May 4, 2008 8:36am

Clinton ‘Not Going To Put My Lot In With Economists’ on Gas Tax

ABC News’ Mary Bruce reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.,  declined this morning to name a single economist who backs her call for a gas tax suspension.

"I’m not going to put my lot in with economists," Clinton said in an exclusive appearance on a special edition of "This Week" from Indianapolis.

In light of fierce criticism from economic experts, Clinton said, "We’ve been, for the last seven years, seeing a tremendous amount of government power and elite opinion basically behind policies that haven’t worked well for the middle class and hard-working Americans. … I know if we get it right, if we actually did it right, if we had a president who used all the tools of the presidency, we would design it in such a way that it would be implemented effectively."

The Democratic candidate also responded to claims that her proposal is not a "truthful response" to the soaring prices at the pump.

"This gas tax issue to me is very real, because I am meeting people across Indiana and North Carolina who drive for a living, who commute long distances, who would save money if the oil companies paid this $8 billion this summer, instead of it coming out of the pockets of consumers," Clinton said. "Now, look, I have long-term plans too.  I mean, it’s a misnomer to say this is all that I’m doing.  It’s not.  I have a comprehensive long-term energy plan that would go right at dependence on foreign oil."

Clinton also differentiated her plan from that of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the likely Republican presidential nominee, who has also called for summer gas tax holiday.

"My proposal is very different from Sen. McCain," she said. "Sen. McCain has said take off the gas tax, don’t pay for it, throw us further into deficit and debt.  That is not what I’ve proposed.  What I’ve proposed is that the oil companies pay the gas tax instead of consumers and drivers this summer."

Clinton has proposed using a windfall profits tax on oil companies to pay for the gas tax holiday. However, she also previously pledged to use windfall profits to create a strategic energy fund for renewable and alternative energies.

But when "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos asked if she had already spent the windfall profits tax, she said, "No … the tax subsidies will go right into that [strategic energy fund].  I’m talking about something temporary this summer.  My longer-term plan is, yes, to put an excess profits tax on the oil companies above a certain level of profit that would go in to help us make the transition."

User Comments

Is Hillary too elitist not to listen to economists?

Posted by: Stacey | May 4, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

She is in a corner and can’t get out. Funny though that she is there with McCain

Posted by: Thinking | May 4, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

It is something..At least she is against doing nothing..Maybe to some 18 cents isnt that much to you but when i have to pay close to $90 if it was reduced I will have more money to buy lunch or a couple more things for my kids that arent expensive..Plus her energy indepence plans..Besides where were the economists with the housing? Where were the economists with the deficit? Where were the economists with Bushes taxes? I think it is time to do something than just theorize!

Posted by: linchristi | May 4, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

How is a Shell Oil lobbyist who supports Clinton’s plan not an elitist?
Obama was right when he said Hillary’s pandering. The thiry cents they think they’re saving will be thirty cents more they’re losing when the price goes up.

Posted by: kravitz | May 4, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Clinton gets things done. Obama says he will tell people the truth(explain things to people because they are too dumb to figure it out, is what he means), and then what. He has no solutions. He is full of hot air.

Posted by: John | May 4, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Hillary would make the gas tax issue work. Obama’s got nothing as usual.

Posted by: Samy | May 4, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Linchrsti,
What part of “LOST JOBS” as a cost for the lost tax revenues don’t you understand? The roughly $28 for the ENTIRE summer will NOT be balanced out for the road construction workers who will more than likely lose jobs because there is no money for road projects.
Stop blindly supporting a candidate and pay attention to the FACTS. The notion of refusing to even acknowledge that the people who are the experts in this area say that it CANNOT WORK is utterly stupid. It’s not just Democrats saying it. It’s Republicans, Independents, Clinton supporters, Obama supports, etc. Not one expert in this area says that it will work or that it will even save individuals any money in the end. Why? Because the oil companies may just choose to increase their costs even further. And even if they don’t $.18 isn’t even worth turning on your car, let alone going to the pump.

Posted by: Eyes Wide Open | May 4, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

This article is definitely only a part of the entire hour. I watched it this morning. The meat of her message on economists is not reflected above. She pointed out that these are the very same economists that have been advising on our economy and are denying the current state of our recession. She is right to not put much stock in their opinions based on their own failed performance as economists. We should listen to the people who know how to make money because they know how the economy REALLY works like Clinton and Buffett – not the windbags in a think tank on the oil company and big business payroll.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 4, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

How can people not see how patronizing Obama is in his speeches? He tells people that he will tell them the truth and then explains things that even the most simpleminded person could figure out. This guy thinks Americans have an IQ of 10.
He doesn’t look so happy on the campaign trail now that is phoniness is showing through.
NO elitists in 08′

Posted by: James | May 4, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Please….how will she get this done by Memorial Day…even the Democratic Congress has remained silent on her vote for support.
If she won’t listen to experts, how will she make decisions…

Posted by: PANDER | May 4, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Hillary! If you won’t listen to any of the economists now, then will you ever listen to them if they try to warn you about something? You say that the intent is relief, and you wonder why people are resisting it? Intent is one thing, what it would actually do is another – can’t you think systematically? Give relief to long communters at what expense? What about the summer road maintainence jobs and those millions of us who don’t commute?If you think that the oil companies will cover the 8$ billion or so lost because of it, you’ve got another thing coming. THAT’S just a theory. You can’t see 18 cents on the gallon when the prices go up nearly double that in one month. This is just another carrot being dangled in the voters faces, hoping to pander a few more votes.
OBAMA ’08

Posted by: Kenvick22 | May 4, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

The only thing a windfall tax will do is give oil companies an incentive to hide their income in shelters. You don’t think they have smart enough people to do that?
Worse than doing nothing, she will take money away from infrastructure.
Not to mention that she already promised to use the windfall tax for other things.
Get over her. Overpromise and underdeliver. Just ask Buffalo, NY and their shrinking population. (-4% since she promised to create jobs in 2000)

Posted by: A Sham | May 4, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Who will prevail in this war of Chinese made flag pins and a mythical gas savings? I hope it’s not the uneducated and uninformed like in the last two presidential elections.

Posted by: ericmiami | May 4, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

For pete’s sake, is the gas tax holiday the ONLY thing George Stephanopolis questioned Hillary about? More “gotcha” reporting?
Just saw Meet the Press where Russert (respectfully) questioned Obama on a BROAD range of topics.
Unfortunately, our local ABC station (Seattle) moved the ABC Sunday show out of the Sunday morning line-up—and buried it in the late afternoon.

Posted by: Carmita | May 4, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Why should she listen to economists when it comes to economic policies!
She knows better!
Hillary Clinton is an expert in
economics, Not!
You would listen to economists for the
same reason that you go to an
accountant to do your taxes!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 4, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Funny how people will defend Hillary doing ‘something’ even though it is crystal clear that that ‘something’ is really nothing . . . but political pandering of the most elite kind.

Posted by: madeyemoody | May 4, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Hey, folks. Clinton has real and specific plan not just talk. I’m sick and tired of Obama’s speech for speech’s sake. Go Hillary!

Posted by: emily | May 4, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

People take a breath. These are her proposals if she were President now. Remember? She and Obama are both talking about things that could be done, might be done, will be done once either one of them is the driver’s seat. We should be doing this, we should be doing that. Goodness sakes people, take a breath and chill out. If she were president right now, she would immediately work with our supposed democrat controlled congress and get her policies up and running. Her total energy package is wonderful. Again, these are policy proposals both candidates are saying should happen “if we were in control now”.

Posted by: Kim | May 4, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Hey, folks. Clinton has real and specific plan not just talk. I’m sick and tired of Obama’s speech for speech’s sake. Go Hillary!

Posted by: emily | May 4, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

She says what will get her votes she is ot the person to run this country>>>>>>She can even manage her own and as far as gas she has not paid for a drop in 24+ years She is a freaken NUT Why would she listen to someone who knows as she states she knows it all just ask her>>>> HELP NC and IND send her home I read even New York don’t want her

Posted by: older person | May 4, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Obama cannot give a tax credit to the people because he is beholden to the oil companies. If you want to see how if behind the media push for Obama you will see it goes as far down the rabbit hole as the Rockefellers…

Posted by: ken | May 4, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Anyone care that the Clinton v. Paul trial is starting soon? Anyone care that Hillary has been ordered to testify after the election?
Obama’s pastor is nuts and I agree with the scrutiny. We are trying to learn about the character of the candidate.
Another candidate is involved in a campaign fraud trial during the same candidates senatorial run. Its public record. Are we allowed to question the candidates character yet…
How about this for a future headline…..’The President of the United States of American, Hillary Clinton, made history today by handing out the first pardon of the presidency to her husband Bill Clinton. No word yet on how much she charged him.’

Posted by: Very Concerned | May 4, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Why do I think the oil companies will just take 18 cents additional profit. They’ll blame the price increase on supply and demand, but then announce a new round of record profits.

Posted by: Tony | May 4, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Who owns Obama? The big oil companies? General Electric? Obama has such a boatload of dirty friends……drip…drip if that boat springs a leak…watch out. Look at Rezko on trial right now. Rezko, as a real estate magnate in Chicago, was given a contract for 3 energy plants to be built in Iraq…. through our government. The plants were never built because Rezko got indicted, but NO DOUBT that Senator Obama helped Rezko GET that contract for Rezko. Not to mention that Axelrod was a lobbyist for Exelon (and the later nuclear legislation with no teeth), or that much of the $$$ loans came through General Electric Financial. Who have been large contributors to Obama’s campaigns, General Electric and Exelon! Who owns one of the largest loan insurance and credit card companies in America, General Electric. Who voted for unlimited credit limits and voted against a 30% cap on credit cards? Obama! Obama said he voted against the 30% cap because it was too high. Apparently NO cap is better than a cap that’s too high. Who owns NBC and MSNBC the home of anti-Hillary all the time? General Electric! Who owns Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and Andrea Mitchell? General Electric! Who owns Tim Russert? General Electric! Who is currently doing business in Iran? General Electric! Who owns Obama? All Obama can do is criticize and point his elitist finger at Hillary for being what he thinks is wrong for big business. Hillary cares about the small town Americans, the ones that struggle to pay bills and get to work, while all of Obama’s friends go to swanky parties at fabulous mansions sipping $100 bottle wine, talking about us bitter small town Americans who don’t understand the importance of making the rich richer!

Posted by: rs | May 4, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Give me a break. She does not get the economy. Neither does McCain. If she can’t get the gas economics right do you really expect her to get the entire US economy right?
She messed up and she is not owning up. How typical of her. Remember Iraq vote? Go home Hillary. The time has come. You had your glory. We need fresh blood, fresh ideas, less partisan people in politics.

Posted by: fooled_once | May 4, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Wasn’t this a ‘conflict of interest’ with George Stephanopoulus being an ex-Clinton employee. Didn’t the disastrous debate teach ABC anything?
George, you have finally allowed the Clinton’s to make you look again like one of their hired surrgates, not to mention loosing any creditabilty as a serious newsperson.

Posted by: Edward King, Omaha | May 4, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

With this gas tax holiday issue, who is going to approved it? Has she discussed it with George Bush first? Is she talking about next year or the year 2012? what a lie!!! It is only way of getting votes.

Posted by: Peace | May 4, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

The SuperDs are not amused. Most will see it a classic political pandering.

Posted by: Bob, DC | May 4, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Get a clue, people. It’s not about the $30 people are saving. It’s about costs and benefits. The price reduction likely will increase demand, leading to even higher costs when the holiday is over. And the loss in tac revenues will cripple the construction industry since COUNTY governments will not have money to support projects. This is hurting the little guy, not the federal government.

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

We do not need mother Pinocchio in DC.
We have them enough as family. Than sooner we dump here then better. We need educated people who know how to listen…

Posted by: lastname | May 4, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Classing someone as an ‘expert’ does not mean that they are neutral!
Tax policy is fraught with political spin. Clinton is advocating a direct redirection of oil profits on a temporary basis.
Why is Obama really sneering at this practical solution? Is it that he actually wants to protect monopoly-driven oil company profits? That’s the Univ. of Chicago school economics plan — let the free market save us all!

Posted by: Kal | May 4, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Why listen to people who devote their lives to things and know stuff when you could be Queen Clinton? The gas tax holiday is disaster, whether you realize it or not.
The reason it matters is that it shows Clinton lacks a basic understanding of economics and the likely big-picture consequences of lowering the gas tax as an economic incentive during a time when our main goal is trying to reduce gas consumption, that or she knows and doesn’t care. I’m not sure which is worse.
Obama is trying to point that out to everyone, but apparently only a select few have the brainpower to process it. It must be frustrating running for President, trying to explain basic concepts to people you need to vote for you.

