Obama Won’t Wait for Clinton Concession
ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Karen Travers Report: The Obama campaign is not worried about the tempest that erupted at a Washington, D.C., hotel on Saturday when top Clinton adviser Harold Ickes threatened to take the fight over Michigan’s delegates all the way to the convention.
"He said ‘reserve the right,’ not that he was going to do it," said Obama adviser Anita Dunn. "They have to get through the next three days. I’ve been there before."
Now that the Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws Committee has decided what to do with the Florida and Michigan delegations, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., is 68 delegates away from clinching the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, according to the ABC News delegate estimate.
Obama’s campaign expects to win around 38 delegates in the final three contests of Puerto Rico, South Dakota, and Montana. If he hits that mark, it would leave him 30 superdelegates away from his party’s nod.
The Obama campaign is pushing superdelegates to come on board by Tuesday so that Obama can claim his party’s presidential nomination when he speaks that evening at the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul, Minn.
The site was chosen because it is the same place where Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., will formally receive the GOP’s presidential nomination in early September.
Asked if Obama would wait to get a concession call from Clinton before claiming the nomination, Dunn said the onus was on Clinton now that the Democratic Party has firmed up the number of delegates needed to claim the party’s nod.
"He’s not going to wait by the phone like a high-school girl waiting for a date," said Dunn. "That’s not Barack Obama."
"After Tuesday," Dunn added, referring to the final contests of South Dakota and Montana, Clinton "can decide how united she wants this party to be."
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
“Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned / Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned.”
Posted by: William Congreve | May 31, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Obama will not have the magic number of delegates needed to clinch the nom after the remaining contests.
Nevertheless, he’s satisfied that the voices of the Florida and Michigan electorate will only be half heard at the convention. He’s happy as a clam.
Now, if only he could get that pesky candidate, who is far more electable than he is against John McCain, to get out of the way.
TAKE IT TO THE FLOOR OF THE CONVENTION, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: Emily | May 31, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
I thought Hillary’s supporters protesting outside the meeting would be in the thousands. Can someone confirm how many were?
Posted by: carl29 | May 31, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
emily you have no idea what happened today do you?
and you are obviously not for party unity
because both democratic parties of florida and michigan won today, and got what they wanted
soooo what you want is chaos
clinton won 29 delegates today by the by
Posted by: bhrandon | May 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Answer to Carl29 – there were “dozens” hard to say. However, Hillary’s plans to disrupt have been fulfilled and if she wants to bring a tornado to the Convention, she will prove she has the power becuase there are enough pawns in her game willing to do whatever she suggests. They are clueless as to what the issues truly are. Hillary got what she was looking for– 1/2 votes. Exactlywhat she was campaigning against so now she is set to go to the credentials committee and on to Denver with protestors in hand and chaos, where she will be in her element.
Posted by: shannon | May 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
For all the furious women in the democratic party who claim they are going to vote for McCain in November, I want you to ask yourselves…
Do I vote for
a) A man who often and always praises his wife as his rock, and has two young daughters he dotes over
or
b) A man who calls his wife an F’ING C-WORD.
Yes, b would be mccain. Look it up.
Stop complaining and join the party. We’re going to the white house!
Obama 08
Posted by: McC-word | May 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
This is a backdoor deal between Dean Obama and Nancy.. It is no more a Democratic Party… It is a party of dishonest racist sexist group.. who will win by any means.. whether it is Chicago Politica.. or introduce racial flow through church by donating Tax Payer money or …. Hillary.. go and run as Independent.. we love you
Posted by: HRC2008 | May 31, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
On behalf of the MI/FL ruling may be many Democrats will vote 1/2 the ticket in November selecting only the candidates for Senator, Rep., Mayor etc.
Posted by: Angel | May 31, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
White democrats WILL NOT vote for
Hussein-at least the majority.
You can take it to the bank.
Hussein will join the losers CLUB
after november 4th.
MEMBERS:
========
McGovern
Carter[2nd term]
Mondale
Dukakis
Gore
Kerry.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 31, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
I expect to see a lot of caterwauling on this blog from one or another partisan troll.
Seems to me the DNC got it exactly right, “not too hot & not too cold”
I think exchange between Donna Brazile and Gov. Blanchard (MI) captured the essence of the debate.
“My momma always taught me to play by the rules,” Brazile said, adding that “when you decide to change the rules, especially middle of the game … that is referred to as cheating.”
To which Gov. Blanchard responded:
“Hillary Clinton did play by the rules, I just want to pick the paper up in Michigan … and feel that the voters were treated fairly.”
Well, as my Momma used to say: “When once side is right, but the other side is also right…split the difference, COMPROMISE.
1/2 votes will not change the outcome. Obama will get the nomination, satisfying his supporters, but Clinton can have the support she received in Michigan and Florida officially placed “on the record”.
A symbolic gesture, to be sure, but the DNC WAS fully within its rights when it completely disqualified the Florida and Michigan primaries for violating the timing rules.
Moreover, no one disputes that the preferences as expressed in the flawed Michigan and Florida primaries only roughly reflect voter preferences in those states. Many potential voters did stay home, taking the DNC at its word, when it said the primaries would not count.
The gesture can give Clinton supporters satisfaction. They can use the 1/2 votes as markers to underline “what might have been”, if the process hadn’t produced this irreparably flawed outcome.
It should satisfy Obama’s supporters. He will get the nomination.
Posted by: Goldilocks | May 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
With all due respect, I think that Clinton supporters just did such a disfavor to their candidate today. They even booed people in the panel who are Hillary Clinton’s supporters.
The lady who submitted the petition for full representation and vote for the Florida delegation, a Clinton supporter, was booed by Clinton people for speaking in favor of the second resolution as an alternative.
The former DNC chairman from SC, Fowler, who is a Hillary clinton supported got booed for speaking in favor of the Michigan resolution which was put forward by another Clinton supporter from Virginia. You could see how bothered they were at the way Clinton’s supporters in the audience were behaving.
They did not look like reasonable, respectful, and frankly civilized people.
Posted by: carl29 | May 31, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
The new coalition = UNDEMOCRATIC PARTY
3rd World tactics – we might as well live in a communist country. Oh by the way, anybody research Mr. Obama and his communist connections?
The DNC are communists
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
The new coalition = UNDEMOCRATIC PARTY
3rd World tactics – we might as well live in a communist country. Oh by the way, anybody research Mr. Obama and his communist connections?
The DNC are communists
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Given the unfortunate circumstances I think the delegates were seated fairly. They had to be penalized in some way otherwise it would set a bad precedent for futue elections.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
This is biggest Joke.. when Obama’s (most racist politician who spread racism by donating lot of Tax payer money for spreading venom) talk about honesty.. civilization etc etc.. go and check yourself in the mirror.. you may have money.. you could able to make some backdoor deal.. but you are not for US.. only thing I feel bad is for these nasty group.. dems are losing
Posted by: HRC2008 | May 31, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Go Obama!!!!!!!!! YOU WON IT FAIR AND SQUARE – and pleeeaaasee don’t choose that witch as running mate, hell you don’t need her trailer park supporters anyway!!!!! OBAMA08VOBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMOBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08OBAMA08
Posted by: Andrew R - Silver Spring MD | May 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Clinton got all she wanted except in the sickening case that she wanted her share of Michigan Democrats but yet Obama should not get his. What kind of a woman is that. all the votes of both Michigan and Florida have been counted.The only difference was that each delegate count relects half. No voter was penalised. The people’s will prevailed. Same punishment meted out by the Republicans and yet their own case has been resolved. Romney has never cried or whined about his yet Hilary claims she is fighting for the people. Which people? She got about 23 extra delegates for an election that should never have counted. More than the total number of either the South Dakota or Montana pledged delegates. I would never have consented to any. Obama should forget about the Clinton Democrats and target to win the Republican votes. For every Clinton Democrat, there is three Republican-Democrats that could be won.
Posted by: jayjay | May 31, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
It really isn’t fair to put Al Gore on the Losers List. He did win the Popular Vote and would have taken Florida, but for the U.S. Supreme court. Had George W. Bush not in effect been appointed, who knows what would have happened?
He’s gone on to have done a lot of good too, in bringing people around on Global Warming. In addition, a Nobel Prize is no small accomplishment. So, in my book, he is no loser, but George W. Bush is.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Clintonites are blind in their loyalty, how did they really think it was gonna go? It was what the states were asking for AND a compromise between what the two campaigns wanted, sounds fair… unless you are a clintonite, then “fair” is only when you get your way and win.
If Hillary had gotten her way it would have been illegitimate because under her guidence her people pushed to take away the delegates of these two states in the first place. It was to her advantage to have no one campaign, because at the time she had overwhelming name recognition. In Michigan she was the only one running, this isn’t some third world country where the establishment candidate gets to keep everyone off the ballot, pretend the voting doesn’t count and then after you’ve won use the voting to say you won. She is probably shocked, once again, everyone didn’t bow down and give her what she wants. The Clinton’s world must be falling around them because nothing was what they thought it was.
When everything is said and done both states will have a full delegate slate at the convention, but the party and most Democrats didn’t want the contest decided by cheating and breaking of rules. You shouldn’t ever punish the only one who obeyed the rules in the first place. Actually if it wasn’t Michigan, an important state, they wouldn’t have gotten any delegates, the punishment would have been enforced.
Posted by: Mike | May 31, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
We will CHANGE washington Politics and will bring CHICAGO POLITICS.. We got our leader.. we will bring all dishonest.. racism sexism and enjoy Power… We have lobbyist.. we have all EVIL element with us…
Posted by: Obama_Hussein_Pancy_Khatun_Mamud_Dea | May 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Democrats losing every 4 years.
Have you ask yourself.
Why????????????????????????????
Because they nominate left wing
liberals.
This year is no difference.Actually
is worst.Because the nominee is a black
muslim with ties to anti-american
people.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
The Democratic Party Screwed the public today. I hope to see the democratic party dissolve away into nothingness. They are run by the most crooked corrupt dishonest politicians. What else could we expect. Democrat No More.
Posted by: DemocratForever | May 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
hillary clinton was fighting for voters she said, and for the states
the states won their proposals, get to go to the convention, and are happy with the outcome as said by the michigan DNC member…
so everyone is happy, obama gave some, the democratic party in the states got what they wanted, and hillary clinton and her supporters should see this as a very good compromise
if they are interested in party unity then they will be happy with these rulings,
if they are not, then
1. you are a republican trolling
2. not intrested in party unity and just think we hsould ignore all the rules and just hand hillary clinton the person who lost the election becuase she is a clinton
i think everyone got something today, and the two states are resolved
its a good thing right?
Posted by: bhrandon | May 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
The band of 300 Athenians, led by General Leonidas, would have been proud to support Hillary Clinton. She shall not give up the fight!
========================================
TO THE CONVENTION AND THE STREETS OF DENVER!!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
west coast what you are talking about is nepolian….
Posted by: bhrandon | May 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
kisa wrote: “They had to be penalized in some way otherwise it would set a bad precedent for futue elections.”
Like South Carolina breaking the rules and moving up? Like New Hampshire breaking the rules and moving up again?
The only precedent this has set is 10 million to 17 million Hillary supporters tearing up their Democratic Party cards and going independent.
This is one Florida Dem here who is unregistering as Democratic.
Obama will join the list of Dem losers. Fitting, since McGovern, Carter, and Kerry endorsed him.
They know all about being losers.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | May 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Obama will have the needed amount of delegates on Tuesday…guaranteed.
Posted by: Rod | May 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
And to think I used to support her. I still think she is a fighter though but her fights no longer represent the wish of any thinking Democrat.I cannot afford another Bush third term. My needs have increased but my resources have dwindled.
Posted by: jayjay | May 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Unbelievable…
at the beginning of this year Hillary said the FL and MI votes would not going to count for anything…
now the delegates are all seated and Hillary gets a net gain of almost 25 delegates, which is twice her gain from her win in PA…
so they DID count, these votes…
so, is Obama protesting?
he has a lot of reasons to do so…
but HE isn’t, HILLARY is…
unbelievable
Posted by: hank | May 31, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Clinton supporters using GANG tactics will not win. Put your support behind your party or except the fact that YOU will be the cause if we lose in November.
Posted by: shall | May 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
All true dems.. come together and fight for HRC.. now DNC is ruled by The Evils.. Another fight.. we may loose this year but it is a time to build a new Party.. We all are behind HRC.. Mccain’s Policy is NOT acceptable to dems.. BUT still we MUST BE ready a Third Bust term.. It is far better than those EVILS.. we faced 8 years.. we can wait another 4 yrs but NO EVILS in dems party pls
Posted by: HUSSEIN_THE_EVIL | May 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
sure, it is not clintons Party anymore.
people, who protested had no clue, what they were protesting about and what was possible to get from that meeting.
Stupid, like everyone in clintons”army”.
amin
Posted by: Linda,Fl | May 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
It takes Obama too long to move away from things he should turn his back on such as his church. The whole church cheered preacher Wright and the whole church cheered the crazy priest. That doesn’t say much for that congregation and those are the same people Obama and Mitchell loved for 20 years. It took Obama a long, long time to decide to wear the American flag, and I wonder if he has decided to put his hand over his heart when the National Anthem is being played or the pledge of allegience is given.
The Democratic Party along with the so call news people have been pushing Obama for months. They have been trying to get Hillary to give up, all of them talking as though she doesn’t have the right to go all the way to the convention. I hope she goes all the way to the Convention and then some.
I refuse to vote for Obama not because of his race which is half and half, but his demeanor, his whinning about anyone who says anything against him and makes it a racial thing, his weaknesses, his sitting in a church for 20 years listening to a hate monger who preached hate for Country and for anyone not black, etc. There are many reasons not to vote for him other than race but his supporters can only think race.
Posted by: Mickey | May 31, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Yavo wrote: “So, in my book, [Gore] is no loser, but George W. Bush is.”
yes, I agree with your reasoning, Yavo. Gore shouldn’t be on the loser list. Obama will be joining it though.
Somewhere between McGovern or Carter and Dukakis.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | May 31, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Had Obama been satisfied getting the 55 uncommitted delegates in Michigan, I’d have been reluctantly satisfied, even though he took his name off the ballot voluntarily and had robo-calls going into Michigan urging people to “vote uncommitted,” a violation of rule and principle.
However — he ended up with two extra full delegates (half of four delegates, because only half the Michigan votes will count) that he did not earn under any circumstances.
How is this fair, moral, or just?
How can anyone make the case this makes any sense?
How can anyone say this reflects Democracy in action?
I am disgusted by this action and do not see it as promoting “party unity” in any way, shape, or form.
I see this as promoting division, instead.
I see this as undemocratic. I see this as unjust.
And I will never approve of it.
Posted by: LSekhmet | May 31, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
bharandon,
I agree, Democracy won today. For the first time in history Hillary Clinton is officially recognized for having won more Democratic votes in a presidential nominating process, than any other candidate in over 200 years of history. That is phenomenal. Obama* wins an asterik as the second choice of the Democratic majority. Now he can go campaign in peace for the general caucus in November. Where is that general caucus held, by the way?
=======================================
Obama* gets a well-deserved asterik!
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
NO! Not again!
Posted by: Sam778 | May 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
rd south carolina was given a status to go early after a long diliberation by that committee you should have watched today
it would have informed you of what went on without campaign spin attached
and you would have realized that the democratic party of each state got what they wanted, and the campaigns will have to make a compromise.
if the states are happy, then the campaigns should be happy
especially hillary since she netted 20 some delegates today
and her whole argument has been that these contests count..
and they do
every vote counts!!!
so this should be over, democrats are ready to unite
Posted by: bhrandon | May 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Hillary should be thankful she got half delegates. If it were up to most of us, we would hold Hillary to the agreement that the states should not count because they violated the rules. Period.
As for the morons who want to vote McCain to show their displeasure, go ahead. You will get just what you deserve. Your children will be going to Iraq next, you MORONS.
Posted by: Tunde | May 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Go Hillary GO.. all True Dems are behind you.. The Fight begins now.. we can suffer 4 more years of Bush.. But not a POWER HUNGRY EVIL>>>
Posted by: HRC2008 | May 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Linda, Fl,
Right, the Obama* numbers far out-number the numbers behind Hillary Clinton in your fantasy world. Obviously, you don’t need votes by any Clinton supporters in the November general caucus, right?
========================================
Hillary in ’08 or ’12, the lower the year the higher the IQ of the Democratic Party, btw, the rest of the nation is already there with IQ sufficiency.
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Hussein’s ELECTABILITY is zero in
november.
Hey Hussein go to Kenya,Indonesia
to collect 270 electoral votes,
because you cannot get this number
in U.S 50 STATES!!!!!!
Posted by: Nicholas | May 31, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
oh I’m informed, bhrandon. What you meant to say is that the DNC selectively breaks the rules.
no matter, the DNC just guaranteed McCain the victory in November.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | May 31, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Today was the biggest display of what arrogant, out-of-touch, biased, incompetents make up the DNC. The party will NEVER be unified when the will of the voters are reversed. How dare them award Obama ANY Michigan delegates when they don’t know how many of the “Uncommitted” were voting for Obama,Dodd, Edwards, Biden, etc. Just because Mr. Smart Guy decided to take his name off the ballot in Michigan,(stupid decision btw) the “Almighty DNC” is going to make it up for Wonder Boy as THEY see fit, not as how people voted??? There’s Democracy for you! If Obama is so far ahead in the delegate count, why the hell couldn’t he accept those delegates remaining “uncommitted” AS THEY VOTED until the convention?? That would have gone a long way in trying to unite the party. On Tuesday, NEITHER candidate will have the number of PLEDGED delegates to win the nomination and even if the Super Delegates weigh in on Obama, it still has to go to the convention to officially vote on the nomination. By that time, many SDs may have a change of heart when more crap comes out on Obama. I for one will be voting McCain if Hillary’s not the nominee.
Posted by: Leaving the Party | May 31, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
I thought the compromise was more than generous. the rules committee had every right to tell MI and FL that they were sticking to the original agreement, but they bent over backwards to be fair, and Obama accepted that though he had every right to object. He’s as entitltled to appeal the decision, too. I’d think twice if I were Senator Clinton.
For the record, not all of the women in the Democratic Party are supporting Hillary, and not all of Hillary’s supporters are women. Lots of male Dixiecrats think Hillary is the only choice we have. The Hillary supporters will never vote for McCain. There’s no way they’re going to kiss Roe v. Wade goodbye and that’s exactly what voting for McCain would mean.
The keynote at the Dem convention takes place on the 45th anniversary of the I Have a Dream speech by MLK – we’d be idiots if we didn’t make sure that Obama gets to accept the nomination on that day. He’s the best thing to happen to the Party since the early 1960s. I just hope we’re smart enough and civil enough to make the most of the opportunity we have in him.
Posted by: Morgaine Swann | May 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
rd, the other states petitioned for waivers to move their primaries that were granted and that is why they were not penalized. For whatever reason Fl and Mi were denied moving theirs.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Going Iraq and fight for our proud is far better than compromising with militant and their EVIL LEADER…. OLD WASHINGTON POLITICS IS FAR BETTER THAN CHICAGO POLITICS.. we need change but Not backward.. NOT LEADED by some EVILS
Posted by: HRC2008 | May 31, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
If some rich people are ready to accept another four years of Bush, I am not. We must move forward. Clinton does not pay my bills, I work hard to do so.Does Clinton know that I exist? I now really believe it is all about Hilary not the Democratic party and I will be a fool no more with this. A Democrat must be in the White house and Clinton can leave with her ardent support if she wants. There will be no more spewing of hate. All true Democrats must unite.
Posted by: jayjay | May 31, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Heck, who knows, by the time August comes around Obama may have denounced Michelle.
Posted by: Susan | May 31, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
first off the dnc had a higher support of clinton people on it then obama supporters so that cant be an argument
the other thing about the popular vote is that i believe, and i dont know, but i believe she can not claim this anymore
because by her own vote standars of let every vote count, i believe that by giving obama the uncommited vote he gets those vote totals…
which hillary opposed…even though as michigan reps stated there was a very well known movement to have edwards, and obama poeple vote uncommitted as they testified
as well as 30k people who wrote in votes
so, i actually think hillary can not claim popular vote
also, if she wants to count votes, she must recognize the caucus; as well because those votes should count by her own definition
FURTHERMORE
the popular vote is not a measure of anything, and its why a lot of states didnt take popular vote counts
hillary clinton when this started has said many times it was delegates that decide this
so, there you have it, the argument is over…
of course we will have to see what part of popular votes count from each state i could be wrong about the uncommitted vote going to obama, he may have just got the delegates
Posted by: bhrandon | May 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
a few thoughts. These same 30 idiots voted to strip FL and MI in the first place. Including dickless, I mean Ickes.
Clinton did say that Michigan and Florida would not count back in 2007. Another example of her strong leadership.
For all the cries of sexism, racism is still far more prevelant. Lest we forget that the feminist movement got “women” the right to vote, just a bummer that they forgot women of color at the time.
So lets stop whining. Clinton cannot win. I am sorry that bums some of you out. Its time to move forward and take care of business in Nov.
Posted by: jdb | May 31, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
After Tuesday if Obama gets the delegates he needs, I hope Hillary just suspends her campaign and politely, quietly waits for the next show. By the time August rolls around, I think Obama and his wife will have been fully vetted by then.
Posted by: Susan | May 31, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
The “pubbie” lurkers, trolls and interjecters are going to be shaking the trees to stir up trouble among democrats on the blogs. The Hillary numbers of cranky lady votes is small and will continue to shrink, whether they admit to it or not. These voters can not alone elect McCain, because they will be swamped by all the republicans voting Obama in November.
Hillary would have never made it out of November with only half the democrats wanting her and no cross overs from independents and republicans. Rest easy and enjoy.
Posted by: Rita | May 31, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Don’e claim you are Dems if you are a EVIL supporter.. if we have to choose someone with whom we don’t agree but an American and Honest Man and with a Group of EVILS.. I will choose Reps.. whoever it is.. even if it is Bush again
Posted by: HRC2008 | May 31, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
yes, lisa, that reason was favoring Obama as the DNC and MSM has done all along.
That’s ok. I doubt many people who voted for Hillary will be watching any MSM news on this election or sending the DNC any money.
The rest of you can go to a November loss with your favored loser.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | May 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
You people are like Hilly she now is saying all sorts of things and crying we the people did not HAND her this win.What in hell is wrong with this woman I think she has had a melt down.She thinks we should give her this election,we owe her this …What is wrong with this picture Clintons telling the whole Dem party what to do and what not to do?????????If both states are happy from breaking the rules what gives her the right to carry on?????Let the witch go to Denver and get run out by the rest of the people making her the laughting stock of the whole convertion.This woman is SICK in the head,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,to say the least.
Posted by: charlie | May 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Democrats are NOT united.
Today IS THE BEGINNING OF THE END of
the democratic party as we know it.
DNC and party leaders WILL be the next
crying babies in november.
I’m leaving the stupid party for good.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Yeah I love it, not only did the CLinton’s lose but they will be blamed for the Dems losing in November and be blamed for the overturn of Roe v. Wade. HAHAHA We orchestrated the whole thing, we kept her in the race, she won Ind and Tex and a few other states because of us, dragging it out, splitting the party and making her loss even more bitter. You Dems are such losers.
If she goes Ind, she will be even more embarrassed because she will come in third and be an outcast. The CLinton’s are finally dead. Ding dong the witch is dead oops mispelling….. I can’t believe how stupid a lot of Democrats are, you will never win the White House. We will win in 2012 also (please I hope she runs again) because half the party won’t vote for her, she will never win the White House now, she made herself look insane. The great right wing conspiracy has beaten the Clintons.
I would love to see the baby killing law overturned and even the feminists blame Hillary. There name is mud, hated by Republicans and Independants and now over half the Democrats. It is like Christmas morn.
Posted by: George | May 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
To WestCoastMessenger- you mean Spartans- get your facts straight- no wonder Hillary lost.
Also to Nicholas- are you saying it is bad that he is black or that he is bad because you think he is a muslim? Are you saying a Muslim can’t run for President? Are you a Hillary supporter? Are you even a Democrat?
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Correct me if I am wrong but it is at the Convention that superdelegates officially vote. Also correct me if I am wrong, but they can ALWAYS change their minds… One cay say now they support Obama, but they may later on vote for Hillary and vice versa. So what “victory speech” is Obama preparing?!?!? I am confused.
Posted by: Dan Hussein Osama | May 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Rita,
Your arrogant, dismissive attitude is priceless. Those 17M voters are “cranky ladies”. Priceless. Yes, team Obama is so persuasive, we’ll just come along like sheep. BTW, not all of us are ladies. But most all of us do real work for a living. You must be a pro bowler, though, your spin is priceless.
========================================
Obama* gets an asterik today
The majority of officially recognized voters in fact voted for Hillary Clinton!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
“…but Clinton can have the support she received in
Michigan and Florida officially placed ‘on the record’.”
Goldilocks | May 31, 2008 9:25:49 PM
No offense meant, but I see it a little bit differently. We’ll have to wait for the official written report of the RBC, I suppose, if there is one; but, it seems to me that while the voting in the Florida primary was accepted as the basis for awarding delegates (with a penalty of ½ for line jumping), the vote totals in Michigan were not accepted. By the vote in the renegade primary in Michigan, Clinton would have gotten 73, Obama none, with 55 “uncommitted”. That obviously wasn’t the outcome, even as the 128 Michigan delegates were restricted to a half vote each. The 69/59 split was obviously NOT based on an acceptance of the renegade primary vote.
On another note: I did some quick calculations. With Florida and Michigan each getting their delegate votes cut in half, the total number of pledged delegates available to be earned in all the primaries and caucuses is 3,409.5.
Half that would be 1,704¾ ≈ 1,705 to “win” the “public” race for delegates. That’s what it would take to win if there were no superdelegates at all.
Obama now has 1,712, and that’s an absolute majority of all pledged delegates.
It’s not a question of the superdelegates winning it for him. If it weren’t for them he’d have it won already.
The only question is, will Hillary be able to convince them to take it away from him?
“For the first time in history Hillary Clinton is officially
recognized for having won more Democratic votes in a
presidential nominating process, than any other
candidate in over 200 years of history.”
WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008 9:47:57 PM
I rather think not. See the above ↑↑ (among other deficiencies in that notion).
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
If you think politics in Washington is bad, wait until you see politics in Chicago.
Check out this report:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/index.html
Obama is more frightening than I thought. Any decent people will not vote for him. History will tell his “hope, change and unity” are cheap!! I sincerely wish Obama supporters would wake up for the sake of this great nation.
Posted by: Pat | May 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Susan wrote: “By the time August rolls around, I think Obama and his wife will have been fully vetted by then.”
LMAO!!! What an idiot. The Repub 527′s save their best stuff for October.
vetted, my @ss.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | May 31, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Obama quit his racist church today. He refused to denounce it because he said there was nothing to denounce. Guess that means that he agrees with his church that racist Louis Farrakhan, their Man of the Year, is a great man. That could be why he refused in his debate with just Hillary to reject him. My guess is that he merely stepped away from his church until he wins the White House or gets sent back to the Senate. Either way it is nothing more than a political move just like wearing his flag lapel pin now. Meaningless because the way he thinks and feels have not been changed by the action.
Posted by: tiredofit | May 31, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Nice work by Anita Dunn by the way. It is about time to call Hillary’s bluff. Let her continue her losing, divisive, race-baiting, whining campaign. Obama will win in spite of her. It is obvious she disdains Obama. But that won’t stop the Change phenomenon on the way to the White House.
GO OBAMA 08!
Posted by: david | May 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Some people here are calling the Democratic party all sorts of names for granting MI and FL’s delegates half votes each. You may want to know:
The Republican party ALSO DECIDED TO GRANT MI AND FL’s delegates half-votes each.
===============================
Meanwhile, John McCain continues to insist that he will never negotiate with unfriendly countries.
Which only leaves him one option: Bomb, bomb, bomb — bomb, bomb Iran AND Syria AND North Korea AND the Palestinians AND Pakistan AND…
Posted by: GOP gives MI, FL 1/2 votes | May 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Ickes looked like an angry drunk this afternoon as well as sounding profane. A perfect match for the Clintons.
Posted by: Janet | May 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Stupid Democrats, what part of Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton/Bush/CLinton…….
don’t they understand.
LOL It is you women’s fault, if you want to elect a woman don’t try to nominate the female version of Hitler. Heck people couldn’t even stand her cackle. Although now Bill can run off with a cute lil honey and she and her life partner can come out of the closet.
Posted by: jack | May 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
JimBeam,
I stand corrected, indeed, they were Spartans, and came from a Democratic society. Either way, they would have supported a strong woman over a weak man. There are three Presidential candidates that are stronger than Obama*. You forgot to mention that the great majority of recognized voters chose Hillary over Obama!
=======================================
Obama*, the second choice of the majority of Democractic voters!
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Rita,
Are you really that clueless to think???
“The Hillary numbers of cranky lady votes is small and will continue to shrink, whether they admit to it or not. These voters can not alone elect McCain, because they will be swamped by all the republicans voting Obama in November.”
You obviously are drinking TOO much Kool-Aid! Clinton’s “Cranky Ladies” are a tremendous force that Obama will HAVE to deal with, like it or not. We’re not “shrinking” by any means instead growing in “numbers too big to ignore” everyday we see the lack of respect the Messiah and Company gives Hillary. And WICH Republicans are you talking about that will actually vote for Obama in November?? The same ones that switched parties just to insure the weaker Democratic candidate won??? LOL
Posted by: Leaving the Party | May 31, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
To HRC2008- 1st you talk a lot phony bologne. Really of all the words in the dictionary you chose the word EVIL! Don’t know about the rest of you but that word is usually reserved for child molestors and serial killers in my book. 2nd- you are not a democrat.
3rd How is Obama a racist or even sexist exactly?
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Hilly lost again and she has been put in her place.She has been told by two states that they are ok with the ruling of the DNC.I am so happy >>>>>>>Now cry ,tell how you are being treated unfairly,you are a woman and deserve this ,you waited 8 long years,your hubby promised you this,you were a shoo in after the super Tuesday opsssssssss along comes Obama wow you got your aqq kicked.Two choices join or loose it all ….Clinton name is nothing anymore in politics….I never thought it was so hot in the first place ,you are a SNOB and think everyoe is below you….You know lady your sh– stinks just like the rest of us.
Posted by: H | May 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
“LMAO!!! What an idiot. The Repub 527′s save their best stuff for October.”
There is nothing left to vet. The republicans will have their pale behind whipped come November. Obama will get many moderate Republicans, that’s for sure. The question is how much. I don’t see many democrats voting for McCain, despite the threats by Clinton’s supporters.
Landslide for Obama come November.
GO OBAMA 08!
Posted by: david | May 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Janet,
You are mixing up anger with resolve. The fight goes on. Keep declaring a premature victory and let us know how the November disaster works out for you. I’m supporting Hillary all the way. Your arguments are not convincing. I’m sticking with the majority of Democratic voters!
========================================
Hillary Clinton, the first choice of the MAJORITY of Democratic voters!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
If you want to elect the first female President don’t try to nominate a female version of Hitler. Heck we couldn’t even stand her cackle.
The republicans beat the Clintons like step children.
Posted by: Bubba | May 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I don’t think she is going to end the race next Tuesday. She has the right to say in the race until conventional. Who knows something will come out the closet about Obama’s background or Rezno trial.
Posted by: stephanie | May 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I AM NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THIS HILARY BUNCH OF LOSERS. LET THEM HIT THERE HEADS ON ROCKS, STONE OR EVEN A VOTING BOOTH. NO PROBLEM.
NOW HILARY NEEDS TO GO HOME AND DO WHAT WOMEN DO – COOK FOR HER HUSBAND.(DID YOU SEE THOSE BUNCH OF WOMEN WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO AT THE RULING COMMITTEE MEETING)THEY SHOULD HOME COOKING FOR THERE HUSBANDS. THEY ARE BUNCH OF DISGRUNTLED WOMEN WHO HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY, “BITTER” AND CLINGING TO THERE GRUDGES AGAINST MEN AND UNRULY BEAST, DESPISING AUTHORITY.
THAT IS NOT WHO WE WANT TO RULE THIS NATION.
NOTE: YOU CAN BEAT UP YOUR HUSBANDS AND SHOUT AT HIM AT HOME, BUT YOU CANNOT COME TO BE PUBLIC TO “DEMAND” RESPECT. THAT IS NOT THE WAY GOD CREATED MAN AND NATURE.
WE ARE CONFIDENT THAT EVEN IF YOU SIT AT HOME OR VOTE FOR JOHN MC-LAME, THERE ARE TRIPLE NUMBERS TO YOU OF INDEPENDENTS WHO ARE ALREADY COMING TO BARACK.
YOU BETTER START PRACTISING NOW TO GET USED TO A NEW LEADER – BARACK OBAMA.
I AM COMPLETELY ASHAMED OF THOSE WOMEN VOTERS WHO PROBABLY HAVE BROKEN HOMES AND HEARTS.
Posted by: tony | May 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Somebody needs to explain to Harold Ickes that the idea of compromise means you have to give something up to get something in return. His insistence on total capitulation and his threats to continue disrupting the process means that he should be welcome at the convention, the one in Minneapolis.
Posted by: Steve O | May 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
that’s fine, jack, McCain is a different name that will be next on that list if Obama is the nominee.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | May 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
There is still no nominee.
Posted by: brigitte | May 31, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Big Brother doesn’t need a concession speech. He didn’t care about the voters in Florida and Michigan. Power can be negotiated in Washington. A deal can be cut for party unity with the rules committee and we can move on – Wrong. When you lie and cheat to steal votes, then you have to be challeneged on it! It time to go to the rules committee and the streets. If we want real change, we can’t let this dirty dealing politician win!
Posted by: Mitch | May 31, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
I am sick to death of it being all about Hillary. I am the demographic that is supposedly voting for her, but I don’t want a woman who is dependent on her husband’s fame to propel her to the spotlight. I want a woman who can stand on her own and has personal integrity, not constant whining about how sexist it all is.
What do you tell your daughters? That’s what I hear from Hillary supporters. You tell them that the time for a woman will come, but warn them against voting for a deeply flawed candidate just because she has 2 X chromosomes.
Posted by: M in So CAl | May 31, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
The irony of it is, the ones not vetted are the Clintons, if she doesn’t get a powerful office they may find themsleves in jail. They are being investigated by the FBI and have two court cases pending for next year. Don’t know why the press was so easy on them.
Posted by: Pepi | May 31, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
I am not voting for obama ….you watch who wins the election this time when hillarys people back mccain!
Posted by: beth | May 31, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
3rd How is Obama a racist or even sexist exactly?
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008 10:07:02 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NO COMMENT
Posted by: Dan Hussein Osama | May 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Who was charged with perjury, and impeached? Not the media! Should we ever trust the words of someone who perjured at the highest level?
Posted by: Jan | May 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Bubba calls her Hitler. Andrew R calls her a witch. Need I remind you that a greater number of voters have pulled the lever for Clinton than for Obama*?
Bubba and Andrew R, you are each no doubt smart as a hog.
======================================
What kind of zombie insults the recognized leader of the majority in order to make a convincing argument?
======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Jan,
I don’t recall Obama ever being charged with perjury. True, we haven’t seen the outcome of the Rezko trial, though.
=======================================
Obama/Rezko ’08
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
To WestCoastMessenger- yes more people have voted for Hillary- based on the math were some states count (when they are large states) but the states that she agreed not to count should count and now that they do count she still thinks that smaller states really shouldn’t count. so yes she has the popular vote also Puerto Rico can’t vote in the general election so it really doesn’t count
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Just wait and see. Hillary will be running as an Independent, and Hillary supporters will vote for her instead of Obama.
Posted by: jmt | May 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Go Independent Hillary!! You’ll get another max contribution from me and more from all our friends.
Hillary 08
Posted by: ALL THE WAY TO THE WH | May 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Some explanations are needed here:
1)How can somebody who can not convincinly win the primary election be more electable than who won?
2) Is DNC greater than Clintons or Clintons greater than DNC?
3)My grandma always emphasize that I should abide by the rules and show respect to the constituted authority? are things changing.
4) Why do we have a lot of uneducated people supporting one candidate than
the other?
5)Is presidential position a family affair?
Posted by: Sam Houston | May 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Some explanations are needed here:
1)How can somebody who can not convincinly win the primary election be more electable than who won?
2) Is DNC greater than Clintons or Clintons greater than DNC?
3)My grandma always emphasize that I should abide by the rules and show respect to the constituted authority? are things changing.
4) Why do we have a lot of uneducated people supporting one candidate than
the other?
5)Is presidential position a family affair?
Posted by: Sam Houston | May 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Hilary and co are crying over four delegates. Just four delegates. The Party must go down because they did not get four extra delegates. Obama should gladly give them those four delegates so that we can have peace and move forward.
Posted by: vuzous | May 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
WHY CANT BHO CLOSE THE DEAL?
Posted by: andrea | May 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
“There is still no nominee.”
brigitte | May 31, 2008 10:10:25 PM
The Republicans don’t have a nominee either. Technically, John McCain will not be a nominee until somebody puts his name in nomination at their convention. He is the “presumptive nominee” is the title the press has given him. “Presumptive Republican Candidate” would probably be a more accurate description, although, after he gets the votes and accepts the nomination, “THE Republican nominee” is probably also accurate (definite article implying the sole and singular claim to the title).
Works the same for the Democrats.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
So sad!! All the Clinton supporters
would sail America down the river to
McCain then to act like real adults who
care about America and vote for Obama.
If McCain wind the Presidency, then all
I have to say is America and whoever
votes for him will get exactly what they
deserve. Worse then what we have now
I guarantee that. Wake up and stop
acting like little children and start
taking America back to the great country
she was. If the shoe was on the other foot and this was Obama, I would definately vote for Hillary she would be
better than what I was going to get in
the White House and in this country and that would be McCain. Shame on the
Democrats if you fail America and don’t
vote for Obama if he should be the nominee. If not happy living and raising your children in your Republican
America. If you still have your jobs.
Posted by: Susan | May 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
I see, increasingly, nowadays Hillary supporters complaining about how Obama supporters treat them and their candidate. So, I guess their response has been to turn around and do the same? The amount of vitriol and sheer stupidity on this comment thread boggles the mind!
For those with their outlandish claims about Obama I suggest a visit to Snopes.com, Oh wait… you want others to believe that it isn’t that you believe it yourself.
Give it a rest people, she is losing! There has been no cheating, there has been no foul play (against her), she is simply losing because she could not control her campaign properly. She hired people to run it on a loyalty basis not on a merit base and has paid for that.
Anyhow, sure go ahead, vote McCain. Guess you want women to lose some of the rights they’ve gained in regards to controlling their bodies, and you want another 3200 american soliders to die in Iraq (over 800 per year so far and McCain says victory in 4 years. 4 X 800 = 3200, you have anyone serving a tour? It might be them, never mind the residents of Iraq themselves), and you want a president that has admitted on record to having no clue about the economy (then denying he ever made the statement). /*on sarcasm*/ Sounds like a winner to me! /*off sarcasm*/
Really folks, don’t be sore losers, don’t be gloating winners, be responsible Americans.
Tom…
Posted by: Tom | May 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Must be cocktail hour on the West Coast.
Since it will be Obama ’08 through 2016, the 3 dozen or so cranky lady voters will be swamped by those who don’t even know who Hillary Clinton was. Bring that day. ;)
Posted by: Rita | May 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
I am beginning to like Hillary for keeping on fighting. She seems to have finally caught onto the importance of valuing all the state’s voters and not kicking some out. This makes her appear a champion of the disenfranchised in contrast to Obama’s champion of the elites. She so lacked a good strategist that it makes me just shake my head. Kind of like the Bush domestic cabinet full of political hacks that just take marching orders rather than lead. Obama is just sitting back refocusing on the McCain campaign. Since Hillary sidelined Bill she has been doing better. He and her old strategist really damaged her chances.
Posted by: Brian | May 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Anita Dunn can go f*ck herself. I have voted Democratic in the past four elections – but not this one. I am either voting for McCain or not voting in the presidential contest.
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Why would people vote if DNC already made up their mind.
Is that they call it” Democrat party”?
Posted by: catleya | May 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
rd, fyi, yes I voted for Obama in the primary but would definately vote for Hillary if she were the nominee. I don’t agree with republican policies at all. But I would never go ballistic like some people if my canidate didn’t win. The woman at the DNC hearing today were embarrassing. After the ruling one of them shoved someone that was wearing an Obama pin.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
“He didn’t care about the voters in Florida and Michigan.”
Hillary Clinton and Ickes were the ones who voted to punish these states. She and her supporters had control of the rules committee when their delegates were taken away. Oh how the mighty has fallen, she planned on stealing the election by cheating to win two states, and she still couldn’t win. Lest you forget, when the committee voted to punish the states, 21 of the members were on her campaign, endorsed her or had worked for the Clintons.
As for the outcome of today, she had 13 public backers on the committee, but the vote was 19-8, she couldn’t even convince her own people to adopt her solution. Also being reported was Obama had the votes to get a 50/50 split at a 15-12 vote but decided against it for the good of the party.
Posted by: Sam | May 31, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
To Dan Hussein Osama:
Excactly! I would’t expect anything less from a someone with your worldly knowledge and great wisdom. I also have bridge in Alaska I would like to sell you.
