toe to toe with McCain.
Obama said he will be meeting with all of the his first day in office and he is going to stop the war, why because AQ is not in Iraq and we are wasting billions being there.
Clinton has been very silent on this issue so they should direct all questions to Obama, he is the big talker so lets see how good he is now, Hillary is doing the right thing stay out of it .
Posted by: SJ | February 28, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Why have people turned deaf ears to what the democrats are saying, especially to what Obama is saying. At the debate in Ohio, he said he wants us to start pulling out within 16months of his presidency but will meet with the joint chiefs to be sure that it is to the benefit of national security here and abroad. Also, begin to pull out does not mean all combative troops will be completely out by then. Listen people, just listen before you start to leap. Good Lord, that’s how we got in this mess to begin with. Golly!!
Posted by: MadeinUSA | February 28, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
If we had had any leadership in 2003, we would have withdrawn then. We should have done what we did after the first Gulf War: Beat ‘em up; then, get out so they can heal their wounds. All we’ve been doing since 2003 is training terrorists. We should stop, and let any “chaos” that develops be handled by people with a genuine interest in the outcome. What do the Joint Chiefs know about fighting civilians, anyway?
Posted by: John Williams | February 28, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The headline (“Joint Chiefs Chair Warns Obama & Clinton on Iraq”) and even moreso, the headline on this same article on the Time politics blog (“Joint Chiefs Chair Denounces Democrats’ Iraq Plans”) are not remotely justified by the content of the article. Mullen simply said we should be careful about withdrawing too quickly — and both Obama and Clinton have said the same thing. From the headline, this looks like an alarming case of uniformed military interference with civilian electoral processes. But from the article text, there’s nothing there. What’s the deal with your headline writers?
Posted by: TKD | February 28, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Isn’t this jumping the gun a bit? Don’t briefings come AFTER we elect someone to the Oval Office? Has the good admiral (and others) forgotten that specifics in any campaign are more an indication of intention that should be expected to be subject to alteration once actual governing begins? Didn’t Obama’s campaign remind us of this too?
I remember plans offered with a caution about being realistic, about not making promises that can’t be kept and not making rash decision. He plans for a careful withdrawl that involves not just the Iraq government but others in the region who have a stake in the stability of Iraq too.
Posted by: SE Croft | February 28, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Very good point, TKD. Very good point.
Posted by: MadeinUSA | February 28, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Well said SE croft. Thanks!
Posted by: MadeinUSA | February 28, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
America can´t beat Obama- He plays by different rules. American´s heart is too nice and naive. Obama not naive…trained.
Posted by: Liwai from China | February 28, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
It’s sad how not even a general has answers for the public.
The truth is, unless a powerful ruthless dictator is in power, the sunni & shia will fight, unless there’s a US presence. And if we put a base there, our people will be attacked on a regular basis.
If we don’t cut & run, we will never get out of there.
If we set up a base, it will act as fuel to the terrorists. They don’t want us there.
Posted by: Right on Day1 | February 28, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Osama bin Laden has successfully cost America 4 trillion dollars in added debt, and made America hated around the world. Bush played right into his hands. Way to go George. There’s your legacy.
And of course Iraq fiasco is just the icing on the cake.
Posted by: Down with MSM | February 28, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
I like that… Obama… A Christian with a Muslim name. Well, I’m a Christian with a Christian name (sorta), and I’m living in Texas, so I’ll take pride in for him. I’m sure he’ll do the right thing in Iraq–Obama isn’t all for ending the war on terror, he just wants to move troops out of Iraq and reassign some of them to Afghanistan. I think it’s a good plan. If we leave Iraq, we won’t be making the Iraqis kill each other. Besides, who’s to say how he’ll act once he’s privy to all of the information that a president gets.
I’m voting for Obama because of his stance against lobbyism and because he’s black (I’m white, and I think it’s time). McCain is too old and will likely represent the corporations over the people, and I can’t vote for Hillary, because I think she’s actually serious about trying this universal health care thing. Why do we never learn from Europe’s mistakes?! (Plus, I’m an insurer and I know damn well the government won’t do my job better than I do)
Did you know the word “hysteria” is derrived from the Latin word for “uterus?”
Posted by: thepianoman777 | February 28, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
1. The Iraqis do want us out.
2. More Iraqis have died because of war than would have died under Hussein.
3. If our goal was to rid Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, we already had won the day before we invaded. If our goal is to referee a civil war, we’ll never be done.
A new WPO poll of the Iraqi public finds that seven in ten Iraqis want U.S.-led forces to commit to withdraw within a year. An overwhelming majority believes that the U.S. military presence in Iraq is provoking more conflict than it is preventing and there is growing confidence in the Iraqi army. If the United States made a commitment to withdraw, a majority believes that this would strengthen the Iraqi government. Support for attacks on U.S.-led forces has grown to a majority position—now six in ten. Support appears to be related to a widespread perception, held by all ethnic groups, that the U.S. government plans to have permanent military bases in Iraq.
The poll was conducted for WorldPublicOpinion by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of Maryland and was fielded by KA Research Ltd. / D3 Systems, Inc. Polling was carried out September 1-4 with a nationwide representative sample of 1,150 Iraqi adults, which included an oversample of 150 Arab Sunnis (hereafter simply called Sunnis).
Posted by: jds | February 28, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
whatever who is gonna be the new president, but in this case between Obama and Hilary, both have good campains. just the illogical war in Irak that have claimed hundreds and hundreds of our american soldiers and this must stop. so these candidates have to realize about to take out all these people and if they don’t do it, the economy of this country would go down! nobody wants that.
Posted by: DAVID | February 28, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Obama has as much SUBSTANCE as a Banana Split.
Two across the Isles of political banana joined by three scoops of Ben and Jerry’s ice cream.
A scoop of Hope, a scoop of Change, and a scoop of Unity.
Then it is topped with his cultural knowledge from living in three different cultures. Hawaiian Pineapple, Indonesian Chocolate, and American Strawberry.
On top of that is a marinade of whip Dream Cream.
Some sprinkles of Peace
Bringing it all together it is topped with One Washington Cherry of Truth.
Posted by: PollCat | February 28, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
America has only one friend over there in the Middle East, and it is Israel. You stay they hate you, you go they still hate you, so what’s new here? There’s no America in Lebanon and the blood letting is merely a blood sport over there. In Iraq it is Iraq killing fellow Iraq citizens. Saddam did his thing and now little Saddams are at it again. You will find peace over there when families love their children more than they want to blow them up. Case closed.
Posted by: Wil | February 28, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Obama as the incarnation of Kennedy? As Obama supporters like to point out, the untested Senator of the 60′s did OK with the Cuban Missile crisis. HOWEVER, would Kruzchev have pulled of a stunt like that if the, then, president had such little international experience? Those nations who fear US reprisals will test the limits of an Obama presidency. Additionally, Kennedy faced just one power that could do serious harm to us. We are faced with many more today. Shall we all hold hands and sing kumbaya with Kim Jong Ill, Putin, Medvediv, Chavez, Than Shwe, Castro(Jr.), Kabiki, Ahmandinejad… and on and on and on…
Let’s get real and face the fact that his inexperiance in foreign policy is a REAL PROBLEM. By the way, his international policy advisor is Brezinski… Carter’s NSA advisor… Nice man but Carter’s advisor???
Posted by: smartprimate | February 28, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Right, we can’t have Iraq desend into chaos.. That would be terrible if that happend.. uggghhh.
Posted by: mdell27 | February 28, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
England tried peace and love with Hitler and his nut cases and look how that turned out, tracksta. I hope (no pun) Obama has more in his quiver than that gem you just related. Please check for yourself. Europe has being trying this approach for four years now and you can see where things are for yourself. Remember: Speak softly and carry a big stick seems much more appropriate.
Posted by: Wil | February 28, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
OBAMA GOING AFTER OSAMA! I love it! We bloggers have all become armchair generals. Wow! Seriously, I do believe that I know as much about the situation as Obama. Ha! You won’t catch me missing any Europe/Nato meetings. In fact, I will go over to Pakistan tomorrow and tell their leader that we are coming tomorrow to get Bin Laden, whether he likes it or not! What is their leader’s name now? Is it still Musharof, or Mooshawruf? Anyway, I will have the strateegery all figured out and the noocalar weapons loaded, and we will get the job done! I will appoint thepian oman as the head investigator of the attack team, because his name will fit in well with the region. I must leave for awhile now, but I’ll be back for some more armchair genralities. I need to find out when John Stewart comes on tonight, because I am in deep need of comic relief. I think I still have a uterus, so that must be the problem!