Posted by: Chris | May 4, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

The reason USA is leading the world is because of its scientific leadership is everything from going to moon, rockets, satellites, medicines, agriculture, manufacturing, etc.
We don’t rely or trust our scientist, yes economists are scientists of economy, then something is wrong with that kind of leadership. Hope people vote with brains not their biases.
Arni, Austin

Posted by: Arni | May 4, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Hillary’s arrogance and denial about this MAJOR ploy to get votes and then dismiss the economists opinions about the gas tax holiday as unimportant is rediculous. Let’s concentrate on this error of judgement and question whether it has hurt her campaign. If it hasn’t, then we are as dumb as she hopes we are in her pandering for votes. Come on press, media and Americans , let’s call her on this one! The economists are pros and she is a deceiver. LaDonna in WV

Posted by: LaDonna Wilson | May 4, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

This is one of her most blatant attempts to date of pure political pandering. I’d say it’s the worst but the campaign isn’t over so she has more time.
Just another example though of why it’s time for America to say…
HILL No!

Posted by: Tom | May 4, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Okay. Help me here.
HC eliminates the gas tax.
To pay for the road work HC makes the oil companies pay the 18 cent gas tax.
So then the oil companies raise the price of oil enough to pay for the tax.
That price increase gets passed on the consumer, making up for elimination of the gas tax.
And the consumer gets what exactly?

Posted by: Adam | May 4, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

How does she even come up with an economic policy without economic experts?? She thinks all this stuff up by herself? Right. That’s why all this b.s. about Obama being inexperienced is just that. Once elected, they all surround themselves with ‘experts’. HRC’s ‘experience’ is in campaigning and backroom dealing. Obama has just as much experience in ‘representing’. HRC remains -divisive-, Obama’s change can get people together and pressure on those who won’t come together to work on our problems. HRC is more of the same sh*tuff, different day… doesn’t matter, she doesn’t have the math to win anyway, an economist would have to explain it to her.

Posted by: RR | May 4, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

You are correct Hillary.
Look at the economy and tell how the EXPERT econo mYstics have done so far!
We have gone under and who do you turn to… the same dopes that dug the hole.
Obama never has any solutions or plans.
If he does mumble some it has been said by others.
He inspires no one unless he has someone else to write a speech or he mimics someone else. He puts me to sleep when trying to get his tongue around a word! Never does he have any original ideas.

Posted by: HP Boston | May 4, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

The problem I see with Hillary’s plan is why just target the petroleum companies? A law like this would have to span all companies and corporations in order to be passed, and we all know this isn’t going to happen. It’s pandering plan and simple. She knows full well it’ll never happen so she’s safe in making this a standing point of her campaign.

Posted by: JustBuzz | May 4, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Gee. How very GWB of her. He didn’t throw in his “lot” with the experts on WMD. He didn’t throw in his “lot” with the experts on Iraq. He hasn’t thrown in his “lot” with economists who warned about every facet of the credit and mortgage crisis we now face.
Couple all of that with her recent “with us or against us” comment, and I’d say the transformation is complete.
A vote for HRC is a vote for the third term of George W. Bush. Those of you who support Clinton – you wonder why Obama supporters can’t stand her. THIS is why.

Posted by: RenaRF | May 4, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

The reason its pandering is she has no way to get the gax tax relief passed for this summer, she’s not the president yet and she won’t be able to get anything passed in time from the Congress. So she can go around saying she’s for it, knowing it can never happen but since she is saying she’s for it, she wins votes. That’s what people need to realize. The summer will pass without the removal of this tax and she knows it but she can say well I was for it. This way since it really doesn’t make sense as the economists say, she gets to say she wants this, but it won’t really happen and cause worse problems she knows will probably happen such as road workers losing their jobs. As people say she will do anything to win. Right now there will be people in North Carolina and Indiana who will vote for her just because they want this gas tax relief and she has no power to deliver that to them and it won’t happen yet she got their vote. Mission accomplished for her.

Posted by: Donna | May 4, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

She’s not going to listen to economist because she know she got it right?? Does that mean as President she won’t listen to the Federal Reserve, the cabinet or Congress? She’s already planning on ignoring the military commanders and pull out of Iraq. She also said we would olbiterate Iran [..which produces a lot of oil]. Hillary is like Willy Coyote, super genius, just before he goes off the cliff.

Posted by: Chris336 | May 4, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

What? Hillary won’t listen to people with, say, 35 years of experience on these issues?

Posted by: krashing | May 4, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

So she’s going to abolish the tax on buyers and impose the same tax on oil producers… who will then raise their prices, essentially forcing the consumers to pay that tax. You don’t need an economist to tell you this. You just need common sense.
In the end, nothing would change, apart from the millions of dollars spent to implement this idiotic policy.

Posted by: fjfjdvdv | May 4, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

What would Obama do. Certainly not pander to the people. Seems like Obama is pandering to the big oil companies right about now. Next up, Obama will trot out his expert on Hamas and Middle East Policy, Jimmy Carter, who likens Israel to an apartheid state. Wright said that Obama is anti-Israel. Wright is telling the truth. Obama is not for the middle class people. Obama does not care what Americans have to say to him. Obama cares what the executives at the big business tell him to do and the heads of the hate groups he associates with tell him to do.

Posted by: calli | May 4, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Toa all those who thionk Hillary is pandering … what solution has Saint Obama put forward…. none… no specifics ever! it is no accident that Hillary is on a solutions tour… Obama will be impotent just as George W Bush believe me!!

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

I’m a little sick of people saying “at least she has a plan.” The truth of the matter is that there is no real quick fix for sky high gas prices. We would have to drill deep into Alaska, build more refineries, or strengthen the dollar. So, it really shouldn’t bother people that Obama doesn’t have a plan to immediately fix our gas woes. It’s better than having a plan that is counterproductive. George Bush had a plan and look at where we are now!

Posted by: prn2oblivion | May 4, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

If you take away this tax . .U cost people their jobs . .There is no argument there from all 3 Candidates . . Hillary is proposing to tax the oil company’s . .Great idea but u have to get it thru congress . .which will not happen . .so she knows this is just a ploy . .Think about it with no emotion . .

Posted by: RabbitEnigma | May 4, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Shifting the gas tax to oil companies will not put that price back on at the pump.
Economists who specialize in tax incidence long ago found that increased costs like that generally get shifted to corporations’ factors of production — to shareholders, suppliers, and employees. In other words, the tax will not end up on top of market-driven pump prices.
Of course, anyone who is determined to support Obama no matter what the facts are and no matter what is going on for ordinary Americans won’t care about this either! So rant away, guys, your candidate is so elitist!

Posted by: Kal | May 4, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

To paraphrase Steven Colbert, economic facts have a well-known bias toward reality. Fortunately, Clinton’s plan avoids that bias. Like our president, Hillary can see through the fog of facts. She, too, values “truthiness” over reality.
Onward to 4-8 more years of truthiness ! The climate can stand it, our economy can stand it, America’s reputation in the world can stand it.
More important, by avoiding gas taxes, I’ll have an extra 30 cents a day to spend. Unless the local gas station juices prices to compensate, that means more gas for my 11 mpg petrol hawg.
Life good. Belly belly good for me ! Thank you Hillary for seeing the public interest over your own self interest.
WHEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!

Posted by: Ron Riley, Evergreen, CO | May 4, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Hillary’s not going to put her lot with economists. But Congress will. People who buy into this grotesque pandering will, unfortunately, be sorely disappointed.

Posted by: Ramona1 | May 4, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Hillary Clinton has primary election debt – yes she does. However, she also maintains $32+ million in reserves, which will become available to her campaign at the end of the primary season. Part of that amount is what she will use to liquidate any “debt’ left over from the primaries. She will exit well in the black. If she wins the nomination, then her debt will simply go away as a result of new donations. In either case, she has planned well in advance. I call that responsible and very intelligent.

Posted by: Barbara | May 4, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

PRN
THats exactly what it would be George Bushes plan if Obama gets in there is nothing about him thatr says hes for normal people if you all want to go out and create an elitist national party go ahead and do so the Democrats dont want you… leave!

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

This woman is incredible. To hell with facts, full speed ahead. Just what we have had for nearly eight years.
Clintush??

Posted by: Richard McDonough | May 4, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Clinton and McCain both have it wrong, truth be told. Clinton, however, has it even more wrong! It’s one thing to eliminate taxes on oil, deprive the government of infrastructural funding, and increase the gas prices by creating greater demand. When you tell oil companies to pay taxes meant for their customers, they will certainly pass that price onto consumers. Her plan is the most insane.

Posted by: prn2oblivion | May 4, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Do people realize that the gas tax is .18 per GALLON, not per dollar?
It’s NOT $90 X .18 = $16.20 savings
It’s 22 gallons x .18 = $3.96 savings

Posted by: belly | May 4, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Right. Just what we need. A president that thinks they are an expert on everything. So she thinks that, as a senator, she can freeze gasoline prices for the summer, drop the tax, and pass a new tax on oil company profits, with two oil men in the WH? Yeah, that will happen.

Posted by: Louis | May 4, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Ted
Nobody wants to be in his administration .. that bs about how everyone is going to flock to his administration regardless of Party or race etc will never be like what Pres Clinton had he was able to work with an opposition party please dont waste the Obama campaigns money by trying to influence people that cant be influenced we will take you down!

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Hillary has run an absolutely incompetent, bungling campaign, given the advantages she had a year ago.
Maybe it’s because she always pokes her finger in the eyes of experts, just like she’s doing with this gas tax fiasco.

Posted by: FilmMD | May 4, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Do you think gas prices are going to keep going up over the summer? Do you think the oil companies are going to willingly stop gouging middle class Americans at the pump if politicians sit back and DO NOTHING? Which is what the old Washington has been doing about gas prices – NOTHING! Moms have to worry about paying for milk and gas now, that’s crazy! And you want to criticize Hillary with coming up with a PLAN – which is better than doing nothing – to save middle class people some money over the summer. You Obama supporters probably don’t know what it feels like to have to choose between paying for day care, gas and milk. Life is sure tough in Obama mansion, wine drinking, designer clothes and finger nails land. Obama says who cares about saving you money? Do you think Hillary has gotten the attention of the big oil companies? Yes. If the big oil companies know the hammer is going to fall on runaway profits, they will have to stop the gouging.

Posted by: frisco girl | May 4, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Ted
I remember the 70s the point is that the Oil Companies make too much abnd thats a fact and Obama will not do anything about it you cannot debate me about Obama he is wrong period and you will find that out we will not back down!

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

The gas tax holiday is bad economics, of course. No debate there. But the much larger problem is the candidate’s contempt for economic expertise. Any president’s presidency flies or dies on the backs of experts. If she disdains sound economic judgment now, why should voters think that she will do a 180 if she becomes president? Pass this one by.

Posted by: Marvin McConoughey | May 4, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

About Hillary’s health plan. As anyone with a small amount of knowledge in capitalism knows “competition is good”. I order to have a mandated health insurance plan, you’d need to have multiple vendors. They’d all have to agree on the same amount of coverage for the same cost. Where is the competition? There isn’t any! Do we see auto insurance, which is mandated, do this? No! Does everyone driving a car have insurance? No! So just how does she plan to accomplish this? Choose one provider over another and drive all that money to one company? I think not! Her health plan is just as bad of pandering to the public as her gas tax holiday. Hillary’s closed door venture with health insurers, during her husbands terms in office, failed because she couldn’t get them all to agree with her. It’s just not capitalistic, and that’s what our society and way of life are built on. Bottomline is her plan can’t work without creating a socialist health insurance system. At least Barack isn’t pandering and saying that his health plan is going to cover everyone, but he’s going to make the insurance companies be competitive. Also, why does Hillary like her closed door meetings? Shouldn’t the public be aware of issues that are going to affect their wallets? I don’t know about you but I believe that government should be more transparent

Posted by: JustBuzz | May 4, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Even high school kids are taught some basic economics these days, and the most important is the rules of supply and demand. If prices go down demand is greater. If demand goes up prices go higher. This doesn’t even have to include the fact that since she wants to tax the oil companies that the oil companies will pass that cost on to the consumer. What I really want in the White House is someone that will not listen to the experts! NOT!