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
This same guy Ickes voted in August 07 to totally disenfranchise Michigan and Florida. He had no problem with it then when his candidate was the inevitable front runner. A typical politico.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/16/671358.aspx
Posted by: time4change2008 | May 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
NOTE TO ALL HILARY SUPPORTER: PLEASE VOTE FOR JOHN MCLAME – WE REALLY DON;T NEED YOU TO WIN THE ELECTION – TRUST ME
THERE ARE TRIPLE NUMBERS OF INDEPENDENTS COMPARED TO YOU – WHO WILL VOTE FOR BARACK
YOUR VOTE IS NOT NEEDED AS IT IS A PARTY THING. THE REAL THING ARE THE INDEPENDENT AMERICANS.
SO GO AHEAD–WHIN AND CRY AND VEST YOUR UNJUST ANGER. SIMPLE -YOU LOSEWHICH EVER WAY.
Posted by: tony | May 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
“WHY CANT BHO CLOSE THE DEAL?”
andrea | May 31, 2008 10:17:08 PM
He just did close the deal. Did you not notice my numbers above? He now has an absolute majority of earnable “pledged” delegates, and that’s with three primaries yet to go, and not even counting the Edwards’ delegates he’s picked up.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
4) Why do we have a lot of uneducated people supporting one candidate than
the other?
Posted by: Sam Houston | May 31, 2008 10:16:48 PM
Yep, Barack Hussein Obama is the most educated person.. been to 57 states. The dude doens’t know squat about US geography.
Posted by: Dan Hussein Osama | May 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Anita Dunn can drop dead. I have voted Democratic in the past four elections – but not this one. I am either voting for McCain or not voting in the presidential contest.
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Hillary lost on February 5th because she underestimated Obama, surrounded herself with a bunch of blow-hard consultant, and was outflanked by the Obama team. Now she wants us to ignore the person who played by the rule just because she’s a Clinton. Competence matters. Fire your consultants, Hillary. They screwed you and you are simply not ready until you have the delegates lead. You are not going to make it. If you’re not careful, this is your last term in the senate. Nobody wants to work with someone like you.
Posted by: Tunde | May 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
CAndidates can only claim the nomination outright if they have the magic number in PLEDGED delegates. Super delegates’s votes are not made official or even counted in any meaningful way until the national convention. Up until August they are free to change their minds.
Obama cannot claim the nomination until the super count unless he gets enough pledged delegates, without supers, to do so.
Posted by: Destini | May 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
To Dan Hussein Osama:
Excactly! I would’t expect anything less from a someone with your worldly knowledge and great wisdom. I also have bridge in Alaska I would like to sell you.
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008 10:21:03 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I don’t want anything from you. I like to distance myself from loonies… Did you hear Obama just quit his church? I guess he finally realized there’s been too much craziness going on there…
Posted by: Dan Hussein Osama | May 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
I’m Hillary’s supporter and I will vote for McCain. I admire McCain because he respects senator Clinton not like Obama. He is very honest and patriotic and he doesn’t play the dirty politic like Obama.
Posted by: Laura | May 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Hillary will be cooperating this week if she wants a job and a future in the democratic party. The noise is bluster.
Posted by: Rita | May 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Westcoastmessenger, It is time to let go and support your party. I recognise you as one of the most vocal of Hilary supporters. Call your other friends, Felixdiaz, Irma, Alpaig and co. The Democratic party needs your support. Hilary has gotten all she asked for. She cant continue with her cries over four votes. She won her fight and the people’s will have prevailed. The party must move forward.
Posted by: vuzous | May 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
“Who was charged with perjury, and impeached? Not the media! Should we ever trust the words of someone who perjured at the highest level?” Interesting reminder! Bill Clinton, shut up!
Posted by: Jan | May 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Clinton Supporters are like sore losers on a playground.
Pathetic.
Posted by: PulSamsara | May 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Hi David HUSSEIN Alexander,
I see we both share the same middle name! Hussein! It’s a lovely Muslim name :)
Vote Obama – Vote Muslim! 08
Posted by: Dan Hussein Osama | May 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
lisa,
I totally agree with your analyst. As an Obama supporter it would take serious consideration for me to vote Hillary but just the thought of the Republican policies would make me do so.
When I hear Hillary supporters claiming to not vote Obama in November, I think of immaturity.
As an Obama youth supporter I’m baffled as how these adults are acting.
Ignorance is bliss.
Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Unfortunately, you are very wrong if you think Obama is going to have a smooth ride to the presidency.
There’s alot more anger than the Obama camp wants people to think.
He may still squeek it out, but I wouldn’t bet on it.
I think it’s more likely the Democratic Party will fracture and collapse.
Posted by: Ethan | May 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Some is more than none.
Hillary should be pleased she got any.
Sore loser, racist supporters, no moral standards. That’s our Clintons!
Posted by: Edward G. Rendell | May 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Anita Dunn?? Who the hell’s she and what the hell is she talking about? Hey, Anita – don’t be soooo AFRAID, Hillary is not going to win>
And here’s the PRIZE you will have, McCain will win in November.
Happy now?
Posted by: Jkan | May 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Congratulations to the people of Florida and Michigan who also took time out of their busy lives to pull a level in our democracy. You are now second class citizens of the United States! May God helps our party!
Posted by: gaypastor | May 31, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
SHe is the one who took away the delegates from these states! She could of easily avoided this by NOT punishing the states in the first place…. or was she trying to steal two primaries becasue she was the only one running?
If she was truly concerned about people’s votes she could have allowed their votes to count in the first place. But then she would have had to compete against other candidates.
Posted by: Barb | May 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Obama is NOT African American. That’s his biggest lie. He’s Arab American.
Vote Obama, Vote Muslim!
Posted by: Dan Hussein Osama | May 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Contrya to popualr belief, if Obama SADLY gets the nomination, he will NOT be the first African American to be nominated. He will be the first Arab American to be nominated.
Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother’s side
and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father’s side. While
Barack Hussein Obama’s father was from Kenya, his father’s family
was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama’s father was only 12.5% African
Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father’s birth certificate even states
he’s Arab, not African Negro).
Posted by: Vickie | May 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Clinton supporters using GANG tactics will not win. Put your support behind your party or except the fact that YOU will be the cause if we lose in November.
————————————–
I would rather lose in November to McCain than suffer 4 years of another Bush presidency. Yes, another Bush presidency. You all tend to forget that Bush promised the world too. And he too disenfranchised voters. Now after 8 years of him, look whats happened. 2 wars we cant get out of and thousands of our loved ones dead for no cause, an economy so bad we have to decide between gas, or food for our families, healthcare so high people die because they dont have the money to see a dr. And oh yeah, he had no experience either! But boy was he charismatic and talked the talk so eloquently. I guess thats all you need as an Obama supporter to be President thesed day.Excuse us Hillary supporters for thinking that experience counts for something.
So, before I let my family suffer through another 4 years of that, I will vote McCain because at least I know what I am getting in him, there are no closets to open. And he is honorable, and honest enough, to change and help the american people get a better chance at life, unlike Obama who feels entitled to be President based on his arrogance and holier than thou attitude to us poor uneducated rifle toters. But, we the kind of people he cant stand to be around anyway. We are not “real” people so it shouldnt matter to any of you, and Obama, if we choose McCain because we dont exist anyway. According to all of you, he can win without us anyway. No loss right?
So,Good Luck Obamanites. I will be there on the side lines in November, if he gets the nomination, to watch the fall of the Obama empire. And oh, I will be the one handing out kleenex to all of you saying I told you so.
Posted by: shewill | May 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Is Hillary Clinton really the one that women want to represent them as “The First Female President”?
Posted by: JimBo | May 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Hillary and Bill = No class
Ickes looked like a retard today. Only the Clinton crazies don’t understand that they got some, which is better than none. Which IS WHAT ICKES WOULD HAVE GIVEN THEM WHEN HE VOTED TO STRIP FL AND MI OF THEIR DELEGATES IN 2007.
Another case of the Clintons not knowing what the meaning of “is” is.
Posted by: Edward G. Rendell | May 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
The rule is the first one to reach 2026 delegates wins the democratic nomination. No one will reach this number by the end of the last primaries. There’s no such rule that whoever gets the majority of delegates, wins. That’s where the popular vote comes in along with the other factors to be considered. That’s the job of the superdelegates to make a wise decision to come up with a nominee who can best balance the results from electoral map, popular vote, gallaup polls on various voting groups, gallup polls on running against McCain. Also, they should now look at the resumes of each candidate and the depthness of their knowledge on economic policies, foreign policies and national security. Who can best beat McCain not by a whisker or smaller margin but by a reasonable margin. Scared Pelosi should be fired from DNC since she doesn’t know the real job of a superdelegate. If these superdelegates are marred by subjectivesness and the idea of just basing the nomination on the majority of delegates alone then the democratic party will be in a shaky position by November.
Posted by: neil1785 | May 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
David HUSSEIN Alexander posted:
“And sure, “technically” they could change their mind….but it has NEVER happened. Not once.”
There’s a first time for everything and I sure wouldn’t count it out from happening this year once the SDs wake up and acknowledge how UNELECTABLE Obama is. There’s SO MUCH MORE to come out on your guy and it will be well before August. So sit tight and see a new “First” at the convention this year.
Posted by: Leaving the Party | May 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
“Congratulations to the people of Florida and Michigan who also took time out of their busy lives to pull a level in our democracy. You are now second class citizens of the United States! May God helps our party”
ahhhh isn’t that the exact punishment the Republicans doled out to these two states? Isn’t it the punishment called out in the rules? are you people on drugs, insane or illogical?
Posted by: Pepi | May 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
The rule is the first one to reach 2118 delegates wins the democratic nomination. No one will reach this number by the end of the last primaries. There’s no such rule that whoever gets the majority of delegates, wins. That’s where the popular vote comes in along with the other factors to be considered. That’s the job of the superdelegates to make a wise decision to come up with a nominee who can best balance the results from electoral map, popular vote, gallaup polls on various voting groups, gallup polls on running against McCain. Also, they should now look at the resumes of each candidate and the depthness of their knowledge on economic policies, foreign policies and national security. Who can best beat McCain not by a whisker or smaller margin but by a reasonable margin. Scared Pelosi should be fired from DNC since she doesn’t know the real job of a superdelegate. If these superdelegates are marred by subjectivesness and the idea of just basing the nomination on the majority of delegates alone then the democratic party will be in a shaky position by November.
Posted by: neil1785 | May 31, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
The center republicans & independents
will put Obama over the top in November and so will most of today’s whiners who will be quietly voting Obama while swearing they won’t. Today is just one of those noisy days and the trolls are also out.
Posted by: Rita | May 31, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Vanessa, I have to admit that in the beginning there was no way I would vote for Hillary. But then reality sunk in. My fear is the Supreme Court. If people don’t like Obama then vote him out in 4 years but the Supreme Court is there for life. I don’t want to take that chance so if Hillary is the nominee then she has my vote.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Do Hillary Clinton supporters realize that even if Hillary Clinton had received 100% of the delegates from both states, she still would be losing by more than 160 votes? I’m just asking because they are acting as if Obama has stolen something from her. She lost. Period. There is no path for the nomination for her. The only way she can claim the popular vote is to leave out the 17 caucuses. Does that seem logical? Also, I keep hearing all these women say they will vote for McCain. Do you all know that McCain wants to overturn Roe v. Wade? Hillary Clinton’s overzealous supporters could set women back 40 years-in every way. Then not only will Clinton have lost, all women will lose. So what, Hillary Clinton is not the nominee. Somebody had to lose.
Posted by: Kim | May 31, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
1st No vote is a vote for McCain. A vote for McCain is a vote for Bush. That is the reality. Suck it up and stop being sore losers.
2nd- How is Clinton stronger? Because she one the big states- whoopi do. don’t you read the news. She trounced Obama in Cali but if the primary was held today he would win by landslide. You can’t be the stronger one if you are 20 million in the hole and let a guy you who came out of nowhere take the nomination from you. If she was stronger then she should have had a better plan from the beginng and not had planned to have this wrapped up in Feb like she did. I would have voted for her but she let it slip away. She should have practiced what she preached “Every vote counts”
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Carl 29 asked how many Hillary supporters were outside the meeting today at the Wardman Park Hotel.
Someone responded “dozens.” Well, there are Obama trolls out there!
Even in the thunderstorm, which was just coming in when I got there, about 1:30 pm, there were still hundreds present and almost as many when I left at 3:30. I do know that quite a few left after the delegates had gone in as I saw them marching off towards Connecticut Ave as I drove by.
I don’t usually stand outside while there’s lightning strikes and tornado warnings, but I’d just walked blocks after finally finding a parking place that afternoon—probably due to the oncoming storm.
I had tried to get there in the morning (around 8:30), but there was no parking at all within a mile. I know, I spent 2 hours looking and I know DC fairly well. That is DC though.
Most people there seemed to have come up from Florida. Good for them!
I particularly loathe the insidious infringement on the rights of the American people. I’m upset that we don’t care enough about this encroachment and are willing to give up when our rights are stolen out from under us—witness the “Patriot” Act. Call it something nice and that’s all the farther most people will bother thinking. In fact, I was very disappointed that the Democratic Party didn’t stand up and fight for us when that act was proposed.
Today’s decision can, at best, be called half-assed.
The Democrats do seem determined to lose this election. Maybe they don’t want to have to deal with the current mess. Too bad for us.
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
EVEN IF WE LOOK AWAY FROM ALL THIS CONTEST:
THE KINGDOM BELONGS TO GOD! HE GIVES IT TO WHOSOEVER HE WILLS. NO MATTER HOW MUCH HILARY OR BARACK TRIES, BUT WE SEE A PATERN:
A GENERATION LASTS FOR 4 YEARS. BEEN 10 FROM 1968. THE PROMISE OF GOD TO LIFT THAT OPPRESSION HAS COME.
THE CRIES OF THE SLAVERY IN AMERICA REACHED OUT TO GOD, AND HE GIVES A TIME OF “PURE JUSTICE” TO WHOM EVER HIS HEART DESIRES, NO MATTER HIS NAME.
SO HILLARY IS JUST DAZED ON HOW THIS GOT OUT OF HER HANDS. NO MATTER WHAT SHE DOES, IT SLIPS OUT.
THE FINAL THOUGHTS OF HER HEART IS THAT JUNE – A COLOSAL CALAMITY LIKE ASSASINATION WILL COME. – LIKE PHAROAH, WHOSE HEART WAS HARDENED AGAINST THE WILL OF GOD AND HE PROCLAIMED THAT THE FIRST BORN OF THE JEWISH SHALL BE SLAINNED – HIS FIST BORN WAS THE ONE THAT DIED. !WARNING – IF HILLARY WISHES THIS ON OBAMA, IT WILL BE ON HER, NOT BARACK. IF SHE HONORS THE WILL OF GOD, SHE WILL BE SPARED AND HEAVILY FAVORED.
I AM NEITHER FOR BARACK OR HILLARY – JUST SOMEONE WHO WATCHES WHAT GOD DOES!
Posted by: DAVE | May 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
“He’s not going to wait by the phone like a high-school girl waiting for a date,” said Dunn. “That’s not Barack Obama.” “After Tuesday,” Dunn added, referring to the final contests of South Dakota and Montana, Clinton “can decide how united she wants this party to be.”
Is someone going to inform Team Obama that going out of their way to show contempt for Sen. Clinton is not the best way to “unify” the party and get the votes of her supporters?
Posted by: Anna | May 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
The rule is the first one to reach 2118 delegates wins the democratic nomination. No one will reach this number by the end of the last primaries. There’s no such rule that whoever gets the majority of delegates, wins. That’s where the popular vote comes in along with the other factors to be considered. That’s the job of the superdelegates to make a wise decision to come up with a nominee who can best balance the results from electoral map, popular vote, gallaup polls on various voting groups, gallup polls on running against McCain. Also, they should now look at the resumes of each candidate and the depthness of their knowledge on economic policies, foreign policies and national security. Who can best beat McCain not by a whisker or smaller margin but by a reasonable margin. Scared Pelosi should be fired from DNC since she doesn’t know the real job of a superdelegate. If these superdelegates are marred by subjectivesness and the idea of just basing the nomination on the majority of delegates alone then the democratic party will be in a shaky position by November.
THE SUPERDELEGATES HAVE TO DO THEIR JOB INTENSLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY WHILE THERE’S TIME. THEIR DECISION WILL COST THEIR POSITIONS WHEN THE TIME COMES WHEN PEOPLE WILL IN TURN DECIDE TO VOTE THEM BACK TO THEIR POSITIONS. THE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN SHOULD NOT BE COMPROMISED JUST FOR THE SAKE OF ENDING IT AND GIVING THE NOMINATION TO OBAMA. SINCE NO ONE WILL WIN, IT’S THE BEST TIME TO SCRUTINIZE THIS CANDIDATE BEFORE MAKING THE FINAL DECISION.
Posted by: neil1785 | May 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
I am glad that there was a solution, it solved the dispute, both states got what they wanted, and both campaigns have accepted (except for Ikees regarding Michigan… but that guy is insane). Now is time to unite behind our democratic nominee, Barack Obama.
I am a proud soldier in the US Army and am ready to deploy to Iraq if needed, but -please- help my chances of staying alive through this war and vote Obama.
Obama ’08
Posted by: Davey | May 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Obama had more political experience then Hillary…. more time in elected office and more offices held.
He has almost the exact same experience as Abe Lincoln, but he went to the White House during easy times….
The most gifted politicians, like Hillary, make terrible Presidents, some of our greatest Presidents were thought to have little experience at the time.
A lot of people, think of DC experience as a negative, the experience Hillary quotes is the type most people DON’T want. That is why Senators and COngressmen don’t win, and why Govenors do well. People like D.C. outsiders, and compared to McCain or Hillary he is seen as the outsider.
Be mad at the Clintons, they ran a horrible race. If they wouldn’t have been so arrogant they would have planned for after Super Tuesday or competed in caucus states, but clear back to last November Hillary was calling herslef the Democratic Nominee and didn’t take the campaign seriously enough untill it was too late. The CLintons lost because of the Clinton’s choices.
Posted by: Brown | May 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
To Mary Indy- Republicans did the same thing. Were you complaining then?
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
If the DNC and media are dumb enoughto get Obama nomintaed than..McCAin 08!
McCain 08!
McCain 08!
McCain 08!
War Hero over No Experience anyday!
Posted by: Vickie | May 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
U.S. Marine here, and like my brother in arms I will be voting for Obama. He has proven to be a friend to the military and veterans, he has been one of the biggest supporters in Washington for Veterans rights.
Three tours, and I see the signs, there will be a confrontation with Iran this fall, it could be another “Remember the Maine” episode, I just hope Americans don’t fall for the lies a second time.
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
“Do Hillary Clinton supporters realize that even if
Hillary Clinton had received 100% of the delegates
from both states, she still would be losing by more
than 160 votes?”
Kim | May 31, 2008 10:36:23 PM
Actually, Kim, their best case scenario was that Hillary would pick up + 111 delegates from Michigan and Florida (Obama getting none from Michigan while Hillary got 73). That would put her only around 80 behind. But, that’s still 80 behind.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
How is Hillary more electable against McCain when she cant even win an election amongst her party base?
Posted by: Bobby | May 31, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
MC-word
All you you are now changing your tune to unity. Why should anyone unify with Obama when his supports have been so hateful and vulgar. That kind of following tells me that Obama approves. Yes, many democrats will vote their principles and that vote won’t be for Obama.
Posted by: Aston | May 31, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Closer to 90 behind. (Gotta quit doing math in my head while I’m typing.)
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Andrew R: You must be one of those drug addicted supporters for the former drug addicted boozer Obama. Well let me go on record to say if Hillary is smart she would declare herself as an independent and knock your Obama out of the presidency so McCain can win and call it a day. But if she doesn’t win the nomination her votes will vote for McCain and he will lose anyway. It looks like Obama resigned from his church. What happened, he couldn’t stand the heat so he got out of the kitchen?
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
John
Sure you’re in the service and can talk to the heavens and determine the future. Sure!
Posted by: S | May 31, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Hillary reserves the right to appeal and carry the drama all the way to Denver!
Part of me wants her to continue making a fool of herself; the other part wants her to just go away!
Hillary, the Queen of Spin and a Legend in Her Own Mind!
http://klintons.com
Posted by: Bob | May 31, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Audio is out of Bill Clinton recommending the 50-50 split at a recent fundraiser. Hillary actually got more than Bill hoped for in Michigan, so if he’s happy shouldn’t all the cranky lady voters be?
Posted by: Rita | May 31, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
lisa,
I totally agree with your analyst. As an Obama supporter it would take serious consideration for me to vote Hillary but just the thought of the Republican policies would make me do so.
When I hear Hillary supporters claiming to not vote Obama in November, I think of immaturity.
As an Obama youth supporter I’m baffled as how these adults are acting.
Ignorance is bliss.
————————————–
You are presuming adults are on these blogs saying these things? We could be young like you, but have strong belief in our candidate, just like you. First and foremost we are Americans, not Democrats.Secondly,we are human beings wwho should fight for whats right for America. Thirdly, you cant define a democrat by their preference of candidates.
After today, I am still American first and to strip half the delegates and give delegates to someone not on the ballot, is UnAmerican, Obama or not Obama. Its UnAmerican. The Democratic Party is about “counting every vote” but today we showed they are about ” count one vote”, and that was theirs.
I am proud to be an American, but ashamed to be a Democrat. I won’t vote McCain but I won’t vote Obama because My vote counts for something.And when I vote its for the “right candidate” for me, not the right one for the Democratic Party. He does not fit that bill for me, and never will.Thats life. I can live with that.It just seems that you Obama supporters seem to think you are the only ones who deserve to have their President of choice, and that is not your right to take that away from us by slandering everything we stand for.
So, you are immature. Not those you seem to think are adults. Look in the mirror and ask yourself someday when this is all over..Ask yourself if you made the right choice for you, or did you do it for the party? I can bet what your answer will be.
Posted by: shewill | May 31, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Here’s the problem.
Lets say Hillary gets lucky and wins the nomination.
Conservatives will jump to remind the public of the 90s scandals and current scandals.
Fraud cases, rape allegations, terrorist ties, mysterious death of those whom were to testify against the Clintons etc
She would lose the Independent vote and defected Republicans.
The African American vote would be up for grabs and I believe youth turnout would be low.
Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
I hope the press at some points asks why the “war hero” lost his command and only reached the rank of Captain when his dad and granddad were both 4 star admirals and he was a graduate of the Academy. Or how he ever got to fly when he finished 5 from the bottom of his class. Or about his anger issues that have made even his republican friends say he is unfit for the office.
Now a lot of his issue are because of his POW time, no one would be stable after 5 years in captivity, doesn’t mean we make them President.
Posted by: Mike | May 31, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
“Count all the Votes”
NO
“Play by the Rules”
But…
If we play by the rules, we give Obama an unfair advantage – Hillary won Michigan and Florida.
But…
“How can we COUNT ALL THE VOTES when not everyone voted, and Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in Michigan.”
Nyaah Nyaah Nyaah. Back-and-forth nonsense.
Neither side could claim the high ground in this dispute. Both sides had a point. The DNC up with a fair compromise.
-Seat ALL the delegates
-Count ALL the votes that were cast.
-Give the delegates 1/2 VOTES at the party convention.
Any other approach
1. completely disqualifying MI and FL, 2. seating the delegates with full votes according to the proportions from flawed elections.
Would have torn the party apart.
This was a good compromise.
Posted by: Goldilocks | May 31, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
John: What trash have you been reading. Obama has only been to Iraq one time and that was about two years ago. His support for the veterans? Obama likes to make big show and its people like you that eat his lies up. He’s a no nothing, do nothing and a racist that is anti-american underneath. Are you really that dumb? I know that 52% of the college students that are on drugs are that dumb because they can’t see the light for being in the dark.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“I hope the press at some points asks why the ‘war
hero’ lost his command and only reached the rank of
Captain when his dad and granddad were both 4 star
admirals and he was a graduate of the Academy.”
Mike | May 31, 2008 10:49:50 PM
I don’t know anything about the allegation that McCain “lost his command”, but I do know that he turned down his first admiral’s star to retire and run for Congress. (No point in slandering the guy’s military record, even if you’re inclined to vote Democrat.)
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Mariann, you need to do some research obviously, since Obama got to D.C. he has been championing veterans rights.
I am glad to defend your right to say anything you wish, I just find it ironic you are calling people “stupid’ when you obviously don’t know the facts and attack the people who defend your freedoms.
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Some people make so much noise about Mccain being a war hero. Yes, maybe in the United States but in other countries Mccain will be called a traitor. Real heroes will prefer to die than reveal any secret but Mccain told it all and thats why he was never really mal-treated. They chose to let him go but he decided to stay cos he was comfortable with them. When he was finally forced to go, then here comes an American hero. A true hero will never vote against any bill supporting his fellow heroes. A true hero will be the one championing their course. There will be nothing like a two year veteran or a ten year veteran. Tell that to the heroes who lost their lives in their first day fighting for their country.
Posted by: vuzous | May 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Vanessa: Youth turn out would be low because their idiots like you. Drug addicts and boozers either still going to college or dropping out. That’s what Obama mostly gets as voters. He can’t get the blue collar workers or the white class workers that’s why he couldn’t win WVA or KY because they don’t vote black. And he didn’t get the big battleground states for the same reason. Where have you been. You must be reading books on blacks only.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
WELL, NOW IS THE TIME TO GEAR UP FOR MCCAIN. I SENT HIM A DONATION. THERE ARE DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN SITES ONLINE. GOT TO KEEP OBAMA OUT OF OFFICE. HE JUST RESIGNED FROM A CHURCH AFTER 20 YEARS. HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH THE CHURCH FOR 20 YEARS. SO WHY DID HE LEAVE? OH – ANYTHING TO GET ELECTED.
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Mariann why do you say that 52% of college kids are on drugs. Enlighten me please.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
It is evident that Hillary Clinton has brought out the worst in her supporters during this nomination fight. Her utterly selfish and unwise behaviour has hurt our people, our Democratic Party and our Nation. Hillary, you have failed Bill Clinton too by tarnishing his accomplishments as President.
Posted by: TellasisPatel | May 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“Obama will not wait for a concession call from Hillary.”
Why should he? He isn’t going to be getting one.
And why on earth would he wait for one anyway? He didn’t wait to be the official, or even presumptive nominee (NO ONE referred to John McCain as the “presumptive nominee” before he reached his magic number) of the Democratic Party before he started campaigning for the general election.
Why should his complete and total presumptuousness and arrogance stop now???
Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“don’t know anything about the allegation that McCain “lost his command”, but I do know that he turned down his first admiral’s star to retire and run for Congress.”
that is a lie, he retired because he wasn’t going to get any more promotions and had lost his commmand.
Posted by: mike | May 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
The new coalition = UNDEMOCRATIC PARTY
3rd World tactics – we might as well live in a communist country. Oh by the way, anybody research Mr. Obama and his communist connections?
http://www.rezkowatch.com
The DNC are looking very communistic along with their Obamaie
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
To the 2000 whiners:
The national media (none of whom were or are Bush-friendly) had access to the ballots after the election and recounted them 57 different times and always the same result – Gore lost. The Supreme Court only decided to stop the whining and let the election play out BY THE RULES – i.e., you count the legitimate votes, and then you stop and declare an apparent winner. Then if the margin is close enough you recount them. both of which were done in Florida in 2000. Not good enough for the Democratic Old Guard (Clinton Gore etc); they wanted recount after recount, with the rules changing on each recount to make things swing their way. With all of that, Gore still came out of the short end, time after time after time. It had to stop somewhere. For the last 8 years we are still hearing the same rubbish because for Democrats it isn’t about what is right, it is about being power-crazy.
Now in 2008 the Democratic Old Guard wants (and evidently GOT a recount because the first election UNDER THE RULES didn’t go their way. So they get the rules changed and they still don’t win. So they are going to fight the rules some more.
If Hillary Clinton were somehow to become the President, how is she going to criticize Russia, Zimbabwe and Cuba for being dictators faking it as democracies when she is sponsoring the same thing right here at home?
Posted by: gottabesomeonebetter | May 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
DNC IS EVIL AGAIN TODAY.
50/50 means they raised the delegates
to 2118.AGAIN WRONG.
100% FOR FL AND MI.MEANS 2218 delegates.
Hussein doesn’t reached the number yet.
All way to the convention.
DNC WAKE-UP!!!!!!!!!!
HUSSEIN IS UN-ELECTABLE.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 31, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
The new coalition = UNDEMOCRATIC PARTY
3rd World tactics – we might as well live in a communist country. Oh by the way, anybody research Mr. Obama and his communist connections?
http://www.rezkowatch.com
The DNC are looking very communistic along with their Obamaie
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Hello Tony:
You make a point that Obama has resigned from his church after 20 years. After how many years are you abundoning the Democratic Party? Please keep that in mind too!
Posted by: TellasisPatel | May 31, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
“…attack the people who defend your freedoms.”
If you’re not the only one defending people’s freedom, then you are no different than the average voter. You have just one vote. Mariann does not have half a vote.
Obama’s idea is to disband the U.S. military. He simply says there is no need for any military. Negotiations is ALL he needs. He is going to Iran, North Korea and Cuba to meet their leaders and make peace, using his mouth. He might keep a small military just in case he need it to help destroy Israel.
Posted by: Brent | May 31, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Try again, Sweetie! Unlike Obama’s supporters, we make up our own minds. And we know a rat when we smell one. This is a rat – and the DNC will pay for it. Nothing Clinton has done has made me feel so committed to voting for McCain. Only Obama supporters, the “liberal” media, the “liberal” bloggers, and Obama himself. Even that ashy Michelle Obama said she would have the “think” about voting for Clinton. Well, I’m going to emulate her.
“It is evident that Hillary Clinton has brought out the worst in her supporters during this nomination fight. Her utterly selfish and unwise behaviour has hurt our people, our Democratic Party and our Nation. Hillary, you have failed Bill Clinton too by tarnishing his accomplishments as President.
Posted by: TellasisPatel”
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
John: My freedom was not defended by people like him it was by people lije mu brother, uncle and three cousins that were in world war II that defended my freedom. Obama doesn’t know the first thing about war. He puts on a good front and has people like you fooled but he couldn’t fool the people in WVa or KY or the big battleground states that Hillary won. Secondly, he has never fought in the war, knows nothing about it and McCain has a better plan than Obama for the veteans because McCain knows what war is all about. This country would be in the biggest disaster it ever seen if he is elected president.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Yeah – but I’m not trying to get elected to anything. He’s acting purely for political reasons. Sorry – no comparison.
“Hello Tony:
You make a point that Obama has resigned from his church after 20 years. After how many years are you abundoning the Democratic Party? Please keep that in mind too!
Posted by: TellasisPatel “
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Communism- nice try at fear mongering folks. Typical NeoCon. No way in hell is the US going communist! We love our freedom and any hint at communist policies would be automatic impeachment. It is Impossible! However, elect McCain and we might go Facist since Bush has already laid the groundwork.
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
McCain voted against the new bill for benefits for Veterans saying it was too “Generous”. The same benefits that the men got returning from WW2 evne if they sent a few months on a ship at the end of the war is too generous for men who have been on 6 tours of Iraq over many years now.
He says they should have to serve longer and the benefits increase the more time you are in, which is stupid and he knows it, being a veteran. If you are in, you have to have college to increase in higher ranks, these benefits are not needed by high ranking people who have been in for twenty years because they all have at least one degree! So he eliminates the pay out for younger veterans and the older ones won’t collect because the benefit won’t be needed. It is a ploy to act like he is supporting veterans and at the same time very little money is going to help veterans.
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
DNC…TAKE IT TO DENVER.
YOUR RULES ARE VERY UN-DEMOCRATIC.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Jim Beam 70: You ask if I was complaining about the GOP re the Patriot Act.
Isn’t that answer obvious?
I wrote Bush and told him to put my name on their list as I considered the Patriot Act to be signally unpatriotic. Of course, I wrote to my representatives in Congress, Teddy Kennedy—to thank him for opposing it, and called my rep’s office as well. I posted on various blogs…but no one was listening.
I actively protested the decision to go to Iraq, out in the cold in January on the Mall—where the numbers was vastly undercounted by the Park police, by the way…going by what I’ve seen at DC gatherings like the Moratorium in ’69, July 4th of ’76, Kennedy’s funeral, etc. I wrote letters then too and posted on blogs…but no one was listening.
I’ve been doing it again during this nomination process…and some people are listening to each other. That’s progress. Personally, I hope that Hillary keeps her campaign viable straight to the convention. This country does not need a pat answer or another drive-thru solution, we NEED to think more and try to think deeply.
Oh well! Make of it what you will.
Hey, it’s just another hippie for Hillary! Yuppies love Obama…since they missed all the action to date. SO unreal!
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Jim Beam 70: You ask if I was complaining about the GOP re the Patriot Act.
Isn’t that answer obvious?
I wrote Bush and told him to put my name on their list as I considered the Patriot Act to be signally unpatriotic. Of course, I wrote to my representatives in Congress, Teddy Kennedy—to thank him for opposing it, and called my rep’s office as well. I posted on various blogs…but no one was listening.
I actively protested the decision to go to Iraq, out in the cold in January on the Mall—where the numbers was vastly undercounted by the Park police, by the way…going by what I’ve seen at DC gatherings like the Moratorium in ’69, July 4th of ’76, Kennedy’s funeral, etc. I wrote letters then too and posted on blogs…but no one was listening.
I’ve been doing it again during this nomination process…and some people are listening to each other. That’s progress. Personally, I hope that Hillary keeps her campaign viable straight to the convention. This country does not need a pat answer or another drive-thru solution, we NEED to think more and try to think deeply.
Oh well! Make of it what you will.
Hey, it’s just another hippie for Hillary! Yuppies love Obama…since they missed all the action to date. SO unreal!
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Sorry ’bout that. TypePad said it had an error and couldn’t post the comment. Don’t backspace!
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
I signed up tonight on McCain’s website and suggest that other Moderate Dems like myself do the same.
I have always been in the middle of the spectrum politically and usually have voted Dem. I do not like how left leaning the party is becoming.
I do not agree on their do nothing approach with illegal immigration and the excessive spending on social programs that end up wasting so much money in the long run.
A recent study, showed that it cost the US almost 10K per year for each illegal immigrant when it comes to education (more expensive with the ESL programs), dependent care (yes they are eligible)and health care.
The Dems have shown that they continue to pander politically to illegals. I have noticed that they are misguided on many points.
Obama is so left leaning and with a Dem Congress and Senate, it is quite scary what is to come. People act like the Dems will solve all of their problems.
Posted by: Indie Here | May 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
He won’t have the delegates needed to win?
He has 2052 total delegates right now, he only needs 65. He has that many sitting in the wings, easily, not to mention the ones from SD and MT. He could stop collecting pledged delegates right now and still get enough SD’s to put him over the top.
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
mariann, I was refering to myself, you called me stupid for having a differing opinion while I have earned the right to express it. I have served my time and deserve more respect. Semper Fi
Posted by: john | May 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
You people just don’t get it, it’s about his experience, his policies and his politics, it has nothing to do with blindly following Hillary, it has to do with the fact that as a Hillary Supporter, I voted for her based on her experience, policies, and record, it had nothing to do with her being a woman, I could just have easily voted for him, however, he did not represent what I am expecting or looking for in a President, he is untested, he is arrogant and his affiliations are legitimately questionable. I am not willing to give my vote to him just because he is a democrat, which by the way I ceased to be today. You people keep thinking that this is about Hillary being a woman or about race or any of the other nonsense, this is about most Hillary Clinton Supporters not seeing the qualities in Obama that we feel a Commander in Chief should have. That is why we will not vote for him period, there is no craziness to it, there is no vengeance involved. I don’t have any loyalty to a party that is clearly not loyal to its voters, so I can step back and take a look at McCain and know one thing for sure. I don’t have to question his love for this country or the fact that he will do what’s necessary to protect it. You can call me foolish or whatever, but every vote that I’ve casted in the last 22 years was based on research, record, and what I felt were the necessary qualities, not all of my candidates won, but at least I slept at night knowing that my vote was based on what I truly believe and I will do the same this time. I don’t take this lightly. I have a nine year old and his future is first and foremost in my mind, but to have a radical in the Whitehouse, that’s not what I’m looking for, nor am I interested in making History because I am an African American.
Posted by: Kim | May 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
“Mariann why do you say that 52% of college kids are on drugs. Enlighten me please.”
Fifty-two percent will be an UNDERESTIMATE. Nearly half of them can’t even located New Jersey on the map. Two thirds of them have no idea what the fuss is about the number 1776. Over half of them think if elected President Obama can fire the entire United States Congress, the House and the Senate, and appoint Senators and Representatives who will support his policies. These ARE the voters who have propelled Obama so far.
Posted by: matt | May 31, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Brent: And you are sick. I can just see Iran talking to Obama and Obama going against Israel. Obama can’t even win a debate how could he talk to world leaders. He wouldn’t know what to say, they would be doing all the talking and he would be listening. As I said before Obama is a no nothing, do nothing talk nothing and doesn’t know the first thing about running this country. Maybe he should go back to taking drugs and booze. That would wake him up for sure.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I can’t believe I just read a Clinton supporter (HRC2008) complain Obama is racist, especially with all the race baiting coming from her campaign and supporters. And quite frankly, the racist elements of their campaign tend to undercut their complaints of sexism. The sad fact is that I have seen both during the campaign, and the are both despicable. However, I didn’t notice sex-based attacked coming from the Obama campaign, but from individuals. I did see race-based attacks coming from the Clinton campaign as well as from individuals.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I think the DNC made the wrong decision today. From the sound of supporters, Obama will not win Michigan and Florida for sure. I want Hillary to go to the credentials committee, take this to the convention floor. I want the disharmony because there should be discord just as it has been for Hillary this whole campaign. The more discord there is, it lessens Obama’s chance of winning in the GE. C’mon Hillary supporters, lets get out there, pull for Hillary, and if not, go with McCain! I would rather have four more years of Bush than that of a racist like Obama. We, Clinton supporters, have the power to put an end to Obama….lets keep the discord up and make Obama and his “StuperDelegates” pay for the grief they have given to Hillary!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
“Try again, Sweetie!” ~ Tony
———————————
Wow, Tony, that was pretty sexist, no?
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Matt, where do you get this info from. I want real facts and not just opinions.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Mike
You ASSERT that McCain lost his command, you say “he retired because he wasn’t going to get any more promotions AND HAD LOST HIS COMMAND.
======================================
That’s a pretty serious charge. I never heard McCain “lot his command”. From what I remember, it is true he wasn’t getting the promotions he hoped for, but that’s hardly the same as losing his command. I checked Wikipedia (admittedly, not always reliable), and all that is written there is that McCain left the Navy to start his political career
because “he was unlikely to ever make full admiral, as he had poor annual physicals and had been given no major sea command.[62] In early 1981, he was told he would be made rear admiral; he declined the prospect, as he already made plans to run for Congress and said he could “do more good there.”[63]
Sources: New York Times.
What are your sources?
Posted by: Goldilocks | May 31, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
To Mariann Pepitone- you know that one of our greatest Generals also became Gresident his name was Ulysses S Grant. Pretty much saved us during the Civil War. I’m sure that you’ve heard of Grant’s Tomb on Riverside Drive in New York City. However, he was not the best president. WAR HERO does not always equal GREAT PRES!
To Tony- If you are a neocon then come out and say stop prentending to be a democrat. You big phony!
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
I thought the Florida decision was completely fair and a relatively easy call to make. Florida’s problem was created by the Republican controlled state government so the state Democratic party really didn’t have much say in the matter and it is easy to be sympathetic to their plight.
BUT, Michigan was a totally different matter. The Michigan Democratic party intentionally moved their primary up just from some misplaced ego and weird desire to “be more important.” It was a very flawed election and not having Obama or Edwards on the ballot made it impossible to really determine the will of the voters. But one thing was for sure – of the people who did vote, 40% of them voted for “Anybody but Clinton.” Hardly a resounding pro-Clinton moment to run unopposed and still almost lose.
Clinton’s bunch trying to push the idea that since Obama wasn’t on the ballot then he shouldn’t get of these votes was a real stretch. Really, she is asking to be rewarded for breaking the rules. As contentious as the Michigan decision was, I thought the committee bent over backwards to placate the Clinton people. If I had sat on that committee I would have recommended they condemn the Michigan primary as fatally flawed and completely strip them of all their delegates period. That seems like that would have been the fairest solution of all.
Hopefully these errant states have learned their lesson and we won’t have to go through this again in four years.
Posted by: mark | May 31, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Yeah, David, I can tell you want discord to help Hillary. You sound much more like a repuglican troll trying to stoke the fires.
Eventually, the REAL Democrats here will wake up and realize who the real infiltrators of the party are. It’s McBloggers, trying to sew discord as it’s the only way McLame has any hope of winning. This party is too strong and too smart for that this time.
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“Some explanations are needed here:
1)How can somebody who can not convincinly win the primary election be more electable than who won?”
#1. Easily when one realizes that the general election will not be conducted under rules that give more votes to the loser than to the winner, nor will a person’s vote count more or less depending on the district one lives in.
If you think this primary has been fair to the voters, you need to go and read all the rules of the DNC and the states for assigning delegates.
Posted by: Charlie35 | May 31, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Indie Here,
I am with you there! In fact not only do we need to go to McCain’s website to sign up but we need to get more actively involved (if Clinton is not nominated). We can get McCain yard signs, talk to friends and neighbors, write on various blogs and tell FORMER Democrats to try to save our country.
Clinton > McCain >>>>>>>>> Obama
Posted by: Brent | May 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
It’s been reported that the Michigan vote was actually going to go approve the 50/50 split, but Obama’s people conceded, in the interest of unity, and asked, instead, to go with the MDP compromise of 69-59. Classy.
