Aug 7, 2008 4:30am

The Note: Obama vs. Clinton: The Battle Continues

ABC News’ Rick Klein writes in Thursday’s Note: Sen. Barack Obama is set to leave for his much-deserved vacation with one very big loose end that doesn’t want to be tied — and that’s not counting the veepstakes.

It’s the drama that won’t go away, the storyline that’s too delicious to recede, the symbol of a party’s divisions the very mention of which brings smiles to the faces of editors and producers: Obama vs. Clinton. (Welcome back.)

To former President Bill Clinton’s missing praise (to say nothing of what he is saying), we add this: A steadfast refusal by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton to rule out allowing her delegates to vent in the peculiar fashion of voting for her on the convention floor, instead of the candidate she’s campaigning for.

“I happen to believe that we will come out stronger if people feel that their voices were heard and their views were respected,” Clinton, D-N.Y., told a gathering of supporters last week, ABC News reported Wednesday. “We do not want any Democrat either in the hall or in the stadium or at home walking away saying, well, you know, I’m just not satisfied, I’m not happy.”

“It’s as old as, you know, Greek drama,” Clinton said. (We couldn’t agree more.)

Read the rest of The Note — and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day — from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.

Clinton gets a chance to clear the air with a *noon ET Web chat Thursday* organized for supporters (hope you weren’t expecting softballs — or donations that don’t come with a price).

What does it say about the most important relationship in the Democratic Party that this is still an unresolved issue, three weeks before Obama is set to formally claim the nomination? Can a party heal if one of its principal players — and a few million of her supporters — aren’t ready for it?

“The refusal to publicly announce her intentions is widely seen as a bargaining chip Clinton is holding on to as party officials negotiate logistics regarding her convention speech and other activities,” per ABC News.

Said Clinton friend Lanny Davis (who, like most inside Camp Clinton, don’t want a roll call): “It’s a reflection of genuine frustration by Hillary Clinton supporters that Sen. Obama seems to have forgotten about 18 million voters.”

Think of how much the joint Obama-Clinton statement released late Wednesday doesn’t say: “We are working together to make sure the fall campaign and the convention are a success. At the Democratic Convention, we will ensure that the voices of everyone who participated in this historic process are respected and our party will be fully unified heading into the November election.”

Continue reading today’s Note by clicking HERE.

ABC News’ Hope Ditto, Alexa Ainsworth and Jason Volack contributed to this report.

User Comments

She has lost but does not want to be forgotten, oh my dear Hillary.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 7, 2008, 4:47 am 4:47 am

Good -
I am so sick and tired of hearing the name OBAMA, OBAMA OBAMA and OBAMA to the point where my stomach turns.

Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | August 7, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

Just imagine if he picks Bayh as his VP. Can you say Obama Bayh. Obama Bayh ha ha ha. Ick.

Posted by: Kitty | August 7, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am

It must suck for Obama, but the fact remains he needs Hillary, and he needs Bill. Both of them have huge support in the democratic party as well as the nation, particularly in areas that Obama lacks support (rural areas). Hillary should be offered the VP spot, but if not, at the very least, they both should be showcased at the convention. If they are not, I promise you this, BO will not win. He must recognize that he won this contest more narrowly than a primary has ever been won. He needs her half of the party. It’s my opinion, that it will be a huge risk if she’s not on the ticket. But if he flatly refuses that, he MUST find a way to showcase her at the convention. I read she’s raised 500K for him and he has failed to raise that for her (an agreement they made after the primary). That gets back to her voters, and it will be hell to pay in November.

Posted by: a reader in georgia | August 7, 2008, 5:03 am 5:03 am

Go Hillary! Unity is overrated. Everyone unified behind President Bush after 9/11 and look how that turned out. Hitler unified Germany behind the German Workers’ Party. Think with the brains God gave you people. Don’t drink the Kool-Aid.

Posted by: Amber | August 7, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Amen Billy…Amen

Posted by: Josh N. | August 7, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

Whether or not Obama picks Hillary as his Veep there are supporters of hers whom still won’t vote for the ticket. I’m still against the “Dream” ticket and a Bayh ticket.

Posted by: Vanessa | August 7, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

Oba can win without the Clintons. He did win when the Clintons were openly contesting against him – how can he fail to win when they are out of the picture? Insane!

Posted by: Al | August 7, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

When will Edwards speak at the convention? ;^D

Posted by: johnny7 | August 7, 2008, 5:17 am 5:17 am

I am one of those selfish Hillary supporters who will vote for John McCain, and yes, I sleep very well at night. John McCain has said many times over the years that he would rather lose an election than win a war. He backed up his words by challenging George Bush on his execution of the war in Iraq, and alienating his own Party. McCain has alienated his own party on several issues over the years. That is the difference between Obama and McCain. I can pretty much predict what McCain is going to do. I have no idea what Obama stands for. He says one thing, changes his mind, and then changes it back again, depending on the way the wind blows. I have no idea who this man really is. He reminds me of an onion. Peel away the layers, and there’s nothing at the core. I don’t always agree with John McCain, but I’m pretty sure I know where he stands on most issues. At least that gives me some level of comfort. From day to day, I don’t know where Obama stands on anything. In one day, he said THREE different things about Iraq – he’d get the troops out in 16 months, then he’d keep troops in Iraq depending on conditions on the ground, and then he went back to his commitment to get the troops out in 16 months. It’s clear to me that this man is willing to say anything to get elected. The question is, what does he really believe and what will he really do?

Posted by: FOB | August 7, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Obama gave a hostile interview to a Las Vegas Radio Station……….he does not like to be questioned…
Channel 8 in Las Vegas

Posted by: Jed | August 7, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

Anybody remember that Saturday Night Live skit? The one where Hillary gives her top reasons she should be given the nomination. Her #1 reason “I’m a sore loser.” I believed it to be true back then and Hillary is proving it to be true now.

Posted by: joel | August 7, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Good -
I am so sick and tired of hearing the name OBAMA, OBAMA OBAMA and OBAMA to the point where my stomach turns.
–> yeah right, if his name is John Smith you wouldn’t be so sick would you?

Posted by: someone | August 7, 2008, 5:22 am 5:22 am

A much deserved vacation. This guy has taken more vacations this year than I have. The Democrats are on vacation and the Republicans are showing their face in Washington D.C. Hillary Clinton is not on vacation and her husband is raising money for AIDS awareness and treatment (a subject that the “One” has not touched) and John McCain is not on vacation. Obama could pick the other “one” , whoevever that might be and I wouldn’t vote for him. Go on vacation Obama. We all need a rest – from you. And because Hillary Clinton would not and did not play dirty by callling Obama out on his racists remarks (good for John McCain) she suffered. BTW he is not the nominee yet. There are over two weeks before the convention.

Posted by: Sue | August 7, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am

The issue is Hillary received more popular votes in the primaries ever. No one else in history has received as many popular votes as Hillary. As a Hillary Democrat, I am disgusted with this party that has chosen to annoint someone not deserving to be the candidate. In the end if Hillary is not the party’s nominee, I shall vote for John happily.

Posted by: benvictor | August 7, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am

I am tired of Obama too but not because of his funny name. But because his pandering- insult to our intelligence campaign.
Obama now wants MI and FL fully seated. What happened to rules are rules?
I mean this is absolutely filthy and so disgusting that I can not contain myself.
With them seated fully
HILLARY WINS!!

Posted by: Davis | August 7, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am

I so sick of hearing the name Hillary,Hillary,Hillary.
Let her go back to her job and let the election take it’s course.
Enough of her and her cheating husband.

Posted by: Bimbo | August 7, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am

I am one of the 18 Million voters that just can’t see Obama as our next president deep down I really want to support Him but, it is not in me due, to the way that he and his supporters treated the Clinton’s through the entire Primaries. Hillary needs to stand up for herself, her values, and the 18 Million people that voted for her. There is no alternative and Obama needs to sit down and shut up. She got the Popular vote, she got more votes yet He got more delegates due to the way our system is set up…If every vote counts then why is she not our nominee….Experience vs. talk and as far as I can see Obama is all talk that’s why He’s flip flopping on the issues. I can’t support anyone who does that. He talked a good game but, now that the primaries are over he’s showing everyone in this country he doesn’t have the first clue….America NEEDS Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: pink rose | August 7, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am

If Obama is so massianic why is he still tied to McCain in the polls? With all the millions raised and economy in the gutter why is Obama not making any movement in the polls? Crazy lunatics in the Obama camp seems too blind not to see that the red states that made him the nominee are no longer there to vote for him in the fall. Arrongance, ego and sheer stupidity will certainly doom this man’s candidacy if he does not take Hillary with him. The southerners voted for Bush/Cheney twice in a row, what makes anyone think that they will not vote for McCain who is a saint and angel combined when matched with Bush. Obama campaign team are really dumb not to take Hillary with them and angle for a landslide instead of a razor thin margin which always favors the vote rigging GOP time and time again.

Posted by: Ed Banks | August 7, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am

The world is not big enough for the egos of Obama, Hillary and of course, Bubba Bill. Bill is fuming that an upstart not only took the nomination from Hillary, but made Bill look foolish in the eyes of many people with his rants. Obama may know this, but he has a Bull’s Eye on his back. The Clinton machine is out to make sure his presence on the political stage is a short one.