Posted by: Ann, MO | May 4, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Can someone please tell me how Hillary gets away with calling Obama an elitist when she went to an Ivy League school as well and her and her husband are cashing in on Bill’s presidency to the tune of $100 million dollars over the last seven years? I keep hearing Obama who graduated from Harvard, well Hillary graduated from Yale, what’s the difference? And she didn’t know how to pump gas or use a coffee machine when she stopped at a local convenience store in North Carolina. But yet the elitist label is passed off on Obama and doesn’t stick to her. Why do white blue collar workers see her as one of them when she is far far from it? Doesn’t it make you guys mad that they have so blatantly cashed in on their public service? And last but not least, will someone please tell me why white blue collar workers who want universal health care think that she will be successful this time when she so horribly failed to this when she was first lady and Bill put her in charge of healthcare. We have with her actually already seen her in action in the role of trying to bring us healthcare and it was a complete failure. Why hasn’t anyone brought this up? We have already given her one chance, doesn’t anyone remember anything? And yet people are voting for her to give her another chance to try again. Wake up people, why repeat the same mistake again? I can’t understand why no one questions her on this, asking her why does she think she would be successful this time when she was totally ineffective last time? We’ve already tested her one time, but everyone has such short memories. Let’s give someone else a chance or else its going to end up the same way. She couldn’t get healthcare passed last time, and she probably knows she can’t again. She just wants power for power’s sake. Please hold her accountable for her past failures instead of giving her a free ride.

Posted by: Rick | May 4, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Rick
Obama made 40 million in less time fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me you all will be put in your place on this make my words

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Stanium …
There is no sane, practical plan to decrease the price of oil in the near future.
Insane plan: threaten Iran with MAD if they don’t give us their oil dirt cheap =)

Posted by: prn2oblivion | May 4, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Exactly…why is Hillary’s pandering worse than Obama’s pandering????
All politicians pander. All politicians mislead. Why do you think Obama is trying to learn how to communicate with with blue collar workers? Talking about arrugula probably doesn’t help his case, however.
Obama appears “weak”, and I thought this even before I read a statement by a former colleague in the Il. Senate who said Obama earned the reputation of “gutless” and “absent” when it came time to make the tough votes. Sen. Ted Stevens said Obama “folded like a cheap suit” when time came to take a stand.
Given Obama’s rep for weakness, maybe Obama’s supporters can explain how he’s going to transform Washington, especially since he’s indebted to special interests as we speak. Have you all actually thought about this to any degree? I know many of you are young folks who haven’t followed the political process for very long, and you’re a bit naive, but maybe you should give it a bit of soul searching thought. He’s not known to be very adept at working across party lines as Hillary has done, so again, how’s he going to make this earth shattering transformation happen??
His ambition shows above all else, and his colleague’s in the Il.Senate said this is one trait Sen. Obama has that all could agree upon.
hrc’08

Posted by: kmb08 | May 4, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

What a great plan – the more you drive the more you save.
One fellow says he’ll save $90 this summer. To get that kind of ‘savings’ he’ll have to buy 500 gallons of gas – at 20 mpg that’s about 3300 miles a month. Perhaps taking the long way home will help him save $100.
I don’t care who’s plan it is. It is pure and simple nonsense.

Posted by: Kees | May 4, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

It has long been stated that no two economists ever agree on anything.
Folks, Senator Clinton has proposed a temporary fix AND a long-term fix. The former (dropping the oil tax for the summer) may be ineffective as a “policy”, but it can provide some temporary, short-term, needed assistance to the small businesses and independent truckers whose livelihood is currently on the line. The risk is minimal if the monies are recouped through a windfall profit tax. Clinton proposes such a tax to inform the oil companies of her intention for her long-term policies which is to say to the oil companies — “get used to it, you will not continue to enjoy outrageous profits while the rest of our society suffers under my administration.”
I am surprised at the scoffing by the Obama supporters. Isn’t this exactly the kind of bold leadership for “change” Senator Obama keeps touting? He keeps telling us all how he intends to “take on the lobbyists” — ok, now is his chance. Who do you think most professional economists work for in this culture — the working poor or middle class? Get real.

Posted by: Barbara | May 4, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Ted
Obama will not become President period you can wish all you want but I know you are getting scared!

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Barbara
Thanks, you said it better than I did but the point was taken by sensible people anyway!

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Ted
Exactly if you dont vote for her its your propblem because Obama will not win and may not be nominated!

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Barbara: Obama and his minions WOULD think that the gas tax idea was a good one, if he came up with it first.

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

TedDaddy: I guess I don’t have the benefit of hanging with the fabulously wealthy billionaires at their San Francisco mansions, drinking $100 bottle wine, and talking about my sweet new ferrari or bentley that I’m driving on the weekends for fun – and my work week car is an escalade. No, don’t have your perspective on things. Just like you and Obama do not have any perspective on what it’s like to be working class. Obama wouldn’t be able to survive. It would be a very bitter pill for him to swallow. Maybe MSNBC could start a new Obama reality show! Michelle and Barack doing the Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie thing – yeah, simple life of the Obama’s! That would be fun to watch.

Posted by: frisco girl | May 4, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

I’d like to see these magical “tools of the presidency” that will miraculously change our status without the help of the people who study the economy day-in and day-out.
And who’s to say they just won’t raise the price of gasoline to make up for what they have to pay for in taxes? They can do what they want. She’s acting like 18.4 cents off each gallon is going to make gas FREE or something. >.

Posted by: Jessica. | May 4, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Clinton is about as bold and hungry for change (the bad kind of change) as George Bush. It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if she puts more than half her stock revenue comes from oil this summer. It also wouldn’t surprise me if she doesn’t cherry pick an economist to sell her great idea to the people.

Posted by: prn2oblivion | May 4, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I don’t care about pandering. What I care about is the Democratic party is about to nominate a man who no experience, who is ahead in deligates ONLY because people voted for him knowing nothing about him. NOW they know the bitter remarked and about Rev. Wright and many regret their votes. Obama WILL loose in November now what we know more about him and somehow the Democrats have to fix this.

Posted by: Ryan Healey | May 4, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

OK you Hillary know it all’s, just where is Barack misleading you? And please stick to the issues that plague Americans. No going off the issues with Wright’s comments or Ayers or bittergate. Try to stick to the issues that matter. Make an agrument.

Posted by: JustBuzz | May 4, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I’m proud for the Clinton’s making so much money after they left the WH. They’re super smart, work their hearts out, and they do tremendous work through the Clinton Foundation, e.g., help fight aids in Africa, give relief to Katrina victims, give relief to tsunami victims, help impoverished countries receive foods and medicines, so do a little research before blasting the Clintons’ wealth.
The Clintons were the financially poorest couple to enter the WH in a very long while. They left the WH only earning a little over $300,000. The Obama’s made over $4 million last year. I’m sure if Obama happens to become Pres., and after he leaves the WH, he’ll make speeches, write books, and earn even more than the Clintons. Are you Obama supporters opposed to him doing this? The Clintons gave more in charitable donations and paid more in taxes than most in their tax bracket. The Obama’s paid a measley 3% in charities.
To help a few Obama’s supporters out: Elitism isn’t a financial position…it’s a mindset. Hillary has worked on human rights issues long before she even met Bill. She’s been a people’s advocate for many years….it just comes more naturally for her to listen to voters, and to make them feel special. Maybe Obama will learn how to do this someday.
Most people who think negatively of Hillary do so mostly because of people like Rush Limbaugh who has told voters to hate her for so many years. People are very much influenced by repetition. If they began to analyze Hillary in an objective way, they’ll see a very admirable woman, although a very complicated one.
hrc’08

Posted by: kmb08 | May 4, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Average miles driven per year: 12,000 miles
Average fuel efficiency of cars: 20 miles/gal
Gallons used per year: 12000/20 = 600 gal
Weeks in a year: 52 week
Gallons used per week: 600/52 = 11.54 gal
Weeks between memorial day and labor day: 14
Gallons used in 14 weeks: 11.54*14 = 161.5 gal
Gas tax break: 18 cents
Total savings from gas tax break: $29.08
This is NOT “elite economics”.
It is called 3rd grade (or even 2nd grade) Math.
Hillary “sniper-fire” Clinton, where did you get your degree, or should I say where did you buy your degree????
Do we want to take away badly needed highway and bridge maintenance money?
Do we want more bridges collapse and people get killed like the one that collapsed in MN?

Posted by: David | May 4, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

All we keep hearing from ALL of the candidates is I have a “plan” but as of yet none of them have come out with the basics of those plans.
How hard is it to say:
I am going to bring gas prices down by putting regulations on the Oil companies similar to the regulations governing other energy suppliers such as Electric and Natural Gas Companies, Under these regulations Oil Companies would be required to petition for increases in prices and only after approval and within mandated limits would they be allowed to increase them.
OR:
My sollution to the Illegal immigration problem facing this country is:
All Illegal Immigrants have 6 weeks to present themselves to the nearest INS office for return to their country of origin, You will be given a post dated work visa for a legal return to the US in 4 yrs. After a legal return you have 5 years to obtain citizenship, If after 5 years you have not become a citizen you will then be returned to your country of origin permenantly. Anyone found in the US illegaly after the 6 week deadline will be returned to your country of origin permanently with no future chance of legal citizenship.
OR:
My solution to Health Care is:
All americans will be covered regardless of income through Federal funding, This funding will be subsidized by eliminating All current and future funding of assistance and grants to other Countries.
OR:
My plan to control Inflation is:
Place a 25% Luxury Tax on all purchases that go beyond neccesity, Home purchases over $250,000 or any Home purchase that is not a primary residence. Auto purchases over $50,000. Etc…
Placing a limit on lending that restricts loans to no more than the total income of 5 years.
If they have “plans” lay them on the line and let the people judge them by their proposed works not just on their words. Saying “I have a plan” without giving the details is like saying “I have a car to sell you, but you can’t see it until you buy it”.

Posted by: A Better place in OK | May 4, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Ryan . . .
Clinton has said numerous times that Obama can win in November. She just claims that she will do a better job in office. But how can anyone say that she would do a good job in office when her judgment isn’t good enough to follow the advice of economic advisers. I mean these are basic economic principals that high school students know about. There aren’t any mainstream economists out there to agree with her.

Posted by: prn2oblivion | May 4, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

lets see we are to believe the economist
when they were the ones saying that the subprime loans were good for our economy.
lets face it if we could get the oil companies to pay the federal tax on gas then why not? Haven’t we been bent over by those company for too long, shouldn’t they have to invest more into our roads, bridges,ect.
And wouldn’t you have agreed with it if your beloved Obama had come up with it,
he doesn’t relate to us working class
people.

Posted by: Melissa | May 4, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

This just proves she doen’t have any fiscal responsiblity. She has mismanaged her campaign and is willing to mismanage the country because she wants to pander.

Posted by: marny | May 4, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

My God – So she plans to run the country like a dictator and not rely on expert advice. Hillary you can’t do it all. Your irresponsible handling of your campaign finances to have to beg PA for assistance, collection agencies after your campaign says it all for me that you aren’t fit to run the show.

Posted by: Simon | May 4, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

prn2oblivion,
If you think oil companies are going to pay for highway and bridge maintenance, then you are dreaming. Wake up!!!

Posted by: David | May 4, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

James you said “This guy thinks Americans have an IQ of 10.”
I say no- Hillary thinks that you have an IQ of 10. First of all, how will she pay for it, considering that she has already committed the money to long term energy improvements as has Obama? What about the impact to jobs?
Most importantly- how is he DOING something? Pelosi and Reid have both said that they don’t support it? Since when can Clinton do anything unilaterally?

Posted by: big rich | May 4, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

…Why does Obama need to explain his stance on the gas tax? I read a comment that said, he is an elitist and he explains it because he thinks people are dumb. I completely disagree. There is no such thing as a perfect decision (every decision will have its pro and cons). As does this one.
And Professionals who understand the impact to the economy (after studying a lot longer than I have) say its a bad idea, it makes you wonder why Hillary and her supporters continue to support a bad a idea…well, I guess they have a lot of practice with supporting bad ideas.
Hillary only listens to professionals when it make political sense.
I also saw a comment that this is Hillary way of getting things done. I chuckled. For some people (thinking objectively), if this is how Hillary gets thinks done (making decision contrary to the experts…in an area she doesn’t have expertise) makes me scare about her being in leadership.
Anybody except Hillary 08!

Posted by: Ken | May 4, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

The so called “Gas Tax Holiday” is a political trick! First, the 18 cent tax is taken off…people buy more gas, especially when they go on vacation…the price goes back up beyond the 18 cents becasue of demand…and when the “Holiday” is over, the 18 cents is added right back on. Then what? You’ll spend much more than the 30 bucks you save during your “Holiday”.

