By Meagan Bond

Jun 30, 2008 11:06pm

Closing Arguments: Should You Be Allowed To Protect Property With Lethal Force?

We recently brought you the story of Joe Horn, a 62-year-old Texas man who killed two men he says were robbing his neighbor’s house. Under the so-called Castle Law, Texas residents are granted broad protections to protect their property — even with lethal force. And today a grand jury declined to indict Joe Horn. But what do you think? Should it be legal to protect your property, or your neighbor’s property, with lethal force?

User Comments

Of course not. We should welcome the criminals with cookies and let them hurt our children. It is wonderful to be totally vulnerable to those that want to harm you.

Posted by: Huh | June 30, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Texas rules. I want that guy as my neighbor.

Posted by: Sally | June 30, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

NO, we should hide in a corner, call and wait for the police then pray. Uhh, on second thought, I’m NOT gonna give an armed and dangerous intruder an extra 30 minutes to an hour before the police arrive to hunt me down and critcally injure me and my family, if not KILL me or do worse to my family… HOW can this even be argued. You have the right to defend your life and your property. If you do not, then you are at the mercy of those who can and will use violent force to impose their will upon you. Wether they are wearning a badge or not. Any arguement to the contrary is purely insane!

Posted by: pity | June 30, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

yes, that is the only way people will be able to have any secruity in their home.
Otherwise, criminals will Know you can’t do anything to stop them, they will be on a rampart spree of crime, rape, murder and violence and you will not be safe in your own home.
Right now the fear of the unknown keeps them away most of the time.

Posted by: seah | July 1, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

OK, I’ll bite…is this a rhetorical question? At what point do we have to say “D’oh”? to these silly pandering questions?

Posted by: Illinois_Bluz | July 1, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

IN TEXAS WE SHOOT FIRST AND ASK
QUESTIONS LATER……..
ALSO WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO CARRY GUNS.
LONG LIVE THE LONE STAR STATE…..

Posted by: TEXAN | July 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Absolutely…It’s about time we end the PC nonsense…If criminals think they may get shot for their stupidity, then it certainly is a deterrent.

Posted by: John | July 1, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

YES YES YES. i understand not allowing people to carry guns who are walking around the city of chicago, but u cant take the right away to protect your home/family and yes even your neighbors home.
This will keep criminals from breaking into homes if they know their heads will be blown off.

Posted by: steve | July 1, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

It’s about time someone stands up to the criminals, it seems at times the “legal system” works for the bad guys, leaving the victims hopeless and helpless. I say shoot em all!

Posted by: Tina G | July 1, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

If more people did this, there’d be a whole lot less crime.

Posted by: enough | July 1, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

The stupid shall be punished…

Posted by: revivalist | July 1, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I want every criminal in the country to know that if they break into a home in Texas, they are likely to get a few rounds pumped into their body, no questions asked.

Posted by: Peter | July 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

God bless Texas. I only hope some would be burglar saw your program and heard those shotgun blasts. If only the rest of the country were so resolute.
-Terrified in Massachusetts

Posted by: ELijah | July 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

someone needs to buy that man a beer

Posted by: joe | July 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Yes We should be able to protect our own property and help a neighbor

Posted by: Larry schmitz | July 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I’ve known Joe Horn personally since the 90s. I’m glad to see the grand jury do the right thing. Joe is a peaceable man and I’d welcome him as a neighbor. I cover my neighbor and he covers me.

Posted by: Jake, Houston | July 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

… Sure!?!
- Next time he should shoot-&-also KILL his NEIGHBORS!?!
… Yee Haw!?! It’s TEXASS!!!

Posted by: Hanford Searl Jr. | July 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Your segment failed to mention that the robbers were both illegal aliens! THEY chose to commit a crime in OUR country! Dont commit crimes and you wont have to worry about being shot and.or killed! Maybe Mr. Horn should sue our government for mental anguish caused by their inability or desire to take any real action on illegal immigration! Bless Mr. Horn ..wish he was my neighbor!

Posted by: texas | July 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

It should be entirely proper to defend one’s own life and property with whatever force becomes necessary. One’s Own!

Posted by: Gayle | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

YES!!! I will!! To protect my family you bet, I want that guy as my neighbor.

Posted by: Dianna | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

It’s PRIVATE PROPERTY the intruder is violating – therefore, YES they have the right to protect their PRIVATE PROPERTY and family with deadly force! if the intruder doesn’t want to be killed, it simple.. don’t intrude!

Posted by: techbud | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I do believe you should be able to protect your own property, but you shouldn’t have the right to take it upon yourself to protect your neighbors home. It’s was none of Mr. Horns business. Bet you anything if it was a black man they would have prospected and stuck him beneath the jail.

Posted by: Houstons5thWard | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I came here to see how many idiots were posting that they should cower and wait for others to protect them at their leisure, but found a bunch honest-to-God Americans posting. God bless Texas.

Posted by: J. | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I think we should be allowed to look out for each other in our own household and our neighbors… I with I lived in texas I think I will move least I know someone has my back…

Posted by: Proud American | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Legal? Who cares. I’m gonna do it anyway. I’ll worry about ‘legal’ as soon as the perps- and the current US REGIME begins to do so.
My name is Sprawl. And I approve this message.

Posted by: Sprawl | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I think it’s great that this guy didn’t get charged for this. We need more people like this and there would be less criminals. Who cares about these criminals anyways.

Posted by: john | July 1, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Texas got it right–stop defending the guilty and prosecuting the victims of crime!
Unfortunately here in Maryland only the criminals can carry weapons–it is bass-ackward here like many Liberal states
Keep our rights alive and stop the criminals in their tracks.

Posted by: Kit | July 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Joe Horn takes his place as hero right beside Sheriff Joe out in AZ! Lead on, Brave Men!

Posted by: janie | July 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

By any means necessary. It’s legal in Texas! I wish Mr. Horn was my neighbor. I hope that someone gives him a parade to celebrate hard working Americans. It’s amazing that you didn’t mention in the story that these two guys were ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. They broke the law to come to Texas and they continued to break the law by breaking in hard working AMERICANS homes! God Bless Mr. Horn!!!

Posted by: Texas_Belle | July 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

A man’s home is his castle. Protect it at all costs. When seconds count the police are only a few minutes away! We must be able to protect our selves.

Posted by: Alan | July 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

You forgot to mention that both these individuals were shot in the BACK. Some threat! The shooter was wayyyy out of line. These guys were no threat to him, he left his place of safety (inside his home) and went out and deliberately shot 2 people in the back. Talk about vigilante justice. Personally, I think this man probably has early dementia or some other mental problem. He kept saying he needed to protect himself, but he was perfectly safe. He walked and deliberately murdered 2 people, even though the police were on their way. This frontier mentality and “take no prisoners” attitude in Texas is pathetic. I do not believe that it reflects the attitude of the rest of the United States.

Posted by: laura | July 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Yes- protection of our homes and families and our lives is our responsbility- not the government’s! I’ll take care of my own healthcare, protect my own person and family -thank you!

Posted by: Dave | July 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Lets put it this way. Your neighbor sees a man taking everything you own and loading it into a truck. When you get home your neighbors tells you “Hey buddy i saw three black clothed mask wearing individuals coming out your window and waved at them as they were driving away with all your stuff. I hope you dont mind?” If you say naw i dont mind you are a liar. I commend this guy for shooting those criminals maybe they will think twice before doing it again. Oh yeah and does anyone have this mans address i want to live next to him.

Posted by: dallas fireman | July 1, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Should have that in Ohio. Neighbors taking care of neighbors….

Posted by: don | July 1, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

No…lets just let the crooks rule and blame the police for allowing it to happen. If they are caught lets let them out sooner so they can come back and take some more stuff…oh yea…tell the cops not to chase them because someone may get hurt…

Posted by: DB | July 1, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

The law should ALWAYS be on the side of the homeowner instead of the thieves. I’m sick and tired of people getting away with crimes in this country. No sympathy from me, the thieves brought it on themselves. It’s just one more thug off the streets.

Posted by: Julie | July 1, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

YES YES YES!!! Texas rules!! HOW can this even be argued…

Posted by: Texan (x2) | July 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

He definitely committed a crime and should be tried.
By expanding the power to use lethal force beyond your own personal property (or even defining property too broadly), we open the door for vigilante justice. There’s a reason society decided to trust the power to enforce laws to a professionally trained sector of the community; vigilante justice results in social instability and is bad for everyone in the long-run.
It may feel good, but it isn’t right.

Posted by: Kevin R | July 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Since the police can’t be everywhere at once, we must protect our lives and property, as times are only going to get worse.

Posted by: Richard | July 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

When seconds count the police are only minutes away. My neighbors and I have exchanged dollars between us and now we all have an interest in each others homes. With out a doubt we have an interest in protecting each other.