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Many of the people here are putting shame to our party. Rules were followed (although HRC challenged them) and we now have a candidate who is clearly and fairly going to attain the democratic nomination. Considering that the policies and issues of Obama are nearly identical to that of Clinton, we should to vote in the democratic interest, which is also the interest of both the Clinton and Obama campaign.
Posted by: Davey | May 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Matt: Evidently you don’t listen to the news at all. It was stated that 52% of college students are on drugs plus there are numerous drop outs because they cannot master the courses. Plus there are other types of drugs they take to keep them going. If you are not aware of that something is wrong with you. Everyone in this country knows that many college students are on drugs. Obama was addicted to drugs and booze in this college days. Where have you been? He admitted to it in public.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
There wiil be no Democratic nominee until the convention chooses in Denver, despite any and all machinations perpetrated by the DNC and Obama’s campaign.
Today confirmed nothing except Hillary’s lead in popular votes.
No delegates are final until Denver.
Obama has won nothing, still only has “hope”.
DNC cannot “award” the votes and conviction of over17 million HRC voters to Obama. Our votes are ours
But we can “award” them to McCain, and I for one will.
If Obama is the nominee coming out of Denver, despite his obvious unelectability, I shall use my vote, my money, my voice, my influence, and my time to do everything I can to defeat him.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
@ brynb2:
You’re mistaken….the Democratic party is not unified at all! The DNC, with Dean, Pelosi, Kerry, and Kennedy have ruined the party, along with Obama. I’m a democrat and always have been one, but this year, the nomination was ripped from Hillary, I don’t care what you say. Yeah, it will kill me to vote for McCain, but I will do it to keep the idiot Obama out of the White House. And, guess, what….17million other Clinton supporters will do the same thing. This will go to the credentials committee, just wait and then to the convention. There will be discord, and I want Obama and his StuperDelegates to have to cringe and feel the pressure and worries just like they have given Hillary for the last 16 mos. Anything to keep Obama out of office is GREAT! Keep thinking there will be unity….I’m laughing at you….it will NEVER happen in 2008. Start practice saying, President McCain! Maybe you can help Obama find a new church….looks like he’s going to have a lot of time after November 4th!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Vuzous and Mike, you are one pair of sick puppies.
I’m not an Annapolis grad or a navy person or a McCain fan, but I’ll tell you this much:
Considering how difficult it is to get in in the first place and how hard the academics are comparatively, you’ll find that the bottom person in the Naval Academy graduating class (which means in the top half of those who entered as freshman, since the other half couldn’t hack it) has a better academic record than most of the top 10% students of most normal colleges.
I haven’t heard anyone suggest that McCain gave up anything as a POW, and that would have come out in any of a dozen elections since then. You think maybe he got tortured because he wouldn’t just give up information?
You can disagree with his ideas, I know I do, but accusations such as yours are outrageous. I assume that you are a good person at heart, rather than being completely vicious, so evidently you are just swallowing the rubbish that some other overeager moron has fed you. Go learn some real truth and then come back with your comments. A democracy depends on an informed electorate. Right now, you’re not holding up your end of the deal.
Posted by: gottabesomeonebetter | May 31, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
“that is a lie, he retired because he wasn’t going to get
any more promotions and had lost his commmand.”
mike | May 31, 2008 10:59:11 PM
I’m afraid I’m going to have to take personal offense at that (being called a liar there–McCain can be offended for himself or not, as the spirit moves him).
If the powers that be will permit me this defense on a subject that’s obviously off their topic, I’m gonna link to MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24883802/
(I recalled it a little off–he was in line for promotion to admiral, hadn’t actually been offered it yet.)
“The Long Run
By David D. Kirkpatrick
updated 11:12 p.m. ET, Thurs., May. 29, 2008
WASHINGTON – At a meeting in his Pentagon office in
early 1981, Secretary of the Navy John F. Lehman told
Capt. John S. McCain III that he was about to attain
his life ambition: selection for admiral.
“But Mr. McCain, the son and grandson of revered Navy
admirals, was having second thoughts about following
his family’s vocation. He had spent the previous four
years as the Navy’s liaison to the Senate, sampling life
in the world’s most exclusive club as he escorted its
members on trips around the globe — sitting with the
sultan of Oman on the floor of his desert tent, or
smuggling a senator’s private supply of Scotch through
Saudi Arabian customs.”
from the New York Times
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
The inevitable Hillary is having a problem conceding.
If for a minute she thinks all “old white women” will support her protest to Denver she’s wrong.
THIS OLD WHITE WOMAN WILL NOT HAND MCCAIN A VICTORY.
Posted by: Majorie | May 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I have never seen a more sore bunch of loosers, I have seen less whining from a 2 year old whose lollipop was snatched. What a pathetic bunch of whiners these people are, what immature people, I cannot believe what I’m reading from some of these supporters of Hillary Clinton. Whew!!
Posted by: Lee | May 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
mark
A cool head;-)
Posted by: Goldilocks | May 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
It’s time that all democrats united amongst the party. Clearly Hilary has lost and lost fairly by the rules of the DNC. I have voted twice for George Bush and am that independent in the middle. I voted for George McGovern also. I’m voting for Barack Obama because I’m fed up with Republican nonsense. When someone is hired for the job and fails in basically all categories, you fire them. Barack has won-get with it!
Posted by: Tom | May 31, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Emily do you believe in playing by the rules?? Hillary did soand it did not go her way. Is your answer if it does not go your way cry foul?? Hillary can and probably will only hurt the democrats and herself by continuing. but hey thats not fair to Hill is it.. get a grip
Posted by: brian in the red state | May 31, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
“If you’re not the only one defending people’s freedom, then you are no different than the average voter. You have just one vote. Mariann does not have half a vote.
Obama’s idea is to disband the U.S. military. He simply says there is no need for any military. Negotiations is ALL he needs. He is going to Iran, North Korea and Cuba to meet their leaders and make peace, using his mouth. He might keep a small military just in case he need it to help destroy Israel.” ~Brent
————————————
You’re LYING Brent. Obama wants to expand our military:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/foreignpolicy/#21st-century-military
The Problem: The excellence of our military is unmatched. But as a result of a misguided war in Iraq, our forces are under pressure as never before. Obama will make the investments we need so that the finest military in the world is best-prepared to meet 21st-century threats.
Rebuild Trust: Obama will rebuild trust with those who serve by ensuring that soldiers and Marines have sufficient training time before they are sent into battle.
Expand the Military: We have learned from Iraq that our military needs more men and women in uniform to reduce the strain on our active force. Obama will increase the size of ground forces, adding 65,000 soldiers to the Army and 27,000 Marines.
New Capabilities: Obama will give our troops new equipment, armor, training, and skills like language training. He will also strengthen our civilian capacity, so that our civilian agencies have the critical skills and equipment they need to integrate their efforts with our military.
Strengthen Guard and Reserve: Obama will restore the readiness of the National Guard and Reserves. He will permit them adequate time to train and rest between deployments, and provide the National Guard with the equipment they need for foreign and domestic emergencies. He will also give the Guard a seat at the table by making the Chief of the National Guard a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
JimBeam70: War hero’s may not make the best president’s but you weren’t around at that time. Obama wouldn’t make half a good president because first of all he was a racist from an early age, hated that his mother and grandmother were white, belonged to a racist anti-american white haing church for 20 years and just now resigned from the church. It took the words of discrimination regarding Hillary to make him resign when he should have walked out of there after the first sermon like Cardinal George stated. I would never vote for a candidate with that background, and also he has close ties to Ayers that bombed this country three times. Is that what you call an American?
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Mariann, I think you are the one on drugs. I am a news junkie and have never heard this about college students. But let me tell you that college kids in these times are very much into politics. I have 2 kids in college and they both major in political science and know a lot about this process. And they are not the only ones. I don’t know how old you are and I don’t really care but college kids are not all about drinking and doing drugs, that was back in the 70′s. The kids today are very knowledgable. So please give them credit and stop degrading them.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
@ West Texas :
I’m with you! Keep up the fight until the convention for Hillary! If, Sodama is the nominee, then 17million of us Clinton supporters should go to the McCain website, sign up, place yard signs, make calls, everything we can do to keep Sodama out of office! This will be great! I want the camera to pan Sodam and ugly Michelle’s faces when he realizes he has lost…..I’m going to record it so I can play it over and over again in order to laugh! This will be GREAT!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
i find it hilarious the way people throw out “Hussein” whenever they want to be racist funny.
Posted by: Jerrod Blavos | May 31, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Lee: And your going to hear more whining if Obama doesn’t get the nomination or if he loses to McCain which I hope. If Hillary is smart accept the delegates then if Obama wins the nomination declare herself as an independent to make sure Obama loses the election. Its a dog eat dog campaign and Hillary should go for the bone. Who cares if the democrats don’t win as long as Obama is not president.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
God > Country >>>>>>>>>> Party
Four years ago, it was John “Marrying John Heinz’s Rich Widow” “Pretender” Kerry. Kerry had been voted the MOST liberal Senator the year before.
You know who was the No. 1 liberal Senator in 2007? Obama. He was to the left of Kerry and Bernie Sanders. Sanders himself is a socialist as he said so himself. Obama was LEFT of a socialst.
LET’S WAIT UNTIL NOVEMBER 4 2008 TO SEE WHO THE LOSER REALLY IS.
Clinton > McCain >>>>>>>>> Obama
Posted by: Brent | May 31, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
David from Texas. Will TX be in play in the presidential? I doubt it. Your protest vote won’t even be noticed.
And if you really believe that 17 million people are going to vote against their own interests and go with a McLame leadership, “More War Years!!” you’re sadly mistaken. Hillary claimed she would have 10,000 protestors at the meeting today, there were MAYBE 200-300.
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
David your ignorance is only outweighed by your kuth
Posted by: brian of the red state | May 31, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Tom…
A friend of mine is doing just what you are doing. They voted for George W twice and say they will vote for Obama.
I know a lot about all of the candidates. Sort of a hobby of mine lately. I saw someone blog that Obama is the Democratic George W…I thought right away that is so right…lol. It is a very simplified way to look at it though.
I just cannot fathom voting for Obama because of how he has played politics as usual when his campaign is based all around the opposite. His long time associates are just crazy and say divisive things. This indicates poor judgment to me. His actions have spoken loud and clear to me on many things.
He has been hyped up, branded so to speak. Mix that with how many things have played out in this election and you get many people who will be turning down Obama.
Posted by: Independent Voter | May 31, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
@ Mariann Pepitone :
I agree with you….what’s important is that Obama DOES NOT WIN in the GE! We, as Clinton supporters, have the power to keep this “rat” out of office…..lets keep the turmoil going, all the way to the convention…..then, see what Hillary does, if she concedes, lets go for McCain….give him our votes, keep Sodama out of the White House! Hillary supporters, we can do this….lets do it!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Lisa: Evidently you don’t listen to the news or you close your ears to what you don’t want to hear. It was even stated on the internet that 52% of college students are on drugs. Take time to read the news once in a while. Everyone in every state knows that numerous college students take drugs and booze. And I already heard the word from former college students. I don’t know where you’ve been but you better check out the facts. I don’t know where you live but I live in Chicago and everytime the Cubs play here the bars are so loaded with young people drinking its standing room only and they are drinking for hours. Even outside of the bar. Get a grip.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
After reading the posts on this blog, I can see that most of these posters threatening to vote McCain were going to do so whether Hillary won or not. You’re a MINORITY, and not true Democrats, and I doubt it’s going to have much affect on the election.
Hillary had 2-300 supporters today, she claimed she had 10,000 coming. She’s never been good at math.
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
You people saying yojur gonna vote for Mcain are idiots. you wanna trade your economic future and your countries future for something as trivial as this. Look Obama isn’t perfect niether is Hillary but voting for 4 more years of hell is traiterous to your party and your country. Look im a 32 year old woman im a registered democrat and i struggle to pay my bills every month but ill vote for Obama if he is the nominee cause he will fight for my interests. Anyhow if you vote against Obama do it because his policies which by the way are almost the same as clintons, not over anger that is what fuels are country already and will lead to our collapse.
Posted by: Darlene | May 31, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I don’t have a horse in the DNC race, however:
1) They only diminished the voting power of the pledged delegates in FL, MI by 50% – not the supers.
This is a back-handed approach to this issue. The people who had the least say in everything that happened were the voters.
The same party leaders for FL, MI who had some culpability in the decision making process should have had their voting power diluted by 50% as well – or instead of the pledged delegates.
This effectively means that the only “punishment” meted out by the DNC was on the voters.
2) There is absolutely nothing sustainable about the delegate allotment for MI.
Either the outcome of the primary has a proportional meaning or it doesn’t. If it does, honor it. If not, flip the onus back onto MI to determine a way to have a fair primary… if they can’t then they forfeit their delegates.
Instead, the Rules Committee has rendered a decision that is completely arbritary and has no foundation on precident, procedure or rules.
…
It’s kind of fun to watch though…
Posted by: Joseph777 | May 31, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Mariann Pepitone: 1st- Neither were you. Can you tel me how many Pres were war heros. Do you know who was good as Pres and who was not. Of the top 5 pres of all time how many were War Heros? I’ll take a guess that you don’t know. 2nd- You don’t seem to know anything about his life as all of the things you stated in your response about his Mom and Grandmother is simply not true. I would say that he could be angry as a youth and I think I would be too if my mother drag me all over the world but and I only met my father once. But How is Obama a racist? Please enlighten me.
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Darlene- well said
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Thanks God! That scumbag BJ Clinton has finally been defeated.
Posted by: Doug | May 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
“Mission Accomplished 2″ – Right!
Go Hillary!
Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
brynb2 :
You will be crying November 4th, when your “boy” Sodama loses. Hide and watch what the Clinton supporters will do. You don’t know how much anger we have in that Obama and the pro=Obama DNC ripped this nomination from Hillary. However, it’s not over. Obama is an idiot and will never become the President. I’ll see you here the night of November 4th, and, you, like the other Obamabots will be so upset cuz the “boy” lost…lol!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
davidfromtexas: You got it. I am voting for McCain if Hillary doesn’t win the nomination. However David, what she should do is declare herself an independent so she can knock him out of the presidency. That would fix Nancy, Dean and Reid for good. And it would not bother me one bit if McCain got elected. I have been a democrat all my life but not for someone like ObamaOsama.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
The remaining super-delegates will put Obama over the top on Tuesday or Wednesday. It’s up to Hillary to be gracious or not.
I am dismayed that Mr Ickes said he was reserving Hillary’s right to challenge FOUR Mich delegates!? Talk about a slender reed. It seems that this was predetermined — regardless of the RBC meeting outcome.
I am disappointed by the sour grapes from the Hillary camp — especially given their campaign theme about how vetted & ready she is. Obama dredged ZERO Clinton skeletons from the 1990s. I can’t imagine all the moaning & ‘readiness’ to come if Hillary had to face the GOP onslaught of Vince Foster, Travelgate, etc, ad nauseum.
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
No sexism here:
“He’s not going to wait by the phone like a high-school girl waiting for a date,” said Obama advisor Anita Dunn. “That’s not Barack Obama.”
Posted by: Paul | May 31, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Obama lost. Hillary wins the popular vote!
Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 31, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
If Obama supporters actually thought he was a sure thing they would not be clogging the blogs trying to alternately schmooze and demean HRC supporters.
They would instead be relishing their already announced victory and just chillin’. Why waste celebration time in here, with a bunch of losers? If they were truly confident?
Yet here they are? Why? Because they are in a panic. They cry out that they have won, yet have won nothing!
And because they know Obama has actually won nothing either. All they have is “hope”, and a wish that we HRC supporters will “change” our minds
We are here because we take nothing for granted, that anything is still possible. That Hillary is the only choice to win the GE, and that we need to hold onto our resolve, and keep on “pushing”.
We know, and they know, that we Hillary Clinton supporters absolutely hold the keys to this election. We are resolute in our decision to never vote for Obama.
No ifs, ands, or buts! Our votes are now the most important factor regarding who is the next President of the US.
Without us, especially if multitudes vote for McCain because he is the best alternative to Obama, the DNC goes down in flames for the third straight time.
I welcome the Democratic Party implosion. Perhaps what arises from the rubble will be a truly Democratic Party, worthy of the Democracy element in its name.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
I was at the hotel where the committee meeting took place today. I was in the hotel’s lobby watching the committee vote over the various motions being proposed.
When the committee voted to give the delegates of both Michigan and Florida a half vote, I heard a Clinton supporter next to me yell out “Look’s like the slaves are taking over this country!”
I’m not saying that this person is representative of all Clinton supporters. But I think it shows us how harmful the election has become to the Democrats. We’re starting to sound like Republicans!
Obama isn’t a sexist and neither are the majority of his supporters. Clinton isn’t a racist and neither are the majority of her supporters.
Please everyone, let’s pressure Obama to offer Hillary VP. It’s the only way to unify our party. Otherwise, this nastiness will only grow.
She wouldn’t be able to reject the offer. Otherwise, she would come off as if she’s not supporting the Democratic party and its efforts at creating unity. If that’s the perception, then she would never have a chance of winning the nomination in 2012.
Clinton supporters, take note. Instead of criticizing Obama, you can pressure him to take Hillary as VP. That would help your candidate, our party, and this country.
Posted by: TheIgg | May 31, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
1) They only diminished the voting power of the
pledged delegates in FL, MI by 50% – not the supers.
Joseph777 | May 31, 2008 11:34:15 PM
Nope, they also cut the superdelegates from Florida and Michigan to ½ vote each.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Mariann, I have read numerous posts of yours throughout these blogs and you do nothing but bash the youth. Oh wait now you say they are at a ball game and drink, so what, doesn’t everyone do that. You are trying to make the point that young people should not have a vote because they do drugs and drink. That is the problem I have with you. Oh I guess the youth that enlist can go to war and die for our country. You are the one who needs to get a grip.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
West Texas and david from texas: Great posts!!!
The half-vote ruling and fighting Obama supporters trying to break all party rules during the March 4th and 29th caucuses in Texas have strengthened my believe that no taking the fight to Denver will be a historic mistake.
2 months are like an eternity in politics.
Posted by: Angel | May 31, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Hillary, take it all the way to the Convention!! I am a Florida voter who voted for Hillary Clinton because she is by far the best and strongest candidate we have seen in a long time!! GO HILLARY!! HILLARY 08!!
Posted by: Paul | May 31, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Nicholas,Hussein_T_E, Dan Hussein_O:
Why do people keep saying Hussein Obama. You idiots, don’t you know that one of our best allies in the middle east–Jordan–was led by King Hussein.
His son now rules and is a friend of America and has established coed schools based on his education experience in the United States.
BTW: King Hussein’s wife was American. Using Hussein as a negative insults his memory and country. If Obama was named after anybody it was King Hussein of Jordan a great friend of America.
Shame on you all.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 31, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Scott in PacNW at 11:38:23 PM: There’s nothing gracious in quitting and Hillary is right to stay in.
Remember: It’s easy to win elections if you push out the opponents before election day. Obama is thug, he’s done it before. Obama’s vile, negative and disrespectful campain deserves no favors. You must face a bully, and Clinton is the one to do it.
Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 31, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Mariann:
I loved how Ickes came back at the DNC today and stated that Hillary will take it to the credentials committee. The anger we have is because of the way that Obama has played behind the scenes to destroy her. However, what he doesnt realize is that he has destroyed himself in the process. There was a lot of hate and vengeance in that meeting today and believe me, it will continue to grow. Hillary supporters will unite, no matter what you Obamabots hope for, they will unite to continue the fight for Hillary, even if it does mean voting for McCain…..we will do all that we can to keep Obama out of the White House……he’s going to lose and I can’t wait! It’s going to be so much fun to see those purple lips of his crying in anguish!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Hillary lost and that is a good thing! Obama placed a stake in the heart of this vampire, and now Dracula is dead. Democrates can rejoice and reclaim the Whitehouse in November 2008!
Posted by: TheNextGeneration | May 31, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Joseph777, get yer facts straight. Both MI and FL supers were diminished to half votes as well. ALL Delegates are half votes, not just the pledged delegates.
Posted by: brynb2 | May 31, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
JimBeam70: How do I know? Get a copy of his BIO from the NYT and it will tell you all about him, his father and mother. His mother was married and divorced three times, his father was married and divorced four times, there are 8 children involved. Obama has a half sister in Hawaii and there are 6 more half brothers and sisters somehwhere around. Read some of his book Dreams Of My Father which should have been Dreams of My Mother. His mother was the one that was educating him when he was young. In that book he stated that he was starting to not like the white race including his mother and typical white grandmother. Or didn’t you hear that. His white grandmother raised him, his mother died of cancer at the age of 53. He attended that racist church because he was racial when he was young. He knew what kind of church that was so why didn’t he leave it? His wife (run of the mouth) was always racial and what did she say? She likes America now? Why not before?
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
West Texas, you (with David from TX and Marianne Pepitone) are doing quite a bit of blog clogging yourselves.
My guess is you’re all GOP trolls. Maybe all one & the same.
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Joseph777
It’s kind of fun to watch though…
=====================================
I’m guessing you did not actually watch the hearings. If you had, you’r know the reason the Supers were given full votes was based on a careful reading of the rules. The Supers are granted a right to a full vote when elected to office, their right is INDEPENDENT of timing issues. I could go into greater detail on this – its all on C-Span, if you care to find out more.
The pledged delegates from Florida and Michigan were a different matter. Those primaries DID violate the timing rule.
In any case, you’re wrong for blamning the Supers in Florida for what happened, the fault there was with the result of Republican monkeying around.
The case of MI is much more complicated. At the end of the day the whole process was so tainted that the best thing may have been to throw out all the votes. But – Frankly – that would have alienated even more people than are alienated now.
The thing you don’t seem to understand is that like many institutions, the DNC can choose to ignore its own rules at its own discretion if it decides that some higher good is served. It has that power. That is what happened with respect to Michigan.
You say “I don’t have a horse in the DNC race”. That’s too bad, since that means you don’t have a horse in the general election either. ;-(
Posted by: Goldilocks | May 31, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
David from Texas,
Hillary lost because she was a bad candidate, tactician, and was untrustworthy! Now, because of her treachery we are seeing the beginnings of a psychologically unstable female candidate. We should all thank God for Barack Obama.
Posted by: TheNextGeneration | May 31, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
College kids on drugs? Who’da thunk it?
Don’t forget that alcohol is a drug…
Mmm…mine have made it through several degrees without becoming addicts and while doing well academically, but, please! They’ve indicated that the pressure to binge is enormous. Cruise through any frat row on any given weekend and check it out. It’s far louder and uglier than it was when I was that age. Of course, frats and sororities were “out” then.
Unfortunately, being “for” Obama is “in.” Whether the “youth” vote will bother to turn out in November remains to be seen. Typically, they don’t, even when they’ve been fired up. November? football? keggers? all that work that’s been put off due to partying and is now due? Obama’s “charm” wears thin after hearing the same bs repeated ad nauseum?
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
brynb2, lee c.
“Joseph777, get yer facts straight. Both MI and FL supers were diminished to half votes as well. ALL Delegates are half votes, not just the pledged delegates.”
Every article I have read makes no mention of the supers. Further, RealClearPolitics has just updates with the latest delegate counts. The pledged are updated and the supers unchanged at 797.
The Rules Committee didn’t touch the supers at all.
Posted by: Joseph777 | May 31, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
West Texas….EXCELLENT POST!
TheIgg:…..What you Obamabots don’t realize is that Obama can not win without Hillary on the ticket and she won’t do that. I see your strategy, though…..you know he can’t win without us and by trying to “appease” us with the prospect of Hillary as VP, won’t work. We’re going for the juglar….we don’t want Obama in the White House…..we WANT him to lose, and he will…….say President McCain!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I’ll be straight up about it.
I’m not for party unity, either.
You Obama supporters just can’t wrap your heads around the fact that a whole lot of people just don’t love your candidate.
Even if he was the only guy in the Dem race, I’m sure he’d tick off just as many people.
Get it through your heads, its not about Clinton or her supporters.
It’s about Obama.
Posted by: josgirl | May 31, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Sylvia Johnsen: Obama is a ‘thug’? Oh please, what nonsense.
If Hillary was going to go all out to stand up to a bully, where was she on Iraq, torture, rendition, warrantless wiretapping, DOJ firings, etc?
She was CYA, that’s where. This is the wrong fight against the wrong people. And it’s a shame all around.
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
david from texas: You have that right. And the media keeps referring to him as black. For educated people they don’t know that he is Mulatto? He is the offspring of a black/white marriage and that’s the name given to those children. He would never be the first black president. Jesse Jackson would have been if he had won the presidency. Yes, we have to keep him from being elected even if all of Hillary’s voters vote for McCain. Anyone but him. He is arrogant, for graduating college, he can’t form the words for his own speech, he uses the speeches of RFK and was given a book of his speeches to study. Keeping him from the presidency will prevent his run of the mouth wife Michele from being first lady.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 31, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
TheIgg, just for the record.
Hillary is too superior to Obama to play second fiddle and possibly save him.
I am totally dedicated to HRC, yet would not vote for an Obama/Clinton, nor a Clinton/Obama ticket.
If HRC supports the DNC after this, that is her perogative. I will not hold that against her.
However, I will never do so. Neither HRC, WJC, nor anyone else, could ever persuade me to vote for Obama. I make my own choices, and have for 46 voting years!
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Who are you Hillary posters?? Are you even US citizens?? Are you paid??
I found this reference to Sylvia Johnsen online…..Hmmm.
========================
New rules, old rules – no matter! Superdelegates will decide this election, and since they are free agent with the right to change their mind it is only logical to take it to the convention. After all, Ted Kennedy did in 1980 with four times as many delegates to win than what Hillary needs.
Sylvia Johnsen, Oslo, Norway
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 31, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Scott in PacNW:
Just because you enjoy penetr8n by hung black brothers in a gang, it does not mean REALmen will join you in submission. You don’t care about your prostate problems that’s your own decision.
Posted by: Mark | May 31, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
david from texas, I voted for Obama in the primary but would gladly vote for Hillary if she is the nominee. But your venom is disturbing. Texas will go republican so unless you are planning to move how are you going to help Obama lose.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Quaere here for the ABC people guarding this blog:
Now that the DNC has ruled on this, will ABC.com be changing its “count” of the popular vote to reflect the Florida vote but not the Michigan vote? Or are ya’ll gonna keep showing the Michigan vote added in as an option? Or do you know?
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Mark: Nice talk, troll.
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
@ TheNextGeneration:
Hillary lost because of the pro Obama MSM, the pro Obama DNC, the pro Obama, Pelosi (stupid), Dean (clown), Kerry (idiot) and Kennedy (drunk). And, lets not forget Richardson (traitor). Everyday, she got up to face unfair media treatment, but yet she got up, faced adversity, even though she had stamina and perserverance. Obama had everyone in the media and the DNC behing him. He has no plans, nothing. He’s an empty suit with no substance. It’s sad that America has been taken over by this Pied Piper that will just lead them down the road of destruction. I plan to cast my vote for McCain. I’m not a Republican blogger, have been a Democrat all my life. I refuse to vote for someone like Obama that can not back up anything he says. It’s not because of his skin color, it’s not because he put Hillary through hell, its because he’s a freaking idiot that thinks ALL Americans are going to fall at his feet and worship him as if he were the Messiah! He’s a joke, no substance….nothing!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
I was ashamed of the (mostly) women who were rudely shouting during the Rules and Bylaws meeting of the DNC. How do they think behaving like sore losers is going to help their candidate? From my viewpoint, I think they just made those of us supporting Senator Obama happier than ever with our choice of candidate.
Posted by: grrrfren | May 31, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Independent Voter>I hear you on that one about Bush Jr. There was a caller on C-Span today and he said he voted for Bush Jr. in the last two elections and now he switched sides to vote for Obama. You can tell the mentality of the voters for Obama especially when they admit to voting for Bush Jr.
I wonder how many democrats voted for Bush Jr. and are now voting for Obama? I get the feeling a lot!
And now these very same people are saying don’t vote for McCain…ironic. Well I guess I won’t be listening to them, especially after knowing that!
Take your party unity stuff and put it were the sun don’t shine. If you think that was a terrible thing to say well to bad!
What happen today with the cheers and jeers is what the Democratic Party is all about. Anybody who is an elder (and I do mean elder) democrat knows what I am talking about. How the Obama people act is like Republicans act.
Well I am not a docile person, I take my politics seriously, I think of country before party and that it was not right what they did to those 2 states. You don’t punish the candidates and voters. It is an issue between the State Reps. and the party.
Posted by: Whyputaname | May 31, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
I am one of Hilary’s natural constituency – a white, middle-aged woman. I would have voted for her happily had she won the nomination – but she didn’t.
I ask all those who want to fight about it at Denver – what’s more important? Disappointed hopes about a particular candidate, or the the country’s future? I shudder to think of President McCain, but that’s what the continued infighting will buy. Do you want the policies and appointments that will come from a president McCain?
Posted by: EL | May 31, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
This is what’s wrong with today’s leaders of both parties.
Hillary’s campaign agreed to punish and
discount the hundreds of thousands of Dem voters when it was benificial, or at least not harmful, to her.
Now that she needs those votes, rather than standing by the punishment that she agreed to she tries to change the rules, and rather than doing it quietly, kicks up a bunch of dust.
Hillary, be a leader. Stand up and say
“I supportted the original decision, and I will stand by my word, regardless of how it effects my candidacy.”
That is what a leader would do.
To Hillary supporters I ask you, was Hillary disenfranchising voters when she orignally supported not counting all the votes? Why know out cry from all of you when Hillary agreed to this?
Posted by: Tim | May 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
I just realized that Hillary would be a bad president for the United States. She would put her ego first, before the need of American people.
Posted by: Bro John | May 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
“Every article I have read makes no mention of the
supers.”
Joseph777 | May 31, 2008 11:51:55 PM
Well then, you need to read more articles. No point in me arguing with you about it though. In a day or two you’ll figure it out. They’ll all get their pages updated eventually. ‘Til then, it’ll all be okay anyway.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
lisa….sorry, just a little upset at the whole process and how they have tried to destroy the superior candidate. I agree, Texas will go Republican, and if for some reason, Hillary is not in contention, I WILL vote for McCain……anything to keep, as you say, Obama out of the White House!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Amen, David and Marianne
They know the facts, despite their false bravado.
We hold the keys to the kingdom and I surely enjoy watching them carp, pule, and squirm.
They are not an annoyance, more like entertainment! Sort of like the sad faced circus clowns.
Entertainment with a bit of pathos.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
I am a Democrat and am running from the train wreck that is Obama’s candidacy. I can proudly say I voted for Hillary and had nothing to do with Obama’s impending collapse in November.
Posted by: Political Realist | May 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Boy am so glad there were two good people in this presidential race. If Hillary is not the nominee at least I can still vote for McCain.
Democrat No More!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Carol 17 | May 31, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
It was a wonderful debate, heated yes.. but the outcome was as fair as it could be. Its clear now that Barack Obama will be the nominee, lets come together and rally behind him! Hillary, I was all for you taking it to the DNC, but they have spoken. I wish you will think about not only the party but for the democratic voters who have want to support an official democratic nominee against McCain. Stop dragging this on, exit gracefully and lets move on already! If you take this to Denver, my take on you will change from you being a strong smart woman who’s best interest is the future of our democratic party, to a divider who’s best interest is yourself before the party. Our future depends on this race, if you keep causing turmoil in the party you are basically screwing with my future and I won’t stand for it.
Posted by: Dana | May 31, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Hillary should drop out Tuesday quickly before Obama claims Victory. Enough time has been given to Hillary to bow out. We gave her all kinds of respect, it is now time for her to pack and go fishing for a while. We will take care of her if she behaves.
Posted by: Sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Its funny now but when the DNC called me for more money and tried to convince me McCain was the enemy I told them that I could not help feeling that Barack Obama was the enemy and is the enemy and I will vote for John McCain just to keep Obama out of the white house and show the DNC that their gamble of Obama wil not pay off.
Posted by: Jessica | May 31, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Hillary Clinton is a woman. Barack Obama is half white and half black. They are both americans. What has happened to our country. The media so controls what people think. The republicans have totally been the strings and all of us democrats bite and destroy ourselves, havent we all suffered enough.I think the racist and sexist stuff is so fueled by the media and we just totally fall for it and let it dominate us just like world war 2 when hitler controlled the masses. Look we need to reclaim our country and if we keep fighting we will lose again. Stop this nonsense and vote on the policies not the race or gender. We can win in bnovember but only if we win over our fears and take control of our destinies.
Posted by: Ann | May 31, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
I wish Hillary would take it to the convention. As Obama poll numbers slide it would be a delight. I’d like to show the 30 who decided MI and FL fate today. I will stay will Hillary as long as she’s in but I will not support Obama even if Hillary endorses him.
Posted by: hank | May 31, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
“Also, according to those with knowledge of the
Michigan agreement, it is fair to claim Clinton the
winner of Michigan. But they caution against counting
her popular vote in the state.”
I wonder if they’ll issue a written report?
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 31, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
McCain never called hhis wife names in public. That was a story put out during a campaign by his opponents. Check Urban Legends….
Posted by: cynic675 | May 31, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Those Clinton supporters who claim to want out of the Dem party. So go. I am sure the democratic party can find other voters to replace you. As I have found over and over, no one is irreplaceable. If you don’t want to be here, then don’t be because you will only lessen the moral of the rest of us who believe that a democrate should be in the White House, no matter who. Good Bye and Good Luck
Posted by: Belinda Harrell | May 31, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Hillary is a sore loser. The Michigan and Floridian Dem’s crafted a resolution that has united them in those states but she wants to go against them. I wonde who they think thye will meet in Denver. Aliens?
Posted by: sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 31, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
The democrats would rather lose with Obama than win with Hillary yet are playing a dangerous game ignoring women and rural voters. Obama will not win in November but the party could be divided beyond repair. I’m not seeing unity. I don’t feel inspired in fact I’m mad and I feel let down.
Obama has divided this country. I will will laugh in glee when he loses the election. Yes John McCain will be better than Barack Obama. If I vote for Nader there is a chance Obama can get in I will do whatever it takes to keep him and Michelle out of the white house.
Posted by: deb | May 31, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Obamabots….do you see the “theme” on this blog? Hillary supporters, coming out, to state they will vote for McCain to keep Obama out of the White House. You think we’re just bluffing? Are you nuts? This is truth, he WILL NOT win without us, and we’re not supporting him! 17 million voters are a lot of people, there is POWER in numbers, and guess what, we’re not smitten by Obamas fake rhetoric and lies…..he doesn’t brainwash us with his charisma….we know he is a “wolf in sheeps clothing”. Face the facts…your “boy” Obama will lose the GE if he is the nominee….he needs Clinton supporters and will not get them.
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Those of you who are voting for McCain because Hillary is going to lose… I better not see you crying later on if God forbid McCain does win the general. You better suck it up with the war, with the gas prices and everything else that you all cry about now. That’s the most stupidest thing I ever heard “If Hillary doesnt win Im voting republican!”, Obama and Clinton’s views are way more alike then that of McCains. What a bunch of dumb crybabies.
Posted by: wakeupwhiners | May 31, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
“Our future depends on this race, if you keep causing turmoil in the party you are basically screwing with my future and I won’t stand for it.”
Dana’s threat to HRC.
What are you going to do to her Dana?
And… what are you going to do about we +17 million supporters.
Are you going to stamp your feet at us?
LOL
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
david from texas, I voted for Obama but would vote for Hillary if she is the nominee. I am a dem and don’t agree with republican policies. Can you please answer a question for me.
I know you don’t like Obama and I respect that, but you can vote him out in 4 years. Some justices will probably retire within the next term and then McCain will appoint conservative judges that last for life. I’m just trying to understand 4 years vs life. It just doesn’t make sense to me.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
This is what’s wrong with today’s leaders of both parties.
Hillary’s campaign agreed to punish and
discount the hundreds of thousands of Dem voters when it was benificial, or at least not harmful, to her.
Now that she needs those votes, rather than standing by the punishment that she agreed to she tries to change the rules, and rather than doing it quietly, kicks up a bunch of dust.
Hillary, be a leader. Stand up and say
“I supportted the original decision, and I will stand by my word, regardless of how it effects my candidacy.”
That is what a leader would do.
To Hillary supporters I ask you, was Hillary disenfranchising voters when she orignally supported not counting all the votes? Why know out cry from all of you when Hillary agreed to this?
Posted by: Tim | May 31, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
I think it’s interesting how vague the Obama haters are on this board about WHY they hate Obama so much.
What exact makes Obama an ‘empty suit,’ a ‘thug,’ a ‘train wreck,’ an ‘enemy,’ etc?
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
My only gripe is that the DNC should have made this decision last fall, like the Republicans did. Would have saved a lot of trouble.
Posted by: madtal | May 31, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Obama will join the Democratic losers club. Only Bill Clinton was successful. They could have won the white house will Hillary but chose to take a gamble on Barack. A dangerous game ignoring women and rural votes. As Donna Brazile has gleefully stated that the Democrats do not need a base. For every supporter they lose they feel they can find another voter who supports Obama. He didn’t even win one Blue state except for Illinois and may have trouble there when he comes back to the Senate in November. Most are fed up with him in Illinois. He is a do nothing senator who has ill served Illinois. In the three years as senator he has written a book, visited his homeland Africa on the taxpayers and ran for president. I don’t think he voted on any major legislation. Again, this is his strategy that will backfire and I will laugh and laugh come November.
Posted by: Jessica | May 31, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Which Obama are you people voting for to lead this country? The clueless Obama who claims that he didn’t know the first thing about the hate that was being communicated within the church that he attended for two decades, or the Obama that trades loyalty to his church (in the light of truth) for votes?
Does anyone see what’s going on?
Posted by: Dakota | May 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Obama will join the Democratic losers club. Only Bill Clinton was successful. They could have won the white house will Hillary but chose to take a gamble on Barack. A dangerous game ignoring women and rural votes. As Donna Brazile has gleefully stated that the Democrats do not need a base. For every supporter they lose they feel they can find another voter who supports Obama. He didn’t even win one Blue state except for Illinois and may have trouble there when he comes back to the Senate in November. Most are fed up with him in Illinois. He is a do nothing senator who has ill served Illinois. In the three years as senator he has written a book, visited his homeland Africa on the taxpayers and ran for president. I don’t think he voted on any major legislation. Again, this is his strategy that will backfire and I will laugh and laugh come November.
Posted by: Jessica | May 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
“‘He’s not going to wait by the phone like a high-school girl waiting for a date,” said Dunn.”
More sexist comments from the Obama campaign. Nothing new.
Ah, the Democrats do LOVE to pick losing candidates, don’t they? Really… they’ve lost 7 out of the last 10 presidential elections. The DNC doesn’t exactly have its finger on the pulse of the American public, does it?
Posted by: Brian W. | May 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
LSekhmet, The 69-59 split was a proposal from the Michigan Democratic Party Officials based upon actual voters’ exit polls, Obama write-in ballots, etc. They all felt it was a reasonable estimation. Ickes disagreed as he was looking at it strictly from the percentages – and ignoring other factors. Obama had the votes for a 50/50 ruling, but felt this was the better choice…Clinton ended up with more delegates as a result – so what’s the complaint? Are 4 delegates who get to vote as 1/2 each (2 delegates) that big a deal, under the circumstances, to fight over? Will 2 delegates make that big a difference with her 176 behind?
Posted by: NanD | May 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
David from Texas: I see people claiming to be Hillary supporters. More like GOP trolls — because a divided Democratic Party is your only hope. Turnout will crush you people in November.
BTW, you seem to forget that your state gave us the (current) worst president ever. I’d say that renders your judgment invalid on politics.
Thanks for less than nothing.
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
West Texas, what I will do is campaign vigourously for Barack Obama, donate whatever I can to his campaign and convince all my family and friends to do so as well! That’s how I will deal it! What did you think? I was going to come to your house and blow it up? LOL!! Loser.
Posted by: Dana | May 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Harold with his long winded speech made me sick. Hyjacking, get real he hyjacked it along with the others who voted to strip. then because Queen Hillary didnt win on super Tuesday.Suddenly peoples vote counted, Check it out and see how Harold voted the first time around to punish those states. Now and only now does it bother him with his pompist attitude. He makes me sick. I commend all those who served and tried to bring unity back to this great party. And shame on all those who for supporting the Queen Hillary to the death of this Party.
They tried and succeeded on the most part by doing the the best possible thing. The members on whole were very respectful.
Hillary win at any and all cost has caused such commotion in this Party by dividing.
There is now way now that good and common minds can see if this party will survive.
Supers need to come forward and do what is right.
Hillary is unfit to be President and Vice President.
Posted by: Lauren | May 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Hillary loses! America wins! YEEAAHHH!!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
TRUE FELLOW DEMOCRATS HANG IN THERE AND REMEMBER:
MCCAIN IN 2008
HILLARY IN 2012!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Political Realist | May 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
1. God
2. Country
3. Family
4. …
5. …
6. …
.
.
.
1000. Democratic Party
Clinton > McCain >>>>>>>>>> Obama
Posted by: Brent | May 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Ann: Great post. Thanks for the sanity
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Gee, more condescending comments from the Obamination (Abomination?)…
“We will take care of her is she behaves.” Well, that’ll bring in a lot of Clinton supporters!
Oh, yes, there are intelligent and industrious college students… supporting Hillary Clinton! Ask the baby bamas what the great bama plans to do… it’s amusing and pathetic.
A bama is a wannabe in DC slang…how very appropriate!
