By Meagan Bond

Jun 4, 2008 10:41pm

Closing Arguments: How Do You Think Hillary is Handling Her Exit?

We’ve learned tonight that this Saturday Hillary Clinton will suspend her campaign and endorse Barack Obama for president.

Last night Clinton stopped short of conceding to Obama – even though he had won enough delegates to clinch the nomination.

What do you think about how Senator Clinton is handling her exit from the race?

If you want to take a look back at all the twists and turns from the Clinton campaign, check out our timeline.

User Comments

Poorly

Posted by: Thinking | June 4, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

tsk tsk tsk… Once again the media is trying to cause drama… She’s handling it WELL! There was no need for your question… Lay off the woman, for Pete’s sake!

Posted by: Dan Hussein Obama | June 4, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Oh Jeez.. The idiot Thinking is back..

Posted by: Dan Hussein Obama | June 4, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Hillary Clinton is handling her exit with class. She let her campaign staff know they would be paid until June 15th. She took time to evaluate her final decision before making it, she chose not to be badgered into making the wrong decision. She sought input. She is publicly endorsing the competitor so he can fend for himself.
========================================
Obama/Farrakhan 2008
Obama and BitterGate, we shall not forget!
Clinton/Webb 2012
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | June 4, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

She’s handling it extremely well, smart and with dignity. Good Gracious, the lady has campaigned for 17 months straight, fought hard and came within a few hundred votes (either way, no matter how you count them) of winning. Let her rest so she can determine the best way to handle letting 18 million supporters down.

Posted by: Oldgaman | June 4, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

I’m leaving the black party for good.
I’m voting for McCain in G.E.

Posted by: Nicholas | June 4, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

She’s a great lady. Thank you Senator Clinton for fighting for us Americans.
We love you and support you.

Posted by: Keith Olberman | June 4, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

i think it could have been done better.. but im sure its not easy for her to give this up its everything to her..she is human and stumbles sometimes what she does next and how well she handles it from here is going to be much more important.
obama 08′

Posted by: melissa | June 4, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

A shameful performance..her entire speech was ME ME ME..Look at me! I had a lot of people vote for me..yes, me, me, me!!!!

Posted by: kp | June 4, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Yup, this is party unity for you. This is fairness and understanding. The woman has just been through a grueling personal and political ordeal that has lasted over a year. During which she has faced (and conquered really) vitriol and scrutiny even this blog admits no other candidate ever has had to endure.
But because she doesn’t make a decision in two minutes flat, she’s evil. God forbid she take a couple of days to tie up loose ends. Since when does a candidate have to cede on the very day he loses? Did Kennedy in 1980? Did Reagan in 1976? Heck, did John Edwards concede on the night of South Carolina? Did Richardson drop out on the night of Iowa? Has Ron Paul dropped out at all?
Even I’m beginning to see why her supporters are angry. I’m sure I’ll never fully understand this grotesque double-standard, but I wouldn’t blame Hillary Clinton one bit if she took a four year European vacation and let this ridiculous country hang itself. Get a grip people!

Posted by: DJK | June 4, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Very poorly – even now, she is conceding because her own best advisers on weds. kept telling her it is over. Now she wants to have a rally Sat. (more photo ops) while holding on to her delegates. Very poor loser. In a race, one wins, second place does not or as they say no cigar. She would be a terrible choice for VP. Hillary would take every opportunity to undermine the President’s efforts. She would consider it a co-presidency.

Posted by: livyann | June 4, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

She’s acting like a spoiled brat. I hope he doesn’t choose her as VP. I see her as being overly stubborn in such a way that the people she’d end up working with will get sick of her and nothing will get done. We need someone like Obama who has fresh ideas. He hasn’t been brainwashed by Washington. I believe he will give it all he has to make “change we can believe in.” That’s what we as Americans need, the color of his skin has nothing to do with it. Other countries don’t look at us as black or white, but Americans. And they have very little sympathy for Americans.

Posted by: Nita | June 4, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

kp,
Keep practicing that me word, buddy, because the “me” generation of Beavis and Butthead now has their candidate in play. By the way, she’s hanging on to her delegates. After all, there are over two months to the convention and Obama still has yet to be fully vetted. His buddy Rezko may try to make a deal and come clean. Rezko gets time and Obama gets the white house — I don’t think so. Not the way it works in Chicago. Those guys turn and they turn quick.
=======================================
Obama and BitterGate, we shall not forget.
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | June 4, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

It took an intervention of 8 senators and 23 congressmen (All her supporters, by the way)to get her to finally get out.
She’s so out of touch, it’s ridiculous.

Posted by: Texas Voter | June 4, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

I think she is handling it with dignity and care. I wish she would register amd run as a independent. After all, the Democratic Party left her for a socialist/marxist/communist/racist. I will never vote for Obama. NEVER. He will lose in November.

Posted by: Mary | June 4, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I think she is handling it better than WCM.

Posted by: MIguy | June 4, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

MIguy – Congrats on your Wings.

Posted by: Texas Voter | June 4, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Apparently better than Mary too. “socialist/marxist/communist/racist”? nice one – but they share the same policies (actually her mandate on health care is more “socialist” than anything obama proposes).

Posted by: MIguy | June 4, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Senator Obama does not deserve the respect of the American poeple. After all, he is the one responsible for the break-up of the Democratic Party. Millions will vote for a true American, Senator McCain in November.
AMERICA IS GOING TO LLLLLLL WITH OBAMA’S POLICIES.

Posted by: Maggie | June 4, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

MIguy – The Hillary WAH-mbulance has been making many rounds today. You should see some of the posts!

Posted by: Texas Voter | June 4, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

She came out prepared to say what she said. She was not going to concede or give Obama the credit he deserve for running a good campign. She and Bill were outsmarted. They are suppose to be the pros. She still thinks there is a chance. She probable wants to be VP…..hoping AS She said in a round about way(a repeat of (rfk) that will let her slide in like LBJ.

Posted by: rennie sands | June 4, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Thanks Texas Voter! Great hockey between two great teams. The game the other night was unbelievable. Congrats to all the Pen’s fans and organization for being a class act. Many stayed around even after the game was over and were gracious in defeat.

Posted by: MIguy | June 4, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Agreed. Great hockey.

Posted by: Texas Voter | June 4, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

THE SPEECH MADE CRYSTAL CLEAR WHAT MANY HAVE KNOWN FROM THE BEGINNING…..IT WAS NEVER ABOUT AMERICA OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…..IT WAS ONLY ABOUT HILLARY.

Posted by: JC | June 4, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I can appreciate that this must be really tough as a human being and that she wants to be able to thank her campaign staff and all the voters. Still, this doesn’t excuse her extremely disappointing speech thursday evening. That she didn’t have the grandeur to even acknowledge Obama’s historic victory, instead repeating her dubious popular vote claim and ignoring Montana because they didn’t vote for her, was not worthy of a presidential candidate. I have defended her when she was unfairly treated in the past, but this time, I’ve had it with her. Losing the Democratic nomination is no shame, especially when the contest is this close, but being a sore loser is.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | June 4, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Mary, you wrote you will NEVER vote for Obama. Never say never. McCain will send all of us into the pits of hell. McCain is such a phoney. You ever watch him when he speaks. He is forever blinking his eyes — he can’t even complete a full sentence without blinking his eyes about 10 times, that’s a clear sign of a liar. He doesn’t even believe half the stuff he says, so why should we believe him.

Posted by: Claudia | June 4, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

@Texas Voter – it looks like it. Criticizing the opponent rather then celebrating their candidate. She ran a hard campaign and came up just short.

Posted by: MIguy | June 4, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

@Claudia: I think that’s the difference between McCain and Bush. McCain knows he’s spewing BS while Bush actually believes it.

Posted by: MIguy | June 4, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

She is handling leaving just like she handled the rest of her campaign very, very, very poorly. What a delusional, irrational, sore loser!

Posted by: Jenny | June 4, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

She should stay in the race. Never never Hussein Obama!!! McCain is the real choise.

Posted by: kerry | June 4, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Hussein is a real Muslim wear the sheep cloth, American please open your eye.

Posted by: kerry | June 4, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

@kerry: nice try to stir up things. i like the poor grammar too, that was a good touch.

Posted by: MIguy | June 4, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

She is a poor loser. Her supporters had to conference and call her to make sure she understands that she has lost the race and needs to get out.

Posted by: Pat | June 4, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Unbelievably dense these Clinton supporters – much like their candidate – they don’t get it. It’s over for her.

Posted by: Pat | June 4, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

About time she got out!

Posted by: Trixie | June 4, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

What doesn’t she understand about “You’ve lost!”

Posted by: Trixie | June 4, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

She is handling it bitterly.

Posted by: Sue Ann | June 5, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Why invite and invoke these racist clowns to take a free shot at Obama…
I’m so sick of HRC and her supporters…
Enough already ABC–get another story line–nobody cares what HRC is doing anymore—it’s over!

Posted by: ken | June 5, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

She’s handling it like the spoiled brat that she is.

Posted by: sms | June 5, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Poorly
I think that she has a real opportunity to help the party, and instead, she is trying to press her way into the V.P. spot as an ultimatum to promoting Obama. I do not think that he should select her, he needs to start fresh. She is not fresh, but stale and mean!

Posted by: Jay | June 5, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

really messed it up, she totally missed the boat on her speech and is strong arming to take over obama’s win any way she can.
There is no way I will ever vote for a clinton again including (no reporters)chelsea

Posted by: oz | June 5, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

It’s over give it up, and move on to whatever. It is not class, it hanging on by the fingernails. Cannot accept defeat.

Posted by: guelda | June 5, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Hilary is not handling it very weel she acts like she should have won it.

Posted by: ken | June 5, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

And just think she was not even ready on “Day 1″ to run a campaign. She was so naive to think voters were going to hand it to her and that only “big states” counted. So much for entitlements and being short-sighted!!

Posted by: Karen | June 5, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Not well.
Worse than 1962′s, “You’re not gonna have Nixon to kick around anymore.”
Everyone – even Nixon – calls his/her opponent(s) to congratulate him/her/them on a race well-run.
Why didn’t she do this?
Why didn’t she apologize – as John Edwards did – for her wrong vote on Iraq?
Why has she no manners and grace like other savvy politicos?
These Clintons need to spend a summer with Leticia Baldridge.

Posted by: JB | June 5, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Before this primary season started, I had tremendous respect for both of the Clintons but now I feel as though Hillary felt like she was “entitled” to the nomination. Just face the fact that a strong, organized campaign with plenty of youthful energy BEAT her fair and square. Right now, it’s not about Hillary anymore. Our nominee is Barack Obama…..let’s just MOVE ON!
OBAMA’08

Posted by: json56 | June 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Hillary, well, she had a chance, until Obama’s campaign gathered steam. I am a middle of the road Conservative. One thing I actually may vote for is an Obama/Edwards ticket. Right now I am leaning toward McCain. Clinton’s exit strategy? Well, she should fish, or cut bait. She’ll never be able to run again at this rate…

Posted by: Al | June 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Obama’s win was not a surprise. It makes you wonder how she would be as president. The inability to recognize circumstances and realize a correct course of action makes me wonder about being president. The inability for elementary arithmetic…

Posted by: Fred | June 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

I think she is handling this exit poorly! The minute she began talking about Michigan and Florida, I realized that she was nothing but a poor sport. Washington does need a change and she and Bill are NOT it!!!!!

Posted by: Jennifer | June 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

i think that she has handled it with grace and aplomb.
the race has been close since the beginning and those urging her to get out have only their own interests at stake…and besides that, most of them are sheep and only waiting to see were the rest of the herd will go.
i think both of the candidates have evolved through the process and we are better for it. the race will be fine. more than once she has said she will support him. what more do people want. in a very sexist climate (barack being a player in it) she has held herself high. i felt her speech the othen night was concessionary yet graceful. i hope she does not consider being his running mate as he is a mysoginsit…her true power will be her proven ability to bring opposing sides together, and that lies in the sentate.

Posted by: rebecca | June 5, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

She is doing as well as can be expected for someone who wanted something so badly that they would stoop to the levels that she did. Shame! Shame! Shame on you!–whatever!
I just thank God that she did not win. Then we would have been really screwed.
Yes, I said screwed.
As for this being the ‘Black Party’, yeah right, what you mean is “the Former We Do Not Care What Bill or Hillary say or do Party.”

Posted by: Vet | June 5, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

She has handled it without grace or dignity. She was not prepared for losing even after it became more and more obvious she could and would lose to Obama. For a newcomer, Obama has shown more class than Hillary. The voters and the media need to move on to bigger and better things and let Hillary go back to NY and move out of the spotlight. This is Obama’s time to shine.

Posted by: Emily | June 5, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

The tone of her speech last night made her seem like the winner; the way she congratulated Obama made him seem like the loser. There was no acknowledgment of Obama being the nominee, which took something away from a historical moment, which is the epitome of selfishness.

Posted by: Joe | June 5, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I think she should have conceded either last night(Tues) or at least today (Wed). By waiting until Saturday, it changes nothing in the delegate count and only makes her look like a sore loser. If she truly wants to do what is best for the Democratic party and unite it, then she should concede sooner rather than later. What good does it do to wait? What is she planning that has to wait until Saturday?

Posted by: Jennifer Miller | June 5, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Hillary’s action and delay are understandable. Her campaign and its actions were meant to destroy anyone who opposes her. Throughout the campaign she was never gracious or respectful when discussing any of her opponents. She acted as if she was the designer of all that was right, and in her fake crying and the code words she used proved that she had no respect for the party or others if they did not fall in line with her.

Posted by: ltb | June 5, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

She isn’t going to bow out gracefully. She’s going to contradict herself again by conceding and saying she’s going to back Obama, then suspend her campaign so that her delegates won’t be able to back Obama. Talk about “Smiling Faces”!

Posted by: Phineus J. | June 5, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Get off her back and start reporting real news.

Posted by: Madeline | June 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

She handled herself as I would have handled myself — in a deliberative, honest, thoughtful manner. Anyone who has come this close to the Presidency should be able to have the luxury of pulling out of the race slowly. It not only benefits her but also encourages her supporters to vote for the presumptive nominee.
I took up her offer to send a comment. I suggested that she stay in the Senate to help the new President (or hinder in the case of McCain). Her talents will be used best if she remains in her current position as a Senator from New York.

Posted by: MVSmith | June 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

She has handeled it very poorly. She had an opportunity Tuesday to show her party loyalty and selfless public service and dropped the ball. I was a staunch Clinton supporter and have lost almost all respect for Bill and Hillary. Tough times show what people are made of. And I’m afraid the Clintons have lost most of their gloss.

Posted by: Andrew | June 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

and besides; barack will prove he doesn not have what it takes.
i hope she says no to VP.
he is a charismatic leader in a time of crisis….consumer BEWARE!!

Posted by: rebecca | June 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Poorly and ungraciously. She should be embarrassed by her behaviour. It is obvious that she cares more about herself than her party and her fellow Americans. This is a classic example of how she would lead if she were elected Commander in Chief. Not impressive at all. Even President Bush and Secretary of State Rice acknowleged and congratulated Senator Obama before Hillary. What a shame!!

Posted by: Bailey | June 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Hillary is not gone till she is gone. Soon is not quick enough.
Hoiw could anyone trust Hillary, who agreed to not campaign in Michigan but left her name on the ballot (while O’Bambi removed his), then wants to get all the delegates for “they voted for me.”
Good riddance!

Posted by: Mr. Tee | June 5, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I think she is maneurvering for a 2012 run. She is so smart/devious.
She has a dilemma now. If she is not offered the vp position, and Obama wins… She would effectively eliminate her chances at being the number 1 or number 2 at the white house. She might run again to challenge obama in 4 years but that’s an up hill battle. Incumbent rules.
Obama, unless he does someting stupid in office, will probably win a second term and hilary will be too old at 68 to run for the democratic nominee again.
well, you still tot the daughter… chelsea…

Posted by: brian | June 5, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Contrast her speech last night where she was full of self-serving praise with that of Obama’s and you have my response. Obama was forward thinking and did not talk about himself, but about America and our future. Hillary could have and should have been less indignant and more conciliatory. She pissed off alot of people. Her defeat was because she had the wrong message for this year, and tactically and strategically, was out-maneuvered almost every step of the way. I had been a Clinton supporter prior the January 08 but I saw the difference between politics of the past and how we need to get past the 16 years of Bush>Clinton>Bush. The only thing Hillary should be bitter about is how her campaign was organized, executed and how her errors cost her the nomination. I hope she truly will work to unite the party and work her **s off for Barack Obama against GWB term 3.

Posted by: Steve | June 5, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Kerry Nicholas…
always the republicans trying to bring divisive lies and fear into the fold in hopes to upset the base of democrats, for that you are applauded
ill say this to those that are saying she should take all the time she wants, and she didnt have to concede to him at that moment
no.. you are right,
but I and most others feel that she made a bad decision that night. She should have congratulated obama on his historic accomplishment. To have terry mcauliff introduce her as the next president they also should have not done that.
She didnt have to concede she could have continued with the speech and said i am making no decisions tonight, but she should have said, something… anything to obamas amazing accomplishment.
its sad when mccain, bush, and condelezza beat you to congratulating your fellow democrat on the historic accomplishment
with that said, she should take these few days nothing wrong with that, she ran a hard race, and her race as well was historic.
She fought like a clinton always will to the very end.
and unlike some obama folks i heard one of hte pundits say and i agree “he won the first quarter, but she had the second”
and its true, in the end he won, but she really caught her stride in the second half of hte campaign when she wasnt running as the likely democratic nominee
for that she deserves our respect, as others should respect obama.
i congratulate her!
and i hope the true democrats come together

Posted by: bhrandon | June 5, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Hillary is an angry, bitter, entitled woman. She thought she was the natural heir to the throne and a brilliant politician fairly won the nomination. Her speech was selfish and narcissistic. She did not demonstrate any dignity last night. She once again proved herself to be divisive. I am very disppointed in this woman I have wholeheartedly for many years.

Posted by: A.F. | June 5, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

One (1) word, abysmal, and for Senator Obama, three (3) words, Just Say NO! Focusing on her un-concession speech, she exemplified a no-class mindset that is abhorrent to the senses of the Democratic Party and the Senator Obama. Senator Clinton had one LAST opportunity to show grace and instead she sullied her reputation in disgrace.

Posted by: BLAINE A WHITE, ESQ. | June 5, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Hillary has not dealt with her defeat with any semblance of dignity. She has plenty of time to prepare for this day. Hillary has proven herself to be a selfish egomaniac. I once rooted and voted for her, (she’s still my senator) but last night she proved that she cares more about herself than the Democratic party or the causes she believes in.
I applaud her historic run and her fighting spirit, but she didn’t do her supporters any favors last night. Being divisive only helps McCain, a pro-life, pro-war, anti-universal health care candidate. If Hillary’s supporters really believed in the causes she has fought for, they would never consider voting for McCain. I hope Hillary’s supporters put their irrational emotions aside and remember what is really at stake (and Hillary’s vanity is not on the table).