Posted by: S. Daniels | May 4, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Melissa …
Even with the subprime loans, economists knew that the economy would suffer from them some day. That’s why we’ve been hearing about economic bubbles for the past two years. This plan isn’t even up to debate. Everyone knows the oil companies will pass extra costs onto consumers. The only thing America can do to stop it would be to nationalize American oil.

Posted by: prn2oblivion | May 4, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Neither Hillary’s short term or long term plan for energy prices will work. The summer tax holiday will be offset by the oil companies rising prices and a slight increase in demand because of the lower prices. Her long-term plan cannot work because everyone needs gasoline, its an inelastic good. If she puts a tax on the oil companies then they will merely pass that tax onto us because we have no alternative. It goes beyond not listening to the economists it goes to not listening to reality.

Posted by: Geoff | May 4, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Geez me and Obama will have to sell all our oil stock before he becomes president. The tax wii be 20% on capital gains. He said he will hike it to 28% when he is elected. So sell while you can stock holders, big oil the quicker picker upper! (capital gains that is)(less tax that is)

Posted by: HP Boston | May 4, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Some of the polls in North Carolina now have Clinton and Obama basically tied. She has closed that gap and that means her gas tax relief has worked. When people in earlier posts have asked, does she think the lunch bucket crowd will be so stupid to fall for this, I guess the answer was yes, she knew she could pull one over on them by saying this, and she used it for all it was worth, knowing full well she can’t
deliver. In a way, this is a blatant statement by her that she thinks the lunch bucket crowd is stupid since she is smart enough to know that in reality this won’t work and she can’t pass it by this summer. She will probably win North Carolina now and its all from pandering.

Posted by: Charlotte | May 4, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Temporary Tax Relief Ideas
1. Use relief money to buy seeds to create vegetable gardens this summer
2 Cajole some oil companies into helping with the tax relief as good citizenry since people might flock to their pumps in appreciation
3 Issue Road and Infrastructure Bonds
4 Charge extra to fill up private planes during the summer
5 Work with both parties to get things done

Posted by: jane | May 4, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

exactly. Her campaign is a foreshadowing of things to come…it doesn’t matter as long as she gets into the oval office.
Blame Bush for the current situation. He is STILL IN OFFICE.
For all that, why doesn’t Clinton promise everyone $3000. Same result, it won’t happen.

Posted by: big rich | May 4, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

From the dumb way she proposes her crackpot ideas, it is obvious she doesn’t understand economics. Please, super delegates, keep this person out of the White House.

Posted by: John | May 4, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

WHAT A JOKE… HILLARY TAKES 18 CENTS OFFD… SO THE OIL GIANTS WILL PUT 60 CENTS ON.
ROTFLMAO…
MEANWHILE THE HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE LOSES BILLIONS… THAT HAVE TO BE BORROWED FROM CHINA…
SHE’S A TOTAL IDIOT JUST LIKE KING GEORGE BUSH.
NO WONDER HER CAMPAIGN’S ALWAYS RUNNING BROKE.

Posted by: Chuck | May 4, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Most of the economists who oppose the gas tax holiday do so on the basis that it would encourage people to drive more and therefore, drive up prices. Yeah, right, if the price goes from $4.00 per gallon down to $3.82, I’m just going to cruise around all day, without regard to cost. When Obama supported the same position in Illinois, gas prices were about one-half of today’s prices. At $4.00 per gallon, I doubt many will be encouraged to cruise the night away.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Hill, Barack, McCain, they are all part of todays Congress. And the Congress is responsible for any mess that we are in. Their role is to make laws and levy taxes, and they have done it in favor of their political donors. When America wakes up and realizes that it’s them and votes them out, maybe, just maybe it can change.

Posted by: Bob | May 4, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Give me a break, the only reason that Obama is not saying the same thing is so that he can make it look like Clinton and McCain are like-thinking. He VOTED for a gas tax vacation in Illinois when he was a state senator. DUH , was that just as he says “politics as usual”, was he “pandering” to his constitutites as he accuses Hillary of doing?
This gas tax vaction is no big deal, it prolly won’t get passed anyway, but it was not presented as a SOLUTION, just a bit of short term relief.

Posted by: hello | May 4, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

This article is very interesting. Although the tone seems to support Hillary, the quote makes her sound a little ignorant.

Posted by: Kyle Pate | May 4, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

The issues I have with Hillary is, everything she does is “behind closed doors” Like her health care push during her husbands terms. Her recent closed door push for super delegates. What’s the problem with just being open about things? Our biggest problem with Washington DC is everything is “behind closed doors” In my opinion, which doesn’t account for much, anything held behind closed doors, is usually something that’s not good. And if it’s held behind closed doors in Washington DC, it’s usually something that’s not good for the American people. SO far Barack has been pretty open about things. I can see his point and reason for “finally” throwing Wright under the bus. So far he’s always seemed to give everyone the benefit of a doubt, even Hillary. But there does come a time when you have to stand up and be accountable to the people and either denounce or make a stand, and make an argument. Many people say “he’s been listening to this reverend for 20 years” …”He has to believe in what this man preaches” Do these people actually know how ignorant they sound? Lets put it another way. Does everyone agree with the actions their employer makes? What’s the difference? If they’ve been there for 20 years and are still employed there, they preach their employers policies on a daily basis, whether they believe it or not. Who’s the bigger hypocrit? At least Barack didn’t immediately throw his former pastor under the bus, for remarkes he didn’t hear first hand, but he did have the guts to do it after he had! I just see alot of weak arguments here, and a ton of supposition for people trying to make a case. Everyone knows that Washington needs to change how things are done, for the good of the people, but seem to be scared to make a leap of faith. And they call Richardson Judas. It’s sad that Americans have come down to this. Grow a backbone!

Posted by: JustBuzz | May 4, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

THE HISTORICAL REALITY IS THAT HILLARY WAS AN ANTI-INTEGRATION, ANTI-CIVIL RIGHTS GOLDWATER REPUBLICAN POLITICO OPERATIVE AS A KID… BUT JOINED THE DEMS WHEN NIXON BECAME UNPOPULAR OVER VIET-NAM…
BUT HILLARY IS STILL A GOLDWATER REPUB PSYCHOLOGICALLY.
HER ACTIONS SPEAK VOLUMES.
THAT’S WHY SHE WAS KICKED OFF THE WATERGATE COUNSEL STAFF FOR:
1) LYING 2) GROSS INCOMPETENCE 3) SUBVERTING THE US CONSTITUTION.
NOTHING HAS CHANGED…
IT’S ALLL ABOUT HILLARY… DAMN THE TRUTH.

Posted by: Chuck | May 4, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

It’s not about reality ($30) it’s about “the message it sends” to voters. I’m so tired of politicians sending messages instead of doing the what needs to be done. Temporary repeal of the gas tax is a cheap political stunt that will do more harm than good.

Posted by: thebob.bob | May 4, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

As Hillary stated, the gas prices are a result of many factors far and above supply/damand. Market speculators play a big role. Saudi Arabia tightens supplies on a whim. Strategic reserves can be tapped. She offers a broad proposal. Surely, the Obama supporters can follow a little more closely than their arguments attest.
As far as educated voters voting for Obama..Have you seen the data released…well, no, you probably haven’t. In the data released on the first 14 states who voted, Hillary had the most college educated voters in 9 states, Obama in 5. Obama had a greater number in those 5 states, so he got the nod. However, in the study, only white voters were included. A tiny bit misleading, but if it makes you feel better…run with it Obama babes.
In the states that followed, Obama got more college educated voters primarily due to all the young groupies following him because he’s hip and cool. There is very little difference in the actual number of college educated voters for Obama vs. Hillary.
Don’t equate college educated with intelligence…you young ones. I have a college education, but I know for a fact, my college education doesn’t compare to life’s lessons encountered since college. Many of Hillary’s supporters are senior citizens, and many of them couldn’t go to college. Many of them had to quit school early on to help their families. In addition, if the later studies are similar to the earlier studies, only white college educated voters were included, which obviously distorts reality.
Hillary has set a goal to eliminate breast cancer within our lifetimes, and this is another proposal I find enriching and worthwhile. She has so many, and if you care to inform yourself, go to her website. She’s a policy wonk who is very impressive.
hrc’08

Posted by: kmb08 | May 4, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

We all know that gas price is a real issue, but no one plans to act. On the other hand, Hillary has both a long term and a short term plans. This summer gas tax elimination is just a short term plan to offer some reliefs to the working class. The average savings is $70, and if you have a long commute or you’re truck drivers, you will save a lot more. Hillary also mentioned in the show that she’s surprise that the economists’ objection on the gas tax relief, and yet no one questions about the Fed’s $30 billion bailed out of Bear Stearn, which violates the “market” economy.

Posted by: ssf | May 4, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Obama is just frustrated that he didn’t think of it first.
But he’s an elitist who might respond to a working class family struggling to put food on the table amid rising prices for fuel and food with:
“Let them eat arugula!”

Posted by: s. valenti | May 4, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

UScitizen: You are correct about Obama. He is desperately trying to deflect the publics attention away from his relationships with racists and terrorists, by criticizing Hillary on her positions, including her position on a nuclear attack on Israel by Iran. Does anyone in their right mind think that any President would sit back and allow the total destruction of Israel by Iran? His criticism actually shows how naive he is about foreign policy.

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

This should go down as the “Hillary/McCain Tax Holiday Flop”, pandering as blatant as this should be called out and I’m proud Obama isn’t jumping on this stupid bandwagon. Our economy is in very real trouble and jeopardizing 300,000 jobs by saying she is going to pay for it with a “Windfall Profits Tax”, money she has already spent on “Green Jobs”, etc. Even if she could pan it out and backtrack from spending it on “Green Jobs”, there is NO WAY Congress gets consensus to make a bill in time to provide funding for bridge & highway projects that will be put on hold due to no funding putting hundreds of thousands of people throughout our country out of work this summer and yes this would DIRECTLY affect people in Indiana AND North Carolina. This is pure pandering at its finest and I resent the implication that voters are THAT stupid Hillary. This is the EXACT type of politics that has driven our nation’s economy into a ditch. We need real change to address the real issues facing all Americans. We need a fresh new direction for someone that offers voters the respect and decency to tell them the truth, not lie to them as with NAFTA and Bosnia. While I sincerely respect Hillary supporters’ enthusiasm for breaking the glass ceiling, snap out of it. Hillary is easily in the top 5 of the most divisive, polarizing candidates to pick from. There is no way most American’s are going to decide to put as our First Man, an IMPEACHED President – so please snap out of it. It is abundantly clear that the negativity the Clinton campaign has engaged in is not embraced by our party – it is in fact exactly what we DONT like about our divisive opponents. It is time for real change and a step in a new direction. Join us as we make history to put people first over special interests so we can make real change happen.
God Bless these United States & Barack Obama.

Posted by: With Open Eyes | May 4, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Obama is too afraid to appear on national television in front of voters to discuss the issues.
Instead, he seeks cover with Russert on the weekly Obama infomercial known as Meet the Press.

Posted by: nana m. | May 4, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Democrats may be more wise in nominating someone who will pose less risk in the general election.

Posted by: Onlooker | May 4, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Clinton supporters refuse to see the truth when it’s right in front of them.
Gas tax is a gimmick folks but once again like all the other things she’s done this campaign, you’re willing to brush it off.
With Open Eyes…you’re right on.

Posted by: Cathy | May 4, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

I say the economists should propose something better that could start to help now/very soon – or else:
The economists and all the wealthy politicians and lobbyists who are opposed to it – should help pay the gas tax this summer!
p.s. Hillary won college grads in Pennsylvania – and it’s been very close in most of the other states as well.
I know many people with Master’s degrees who are supporting Hillary.
(resubmitted because of typos)

Posted by: Economists should pay then | May 4, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Clinton was smart to link this temporary savings for consumers with our government’s bail out of Bear Stearns. It’s time the government thought about helping working people.
And, where were the economists while gas prices, foreclosures and failing financial institutions have been increasing at such an alarming rate.
Economists = Elitists = Obama

Posted by: s. valenti | May 4, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I’m actually in favor of an elitist becoming president. God knows we’ve had an idiot good ol’ boy in there for the past 8 years. Also, don’t we actually WANT someone who’s superior than us? Afterall, he is the PRESIDENT of the United States.
Finally, read your history books folks. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin….clearly the elite of their generation.