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Good riddance fake Democrats. Lose with Hillary in June. Lose with McCain in November. LOSERS ALL AROUND!!! YEEAHHH!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Dear Hillary Clinton Supporters,
I know that you are unhappy that your candidate is destined not to win the nomination of the Democratic Party. As an Obama supporter, we respect your and respect your enthusiasm for your candidate. But despite your passion, the fundemental reason you candidate couldn’t win is not due to anything we as Obama supporter did to disenfanchise your candidate. Its not because of our of others sexism, or media bias, or any other excuse which, like it or not, really sounds like whinning (who was it who said, if you can’t handle the heat, get out of the kitchen)? No. Her lost can be attributed to simply alignment of the stars. People know Hillery, more generally the Clintons, and she represents many (at least partially though her association with her husband)old school politics in a year where all politicians are out of favor. This is a year where a candidate with that type of baggage, no matter how astute in their political skills, will not be able to connect with the majority of voters. So while most democrats and independents, given the choise between McCain and Clinton, would choose the later, the winds of time favor someone who offers the nation a departure from the past and all the divisions that we are all too familar with. As a Edwards supporter, Obama offers a clear alternative, addressing (often unspoken) underlying national problems. This connects to the hearts of those who want solutions for the many, not just the few/one. The gas rebate issue which came to light during indiana is symbolic of the difference. While many say his campaign is all words (oratory), great presidents are neither intellectually brilliant nor overly skilled in in perception, but rather led by passion, inclusion, consultation and deep reflection with minimal consideration of the short range or personal political ramifications. Clinton (or McCain) lack these characteristics or attributes. Which leads me again to why Hillary lost. Please: its not sexism. She gets more than a proportionate percentate of support from women in a party disproportionately female. My lack of support for her has nothing to do with her sex, as i can think of many women i have voted for, and would consider for president. What it is is character. The fact that she’s is the very persona of a politician in a times where being a politican is clearly unfavored. But it is also the message. Some say She found her voice (late), but the political translation of that is she found the message/spin combination that fit the environment/time. The play is over, and now a more exciting and important act opens. When that curtain opens for the next act, please join the Democratic effort to roll back the Republican years of disgrace and damage and lead with unity this nation to grateness again.
Posted by: Jake Crawford | May 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
lisa…..I cannot vote for Obama for several reasons, too many to post here. But, here are a few: He played the race card and caused division; he supports Brzenski(Russian anti-Semitic) and Soros (where he gets most of his funding who also hates the Jews and is endorsing Obama because he will open negoitiations with Iran), his 20 years of attendance in an anti American church, his lies, lies, and more lies about his father and the Kennedy’s, NAFTA, and on and on. Added to this, he is inexperienced and states a lot in his rhetorical speeches, but can’t provide any plans for accomplishment. You know it, I know it, that Hillary is the better candidate, and will be the better candidate against McCain. However, if Obama is the nominee, I would rather have McCain in office, I’ll take my chances…with Obama, I see nothing but bad and dark days for America!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Hillary should have gotten out long before today. It was clear that the MATHS did not lie. Her campaign debt grew by the minutes to over $20 millions, the super delegates abandoned her, she played dirty, she lost fair and square. Part of her base that is made of racists and ignorants will vote for McCain because it is not about the party ideology. They can’t afford to pay Hillary’s debt but would rather have a $10 a gallon of gas, more job outsourcing, 3 more wars of 100 years with Iran Syria and Korea, Roe Vs Wade reversed, social security privatized, a draft in the military, more housing crisis, tax cut for the riches, no affordable healthcare….This is the price to pay for the loyal Clintonites. That amounts to become a suicide bomber.
Posted by: Sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Hillary should have gotten out long before today. It was clear that the MATHS did not lie. Her campaign debt grew by the minutes to over $20 millions, the super delegates abandoned her, she played dirty, she lost fair and square. Part of her base that is made of racists and ignorants will vote for McCain because it is not about the party ideology. They can’t afford to pay Hillary’s debt but would rather have a $10 a gallon of gas, more job outsourcing, 3 more wars of 100 years with Iran Syria and Korea, Roe Vs Wade reversed, social security privatized, a draft in the military, more housing crisis, tax cut for the riches, no affordable healthcare….This is the price to pay for the loyal Clintonites. That amounts to become a suicide bomber.
Posted by: Sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
nicely said Scott in PacNw.
A dem will win in Nov. And It will be Obama.
Posted by: Lauren | May 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
“If you don’t want to be here, then don’t be because you will only lessen the moral of the rest of us who believe that a democrate should be in the White House, no matter who. Good Bye and Good Luck” quote from Belinda Harrell, above.
Belinda I don’t think we could possibly do anything that would lower your or any Obamabots “morals”.
Surely they are as low as they can go!
Did you perhaps mean morale? LOL
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
I’m glad the delegates have been seated with the appropriate punishment for MI and FL, and hopefully Clinton and her annoying campaign will go away. It’s amazing how she said those primaries wouldn’t count when she was ahead in the polls, but when she fell behind she suddenly decided that they should be counted. What a hypocrite…
Posted by: It's over | May 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Losers in Texas gave us Bush. No reason to care what they think. GOBAMA! YEAAHH!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
mary indy, I don’t like how some Hillary supproters portray our college kid as druggies. That is so unfair to them.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Jessica,
Check your facts. Obama won in Iowa, Delaware, Connecticut, Missouri, Minnesota, Washington (state & DC), Maryland, Wisconsin & Oregon, all varying shades of blue.
Posted by: madtal | May 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
“After Tuesday,” Dunn added, referring to the final contests of South Dakota and Montana, Clinton “can decide how united she wants this party to be.”
You have to love it. He is not waiting on her and if she wants her power within the party to continue she best fall in line.
Make no mistake he doesn’t make it this time there is no 2012 for Clinton.
Posted by: Thinking | May 31, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Hillary, you lose.
Posted by: dncfan | May 31, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Wow! Vote fore McCain? Calling Barrack a Muslim? Support Hillary or else? Sounds more like Republican operation chaos than democrats.
Posted by: Marie | May 31, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Now I know why Obama said that he’s been
to 57 states and has 3 left to go, those extra 10 states are going to give him the electoral votes that he needs to best McCain in Nov!
Posted by: mnmama | May 31, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
West Texas:
I think she meant exactly what she said. Obamabots do NOT want us to contaminate their pool. Their morals are dictated by Messrs. Wright, Farrakhan and Pfleger. We are only going to distract them when their hearts and minds are touched by these esteemed spiritual leaders.
Clinton > McCain >>>>>>>>>> Obama
Posted by: Brent | May 31, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
It’s been a great campaign. Hillary lost in Iowa and has been behind ever since. SHE NEVER TOOK THE LEAD! She’s been losing for six months and whining about it all the way. There’s nothing more entertaining than that! ThaNKs for all the fun, Hillary. Now get out of the way. We have a real campaign to run and don’t need any losers in our way. YEEAHH!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
I just saw the demise of the Clinton’s today on national tv. GO DNC!
Posted by: dncfan | May 31, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
For those of you who say people from Texas gave you Bush, you’re wrong. America voted for Bush…..Texas is one state among 50, so your claim is bull! Now, back to the point…..face it, Obama will not win in November…..he can’t without the Clinton supporters, and you can bet that she will keep the dissention going along with her campaign all the way to the convention and after. There is waaaay too much division in the Democratic party caused by Obama for it to be healed by November. Obamabots don’t want to think about this, but its reality, so face it! Obama will lose in November….the writing is on the wall, the problem Obamabots have is that they are too blinded by the lies of Obama to read this writing!
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
$4 a gallon is what a war of 100 years cost to this country with 4000 troops killed. You add McCain 3 more wars of 100 years in Iran, Syria and Korea that will equate to $16 a gallon and 16000 troops killed. Vote for McCain and be ready to pay a heavy price for the stupidity.
Posted by: sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Today we found out what this race is really about and thanks to Mr. Icke, the country no longer has to guess. The motives here are clear – Win by any means necessary and allow the results of a flawed primary to become the book of record even if it disenfranchises thousands of registered voters who took the DNC at it’s word and didn’t vote in the primary. It’s interesting how that is somehow reflective of the will of the people but a compromise that seeks to actually reflect some semblance of what likely would’ve been the outcome. Does the Clinton campaign believe that Senator Obama wouldn’t have recieved a single vote if his name appeared on the ballot? Of course not so why suggest counting the votes in MI as is could be even remotely close to reflecting the will of the people.
I like the Clintons and I applaud Hillary for her strength and refusal to quit but their proposal is irrational and based simply on there attempt to catch up. They should cease any suggestion that they are fighting for the people of MI and FL. The truth is they are fighting for Bill and Hillary.
Posted by: DemocracyWon | May 31, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
I understand it is difficult to concede a position, even when it is in the interest of the greater good. Now is the time for democrats to put our collective ego’s aside and to consider that whether it is Clinton or Obama winning the nomination, we as a party have “more that unites us than divides us”. Let’s move on to try to salvage what is left of our great nation and put it on a path of recovery – something I cannot believe can be done with another 4 years of republican “leadership”. Let us also pledge to one another to fix the problems with the nominating process so we can avoid the spectacle of this election in the future.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
david from texas, I never liked Hillary from the get go. She felt entitled to this nomination and that showed arrogance on her part. But I would absolutely wote for her. I do worry about the supreme court though. Like I said I respect your vote. What are your thoughts on the supreme court.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Joseph777, You may want to re-check your assumptions. My understanding is that both MI and FL delegates AND superdelegates are seated with one half vote each.
Posted by: NanD | May 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Hillary is not more electable than BO. It has been two against one for a couple months now. Had it been two against one – against Hillary – she would be behind in those head to head McCain polls.
It is Bill’s fault she lost. When he made the decision to marginalize Obama to the “black” canidate – he didn’t realize that the white egg heads would leave too. So long slick Willie – do soil some more blue dresses.
Posted by: paul | May 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Lisa:
McCain would not be able to get conservative judges approved by Congress…he’d need to advance moderates. Actually, he’s been considered a moderate and that has caused him trouble with the GOP, in case you haven’t noticed. Remember? They’ve been concerned that he couldn’t carry the conservatives?
It seems to me that those who are identifying them-selves as Independents are not for Obama. I’m certainly not. I began voting as a Dem and have never missed a vote. I went independent a long time ago, when it appeared to me that both parties were rotten to the core. I rejoined because of Hillary’s logic and command of the facts and possibilities. It was so refreshing not to have to listen to fluff. Though I usually, not always, vote Dem as the lesser of two evils, I got excited this time about having someone worth voting for. If I have to go back to choosing between the lesser of two evils again, I’d still rather have an experienced hand at the helm than another Bush-style robot.
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
McCain can not even have a pro life VP, wait to see when he will appoint judges who will reverse Roe Vs Wade. Be ready to pay the price of the supidity. 4 years under McCain will look like 10 years in hell. Try it, you will pay big time.
Posted by: sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Folks, please get yourselves a life! Please come back in three days and read your own posts – I am sure you’ll find it quite pathetic.
If you guys and gals, who make up the electorate, don’t grow up, then where’s the future of this country? GW Bush got elected because, in my view, the electorate lost its mind (at least in 2004, if not in 2000, when the Supreme Court took care of it).
Let’s not go there again by acting like rabid dogs.
Posted by: Justforkix | May 31, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
lisa, I think it’s tough to call about the Supreme Court positions. McCain is not your average Republican. He’s more liberal than most. I don think he will surround himself with strong advisers on each and every issue. I just think he will be better for America than Obama. McCain has proven himself, POW, years in politics, good resume’. Obama….well, hard to find anything good about him.
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Are there any Clinton supporters that complained when the votes were originally stripped?
Anybody out there that, when the decision was made, said it was wrong and that every vote should count?
Posted by: Tim | May 31, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
I really feel like Hillary Clinton and their supporters will need grief therapy after this. They are really taking it hard. SCARY.
Posted by: wakeupwhiners | May 31, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
We will win
Posted by: McCain Ahmedinajad Maliki Bush | May 31, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
David from Texas: Thanks for being specific on Obama & what bothers you.
Most Obama $ comes from small donors not Soros.
From my perspective Bill Clinton played the race card first. It was a sad day. I expected more from him.
I agree stupid things have been said at his church, but I don’t agree with a lot of stuff said at a lot of churches.
As for Obama’s supposed lies, check out the Snopes Obama page: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/obama.asp
Often the people lying are the ones talking about Obama, not Obama himself.
And Obama has a 64-page plan. You can find it at his website: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf
Thanks again for being specific. :-)
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
If the Lord Obama can call people sweetie, so can I. He’s a great role model for black men…
“Wow, Tony, that was pretty sexist, no?
Posted by: brynb2
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
LOL, McCain Ahmedinajad Maliki Bush. Laughing at your comment AND your name heehee.
Posted by: Dana | May 31, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I am sick, sick, sick of hearing people say they will vote for McCain if they can’t have Hillary. You have every right to vote for McCain. So, go for it. However, I would also suggest that since you plan on voting FOR continuing the war that after you cast your vote you head on down to the recruiting office of your choice and sign up to fight FOR a war you will be voting for. If you are going to vote for McCain be willing to fully support his agenda.
While you’re there you can explain to all the other soldiers that are there why you voted for them to continue to be there. Then explain to them that they will have to stay in the military a longgggggggg time because your candidate doesn’t believe in a GI bill unless they stay in there until they’re 40.
Also, while you’re in the area maybe you could swing by Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Turkey, (sorry if I left anyone out) and bomb, bomb, bomb.
When you return gas will probably be $10 a gallon by then, if in fact you do return. Your house will be foreclosed on and your job will probably be shipped overseas. But, hey look on the bright side. Hillary may be a Senator of one of those “hard-working white people states. You can always move there.
The website is:
http://www.johnmccain.com
Good Luck and Come Home Soon!
Posted by: Tina, Obama Supporter in NC | May 31, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Honey, you are so delusional. LOL. First of all, it’s not just old women. It’s middle aged, poor, middle class women and men…..and some blacks too. I’m black and I wont vote for that fraudulent Obama.
Rita,
Are you really that clueless to think???
“The Hillary numbers of cranky lady votes is small and will continue to shrink, whether they admit to it or not. These voters can not alone elect McCain, because they will be swamped by all the republicans voting Obama in November.”
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
While the country is suffering at home, the war in Irak cost to the taxpayer $20 billions a month, add 3 more wars from McCain then the total cost will be $80 billions a month. 80% of the people believe the country is going to wrong direction. Expect McCain to move that number to 100% just 3 months after taking over from Bush.
Posted by: Sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
i saw the most bizarre comment and had to offer 2 cents…
?Posted by: Barb | May 31, 2008 10:29:22 PM
?Obama is NOT African American. That’s his biggest lie. He’s Arab American.
?Vote Obama, Vote Muslim!
1. arab is neither a race nor a nationality. anyone who speaks the arabic language is an arab.
2. i don’t know his history, but obama has publicly stated that he is a christian. he cannot be a muslim.
3. just for measure, unlike israel and iran, there is nothing restricting the race or religion of elected officials in the US. in fact, if there were, it would be bigotry.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Lee – you need to look in the mirror. LOL. I’m not whining. I’m just not voting for Obamarama. LOL – what’s wrong with that?
“I have never seen a more sore bunch of loosers, I have seen less whining from a 2 year old whose lollipop was snatched. What a pathetic bunch of whiners these people are, what immature people, I cannot believe what I’m reading from some of these supporters of Hillary Clinton. Whew!!
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Sep. 25, 2007:
It’s official: Washington insiders believe Hillary Rodham Clinton will be the Democratic presidential nominee.
The latest sign of Clinton’s “inevitability” … Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh endorsed her presidential bid Monday. Just take a look at some of the evidence:
* Sunday’s front-page New York Times story led with this sentence: “Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has consolidated her early lead in the Democratic presidential contest, showing steady strength as the candidates head toward the first voting early next year.”
* Clinton appeared on five –FIVE! — Sunday talk shows, winning generally positive reviews and, as importantly from her perspective, not making any errors.
* Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh (D) — at one point a candidate for the 2008 nod himself — on Monday threw his support behind Clinton, calling her a “seasoned, experienced leader who will be ready to lead this country on day one.” The two serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee together and traveled to Iraq and Afghanistan in January.
* Early predictions for the third fundraising quarter, which ends Sunday, hold that Clinton will outraise Sen. Barack Obama.
Those four factors — not to mention President Bush saying that he expects Clinton to be the nominee — and, voila, you see the Washington establishment lining up behind the Clinton “inevitability” view.
“The ‘establishment’ fears nothing more than not having booked passage on a ship set to sail,” explained senior party strategist, Carter Eskew, who is not supporting any of the current candidates. “She has passed early tests in the debates, built a great campaign, gained ground in Iowa, blunted negatives [and] mastered the Sunday talk gauntlet.”
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
It boggles the mind why Clinton supporters would want to drag this out until 3 months before the general election.
That gives the party 3 months to unify a party that between now and then would become only more divided.
Sounds like a recipe for failure.
Posted by: Vohn | May 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
So what some of the Hillary Supporters are saying is: They never really cared about the War in Iraq, about bringing our soldiers home, about fighting terrorism in Aghan., about the issues affecting the middle class and healthcare. Is that the reason you are supporting Hillary. It has become abundantly clear that they only cared about Hillary all along and wanted to make sure she got the nomination. They don’t care about the issues- they only care about Hillary.
I hate to break it to you pin heads- this election is not about Hillary or Obama it about the issues they both represent.
If the Party loses because of your anger mgmt issues then you will be responsible for another 4 more years in Iraq, trillions of dollars in more debt and another 4 years of the status quo.
This is the reality if Obama doesn’t win in Nov.
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Don’t worry Mary. You and your whitey hating America bashing homies can have the Democratic nomination. I’ll be voting for America (and I know that drives you crazy!!!!!)
Posted by: Political Realist | May 31, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Clinton is a tad bit late on trying to argue the Michigan Florida case. OH YAH I forgot, she didn’t NEED them back then.
Posted by: dncfan | May 31, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Lisa, Mary, Lauren, wakeupwhiners, Dana, Mary, Jake Crawford, Sheila, It’s over , Thinking, dncfan, Marie, DemocracyWon, Michael, etc. are all out-sourced, $4 an hour, Obama posers.
Most with non U.S. IPs, posting from non U.S. time zones.
They are changing names, using scripted attacks and rebuttals.
Blogs are full of them. Posts follow same theme with few variations.
Notice their English, phrasing, and syntax. Pathetic!
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
David, McCain said he would appoint conservative judges. Of course he wants to appease the conservatives in his party. Right now they can’t stand him. I think no one knows who will win this because both sides will cross party lines. I find this fascinating.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
David from Texas wrote: “For those of you who say people from Texas gave you Bush, you’re wrong. America voted for Bush…..Texas is one state among 50, so your claim is bull!”
Texas did give us GWB. That’s just a fact. How can you claim otherwise?
(Nice job of trying to kick him to the curb though.)
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Miss Thing, stop trying to play all high and mighty. We just don’t like your wild card boo. He may have seduced the media, white yuppies, and college students, but try to win the national election with that group. LOL!!!!!!!!!!! Not gonna happen. You are the ones who need to live with it. Obambi is TOAST. I CANNOT WAIT TO VOTE FOR MCCAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“I totally agree with your analyst. As an Obama supporter it would take serious consideration for me to vote Hillary but just the thought of the Republican policies would make me do so.
When I hear Hillary supporters claiming to not vote Obama in November, I think of immaturity.
As an Obama youth supporter I’m baffled as how these adults are acting.
Ignorance is bliss.
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Political Realist Losers are really cute when they have one of their widdle tantrums. It has been fun crushing them under our boots all year long. It will be even more fun in November!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Poor West Texas. Dncfan was right, you do need grief therapy. And btw.. that’s how you ignorant you are. If you could see my IP its coming straight from Hawaii… HOME OF BARACK OBAMA BABY!!! GO BARACK OBAMA, WE LOOOOOOOVE YOUUUU!!!!
Posted by: Dana | May 31, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
To the Hillary supporters who have had to endure a narrow defeat but understand the big picture (beating McCain): I applaud you and I know how it feels to lose a big, important battle, so I also empathize with you.
To the Hillary supporters who say they are now going to support McCain, who is OPPOSED TO EVERY MAJOR POLITICAL POSITION HILLARY IS FOR: Do you hate Obama so much that you will vote against all of your candidate’s positions in November? If so, please go back to focusing your time voting on reality TV.
Posted by: 1-20-09 End of an Error | May 31, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Darlene, we told you hope wouldn’t put food on the table, but you guys laughed at that. Oh well. I hope you survive the next four years. It will be rough either way…..
“You people saying yojur gonna vote for Mcain are idiots. you wanna trade your economic future and your countries future for something as trivial as this. Look Obama isn’t perfect niether is Hillary but voting for 4 more years of hell is traiterous to your party and your country. Look im a 32 year old woman im a registered democrat and i struggle to pay my bills every month but ill vote for Obama if he is the nominee cause he will fight for my interests. Anyhow if you vote against Obama do it because his policies which by the way are almost the same as clintons, not over anger that is what fuels are country already and will lead to our collapse.
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
west texas, I live in Md and haven’t changed names. What are you talking about.
Posted by: lisa | May 31, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Hillary Clinton supporters are the biggest bunch of psychos. These are women who are reaching senior citizen age and they are behaving like bratty children. I have seen more maturity in the Chuck E. Cheese ballpit than I’ve seen from some Hillary supporters today. They should all be ashamed of themselves. and they should apologize for embarrassing the Democratic party. Idiots.
Posted by: Amy | May 31, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
When the world ends I hope I’m in West Texas because they are 30 years behind the rest of civilization there!! Giddyup, LOSERS!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
So how was that crack sandwich you had for dinner?
“Just wait and see. Hillary will be running as an Independent, and Hillary supporters will vote for her instead of Obama.
Posted by: jmt
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Mary I’m voting for McCain. Get over it already. I know that upsets you but don’t worry sweetie (Obama’s term) mama will make it all better.
Posted by: Political Realist | May 31, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Clinton-Backer McAuliffe Threatened To Strip Rogue Delegates In 2004 Cycle
By Eric Kleefeld – April 26, 2008, 3:05PM
In an interesting example of how the views of many high-profile Clinton supporters have changed regarding the status of rogue primaries, blogger Mark Nickolas has spotted a key passage from Terry McAuliffe’s 2007 book.
McAuliffe recounted how he stared down Sen. Carl Levin’s (D-MI) attempt to move up the Michigan primary during the 2004 cycle, and held firm on his threat to strip the state of delegates:
“You won’t deny us seats at the convention,” he said.
“Carl, take it to the bank,” I said. “They will not get a credential. The closest they’ll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules. If you want to call my bluff, Carl, you go ahead and do it.
“http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/clintonbacker_mcauliffe_threat_1.php
Posted by: Tim | May 31, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Since he passed his audition at the Democratic convention in 2004, Senator Obama has been taken over by George Soros and other hedge fund millionaires to launch a campaign out of nowhere, based on nothing but rhetoric and Wall Street millions. As darling of the rich elitist Kennedy/Kerry/Dean wing of the Democratic Party, Obama’s pseudo-Camelot will deliver Wall Street and the Anglo-American financiers the goods while disguised in a patina of racial teflon and faux populism from the upper crust.
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
IP/Time-zone situation is the same with Political Realist, and JimBeam70.
All off-shore, out-sourced Obama bloggers.
Obama has moved harassing jobs off-shore already.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
She is cooked. The primaries are over on Tuesday and QUEEN Hillary will be history. Vote for McCain if you wish, sore losers.
Posted by: sheila | May 31, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Hey Amy, I felt shame for Hillary Clinton too! Her supporters behaved worst than my kids at age 2! I’m proud that the Obama supporters represented Obama with grace and dignity, just as Barack Obama had wanted them too. What a poor reflection of Hillary.
Posted by: Dana | May 31, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
My mistake Political Realist, read the wrong IP.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Apparetently you are VERY YOUNG! I have lived through a lot of nominating processess. People left the Democrats to vote for Reagan. And they will do it again.!
“And if you really believe that 17 million people are going to vote against their own interests and go with a McLame leadership, “More War Years!!” you’re sadly mistaken. Hillary claimed she would have 10,000 protestors at the meeting today, there were MAYBE 200-300.
Posted by: brynb2
Posted by: Tony | May 31, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
A reporter asked the Political Realist what he thought about the President’s Civil Rights Bill. He answered, “If he owes it, I reckon he should pay it.”
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
First: most of the fools talking about not voting for Obama are not Dems anyway. They’ll get replaced by new voters and Indepedents who decide general elections. Second: if you’re not in a swing state (WI, IA, NM, NV, etc.) JUST BE QUIET!. People from TX talking about not voting for Obama – TX IS A RED STATE DUMMY. People from CA – you’re entire neighborhood can not vote for Obama, and CA WILL STILL BE BLUE IN NOV.
Grow up.
Posted by: KT | May 31, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
DEMOCRATS FOR AMERICA!!!!!!
MCCAIN 2008
HILLARY 2012!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Political Realist | May 31, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
How do you know when your staying in a West Texas hotel? When you call the front desk and say, “I’ve gotta leak in my sink” and the person at the front desk says, “So go ahead already!”
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
West Texas needs grief counseling.
Posted by: dncfan | May 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
If Hillary supporters or disgruntled FL & MI voters want to sit out or vote for McCain or write in a vote, that’s fine. PLEASE blame yourselves when (if) McCain wins. There’s obviously some other reason you just WON’T vote for the DEMOCRATIC nominee. If by chance Hillary was the nominee, I would support her because I am a democrat and want what’s best 4 the party. If I wasn’t, I’d just register as a republican from here on out. Get over it! If Dubya can get 2 terms, please don’t tell me you won’t even give Obama a chance…
Posted by: Sara 4 Barack Who's Sane Obama | May 31, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
david from texas- not me homeskillet. Why don’t you prove it.
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Tony:
“Traitorous to my party?”
Gee, how about we just ask the folks in Florida and Michigan what their “party” did for them today?
I’m sure every one of those DNC Rules members will want the Florida and Michigan votes to count in November…..
Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
I’m hoping Hillary wants this party as fractured as it already IS. There is nothing she can do or say to her supporters to convince them to vote for that drek Obama. I only pray she keeps her name off the ticket so he can lose on his own!
HILLARY SUPPORTERS FOR McCAIN!
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
As the Gallup analysis shows, Clinton is currently running ahead of McCain in the 20 states where she has prevailed in the popular vote, while Obama is tied with McCain in those same states. Thus, at this stage in the race (before the general-election campaigns have fully engaged), there is some support for her argument that her primary states indicate she would be stronger than Obama in the general election.
The same cannot be said for Obama in the 28 states and D.C. where he prevailed in the popular vote.
Posted by: david from texas | May 31, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Crybaby losers for McCain!!! Who cares what they think? They lost big time once. They’ll lose worse in November. Once a loser, always a LOSER!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Wow Debra, what an ass you are because your girl is losing. Grow up. Oh I guess you’re taking your toys home now.
Posted by: jj | May 31, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Yes Debra — you have many fellow Democrats like me who will also be voting for McCain. It’s painful but we have to put our country ahead of our party. But we will be voting for Democratic senators and congressmen who can work with moderate McCain.
Posted by: Political Realist | May 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
A losing candidate is stronger in November than a WINNER!!! Great logic! No wonder they LOST!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
OK, the bamas are getting boring in their insults.
No, I don’t want the war in Iraq to go on. No, I don’t want Roe v Wade overturned…and so on.
What I really don’t want is an inexperienced dummy in charge…like the one we’ve just lived through for 8 years. Who will be whispering “sweet nothings” in bama’s ear when he tries to answer questions he doesn’t understand. What am I talking about? How about his plan to just talk to all the heads of state with whom we have problems? He’s been retrenching on that position ever since he used it to sell himself on campus. Who bought into it? The ever-hopeful, ignorant, and inexperienced.
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Speaking as someone who is not from America, and has no real stake in either Democratic candidate. Can I just say this:
It has been a tough race. But Obama himself, and the far majority of his supporters, have conducted themselves in a far more mature and noble way than Hillary Clinton and you, her cronies.
There are a lot (in fact, another far majority) of Hillary Clinton supporters that have/will concede defeat if/when it is clear to them she has lost, and will instead vote their logical second choice and best candidate for their interests: Barack Obama.
To vote for McCain, the nominee your beloved Hillary Clinton is herself against, just because you’re bitter she didn’t win is both dangerous and incredibly petty. You do not care about what is best for your family or country, you have become the unintentional victims is a cult of personality.
The truth is this: there is no circumstance in which some of you people would concede defeat to Obama. Not if he had 99% of the vote. You are not thinking straight and the rest of the world is laughing at you.
Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
at JayJay: *lol*
I think Michelle Obama in the White House would make Hillary look like Laura Bush. That’s one vile, ugly, angry lady.
But that’s not going to happen, as I look forward to the inauguration of President McCain. It’s a done deal.
Posted by: Keskie | May 31, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Speaking as someone who is not from America, and has no real stake in either Democratic candidate. Can I just say this:
It has been a tough race. But Obama himself, and the far majority of his supporters, have conducted themselves in a far more mature and noble way than Hillary Clinton and you, her cronies.
There are a lot (in fact, another far majority) of Hillary Clinton supporters that have/will concede defeat if/when it is clear to them she has lost, and will instead vote their logical second choice and best candidate for their interests: Barack Obama.
To vote for McCain, the nominee your beloved Hillary Clinton is herself against, just because you’re bitter she didn’t win is both dangerous and incredibly petty. You do not care about what is best for your family or country, you have become the unintentional victims is a cult of personality.
The truth is this: there is no circumstance in which some of you people would concede defeat to Obama. Not if he had 99% of the vote. You are not thinking straight and the rest of the world is laughing at you.
Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Speaking as someone who is not from America, and has no real stake in either Democratic candidate. Can I just say this:
It has been a tough race. But Obama himself, and the far majority of his supporters, have conducted themselves in a far more mature and noble way than Hillary Clinton and you, her cronies.
There are a lot (in fact, another far majority) of Hillary Clinton supporters that have/will concede defeat if/when it is clear to them she has lost, and will instead vote their logical second choice and best candidate for their interests: Barack Obama.
To vote for McCain, the nominee your beloved Hillary Clinton is herself against, just because you’re bitter she didn’t win is both dangerous and incredibly petty. You do not care about what is best for your family or country, you have become the unintentional victims is a cult of personality.
The truth is this: there is no circumstance in which some of you people would concede defeat to Obama. Not if he had 99% of the vote. You are not thinking straight and the rest of the world is laughing at you.
Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
What does Political Realist call reruns of “Hee Haw”?
Home movies.
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Dukakis.
Mondale.
McGovern.
Kerry.
Obama.
Republicans are dancing in the streets, as they well should.
Posted by: Anna Banna | May 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
david from texas (also known as closet republican) – Did bill clinton carry all of the states that he won in the primary? No he did not. What happens in the primary does not reflect what happens in the General Election. The latest news out of Cali shows that Obama would beat Clinton by a landslide if the they reheld the primary. Hillary campaign is sunk. I hope all you Bennedict Arnolds enjoy sleeping with the fishes.
Posted by: JimBeam70 | May 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Jon — I don’t know what country you are from. But trust me, unless you are from China or Russia (doubtful) you are pretty insignificant in the world and I’m sure we would be laughing at you if we had the time to pay attention to little countries.
Posted by: Political Realist | May 31, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
If Obama is an idiot then Hillary is LOSER who can’t even beat an idiot!! HAHAHAHA!!!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Don’t worry. Obama will protect us from those who would kill us all.
*hysterical, manical laughter*
Posted by: God Help Us All | May 31, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Now, now, you guys.
The “Chosen One” said to lay off his wife.
You might hurt her non-existent feelings.
Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
God must hate Hillary since he made her a LOSER!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
After the last debate in Philadelphia, I thought ABC got some unfair criticisms. I didn’t understand what all the fuss was about. Now I understand that perhaps people knew more than I did. It seems that most of the racists in the democratic party are hidden here. I have to ask though, What are all these racists doing here? Isn’t there a party for them called the republican party? Now, understand I’m not talking about people who simply support Hillary Clinton. Heck, I’m not even talking about some who are thinking about not voting for Obama. I’m talking about the name callers and racist or insulting remarks makers. When you read some of the posts here, you really have an idea why some say the ignorant ones are behind Clinton. Obviously, I do not believe that to be the case. Yet, some of the posts here make a stronger case for that notion. I simply good, decent people who support Hillary should not want to be associated with these ignorant racists. But I guess politics make strange bedfellows. Hey, you racists, please run to the republican party. Stay there. You belong there. God have mercy on your souls.
Posted by: doppp | May 31, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Please, read this. Educate yourself. Learn something.
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0385511841
Posted by: Denna Trillum | May 31, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Racist jokes denigrate nobody but the ones who tell them. They aren’t funny, they are unsettling.
I dislike Obama to a very large degree, and I couldn’t give a crap what color he was. I can’t stand his disingenuousness, lack of spine and frighteningly socialist views. I don’t want him to lead the country I love.
Knock it off with the jokes. If you dislike the man’s views, articulate why.
Posted by: Jackie | May 31, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
“He’s not going to wait by the phone like a high-school girl waiting for a date,” said Dunn. “That’s not Barack Obama.”
This is a particularly sad analogy for an Obama spokesperson to offer — given that women are fed up with the demeaning treatment that has been accorded Clinton by the Obama campaign and the media.
Posted by: SS Massachusetts | May 31, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
All you stupid white Hillary supporters can just go and cry because we Blacks have wanted to give it to the white man or women for a long time. Rev. Wright and Obama are right about America. It is a shameful country and if we vote for Obama we can be proud of America for the first time. GO OBAMA!!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Obama/Clark ’08 for President!!!
Clinton/Peter Paul ’08 for President of the Federal Prison!
Posted by: FinallyOver | May 31, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Now, that’s an interesting comparison…Benedict Arnold? You know what put him off? The politics, lies, and greed rampant in the young American government and military of that day…which were causing the failure of every campaign. I don’t think he chose the right course and his defection was a great loss to our country.
Again, as to working with McCain, just give him a Democratic quorum to work with!
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
why do people keep bringing this 57 states thing up? He most likely meant 57 states and territories including Washington DC, Peurto Rico, Virgin Islands, etc. You people who don’t get that and think Obama doesn’t know geography are pretty dumb.
Posted by: Davey | May 31, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Hey Obamaisanidiot.
I live in a country that allowed women and non-whites to vote before you did, with a stronger economy than yours, with a better diplomatic standing in the world, better education, healthier population, better record of human rights.
Having trouble guessing where I’m from?
Must be because SO MANY countries fall under this category.
Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Yet another lifelong Democrat here, voting for McCain. Just checking in and saying hello to everyone.
Posted by: Another McDemocrat | May 31, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Since I am a Republican who voted and supports Hillary Clinton (I am not a party loyalist)…I have no problem supporting Sen. McCain…in fact I will work my a– off 5 days a week at L.A. headquarters come Sept. There are millions like me for all you Obama cult. Don’t think all 18 million Hillary supporters will go to Obama camp. BEING AN AMERICAN COMES BEFORE ANY PARTY LOYALTY!
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Hey Jon, nobody gives a damn where you’re from. This is an American board and media outlet. Take your anti-American views blow them out your arse.
Posted by: Darryl | May 31, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Obam resigning from Trinty Church today is like a candidate resigning from the after 20 years.
That candidate could use Obama’s line.
Yeah! I sat in the meetings for 20 years, hung out with them, called them my spiritual leaders, put them in my campaign, etc.
And yes I titled a book after one of the grand klegle’s speeches, quoted him regularly, and based my life on the teachings of him and the grand dragon.
But I never heard them say anything but good stuff, and had no idea they were racists.
None of it had any effect on me, I was oblivious. So was my wife. We really were there because we just have a thing about clean sheets and brightly lit crosses.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Obama resigning from Trinty Church today is like a candidate resigning from the KKK after 20 years.
That candidate could use Obama’s line.
“Yeah! I sat in the meetings for 20 years, hung out with them, called them my spiritual leaders, put them in my campaign, etc.
And yes I titled a book after one of the grand klegle’s speeches, quoted him regularly, and based my life on the teachings of him and the grand dragon.
But I never heard them say anything but good stuff, and had no idea they were racists.
None of it had any effect on me, I was oblivious. So was my wife. We really were there because we just have a thing about clean sheets and brightly lit crosses.”
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
popular vote:
Clinton 17.41 million
Obama 17.23 million
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
I’m not anti-American whatsoever.
My first post was anti-hysteria
And my second was anti-bigotry.
And I won’t stop posting here unless I want to.
Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Debra
yea I will wait for the floor fight before I actually vote for mccain in the meantime I have both hillary and mccain stickers on my car.. its a free country!… more or less!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Sheila, thanks for giving us permission to vote for McCain, although if you do the math you surely see that your candidate can’t win with only half of the Democrat votes. Also, someone mentioned that there were only 200 protesters for Hillary. I’m sure many more wanted to be there but couldn’t afford the expense; undoubtedly they had to work, and if they had extra money it probably was spent for medication for a family member since so many of them support her because they can’t afford health insurance. I don’t have that problem because I’m a health care professional and have health care insurance, but I see many on a daily basis who don’t and really suffer without needed medications. Her efforts to get universal health care in the past were defeated, and I am beginning to think this may be one of reasons that the DNC decided from the beginning that no way was she going to be the candidate( it would be devastating for them to lose the lobbyists from the drug companies!) Some of you Obama supporters go ahead and reply in your usual manner and tell me we Clinton supporters are stupid and un-educated. I love it when you talk dirty! It gives me more reason not to vote in the General.
Posted by: womanpower88 | May 31, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Mary…I’m guessing most of the 14% of the black population think/feel like you which is why Obama gets 98% of black support. Thank God, the 86% left of the country is comprised of blue collar whites, women, hispanics, Asians, bible huggers, gun toting, MIDDLE AMERICANS….THE FOLKS THAT VOTE OUR PRESIDENTS INTO OFFICE.
Good luck with that 14% (and college kids/radical support that goes B. Hussein’s way).
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
mary Indy
yea that is a criteria of the nomination process a majority of the popular vote but those fools pushing the unconstitutional affirmative action by laws in the rules commitee thinks that they have the best of that butt they dont!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
womanpower88
Im with you on a convention floor fight and Im a male!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Debra,
You are right. I have voted Democrat since I turned 18, 30 years. My country comes before the Democratic Party, which is why I will either not vote or vote McCain. I can’t vote with a clear conscience for Obama, something is just not right there.
Posted by: J | May 31, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Way to go Staniam..Hillary and McCain are two Americans I can believe in to put our country first. They are both moderate and that is what this country has voted for historically. No way a big lefty liberal/radical magnet as BHO.
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Please all Hillary supporters…sitting it out, or a no vote just ups Obama’s chances….YOU MUST VOTE McCAIN….KEEP OUR COUNTRY SAFE AND BIGOT FREE…NO ANTI AMERICANS IN WH.
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
CAN ALL THE IDIOTS ON THIS BLOG WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND RULES – SHUT UP
MOST LIKELY, YOU NEVER GREW UP WITH RULES IN YOUR HOME..THAT IS WHY YOU ARE SPEAKING LIKE VAGABONDS.
WITHOUT RULES – NO PARTY,- CHAOS.
NO ONE IS BIGGER THAN A PARTY, NO PARTY, NO NOMINEE
PEOPLE/VOTERS/PRESIDENTIAL CANDIADTE ARE NOT BIGGER THAN THE PARTY.
IF YOU ARE NOT HAPPY, THEN GO JOIN ANOTHER PARTY -SIMPLE
Posted by: tony | May 31, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Yes Debar we Blacks (and I call myself a Black because African American implies I am American) voted for Barack. Just as you and your lilly white friends have been voting down and imprisoning the Black man for years. This is a shameful country and we will do whatever we need to do. You forced Obama out of Rev. Wright’s church because you couldn’t stand that the Rev. speaking was the truth to your white faces. Our time has come Obama in 2008.
Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Saw a clever comment somewhere that stated:
McGovern switched support from Hillary to Obama because he looking for, and hoping for, someone to beat his record of losing 49 states before he died.
He decided Obama was “the one he had been waiting for”!
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Hey cracker, it’s spelled “grammar”.
Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
For Davey:
Maybe this better explains why and could be the cause of Obama’s “there are 57 States” remark:
The Organization of Islamic Conference Member States
Currently, the OIC has 57 member and 3 observer states
Source: Organization of the Islamic Conference http://www.oic-un.org/
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/oicstates1.html
Freudian slip perhaps?
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
J
absoultely right there is “no there, there” with Obama… there is somethign lurking in the distance or all around us or something about the man!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
The thought of suicide is a powerful solace: by means of it one gets through many a bad night. – Nietzche
Posted by: Cheerful Guy | May 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Slavery was the most degrading aspect of humanity in mordern history. it is part of America that is ever buried deep.
No matter how much we cover it, it is there and the wickedness done, the blood drawn has turn the tides.
Clinton should learn about the time bomb before dragging this too far.
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Hey, West Texas! I loved your 1:33 post. Also, way to go Staniam. Glad you’re with us tonight!
Posted by: womanpower88 | May 31, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Hillary supporters stop crying and support Obama as your leader promised@
Stop the nonsense!!
Posted by: Breaker | May 31, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Debra
I was never a conservative but I see what they are saying about the ultra left wing of the party now! its not operation chaos or anything … the Obamabots are just trying to justify stopping a qualified candidate because they have one issue they are angy with… what small minded freaks!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
I feel bad for the Clinton supporters because your candidate is feeding you a load of crap. The process has been fair!! People are looking for a conspriracy where there is none. The people who did not want Clinton were the voters- pure and simple. FL & MI were an issue before one vote was cast for Clinton or Obama so how could it be a conspriracy not to nominate her. Clinton was outsmarted by Obama. She ran a bad campaign. Now she is trying to get everyone riled up over FL & MI. Seating these delegations have nothing to do with either candidate. It is about the voters in the states. The states proposed their own solution which the DNC voted on and passed. It is not right to accuse Obama of stealing the nomination when he won it fair and square.