Posted by: georgia | February 28, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
The war is one of the major causes of the current economic crisis. Bush says its a slowdown while 2/3 of the country say they are experiencing a recession. Bush and McCain just want some more time to make the war work. In fact McCain wants as much as 100 years. By that time the US will be a second rate country. It is time to start withdrawing the troops. Clearly, we do not want chaos, but that doesn’t mean we have to stay there forever. Besides, if the economy keeps getting worse we will have chaos at home.
Posted by: Jim B | February 28, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
War cost money, lives and great sacrifice from our troops and there families. You people do not care about our troops or the safety of our country. Our troops did not die in vain. Our troops are winning and you would have them cut n run. Shame on you all. Shame on dems and libs with the coward mentality. We have been safe every since our troops got involved. Show some appreciation for the greatest military in the world. Allow them the victory that you stopped in Vietnam. While we were planning on moving a half million troops to desemate the enemy, you instead cut the troops and then made them leave too soon. Victory was at hand. This war, right or wrong is a work in progress. We made a few mistakes. Overall, we lost far fewer lives and killed the enemy over 10 to 1. The enemy still wants to attack the US on our soil. Our great military has them running scared and hiding like mice. Lets finish the job at hand. Support your troops though I know that you wont. Pulling out is NOT supporting our troops. Ask them! God bless our troops in harms way and across the globe.
Posted by: For Whats Its Worth | February 28, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
So….. to a lot of you, it’s just a question of MONEY! Oh, it’s too expensive! Very sad!
Posted by: Mark | February 28, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Have you noticed any planes flying into US skyscrapers lately? Thank you, Mr. Pres, for keeping the chaotic mess “over there” and not in the US. I sleep well at night thanks to our Troops.
Posted by: 83uztutz | February 28, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
We’ve got to decide if we’re going to prioritize their concerns or ours. We’ve given Iraq precious years of military and monetary support. Why don’t Republicans mind spending government money on other people’s countries but scoff at supporting their own citizens who are poorer than ever in memorable history? Stability for Americans right here in the US has to be our top concern.
Posted by: marcuswatson | February 28, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
It is not just money. It is costing lives. I say bring the troops home and save both money and lives. And the idea that the invasion of Iraq has anything to do with 911 is just wrong. The fact is that the invasion of Iraq led to Al Q. coming into Iraq.
I don’t know why people think that wanting an end to the war is somehow anti-military. This war was ill-conceived and has shown no benefit for the US. It has cost us lives and money and made us less safe.
But the choice is simple. If you like the Bush plan vote for McCain. If you don’t vote for someone else. This is clear. Bush has been such a success that we really could use 4 more years of the same ideas.
Posted by: Jim B | February 28, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
a great man once said,” Getirdone”. I could not agree more.
Posted by: for what its worth | February 28, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
We should leave Iraq but only when our Generals say it is necessary to do so- regardless of who is President. It would be great if we are able to leave a stable situation there but this is ultimately up to the Iraqi people to determine. I am also saddened by the divisiveness of recent Presidential campaigns and hope that the American people and their Candidates will set a positive example for how an efficient Democracy should operate. The Iraqi government as well as our own should stop taking so many vacations and get to work on meaningful solutions (A.K.A. legislation) to fix these problems!
Posted by: RedRightRose | February 28, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Tor- do you choose to ignore facts that you don’t like? It said that Mullen’s term is not over until Sept. 09. He will be serving under the next president for at least 8 months. At least give him credit for speaking his mind, yet willing to follow any orders that are given to him. I trust his opinions and suggestions more than someone who hates Bush and thinks they know exactly what’s going on because they watch the news. You may not like how or why the war started, but pulling the troops out too soon doesn’t change history. The fact is we’re there now and need to finish the job and leave it in a stable condition. The Dems want to pull the troops as soon as possible as if that would change the fact that we went in there in the first place. That is not only moronic, but also dangerous. Stop living in the past and start fixing the problem today. History is what it is.
Posted by: Androoo | February 28, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
If there was no oil in Iraq, Bush would not have invaded them. Bush and Congress spend $12 billion a month on this folly. This money could have been invested in making us free of oil dependency. It was not and now we are in debt and broke. Why should the next administration validate the mistakes made by Bush and Congress? Wasting more borrowed money and America blood in the Middle East is stupid to the power of ten.
Posted by: x32792 | February 28, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
No , when we pull out everything will be as it should. Invaders are out of other peoples country. They will adjust as did Vietnam and anywhere else. Disrespect a mans house and he will resist, leave and there is nothing left to resist The only thing that will stop is the kickbacks on all those oil profits. They dont care about those people, they dont even care about the PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY . they dont even care about oil, they care about the DISCOUNTED(DAMN NEAR FREE) OIL. Leave iraq and watch the money begin to dry up and then see who is effected. A rapid withdrawel , return as much as their resources and property as possible and a dam* apology is in order.
Posted by: tracksta | February 28, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
New Yorker: Finally, I have some company as regards Shia and Sunni! I was one of the UnAmerican and UnPatriotic 20% who protested the war in Iraq. I am not a military expert but we already had one front in fighting an enemy that does not believe in the Geneva Conventions! I remember a Wanted, Dead or Alive poster for Osama bin Laden. He may be dead in some cave or still happily camping out in Afghanistan. Did Bush once say that bin Laden is now irrelevant? His ideology and numerous hydra-headed offshoot monstrous terrorist groups certainly are not. For me, it is Mission UnAccomplished. I once said I have a teeny bit of experience in that part of the world many years ago when my Dad was sent there for four years and spent our time primarily in Pakistan. I got blasted because things have changed since then. Yes, they have and not for the better! The King of Iraq was assassinated and his body drug through the streets while we there. The Shah was still around but inconveniently got himself deposed. Pakistan was starting its string of coups-then got into its war and splintered into Bangladesh. Shias and Sunnis hated each other then and still. Downright inconvenient of their prophet not have named a successor! Changed? Yes. Some of them now have nuclear capabilities and have learned some dirty tricks. Basically, the mid-east does not want westerners in their counries after coloniasm/ imperialism. The Iraqis did not fall into our arms. We had no business going in there until Afghanistan was secured. al Quaeda was not in Iraq – common sense dictates that reasoning since Saddam shared power with nobody. Now, the Taliban have taken back 10% of Afghanistan, only 30% is controlled by Karzai and the rest in the hands of the war loads. Answers? I wish. But, I do not think terrorist attacks will come out of Iraq but from that frontier between Afghanistan and Pakistan. In the meantime, we have to support the troops who obeyed orders, but do not count on us being welcome for overly long. If the current government is toppled, we will be forced out. al Sadr and his Shia Mehdi are just biding their time. Mid-easterners have a trait many westerners do not – patience until just the right moment. War is not a glorious victory but a foul and filthy death for many young men – and women these days and the innocents.
Posted by: tcnz | February 28, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
If there was no oil and no Jewish Lobby in Washington, no one in the country would even look in that direction. The current Middle Eastern Policy is a turd wrapped in our flag.
Posted by: x32792 | February 28, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
The generals work for the president. The president is commander and chief. So they do what he says. It is inappropriate however for the generals to engage in politics. They should not be using the media as a public forum.
If Kennedy had listened to the generals we would have had nuclear war with Russia. This is one of the reasons that the constitution puts the president in charge. Generals fight wars and presidents lead countries. There is a difference in perspective and ultimately the president decides. Unfortunately Bush made bad decisions. McCain seems to agree with these bad decisions.
Posted by: Jim B | February 28, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
England tried peace and love with Hitler and his nut cases and look how that turned out, tracksta.
To wil, you dont get it do you. This is not about England, hitler or nutcases.
No one said anything about peace and love, this is what you (and some of your people) dont understand, there is a fine line between peace & love and lets steal your shyt or lets take the fight to them before they bring it to us. That sounds like some high school rivalry logic, the type that has become expected of your type. Leave other people shyt alone. Respect , something you know nothing about
Posted by: tracksta | February 28, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
As a republican conservative voter for the past twenty three (23)years, it is my belief that my party has lost the support of the people, probably for the next 20 years. Accordingly, I am pleased to announce that I am now supporting Barrack Obama for President. Mr. Obama has vision and is correctly promoting hope throughout our land. The General’s at the Pentagon, including Gen. Mullen, must prepare to take orders from a new President. We must leave Iraq or else our economy will plunge further into chaos. As President Kennedy has previously stated, “the torch is being passed on to a new generations of Americans”; these new Americans are correctly thinking outside the political box. Because of the expected new leadership and new thinking, our nation will prosper. The Cold War is over and we can no longer financially support the entire “WORLD”. Even my old thinking must give way to new progressive thinking. Let us rebuild our economy and our great Nation for the benefit of generations unborn. THANK YOU
Posted by: Howard | February 28, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
How much longer can we afford to pay for Bush’s mistake? This war is dragging our economy under with no end in sight. I don’t give a damn about Iraqis – if they don’t want chaos, then it’s up to them to stop killing each other. We can’t sacrifice our prosperity for their security. How much is enough for old man McCain and the Republicans?