Posted by: Cathy | May 4, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

kmd08 I’m pretty sure thre have been more than 14 states that have voted so far. Anyone can take statistics and manipulate them, but to make your case, you need the statistics for ALL the states that have voted, not just the 14 you choose.

Posted by: JustBuzz | May 4, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

JustBuzz…
Are you aware that Dubai has been involved in port security for many many years for US interests?? Heck, Bill has always been more open to free trade than Hillary. Where’s the secret Buzzboy?? So, the Clintons have connections in dubious places…well, isn’t that something your man Obama wouldn’t know about?!?! The Clintons selling out the American way of life….you’ve got to be full of it!!! By the way, Nafta has actually been very good for some parts of this country…try not generalizing every issue…if you’re able.

Posted by: kmb08 | May 4, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

It’s basic economics – a reduction in fed gas tax must be offset by a reduction in government spending, which depends on the fed gas tax to help fund government spending. Of course Hillary won’t do that, regardless of her “plan”. Promises to cut taxes gets votes, that’s her plan

Posted by: Don | May 4, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Justbuzz..
If you are going to quote me…get it correct! I said in the FIRST 14 states…not that only 14 states have voted. Try again…dear.

Posted by: kmb08 | May 4, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

why is this brought up now ? where was she and mac-kain for years (35 yrs of experience) and all u can suggest is temp gas tax relief. This is nothing more than jumping on the bandwagon – anything for votes. She actually thinks that voters are stupid and will fall for the buzz words. It is her so called extensive experience ( and other lifer politicians) which has led the nation to where it is now. Time to dump the old and in with the new.
Obama all the way – like it or not.

Posted by: Another Voter | May 4, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

As soon as John McCain came out with this “holiday” nonsense I just slapped my forehead. I really thought better of the man. The fact that Hillary co-opted such a bad idea was disappointing, but not surprising. I don’t agree with Obama or Hillary on any kind of subjective “windfall” tax on oil companies, but I can at least respect Obama for not stooping to such blatant vote pandering.

Posted by: Unwashed Masses | May 4, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I am “Pander in Chief” HRC and I approve this message:
I see vote I want vote. I’ll say anything and do anything to get votes. I did it before, I do it now, and I’ll do it later.
I am “Pander in Chief” HRC and I approve this message.

Posted by: fooled_once | May 4, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Boy, those Obama talking points must have been burning up the blackberries today. Of course, Hillary’s supporters don’t own such fancy electronics.
We do have TV though and she looked presidential this morning – willing to discuss this issue along with others in front of actual voters asking tough questions.
“Girly man Obama” though – he was too busy explaining yet again – enough already (unless of course he’s willing to finally tell the truth)about his association with a racist, anti american minister.
End the Drama – Pull the Plug on Obama!

Posted by: s. valenti | May 4, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

“Girly man Obama” couldn’t even stand up to Rev. Wright. Do we trust him to go up against the Iranians?
I don’t think so.
End the Drama – Pull the Plug on Obama!!

Posted by: s. valenti | May 4, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

She means she wants oil companies profit to go to refinery operators!
Consumers will get a couple of pennies off for a week or two until supply/demand adjust itself to current level or even higher.
It takes an average person’s IQ to get it. Anyone should understand why this idea is phony.

Posted by: fooled_once | May 4, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

The question is who are these economist asked the question are supporting?? They are surely supporting Obama because it has turn to a situation that the educated ones are supporting Obama . HIllary clearly stated how she will compensate for it but they are not talking on that . Where have they been when the issue of housing market crumbled ??? some of these economists are liars. The true fact is that the main sream media would have talked wit the economists they wanted to bring to their programs so they know what they will say already useless medi. Clinton we are for you Obama is a failure!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Why would she listen to the experts (the economists), she knows better that the tax issue is a gimmick where experts have no say. the other option is that she is too arrogant to listen to the experts.
In either case, she does not seem to think right.

Posted by: ray | May 4, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

POLITICAL campaigning necessarily produces a wide gap between words and deeds. This is the price of bringing together a broad coalition with disparate interests. All effective politicians are at times authentically insincere or sincerely inauthentic. Exaggeration, embellishment, overstatement, doubletalk, deception and lies presented as metaphorical truths are the order of the day.
So, of course, Barack Obama is no different. He exaggerates the credit he deserves for a limited piece of ethics-reform legislation. He embellishes when he presents himself as having had a consistent record on the Iraq war when in fact he’s done a fair amount of zigzagging.
He engages in doubletalk when, on free trade and Iraq, he tells the yokels one thing and the policy people another. He overstates when he presents his minimal accomplishments in the Illinois Senate as proof of his stature. He engages in systematic deception when he says he doesn’t take money from lobbyists.
He presents a lie as metaphorical truth when he says it was the 1965 bloody Sunday attacks on peaceful civil rights protesters in Selma, Alabama, that inspired his parents to marry. (They had been married for years already.)
All of this is unappealing, but also unexceptional. What makes it different is that there’s not just a gap but a chasm between his actions and his professed principles, which would normally kill a candidacy. And because his deeds are so few, the disparity is all the more salient.
Obama, far more than the others, is the “judge me by what I say and not what I do” candidate. He wants to be the conscience of the country without necessarily having one himself.
The disparity between Obama’s rhetoric of transcendence and his conventional Chicago racial and patronage politics is a leitmotiv of his political career. In New York, politicians (Al Sharpton excepted) are usually forced to pay at least passing tribute to universal principles and the ideal of clean government.

Posted by: Joe | May 4, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Obama will lose you all are wasting your time

Posted by: staniam | May 4, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

If the economists are so smart, why do we keep going into recessions? I ignore them and only pay attention to what effects my own pocketbook and the gas tax holiday would do that for me. The last time I filled up the tank on my 1994 vehicle, it cost me $63. Obama spends too much time with “Latte liberals” to understand what even a saving of $30 can do for folks. It might even buy me a bag of groceries,

Posted by: Marta | May 4, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

If the economists are so smart, why do we keep going into recessions? I ignore them and only pay attention to what effects my own pocketbook and the gas tax holiday would do that for me. The last time I filled up the tank on my 1994 vehicle, it cost me $63. Obama spends too much time with “Latte liberals” to understand what even a saving of $30 can do for folks. It might even buy me a bag of groceries,

Posted by: Marta | May 4, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Ted Daddy we all know how The main stream media have played up Obama in the past and Hillary surely has better plans on the Oil tax as well as heath care issues what has Obama got nonsense He knows nothing and he is even afraid to debate. If you know you have a point agaisnt her come out debate with her and let us see how it goes. she offered a situation where there will be no commentator but Obama is runing away. He is a coward , a real one GO AWAY OBOMBA GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Only a few months ago, people projected their hopes on Obama. Now, because of shady affiliations, poor judgment and no accomplishments, their projecting their fears.
His campaign is sinking. Let him go back to the Senate and get to work.

Posted by: nana m. | May 4, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

When you talk about people that have built this country economically you will talk about Bill Clinton. Bill is an ecnomic genus and most Obama followers know this but because they want to make terrorist rule America they are putting that aside . Hillary listens to econmists but she will come out with the best and most viable decision unlike Obama that doesnt know where to stand. He cant make any good decision. Cudos Hillary you are God sent God bless you AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

I know most of Obama supporters vote for Bush they want to bring Obama again .NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! America will be liberated from you haters of America. NO WAY for Obama NO WAY for you NEVER!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

I know most of Obama supporters voted for Bush, they want to bring Obama again .NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! America will be liberated from you haters of America. NO WAY for Obama NO WAY for you NEVER!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Obama is a big disgrace to America. He will open eyes wide until all the Islamic countries wipe Israel away . God himslef will fight against you Obama . You will not and never win the nomination.

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Just like Bush… ignore the advice and counsel of experts in their field who might actually know about a subject than you. We don’t need Hillary’s cowboy approach any more than we needed Bush’s.

Posted by: DogBitez | May 4, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

I am not a american citizen. However, I love America. I am disturbed how many americans cannot see or comprehend Clinton gas tax is ridiculous. Yet, they focus on Rev. Wright…Funny how noone focus on John McCain association with that controversial pastor, name escapes me
Yet they ignore ( especially Ohio and PA voters) the reason why unemployment is so high…The reason is Bill and Hilary sold you out for NAfta and payoffs..
Yet they ignore Peter Paul association with Clintons ..Why havent the media talk about that…
They call Obama a elitist..when Hilary say “Screw them ” referring to southern and poor whites..
Anyone with two neurons can tell you Hilary Cinton plan( no matter since she cannot win)…to damage Obama for McCain, thus the dems losing and she running in 2012. She is selfish, and dont care about her party, and feels she is entitle to the presidency. She claims
experience, yet her judgement is not one of a leader. Why should I care, I am French and rather sit back and laugh at the stupidity of some Americans

Posted by: Marcus | May 4, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

BAMA LIES AGAIN Hillary Clinton never voted for the Brankruptcy Bill of 2005. Hillary Clinton was the sole Senator not voting on the bill, due to the fact that Bill Clinton had heart surgery that day. From Senator Clinton’s official statement on the bill:This bankruptcy bill fundamentally fails to accord with the traditional purposes of bankruptcy, which recognize that we are all better off when hard-working people who have suffered financial catastrophe get a “fresh start” and a second chance to become productive and contributing members of society. With the passage of this legislation, which makes obtaining this fresh start more expensive and more difficult, we are ensuring that many responsible Americans will continue to be buried under mountains of debt, and unable to take back control and responsibility for their lives.In the days before S.256 was finally brought to the floor Senator Clinton voted for every amendment which would have added consumer protections to the bankruptcy bill. Amendments which were repeatedly rejected by both the Republican majority and far too many Democrats. She even voted against cloture in an attempt to keep the final bill from coming to a vote at all.Several commentors correctly noted that Hillary Clinton supported the earlier bill (although she voted for amendments adding consumer protections in that bill as well). She wasn’t the only Democrat to change her position (voting for the 2001 bill and against the 2005 bill) and I’m not qualified to compare the differences between them.However, several articles have discussed her change of position, including this recent article in the NYTimes.For what it’s worth, Democratic Senators Akaka, Cantwell, Dorgan, Feinstein, Leahy, Levin, Lieberman, Mikulski, Murray, Nelson (Fl), Schumer and Wyden switched in the same direction as Clinton. John Edwards, who also voted for the 2001 bill, suggested he would have switched his vote as well.

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

I am just curious- I hear dHillary Clinton speaking about “elitists” and the ” common people” and “mainstream America. Didn’t she and her husband report over $100 million in income in the past several years? I believe that is far more money than Obama made, so who is actually the elitist and not in touch with regular Americans?
I do not support either candidate, but I hear people ripping apart Obama as this rich out of touch guy, who when he said he had 5 suits that he rotated around was persecuted. I don’t believe I have seen Hillary in the same outfit twice….., Just an observation

Posted by: A republican with a question | May 4, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Carolyn Gilmore Why did you say that???
I am a black American man living in Chicago and i know my right from my left ,right???
By the way , why did you say that??? YOu expect me to vote Obama because i am a black man???? NO I am not voting colour like most Obama supporters but voting good policy . Hillary is the best for the job right???

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Sound familiar? Just like Bush – ‘My way or the highway’! Did Hillary get a degree in Economics when I wasn’t looking? We don’t need ‘stubborn’ in the W.H. for 4 more years – 8 yrs. has been enough.

Posted by: GrandmaCDA | May 4, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

She sounds a lot like George Bush talking about either scientists or diplomats.

Posted by: The tall Texan | May 4, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Carolyn Gilmore I am a racist like you and Obama i have my senses working well . Obama is wrong and will futher divide America. Obama is not my choice he is a failure

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

At least Hillary Clinton is willing to try to eliminate the gasoline tax (and have the oil companies pay for it!) Don’t you hate it when people tell you that something is not possible — even though they haven’t tried. No one has tried — they just say it doesn’t make sense. Well, I have heard that plenty, and then I go and do it! It is amazing what is possible when someone just gives it a go! If anyone can get it done — Hillary can.

Posted by: bevvyjean | May 4, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

What does Obama know about economy ?? If it is rhetorics i give it to him. He is an expert in that field but when it comes to Economy, Hllary Clinton is superb. I think we need someone that solution to ut problem and not anyone that will just talk and talk without any tangible solution

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

What does Obama know about economy ?? If it is rhetorics i give it to him. He is an expert in that field but when it comes to Economy, Hllary Clinton is superb. I think we need someone who knows the solution to our problems and not anyone that will just talk and talk without any tangible solution

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Bevvyjean- How will she eliminate the gast tax to be of any support for this summer without the legislature supporting it? It is a promise that she can not keep. She and McCain might as well say that they are giving you $20,000. That won’t happen either.
Say anything politics to get elected must end.