Posted by: Stacey | May 31, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Breaker
hes not my leader and if he loses the election may you continue to follow him… drink the koolaid and die!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Hillary supporters,
John McCain respects Hillary and her years of service to the nation.
We welcome your support in November if the media helps steal the nomination from Hillary!
Maybe we will see McCain vs Hillary in 2012 if McCain wins the general election.
Posted by: J.J. | May 31, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
As a Clinton supporter from Florida, I will either cast a write-in for HRC or I’ll abstain.
Either way, they deal is now officially sealed…the DNC has officially alienated Florida and with McCain up double-digits against Obama, say hello to your new 44th POTS…John McCain.
Way to go, Obama!
Posted by: Michael from FL | May 31, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Ok, there are a lot of Republicans posing as Democrats here. They are also some very dense people. Listing up: The democratic nomination is over. Senator Obama won. After Tuesday, he will be at most, 24 delegates away. He already clinched the pledged delegate majority. He will receive more than 24
Superdelegate by Tuesday. It is over. And, we will kick McCaine’s a$$ in November. Go Democrats!!!!!
Posted by: munk | May 31, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Stacey
he is the apparent winner because of a rules and by laws committee dominated by african americans that put into place disproportionate affirmative action rules… and the caucues system which isnt representative that they took advantage of… that is the real truth… there will be no suppot of him by us… NEVER!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Monk
I am not a republican and Obama cant beat Mccain … you are wrong
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Hang in there Womanpower, we men and women supporters of HRC do hold the “power”.
We are immovable, Obama’s worst nightmare, and absolutely hold the keys to the White House.
We will only turn them over to Hillary or McCain.
Obama can rent a room down the street.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
understand those who talk all this hate are not who they say they are! It’s to obvoius that there are republicans planted among these blogs to fuel the fire. It’s not what I wanted- but the reality is-we all knew our votes wouldn’t count months ago. ANd I will garuntee you many of these people are not even from Michigan or Florida! Let’s reconize these nasty people who post this garbage about voting for the other party as who they are- REPUBLICANS.
No true democrate would ever vote for a republican. At least a real democrate!
So all of you who talking this nonsense we know who you really are- and don’t worry- you’ll be out of the White house in the street soon along with your sorry republican party!
And if your are a Democrate- and your talking about voting for another party- please SPRINT to your local post office and change ASAP!We have no room for the weak and mis-informed. Your the same crowd that has plagued our party throught the years and it’s time that you go!
Because we are only looking for strong Democrates who understand our important mission- who will take the time to do their homework and be informed, and not be so stupid as to fall for the most obvious politcial spins. So please be a republican- I’m sure they will welcome you since we all know how much they care about the middle class. And one day they may even learn to be champions for women and minority rights. Maybe even one day, they will forget about giving tax breaks to their rich company friends, and they may even throw you a bone- and let earn equal wages in the workforce.
Wake up! or get out!
Posted by: frank | May 31, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Hey West Texas, Did you count the caucus states? ‘Cause Clinton people seem to forget that we have two ways choose delegates. They want to count the popular vote w/o the caucuses. You know what Hillary ignored the caucuses also. That is why she is losing the nomination.
Posted by: Stacey | May 31, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
jj
i wouldnt be a bad idea for Mccain to pick Hillary.. since Obama seems bent on a republican vp all that talk about webb etc is bogus… thats not change
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Munk…sure it’s over. I agree with you completely. BUT, don’t be so confident on Nov. With the Dems divided, the GOP’s running strong.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
stacey
she ignored them maybe but Obama took unfair advantage in them
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
staniam,
I haven’t put my finger on it, but from the beginning something has not felt right about him.
Posted by: J | May 31, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
frank
dummy
Im a democrat and you will not influence squat… the rule of law has been subverted today and bad karma will befall Obama!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
The priest from Obama’s church was wrong when he said that Clinton thought she deserved the nomination because she was white. Her husband and her have shown themselves to be friends to African-Americans and Obama himself has said this.
But he was SPOT ON when he said she thinks she deserves it because she’s married to Bill Clinton. Someone needs to acknowledge that.
Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Whatever one may think of the two candidates individually, the fact is that Clinton ran an incompetent campaign based on thematic choices that were out of touch with the electorate (“experience” and “toughness” when 80% think we’re going in the wrong direction, largely out of war fatigue), an overconfident perception of the primary schedule (no post-Super Tuesday plan) and a pre-internet management and fundraising approach. She just didn’t anticipate a serious challenge, and when one unexpectedly materialized, she didn’t know how to respond. Despite her claim to have “found her voice” in New Hampshire, she really didn’t until many weeks later, when she re-invented herself as the angry populist. Ironically, the candidate who ran a campaign this year with the skill of Clinton ’92 was Obama. Pity she didn’t think it through. If campaigning competence wins, Hillary loses on the merits.
For those who are angry about this, my advice is, get a smarter, more competent champion next time.
Posted by: R. Kevin Hill | May 31, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Add in the caucus participants, Stacey.
More people voted in my county than actually caucused in Iowa
LOL
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
THE CORRUPT, DISHONEST, HATEFUL, BULLYING MACHINE IS OUT. ON TO NOVEMBER! TO A CHOICE BETWEEN TWO CANDIDATES ALL AMERICANS CAN BE PROUD OF. I’LL BE VOTING FOR BARACK AND WHOEVER HIS FEMALE RUNNING MATE WILL BE. SO WILL ALL OF YOU IF YOU HAVE A BRAIN. BUT UM…IF YOU HAD A BRAIN, YOU WOULDN’T BE MACHINE-LEMMING SORE LOSERS…HMMM…
Posted by: Rex Range | May 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
FRANK…”Wakr up or get out!” Come November, you’ll be BEGGING for the HRC votes!
Stacey…Caucuses aren’t worth discussing now. The general isn’t a big caucus; BO won’t hold a grassroots advantage then like he did in the Democratic caucuses.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
J
everyone I talk to says that… I think beecause to me hes so much like… almost liek they planned to run that way… this will be the first time since 1876 that the poipular will was subverted in a nominating process! coincidentally, one of those candidates then stole 4 delegate votes too!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Go Obama!!!!!!!!! YOU WON IT FAIR AND SQUARE – and pleeeaaasee don’t choose that witch as running mate, hell you don’t need her trailer park supporters anyway!!!!!
In response to the above comment (and others that reflect the same message and spirit) about “trailer park supporters” sounds an attitude that is disturbingly like what Democrats used to complain about Country Club Republicans. The Democratic Party, I thought, was inclusive and an advocate of minorities, women, the working class and other less powerful members of American society. It sounds prejudicial; the antithesis of what the Demcoratic Party is supposed to stand for. Besides, I don’t think the Democratic Party can afford to split its base like that… its nominee simply can’t win otherwise. I don’t know if the person posting that comment recalls President Reagan’s commanding victories, in no small part thanks to the Reagan Democrats. And I know many blue collar workers who voted twice for President Clinton but crossed over to President Bush in 2000 because they believed he sympathized with and supported their concerns more than did Vice-President Gore. The battle that could divide the Democratic Party isn’t only waged by candidates, but also their supporters. Believe me, without “trailer park supporters” in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Missouri and other swing states, it will be difficult if not impossible for Senator Obama to win in November. Over-exuberant supporters should remember that before strutting and casting aspersions.
Posted by: Democrat Observer | May 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Too many members of the Democratic Rules and Bye-Laws Committee should hang their heads in Shame today, during the meeting when they often acted more like a footie crowd supporting one candidate only and not what is BEST for THE PARTY!
It is easy to see where Hillary may get her short temper from Harold Ickes had steam coming fro his ears from the start, when he didn’t get his own way!
Will THE PARTY NOW UNITE or will some still attempt to split us????
Posted by: John B Sheffield | May 31, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
rex range
you are the lemming and youre going off a cliff with BO!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Rex Range…”sore losers?” Way to heal a party there! Keep on name-calling, and let’s see how November turns out…
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
john B sheffield
lert those awfull R&B members start their own party …Ickes was the only one with courage today!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
In case some of you cannot comprehend the written language, let me make this clear: Hillary does not lead Obama in any electorial category.I am reading idiocy about how she now leads in popular vote. That is compelte bullshit. Check the numbers.
Posted by: munk | May 31, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
DEM OBSERVER…Trailer park supporters?! I DON’T THINK HER 17 MILLION SUPPORTERS ARE IRRELEVANT!!! KEEP THE HUBRIS UP AND YOU’LL BE CRYING COME NOV…
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
munk
technically she does today because the mi and fl votes have been settled and tomorrow in PR she will… she leads.. you are wrong you are dumb as a post!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Obama didnt ‘win’ anything fair and square.
He doesnt have enough delegates to win. He never did.
He won on SUPER DELEGATES.
Party insiders who IGNORED THE FOLLOWING:
-the person who won the popular vote
-the person who wins winner take all
-the person who wins by electorial vote
-the person who runs state by state far better against Mc Cain.
They IGNORED all that and chose the guy with a 1.5% pledged delegate lead.
That folks, is directly an INSIDE JOB.
Posted by: cgeast | May 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
staniam-
being a democrate is more than just saying your one! It’s Ok to disagree- but to wish bad things for the party means only one thing!
Your a closet republican- and when we toss your sorry party out of office- you will be crying about something else. We need solders in this party- not victims- Goodbye and good luck I hope they serve you well! We True democrates have work to do!
Posted by: frank | May 31, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
cgeast
it has never been closer in the history of primary campaigns so just on that it cant be shut down!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I will never, ever vote for a racist like Barack Obama. That is like voting to put pastor Jeremiah Wright and Rev. Michael Pfleger in the Lincoln Bedroom.
NO THANK YOU.
EITHER HILLARY OR MCCAIN IN 08′!
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
The Democratic Party today just gave the Republicans all the electoral votes from Florida & Michigan.
The DNC disenfranchised millions of voters!
Send a strong message, vote John McCain in November.
Posted by: KAY | May 31, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
MUNK…Check the FL polls: McCain up over Obama by 10 points, Clinton over McCain by 6. FLORIDA is the 4th most populous state with 27 electoral votes.
Check the numbers, you say…www.rasmussenreports.com. Maybe you should!
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Frank
I have a DNC card in my wallet.. I worked for Dukkakis 300 hrs in 88 clinton like 500 hrs in 92 and went to the innauguration and in 96 and in 2000 I worked for gore in 2004 worked… against my better judgement at Moveon.org phoneb anks… they will drive Obama to destruction being so highly left wing partisan… you are wrong!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Stacey, I don’t know that Clinton was “outsmarted” by Obama. The media certainly went into a frenzy over the winning of the caucuses in the “red states.” Now, I have to wonder, since those states are unlikely to be won in the GE, and shouldn’t have carried that much weight with Democrats, what’s their angle? Are they just stupid? MSM…big business…
MI and FL were issues before a vote was cast…it’s just that most of us didn’t know about the problem. It took awhile to ferret out the whole picture too. Why didn’t the media discuss that?
I agree that “it is about the voters in the states,” however, the voters did not propose the date of the primary—the GOP legislature did that—nor the “solution.” Don’t you rather think that the voters would each like to have their vote count? Wouldn’t you?
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
michael
he should look no further than the abc delegate count to show shes ahead in pop vote… some people are insufferable Dumb$sses!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Listen, I’m in no way Anti-Obama. He’s a solid candidate. But what the DNC has done and the way Obama’s supporters have treated HRC’s supporters, it’s not going to be easy for him.
Who’s to blame? Dunno, don’t care. All I know is this: While the blues are slinging the mud, MCCAIN WILL WIN! Mark my word.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
I love my party, I love my country, and as the proudest Michigander, I love my state.
I would be loathe to have to go under four more years of republican rule. Our economy can’t suffer much more. I’ve had friends, parents of friends, children of friend, even family lose their house, jobs, and life all at once because of what is happening to our poor and bedraggled state’s economy.
As much as I long for michigan’s voice to hold prominence in choosing our nation’s leader, and as proud as I am for the FULL VOTE I cast for Sen. Clinton, I appreciate Sen. Obama’s talents and ambitions, and he will lead this party to victory on November 4th.
Posted by: Marois | May 31, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
mary Indy
you are right… the committee sat and debated whether to use the rules as they estimated the primaries before they took place or the ones after… thats a no brainer there.. and they talk about Clinton changing the rules!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
There is no such thing as party unity now or in the future regarding the present version of the Democratic Party.
The present DNC is comprised of losers, seeking to coronate another loser.
Bill Clinton is the only 2 term winner Democratic President to occupy the White House in 63 years, since the death of FDR.
In 1992 and 1996, Bill Clinton won 11 of the designated twelve “swing” states.
In 2000 and 2004, Gore and Kerry each won only one.
Hillary Clinton is the only Democrat likely to repeat WJC’s success. Only she has any chance of winning the states he won.
Obama has a snowball’s chance in hell.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
marois
talent … maybe but his ambition is dark and therefor I will move to do everything I can to block his election!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
The women who say that they’ll vote for McCain because Hillary lost are obscenely vile. They’d rather vote for a man who graduated 894th out of his class of 899 at the Naval Academy…which makes McCain the ONLY person in America actually dumber than Bush Jr. These sore-loser “women” that are going to vote for an idiot out of SPITE will do NOTHING but set back the cause and progress of women forty years. Pathetic.
Posted by: wilder5121 | May 31, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
As the “de facto” democratic nominee, Hillary was annointed. As the loser in the democratic primary, Hillary was dissapointed. She ran a dumb-as-dirt campaign against a junior senator who cleaned her clock. Obviously, Senator Obama, is the superior executive,as demonstrated by the way the campaigns were managed. We need his skills, and not Hillary’s deficiencies in Washington at the helm of our country. Now, because he is biracial, he is causing Replican, racists and bigots, blood to boil . . . Feel the heat, it is the precursor of generation X, tossing all the old and tired crap, into hell.
Posted by: munk | May 31, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
west Texas
well said… they think they can continue to be the elite party and nominate the like candidates but we will stop that!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
munk …. we are not racists we are not republicans … go take your meds and go to bed why dont u!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
wilder5121
its not just women … numbskull
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
MUNK…Let Generation X toss all they want now. Come November, this ELDERLY STATE OF FLORIDA will vote for McCain and you can go back to playing Xbox.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Michael, I don’t think that most Democrats think that Hillary Clinton’s supporters are irrelevant. Nor are Senator Obama’s. My post stated that the bloggers calling Senator Clinton’s supporters “trailer park,” “hillbillies,” “poor,” “uneducated,” “brainless,” etc. are assuming a off-putting arrogance that could turn off many of the Democratic electorate. I certainly am not keeping up any hubris. I seldom, if ever blog, and think that either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama would make a fine Democratic nominee. On my previous post, I copied and pasted another bloggers post, which called Senator Clinton a “witch” and mentioned her “trailer park supporters.” Those were that bloggers words. Then, a couple spaces after, I responded with my observations that the Democratic Party can ill afford to split its base. Its an observaton that I arrived at from watching at least six presidential elections.
Posted by: Democrat Observer | May 31, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
It does not matter how fair the dems try to be to hillary who signed the agreement that these votes would NOT count and was the only candidate NOT to take their name off the ballot in Michigan ..she is the HILLARY party …NOT the Democratic party …so be warned dems shes gonna rip the dems apart before her supporters and her EVER CONCEDE .,..its called a sore loser…like when you were in grade school and the brat pouted when they didnt get their way….
I HAVE HAD IT WATCHING HER CAMPAIGN..NOTHING SATISFIES THEM
SHE LOST GET OVER IT
Posted by: ed in fort lauderdale | May 31, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
munk
lol
yea hes prob like the guys that are on xbox with no jobs .. Obama is promising to pull everyone out of poverty … are we going to line up at the chicago syndicate or something for checks?
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Michigan, Florida, & Ohio will go John McCain. That = 44th President of the United States of America.
You can blame the DNC for the loss in November.
Posted by: Joe | May 31, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Ed in FL
has it occurred to you that we mean to tear the party apart because its not what it used to be!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
staniam…point taken. There are plenty of MALE sore losers too…JUST AS PATHETIC. Feel better now?
Posted by: wilder5121 | May 31, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Democrat observer
well said… but it was the Obama people that started us down that road and now its too far to turn back!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Obama should claim to win until he nominated on the floor and the super D’s have all summer to watch and learn how the GOP will tear the Obamabots down to nothing because youre whole machine is on summer vacation from school enough time to plant the seeds into working people minds he wont win, next big problem is the issue you cant use big crowds and dont get down to specifics. sippin kool-aid is a really bad idea when youre wandering in the desert
Posted by: Quintell | May 31, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
wilder
well your “sore losers” will prevent you from givign your candidate the nomination and the presidency … that will happen!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
quintell
this is what the original by laws stated that the SDs were to wait till the convention … the obamaphiles can twist it any way they want!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
to Nicholas
I am white America and you can go to hell. I intend to vote for Obama.
Posted by: The Unshrub | May 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
er…Frank, you trueblue “democrate”…that’s democrat.
What’s a democrate? Something you carry samples in?
I have to say, it seems unlikely that you are actually a democrat. Pot calling the kettle black? Hey, does that make you a racist?
nothing like good, clear thinking…
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
staniam…you sound just like a Republican. Which makes you not worth responding to. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzz….
Posted by: wilder5121 | May 31, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Democrat Observer…
I can’t agree with you more. We can’t afford to split our base. But somehow, that’s exactly what we’ve done.
We’ve taken a party which has prided itself on diversity and we’ve brought it to the brink of fragmentation.
I’m a Clinton supporter, but not because I’m racist, old or poorly educated. I’m a 31 year-old gay college graduate who is so proud of his country that a woman and black man are running for POTS.
But with comments like those from munk and to see the DNC disenfranchise Floridian votes, it’s not difficult to read the writing on the wall. As much as it disappoints me, Obama has no chance come November.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
unshrub
have you considered that you are already in hell if you are an Obama supporter! antichrist has a nice ring to you doesnt it!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
wilder
I am a democrat and you will listen to the clinton people !
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
whatever .. to the respondents of my post…
it proves that the HRC supporters on here could care less about rules and will do anything just like Bush did to win… and hence hrc =bush another dictatorship … thats why I am now for obama … its because of watching the end of this campaign and how the rules are again be thrown out the window to do anything to put someone in the white house. All of suddent the process that elected every single presidential nominee up until now is going to be change to do anything to make a candidate that lost fair and square … win…
sounds more like a dictatorship ruler from the 30′s to me.
Posted by: ed in fort lauderdale | May 31, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
The more I read must of the comments posted here, the more I realize how dumb the American public is. You get all worked up and swear you will vote for another 4 years of Bush policies. Be careful what you wish for…
Posted by: Eve | May 31, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
ed in FL
if she wins you will accept it though … thats not negotiable!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
eve
either Obama picks Hillary a Vp or he will not win… we will make sure of it!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Barak Obama wants to be the Affirmative Action President: vote for Obama, or get lynched by the hordes of Obamaniks as a racist. It’s an un-American outrage. I don’t vote for, nor against a person because of their race. Don’t let anyone threaten or bully you into doing it either.
Posted by: KillWhiteyObama | May 31, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
ed…fact is fact. rules are not. we can talk about rules until we’re blue in the face, but it doesn’t change current polls.
Obama cannot carry Florida as of tonight. Hopefully, that might change. I doubt it after today.
Without OH, MI or FL, Obama cannot win in November.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
cracker
good one! he sounds like that wexler guy today at the R&b meeting
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Michael
I guess rules are rules and polls are polls eh!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Eve,
Anyone is better than Obama. War hero or closet racist that jus left his church for political reason. Easy decision for me.
Posted by: Jeff from FL | May 31, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
I’m Barak Obama, and I approved this message.
KILL WHITEY!!!!! KILL WHITEY!!!!! KILL WHITEY!!!!!
KILL WHITEY!!!!! KILL WHITEY!!!!! KILL WHITEY!!!!!
KILL DA WHITE MAN!!! RAPE DA WHITE WOMYN!!!
KILL DA WHITE MAN!!! RAPE DA WHITE WOMYN!!!
KILL DA WHITE MAN!!! RAPE DA WHITE WOMYN!!!
KILL WHITEY!!!!! KILL WHITEY!!!!! KILL WHITEY!!!!!
Posted by: Barak Obama '08 | May 31, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Contrary to this crass and insulting comment by wilder5121 at 2:19:24 AM:
“These sore-loser “women” that are going to vote for an idiot out of SPITE will do NOTHING but set back the cause and progress of women forty years. Pathetic.”
The effect will be just the opposite the women that stand steadfast against the DNC’s “Obamanation” will prove once and for all that they truly count.
They will cause an implosion in the DNC, resulting in their never again being ignored, insulted, race-baited, “sweetie-pied”, etc.
They will prove that they are truly important, not to be taken lightly, and never again to be taken for granted.
They along with we men, who love them, respect them, understand their ire, and will stand beside them, absolutely have the power to determine who is the next President!
They shall do so!
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Jeff from FL
good point! no one “resigns” from a church” the black guy didnt seem to get the lingo right!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Michael,
I agree with you.. the fragmentation of the Democratic Party is sad, as is the bitter insults being lobbed. I am also a college graduate, Latino and 43-years-old. And also a Clinton supporter. Not your typical “hillbilly.” But I I also don’t live in a trailer. But as an ardent fan of the Democratic tradition of MLK, Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, JFK, FDR, Truman (who many might call a hillbilly–although I doubt he would be offended by it). By the way, I love the diversity that you represent… it is what I believe to be the true spirit of the Democratic Party. Also, I have to agree that if the animosity, anger and division continues to fester among the candidates’ supporters; hard feeling from Florida linger, the Democrats might lose what should be a sure fire win.
Posted by: Democrat Observer | May 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
west texas …
where do I sign up…thats more convincing than the obamafilth I hear all the time!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
John McCain will choose Romney as his running mate. That takes Colorado, Nevada (Moromon votes), & Michigan (Romney’s birth place) out of play.
Gov Crist will make sure Florida goes Republican. All that is left is Ohio & it’s game, set & match.
you heard it here first
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
YOU HRC supporters are unbelievable… ok the POLLS are more important than the voting process now? SO you want to change the method of electing someone because the polls say something.. DIdnt your QUEEN SAY EVERY VOTE MUST COUNT….so now which is it EVERY POLL MUST COUNT because she cant win by the votes? and threaten all u want DONT VOTE WHO CARES.. vote for Mccain because now you are using BLACKMAIL another illegal tatic.. IF she doesnt win im voting for MCcain…. The only thing I have learned from this election is that HRC supporters are non educated cult followers who will bust up the constitution even more to get their way.
Posted by: ed in fort lauderdale | May 31, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Democrat observer
Im almost 39 and white but my problem is with the 18 yr olds that are just voiting… I was starry eyed for dukkais in 88 and I think that the only thing different is that Obama is using computers to communicate with them… I saw someone by the name of Bill Clinton get up and speak at the 88 convention and thought… what a bore… but he is the only president to be re-elected since fdr.. democrat that is!
Posted by: staniam | May 31, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
So if Obama is going to be in the “Loser” club…where does that put Hillary?
She couldn’t even beat him…
The party will be fine as long as all the Clinton supporters get this temper tantrum out in the next couple weeks.
Perhaps think about the wellbeing of the country rather than a selfish political machine?
The die-hard supporters remind me a lot of how George Bush and his cronies operate…loyalty over common sense.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Don’t worry, Obama will go down faster than Kerry come November before the election. You can count on that.
We are fueling the faster swiftboats as we speak.
Posted by: 527's | May 31, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
The MYTH of Obama’s “intelligence”:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/05/obama-mythical.html
Posted by: Shuck'n'Jive Osama | May 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Ed…I’m not a non-educated cult follower. I was stating fact, not implying I’ll vote McCain.
To “unite the party” the DNC could’ve symbolically done more. OB was WAY ahead of Clinton in delegate count…an extra dozen pledged to HRC wouldn’t have dented his lead that much. BUT, it would’ve shown goodwill to HRC supporters in FL and MI, two MUST-HAVE swing states!
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Staniam, you have already signed up, as have many others on here.
Your posts show your passion for once and for all proving the DNC’s ineptness and bias has made them losers.
Women and we that support them will yet rule the day!
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Staniam,
Like you with Dukakis, I recall being starry-eyed for Gary Hart back in ’84. College kids have their favorites and they are looking for a fresh new person to voice their vision. Most of us didn’t see President Clinton’s potential at the 1998 Democratic Convention. In 1992, I was wowed by both him and his wife. I thought they were the FDR and Eleanor of my lifetime. He is, actually, the only two-term Democratic president since FDR. It’s somewhat unsettling to see how he has been castigated by many Democrats. That’s not to say he was entirely perfect during his wife’s campaign. But some of the vitriol lobbed at him by Democrats makes the 1990′s GOP partisan attacks on him seem tame, almost like love letters.
Posted by: Democrat Observer | May 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Chris,
After Obama loses in November, the Hillary people will come out and say “I TOLD YOU SO”. That is where it will put Hillary, right in the front line for the 2012 election this time without Obama.
Posted by: Ann | May 31, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
ed in fort lauderdale,
Did you once stop to think that some people do not trust Obama? How are we busting up the constitution? She has every right to fight all the way up to the convention. It’s called democracy. There are too many unanswered questions for me as to what Obama’s agenda is. I am voting for this country not because somebody tells me I must vote for Obama.
My country comes first, not the democratic party. I have voted as a democrat for 30 years, but I do not like the direction this party is going.
Posted by: J | May 31, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Stanium,
Oops… I wrote that most of us didn’t recognize President Clinton’s potential at the 1998 Democratic Convention… meant to write 1988 Democratic Convention, when he spoke.
Posted by: Democrat Observer | May 31, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Hillary should never run with the dirty Obama…he shouldn’t get 1 of her 18 millions supporters. Let him lose on his own with no one else to blame.
HILLARY SUPPORTERS DON’T SIT IT OUT OR TAKE CHANCE WITH WRITING HER IN….McCAIN GETS MY VOTE TO PROTECT THE WH FROM OBOMBINATION.
When is the scarey tape of Michelle’s whitey rant going to be exposed by the GOP….I hear they are waiting for just the right time. This will be one angry black he won’t be about to kick to the curb, denounce, or reject.
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Ann,
Great and in 2012 when our country is still stuck in Iraq and failing even worse than right now. You can congratulate yourself on being right.
For what its worth, thanks in advance.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Hey frank (Jun 1, 2008 2:00:46 AM): Well said. Exactly right.
A lot of GOP trolls here posing as Hillary supporters.
They don’t bother denying it or posting anything constructive either.
But that’s their way: Spread division & fear. Because with 80% saying the US is on the wrong track, dividing Democrats is the only hope they have of winning.
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | May 31, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Chris,
Don’t blame us. Blame the DNC & media for creating this sham call Barack Obama.
Posted by: Ann | May 31, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Remember that the next president will be nominating several supreme court justices….do you want a democrat president doing that or a republican president?
Posted by: Murrdog | May 31, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Obama will be our next president, but he will never be a great president like George W Bush.
Posted by: Fred | May 31, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Chris,
Even with Obama we will still be stuck in Iraq in 2012. To think we aren’t is being naive.
Posted by: J | May 31, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Better putting conservatives on the Supreme Court than racist judges.
Posted by: Steven | May 31, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Clinton supporters it’s time to get on board for the big win.
Your candidate ran a good race but came up short at the end. Your candidate hates whiners and likes to play rough (both Clintons have said that). So I don’t understand why your complaining about the DNC rules committee’s decision.
Finally, if Obama is such a flawed candidate why did he beat yours? Doesn’t that make HRC a more flawed candidate by definition?
Posted by: WB | May 31, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
J,
Highly doubt it…even purely on public opinion numbers, but clearly your argument of me being “naive” trumps any of those statistics things I keep hearing about.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
i can’t believe after all this time, and all the controversy surrounding obama that people out there still believe in him. why??? he is a bigot, a racist, a crook, and it is all coming out now. i wish it all would have come out earlier. maybe then some people would have pulled their heads outta their butts just to see the simple fact that he is nothing but an empty suit with fancy words (from teleprompters).
his wife yells, ‘rail the whitey’……ok, i guess that is fine with obama supporters. what the hell is everyone going to do if he makes it to the white house, and we have all these idiots crawling out from under the rocks as they are now, but only going to get worse? and michelle will greet foreign leaders with the chant, ‘rail the whitey’……geeze, what would we be in for then. who is going to be vp….wright, rattso, ayers……think about it.
Posted by: carlasue | May 31, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Let me get this straight: Clinton supporters are unhappy about an outcome that delivers a net gain to Hillary from two contests that Hillary herself said would not count for anything?
FL and MI should not have been given any delegates. Rules are rules, and these states broke the rules. Every candidate understood that these states broke the rules, which is why none of the Democrats campaigned in these states. Now, out of fear, we have to make a concession to these states? Please. Next time, follow the rules and get your delegates counted. How hard is that?
The outrage expressed showed by HRC supporters merely proves that their loyalty is not to the Democratic party but to a single person. A person, by the way, who has lost the most states, most votes and MOST DELEGATES.
Posted by: Leo | May 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Chris,
That last statement about the DNC and the media. They are the ones that rigged this election. Just look what is coming out of Dean, Pelosi and Reid’s big yaps. The media has jammed Obama down our throats as well.
Posted by: J | May 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
WB…she didn’t have Affirmative Action behind her and all the liberal MSM. Plus Soros and the 4 other billionaire liberals who bundled their $$ into his campaign. I don’t think anybodys endorsement helped him tho…not Oprah or Teddy’s.
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Obama, your chickens will be coming home to roost in November. Finishing in 2nd place still = loser.
John McCain gets my vote.
Posted by: John | May 31, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
WB: “Finally, if Obama is such a flawed candidate why did he beat yours? Doesn’t that make HRC a more flawed candidate by definition?”
Simple: It’s a little phenomenon called block voting. With a demographic group (African-American), which in some states made up close to 20% of the electorate, voting for Obama by 90-95%, HRC was drastically disadvantaged.
First, is this criticizing blacks? NO WAY…we all tend to vote for those with whom we identify most closely. I appreciate that.
But, Obama has trouble reaching “swing demographics,” the so-called Reagan Democrats. 12% of the pop won’t carry him in the General.
Obama needs to make sure those Reagan dems won’t be McCain dems. At the moment, he’s losing this battle. Clinton’s not!
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Leo,
Don’t you know…its about “counting every vote”…..well as long as they are counted for Clinton.
It blows my mind too.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
The Clinton supporers who are vowing to vote against Obama are not real democrats. The women who voted for Clinton but refuse to vote for Obama in November, what the hell is the matter with you? You will vote against a person who has virtually the same policies as your candidate, and you will vote for a guy that will take away your right to choose as soon as the next supreme court judge retires.
Posted by: James | May 31, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Scot…IT’S NOT A PARTY/POLICY THING…IT’S AN AMERICAN THING!!!!
I am a Republican who votes whoever I feel is the best candidate. I voted Hillary here on 2/5. Gave money to her campaign. I WOULD NEVER VOTE OBAMA AND HIS COPIED POLICIES (FROM HILLARY) OR BUY INTO HIS PROMISES (or any politicians really). AMERICANS VOTE QUITE SIMPLISTICALLY FOR WHO THEY LIKE PERIOD THE END.
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
OK, last post…I keep telling myself that.
Ed, these rules you’re in such an uproar about are most certainly not the ones that have produced every nominee up till now. Nice, true-bluey kind of thought… but mythical. Way mythical. What we now have is the most amazing mishmosh.
Haven’t you wondered how Obama kept getting so many candidates out of so few wins within the states? Have you even looked at the maps to see who voted where? Check it out. Are you in for a surprise. That black vote we’re not supposed to mention was very heavily weighted by the party in terms of how many candidates were awarded to the traditionallly black precincts in which they voted. Guess how much that vote was worth compared to yours. One person one vote? Not hardly, snookums.
Posted by: Mary Indy | May 31, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Scott in PacNW,
Have you ever thought about if Obama loses to McCain in november, she may likely win the presidency easy in 2012?
If Obama wins, she has no chance.
Posted by: Ann | May 31, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
J,
Again the DNC and the media does not vote. Even if what you were saying was remotely true its still the citizens who did it.
I think Hilary was lucky they didn’t try to push her out.
God knows we need some good mending after what she has done.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
WB…get over myself??? i never called obama an idiot. you did. i don’t care where he graduated from either. bottom line is he is a racist and a bigot. how many ‘associates’ does he have to denounce or separate himself from before anyone gets it?
and yes, graduated from harvard, correct. but we have all been lead to believe that obama lead a poor poor life. just shows once again that he is a hypocrite.
Posted by: carlasue | May 31, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Ann,
Haha you were actually reading my mind.
I figured the final dirty trick from Clinton would be to try to screw the Democratic party so she would get another shot at things.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
By far the biggest group of voters (on the Democratic side) was women. So there goes that argument. Plus Obama won states like Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Colorado etc… Not too many black voters there. HRC won all that states next to where B. Clinton was governor. Or states where name recognition mattered more (California). Polls show that California would have voted for Obama if the contest was today.
“Simple: It’s a little phenomenon called block voting. With a demographic group (African-American), which in some states made up close to 20% of the electorate, voting for Obama by 90-95%, HRC was drastically disadvantaged.”
Posted by: WB | May 31, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Carlasue,
You do realize that Obama was paying off student loans when the Clinton family was making millions of dollars. (Not to mention she served on Walmart’s Board)
THEN tries to paint herself as a blue collar candidate in rural America?
Huh what?
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Wright, Pfleger, Ayers, Michelle Obama…
No More Drama, Vote Obama???!!
Haha…..
The media was too busy “getting chills up their leg”, but the rest of us were not fooled. This lifelong Democrat will never vote Obama.
NOBAMA ‘08
Posted by: AG | May 31, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
caucus state democrats are to blame their 7 hour vote-a-thon and nobody in there bothered to think should we go with the safe pick and go with flare. the real reason super d’s are going to obama is for pork and jockeying for positions for their own selfish ambitious dreams.
Posted by: Quintell | May 31, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Lots of Clinton supporters will not vote for Obama no matter what.
They also know that Hillary will have to publicly say she is supporting him even if she may not really.
The votes will not be there come November if Obama gets the nomination.
That is a certainty.
Posted by: Ann | May 31, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
chris, i am a staunch dem as you probably are as well. i believe in hillary’s early years she was establishing herself just as obama is trying to do the same. after all, we do make mistakes as we are all only human. but compare the two. i think hillary has learned from hers. but have we seen any evidence that obama has learned from his. i said early on that if hillary did not get the nom i would vote for obama because he is a dem. but now i see all these radical creeps crawling out from under their rocks, and it scares me more than any wal mart board could throw my way.
Posted by: carlasue | May 31, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Obama will give her a position in his cabinet, probably another shot at Healthcare…hopefully it goes better than last time.
She gets what she wants…or at least what she tells people so they vote for her, and he gets her off his back.
Win win?
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
No way I can ever pull the lever for Obama with all his radical clowns & pastors coming out of the woodwork.
Posted by: Jeff from FL | May 31, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Ssomo,
Right on.
Honestly Obama’s policy points and Clinton’s don’t differ much at all.
Its kinda stupid to vote out of revenge rather than whats best for the country.
If you actually believed in what Clinton wanted to do with the country, rather than just Clinton herself it would seem logical to get on the bandwagon.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Hillary can say she is supports Obama all she wants, but we all know that she has to say that. We all know in our hearts she doesn’t.
Posted by: J | May 31, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
WB:
1. By far the biggest group of voters (on the Democratic side) was women.
OK…a little math. Let’s say 100,000 people vote. 20,000 are black; 40,000 white women (VERY SKEWED ESTIMATE). Let’s be generous and say 60% of women vote for HRC, the rest Obama. Let’s say 92% of blacks vote for Obama, the rest Clinton…that’s 25,600 for HRC, 34,400 for Obama.
Your claim that the women’s vote was so significant doesn’t stand.
2. “Plus Obama won states like…Iowa [caucus], Minnesota [caucus], Colorado [caucus]… Not too many black voters there.”
Not too many blue-collar workers vote in caucuses either.
3. “HRC won all that states next to where B. Clinton was governor. Or states where name recognition mattered more (California). Polls show that California would have voted for Obama if the contest was today.”
California would vote Dem if Donald Duck ran (as would NY). Florida (state #4 with 27 electoral votes) is a different story: elderly, hispanic, blue-collar…Obama has probs here at the moment.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Chris,
That is funny. A position in his Cabinet, lol. Like Bill Clinton hinted, if Obama does not offer her the V.P., it ill be all out war, and we are not talking about democrat versus republicans either.
Posted by: Ann | May 31, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Come On, Guys! Remember how dark the clouds got the day before the New Hampshire primary?? The very next evening Hillary was ascending the podium to deliver a rousing victory speech to a jubilant crowd of supporters!
She can still prevail! Never give up!
Posted by: Scott | May 31, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Chris,
My problem is with Obama is, is how do we know if his policies are similar? He’s flip flopped so much and he’s wormed his way out of these pastor things etc. I don’t trust anything he says. He has shown me that he will say anything to get elected. Rev. Wright was right on one thing, Obama will say what he has to say as a politician.
Posted by: J | May 31, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
If Obama supporters actually thought he was a sure thing, and did not realize he hasn’t got a chance, they would not be in here typing away, trying to alternately schmooze and demean HRC supporters.
They would instead be relishing their already announced victory and just chillin’. They are winners, just ask them. LOL
Why waste celebration time in here, with a bunch of losers? If they were truly confident?
Yet here they are? Why?
Because they are in a panic. They are more paranoid and have more angst than a Woody Allen feature character.
They cry out that they have won, yet have won nothing!
And because they know Obama has actually won nothing either. All they have is “hope”, and a wish that we HRC supporters will “change” our minds
We are here because we take nothing for granted, that anything is still possible. That Hillary is the only choice to win the GE, and that we need to hold onto our resolve, and keep on “pushing”.
We know, and they know, that we Hillary Clinton supporters absolutely hold the keys to this election. We are resolute in our decision to never vote for Obama.
No ifs, ands, or buts! Our votes are now the most important factor regarding who is the next President of the US.
Without us, especially if multitudes vote for McCain because he is the best alternative to Obama, the DNC goes down in flames for the third straight time.
If Obama is the nominee coming out of Denver, despite his obvious unelectability, I shall use my vote, my money, my voice, my influence, and my time to do everything I can to defeat him.
I welcome the Democratic Party implosion. Perhaps what arises from the rubble will be a truly Democratic Party, worthy of the Democracy element in its name.
Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Caucus represent about 1% of voting Dems. I heard that last week on radio. I hope Hillary stays away from any “dream ticket”, not that I think Obama camp will offer it. But her suporters (large percentage) can’t pull the lever for him at all. They’d blame her too. Let him lose on his own.
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
WB, with all due respect, exit polls really don’t carry a hell of a lot of weight. that was the DNC’s argument with michigan reps today during the meeting they had. you just can’t put your money on the exit polls.
Posted by: carlasue | May 31, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Chris,
I read that already. It clearly states her people don’t know what Hillary will do. We both know she will never take a cabinet position under Obama. Money is not an object for her. One book after the election will clear all debt + $10 million more in the bank.
It all depends on what she wants politically. She can control her own destiny imo.
Posted by: Ann | May 31, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
WB-
1. I suggest you read an exit poll. In most states women were about 55 – 60% of the vote. Or are you suggesting black people are hermaphrodites?
90+% of African-Americans voted for Obama, regardless of gender. Hermaphrodites, no…black women, no…female blacks, yes.
Even with 60% women, the figures still favor Obama. 100,000 (total pop), 20,000 black, 80,000 white (incl. 48,000 women). Results (blacks/white women): 30,400 HRC – 27,600 OB.
Your math STILL doesn’t hold.
2. I didn’t realize Iowa was a financial or tech capital of the world.
The demographics (young, highly educated) as well as caucuses fit Obama well.
3. Finally, the polls show Obama would beat Clinton if the contest was today.
Which state? FLORIDA, MICHIGAN, and OHIO MATTER…that’s ALL at the moment! Obama is losing two, struggling in the last…
Please check your facts…
OK…a little math. Let’s say 100,000 people vote. 20,000 are black; 40,000 white women (VERY SKEWED ESTIMATE). Let’s be generous and say 60% of women vote for HRC, the rest Obama. Let’s say 92% of blacks vote for Obama, the rest Clinton…that’s 25,600 for HRC, 34,400 for Obama.
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
“WB, with all due respect, exit polls really don’t carry a hell of a lot of weight”
Yeah but when you have 40+ contests you can see a pretty clear trend. When the exit polls in every contest has more women voting than men you can begin to get a pretty clear picture.
Posted by: WB | May 31, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
West Texas…you are so dead on. The real power player now is Hillary and the DNC know it (tho they sure didn’t give a crap today in Washington). She has all the cards in her 18 million supporters who she can “ask” to support Obama KNOWING majority of us can’t stomach him.
Wait til they see the exit polls when Obama loses in Nov and they see all the McCain democrats that were complete Hillary supporters.
Posted by: Debra | May 31, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Alright Ann,
Well watch the news in the next week, guess we will see.
I think if I had an option of recouping 15 million dollars and advancing my career in some way I’d take it.
But you are right, who knows…she does do some interesting things.
Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
WB (added quotation marks to differentiate my text from yours)…
1. “I suggest you read an exit poll. In most states women were about 55 – 60% of the vote. Or are you suggesting black people are hermaphrodites?”