Posted by: Lee R. | February 28, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Who cares what the JCC thinks? They just want to keep the gravy train coming from the taxpayers. The military has no interest in ending the war – they want to keep the money coming to buy shiny new toys. We are being bled to death to pay for this disaster and it has to stop!
Posted by: Carol Elsinor | February 28, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
The majority of the posters who say they are Democrat and voting for McCain are GOP posters,fresh from the KKKarl Rove school of propaganda. We can spot you fakers a mile away. And by the way Rove is a piece of crap! A modern day Goeebels.
Posted by: AJ | February 28, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I have just been reading all of the comments again. McCain was in Vietnam which was more like a jungle war in Asia. I do not think that either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama have spent time with the ordinary people of the mid-east – the halls of power do not count. And, I wonder how many of you people have ever been to any of those countries outside of a guided tour where you get to see the pretty bits? The mid-east is a seething turmoil within. We had no business going into that area except Afghanistan where those terrorists were trained. And, they happen to have been Saudis. Are we at war with them? I think it was Leon Uris who wrote in Exodus that the Kingdom of Heaven may run on righteousness but the kingdom of earth runs on oil – or words to that effect. None of the candidates has the necessary expertise on the mid-east – so which one could and would bring in real experts and be really willing to listen to them? And, I do not mean those PhD types or chair polishers. Secy Rice has a PhD in Russian affairs or the like but definitely did not visit that country while writing her dissertation. And, much good that has done us in our relationships with Russia. No more armchair generals! Wonder what happened to General Tommy Franks who did protest at being told to prepare plans for a war in Iraq while he was still in Afghanistan? Sounds like the kind of military brass that I could trust! Make sure that our troops have what they need and start getting them out of Iraq. Keep our mid-east relations on strictly business terms. Money talks in that part of the world – but alas, we do not have much of it right now and our dollar is sinking! No, I do not mean to sound angry at any of you – just feeling very depressed at the situation we are in over there. And, I would like to know who the despicable low-life was that revealed that Prince Harry is in Afghanistan just trying to do his duty as a soldier instead of being another royal gadfly? Now that sorry specimen of humanity has put Harry’s life in danger and those of his men.
Posted by: tcnz | February 28, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Why should we listen to the JCS? These bums can’t win a war and need to shut the hell up and stay out of politics! I hope Obama fires the lot of these incompetents when he takes office!
Posted by: AndyBoy | February 28, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
McCain is a useless old man who’s still got something to prove about Vietnam. He wants to compound Bush’ original mistake in Iraq and bankrupt the country just to prove to his Daddy that he’s not a loser. America doesn’t need to be locked into a costly, losing war just for John McCain’s senile psychodrama.
Posted by: Biff Tinkler | February 28, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Only war supporters should have to pay for the Iraq war,I don’t want one red cent of my tax money spent on that hell hole. Every day America is sinking more into the red,only military contractors,ditto heads and big oil want us to stay in Iraq. Biggest mistake ever!
Posted by: AJ | February 28, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Do the stupid Republicans think they can try to pin the blame on the Dems for THIER failure in Iraq? Nobody is buying this nonsense, and the surge is already breaking down – violence is back up and troop levels won’t get any higher. Sorry, Republicans, everybody in America knows that this mess is all yours!
Posted by: Constance Brennan | February 28, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
AJ – I agree! Only Republicans and war supporters should have to pay off the debt to China that funded this stupid war. We should impose a “Bush Stupidity Tax” and force all Republicans to fork over 95% of their net worth to pay for their failed war – or else they get deported to Baghdad. This is America – and failure should have a price. That should demonstrate the “accountibility” that Bush was always prattling on about. Stupid Republicans!
Posted by: Carol Elsinor | February 28, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Calling all Neocons: Line up,ship out,and fight Bushes glorious war in Iraq. I don’t care if your eighty years old or a Bush twin. Go fight your war! You want it,go for it.
Posted by: AJ | February 28, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Here’s a suggestion to President Obama – fire the current JCS: they should know better than to butt into domestic politics. Maybe if they spent less time shooting their mouths off they could actually win a war? Fire them all!
Posted by: SummerSharer | February 28, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
McBush – how about sending your kids in there…or your grandkids?
Robert, McCains son Is over there.
Posted by: Nestor in Miami | February 28, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Do these stupid Republicans really think that the rest of us don’t see this pathetic attempt to pin the GOP’s Iraq disaster on the Democrats? What a joke. They’re not fooling anybody!
Posted by: Kyle Galloway | February 28, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
You people who think we need to pull out of IRAQ have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You talk about Iraqis dying like its the U.S. fault, stop listening to the media and start listening to the people who actually have been there. Insurgents are killing Iraqis not US troops, how anyone could think otherwise has no idea and is showing how mis informed they really are. I suppose you all think 9/11 was Bush’s fault, he didn’t ask not want that to happen when it did it changed the entire complexion of his presidency. Pulling out like the dems want is the worst move we could make, you think oil is high priced now, and I suppose that is Bush’s fault as well, oil would become so expensive we wouldn’t be able to afford it why, because IRAN would take control. You bunch of bleeding hearts are excatly what we don’t need in this counry, we need strong leadership say what you want about Bush he has laid out a plan on IRAQ and stuck to it, and it has been the right move. I’ve been to IRAQ I’ve seen the cheerful Iraqis so thankful we’re there but instead you all take for gospel what the media is saying and it is very one sided.
Posted by: Al | February 28, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
There is no morality in fighting an immoral war. Never trust a government that doesn’t trust you. The most frightening headline of the past 200 years appeared on the front page of “USA Today” yesterday. There is a debate going on now and it will probably be left up to the Supreme Court to decide: “Is it legal for an individual American to own a gun?” We’ve already given up our right to be searched. You do the math. And remember folks, Osama is NOT the President. But it will take someone like him to stop the neocons and let them know their day is up. His security detail should be quadrupled. At all costs and at whoever’s expense, this man MUST BE PROTECTED. Thanks for your time.
Posted by: Hanks | February 28, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Al – if you love this stupid war so much, how about you go and fight it? Also, are you willing to pay a special tax to pay for it? I think people who support this war should have to pay reparations for it – why should my taxes go to a disaster that I never supported? Al, I hope that when the Dems take back the government that they confiscate your house and everything you own to pay for your failed war. And then I hope they deport you to Baghdad to live with the consequences of your stupidity. You suck!
Posted by: Claire | February 28, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Hey Al – I remember people like you saying the same kind of nonsense about pulling out of Vietnam – it was crap then and it’s crap now. We need to pull the plug on this losing war and rebuild our economy at home. We can’t keep borrowing to pay for this war forever.
Posted by: Veebler | February 28, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Everyone who hasn’t already done so needs to see “No End in Sight.” If you can’t find it near you, go to Amazon.com and get a used DVD for 8 bucks. Then read what the Joint Chiefs are saying.
Posted by: Eridon | February 28, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Iraq is still a disaster — a war that should have never been started in the first place. It has been 5 years, time to face reality and get out. Give Iraq back to the Iraqis.
Posted by: Bob, DC | February 28, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Mr. McCain, with all due respect to you, I ask how many immediate members of your family are serving in a danger zone in Iraq? I would ask President Bush why his daughters haven’t shown an example to the American people and put themselves in harm’s way to end this “insurgency.” Calling it an “insurgency” is like screaming that sharks are attacking humans. Well, no wonder they are attacking humans. We are swimming in their home. We are on their turf. How would you feel like with a shark coming into YOUR house? Think on it. Get someone to explain it to you. The only plan is the one Obama proposes that gives the Iraqi government well over a year and a half before they would even begin to be implemented. And why don’t you be the one to tell the 56 innocent Iraqi’s who were blown to pieces this past Sunday that “the surge is working?”
Posted by: Chase | February 28, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Everyone who hasn’t already done so needs to see “No End in Sight.” If you can’t find it near you, go to Amazon.com and get a used DVD for 8 bucks. Then read what the Joint Chiefs are saying.
Posted by: Eridon | February 28, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Folks I feel your anger. Yes, we have to somehow get ourselves out of Iraq – but would like to at least keep face along the lines of we can now trust you to take care of your own security, here are the keys, very publicly, and speed back as fast as we can to Kuwait to ship out! This time though I would like to think we have the decency to give sanctuary to those Iraqis who have really helped us instead leaving them to a probably hideous fate. However, I hope you are all keeping track of other news. We now have the USS Cole and two other war ships on the eastern Mediterranean Sea off Lebanon. Six more are sailing in. Howl!!!!!!!! There are the anti-Syrian and the pro-Syrian factions there. No sure where Iran fits in but probably does somewhere – bound to since they are one of the axis of evil. Wonder how much a President can actually do in ten more months?