Posted by: big rich | May 4, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Carolyn Gilmore I am not a racist like you and Obama i have my senses working well . Obama is wrong and will futher divide America. Obama is not my choice he is a failure

Posted by: A True black American | May 4, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

You got the nice millionaires that give 10% of their income to charity like Bill & Hillary Clinton; then you got the stingy and selfish millionaires like Michelle and Barack Obama that give less than 1% of their income to hate-filled anti-american churches like trinity.

Posted by: Jenny | May 4, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

A True Black American-
He is such a failure that he is inthe lead with delegates, and his campaign has never run out of money.
Give it a rest. Place your vote accordingly.
As for me, I am a Hoosier, and I voted absentee weeks ago. Hope that you got your say when it was your time.

Posted by: big rich | May 4, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

So, the problem with the last 7 years has been the administration listening to too many experts?
Is she sleep-deprived again?

Posted by: LoyalDem | May 4, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

hello Emily, and for anyone else out there that are still being lead around by the political spin of ‘All Talk, No Action’ regarding Obama. Just stop for just a moment, and snap your fingers. Once you come out of your daze, go to Obama’s web site for details of his plans.
PS – What do you think of the campaign he is running? Is that all talk also?
Obama…..

Posted by: CPR In Seattle | May 4, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Ever heard a joke about economists? “A plane with a physicist, mathematician, and economist on board crashed and stuck on an island with nothing around. They had only a box of can food left. While the physicist and mathematician were squeezing their brains to figure out how to open the cans, the economist simply sat on the sideline smiling. When they asked the economist why he was so comfortable with doing nothing but smiling, he said: let’s assume the cans are opened!”
The govnt must intervene when the price of basic goods like gas is shooting through the roof. This would re-set the expectations of the market and give a temp price relief. Luckily,
Sen Clinton is not an economist!

Posted by: Vickie | May 4, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Whe won’t read reports before, voting on military action. She doesn’t want to listen to economists, on the wacky gas tax
idea. She is involved in one of the largest political controversy’s in American political candidate buy off’s.
What an arrogant elitist…..it is amazing
how she has lasted. Over and over the groups she appeals to put blinders on…

Posted by: ruby | May 4, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Yes, we can. Yes, we can. Not even that chant belongs to Obama, he stole it from hispanics when they chanted that will marching down the streets during an immigration rally. Obama needs to come up with something original. But can he?

Posted by: John | May 4, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Rush Linbaugh, the drug addicted, white, Rev. Wright has helped Clinton gain false momentum through his ‘operation chaos’, in which he’s begging his republican listeners to ‘cross over’ and vote for her, but ONLY in the primary.
Her gas tax pandering makes Rush look like a genius.
IN and NC, you have the chance of a lifetime. Obama IS going to win. Give him a big win on Tuesday

Posted by: oldwhiteguy | May 4, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Isn’t she undermining any credibility she has to attack the Republicans?
Experts disagree with them on the environment, the war in Iraq, and tax cuts for billionaires.
Hillary has attacked them for this but now says listening to experts is elitist?
We’ve had 7 years of a guy that DIDN’T listen to the experts – a guy that listened to his gut.
ENOUGH!

Posted by: white dude in Muncie | May 4, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

I thought Hillary wanted to yank George Stephanopoulos’s ball s off. Unfortunately, she owed him bigtime for his biased moderation in the debate before the PA primary so she just stood up and farted!

Posted by: Terry G. | May 4, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

One of the greatest economists in our history John Keynes ever said, “In the LONG RUN, we are all DEAD.”
If we cannot handle short-run crises, what is the usage of a LONG-RUN solution? Sen Obama needs to think more before he criticises Sen Clinton.

Posted by: Vickie | May 4, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

It is kind of like the “intent” to bring 200,000 new jobs to upsate New York that she promised in her first senate bid. That never happened either.

Posted by: big rich | May 4, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

She is lying and pandering to the voters in order to win. In fact, she has been lying and making false promises through out the campaign. Further, she has poor judgment and vision for the future. Let’s hope that the voters of Indiana and North Carolina do not fall for her cheap ploy.

Posted by: Azar | May 4, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Government does not solve problems in most cases they cause problems. Just look at government’s attempt to solve global warming via bio fuels. The outcome, food prices are going sky high and there are food riots in third world Nations. Just name one major government program that works well and does not have a lot of top heavy overhead where most of the money goes. I bet you can’t. More inefficient, top heavy and do as I tell you or else government programs is what you will get if you vote for Obama or Clinton. It is the free market and the creativity of the American people that solves problems and produces all the products and services the people really want and need. Not government.

Posted by: marian | May 4, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Expectations! Expectations! Expectations! If the government sets the right market expectations, at least this would stop the speculators from bidding up the oil prices temporarily. If the gas price stops climbing up this summer as a result, then the consumers win. (We can talk about making up the losses in ECON 201.)
Sen Obama knows this. He is against it only because Sen Clinton has set the expectations. And he does not want to look like a follower-beating the drum for her.

Posted by: Vickie | May 4, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

I watched both Hillary on “This Week” and Obama on “Meet the Press” (courtesy of Tivo). The difference between them was striking. If I hear one more “uh” or “you know” from Obama today, I think I’m going to have a headache. The guy is always looking for the next lie, I mean word, and is very irritating to listen to. As usual, his discussion was amply pepper with misrepresentations. Hillary, on the other hand, was fluid and capable in her responses. She shows a command of the issues that Obama can only hope to have someday. The more I see him without his teleprompter, the more I question his alleged intellectual prowess. No wonder he is afraid to debate Hillary again.

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

TedDaddy: It amazes me that people will argue against their own interests in order to defend their positions (and in this case, their messiah, Obama). What’s wrong with giving people a tax incentive to buy more fuel efficient cars? The answer; nothing is wrong with it. If your messiah thought it up first, you would be on this blog extolling its virtues. Very sad.

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Our economy is in very real trouble and jeopardizing 300,000 jobs by saying she is going to pay for it with a “Windfall Profits Tax”, money she has already spent on “Green Jobs”, etc. Even if she could pan it out and backtrack from spending it on “Green Jobs”, there is NO WAY Congress gets consensus to make a bill in time to provide funding for bridge & highway projects that will be put on hold due to no funding putting hundreds of thousands of people throughout our country out of work this summer and yes this would DIRECTLY affect people in Indiana AND North Carolina. This is pure pandering at its finest and I resent the implication that voters are THAT stupid Hillary. This is the EXACT type of politics that has driven our nation’s economy into a ditch. We need real change to address the real issues facing all Americans. We need a fresh new direction for someone that offers voters the respect and decency to tell them the truth, not lie to them as with NAFTA and Bosnia. While I sincerely respect Hillary supporters’ enthusiasm for breaking the glass ceiling, snap out of it. Hillary is easily in the top 5 of the most divisive, polarizing candidates to pick from. There is no way most American’s are going to decide to put as our First Man, an IMPEACHED President – so please snap out of it. It is abundantly clear that the negativity the Clinton campaign has engaged in is not embraced by our party – it is in fact exactly what we DONT like about our divisive opponents. It is time for real change and a step in a new direction. Join us as we make history to put people first over special interests so we can make real change happen.
God Bless these United States & Barack Obama.

Posted by: With Open Eyes | May 4, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Are all of these so called economists working on our country right now or is the government just not taking their advice?

Posted by: dgh | May 4, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Hillary is so out of touch with reality she thinks 30 cents per day is significant. That wont even buy a coffe at 7-11 which I suspect she has not done in quite sometime especially considering she did not even know how to operate the coffee machine there recently. Dumb.

Posted by: Bob, DC | May 4, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Hillary claims all economists are elitists and only she understands the complexities of the gas tax on the American economy. Wow.

Posted by: Bob, DC | May 4, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Hillary claims all economists are elitists and only she understands the complexities of the gas tax on the American economy. Wow.

Posted by: Bob, DC | May 4, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Economists = bunch of power thirsty capitalistic morons.
Clinton is just a selfless hero working for the people; this is all the people need: 30 cents a day. Vote for Clinton and the future is rosy.

Posted by: mfr_08 | May 4, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Obama on the rebound!!!
According to the latest CBS News/New York Times poll Obama now leads John McCain by eleven points, 51 percent to 40 percent. That compares to a tied match-up in a CBS News/New York Times poll that was released last Wednesday.
Obama’s lead over Clinton has increased — he now leads Clinton by twelve points, 50 percent to 38 percent. That’s up from his eight point lead in the poll released just a few days ago.
========
Obama has survived crazy Rev Wright — again!! Looks like Tuesday could be very good for Barack!

Posted by: Bob, DC | May 4, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Gas tax, Iraq and Iran. Obama show that he has good judgment.I hope that the Hillary fun will start putting the interest of this country first.

Posted by: leche | May 4, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I can’t help but notice how often Obama supporters tell us to go to his website for answers to questions. Does Obama’s fans know so little or care so little about his acutal positions that they can’t articulate them? As flawed as Hillary maybe, she promotes ideas and proposals that we can evaluate, she thinks on her feet. I just don’t hear Obama saying anything that wasn’t written down with his advisors long ago.
Furthermore, on the tape that was rolled on Obama, during his speech was anyone in his crowd listening to him? All I heard was nonstop cheering and handclapping, while he struggled to be heard above the din. Circa The Beatles at Shea Stadium 1962 recast with full of adult guys and gals. Too much idol worship-its creepy.

Posted by: Cat Lincoln | May 4, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I can’t help but notice how often Obama supporters tell us to go to his website for answers to questions. Does Obama’s fans know so little or care so little about his acutal positions that they can’t articulate them? As flawed as Hillary maybe, she promotes ideas and proposals that we can evaluate, she thinks on her feet. I just don’t hear Obama saying anything that wasn’t written down with his advisors long ago.
Furthermore, on the tape that was rolled on Obama, during his speech was anyone in his crowd listening to him? All I heard was nonstop cheering and handclapping, while he struggled to be heard above the din. Circa The Beatles at Shea Stadium 1962 recast with full of adult guys and gals. Too much idol worship-its creepy.

Posted by: Cat Lincoln | May 4, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Leche, it is not that “no single economist in this country agree…” Economists are now very busy developing their gigantic econometric models with thousands of non-random and random variables included to come up with a projection of the impact. There likely would be more than 10 thousand scenarios depending on the more than 10 thousand ASSUMPTIONS made for each model. This summer would be over by the time we have some “on the one hand…, but on the other hand” results!

Posted by: Vickie | May 4, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Those people, including Obama, who speak of lost jobs because of the gas tax holiday must be losing it. If I am not mistaken, it is would be the oil companies who will be paying for it, hence the monies for road work would still be there. I do not quite understand how the jobs would be lost and the work not be done.
It is obviously a temporary fix until other things get done. It is for the summer only and will provide much needed relief for truckers. It is more of a token relief. I see nothing wrong with that. If anyone actually believes that Clinton would do nothing about the oil companies later on, then they just do not have a clue.
For Obama to say that jobs will be lost and gas prices will just rise surmounts to scare tactics. Of course gas is going to rise, and when it does, you cannot just blame it on the tax relief. It seems funny to me how gas prices have leveled off now that there is talk of them paying a tax.
The point is, big oil needs to get out of the White House. Both Clinton and Obama have taken hundreds of thousands from big oil for their campaigns. For those Obama supporters who refuse to believe this, just google it. They all do, they are all politicians. Clinton has shown she gets things done.
The only way the Dems will get into the White House is if there is a ticket that includes both Clinton and Obama. If the Republicans can swift boat Kerry, what do you think they will do to Obama?

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 4, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Aren’t the economist the ones who told us that the subprime loans were good for our economy. Yeah! like I would listen to them.

Posted by: Melissa | May 4, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

It is dangerous to let economists run the country. They are philosophers. They make dangerous generalizations.
I heard a far cry from the wilderness saying ‘Supply side economics’
The world do not run according to the theories of economists or else your presidents in the past would not have fits in their office; what a pity!