Posted by: Juliette | June 5, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Hillary handled her exit very poorly on June 3. She did not even acknowledge that Obama had won the nomination: no no concession. The worst part is that she tried to force her supporters to pressure Sen. Obama to add her to the ticket as VP. Very tasteless. She seemed in denial that it’s over. Sen. Obama should realize that she and Bill have for too much baggage – much of which the GOP would use in Fall campaign videos. Her 17 million voters indeed deserve to be respected – starting with a more gracious departure on her part.

Posted by: David F. McBride | June 5, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I think under the circumstances she is handling it well enough. Although I do think she has a point about winning most of the popular vote and losing to the delagate count. Reminds me how Al Gore lost the electoral college tally

Posted by: David Noel | June 5, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

REALITY CHECK
=============
MILLIONS LIKE ME HILLARY’S SUPPORTERS
WILL VOTE FOR McCAIN IN NOVEMBER.
I WATCHED “NIGHTLINE” AND REALLY I
GOT SICK HOW THE HUSSEIN’S CAMPAIGN
MANIPULATED THE SYSTEM TO GAIN
DELEGATES.
IN NOVEMBER HUSSEIN WILL BE TOAST.

Posted by: Nicholas | June 5, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

As for Nicholas above who says he is leaving the black party, I don’t know what black party you are talking about, but it’s clear that you are extremely ignorant and uneducated!! I’m white and I am supporting Senator Obama all the way. He is exactly what our country needs. Go ahead and vote for McCain if you wish – I’m too old to be drafted so I’m not worried.

Posted by: John | June 5, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Last time we had someone rush to concede, we ended up not counting votes correctly and getting Bush. Perhaps we should simply let the party make whatever announcements they will, when they are going to make them. It was Sen Clinton’s job to run a race to the end, yet people have been trying to force her to quit for months. When you run a marathon, you don’t just stop running just because someone passes you by. Since the media has declared him the nominee, but the party has not yet, what’s the big rush for her to make a big grand announcement. Maybe people are nervous and want her to concede before Rezko implements Obama?

Posted by: Kyle | June 5, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I think she’s was a great candidate, but handled exiting poorly. I started off not knowing which of the two I would support before choosing Obama. I was very upset w/ her speech; even if she didnt’ concede, she did not have to focus on her and what she’s done, after HE just clinched the nomination. That did not convey party unity. To those of her supporter who said they would vote for McCain shows their support was based on a personality. Both of them had essentially the same policy ideas, and he’s shown her nothing but respect. Unfortunately, she did not return the favor because she put herself and the Clinton legacy in the way of the Democratic Party.When senior party leaders like Sen. Kennedy, Sen. Edwards, Sen. Kerry, Gov. Richardson, etc came out and endorsed him, Democrats should recognize he’s good for the Democratic Party, the US, and the world. To vote for McCain is not the answer, and just proves how divisive HILLARY has made the party.

Posted by: Adrian Cornelius | June 5, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Let’s face it, the Clintons have shown just how classless they have always been. We escaped a real nightmare and are blessed with Obama.

Posted by: tututango | June 5, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

I beieve Clinton is handling her loss like a spoiled child who refuses to take no for an answer. Asking her supporters to go to her website was just her way of trying to continue her campaign for either the presidency or vice-presidency and at the same time pretend she is just caring about the wishes of others. How dumb does she think we older white women are?

Posted by: Mary S. | June 5, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Hillary cares about…..Hillary.

Posted by: PsychoSwami | June 5, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

She was cashing in her 18 million votes and forcing Obama’s hand for the VP spot. Not cool. She wants respect but does not give it. Plus, Is she going to stand in his shadow in the White House after all of that? Sounds like another bad realty TV show in the making of that ticket. Lots of votes are nice but the true “dream” ticket is a “team” ticket. What are our other VP options?

Posted by: max | June 5, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

What is the big rush? Hillary Clinton is taking a few days, not a few weeks, to wrap up her campaign, shift gears, reflect and move forward. Her campaign staff deserves some respect and recognition after 16 months of hard work. It’s not like Obama has offered her the VP slot and awaits her decision (quite the contrary!). I believe the woman deserves more respect then she’s getting from many party members, and as always, the press.

Posted by: Vee | June 5, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Mrs. Clinton like so many other women and girls in this country participate very little in team sports. It is in this context that boys and men learn sportsmanship, fair play and honorable concession. As she said in NH, this campaign is personal to her. It’s how we as women see many things and find it hard to let go. Mostly we do it badly.

Posted by: Deahdra Butler-Henderson | June 5, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

and obama does not care about obama?
wake up!
hillary has been gracious, you’d have to be very dense to not see that.

Posted by: rebecca | June 5, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I think Hilllary is handling the end of the campaign with grace and dignity.
I’d love to see her as vice president. Obama embodies change from a white man to a non white man, but still a man . Hillary further’s the message of change away from the man part of the equation. We need a non white man to be president and we need a woman as veep. Now that is change I can really work for.

Posted by: bhl | June 5, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Hilary is probably doing fine. You TV people just do not get it. You have conducted the most disgusting analysis of this pre-election and you do not understand that. Thus, all of these blogs to find out what people are thinking. Well what we are thinking is why none of you TV people still have a job after the most incredible display of the worst journalism in the history of TV. I guess the people who hired you are just as bad.

Posted by: Paul Rogers | June 5, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I’m pleased for this to be over. Now Mr. Obama,aka the 2nd JFK, can consult with Ms. Miracle Worker, Ms. Oprah Winfrey, and decide what to do next. No I am not an Obama supporter. He speaks well and has definitely sent a strong, positive message to young blacks. What is his message for this country?
Hillary is a strong,tenacious woman. For all the MEN who had such a Laugh bout her, she will most likely have the last Laugh.
She bowed out when she was ready:) You go Lady!

Posted by: verne | June 5, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

So far, she has handled it in a way that is not very helpful to the nominee, Barack Obama, nor to her stated party, the Democratic Party.
As a Clinton, frankly, I didn’t expect much better. But, I am nevertheless disappointed.
If nothing else, her handling of her defeat should be another red flag for Obama not to get sucked into the so-called “Dream Ticket” that the media and some of the more obnoxious Clinton supporters keep pushing.
There is nothing false about hope.

Posted by: w_roos | June 5, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Hilliary is about her supporters and her supporters are about letting her do everything her way. Why should she have conceded to Obama as soon as he had the delegates needed? The DNC stole delegates from her last weekend. She should take even more time. There is no one better qualified to be president right now.

Posted by: Elodia Resendez | June 5, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

I am one of the 18 million whom Hillary asked for feedback , and here is mine: “FORGETABOUTIT.”
As for Hillary’s selection as VP on the democratic ticket, here is my feedback, “THE HORROR, THE HORROR.”

Posted by: Miranda | June 5, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

YEH!!! THE BLACK PARTY.
BLACKS AND LEFT WING RADICALS CONTROL
THE PARTY.
THERE’S NO ROOM FOR THE REST OF US.
HUSSEIN STOLE THE NOMINATION BY STEALING
DELEGATES.HE RUN DIRTY CAMPAIGN.
DEMOCRATS WILL PAY THE PRICE IN G.E.

Posted by: Nicholas | June 5, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I think she handled her defeat as we should have expected: 1) those of us who can hear and see have known since early in Bill’s administration that she has no class; 2) she’s a democrat, and for as long as I can remember, it has been the demonsted, unwavering, mission of the democrat politicians to shoot their party in the foot (or other low places) as often as posible.
As a lifelong Conservative, I appreciate and applaud her actions!

Posted by: Mike Dearing | June 5, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

It is a shame there is so much hatred towards Clinton. I think it speaks to a much larger issue in our society. My daughter did not understand what the big deal is about an African American candidate. She is correct, we have had them before and thankfully, just as Obamas’ daughters, she has not suffered racism because this is a different society. However, never before have we had a woman run for president. People always say how they are not racist, and would feel horrible if others thought they were. But women hear daily “run like a girl”, “cry like a girl”, woman driver”, and every other derogatory sexist remark and they are all socially acceptable in this society. If you like Obama, great vote for him, but how about leave all the hatred remarks out of it. If you can’t seem to control your hatred, I hear Obama knows of a church that would be perfect for you.

Posted by: Kyle | June 5, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

The true content of one’s character is shown by how gracious you handle defeat.

Posted by: Arturo Zamudio | June 5, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

The whole conflict could so easily be resolved if Hillary were to become ATTORNEY-GENERAL! She’s a lawyer, after all, and could restore this position to its former honorable and respectable status. What a wonderful way to soothe hurt feelings, and end up with both leaders working independently for the welfare of our country! What a happy compromise this would be! Why AREN’T people proposing that Hillary Clinton have the major and dignified role of ATTORNEY-GENERAL? Is ANYONE out there listening?

Posted by: Carol Lems-Dworkin | June 5, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

What a disgrace this woman is–to all of us other women and to the
Democratic Party. I’d heard stories about her, and I now believe they
are all true. Sad thing is–I don’t think we’ve seen the worse.
Doesn’t take much to understand why Bill sleeps around or to
understand why she wears pantsuits.
Thank you to those in the Democratic Party who are helping her to face
reality, even if it is thru perceived denial of support if she doesn’t
come around. I have thought for some time that the woman has a mental
problem and is delusional. It is really becoming obvious now.
She lost. Obama won–without her help. He owes her absolutely
NOTHING. She doesn’t get to call the shots. It’s HIS candidacy and
HIS presidency, not hers. She’s demonstrating that she’s not a team
player, so why would anyone want her on their team? If her ideas and
her plans and her personality and her leadership were THAT great,
she’d be the winner, not him.
First, she was going to concede Tues. nite. Then she wasn’t going to
concede until Obama had the correct number of delegates. Well, that
WAS Tues. nite and she missed her chance. As with her past pattern of
being a sore loser and not congratulating Obama on his wins, she
couldn’t even admit that he’d won. Now she’s not going to
concede–she’s going to “suspend” her candidacy. Wow, what a way to
NOT build trust. Why would anyone want her around when she cannot
commit fully? She still believes a skeleton will emerge from Obama’s
closet or that superdelegates will become convinced to switch sides?
She might as well launch her candidacy as an Independent
candidate–she’s doing that much damage. All the while she’s verbally
supposedly supporting Obama, she’ll be working behind the scenes to
convert superdelegates to her side. This woman canNOT be trusted.
Democratic Party leaders, you have more work to do. Her behavior is
simply NOT tolerable. I don’t care who she is. She is NOT God.
She’s a candidate and she lost. Your non-action will support what she
doing presently, so you need to take firm action to turn her OFF.
This woman is not mentally healthy. It’s still a me-me-me game with
her and has never been about the Party or our country. She has
strongly shown now that if she doesn’t get what she wants, then no one
will. Acting more like a spoiled brat, wouldn’t you say?
Obama needs to be able to focus on McCain and the campaign, and about
leading our country, not worrying about what SHE is up to. I’ve now
grown even more concerned for Obama’s life–she is up to something.
Please…someone….do something! She, personally is responsible for the disunity in our party and in our country!

Posted by: Jeanne Beans | June 5, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

I have never in my whole life seen such an ungracious loser, save when I was a child.

Posted by: Joe | June 5, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

With vanity, self-obsession and gracelessness.

Posted by: Carl | June 5, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I’m a Hillary Clinton supporter, but I will support Senator Obama now. However, I’m sick and tired of women taking a back seat to men and to minorities. Women have been waiting a long time to have a woman president, and Hillary waited her turn. She earned every one of the votes that she recieved. Give her some respect folks. If you think that you are helping Obama by trashing Hillary, you are so very very wrong. There’s something about being a gracious winner that seems to be losted on many Obama supporters. The media elected Obama, plain and simple, but I’ll accept a flawed campaign season and support Obama because McCain would be a disaster!!!

Posted by: Lorraine333 | June 5, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

She is a sore loser. How arrogant and self-serving to now suggest she is willing to be VP. She has lost the opportunity to concede graciously.

Posted by: Julie | June 5, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

I’ve always admired Senator Clinton,and considered her a great leader, but must confess that I was dissappointed with her inability to concede. It eluded to “arrogance”, and revealed a weakness in her Leadership abilities, which should be marked by being “other” oriented. It also demonstrated that she lacks the wisdom and ability to know when to let go! Timing is everything……….

Posted by: Vary | June 5, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Carol, The Attorney General must be an honest trustworthy person. Someone who “misremembers” about being under sniper fire could hardly qualify.

Posted by: Carl | June 5, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Obama and his team knows that they won because of caucus states and black vote and enough left wing nuts and naive young people.
Look how Obama’s Iran posture is evolving.
You know what, I would have had trouble voting for Huckabee. But, without a Clinton, my vote is for McCain. This, from a person who lost his senses when the TV started flashing “Bush Wins Presidency” in 2000. Who couldn’t believe Kerry lost Florida and Ohio and thought Kerry should ask for a revote in Ohio.
But, I will never vote for an anti-american lunatic left wing candidate.
My vote is for McCain. I urge every Hillary supporter to show and show up for McCain in November.

Posted by: Roger Miller | June 5, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

And a PS. Obama has enough delegates at the moment, but super delegates can change their mind at the convention. clearly TV people are too stupid to understand this. Just another indication of the disgusting TV analysis. Obama is not the official candidate until the convention and same for the republicans. Wake UP!!!!!!

Posted by: PAUL | June 5, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Senator Clinton has worked tirelessly for Americans for sixteen years. Her success in this nation’s longest primary season ever, is nothing short of historic. How could ANY person be expected to provide an explanation for the next step in one’s future path (and our country’s) within the first 16 hours of that journey. Come on now….Let’s all just take a deep breath and be sensible. Senator Clinton, Senator Obama and OUR country deserve that!

Posted by: Perry | June 5, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Jean & Joe you’re made for each other. Why don’t you two let the DNC make their announcement. Are there not superdelegates uncommitted still? All those people aren’t hurrying so why jump all over her. It is great he made the number, but she was giving a speach to her supporters. She was not holding an Obama rally. Go use your energy for good instead of evil won’t you-

Posted by: Kyle | June 5, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Absolutely, Disgraceful!
Hillary is selfish and a power monger!!
My family prays that Senator Obama does
not consider her for any role in his ad-
ministration. I met her in person & she
has ice in her veins & would be poison
as V.P…

Posted by: Paul Thorne | June 5, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

abc is censoring me!!

Posted by: rebecca | June 5, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Believe it or not…she was addressing the 15 million…15 million people who woted for her. Not the political hacks, pundits and Obama supporters who are greedy to “win” at a huge cost to those 15 million. By the way Terry, if your emails are “not very nice,” why did you give them air time?

Posted by: Jane | June 5, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Ms. Clinton is handling her withdrawal with the dignity we’ve come to expect from her and the disappointment she surely feels. Like many of her supporters I held out hope that she would take our fight to the floor of the Convention and perhaps beyond, but that is apparently not to be. If Ms. Clinton SHOULD decide to run as an Independant or to allign herself with a third party (maybe she could resurrect Teddy Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party) I can assure you that I’d be the first to sport a “Democrat For Hillary” bumper sticker on my car. I’m a lifelong registered 54 year old male Democrat, reasonably educated and proudly liberal, who has NEVER voted for a Republican in a national election. I will not be voting for Senator Obama in this year’s general election because I’m DEEPLY offended and disappointed in the Party’s treatment of Ms. Clinton. My vote at this point would go to Mr. Nader or, if it’s needed to defeat Senator Obama, to Senator McCain…..

Posted by: RickfromAmerica | June 5, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

She has been portrayed as bitchy and pushy. If she were a man, it would be considered strategic to work endlessly through the final states to show that 18 million voters like her. The bottom line, Obama isn’t a pushover and he is intelligent, give him some credit, if he understands and believes that Hillary is the best VP candidate, he will do what he needs to do. I have faith that Obama will think of the dire situation we are in when choosing his running mate (I like Obama). Also, I have respect for Clinton to defy the media and odds and talk to her contributors and supporters prior to a press release that changes her entire thought process of her future and ours. You all know she will do the right thing shortly, why the pressure?

Posted by: Karen Moller | June 5, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

The same way she handled her campaign…very un-presidential.

Posted by: Aries | June 5, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

I guess some Obama supporters are still worried that if Hillary did not immediately concede they could be in for some trouble. “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain”. This is a job interview, people. You would never hire the man with 4 years of experience and questionable ties, over the man who has over 20 and was a POW, war hero. Hillary should have taken a moment – there are super delegates who are uncommitted who also still can change their stance – like say if Obama is implicated by his convicted buddy, or any more things pop out of the closet.

Posted by: Kyle | June 5, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

The democrats, through Hillary, prove once again that they have an absolute genius to pull defeat from the jaws of victory!

Posted by: Psyched | June 5, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

She has handled it poorly, like a devious and sore loser in any game of skill would.
But this is not just any game. It is a game for the future of our country and its role in the world. Her inability to handle her loss decently not only damages her reputation as a respected political leader but also risks visiting on the country four more years of disastrous Republican rule.

Posted by: Bill Scanlon | June 5, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Unbelievably unstateswomanlike.

Posted by: Carl | June 5, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

As I read the Comments Demoracy sometimes becomes Demockcrazy . That’s the Beauty of it . At least America hopefully will not atand for Dictatorship.
God Bless America & She is a Great Woman .People Will Admire Her & people will Hate her ,However She is on “Gods Side” as She says during Her Campaign .

Posted by: Jack Joshua Miller | June 5, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Maybe the better question is ” How is Obama handling his victory”
I think that he showed lack of class in callg her twice imediatly after the results were in.
Is it not up to the loser to decide when to call he winner.
It is probably a technical point, but the convention is in August, and it is her right to decide when to concede.
For the apparant winner to intiate the call takes away Hillary’s chance to handle it her way. It seems to be an attempt to make her look bad or worse yet show her up.
Does not anyone else not notice this tactless move. At minimum he should have left the information about calling confidential until Hillary made her decision.
Rick

Posted by: Rick Hamilton | June 5, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Hillary is handling her exit with class and intelligence. I believe her campaign financing must stop when she withdraws from the race so it makes sense to delay withdrawal until she retires some of the outstanding debt. She took less than 24 hours from the close of the final two primaries to evaluate her circumstances and make a decision. I think anyone suggesting that is too slow is an unreasonable person.