90+% of African-Americans voted for Obama, regardless of gender. Hermaphrodites, no…black women, no…female blacks, yes.
Even with 60% women, the figures still favor Obama. 100,000 (total pop), 20,000 black, 80,000 white (incl. 48,000 women). Results (blacks/white women): 30,400 HRC – 27,600 OB.
Your math STILL doesn’t hold.
2. “I didn’t realize Iowa was a financial or tech capital of the world.”
The demographics (young, highly educated) as well as caucuses fit Obama well.
3. “Finally, the polls show Obama would beat Clinton if the contest was today.”
Which state? FLORIDA, MICHIGAN, and OHIO MATTER…that’s ALL at the moment! Obama is losing two, struggling in the last…
Please check your facts…
Posted by: Michael | May 31, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
We need to move forward NOW. All due respect to the Hillary supporters. You guys are awesome and you have fought a brilliant battle for her nomination. I have much respect for your choice. I too was once a Clinton supporter and I voted for Bill 2 times.
I made a conscience decision to switch to Obama in the voting booth in the California primary. I didn’t make a hasty switch. I was in the booth and a light went on in my head and all I could hear was “CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN” and” YES WE CAN” and I am not easily influenced politically. For the first time in my 42 years as a registered democratic voter I felt that something good could come from his message.
It is not going to be an easy assignment but with all of us democrats working together we can help our economy and we can find a better solution to the ongoing war in Iraq. I am proud of the DNC for making a tough decision the opposition was very tough. I salute all of the committee members for doing the right thing.
In all honesty the people of Florida and Michigan were lead astray by the republican political figure heads in their states. They all knew there were alternative remedies to their voting schedule but they failed to get it done. Going forward the Florida elections committee needs to renovate their system so it accommodates each parties voting timeline.
Michigan made a good point that needs to be addressed no states should have the advantage to have early primaries I think the committee needs to revisit the current policy and include those issues in CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN. Vote OBAMA 2008
Posted by: Lou | May 31, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
i really don’t think in all contests that women have been the majority of voters. i will not cross the lines on sexism, race, or anything else like that. you hear the MSM calling out numbers, percentages, things like that, and a lot of times they are wrong. all i have to say is let the voice of all the people be heard, and be heard in a fair, democratic manner.
Posted by: carlasue | May 31, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Michael your math is still off. Plus you don’t compensate for white men who won’t vote for a black person. Contest I’m referring to is the one we were talking about, California.
Finally, do you really believe that if Obama’s name was say, I don’t know, something like John Kennedy or John Kerry or Al Gore instead of Barack Obama that would have been a disadvantage for him? Being black does not give you a leg up when you look at the contest as a whole.
Posted by: WB | May 31, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Debra,
On the other hand, Hillary would need Obama supporters even more were she the nominee in Nov. and there are just as many of us who cannot stomach Clinton as there are of you.
Ultimately, if the Democrat party is split in Nov. it is the end of the DNC.
Posted by: Gary K. | May 31, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
WB:
1. My math is correct.
2. “Being black does not give you a leg up when you look at the contest as a whole.”
Depends on the contest to which contest you’re referring. In the Dem primaries, being black DID give him a leg up. Why? African-Americans are one of the bedrock demographic groups of our party. I would venture to say that less than 10% of all blacks vote Republican (this is a guess). In the general election, black will only make up 12% or so. Important, yes…but not as significant.
Just to lay all cards on the table: Do I believe the vast majority of black voted for Obama b/c he’s black. Yes, I do.
Do I think there votes were misguided by doing that. NO WAY. We all vote for candidates for a variety of reasons, one being the degree to which we identify with him or her. I fully appreciate that.
BUT: this does not change the fact that Obama has a real issue with blue-collar whites. HE HAS TO GET THEM ON BOARD!
Posted by: Michael | June 1, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Oh, Lou you are so deluded with your “all of us Democrats working together” line. Have you heard of “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned”? Now, not all 18 million Hillary supporters are female…but there will be alot of wounds that will not heal from this process on top of the voters that just don’t like him and will never vote Obama. I’m glad that light went on for you in the voting booth about change you can believe in…too bad the light never went on in Obama’s head about his church/rev….as it will be the biggest reason Americans didn’t vote for him in November.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
West Texas,
Are the “ephemeral nonsense” you are talking about those pointless numbers? Like delegates or statistics and stuff?
Cause if so…then yep! We should only let women vote….oh and they have to be 65 or older….oh and only WV gets delegates.
Give me a break.
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Michael,
Take a deep breath and ask yourself a really simple question. What gives you a bigger advantage in getting elected the Democratic nominee; being black or having your spouse be the former two term Democratic President? HRC had the advantage, Obama ran the better campaign. End of story.
Posted by: WB | June 1, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
GaryK…you’re right…one half of the party needs the other and I don’t see that happening….Hello President McCain. Unless Obama can get his liberal billionaires to buy him the Presidency…but he out spent Hillary sometimes 4 to 1, proving Americans can’t be bought. Again, HELLO PRESIDENT McCAIN, AND I’M OK WITH THAT.
HILLARY ’12
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Scott,
What makes you think he will stick with those policies. If you would have read all of what I wrote, you would have understood that. Look at Iran, first he says it isn’t a threat, the very next day he says it is a grave threat. Which is it? He has no clear plan to change things.
Posted by: J | June 1, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
The end of the DNC would be welcomed!
Tear it up, build a new one that is in touch with reality.
Start at the top with the demolition.
However, I would very much welcome a new party built around the Clintons and we 17 million plus voters that respect them, what they have done for this country, and the fact that they are fighters not wimps.
I will donate the max to help form such a party, and I will also donate the max to an independent run if HRC chooses to do so!
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
west texas, count me in!!!
Posted by: carlasue | June 1, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Can Hillary run as an Independent if she campaigned as a Dem and raised Dem dollars? Who would be a good running mate?
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
debra, her perfect running mate would be Gen. Clark!!!!
Posted by: carlasue | June 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Excellent, Carla Sue.
I truly believe there are enough of us to actually bring such to reality.
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Debra,
She can’t run independent. She signed an agreement to fundraise for the DNC.
Well at least she could run, but any money would go to the DNC’s election fund not hers.
At least thats how I understand the rules.
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
WestTexas,
I’d agree to that.
Posted by: J | June 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Debra,
“ Again, HELLO PRESIDENT McCAIN, AND I’M OK WITH THAT.
HILLARY ’12”
I hate to break it to you, but this is the end of Hillary’s presidential runs. She is burning too many bridges. The African American community will vilify her for decades for blocking the first African American president, and Obama supporters in general will look at another Hillary run, and in the spirit of “Remember the Alamo” and her role in defeating Obama in 2008, they will crush any chance she might have had. The rallying cry will be “Anyone BUT Hillary in 2012.” They might even vote Republican in the same spirit Clinton supporter are doing today. Turnabout is fair play, correct?
No, Hillary is finished. She’ll be lucky to get the DNC’s help in another NY senate bid.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
chris, don’t know how it can or should be done either. but if hillary ran as an independent with Gen Clark as the VP…it would be a hands-down, slam dunk, no-brainer of a landslide win….i will do whatever it takes to accomplish this…someone let me know how to get the ball rollin…..
Posted by: carlasue | June 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Chris,
Didn’t Obama pledge to accept public funding for the GE? Now he is going back on that pledge. Seems to me she could pull the same BS.
Posted by: J | June 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Carlasue,
Try running a campaign without any money.
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
J, it’s a fair question. First, quantifying a threat is not the same as setting a policy. Agreed?
Second, Obama didn’t change what he said. He was comparing Iran to the former Soviet Union — that Iran is not as serious a threat as the old Soviets.
To me, that’s a pretty obvious statement — and not controversial.
It’s less worrisome, for example, than McCain stating — repeatedly — that Al Qaeda is Shia backed by Iran.
Posted by: Scott in PacNW | June 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
laeving the party — do you honestly beleive that Obama would have gotten ZERO votes in Michigan? is this about the “will of the voters” or not? I could offer my kids liver for dinner and ask them if they wanted that or nothing and if half said liver, it would hardly qualify as a “victory” over the pizza i offered them later. one minute you claim it’s about the voters and then say “it’s obana’s fault he followed the rules.” you are an idiot. go ahead and vote mccain. serves you right.
Posted by: jt | June 1, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Chris
she only has to be in the DNC through the end of the primaries.. and shes not dnc shes a member of the DLC which is different and the only organization that brought about two clinton administations well that and african american vote and now that Obama has appealed to their emotions including the snakes on the R&B committee she doesnt have to follow their rules!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I do not have a horse in this race. Both Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton are excellent candidates. Both are to a certain extent “flawed vessels”, to employ Sen. Obama’s eloquent phrase.
Perhaps Sen. Clinton would be a superior candidate but we will never find out if this is the case, largely as a result of fundamental strategic errors her team made in pursuit of the nomination.
The Democratic Party has crossed this Rubicon and the die is cast. Sen. Obama will be the nominee, and we should do what we can to ensure that he is elected. Another four years of strict constructionist appointments to the Federal judiciary is not a pleasant thought.
Posted by: loki50 | June 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
hi chris, maybe i could call rattso, or ayers, or oprah, or wright, or flannigan, or………..any other ideas??
Posted by: carlasue | June 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
JT
well he certainly didnt deserve 4 estra delegates from it… and the argument that nobody told him to take his name off the ballot… it was understood that they were goign to try to stiff hillary if she was ahead in delegates… it backfired… now the popular vote rules!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Scott in PacNW ,
Nice spin on Iran. So how can he say one day it’s not a grave threat and the next day it is. The man doesn’t have a clue. Ahmenijad is a nutbag who knows what he will do.
Posted by: J | June 1, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Gary K…so are you saying Hillary is to blame when Obama loses by his own doing? Confused. She did not marry his angry wife, she did not attend a hateful racist church, she does not have radical ties….I know this isn’t all the “policy” stuff you guys want to talk about…because their issues are so similar….it’s about American values and why millions of American’s cannot vote Obama. I would support a Condi or a Colin…(unless they have some hateful, radical sh– in their closets).
Don’t blame Hillary when Obama loses, therefore she can run in 2012.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
Carla Sue, I also believe that many, centrist Republicans would enjoy the opportunity to divorce themselves from extremism and align with HRC dems.
Leaving the far-right and the far-left behind, is the only true path for those of us who would like for our government to represent all Americans, not just segments.
Bill Clinton did that successfully, which is why both the far-right, and far-left hate and envy him.
It is also why, even after being impeached he left office with a 65% approval rating.
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
loki50
he hasnt crossed it yet… the goal posts have been moved to 2100 that means he will be a few short even if 50 Sds come out after tuesday for him.. and not that many will… and they will change their minds in 3 months mark my words!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
J,
I think you are mixing up the victory fund with the campaign finance rules that Obama and McCain were dealing with. Which limited the amount spent in primaries etc.
I think Clinton has signed an agreement that funds she raises go to her primary funds or the DNC victory fund.
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
“don’t know how it can or should be done either. but if hillary ran as an independent with Gen Clark as the VP…it would be a hands-down, slam dunk, no-brainer of a landslide win….”
Do you really believe that? We are a 50-50 nation; what conservative demographic would even consider that ticket? No, an independent run is a landslide victory for McCain and the end of any chance of Hillary EVER being president.
Take off the political hat for a moment and think about it.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
You Democrats are so crazy. As a Republican I thought no way do we win this election but after reading all your posts I don’t see how we can lose. If Obama gets the nomination Clinton supporters will sit out or join us. If Clinton gets the nomination Obama supporters will sit out or join us. Oh and for all you Clinton supporters who think 2012 is your year think again all the Obama supporters will not forget what you did did to them in 2008. Thank you all for making sure we have a Republican in the White House for at least the next 8 years!
Posted by: Republicans rule! | June 1, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
More BS, Chris!
There is no such rule, and no such “contract”.
IF she leaves the race, she can do as she pleases, just as we can.
She could raise any funds she wanted to, and use them.
Try looking that up also, while you are looking up “ephemeral”!
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
hi gary k. i do believe that if hillary ran with gen. clark it would be over in a heart beat. west texas, once again, you are right! hillary represents the bulk of what the american people believe in, and who they are. hard-working check to check people, just trying to keep the roof over their heads, food on the table, gas in the car, and make the darn house payment.
Posted by: carlasue | June 1, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Staniam,
Only knock her because she claims close work on everything positive when she was in the White House but nothing negative.
Can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
If you don’t like the result which actually is exceptionally favorable to Hillary in terms that the invalid votes were counted as a result of her ungrounded, arm-twisting rant, why don’t you bring the issue to the court?
Then the court will legitimately invalidate all the votes of the two states which held primaries against the party rule. If Hillary really wanted all the votes counted, why didn’t she try to talk to the states to change the primary dates in the first place?
Now it’s laughable that Hillary is a lawyer. She, and her supporters, are mocking laws.
Posted by: mary | June 1, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Obama disenfranchised FL and MI voters with 1/2 votes. The cut-and-dice-the-vote Obama gamed the system and prevailed with the DNC.
Sen. Clinton should appeal the fundamental unfairness to the credentials committee to get every vote counted in full, undo the MI hijacking, and save the Democratic Party from defeat in November.
Posted by: crat3 | June 1, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
West Texas…centrist Republicans will be OK with McCain…not sure what you meant above. He’s too middle for the far right, which is why the match up between he and Hillary would have been the most competitive. But DNC and liberal decided awhile ago it was the black guys year.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
I meant DNC and liberal media (all but FOX) decided almost from the start, they were behind Oabma. The treatment she has taken throughout this has been horrible. Two slip ups to his how many?
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Unfortunately, what we really have here is a system of regime alternativity.
Two candidates are pushing the “fascist model” and a third candidate (BO) is defending/promoting democracy.
The difficulty of the 08 democratic nomination process reflects the coalition of the two dynastic candidates stenuous efforts to clobber democracy by demolishing (one way or another)
BO is one of a life time leader who is ready to risk his life
The conventional GOP/Dem political demark is no longer relevant : there are great pro-democracy politicians on the GOP side and then there are openly fascist politicians on laboring on the democratic party side as exemplified by HRC
Posted by: marcdestree | June 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
“so are you saying Hillary is to blame when Obama loses by his own doing?”
No, I’m saying that the bitterness in this primary season WILL linger far into the future. By invoking a scorched Earth policy and dragging this out until Denver knowing that she has almost no chance to win the nomination (which she virtually admitted with the RFK comment), Obama supporters will view her and Ickes as a key reason for the division in the party, and thus, the Democratic loss in November. If Obama looses because Democrats defect to McCain in the GE, don’t expect to see them helping Clinton in 2012. I’m just laying it out as bluntly as I can. Turnabout is fair play.
“Don’t blame Hillary when Obama loses, therefore she can run in 2012.”
She can run; but she will not be the party’s nominee. The DNC, African American community, and POed Obama supporters will make sure of that.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
So FOX gave fair coverage?
Republicans would break for Hillary?
Alright some people are pulling for straws now…
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
staniam,westtexas,debra,
i just left denver today and got home late tonite. you should have heard the word from there. i kid you not, this is the truth, i stayed at the marriot city center convention center, and all they could talk about was hillary coming to denver in august. i walked the 16th st mall for three days talking to people, all types, races, creeds, and they all said they couldn’t wait to see hillary. i will say the majority said that. there are some who look forward to obama. but honestly, and whole heartedly, the vast majority can’t wait till hillary arrives in denver. believe me, i left there today at 8:00 pm, and i am tired tonite, but telling you all what i saw, and heard.
Posted by: carlasue | June 1, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
The same people that the Clinton’s have tons of connections too….
You are saying a freshman senator has deeper connections than a political dynasty?
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Debra, you are right regarding this election.
Centrists are cofortable with McCain, as am I.
However, I believe a new party completely devoid of either extremist wing could attract both Dem and Rep centrists.
And I am not certain that even this year it would be improbable that HRC could attract many of them based on health-care, and hearth and home issues.
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
carlasue
staying at the marriott in denver you probably have better connections than I but I work for people that have 4 hotel chains and can block out the entire city of Denver for the convention1
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
West Texas yea say something like the Democratic Leadership Party … but Harold Ford is in the tank for Obama so I dont think they would let us take that name!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
marcdestree: how in the hell is Obama risking his life? Lets compare Sen. McCain in full body cast, a tortured POW who’s arms were repeatedly broken and wouldn’t go home when they offered to send him back to the U.S., without his fellow soldiers. Obama risk life for what. McCain American Hero…proven love for THIS country. What risk are you talking about with triple the secret service that we taxpayers are footing the bill for.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Chris,
Obama & McCain both signed on to take public financing for the general campaign ($84 million).
Obama is likely going to back out of it knowing how much he can get through the internet, and McCain will use it to attack him in ads.
McCain will have plenty of money because the RNC is loaded compared with the DNC.
Posted by: Ann | June 1, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
“ to keep Obama out of the white house NO PRICE IS TOO SMALL… IN ALL SERIOUSNESS! believe it!”
Staniam,
Sure, I believe it. In understand that there are many who vehemently dislike Obama. You don’t have to point out the obvious.
However, there are just as many who feel the same way for Hillary and will do everything in THEIR power to prevent a Hillary GE win in 2008 or 2012. It’s that simple.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Way to go RBC, finally we can move forward together and concentrate on defeating McCain in November, we are on are way, Yes We Can.
Wonderful job by Chuck Todd!
Posted by: Charlie Richmond | June 1, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Ann
thats right… his 3rd rail of financing would be jeapordized because hed have to make his donor list public and he would have to abide by caps
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Carlasue…so this is going to the convention? Any real offical word. Super dels can change their minds right up until August. Didn’t Ted Kennedy go to the convention with a 750 point difference…Hillary is so close, it’s ridiculous and she has the popular vote.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Senator Clinton should run independet The DNC is not Democratic anymore, it is now the party for affirmative action.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
libre
well we dont have to support mccain yet if we sufficiently embarrass them in Denver and by the way where is the full committee going to meet I think thats in July somewhere?
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
carlasue
yep I hope so… maybe they can turn the SDs from CO around to Hillary!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
hi gary k.
i do believe that if hillary ran with gen. clark it would be over in a heart beat.
Hi carlasue,
I see. I have to admire your spirit. I just don’t see how it will work mathematically. Who is she going to siphon votes from? Obama? McCain? I’d be interested in an argument that makes an independent run a viable/winnable option.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
respect
its not about race its about resolve,competence, and being cool under pressure… even now in his advantages…. as Hillary said, “he cant take the heat!”
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Staniam,
My family has always supported the Democratic party.
However, in ’52′ my Father voted for Ike because he had served under him, respected him, and trusted him.
When teasingly asked by others was he then a Democrat or a Republican, he replied that he had become a “Considerable”.
Saying that there would be no more straight Dem tickets. He would consider all aspects and all candidates. He remained in the Democratic party.
I think he would be proud of me for now leaving! Principles matter more than words.
I would like to join a party of “considerables”. Certainly couldn’t hurt.
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
GaryK
the only math that you have access to is that of the Corrupt sold ot DNC and the far left Dems… they are makign it look better for Obama than it would be in the GE to appease him… hmmm where have I heard that word before?
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
hi debra, not sure whether or not this is going to the floor. but when i was there over the last three days, hillary was all they could talk about.
i hope she takes it to the floor. we need a fighter and she is it! that is what the majority of the folks in denver had to say over the last three days.
if hillary takes it to the floor like she should, as she has the pop vote, i will be there….screaming my butt off for her all the way. go hillary!!!
Posted by: carlasue | June 1, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Ann
at the very least it will be a brokered convention and Obama will be forced to take Hillary as VP
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
carlasue
if saturday was any indication.. those were just a few women tha rattled the charlottan Alexis Herman and Donna Brazile!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
John McCain will be the next president. Mark my words the democratic party I once knew is gone. So go ahead Mr. Obama declare yourself but you will lose in November…
Posted by: Kimberly Starr | June 1, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
staniam Hillary as VP for barack? no way, she should run Independent and wait to 2012.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Staniam,
My father never regreted voting for Ike.
He said Ike governed well, built great infrastructure, such as “blue-star” highways, interstates.
But he said the best part about Ike was that when was not “building stuff”, he “just played golf and didn’t bother anybody”
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
If it goes to the convention, Hillary will be the V.P.
You are right staniam, because when a Clinton delgate nominates her, she will get the votes. Nothing Obama can do about it.
Posted by: Ann | June 1, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
staniam,
“the only math that you have access to is that of the Corrupt sold ot DNC and the far left Dems… they are makign it look better for Obama than it would be in the GE to appease him… hmmm where have I heard that word before?”
What? That wasn’t even my question. And for the record, I’m an independent who hasn’t voted for a democrat in several years. Both parties have been in the tank as far as I’m concerned. And I’m certainly not a “far-leftists.” I voted for GW Bush in 2000–although, I have given myself many a “boot-to-the-head” since then. =-)
Again I’ll ask: give me a viable scenario that has Clinton winning as an independent candidate. It’s a simple request. If you have any evidence, present it. If not…okay.
The question was for carlasue, anyhow. I admire her spirit, although, I fear that all this wrangling is not going to help Clinton at all, and will bode worse for her in 2012 if she were to run.
BTW, please try to be respectful. Even though I may disagree with the many Clinton supporters, I’ve always trying to express myself in a manner that respects the person on the other end. I only ask for that in return.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Libre
yea well I mean if Obama intends on getting in on rules made up for him… but I see your point that it would be easier to run as an independant and then run in 2012 I just dont want it hijacked like Ickes said saturday!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Garyk
all I know is she beats Mccain in most electoral maps without young people and without african americans which is Obamas base and there are moderate republicans that will join Hillary I dont care if soem republican hack said if you are middle of the road youll get run over!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
It is time for UNITY.
Though I used to support Hillary in the past but I am glad to say I don’t in this primary. Hillary herself said No matter what happens she respects the outcome.
Whatever she decides I wish her good luck and goodbye.
Posted by: Jolanda | June 1, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Gary,
I think you are wrong. If Obama loses in November, there will be lots of questioning & second guessing in the democratic party. There will instantly be a “I told you so” group that will the front-runner for the 2012 election.
There will be severe damage to the democratic party because all these young voters that just joined will likely crawl back into their hole and likely stay away from politics for a long time. Politics will go back to the way it was in the 80′s to 2000.
That’s my prediction.
Posted by: Ann | June 1, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
libre
given the chances of his succeeeding which are nil I was thinkign about not voting for that even if shes on it … and I think Ickes and she and other Clinton people figured this oout when Obama took over the caucuses and when MI and FL were taken off the DNC gave her a right to protest and walked right into givign her a reason to keep goign till the convention… very bright bunch they are… and where did they get ther DNC secretary that calls the rolls at the convention she was like a school girl talking abotu obama but was older than dirt!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
west texas
yea thats just demeaning to themselves when they do that!
Posted by: staniam | June 1, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
I’m with Jenny on this one. The unwillingness of the Clinton camp to compromise today was utterly despicable and underscores the Clinton’s betrayal of the Democratic party. “I want it all” as her supporters stated on one hand, coupled with Ickes lawyerly “fair reflection” B S makes me want to puke. Go ahead and shriek you worthless pieces of sh-t. You are nothing but a bunch of sore loosers and you are not Dems. Go vote for McCain – vote for another 100 years in Iraq, another pre-emptive war with Iran, the overturning of Roe v. Wade, etc. and watch you waste your vote when the Dems destroy McCain in Nov you fuggin whiners. I’ll throw some confetti for ya when Senator Obama wins. ;)
Posted by: EddyNewHope | June 1, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Carlsue
What Denver did u land in? Because in the Denver CO. that I have been born and raised in overwhelmingly supports Obama. Three days on the 12 blocks that make up the 16th street mall is by no way to say the State of Colorado is behind Clinton.
Posted by: Drew in Denver | June 1, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Let’s be honest everyone. Obama is only at this point because he is black. I am not racist or anything, just stating my opinions. If Obama was white, would he be where he is now with only less than 1 term in Congress, little experience, just on talks of hope and change?
We all honestly don’t believe so. He would probably not even make it out of Iowa.
I cannot vote for Obama because of his lack of experience, his policies, + his radical friends and his radical beliefs.
opinions?
Posted by: Ann | June 1, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Sorry about the name I mean Carlasue
Posted by: Drew in Denver | June 1, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
I think HRC could win as an independent by drawing Dem, Indy, and dis-enchanted Rep. bread and butter oriented, women.
That faction plus we millions of HRC supporting DEm and Indy males could prove to be a winner.
I think with Clark she also draws many Rep. males.
I think she would draw votes from McCain in large numbers, while absolutely demolishing Obama.
Even if McCain still won, Obama goes down in flames and she builds a solid base for 2012.
The DNC would lie in ruins.
Posted by: West Texas | June 1, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Gary,
A three ticket election = a cake walk for McCain. Hillary will be labeled a disloyal democrat. It will never happen.
2012 looks a lot more likely. She can discreetly take Obama down without being held responsible. The real question is will she take the “nuclear option”?
Posted by: Ann | June 1, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
HAS DNC COME TO THIS?!
This was NOT democratic, it WAS dictatorial!!! I watched the whole debate, just as I have followed the whole warped campaign. I listened to Sen Bill Nelson and the passionate words of Sen Joiner and was encouraged, believing that the so called Rules Committee would get it right. I listened to Harold Ickes at the end of the debate, at a total loss for words, because of the blatant injustice. By this time I was feeling broken hearted by this travesty, because the decisions have totally negated the rights of the voters and is unjust. You may think it’s unimportant, but it has set an example and it’s a matter of principle! DNC such a shame on you! I hope Hillary challenges this and takes it to the Credentials Committee, because this has been a total stitch up throughout!
Posted by: Di | June 1, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
nice chatting w/ everyone
good nite all
Posted by: Ann | June 1, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
yes this mess was caused by the DNC
Posted by: Ann | June 1, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
The election will come down to white independent voters and Clinton supporters.. However they vote is how the election will go. Obama will not get the needed votes and will lose the general election. A lot of Clinton supporters will either vote for McCain or stay home. Obama has split Americans down the middle due to his using the race card and changing his mind whichever way the wind blows. The damage is done and now and the Dnc will have to try again in 2012. No one in their right mind will vote for Obama knowing he will tear down America not build it up.
Posted by: s4bo | June 1, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
“A three ticket election = a cake walk for McCain. Hillary will be labeled a disloyal democrat. It will never happen.”
I know, that’s what I was saying. There is no way Clinton can win a three way race. Her only chance in the Democratic nomination, or a strong Bob Barr showing as a Libertarian candidate.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Libre,
You misread my post
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Wow – this primary has become centered aroudn the cult of the Clinton personality. “Be damned party – give it to McCain if our girl Hillary isn’t handed the nomination” even though she lost decisively in spite of every advantage including the “Clinton brand”, a 120 super delegate lead to start with, “inevitable nominee” status, etc. If you want to blame someone, blame Mark Penn, Bill Clinton, Ickes, etc. for running a feeble campaign that verges on malpractice. Bottom line, she lost. If you feel so inclined, go vote for McCain and join the GOP. The Clintons already have based on their actions.
Posted by: EddyNewHope | June 1, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
LOL – Wow, these desperate and melodramatic posts are laughable. Don’t worry, we’ll welcome you back into the fold once you return to your sense. Or, we’ll throw some confetti for ya when Senator Obama wins in November and you can celebrate being 2-time loosers: first with Hillary, then with McBush…I mean McCain. LOL
Posted by: EddyNewHope | June 1, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
I think Hillay’s presidency was never meant to happen.
I had huge respect to her when she was First lady but she was the ONE who deceived voters with manners and word what she showed and said, not me !
I am just tired of blaming politics.
She saids that she’s fighting through because of her supporters ? that’s very weak. She’s only fighting for herself now. I am not blind.
Posted by: Jolanda | June 1, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
600,000 voters were ignored in MI and Hillary lost 4 delegates because of the pathetic decision of DNC…BO wasn’t even on the ballot AND THEY CALL THIS DEMOCRACY. It’s disgusting and the outcome of the GE will not be slick Barry O’…there will now be 4 more years of power mad Republicans in control, lead by Mr McGoo!
Posted by: Di | June 1, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
libre says I won’t for Barack even with hillary as vp. – All the more reason why HRC should not be accepted as VP.
Posted by: joeforsure | June 1, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
I think Hillary needs to face reality at some point. Does she want a tainted nomination that she has had to wrestle from the more rightful candidate, or does she want to gracefully step aside and give herself a future in the Democratic Party. Fla and Mi both broke the rules, it would be wrong for the delegations to be sat and given full voting rights.
Posted by: markymark | June 1, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Gary K Most Democrats casted their vote in Michigan, they could have seated the 40% UNCOMMITED VoTES IN THE CONVENTION AND LET THE M VOTE EITHER FOR oBAMA OR NOT.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
Interesting Gary… I think there should have been a revote in both FL & MI too!!!
We almost agreed, careful people will start talking.
Posted by: Di | June 1, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Gary K The polls do not ask people who do you prefer, they ask a series of questions designed to manipulate the poll as they pleased, If you believe thos polls then Sen Clinton would’t have 17 million plus votes, and Obama would have clinced the election 6 weeks ago.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
Statistics…I tell ya!
Posted by: Di | June 1, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
The way they cheated Florida and Michigan today is anti-democratic. Those states will vote Republican in November. I won’t vote for McCain, but I will never vote for Obama or any politician like him.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
If Obama feels it is appropriate to claim victory then so be it. It would still require either a concession from Clinton or ratification from the DNC. that said I agree this is pretty much over.
I cannot see any successful way they can run a joint ticket.
Now I don’t hate Obama. I hear how his supporters say there is something about him aside from the issues that says to them he is the man for the job. I can respect that but my problem is he doesn’t make me feel that way. i don’t see it.
Now I value my vote. I want to vote. I have always been a Democrat and I am not saying I will vote for Mc Cain but I can’t see me voting for Obama. I don’t know what to do. I hope it all becomes clearer by November
Posted by: rode | June 1, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
jolanda Because she care enough to try and save this country for the terrible damage that McCain and/or Obama will do
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Hey rode, just write Hillary on your ballot paper.
Posted by: Di | June 1, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
Gary K. I heard Ickles saying that more likely all uncommited votes more likely were for Obama, the only thinig is that maybe some were for Edwards, so I think it was reasonable to let the delegates decide that on the assembly. instead of giving “free” delegates to obama. But everything was engineered form the begining by the DNC to give the nomination to barack. They think they are going to appear in History books as civil rights advocators, instead they are going to appear as engineering a defeat that was impossible to achieve against the after Bush republicans.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am
Hillary should take this fight all the way to the convention. Obama is pulling a fast one and this so called “solution” is nothing more than a fast one pulled by Obama, Pelosi and Dean. Hillary is much more electable than Obama who has the support of Reverend Wright. Go Hillary!
Posted by: Bakerson | June 1, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am
Yes gary K all media has had a bias favoring Obama all along, you will see that shifting to McCain after the Democrat primaries end. The Republicans helped Pelosi against Sen Clinton, becuse they know they can defeat obama, but no Sen Clinton.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
After 20 years of listening agreeing and endorsing hate and racism, Obama quits his church because suddenly in one month he realizes is a liability for his campaign. Very convenient, but not credible, the same way that nobody bought his staged break up with Rev Wright.
Posted by: libre | June 1, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am
What a day! Don’t you just love American politics?
I am a big supporter of Senator Obama, and I don’t dislike Hillary Clinton. I just can’t support her and I am not sure what to make of what was done by the Rules and By-Laws Committee of the DNC.
I think the compromise was well-crafted and probably not easy to achieve given the number of Clinton supports on the RBC, but I wonder if perhaps the RBC has opened a dangerous can of worms. I wonder if what they did was constitutional and if perhaps they have opened the door to a floor fight and perhaps even a civil rights law suit on behalf of the Michigan delegation. I am not an attorney or a constitutional expert, but I feel troubled by the way the DNC / RBC moved “uncommitted’ delegates into the Obama column. I wonder if that violates the principle of “One person, one vote.”
I hope I am wrong about this, and I suspect that right now there are a bunch of very qualified constitutional lawyers examining this decision from every possible point of view. I hope the party will move past this, but I suspect the fight is not yet over. I would not be surprised to see this issue brought to the Credentials Committee as Mr. Ickes comments suggest.
Lowell Copeland
New York, NY
Posted by: Lowell Copelan | June 1, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am
Thank God,Mr Obama will be the next president of U.S.A, this have given a solid prove to that.
Posted by: emmanuel | June 1, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
I’m speechless!
I thought that yesterday’s decision would restore party unity!
I guess I was wrong!
I for one am becoming disaffected with politics again… a little more each day!
And yet I will go vote in November and I will cast my vote not based on hurt feelings or to teach the DNC a lesson but TO GET OUR PROBLEMS SOLVED IN THIS COUNTRY!
DEMS, UNITE, NOW!!!!!!
Posted by: outragious008 | June 1, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am
This decision is fair to any open minded person. Clinton supporters are so sentimental about this issue that they ‘ve lost any sense of fairness.
How could anybody in their right mind ask the committee to reinstate the entire delegates and pretend as if no rules were broken?
If they care so much about disenfranchisement of voters now, it ‘s fair to ask why the states didn’t care about the same disenfranchisement when they decided to break the rules, knowing very well the price they had to pay.
Posted by: Geldo | June 1, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am
This decision is fair to any open minded person. Clinton supporters are so sentimental about this issue that they ‘ve lost any sense of fairness.
How could anybody in their right mind ask the committee to reinstate the entire delegates and pretend as if no rules were broken?
If they care so much about disenfranchisement of voters now, it ‘s fair to ask why the states didn’t care about the same disenfranchisement when they decided to break the rules, knowing very well the price they had to pay.
Posted by: Geldo | June 1, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am
I dont’t understand how Clinton supporters (cliaming to be democratic and fair) would continue to follow a candidate who continues to cheat and change the rules as she feels fit. Unbelievable!!!!!!
I have bee a clinton supporter.. but have switched to Obama due to clintons undemocratic campaign..
Dont forget.. she agreed to these rules prior to the start of the game.. oh no im loosing…lets do over and change the rules until Im ahead…
Hillary supporters are following a 5 year old… GROW UP!
OBAMA 08!
Posted by: Kenya Wilder | June 1, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am
“I heard Ickles saying that more likely all uncommited votes more likely were for Obama, the only thinig is that maybe some were for Edwards, so I think it was reasonable to let the delegates decide that on the assembly.”
But therein lies the problem. Pledged delegates are allotted by popular vote, not on the whims of the delegates themselves—only superdelegates can do that. So the only way to allocate the pledged delegates in a primary is by popular vote. But the elections were unfortunately a farce, in that Obama wasn’t on the ticket. This were the crux of the mess.
The only recourse would have been to hold a revote, or change ALL the pledged delegates (Clinton’s too) into superdelegates. But that would have also meant that the whole electoral process would have been discarded. But giving Clinton the pledge delegates and while letting the Michigan uncommitted (Obama voters mostly) go un-pledged would have also been inequitable, since they were told that their votes wouldn’t count. Really, the whole thing was a mess from the start.
Ultimately, a revote would have been the only way to quell most inequalities. But while the DNC ruling might have been imperfect, I think is got at the heart of how the electorate of Michigan and Florida actually felt. I don’t think even Ickes can refute that.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am
Geldo =======================
Your post is the most sensible I ‘ve heard in a long time.
Posted by: Independent | June 1, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am
Obama’s own “Mission Accomplished 2″ on Tuesday. Declaring it to be over – again.
He continues the plan of bullying Clinton out before the convention, which is consistent with his entire campaign of negativity and trashing Clinton’s approval numbers to get a win. Divisive, Obama breaks the mole on devisive. Too bad Obama friends from the neighborhood isn’t as apt of lying as he, making stupid sermons, saying exactly the same spew Obama’s been pushing from the pulpit.
Obama got greedy when he took 4 delegates from Michagan that she won fair and square. Now Clinton has to stand up to this bully, and if anyone can – she can.
Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | June 1, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am
All Obama needs is a “Mission Accomplished” sign. Maybe he can borrow Bushes. He could have conceeded a handful of delegates, still have maintained a commanding lead, and have backed Hillary into a corner. Instead he comes off as small and petty. Time will tell.
Posted by: jimdelavega | June 1, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am
It amazes me the number of Clinton supporters that acually blame Obama like he was sitting at that table and calling the shots. I know their is no reasoning with these irate people. The majority of the DNC yesterday that voted on these issues was Clinton supporters. They did the best they could and didnt give Obama what he wanted either. If they had givin the Clinton camp everything they wanted Clinton would still loose the nomination next week. Blame the leaders in your states. Not Obama. Ive never seen or heard such hate of a canidate that has done nothing but run a better campaine. There has to be something else to all this blame and hate against Obama. I do not know if its a race thing or because they wanted a woman in office so bad that all else doesnt matter. Some are yelling and kicking about the 4 delegates given to Obama. Its just 4 delegates! It would not have put Clinton in any better position to win if they had given her those four and four more. They would be just screaming over something else. What a display of rudeness at the meeting from the Clinton supporters. Just like on these blogs some of them are borderline crazy and theres no reasoning with them. Its like she has a brainwashed cult following. Oh well its on to the GE. I would have supported the Dem party in Nov. even if Hillary had won the nomination because of the bigger picture. Hillary and Obama see eye to eye on a lot of issues however seening her in these past couple of months and way she as acted it would have been hard to vote for her. Now some of these crazed Hillary supporters are saying they will vote for McCain out of spite. I hope you are willing to lay in the bed you could possible be making. I doupt we will have to worry about that since a lot of republicans are coming to the Dem ticket and will make up for any losses of irate voters jumping to McCain. I also love the people that say All HRC supporters are going to do this or that. In reality the mass of Clinton supporters are Dem first and a supporter second and will join Obama’s fight for the White House.
Posted by: CW | June 1, 2008, 4:06 am 4:06 am
Shannon, thanks for the information. I didn’t know that. I’m a lifelong Republican, but really!!!!
Posted by: MaryM | June 1, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am
I’ll never vote for such an arrogant and pompous person as Obama!
Posted by: Danielle | June 1, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am
if the hillary supporters are going to vote mccain, why can’t they just do it? why do they have to keep threatening everybody else?
peace and obama 08
Posted by: peace | June 1, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am
there is no way that the committee is going to deny the first African-American nominee the nomination. Sen. Obama has won by EVERY criteria – but, its the delegates that count.. NOT the popular vote. its over and mcclinton and her supporters need to get over it and support Sen. Obama
Posted by: tulcak | June 1, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am
bhrandon,
i believe you are correct. hillary has not won the popular vote. she always phrases it as “more voters that have cast a vote” as opposed to the popular vote. this, somehow, excludes the caucuses.
obama 08
Posted by: happy | June 1, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am
Obama could have been on the ballot in Michigan, they could’ve held another primary, he chose not to work with the Clinton campaign or the DNC on the issue.
So, as a political tactic, he removed himself from the ballot in Michigan and urged, in violation of rules and laws, to have those voters vote “Uncommitted”.
Well, since there were still a total of five candidates at that time of the Michigan primary, and, let’s see, 55% voted for Hillary Clinton and 4% for Kuchinich, that leaves the rest to be divided up between the remaining candidates. So, how is giving Obama half and taking some away from Clinton considered fair?
If there was no re-vote, then there should be 55% of those delegates for Clinton and 0 to the rest of the candidates.
However, once again, democracy (that joke of a thing) was violated. And, it was a planned, calculating choice directly from the likes of that American hating Obama.
Hillary – go to Denver girl! You go!!
Because we will not vote for anyone but you come November. In fact, I lie, I will vote for BARR (Libertarian candidate). But Obama will not get my vote.
Posted by: jeffrey | June 1, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am
All this could have been avoided if the players adhered to the rules set prior to the race. The DNC should have respected Florida and MI decision to hold primaries when they wanted.
Posted by: Keith | June 1, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am
When ALL votes are counted— INCLUDING all caucuses and primaries— Hillary has a 52,331 vote lead.
Again: Hillary has a 52,331 vote lead in the popular vote, INCLUDING ALL CAUCUSES and primaries.
Of course, the “Democratic” party is not all that democratic, so the candidate with the most votes doesn’t get the nomination, and the nominee that does get the nomination has to get it by cutting the votes of two major states in half.
Oh well.
From 3/5 of a vote to 1/2…
We’ve regressed after 100 years.
Posted by: Tampa Voter | June 1, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am
In the long run divisiveness and hatred cannot win. While I agree that some angry Clinton ‘supporters’ (in reality panicked Clinton campaign workers posing as regular supporters) would do anything to defend their chance of a fat and easy job in the near future, the sane and honest Clinton fans will vote for the honest Democratic nominee and not for McCain.
Posted by: mfr_08 | June 1, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am
clinton is not electable simply because she has not won the primary, period.
Posted by: goDem | June 1, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am
Re: mfr_08
“Honest Democratic nominee” ?
LOL!!
That’s laughable. Obama his lied his way out of scandal after scandal, and cheated and backdoored his way in election after election.
Ask Alice Palmer. Ask Jack Ryan.
Posted by: Tampa Voter | June 1, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am
Obama is telling us who the Democratic nominee is, and is making his own rules for the process.
This has been going on since North Carolina and continues today. Dean and the DNC have never said, “Hey, stop presuming you are our nominee. Maybe because the deal is made, and has been for some time they are allowing Obama free rein.
If the DNC had a any spine they would honor their own process, and let resolution happen at the convention.
Obama is calling the shots though and it is clear he will do what it takes to circumvent the process, just as he did when he ran for the Illinois senate.