Posted by: John_Lai | May 4, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

What I see from Hillary is a person who put the people at the fore front of all policies.
It is the academics who don’t understand. That is why people have been telling OBAMA you are unapproachable and consequently out of touch.
Before making policy, you have to think of the people and see if they can heck it. If not, you build them up slowly before hitting the road full steam for changes.
Common sense like this is beyond the comprehension of academics. and elites.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 4, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Hillary Clinton is one of the most pandering politicans this country has ever seen. She expected to be anointed queen as if it was her destiny. She will promise anything for a few votes, she will lie straight faced to boost her ratings and continue lying about her bosnia trip. Don’t elect politicans that lie and pander for votes this country deserves and should demand honesty from thier leaders. We have enough twisting of the truth already from the bush terms.

Posted by: Tim | May 4, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

We have 300 million people in this country and for the last 20 years we seem to be stuck with a Bush or a Clinton. Wake up america time for a change!!!

Posted by: jg5012 | May 4, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

If you ran a business that the government regulated prices on for three months, in the forth month (and months after) what would you do? You’d do your best to bring your books back into the same shade of black that it was in before. By slowly gouging the working class until profit streams were equal to, or larger! For those of you who think that Big Oil Inc. will stand idle while being forced to pay for infrastructure, GET REAL!
Wake Up! Big Oil Inc. won’t buckle for you, HRC, or McC. The plan will stall, and the promise will be just that, a promise.
It’s time for us to admit that our bloated, wasteful disregard for oil has finally reached critical mass.
This reminds me of a morbidly obese person in failing health complaining that fast food is killing him, instead of trying to change his diet. Then applauding as a so-called advocate makes it easier for him to get. Instead of telling him he’s obese, and going to die, pandering.
Big Oil Inc. has speculated itself rich, and we are begging for a summer coupon instead of trying to find a better option. Wow.
Yet, when most are approached with the truth – alternative fuels, limited dependence on OPEC, and better fuel economy – they become distracted with BS.
Don’t do it in IND and NC.
BTW, if you agree with it, then surely you will share a portion of the incredible $30 windfall with the newly unemployed highway workers who’s jobs you, HRC, and McC think Big Oil Inc. will subsidize.
Get REAL. Elect someone to tell you your diet STINKS.

Posted by: Mark | May 4, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Gallop Poll: Clinton has been running better versus John McCain than Obama in the Gallup tracking general election trial heats for the last four days, though McCain has the edge over each Democrat. Registered voters currently prefer McCain to Clinton by 46%-45% and McCain to Obama by 47%-42%.

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Well said Mark!!!

Posted by: jg5012 | May 4, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

RASMUSSEN POLL: The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows Hillary Clinton with a two-point advantage over John McCain, 46% to 44%. At the same time, McCain has a three-point lead over Barack Obama, 47% to 44%

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Are you kidding me?
Hillary spends the windfall profits tax twice. When economists criticize her, she uses George W. Bush politics.

Posted by: Juanita | May 4, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

The price of a barrel of oil is driven by global demand, not the whims of U.S. policymakers. While it’s true that the U.S. has enjoyed lower than market price historically, with increasing demand and dwindling supply those days are fast coming to an end.
Nothing a U.S. politician says or does can change this trend. Not Hillary, not Obama, and not McCain. At least Obama seems to understand and accept this fact.
As for Hillary’s dismissal of ‘elite’ economists, (the Clinton’s were once very receptive to elitists like Robert Reich) who does she plan to look to during the course of her administration? The truck drivers of Pennsylvania? This is blatant hogwash and she knows it.
Clinton’s ‘gas tax relief’ is a sham precisely because it encourages a state of perpetual delusion. It justifies the belief that Americans are somehow more entitled than the rest of the world to cheap fuel.
The surest sign that Clinton is pandering to, and patronizing, her beloved blue collar constituency is her willingness to garner their support in the short term with a even shorter term summer’s dream. That’s business as usual in Washington. We need someone who will help us face the facts, not delude us for personal gain.

Posted by: Gerald | May 4, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

This gas tax summer break is indicative of what Clinton is all about, a gimmick for a few more votes and meanwhile bridges need repair etc. The real solution which should have by the way being embarked on years ago by the clinton and bush presidencies is a long term one, invest in R&D, mandate higher milage standards, set policies to help renewable energies adpotion like Germany has with solar and wind power. This energy problem requires tough choices and honest leadership that will tell us what is needed and not what is politically attactive for a few votes

Posted by: Tim | May 4, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Oh Yeah, that’s logical.
It can’t hurt me because Big Oil Inc. is paying from their profits!
Man, if I’m (or anyone else) labeled elite-ist for calling that comment well…whatever you want, then we should all get hummers, or learn to drive tractor trailers (to take the kids to school) and just burn gas fires in our backyards for GP.
To heck with all that alternative fuel talk. Let’s let things go until it gets to be like Mad Max and the Thunder-dome. I liked Tina Turner in that get-up anyhow.
Big Oil Inc. hasn’t answered to anyone for 30 years or more. Taking 1 billion from 40 billion in profits is going to do ONE thing…
RENEW THEIR DETERMINATION TO JACK YOUR LOOSE CHANGE AS SOON AS YOU ARE DISTRACTED…once again. Judging by a few of the posts (and thankfully only a few) here, it’s not that hard to do.
Lucky there isn’t some flickering banner on this site telling you that you won an i-pod.

Posted by: Mark | May 4, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

We all know that hillary will do and say anything to get elected. She is as she has always been.

Posted by: juneau | May 4, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Not being able to bowl is one thing, not being able to pump gas and get a cup of coffee is quite another – who called who an elitist?
hehe

Posted by: With Open Eyes | May 4, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

When did Hillary become the UNDERDOG

Posted by: Knowledge | May 4, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

It would make since for the hillary supporters who are mostly uneducated, sorry let me make sure that I’m politically correct “Working Class White People” and either old, would support her and this gas tax holiday. It would take someone that has brains to know it will not work, and just give her a few more votes.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste, get out and get educated fools.

Posted by: chaz | May 4, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

With gas prices as they are and expected to get up to ten dollars a gallon, nobody will be using the roads. There may not be a need to repair them. Oh, in time only the elite will use the roads, got to fix them.

Posted by: norma | May 4, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

OK, so Hillary has proposed two solutions, summer tax break on gas and $10,000.00 car credit. What about Obama, what are his solutions?

Posted by: Mike | May 4, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

All that long bla-bla-bla list of Obama’s “lies” which has been today signed up by ARTHUR BURRIS I have red day before signed by different name. Word by word.

Posted by: vlad | May 4, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Hey, I’d rather have truth in government than a new car, anytime. How is Mr. Obama going to ensure truth in gov., we need that. Honesty, we do need that, after all those years of dishonesty, Obama is my president. Again, how is he going to enforce honesty. Last I heard his pastor accused him of not being honest to the American people. What the heck Obama can practice enforcing honesty with his own pastor and maybe by looking in the mirrow. Never mind, I’ll take the tax credit for my new fuel saver vehical after all. Obama still needs to learn the how to.

Posted by: mike | May 4, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Wow, she sure is desperate! Beyond that, she must either be unethical or just plain stupid.
So, here’s a little economics:
If you tax something (like oil), you get less of it. If you get less of something (like oil), prices go up, not down.
So, the effect is higher prices.
Moreover, irrespective of the political incidence of the tax (assigned to either consumers or producers) applied by ignorant politicians seeking election, what really matters is the economic incidence of the tax, which any economist will tell you is based on the price elasticities.
It is quite likely that consumers will bear a larger percentage of the tax than producers because they are more price inelastic.
–And in case you were wondering, big oil firms are price takers, not price makers in the world market. Simply look at how the price of a barrel of crude changes based on what is called a “random walk”.
Oh, and one more thing for those on here that are so emotionally inclined. Take a look at the profit margins of the oil firms and see just how relatively low they are!
–Get real

Posted by: IntellectualBadA$$ | May 5, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

When people say that the gas tax would not work, I say they are wrong. ANYTHING would help right now. It may be a short term solution but it is something trying help. What solutions do Obama have? All he does is knock down other ideas. I have read on this board that people are angry that Clinton doesn’t listen to economists who keep criticizing her plan. Who are these so called economists and where were/are their plans to help the typical working American citizen? All these economists and politicians like Bush, Obama, and yes Clinton all make over $250,000 a year and they can all afford gas no mater what the price is. If the US wants to curb it’s use of gas/oil, Bush and other politicians need to stop all their use of their helicopters and private jets. Use them when necessary. Bush flies all over the world for stupid reasons. What a waste of fuel that is!!
Until Obama starts giving some good ideas for our future, he needs to be quiet. How about an original idea? No, that’s too hard for Obama. We need action now, not more talk and name calling. Obama campaign isn’t negative? He’s the one doing the name calling. Wake up America!!!

Posted by: Chris | May 5, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

If Hillary and McCain were able to pull off a tax holiday, we would never see the benefits at the pump. The oil companies would take advantage of the situation by raising their prices to compensate. Then after the tax holiday, the taxes would go back up and the price raises put in place by the oil companies would stay in place. We would be even worst off. We have seen this happen in the past. No. We need a complete change. Throw out the Clintons, McCains and Bushes, and all the old dishonest politicians, and start over with a change we can depend on. We need Barack Obama.

Posted by: John | May 5, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am

Let’s have a federal income tax relief this summer. Middle and lower class people from $25,000 to $75,000 pay no federal income tax this summer. How about that? If gas prices keep going up, no state income tax for the middle class this summer. How about THAT?

Posted by: Bob | May 5, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am

Hill is a fool. Why can’t she just admit that she panders but listens she she getsit wrong and then makes corrections. Rather than making an idiot of herself. Obama maybe slow on judgement but it is important to get it right rather than ducking the country further into an economic doom.

Posted by: Gor | May 5, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am

Hillary is trying to buy votes by using the American people’s money. “The Hillary gas tax holiday”, opposed by ONLY those that know how it would hurt the American tax payer, the actual American who pays taxes. Hillary has awed the government dependent people by dangling this monetary vote-getter to the lower class and poor who have latched onto it with greedy talons, not caring nor understanding that Hillary will move taxpayer money from other debts to “PAY” for her “holiday”. — WHAT A JOKE — But you Hillary lovers are selfish and blind to embrace more government to the downgrading of the freedoms that are left in America. — Yes, self-centered, as in “How much will ya gimme? — Gimme, gimme, gimme! — Go you Socialist Commy Pinkos!

Posted by: sumterala | May 5, 2008, 5:39 am 5:39 am

To those of you who say “18 cents is something, its better than nothing” – I invite you to think logically:
1. Gas prices have gone up by 14 cents in the last two days – project that forward to see how much it will have gone up by the end of summer.
2. Even if by some miracle, this gas-tax-holiday could be passed in time for summer (which it won’t) – THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY FOR THE “WINDFALL PROFITS TAX” ON OIL COMPANIES TO BE PASSED BY SUMMER.
3. With no Windfall-Profits-Tax on oil companies – the money that was to go into upkeeping roads and bridges will be gone – that is about 9 Billion Dollars
4. THOUSANDS of construction jobs will be gone – meaning thousands of people out of work and taxing the system.
5. MOST IMPORTANT: $30 over the course of the summer will be spent on the rising cost of fuel – not saving you one dime.
Think about it please!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: CB | May 5, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

It’s like not going to a doctor because doctors are too elitist. The doctor has spent years studying and training and gaining experience. Who are these elitist doctors who think they know more about disease than Hillary?

Posted by: X marks the spot | May 5, 2008, 5:47 am 5:47 am

Hillary Clinton’s husband never followed the economists either. Bill Clinton never paid down the National Debt. Bill Clinton never had a budget surplus.
Look on yahoo.com and search on Yahoo’s search engine for, (Public Debt to the Penny). This is the United States Treasury Departments website.
Look at the left hand page of the website for ,(Historical Debt Outstanding)…….click on it.
It lists the United States National Debt in 50 year increments from the inception of the United States.
The last time the United States National Debt was paid down was in 1957!!!!!!
50 years ago!!!!!!!
Hillary and Bill Clinton don’t pay their campaign bills as well as the United State’s Bills.
Bill Clinton lied about paying down the United States debt. He told everyone he had this big surplus. George Bush co-opted Bill Clinton’s lie and gave everyone a tax cut.
We now owe 4 Trillion dollars more on the national debt because of Bill Clinton’e charade.
Hillary Clinton is a huckster also. She will get you the free gas, by not paying the bills for road projects.
When you are driving on dirt roads in your spiffy hybrid…..you can thank the queen of lying and her husband Bill for it.
Mrs. Potato head put on new plastic parts for everyone….everyday. Just so you will vote for the liar in the election. Vote her in……it will be interesting watching the United States economy collapse under her watch.

Posted by: Steven Wilson | May 5, 2008, 6:25 am 6:25 am

Hillary Clinton’s husband killed the development of ANWR in 1995. It would of been pumping oil right now if Bill Clinton had left it alone.
Now that we need fuel….she runs on some bogus tax cut scheme with McCain. If the Clinton’s hadn’t blocked every energy source being developed….we would have lower fuel prices.
But we are supposed to vote her in, for the very problem the Clinton’s helped create?
That’s a wonderful concept….let your inept husband run the United States and mess everything up. Then run a campaign telling everyone you are going to fix his mess.
Thanks…but no thanks!!

Posted by: Steven Wilson | May 5, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

bush, clinton, bush, clinton… anybody else see something wrong with that. This woman is now railing against educated economists. Go cry about it hillary

Posted by: brian | May 5, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am

“To pay for the gas tax holiday, Hillary is calling for a windfall tax on the oil companies’ 2008 profits. It’s an immediate proposal. Hillary has never proposed a tax on 2008 profits previously.
Hillary would continue the windfall tax on 2009 profits and beyond, and that revenue would go to her strategic energy fund and for renewable energy.”
Clinton has proposed using a windfall profits tax on oil companies to pay for the gas tax holiday. However, she also previously pledged to use windfall profits to create a strategic energy fund for renewable and alternative energies. ”
“But when “This Week” host George Stephanopoulos asked if she had already spent the windfall profits tax, she said, “No … the tax subsidies will go right into that [strategic energy fund]. I’m talking about something temporary this summer. My longer-term plan is, yes, to put an excess profits tax on the oil companies above a certain level of profit that would go in to help us make the transition.”
(THE TOP QUOTE WAS FROM “CHECK HUB”; THE BOTTOM WAS FROM JAKE)

Posted by: questioner | May 5, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

If putting the windfall profits into the strategic energy fund, why wait until 2009? Put the profits into the strategic energy fund, adding a bunch of green collar jobs, decreasing our need for oil, dropping long term oil/gas prices, and do it now. Oh . . . that would take too long too help Hillary get elected and some elitist economist might actually agree that it is a good idea.

Posted by: X marks the spot | May 5, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

Build nuclear ower plants for fuel. Mandate all cars to become electric with exchangeable batteries at the convenience store.
How hard is this really???? You can talk about a problem forever. The environmentalists wouldn’t have a job if someone really changed the system. They are just as involved to keep the gasoline engine and polution…..as the car companies and oil companies.
Without the combustion engine….environmentalists are going to go the way of the dinosaur.
They block any idea that makes sense….why is that???? Maybe you become part of the problem…..when you won’t allow change to fix the problem?

Posted by: Steven Wilson | May 5, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

STEVE WILSON:
RIGHT!
What has Bill done for us lately???
How can you compare his lack of accomplishments with Barack?
The following quote is from “wikipedia”
][5] Clinton presided over the longest period of peace-time economic expansion in American history, which included a balanced budget and a reported federal surplus.[6][7] Based on Congressional accounting rules, at the end of his presidency Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion. On the heels of a failed attempt at health care reform with a Democratic Congress, for the first time in forty years, Republicans won control of the House of Representatives.[8] In his second term he was impeached by the U.S. House for perjury and obstruction of justice,[9] but was subsequently acquitted by the United States Senate and completed his term.[10]
Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end of office rating of any President since World War II.[citation needed] Since leaving office, Clinton has been involved in public speaking and humanitarian work. To promote and address international causes, such as treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS and global warming, he created the William J. Clinton Foundation. In 2004, he released his autobiography, My Life.
And another thing….
Until this fiasco with Obama, Bill Clinton was always considered a friend to African-Americans. So much for friendship, when a Bozo like B O can come along and knock the socks off a person’s personna with ONE card….
That’s kind of sad.
But that’s politics
In any case,I’ll be casting MY vote for
H I L L A R Y!

Posted by: questioner | May 5, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am

The fact of the matter is, the media is setting us all up for the BIG LIE. Do we need further evidence that the vote is fixed? The true Clinton supporters add up to about 30% add the racists and you come to 40% of the Dem party. However, once the saw that HRC was LOSING, something had to be done and quick. The rethugs got all teh talking heads on board. Rush, Hannity, Kristol, Gingrech, Rove, Coulter, all pumping up Hillary, telling their followers to go out and vote for her so we can run against her in the general. They want no part of Obama as it may end the corporate monopoly on information distribution(Is that enough info?) But even that didn’t work so in come our friends from Diebold. All of a sudden everything is close again. The media shrieks about Wright and Aires, the people call bs but it doesn’t stop the right wing press. They continue to wail how this is a race while HRC has no way of catching Obama, absolutely none. If she were to win every remaining race by a 65-35 margin, she would still need 70% of the supers to win. If you truly care about this country, that should be enough info for all the “low info’ voters out there

Posted by: thea2b | May 5, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am

tomorrow will tell the tale.
My vote is Hillary.. without fail

Posted by: questioner | May 5, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

There are short-term fixes and there are long-term fixes. The mortgage crisis is now affecting many. The high gas prices are affecting many. Are we supposed to wait until people lose their homes, truckers lose their livelihood, the housing market drags the rest of the economy down, and the price of gas drives working families into more chaos and loss? People are hurting now and they need some relief now. Working people in the middle and lower incomes understand that better than anyone–even more fully than do any of the economists. Hillary understands it very well. She also has effective long-term plans to fix the problems with energy and the housing markets. She studies the issues, and has the experience to know what is important. She is tough and she will fight for you. Go, Hillary!

Posted by: georgia | May 5, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

If Hillary’s long term solutions are going to be effective, start today. Why is she going to waste a year on a short term solution that won’t help the people that need it the most? The people that save the most are going to be those that drive big SUV’s and take driving holidays. Someone that can’t afford to leave town isn’t going to benefit much from the price of gas for leaving town. The $70 Clinton claims is going to disproportionately go to richer families. The poor would be lucky to see a quarter of that.
The rate freeze on ARM mortgages penalizes those of us who bought what we could afford, scrimped and saved and read the mortgage papers we were signing. Freezing the rates will make writing mortgages riskier for banks. Banks will make up for that risk by raising the rates AND making it harder for poor people to get a loan. Her plan might help a few people irresponsible people, but will drop housing prices more and make the cost of new loans higher.

Posted by: X marks the spot | May 5, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

The ‘elite’ experts bailed out wall street but leave main street to fend for themselves. The ‘elite’ experts do nothing while hardworking American are foreclosed on. The ‘elite’ experts ignore the abysmal costs of fuel and food (Obama blames the farmers who are growing for ethanol). Senator Clinton is the only one who cares what happens to average people. Obama is too busy defending his pastor, his relationships with domestic terrorists and trying to convince us that he is one of us. Very few of us have brie and chardonnay with people who blow up police headquarters or the pentagon. We don’t attend Salons in Hyde Park…we are too busy working multiple jobs…trying to make ends meet.

Posted by: Kathy Corey | May 5, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Very telling of Hillary-You know when she was working on Health Care she had lock down meetings and was not too willing to be challenged on her project. It is real important as a leader to respect and listen to others about the pro and cons of ones decisions. Hillary will never have the answers to everything nor will she be a team player. This is why I wouldn’t vote for her, her ego is greater than being humble and inclusive-
GO OBAMA

Posted by: Sophia Beck | May 5, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Hillary is RIGHT ON again. The vast majority of Americans are sick and tired of major oil companies making record profits on the backs of average hard working Americans. Her proposal to eliminate the tax during the summer is a step in the right direction. The Obama supporters are “Out of Touch” with the comman folks, and if they didn’t get the message in Ohio and Pennsylvania, then they will pay the price in the General Election. That is assuming he get’s the nomination. He is a Turkey and so are his supporters.

Posted by: Jimbo | May 5, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Hillary will listen to the common man but she won’t listen to anyone who actually knows what they are talking about. She won’t listen to economist. She wouldn’t listen to military experts (by not even reading political/military analysis about Iraq before going to war).

Posted by: X marks the spot | May 5, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

You know, I know you all want to accuse Hillary of pandering for votes….ummm HELLO of course she’s pandering for votes. SO IS OBAMA! Even if the tax holiday is a bad idea at least she does have some sort of short term solution. I don’t think Obama screaming PANDERING! AND BAD IDEA! helps anything at all….I think he’s just as full of crap as she is. Those of you talking about Hillary lying….look at Obama and the stuff he tried to pull past all of us. C’mon now….this is an election and both of them are doing everything and saying anything to get votes. BOTH OF THEM. Not just Hillary. So please, stop trying to twist it and villainize Hillary. I’m sick of reading that crap. They’re both one in the same with their plans….one just has more experience and substance than the other….and thats the person I plan to vote for.

Posted by: Ellie | May 5, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

… at how many people here are defending Hillary’s idiotic gas tax plan. Frankly, it’s AMAZING how dumb and naive you people are!
How about this for starters? Assuming Indiana is a state with average population, for the price of accepting her promise for $0.28 a day, you will cost 4,000 people in Indiana their job.
That’s even if it worked, which it won’t (the highway fund will be depleted, and prices won’t go down – they may actually go up).
Those of you with the “at least she’s doing something” point of view make me fear for our republic.

Posted by: I'm shocked | May 5, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Oil companies are going to increase prices no matter what Hillary does! So why not have a gas tax break. How many of us drive more than 15 mile to get to work? How much do you pay a week in Gas?
The Economists’? How have they helped us? What plan do they have? Do they have a better one?

Posted by: rose | May 5, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Economists come from all sorts of family backgrounds and specialize in economics for a variety of groups, not just big business. If none of them are stepping forward to endorse the idea of dropping the gas tax for the summer, there must be a good reason. The democrats and republicans in Congress don’t support this idea. Why? Because if they pass it, they know things will get worse and they will have trouble in the fall getting re-elected. So why is Hillary and John supporting it? It sounds good to the voters and yet there will be no consequence because they know it will not pass. Finally, if this was really a good idea and they really were leaders that can get things done, why are they not trying to get Congress to vote for it? Because they are busy telling people what they want to hear and have no real interest in getting this passed.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | May 5, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

It is ironic that some people here are not worried about the present. i am a middle class working man who if someone wanted to give me a 5 cent break on gas i would jump all over it. you talk about elitist. obama doesnt have a clue about the average working man in this country. maybe im just bitter, but this snob will never get my vote. Maybe the educated middleclass for obama have alot more money than i do. educated, what a joke.

Posted by: jimt | May 5, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Didn’t she misspeak? Or does she think we “misheard?” Or is it a combination of misspeaking and mishearing? Or is she going to say that that’s what she said but she didn’t mean it to sound that way?

Posted by: John | May 5, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

I like how ABC News fails to look at Illinois. The Gas tax holiday failed miserably here. They should be reporting on that.

Posted by: Chris | May 5, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

questioner:
If Hillary loses Indiana her ship
will sink and she’ll have to bail!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 5, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Bush tried to push religion over science. Hillary is trying to push politics over economic success. What I haven’t seen covered is if the oil company’s have to pay a windfall tax, all of us who have mutual funds and 401ks will lose more than $20.

Posted by: X marks the spot | May 6, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

Good to see the Clinton supporters out in force supporting this nonsensical idea. I’m sure with the Clintons’ multi-million dollar fortune they’re really concerned about gas prices.

Posted by: AMB | May 6, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

to the person who says obama talks to americans like they are dumb maybe he does or doesn’t, dont think that is necessarily true.
but, well, they kind of are dumb.
they voted in george w bush A SECOND TIME!

Posted by: SiR ReaL | May 6, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I don’t think many people understand the issue. It’s irrelevant who is pandering to whom for whatever political reason–they’re politicians not saints. The issue is that a gas tax=no change in price at pump (ok, maybe 2-3 cents less per gallon, but that’s like $.36 MAX savings on a full tank and if $.36 is a big deal, maybe you should just beg on the streets?) Do some learnin’ about “tax incidence”. Oil companies will block any “corporate profit tax” from being passed in Congress since they have fancy accountants, lawyers and lobbyists. Then we’ll have a budget shortfall and guess what? Higher future taxes and/or cuts in programs. So it’s a bad idea PERIOD.

Posted by: v | May 7, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

I don’t know, how uneducated Hillary supporters (as she say about her supporters) can understand the real meaning of the issues. But she will sink for sure.
Don’t forget we will stay in Iraq for 100 years. If you choose Mcain.

Posted by: Hiloma | May 17, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.