Posted by: issy | June 5, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Bill Scanlon- If we have 4 more years of Republicans it will not be because of Clinton or any of her actions. Obama is a great speaker, but a rookie. McCain just has a better resume. Your right, it is not a game. It is a job interview. Poeple should stop the popularity contest and actually look at their resumes.

Posted by: Kyle | June 5, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

hillary is handling things just fine. there were only 2 votes separating the republicans and democrats in our county the last general election. given that this race also is a virtual tie, combined with the fact that like it or not the decision is not official until the convention…she is handling the fact that she has been badgered to get out of the race since oh, feburary, exceedingly well. personally i will be looking for some one other than barack to vote for. i have voted nader before if he is still and option i just may do that again. can’t bring myself to vote republicain but in a county where only 2 votes picked the winner…hmmm. and no i don’t think hillary should be barack’s vp. he thinks he can do it? let him do it. what states did he win? which states carry presidents?

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Unashamedly, Hilary has been nothing more than a self declared “Miss USA”; not yet ready to hand over her “stripped crown” or give up her supposed reign.

Posted by: Ms. S | June 5, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

I think Hillary is handling her exit fine.
Considering the amount of time she has spent in the last months toward her campaign, it is only fair we provide her a few days to officially concede. By Saturday I think even those who disliked how she is handling her exit will be satisfied, and the Democratic party will move forward, united.

Posted by: Mithu | June 5, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

If that was a speech to comfort her supporters, I think the speech was more of a disservice to Sen. Clinton and her female base, by invoking a stereotype of being emotional and vindictive. Sen. Clinton played the feminist card to the vary end. Sen. Clinton couldn’t make a leadership decision last night as to “which way to go from here”, showing she is not ready for day one. Sen. Clinton’s campaign ad of it’s 3:00am, failed, she couldn’t answer the call of leadership when it counted, and instead she wanted to hear from her supporters as to her next step, “by going to HillaryClinton.com”.

Posted by: Danny Couch | June 5, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

She has earned a dishonorable discharge with her unforgivable show last night.

Posted by: Sally | June 5, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

She messed up. She made her exit worse by giving that speech down below the ground. Even now, what does “suspend” mean, as opposed to “end”???

Posted by: kta | June 5, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Hillary Clinton is holding her 18 million votes for “ransom”. Barack Obama is supposed to pay the ransom in exchange for her support. We’ll soon know how much she expects to be “paid” for her 18 million votes. Hardly a graceful exit.

Posted by: DrDebRet | June 5, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

excuse me how long did it take edwards to let go of his delegates? he suspended and held on tho his delegates and failed to through his support behind barack until what was it ohio? at any rate it was far far longer than 24hours.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Well, she did not cry as of yet like she did when some one asked her who did her hair. She does hold her head up high with pride and does well. Every one should watch Jimmy Kimbal it is so funny about the whole thing.

Posted by: James Staley | June 5, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

HILLARY SHOULD CHANGE TO REPUBLICAN AND RUN WITH McCAIN.WE WOULD THEN HAVE TWO
GREAT LEADERS, TO GET THIS COUNTRY BACK WHERE IT SHOULD

Posted by: BRENDA | June 5, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Rick Hamilton
Get real! He was being courteous in my opinion not rubbing it in her face. She didn’t even have the audacity to congratulate him on being the PN, and she still hasn’t congratulated him. Why in the face of loss do you want to turn the table around and make it seem like it’s his fault she has lost. Why don’t GROW THE HELL UP AND STOP WITH ALL THIS BITCHING BECAUSE THAT’S ALL IT IS.

Posted by: PittBull61 | June 5, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Hillary Clinton is a disgrace to women. Her horribly self-absorbed speech will only serve to reinforce stereotypes about women being unable to handle the tough scenes. What she was doing in effect last night is to scream out to no one in particular: “Please, please, you gotta let me be president. I know I can do the job. Waa, waa, why won’t you let me win?… OK I won’t play with you if you don’t let me win. I’ll take my stuff and go home if you don’t…or I’ll…I’ll think of something to get back at you if you won’t let me win…Oh please, please all my friends think I’ll do great if you let me. Look lots of people think I’m nice… Please?

Posted by: Disillusioned by Hillary | June 5, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

HOW IS A MAN HALF BLACK AND HALF WHITE
AT BIRTH, BECOMES A BLACK MAN…FOR
POLITICAL PURPOSE…YOUR MOTHER MUST BE VERY PROUD

Posted by: sAM | June 5, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Hillary is is a Phenomenal woman.
She is handling it in Presidential style!

Posted by: seah | June 5, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

It’s admirable that she didn’t give in to the pressure to concede, especially from the demands yesterday and today. Instead, she relied more on her own timing and assessment.

Posted by: katrina | June 5, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

She’s handled it with more grace than most of the manipulative media coverage of her (and, might I add, with more grace than some of these postings). How is asking her supporters for their advice as to her next move “me-centric,” as some postings have claimed? As a teacher, in my profession, that kind of responsive feedback is the standard of collaborative leadership. Furthermore, as a teacher, I also teach my students to analyze media critically, and unfortunately, the biased undertones of most reports on Senator Clinton provide ample examples of fallacious, presumptive reasoning. The double standard mentioned in an above posting also notes the too-often unacknowledged gender bias. Even this quick demand for a gracious, quiet, lady-like exit reeks of gender hypocrisy, as male opponents (such as those listed in another posting) have classically been allowed to contest and battle back.
Community respect and valued voices are also encouraged in my classroom. Debate and dialogue are vital to any democracy, but the kind of superficial back-talking pervading this country right now disheartens me. If people are upset that Senator Clinton didn’t acknowledge Obama’s historic milestone, why overlook the greater history that could be made from a united Obama-Clinton ticket? If Obama wishes to create “change,” it would be an incredible change for this country to finally elect executive leadership that actually represents over half its population. If the traditionally minority voices of this country (ie: African Americans and women) would join forces, past experiences, and visions, the minorities would be the majority many of us would be proud to claim. Instead of dividing ourselves (or purposely stirring each other up until we tattle-tale one another into non-sensical arguments), let’s try coming to the table with substantive points for what this “change” should look like in our country, in terms of policies, actions, and general decency.

Posted by: j.a. | June 5, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

I think that Hillary is proving Father Pfleger’s statement “I’m Bill’s wife, I’m white, I’m entitled and then here comes Barack Obama, and she said Oh damn, where did he come from, there’s a black man steeling my shooooowwwww!” She proved that he was right! She proved she was racist and sexist in every way!
Well here’s a news flash for ya’ Hill, Da Black Man dun stol’ yo show!
As a woman she has completely embarrassed me, she has shown that she is defiant, rebellious, and emotional. She has shown that clearly she feels she was entitled and was better than taking a back seat to a black man! I’m sorry somewhere along the way she thought she could pull a Rosa Parks move but it was the wrong bus and she should’ve known when her stop came and got off the bus!
She has only shown that men are right when they always complain that women are fickle, she has allowed men of America to say, “see how women are, you can’t tell them anything”.,
She has shown future generations of young women that if you don’t get your way…pout. Well pouting didn’t work for her very well at all!
If she were truly for her Democratic party and was a true politician and strategist, she would have conceeded before the Penn state primary, gotten on board with Obama and said to him, “hey lets do this, lets create one hell of a historical dream come true.
If she were using her brain and not her heart as a women she should have rallied behind Barack for the next Eight years!! In turn he would have returned the favor for her to win the presidency and been her support and helped her clinch the NEXT EIGHT years and truly HISTORY would have been made!
Democrats could have held office for 16 years and if there are any republicans out there who are laid off that have a problem with that, just think about it for a moment… every time republicans take office the country goes to crap, jobs are lost and the economy suffers.
When Democrats are in office jobs increase, money starts circulating again and the country becomes stronger! Those republicans that are laid off are then able to find work again thanks to Democrats! The republicans get richer when Democrats are in office versus staying flat when republicans are in office.
People have spoken from all walks of life to simply say they are ready for a change and while they TRULY were NOT against having a female for the president, they were just not ready to have the Clintons back in office so soon!
I truly believe that after eight years of success with Obama EVEN republicans who are tired of being laid off, losing money on investments, losing their homes, not being able to count on our current government to help with these creditors and the list goes on would have undoubtedly welcomed another eight years of Democrats to strenghten their dollar, increase their investment opportunities and be able to afford to fill up their tank full of gas without having hunger paings.
I am sorry to say that Hillary has disgraced us as a Nation, as Democrats and as Women. Shame on you Hillary for showing that deep down inside you are a sexist, racist, spoiled brat!!!!
God bless America in every way he can, God bless Hillary Clinton and God bless Obama to do good for America starting in November 2008.

Posted by: Pier Robinson | June 5, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

I think Sen. Clinton is handling her exit with far better class than many have given her credit for.
Her exit has dimmed the light of hope that I had, because I believed that she is the better person to fight for many of us.
Many people have talked about the number of blacks that are supporting Sen. Obama, but you have not looked at the blacks such as myself who are college educated, but are supporting Sen. Clinton.
I am sad that she is bowing out on Saturday, because I believe she should not stop until Denver, but this is what she is choosing to do.
Unless she is choosen to be on Sen. Obama’s ticket, Sen. Clinton’s exit has made my decision to support the Green Party Candidate that much easier.
Linwood Christian-Petersburg, Va.

Posted by: Linwood Christian | June 5, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Last night was such a historic night for Barack Obama and our country and Hillary acted like nothing had happened and that she might still be in the running. I absolutely found her remarks to be more than ungracious. So many of her supporters have been saying she just needs some time to absorb all of this but I can’t believe she didn’t know it was over for her after the meeting on Saturday where the Florida and Michigan delegations even agreed to the results on how to count their delegates. So many times she has changed the criteria on the way she could be the nominee that it just showed you that she will say and do anything to get what she thought was owed to her. Senator Obama has gone out of his way to be gracious to her and her supporters and no one can tell me that all of her voters will fall in line with her future decisions. After her behavior any one talking about her wanting Senator Obama to help pay off her campaign debt should just remember she and her campaign got themselves in this mess and since she and Bill are worth $109 million dollars they can just pay off the debt all by themselves!!

Posted by: sandy | June 5, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

I’m just sad for her a proud woman come to this – unable to concede her loss, looking desperate, with a snese of entitlement, unable to accept reality, very unpresidential and more like the sore loser she has been accused of being many times during this race.

Posted by: Jon | June 5, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

I certainly hope all americans, especially some who posted here, have more FACTS before voting in November! Change we can believe in?! Politicians really aren’t truthful, beware of WHAT KIND of change we are in for. Yes we know alot about Hillary because she has been in politics for many years, have we forgotten how GOOD THE ECONOMY was for 8 years and HOW MANY JOBS people held for 8 years and HOW MUCH BETTER OUR SCHOOL PROGRAMS were for 8 years, just maybe she was a part of or certainly learned much. 2-3 years of experience for OBAMA in the Senate, there certainly will be CHANGE but what kind? What do we really know about OBAMA, he has had for 20 years, Mentors, and what do we really know about them,ie a Minister, a Neighbor, a Priest? Oh yes and Racist, are we really trying to STOP this or Stirring it? Comments made by The Minister, The Priest, The Wife and Supporters in Georgia: “Obama has to say what a politician has to say”, “A black man is taking over for a white woman”, “I am finally proud of America”, “I have never voted in 60 years but now we have a black man and I will vote”!? Can anyone NOT BE INFLUENCED by people they surround themselves with for 20 years and because he is pressured by he Party, he resigns from that church, do you really think he instantly forgets all those years!? Also, never wearing a flag pen or seeing him with the American Flag and after he was told by his supporters(these are his words)it would be good, so now it is always there. Is that political or honesty?! Please know it did not matter to me until he made that statement and also you should know at the beginning I was impressed with him and considered voting for him. As time passed and he stated nothing except CHANGE, he scares me! The media contantly has picked away at Hillary, don’t hear half as much about the man. Who is making this about GENDER?! Thank you Hillary for fighting for the poor and middle class, it was an uphill battle, especially with Florida for the second time, our votes were not counted but distributed as needed!!! Don’t give up, continue to fight for The United States, wherever and however you can, as we all must do before we give it away! We must all remember, the average person does not know how the political world really operates so therefore we don’t know what or when is the best time to stop, let’s try not to judge and may “GOD” Bless America by giving us the leader we need!! (for the party, if the election was today, I would vote Rep and am a Dem)

Posted by: Glo | June 5, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Hilary Clinton continues to behave badly!
She is self centered and self absorbed, like her husband.
Senator Obama has class, grace and good manners. He has shown Hilary Clinton every consideration, yet she has needlessly opened up race and class issues.
Hilary Clinton needs to make a graceful exit pronto, or be unceremoniously given the boot.
I’m a republican for Obama, but I won’t vote for him if she if his VP.

Posted by: Dr. F. Mark Carter | June 5, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

someone suggested hillary as attouney general…hadn’t thought of it. good point to ponder.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Oh yah, to the Obama supporters on this blog, if you were listening to his wonderful speech last night, you heard him spend 5 minutes praising Hillary Clinton. He praised her as a hard working Senator, as a leader who has worked hard for many of the social programs that he supports, and as a politician and candidate. Remember when he said that, how she has run her campaign, made him a better candidate. So, is he a liar or are you disagreeing with your own leader, already?? I don’t think that Obama would appreciate your disrespectful words on his behalf. As for Hillary, not to worry, she can take anything that you dish out because you don’t even know her. She’s a great lady who deserves some respect, even from angry people like you!

Posted by: Lorraine333 | June 5, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Hillary missed a great opportunity to prove that she is a true professional and has the country’s best interests at heart. Instead she handled it like a girl who got her feelings hurt. Comments like “there’s so much pressure…” certainly are not those of a professional. If she thinks this is pressure, what on earth would she do if she do if she were president and had to make decisions with world-wide ramifications?
And then she asks her supporters to email her their feelings! Good grief!
As a woman who completed a very successful career in a nearly all male environment (U.S. Army), all I can say is Hillary needs to grow up and show some dignity. It was a tough race and she lost. Congratulate your opponent and move on!

Posted by: Susan | June 5, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

again how long was it between edwards suspension and his coming out in support of barack?

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Soooo embarrassingly I have my hands over my eyes. I can’t bear to watch anymore. I was a Hillary supporter, but you have to be realistic. She has lost the race. She lost because of her badly executed nomination bid. I will now support Obama and pray that she will see the light very soon too. No more Republican years.

Posted by: Sara876 | June 5, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

I think Hillary is handling her exit like anyone who assumed the nomination was hers. And you know what they say about assuming. It makes an ass of u and me. Later Hillary…

Posted by: Dan | June 5, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

where was the edwards bashing?
i don’t get all this anger about 24 hours to listen to your supporters and decide how to handle it. have any of you actually read how passionate these supporters have been. she would have let them down if she had suspended any quicker. and realisticly had there been a blizzard in any of the caucus states this could have been a whole different story. the votes are that close.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Back off and give the woman a break. She got almost 18 million votes, she deserves enormous respect and the opportunity to bow out any way she pleases. Hopefully as she bows out the media will show her the respect befitting a person of her caliber, since they most certainly have not to this point. It’s sad for America that we lost this opportunity. To lose a Gore presidency and now a Hillary Clinton presiedency is sad for America. I believe that history will record these as unique opportunities lost.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 5, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

I think Hillary Clinton is handling her exit from the race very well! I don’t understand why anyone would criticize her manner in leaving, so harshly. I personally wouldn’t want anyone, least of all her to drop out of the race immediately after another has seemingly gained a substantial lead. She’s been a great fighter in this race and I will sincerely hate to see her leave. Come on America, give Hillary the respect you owe her, she’s earned 18 million votes! People really need to leave her alone. Politics in America are still a sham. I’m tired of people treating Obama as if he was a saint. If half the people that support Obama actually watched the debates and paid attention they’d see he has words but nothing behind them. Hillary actually responded in the debates, while Obama constantly replied with “I’d love to have a debate on this issue” and then would meander on about something else minimally related, Hello! Did no one tell him that it was a debate? All in all I’m very proud of Hillary Clinton for being the first woman to run for President of the U.S. I knew it would be very difficult to pull out an overall win because we still live in a world of racism and sexism. Perhaps after 4 years of the next schmuck to lead our country is done she’ll think about trying again. I will continue to support her either way.

Posted by: Marrisa Lewis | June 5, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

I WILL VOTE STRAIT REPUBLICAN TICKET
TO PUNISH THE BLACK PARTY AND THE PARTY
LEADERS.
McCAIN’08

Posted by: Nicholas | June 5, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Unfortunately i think she is in denial along with some of her supporters. she only claims the popular vote if you don’t count the caucuses and if you dont give Obama the uncommitted in Michigan which polls say he would actually get more votes then just the uncommitted. this is sad. she will not get the VP nod either she just ruined any remote chance of that.

Posted by: J P | June 5, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

She is a looser, Obama will not pick her as running mate. Some of you people in the public may not know that her husband, yes Bill Clinton, being the President at the time, ordered the Israeli Gov’t. to release terrorest from their prison. One of them was Mohamed Atta, anybody know what he did??? HINT, 9/11, plane, Trade ctr. And what happened to the USS Cole, has he washed his hands on that too. And for Hillary there’s Cattlegate, Whitewater, Travelgate. Now this one was something, she had the staff of the Travel Office fired so that she could have “OUR PEOPLE” in the office. Their job: to make travel arrangements for members of the White house staff. The Travel Office was a permanent position as presidents came and went. Some of these people were lifelong employees with outstanding records. But she wanted “her people”, Harry and Linda Thomason, old Arkansas friends. And there’s FILEGATE, lOOTGATE,
you media guys have’nt forgot that? Maybe you have. Then there’s the shooting insident at the airport running for her life, pleasssssse!!!. And you think that Obama should have her for V.p.?? I wash my hands on voting this time.

Posted by: Herman | June 5, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

caucuses are a ridiculus way of picking a candidate. do you realize that in most of them people only stick around to cast thier first vote then leave. then a kind of mob mentality occurs and eventually the mob wins over the others in multiple votes that are not secret. it is not like the general election where in the privacy of your own mind you can vote your concience. other people are there trying to get you to change your vote and a critical mass thing happens and very few stand for the vote that they came in with. why? what do we tell our children to stand up against peer preasure.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

The Clintons are winners who have given an enormous amount to the Democratic Party. To not honor their contribution is outrageously disrespectful. If Obama wins 2 terms and leads us through 8 years of peace and prosperity maybe he will earn a place among Democratic heroes like the Clintons.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 5, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

She was great, hard working, smart.
Thank you very much Senator Clinton.
You are the winner in our hearts.