Posted by: Dave | July 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

The right to defend yourself and your property is at the essence of our freedom. The peace of mind that comes with that freedom is priceless. Those who don’t see that right as a right must not have any family or own any property.

Posted by: ruserious | July 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Your darn right… there is no one else that is REQUIRED to defend you or your property. And, I’d like to know the effect this incident has had one crime in that area? I’d bet would-be thieves are thinking twice:)

Posted by: Bill | July 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I would love to have neighbors like that!

Posted by: Geraldine | July 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Are you shi**ng me? Of course you should be “allowed” to shoot those bastards! Stay OUT of my house if you don’t wish to be shot!

Posted by: charlie | July 1, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Its about time the criminal element is perfectly clear about the risks of burgularizing a home….you MAY get killed! Come on to my house. It will happen here, too!

Posted by: ted holland | July 1, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

If we had more of them kind of guys here in Oklahoma criminals would think twice about it. Thank you!

Posted by: City2000 | July 1, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Yes…Watching someone violate your neighbor’s home is too close to your own. If you don’t do something about it, then you are next. We are suppose to help thy neighbor and that includes protecting them from any violators. Why should we be protecting the criminals? That is just 2 less thugs that we have to worry about coming back for seconds and hurting our family members…

Posted by: ly | July 1, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Absolutely.I would have done the same thing Mr Horn did.If we dont protect our properties and our neighbors , who will? High five to you Mr Horn.Thats 2 less crooks in your streets.

Posted by: Eddie | July 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I salute that man. I think the American people have had enough crime and murder. They grab purses at the grocery store, hijack cars not to mention robbing our homes. I wish more people would do that.

Posted by: Beth C. | July 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Yes, who’s to say that he or another occasion Joe Horn or somebody else could of saved a life these robber would of maybe taken in the act of a crime. Joe is a hero. It would maybe make bad people think twice about committing a crime and breaking into peoples home. If you can feel safe in your own home…what’s left!?

Posted by: los | July 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Yes, American have the right to do what ever they want to do……..shoot them.

Posted by: Alan | July 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

This is TEXAS, and we look out for each others property. I don’t think that someone should be killed for this, however, maybe buckshot over head first with a warning to stop in their tracks, and if that doesn’t work, well…. pepper their butts!!! and make them drop to their knees. We live in TEXAS for crying out loud for a reason.

Posted by: Joy | July 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Not only were they Illegal aliens,but they both had long criminal records. One of which had been deported and reentered our country to commit this crime.

Posted by: RP | July 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Surely the intruders don’t think about about robbing or shooting anyone
to get what they need or want so
certainly we should have the
right to protect ourselves and
our loved ones. As so many in
your posts say, time wasted on
waiting for someone to come to
your aid just doesn’t cut it.
Glad Texans Have The Courage And
Right To Protect !

Posted by: DK | July 1, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

What would Jesus do?
Yes, if someone is breaking into “my” home I will probably shoot them or do what I can to protect my family and property. If someone is breaking into my neighbor’s home – I will call the police. I would not murder someone (who is running from the scene)because they stole stuff from my neighbor. If this was a black man who murdered 2 (escaping)white men – for breaking into a neighbor’s home – especially in South Texas – that shooter (murderer) would be in prison.

Posted by: TexanChristian | July 1, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Folks, the man was not protecting his own property rather the neighbors. His life was not in danger. What if the people he shot were relatives of the neighbor? What if it was the repo man? Bottom line Texas wrote a great law, this man has his own interpretation and charges should be filed.

Posted by: Dannee | July 1, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS”

Posted by: TEXAN | July 1, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

No, not every Texan agrees with taking a life for property, Property can be replaced.

Posted by: Greg_Texan | July 1, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

He did the right thing. How was he to know if these low lifes were going house to house, taking what they want only to encounter him inside and not ready. I think that his intentions were for them to be aware that he was home and ready to protect himself. When the creeps were aware of this, they rushed him thinking he was vulnerable and they got what they deserved, a death sentence. Too often the headlines of a home invasion tell of the death of the homeowner, NOT IN TEXAS! NOT THIS TIME! Yes Long Live TEXAS, the South, and long live JOE HORN!

Posted by: Chris | July 1, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Lets look at this from a criminals point of view. I am planning to do a crime. Choice one is a gun free zone and the second choice is Texas. How many millions of times per day is this question asked and answered in the free market of crime.
Even in Austin!

Posted by: redrock | July 1, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

ABSOLUTELY!!! Way to go Joe Horn and the TX grand jury. I’m ready to move to Texas!!!

Posted by: Jill | July 1, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Liberals want the criminals to have to all the rights. At least Texas has got it right. People who work and pay for their home and property should be able to protect it. Last time I checked, thief is not a legal profession. If more states had laws like this maybe crime would go down. Getting killed vs stealing a flat screen TV or jewels might just be the right medicine. Maybe the thugs will seek a new career choice. Besides dead thief don’t take up space in our prison systems which we the working tax payers have to pay for. Texas got it right.

Posted by: EntropyXS | July 1, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I hear a lot of people asking “does theft warrant a death penalty?” This question should be directed toward theives; if they say “no,” then do not steal; if they say “yes,” good luck with your career.

Posted by: bdm4639 | July 1, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

The real question is why would ABC skew the story? I did not see the previous ABC coverage, but local coverage in Texas revealed Horn was on the phone for several minutes talking to the 911 dispatcher. I believe the Grand Jury made the correct decision. But the bigger question, if I don’t believe ABC presented the unbiased story here, why should I believe they are unbiased in any story?

Posted by: MH | July 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Ablolutly.. Now the bad guys have more than the home owner to worry about and think about prior to commiting the crime..

Posted by: Bobby | July 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

GREAT DECISION! It’s time the innocent people of this country stood up against the criminals. If they fear that every citizen is armed and protected by the law if the citizen blows the criminal away we will all be safer. The outrageous incidents around Orlando show that the criminals are out of control, firing at police, running them down with their cars etc. We must all fight these outlaws.

Posted by: Jerry Hale | July 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

If Texas law gives him the right to protect life and property, how did he do any thing wrong? Illegals in Texas? NAW!! They were probably just going to church and got confused with the address. Kill them all and let God sort ‘em out. Kinda brings that slogan to mind, “Don’t Mess with Texas” homeowners that is.

Posted by: ed | July 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

alan wrote in a previouis post the following, “This frontier mentality and “take no prisoners” attitude in Texas is pathetic. I do not believe that it reflects the attitude of the rest of the United States.” I bet if his wife and child were being beaten to death by someone breaking into his house he wouldnt have a problem with us texans shooting someone to protect them. He must be a liberal we all the right to do anything we want. Sounds like the bible right before GOD brought forth the flood in noahs days.

Posted by: dallas fireman | July 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yep!!!!yep!!!!yep!!! wish he lived next door to me…….

Posted by: Paige | July 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Who is Kevin R? Wait till it happens to you sometime and see if you sing the same tune.

Posted by: JH | July 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

If you don’t want to get shot don’t be trespassing on other people’s property. Next, time they would have been back at the neighbors robbing him.
Mothers, you should really teach your sons better. Teach them to not take things that don’t belong to you and then you won’t have to worry about them being shot. There are consequences for behaviors.

Posted by: Nickie | July 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

You have got to be kidding me. Has anyone even heard about what this nut did? Joe Horn saw his neighbor’s home, who he hardly knew at the time, being robbed from the safety of his own, well-armed home.
After being ordered by the dispatcher not to get involved, he trotted out behind these guys and shot them in the back… no he EXECUTED them by shooting them in the back. Joe Horn was not involved, nor was his life or property at risk, until he left his house for a bit of vigilante justice.
I’m all for Texas giving people the right to defend themselves and their families, but this wasn’t defense, it was murder. Listen to the tape… Horn cited the Castle Law as his justification for shooting these guys PRIOR to confronting the burglars outside of his neighbor’s home about property that was neither his nor in his charge. This is the story of a old man with an axe to grind who saw an opportunity for a little payback, plain and simple. How that doesn’t warrant an indictment, I can’t even fathom.

Posted by: Chad | July 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Being a garage theft victim, I can definitely appreciate a neighbor like Joe Horn. If I was not available to blow their heads off, I would certainly appreciate a neighbor doing so.

Posted by: phebie | July 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Mr Horn is a true patroit. He can move to Austin and be my neighbor anytime. We will be neighbors looking out for neighbors. The way it is supposed to be!
A fellow Texan.

Posted by: John Dickens | July 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

If the Supreme Court wants to protect a men that rape and kill 8 year old girls it’s time to lock and load and retake the streets of our cities. Thank God for Texas where the people know how to protect their neighborhood. Joe Horn should get a Presidential award for cleaning up the trash. Thanks Joe those thugs will never harm another person.