Posted by: tcnz | February 28, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Obama should make it a point to fire the entire current Joint Chiefs of Staff on his first day in office. These clowns should know better than to interfere in domestic politics. Plus, they can’t seem to win their war, so it’s time for some fresh blood and new ideas anyway. Let’s sweep out all the Republican incompetents and Bush cronies once and for all!
Posted by: Kevin Dudamell | February 28, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
So, basically, the joint chiefs want to keep their war on so they can keep the tax dollar gravy train flowing? Sorry, losers, we can’t fund your failed war forever. Hold a bake sale or something. LOL
Posted by: R. Gottlieb | February 28, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
I remember the Hueys lifting off of the roof of the American Embassy. Long lines of desparate people waited to be saved. The last Huey lifted off and they knew they were doomed. It was 1975 in Saigon.
I will never forget that shameful repudiation of a promise we made to the South Vietnames that we wouldn’t abandon them when American combat troops withdrew in 1973. We promised that we would give them military aid to continue their fight. Ford and the Congress begtrayed that promise. Millions died.
Now we are contemplating repeating the same shameful scenario. We must keep the promises that we have made to these people in our battle against Al Queada. They have stuck their necks out and trusted us. If we put our tails between our legs and slink out we will hand victory to our enemies who have sworn to destroy us.
Posted by: strangelove | February 28, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Hillary voted for the war and has never apologized for her vote. Obama was not a member of Congress when the vote took place but since he became a member, he has always voted for every spending bill for Iraq.
Neither Hillary nor Obama have any intention of pulling the troops out of Iraq. Both of them said so in a debate a few months ago. When they say they do, they’re thinking only of winning elections.
Posted by: marco123 | February 28, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Many of the posts act as if a withdrawal from a war against terrorists has NO effect on us back home. How do you know this. These guys have made it perfectly clear that they will bring the war to our homeland. The ONLY thing between us and these monsters are the grunts. You say that you support them yet you say that their mission is a ‘sucker’s play’. Any of you sweethearts ever been in that situation before. I guarantee that you don’t feel supported when you have to suit up everyday to go into ‘harm’s way’ and the folks at home are calling it a waste of time. They need your support of what they are doing. They have spilled their blood for you. They have given limbs. They are lost time with their families. For Heaven’s sake, tell them ‘thank you’.
Posted by: strangelove | February 28, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
We spend millions of dollars training soldiers to become generals. They spend their lives gaining training, experience and knowledge in their profession. No one on Capital Hill or in the White House has the training and experience of our Joint Chiefs of Staff. Every time we get into a war or involved in a conflict our civilian government takes command away from the very people who should be commanding war efforts. Our civilian government, Democrats and Republicans alike, gave our military leaders a job to do. Right or wrong we are in a war. The time for argument is over. Give the generals what they need to do the job then leave them alone until they get it done. If you don’t want them to finish the job you shouldn’t have told them to start.
Posted by: jijalagi | February 28, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
I was in the Marines for 6 years and I might have seen 25 generals or admirals in those six years. I guess they were all on this board full of expert opinions. America is getting lip service from the democrats. I will laugh if either Clinton or Obama win, as they renegue on their promise to get america out of Iraq under some type of time table. Trust me, noone prays for peace more than the soldiers inmersed in war. I do not like this war, but we are there, and a quick getaway aint happening. Maybe 2010-2011, no sooner.
Posted by: Nestor in Miami | February 28, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
New Yorker on 02/28/08 @ 7:01 is Absolutely Correct. Vote Hillary ’08′
Posted by: georgie | February 28, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
jijgali – what a bunch of claptrap. These generals are interfering in politics, not the other way around. Obama should fire the lot of them when he takes office. Also, they’ve had all the money and troops they asked for and they still can’t win the Iraq war – stop blaming civilians for the military’s failure.
Posted by: Kurtis Blow Me | February 28, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Yea, if we withdrew from Iraq Al Queada would just move out and leave everyone alone. They would move out just like they moved out of Pakistan. They would move out just like Hamas moved out of Gaza. They would move out just like Hezbella moved out of Lebanon. Yea, I’m willing to put my trust in a genius like you. Oh, yes, hotshot, what if you are wrong and they start a bloodbath in Iraq? What if Al Queada doesn’t move out and we have to send combat troops back in? Have any idea what our casualty rates will be under that scenario? Yea, I know. You are just an armchair general.
Posted by: strangelove | February 28, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
A dollar investment today saves millions tomorrow. Stop letting inexperience self serving politicians tell you catchy phrases. Think for yourself, analyze and be informed.
Posted by: Miami, Florida | February 28, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Our Joint Chiefs of Staff are all career military with their pension and a good job secure when they get out. They Follow orders, and are possibly the most apolitical bunch in Washington. I take the admiral at his word. I am sure he does not want to see his men and women die, but he is a realist. I am not a war monger. I have been to war and it sucked. Many of these opinions amount to not much more than monday morning quarterbacking. If so many of you know about miltary tactics, then join the military and get us out of Iraq yourselves.
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
The Chinese & Sauds are only too happy to loan us all this money for the Iraq war. Waite till they want pay back time. Time to get out of Iraq.
Posted by: georgie | February 28, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Miami, Florida – same goes for self-serving generals trying to shake the taxpayers down for more money for their failed war.
Posted by: Kyle Galloway | February 28, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
We were in Vietnam because our country sent us there. No one asked me if I wanted to go to Vietnam. I went. We didn’t lose your hearts and minds. It’s pretty clear that you didn’t have anything to lose in the first place. You listened to General Cronkite and General Giap. You did exactly what the enemy wanted you to do. They said later that they knew they couldn’t beat us on the battlefield but knew they could beat us at the home front. Read some of General Giap’s comments about the war. He was pretty clear about their strategy. He knew what morons people like you are. You love to send us to war but if we don’t get it over with in 30 minutes you are ‘out of here’. Panty waists like you have always been around. Just more of you now.
Posted by: strangelove | February 28, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Veteran – that sounds pretty naieve to me. The JCS is EXTREMELY political – don’t be fooled. This is pure politics and they should know better than to butt in to an election campaign. I agree with the people who think the next President should fire the lot of them – they’re all Bush stooges anyway.
Posted by: AndyBoy | February 28, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
stranglove – and yet you still lost, wanna know why? Because it was an immoral war and had NOTHING to do with our national security or any of the other high-minded lies used to sell the war. Stop whining already. The war is over and you lost. It was an immoral war and you were on the wrong side of history. Get over yourself already. You think you’re special? Every war has winners and losers, it’s not my fault if you can’t accept that you lost.
Posted by: Kelly Hong | February 28, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Obama stated there was no Al Quada in Iraq prior to George W. Bush decision to invade Iraq. Borak H. Obama forgets Al Quada was in the United States killing Americans. Id rather fight terrorist were they breed and waste oxygen breathing.
Posted by: Roe | February 28, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Clinton and Obama won’t get out of Iraq because we need a stable supply of oil. You ‘bug out’ folks have a real selective memory. When the gas prices start hitting the stratosphere you will all be demanding that we go back in and secure the oil. A lot of grunts will pay for your stupid mistakes. You won’t care as long as you can have gas.
Posted by: strangelove | February 28, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Andyboy, you speak like a very experienced politician, or perhaps you are an expert military tactician. Who is the next president going to nominate to JCS? more generals and admirals, all of whom are career military and who served alongside the ones in place now. I am repulsed to see how many people blame the failure on iraq on the military. If the military ran wars (and not politicians), Vietnam and Iraq would be both speaking English by now, and voting in November’s election.
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
stranglove – you keep saying that like it means something. But you fail to realize that West Africa – specifically the Gulf of Bakassi – has already been tapped to come online as the US’s next major source of oil. The recently discovered reserves are huge and easier to transport to the States – which offsets the lower quality of the crude. Pretty much all your arguments are nonsense. You cons and warlovers and tired and your intel is out of date – time to sit down and take a rest while the world changes around you. LOL
Posted by: Kelly Hong | February 28, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Veteran – um, last time I checked, the Military was running Iraq. Heckuva job. LOL Meanwhile, all I’m saying is that the current JCS is a bunch of Bush/Rumsfeld appointed hacks and yesmen. Time for some new blood who can get the job done. Promote the next generation that’s free of the taint of Bush’s failure.
Posted by: AndyBoy | February 28, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Kelly Hong, Then why would we not get out of Iraq if there is so much oil in Bakassi and it is so easy to transport? I dont doubt your statement, but if it is that easy, why wont we do it? I mean even Bush could see the logic in that? (by the way, why all the name calling?)
Posted by: Nestor in Miami | February 28, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Roe – um, in case you missed it, the guys who attacked us on 9/11 weren’t from Iraq. The real war on Al Queda is in Afghanistan, not Iraq. Get a clue.
Posted by: AndyBoy | February 28, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Nestor – who knows? Do I look like Bush to you? Ask him. If I had to guess I would say that it’s probably because Iraq was never really just about oil, but about the neocon’s crackpot and poorly-thought-out scheme to “transform” the Middle East.
Posted by: Kelly Hong | February 28, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Andyboy, they are not from afghanistan either, most were saudis. Should we attack Saudi Arabia? And no, The military does not run Iraq. The Military has no mandate, it follows orders from civilians.
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Here is the bottom line. You want to know your future? Here it is. You are going to have to fight for oil. No fight, no oil. Can you dig it?
Posted by: strangelove | February 28, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
strangelove, I do understand and Thank you. Many may not share your views, and have issues adapting to forums that intend to put a finger on the pulse of our country, instead of denegrating opposing opinions, and using name calling as a weapon. Besides that is the only weapon they will ever have the guts to bear, hiding behind a computer in these forums.
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Veteran – nice try, but the 9/11 hijackers were trained in Afghanistan, and their leadership remains there (or across the border in Pakistan).
Posted by: AndyBoy | February 28, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
nice try? they weren’t saudis?
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Veteran – you think it takes “guts” to carry a weapon? No. It takes guts to raise a family, pay your taxes, live an honest life and do the right thing. Any moron can pick up a gun – just look at the gangsters and thugs on TV. It takes courage to stay the course and live a decent life.
Posted by: Kelly Hong | February 28, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Veteran – first of all, they weren’t all Saudis – they were a multinational, non-state-sponsored crew that was trained in Afghanistan. Which is why we invaded Afghanistan, not Saudi Arabia. Remember? For someone who purports to know so much about national security matters you sure seem fuzzy on basic details.
Posted by: AndyBoy | February 28, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“raise a family, pay your taxes, live an honest life and do the right thing”
All things that I have done, as well as carried a weapon in the name of the US (under president Clinton’s mandate, if that makes you happy). I hope we never get invaded because I am sure you will be one of the first to move to Canada to “do the right thing”
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Good for you – but why do you disparage others and imply that we’re cowards just because we chose not to serve? This is the problem with so many military people – you’re so very arrogant and think that the rest of us are some kind of second class citizens. Well guess what – you’re not special and you’re not better than anybody else. You did a job just like anybody else – and the rest of us taxpayers paid your salary. Get over yourselves. stop putting on airs and shut up about it already.
Posted by: Kelly Hong | February 28, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Ok, sorry, 15 of the Multinational force were saudis. And no I am not an expert, and neither are you Kelly.
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
AndyBoy-Al Quada has no borders we are killing them in Iraq in addition to Afghanistan. How many terrorist attacks have occurred in the US since 9/11, NONE !!
Posted by: Roe | February 28, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
You disparage strangelove, and he was more than likely drafted. You disparage any opposing view, and tell everyone that doesn’t agree with you to “shut up”…Hmmm what democrat running for pres sounds just like that? Have the board, and comment to yourself, and praise yourself, good night.
Posted by: Veteran | February 28, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Roe – boy are you stupid. First of all, Al Queda in Mesopotamia is a copycat organization that has no real ties to BIn Laden’s AL Queda, aside from the name. Also, it didn’t exist before we invaded and won’t exist long after we leave. Also, you’re wrong about the terrorist attacks in the US post-9/11, too. You’re forgetting the still unsolved Anthrax attacks that happened in late 2001. Damn, son, you’re 0 for 3 – why don’t you quit while you’re ahead? Stop drinking the Con Kool Aid and go educate yourself. LOL
Posted by: AndyBoy | February 28, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
I disparage Strangelove because he’s putting other people’s lives in danger because of his messed-up Vietnam babyboomer psychodrama. Sorry, but he’s earned my contempt with his nonsense.
Posted by: Kelly Hong | February 28, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
How can we trust the guys in their overly decorated uniforms? Of course the Administration has “politicized” the Joint Chiefs… all the generals that critizied the Bush Administration are gone. What does that tell ya?
Posted by: Patriot | February 28, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Obama/Zinni ticket in Nov. ?
Posted by: PollCat | February 28, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
The meeting point of fundamentalist and socialist is the time when people vote to
Obama – Farrakhan!
against smart, experience and hard working women-Hillary Clinton.
and society is ready to go down hill, women with Hijab, polygamies all over the world.
Please don’t give freedom that has cost millions lives. Vote for Hillary Clinton for peace, prosperity and democracy.
Posted by: Uma, mpls, MN | February 28, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
John Williams:
We should have Withdrawn from Iraq in
2003? We invaded Iraq in 2003!
Did you mean we shouldn’t have gone into Iraq in 2003?
Otherwise I’ll have to assume that you’re just another Clueless Democrat!
Posted by: reaganfan | February 28, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
As in Anthony Zinni?
Posted by: Nestor in Miami | February 28, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Barak Obama/Retired General Zinni
Nov. ticket
Heard a few names tossed around on the news yesterday morning.
Posted by: PollCat | February 28, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
All these words!
There is no such thing as a moral war.
By definition once you start killing people for whatever reason, you are in the immorality business and civility is out the window and barbarism takes over – the human interaction then moves to a very basic stage the end result of which is described by two words.
One is “win” and the other is “lose”
No matter how lofty your ideals history teaches us that dramatic changes take place for both those who “win” and those who “lose”, and Iraq will not be any exception because wars have their own simple dynamics and results.
If you are going to use an excess of words at least address them to the future result, continually rabbitting on about how and why you are there is an exercise in futility, the fact is you are there, now you have to decide how to turn this into a win.
I understand the desire to run away from conflict, but assuming that when you run away that the enemy will not chase you is a very big assumption indeed – certainly not one I would like to have on my conscience if I was a leader and that assumption was proved to be incorrect.
Posted by: Gerry Sinclair | February 28, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Gerry — Well said, but I doubt they will get it….
Posted by: givemeabreak | February 28, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
For all you folks out there who keep screaming about the costs and the lives and the “immorality” of this war. Consider this please. I am not saying this is a definate, but it is a definate possibility — We pull our troops from Iraq and put an end to this 5 year multitrillion dollar war. We move our troops to Afganistan. Within 1 year, The Iraqi government falls to Alqaida operativces funded by Iran. Iran is now ready to deploy short range Nuclear weapons. Within three months they Attack Israel who retaliates and destroys Iran.. In the process, the US (who is still heavily in Afganistan) sustains sever casulities. AlQuaida then turns their attention on massive terrorist attacks on the US because we are now to weak to even defend ourselves. The result – Within three years of withdrawal – Israel is gone, Iraq is gone, Iran is gone, and the persian gulf is now un inhabitable for the next 300 years. The US economy is destroyed and teh entire world is now operating without 70% of its energy source. Worst case senario? Definately… Are you willing to take the chance???
Posted by: givemeabreak | February 28, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
givemeabreak: as usual, your concocted scenarios, just like those of your hero, GWB, are more the product of a wild imagination than of any resemblance to reality or fact.
I would guess this general who is warning us about the dangers of withdrawal isn’t suffering from losing his job, having basic services in his state collapse and doing without enough food and gas for his gas tank. That is the price we are paying just to ‘stabilize’ Iraq. Even if the surge were working and it is not the cease fire of Moqtada AlSadar that is responsible for the slowdown in violence, can we sustain 12 billion per week for the foreseeable future? When the dollar is collapsing and we are losing our collective shirts, WILL THIS G.D. GENERAL STEP UP AND PAY THE BILL FOR IRAQ? Al Qaeda won’t do half as much damage to us as economic collapse will do, due to this god-forsaken, open-ended occupation. Let those who think Iraqi’s won’t sort it out themselves pay the cost for the collapse of our society as we run out of money and credit. We are kidding ourselves if we think what happens in Iraq’s violence is worth our own demise as a country. The cure of open-ended bankruptcy is worse than the disease of terrorism.
Posted by: allen_osuno | February 28, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
@ givemeabreak
“Alqaida operativces funded by Iran”
This is the most ridiculous claim, and for the rest of your delirium this is the most pathetic piece of crap that i have read lately…
Al-Qaeda is a radical Sunni group while Iran is made of their arch rivals Shiites, Sunnis foreign fighters come from Saudi Arabia and not from Iran or Syria like the Israeli propaganda machine may have conditioned you to think so.
Do you dare to think that Al qaeda, that fringe group made of few hundreds people, can overtake a country? Lol, yeah keep dreaming.
Al Qaeda are an handful in Iraq, most of the mess being created by religious communities’ militias and fighters struggling for power, the Sunnis that have been stupidly ousted from power after the fall of decades old CIA asset Saddam Hussein were lately bribed by the US gov to keep things from degenerating even worse and to fight against foreign fighters creating undiscriminated havoc, they were given control of huge part of the country and of cities like Fallouja with tens of thousands large armed militias headed by Thugs of war who were earlier killing US troops and who nowadays say they will soon resume that if they don’t reach the part of power that they wish. “Al Qaeda in Iraq” is a detail in this mess, being of course inflated by this administration who will as usual deceptively label every groups opposing their troops under the “Al Qaeda in Iraq” generic all-in-one banner for their propagandist stunt, US troops are just in the middle of a centuries old confessional war that this administration just regenerated all by itself, while removing troops from Afghanistan in the middle of a war.
Now for the Iran part i can see how a propagandist machine is still working in full throttle for some of you, Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons, Israel have at least a good hundred (ty to the french) without the AEIA having access to their stock pile, Iran is not governed by wackos contrary to what you may think, the rhetorically provocative Ahmadinejad is a puppet without real power and will be ousted at their next elections. The only people wanting war in this region is the US and his war pusher Israel (who make your country go to Iraq FYI), these long time warmongers threatening everybody, others just struggle for regional influence which won’t make it to a war.
Now please get out of your cave before writing down again your nonsense.
Posted by: Muhahahaha | February 29, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Egregious interference in the political process by the military. The man and everyone like him needs to be fired as soon as there’s a change of regime n Washington and replaced with people loyal to the US Constitution.
Posted by: denis | February 29, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Egregious interference in the political process by the military. The man and everyone like him needs to be fired as soon as there’s a change of regime n Washington and replaced with people loyal to the US Constitution.
Posted by: denis | February 29, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Yep, fire the admiral. As a matter of fact, keeping firing them all until we get someone in there that will say what we want to hear. Then everything will be just hunky dory. I’d advise the same thing in picking your candidate of choice, go for the one that continually says what you want to hear. Don’t worry about facts, experience or substance, you don’t need those trivials in making your decision, your main objective is just to feel good, happy and oblivious.
Posted by: JKIA | February 29, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am
Admiral Mullen should be sacked immediately. Our military leaders do not insert themselves into political campaigns. Harry Truman had the good judgement to relieve MacArthur of his command. George Bush does not.
Posted by: Jake | February 29, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
George Bush says: Yes if we leave Iraq all them poor military contractors,my Blackwater murderers,oh I mean friends and my big oil buddies would suffer dire circumstances. I agree with John McCain a hundred more years of war in Iraq is good! War is good! Peace is bad! If you don’t agree your a liberal traitor!
Posted by: AJ | February 29, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am
Lets see…AFTER WITHDRAWAL CHAOS vs a bankrupt America, broken down education system and delapidated schools, falling infrastructures, economic & foreclosure crisis, environmental crisis, a city devastated by Katrina still looking like a war zone with little recovery, a mounting debt, a dropping dollar, borrowing from other countries, lost credibility around the world…hhmnnn, SOUNDS LIKE REAL CHAOS…and not on the other side of the world, but right here on our own doorsteps!!!
Posted by: jay | February 29, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am
Obama knows what he is doing, he will simply give one of his change speeches to the insurgents and the problem will be solved. What does the chairman of the joint chief of staff know , he is just an admiral and probly doesnt have much experience like Obama.
Posted by: billy bob | February 29, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am
Notice that the rotten man could not define a “rapid withdrawal” in a timeframe. So he refused to indicate what rapid means to him.
No Republican can.
Right now, we are about as good as it going to get in IRaq for the near future. Part of the gains were from our troops on the attack. Part is from the SUnnis working with us and not attacking us or working with Al Quaida, But …thats coming to an end as they become more and more dissatisfied with the US. Part of the quell in violence is also because of the Sadr army’s ceasefire thats been going on for 7 months now. What happens when that stops?
The idea that This surge is solely responsible for stemming the violence in a country of 25 million people is absurd. They only added 30,000 troops.
Posted by: FormerRepub | February 29, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am
Hey wake up people. When John McCain says we should try and give George Bush some credit because we havent been attacked since 911 he is lying. Every day our soldiers in Iraq and other places are attacked and killed. What the matter with John McCain does he think those lives dont matter!!!! McCain is too old and owes his loyalty to big business and special interests, he will break under the everyday pressure of the Office of the Pres of the US. Our only gain in Iraq has been the high body count of scores of civilians we have killed. Not to mention the absurd loss of life of our own soldiers. George Bush, John McCain and Hilary have no clue on whats going on there and Iam sure they will want this to be a 100 years war. We can do better….at least B. Obama has taken a position that is not totally off the wall….
Posted by: Jane Smith | February 29, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am
Excuse me, but I really, really, really, don’t care what happens to Iraq.
Posted by: Hey Scoob | February 29, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am
The blood of millions that were slaughtered after we pulled out of Vietnam are on the hands of the anti-American hippies.
Now if we pull out and it happens again the blood will be on the leftwing jihadists here. Treason is punishable by death. You have given the enemy aid and support. We must start to enforce treason. I swear to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic. It is time I take out the domestic ones as well.
Posted by: ssgt frank | February 29, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am
There is a lot of preaching and exterpolating of numbers going on in this blog, if I want that I will go to church or take another advanced math class. The real point is will the next president pay attention to the Military Leaders that are susposed to know their job or fire them and hire a “Yes” man in their place just to appease their election promises. I believe Obama would do the latter.
Posted by: Rin Tin Tin | February 29, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am
Its very simple..Obama will walk on the water to Iraq.. He will then deliver one of his electrifying speeches and he will talk them into forming their own government, paying back the 800 billion that we spent over there, giving us access to their unlimited oil supplies, and all will be well.. He will make a CHANGE there and they will flock to his speeches like they do in America. The American media will be pushed aside by the Middle Eastern media who will also fall under Obamas spell.. Next on Obamas agenda he will float in the air to Iran where he will show them the evils of their ways and deliver another magnificent speech that will stun the Ayatollahs and they will give up all their nuclear ambitions and invite Obama to wear their garb. Next on the agenda is North Korea where Obama will promise them food and ALL of South Korea if they applaud and faint at another one of his electrifying speeches. so don’t worry folks…alot of you say he is the Messiah and I feel confident he will just make it all right for us once again …!!!! Yeah…right…
Posted by: JIMBO | February 29, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am
I’m from Iraq and live in Canada, I feel really sick when I listen to Obama talks. If USA leaves Iraq that means a Victory for Osama Bin Laden and terrorism beacsue they will control the Iraq and will attack the west from there, remember what they did when they were in power in Afghanstan. I hope Barak Hussien Obama thinks twice about Iraq if he bcome a presidint, but I hope he won’t. Please American people don’t elect him because electing him is victorian for terrorism.
Posted by: Goran | February 29, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Rin Tin Tin – I agree, he’ll pick a yes man. Obama’s whole campaign is about feeling good – having to face the cold hard facts of reality goes against everything he and his supporters chant about. They don’t want anything icky, just sunshine and rainbows.
Posted by: BAH | February 29, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Let me see if I understand Obama- he said there was no “Al Quada” in Iraq until “Bush and McCain” invaded. Well, if our Army was sitting here at home, would there be an “Al Quada in America?”
Probably not- Barak Hussein Obama (BHODS) delusional syndrome.
Posted by: Bill | February 29, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am
Let me see if I understand Obama- he said there was no “Al Quada” in Iraq until “Bush and McCain” invaded. Well, if our Army was sitting here at home, would there be an “Al Quada in America?”
Probably not- Barak Hussein Obama (BHODS) delusional syndrome.
Posted by: Bill | February 29, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am
What has changed since the democrats took control of congress in 2006?
1) US Troop level in Iraq? Yep, up more than before.
2)Sales of existing homes? Yep, down to 10-year low.
3)Wholesale inflation? Yep, up to a 16-year high.
4)Approval rating of congress? All-time low, low 20′s.
5)Bush’s approval rating? Nope, still ~33%.
6)Minimum wage? Yep, up to $6.55/hour.
7)Airline industry? All time mess.
8)Guantanamo Bay? Nope, still open for business.
9)North Korea’s Nuclear facility? Yep, closed.
10)Water boarding? Nope, still not torture.
11) Global warming? Nope, last time I checked, there were record lows and snowfall all over the world.
12) Price of gas? Record levels/
Keep up the good work ya’ll.
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Bill, You have a good point. And I’m from not Barak Hussien Oboma, there were, are, will be al Quada in Iraq, and the only way to talk to them is GUN, no other way. my Mom was killed by Al Quada in Iraq because she wasn’t wearing a “Hijab” while she was driving her car from work to home. Al Quada had a chick point and stop my Mom and killed her for not waering a muslim clothes, and that was 6 years ago before USA go to Iraq. However I think MR. Hussien Oboma should go to Iraq and check it out if he has gut to do that. Stop giving unrealistic speech just for fooling people Mr. Hussien Oboma.
Posted by: Goran | February 29, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Wow. Listening to all of these arguments FOR this “war” in Iraq reminds me of the SAME rhetoric about Vietnam!! Yes, I am one of those who is old enough to remember it! The poet and philosopher George Santayana: “Those
who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” We finally “got out” of Vietnam,and yes it was in a “hurry”, but we saved thousands of more lives, and look at Vietnam now! Hotels are being built, people are going over for tourism and enjoyment, we have a growing trade relationship with them. According to the Vietnam Trade association website ” In 2005, Vietnam became the 44th biggest exporter to the US and while the US market has become the biggest importer for Vietnam, accounting for 20.2% of its total exports.” So there you go. Let the people “figure it out for themselves.” They–Iraq and Vietnam, have the right to choose. We are not invading North Korea, and they have a dictator we don’t like. Can we go into ALL the world and “replace” it’s leaders? I don’t think so! Of course, if oil is not involved, we probably won’t go there anyway. AND, the U.S. is NOT safer since we started this “war” in Iraq! We are not even safer from ourselves–look at all our home grown terrorists and college killings! The world is an unsafe place, and we are contributing to that instead of putting an end to it! We need an orderly pullout, beginning NOW! Then we need to build our country back up, repair our aging infrastructure, and figure out how in the world to pay off our trillions of dollars of debt–before it is too late! BTW–I think that “JIMBO” is a republican “plant”!!!It sure would be GREAT to see a republican candidate take a different track than Bush has! A vote for McCain is a vote for “more of the same!” And for all of you, like “bill” who take GREAT pleasure in using someone’s middle name, that just happens to be an honored family name in his family–shame on you! That won’t stop the truth from coming out! It is just stupid and no one believes it or agrees with it. To me, it sounds like the KKK trying to raise it’s ugly head…Also btw–Al Qaida is ALL OVER THE WORLD–just look at things that happened in England and Germany! To fight this kind of thing worldwide should be our objective, and NOT just focusing on one country!
Posted by: M.L. in Bloomington, IN | February 29, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
I believe Deep Purple said it well in the lyrics “Under the Gun”: Infidel can you hear… Would be strange delight… I need you to give your sympathy tonight… When you hear what I say… Deeds I’ve done… Realise I’ve never lost and never won… I’ve got a feeling that it’s never right… There was a reason but it’s out of sight… It’s going down somewhere tonight… Under the gun… Put death in my hand… Learn to fight… Who could care if it’s wrong or if it’s right… We got no choice… Under command… We’re ordered to die or take this land… Stupid bastards and religious freaks… So safe in their castle keeps… They turn away as a mother weeps… Under the gun… When brave men fall… Under crimson skies… There’s a sadness reflected in a soldier’s eyes… Tears will dry… For those I kill… Remember no more their names but someone will… The only way to be victorious… Screw the fools who think it’s glorious… Who gives a toss about the likes of us… Under the gun.
Posted by: OpusRooster | February 29, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
If beleave Clinton is going to pullout of Iraq your mistaken. Obama will because we killing his people However Clinton will but not reght away. But when she does it will be to soon and she like her husband will allow genocide to take place remember Bosnia
Posted by: William F. E. | February 29, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
If my memory is right, Obama’s father was a muslim. If Obama becomes president, I think he be supportive of the muslims constant fighting in the Middle East. Extremist Muslims along with their clerics
advisers are the problems in the Middle East. We need a strong and experience commander-in-chief who will help lessen the constant Muslim problem in the Middle East.
Posted by: Owen Lewis | February 29, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
You Democrats just don’t get it. You are all a bunch of cowards. You all want us to tuck our tail between our legs and run away. We all know there have been major mistakes in this war but what’s done is done. We are there now and must finish the job. If you wimps who weren’t so worried about the ‘innocent’ people in Iraq would shut up and let the military do their job the way it should be done we could destroy the enemy and let the good people of Iraq take over their country. we should be blowing the hell out of enemy but we have to worry about casualties. Since when do these people worry about our innocent? Leaving now would not only be giving in to the terrorists, but then all the men and women who gave up and sacrificed so much would have done so in vain. I am also sick of hearing that there were not terrorists in Iraq until we got there…who are you kidding? They have always been there. And more of them could be here, on our own soil, if the fight was not over there. You should be asking the media why they never show the good that goes on there on a daily basis…you just follow what they say and belive that we are an evil country lead by an evil president. You cowards all make me sick.
Posted by: Wells747 | February 29, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Let’s see; Vietnam War, started by two Democrats, stopped by Nixon. Gulf of Tonkin never happened. Johnson lied and 57,000 US GIs and 1,000,000 Vietnamese died? We lost that one.
Oh, Korea. Happend on Truman’s watch. 35,000 GIs dead, untold number of civilians. We tied that one.
WW II. Pearl Harbor a suprise? One of the biggest lies in history. FDR had plenty of intelligence warning of an Japanese attack. The US embargo was an act of war, and the Japanese said so. The reason FDR did not get blamed – the congressional panels “investigating” the so-called suprise were all controlled by Democrats.
WW I. Wilson (also a Democrat like his successors) campaigned on a slogan “He Kept Us Out of the War in Europe.” That was 1916. By April 1917, we were at war with Germany. So, Wilson lied and 275,000 US GIs died? What was our national interest in that war. Keep the world safe for democracy. Yeah, that worked out well, didn’t it?
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
This is silly. Barack Obama has said that we need to redeploy troops from Iraq to Afghanistan…essentially what Admiral Mullen is saying.
Some of you right-wing tools commenting here are downright scary. You should learn how to read and write before going on the internet. I understand it’s easy to get tough without actually having to do anything, which is apparently all some of you can do.
Posted by: Jeff | February 29, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Peace thru strentgh
Posted by: doobie | February 29, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
As a Hilary supporter I believe she is wrong, and Obama for that matter, on the war in Iraq. Nevertheless, I do understand no democrat can run saying they will sit down and conduct a full review with new eyes on the Iraq question. Now there is gonna be one heck of a mess left behind. Furthermore, there are going to be a lot of unhappy gulf states dealing with the mess none of them started. If anyone thinks gas prices are high now, you ain’t seen nothing yet. If you think the economy is bad now, wait for the energy prices to hit pocketbooks in a future coming to you all next year. Lastly, Iran will get nukes, plus Iraq, and then get set for nuke exchange with Israel which Israel will win but at what cost?
Posted by: Wil | February 29, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Want warmonering? Get John hundred years war McCain.
Posted by: AJ | February 29, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Let’s keep the U.S. in Iraq for another 1,000 years. By that time, maybe the brain-dead U.S. electorate will have had a relapse and decide to gut the Pentagon’s criminally insane budget.
PatRIOTically As Always,K.
Posted by: K Trout | February 29, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
I’m 41 years old and African-American and I would NEVER vote for Barack Obama. He’s a uppity, stiff shirt in a suit with an arrogant attitude, and he is not ready to run the country…..GO HILLARY !!!HILLARY 08!!
Posted by: Marco | February 29, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
FACT…. WE COULD STAY IN IRAQ for a hundred years, and when we pull out on the 101st year there will be choas. WE HAVE LOST ENOUGH… TIME to pull out and focus on issues that have solutions that are within our control and there are many!
Posted by: Squierghia74 | February 29, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Warning Democrats, warning liberals, warning Doves, warning those driven by fear, writting on the surface of the ocean with your finger, all equally effective!
Posted by: Alchydave | February 29, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
All of you who have not served in the US Military I think have no right to vote in the first place. All you do I ride in your nice BMW’s and go to your good paying jobs and think you are better then everyone else. You talk all this stuff but have given up anthing for this country!!! I have! I’ve been there and if you want to know why McCain is getting a lot of votes. It’s the military members that are voting for him. Cause I dont want to see what I faught for and lost friends for being taken away like Vietnam! Only cowards and dis the President cause when he stood on top of the crumbled Twin Towers and said that the people who knocked these biulding down will hear from us soon. You stood up and supported. I know your gonna say we didnt need to go to Iraq. Well let me tell you something! THIS IS A WAR AGAINST RADICAL ISLAM. To them its a war againts our religon. So we have to think the same. You get me drift.
Posted by: Slaychild | February 29, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
All Generals and Admirals LOVE WAR that is how they get promoted and insure they get a GREAT RETIREMENT PLAN. There has never been a war “they did’nt like”…And Mullens is a BUSH CLONE..
Posted by: Joe MUrphy | February 29, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Most Bush supporters and some other GOP war lovers would be devistated if we stopped being a warmongering nation. Watching Faux news and Rambo movies 24/7 and making remarks like: Bush is the “War President”,are typical traits of these blood thirsty Rambo wanabees. Everyone who doesn’t embrace war is a liberal traitor in their sick minds. These people are the true traitors to the American way! Especially the Chickenhawks,worst Americans ever!
Posted by: AJ | March 1, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am
We should be most afraid of the radical Right. These people think war is glorious,and the ones who served were mostly the low ranking soldiers. They performed mostly menial tasks due to their lack of intelligence. These were the sheeple troops no one could stand! I served and I do drive a nice shiny red BMW!
Posted by: AJ | March 1, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am
I do not get it. Why do not you realize that it is costing the U.S. $338Billion dollars annually to pay for the illegal aliens. At the rate they are invading us on all borders is too great and nothing is being done.At last count 12 million. We are broke, stealing from Social Security, Robbing Peter to pay Paul. How long can it last. All of our resources, manpower, and time is overseas in a civil battle that we cannot win. While our borders are left vulnerable. We have no equipment it is all overseas, no money, it is all overseas. Our U.S.is being mismanaged and we need an overhaul of the corruption starting at the top. Get all the illegals deported and let them petition to become citizens. We have to have a passport/they need the same credentials. Otherwise it is discrination. We could not do that in their countries. How much we could accomplish for our citizens with $338 million dollars. A hell of a lot. What are you thinking why the people that hire them are just getting richer off the exploitation of illegals similar as the exploitation of slaves.
Posted by: Arlene DeRibas | March 1, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am
LET ME ADD… IT’S TRUE DEMOCRATS IN CHARGES ALWAYS GET US INTO HOT WATER…EXAMPLE -DURING CARTER’S YEARS NO EXPLAINING THERE LOOKS WHAT’S HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE-EAST…THAN THERE’S CLINTON…MORE TO SAY…LOOK HOW HE PULLED TROOPS OUT OF SOMALIA, WHEN THEY HAD A CHANCE TO TAKE OUT BIN LADIN..WHAT’S NEXT THE GREAT OBAMA WILL WITHDRAWAL TROOPS OUT IRAQ AND AFAGHANISTAN, THEN WE HAVE TO GO BACK AGAIN PROBABLY CAUSING MORE LOSS…NO MAN OR WOMAN WHO NEVER SERVED THE U.S. MILITARY SHOULD BE COMMANDER-IN-CHEIF…
Posted by: MARINE4EVER | March 1, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
War sucks, there is no doubt about it. Particularly if you’d like to see the U.S.A. become collectivist, socialist or communist. All we have to do to achieve THAT is elect a Democrat.
Posted by: Alchydave | March 1, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
One minute she is “not dead yet” the next minute “she has lost”, the next “she will carry Texas and Ohio by slim margins” the next “they will fail”…. what a great way to lead… kinda like his voting record, when he did vote…………or his speeches..”What do you need, I will say what you want to hear”…. or “I will make change happen,……Canada – don’t worry, they are just words” – blah blah blah
Posted by: Chipo1965 | March 1, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Its simple. Take your best guess as to who bin Laden would vote for, and vote against that candidate. I thank God that this simpering generation of X-Boxers weren’t around in the forties, when Americans endured gas and food reationing to fund the war effort. And BTW, my son is patrolling the streets of an Iraqi town today, as a 3rd generation combat Marine.
Posted by: We the Sheeple | March 1, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
For all of you who speculated as to my reasons for being a Vietnam vet, I volunteered—never was drafted. I didn’t want to go to war but knew that it was my duty as a citizen. Our elected representatives made the decision to go to war and I did my part as did a lot of other guys. Those of you who call this a ‘Bush’ war need to remember that it was the Congress that authroized and appropriated money for the war and not Mr. Bush alone. It is not Bush’s war, it is our war.
Posted by: strangelove | March 1, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Pull out on day one. Oh yea I can hear the vacuum now. Don’t worry it will be a great victory for those who have fallen. Thier loss of life means nothing they were just disposable anyways. Their families should be thankful for the $100k in life insurance they got right, so what are they whining about. They got paid, and a brand new flag to put on their mantle. So those that do come back get to spend months in a rat infested VA hospital. They wait for a couple of years for appointments to get help. They can’t get the needed rehab. All under the watchful eyes of a great congress. Who put these great American icons in office anyways. Yep that is right the left side of the aisle sees this as their greatest victory.
Posted by: TexasRules | March 1, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
You the American voter, you voted in to office the worst congress in history. Now your going to vote in the worst president in history, because you have learned nothing from your past. Ohio listen up, go vote for Hillary. Your welfare checks will support you. Your unemployed children will thank you. Your health care will cost you nothing, those working in the rest of the country will pay for it. Texas vote Hillary. She needs to garnish your wages for welfare, health care and unemployment. The people of Ohio are counting on you to make their life easy.
Posted by: TexasRules | March 1, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Too many ungrateful citizens here- how sad! We have to be grateful that we have not had a repeat of 9/11. Do you read foreign journals or just listen to the biased media here? Do you know that China spends 10% of their GDP on their military? US only spends 1%. Have you ever wondered why China and other nations spend so much of their money and energy to rebuild their military? China’s not an immediate threat. There’s Iran and Russia we have to worry about soon. As long as America remains the super power, we have to accept our responsibility. I honestly think we should step down and just be a normal country like Australia and not worry so much about policing the world. The only question is, who would step up to the plate and be the new superpower? Russia? China?
Posted by: cheri | March 1, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
“gains we have achieved…” Let’s see. No weapons of mass destruction found (the original justification for the war in Iraq), no connection to 9/11 found despited the Bush-Cheney statements to the contrary, nothing done for the more than four million Iraqis now living as refugees in either foreign lands or their own country, Al Qaeda now in Iraq because we invaded, Iran’s influence in the region (including Iraq as reported in today’s news) on the rise because we chose to stay and occupy Iraq, bin Laden still at large since we didn’t devote enough effort to finding him, the Taliban on the rebound in Afhganistan with expanding influence now in Pakistan since we squandered most of our resources in Iraq, more national debt than we piled up during the Vietnam War, thousands of Americans dead, no justice for the families of 9/11 victims, moderate Muslim forces in many nations now destabilized because we fueled the fires of ultra-right wing factions in many nations, Iran with its own Bush-style president elected in their own right wing theocratic reaction to our invasion of Iraq, Saudi Arabia now worried about the regional destabilization…yeah, we’ve achieved a lot. Right. How do these guys sleep at night? Easy. They believe their own public relations campaigns.
The events that will unfold after we leave Iraq were forecast before we ever invaded that country. But neither the neocons, the Joint Chiefs, Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney, Powell, or Bush chose to listen. To this day they still don’t acknowledge that many experts in Middle East politics warned against our bonehead move there.
So, now they plan to blame it on whoever is elected to clean up their global mess. There is no accountability by anyone who led us in this unnecessary war that has made us more at risk instead of making us safer. No accountability, that is, until next November.
Posted by: Stan McCauley | March 1, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
The sole chaos that Acting President Chaney and his flappers want to avoid is any hinderence to their exploitation of the oil fileds. They care nothing for our Constitution and even less, if possible for the creation of a civilized nation in Iraq. The shape of the future Iraq can bew measured by the gangs of thugs we have armed, paid off and declared to be Awakening groups. Sort of like appointinging the Hells Angels a State govenerment. Read Iraq’s future in the murdered women that were killed in Basra for wearing make up or exposing their hair. Is that what our troops are dieing for? Seems so.
Posted by: Eugene Elliott | March 2, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am
Sadly his followers are refusing to acknowledge or admit that even while Senator Obama is running his campaign that there is speculation and intimations of a Criminal Investigation into the purchase of his multi-million dollar home from Renzo, the slumlord for far less than fair market value during a time his client was being investigated by the Grand Jury .. and, that there may be an even bigger scandal over that relationship than what was exposed with Jack Abrahmoff and his band of crooks…
Sad if our Democratic Candidate has to spend time in court rather than the White House solving our real problems
This isn’t change in Washington — it’s a Cult of followers buying into polite insults delivered with a shiny smile by a man that looks nice in a suit and tie but carries empty promises and sack full of magical beans
Posted by: Kevin | March 2, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Psst, Kevin. The investigation was done and Obama was declared of having no wrong doings. Don’t tell anyone else, it’s a secret.
Posted by: MadeinUSA | March 3, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Neither of these two are capable of being president ! Look at Hillary… She voted for the war and now is against it. What kind of Leadership is that ? Hey we might be making progress, Let’s Leave. I think Donald Duck could do better than those two together.
Posted by: MikeCx | March 11, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am