The man who probably knows him best spoke an absolute truth. ” Obama is a politician. He is doing what is politically expedient. Rev. Wright.
Until the supers cast their votes at the convention, there is no nominee, and that is what the DNC and the national media ought to be saying.
Not to worry though, Barrack knows and is telling us so. However there are those who have a different idea!
Posted by: anotherview | June 1, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am
who is in charge here? mcclinton? or the democratic national committee whose rules decide the nominee… repeat after me: delegates, delegates, delegates… no popular vote or any other criteria decides the nominee, again? its the DELEGATE count… end of story… who has the most and who will have the required number by the end of this week? Sen. Obama of course. case closed, sit down and shut up if thats all you are capable of doing. better yet, support and vote for Sen. Obama. He is the one the republicans fear because they know they can win against mcclinton.
Posted by: tulcak | June 1, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am
Also and correct me if I am wrong as the media does spin things. I heard on one media outlet that while John McCain was being held prisoner, that is wife at the time was fighting for him, traveling overseas, doing everything she could to get his release. She was a fantastic partner and wife to McCain. However upon his return and release he dumped her because she was overweight and went for the better looking rich woman.Hell of a way to say thanks. Research this McCain jumpers. If this is true I certainly wouldnt support such a canidate.
The difference of the way Clinton is handling this and the way Obama would handle this if the situation was reversed. If Obama was in Clinton’s position and heard of all these supporters yelling and screaming about joining McCain , I bet he would give a speech on whats important and why all Dem.’s should unite to take back the white house and why the Dem party is a bigger piture than either him or Sen Clinton. He would be trying to calm the situation and bring his angry supporters back to whats important and thats not letting McCain win the GE and to support who ever wins the nomination.Thats the kind of leader he is. Clinton is showing her true colors and showing what is important to her is “her” not the bigger picture or whats best for the country and the Dem party. Maybe voters have seen that ant thats why she is loosing. I hope I am wrong and she does and says the right things after Tuesday. If not , she is only hurting the Clinton legacy and her chances of having any respect.
Posted by: CW | June 1, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am
Mr. Ickes admitted yesterday that the Fl & Mi primaries were deeply flawed; therefore, their results are deeply flawed, as anyone who successfuly finished highschool would understand. The claim that they should count as cast is abusive and ridiculous, and should turn their frustration against those who have insisted on having those early primaries.
Posted by: mfr_08 | June 1, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am
Mariann Pepitone:
Stop pretending to be a Democrat. You’re a right wing plant.
Posted by: Fairspeak | June 1, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am
and those mcclinton radicals who want to vote for mcsame if their lady loses? wow, you really are bitter and care nothing about our country – just like the republicans… win at all costs and screw the country if you don’t get your way… mcclinton has become the very people that attacked her and her followers have done the same. you really want to condemn our country to more of bush policy? so, you would rather destroy everything like a spoiled brat throwing a temper tamtrum? grow up and start thinking about someone/s besides yourself. selfish and shameful.
Posted by: tulcak | June 1, 2008, 4:44 am 4:44 am
It amazes me the number of Clinton supporters that acually blame Obama like he was sitting at that table and calling the shots. I know their is no reasoning with these irate people. The majority of the DNC yesterday that voted on these issues was Clinton supporters. They did the best they could and didnt give Obama what he wanted either. If they had givin the Clinton camp everything they wanted Clinton would still loose the nomination next week. Blame the leaders in your states. Not Obama. Ive never seen or heard such hate of a canidate that has done nothing but run a better campaine. There has to be something else to all this blame and hate against Obama. I do not know if its a race thing or because they wanted a woman in office so bad that all else doesnt matter. Some are yelling and kicking about the 4 delegates given to Obama. Its just 4 delegates! It would not have put Clinton in any better position to win if they had given her those four and four more. They would be just screaming over something else. What a display of rudeness at the meeting from the Clinton supporters. Just like on these blogs some of them are borderline crazy and theres no reasoning with them. Its like she has a brainwashed cult following. Oh well its on to the GE. I would have supported the Dem party in Nov. even if Hillary had won the nomination because of the bigger picture. Hillary and Obama see eye to eye on a lot of issues however seening her in these past couple of months and way she as acted it would have been hard to vote for her. Now some of these crazed Hillary supporters are saying they will vote for McCain out of spite. I hope you are willing to lay in the bed you could possible be making. I doupt we will have to worry about that since a lot of republicans are coming to the Dem ticket and will make up for any losses of irate voters jumping to McCain. I also love the people that say All HRC supporters are going to do this or that. In reality the mass of Clinton supporters are Dem first and a supporter second and will join Obama’s fight for the White House.
Posted by: CW | June 1, 2008, 4:45 am 4:45 am
tampa voter, are you a republican? your post is 100% full of faslehoods… go read the agreement mcclinton signed, i don’t have time to point out facts to you and it wouldn’t do any good because you wouldn’t listen anyways…
also, your claim that mcclinton won every debate? that’s an opinion many people could easily dispute – and its just opinion anyways… repeat after me: DELEGATES, DELEGATES, DELEGATES. the committee rules make it clear. so forget about debates, popular vote, etc… also, and again, Sen. Obama has by far, won the most primaries – this is fact, go look it up… he has the most delegates and he will have the number required by the rules of the committee by the end of the week to have officially won the nomination. case closed. mcclinton loses…
Posted by: tulcak | June 1, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am
Although “We” would love to have you help Mr. Obama win the white house, this is America and you can vote as you wish. So, to all of those who say that they will vote for Mr. McCain, by all means do so if you wish. However “We” do not think that will help or harm anyone. Therefore, “We” will have to accept that fact which “We” and I do. I leave it to you.
Posted by: We The People | June 1, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am
Funny how Clinton says she is ahead in pop. votes and all votes should be counted. Except for her she wont count the caucus states. I guess to her those are not voters.
Posted by: CW | June 1, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am
The Clinton campaign is happy. They got the votes in two states where Barack didn’t campaign to count.
Two states where many voters didn’t vote because they were told this vote didn’t count.
Yes – we understand what the Clinton campaign is about and it certainly isn’t concerned with what the voters really want – it’s all about her.
Posted by: Citizen Voter | June 1, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am
Hillary Clinton makes me sick! First, she agrees to penalize FL & MI for their early voting and now she whines because each was only counted with half-votes. Hello! Their votes should not count! You don’t change the rules in the middle of the game!
Hillary & Bill Clinton will do or say anything to get elected. Well Bill & Hillary, get ready for disappointment and I couldn’t be happier for both of you! Go back to Arkansas and rot!
Posted by: Bubba P | June 1, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am
With all this discourse towards Obama coming from people within his own party, can his supporters really expect him to win in nov? Now add to this republican and independent voters. There is no chance he can win the swing states with these kind of odds.
Do you Obama supporters really think that many people will unite after a blood bath like this? And all this coming from someone that was supposed to unite the party.
This arrogance by Obama thinking he has the mandate of his party will be his downfall. His supporters nor the DNC haven’t a clue how much their constituants are against his nomination but, they will find out come nov.
Posted by: '68 VNvet | June 1, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am
Hillary Clinton makes me sick! First, she agrees to penalize FL & MI for their early voting and now she whines because each was only counted with half-votes. Hello! Their votes should not count! You don’t change the rules in the middle of the game!
Hillary & Bill Clinton will do or say anything to get elected. Well Bill & Hillary, get ready for disappointment and I couldn’t be happier for both of you! Go back to Arkansas and rot!
Posted by: Bubba P | June 1, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am
All the supporters Clinton’s and Obama’s. It’s the time for UNITY.
We(FL&MI) broke the rules in the first place remember? Prizes and punishments are given in correct way yesterday so we can not really complain with the outcome.There are no real losers. We are all winners.
Let’s move on.
Posted by: Florida & Michigan | June 1, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am
Harold Ickes behavior was shameful, form the start it was plain for all to see he would only accept one ruling, this being against what he accepted previously, but then he did not think it would count?
The way Ickes reacted to many speakers was disgusting and showed no respect that we all have opinions. Harold Ickes was only ever going to as I said accept one ruling and when that was not agreed to to make the possible legal Threat at the end was so typical, it was not what was best for The Party just who he represented, that is the only rules he plays by.
The Democratic Party needs to UNITE to end with the statement from Harold Ickes yesterday was not the best start, I trust Harold will reflect and watch his full performance and hopefully some trusted colleagues and friends will speak to him, politics like that take us way back, no wonder Voters want Change!
Posted by: John B Sheffield | June 1, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am
Sorry Joe, I am one EX-DEMOCRAT turned INDEPENDENT. I have decided I have had enough of the party mentality that makes you vote for a party and not the person.
Posted by: '68 VNvet | June 1, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am
SEN OBAMA IS NOT ONLY GOING TO BE THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE BUT HE IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Posted by: mike moore | June 1, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am
This is America.
Forget this “nomination” mockery.
In November, I WANT YOU to vote for an AMERICAN.
AMERICA FOR THE AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Unle Sam | June 1, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am
Don’t be too hard on Harold Ickes, keep in mind if he was running Hillary’s campaign from the start she would be the nominee today. Its also clear Hillary is searching for an excuse to stay in the race until the convention. Now she can use Michigan as her new lost cause.
Posted by: Schlindamae | June 1, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am
Any amount of anger held by the Mi and Fl Democratic primary voters will be NOTHING compared to the anger of the voters of the other primaries if HRC is handed this nomination. She cannot win by any legal or moral methods–but she HAS said she will do ANYTHING she has to to win the election because she feels she is the better candidate. Too bad for her, that most of the (elected by the voters) delegates don’t seem to agree.
Posted by: Lindy | June 1, 2008, 5:22 am 5:22 am
I am a woman.I am proud to be a woman among all women with pride and dignity. Yesterday, watching and hearing Clinton’s supporters who were indoor and outdoor made me wish I was a man not a woman. The agressivness, need for control and power were obvious and scary at the same time. I thought Senator Clinton was much smarter. I hoped she would take the opportunity to advise her people about the importance of Unity rather than advise them of reserving her right to create chaos and bitterness. She missed another big chance…
What a shame!
Posted by: Neta | June 1, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am
I have read alot, but not all, of the comments here, and the one thing that seems not to have been brought up is the fact that the date of the primary in Fla. was set by a republican house and board of elections. That being true, then why should Hillary be punished for her win in that state with only half the delegates?
I don’t know about Michigan, and I plan to do research, but if Obama was stupid enough to pull his name off the ballot in ANY state, then it would seem to me that he should not be able to reap the rewards of that action (half-vote delegates).
Bottom line, the DNC set the idea of democracy back about 500 years yesterday with that despicable ruling of half-vote delegates. I suppose that in Nov. the electoral votes from Fla. and Mich. with only count as a half-vote?
To those of us that still believe that your vote counts, we have also been dealt another serious blow to democracy. Our forefathers are rolling in their graves with the thought of how their democracy is dead, only to be replaced by a system that involves cheating and divisive tactics instead of putting the will of the majority first.
Posted by: Mike | June 1, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am
It is so sad to think that in our democratic process we have to broker a nominee and not according to the will of the people. The news media has selected a nominee. Nancy Pelosi stated in the beginning that the superdelagates should go with the will of the people. Hillary has the most popular votes and the most blue states. The hate that the Obama supporters are displaying reflects the hate-filled sermons of the church left by the politically oportunistic Obama. What he did to win in Chicago represented the same old cut-throat politics of the Daly machine. Yet he gives this spiel about a new kind of politics. We will sit back and see just how his resume fills out. He is talking about ending the war in Iraq and has not met yet with the committee he heads concerning the war in Afghanistan. When you come from a very hate-filled and cut-throat political base you attract the kind of supporters that give the nasty comments concerning Hillary Clinton. The people in their disrespect forget that their mothers and sisters are women. Too long have we as women excleed and had to take the back seat. What about the will of the people? We praise Obama and really don’t know why and as democrats are fooling ourselves into believing that we will become united. The media knows this. They were the ones who designated the pledged delagates barameter in determining a winner. Never in my history of voting have I seen such disloyalty, traitors and users. Clinton supporters who used them for political gains are turning their backs on them and expecting them to be loyal to them and the party. I am disillusioned with the whole democratic process as a result of the Democratic Party. They talk about Al Gore being robbed of the election when he had the popular voted, yet they do the same thing to Hillary. They are using a flawed candidate and fear to try to win an election instead of selecting a worthy candidate to run who can win on her own merits. They use the fear of four more years of George Bush and the fact that Blacks will somehow revolt if they do not get their way in Obama being nominated. The need to educate Blacks in the true sense of what the electoral and selection process are concerned and help them to understand that bullying a country is not the way to have a viable Black candidate. The Democratic Party cannot continue to blame Hillary for their own flaws and for the loss of Obama’s run for the presidency. They expect her to use her political power to help him win when he does not represent the will of the people. Why would all of the superdelagates jump behind him when he does not have the most popular votes? What is their rationale? It has to be personal prferences. It can’t be electability. I will cancel my newspaper and become an independent voter in this election. I will not under any circumstances vote for Obama and watch him muffle his way to the White House through fear tactics. Hillary will have one more popular votes than any othe candidate in the history of primary voting. Obama claims victory after every primary no matter how bad he does because the media drinks his Kool-Aid. We all look so rediculous when we continue to make excuse after excuse for all of his blatant mistakes. I wish that there was one person who would stand and make him accountable. No one seems to have the nerve.People hate to admit when they are wrong. We smile and think somehow we don’t look just plain stupid. We will put him there and crucify him when he makes predictable mistakes. Some democracy. If Hillary makes you sick, then you will be sicker with inexperienced Obama and his flawed, idealistic plans.
Posted by: Anne C | June 1, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am
compromise according to clinton is when you get all and your friend gets nothing.to me thats cheating,americans are tired of cheaters and desperados as leaders. sorry, madam clinton accept defeat and move on. you will be greater for it.
Posted by: pero | June 1, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am
Game over. The math isn’t there for HRC. She ran a good campaign, but the time for political dyanasties has passed. It’s time for something new. OBAMA ’08
Posted by: Ken | June 1, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am
I think this panel is a failed panel. I mean the whole thing was planned even before the start of the seating . It wasnt that the useless leader in the party even really wanted this meeting to hold or that they wanted to hear the Clinton side of the story but they did it so that Obama will win Florida and Michigan in November. That was their fear but i think they have played to the roof they have not deceived anybody but themselves. We Real Democrats will vote McCain in November even today the party has proved how wicked it could be. It is sexist party, a wicked party, a party that discriminates against women, aGos forsaken party, a party of racial divide. This party is going to nowhere but it is going to fail and terribly in November. I AM FED UP WITH THE DNC. PLEASE HILLARY CONTEST AS IN INDEPENDENT OR WE WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: America will be liberated | June 1, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am
Clinton shouldn’t be on the Obama ticket. She used slander , racism , sexism and everything in her foulmouthed dictionary to stop Obama including changing party rules and she utterly failed. Super delegates are flocking to him by the dozens. Her only chance in getting a VP ticket is actually on McCain’s ticket as she has done him great favors in destroying the party and I believe McCain is indebted to her. Being sore is one thing but being destructive is a whole different ball park. Stop this Woman now!!!!
Posted by: Harry | June 1, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am
Sen. Obama will never get my support. The Supers are destroying the DNC. McCain will get my full and undivided support this November. And, I’m looking forward to joining his campaign. At least he treats Sen. Clinton with the respect she’s earned.
Posted by: bluebird | June 1, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am
Anne C:
Very informative post! I totally agree with you. I think the DNC (Pelosi, Dean, Kerry, Kennedy) all pushed Obama down America’s throat in hopes that Hillary would give up the fight and lend her support to Obama. What happened is that she ISN’T giving up, she has over 17 million supporters and they know they have screwed up. Now, because of them and Obama’s deceit, the Democratic party is divided beyond repair. It will be an easy win for McCain in the fall. I will NOT vote for Obama, never, and I for one, as a Hillary supporter, will be out on the streets, blogging, talking, whatever it takes to convert voters to McCain or Hillary and against Obama. I have been a Democrat all my life, but this year, I am embarrassed by the DNC and the process. I don’t hate Obama, and it’s not his race, or his church. It’s the fact that he gives all this good rhetoric, with no plan of action. Added to this, is he lies and I can’t stand a liar! If Hillary runs as an Independent, she has my vote. If she concedes, I (like 17 million other Clinton supporters) will vote for McCain. See, what Obama supporters don’t realize is that Hillary has already won! Obama can’t win without her and he knows it. He’s scared now and his supporters know this as well. I would rather have 4 more years of a Republican than 4 years of a liar!
Posted by: david from texas | June 1, 2008, 6:21 am 6:21 am
Expect the complete meltdown of the democratic party if this moron does what he suggests and claims victory.
After what the RBC did by stealing Clinton delegates and handing them over to Obama, it’s over, baby.
Posted by: scorbs | June 1, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am
I’m really sick and tired of people calling each other racists as a cop out. I happened to be African born American citizen. I think, no, I believe Obama is a jerk.He got a bunch of people in the backgrownd telling him what to do what to say and WHEN to say it. We must be some kinda of fools. He uses your race my race and anybody’s race to get to his end. type A. He just ain’t got the experience Mrs Clinton has. She certainly deserve better treatment. She worked all her life.For the people of her country, for you and me. Just because this great country gave us the right to say what we want to say about anybody in public office ( no place on earth enjoys this right with this magnitude BTW) It doesn’t mean we have to be so unsulting to them to the point to degrade the human in us! Mercy! Have some compassion and decency.
Posted by: comicrelief | June 1, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am
Why is she still doing this? She knows that she cannot win. I have an unconfortable feeling that this woman is up to no good.
If anything happens to Obama, the party shoud bring back Edwards!
Posted by: Bring in the Straight Jacket | June 1, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am
She can win and even has better chances than Obama . Obama cannot win and will not win .
Posted by: America will be liberated | June 1, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am
I would like to know what the DNC are going to do about the persons who did not vote because they were told that that the election would not count!
This decision is like a losing baseball team stopping the game in the 5th inning and declaring that to score a run you need only get to second base!
Ridiculous!!!
Posted by: Sick of This | June 1, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am
Obama just wants to get the nomination over with – legally. If he had ceded Clinton the “full vote” package from Fla and Mich, she would have used the “closeness of the race” to drag it on for at least another month. You watch – once/if she concedes, he’ll agree to Fla and Mich getting their FULL votes!
Posted by: Clair | June 1, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am
The Clintons are power addicted, they crave a third term more than they want the very air they breath. It is not expected she would give up now, especially not when Mexico and Canada
have not voted.
Posted by: TK | June 1, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am
ONly took 20 YEARS to denounce WRIGHT.
Not a second too soon!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 1, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
It appears that the DNC is setting a new precedent: You no longer have to be on a ballot to get votes. In Michigan, Barack Obama removed his name from the ballot, own choice, own reason, but hey…. That don’t matter because he is getting delegates and votes from the DN who think it is fair to give him some even though he did not represent himself. The morons who decided on this must be FIRED!!!!
Posted by: Retrovvision | June 1, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
Hillary “voted against the FL and MI delegates before she voted for them” Lets stop kidding ourselves people. Hillary needs these delegates to stay in the game and now they are “important”.
Lets discuss the merits of how FL and MI was handled without connecting them with a self serving politician who has said almost anything to keep herself in the game!
Posted by: Amenzoser | June 1, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
Added to this, in recent analysis, with respect to the electoral vote…..Hillary is the only candidate that can beat McCain….she will carry Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Kentucky, Florida, and Michigan. Obama loses to McCain in the electoral votes on all counts. If Hillary is not the nominee, these states will go red in the GE, McCain will win by a landslide. The DNC definitely put the final nail in Obama’s coffin yesterday. As one analyst said, the Republcans are giving each other high fives today, because, now, it’s a sure win for the GOP in November as a result of what the DNC did with Florida and Michigan!
Posted by: david from texas | June 1, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am
Obama is power hungry and will not get be president . He will fail and the DNC will be brought to shame in November.
Posted by: America will be liberated | June 1, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am
To give zero delegates and zero popular votes to Obama from MI would have been undemocratic. Exit polls showed 46% favored Clinton, 32% favored Obama & 12% favored Edwards. (see Wikipedia on this) If you break that down into delegates, it would have been HRC 59 delegates, Obama 41 & Edwards 15. So, in the end you could have imagined 59 for Clinton and 56 for Obama if Edwards gave him his share of delegates.
The committee also took into consideration that there were many who wrote in Obama’s name on their ballot but those ballots were not valid because you are not allowed to write-in a candidate in a primary election.
A difference of 4 delegates for Clinton is not worth taking it to the convention and risking 4 years of McCain.
By the way, Obama was not the only one who took his name off of the MI ballot; Biden, Edwards & Richardson all took their names off of the MI ballot. None of the candidates were able to take their names off of the FL ballot because in order to do so, they would have had to drop out of the race, i.e. end their campaign!
Posted by: Cindy | June 1, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am
I just love Donna B.’s statement about rules, considering the DNC broke the rules when they first stripped Florida and Michigan of all of their delegates, when the rule states they should lose 1/2! And did anyone else find it suspect that the lunch break took so long? Or that Senator Obama is planning on seating the full delegations once he gets the nomination? Now, on the same day, he announces he is “resigning” from his church. After all of this time; we know Rev. Wright has been spewing his hateful rhetoric at least since 9/11, that is well documented by the church itself, but now the Senator decides it is time to leave. Can anyone say, political expediency? Can anyone say October surprise. Does anyone really believe the Republican party will not use everything they can to defeat him? “Typical white woman” “Bitter and cling to guns & religion” Black liberation theology; Ayers, Dohrn, Rezko, Wright…and the list goes on. After 35 years of voting for every Democratic candidate, should the nomination go to Senator Obama, I am changing my affiliation to “no party” and will vote my conscience. I cannot vote for Senator Obama as I have to many unanswered questions with regard to his character and judgement, and nothing I have seen or read has allayed those reservations. My opinion and I do not think I am alone. You are all entitled to your opinion.
Posted by: Michiel W | June 1, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Sophia |- first off Hillary always interested in Florida and Michigan voters…right after the election she went to Florida and declared she would fight for their votes..she went to Florida to fund raise during the Primary..for a person not interested in their votes she sure made a big effort to indicate otherwise..Obama is the true ploariziing factor in the Dem party…does she not have the most democratic party follower .with the exception of the Black vote other then that she has the Asian , hispanic, White, blue collar workers, as Obama supporters call them “uneducated”, and you think Obama should get the nomination….
Posted by: dellee | June 1, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am
To Ms. Dorothy Kincaid…..EXCELLENT POST! I lived through the sixties as well, and remember the “whites only” signs and the bitterness of America then. And now, with Obama, I’m feeling the same feelings I had then. He’s a liar, has turned his back on his own race, tries to be white, all of this in order to win an election. He’s downright scary……and now, he has “powerplay” in Washington with the DNC…..I bet Dr. King is crying right now, seeing what this man is doing to America!
Posted by: david from texas | June 1, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am
BO and his supporters will have no one but themselves to blame when he loses in November. With their misogynist, disrespectful and race baiting campaign they have managed to turn off the largest voting blocks in the States he would need to win to become President. He is not a unifier and now neither are we.
Posted by: politic girl | June 1, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am
By staying too long, It permanently puts a dense on her reputation. Clinton is eliminating her own chance to run for another president office next time.
Posted by: rogersb65 | June 1, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am
June 1992 – Bill Clinton is behind both Bush and Perot. Determining who is most electable at this point, is useless. The Clintons know this! BTW, Bill also had 3,000+ delegates when he won the nod in 1992. The primary race that year did NOT go until June, like the Clintons are claiming.
Posted by: TruthTeller | June 1, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
rogersb65:
You can’t speak for the majority of Democrats. People like you and Lake-Heart would rather put needles in their eye than vote for a competent Woman.
The people had enough of this kind of sexist arrogance, and media bias.
Posted by: Retrovvision | June 1, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Whatever will be will be. I’m not geyting involved in all this crazy making. Some people can’t accept the inevitable.
Posted by: ChayaFradle | June 1, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Hillary is looking into leaving the Democratic party and creating the party of Independent Democrats according to unnamed sources close to her campaign. COULD YOU BELIEVE THIS?
Posted by: Matelot | June 1, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
By staying too long, It permanently puts a dense on her reputation. Clinton is eliminating her own chance to run for another president office next time.
Posted by: rogersb65 | Jun 1, 2008 11:47:44 AM
————————————
Nice try roger….WE are not talking any next time here.
When Obama loses the GE he can think next time!!
We the majority are going to turn off the chatter, lay low till NOV and BAM we vote Hillary! Write in or McCain if we must.
Posted by: HP Boston | June 1, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Hey I’m a devoted independant. No party BS for me.
Posted by: Getalife | June 1, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Hillary is looking into leaving the Democratic party and creating the party of Independent Democrats according to unnamed sources close to her campaign. COULD YOU BELIEVE THIS?
Posted by: Matelot | Jun 1, 2008 12:07:54 PM
———————-
SOUNDS GOOD TO ME!!!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 1, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
I live in the UK and I’ve watched the contest between Obama and Clinton with interest. She gives the impression of being some sort of power crazed banshee that simply doesn’t know when to stop. I sincerely hope that she bows out with what little grace she has left, she is making the Democratic Party look like disunified and disfunctional group on the international stage.
Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
In the beginning I had a lot of respect for H. Clinton, but now I’m so dissappointed in her, that I don’t want to hear even her name. what a disgrace!
So hungry for power!
Posted by: Universal | June 1, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
I really don’t care who you vote for in Nov. I’m still undecided.
Posted by: Getalife | June 1, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
When will the sexism from the Obama camp stop??????
John McCain has never made such sexist comments, or if his advisors had he probably would have fired them.
The Obama campaign is a disgrace.
Unity?? Why don’t you first work on not being chauvanist and racist, then we’ll talk about unity.
Posted by: Jeremy | June 1, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Well, jayjay…how is giving Obama 4 of Hillary Clinton’s Michigan delegates getting his full share? How does that add up to not only Hillary getting everything she wanted but more importantly everything she deserved.
“Right thinking Democrats” do not come up with formulas, irrespective of how they impact the final outcome, that steal delegates from a candidate.
And for those of you, a la Alexis Herman, who think Hillary Clinton’s supporters were out of order at yesterday’s meeting, put the shoe on the other foot. Your guy appears to be the eventual nominee and you are still hurling hateful and demeaning comments not only at Hillary but also at us, her supporters.
As Harold Ickes so correctly stated, this is certainly not the way to unity.
Posted by: mkevin | June 1, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
HRC signed the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee AGREEMENT [PLEDGE] in January 08. Apparently SIGNING [meaning giving her “word of honor”] the DNC RBC AGREEMENT meant NOTHING and she RENEGED? So the question one must the ask oneself is, “What would she do if she were our POTUS and signed a “WHITE HOUSE ORDER”, “CONGRESSIONAL BILL”, or an “AGREEMENT” with a “foreign country” and later determined to renege? Do you know what that would do to our country and her presidency? I do!
Posted by: Disparaged | June 1, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
I have one more comment to make, and then I will leave these blogs just as I am leaving the Democratic party. It is ironic that the Democratic party has turned out to be least democratic of all. That the Rules committee should blatantly disregard the rules when making their decision with regard to the Michigan deligates. How is it remotely democratic to “give” Senator Obama 59 delagates? Senator Obama, along with J. Edwards & Gov. Richardson voluntarily removed their names from the ballot and urged voters, distributing hand bills, to vote undeclared. Where in the Democratic charter does it say that a committee can arbitrarily decided that a candidate deserves not only the uncommitted votes, but some of those actually cast for another candidate? This is exactly what the committee has done. So much for rules, Donna B.!
We thought it was only the Republicans who seemed to disregard the votes of the people, now we know it is also the Democratic party. Since the popular vote, “We the People”, is split approximately 50/50, I firmly believe Senator Clinton should take this fight all the way to the convention. I believe I am not alone in this opinion. I believe, looking at the electoral map, that she is the one who will win decisively against John McCain and the Republicans in November. I do not believe the same can be said of Senator Obama. I believe a vast number of the Democratic party core voters will not follow blindly along party lines; there has been way too much animosity from his supporters and way too many derogatory comments from the Senator himself, along with way too little being known about him and what is known is not inclined to inspire trust in his character and judgement; the two things he says qualify him to be our next President. I will spend all of my “blogging” time writing to the DNC and urging superdelegates to back Senator Clinton. Good luck to all!
Posted by: Michiel W | June 1, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
WHOA!!!! Michiel W. Well said.
Posted by: american | June 1, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
If all else stays the same, I’ll vote for my father again.
Posted by: Getalife | June 1, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
jeremy stated above: When will the sexism from the Obama camp stop??????
John McCain has never made such sexist comments . .
Jeremy, did you NOT hear what McSame called his wife? He called her the “C” word. THAT IS DISPICABLE “SEXISM”. Don’t say McSame not a sexist – he is!
Posted by: Disparaged | June 1, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
After the kitchen sink tactics HRC used in the primary, she’s lucky to keep her NY senate seat let alone the Dem Nomination!!!!
Posted by: Tribute to Father Pfleger | June 1, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
A McCain landslide would kill thousands of more soldiers in Iraq. I guess you don’t care about American lives Or you never knew anyone that was killed there. All for a fanatic support of a canidate.
Posted by: Getalife | June 1, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Father, you addressed your post to me…I assume we’re in agreement right?
Posted by: Clair | June 1, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Clinton supporters will never be satisfied with anything other than her stealing the nomination from Obama. They would rather vote for McCain than Obama, that’s so sad, they will bring down the entire country just for spite. I want the troops brought home, I want people to be able to keep their homes, I want gas prices to come down, I want better education for my grandchildren and affordable health care, I DON’T WANT ANOTHER REPUBLICAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!
Democrats need to win in November…period!
Posted by: Tribute to Father Pfleger | June 1, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Yes Clair, I guess we’re the latte drinkers!!!!
Posted by: Tribute to Father Pfleger | June 1, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Obama didn’t win ANY votes in Michigan. He took his name off the ballot. The Rules Committee gave him MI votes he didn’t win because they know he can’t win the nomination if MI and FL are truly counted.
Posted by: Karen | June 1, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
This board just shows how the Media, corporate owned and operated, leads us and that we Americans are loosing what little stomach we had for civil / political life.
Just because “experts” say the democratic party is not united doesn’t mean they are right. A healthy party should be able to pull the gloves off. I don’t support Ms. Clinton. I do support her right to stay in as long as she, who is running for president, feels she should.
I remember the 2000 election and the Media’s cries for how the american people can’t be annoyed by prolonging the process and actually counting the votes. I remember when Ford felt that it would be more expediant to forgive Nixon.
Yet we were subjected to months of O.J.
The democrats are not divided. Even if Hillary takes it to the convention. Good for her.
Also: stop the crap about Obama and Evil and Muslim.
Obama just left his Christian church.
lets get real folks and focus on the issues.
Do we think we need a prolonged war in Iraq?
Who do we think can carry out the best Exit strategy?
Because that’s where our lives, the lives of the next generation(s), are in play.
Posted by: letsgetrealnow | June 1, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Re: “Hillary is one of the mosy corrupt scandal ridden politiians in history.”
Stop lying. She hasn’t been in any scandals and she has never broken the law. She is a twice elected Senator and the first viable female candidate for President in US history. When she won the New Hampshire primary, she was the first female presidential candidate ever to win a state primary.
I’m tired of this propaganda campaign against Hillary. The corporations don’t want a smart woman in office who will be an advocate for women here and around the world. They want an empty suit who can control the masses.
Obama cannot hold a candle to Hillary Clinton. He does not have 1/10 of the knowledge and experience that she has. Before she was even First Lady she was named one of the top 100 women lawyers in America.
If Obama gets the nomination, he will have to beg her to campaign for him in November.
Posted by: Karen | June 1, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Ickes and the Clintons are masters at creating leverage where there isn’t any.
By threatening havoc in Denver, they stake out a negative that becomes a bargaining chip.
Such tactics are their stock in trade. It requires a gullible public, a lazy press corp, and an opponent afraid to take risks.
Pretty good odds for such a strategy such as Ickes is employing with the DNC on Hillary’s behalf.
Posted by: gorgon '08 | June 1, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Nothing matters except this: Obama ran the better campaign from the very beginning. He raised more money more consistently. He focused on what he needed to accomplish, i.e., win delegates, and he kept his eye on the goal post. Clinton, on the other hand, assumed she would be crowned by a fawning party. She was wrong, and that assumption cost her dearly. She didn’t use her money wisely, and she never raised as much as her opponent. And when the going got rough, she played ugly. If a johnny-come-lately black man from nowhere can run a top notch campaign while a member of a white wanna-be-dynasty with name recognition galore bungles hers – it is obvious to me that I want the black man for president. And that is the end of the story.
Posted by: Cia | June 1, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Also:
This “war” would have been over already if we still had a draft instead of an army of the poor.
Posted by: letsgetrealnow | June 1, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
What is puzzling to me is why didn’t the Obama campaign just go ahead and concede and/or promote that all the delegates be seated with a full vote. He doesn’t need the candidates to win the nomination and could have prevented the possible appeal to the Rules Committee decision. The Committee’s decision doesn’t change Hillary’s popular vote and electability argument. Yes, he would need even more of the uncommitted super delegates to go his way but why would he have any concern or doubts about getting the minimal number needed. It seems to me his campaign could have taken a more positive step toward unity and postured him as the candidate that is above the fray.
Posted by: JD, Pittsburgh, PA | June 1, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Guilty, naaa. I wasn’t involved in the scandals.
Posted by: Getalife | June 1, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Obama is the epitome of a spoiled brat. If literally ANY other candidate in the history of the Democratic Party were to behave like him, they would have been drummed out a long time ago. This is hilarious! The Dems just decided to intentionally disenfranchise over two million voters with a committee decision in order to push the more radical of their two candidates on to the nomination. I hope the Dem voters in Michigan and Florida realize what their party just did to them, and never again vote for another Dem candidate. Having people worth only half a vote reminds me of the Dems who pushed for blacks to be worth 3/5 of a person in Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution. And furthermore, anyone who isn’t a hate-America radical would have quit Trinity “church” twenty years ago!
Posted by: davenp | June 1, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I don’t think Obama will do this well in MI or FL in the GE, 50% is more than he can hope for in November, which means Reups will win
Posted by: Chipo1965 | June 1, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
It’s time for UNITY.
We(Fl&Mi) are the one who broke the rules, remember? The outcome yesterday was fair. The case closed.
Posted by: Florida and Michigan | June 1, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
What Clinton supporters don’t grasp is the fact that Obama, based on the fact he played by the rules set, and being ahead in pledged delegates, held the cards in discussion. Clinton’s proposals had no chance of passing if there were not some concessions – he didn’t have to accept anything. The committee could have kept their original ruling. But he conceded far more than he should have. Get over it.
Posted by: irishspacemonk | June 1, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
“Having people worth only half a vote reminds me of the Dems who pushed for blacks to be worth 3/5 of a person in Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution”
Your math is flawed. First, you realize that it’s half a delegate, not a person, correct? Secondly, a delegate technically represents approximately 6000 people for every one delegate. In effect, then, a person by the nature of the system is 1/6000 of a delegate.
I’ll let you ponder that for a little while.
Posted by: Gary K. | June 1, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
This is a backdoor deal between Dean Obama and Nancy.. It is no more a Democratic Party… It is a party of dishonest racist sexist group.. who will win by any means.. whether it is Chicago Politica.. or introduce racial flow through church by donating Tax Payer money or …. Hillary.. go and run as Independent.. we love you
===========================
If this is true, then I guess Hillary’s supporters are just the same because they agreed as well. It took 2/3rd to get a motion passed.
Why can’t you all realize that what happened yesterday was more than fair. If I had to decide it, it would have been follow the rules period! They knew the rules before the voting began.
Now go out and teach your children to NOT follow the RULES if they don’t like the result of life.
Posted by: Angel | June 1, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
If the DNC and superdelegates continue with their tirade shoving Obama down the throat of every democrats, there’s a prize to pay. Moderate democrats, independent and Republican voters will rain McCain with their votes.
What will happen to the Democratic Party? They’ll lose their majority in Congress and Senate, those who endorsed Obama will be voted out of office by their constituents.
I’d be voting for McCain in general election if Obama is the nominee for my party, I want the BEST PERSON to LEAD this country. McCain is also a moderate republican. I’m not voting for a party to lead this country, I am voting for a PERSON. Obama will NEVER be President, you can take my word to the bank! He’s now limping to the finishing line and this is just primary election. He doesn’t have 2, 210 delegates required to seal the nomination.
To all democrats who endorsed Obama when their constituents VOTED FOR Hillary, you’d be paying dearly. When its time for your re-election, you’d be voted OUT of office. I already change my political affiliation, I removed myself as registered democrat, I joined other lifelong democrats and become independent voter.
Posted by: Leslie | June 1, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Wait by the phone like a high school girl waiting for a date???
Can the idiots on Obama’s team be any more condescending towards women?
Why didn’t they say “like a kid waiting by the mailbox to see if he’s been accepted to Harvard?”
Everything you say against him in this campaign is racist. I see. But all the crap you blab insulting her and her voters isn’t sexist? Got it. Of course not — let’s see how far the arrogant, dissembling, woefully inexperienced and apparently clueless Senator Obama gets with this strategy…
Been working great so far — his numbers in crucial demographics he needs for November have been tanking horribly these past three months — that’s why he lost OH, PA, TX, RI, IN, KY, WV and even Puerto Rico…how’s that elitism workin’ out???
By the way, good luck with MI and FL this fall, too.
This isn’t about party unity. This is about America, and Obama, with a complicit DNC, is now practicing voter disenfranchisement. Obama was hugely rewarded yesterday for blocking revotes these past several months. What kind of a message do you think that sends to the American people?
Do you think the truth of that info won’t get out — even if the media won’t cover it — you can’t stop the internet and the facts are EVERYWHERE.
Many of us out here looking at this feel it has been rigged — I’m talking about Republicans, too, by the way.
Please don’t anyone blame Hillary when Obama loses in November — she has been preaching unity all along, while he smirks on the campaign stump insulting and vilifying her every chance he gets. CClassy. Very presidential.
She has been an honorable public servant for many years. Working for the Childrens’ Defense Fund, championing womens’ rights, veterans, first responders, health care and education and for this, he drags her name through the mud.
Senator Obama, don’t be waiting by the phone like a high school girl hoping to get my vote. That phone won’t be ringing.
Posted by: annagain | June 1, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
I cannot believe you dems. and the HRC fans say she is not divisive? look at what she is doing to your “party” (clique) and then think of what she would do if elected…
Posted by: Nestor in Miami | June 1, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
It does not matter how people want Clinton to her supporters with the party. It matters HOW Obama is gonna unite people since I heard he’s a uniter. For sure he’ll fail unite ME with his camp. I will leave Democratic Party after the party crowns him the nominee. My vote will leave with me.
Posted by: concernvoter | June 1, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Goldilocks — If you want to quote somebody please don’t use Donna Brazile who couldn’t even get Al Gore elected in his own state. She has flip flopped so much it’s not even funny. She is the ultimate political opportunist and why, I just can’t figure out, anybody listens to her or what the source of her “clout” is is beyond me.
Posted by: d | June 1, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Hey Nestor – Don’t blame Hilary for destroying the party — although I’m sure that’s the strategy Obama and the Pelosi’s will try. All she did was run for President and rack up a very impressive string of victories at that. All the while she was trashed at every turn not only by the media but on the sly by Obama as well or his “surrogates”. NOW they want her to be LOYAL. I DON’T THINK SO. Call it sour grapes or whatever if Obama loses in November blame HIM — if HE’s such a uniter then it shouldn’t matter if Clinton supports him or not, right?
Posted by: d | June 1, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
politicopsych, you really are missing the point!
Delegates do not equal votes in the general election.
The popular vote in states which can be won do amount to electoral votes.
As to how you count the caucus states…well, you can’t and that’s just one thing that’s wrong with them!
Posted by: Mary Indy | June 1, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Emily – Why is this Obama’s fault. If you watched the meetings yesterday, you heard the background about how this came about and at no time did anyone say Obama was instrumental in causing these states to move up their primaries. You don’t want unity, you just want your way.
Posted by: sherbug | June 1, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
I can’t believe everyone on here is getting so emotional about this and ignoring the reality that Dems have to deal with in November. Fact: Clinton won the majority of the big states that the Dems rely on in November. Fact: Clinton won the swing states that are already targeted as battleground states. Fact: Obama won more states. BUT – many of those states wil never go blue in November. It’s great to see all the enthusiasm and voter turnout in these states, but are we really competitive in Nebraska, Kansas, Montana, SOuth Dadota? Really? I think the answer if you look at history has to be no. Now, the argument that Obama can take moderate Republican votes and Independent votes I just can’t buy, because although he is an AMAZING speaker – I mean AMAZING – his voting record when revealed to the general public will be way too left of center for those moderate Republicans and Independents. So, we have to look at the major Dem states, like California, New York, Mass, New Jersey, the Upper Midwest states, W Virginia, Kentucky… They overwhelmingly voted for Hillary. The CLintons are well known in the SOuth, too – they can do some damage there in November. If we really want to unite the Dem party like all of you say we do (or some of you at least) shouldn’t we nominate the candidate that won the true blue states and is more moderate and center to the average American voter come November? I hate Pat Buchanan, but he said something that I thought was true. He said Obama had a higher ceiling, but Hillary had a higher floor come November. Meaning, basically, if we go with Obama, we might get 60-65% in the general, but there’s a chance he crashes and burns also. If we go with Clinton, we pretty much guarantee 52-57%, but probably no more. This guarantees us the White House, and with a Democratic led congress, we can definitely get to work undoing the Bush mess. So, as a party, what do we do? Risk it with Obama and possibly get a huge turnout or miss the boat completely, or go with a sure thing and know what we’re getting? Remeber, Obama is also less known as far as policy – he just hasn’t been around long enough. Now, everyone’s risk tolerance is different, but I for one after 8 miserable years opt for the sure thing. Lets forget the emotion, and go get a definite win.