Posted by: Jason | July 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

mr horn gives a whole new meaning to the words neighborhood watch,, bless his heart for being a stand up guy. He should be recognized as a hero, and for setting a precedent for future incidents of criminal incursions to our neighborhoods.

Posted by: jim | July 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Pay attention, this is complicated.
If the 2 dead men had been robbing Joe Horn’s house, yes, Joe Horn had the right to protect himself and his property. As the 2 dead men were robbing his neighbor’s house, he had no right to use deadly force.

Posted by: Mary | July 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Pay attention, this is complicated.
If the 2 dead men had been robbing Joe Horn’s house, yes, Joe Horn had the right to protect himself and his property. As the 2 dead men were robbing his neighbor’s house, he had no right to use deadly force.

Posted by: Mary | July 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

The media is so left wing it’s really sad. The spin they’re trying to put on this would have you feel bad for the robbers. Here in Jersey gun laws are so strict criminals have the peace of mind to shoot and kill without a worry. I can‘t wait until I retire and take my fat NJ pension to a wonderful pro gun state. Vote for McCain and save the second amendment!!

Posted by: Jersey Fresh | July 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

He did what he felt he needed to do.
If they hadn’t made their decision he wouldn’t have had to make his.

Posted by: Bonnie | July 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

If you are taking my property you are taking my life….

Posted by: db | July 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

He should be given a medal. We used to LEGALLY hang horse thieves in this country. The only good thief is a dead thief. I wish ALL of my neighbors were just like Mr. Horn.

Posted by: Jeff | July 1, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

sure, why not. tell the 911 operator to go kiss your ass. then shoot your neighbors’ burglars specifically in the back as they are running for their lives. don’t even try to aim for the extremities, go for the jugular. you’ll be in good company because in Texas, jurors are such anti-crime fanatics and have little regard for the life. you can answer to God later like the rest of ‘em.

Posted by: 30ROCK | July 1, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

From reading the responses this probably isn’t what you “fair” media people wanted. I agree with the majority, I would be proud to be neighbors with someone who was willing to help protect me, my property and my family, not being afraid of the lawyers and the criminals with more rights than honest people.

Posted by: Ryan | July 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

FOR SURE! Shoot the robbers!
I am 76 year old greatgrandma and a good shot! What I have is mine, but if you need something I’ll share – just ask.
Come on my place to rob me and you will get a face full of lead! The law is on my side.

Posted by: Jeanie | July 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Swift and sure punishment is the only message that rings clear in the law of the streets. The Criminal Justice System might want to take another look. Wish Maryland was as brave as Texas!

Posted by: Pathfinder MD | July 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Laura, do you get the idea from the rest of us that YOU are the idiot among responders? You are of course. I hope YOUR home and family are the very next targets for the illegals! YOU and those who DO think as you do, are DIRECTLY responsible for the lawlessness in America today! And I hope against hope that YOU pay for your stupidity! Sadly, others normally pay that price. You stupid idiot liberal!

Posted by: charlie | July 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

We call “911″ via Smith and Wesson. This fella did what most of this law biding country’s citizens were thinking and would have done. He just saved the courts and tax payers thousands and thousands of dollars. Hurray!! for the grand jury. They got this one right !!We need more neighbors like him !!

Posted by: Maria | July 1, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Mr. Horn committed a crime – murder. He was safe in his home and in no way was he protecting himself by leaving his home to go next door and shoot two people in the back.

Posted by: Anne | July 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

These men were shot in the back. Yes, they were wrong for stealing and Joe Horn definitely was wrong and should be punished for what he did – murder, it was Joe Horn’s intent to KILL and he followed through. I do not understand the Grand Jury, This is so called Texas justice and it is wrong, wrong,wrong. I live in the Houston area and this is scary. The Grand Jury has made Joe a law abiding vigilante. He is proud of what he did, just listen to the tape. This man is a murderer and he knows it, I hope he has sleepless nights for the rest of his life

Posted by: mat | July 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Way to go Joe, two less thugs on the street. There is no telling how many innocent lives you saved by ending these two.

Posted by: bhair | July 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

If this were aired more there would be less crime. But of course our liberal friends at abcommie want the opposite to be true.

Posted by: Dead Eye | July 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

WE TEXANS BELIEVE VERY STRONG IN
THE 2ND AMENDMENT “RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS”
TEXAS IS A RED STATE…..
LIBERALS NOT ALLOWED…..

Posted by: TEXAN | July 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

It is high time we take this country back from criminals, bad govenmnt officials and illegal aliens!!! I would have shot to wound, but I would not indict Joe Horne for doing what corrects a definite wrong. Our government now sees fit to protect the criminal and prosecute the innocent! Where is this country heading?????

Posted by: Dave S | July 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Bubba Joe says ” Illegal aliens are criminals, and when they invade my
castle,their intentions may be to harm
my family or me and anything I do to protect my castle is within the law.
Aliens coming to the USA should learn
english and assimilate into our society.
Should they not want to or refuse to,
they need to get OUT of the USA.
AAliens of a hundred years ago, came wanting to be USA citizens. They were the backbone of America.

Posted by: Bubba Joe | July 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

I echo the sentiments of those who thought Joe Horn did the right thing. As someone else pointed out, both crooks were illegal aliens from Columbia. I don’t care what your opinions on immigration are, a thief is a thief and you only have to be stolen from once to feel violated. Local minority race Houston activists are leading protests against Mr. Horn. Does that mean that they are taking up for the criminal element? If I had been Mr. Horn, I would have done only one thing different; instead of shooting to kill, I would have aimed lower and blown their legs off, and then watched them bleed to death.

Posted by: Native Texan | July 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Joe Horn should have been indicted. He was told repeatedly to stay inside by the 911 operator. He didn’t even know the neighbors whose house was being burglarized. He shot two men in the back — for what?
How we love our stuff! How little we value life nowadays.

Posted by: sueaside | July 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Joe did the right thing. He dialed 911 and was on the phone with police dispatch for ten to fifteen minutes. Unfortunately the burglary occurred during police shift change so the response was slow. There was a cop in an unmarked car in front of Joe’s house at the time of the shootings, but did not intervene. The two bandits fatal mistakes were; They were in the USA illeagly, had no other jobs and didnt stop when Joe told them to.

Posted by: Willie | July 1, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I absolutley agree with the others that have posted. Research has been done with convictd felons currently in prison for violent crime. Their #1 concern and biggest deterant while looking for a soft target was wheather or not that target might be armed. Not the police, not tough crime laws and not even tough gun control laws. These preditors feared only one thing…another preditor with a different set of core beliefs backed up by training and willingness to preserve life and prevail.

Posted by: John in Michigan | July 1, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

The last time I checked, the penalty for burglary in Texas is not death. Whether the person is an illegal resident or not makes no difference. The laws apply equally to everyone who commits a crime – not just citizens. The dispatcher told Mr.Horn, twice, to stay in his home. Mr. Horn was defiant – he wanted it his way or no way. He was not on a trophy hunt. Yet, he shot the two men in their backs as they were retreating. What a big baby coward-they were absolutely no threat to him. His lawyer obviously had friends on the Grand Jury. Just imagine, if the two men were White and the shooter was hispanic, what do you think the result would have been. That’s right!
If we are determined to have all these hunters with ther guns locked and loaded, let’s just turn law enforcement over to them. We could save milions of dollars by eliminating our police forces and sending any measely criminal to the cemetary rather than prison. Let’s see, we tried that in the 16th century and it did not work.
It would be interesting to see the poll broken down by zip codes. That would tell the tale and I suspect it would be readily apparent that Pasadena and other places known for their red-neck cowboy mentality would account for most of the trigger happy fingers.
This is a disgrace to Houston. Mr. Horn’s actions will forever be a blight on our name. If I were he, I would be careful and always carry my guns. I suspect there will be a “take no prisoners” illegal resident who is just gunning for Horn. I sincerely hope Mr. Horn will finally get the justice he so carefully meted out. Shame on you Mr. Horn, you would we wise to study the law of Karma.

Posted by: RLG51 | July 1, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

My wife and I were burglarized while asleep in our home. The police dispatcher told my wife to hide in the bathroom, basicly be a statistic and victim. I don’t know how many burglar’s it was but we ran to the neighbors house and no one was home, I made my wife stay there and ran back after them with a rambo knife. I only wish I had guns in my house because when the police arrived they would not help me chase them., there response was they didn’t have enough officers on duty that night. The officer seemed scared, I wanted to borrow his gun and go after them. Now I have a shot-gun, 2-guns, an alarm, plus a giant-breed German Shepherd. Basicly my wife and I are on our own, no thanks “To Protect and Serve” of the Police. I would have shot them too, No questions asked!!!!

Posted by: Charles | July 1, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Yes! Simple as that. So should the police.

Posted by: T Bear | July 1, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Historically, under the common law, the right to protect one’s own property with lethal force is acceptable. But, to murder another individual, let alone two individuals, who may or may not be committing a burglary against another individual has been, and should be illegal.
Of course, gun rights activists will try to change the subject, but this is not a 2nd Amendment issue. The real issue is whether an individual has the right to act as a surrogate law enforcement official, although he or she is not sanctioned as such.
The US Constitution does not create affirmative duties for citizens to report crimes being committed, let alone to intervene in stopping them. While helping a neighbor in their hour of need is an admirable thing to do, one’s intentional taking of another’s life in the process (without one’s own life being threatened) is, in most states, illegal. It should remain illegal unless we, as a country of laws, wish to subside into lawlessness and the horrific concept of every man/woman for him/herself. I suspect we are better than that, and that we, as a whole, have faith in, and a deep respect for our legal system–a system which finds protecting one’s own property with lethal force as acceptable, but that of another’s with the same force as morally repugnant.

Posted by: John Litchfield | July 1, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

This isnt how it usually works. Most of the time the illegal alien/criminals just get wounded, sue someone and end up liveing life off the hard working tax payers. Way to go Joe “Texan” Horn.

Posted by: safe in Texas | July 1, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Mr. Horn positively did the right thing. The talking is over, if you come into my house your going to be lying on the floor and I’m not going to ask you. Ever hear of high speed lead poisoning? That goes for my dear neighbors also. If I knew where Mr. Horn lived I put a case of beer on the front porch and hall you know what.

Posted by: say it one time | July 1, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Absolutely, we should have every right to protect our home, our family and that of our neighbors. I say, if the person who wants to become a criminal can’t take the chance of getting killed, then maybe he/she better think twice before they decide to break into someones house, or their garage or their car or truck. And the same goes for someone who is trying to break into your neighbors house, garage, or vehicle. Anybody who decides he/she doesn’t have to work for a living and decides to steal someone elses stuff that they worked hard for, then I see nothing wrong with putting them down like a rabid dog. I am sick and tired of all the bleeding hearts who say these criminals have rights. Wrong, wrong wrong, they gave up those rights the minute they thought of themselves as above the law. We would have a lot less people in prison and wouldn’t have to spend near as much money to feed and cloth these vermin as we do now. It would be a huge savings for everyone.
We should take a lesson from Kennesaw, Georgia. Those people are much safer then any one any where in the United States.

Posted by: Charles Domanski | July 1, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Most people blame everyone but the person that did it. It’s not the burglars fault…it’s the cops fault for not stopping it…

Posted by: db | July 1, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Seriously, was it ok for Joe to defend his neighbors home that was being broken into which is against the law, by two illegal aliens??? Yes, yes, yes!
Maybe if all criminals knew this could happen we would have a lot less crime. In Texas we teach our children that you should make sure that you can live with the consequences of the choices you make. They made bad choices, they got a bad consequence. Way to go Joe!!!!

Posted by: Texas Teacher | July 1, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

As far as I’m concerned Joe Horn got away with murder. The grand jury is just as guilty for not indicting him. Only in Texas are citizens allowed to take the law into their own hands… And what about justice?

Posted by: Robin Mead | July 1, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Yes.Yes.Yes

Posted by: Texan | July 1, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

yes, we should have the right to protect our or our neighbors property with deadly force. hats off to Mr. Horn.
KEEP THE GOV. OUT OF OUR LIVES !!!

Posted by: chip b. | July 1, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I bet that wasnt their first offense…

Posted by: db | July 1, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I think the courts got it wrong. I am all for defending your own-(self, family, and home). I am against shooting someone in their back when their robing your neighbors home and they are not there. They were not in harms way.Surely killing someone is not equal in my books to stolen goods that was able to be carried away by hand.He should have written down any information he could gather on the criminals such as their discription,their cloths, the method in which they were traveling, anything that would have inhanced the police in the serch for them. Maybe he should have grabbed a camera an filmed it all. If he owned a gun he should have a camera. That was just a guy wanting to use his knowledge of the texas law to his advantage and it’s a shame that he might get away with it. For all the bloggers before me ,”you all are very sick and are border line if not on the line of cold hard killers”. “You are all looking or thinking of something more extreme then your own lives”. It’s really a shame- that it maybe allot more wack jobs in this world like you all then i had thought!

Posted by: Andrea | July 1, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

These men,illegal immigrants, human beings, where shot in the BACK. Mr. Horn is an all out COWARD and he should be charged for the crime he committed. COWARD! COWARD! COWARD! COWARD! COWARD!

Posted by: Houstons5thWard | July 1, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

YES to protecting personal property. Next time it could be your’s !!!

Posted by: gb | July 1, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

The beautiful thing about TEXAS, as well as 40 other states, we don’t have to depend on the court’s interpretation of the Second amendment of the US Constitution. The Texas Constitution, as well as 40 other states, leaves no doubt that “every citizen” has the right to bear arms. Notice there is no mention of a militia.
Texas – Article 1, Section 23 – Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.
Check your constitution! You might be surprised to find out you have the same rights.
What amazes me is all the fuss in Chicago about the the Supreme court decision. Illinois’ constitution is even more clear by using the word “individual”!
Illinois – 1.22 – Subject only to the police power, the right of the
individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The reason criminal activity continues to rise is because the criminals know that we have built a culture that shuns the thought of shooting someone for stealing. I have been tempted to take things that didn’t belong to me and I can promise you a decided not to because I was afraid of getting my a** shot!
We don’t play in Texas. And, I am proud of Joe Horn!

Posted by: Don | July 1, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

My gosh, did he have to shoot BOTH of them? I wonder what Sargent Sam has to say about this? I think we should call law enforcement first. Austin has a great police force.

Posted by: Steve | July 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Let me know where you live so I can come over and take some of your stuff since you are not going to stop me….What are you going to do to stop me from coming over to your place and taking your stuff? You’re not going to use deadly force so get out of the way….

Posted by: db | July 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Yes, you should be allowed to protect your property from an INTRUDER!! That means the person came into your protected space and posed a threat to you and your family for the taking of your property. However, this case has nothing to do with protecting your property because his property was never in any danger. He did “not” know his neighbors that he claim to be protecting. He saw a great opportunity for a “Good Old Boy” to get him one or two! What would happen if we all decided to shoot first and worry about it later….”The dog pooped on my lawn, so I shot him and his owner for bothering my property.” “The kid threw a ball through my window, so I shot him for trying to break in.” When is a life more precious than property????

Posted by: Fed Up Texan | July 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

The Grand Jury got it right. Thank goodness for the Castle Law and similar laws in other states. Also, I am very pleased, although not at all surprised, at our Supreme Court’s ruling on the Second Amendment. There is no doubt that our forefathers meant that citizens have the right to bear arms. A simple review of the grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, and wording lets one know the intent of the Second Amendment.

Posted by: Janet Barrow | July 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Yes! Toby and Willie say it best, “Take all the rope in Texas. Find a tall oak tree, round up all of them bad boys. Hang them in the street for all the people to see…”

Posted by: Mike Connell | July 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

The Castle law is a great thing….Bottom line, if you dont want to get shot or killed, dont attept to steal, rape or murder on my property!!
Texas is the greatest state in the U.S.

Posted by: Mike | July 1, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

we should just give all of the illegal immagrants all of our guns, that way they can shoot us first, while robbing our homes and threatening our families.

Posted by: Texan | July 1, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

This section of the Texas Penal Code is more than likely what gave Joe Horn protection from criminal, more than likely civil penalties.
§ 9.43. PROTECTION OF THIRD PERSON’S PROPERTY. A person
is justified in using force or deadly force against another to
protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if,
under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the
actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force
or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful
interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or
criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property; or

Posted by: NoMercy | July 1, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

This country was taken by force just like everything else on this planet…only the strong survive…I would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six…

Posted by: db | July 1, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Lethal force should only be used when all other options have been exhausted, and in my opinion Joe Horn used it as a first option. First of all, he shot to kill, not to protect himself. Also, his life was not at risk because the potential burglars were not on his property. In addition, if Mr. Horn did not trust 911 to handle the situation, why did he call them in the first place? I saw this story when it originally aired in February, and I was beyond shocked as I heard Mr. Horn brazenly gun down two men while calmly speaking to the 911 operator. This type of crime, which I am labelling as such because I believe that Mr. Horn murdered two people, should not be permissible in Texas or any U.S. state for that matter. What if the two burglars had not really been burglars, but canvassers or colporteurs that Mr. Horn mistook for thieves? I really think that the state of Texas needs to revisit this case and give Mr. Horn the punishment that he deserves.

Posted by: Jeanette Y | July 1, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I would hope everybody should take about two seconds to think this one out. Lets wait for someone to come into their house and rape or kill a loved one or themselfs hmmmm… I would not think twice to shoot and kill someone in my house.You also have to remember if they survive they can sue you.That would not be good for anyone but the thief. Joe did the right thing,and if the GOVERMENT stopped the illegals from coming here this would put a dent in crime

Posted by: Joe | July 1, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

It is very interesting that everyone’s argument is about how you should have the right to protect yourself and your property. No one mentions the fact that in this case, it involved someone else’s property. The Texas penal code sections 9.41 through 9.43 only allows deadly force to protect one’s OWN property, or someone who has the right to be in possession of it. Additionally, this is only allowed when the person reasonably believes it is the only alternative. Joe Horn neither owned any of the property or had any interest in the property. Also, he was informed that police were on the way, so he knew there was another alternative. With the policy adopted by Joe Horn, ANY amateur can grab his or her gun and shoot anyone he or she believes to be doing something against the law. Do not get me wrong, I am not an advocate for robbers. In fact, if they had tried to rob Joe Horn’s home, I would not care less if he shot them one hundred times. Here, however, I can not agree with a policy allowing someone to take on the role of the judicial system (police, judge, or jury) and shoot two people in the back for ALLEGEDLY robbing his neighbor’s home.

Posted by: Danny Norris | July 1, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

I hope all those liberals stay up north, they have lots of money to pay for everything including JAILS. When has the last homeowner who was robbed received justice–when were those criminal caught? NEVER

Posted by: Texan | July 1, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

So we return to the lawlessness and lynch mobs of the wild, wild west? Why even bother to fund law enforcement or a judicial system? Just issue guns to everyone and see who’s left standing. This is purely the end of civilization, law and order. What a shameful state of affairs.

Posted by: disgusted in TN | July 1, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Things seem to go from one extreme to the other. So, what do people really want? There are more crimes than any local police department in the country can handle. The Constitution guarantees you the right to bear arms. You may have the right to carry a weapon with a permit. So what? You are not going to use it? Defeats the purpose does it not? The only reason the courts do not want you taking justice into your own hands is because it reduces litigation which is where all the lawyers, judges and anyone else affiliated with courts earns their living!

Posted by: Larry | July 1, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Yes, we should be allowed to use lethal force to protect ourselves and our neighbor’s property. It’s the American way. It has been since the founding of this country, even if they don’t teach it in history class.
My daughter thinks that we should be able to protect ourselves and not just our property with lethal force. Imagine some guy trying to rob you or worse.

Posted by: Cathie | July 1, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

I cant believe the number of people that dont have a clue as to how this country and all societies evolved ….it was taken by force…duhh get a clue…we better get a clue from Mr. Horn and start standing up to those that are against our law and order.

Posted by: db | July 1, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

My husband’s work has him traveling most of the time. All that came to my mind when I heard this story were the faces of my 2 boy’s, and imagining 2 robbers breaking into our home.
If a person doesn’t believe in Mr. Horn’s innocence then they should picture someone they dearly love being at the mercy of some intruders and maybe they would praise Mr. Horn for his bravery and not crucify him for it.

Posted by: Brenna | July 1, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

The Joe Horn story is a sad story. Yes, Joe Horn should not go to jail since he did not operate outside the law. In this case the guilty parties include the Texas legislature and governor that would enact such mindless legislation. Property can be replaced. I’m not particularly interested in seeing the blood of stupid criminals splattered across the lawn just to save an insurance claim. It’s too easy to make a mistake with someone who is disabled that walks up to the wrong household, or to kill a misguided youth who could be turned around, or even one of my own children who I thought was home in bed. Bad legislation, bad.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 1, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

This was not defending anything, This was cold-blooded murder. This proves that people with guns just want to kill people. This is a civil rights violation and the failure of the Grand Jury to indict harkens back to the days when The KKK could kill with impunity. It is time for the federal government and the FBI to move in and arrest the Grand Jury as well as the perpetrator for civil rights violations. It is just disgusting when you listen to how eager that old coot was to go out and murder someone in cold premeditated blood.

Posted by: swbkhd | July 1, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Even though they were illegal immigrants, they did not deserve to be shot in the back like that. Who determines the value of a person’s life. He admitted to his intentions for killing them even though he was inside the safety net of his own home. How come sex offenders can spend a few years in jail and get out with good behavior after molesting someones child, where is the justice in that. For those poeple who said God bless America, I wonder if God himself personally told them that he approves of vigilanty killings.I understand if someone is breaking into my home and my life and that of my familys’ is at stake, then i could see him shooting them, but he went outside. What if they had guns and shot him then what would everyone say. things could have been the other way around. He should pay for his vigilanty actions.

Posted by: reasoning | July 1, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Something else to consider that burglery of habitation is a felony in Texas. And all citizens have the right and obligation to arrest anyone committing a felony. The law authorizes the use of deadly force, if necessary, to make an arrest IF, and only IF, the arresting person witnesses the felony. Joe Horn did in fact witness the felony act and instructed them not to move. They attempted to flee and he shot them. Being in the back sure doesn’t look good for him and definitely kills a self-defense argument. Shooting them was a matter of preventing their escape. And that my friends is legal in Texas. Remember the laws says you may use use deadly force to facilitate the arrest of felon if you witness the action. The news outlets won’t tell you truth about why the Grand Jury No-billed him.

Posted by: Don | July 1, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Decide who you want as your neighbors, Joe or the ilegal aliens. I think Joe did wrong and should have been punished, by maybe a $10.00 fine. That is more serious punishment than some criminals get. It’s refreshing to see people in this country still appreciate someone willing to fight to protect things we work hard to earn, while others wait to steal or destroy our property, or life.

Posted by: Robert | July 1, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

The grand jury just allowed a cold blooded murderer to walk away from his crime and issued a “shoot to kill” license for every gun owner just wanting an excuse to kill someone.
These men, no matter their status or nationality, were leaving, as in going away from Joe Horn, when he shot them in the back. That does NOT make Joe Horn a hero. Shooting someone in the back is the act of a coward.
May Joe Horn reap what he sows.

Posted by: sam | July 1, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Some people think that by letting people defend themselves by using guns that we are becoming lawless and will be forming lynch mobs soon. You know what, That Sounds Good To Me Right Now. I, for one, plan on using my GOD given right to defend myself and my neighbors from someone threatening to do me or them harm. If it means that I’m shooting them in the back, well better them than me. They wouldn’t hesitate to shoot me, why should I give them a benefit of the doubt.

Posted by: Rachel | July 1, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

No, people should definitely not be allowed legally or illegally to do the job of the law enforcement: especially, if either they or their property is not being threaten.
It seems that whenever some gun yielding trigger happy nitwit shoots and kills someone, others of the same mind set joins with them by agreeing with their outrageous and wicked actions. When will they understand that life is precious to some people?

Posted by: Clark Kent | July 1, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

yes, I believe that we have every right to protect ourselves and our personal belongings. My son and I were home alone
and were intruded by a masked burgular. He held a gun to my sons head, who at the time was only 14.He robbed us and tied us up and threaten to kill us he if he saw any signs of police coming and any lights on after he left. He said he would be watching.If I had a gun, that I could have gotten to in time I would have shot him with no hesitation. Fortunately we are doing fine but of course the police didn’t find out who it was. We even had surveilance and and now the police say they lost the tape. We have sold our house, moved to a new city, and live in a gated subdivision. It was a terrible incident. The next time and hope there is no next time I will shoot to kill.

Posted by: Debbie Schillace | July 1, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Last as i posted under Joe at 12:46:01am also who would do the goverment landscaping for cheap. You people say burn Joe at the cross if it happened to you, that some took all you identity and personal stuff you would think different about this.I know it took around 7 years to get my friend life straightend out after his social ser..# was stolen and sold to and illegal alien.

Posted by: Joe A | July 1, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Good for Joe. I would of done the same thing.

Posted by: Lorraine | July 1, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Hey Superman…
Let me know where you live so I can come over and take some of your stuff since you are not going to stop me….What are you going to do to stop me from coming over to your place and taking your stuff? You’re not going to use deadly force so get out of the way….

Posted by: db | July 1, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

I would say that everyone should have the right to protect themselves and thier property and it would be great if that was allowed in New York. I’ll bet my entire check that crime would start declining.

Posted by: Angel Rosado | July 1, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

You people up north just don’t have a clue.
In TEXAS, the right to use deadly force extends beyond personal safety. Here in TEXAS, you can use deadly force to protect you own property AND YOUR NEIGHBOR’S PROPERTY.
If you don’t like our laws, keep your a** out of TEXAS!

Posted by: Don | July 1, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

We deserve the right not to be victims. Every night on the news there is somebody being robbed or victimized in some way or another. I support open carry, concealed carry, and the right to defend myself. I refuse to be a victim. God Bless.

Posted by: Jeff | July 1, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Joe Horn had two choices. 1. Watch two criminals violate the sanctity of his neighbors home while cowering in fear. Then continue to cower in fear for the rest of his life while having nightmares about the same individuals returning to invade his own home,and possible place his family in mortal danger. 2. Eliminate the threat, and live out the rest of his life in peace.

Posted by: Rich | July 1, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Hmmm…I’m too lazy to work or earn my own living or money, so lets see, I’ll steal it from the person that does and God help him if he steps in my way during the process of my crime. Well things went a little different this time!! JOE HORN FOR PRESIDENT!!!! Way to go…JOE!!

Posted by: Proud to be a Pasadena Texan | July 1, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Absolutely he had a right to protect his or his neighbors property! How much you wanna bet the criminals were Mexicans?? This country was founded on basic principles that we can speak freely, bear arms, and pledge allegiance to God. These basic principles are what makes this country so great! Black powder smells good!

Posted by: Rae | July 1, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

I would like to bring attention to the fact that besides Joe Horn and a couple of thieves, there is rampant crime in this country and it is getting worse. Did noone see the news about border crime and how kids are dodging bullets just to get to school? Law enforcement was on the scene and they could not control it. If it were my kids, I would walk them to school myself with my AK47/scope. Are you not aware that Mexican gangs have violently taken over control of cocaine distribution in every major U.S. city? Has anyone checked to see why so many vacancies exist for teachers and principals in Chicago schools? Could there be a connection here? I believe it is on iasaedu.org or .net. In spite of a 32 year ban in handguns in D.C., the murder rate only went up. Do you really believe it was the cause of legal and law abiding D.C. residents? Would you really rather be a victim? Which would you prefer… your family members dead or the perpertrators? You really need to think this out because it is only getting worse and the time for you to figure out what you will do is now, not later!

Posted by: Larry | July 1, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

I’ll bet, Houston 5th ward, laura. and matt probably broke into more than one homes themself. They were shot in the back because you don’t let a criminal turn and get aim on you!!! if their lives were worth more than a burglary than why the burglary? If You are going to commit an crime you should know that the courts may put you in jail, but a citizen will shoot you and should have the right to do so. it’s vigilante justice if the couts say its O.K.
And to those who chose to interject the subject of race, If the burgulars were white, this wouldn’t even be a story!! And Why do I get the feeling that the Texas christian probably belongs to Jerimaiah Wrights church!

Posted by: obamasucks | July 1, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

To those against actions like these: I hope one day when some one is doing harm to you, your family, or your property (aka: your castle) that you find your self praying for someone to help you and your only savior is the good lord or the cops down the road that aren’t sure if your on the 123 North or South end of your street. TO THOSES THAT AGREE WITH THE LAW: MAY WE BE THE THIRD OPTION IN THESE PEOPLES LIVES THAT CAN OFFER TO LEND A HAND AND THEN, AND ONLY THEN, WILL WE BE SEEN AS BETTER PEOPLE OR NEIGHBORS. As for criminals, they continue doing crimes because they know there is noe real punishment. Their lifes are in the gutter already, so going to jail, getting 3 meals a day, AC, showers, cable TV, education,etc. is a vacation for them AND WE PAY FOR IT WITH OUR OWN TAXES. No wonder they continue doing crimes and crime rate continues to rise..So you bet your dollar I carry a weapon, and I too will put a criminal doing harm to me or others around me dead in their tracks! ITS MORE THAN JUST TEXAS, ITS WHAT THIS COUNTRY SHOULD BE ABOUT!

Posted by: Lee | July 1, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Rich, you sound like you have an IQ of 60. Joe Horn did not need to cower, he took action and called the police, could have been man enough to fire warning shots instead, could have been man enough to shoot to wound instead, could have been man enough to listen to the 911 operator and stand by for the police intervention — instead he resorted to the lowest form of action possible, apparently legal, but nonetheless showing the mentality of a caveman.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 1, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

If you don’t want to get shot while you loot someone’s house, well don’t come to Texas and do your dirty deed. Get a job!!!

Posted by: D. Johnson | July 1, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Hey Rae,
I’ve seen white people rob Mexicans. What does that say about ALL white people. Nothing, stupid!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 1, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

I would sure hate to live next door to a murderer like Mr. Horn. I would be frightened to death if my children came home in the middle of the night while I wasn’t home. Mr. Horn wasn’t in any danger and he did what any responsible neighbor should do. He called the police. But he went to far when he disreguarded their warning and took the law into his own hands. Many call him a hero, I call him a murderer! Since he doesn’t have to answer to the courts he must remember that he will have to answer come judgement day.

Posted by: Dianne Williams | July 1, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Yes, anyone should have the right to protect life, family and property. For far too long the laws were in favor of the chriminal. It’s about time the laws were changed to allow people to protect themselves from elements that have not respect for life, limb or property. They know the laww will protect them. Take a stance and say “Hell no, no more.”

Posted by: J. B. | July 1, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

J.B.,
It sounds like the opportunity to shoot another human being rather excites you. You and anybody else that thinks this would would be well-advised to go get examined, just in case, if you know what I mean. Just for the welfare of those around you, in case they make a “mistake” that enrages you. After all, your judgement is superior to others, right.
I’ve noticed a pattern concerning those that blather about a sacred right to kill over property–such people are often prone to violence themselves and harm others around them, including their own family members for little or no reason. Small-minded, indeed.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 1, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Lets shoot more in all States.
Reduce the court and prison population.

Posted by: Damian | July 1, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Thank God I do not live in texas. How ashamed the residents should be that toot about their hero joe horn. you are actually cheering a coward who shot 2 men in the back. some hero but then considering the idiots in texas, like the president, who can’t even speak or understand english, what can one expect.
joe horn is a true texas coward & the grand jury condoned murder

Posted by: shannon | July 1, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Now now now …
The job was half done.
He should have shoved the shotgun up the thieve’s behind and then pulled the trigger. That way the criminals get a better understanding of how it feels to be raped by strangers just before the end of their stay on planet Earth.
Its time to TAKE BACK YOUR NEIGHBORHOODS!

Posted by: JohnQ | July 1, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

I applaud the Supreme Court in their decision to up hold our Constitutional Right to keep and bear arms. These justices finally read our Constitution and Bill of Rights in the light in which they where intended. Every American citizen who has this right are few compared to the world where only the police, the military, or the criminal element possess weapons. The populace suffers mostly under such rule.
However, we must exclude those persons that common sense laws have revoked this unique right to keep and bear arms such as felons convicted of rape, murder, and violent crimes. Criminal control is the key element to gun control.
If I am armed and willing to protect my family and property and if needed my neighbor’s family and property, then a criminal is not so inclined to practicing his profession. Other words, lets put the shoe on the other foot for once. We as Americans that have the Right to Keep and Bear Arms must exercise common sense just like driving an automobile which has been proven to be one of the most destructive weapons devised by man. In fact, since 1975 to 2006 according to the NHTSA the automobile has killed 1,415,550 people not including the injured.
To answer the question if Mr. Joe Horn was wrong in killing two criminals in the act of committing a crime, NO.

Posted by: James | July 1, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

This is truly a no brainer I am a law student and do believe you have the right to protect your property and that of your nieghbors when its bieng violated by criminals. Anyone who can see this in any other light must be either simple or a criminal themselves.

Posted by: LISA | July 1, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

Everyone seems to think our police is there to “serve and protect” us. That is not their job. In fact, their job is to enforce the law, arrest suspects, and help with the conviction of the suspect. Politicians and elite Businessmen and those that have an abundance of money can hire their “gun” to protect them.

Posted by: James | July 1, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

The bigger question now is will the ABC news staff see fit to report the overwhelming positive response to this story.

Posted by: stan | July 1, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

What a great nation…we all get the right to blow people away because they’re trying to break into our neighbors’ house. And we all get to pontificate about how right we are to want to kill other people. Kill, kill, kill. Lot’s of killers in Texas I guess. I’d better go get a gun to protect myself against the nutjobs from Texas who want to kill everyone. Should have let you idiots become you’re own country when you wanted to; then we could blow you all off the face of the earth when you threatened us with all your guns. What a great nation!

Posted by: SDTrueman | July 1, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

June 30 2008,
I think everyone should be justified in
protecting their property and those of their neighbors when the crime was in progress and being witnessed as they occur. We can not just sit back and let these criminals run away with the loot and maybe they will come back the next day to victimized you and your family.
A lot of cummunities in Los Angeles has a neighborhood watch and this serves as a deterrent.

Posted by: Enrico Tuason | July 1, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

The dead men were criminals. Their killer was not, according to the law. The criminals took none of their ill-gotten gains with them. The killer will take none of the material goods he saved with him after he draws his final breath. He will, however, take the blood on his hands. They will all appear in the same court for their final judgment. Texas law will have no jurisdiction there.

Posted by: Liz | July 1, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Guns are for cowards. I lived in Texas for 30 years. And yes there are a lot of cowards in Texas, I’m sorry to say.

Posted by: Steve | July 1, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

I would say yes, this country was founded on the right to bear arms to protect our families and our properties, also to include any ones property who is being violated. GOD BLESS MR. HORN & TEXAS.

Posted by: nathan | July 1, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

ABSOLUTLY…100% We should be able to protect our own property and our neighbors. Thank God for our Constitution!!! If we sit in fear then the criminals keep coming. If we have the right to bare arms and protect ourselves then the criminals think twice.

Posted by: Carrie | July 1, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

Mr. Horn is one thing, and one thing only… a common criminal – plain and simple he MURDERED those two men. Mr. Horn was REPEATEDLY told to say in his home, where he was SAFE and NOT IN ANY DANGER… and in no need of defending himself from anything. While I agree that people have the right to own guns and protect “themselves (or a third person) & their personal property” — this is not what happened here. One thing I didn’t hear was the race of the alleged criminals. We know had Mr. Horn been black and the two alleged criminals been white, Mr. Horn would have been lynched. And if the alleged criminals were black… well, we know what happened there now don’t we…

Posted by: Keith M | July 1, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

Yes, Texas got it right.
Criminals need to know that ANYONE
can detain them until the police
arrive and shoot them if they resist.
Neighbors must be able to look out
for and protect each other. That is
what makes for good neighbors.

Posted by: Ron | July 1, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Alaska is a right to carry state too. Let the criminals figure out if my 3yr old computer is worth their life. Texas rocks too. duh.

Posted by: Alaska | July 1, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Well is about time! When criminals know that we have the right to defend ourselves I think they will think twice before commiting the crime.

Posted by: AL | July 1, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

Statistically, gun owners are more likely to kill themselves than anyone else with their guns. So to all the gun nuts, do the world a favor – lock and load.

Posted by: Steve | July 1, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Goooooooood for him .If he hadnt have done it what would have happened at the next robbery? rape? murder? Iam tired of all of the criminals having all of the rights.If my neighbor was being robbed I would feel it is my duty and responsibility to protect. Apolice officer can pick and choose if they want to get involved.We as Americans NEED to have each others back!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: John | July 1, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

yes you should be able to protect you property.
i worked for years as a security officer for the US Navy and am a vietnam veteran.
i am totally feed up with being rip off by lowlife criminals.
i just had to repair the ac unit on my house because a lowlife swiped the copper.
i have been disabled for the last 5 years and have to live on less then $930 a month.
i do not have the money to replace what the lowlifes steal so i will take it out of there hide in pieces.
so what if i go to jail the state will find it will cost them dearly just to pay for my medical costs.
and i will live better .
that if they find the body.

Posted by: augoldminer | July 1, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Law enforcement can not be every where all the time. It is not their purpose or responsibility. Their function in society is to enforce the rules we as citizens choose to enact. Yes, we have laws or rules against crime.
However, it is completely unrealistic to believe that our appointed law enforcement officers are either prescient or clairvoyant. The hard truth is, try as many of them do, they can not be everywhere all of the time and prevent every crime. When they do it is a through hard work on the ivestigative side or chance (being in the right place at the right time.) When it happens an officer is right there, johnny on the spot as it were, it is a bonus. Be glad that it happens as often as it does.
We as citizens can not and should not abdicate our responsibility for protecting ourselves, our families, our neighbors or our property. We are part of the overall law enforcement system as law abiding citizens and the people who ultimatly create the laws we ask our law enforcement professionals to enforce. We have responsibility to our neighbors in a civil society. Just because it was next door should we ignore the crime. pretend it did not happen just because it was not us, our home. What is it was a rapist would this question even have been asked.
It is unfortunate the deceased chose a life of crime, chose to steal, chose not to surrender. Sometimes self help wether for yourself or your neighbor is the right thing to do. It help maitain a civil society. For crime to run rampant all it take is for good people to do nothing. That does not mean it is open season on criminals but, the criminal element will be on notice.
My family is Swiss originally, They have automatic weapons in every home. The swiss also have a very civil society with very little crime.

Posted by: RockyUSMC | July 1, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

I think Texas got it so wrong. I believe this guy should be charge with first degree murder. His life was not in danger when he shot those individuals. There is nothing that I own in material things that is worth the taking of two lives.

Posted by: someone with sense | July 1, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Ah…Texas. Where you can just kill anyone who might annoy you on a given day, then rush into court and say “I had to protect myself. . .I felt threatened.”
A conservative’s favorite wet dream? Live gunfights on their main streets after the saloons close every Saturday night.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | July 1, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

I really believe that how you feel about this issue depends on if you or a close friend or relative has been the victim of a crime. People who have never been a victim can not understand how violated people feel when someone enters their house and steals items that they have worked very hard to obtain. I have had a lot of experience in this area, and I think that the State of Texas has pretty much got it RIGHT! I don’t think that Mr. Horn wanted to shoot the law breakers, however, he did not want to see his neighbors victimized either. Also, based on my experience, I can assure you that if Mr. Horn had let these individuals get away, they would have returned to victimize other citizens, possibly even some of those that are so upset by Mr. Horn’s actions.
After all, if the culprits had just complied with Mr. Horn’s request, they would still be alive. If they would have been innocent, when the police arrived, it would have been “No Harm No Foul.” Also, I think that it is true that criminals don”t only commit one crime, and that many times the the level of violence escalates. What is at first a property theft can soon become an armed robbery. Actually, I live in the Los Angeles area and I would be happy to have Mr. Horn as my neighbor.

Posted by: BWC | July 1, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am

YES, of course he did the right thing, and if you are not willing to protect yours and your neighbors life & property with any means you deem necessary your not much of a man, American, or even descent human. Until everyone has there own armed policeman 24 hours a day you have to protect yourself, anything less is stupid. Poor ABC, I don’t think there biased propaganda story converted anyone to there (the dark) side. Here in the communist state of Oregon they would call him a terrorist and bury him.

Posted by: Lonnie | July 1, 2008, 4:20 am 4:20 am

It was a DSAF shooting.
(Did Society A Favor)

Posted by: Richard | July 1, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am

It was a DSAF shooting.
(Did Society A Favor)

Posted by: Richard | July 1, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

In a way I can understand the majority thought here but at the same time I am horrified.
The expansion of the right to use deadly force shows that our society is moving backwards into the dark ages or lawless wild west days. Property now has more rights then human life.
Now would what Jesus think about this?
There should be alternatives. Better secured locks, alarm systems and camera systems not to mention yard dogs to prevent theft outside of killing and valuing property over human life even if they are what we consider subhumans..theives and…illegal immigrants.
It also shows our legal system has broken down where we rather put in jail a pot smoker when somebody that steals.

Posted by: John | July 1, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am

I wish Mr.Joe would come and be my neighbor. I am tired of repairing doors and windows after attemps have been made to get in my home. We need more like him and fewer parasites like the two he shot.
Did anyone check where those guys were living? The fat girlfriend home? I bet she is was recieving and enjoying some of the goods those two pieces of trash were dragging home.
Go Joe.

Posted by: jean | July 1, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

If I owned a gun and knew how to use it, and was in Joe Horn’s position, I’d shoot. The deaths of the robbers are regrettable, but preferred than if they got away and came back more brazen and armed before.
Thievery is not a safe profession. These guys robbed a house in broad daylight. If they weren’t aware of the risks, they were incredibly stupid and worthy of the Darwin Award. Either that or we have become too scared or weak.
The fact the robbers were illegal immigrants is irrelevant. The same result ought to be for legal Americans.

Posted by: Lily | July 1, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

It wasn’t Mr Horn’s home they were breaking into and he was never threatened. There was no reason for him to go outside with a gun and shoot them. Instead he chose to go outside and shoot to kill. His shooting them in the back speaks for itself. He went out there to kill two people and he did it and now the state of Texas says, hey, that’s okay – you killed two people but they were only illegal aliens – it doesn’t matter. Mr Horn deliberately killed two men and he’ll have to answer for that on judgement day.
I too wonder what would have happened if Mr Horn had been black or Hispanic and killed two white men. Would they have let him off so lightly? I doubt it.
I wouldn’t want Mr Horn as my neighbor!!

Posted by: Jay | July 1, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

lots of good points…and, “hell, yeah!” i’m glad he wasn’t indicted! i’m thinkin’ poor little “kevin r” has never had his house robbed & all his stuff stolen; it’s noteworthy (even tho ABC didn’t think so) that both these dead guys were illegal aliens!, as well as caught-in-the-act thieves. as for how ABC will report these responses?; my bet is they’ll take the extremely few minority bleeding-heart posts and make them sound overwhelming…like they always do. we’ll find out tonight, huh…

Posted by: mr. bill in TX | July 1, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

I think it’s outrageous that the grand jury declined to indict Joe Horn. I read a number of the posted comments, and frankly, I think it’s sad. It makes me ASHAMED to be an American! What’s wrong with people in this country, particularly in the state of Texas??? These people invoke the name of God – “God bless Texas”, “God bless Joe Horn.” They say they have the right to protect themselves, their families, & their property, which is all well and good. But did these people READ/WATCH and UNDERSTAND the facts of this case? The two men Joe Horn shot, while they should not be absolved from their criminal acts were robbing A NEIGHBOR’S HOUSE – NOT Joe Horn’s house. In fact, Joe Horn said he didn’t even KNOW the neighbor whose house was being robbed. Furthermore, the 911 tape clearly shows that Joe Horn was REPEATEDLY told NOT to leave his house and take action against the perpetrators. Yet, after being told to stay in his house and wait until the police arrived, Joe Horn took it upon himself to shoot the two men – yes, men (i.e. HUMAN BEINGS)IN COLD BLOOD, siting a law that he KNEW would protect him from being punished for MURDERING these two men. The men were not in any way ‘threatening’ Joe Horn. In fact, the investigation showed they were RUNNING AWAY FROM Joe Horn when he shot them. So given the FACTS of the case, was Joe Horn justified in his actions? I THINK NOT!

Posted by: Jasper | July 1, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Comments in this thread have certainly confirmed one thing: Texas is populated by a bunch of gun-toting, redneck thugs. What a sad commentary on a capitalist, materialistic society gone mad. No amount of “stuff” is worth a life. Perhaps you’ll realize this when one of your cowboys “mistakenly” kills your child or other family member. Lethal “mistakes” are permanent.

Posted by: disgusted in TN | July 1, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

To the “jay, jasper, mr bill, & disgusted in tn”‘s, you all just don’t get it. First, these were CRIMINALS with a long list of crimes behind them, not mid-guidedf Sunday school attendees. The fact they’re illegally in our country really isn’t the issue, BUT THEY WERE ILLEGALLY in our country!! Also, WAIT FOR THE POLICE??? Why isn’t anyone questioning why it took the police sooo long to get to the scene of an on-going robbery—- it seems like the police wanted the burglars to get away, in order to avoid the dangerous confrontation with the criminals. Which left a citizen to have to take the responsibility of defending his neighborhood into his own hands! Then, the 911 dispatcher — could he have been more passive?? The way the dispatcher was talking you’d think he was talking to a “kindergartner” about not misbehaving!! I think Mr. Horne acted appropriately & I DO HOPE FUTURE CRIMINALS stop & think before breaking into someone’s home or car — for that matter.

Posted by: mjp | July 1, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Amazing how many people here confuse property with life and burglary with atempted murder.
I don’t know enough of the details in Joe Horn’s case to judge him, but it should be pretty simple:
Of cause it is OK to shoot someone who threatens the life of you, your family or your neighbor.
But it is NOT OK to shoot someone simply for trespassing or burglary if he is not threatening anybody’s life. People who favor that kind of twisted justice should move to Saudi Arabia.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | July 1, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

You people are so confused or just plain ignorant. In the case of Horn, there was no one in the home in which the men burglarized. No human life was in jeopardy, nor did they attempt to rob or harm Mr. Horn. They were not even aware of his presence NEXT DOOR! He blatantly went out to kill them. He could have wounded them instead, or just take a description, hell, take a picture and turn it over to the police when the arrived.
Yes, we should be able to defend ourselves and family if/when we are being threatened.
There is a difference, are you people to ignorant to acknowledge that? My guess is, YES!

Posted by: ccm | July 1, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

I admire that he is willing to risk his life for a neighbor that he didn’t even know very well. So often, people just look the other way. It is unfortunate that the robbers died, but in a situation like this I cant imagine being able to accurately access how dangerous they may be. I agree that no amount of stuff is worth a life but stealing shouldn’t be worth it either.

Posted by: wsquared | July 1, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

YES

Posted by: PJ | July 2, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Police do it every single day. They don’t shoot in the leg to stop a homeless person with a stick, they shoot to kill. Why not us? I don’t think I could kill anyone but if their is a law out there to protect me and Joe Horn knew of it, then he had everyright to apply the law in that state, surprisingly the Federal Government isn’t over ruling these laws in some states like they always do we vote they say NO and they win we loose. So be it.

Posted by: PJ | July 2, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

Here’s an idea, why don’t all you people that think Mr. Horn was wrong, publish your addresses. This way the criminals will know where the easy targets will actually be and their line of work will be a safer one. You don’t seem to care what could have happened to Joe had he not protected himself, so why not let it be you. It’s about time somebody takes a stand against the unevolved.

Posted by: Chris | July 2, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

What mr.Horn did was wrong, i don’t care if theres a law that says killing people over property is right, i dont care who tries to justify what he did, because quite frankly i don’t think there is a justification for taking a life, a life is a life, if they were trying to kill him then i would understand a little more but the fact that he was in no danger and the police were on there way to take care of the criminals makes mr.horn a murderer, and it sickens me that some people actually said that they would love to have mr.horns as a neighbor that they would love to live next to a murderer. i mean what has humanity come to when a piece of land is more valueble then two human lives.

Posted by: Caitlin | July 2, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

What mr.Horn did was wrong, i don’t care if theres a law that says killing people over property is right, i dont care who tries to justify what he did, because quite frankly i don’t think there is a justification for taking a life, a life is a life, if they were trying to kill him then i would understand a little more but the fact that he was in no danger and the police were on there way to take care of the criminals makes mr.horn a murderer, and it sickens me that some people actually said that they would love to have mr.horns as a neighbor that they would love to live next to a murderer. i mean what has humanity come to when a piece of land is more valueble then two human lives.

Posted by: Caitlin | July 2, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Yes. We should be able to protect our property with lethal force. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, does not just happen without a cost. If it were my family or a trespasser, I will defend my family. No questions asked.

Posted by: Mary Beth | July 3, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

If someone is IN my house I have the right to protect myself and family. Not property but life! I would not have second thoughts about shooting to protect ourselves. Only 2 years ago someone walked into my house- I came out w/ a loaded shotgun! Amazing how fast one can run when they hear the click of a shotgun shell entering a chamber of a gun! Any questions?
Didn’t think so! WE have the Right to Own and Use Guns!
YOU do NOT have the right to protect the neighbors property, you have the right to call 911.
But you come into MY house when I’m in it… you have your choice “over or under”!

Posted by: farmers wife | July 3, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

More States should adopt the same laws as Texas. People like this in Texas are my Hero’s, and with all the spinless Liberals out there there is a lack of Heros these days.

Posted by: Geek | July 3, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

I’m sorry but that broad singing the wrong lyrics to The Star Spangled Banner that I just saw on Nightline rubbed me the wrong way. She should sing only the correct lyrics or not at all!

Posted by: Chuck Holmes | July 3, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

ABSOLUTELY. Finally the Supreme Court (Heller Decision) determined what many of us have known ever since the constitution was written; we as American citizens have the right to keep and bare arms. We have the right to protect ourselves why not our property. If I’m ready to die for my property why not be legally able to use leathal force to protect my property? Texas has the right attitude! Go Texas!

Posted by: Greg White | July 3, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

Mr. Horn, I suspect isnt the first person whose shot someone over his/her property. I dont think those robbers had to die because they tried to rob him.
If we were all lawfully owning guns, I’d be more scared.

Posted by: Beth | July 3, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

This guy is nothing less than a murdering dog. This brave man shot two unarmed men in the back while they were running away from him. He left the safety of his home to confront them. He had called the police which is all his neighbors would have expected of him and then he went outside and gunned these two men down like rapid dogs. By the way, Sheriff Joe would have arrested this man and Maricopa County Attorneys Office would have prosecuted him and Arizona has a similar law as the new Castle law. I also believe in the right to bare arms and the right to use deadly force in the protection of property and family but this is so far out there I don’t see the relevance. This guy wanted to kill some one. I hope the Feds step and prosecute.

Posted by: Davy | July 3, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

Lets apply Mr. Horns actions to identy theft also.

Posted by: Bob | July 3, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

I believe what he did shows a lack of mental capacity. Unless his neighbors were in mortal danger, it made no sense for him to go outside and put himself in possible danger, and unless they were running backward to attack him, he shot without cause.

Posted by: John Uhas | July 5, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROTECT OUR PROPERTY WITH LETHAL FORCE IF WE’RE BEING ATTACKED.

Posted by: ANYBODY-BUT-OBAMA | July 18, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.