Posted by: catleya | June 5, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Those of you who live in states with early primaries & caucuses may find it hard to wrap your brains around this BUT the citizens of Montana and So Dakota have been disenfranchised primary voters for years. Our primary votes never counted before yesterday. Because Sen. Clinton stayed in this race to the end, she gave us a chance to cast a vote that counted for something. Becuase she did that, at great personal cost, I am willing to give her a few more hours or days to end her campaign. She has given this country over 35 years of public service; what’s the rush? The corporate media has pushed us into believing she needed to end the race months ago because it was more expensive for them to cover the primaries when the race stretches into June than if they ended on Super Tuesday. Democracy is a messy process, but God bless Democracy and God Bless Hillary.

Posted by: -rose | June 5, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

I just don’t understand of these people here.
Why you are still angry at her and throw some nasty things to her.
She conceded already and ready to give a speech on coming saturday.
She even willing to support him.
If I were her no way I’d do that.
btw, her supporters suppose to get angry right now because of disappointments and you Obamabots should be thank her.

Posted by: catleya | June 5, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

I was surprised she didnt congratulate Obama for his delegate win. She did praise him, but I guess she wanted to wait .
She has handled it as well as anyone who has been thru this grueling, historic battle.
However, the media, Obama pundits , and republican pundits have handled this HORRIBLY.
They savagely kicked her when she was down.

Posted by: Obama supporters are idiots | June 5, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Pit Bull
I never said it was his fault that she lost. I just said that I thought that it as in poor taste that he called her.
What did he want? If it was to congratulate her on a fine campaign, I am sure she already saw it on the tube,or to had staff tell her about his
speech.
He wanted to create a situation where she would have to concede on his terms.
He was looking or her to sa “Uncle”
Not cool.
Even in the mixed martial arts caged arena, the loser gets to decide when to tap out.
With the name PIT Bull, I need no further explanation as to why you twisted words.
Rick

Posted by: Rick Hamilton | June 5, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

rose you are right. the methods of voting for canidates need some real work. personanlly i hate this whole “big mo” who has the “momentom” nonsense. when people honestly say things like abraham lincoln would not be elected in this day and age. not that he was perfect. no one is but where would we be as a nation if he had not been presdident? would have there been an emacipation proclomation? would we still be the “united” states? then people had to read well written speaches. not that there was not trash talk in the yellow journalism. but just way the information came to people there was more time for reflection. not make up your mind based on how you feel about a canidate in a 30 sec. sound bite.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

she’s being very gracious and is even willing to support obama.
unfortunately, i’m still not willing to vote for him. no still means no.

Posted by: Mike | June 5, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Non-sense. Obama did gain the required number of delegates. He needs super delegates to vote for him and they can do only at the convention.
I think Hillary should take this to the convention. Obama supporters wanted her to concede even before New Hampshire. History will repeat itself and Obama will be another McGovern.
Good bye to democratic party. Republican party, here I come.

Posted by: Roger Miller | June 5, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

Goodbye Roger, and all the other dimwits who feel that way. You were never a true Democrat to begin with. All you want to do it take your toys and go home.
Good riddens!!

Posted by: time to move on | June 5, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

Horribly. The only reason she’s exiting at all is that her closest advisers finally decided that they had to step in and save her from herself if she was to have any future in the Democratic party. Not to have conceded last night was in excusable. This whole campaign, her whole political career is about one thing. That one thing is Hilary Clinton. It’s the only true allegiance she truly has and she’s made that abundantly clear.

Posted by: John | June 5, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Horribly. The only reason she’s exiting at all is that her closest advisers finally decided that they had to step in and save her from herself if she was to have any future in the Democratic party. Not to have conceded last night was in excusable. This whole campaign, her whole political career is about one thing. That one thing is Hilary Clinton. It’s the only true allegiance she truly has and she’s made that abundantly clear.

Posted by: John | June 5, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

She really is in denial. I give her credit for her tenacity, but really, it’s time to give up. It’s not easy but there can only be one winner and she’s is not the one!

Posted by: Gwen | June 5, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

The term “Scorched Earth” comes to mind. Hillary has been providing the Republicans fodder to use against Obama for months. Now she is trying to extort a VP nomination. Many of her supporters have vowed vindictively to vote for McCain. When the Dems once again fail to win the White House they will owe it to Hillary Clinton and her scorched earth politics.
Within a year of his innaguration John McCain will have us invading or threatening to invade Iran. Can you say $250 a barrel oil? Of course no one will be able to buy it.
Thanks Hillary!

Posted by: Ron | June 5, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

She’s not handling it. She ‘handling’ us.
Her very ugly attempt to take some of the air out of Sen.Obama’s historic and transformative victory was a new low in American politics.
Obama always talks in the ‘we’.
Sen.Clinton talks in the ‘me’.
Only Clinton (notice we have to call her Hillary so we can make at least some separation from the aspiring ‘first man’?) talks about herself in the third person.
Sorry. Forgot about Sean Combs.

Posted by: elbajoeste | June 5, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

Hillary’s handling her withdrawal about as badly as King George the Third did over two centuries ago; he couldn’t see the forest for the trees, either.

Posted by: Greg G. | June 5, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Hillary’s handling her withdrawal about as badly as King George the Third did over two centuries ago; he couldn’t see the forest for the trees, either.

Posted by: Greg G. | June 5, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

It was hard for her to face and wake up to the fact that it was time for her to step out of the race. I feel sorry for her but am also grateful she will finally stop campaigning as I do not trust the woman. E-Gods enough of Hillary let us all begin a new chapter.

Posted by: Patty | June 5, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

I cannot believe that the media continues with the Hillary Clinton bashing. You knew the type of answers you would get from the hateful NObama supporters who can’t be happy even now that he has the nomination.
Throughout her campaign she has acted with unbelievable grace, putting up with YOUR (the media’s) bias.
Hillary Clinton, the amazing work she has done for the US and the way she has handled the last two days can only command admiration.
McCain is NOT another Bush, that is ridiculous. And although he doesn’t have my vote yet, I can definitely say that NObama nor the DNC will ever have my support.
If you all are so happy for NObama then move on and leave her alone once and for all.
I believe her actions reflect the respect that she has for us, her loyal supporters.
And we don’t want her as a VP, what an insult, why? so she can train him???

Posted by: Nancy M | June 5, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

I think she handled it like the spoiled brat that she is. She is a narssisitic woman who is scorned. I am a 55 year old woman and she lost my respect when she let her husband humiliate her and her daughter in front of the world and stood by his side to further her political career…didn’t work did it? And you call that Feminism???? I don’t understand why everyone says she needs time, respect, etc. During a general election the losing candidate always congratulates and concedes “that night” and don’t tell me that they don’t have millions of supporters and haven’t worked hard to only lose in the end. Why is she so “special” that we all have to walk on egg shells around her….because she’s an “entitled” Clinton…well, I guess their days are numbered in the Dem. party!

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Hillary was the First Lady. She had the chance to exit this race with style and grace. On one of the most historical nights in history, she acted like a rich spoiled brat. What a disgrace.

Posted by: Angela | June 5, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

PS: When people hear the name Hussein, why don’t they relate it to King Hussein, a great man from Jordan because after all it’s only a name…..how shallow can some people be…….

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

Hillary is an embarrassment to women in politics. Tuesday night would have been a good opportunity for a woman to exhibit strength.
What is her reason for waiting until Sat? Is it really because of “so much pressure”? Does the presidency not have pressure constantly? As president would she wait a few days to “get over things” or “process” if there were a crisis situation? What happened to being ready on Day 1? Or to being able to handle anything, even at 3 AM?

Posted by: GMH | June 5, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

The Democratic Party hasn’t done squat for us in many years. Pelosy has deserted us and Obama hasn’t done anything to make me think he will/can change anything. At least with Hillary we have a proven track record we can rely on. I can’t think of any reason she has to do anything on THEIR schedule. These same people have been trying to get her to leave since the day Obama started his campaign.
Senator Clinton has said all along that she will do anything she can to get who ever is the Democratic candidate elected in November. Strange, Obama never said that.
Let her thank her hard working people and supporters first. Then she can talk to the rest of the nation.

Posted by: Dot | June 5, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

to me all this underlines a warning form george washington against falling into a 2 party system. look at the 2 sides just in the democratic party. most of what is being said here is just nasty name calling. i brought up edwards for a reason. earlier tonight someone somewhere brought up ron paul and how he is still running even though mccain has been given the nod for the republicans, yet some how he is not being villified for it. edwards did not throw his support behind obama until it was to obama’s advantage after hillary won big in pennsylvania or ohio was that just so obama could “steal” her thunder? it is if the same logic is applied as is be applied to hillary for taking a whole 24 hour to decide how and what to do. and i am sorry obama’s “we” all the time i find very annoying, patronizing and disingenuous. are you going to be sitting in the oval office? well you set our energy standards? will your finger be on the button for a nuclear bomb? no it will not. his will be and you are voting for him hopeing that he will do what you believe in. that is all any of us are doing. and all obama’s posturing about he never voted for the war…he had no more say than you or i about weather or not the united states went war. 9/11 was in 2001 right? what was obama’s job then?

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Remember the country song “I Wanna Talk About Me”- That should have been Hillary’s campaign song. ME, ME,ME. Hillary doesn’t care about this country. She cares about HILLARY. And any idiot that votes for MCCain instead of Obama deserves the America they will get – 6 dollar gas and more homeless vets!

Posted by: AngieJ | June 5, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am

Hillary has handling her exit from the race just like a politician. And why should she exit any other way. She has given her life to politics, Government, Law and this country as her husband has. Hillary has campaigned her way across these Untied States and has given her best shot to become a leader in a world dominated by Men who act like boys, the male penis club of America. So I say she has worked long, hard, and wonderfully to be where she is and can exit any way she wants. The net result will change nothing, when all is said and done Barak Obama will get the nomination. And no matter, as a lifetime Democrat not a chance in hell he gets my vote.
Just briefly a man who has no idea who his Church leader is, has no judge of character at all. Do you really want a guy like that picking out our next administration cabinet? A man who has a history of more no votes that any other Senator in his position has no substance/ credibility what so ever to have opinion of. A man who cries and claims Hillary has more lobbyist donations money to her than any other senator obviously has no credibility among his peers. Why would anyone lobby him.
The problem with our country today is that the people have been lied to by so many politicians that people especially president Bush that they are willing to believe anything put in front of them. No politician has ever done what he said he would do. And every politician says he is going to do everything the people want to hear. So we have a country filled with people scared out of their minds and rightfully so.
God Bless us for who ever the next president is!

Posted by: Scgary | June 5, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am

Hillary said in the beginning, she is the most well experience candidate. Her no action is speaking louder than words. Is this how she was planning to lead this country? She could atleast personally congratulate Obama and did her speech on Saturday.

Posted by: Victoria | June 5, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

how do you know she has not? were you privy to her personal phone calls? should every conversation a person in public service be public?

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Do you people remember all the things the Clintons have done? Are you too young to remember Whitewater, Travelgate, Jennifer Flowers, Vince Foster, Monica, etc…..you blame Obama for his pastor and forgive the Clintons for ALL of their obvious misdeeds that they really did know about and do???? Are you taking your sore loser status from Hillary??????
PS to DOT: Obama did say that he would support the nominee MANY, MANY times…you obviously have not been listening to his speeches……..

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

First of all, by not quitting until all the primaries were completed, proved her loyalty to her supporters and assured that all those votes were counted. The way she is exiting proves that she is a champion. I feel that she is deeply concern of the outcome of her decisions. She just wants to make sure that she does a superb job for her supporters, the democratic party, and for her and her family. She needs time to sort it out. We all should be proud of her, and patient, and give her time to complete her mission.

Posted by: Bob Vargas | June 5, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

How about basic good manners : Acknowledge that
Barack Obama won the nomination and congratulate him. Isn’t good manners a basic principle to teach
children ?
In addition, Hillary Clinton should say she supports
his nomination and will do everything she can to make
Obama – the Democratic nominee – become our next
President. That means rallying her ardent supporters
to vote for him in November.

Posted by: Lorinda | June 5, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

Scgary
You said all that just to say BO would not get your vote. Good Lord.

Posted by: PittBull61 | June 5, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

Here are two options: Hillary’s decision was so abrupt that leads me to believe that the head of the Democrat convention made a proposal to her in exchange for a possible place on the ticket as VP; OR, she proposed conceding and giving him the super delegate votes in exchange to be on the ticket as his VP.
However, Obama doesn’t need her on his ticket in order to win. He will have a shadow of Bill Clinton behind him instead of his own shadow if Hillary is chosen to be VP. The things that I have read about the Clintons leads me to believe they are crooks. Also, in voting for a president, one must ask the nominee to answer this cliche. “Tell me who you go with, I’ll tell you what you are.”
Has anyone at ABC read this article yet?
——————————————————————————————————————————–
HERE IS SOMETHING ON POLITICS IN KENYA. NOT GOOD NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7165406.stm
Persnally, I hate the thought of voting for the two democrat contenders and the republican nominee. Yuck. None will ever fill the shoes of a good President of the United States.

Posted by: xceo1931 | June 5, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

Lorinda…very well said. That would have been very “classy” and “dignified”…sounds like the way Obama would have handled it….not being mean, just that he has that grace and humility.

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

Hillary handled the most trying situation with dignity, firmness in upholding the democratic principles and graciousness towards Obama whose camp has maligned her with “republican will dig up a load of dirt on her”, “she is responsible for all the problems caused by nafta” and she is “divisive and negative.”
If Obama has suffered just a fraction of what his camp has thrown at her, Obama would probably twisted Hillary’s arms instead of refusing to shake her hand.
Hillary has gotten the short end of the bargain but she is still acting with dignity and grace.

Posted by: realdemocrat | June 5, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am

xceo1931: How does the article relate to anything here??????? Because it’s in Kenya…are we now going to blame Obama for everything there just because his father is from there????
You are right, Obama does not need “them” on the ticket. He can win on his own unless she continues to undermine him and try and make him fail so she can come back and say “I told you so” and run herself in 2012….she has it all planned out…….

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

realdemocrat
Your not a real Democrat if you believe that non-sense. Your spinning her loss and not accepting it as BO’s fault. It’s a done deal no matter what is being said. Can we unify and move on?

Posted by: PittBull61 | June 5, 2008, 4:06 am 4:06 am

as far as standing by her man…that is her choice. she would be villified for which ever decision she would have made on that count by some one. as for the rest of the stuff…do you know everything your significant other does? are you resposible for everything they do? of course not. would have i stayed married to a man that cheated on me as he did…hell no. but wheather or not hillary chose to stay with bill was her choice and no one elses. as a woman if you can’t respect that i would question your feminism. i grew up in the middle of the era fight. my understanding was that the purpose was so that women’s choices were not dictated to them simply because they were a woman…by anyone even other women.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

realdemocrat: Can you honestly say that Obama hasn’t suffered from what the Clinton’s threw at him….you have to be joking….she threw the “kitchen sink” at him and he came out winning…..short term memory loss?????

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

suzanne,
I am so glad you’ve responded, I just didn’t have the energy. The article made no sense to what is being talked about here.

Posted by: PittBull61 | June 5, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Jeez, do all you Clinton supporters really believe the crap you are spewing about her? Dignity and grace? This woman doesn’t even know the meaning of the words!
Either you are all too young to remember the Clinton’s checkered past, or you are too under educated to even research it.
Just Google the number of people associated with the Clintons who have died from mysterious consequences.
Sheesh!!

Posted by: time to move on | June 5, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

Obama is extremely shrewd when he engaged in scare tactics by telling his young crowd that Republicans would dig up a load of dirt on Hillary and thus make her unelectable in Feb and March 08.
He knew the young crowd were too young to remember or know Ken Starr’s $50 million investigation of the Clintons and turned up nothing except for Paula Jones. Obama knew what he said was totally untrue but would scare people about Hillary’s “dirt” and “unelectibility”.
It was that moment I saw the epiphany of the true Obama, a shady and dishonest politician instead of the noble agent of “change”
After that scare tactics, Obama got 11 wins on the momentum created by the media and his lies about Hillary.
Hillary’s campaign should have swiftly exposed Obama’s lies but they did not.
Thus Hillary suffered a string of losses as the young and foolish believed that she has lots and lots of dirt to be dug up by the Republicans and could not be elected.
The shady, crafty and mean always win, regardless of color and race.

Posted by: realdemocrat | June 5, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

northstar: I know it was her choice, but that’s what i am saying…she choose to stay to further her own agenda no matter what it did to her family. She hung on his coattails and used his presidency to get where she is today and often referred to what “her husband did” back in the 90′s…do it on your own!
I’m not blaming her or holding her responsible for what he did for the whole time of their marriage just as i don’t blame Obama for what someone whom he was not even married to has said or done……..

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am

JUST COMPARE THE LANGUAGE USED BY THE OBAMA-SUPPORTERS AND CLINTON SUPPORTERS ABOVE, WE CAN KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO CANDIDATES.
‘BIRDSOF ONE FEATHER, FLOCK TOGETHER”

Posted by: difference | June 5, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

realdemocrat, you really enjoy her Koolaid don’t you!
The Starr investigation was just a small bump in the road compared to what the Republicans will bring out.
Do you retards realize that the entire world is looking at the US right now? Read some of the comments other countries are making about Clinton. She is becoming a joke!
Oh, I forgot that may not be possible given the Clinton supporter educational level.

Posted by: time to move on | June 5, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

realdemocrat: There were so many things that the Clintons were connected to that were “swept under the rug” and so many people that he “owes” (read your history about them)….and Hillary lost those 11 because she thought the election wouldn’t go past Feb 5, (which her campaign has admitted to) so didn’t “bother” with the caucas states……

Posted by: suzanne | June 5, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

realdemocrat,
Like I said, your not a real DEMOCRAT if you believe that. Young crowd or not even if he did say those things, do you think they were too stupid to check things out for themselves? And where did race come from? I never mentioned it. So, HRC has never said anything bad about BO? Please don’t let me have to refresh your memory. We just had our Primaries. The Honest, Dignified always wins in my book no matter what color you are.