Posted by: Corey | June 1, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Mary Indy
No, I’m not missing the point. I know that the argument is that popular vote is related to electoral vote, but remember that (1) primary votes rarely predict the way the state goes in the general election, and (2) even if the popular primary vote were to predict electoral votes, the primary vote still is not the criterion by which the Democratic Party selects delegates. You may not like caucusing, and I may not like it either, but these are our rules and we’ve been following them for a while now.
The fact that we may not like the outcome our current rules gave us does not mean we change them in mid-stream.
Delegate count is our criterion, and until we change the rules, that is what selects our nominees.
Posted by: politicopsych | June 1, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
McCain is a real american; as real as George W. Bush. And very likely to take us along the same path.
So, for all the screaming from both Obama and Clinton supporters, i remain convinced that we will come together when we have to in order keep the WH away from McSAME.
Also, if anyone starts a legit third party, great! we need reform in how we elect. right from same day voters registration, to several party politics.
Posted by: letsgetrealnow | June 1, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
politicopsych:
That’s why I am hoping for perspicacity from the automatic delegates. They are supposed to bring their experience to bear in just this kind of situation…this is why they were created…to avoid a McGovern rerun.
Incidentally, why have I never heard in the media that Mondale is one of Clinton’s endorsers?
Posted by: Mary Indy | June 1, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Gee, how does a bama know anything? he doesn’t, he just takes bama’s or the media’s or his drinking buddies’ word for it…the bama thinks very simply, if you wannabe popular, you gotta be on the bandwagon.
So, undereducated, eh?
Why don’t you grow up and turn off your capslock, little one? Do you always yell? No, I imagine you’re fairly well practiced at whining to get stuff from mumsie and poppy! Childish twerp.
Posted by: Mary Indy | June 1, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
word, huh?
Posted by: Mary Indy | June 1, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Mary
What is the definition of a true American?
Posted by: penny | June 1, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Thank you DNC for saving us from Hillary…it would be a grave mistake to have her as president….I use to support Hillary but she has been so unprofessional in her handling of this..it is pathetic.
Posted by: tim | June 1, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Joceyln, You’ll be praising Obama straight back to the Senate come December, because he’s going to LOSE!
Posted by: Former Dem from FL | June 1, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Whatever, Clair…CA would vote Dem if they ran Donald Duck.
Who do they need? FL, OH, PA, MI…Clinton beats McCain in ALL, Obama only in one!
Obama will sink come Nov…
Posted by: Former Dem | June 1, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
McCain is an incredibly weak candidate, if the Democrats loose the Presidency in 2008 we have only the Clinton’s to blame.
Posted by: James | June 1, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
TJ: Thanks for following my advice. Way to go with the caps lock btw, but next time consider adding a bunch of exclamation points. That’s how you really convince people.
Posted by: Hematite | June 1, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
What’s so weird is that the punishment was Harold Ickes’ idea in the 1st place!
Posted by: Clair | June 1, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
No Mary, I’m talking about your obvious “spilled milk syndrome” anger. Get on with your life and try to make the world better without doing it at the expense of the rest of us. We’d like a country that works thank you and you voting for McCain isn’t going to get us there! But you’ll have to figure that out for yourself.
Posted by: Clair | June 1, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Mary
Are you speaking of the same Jefferson who thought so much of others that he owned slaves?
For those who enjoyed the last 8yrs, go ahead and vote for McCain,you will continue in your comfort. For those who wanted Hilliary to win so bad that they would now vote for McCain, then I would say to you,examine your reasons why very carefully. Is it because Barack Obama’s policies are so different from hers that McCain’s policies are closer to what you wanted? I think not. Is it because of the Rev. Wright sermon of God damn America? Well let’s examine that. he said God damn America for killing innocent people,for treating her citizens as less than human,and if she continues to act as if she is God. Do you think that America is beyond the judgement of God? Or do you believe that America has not done these horrific things? Or maybe it’s the chickens coming home to roost statement. Let’s examine that statement,which was said by the U.S. ambassador Peck. What they both were saying was that you reap what you sew. Never once did he say he hates America. What he is saying is that America needs to do better by all of the other peoples of the world. If we are going to be the GREATEST country in the world like we always claim, we must examine our flawed foreign and domestic policies.
It is our job as citizens to get to the truth of issues and not just conviently conform to what ever information our CORPORATE OWNED MEDIA feeds us. We must be smarter than that. Our country is at stake. The press has silenced us with this false claim of hate and unpatriotism. If we truly love this country, we will fight like hell to take back our country from these corporations and get it back on the right track. If we are so busy fighting one another over the most silly and dishonest snippets put out by the media, then we will remain in{cororate America’s} grasp. This fight is not about race or patriotism…IT’S ABOUT CLASS…THE RICH FIGHTING FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP THE OTHER 97% OF AMERICANS POOR. We cannot claim to be the MORAL authority of the world until we recognize that yes we are our brothers keeper, and as long as we follow the media and help them get their ratings, we cannot be good to one another or respect one another,and learn from one another so that we may be able to take this country to the next level. For years we have been slipping backwards. We have been so caught up in the frenzy of hatred and greed over having THINGS instead of having each other.
Wake up! We need each other to make this country great!
Posted by: penny | June 1, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Chew on that, gotta go get some work done before work tomorrow. Righteous anger is sometimes necessary.
Pruning out the dead wood!
Buhbye!
Posted by: Mary Indy | June 1, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Europeans currently prefer Obama 52% among voter-aged females compared to 42% for Clinton and 6% for McCain.
Betsy, you seem to be in the minority both here and overseas. Guess you could stay there?
Posted by: Clair | June 1, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
How rare it is for us to see the real democratic party. They claim to speak for the little guy, but now we are able to see that they have the ability to ignore the majority and push forward who they want. Super delagate, the ability to say with a straight face that my vote is more important than yours. I’m so glad that I actually believe that one vote for each person is fair. Clinton has the majority of votes, but according to democrats and their system the chosen few can select anyone they want and ignore the majority. I’m glad this has happened for all to see, how rare this is.
Posted by: Brian R. | June 1, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Mary, same here…I’ve been on the computer too long already! I guess we’ll agree to disagree. I’ve listened to everything Clinton’s said and if you’ve done the same with Obama, I guess what makes us tick is VERY different. I’d like to think I’m a good judge of people, but we each have our own realities. My state of birth Ohio ratified the right for women to vote less than a year after I was born, so I’ve been doing this coosing thing a long time. My first vote was for FDR’s 3rd term. I was sure I was going to be long gone before I saw a woman as president, but now I believe I may see it. At 89 I still have a few sassy years left in me. God bless!
Posted by: Clair | June 1, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Angel, well said, you are a wise one!
Posted by: Clair | June 1, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
im in fl in 2002 my vote didnt count now in 2008 the votes dont count because the dnc says who wins how are they any beter then reps and bush -obamma ran add after add here in fl before the vote which was against the rules hillary didnt and still won
Posted by: davidpatrick344 | June 1, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I hope Hillary decides to appeal this to the convention. As a result, Obama will not be under any pressure to put her on the ticket. And he will be able to put one of the female Democratic governors on the the ticket as Vice Presidential candidate without having to explain why he bypassed her.
Posted by: CaptainVideo | June 1, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I hope and pray that the Clinton supporters who are threatening to leave the Democratic Party and vote for McCain do just that. Please by all means. You are not a true Democrat if you throw a hissy fit because your candidate didn’t win. Regardless of who got the nomination that person was getting my vote. WHY? Because it’s about THIS country..not either candidate. It is about getting this country back on it’s feet. Every day I work with people who are laid off and I’m quite busy right now. These are the people it is about. Not Hillary Clinton as she has her supporters believing or Barack Obama. It’s about this country and if you want more of the same and no abortion or women’s rights, then by all means vote McCain. We don’t need traders in this party. Do your thang but don’t get mad because we have a viable Democratic nominee. I would have been happy either way. I’m a Democrat..not a Democrat when it’s convenient for me.
Posted by: Michelle | June 1, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Obama is trying to steal the election. It’s not over yet.
Posted by: Anders Scooper | June 1, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Barack Obama’s slight lead is enough to make him the winner. In primary elections, there’s only one winner.
The votes that HRC attracted in the Primary will help BO win the General Election however, so it’s time for the DP to “Come Together”. That will be easier once HRC accepts the Primary results, supports BO and participates in his campaign, so it’s up to her at this point. But:
The remaining Primaries will have to play out. Within 2 days afterwards, most of the Superdelegates will commit, mostly to BO. That will put him over the top.
Meanwhile, the phony claims and inflexibility that breed hate in thinking, fair minded people will continue, as the HRC camp hopes for a miracle, believing this puts them in a position of strength.
The false bluster will fade away when the race has played out and the intra-party negotiations become final. Her supporters will follow her lead.
Posted by: dhinds | June 1, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
I will be an Independant next week.
Posted by: Anders Scooper | June 1, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Here’s what happens next.
Obama gets the nomination.
For reasons too numerous too list here, he loses to John McCain in November.
Who gets blamed?
Hillary Clinton of course.
No one that ran against John McCain in the primaries has campaigned for him since he became the nominee.
And most probably won’t on a regular basis.
But WHEN Obama loses you know who’ll get the blame.
I’ve been a Democrat for 52 years, but that’s the CHANGE I see coming in November.
Posted by: Peter | June 1, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Obama supporters, please read what Angel said at 5:48:24 PM. It’s time to unite and stop trying to convince people who cannot be persuaded to accept defeat graciously. Obama will probably lose a few votes from people like this, but we can offset this by getting as many new people as possible registered to vote. I’m 54 year old woman from Florida. I didn’t vote in the Primaries because the rules said our State would be penalized for moving the election date up, and all the candidates agreed this back then, so I and many friends thought it would be a waste of time to vote. Although at the time I would have voted for Clinton, I am still shocked to hear Hillary Clinton arguing with a straight face about disenfranchised voters. I, and many people I know, was disenfranchised because we followed the rule. Obama’s name was not even on the Michigan ballot yet the Clintons with a bare-faced nerve actually expected to get all the Michigan votes. This type of immoral behavior is what has turned people with scruples and morals against Ms Clinton. So let’s double our efforts to get Mr Obama new support to make up for the the people who will stay home. No true Democrat would vote for four more years of Bush’s failed policies that have brought so much hardship on us and the rest of the world, but a few misguided ones might just be angry enough to stay home.
Posted by: Sarah | June 1, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Let’s look at the possible worst case scenarios for a minute.
The Hillary supporters are essentially saying Barack will lose because he can’t get poor white voters. Some are even calling him “Hussein” on this blog.
On the other hand, Obama people are saying if Hillary got the nomination and lost the general it would be because of an inability to convert the hardcore Clinton haters.
Barack will likely win the general.
But “if” Barack is destined to lose in November it will be because we couldn’t recruit the 15% or so of the US population that are still hardcore closet racists.
Losing because of all the baggage the Clintons bring with them would be losing in the worst possible way.
Posted by: Dave | June 1, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
For weeks we knew what the Rules&Bylaws Comittee was going to do, the Clintons also knew it. Clinton said she would abide by what Mich and Fla wanted, this proves what her motives are cause Mich and Fla spoke but because it does’nt help her she will take it to the convention. Clinton again lied for her own ruthless ambition, why does’nt her supporters see what she is trying to do.
Posted by: Michael | June 1, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
O-Kay, It is time for the Democratic party to do what it is suppose to do. Be the strength of Domestic Policies first and foremost. I think Hillary is running to make it seem like the ticket is unwinable without her. This I feel is her concession. Nobody likes a looser and they really dont like a person whom drags out the inevitable. FYI somebody has to loose. Let’s pray it’s good ol’ Mccain….say no to four mo’.
Posted by: Dnick5151 | June 1, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
I agree with Sarah. I am from Florida too. Nobody seems to understand that many of us didn’t bother to vote because we knew that our State would be penalized for moving up our vote. Like her I was a Clinton supporter up to where I realized she really didn’t represent my values of honesty, integrity, honor and that she really didn’t have the experience she was claiming anyway. Some people for many reasons will never accept Obama, but for those of us who know how important it is to have a Democrat in the WH, we must work to attract new voters to replace the Hillary whiners. Let’s stop wasting our time trying to get them reason objectively, and just replace them. Having said that I don’t think there are too many of these rabid Clinton supporters who won’t vote for Obama. They were expecting thousands in Washington on Saturday. They pulled out all stops to get people out to “send a message” yet only a handful turned up.
Posted by: JennyR | June 1, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
I read lot of Hillary supporter blogs and it is obviously that a lot of you are plain just wrong. Democracy for the Hillary supporters is defined like this: you can be anything but black or you can be a white man or woman but black. Well, democracy has taken a new meaning now and thats called being honest and fair with one another and bring the nation together.
Posted by: Wallace | June 1, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
How do people still say Obama hijacked this nomination?? Can I PLEASE have someone explain to me how this man STOLE an election??
Posted by: The Oracle | June 1, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
You didnt bother to vote because you knew your vote wouldn’t count?????
Did you not have a primary, where you also had to vote on other candidates, such as your congressman?
In Oregon, there was an undervote of nearly 90,000 people who only voted for the DEM nomination. Did not even bother to mark the circle for the DEM senate candidate to run against our republican senator.
Sorry, I have no sympathy for anyone who has the chance and obligation to vote, who doesnt bother.
Uninformed voters are a curse on democracy.
Posted by: oregon | June 1, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Come on fellow Hillary supporters, as difficult as it is, we have to face the truth. She can’t win, she has lost. She lost because her campaign was so badly run. She chose the wrong people to run her bid and didn’t fire the losers soon enough. Let’s stop blaming everyone else under ths sun and unite the party now. We can’t have another 4 years of republicanism. I’ve had enough of hearing that Hill supporters are sore losers.
Posted by: Sally | June 1, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
i agree wit Sally. Im a Hillary supporter 2. But we have to stop acting simple ya’ll. Lets stop the madness, vote DEM ’08
Posted by: Manly Girl | June 1, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Wow, I am SO PROUD of the Hillary supporters who are seeing the reality of the difference between the DEMOCRATS and REPUBLICANS in POLICY and issues. That’s what we will be voting for at the end of the day anyway. ALL THREE people are still people, and not God. Only God is perfect.
Posted by: ChayaFradle | June 1, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
HRC2008: Better start sending the DNC money! They have only $4.4. million to run a Convention. They cannot pay for it. HRC is $20-30 million in debt. Start sending her some money too. Only Obama who spent just 75 cents of each dollar contribution still has $44 million dollars left. So put the money where you mouth is as the saying goes.
I do not see why Obama and his supporters should foot most of the bill for a Convention fight! And, it is unlikely that hard-core Dem leaders or even her political bigwigs would support her at that late date. And, just what would the DNC and HRC run an election on? They are broke enough now and will be bankrupt after the Convention on just their campaign chests. Even HRC knows that to turn Independent she would lose the real support that she needs for political clout to maintain a career.
In January, she was inevitable, had a multi-million dollar campaign chest, 700 campaign staff, 100 super delegates behind her even before their States voted so they did not even bother to wait for the voice of the people. She ran a bad campaign with poor managers. She put absolute loyalty to herself first instead of efficiency. Any good CEO can tell you that selection of department heads based on blind loyalty is a major mistake as are assumptions and presumptions. You can check that all of my figures are accurate.
I would be happy to have HRC as a VP but only if she dumps Bill first because I do not want him tagging along. My personal opinion. Or, a really very important Cabinet position and not some token job would be fine. She has a lot to offer but has alienated so many people except core supporters with her lousy campaign staff and some undeniable misspeaks.
Right now, I would be more than happy that all pastors for all candidates or endorsing them have a gag order put on them. Politics and religion are becoming a menace. Most of us know about McCain’s and Obama’s problems. Rev. Manning who is Black, in Harlem, a Clinton supporter recently called Obama’s mother White Trash. A former Clinton pastor in Utica is in prison for three years prison for inappropriately touching a 7-year-old girl at his home last March. Get them all out of the picture.
Posted by: KiwiTricia | June 1, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
All those that keep referring to Barack Obama as if he’s a Muslim are sadly mistaken. YOU are also so blinded by race that you can’t even accept the fact that Obama had nothing to do with FL/MI breaking the rules and that both states ended up with the original penalty they would have had ANYWAY because STATE PARTY LEADERS moved up the primaries….if you somehow convinced yourself Obama had something to do with it….why haven’t you convinced yourself Hillary and every other previous candidate had something to do with it?
Posted by: NJ Mom | June 1, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
I don’t understand why Donna Brazill or Susun Mualvax off CNN did not run for president if they wanted change if it was only based on color to win the race, they should have ran if this is the change they wanted. Mybe they shoould consdier next time to run but I’m sure Obama will win since this is the change they want for now
Posted by: gg | June 1, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Yeah Clinton supporters Democrats have to unite against Republicans. It’s time to accept Obama as the Democratic candidate. It’s over fellow Hillary supporters there’s nothing more that can be done that won’t help Republicans. They are the real enemy.
Posted by: Pat | June 1, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Hillary Clinton is the No. 1 Corrupt Politician of 2007… and the last time I checked, 2007 was last year. Look it up! Go to Judicial Watch and you will see that out of ALL the politicians in the world, Hillary Rodham Clinton is “the” No. 1 Corrupt Politician of 2007. What would that have said about America if we had put the No. 1 Corrupt Politician of 2007 in the White House? It would have said we all need shrinks. She is not worthy of being anything. Her and Bill have “sex issues” to deal with. Hillary is with her women, and Bill is with his women. it’s a marriage of convenience, and here this has been couple come, thinking that we don’t know it. They continue to try to insult our intelligence, when Hillary is as lesbian as they come. Bill cheats because Hillary is too busy doing her own little thing with women as well. I do know one thing… they sure love those “interns.” Hillary get with young women and so does Bill.
Posted by: Redred | June 1, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
whats most important is the economy, Iraq and health care someone who is experienced and can do all this and be fair and have real unity for all not just on race or that race but unity for all and fairness for all in all area. I look around I so sadden buy what I SEE YOU GO into communites and there so POLORIZED just tells you who the people are polorized and prejudice, I’m not going to let them run me out no more I am a citizen and if they don’t like me for who I am or my color then they should move or get out of United states
Posted by: gg | June 1, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
As a Clinton supporter I must join those who are encouraging party unity at this time. I think we are beginning to look like morons if we do not accept defeat and ensure a Democratic victory in the Fall. She ran a hard race, I fought alongside her but she didn’t win, and no amount of math manveuring is going give Hillary the victory.
Posted by: Carl | June 1, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Go to the site: Judicial Watch
Guess who is the No. 1 Corrupt Politician of 2007?
Yep, that’s right. Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The Clinton’s currently have about 4 cases pending against them, 3 of ‘em filed by Judicial Watch, and then there’s:
Paul v. Clinton – in which they are being sued for $17 Million in the largest fund raising scam in election History.
It’s all online. Check it out. They are an embarrassment to their own party.
Posted by: Redred | June 1, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Nope. No way. I will NOT support Mr. Obama! He is a leftist, period. I’ve done the research. He’s a fascist, a far left fascist, what is called authoritarian. He’s as bad as any neocon.
Check it out…
http://pundita.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-authoritarian-left-and-barack-obama.html
Posted by: A. L.L. | June 1, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Principle takes precedence over the Democratic Party. Thousands of us have already ditched the party to become independent, thousands more will do some in the coming week. No party unity until the party rediscovers the value of its base and decides not to throw us to the wolves. Obama is inexperienced, unqualified, he has no record, and he is too far left. Yes his policies are similar to Hillary’s. Why wouldn’t they be, since he stole them from her. The man couldn’t come up with an original policy if his life depended on it. The problem is our lives depend on it too. His foreign policy is wrong, its dangerous and its naive. No we won’t put such an unqualified man in the White House. Hillary Dems will vote McCain for the safety of our country, and we will stand on principle. We won’t support the Democratic Parties coronation of Barack Obama.
Posted by: jdona | June 1, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
I am 73 years old and I have voted Democratic since I turned 21 in 1956. I am supporting Obama since I believe he is the best candidate. If the Clinton machine steals the nomination I will have a difficult time in voting for for them. I, like millions of others. will not vote for Mr Flip-Flop Mccain. So I will end up voting and supporting Clinton. I won’t like it but she is better than Mccain. It is time that the Clinton supporters offer the same support to Obama after he gets the majority of needed delegates. This is unless you want to give up your freedom of choice, universal health insurance, four more years of our military getting killed in someone elses civil war, the destrution of social security, $10.00 per gallon gas, spending billions to rebuild Irac while our infrastucture rots away, the elimination of our middle class, the increased burden on 98% of us while the 2% do not pay their fare share of taxes and our civil liberties are completely taken away from us. To those of you are so pasionate toward Clinton and so abusive toward Obama, grow up and think what you want for America.
Posted by: ken | June 1, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
EMILY….
you are stupid. “take it to the convention” is idiotic. What good would that do? Hillary lost. FACE IT!
Posted by: DRS | June 1, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
What I would hate to the most is Mr. John Mc Cain’t taking over the White House. But I would also not like to see the Clinton Saga part II “Revenge of the Monica Lewininski” in the White House.
Posted by: SAQ | June 1, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I have listened to people place the results of the DNC Rules and Bylaws committee decision on racism, sexism, Dean and Pelosi. I watched the meeting. Both states democratic parties chairs basically recieved what they asked for. Michigan received the 69-59 decision they asked for, yet both states were penalized to a half count per the DNC party rules. This party needs to grow up. Carry this mess to the national convention and the GOP will be sitting back smiling.
Posted by: Gee | June 1, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
If Hillary cares about the democratic party and the Clinton legacy, she won’t take thie to the convention. She should bow out gracefully.
Posted by: erin | June 1, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
He’s getting a little eager for that big smooch aye? He should be careful he may have to back away when the Democrats get a new girl with a sudden sweep of defecting super delegates to Clinton in August. Wouldn’t that be embarrassing for the Jr. Senator.
Posted by: Wild | June 1, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Didn’t the Bylaw committee, Tina Flournoy and Harold Ickes, make the decision to strip both states of their delegates. Hillary had no problem with their decision in the beginning. She had the nomination in the bag, so what was the problem.
What a difference a day makes. Her presumtive nomination no longer a sure, her new battle cry is Florida and Michigan must be counted. Ickes and Flournoy now agree.
Will the party continue with this day time drama of “As the Clinton’s World Evolves” or put an end to this charade and get about the bussiness of winning the Whithouse. Hillary lost this nomination on Super Tuesday due to her arrogance. It’s time to move on!
Posted by: 253857 | June 1, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
How can anyone, even if you are a supporter of Senator Clinton, approve of redefining the rules in the middle of a primary?
The candidates are elected by delegates, not in a national popular vote. What in the world does that argument mean anyway??
All the candidates agreed that the primaries in Michigan and Florida would not count. These were well established positions, and everyone knows it.
The fact that there are people who believe the rules should be thrown out at the end of a primary, just to benefit their prefered choice, is terrible. Shame on you.
Posted by: Nos | June 1, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Honest to God, I can’t figure it out – do Hillary voters vote for Hillary or Bill?
Posted by: K | June 1, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Honest to God, I can’t figure it out – do Hillary voters vote for Hillary or Bill? Because I sure can’t understand her appeal. This election was hers to lose and she succeeded.
Posted by: K | June 1, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
This is all really sad.
Nobody likes to be on the losing side of a race – but the truth is that Hillary lost this by ignoring the caucus states and not having a plan for after Super Tuesday. Those two mistakes dwarf the impact of what the DNC decided on Saturday.
If you let McCain win then rest assured that more of your children will die at war and his Supreme Court nominations will guarantee that Roe v Wade is overturned.
Posted by: Sinaca | June 1, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
I can’t read through even a tenth of these posts…
Is everyone crazy?
Obama and Clinton are so close in policy issues, it has come down to a loyalty issue. Are you ppl so insane to vote for McCain? Who stands for everything that both Barack and Hillary stand against? Simply because your candidate LOST?
Face it.
Obama is our nominee, and he is the one who will take McSame to court on his flip-flops on just about everything.
Do you want a never-ending war in Iraq more than you want Hillary to be the nominee?
Do you want McSame to appoint more radical judges to the Supreme Court more than you want Hillary to be the nominee?
Do you want someone who has no clue as to whether Iran is training al-Quida or Iraqi fundamentalists, when he is supposed to be the *expert* on foreign policy, but has to be corrected by Lieberman to be the POTUS?
McCain has no clue.
Obama has the judgment. He is our nominee. Why can’t we all get behind him and defeat Bush III?
Ron
Posted by: Ron | June 1, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
I had a tough time making up my mind back when my state’s primaty was held. I knew I’d vote as a democrat and I felt a great amount of respect for both Clinton and Obama.I listened carefully to both of them, closely followed their campaigns and thought I knew where they stood on issues and what their positives and negatives were in a general election scenario. My deciding question became, “Do I choose someone who talks about my fears or do I select someone who appeals to my hopes?” I voted for Obama and I continued to listen and watch.
His message has been consistent. I’m saddened, though, that the admiration and goodwill I felt for Hillary have been SO assailed by fear-mongering, pandering and rule-changing positions that I no longer would be happy to see her as my president. Today, as I’ve read the comments and see the spewing vitriol coming primarily from those who purport to support her, I am more convinced than ever that I made the correct choice. And I know Obama will prevail agaimst McCain in the fall. He’ll do this because the true democrat will put aside his/her candidate choice from the primary selection process and understand that the coming general election is far too important to EVERYONE in this country to allow a continuation of the policies that have brought us to the current sad state of affairs in our nation.
Posted by: Gerry L. Coffey | June 1, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
I am an immigrant citizen puzzled by the anger and hatred that several of you exhibit towards Obama on this blog.
If you are not racists, please explain what this man has done or said to deserve this wrath.
In my opinion he has conducted the most positive campaign I have witnessed in 27 years I have lived here. He has done or said nothing common or mean spirited in 15 months of intense campaigning and despite much provocation.
His campaign organization has been innovative and a model of efficiency.
What’s there not to love.
Posted by: Selbourne | June 1, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Anything but McBush!!!
Democrats ’08
Posted by: Mr. Adams | June 1, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
its impossible for obama to win in November, and he has only himself, his wife, and his arrogant, ignorant, naive, racist and sexist “supporters” to thank…..of course, his supporters will blame someone else, because that’s what they’re good at, and that is why they can never succeed…..
Posted by: chris | June 1, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
To the person who sarcastically asked why Hillary is “crying over only four delegates – only four!” my response is: those four delegates represent 600,000 votes. Let me repeat this in case you didn’t get it the first time. 600,000 people voted for Clinton, and those 600,000 votes were “given” to Obama. We’re not talking four votes here, people, but rather over half a million disenfranchised voters. NOW do you get it??
Posted by: Denise-Mary | June 1, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
It’s time for her to move on and let progress move forward. She is giving me a freaking headache! It’s time to target McCain. We cannot take four more years of this crap. A vote for McCain is a vote for another war, and a 21st century depression. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
Posted by: kim | June 1, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Hillary isn’t smart enough to get out on a high note.
She is going to drag this thing out to the end. I wonder if Hillary and Bill Clinton are aware of what this is doing to their reputation. There are a lot of people who respected the Clintons, but now, they are making a fool of themselves, not only nationally, but, internationally. Just think, she has to go back to the Senate floor to work with other democrats. I don’t think she will be as respected by her peers because of her foolish behavior. Just wait until things start coming out about Hillary’s past. Then she’ll be so embarrass and sorry.
Hillary isn’t smart enough to get out on a high note.
Posted by: BuckSCC | June 1, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
For all you Hillraisers who think that the delegate compromise falls short, think on this: by arguing that there should be no penalty for those states breaking the party rules, you are arguing against the very foundations for rules, law, and order in general…those rules for the primaries are, on the party level, the equivalent of the constitution on the national level. By arguing for full seating, especially in the face of the lack of competition on the ballot in Florida, is making an argument against fairness and an argument for tyranny…after all, only in totalitarian states does one find candidates who run on a ballot alone and feel entitled to eventual victory.
Posted by: Palatine Pup | June 2, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am
Let’s leave the floor to the superdelegates, let them decide who picks the next Dems nominee and likely President: The people or Ted Kennedy?
Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | June 2, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am
I would consider that your religion.
The Agnostic suspends judgment, saying that there are not sufficient grounds either for affirmation or for denial.
That being said, that is what is great about our country, all religions are accepted.
If fact I would have to say just by being Agnostic, you are a free thinking person.
Posted by: '68 VNvet | June 2, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am
Obama will lose the general election.
Posted by: jmt | June 2, 2008, 6:48 am 6:48 am
“over the Hillary” reminds me of numerous women who got ahead in a company because of reverse racism, and making everyone afraid to cross their path so they just keep moving up the ladder. (rhymes with witch )Hillary cheated in Michigan and Florida and lives in her own little make believe world. She has hurt the Party, and all women with her ego/attitude…. bye bye
Posted by: philosopherkingtomas | June 2, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
You know what’s REALLY sad? How Fox News will be covering the DNC in Denver. Picture this: Split-screen shots… one side, the convention floor (with the sound turned off)… the other side, 5 or 6 Clinton diehards picketing outside (although, likely, Republican plants pretending to support Clinton)… and Sean Hannity’s smug face in between. I’ll stick with MSNBC.
Posted by: Great Caesar's Ghost | June 2, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
We should give all women 1/2 votes from now on thanks to Hillary. Surrender and go back to your job as NY Senator !
Posted by: philosopherkingtomas | June 2, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am
LeavingTheParty wrote on May, 31st:
“…just because Mr. Smart Guy decided to take his name off the ballot in Michigan,(stupid decision btw)…”
I think, LeavingTheParty adresses an issue many here feel the same as he does. But let me tell a little story.
Picture this: Your favourite football/baseball/whateverball team is having a game and you’re among the supporters. But just before you ready to leave the house, you hear in the local news that the game is cancelled because the referee got ill (and no substitute is found). So you and your team stay at home, because, well… there is no game. But it turns out that your opponent’s team cunningly got to the place, though, having found someone volunteering as the referee’s substitute… and has been playing the game without an opponent (that is, your team). After the game they claim to have won by a wide margin and that these points be counted in the league (thus maybe catapulting them to first place, for the sake of drama).
Well… now tell me, was it stupid of your team not to show up? And on the other hand, did your opponent’s team make a good decision to play and to claim that the points be counted? I think there would be the hell of an outrage if these points were counted…
OK, I might have got some facts about football/baseball/whateverball wrong, but I do hope you get the basic idea. Pleas feel free to send me a reply or a refinement (i.e. improvement) of the little story I posted above.
Posted by: mouve | June 2, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Hillary’s connections are not anti-American, blow up the Pentagon guys!! Hillary’s connections to not include spending 20 years in an Anti-American white hating church with spouse and kid! Hillary’s associations do not include the corrupt Chicago machine! There is no way you can equate Hillary’s life to scumbag Obama!! By the way, I don’t care who Bill sleeps with…he is not running for president..and if he was..I would vote for him again! And that vicious rumor about McCain calling his wife a name was started by an Obama flunky!! That’s all they know how to do is slander Hillary and McCain…what else do you expect from those low life! Check out Axelrod..you will find he has connections that are shabby to say the least!!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 2, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am
Monkey see, monkey do! Reminds me of the three monkeys but this time there are only 2 monkeys..hear no evil, see no evil…..but the third monkey changed his tune…..speak the evil..that is what Obama and his supporters are …all like the NEW monkey story!!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 2, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Mariann Pepitone’s posting need to be blocked due to her repeated racist tone… and now her obvious pro-violence attitude.
Posted by: Great Caesar's Ghost | June 2, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Alright, the substitute thingy is a bit weird, I admit. So please, replace the referee issue with a bad weather issue. Later, the opponent’s team found out that the weather isn’t really too bad to play.
Yeah, this seems to be a better explanation.
Posted by: mouve | June 2, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
Nicholas, I’m actually quite surprised you can even spell Hussein. That ability somehow seems a contradiction to your obvious intellectual shortcomings.
Posted by: MH | June 2, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
You all know that the GOP have a new tape of Michelle and Farrakhan sitting on a board “railing against WHITEY”. I guess we have to accept that Obama will be the nominee but McCain will be the next President. Too bad Hillary has to go against such unsurmountable odds this year because she would be the best one. I’ll never vote for Obama.
The MSM and bloggers think that they have manipulated this election; they are wrong. Middle America will not vote Obama!!!
Posted by: JoeTN | June 2, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
We Clinton supporters know that everything possible is being done to backstab Hillary…so..the DNC and Obama will get what is coming to them!! The black vote only consists of 12% of the population..republicans do not like Obama…majority of Jews do not TRUST Obama…Hillary supporters will vote McCain…to me that is a sure sign that Obama’s goose is cooked!! Every day Obama’s approval and trustworthiness rating is going down!! Hillary has won more votes than any other candidate in HISTORY!! These are the facts, Obama supporters…ain’t no way you can dispute them!! Obama will never win the White House…after all, it is the White House…call me a racist…I am not…I will not let this anti-American tell me what to do!! BTW..I am a Jew!! I am sure you will have some derrogatory remark to say about that too!
Posted by: murray190 | June 2, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
I am personally out of breath with this primary process. It is not a good thing at this point. The rules were accepted by all the candidates. The votes were agreed NOT to count. It is not the people of Florida or Michigan’s fault their elected officials decided to violate the DNC rules, knowing well in advance that this would make their process in violation and their votes would not count.
The fact of the matter is the Clinton campaign needs those votes as their only hope to keep this campaign floating her punch line “don’t forget to go to hillaryclinton.com” this is YOUR campaign. Don’t forget to
donate more money to a campaign that is finished?? I am so tired of this crap.
Super delegates if you don’t step in after Tuesday and give one of them the votes needed to clinch the nomination she will keep making threats and dividing the party further. I am hoping that voters hold politicians accountable for allowing this to go on this far. Vote NOW, I place my vote for Senator Obama and I was a Clinton supporter.
Posted by: Lou | June 2, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am
OBAMA will have the magic NUMBERS sooner then we think, abd hillary should just gracefuly bow out.
Posted by: marika | June 2, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
I was sick of the Clintons a long time before this stuff happened. More of her true colors have surfaced, and I wonder what scandal she will be in next.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | June 2, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
OBAMA will have the magic NUMBERS sooner then we think, abd hillary should just gracefuly bow out.
Posted by: marika | June 2, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Conventions are designed to finally CHOOSE just who the nominee will be, not to praise a nominee already chosen. Why is the DNC and the Obama campaign hurrying so much? Because the truth about Mr. Obama’s political history is beginning to come out, that’s why. And it isn’t pretty. Here is just one example:
http://pundita.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-authoritarian-left-and-barack-obama.html
Posted by: A. L.L. | June 2, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I no vote fur clintin but osama. he good presodent. mccane too old.
Posted by: Juan Diego | June 2, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
murray190 wrote:
“…after all, it is the White Houe…”
Got a favour for black humour, do you? Sounds like you’re not feeling blue but black already. But I hope, you don’t get me a black eye for that. Well… couldn’t make up more jokes in due time…
Mind you, I’m not a racist either.
No, seriously, do you really think it’s going to be that bad? You see, voting republican is quite a long way away from what people want in this country. They’re fed up with the Iraq war and… well, I don’t have to tell you. So… many people already stated that Obama and Clinton differ only in few points. Why don’t you give him a try? And please don’t start digging up that MI/FL issue again. I think we’re through with that, it’s been fair regarding the fact that the delegates could have been disregarded completely. It’s the rules.
To all “back stab” people, esp. Mariann Pepitone:
Your obvious misapprehension of modern history is outrageous. You know, this “back stab” you mention reminds me much of one basic precondition for Hitler’s takeover in Germany: A similar argument was initially set up by the High Command of the Reichswehr (OHL) at the end of WW I (the German back stab legend being “Dolchstosslegende”) and claiming that the German army had exclusively been beaten by political opponents, not the Entente. As you all know, Hitler’s takeover resulted in WW II and the murdering of about 6 million jews, let alone the other 45 million dead people (soldiers and civilians). The German right-wing parties (bloody Nazi party and their fellow bunches of a***holes — sorry but that’s what they are) adopted this “back-stab” theory to badmouth political opponents and, without any doubt, Jews. Now, I won’t go so far as to say that you or anyone here is in favour of this Nazi bunch. But this “back-stab” claim is absolutely inappropriate and shouldn’t be uttered in a country like the USofA, claiming to be free and fair towards everyone, so CUT IT OFF, WILL YOU??
Posted by: ConsiderThis | June 2, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
I think you are missing the core information as to the reason the Michigan DNC awarded the extra four votes. The goal was to count every vote. There were 30 thousand write in ballots with obama name written in that was not counting. So when they decided to count those ballots that changed the precentages which gave obama 4 more delegates and clinton 4 less.
If the Hillard supporters would pay attention and listen instead of showing how unintelligent they can be, they would understand how the allocation was derrived. I blamed this on Harold Ickes because he knew the circumstances but decide to make a political move the would mke his supporters mad.
Posted by: c tra | June 2, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
I just love the Democrats! It’s such a pleasure to see such a diverse group of people pounding out compromises and seeking fairness. Sure, there’s politics going on (that’s what all this is after all), but when all is said and done, the party is more representative of who actually lives in America. If you want to be a robot and fall in line, be a Repub. If you want to scratch and kick and make yourself heard, be a Democrat. They’re like a family: you can fight and not speak to each other, but when all is said and done, ya gotta love ‘em.
Posted by: DT | June 2, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Mariann Pepitone:
“…the internet was talking about.”
Your internet talks to you too!
Wow…I thought it was just the pain medication for my toothache.
Talk to me again Mr. Internet! Tell me about your series of tubes and everything.
Posted by: GK | June 2, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
39.5 delegates to go (as of 2 am). He will get them. He can even lose SD and get them. No false accusations of sexism, claims of “violated voter’s rights” (my GOD, when will Clinton supporters pay attention to the PLEDGE SHE SIGNED!), or other misc. howls of misdirected outrage will win it for her now.
Let her take it to the convention. Watch what happens when those “latte drinking, volvo driving, cult member, elitist, racist, sexists” who worked their asses off to get him the nomination, and have been biting their tongues–resisting the urge to show up en mass to smother Hillary and her “hard working Americans, white Americans” supporters with the sheer weight of their masses. The word will spread the that Hillary and her bussed-in protesters are going to try for a coup at the convention. See how many thousands of Obama people show up. Even if Obama’s HQ’s asks them not to protest or show their outrage (as he did re. the RBC meeting), there won’t be any stopping them. It’s not even about him at this point. It’s about stopping McCain.
So maybe we’ll see you all in Denver. In the meantime, I’ll be having an Old Style in honor of Obama tomorrow. Maybe I’ll pour it in a glass. You know, just to be an elitist–I’ve got a reputation to protect.
Posted by: Tastytone | June 3, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Everything surrounding obama spells hate, his church his associates, his wife. Why is the DNC even considering nominating this guy?
Posted by: Libre | June 3, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
The Clinton camp now bases all its hope on persuading 300+ superdelegates to change their minds. But they haven’t any new argument why they should, so it oesn’t look like they can do anything but act as spoliers at the convention ad campaign for McCan afterward. The end of the Clinton era in politics, self-destructive to the bitter end.
Posted by: EmmanuelWinner | June 3, 2008, 5:06 am 5:06 am
I’m done with the Democratic party. This whole primary has been a sham. Polosi, Dean, Donna Brasille, Obama, Obama’s supporters and many turncoat superdelegates have turned me away from the Democratic party for life. It’s no longer the Democratic party in my opinion. Obama is a lying, racist, dirty politician that will never get my vote. Did the DNC, Obama and all of you supporters expect we Hillary supporters to roll over and vote for Obama? A man we believe has huge character flaws? He’s the worse type of politician, tries to pretend he’s one thing when he’s really a snake. I look forward to McCain crushing him in November.
Posted by: Dee | June 3, 2008, 5:34 am 5:34 am
Deja vu! This is 2000 election all over. The Democratic superdelegates are playing the role of the US Supreme Court of 2000. Just as Dems have been accusing the US Supreme Court and the Republicans of stealing their 2000 election by ignoring the popular votes, their superdelegates are now doing exactly the same thing: ignoring the voice of people which are the popular votes and are won by Hillary. Americans all see through this hypocrisy. This is why McCAIN WILL WIN IN NOVEMBER.
Posted by: ablanche08 | June 3, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am
Going Iraq and fight for our proud is far better than compromising with militant and their EVIL LEADER…. OLD WASHINGTON POLITICS IS FAR BETTER THAN CHICAGO POLITICS.. we need change but Not backward.. NOT LEADED by some EVILS
Posted by: HRC2008 | May 31, 2008 9:54:25 PM
__________
So when are you packing and going then? It’s so damn easy to spout this while sitting in your cozy office/living room … with no care in the world.
I for one would prefer diplomacy and a husband at home, so I wouldn’t have to worry about him 24/7.
Posted by: Xanthiana | June 3, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
i will never vote for OBAMA OSAMA
Posted by: skypawny | June 3, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Hillary,
How Obama can beat the Clinton family by himself. I am not surprised since he is the right Guy for the White House after Bush.
Posted by: Getro Compere | June 3, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm