Rezko Trial: Obama Consulted on Board Picks
As an Illinois lawmaker, Barack Obama was one of eight state officials consulted on appointments to a state board which later became involved in what prosecutors describe as a fraud scheme, the Associated Press reports today.
That information was contained in a June 2003 memo from a national Democratic official introduced this morning as evidence at the trial of Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a Chicago-area developer and political operative facing corruption charges.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
The memo does not say how much influence Obama had over the process of picking members for the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board, AP said.
And it did not indicate Obama was involved in the alleged corruption that later tainted the board.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
WHO THE HELL CARES…OBAMA HAS ONE POSSIBLE SCANDAL..SHALL WE START LISTING OL’ BILLY BOB’S AND HILLARYS SCANDALS. IF THE WORST THING THAT OBAMA DID WAS BE-FRIEND A POSSBIBLE SCUMBAG…I WOULD STILL VOTE FOR HIM WITH A SMILE…
Posted by: GODISNOTREAL | March 10, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
So, … there is non information here?
Posted by: Mark Webb | March 10, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
No news here. The media is trying to get something out of the Rezko suit that does not exist. Hillary, Bill, Bush and every politician out there have had something to do with a fund raiser that got indicted. Bill Clinton actually testified in court. Hillary returned almost a million to Norman Hsu who is in jail today.
Posted by: james | March 10, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
obama knew the SYRIAN slum lord
for 20 years and also contribute in his
(obama) campaign when HE ran for office
in CHICAGO.So how can you say he was not
involved in the alleged corruption that
tainted the BOARD.Again tip-toe around
OBAMA.
Posted by: baccarattwo | March 10, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
There is no question in my mind that Obama will be called to testify. It is about time Brian Ross started to peel back the onion on Obama. So far, he’s had an easy ride. Things are beginning to change.
Posted by: Nia | March 10, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Health Facilities planning board? Does this tie in to Michelle O’s 200k raise?
I can only imagine what is going to come out next and I wonder if the media will cover it or continue to pretend that all of this is on the “up and up”
Sounds like Obama is less of a “change” candidate than he would like us to believe!!
Posted by: Jerry | March 10, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
The problem is that Obama acts like the saint who does politics differently from other politicians. But he’s no different. His campaign theme is about clean politics. But he just hasn’t dipped his hands in the national politics longer than other dirty politicians. Barely 3 years in national politics. Wait until he gets into double digits. This is only the beginning. Nobody’s perfect.
Posted by: Dao | March 10, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
This man Obama comes with to much baggage,it can’t all be just rumors!
Posted by: Kathy | March 10, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
And why is this important???
You guys keep on fishing. You might get a nibble but no catch.
Posted by: ROB | March 10, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
The media has had pain trying to het something on Obama’s record and it has been daunting. To say he is not vetted is not true. They have been investigating him for a while and all they have is this. I will vote for him if this is all they have.
Posted by: james | March 10, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Brian Ross,
Excellent work! The more you dig, the more filth you are going to find.
Posted by: Michelle | March 10, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
This does not even begin to pass the “smell test”. Have to hold your nose if you vote for Obama. This already stinks to high heaven and just stay tuned. There is lots more to come. Oprah is in this up to her ears as well.
Posted by: Bill Elliott | March 10, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Yeah, let’s talk about Clinton scandals. Whitewater was investigated for 6 YEARS at a cost of 60 MILLION dollars and no evidence was ever found that the Clintons did anything wrong. People today still drag that dead horse out for view. But let there be any suggestion that Obama may have done wrong and it’s “they’re smearing Obama” oh my, how can anyone say such things about “Saint Obama”. Talk about a double standard.
Posted by: JR | March 10, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
I smell something funny. It’s funny that people here see something coming down the pike that “may” be negative stuff for Obama and his followers revert back to Hillary and her decade and a half old scandals. It amazes me that Ken Star investigated these allegations against HRC and found nothing but people still want to believe that she is quilty. People really are afraid of strong powerful woman.
Posted by: Karl | March 10, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
You, Obamanias, are making it seem like Obama is special just because he doesn’t have much baggage. Any fresh first term Senate will have same amount of baggage as Obama. Obama was just smart enough to take the opportunity during a time when people wanted changed from Bush type of politics.
So if Obama has nothing to hide why did he run from Rezko questions in San Antonio, and making himself look bad? lol
Posted by: Dao | March 10, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
It is becoming increasingly clear that O’Bama and Clinton are carrying some pretty heavy baggage. This is just the tip of the iceberg for O’Bama. Sitm watch and enjoy the show that has just begun. How did we end up with these two for our candidates?
Posted by: Bob H | March 10, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
obama dances well, to well. how could you not know what a friend of 20 years does? PLEASE!!! people are just riding the obama wave as it were. but they eventually crash…
Posted by: sal | March 10, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Unfortunately for Sen. Obama it’s almost inevitable that the ongoing Rezko corruption trial is going to bring out very damaging stuff. The Chicago press has already been all over him for this, and the national media will soon be forced to cover the “dirty old politics” of Sen. Holier-Than-Thou.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 10, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Obama claimed himself a clean and new type of politics. He lied because he was just the same as others… The bad but pretending good is the WORST… Please don’t claim yourself as pure as Saint again….
Posted by: Truth | March 10, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Makin’ a Mountain out of a Mole hill…
This is just too much fun for one fool…
Posted by: Jester of Fools | March 10, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
so let me get this straight, after 200+ investigative news stories and an FBI investigation, neither of which turned up anything illegal on the part of Senator Obama, this is a scandal for him how? Because he knows the guy? C’mon Hsu was/is dirtier than Rezko. Bill Clinton has actually been convicted for lying to Congress and HRC still associates with him. Rezko is small potatoes compared to the Clinton associates that have been or are under investigation/indictment/impeachment.
Posted by: Louis | March 10, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
did you people catch this:
“The memo does not say how much influence Obama had over the process of picking members for the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board, AP said.
And it did not indicate Obama was involved in the alleged corruption that later tainted the board.”
The only apparent fact in this article is that Obama was 1 of 8 consulted in the appointing of a state board that later is being accused of wrong doing. No where in this article or any other does it prove that Obama has done anything illegal. He’s not even being investigated. Can someone, anyone post a like with proof that Obama did anything wrong or is even being investigated for doing anything wrong… Waiting
Posted by: Kim | March 10, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
baccarattwo it can be said that he wasnt involved because there is no proof whatsoever that he was and believe you me if it comes out that he were involved in anything illegal this country will nail his but to the wall. You people are just waiting for it.
Posted by: Kim | March 10, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Folks keep talking about the “Clinton scandals”. Fact is, those “scandals” were investigated aggressively and spread on the front pages of all the major media at that time. Bottomline – nothing was found.
Obama on the other hand has not been investigated, and has gotten kid glove treatment by the press. Now, he may also come out squeeky clean in the end, but will that happen in time for the general election? Can Dems take that chance? And, what if he is not found to be clean? What do we do then?
Folks, we have serious business in this country – we need solid leaders with proven track records. My vote – Hillary. If she is not the nominee – McCain. Plain and simple.
Posted by: bw | March 10, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
And the plot sickens!!! Wow,will all this come out in time to stop one of the biggest mistakes of our Democratic Party’s exsistence (Thomas Jefferson’s Party). We need Hillary Clinton. She has a firm grasp of the issues and a lifetime of committment to America. Americans, please wake up and smell the coffee. Let’s not end up with four more years of the same. moblou KY bring the vote on to the rest of “US”
Posted by: Mary O'Bryan | March 10, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
This IS significant. Obama is proving to be the old-school political insider he constantly harps on. I am starting to wonder if his decision to run for president right now, after emphatically stating that he wouldn’t, has anything to do with the dirt that will be found on him as the Rezko trial continues.
I really hope that if Obama had shady dealings that we find out right now instead of after he is elected president. The more we learn about Obama the less he looks like the bringer of hope and change he claims to be.
Posted by: Haley Rodman Clemson | March 10, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
You know what I find interesting? It is that Obama wants to accuse Hillary on her “judgement” on the War, yet his “bad judgement” with his association and implicit connection with Rezko is beyond just questionable.
Posted by: Heidi | March 10, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Good point Heidi!! If entering into a deal with someone who is under investigation is not Horrible judgement I do not know what is!! This is some of the worst judgement I have ever seen!!
Posted by: Jerry | March 10, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Here’s a good “judgement”… Obama has been the chairman for Senate Foreign Relation Committee since January 2007, he has not held a single hearing since he took the position. His excuse, too busy with campaign. He pressed the wrong button 6 times on Senate votes, another good “judgement”. If you don’t have the time to be responsible for a position you took, resign, don’t let it ride for over a year LOL. If you push the wrong vote button 6 times, please don’t press that red button wrong 6 times when you become the president. LOL
Posted by: Dao | March 10, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
It’s about time Obama is summoned to testify in court about Rezko.
The media is too shy to report Obama’s wrong dealings with Rezko for 20 years.
Posted by: Lisaky | March 10, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Obama got money from Rezko. Rezko got money from Nadmi Auchi. Nadmi Auchi made his vast fortune from doing business with Saddam Hussein.
It is all true. And if Obama would be the nominee the Republicans will crush Obama.
This is only the beginning. This trial is expected to last 4-5 months. They are not even close to revealing the Nadhmi Auchi link.
Posted by: Follow the Money | March 10, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
The issues are not as simple as the Obama supporters would like every one else to believe. Mr.Rezko is a very corrupt political dealer who bulit very
unsafe buildings. Mr.Obama continued to write support letters for this individual and curried favors from this individual small and big ones including large sums of campaign money and assistance in buying house. Mr.Rezko is not an acquaintance but a very close ally of Obama. Mr.Obama is lying through is teeth!!!
Posted by: mike | March 10, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Let Oh-Bama and Michelle move into one of those slum like buildings that Obama never bothered to get fixed for all those poor people in his district Instead of being ashamed of America — Michelle should be ashamed of her DO-NOTHING husband who “folds like a wet suit.” when theres problems to solve- according to Senator Lindsay Graham and the New York Times. . Alot of us are not on the Piped Pipers bandwagon..
Posted by: jimbo | March 10, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
What’s worse is that Rezko was being bankrolled by a British/Iraqi guy named Nadhmi Auchi (who had ties to Sadamm Hussein). He made a huge money transaction to Rezko just before the questionable house deal involving Obama. Do a search on Auchi. Wait until this guy’s name comes up in the Rezko trial.
Posted by: nhnell | March 10, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
I don’t understand why big time politicians and celebs support Obama. He does not have appropriate experience to be a President of USA, yet. The answer is MONEY. They were bought by Obama and his friends, Rezko and sub-prime mortgage lenders.
Posted by: Lisaky | March 10, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
I just read a post by a Clinton supporter that “this man (Obama) comes with too much baggage. How can we support him.” Is this person a supporter of Hillary Clinton, you know, the one who served as Bill Clinton’s co-president who proudly proclaims the “vetting” of her baggage? Here is the intellectual height Clinton needs all her supporters to reach and not exceed to have a prayer.
This is the Bush Justice Dept and the Attorney Generals left in it are the one’s who did not lose their jobs for refusing to perform political prosecutions.
This is also Clinton the fighter’s machine. I would lay money odds on any number that if Bush or Clinton actually had anything of Obama he would have been carted off before Rezko and the others and he would have been offered a deal quicker and better than any deal OJ’s Vegas co-defendants got. LOL.
Posted by: shelgirl | March 10, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Never seen anyone so “GREEDY & SELFISH” more than clinton family over past 31yrs have been existing as a human which makes it so hard sometimes to sawllow thinking about their ways of getting the white house back like that property on penn ave belongs to them. Probably their thoughts on getting nomination will be better using tony rezko trial linking obama to the case will give the ulimate gift they’re looking for obviously they’re chasing wrong ambition period cause we’re here when “Bill Clinton” lied under oath about sex scandal,white water & more definitely we’ll end their careers this year.
Posted by: Abdul Olufowobi | March 10, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Believe me, the republicans have a few more dump trucks of dirt, they have loaded up and waiting for the correct time for MR. OBAMA.
Posted by: Beck | March 10, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Lets just remember that Rezko has donated to a lot of Democrats as well as Republicans. Lets not just point the finger to Obama as many poiticians benefitted from this man.
This says it all:
Obama has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the Rezko case….
Obama has returned nearly $150,000 in political contributions from Rezko and his associates…
He’s done nothing wrong here and he returned any money involving Rezko.
Posted by: MT | March 10, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Heidi,
Don’t forget his ‘judgement’ in hiring dopes like Samantha Power and Austen Goolsbee.
Posted by: daledog | March 10, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Kim,
The Clintons don’t have to do anything wrong but people still insinuate that they have. Welcome to the world of the Big dogs. It’s about time they started investigating what this man is all about.
Posted by: J | March 10, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
How about Hillary showing her Tax returns so we can judge both candidates in a fair and equal manner? I can’t believe people are listening to her when she hasn’t been transparent at all.
Posted by: natalia | March 10, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Mr obama needs to be vetted.He wants the most important job in America yet the public knows nothing about him. He’s a good salesman but thats about it. Go Hillary!!
Posted by: andrea benini | March 10, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
This is terrible for the democratic party.
He needs to address this and his ties to that terrorist.
Posted by: John | March 10, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Obama is keeping quite on Rezko because he knows the prosecutor is playing a cat and mouse game with him and he doesn’t want to get caught up in another lie. Unfortunately, Obama doesn’t know what cards the prosecutor has! It’s going to get much deeper – hold on!
Posted by: jim | March 10, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
It’s frightening that people are choosing to just ignore things like this. Is this a sign of immaturity? This needs to be looked at for people that are being put into office.
Posted by: John | March 10, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Considering the fact that the Clinton’s have never been found guilty of anything ever, except Bill lying about a sexual encounter (why didn’t we ask JFK about Monroe?), how can anyone fall to the lies and deceit of the Republican machine during the Clinton years? It’s TERRIBLE what you Obama radicals are doing in your determination to win. Listen to yourselves, turning your backs on the most successful Democratic presidency in most of our lifetimes. A lot of Hillary supporters like Obama, but many in their own wisdom feel that at this moment in time, they trust and believe in Hillary now, and see that Obama will be better off working a country to full change when its infrastructure has been repaired.
Posted by: Benjamin | March 10, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
The paper trail between Rezko and Obama is a long one, according to the Chicago Sun-Times, with Obama writing endorsement letters for the developer to get big government housing projects. Obama also hired as an intern the son of a Rezko associate who was later convicted of fraud. And after the City of Chicago had to sue Rezko for not providing heat to low-income tenants, Obama remained on good terms with him, getting all those political contributions and $625,000 towards the purchase of a home. In the end, however, the national media will likely devote more coverage to Hillary Clinton’s tax returns.
Posted by: Factcheck2 | March 10, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Rezko is under inditement for extorsion and political favor selling.Who was Rezko extorting money for Obama and his senate campaign,who gave back 150,000 dallors when the story broke but did he tell anyone that he was a board menber on the very board his good friend is getting investigated for favor selling and extorsion no hes said nothing.Rezko was also being sued for failing to pay back G.E financial 3.5 million,at the same time he was buying the lot next door to Obama,a lot that Obama could not afford to buy,so rezko bought it.I dont think the forced campaign contributions to Obama for contracts and loans by the board was anything less than a plan by both Rezko ansd Obama
Posted by: girlinvt | March 10, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Factcheck2:
You write as though your information is factual…..ha, ha, ha, …
Now, what do you know?
Posted by: tony | March 10, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
All of this is just simply fascinating. Democrats devouring their own! What an enjoyable experience! you should all take a look in the mirror. You’ll scare yourselves!
Posted by: Onlooker | March 10, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
This is day one of a corruption trial …don’t expect to know everything after one day…just pay attention..don’t be impatient..
and guess what…Hillary’s tax returns and other docs ..Kenneth Starr examined all to the tune of 40 million plus and found nothing..you were all so sure he would..
i predict hillary releases tax returns on april 15th..nothing scandalous in them..and then the messiah will really look exactly like Ken Starr..
we shall see..or as Hillary says about rush..”Be careful what you wish for..”
by the way this story will break right before the Florida/Michigan re-do vote..and guess who will win both…?
that’s right. good night and good luck.
Posted by: christine craft | March 10, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Actually the Rezko scandal is not a small thing..
This scum was actually running his business in Obama’s small District 56. If he can’t control Dis. 56 then how the heck can control the entire USA?
Exactly…. he can’t!!
Posted by: Jon | March 10, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
How long has Michele Obama been employed in health care field? Hope for them it was before Rezko involvement and this health committee assignment…because that would be a bombshell if her employment could be tied (even loosely) to this assignment. Oprah’s angel…may lose a few more wings…
If Obama is the nominee..anyone for Ralph Nader?
Posted by: jackie | March 10, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Seem like Obama gave the names of people that were willing to take a little from the kitty.
You scratch my back and I will scratch yours.
Posted by: SJ | March 10, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
JR – ok let’s talk about the Clinton scandals. 40 million of our tax dollars were used to investigate. Crimes committed by Hillary Clinton = 0. Best they could do was expose a sexual impropriety that is irrelevant to the job as President. Vetting and investigation into Obama has just begun and may yield crimes committed by Obama.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 10, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
I am waiting for the investigation of Michelle Obama. She received a 200k raise from a hospital that charges 3.5 times more for services to uninsured patients than it does for insured patients only after Obama announced a run for the Presidency. Makes ya think..
Posted by: DCVoter | March 10, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
factcheck2… I did research of my own and was shocked but not surprised. There is so much out there. I once supported Obama but not after all the negative info i read about him and wife. I am now considering voting for Hillary Clinton. Hey i came across a web site with the some very scary facts on Obama and his wife. Wow ! it’s crazy.
I see he is no better then Sen. Hillary Clinton or McCain. I’m glad that people like you are posting facts like the Rezko/Obama story.
What scum bag
Posted by: Jon | March 10, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
All signs lead to a direct connection to Michelle Obama. Hmm, I wonder if THAT is why she is so angry.
Posted by: jeff | March 10, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
The curious thing about Obama & Rezko is the denial & big lie at the SC debate with Clinton & Edwards.
When Obama tagged Clinton with her time on the Wal-Mart board, she shot back with “what about your ties with the slum-lord Rezko?”
No, he shakes his head & says “NO, NO, NO”. He went on the say he only knew him thru about 5 hrs of billing for the lawfirm he worked for. Clinton got boo’d. Obama took SC by a landslide. That Sunday, the day after the SC election, Obama went on a news show & confessed he & Rezko were friends & he was a fundraiser for 20 yrs.
WHY the lie? Shortly after, Anderson Cooper “Keeping them Honest” did one little small glimspe into this.
They produced a letter, on the US Senate letterhead of Senator Barack Obama,on behalf of Rezko. To assure the parties concerned that Rezko was on the up & up. That’s a pretty good reference. From a Senator.
So my questions are these >>>
How do you say Obama is innocent of all dirty dealings?
How many of the swindles would not have happened if he wasn’t Rezko’s “character reference”?
Were any of the “deals” that now find Rezko in jail a result of Obama’s letters of reference? There is something here not yet discovered or not yet made public. He lied too hard, to fast & too much to have clean hands. And it was done in public on that debate stage in Myrtle Bch, SC.
Posted by: Sophia | March 10, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Hilary was sleeping with Bill and didn’t know where he’d been!
So, why is it farfetched to think that Obama indeed may not have known what Rezko was all about.
Every great nation had it’s downfall. I think that this is the beginning of the end for this once great country.
Posted by: mythinking | March 10, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Health Facilities Planning Boards – These groups control allocation of high ticket items like MRI’s, Chemotherapy centers, Cardiac Care centers – and represent an enormous opportunity for graft or “pay to play” schemes. The fact that Michelle Obama moved from law and advocacy to the the University of Chicago Medical system while Rezko was consulting with Obama about appointment to this board bears looking into. There is more here than meets the eye.
Posted by: twinmom48 | March 10, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Obama is all hat and no horse…
Posted by: Joe MUrphy | March 10, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
This is just the starting for Mr. Change man…. The more we research on this guy, more we will find he is not what he is trying to portray himself……
I hope people see this sooner then later…
Posted by: RS | March 10, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
During “Watergate” the question to President Nixon was : what did you know and when did you know it ?? The most important question with Obama should be; When did you know Rezko was under scrutiny, under indictment and when did you separate yourself from him and his associates. Until he can answer that, he is not fit to run for president!
Keep your eye on the Rezko trial, it is getting really interesting.
Posted by: Di | March 10, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I have a great idea! If there is any possibility that someone is guilty, lets throw them in jail. Why do we have to find the evidence. Also, lets forget about history so we can make the same mistake again. Forgot all the things the Clintons were accused of and later was found to be false. Forget that, throw Obama in jail. Proud Americans know he is guilty. Stop Obama!!!
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | March 10, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Obama is a corrupt politician. I don’t call that “change.” He should not be the Democratic nominee as you ain’t seen nothing yet. Rezko is just the tip of the iceberg.
Posted by: Doreen | March 10, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Wow! Reading all these comments makes me wonder why so many people are willing to give Obama a pass. I think they are worried that they’ll find out that Obama is not the Saint he claims to be. Are we going to risk losing the Whitehouse on this guy.Well,I guess I’ll have to wait for universal heathcare for another 8 years. Thanks St.Obama.
Posted by: Mario Lockhart | March 10, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
First it was the debate in South Carolina,where Obama stated he never had dealings with Rezko,except for 4-6 hours for a church group that he was working for. Then came the news about Obamas house and Rezko who was being sued by G.E. financial for defaulting on a 3.5 million dallor loan but he could find 625,000 to help his buddy buy a house. Now today during testimony for Rezkos trial,it was anounced that Obama was one of the eight members of a board,that Rezko is accused of selling political favors,extorting money for contracts ect. And still Obama will not acknowlege that this has happened.McCain has an aide at the Rezko trial taking notes and getting info for later use.
Posted by: girlinvt | March 10, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
The truth will come out and Obama’s doomed forever. It’s the end of Barak’s “Chicago Way.”
Posted by: swissdiver | March 10, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
First, a little bit of information was released against BO. BO denied immediately just like the week before 3/4 on the conversation between his economic adviser and Canada. Then more detailed information like memo are behind it just like a bait waiting for your screw-up.
Posted by: abcabc_123 | March 10, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Hillary, please don’t offer him a ticket to be VP! After months
of the media adulation, they are suddenly realising that Obama is all talk.
The race is on and your message of experience is getting through.
He can promise “change”but change is the only real permanent thing in life, it happens, whether he makes hollow promises, or not , so his promises carry no weight! SOLUTIONS are what people want to see!
With regard to Rezko, the question to President Nixon on Watergate was
:What did you know and when did you know it ??
Therefore the most important questions for Obama is :
When did you know Rezko was under scrutiny, under indictment
and when did you separate yourself from him and his associates?
Until he answers that, he is not fit to run for President, there is
too much “sleaze”about to surface.
Posted by: Di | March 11, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Please tell us more – we don’t want to be surprised if he makes it into the general election. The Republicans are going to pull out all the stops. We need to know NOW!
Thank you ABC for following up on this!
Posted by: Mary Ann | March 11, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
US DEM. NEED TO BE PULLING TOGETHER AND NOT FALL INTO THE HANDS OF THE REP., I KNOW WE CANT TAKE FOUR MORE YEARS OF A REP. PRESADENT. I HAVE MY PICK OF THE CANIDATES WHICH IS SEN CLINTON BUT IF SHE DOESENT GIT THE NOM., I WILL VOTE FOR SEN. OBAMA ITS A MUST, WE HAVE GOT TO PULL TOGETHER AND ELECT WHICH EVER WINS THE DEM. NOM..A SIXTY YEAR OLD WHITE MALE. THANK YOU.
Posted by: ALVIN | March 11, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
Isn’t it comforting to know that there are so many expert, judgemental, and investigative individuals in the U.S. such as the many who have posted on this board. Just goes to show how screwed up the American Justice system really is. Used to be innocent till proved guilty. Do you really believe one can get a fair trial by your peers in this country? Now you don’t even have to be charged with anything, and you are guilty. At least the Clinton’s HAVE BEEN CHARGED. Hillary recently skated the law, and being called as a co-defendant in the Paul vs Clinton case, working it’s way through the court of Appellate Judge Aurelio Munoz in California by claiming protection against tort fraud conspiracy charges under the California anti-SLAPP law. At that hearing in April 2007, however, Judge Munoz admonished the lead Clinton attorney, David Kendall, that unequivocally any attempt to DENY Senator Clinton’s testimony as a witness in the case, would be “Dead on Arrival” Lead attorney, David Kendall then instructed Paul’s attorney, Colette Wilson, that none of Clinton’s three attorney’s of record would accept a witness subpoena for Clinton’s deposition on her behalf, and there would be no cooperation in the process the Judge stated should include Clinton’s testimony. This is outright contempt for the rule of law. I guess Hillary will depend upon her Secret Service protectors to protect her from the process servers as well as school children wishing to get interviews of the Clinton’s for their school papers.
Posted by: paul mall | March 11, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am
No matter how you throw it. Dirt is still dirt.. Mr. Obama is silent because this is just the tip of the iceberg. This could bring him down if he is found to be more involved in this corruption trial.
Posted by: Jay | March 11, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am
I hope someone finally publishes the dirt on Obama before its’ too late. It is obvious from the NAFTA deal and others that he is a crooked politician willing to say or do anything to get elected.
Posted by: df | March 11, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am
Hillary and Bill has pictures of them taken with Rezko! Im sure Rezko has donated to Hillary’s Campaign as well!
Posted by: Demo Rules | March 11, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
According to the AP, although the memo does not say how much influence Obama had over the process of picking members for the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board, Sen. Barack Obama again is guilty by association. The fact that the property was put in Michele Obama’s name further puts to question the legality of the transaction. As a married man, each time that I have purchases a home, my wife and I both were on the title. As a lawyer, Obama knew what he was doing no matter how the media makes excuses for their favorite candidate. Again this shows how this inexperienced politician lacks knowledge even in the law area. Even if the article does not indicate Obama was involved in the alleged corruption that later tainted the board, his acts again are questionable.
Posted by: Rene, Lt Col, USAF Retired | March 11, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am
The news media outlets are describing New York State Gov. Eliot Spitzer, as one of the democrat party shinny star, upcoming, holy clean, new hope in the democrat party? Sound like the description of another upcoming democrat’s candidate (Obama).
Posted by: suzelee | March 11, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Suze: The news media outlets are describing New York State Gov. Eliot Spitzer, as one of the democrat party shinny star, upcoming, holy clean, new hope in the democrat party? Sound like the description of another upcoming democrat’s candidate (Obama).
——————–
You are right on the money.
Posted by: sj7465 | March 11, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Obama has several scandals. The Iowa independent reported in October of last year about a coup that Obama started so Hillary would be the sole person left on the Michigan ballot. He wanted her to look bad so she would lose the votes in Iowa. Several joined him but Dodd and Kucinich did not. He succeeded — Iowans are very particular about their first caucus status and Obama’s coup worked. Often we wonder why someone has crooked friends — who would be willing to borrow half a million dollars+ even if you are broke — like Rezko. It is not surprising now. The reasons are coming out. The politician who talks hope is really the leader of a political coup. He has so many fools in his bag. I am so glad that I am not one of them!!
Posted by: Voter | March 11, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
there were poor people in Chicago who did not get decent housing, even though Rezko got millions in government monies for supposed rehabilitation. This infuriates me. So why didn’t it infuriate Obama? He was their state senator after all.
Posted by: toby | March 11, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Obama has been in the national spotlight for less than 2 yrs – most of it as a media sweetheart. When anything remotely negative comes out, you Obama-bots claim – “that’s not bad” or “at least he doesn’t have a ‘Clinton-sized’ scandal.” I’d love to read your book of moral standards. You can’t selectively label morality and ethics. You’re exposing your own ignorance, due to your bias for Obama. That being said, it’s acceptable to say “I realize Obama is not perfect and I don’t feel these character flaws or lapses in judgment are relevant to being POUS.” If that’s what you mean, then say it – show some guts. The Clintons have 16+ yrs in the national spotlight – don’t try to make the comparison at this point. The question is whether you are willing to bet that this is the ‘end’ of Obama’s indiscretions. And before it comes up – let’s just put the “He gave the money to charity” argument to rest. This doesn’t right a past wrong. Should a murderer be exonerated if he donates his gun to the police? I think not.
Posted by: TheTruthWillSetYouFree | March 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Hmmm… Obama was on the Illinois health Facilities Planning Board. Wonder if that had anything to do with the huge jump in salary for Michelle Obama.
n 2006, the Chicago Tribune reported that Mrs. Obama’s compensation at the University of Chicago Hospital, where she is a vice president for community affairs, jumped from $121,910 in 2004, just before her husband was elected to the Senate, to $316,962 in 2005, just after he took office. And that does not count the money Mrs. Obama receives from serving on corporate boards.
Posted by: pleaseanswer | March 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
This is exactly the kind of situation that the SD’s in the democratic party are needed for – in the event a presumptive nominee is not the right one for the country. Let’s let the prosecutor do the job they were hired to do and see how it pans out. Then the SD’s can do their job.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 11, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
NO NEWS HERE. What about Hillary’s taxes? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING
H I L L A R Y? The truth will always come out and it’s going to shut you down for good.
Posted by: joris | March 11, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
little by little the truth will come out. You don’t have a near 20 year relationship with a corrupted person like Rezko and State ” I did not know that about him”. Obama is either delusional or so naive , he doesn’t deserve the American peoples trust. Slowly Obama releases info on Rezko and himself. It is the responsibility of the media to make all information available to the American people. Electing a President is serious business.
Posted by: jp,michigan | March 11, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
The American media failed their country when they failed to test G W Bush on the reasons to go to War in Irak. They were too willing to accept all the sexed up dossiers and stories about Irak’s weapons of mass destruction.
I am afraid they are failing the American public again, if they fail to at least research, check and test the fancy, almost evangelical rhetoric of Senator Obama.
The prize of their failure might be even far more disastrous for America than the Irak war has been. If Obama is questioned and treated fairly, and he still comes out as the winner, then American will be all the more stronger and better for it.
But Frankly, the idea of a free ride or the idea of a positive discrimination candidacy is hardly one that America needs now. I believe even, die-hard Obama supporters would agree that they need not only, a President who can bring together everybody but also they need a President who can face the wide crazy world with certainty and above everything else with a good know how.
By all means let all the candidates be vetted and tested and all the skeletons brought out from the closets. America deserves better after 8yrs of Bushism!
Posted by: Collins Sigala | March 11, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
If people really wanted an honest politician, we would have supported Gravel, Kucinich or Ron Paul. If you ask me, Americans love scandalous, extorting, warmongering, and fraud committing presidents. It just makes the news that much more fun to read. And the late night comics need material.
Posted by: Ben Straub | March 11, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Has anybody seen the acclaimed TV Show called “The Wire”? How about “The Sopranos”? This is the kind of stuff that huckster politicians pull off all the time to hide the money flow, as shown in those types of episodes. Shame on Obama if he’s guilty of peddling influence in exchange for the housing transaction. He’ll be dang lucky to even get a VP offer, much less get re-elected to the Senate.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 11, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
This is exactly the kind of stunt that huckster politicians pull off in order to hide money flow. Shame on Obama if he is guilty of influence peddling in order to engage in a housing transaction. He’ll be dang lucky to get a VP offer, much less a re-election to the Senate. SDs will be weighing just how dirty he is. This could be very embarassing to those Senators that jumped on board too early, i.e., Kennedy and Kerry.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 11, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
If the US Media had done it’s job, then Obama’s background would have investigated long time ago. Instead they chose to hype up his candidacy for getting higher ratings. I have zero confidence in the US Media. Now I do my own research on the internet and only watch BBC or Jim Lehrer’s News Hour on PBS.
Posted by: pleaseanswer | March 11, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
If the US Media had done it’s job, then Obama’s background would have investigated long time ago. Instead they chose to hype up his candidacy for getting higher ratings. I have zero confidence in the US Media. Now I do my own research on the internet and only watch BBC or Jim Lehrer’s News Hour on PBS.
Posted by: pleaseanswer | March 11, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
this morning’s NY Times debunked this story — the memo did not say Obama had any involvement in picking board members, nor would he have had any opportunity to do so; nor is this even theoretically wrong as to the people who did pick board members; this really is guilt-by-association journalism
Posted by: get real | March 11, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Well ,certainly I can see from this blog that most are made up of Clintonian ranting. Very emotional ,not very factual.
Posted by: YESSS | March 11, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Maybe Obama is so deep into the corruption. That he screams cleaning it all up.
Maybe to make people look the other way.
Are there any politicians in Illinois that are not corrupt or crooked.
Posted by: seah | March 11, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Rezko
Auchi (Iraqi billionaire who gave Rezko the $ for the Obama land deal, and wired him 3.5mil)
Khalidi (ties to PLO and served with Obama on board of the Woods Fund, which granted $ to The Arab American Action Network)
Exelor – who bought their way out of troublesome proposed legislation, execs top fundraisers, and his chief campaign strategist is also consultant to them. Company have him over $100K.
The UBS quasi-blind trust which wasn’t so blind.
Look this stuff up…it’ll make your head spin. Obama is not what he is selling. And there is a frightening trend.
Posted by: NJVoter | March 11, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
LOL A Kennedy afraid of a scandal associating them with another politician accused of influence peddling? Remember, the JFK side of the family was riddled with implications of “improprieties”. Ted would probably think oh well business as usual, call our people to handle it.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 12, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am
Obama claims he will have Transparency in office, yet he seems to be winking when he says it. Sometimes it’s to good to be true.
Posted by: Tex | March 12, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
THE ONLY MERIT HILLARY HAS BY RUNNING IS THAT SHE WAS BILL S WIFE AND THAT SHE IS A WOMAN,SEBELLIUS HAS MORE MERIT THAT HER ,AND WOMAN ARE VOTING FOR HER JUST BECAUSE OF THAT SO FERRARO REDUCING OBAMA TO HER RACE AND WHAT ABOUT THE PRESS NOT GIVEN NEWS ABOUT HER HER TAXES I REALLY THING THE PRESS IS BIASED ON THIS HOLE THING
Posted by: THIERRY | March 12, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
is amazing how obama supporters react to any comments or suggestions against their candidate, almost as he is beyond hollyness. Come on! we are trying to select one person to be the president of our great USA, not the next American idol! Snap out of it!
Posted by: unbias | March 12, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Ask Obama if the 100K for the strip of land was a return of Rezko down payment on the lot?
Posted by: TedGon | March 13, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
It’s obvious that people are just looking for stuff on Obama, as they do with all presidential candidates. But this is not a scandal for him nor is he the supreme ethical person his supporters make him out to be. No one is perfect and I’m sure Obama has plenty of bones in his closet, just like the rest of us. Obama could not win that new TV show “Moment of Truth”, but then again no one could without damaging themselves.
Posted by: kevin | March 13, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
its the end folks…
Posted by: appallachian blue | March 13, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
The Obamanuts have truly gone nuts!! Do they actually think that they can elect Obama to become President when he has not been vetted or does not have the experience? All these nuts can do when Obama is questioned is to throw allegations back at the Clintons which have been debunked after $70 million investigation by Ken Starr. And what do they don’t like about the most succesfull presidency of our times? Low unemployment, budget surpluses, declining poverty level, excellent standing around the world, 64% approval rating? Are they so blinded by their dreamboy that they are drinking the Republican cool-aid? Hillary herself has made tireless contributions to the democratic party for her lifetime starting with the McGovern campaign. She has been a very successful Senator for 7 years where she has not been afarid of taking leadership positions on issues in a partisan when appropriate and bipartisan when that is appropriate. As for the war vote, Obama did not have to make the difficult choice but after he came to the Senate their records have been identical.
Posted by: nofuzzydreams | March 13, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
OBAMA SUPPORTERS…
He was personally a friend of dear Tony. Michele got big bucks for being on the health board.
Obama is figment of your imagination.
Posted by: maria | March 13, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Google Rezko and Clinton. Her and Bill have had a relationship with Rezko also. He has also contributed to Hillary’s campaign. Obama at least gave the money Rezko contributed to him to charity. While Hillary has kept hers.
Posted by: Missouri | March 13, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Obama’s political manuvering has to be appreciated by all parties:
This is from the Chicago Tribune, speaking of rules vs. fairness:
>>
The day after New Year’s 1996, operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.
There they began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer, the longtime progressive activist from the city’s South Side. And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama’s four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot.
Fresh from his work as a civil rights lawyer and head of a voter registration project that expanded access to the ballot box, Obama launched his first campaign for the Illinois Senate saying he wanted to empower disenfranchised citizens.
But in that initial bid for political office, Obama quickly mastered the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics. His overwhelming legal onslaught signaled his impatience to gain office, even if that meant elbowing aside an elder stateswoman like Palmer.
A close examination of Obama’s first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career: The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.<<
Posted by: Seed of Change | March 13, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
You don’t befriend a person for 20 years that made you what an who you are without being tainted by that person.
Obama supporters must think that the rest of us are fools. Eventually, the truth will come out. I hope it is not the Republicans that have to flush the truth out in the fall if Obama were to be the nominee.
Also, if it is Hillary’s pastor that denounced American as the evil empire, you know the media will play that 24 hours daily.
Obama does not stand a chance against the Republicans in the fall. There is just too much mess hanging over his head. I hope Democrats will not fall into this trap.
Posted by: Sam1 | March 13, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Can someone ask Mr. Obama why Mr. Odinga (his cousin) is using his same campaign rhetoric of “Change” and “Hope”??
Posted by: WhatISHope | March 13, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
You know they say if you throw a rock, the one that gets hit cries the loudest. Obama is this type of person. He makes sure he out talks anyone who does not agree with his false politics. He is dirty and I agree with another writer that Oprah is in up to her neck with Rezko, maybe we should find out how he influenced her purchase of the school in Africa, and if she can help get Obama elected, he can calm the waters with Rezko and keep her name out of it. She used her influence with the public that trusted her to back Obama and knew he was associated with Rezko. Look out, Michele’s claws should start showing soon, you can see her posture is under tight control and I am sure her husband told her until he is elected, make sure it stays there because I think she can be a lion with sharp claws if not controlled. They are both dirty. He can out talk Hiliary. Shame on the people who did not recend their vote when Obama lied about his business association with Mr. Rezko. He knew it was more than 5 minutes of business association with that corrupt business man and when he knew the truth was going to be told recanted his statement and made it sound as though he had forgotten the other times he associated with him. Obama, it’s called 20 years. Buying a house for you and then making sure your wife salary go up is not just a casual relationship..shame, shame. Also, my husband and I bought a house and both of our names were on the deed. I think Barack wanted to hide this purchase in case the media found out. Look out Michele, he may start making you look like the corrupt person and he did not know anything about the transactions between you and Mr. Rezko. Obama is quick to point out Hiliary’s vote on the Iraq war but claims that his one vote for the health board could not influence a decision. What make Hiliary’s one vote influence the decision on Iraq any different. It took all the senators who belived that there were weapons of mass destruction to approve the war. By the way, how did he vote? If he voted present, then he voted for the approval also because he did not take a stand for or against the war. The media needs to stop walking on egg shells around this man because he is black. He is about as black as Tiger Woods. Hiliary don’t forgive John Lewis for deserting you and backing Obama.
Posted by: Eloise | March 13, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Rezko is a problem. Wright is a problem. His VOTING RECORD is a REAL problem if anyone would look, and more importantly, his VANISHED State Legislature Records and his UNRELEASED 2005 and 2006 EARMARKS are a problem. My bet is that Rezko – missing papers – earmarks all have the same smell. BO.
Posted by: Blaine | March 13, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Ergo, stuff like this doesnt matter. It only matters when Clinton is involved.
Obama has no past, therefore you cant critique him.
We should nominate Scarlett Johannson for president. She is a total babe and is FAR more electable than Obama can ever hope to be.
Posted by: tomdavie | March 13, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
This is all old stuff, does no one read?
The prosecution has made it clear there is nothing to suggest Obama is involved in any of this. So he knew him? So did a whole lot of people or did you miss the background on Rezko in the Chicago newspapers? They clearly shows that for many years Rezko was well respected and seen as a leader in affordable housing.
Obama bought his own house and Rezko’s wife bought the adjoining lot. His only mistake or which Obama acknowledges as a ‘bone-headed’ decision was that he bought 1/6th of the Rezko lot to increase his yard size, when he new there were rumors about Rezko. Yes, he donated and raised funds for Obama and many, many others. Obama returned every dime, including any funds he got from the Chicago Democratic party that may have come from Rezko, unlike Hillary!
Rezko mostly supported Democrats but he also donated to Bush! The other 5 co-defendents have a long list of donations, including to the Clinton’s!
So give me a break! It’s just a desperate attempt to find something, anything on Obama.
Posted by: s_charles | March 13, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Ross,
Good start. Now keep on digging.
Obama’s prevaricating about Rezko doesn’t pass the smell test. How about more on the FBI agent that reportedly testified to seeing Obama and the Governor visit Rezko repeatedly?
Money from Rezko, Exelon, .. the Carlyle Group.
Better it comes out now instead of after the nomination, or worst yet the coronation.
Posted by: JimF | March 13, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
i think the FBI and the IRS need to investigate this with obama and his wife michelle about this with the chicago hospital, i smell fraud some where and embezel of monies
Posted by: bbb | March 13, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Mark these words: This Rezko thing has legs. And woe to the Democrats if it comes out AFTER Obama has been nominated.
Posted by: Mike | March 13, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
This just shows neither Hillary or Obama can win a general election.
Yeeehaw!
Posted by: Jo | March 13, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
For the umpteenth time—
Rezko details investigated = Obama cleared of any wrongdoing.
Is that really news?
Posted by: SE Croft | March 13, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
This is news?????????? Where’s the dirt?
Posted by: Marilyn | March 13, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
No wonder Obama skips over issues, if he spoke, then a lot of issues would come out. The health board appointments, his wifes salary, but most of all his connection with his pastor that uses Gods name in vain and hates america and Obama supports him. dig a little deeper and you will strike oil and a lot of hate.
Posted by: Bruce Griffin | March 13, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Interesting, I read in another newspaper that he had nothing to do with the board picks. hmmmm
Posted by: halisi | March 13, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Then there is his bone-headed, no doubt, association with his racist pastor for 20 years. The racist pastor is a member of his campaign hierarchy. I demand that you apologise for the racial and anti-American remarks of you pastor to me. I have been slurred by your pastor.
Posted by: Jay Morgan | March 13, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
NY Times: But David Wilhelm, a former campaign adviser to Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich of Illinois who asked that the e-mail message be written, said in an interview that he had never talked about the appointment process to Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama has said he had nothing to do with Mr. Rezko’s activities with the board.
Posted by: Lisa Hussein | March 13, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
This is what makes my hair turn gray. For a low life crook like Rezko, there are always something there he saw in Obama that he could for benefits. Rezko is not the type to have friendship without the benefits and calculations.
I know there are more to unfold that I never could imagine. Obama has finally come down to Earth, just so oh sinful.
Posted by: mossyframe | March 13, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Posted by: tony | Mar 10, 2008 7:44:22 PM
All of this is just simply fascinating. Democrats devouring their own! What an enjoyable experience! you should all take a look in the mirror. You’ll scare yourselves!
At least the Dems can look at themselves in the mirror, maybe it’s about time the Reps did the same thing. McCain in nothing but a Bush apostle, are the Reps ready for at least another four years of Bush policies. It seems they are.
Posted by: jifler | March 13, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Between Obama’s Corupt Friends and his hatefull Pastor I will never vote for him
Posted by: Darrell | March 13, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Oh My Look who is in the news Obama”s Friends and Minister waht a great combination
Posted by: Darrell | March 13, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
There are daily reports in the Chicago newspapers on the evidence being introduced. I personally am watching close. If there is evidence that links to Obama related to wrongdoing, criminal activity, or unethical practices and he becomes the Dem nominee because the SDs give it to him… McCain will be the next President.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 13, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Haven’t you figured it out yet? The GOP does not want Hillary as a running mate against McCain…so anything Obama-Dama does is going to be AOK. It’s a SNAFU, Kobyashi Maru!
Posted by: Debbi | March 14, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
The only reason the Clintons weren’t prosecuted over White water is that Janet Reno who was a friend of the Clintons and appointed by Billy as the Attorney General wouldn’t let it go forward.Get your facts right
Posted by: David Walls | March 14, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Darrell,
Have you looked at McCain’s Ministers? Both of them are pretty hateful too.
Posted by: Manny | March 14, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
It is time the press started peeling back the layers of the Obama onion and let the voters have all the info necessary to make an informed decision.
Posted by: Rog | March 14, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Who is still supporting Obama is brain washed.
For him to even to be involed is enough to tell you ha isn’t trust worthy. Then he goes to a church FOR 20 YRS that is Anti -American.
NOW WE KNOW WHY HE WILL NOT WEAR A PIN WITH A FLAG ON IT, PLEDGE TO THE FLAG AND NOT TO SING GOD BLESS AMERICA. IF YOU REALLY TRUST HIM, HE PULLED A WOOL OVER YOUR HEAD AND HIS SWEET TALKING GOT YOU ALSO.
EVERY ONE IN PA. I SM JUST ASKING YOU TO THINK LONG AND HARD BEFORE YOU VOTE.
Posted by: Ron | March 14, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
There is an obvious BIAS from ABCNews in favor of the evil Clintoons and against Obama! There’s just too much evidence as to their bias. Could it be because Georgie Stephanopolous is now an employee of ABCNews and had been one of the Clintoons’ henchmen before?? hhhmmmmm….something smells fishy here!!
Posted by: Bag the Billster | March 14, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Whether he did anything wrong or not in this instance, he showed poor judgment in his association with Rezko. He also showed poor judgment in snorting cocaine whenever he could afford it. He showed poor judgment in his choice of attending a racist church and choosing a racist spiritual mentor for 20 years.
Maybe these aren’t just ‘boneheaded mistakes’. Maybe he is just a bonehead that shouldn’t even be considered the leader of the United States.
Posted by: Roger | March 14, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Saint Obama again? Sorry, but the American people are truly naive if they do not think for one minute that all politicians have a skeleton in the closet…that’s why it is called “politics”. This Saint Obama thing is really getting old. Whether you like McCain or Clinton, it really doesn’t matter, but at least you know what yo are getting with them. I’m still waiting for the other shoe to drop on Obama – stay tuned.
Posted by: JJ | March 14, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
This is Stuped
I am going for Cliton.
Posted by: Devin | March 14, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
If barack hussein obama had not been completely overlooked by the national media the american public would have known the real truth behind this wolf in sheep’s clothing long ago. Any other person with such anti-american ties would have never made it this far.
Posted by: Andrew | March 14, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
If you accept americans are basically stupid when it comes to elections, it makes this a tad bit easier to take. BUT, the sad part here is Obama was weak when he started the debates bec he had to answer ques. He learned fr Hillary and relied on JOhn Edwards to take Hillary on–the “angry” change candidate. Watch the debates, Edwards would argue the point and Obama would come in at the end and agree with John and do a closing statement and assume credit. Edwards lost the points and Obama gained them. U speak last- any debater knows that u want that at times-Obama does. Problem is our media morons don’t. their questions are stupid and show how media is a yelling match of overstuffed and overpaid morons. Pat Buchanan (who I disagree with politically 98%) is the only real “analyst” on pol talk today. Let him ask questions of the two. He could follow up without making himself the center of attention–can you imagine russert potatohead, matthews, suntanned guy, fineman, oberman–all fr nbc actually asking intelligent ques.(I am not a Fox follower. I just have a brain). Massive failure by the press here and we’ll pay for it in november. remember matthews in “00 who would like to have a beer with–gore or bush. that’s the level of analysis you can expect.
Posted by: jackie | March 14, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
MR ROSS!!! and ABC iNVESTIGATIVE sTAFF!!! yOU ARE DOING GREAT! yOU ARE THE REAL AMERICANS WITH OUR GIS IN IRAQ
FOR PIERCING THE VEIL OF REZKO AND OBAMA PARTNERSHIPS. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK
Posted by: Francis Magno | March 14, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
OBAMBI’S TRUE COLORS ARE COMING OUT. CROOKS, ANTI AMERICAM PRIEST, DRUGS COCAINE ETC. WHAT ELSE DO WE NEED TO KNOW BEFORE WE ELECT SAINT OBAMA.
Posted by: TAHIRN | March 14, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
WOW,,, PASTOR..MEMBER OF THIS SO CALLED CHURCH FOR 20 YEARS.
AND NOW Rezko COURT APPERANCE….I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR OBAMA.
AT LEAST WE KNOW ABOUT THE CLINTONS…BUT THIS MAN SCARES ME.
NO OBAMA.
Posted by: jimhenry | March 14, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
I certainly wouldn’t want to give the “black briefcase” and all the secrets of our military and defense to a man whose inspiration came from a minister who hates America and whose wife is not proud of America. And yes, we cetainly need to look into this Rezko thing and why can’t the press be objective???
Posted by: pinion65 | March 14, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Now.. there is a connection now between Obama’s wife getting a higher salary for working in the University of Chicago Hsopitals.. thanks.. my husband… so ethical standard is Obama is preaching.. tell it to the Matines..
Posted by: ds | March 14, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
My, my, my…if this is the only skeleton, I will take it right to the polls and vote Obama, considering my options. I just wish he would stop being a gentleman and take the gloves off. That is the way white politicians have always done it and its the only way they can win. They don’t know how to achieve victory and maintain their dignity, they only know one way. To play DIRTY. History has always proven that.
Posted by: BB | March 14, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
the audacity. it just keeps leaking…slowly…but surely.
What’s next?
geez, i thought he was different.
he’s not.
concede the point and let’s debate the issues and choose the best candidate!!!!!!!!
Posted by: hopeful | March 14, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Rev Wright traveled to Libya with his friend Farrakhan to meet with Moammar Kadafi. Surely, O knew about this years ago but O never said a peep, never left his church.
Now we see the contest that explains Michelle’s disdain for America, why she has never been proud of it.
Posted by: jonnyB | March 15, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
you receive 1/4 million dollars from Rezko and don’t do favors, you go to a church for 20 years and don’t hear what your preacher is saying, we don’t need another liar in the white house.
Posted by: Geraldine Ciesielski | March 15, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Tony Rezko is a long time friend and fund raiser for Sen. Barak Obama. Few days ago Mr. Obama himself finally acknowledged as much as $250,000 was contributed by Rezko to his campaign. Tony Rezko 52, is a Syrian immigrant who became a property developer and political fixer in Chicago. He is accused of using an accomplice on two state boards to demand kickbacks from companies that sought to do business with the state. Mr Rezko has known Mr Obama since 1990 and was one of the earliest fundraisers for his political career. ABC news reported that Mr. Rezko received about 100 Million worth of property housing project deals from the district that Mr. Obama represented. The two also became entwined in a controversial property deal in 2005, a year after Mr Obama was elected to the US Senate, in which the Obamas bought a mock-Georgian home and Mr Rezko’s wife bought the adjoining garden. “When Sen. Barack Obama decided to buy a stately $1.65 million home last year on Chicago’s South Side, Tony Rezko and his wife wasted no time. The same day the Obamas closed on the house, the Rezkos closed on the purchase of the adjoining vacant lot, which once was the estate’s lush side yard.” Chicago Tribune said. The Obamas bought their house for more than quarter of a million dollars less than the market price. Prosecutors claim that Mr Rezko effectively controlled decisions by the Teachers Retirement System, which manages Illinois teachers’ $30billion pension fund, and the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board, which must approve all building permits involving hospitals. A longtime friend and fundraiser of Barack Obama is now threatening to derail the Democratic front-runner’s presidential campaign, although Mr. Obama now renounces his long time buddy Tony Rezko and calls his dealings with Rezko, “A bone-headed mistake!”
Posted by: charleschaplin | March 15, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Strange how a man who holds “good judgement” as his trump card associates with so many questionable people.
Posted by: strange | March 16, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
I agree with Jackie, Pat
Buchanan is the best political analyst on the tube…the others are worth crap. I don’t think this Rezko thing will sink Obama, but his pastor’s statement will, and should. As a
Christian, I searched long and hard for a church and a spiritual advisor with whom my heart agreed. I left a church because of their racial views, and another because of their view of women. You cannot have a spiritual advisor unless you agree with them on certain fundamentals…if your pastor hates your country and is racist, people that hold other values will not be in relationship long. These things may fly in black churches but is appalling to white people. Be prepared to hear his “God damn
America” over and over in the McCain campaign. This is abominable and Obama must agree on some level or these remarks would have knocked him out of this guy’s church
Posted by: janner | March 16, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
The American people will make the final judgement on this. We are smart people. No amount of blogging is going to change the truth. We are judged by the company we keep.
Posted by: JUST THE FACTS M'AM | March 16, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Just watch the congregation, With every inflammatory statement made by pastor Wright they would jump to their feet and applaud.You tell me that in 20 years Obama never saw this .Come on. JUDGEMENT.
Posted by: ron9craw | March 16, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Karl: you wrote “It amazes me that Ken Star investigated these allegations against HRC and found nothing but people still want to believe that she is quilty. People really are afraid of strong powerful woman.”
Best I remember, when HRC was sworn in to testify, she responded 56 time with “I don’t remember” I can’t recall” or I’m not sure”. she hid the Rose law firms records for several years and her primary experience was trashing Bill’s lovers. At some date in the future the democratic party will come to the conclusion that you need something other that a feel good person to run for office.
Posted by: Southern Farmer | March 16, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
please people this just a fun little show the hussein obamas people are putting on and soon it will be over. He will never make it to the white house.This is just smoke and mirrors to make sure that the republican retain the white house hrc supporters will vote mcane before they vote obama so it he wins the nomination you can bet your tail that mcane will when the white house
Posted by: Damon | March 17, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
It is obvious that abc is pulling for hillary, but obama is a very cunning, deceptive smoothie just like billy was. You liberals are all so holier than thou when you are slamming GW, and yet your candidates are the most dirty ppl ever in the game. Bush was no more of a bad person than anyone who ran against him. In fact, the dnc started to simply assassinate his character 24/7 as soon as they thought that he may win the 2k election so they would win the next time. They even tried to steal the election, and when they were getting caught, they accused Bush of it! [Isn't it ironic that Mayor Daly was sent to Florida to count votes? His father; mayor of Chicago as well, had counted thousands of dead ppl to secure the win for JFK! Check the FACTS ppl!] The great majority of their attacks have been utter lies and distortions, but HEY!- it’s been working quite well. All of the sheep-minded in this country now believe that he is a dunce. He united Texas, working w/ democrats. But when he reached out his hand in Washington, the dems SPIT in it! The clinton dung-pile lied as to how they had a balanced budget. They didn’t! The monies in the defense budget, medicare and medicaid are NOT recorded; never shown to our eyes anyway. The liars fudged the numbers to make it look good. And they decimated the military to have HUGE money show up in their ‘balancing act’. I’m not all for Bush. I don’t trust ANY politician to do what we want them to. But I think that he means to do us right. And I am a staunch conservative. Yep, I’m SO much happier that we’ve had him for 8 years compared to the idiots that you presented us with. Anyway, you’ve got two VERY crooked ppl as your ‘runners’ this time. I was all for Romney, but the rnc wants McCain for some odd reason. I have to vote him in so that these liberal whack-jobs don’t destroy our country.
Posted by: MikeInMaine | March 18, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am
Like I’ve been saying for many, many months now: Obama is just another dishonest, power-hungry politician who uses high falutin false-preacher rhetoric to persuade people he and his wife are not the million-dollar-a-year, Harvard-Princeton tight-with-the-money crowd couple.
Obama is far worse than Hillary for his extreme hypocricy. By the way, while Obama criticized Hillary for being a lawyer on Wall Mart’s board, HIS WIFE, MICHELLE, WAS ALSO A CORPORATE LAWYER WORKING FOR A WALL MART SUPPLIER!
What a joke!! I’ll take Hillary and a real health care plan any day of him.
Posted by: max | March 18, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
I can’t wait until you all find out who else was on the board. Can’t say right now. Oh this is not only juicy but fatal. This is the CHANGE we’ve been waiting for. This is an endless mindblower.
Oh and where are Barko’s 2007 tax returns? What about his 2006 tax returns? He only provided the first page.
And wait until you find out his true agenda. White men will leave him in droves.
Barko owes so many people favors that the white house will look like a circus if he ever gets in, but I doubt that will ever happen.
I wonder if the pastor is just retired from the church to work for Barko and is still on the campaign incogneto. I also suspect he is promised a role in the whitehouse.
So picture this: White House staff of Barko’s=Wright, Dodd, Daschel, Drunken Kennedy, Pelosi, Dean, Nation of Islam staff, New Black Panthers, Farrakan, Gov of Illinois, Oprah, Caroline Kennedy, Maria Shriver, a sprinkling of various Republicans and —-fill in the blank.
It’s all out there in pieces. I wanted to list them all at once. There is more but this is all for now.
At this point they are neck and neck and I expect a landslide in the coming states for Hillary.
This is not a popularity contest. It’s about competency. It’s about our country on the brink.
So it all boils down to who has the ability to lead America up from shambles on day 1 and help us mend.
Why hope for CHANGE? Vote for it. Hillary 2008.
Posted by: you_are_screwed | March 20, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am
This guy is as slippery as an eel. mark my words, if he gets the nomination, by election time he will have hung himself and we will have McCain and more war and more deaths. He’s up to his eyeballls in “bonehead” judgements (thats what he likes to call them when he gets caught at them), and hateful people. If I was an Illinois resident I’d be shouting for his resignation as my senator. This guy IS big trouble. Con man with an evil wife. Lets get rid of him ASAP!
Posted by: tess | March 21, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am
politics and politicians,they will never tell u d truth,they will kill each other,taint names and even use human being for sacrifices if it would make them win elections…
Posted by: Dannygreg | March 21, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
What else can we expect to hear about. Will it be too late and we have another crooked politician for the democrat’s nominee? Why did it take the public to bring the info about Rev Wright to the public’s attention? Where is the investigative journalism. Seemd we only hear the candidates talking points regurgitated by the media. I’m wondering what the holdup is about learning more of the Iraqi billionaire that was bankrolling Rezko. Its too unseemly. With friends like these……
Posted by: glennmcgahee | March 22, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Hi all,
all politicians have to face the reality is that they need money, influence and support from all kinds of people to get to the position (which might mean taking help from this rotten eggs sometimes – you need to trade with rotten eggs because they have money and power), where they can make an impact.
But there are those politicians who don’t intend to make a change, just to be in power.
But there are people who though make some compromises but keep on the path.
We need to accept politicians in face of this reality, but we also should have a capacity to identify which one is inherently honest and are likely to bring in much needed change.
Lets try to do that, it will be useful.
Posted by: AB | March 26, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Obama and Rev.Wright have known each other for 20 years. And Obama and Rezko have known each other for 20 years. Makes you wonder how well Rev. Wright and Rezko knew each other. Obama’s hands are not cleanand neither are Michele’s. And I agree with one of the other commenters on here Oprah is in this mess up to her eyeballs. ” OH WHAT WEB WE WEAVE, WHEN FIRST WE PRACTICE TO DECEIVE. Obama knew how corrupt Rezko was and he didn’t care as long as he got what he wanted, They used each other. And Obama sat in Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years and listen to his hate and racism and he feels the same way. Obama can say he never heard any of that from Wight, But in his speach he said that he did hear him say all those things but he disagreed with him, But that wight is a good man and that the news didn’t hear the whole sermon. If Rev. Wright loved this country and was a real Christian he never would has spewed that trash out of his mouth. If my preacher would have said anything like that at the pulpit or in private I would have left that church so fast.
They are talking about Hillary and what she said about when she went to Bosnia and says she is lying, well atleast she went there plus other countrys. Where has Obama been other than Kenya. Obama has told alot more lies and gets away with it and never called on the carpet for it, but let Clinton tell one and my God shes such a Lier. The news media love Obama, they have been hoodwinked by Obama and don’t know it or don’t care. The people that see Obama for what he really is , is the only people that will pay for it.
Posted by: armymom | March 26, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I read that Obama went with 8 board members to the health care faciluty about adding a pavilion .Now Michele was the director of treehouse foodswhich is owned by walmart but quit when her hubby made those statements to Hillary during one of the debates.Does
Rezko have anything to do with this food service?
Posted by: maggie | March 27, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
This man has no values! He doesn’t deserve to hold ANY office. What is wrong with the Democratic party?
He does have more skeletons than boot hill.
Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
What about Rezko’s ties to Karl Rove? Karl Rove tried to have Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, pulled off a case at the urging of Tony Rezko. Why isn’t Rove being dragged into this? Why the favortism toward the Bush White House?
Posted by: Dr_Detroit | April 23, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
“OH WHAT WEB WE WEAVE, WHEN FIRST WE PRACTICE TO DECEIVE”. True to that. Expose Obama! We deserve to know the whole truth!!!! And then make your judgement call! EXPOSE HIM!
Posted by: Monica Borjas | May 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Everyone… Please
I’ve read all of your comments. Some right and some very wrong.
I read where the FBI investigated and still found nothing implicating Obama.
First and foremost, please remember, the FBI really has little to do with Obama’s investiagion and Rezko’s as well. We’re talking Department of Justice and Homeland Security. The media, you and I have no idea what they know. And, rightfully, we shouldn’t at this time.
But, common logic says, “money crossed the water,” and “going to and from what country?”
I’m no comspiracy theorist, but I see a waking giant. And, we should begin thinking hard about Senator Obama and his judgments.
Posted by: Kathy | May 15, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
James: Obama is no match for McCain and I believe McCain will win the election if Hillary is not the nominee. If Al Gore would endorse Hillary she would surpass Obama and go on to win the nomination but he isn’t endorsing anyone at this time. I believe he should because Clinton used him as his running mate. Hillary would win by a landslide.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 15, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Nia: I believe Obama knows all about Rezko’s wheeling and dealing and the courts appear to be afraid of a scandal because he is campaigning for the presidency. Obama is no saint when it comes to being crooked. He probably did a lot of favors for Rezko that’s why Rezko bought him his house. And his closes ties to Ayers that bombed this country three times. What true American would be friends with a person that hates-america? Obama!!
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 15, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Missouri: I don’t know where you got your information at but Rezko only donated to Obama $250,000 and Obama did not return $100,000. Everyone knows that and it was in the news. Rezko also bought Obama’s house for him. The donations that Obama got were from cooked organizations like Rezko. Hillary did not get donations from people like that. Besides that Obama couldn’t write out a check for 3 million because he only has less than 2 million but the Clinton’s can write out a check for 25 million and they wouldn’t be broke. Hillary loaned herself 11.4 million therefore debt is 10 million not 20 million. You can’t include her own money.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 15, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Hillary has 30 years of service, Obama is a neubie, and he still hasn’t got a clean closet? He is a hypocrite of worst sort! Not a man to take charge in the middle of a war when thousands of soliders are risking their lives and dies every day.
What is unbelievable is the horrible job US media done covering this campaign. Excerps from the lifestory from the Obama book and superficial critizism of the man’s middle name just doesn’t cut it. (Note: Hussein is not a negative!)
Nobody wrote on how the Dems oldguard was running Obama like a puppet, doing their bit to hide the fact Hillary is winning votes. Every day they drip Superdelegates to rain on her fantastic achievement.
Posted by: Johnsen | May 16, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
It is nice to see that the negatives about Obama are being shown to the American people. Why is it that we need to search this information out for ourselves. It is as if the media is afraid to report it.
Let’s face it, the media, especially MSNBC has been Obama’s puppet. It is sickening to see that the media has abused its power.
I am sure that if the people knew about this before, they may have taken another look at Obama, up, down and around all of the “change” signs.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 16, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Are you posters being paid to trash Obama or are you doing it because you think it will help your candidate (McCain)?
Here’s the tell: No one is bringing up anything about Whitewater except supposed “Clinton supporters” who say that others are bringing it up. Most Obama supporters were on the front lines defending the Clintons against the unfair prosecution and silly impeachment.
And how come no one mentions all the money Rezko raised for G. W. Bush? He actually contributed to the Clintons as well. This guy is just trying to buy influence by throwing money out there and see if he can get some pay back. He did not buy Obama’s house. He only seems to have gotten a photo from the Clintons. Did he get stuff from W? Is anybody checking on that? I didn’t think so.
As for Hillary Clinton, she brought up Rezko in a debate. I did not hear Obama or his campaign say a word about Whitewater or Lewinsky or any of the nightmare pseudo-scandals of the Clinton years. He has too much class.
Posted by: Jana | June 7, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am