Posted by: PittBull61 | June 5, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

suzanne you know that how? honestly you think the only reason she stayed with him is for political reasons? how could you possibly know that? you only know what the media has said. referencing what he had done that was positive is no less than anyone who was closly associated with someone who did something they thought was good would do. look how many people evoke jfk like he was the next coming…people who no way no how could have possibly known the man. and you know chelsie was harmed by her parents staying together how? and what exactly do you mean by doing it on her own? is she to deny she was every married to the man? would have she have been able to get the health care topic as far as she did if she had not been first lady? seriously. if someone had not picked obama to be the keynote speaker in 2004 who would know him right now out side of his contacts in illinois? honestly. oportunitie are not as self made in this country as the myth of the american dream would have you believe. oppourtunities are handed out. some will say that opportunity is where hard work and prperation take you. i have known people whom have worked thier fingers to the bone yet have never been given the oppourtunity to spread thier wings and fly…so do you have children that you are supporting on your own? are you living on 2 or 3 minimum wage jobs and still not being able to make it? have you walked that walk or even know someone who has? or have you been fortunate enough to have had an oppourtunity handed to you and you latched on for dear life and ran? i dislike that this whole discussion has not been more cyribral. but if making something personal is the only way to get someone to say something i guess that is the way this whole game is played. i type very slowly and am dyslexic so i by pass much in the form of puctuation, etc. honestly why didn’t edwards or ron paul get raked over the coals for how they have or have not exited the races?

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

I think her non-concession speech last night was typical. If she is such a strong leader why does she need to read the emails of her supporters when Obama has the delegates for the nomination? Most other politicians though it may not have been what they wanted to happen would have conceded and thrown their support behind Obama last night not left it hanging as to what they would do.
At least that is what I would have done when it was obvious that he had the amount to gain him the nomination.
Just my opinion. Which is what was asked. :O)

Posted by: JRT | June 5, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am

I have watched the primaries with growing frustration. On both sides, the media chose who to give lots of time to and influenced the voters; they did not represent all the candidates fairly. Even the debates were slanted and excluded candidates. The whole nomination process needs to be changed for both parties so that ALL the candidates get to be voted on in ALL the states to get a REAL representation of who should be the nominees. Cut it down to only 3 months with ALL candidates on ALL states ballots and in all the states caucuses and then see who the nominees would be. Then hopefully all the losers would bow out gracefully and there would be one definitive winner in each party to run against each other. Better yet get rid of the two party system and this whole dog and pony primary/caucus show and lets have some real people representing the US people.
Let’s move on now. We once again have to choose the candidate we think will do the least harm to the country as president since the best candidates never get to run in the presidental popularity contest.

Posted by: Independent in WA | June 5, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

one of the many things I have learne from this process is not only does the media brainwash the candidate they want to win, the Obama supporters come on to the bloggs thinking they are PUNDITS for Obama and somehow are helping the guy.
Like all these ‘uncommited voters’come onto these bloggs.

Posted by: Obama supporters are idiots | June 5, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am

Senator Clinton is dignified and grounded. A role model for all young women. Take a look at the amazing daughter she has raised, intelligent and grounded just like her Mother. Shame on you ABC for being a trouble-maker.

Posted by: anita | June 5, 2008, 5:14 am 5:14 am

i simply don’t get why 24 hours was too long too suspend. just don’t. this thing we are typing on has given us the oppurtunity for real discussion real sharing of information accross the fricken world…yet it just seems to be feeding into this faster is better, live in the now, history be damned, now is all that matters way of life. niether of these canidates are perfect. it always is a process of picking the person whom best reflects what you hope they will do. personally i wanted hillary. i have been on the loosing end of our health care system. like it or not she was working on health care when obama was just cutting his teeth in public service. she had to take on a much larger red machine than exists in congress today. but i gotta sleep fun and frustrating as this first blogging experience was.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 5:22 am 5:22 am

Hillary has had a year to consider what to do if she lost. For someone who advertised herself as “ready on day 1,” why does it take 4 days (and a request for input from supporters) for Hillary to figure out what to do when the other candidate actually wins the nomination?
So much for “EXPERIENCE.”

Posted by: Rob | June 5, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

Hillary’s exit style is a grand role model for the girls of this nation. She should not be rushed to end the media horse-race.The male dominated media just doesn’t get it! Their concocted horse race has no legal standing! OBAMA IS NOT YET THE LEGAL NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATS or what’s the Democratic convention for? SHAME ON THE MALE-DOMINATED MEDIA AND THEIR SHODDY, TRAGIC TREATMENT OF Hillary. Since any delegate can change her/his mind before the vote in Denver, OBAMA IS NOT YET A LEGALLY CHOSEN DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE. The media ignores the votes of the people. Obama calls for CHANGE…one of the biggest and best in this nominating process is that female candidates do not have to be castigated and pushed aside easily, especially with 18 million voters backing them. The good news is that talk about race is such a hot potato we dare not discuss it overtly. The bad news is that a strong woman must be attacked, besmirched and treated as an enemy from Day One.
Hillary’s showing the strength of a champion. HILLARY IN 2012!!!

Posted by: Tink Winter | June 5, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am

I believe that we make our own choices and opinions, anyone that takes that time to vote is usually smart enough to know that the media lies. However, it is time to bow out gracefully and with some dignity left. I as a previous lady law enforcement officer, did all I could to not be segregated as a female. And believe someone in this position should do the same. But just don’t disgrace us with dragging this on. When its over its over. This is like stalking a lost love!

Posted by: Lisa | June 5, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am

If Obama had lost there wouldn’t have been the clamor to offer him restitution or to rescue him from his failures. But, then, he’s a man. It takes a woman to do Damsel In Distress.
Senator Clinton is exiting this contest as a Special Interest candidate. In the final days of the campaign, she stood for two Causes. Women and Herself. She let both of her causes down by her atrocious and unprofessional behavior

Posted by: Michelle Cole | June 5, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am

Sadly, the way Hillary handled this defeat will damage her future political career and that of every other woman seeking a leadership role for years to come.

Posted by: Rob | June 5, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

Hillary is exiting this race with class and her head held high. She fought a hard battle. She lost, processed the loss, grieved for it, came to terms with it (maybe not all the way), she didn’t turn her back on her supporters on Tuesday night. She is now doing what a true democrat would do, she will back her fellow democrat in his bid for the white house. With that being said, I will not vote the democratic ticket in November. I’m sorry that is how I feel.

Posted by: char19145 | June 5, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am

As much as I didn’t support her and as much as I didn’t like how she handled things, I think that she is doing this the right way. She and her supporters have worked hard for all of these months and as we are constantly reminded how many votes that she got, she also needed her moment in history. Senator Obama’s moment will keep on going while Senator Clinton’s will be ending.

Posted by: myraone | June 5, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am

Hillary showed exactly what she is. She counted on women votes because she thought that no woman would vote against her. She spewed more lies than even Bill could muster up. She is petty, vindictive and basically disgusting. If she were Baracks VP, an dI were him, I’d have a bug embedded in her mouth to record every sngle thing she said and the same with Bill. Why? Because if I were the POTUS and she was VP , my life wouldn’t be worth a plugged nickle. Barack, choose the Gov. of New Mexico and you have a ticket to the white house and a first class partner watching your back.

Posted by: danceswithpenguins | June 5, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am

Who cares the *itch is gone

Posted by: softail | June 5, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am

kicking and screaming.
Carving ten lines in the floor from her fingers as the party drags her to stage left.
Holding millions of voters hostage for the respect that she is already getting
Hillary Clinton is a great American who lost a campaign that was hers to lose in a dynamic fashion. Now she could have actually won by showing that she could gracefully transition out of the running for President and quell the disdain of her supporters. But as they screamed “Denver” she paused with her sinister grin.
Then you fail to recognize the historic night that was taking place and decided to make it “What does Hillary want” night.
Senator Clinton you have lost again.

Posted by: Omentum | June 5, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

“Hillary is exiting this race with class and her head held high. She fought a hard battle. She lost, processed the loss, grieved for it, came to terms with it (maybe not all the way), she didn’t turn her back on her supporters on Tuesday night. She is now doing what a true democrat would do, she will back her fellow democrat in his bid for the white house. With that being said, I will not vote the democratic ticket in November. I’m sorry that is how I feel. ”
1.) you are joking right? Class? Head Held High? (over a toilet)”
What you really want to say is That black sob stole her entitlement, right?
What you should look at is that fact that Barack Obama is better organized, more well spoken, FAR MORE honest and managed to come out of this primary ahead and with money in his pocket.
Hillary could not manage to fund her campaign, how in the hell would she run our country.
and I personally could care less if he or McCain wins

Posted by: danceswithpenguins | June 5, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am

Looks like Father Pfleger was right. Hillary just proved it.

Posted by: Omentum | June 5, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am

Just imagine this basketcase could have been answering the phone at 3 a.m.

Posted by: Omentum | June 5, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am

Nicholas
The part is over … you can go back to fox now.
Nice blogging with a GOP Koolaid drinka.

Posted by: Omentum | June 5, 2008, 6:54 am 6:54 am

The power of clairvoyance on Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton’s touted soon-to-come concession will be inconclusive and a cliffhanger. She still strongly believes in clairvoyance which as recently as the beginning of May reconfirmed she would get the nomination. Not all in her inner camp believed this, Bill included. The pressure by her staff to give up after North Carolina and Indiana was resisted solely because of this strong faith in clairvoyance. The RFK and June reference was not a misspeak, but had been discussed and rumored within the inner circle. It has been assured to her again and again that something catastrophic will happen towards the mid of June, and she would get the nomination. However, the pressure in the recent days has become too intense, but she is bidding for time, and still strongly believes in waiting till towards mid June as she was assured. Hence, even when she stages a mock concession this weekend, it will go thus: I am suspending my campaign to support BHO, but wish to retain the right to hold onto my delegates and votes, and enjoy the necessary visibility to continue to promote my agenda on health care, economy, ending the war, and the environment. Do not be mistaken, she still believes strongly that the nomination will be hers. If the DNC and her increasingly dissenting inner circle do not prevail on her to make an unconditional concession, she will hold onto this believe, and will try to force things to happen by herself at some point before August. She is herself becoming increasingly impatient against the advice that she remains calm and patient till all is fulfilled. I am one who no longer shares this belief.

Posted by: Jan | June 5, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am

Finally
I am not taking this SHOCK excuse.
This was very apparent since the beginning of March. There was 90+ days to prepare for concession.
Now all of sudden a hard decision has to be made when the decision is not hers at all. YOU LOST YOU CONCEDE. A NO BRAINER
I must say it is scary to think that Hillary Clinton almost became the most powerful person in the world and she ran the most backwards campaign in history and is now being the sorest loser in history.
But seriously… I understand. She has been in a political fairy tale since the days or Arkansas and the story was suppose to read “Her and Bill left the White House in 2016 and lived happily ever after”

Posted by: Omentum | June 5, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am

She’s really handling this well. I just can’t believe the media is still harsh to her. She’s human. She needs time to digest all this and think through. Leave her alone.
By the way, I will not support Obama if I were her.

Posted by: emily | June 5, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am

She’s really handling this well. I just can’t believe the media is still harsh to her. She’s human. She needs time to digest all this and think through. Leave her alone.
By the way, I will not support Obama if I were her.

Posted by: emily | June 5, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am

She could have taken the high road last Tuesday, but she didn’t and that’s how the world will remember her. She could have talked about setting the stage for the next woman to run for President and tossed in her support for the first non-white to get the nomination. To vote only for Hillary because she’s a woman is to say vote for Obama only because he’s not white. Both views are wrong. Obama convinced a majority of the Democratic Party (if you include the causus states) that he is the best “person” for the job. I would have voted for Hillary if she had won, because either Hillary or Obama are far better for America and the World than John (George Bush) McCain.

Posted by: algwriter | June 5, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am

Emily: “She’s really handling this well. I just can’t believe the media is still harsh to her. She’s human. She needs time to digest all this and think through. Leave her alone.
By the way, I will not support Obama if I were her.”
Spoken like so many women on so many boards that think hillary can do no wrong and should have been elected simply because she is a woman.
BTW: your racism is showing! If you were a true democrat , you would be proud to support him.

Posted by: danceswithwolves | June 5, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

She could have said a little something Tuesday .Nothing is more important to her then herself and she proved it.He is using kid gloves I would kicj her aqq out and she could sty out .The Clinton area is OVER.and I for one am glad it is .

Posted by: white older voter | June 5, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

To the fools that will jump ship just because poor HRC lost…I say good riddance. You obviously were never true Dems and need to be with McCain. We will survive without you and Obama will still be your President in November!

Posted by: adventist1962 | June 5, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

Emily,
Not only are you a racist, you also need work on your grammar!

Posted by: time to move on | June 5, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

adventist1962,
Amen to that!!
;-)

Posted by: time to move on | June 5, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

The power of clairvoyance on Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton’s touted soon-to-come concession will be inconclusive and a cliffhanger. She still strongly believes in clairvoyance which as recently as the beginning of May reconfirmed she would get the nomination. Not all in her inner camp believed this, Bill included. The pressure by her staff to give up after North Carolina and Indiana was resisted solely because of this strong faith in clairvoyance. The RFK and June reference was not a misspeak, but had been discussed and rumored within the inner circle. It has been assured to her again and again that something catastrophic will happen towards the mid of June, and she would get the nomination. However, the pressure in the recent days has become too intense, but she is bidding for time, and still strongly believes in waiting till towards mid June as she was assured. Hence, even when she stages a mock concession this weekend, it will go thus: I am suspending my campaign to support BHO, but wish to retain the right to hold onto my delegates and votes, and enjoy the necessary visibility to continue to promote my agenda on health care, economy, ending the war, and the environment. Do not be mistaken, she still believes strongly that the nomination will be hers. If the DNC and her increasingly dissenting inner circle do not prevail on her to make an unconditional concession, she will hold onto this believe, and will try to force things to happen by herself at some point before August. She is herself becoming increasingly impatient against the advice that she remains calm and patient till all is fulfilled. I am one who no longer shares this belief.

Posted by: Jan | June 5, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

Give the woman a chance to breathe! The media and now major Democrats don’t even acknowledge her accomplishments as a serious female candidate for President.
The more I hear from the Obama supporters, the more inclined this Independent is to support McCain.

Posted by: Mike Johnson | June 5, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

“The more I hear from the Obama supporters, the more inclined this Independent is to support McCain.”
It is not Obama supports you are hearing from. It is poeple who are finally, totally and completely disgusted with teh Clinton “you owe me mantra”
If she had won the nomination , you would have seen two very important things.
1.) Party switching the like of which have never been seen before.
2.) Republican voters crawling of of hte woodwork to vote and keep her out of office.
3.) She has earned every slap in the mouth she is getting and rightfully so.

Posted by: danceswithpenguins | June 5, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Mike Johnson
I would be my house on the fact that you were not going to vote for Obama anyways.
It is ABSOLUTELY AMAZING that you and other would go and vote for someone whose policies are 180 degrees from that of Clinton’s and virtually the same as Obama’s
You don’t leave me many possibilities to think what driving your vote.
Are you racist? Not accusing. Just asking.

Posted by: Omentum | June 5, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

bet my house that is.

Posted by: Omentum | June 5, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

I just hate it when I lose count

Posted by: danceswithpenguins | June 5, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Forcing her to do it on THEIR timeline will come back to haunt them. Her women supporters are only gonna get more pissed off!

Posted by: uho | June 5, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

She left is like a woman would..emotional..instead of strong

Posted by: Lawrence | June 5, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

She left it like a woman would..emotional..instead of strong like she wanted her supporters to believe she was.. “I’M A FIGHTER”, fighters know when they are beat and the fight is over.

Posted by: Lawrence | June 5, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

She should have TAP-OUT on Tuesday…

Posted by: Lawrence | June 5, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Larry looks like your original post was your true feelings & it sounds pretty sexist but then you get disgusted if people make what you think are racist remarks of BO. Pathetic!

Posted by: uho | June 5, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

She’s handling it fine – apparently many of you faux Dems aren’t. You misogynist “affluent, better educated whites” should just give it up – your white guilt and rush to laud the “black man” aren’t going to gain you any points, Obama is not going to be your “boy” in the White House. Why do you think black people are voting for him? Not because they want him to help whites! I’m a minority, and I could see that a long time ago. Plus, if you’re so stupid you can’t see that the Democratic Party NEEDS Hillary’s voting base, then, like several others have observed, you deserve McCain. So you fascist Dems just go ahead and keep spewing bile at Hillary; just remember, come November, that Democrats don’t rule in the US, and you may be eating that bile when the Independents and Hillary supporters write-in the candidates of their choice because the so-called Democratic Party decided not to be very Democratic.

Posted by: mudgeon | June 5, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Does McSame really want to go to a town-hall with Barack “the Rock Star” Obama?? Mistake number one…

Posted by: Lawrence | June 5, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

There are more racial remarks to go around on the blogs and more to come.. doesn’t bother me.. my remarks is the truth like others you don’t want to hear. Call it sexist if you want.. that was “emotional” decision and the wrong one.

Posted by: Lawrence | June 5, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Sexist Larry don’t go getting a woody for BO. Any type of debate or disussion that isn’t scripted for BO is a problem for him. He doesn’t respond very well to tough questions. So, rock on that.

Posted by: uho | June 5, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

For someone who professes to be strong and resilient, she is proving to be a real wimp. I agree she didn’t need to concede on Tuesday ,but she needed to get off the Me Me crap and talk about the party and the election.

Posted by: newera | June 5, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Against John McSAME …come on dont’ go getting Hillary on me and making these assumptions and mistakes this early…

Posted by: Lawrence | June 5, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

Emily..after this statement:
By the way, I will not support Obama if I were her.
I believe Obama will realize he doesn’t need all you whinnng HRC supporters. Every since this primary began you have been whinning about him dropping out and that she will win. Well look what happened. People don’t want the same ole crap the Clintons arte handing out.

Posted by: truthtell | June 5, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

verne…you must be racist if you believe Obama’s message was only meant for blacks. He message is to unite as people..look past color, gender, and nationality…we need to work together my God!

Posted by: grandma | June 5, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Besides his lack of experience. i enjoyed her stand on technology and science. It would of been nice to see someone back science and tech field with some leadership. She was a big believer in higher education.
Also bit miffed with Oprha while i realize many of us would not vote for someone because Oprah said so i wonder how many folks did vote that way because Oprah said so. I do not want to think it was all the media and her Cheer leading that help make this happen.
Traditionally when our choice did not get picked folks stayed home. Hopefully this time they will still vote and fuss at Demo party rules DNC loudly for changes to be made. If that does not occur then there is a good chance the demo’s will lose ground for those miffed at DNC and party rules.
I hope like senator Kennedy she stays a long time in the Senate becomes a power house in the Senate and still has a wonderful life in spite of her disappointment.
Thank you Hill for trying !Salute!

Posted by: susie | June 5, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

All these Obama supporters make me want to vote for McCain. And I bet a bunch of us will. DJK said it all.
What will Obama’s supporters do all day when they don’t have Hillary Clinton to whine about?

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | June 5, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

HRC is not a gracious loser and a loser is what she is. Failing to acknowledge BHO’s success and giving a defiant speech that was all about her is typical of the classless act that she is. Her campaign was emblematic of how she would have run her administration and those failures should make everybody grateful that she lost.
One of my complaints about HRC was her alleged concern about health care. She had the opportunity, out of the public eye, to put her money where her mouth was when she sat on the board of WalMart. Where was her concern for the thousands of employees who had no health care benefits? She had a golden opportunity to act and did not. Instead, she panders to her lemming followers who don’t have a clue about the health care and insurance industry by claiming she will act by forming committees. Her focus is on Medicaid and the uninsured. DUH!! That’s a solution already in place. Get rid of the 40% fraud in Medicaid and you can fund anything you want.

Posted by: J Pryor | June 5, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

If she handled that 3AM call to the White House the way she handled her so-called exit, we’d be in trouble, wouldn’t we? She wouldn’t have time to summon her supporters to ask them what to do next! This confirms what I’ve always known about her – she’s a phony, massively insecure control freak who can’t move without being told how and what to do. Pam from San Francisco

Posted by: Pam from San Francisco | June 5, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

I can’t believe it’s “batter”! Oops, it’s so bitter.

Posted by: mampang | June 5, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

She is to selfcentered to exit with grace.All she knows how to do is blow her own horn.
There is still something she is up to and I cannot wait to see what it is.
She will NOT be vee p NOT

Posted by: me | June 5, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

I keep hearing comments from Hillary supporters saying they will vote for McCain. Do you really want four more years of Bush? Do you really want the Iraq War to last 100 years? Do you want to loose your jobs, houses…? Get a grip. Threatening to vote for McCain is not the answer, unless you were never Democrats in the beginning.

Posted by: algwriter | June 5, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Somebody might want to put Medusa on suicide watch.
She’s not feeling very good right now.
How’s the crow tasting cynics?
OBAMA 08

Posted by: David Duke | June 5, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Hillary is handling her exit with class. The way the Democratic Party has treated her is abominable. After 16 months of tireless campaigning to get her message across, and after garnering nearly 18 million votes, she has earned the right to take some time to grieve her loss, and to thank her many supporters. She owes the Democratic Party and Barack Obama absolutely nothing.

Posted by: Mark Richman | June 5, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Buttermilk McCain’s S*** Talking Express is currently on blocks attempting to overhaul the engine from the all powerful lawnmower engine to the even more powerful moped engine.
Man, Buttermilk is gonna get smashed in the GE. The Repugs already know they don’t have a snow ball’s chance in hell.
OBAMA 08

Posted by: David Duke | June 5, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

for someone who claimed to be ready on ‘day 1′, can handle the 3am call…etc
it is a very disappointing, poor performance
how can we trust her ‘exit strategy’ from
Iraq while she does not have one for herself?
would there be a web site for US citizen input to help ‘president’ Clinton to decide what to do??

Posted by: south | June 5, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Hillary who?
Oh, the former Senator from NY who decided to cut off her whole arm to save a papercut on her pinky finger?
She’s currently in political purgotory and will be soon moving on the the political abyss of darkness.
RIP

Posted by: David Duke | June 5, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Very soar looser,,keeping the party split,,begging to get her 11 million back that she loaned her campaign.

Posted by: joe | June 5, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Hillary Clinton is NOT handling her exit with the class, grace, and dignity that one would expect from someone in her position.
But then, we have to remember that this is the whiney, entitled, gun-totin’, beer drinkin’, crying fake tears, SNL drama queen who was SURE she was destined to be President.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned (by the voters). This is what I see.
I’ll bet she is a livid, raving, cussing, out-of-control bitch to be around right now. (Just what old Billy-Goat William Jefferson Clinton deserves–in fact, they deserve each other!HA)
And while we’re at it, I am sick of hearing: “What does Hillary want?” Isn’t is about time that she and the media realize that it’s NOT about her anymore and what she “wants”. (Like some little whining kid who loses at stickball.)
WE SHOULD BE HEARING INSTEAD: ” What does Barack want?” because after-all, he (and not Hillary), is the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States.

Posted by: Claudean | June 5, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I think Hillary is handling her leaving with class. I was very happy she waited til the absolute end to concede. One thing I can say is that I will not vote for Obama unless Hillary is his running mate. I will then be voting for a republican for the first time in history. Obama is a smooth, snake and people do not realize it. He will do nothing for us unless Hillary is his running mate. That is the only way he will get my vote. If not, Go McCain!

Posted by: Lisa | June 5, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

She is doing a brilliant job, just like she ran a brilliant campaign. The media, as usual, are making something out of nothing. Leave the woman alone! The media is partially responsible for Hillary not getting the nomination when she has received MORE POPULAR vote than any other candidate. For the third time in a row, the people’s choice will not get the job. How sick is this? I will not be voting for a Democratic ticket without Hillary on it. The party has betrayed me for the last time!

Posted by: Jo-Ann | June 5, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

One of the funniest (and best) shows on t.v. is Boston Legal. Did anyone see and enjoy Denny Crane’s opinion of Hillary Clinton? When asked what he thought of Hillary, Denny (played by William Shatner) raised up his butt cheek, strained a bit, and let rip a very expressive fart. I laughed until I cried, for it was my opinion of her too. Her behavior Tuesday night reaffirmed that opinion.
Oh, also on this NBC show, earlier in the same episode of Boston Legal, Shatner/Crane was looking at pictures of Hillary as she campaigned around the nation. In every example, her mouth was gaping wide open in a big “gator-grin” and her eyes were about to pop out of her head. Pointing to the photos, Shatner/Crane said something like this: “My God! It’s Mad Cow Disease.”

Posted by: Claudean | June 5, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

To respond to Rick Hamilton. She did handle it her way. With NO CLASS…. that’s why she is the loser. Loser go home ! I am an over 60 white female who would love to see a woman as president BUT not HRC. She would only continue with her selfish ME,ME, ME and never care about this great country of ours, or us for that matter. She has hurt the chances of ever having a woman as president with all her lies and down right negative campaigning ,her anger, her refusal to play by the rules. Not to mention her tantrums and feeling of deserving it because she is a woman ,and a Clinton at that. She should hang her head in shame and go home. My 4 year old great grand son and all the little ones on his T-Ball team show more class and are much better losers than she. She is pathetic.

Posted by: joan | June 5, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

OMG! I see the webidiots have arrived. So they won’t vote for Obama without HRC, but will vote for McSame instead –and out of bitterness/revenge.
Ever hear of cutting off your nose to spite your face? How moronic to want 100 years more of war, possibly a Third World War of nuclear proportions. Do you think your spite will serve you well when your sons, grandsons, and great-grandsons come home to you in body bags?
It should be a law that no one with less than a 3-digit I.Q. is allowed to vote, and some of the recent rants on here appear to be of the 2-digit variety.
Too bad brain transplants aren’t perfected yet. There are a couple of candidates on here who would make excellent experimental specimens.

Posted by: Claudean | June 5, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Something else to wrap your brain cells around: Watch for “trouble in paradise”. Ever wonder why Hillary decided to Stand by Her Man (with apologies to Tammy Wynette)?
Many have speculated that, in retrospect, the day the media focused on the 3 Clintons, morose and lethargic, walking toward a waiting helicopter, would play out big in 2008. For that is when (it has been suspected )that Hill went off to make her “deal” with Bill.
The deal was this: (With Chelsea running interference)–Hillary would stay with her old Billy-Goat of a randy husband IF, and only IF, he turned the Clinton Machine over to her disposal. She wanted to be President too; and if he would do everything within his, the Machine’s, and the Arkansas Mafia’s power to get her elected BY ANY AND ALL MEANS POSSIBLE, she would stand by her man.
But will she now? It should be very interesting to see “what Hillary wants”– when the Valium wears off.

Posted by: Claudean | June 5, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

People seem to have short memories. In the past 8 years this country has gone to Hell because of the fixed election in Florida with George’s brother as governor. All of this happened because Al Gore conceded too early. Why is everyone so judgmental?

Posted by: Gale | June 5, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Very poorly, but she’ll get back in the fold this weekend.

Posted by: Peter Donhowe | June 5, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Hillary is doing what she needs to do to make a clean exit from a long drawn out election process. I hope she goes back to the Senate and works on getting the Electoral College whipped into shape. Super Delegates should have to vote for whoever we voted for – they are our representatives. Why vote if they can pick and choose whoever they want after our primary? I’m tired of hearing about Obama’s Black heritage – he also has a white heritage which he seems to have forgotten.
I’m not sure I can support Obama unless he remembers where he really came from -America / the good old USA – he was born here or he couldn’t run for president. He needs to start talking like he belongs here – if he is “African” then send him there – he is AMERICAN.

Posted by: Judy | June 5, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Everyone is so worried about racism, well scew that. What about sexism? Look at the media portrayal of the snake, Obama’s campaign, then look at Hillary’s. Now you should all know what sexism is. Come on women out there, quit standing behind your man and calling it loyalty, and get a mind of your own. People are going as far back as to bash Bill Clinton, but everyone of the presidents have indiscretions and skeletons in their closets, too. So why was it that Bill Clinton got it? He was the only recent president we have had that has done anything at all for America. Bush has done horrible things for America, well know we have either a Bush clone to vote for or a snake in the grass. Good luck to all, I am moving to Canada.

Posted by: Lisa | June 5, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Lisa is your ” Come on women out there, quit standing behind your man and calling it loyalty, and get a mind of your own.” comment sent to Hillary? If not it should be.
I have a mind of my own thank you. I also have brains enough to vote for who I believe will be the BEST president and NOT to vote for someone JUST BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN.. That is just dumb !! Yes, I am an over 60 white woman. By the way,.HAVE A NICE TRIP !!…

Posted by: joan | June 5, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Hillary is handling her exit just the way she handled her campaign – like a spoiled brat that wasn’t getting her way. I can’t help but wonder if she would have fought so hard to get Florida and Michigan votes counted if Obama had won those states.

Posted by: Anne | June 5, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

ANNE, of course she wouldn’t have wanted them counted . Had it been he that was losing and crying to have them counted she would have been saying “”UNFAIR,UNFAIR, we both signed an agreement NOT to count them now he wants to change the rules. Who does he think he is? NOT FAIR !!”"

Posted by: jan | June 5, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

SHAME ON ABC NEWS, for continuing to fuel the Clinton hatred that is so rampant among NObama’s followers. Why would you ask this question? To get the outcome you knew would come.
NObama is incompetent, unexperienced, and ready to be the DNC’s puppet.
It is understandable that people are upset over this.
What is not understandable is why people assume to know so much about NObama when in reality they do not. Just as they do not in reality know the outstanding service Senator Clinton has served this country with. She deserves our respect and admiration.
She does not need the VP spot to continue her distinguished work. Although he will need her to come close to winning the Presidency, which he will not.
Shame on you ABC, for not doing real journalism and turning your program into Weekly Gossip Hate Festival. As it is only NObama supporters who cannot for one second be happy but instead continue to spew hate.

Posted by: Larry | June 5, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

SHAME ON ABC NEWS, for continuing to fuel the Clinton hatred that is so rampant among NObama’s followers. Why would you ask this question? To get the outcome you knew would come.
NObama is incompetent, unexperienced, and ready to be the DNC’s puppet.
It is understandable that people are upset over this.
What is not understandable is why people assume to know so much about NObama when in reality they do not. Just as they do not in reality know the outstanding service Senator Clinton has served this country with. She deserves our respect and admiration.
She does not need the VP spot to continue her distinguished work. Although he will need her to come close to winning the Presidency, which he will not.
Shame on you ABC, for not doing real journalism and turning your program into Weekly Gossip Hate Festival. As it is only NObama supporters who cannot for one second be happy but instead continue to spew hate.

Posted by: Larry | June 5, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Joan,
An independent woman will do what she needs to do and not apologize for it. So she stood by her man, so what. She is also independent and not walking in his shadow. Hillary is the best woman for the job, she did not just spout off what she was going to do, and NOT back herself up like Obama. Please do not try to twist my words around to suit your will. I have not once picked someone out and singled then out like you have. Bring it on, white woman over 60. I am much younger and ready. Mark my words, we think Bush has done bad things, just wait and see what all comes out about Obama. Mark my words. Have a good day Joan. I’ll write from Canada.

Posted by: Lisa | June 5, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Lisa-
Your comments are a credit to all women, you and I -we won’t fall for a ‘pop star’ who says a whole lotta NOTHING!
Joan -get an education. Sexism is a HUGE issue in America, it just isn’t addressed -unlike racial ones. As a woman you should care. What happens behind closed doors (or what should have been kept behind closed doors -thank you Kenneth Starr and Linda Trip) is none of our business. Hillary’s personal life and choices don’t matter to me, what does are her public policies, her experience, and her ability to work with everyone. I did not vote based on GENDER I voted for the very best candidate for the job and I can see that Lisa is quite educated also, and voted based solely on who could best do the job. I hear Canada is quite a great country! Much more socially progressive than the U.S. I appreciate those who do not fall for the hype! and for all the Obama supporter -really take the time to listen to him speak- what does he plan to do, how does he plan to do it? How many times does he say CHANGE in his speeches? He’s nothing more than a glorified motivational speaker with no idea how to run a country. And Lisa -YOU GO GIRL!
God Bless Hillary Clinton!

Posted by: Sara | June 5, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

time to move on
Obviously, educational level has no bearing on intelligence or class if you believe you are better or smarter than people who may not have reached the same level of “elite” schooling as you.

Posted by: Gale | June 5, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Dearest Gale-
I do not believe I stated I was better than anyone else. And for a democrat who pulled herself up by her bootstraps I am VERY proud of my education. My eyes were opened while persuing my undergraduate education in the social and political science classes I took, prior to this educational experience I followed our biased media and the rhetoric that many politicians spewed forth. Saying I am educated does not mean that you are unintelligent at all… I can just cite my education as my basis for knowledge. I am proud of women who dare to be more, achieve more, and work harder for all Americans, which is what Hillary stands for! I am very secure in my level of intelligence -as well as my level of class. When discussing education I choose to appreciate those who look beyond the rhetoric and media bias and make informed choices (from more obscure sources). You don’t need to have a doctorate to do that. Let’s not get personal okay, Honey! Take care-

Posted by: Sara | June 5, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

I have lost a great deal of respect for Senator Clinton. During this whole experience, she has behaved like a spoiled child. She wanted to make up the rules as she goes along. It is still sad when American’s would rather self-destruct than to see a person of color with so much power. Yea! “God Bless America”.

Posted by: Joyce | June 5, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Hillary deserves to be revered and respected. I think her slow reaction to ‘NObama’s’ candidacy is deliberate. She makes informed choices about everything she does and chose to concede when it was best for her. I would do the exact same, this has nothing to do with an attitude of any kind. She has a winners spirit and truly cares about America. I appreciate her experience. And am worried about the state of America with Obama or another Bush in the reigns!

Posted by: Clemintime | June 5, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Hillary deserves to be revered and respected. I think her slow reaction to ‘NObama’s’ candidacy is deliberate. She makes informed choices about everything she does and chose to concede when it was best for her. I would do the exact same, this has nothing to do with an attitude of any kind. She has a winners spirit and truly cares about America. I appreciate her experience. And am worried about the state of America with Obama or another Bush in the reigns!

Posted by: Clemintime | June 5, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

UNITY = WIN + WIN
18,000,000 + 18,000,000
superdelegates, elected officials and other party leaders who can vote for whomever they choose at the Democratic convention CAN CHANGE THEIR MINDS, that’s why President Kennedy pushed until the DNC, and not dropped out under any pressures….

Posted by: Chris | June 5, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Hillary’s waited until now to concede because it was best for her. We should all take a lesson from this intelligent woman. Obama is no saint and will contribute to the downfall of America. He needs Hillary!

Posted by: Hannah | June 5, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Very True Chris!
The only difference is that Hillary is a woman. President Kennedy was looked at as a person who never quit, and had the strength to go on. Clinton, unfortunately, is looked at as a sore loser, and someone who does not know when to give up. There is a lot of sexism still. I wish Hilary would not give up, and give into the pressures of those politicians who have their own agendas.

Posted by: Leah | June 5, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I am amazed that Hillary did not learn somewhere in life that contests are based upon who gets the most fair votes. Counting votes where every candidate is not on the ballot is not only dishonorable for Americans but an abomination. That is the equivalence of giving a “multiple choice” test and the test only has one answer choice for each question – like going to Baskin Robbins with 31onderful flavors and only see vanilla. Hillary’s actions have created a great divide amongst the very party she claims to want to help. When a game is clearly won Hillary wants to go into overtime rather than concede. This type of behavior intensifies bitter feelings within her supporters. Clearly, given Hillary’s double standards, she would have call to force Obama out of the race a long time ago. For those who declare Obama should have waited his turn to run for president of the United States, hasn’t America waited long enough to accept the thought that an African American of any gender could be president of this great country?
In response to the question of whether or not Hillary should be on the ballot as vice president, would this have been the expectation of Hillary had she come in first place? Would she have been expected to automatically place Obama on the ticket? Is this not another one of Hillary’s disgraceful tactics? This is unprecedented and again shows the lack of human dignity on behalf of Hillary who would not stand to be treated this way. Hillary is a great example of the saying “people will treat you in a way they themselves would like to be treated.” Clinton should have exited the race a long time ago! Prayerfully, those who encouraged Hillary to stay in the contest will be the ones to help Hillary clear her campaign debts.
Anonymous

Posted by: Anonymous | June 5, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

I very much disagree with “anonymous” your logic on Hillary clinton is skewed. You are obviously very biased. Hillary is not responsible for separating the party, Clinton is powerful, but not that powerful! Excellent point Chris!

Posted by: Jennica | June 5, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I believe that Hillary is doing the right thing by waiting to concede. I’m open to Obama, but really feel for Hillary Clinton. The press and Media have favored Obama, and hurt Clintons campaign. I think Hillary would have made an excellent president. Even though I am open to Obama I am a little frightened of his inexperience -look at the hell we’ve been through over the last 8 years with this inexperienced president. Obama can make a speech, but what is he really saying? We all need to face it -of all the candidates running Hillary would have been the one ready to go on Day 1! Now lets hope and pray that Obama can come through… I guess we’ll see.

Posted by: David | June 5, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Lisa, a bit touchy aren’t you? I did not twist your words, as a matter of fact they were cut and pasted right from your comment.I only ask if you had sent your message to HRC ,and if not ,suggested you do so. Didn’t twist anything. Being younger doesn’t make you better or smarter. Just means you have a whole lot to learn and experience.Possibly your so young you don’t even know things about her that happened in the past.Just read the posting to find out. Who said I was an OB backer? I sure didn’t. I do have to comment on your ” She is also independent and not walking in his shadow” though. I totally disagree with that statement. Just as I disagree with her being the best woman for the job. My right to diagree with you, even if I am an over 60 white female.

Posted by: joan | June 5, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I would like to know why is she going to “suspend” her campaign in order to keep her superdelegates she is still playing duty and only for her self worth (which is typical Clinton style).
All in all I am glad to she her leave the campaign trail and hope she will never become President or Vice President and for that matter that thought includes their daughter (also any other of the Bill & Hillary’s relatives).
Bill and Hillary had to 8 years to clear up America’s problems but they were only looking out for themselves and now they thought everyone forgot what the did/did not do for Americans that we would be dumb enough to have Hillary as President so she could have Bill back in the White House so they could finish their dirty work.
How does any of the Clintons think that we would be so dumb to vote for any of them back in the highest job in the country again when they can not tell the truth for 5 seconds, we all remember of all the times that Hillary mis-spoke and Bill kept on running his mouth as if you was running for office which again were lies or putting down Senator Obama. Thank god it did not work.
I love the Vanity Fair article on Bill Clinton because it gave more details than the New York Times (online) article regarding Ex-President, Mining Deal.

Posted by: Guy | June 5, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

She is like the perennial “teacher’s pet”. She cannot do wrong and thinks she should get everything and of course win everything. So in this case she pouts and hopes someone takes pity and says that in fact she did actually win and then she could be happy. However, she realizes that this is not a dream but reality and she has to go away even though she still wants a piece of it that is why she is crying VP. But now she really thought it through and knows she must now leave-bittersweet though it may be. She could have done much better but if she had, she would of course had won. Good Bye Cruel World!

Posted by: ACP | June 5, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Sara, as for your Joan -get an education quote I happen to have a very high level of education. Not that that matters. So I disagree with Lisa. That doesn’t make me any less intelligent or less of a woman. If you wanted to see sexism at it best you should have been around in the 50′s and 60′s competing in a man’s world.,.

Posted by: joan | June 5, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

“YES” to Lisa & Sara
You are both so right! Obama was never specific about what changes he would make or how they would be implemented. Though he may have come from humble beginnings, which he certainly mentioned many times, now that he is among the nouveau rich, he seems to be as arrogant and unaware of the average American as the current president. When he commented in a debate that middle class Americans have income between 200 to 250K, I realized he doesn’t have clue about the current reality of the majority of people in today’s economy.

Posted by: Earlene | June 5, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Dear Sara,
I was not referring to anything you said in my comment about “being better”, I was responding to the comments by “time to move on” who made a remark about the Clinton supporters level of education and that they are probably unable to read. If you read my last posting you will see that I happen to agree with you and Lisa. Sorry I didn’t make the first line clear as being the “name” of another writer.

Posted by: gale | June 5, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

I just feel that Hillary’s whole life has been calculating. She could have handled her exit a little more diplomatically. A congratulations and a job well done to Obama would have been well received. She chose otherwise and it may brand her politically as a sore grapes loser. Too bad to sad!!!

Posted by: Rob | June 5, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

I just feel that Hillary’s whole life has been calculating. She could have handled her exit a little more diplomatically. A congratulations and a job well done to Obama would have been well received. She chose otherwise and it may brand her politically as a sore grapes loser. Too bad to sad!!!

Posted by: Rob | June 5, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

“What does Hillary want?” perfectly summed the point of her campaign. “What does the country need?” should have been the question. Let’s keep focused on the “WE.”

Posted by: Rob | June 5, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Boy, people are very passionate about their beliefs to the point that they are willing to get on others. I do not like to debate in a dirty way, but I have to say to Joan that I am not as young as you might think and am quite educated and experienced, which is beside the point. I will agree to disagree. The one thing to remember is that some of that bed stuff you believe about HRC was also reported by the media who have their own agendas and votes. Also, just to set things right, I never once said I was behind Hillary because of her gender, but because I felt she was most experienced and actually cared about america and the needs of the people here. For example, the universal health care, I don’t know if that is the right way to go, but obviously something needs to be done about the medical costs and people’s insurance companies denying to pay bills for their care. I am the mother of 4 and a cancer survivor so I have been involved with the medical insurance companies for some time. But, that is just my experience, I am also a nurse and see many elderly who have to choose what medication to omit to afford heating costs and things like that. I like Hillary not for any good or BAD she has done in the past, but for where she stands on the issues at hand, and how she plans to get there from the shambles we have left after the Bush administration. As for the sexism issue, I am looking at all of the positive or otherwise media coverage Obama got, as compared to Hillary. Many times when things were actually mentioned about Hillary, they were negative and biased and journalism is not supposed to be that way. God bless Hillary, I don’t judge for past indiscretions because nobody is perfect, but I will go for what I see she does right under my own beliefs. She at least has a plan and can say what she will do to get where we need to be from here. :)

Posted by: Lisa | June 5, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Hey Gale-
Sorry I mistook you! I thought you were talking about my comments. In reading your posts I do realize we have similar views!
Everyone-
I think Hillary should now think about running as an independent! I think she has a shot and needless to say, then Obama will surely not get her votes. This may bode well for McCain, but then again 40,000 plus “Hillary” fans/voters have already pledged their votes to McCain anyhow. Check out the website.

Posted by: Sara | June 5, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Sara, Great idea!

Posted by: Lisa | June 5, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Go Hilary!!!!!! (Lisa’s eldest daughter)
Even though she dropped out! Shes aan Independent Woman!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: courtney | June 5, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Hillary as an Independent in November? Oh, great. Let’s bring in a Ralph Nader and just toss it to McCain. You people are totally nutz. Why not start your own party – The Spiteful Noseless Party

Posted by: Robley | June 5, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Everyone knows what a fish bowl you are in when you are running for president!!!What was Hillary thinking when she said “They had to rush in and not be greeted because of sniper fire.” As soon as it came out of her lips she should have realized that it was going to be found out. And to wait a week to say she mispoke. Where is the integrity in that?

Posted by: Rob | June 5, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

After reading all these blog comments, no wonder America is so messed up.

Posted by: David | June 5, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Robley said: Hillary as an Independent in November? Oh, great. Let’s bring in a Ralph Nader and just toss it to McCain. You people are totally nutz. Why not start your own party – The Spiteful Noseless Party
When the Democratic Party turns it’s back on 18 million ardent supporters of one of it’s candidates maybe it IS time to look at alternatives…….

Posted by: RickInAmerica | June 5, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Hey thanks for the laugh.
John and Jane Public can’t let go of it in 24 hours.
But the candidate who has almost 18 million people wanting her to be president cannot take less than that to decide how to tell her supporters she is suspending her campaing?
Funny. However, I do think it is time to rethink how we elect candidates particularly presidential candidates.

Posted by: northstar | June 5, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

pa-lease press, lets get out of high school, this is politics people…Hillary is doing a fine job, in these days of instant gratification we expect immediate compliance to whatever whenever. It is her decision to decide when it works best for her to concede. We wouldnt be having this conversation if she was a “he”. The media has consistantly grilled Mrs.Clinton like no other. The graces of Oprah and big money buys you a lot of media friends that tread lightly on Obama. I support the woman and her own wisdom of when it makes sense to join Obama. The media wants to make drama out of the momma. Anyways, Millions of Americans LOVE Hillary …the numbers dont lie. I wonder had she had the youthful sophistcation of “branding” herself better from her campain gurus like Obama how different this outcome would have been. Its all in the “sell” I guess and not your history….didnt we make that exact same mistake with Bush…….Anyway, The ONLY way I will vote Obama is if Hillary is on the ticket. He NEEDS her.period.
iremember the beauty of the 90s when the Clintons reigned!

Posted by: ninja cali mom 74 | June 5, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Obama didn’t outsmart anyone. He was given the nomination by the delegates. After the country got sick of him and started voting for her, the big plan backfired on the DNC, so they had to deal with the Super delegates to give him their votes. After all, it is majority men and we can’t have a woman president!!!!!!!
I will never vote for Obama.
McCain ’08

Posted by: Maggie | June 6, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

I know Hillary, go back to your Senate job and wash your hands of this stinking Democratic party. Just sit there like Obama has in the past and when it comes time to vote on ANYTHING, press the “present” button like he did, 29times. Not a yes or no vote, but “present.” Meaning, I’m here, and I don’t care. Obama hates this country so much that he thought, “I don’t care about what you are all voting on. I will vote “present” and you all vote on these issues. I am just going to sit here and disconnect myself from this and sit back and draw my paycheck. Because I don’t care about America.” Why else America would he do this? It all fits with his racist, anti-American churches beliefs. They hate this country!

Posted by: Maggie | June 6, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

What, Obama makes a shadow??????

Posted by: Maggie | June 6, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

40 yrs ago this evening I was one of RFK co-campaign coordinators in LA & was with him at the Ambassadror & testified to FBI having seen sirhan.
Saddest day of my life. I was also in JFK’s 1st Peace Corps,built schools in Ghana & Kenya where Obama’s father came from,etc. They passed the torch to a new generation, mine. I’d also marched with MLK, but I didn’t become cynical about politics nor dropout going on POT & LSD,as others did allowing NIXON and others to take over by default. I Kept the dream alive & helped build LA SW College after Watts Riots,& am the Faculty Father of LA Mission College in poor NE SF Valley. I pass the torch to my students which I still am teaching at 69 with no plans to retire. I’m proud of America in 21st century growing up to where we don’t judge people by their gender or ethnic background! When the Terrorist attacked the N Valley Jewish Community Center School he shot the classmates of my 4yr old sone Darwin in his Kindergarden. It was Hillary Clinton who then came to his classroom without publicity and read the RAINBOW FISH to the KIDS.
THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT AMERICA HAVE A BEAUTIFUL RAINBOW TO SHOW THE WORLD AND WE ALL SHOULD REJOICE. BOTH OF THE CANDIDATE HAVE ACTED WITH CLASS & SPREAD VOTING DEMOCRACY ACROSS THE WHOLE NATION BRINGING BACK THE YOUNG THAT EMPOWERED ALL THE KENNEDYS.This make me proud to be a Prof of gov’t. & a life long Civil Rts Activist,
Obama & Hillary will do what is best for America, whether or not she is VP she will serve this country as Ted Kennedy has, doing more in the Senate over a longer period than he could have
if he had been President. I’m proud of them all for they join in God Blessing America the land of the free.
On this sad RFK DAY 40 Yrs
Don’t ever let the dream die, hold the torch high!
Chuck Dirks LAMC

Posted by: Prof. Charles E. Dirks | June 6, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

To Judy, June 5,08 1:38
About Obama’s white heritage, he is a member of the Kennedy Klan. He’s starting another branch of the Kennedy’s and he has apparently convinced them that he is a member, and they don’t really know otherwise. In reality, Obama is al-Qaida. His father was African and Islamic. That is why Obama stayed in that anti-American, hate filled church for 20yrs. That is why he identifies so much with them. That is why his church embraces Islam. It all fits!!! After seeing an al-Qaida training video from northern Africa the other day, where they are training recruits, I looked at those guys. They have slender dark faces with black beards. They look just like Obama, if he had a beard. Obama doesn’t look like the “typical black” man. I think he is using all of us for his purpose. He has blown stardust even in the blacks faces and they don’t see it. They just want him so bad.

Posted by: Maggie | June 6, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

just a question everyone out there talks about what a historic race this has been for obama because he is the first africain american running for president. now we all know that that is not strictly true. but why hasn’t any one talked about the fact that this to the best of my memory is the absolutely first time a woman of any color has ran for the top half of a presidental ticket. i know g.f. was mondales vp but other than that? who has there been?

Posted by: northstar | June 6, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

It is such a shame that America is still so full of hateful people. Maggie you should be ashamed of yourself. First of all you didn’t answer the question, you are so racist that you can’t stand a black man to get ahead. I am goining to pray for you because you need help. As far as Hilary is concerned she should have stepped up and supported Obama as soon as she lost. What she did is called being a sore loser.

Posted by: Deborah | June 6, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Northstar this was posted earlier by Marguerite. Should help answer your question.
I am really upset that Cynthia McFadden stated that Hillary was the most viable female in history that ran for President. Did she forget Shirley Anita St. Hill Chisholm (November 30, 1924 – January 1, 2005) was an American politician, educator and author [1]. She was a Congresswoman, representing New York’s 12th District for seven terms from 1969 to 1983. In 1968, she became the first African-American woman elected to Congress. On January 23, 1972, she became the first major party African-American candidate for President of the United States. She won 152 delegates.[2], [3] Other women who ran for President of the United States in 1972 include Linda Jenness and Evelyn Reed.
I must let you know that as a reporter of her stature her words were a disgrace to a race of Black women and to especially a misrepresentation of American History.
Mrs Clinton is in the race and is a viable candidate. Sen. Clinton is not just the most viable woman. She is just in the right part of American history, and Mrs. Chisholm was right in her history making also. Ms. McFadden should make a retraction to her statement. I think she was rude and one sided in her opinion.
Sincerely,
Marguerite

Posted by: Jan | June 6, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

She’s doing her best. She’s devastated. She’s trying to still look like a leader. However, it dawns on me that those who say the Clintons are consumed by narciss ism may be right. It does seem that for them, everything is all about them.

Posted by: janet johnson | June 6, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

oh what a sandlot.
i don’t recall there being any rules about the length of time a candidate may take to suspend, concede, withdraw, let go of delegates other than the official nominee will be picked at the convention. for those who are upset that she did not act fast enough to suit you…what does it matter really? obama has plenty of money he is already taking mccain on and on this very broadcast the were saying that barack and hillary had a private meeting…yes PRIVATE. the voters can bicker back and forth all they want but for all practical purpose our role in the nominating process is over. now it is up to the canidates to decide what they are going to do. if hillary comes out and says nope i just can’t do it i have to continue my own campaign, that will be her choice. if she says i am going to stay loyal to the party we must not let another republican into the presidency that is her choice. and until she and he decide what direction they are going to take…no amount of name calling will change it.

Posted by: northstar | June 6, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

KUDO’s to Northstar. Couldn’t have said it any better.

Posted by: CROSSFIRE | June 6, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

To Guy,
Obviously you must have been living somewhere other than the US when Clinton was in office. During his term this country was in the best shape I’ve ever seen in 60 years of life. He balanced the budget, got the country out of debt, the economy was great, everybody had jobs and we weren’t at war. The only thing that he wanted to accomplish and was unable to was universal health care and that was because of Newt Gingrich, the Republicans and the insurance lobbyists, not Clinton. Right now our country is in the worst condition since the Depression in 1929 and if the Republicans remain in office it won’t get any better. We are in a recession, millions of people are losing jobs and their homes, we are trillions of dollars in debt, we are in a war where no one can be a winner and our sons and daughters are losing their lives, other countries and former allies now hate us, and fuel and food costs are higher than ever. Bush and his cohorts don’t seem to give a damn about what is happening in our country or to the American people. They have been completely ineffectual in everything but helping themselves and their rich friends get richer. Try to name one thing Bush has accomplished that was beneficial to all Americans.

Posted by: Gale | June 6, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Well said Texas Voter,
I agree 100% with you.
Morals and truth doesnt have anything to do with Republicans or Democrats Party. Its the character of the candidate.
Only thing Hillary cares is about her self and her play boy husband getting back to WH.
She fooled a lots of people thinking she cares abour regular people?
The truth is she doe not. She was for NAFTA yet in Ohio and Texas she said she is against. Same thing for war in Iraq.
She lied about her experiance visiting Bosnia?
She have said that she can not run effective campign due to poor finances and doesn’t have enough money to run effective campaing, yet Clintons amazed $109,000,000.00
Why spend their own money when they can spent someone elses.
America will be better of without Clintons.
No more Lincoln bedroom for sale,
no more sex scandals with interns,
no more pardons for money
no more worrying more about appearing on L.A TV night show as guestand playing saxophone while not carring and doing anything about the first attack on WTC back in 1993 when Clinton was president. Have he did (9/11 might not have happened.
No more taking furniture out the WH and trying to take piano as well on the last day.
She even said she would not exit since its not June in reference to JFK while Bill said day earlier that the best way to her presidentcy is to start with VP.
GOD BLESS AMERICA without Clintons.

Posted by: Danny | June 6, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

It was a long race. Too long…
Back in March it was over; people just did not realize it… (look at the numbers!) The Media and BOTH campaigns kept it running albeit for different reasons: ratings, petty self interests, strategic distractions to blindside the other party, many reasons…
We will read the final verdict in about 50 years or so. Looking back at it even now all (the attacks) even seems a bit silly.
It was pretty interesting to have witnessed the generational change that his and her campaigns represents.
All over the country it was about the ‘young folk’ for Obama. ‘Young folks telling their parents about Obama, young folks going to vote for him in droves etc… It seemed to indicate that ‘old’ folks were being displaced for the new. as if “It was old age having a go at youth”…
If I can remember the most evident moment there was media manipulation for this ‘old vs young’ nonsense was when Edwards (with the help of the magic of television) called Hillary ‘
Status Quo’; the camera switched to her and showed her face as she was crazy-angry. The anger does not indicate anything actually; I would get angry when someone that does not know me calls me something I strive not to be, even worse during a live audience of millions. How dare he challenge my core beliefs ?. Obviously to the naive, those beliefs never change.
I congratulate Hillary for her campaign (Even though I dislike her motives) now anything is possible!
She should have conceded sooner though; Bill Clinton looks different now to many people… I expect him to disappear from the spotlight for a while. He needs people to forget him…
P.S.
To all the ignorant people out there who think in terms of gender or race: you are slowly becoming what many of us want you to become: extinct.
Not soon enough though…

Posted by: McFullen | June 6, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

thank you jan, thanks crossfire. i am so very disapointed that this oppoutunity to speak so freely to people is not used more efficiently. everyone gets there tail feathers up now and then and i am not a robert rules person…but lions and tigers and bears oh my. i gotta get some sleep. night.

Posted by: northstar | June 6, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

“The deal was this: (With Chelsea running interference)–Hillary would stay with her old Billy-Goat of a randy husband IF, and only IF, he turned the Clinton Machine over to her disposal. She wanted to be President too; and if he would do everything within his, the Machine’s, and the Arkansas Mafia’s power to get her elected BY ANY AND ALL MEANS POSSIBLE, she would stand by her man.”
If you young’uns really want to know, PLEASE Google the phrase “Open Marriage” or got to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_marriage
and read the definition for this phrase in 1972 and 1977.
Now you know why Hillary had to act surprise when the public found out Bill was having sex with women other than Hillary.
Now you also know why Hillary did not leave Bill.
I know because I use to be a member of the same private clubs where they would Party at back in the early 80’s.

Posted by: Jane and Bob | June 6, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

This is for the meathead who thinks it is wrong to think in terms of gender and race:
-You are probably a white male
-you don’t even see the unearned agvantages you automatically get
For a woman life is different we have to fight to achieve what a man automatically gets (and only get .75 on the dollar). Most women who have a bachelors degree often times only make as much as a male right out of highschool (Harvey & Allard, 2005). We achieved the right to vote even after african american males. We have to look over our shoulders and think about our safety always… don’t tell me that ALL the negative press Hillary has had to put up with had nothing to do with gender! Remember the comment that “Hillary was pimping out her daughter”? None of the other (MALE) candidates had to endure half of what Hillary has! Don’t tell me gender isn’t an issue…it is THE issue! The very reason why she didn’t get the democratic candidacy. I am completely disappointed in the Democratic party for turning their back on 18 million voters.

Posted by: Fiona | June 6, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

RickinAmerica – I realize my suggestion that a certain group might form the “Spiteful Noseless Party” was a little incendiary but do you honestly believe that by following the established rules and nominating the candidate who got the requisite number of delegates, the Democratic Party will have “turned its back on 18 million supporters of Hillary?” Interesting. Why follow ANY rules? How’re we different than the Bush administration?

Posted by: Robley | June 6, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am

I’m very much looking forward to hearing Hillary’s unifying speech on Saturday. I’ll be listening for “WE” to replace “ME.” (If it doesn’t, there’s not much hope for a Democratic president in 2009.)

Posted by: Robley | June 6, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am

While the press and others are treading lightly about Hilleary holding up the political process because of her “Personal Problems” and how she is unable to cope with her loss, the public is thinking.
How in the heck would Hillary be able to cope with the stress of being the President of the United States, the Commander in Chief of the United States and the Leader of the Free World. Now those are some pretty fancy titles and I’m sure Hillary would like these titles. However, Hillary’s reaction in the past two weeks has caused me to highly question her mental and emotional ability to perform under stress during critical emergency incidents, which our Commander in Chief is required to do or be prepared to do. Remember, she’ll have her finger on the “Button”.
I ask you, what would Hillary do under the scenario of the “Cuban Missile Crisis? Take time out so she could cope?
Hillary was in the mental stage of Denial and now, instead of getting on with her life and doing her job as an employee of the citizens of the state of New York, she is holding her self up in her home while she is trying to cope with her loss that has been obvious for several weeks and foreseeable as any candidate who has thrown her/his hat in the ring.
I ask you, can you remember any other candidate for President, or for any other political position for that matter, behaving this way?
There is more to being the President of the United States than shaking hands and having people serve them. It is a JOB, a very stressful job. I want someone as my president who is mentally and emotionally stable and Hillary has proven that she is not.

Posted by: Mary | June 6, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Mary-
I will apoligize in advance for my comment, but this is how I truly feel…
YOUR IGNORANCE ASTOUNDS ME. Do you know how many candidates took either longer than Hillary to concede or didn’t at ALL (Kennedy -for one). AND THEY WERE MEN! You are a discredit to women, for someone who works in the psychology field I can tell you that emotions serve a very important purpose in human beings. Somewhere along the way in America’s History emotions were seen as weak. It has been proven that those who risk displaying thier emotions are stronger than those who will not -due to the possibility of ridicule. And if there is one thing I can say, As for Hillary being emotional, BU**SH**! Unfortunately, she has to hide who she is because she’s damned if she does and damned if she doesn’t. When she doesn’t show softness she is seen as too hard and to obstinate and is criticized, when she does she is ridiculed. What man ever get’s analyzed in such an unfair way? Hillary could handle the cuban missile crisis with grace and aplomb and likely with more know-how than any man. Your Post is likely the worst I’ve read yet…you must be fresh out of highschool and still seeing the world as idealistic. If that’s not it, then your just plain ignorant. Oh, and by the way don’t tell me about the mental stages of denial, I work with people who display these symptoms and I can tell you that Hillary Clinton is taking some time to reevaluate the situation…If you look back you will see that MANY men have done this same thing, but they never had to put up with spiteful remarks from women like you! As I said before you are a discredit to women everywhere. I appreciate somebody who knows what they are talking about, you obviously DO NOT! I won’t wast my valuable time on you anymore -you are beyond hope! Do me a favor and look up gender bias, sexism, and ignorance in the dictionary…your face might proudly be displayed!

Posted by: Sara | June 6, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Mary-
What are your credentials? How is it that you believe you are able to diagnose somebody as mentally and emotionally unstable? Are you a psychotherapist or a psychologist? Do you know the “DSM IV TR” (Diagnostical and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) well? You say Hillary is in denial, what is your basis for such a statement? If I were to go out on a limb I’d have to say that Hillary isn’t the one with the problem… you might want to search out the nearest psychotherapist for your issues with sexism.

Posted by: Jake | June 6, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

I think it was time some excitement was put back into politics, and the Democrats certainly gave us that. I have been for Barack Obama ever since the awesome speech he gave at the Convention. It was obvious his was real intelligence. I think the way things have played out, people saw it.
I never could understand why the media pandered to the Clintons, calling both of them “intelligent” and “brilliant”. Theirs seemed fake, phony, and forced. And again, I think people saw that too.
To return to the REAL topic of discussion on here: How does the public think Hillary handled Tuesday night and her “exit”? Well, it’s not over until the woman in the pants-suit says it is.Soo-oo…
Lets hope and pray that she puts on her most patriotic pants-suit this weekend, and FINALLY does the right thing. Up until now, she has not. I think we just witnessed the inner-most essence of what these 2 candidates truly have been all along, and are:
Barack, poised, eloquent, gracious.
Hillary, narcissistic and pissed off.

Posted by: Claudean | June 6, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

I think it was time some excitement was put back into politics, and the Democrats certainly gave us that. I have been for Barack Obama ever since the awesome speech he gave at the Convention. It was obvious his was real intelligence. I think the way things have played out, people saw it.
I never could understand why the media pandered to the Clintons, calling both of them “intelligent” and “brilliant”. Theirs seemed fake, phony, and forced. And again, I think people saw that too.
To return to the REAL topic of discussion on here: How does the public think Hillary handled Tuesday night and her “exit”? Well, it’s not over until the woman in the pants-suit says it is.Soo-oo…
Lets hope and pray that she puts on her most patriotic pants-suit this weekend, and FINALLY does the right thing. Up until now, she has not. I think we just witnessed the inner-most essence of what these 2 candidates truly have been all along, and are:
Barack, poised, eloquent, gracious.
Hillary, narcissistic and pissed off.

Posted by: Claudean | June 6, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Oh and this, too, is for MARY:
Dear, Don’t pay any attention to the nasty posts. What you said makes sense. Those 2 are playing a form of Eric Bern’s “Games People Play”, One-Upmanship. Makes them feel superior.
Ya know what? You and I could stick around and have a mental duel with these two–but then, I don’t take on UNARMED opponents.(AKA Jake and Sara.) And besides, they don’t sound like they’re having a very good day, poor souls. More to be pitied than censored, as I was taught…
I thought we had a topic on here anyway that we were supposed to be discussing?

Posted by: Claudean | June 6, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Mary-
Isn’t that all speculation and bias on your part? (or maybe the Media’s?) I have not heard any such thing about this. It is such a shame that Hillary has to deal with issues such as these. He mental status is just fine, how’s yours?

Posted by: Leah | June 6, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Claudine
maybe you should only post once (not multiple times for one post), your wasting space with your hot air. As for Jake and Sara, I do believe they were speaking in defense of Hillary -A very valid topic in my eyes. Just because one is for Barack Obama doesn’t mean he/she needs to be a Hillary basher, but perhaps we haven’t evolved that far yet!?

Posted by: YRSOFT | June 6, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

No longer a democrat, McCain supporter now…I am disillusion with the democratic party. Hillary got an unfair shake. Great point ‘YRSOFT’ -just because I support Hillary I won’t bash Obama, I will take the higher ground. I am confident I voted for the best candidate. We need someone who knows her stuff and Hillary was the woman for the job.

Posted by: MonicaQ | June 6, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Claudeen wrote:
“Barack, poised, eloquent, gracious.”
I would have to agree with this statement, but is this a reason to vote for him for president? I need more substance and content.
Barak will not get my vote…I will go independent. Hillary is handling all this just as well as she has handled everything else, with grace and with her head held high. We will see more of her (thankfully) and her pant suites!

Posted by: DonaldFIN | June 6, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

To Deborah @1:41 am 6/6
What was the question I didn’t answer?
I am not a racist. People are so good at calling others bigots as we all have been called because we are against the illegals storming our borders and taking our jobs. Most of the country is asleep or they are morons. I am not a bigot if I am against what is wrong and voice my opinion loudly at this injustice our country’s leaders are cramming down our throats. Everyone is sitting here out of jobs and homes, but the Mexicans HAVE JOBS and are buying homes and cars! I am not a bigot.
Then here is Obama that has been in this known racist, anti-American church for 20yrs., and their website declares it too. He has made one comment after another for months that is stupid and offensive. We have heard parts of sermons from his church, if you want to call it a church, that are offensive or should be to all Americans, yet they still vote for him because they don’t want to vote for an older person??!! They find all kinds of fault with Hillary, but she is not racist and is not anti-American!!!! We know her and we know she would work tirelessly for ALL of us. Obama has pledged his allegiance to this church only, and I believe they hate this country so much because of slavery that they refuse to pledge their allegiance to it. That is why he won’t recite the “Pledge of Allegiance” or put his hand on his racist heart. Because he doesn’t care about it!
Our men have been fighting wars for decades to keep his butt free. They come home and want to kiss the ground, thankful to be on American soil, and they still vote for him, and Obama stands there on the platform looking defiant and rebellious. I guess this is the change we will all see if he becomes president. Ok. You are all in for a lot of changes. I can only imagine what they might be.
Why should Hillary step down? This race was taken from her. Maybe the Super delegates will come to their senses and move their votes to her. I AM ONLY ONE OF THE 18 MILLION HILLARY SUPPORTERS WHO WILL USE MY 8TH GRADE LEVEL INTELLIGENCE AND VOTE FOR MCCAIN THIS NOV. I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR BARACK AND HILLARY TOGETHER ON A TICKET OR FOR DEMOCRAT EVER AGAIN. I HAVE NEVER SEEN A RACE LIKE THIS ONE.
I was really logging back on to this site to say “adios.” These blog sites aren’t good for anything but to let all of us vent our frustrations. Who’s reading these anyway but the one’s commenting here. You don’t think the Super delegates are wasting their time looking at this? I don’t even think Nightline is wasting their time. I will never listen to the news channnels again and will get my biased news from the Internet, that which I have to pay for anyway. I was going to say “It’s time for everyone to pray to their God (whoever that might be) for the only hope we have. Mine is Jesus. Not Barack Hussein Obama!!!!!
I am not blogging anymore. This is a joke. I cannot believe how differently so many people think. Obama goes from being a 20yr. member of this white racist, anti-American “hate rally, so called church” then the next week is baptized into a red-blooded, all American boy.
Who’s the moron and the racist??????

Posted by: Maggie | June 6, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

“Stay the Course” lemmings. Let’s ignore the rules, leave the party or fail to vote and give the election to McCain. By 2012 there’ll be nothing left to save in this country. But you can tell your children and grandchildren I didn’t compromise! Shades of the Scorpion and Frog fable…

Posted by: Robley | June 6, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Hi maggie-
I get what you are saying and do understand where you are coming from. You don’t have to make excuses to these overly aggressive Obama supporters. What they don’t understand is that supporting Obama doesn’t have to mean bashing Hillary. Also, just because we support Hillary and not Obama does not make us racist individuals. I support Hillary for her experience, her stance on important issues, her ability to work with everyone, etc. (I could go on and on). I gather you support Hillary for all these reasons also. She was simply the very best candidate for the Job!!
Hold you head up and enjoy your day!
Sara

Posted by: Sara | June 7, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Sen. Obama is simply unelectable. It would be helpful for anyone who doubts this hypothesis to read “Vote by Numbers” column by an astrophysicist named Neil DeGrasse Tyson on 6-6-08 in the New York Times. It says, “If the general election were held today, Barack Obama would lose to John McCain, while Mr. McCain would lose to Mrs. Clinton. This conclusion comes not from wishful thinking but from a new method of analysis of statistics of polls that has been accepted for publication in the journal of Mathematical and Computer Modeling. The authors, J. Richard Gott III, a professor at Princeton and Wes Colley, a researcher at the University at Alabama in Huntsville, are not politicians. They are astrophysicists. And one of the tasks of scientists is to clarify the apparent complexity of the universe by using the language of mathematics… ”
I don’t think we needed a these scientists to tell us what’s going to happen in November. This situation is very clear to most of us. For most Clinton supporters what happened at the Democratic Presidential Primary race was a true tragedy for Sen. Hillary Clinton and they know it was even a greater tragedy for America if not for the entire world. The Democratic super-delegates have abandoned their role as party leaders, for the purpose they were exactly created for. They were paralyzed and dysfunctional lot, most of them without a backbone, full of sentimentalities, various kinds of social and cultural justifications but unsuited make tough decisions that our country needs. You saw them in session in Washington DC trying to decide what to do with Florida and Michigan, last weekend. Did you ask yourself the question, are these are the cream of sum-collective of our political leadership of the Democratic Party? Not being able to vote against Sen. Barack Obama─ afraid it would be considered “racist” ─Democratic Party leaders and super-delegates have let unelectable Sen. Obama as their party’s nominee. But this is unfortunate because Sen. Obama can’t win against Sen. John McCain. We all knew that. Sen. Obama’s base of support is too narrow, having won most of delegates through caucus states. Not having won a single major state and not being able to get the support of wide segments of voters Sen. Obama is simply unelectable. The Democratic Super-delegates with the helped the American media are electing Sen. John McCain as our next president. We can look forward to a George Bush’s third term in November 08. Get used to it. Get used to President John McCain!

Posted by: charleychaplin | June 7, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Like a sore loser.

Posted by: Su Jay | June 7, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Maggie, You should post, you have valuable things to say and there are more on your side than you believe. We are all NOT racist and can hold our heads up. So we liked Hillary and are upset about her conceding to that snake in the grass. It does not mean we are racist. But I do believe there is a sexism issue here. Don’t let people who are being rude get you down. For everyone of those itiots bashing you there are ten more saying you go girl! I look forward to hearing from you in the future, I understand your anger! Keep your chin up, no one here knows who you are. Stand up for what you believe in. :)

Posted by: Lisa | June 7, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

I think Hillary handled it with class and dignity. This whole process has been an eye opener. I have been a life long Democrat and in November I will vote for a Republican. I would never for Obama. He has no experience, has Chicago mob connections and his “we will all get along speech” is a bit tiresome. We’re losing jobs by the millions, people are losing their homes, gas is going through the roof and he wants us to all get along! This country will be another Detroit if he gets in and yes I’m from Kentucky! We handed his butt back to him on a sliver platter and for that I worked my own butt off for Hillary (besides loving the Clintons for all they are). Think about this for a moment – the movers and shakers of the Democratic Party didn’t want Hillary to win because they know that she would beat McCain. So they put this poor old black guy out there to lose. Shame on Howard Dean and the Democratic Party. You will lose in November.

Posted by: normajean | June 7, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Normajean:
I totally and completely agree. I have said that a thousand times. Washington wants a third Bush term and they know McCain can’t beat Hillary, so they put Obama out there.

Posted by: Lisa | June 7, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

We as so called Americans all came from some where else. I didn’t call Hillary a racist I called you (Maggie) one for your comment about the way Obama looks. Bush is taking us all to hell in a hand basket while you are talking about someones name and characteristics. At least he (Obama) wants to try and change the status quo but because he has a black father he is a terrorist? I wonder what his mother or grandparents that he speaks so highly of think about the way he looks.

Posted by: Deborah | June 7, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

robley,
are you talking about the scorpion that asked the frog to give him a rid across the river? and then the scorpion killed the frog once they got across the river and the frog asked the scorpion why did you kill me? i helped you. and the scorpion basically said “scorpion” like jack said “pirate”? is that the fable you are talking about?…yes i am taking short cuts with how i am telling the story but as for the facts i believe i have them right. the lesson i got is don’t blame the scorpion for being a scorpian foolish frog you knew what i was when you gave me a ride. so if we know a scorpion is a scorpion we should treat them as such.
i’m not sure how you meant that to apply to this discussion. who was the scorpion and who was the frog? i can see agruments for either.
HOWEVER, as far as leaving the party…obviously the whole of washington needs shakedown. and maybe there has to be a few bloody years with some other views being expressed with something other than this hatfields and maccoys fued we have now. as far as not compromising some times you can not compromise. what if we had compromised in the revelutionary war? where would we be? i don’t think she will do it because she has been a party loyalist for so long but maybe a third party with a canidate that has a real shot at winning is what this country needs.
i read something that suggested that the democratic leadership knows that obama won’t win but sees more benifits for having him as the canidate even if he looses than putting hillary on the top of ticket. what does that say if it is true?
why does the “we” aspect enthral you so? how does obama saying “we” all the time elicit your loyalty? how is “we” any different from asking your supporters to tell you what they think? i know some people will only see that as a defiant i dare you statement and will never be able to see it as a i am fighting for my supporters statement.
but robley how much influence are you really going to have over what obama does once he is in the white house? once he is in he is in and he will do what he wants to do. he will be, to use a bushim, “the decider”.
i have long believed that we will have a “black” man in office before we have a woman of any race (and it is only because it is the color of his skin that he calls himself black, sad really cause every one knows he is also half white.) i wonder about this whole putting your racial identity before your political identity. but remember when being italian, irish, chinese or japanese were the big taboo’s? this whole race issure opens a whole new can of worms that it is not my intent to talk about. but why are we still defining things by color at all?
but i don’t want do go down that route when we also have the question of some people thinking strictly based gender “who cares the *itch is gone.” that was actually said in this blog. what if softail had said “who care the *pook is gone.” (are we just using that stupid *ode for the edtiors?) would not have every obama supporter just have come unglued?
so what are we left with when ultimately it seems everyone is only talking about race or gender?
what does that tell us about ourselves our country and our political process? it has been said that all politics are local. everyone sees the world through the lens life has given them.
what niether political party seems to take into account is that every political race is divided into 2 parts male and female. and if you alienate one part of your party you are going to suffer the conciquences of that. but may be that is the only way something, anything will really change in washington. is if a party takes a big hit.
then maybe we will get away from the democratic party being discbed as a party that is held together by mutual hate.
there are rebublican women (and a few men) that would have bailed ship for hillary. is charliechaplin right? if all hillary supporter lumped together regardless of party affiliation would she win the white house?
then we must ask what is wrong with the way we elect presidents muchless anyone else when race, gender, political affiliation, religion and so much more comes before ideas and sulutions?

Posted by: northstar | June 7, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.