Posted by: Jeff in Orlando | August 7, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am

Michael,
Wait, Hillary isn’t a liberal. Could have fooled me. Many liberals supported Bill Clinton as President, Hillary as Senator, and Hillary’s run for the Dem nomination. Many still love and respect the Clintons. Why? Because the Clintons are liberal. And if they aren’t, why have the right-wing nuts been telling me that the Clintons are Socialists/Commies for the last 16 years?
Compare and contrast Hillary’s and Obama’s proposed policies from the primary. I challenge you to find any significant differences. Now do the same with McCain. I think you’ll find that Obama and Hillary agree on FAR MORE issues than either does with McCain.
And dude, the Socialist Regime crap. It’s so tired and old and intellectually lazy. Grow up.

Posted by: OGLiberal | August 7, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am

Obama had better select Hillary as his VP or he can kiss the presidency good-bye and the US will suffer another 4 years of Repuklican dictatorship & most likely go down the tubes!
Obama, we don’t want McShame running the show so hurry up and announce Hillary as your running mate OR LOSE!

Posted by: luvwknd | August 7, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am

Go Hillary!

Posted by: Thermal | August 7, 2008, 5:34 am 5:34 am

If I were Obama, and she tried to pull this stunt at the convention, I’d with draw my name from the Democratic Ballot and let Mctyrant get the oval office.
Let’s see how Hillary chokes on that! Shee needs to realize that she’s not all that!
It’s insulting to think that because it IS time for us to get a woman in office, I’m not about to vote for ANY woman. I want my vote to count for the right direction.

Posted by: DAVID NH | August 7, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am

Hillary don’t you remember commenting if you cant stand the heat get out of the kitchen? Well get the hell out of the kitchen already. You ran a good race and came in second so be it. I expect a speech at the convention that is not all about me me me me me me me me me me me me me me from you. You are yesterdays news period.

Posted by: Raul PEDRAZA | August 7, 2008, 5:36 am 5:36 am

Sad to read the comments on this board– indicating lingering strife and resentment within the party that I hadn’t realized ran so deep.
Hillary lost. Numbers weren’t there. Now the Clinton dynasty will foul the convention, the only hope of sending a clear msg that the party is united.
McCain’s a hawk, a social conservative and a petty wingnut. He reps 4 more years of tax breaks for the rich and deficits due to military spending.

Posted by: agosto | August 7, 2008, 5:42 am 5:42 am

Since Obama does not think he has an obligation to add Hillary to the ticket, Hillary should not go out of her way to help him. It is absurd to demand that the Clintons help him after all the nasty campaign he did against them. Why should the clintons help obama? Hillary is not obligated to do anything. Why is obama not asking the rest to the 8 past candidates to help him, why Hillary? Is Obama a user and abuser of women too?

Posted by: Ed Banks | August 7, 2008, 5:42 am 5:42 am

Why no one has interviewed Obama’s mentor, Alice Palmer from Illinois is beyond me. Hillary Clinton was not the first women Obama threw under the bus. Any woman that votes for him is an idiot. But then, that’s what men think women are – idiots.

Posted by: jc | August 7, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am

Hey – all you John Edwards fans. You know who you are (were). Remember your enthusiasm for him as president then, as vice president.
Where are you guys hiding? What sweet-talking empty-headed candidate are you supporting now?

Posted by: Thermal | August 7, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am

The DNC thought they were so clever when they picked Obama to be the nominee, only thing they overlooked were the people weren’t as stupid as they thought they were. The DNC thought the whole party would back their choice and had the republican nominee been a conservative that might have been the case. Fortunately, the repubs elected a central moderate nominee, one that many dems and independents are very comfortable supporting. Howard Dean banked on the dem party to be simple minded minions that would blindly follow. He miscalculated, 40% of the party are free thinkers who resent their heavy-handed political tactics. That 40%, plus the indies, plus the repubs will turn out for McCain. The DNC and Obama will lose this election.

Posted by: Ex-Dem | August 7, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

Since Hillary was cheated out of the opportunity of running for president, I have had to turn to Plan B – Vote for McCain.

Posted by: Lee | August 7, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

Is John McCain more representative of the democratic party’s values than Obama is? Of course he is!!
Obama is a socialist not a democrat. He represents the mind-set of elitists who want to re-engineer the American way of life.
Real democrats will vote for McCain!

Posted by: Thermal | August 7, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am

Donna,
I have to commend you on your wonderful contribution to this discourse. Well done. Such insight!

Posted by: OGLiberal | August 7, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am

“Is John McCain more representative of the democratic party’s values than Obama is? Of course he is!!”
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.

Posted by: OGLiberal | August 7, 2008, 5:57 am 5:57 am

Why is everyone so angry?
Can’t you guys chill out, stop shouting slogans at each other and remember what this is?
You are trying to elect the guy who will dictate the policies of the U.S. for the next 4-8 years.
Think about issues, policies. Either guy, if elected, will more or less do what he said during the campaign.
McCain will have a slightly more aggressive foreign policy, favour oil/big corporations a little more, be softer, tax-wise, on high earners and, consequently, a little harder on middle-low earners.
Obama, the other way around.
Thinking backwards, had Gore been elected there wouldn’t have been Iraq war and tax cuts, and there would have been two centrist-to-liberal Supreme Court nominations, instead of two centrist-to-conservative ones. You can pick based on this. Either pick is legitimate, and has little to do with the actual identity of the candidate. It’s party policy.
All this character BS is just a smokescreen. These guys are professionals of politics, and will enact their respective party’s policies, within the constraints of Congress control. Only rarely does a politician’s actual character/leanings matter much at all at this level (it did a bit for W, but one could argue he wasn’t a professional politician in the first place – near unique case).
So, if you like the Dems’ policies, vote Obama. If you like the Repubs’ ones, vote McCain.
All the rest is nonsense.

Posted by: Gianluca Pollastri | August 7, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am

NYT: Obama leans on big-dollar donors
So much for Obama’s high and mighty claims to get his $$$ from little people. What a fraud!

Posted by: Thermal | August 7, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am

This is perhaps the single most important election for years and here we are still dickering around with the Clintons. It like Nero fiddling away while Rome burnt down. It is time to get rid of the good old boys on both sides of the political canvas and come up with some that know what they are doing and put the interests of the American people first. It time for he big boys to realize that if you loan money to people you might loose it and its time to stop subsidizing all sorts of stuff the the government should not be involved in. It time to balance the federal budget and if that means some banks go down or farmers have to grow stuff so be it.
Alex P

Posted by: Alex Paterson | August 7, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am

Seems Like a typical CLINTON tactic….
I don’t care if I lost I want it anyway.
Our system is set up so there is no 2nd place – too bad the CLINTON’s don’t understand that.

Posted by: Klark Kent | August 7, 2008, 6:06 am 6:06 am

Hillary and her supporters showed NO respect to Obama and his supporters during the campaign, they deserve NON for themselves, now.

Posted by: Thomas Mc | August 7, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am

Obama is going to lose. Plain and simple. The tide has turned,.People are very tired of seeing him and his family in the news and on the magazine covers. The marketers that created his image have oversaturated America with him. His star rose quickly and it is going to crash even faster. He will lose in November.

Posted by: Ex-Dem | August 7, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Hillary only lost because of the media, and the DNC, with the games they played with Florida and Michigan, had they campaigned, and had they both had their names on the ballot, we would have seen the real results and I believe Hillary would be our nominee, the Volume by which she would have won BOTH states would have carried her forward with such force Osama could have never caught her. Hillary and all of us that support her got screwed and she is right in allowing us to be heard, we will not vote for osama at any cost.

Posted by: Leo | August 7, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

OBAMA and his supporters showed NO respect to HRC and her supporters during the campaign, HE now deserves NONE for Himself.

Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | August 7, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

I believe people are mentioning the name ‘OBAMA’ more than they are saying ‘GOD help us’. We just can’t do that. What has he got to offer compared with God?

Posted by: Dave | August 7, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

Stated perfectly, Thermal.
The new democratic party no longer represents that average American family.

Posted by: Ex-Dem | August 7, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am

Hillary supporters are so childish, why do they think we can take them seriously?

Posted by: Thomas Mc | August 7, 2008, 6:13 am 6:13 am

Thomas – I’m thinking come November there will be many who think “maybe we should have taken them seriously.”

Posted by: Stan | August 7, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

For All Hillary supporters,
Be prepared to say hi to President McCain until 2012, then We say hi to President Clinton.
OBAMA – Drive-By Media = BIG NOTHING

Posted by: Microtek | August 7, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am

Clinton’s supporters are massive in numbers and growing. We may be seeing the formation of a new moderate third party, and that’s not at all bad. Obama’s supporters with their nasty personal attacks are trimming the rolls of the DNC and soon they will have complete control of “what”.

Posted by: Ron | August 7, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

The hardest thing to understand is how the Clinton’s, who are as mean-spirited, self-centered, and oblivious to reality as anyone in recent history, can generate any level of support. Vote for her because she’s a woman????? There’s a lot more capable women than her around, who aren’t saddled with old Albatross Billy. The sore loser sketch on SNL had it 100%. Even the Bushies haven’t had hootchi-koo with the interns, and staffers mysteriously showing up dead in the park, followed by a complete tossing of the victim’s office the very night of discovery. And, the friends they attract are pretty scary as well. I’m as surprised as anyone that they didn’t just steamroll their way in. Maybe Slick can call Ross Perot and see if he can do something to help like he did back in 92.

Posted by: Cap'n Barky | August 7, 2008, 6:20 am 6:20 am

I don’t know why the media continues to only give half the story. Hillary Clinton clearly said in her announcement that she is backing Obama in this election and is appealing to her fans and supporters to do the same. She is holding a web conference today, but she doesn’t look or sound angry and hateful. I am so tired of the “spins” reporters and the media put on these poor people. Sometimes we don’t put on the best face when disappointed, but that doesn’t mean it has to be beaten to death by the media who wouldn’t know the truth if it bashed them in the face.

Posted by: Lgs | August 7, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Frank…” I think Obama will ruin this country more than anyone else.”
Just how?

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Jan…the best what???? Lier….Mmmm
I’d say she has her place and she should be in position where she can fight….Att General maybe

Posted by: newvoter | August 7, 2008, 6:28 am 6:28 am

Yes, Frank…let’s hear how you think that will happen, and why

Posted by: truthtell | August 7, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am

Laugh on Billy. Your comment is respresentive of the Obama low road.

Posted by: Ron | August 7, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am

I’ve always felt that Hillary has a hidden agenda. I think she will be up for roll call. Her supporters are uniting even more now, and with this press, it will fire them up for the convention. This will have a serious negative affect on Obama, because it’s clear that the Democrats are not united. This is going to be interesting to see how it plays out. You can’t get one over on the Clintons, and now, since Obama is falling in the polls, its evident that Hillary would be the better nominee against McCain.

Posted by: david from texas | August 7, 2008, 6:30 am 6:30 am

Hey newvoter,
I say ambassador to China. Would be fun to see Bill/Hill deal with people as hard headed and devious as they are themselves. Plus, it gets them out of the way here.
If China’s not available, let’s open relations with North Korea. That might be even better.

Posted by: Cap'n Barky | August 7, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

Obama is so narcissist and Michelle so hateful!…..
18 million democratic americans love Hillary Clinton and dislike Barack and Michelle. If Barack really wanted to unite the party and the country he would choose Hillary Clinton as the VP; but NO, he is a pompous, egotistic empty suit and as a result of that millions of Hillary supporters will not vote for Barack in the general election.
The question for Hillary Clinton supporters still remain; will they vote for John McCain or stay home??
Many of us are so worried about Barack in the white house that are planning to vote for John McCain to make sure we have someone in the white house with integrity and good intentions for America, and that is the sad reality.

Posted by: Manolete | August 7, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

ok NOT listen and listen well….. she got more vote in the primary than anyone in HISTORY…. so we just don’t want her name in the nomination…oh I forgot she is female she doesn;t desire it.Im glad FDR wasn’t a female…because he didn’t get the nomintion untill the 4th ballet !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: glen | August 7, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

LGS…Obviously you don’t watch the news. Yesterady Hillary was video taped at a fundraiser saying she didn’t think Obama could win and that “we need to make a showing at the convention, we need to protest.”
That’s not showing support for the candidate. Have you really seen her since she conceded? NO

Posted by: militarymom | August 7, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am

he has no one to blame but himself. He stole everything from his speeches, to delegates. Karma is coming back on him. He cannot win in November. He needs the Clinton’s and he knows it. Too bad, so sad….Hillary can and will take the Nomination. We will not support a selected candidate, and we do not want Hillary as a VP. He should have took the the Clinton/obama ticket when he had the chance. We are not all old, fat bitter women….we are all ages, nationalities, we are men and women…and we will remember in November!
PUMA

Posted by: prplvette85 | August 7, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am

People get the Government they deserve. There are millions of intelligent people in this great country of ours, but unfortunately we also have a majority of people who are well endowed with ignorance and need other people to think for them. It is clear that Bill and Hillary are motivated by self interest and that is not an attribute becoming a President of the USA. If I need a leader whom I will follow regardless of the circumstances I choose Jesus,

Posted by: Frank Small | August 7, 2008, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Go Hillary. Demand a vote and win for America!

Posted by: carolyn | August 7, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

The Democrats are truly not unified at this point and this will cause defeat for Obama in November. Welcome, President McCain!

Posted by: david from texas | August 7, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

There is no excuse for Hilary and Bill’s actions. Enough!

Posted by: thebob.bob | August 7, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

How absurd to get your nose bent out of shape when a politician “flip flops.” To me that is the mark of a pro. A good politician practices the art of compromise; how else do we get things done in a democracy when there are numerous opinions. Have you noticed how little George Bush has accomplished because he won’t change any of his positions. Give both Obama and McCain a break when they they are willing to change their position in order to move the country forward. If McCain now supports higher mpg standards, good for him. If Obama now is moving toward off shore drilling, good for him.

Posted by: Richard | August 7, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Genderism is alive in the USA. There are a lot of angry women out there.

Posted by: Frank Small | August 7, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Manotle….he didn’t choose Hillary because of Bill….have you seen him lately when he talks about the primary. He is still livid that they didn’t win…he would be a MAJOR distubance in the job of running the government…

Posted by: thoughtful | August 7, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am

I will be voting for McCain. Obama stole the nomination with underhanded tricks and corrupt lies. I will never have respect for him. He is a charlatan.
Hillary should continue making all the right noises but keep her distance from Obama. Obama will be enemy no. 1 in the democratic party soon. Anyone who is too close to him will be affected badly.
Hillary for president in 2012.

Posted by: Hillary2012 | August 7, 2008, 6:44 am 6:44 am

A roll call for Senator Hillary Clinton at the Democratic Convention has nothing to do with narcissism, entitlement, fat menopausal bitter women, or being a sore loser. It has everything to do with History. It needs to be recorded in History that the first woman to campaign and run for the office of President of the USA was a serious contender, coming very close to securing the nomination. History will also study all of the reasons that this did not happen. There will be a symbolic roll call and Hillary, the consummate professional, will cede her delegates to Obama. This is how it is done, how it used to be done when all of this business was conducted at conventions instead of back rooms. Not to do this would be very injurious to the millions of voters, male and female, old and young, rich and poor and middle class, who voted for her and there were sufficient of those for others to claim she was “harming” the process and needed to “get out of the way”. The process of voting for the candidate of your choice cannot be harmed as long as people are expressing their choice, but, the deed is done, and this roll call is a MUST. People need to get over their bitterness and hostility; I have and, if I can, the rest of you can, too. Afterall, you got what you wanted and you should turn your angst and anger on to where it belongs. Along with all the rest of the history made in this primary election was the unprecedented showing of a woman campaigning for the office of President.

Posted by: tomay | August 7, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

Obama camp and supporters are running scared now for good reason. The “world” may still be chanting for the “citizen of the world” but the VOTING American public is sick to the point of gagging at his pretty boy face and his platform of “just words”. He and Pelosi and the rest of the DNC railroaders are off to their vacation while we the public can’t go anywhere with gasoline prices at $4/gal or more! The DNC has created a train wreck of gigantic proportions, splintering the party and possibly doing irreparable damage.
Go McCain! ’08

Posted by: change to what? | August 7, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am

At this point, anyone who thinks Obama can win needs therapy. It’s over for him. He has peaked and is on his way down.
Sorry Dean, Brazile and Pelosi but the American people are not idiots. You cannot convince them that a guy who’s only redeeming quality is reading someone else’s words from a teleprompter should be the next president. Because his ego seemingly knows no bounds, the man is potentially even more dangerous than George W. Bush. His recent king of the world ego trip did him in with most thinking folk.
It’s not too late. The delegates can grow a spine at the convention and give us a candidate who is brilliant, accomplished, competent and, best of all, able to beat McCain. It’s your move, DNC. Fix it or lose it!

Posted by: antifish | August 7, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Capitol Hill doesn’t care what we think.
That’s why their approval rating is so low.
And we continue to leave those idiots in power. We get what we deserve.
Go vote.

Posted by: billyjack13 | August 7, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

change to what, I believe “vacation” means going home to be with their families. And Obama supporters are not running scared, sorry.

Posted by: d | August 7, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Hillary got more votes than McCain
Hillary got more votes than Obama
So the ONE candidate who got more votes than the other candidates, and those voters should be ignored at the party convention? Yep, good way of dividing the party.
Love it how the Obama supporters are always so viciously defensive, to the point of being foul and vicious when their precious messiah is threatened in any way. this is the “change” and “hope” that he is talking about? This blind obsession sounds more like what got Hitler into power.
Again, Hillary got more votes. You can whine all you want about “sore losers”, blah blah blah, but, so sorry for you, and you hate to admit it, but you need the votes of these sore losers for your messiah Obama, don’t you know? Better be nice to us.
No matter though, we ain’t voting for Obama.
DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN

Posted by: decentAmerican | August 7, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am

Good for Hillary. The DNC, the party elite and the mainstream media made a huge mistake when they orchestrated the Obama nomination; they will pay for it in November.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am

Every vote for McCain is a vote for the oil companies, its for tax troubles, its for middle class holding their middle class spots, its for the lack of progress. Every vote for Obama is for better energy, its for higher taxes(cuz his policies need more funding), its for a slow progress, but its for more jobs. Every vote for Hillary, if the situation arises, is for failure. She isnt winning.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

THANK YOU TOMAY….. WONDERFUL COMMENT

Posted by: BMW60 | August 7, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

“$267,000,000 for Hype” huh??? But yet you all want Obama to settle Hillary’s debt with some of that “HYPE” money…Y’all are Full of IT!

Posted by: Lisa Lewis | August 7, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am

Ditto BMW60′s kudos to TOMAY
Posted by: Kitty | Aug 7, 2008 9:00:26 AM
I prefer, “Bayh, Bayh Obama!!”
LOL!

Posted by: just.words... | August 7, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am

Lisa Lewis: Many, if not most, of Hillary’s supporters have worked hard and sacrificed greatly to pay off her campaign debt. The supporters you are referring to are not necessarily the ones asking for help from Mr. Hype. In fact they’d rather not have ANYTHING from him.

Posted by: done with dems | August 7, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

tlintw, Now you don’t like Obama because he wants to take some time off to be with his family. I think he misses his 2 young daughters as they miss him. To me that is being a wonderful dad. Wouldn’t you agree. This is so petty of you to respond like this.

Posted by: erin | August 7, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

To Cap ‘N Barky,
For an “Accidental President” who was “an accident” for two terms and the only Democrat able to be elected since Carter, I’d say he did a pretty good job. I believe you would have to admit that you did pretty well during those days of peace and prosperity and good will abroad, as well.
I commend your unadulterated adoration for your current choice, but it does not require you to dismiss the accomplishments of another. Even if your candidate did a totally unprecedented thing of defaming the Administration of a former President from his own party because he was frustrated with a challenger who happened to be the wife of that President and couldn’t deal with it, you do not have to. They will not win or lose the election for your candidate; he will do either all on his own. If your candidate is so smart and capable, so all-knowing and so deserving, so perfect for these times, you do not need to be so radical and so defensive that you trash everyone who came before him. The mess we are in is a direct result of the current occupant of the WH. Direct your comments to those who put him there and to the dismantling of this country that has occurred since he has been there. The “Accidental President” left the country in good shape, in spite of the Republican campaign to remove him from the day he took office.

Posted by: tomay | August 7, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

Does anyone find it odd that Rick Klein (a supposedly unbiased writer for ABC) uses language like “Sen. Barack Obama is set to leave for his much-deserved vacation…”?
“Much deserved”? That’s a curious assessment for a member of the media. And it smacks of exactly the type of swooning that others in the media are guilty of.
And if McCain were going on vacation, the writer would likely use words like “Sen. John McCain is set to leave for his much-needed vacation…” (hinting that he’s old and tired).
Maybe I’m reading to much into it. Maybe I’m not. Maybe I’m for Obama. Maybe I’m not. But one thing is certain… we MUST be on the lookout for media bias at every turn. Whether it be for or against our particular choice among the candidates.
It’s imperative that the press remain neutral and dig hard on both sides of the fence. There is too much at stake for any of us to accept anything less from the media.
PEACE
SMC

Posted by: SMC | August 7, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

Wow I’m so sick of hearing Hillary. She had the majority of the democratic voters and she wants party unity. I just don’t like that she gets in the press and not Obama. Why can’t she let the celebrity bask in his moment of glory until the election.

Posted by: mccain 08 | August 7, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

One of the 18 mil here that will never vote for Obama. Go Hillary!

Posted by: Mack | August 7, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

18 million doesn’t matter unless you all live in swing states.

Posted by: d | August 7, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

FOB: Obama stands for nothing because you have not listened to him, you decided from the start that you do not like this man and that is that. Stop trying to make up excuses for yourself. For someone to honestly say they think McCain is good for this unbelievable to me. McCain is why this country is in the condition it is in. His race today is not McCain vs. Obama… It is McCain vs. McCain. everything he has not done for the US this past, lets just say 8 years, he now wants to save us from. McCain is wanting to save us from McCain. you people are crazy.

Posted by: beck | August 7, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

erin | Aug 7, 2008 11:18:36 AM
What I would agree to is that obama knows he’s in hot water over the birth certificate issue and he has to find a legitimate reason to get to Hawaii and “take care of” that pesky detail before it finally bites him you-know-where. I hope McCain has someone keeping an eye on what goes on while he’s there…can’t count on the mainstream media to do that!

Posted by: done with dems | August 7, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

This whole thing is about race. You never planned to vote for a black candidate anyway no matter who he is. Its routed deep down inside your sub-conscious, maybe not hood wearing kind, but never the less it’s there eating at you. What you’re looking for is another reason other what you really feel. If you are upset because you feel you have been labeled a racist, you probably are. If the shoe fits wear it. Don’t candy coat it. Don’t lie to us or yourselves. It’s all about color.

Posted by: badman | August 7, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

done with dems, you can’t possibly think there is a problem with his birth certificate. He would have never gotten this far if there was. I think it’s just more wishful thinking for some of you. Besides you don’t think that Hannity would have been all over this. I don’t buy it one bit.

Posted by: erin | August 7, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

I agree that most successful politicians are ruthless, deceptive and arrogant. However, because Obama could not run on his experience (because he had so little), he instead chose to run as a “different” sort of candidate who was more honest and above politics. Now, after months of lies and flip-flops, we find that he is, instead, a typical politician, only less experienced and more racist. I bring up the racist issue because of the nature of his belief in black liberation theology, the theology to which he subscribed for 20 years at Trinity United Church.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

Once again the democratic leadership feels it is worth the risk of losing to try shoehorning in a left wing radical instead of nominating more of a moderate who would win in a landslide in the current political landslide.
The republican leadership has major problems since neo-cons have taken over much of the agenda but the democratic leadership apparently also shows socialism and world wealth redistribution are more important to them than winning with a president who would actually pass pro-american laws.

Posted by: Cryos | August 7, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

badman | Aug 7, 2008 11:24:55 AM
Put that race card back up your sleeve!
Obama’s race is probably the LEAST controversial thing about him. When obama supporters run out of valid arguments they just scream racism and run. He’s set race relations in America back half a century!

Posted by: done with dems | August 7, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am

“I agree that most successful politicians are ruthless, deceptive and arrogant. However, because Obama could not run on his experience (because he had so little), he instead chose to run as a “different” sort of candidate who was more honest and above politics. Now, after months of lies and flip-flops, we find that he is, instead, a typical politician, only less experienced and more racist. I bring up the racist issue because of the nature of his belief in black liberation theology, the theology to which he subscribed for 20 years at Trinity United Church.”
Great post. A must read for all bots.

Posted by: Mack | August 7, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

We, in Texas, are still waiting for Obama to make good on his promise to help campaign for our Congressional Democratic candidates…..That is one thing one can say for “the Accidental President” and the fantastic Senator from New York. They have a record of working hard to bring everyone along with them, to campaign for others, to make the Democratic Party successful. You know you don’t really believe the filth you are spouting about “The Clintons”, who are not a threat to your candidate. You just mistakenly believe that you cannot acknowledge anyone’s goodness and accomplishments other than your current interest. This is not necessary to getting Obama elected. He stands on his own, the good, the bad, and the ugly. You do nothing to serve him with this mindset. You have just a short time left; use it wisely.

Posted by: tomay | August 7, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

The arrogance and naivete of so many Obama supporters never ceases to amaze me. These two posts take the cake:
“This whole thing is about race. You never planned to vote for a black candidate anyway no matter who he is. Its routed deep down inside your sub-conscious, maybe not hood wearing kind, but never the less it’s there eating at you. ”
“lol again…that “18 million” comment so typical of Clinton “supporters” is indicative of their delusional and self-aggrandizing personalities. note to jackass: you’re in the minority. there is no “18 million”. there’s only you and a few of your fellow merry band of morons. you effect nothing. go back to the basement”
So let’s see, if you are not for Obama, you must be a racist or a jackass. Lovely.

Posted by: John | August 7, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

I have zero respect for people who say that they will vote for McCain because Hillary doesn’t win. I BELIVE THEY ARE RACISTS. Personally I would have been still voted for Hillary if she won although I wouldn’t have been as happy. We need a Democrat in the white house. You cannot fix the problems with this county with a war going on. More and more people are losing their jobs and nothing will change with McCain as President. Republicans don’t want to admit the war was a mistake and we should be concentrating on Afghanistan. McCain is letting his ego and his love of being at war make his decisions and that’s what scares me. I like the fact that Obama makes his decisions based on what is the right thing and not just sticking to something no matter how wrong it is so he doesn’t have to admit he’s wrong. I like that Obama thinks before he speaks and if he makes a mistake he will actually change his mind. The reason we are in the mess we are in Iraq is because once we realized there were no WMD’s in Iraq we should have gotten the hell out. But what does Bush do? Continue the war causing Americans to suffer and troops and Iraqis to die all becaue they don’t want to admit that they made a mistake. I’d rather die than vote for McCain.

Posted by: Carol | August 7, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am

Obama is secure in the knowledge that his lemmings will blindly and obediently support his every move. They will gallantly argue for any position he holds, and when he changes that position, they will argue, just as vociferously, for that new position. Bud sadly, for the Fraudulent One, he knows that his lemmings are not enough in number to secure his election, and deliver to him the power he so ravenously craves. So, Obama knows he must now con the great sea of “undecideds” into believing that he is a centrist; that he is “one of them” — hence his recent “move to the center,” which is actually more of a temporary and politically expedient “detour,” than a real change of character or positions. Fortunately for the Fraudulent One, in this great battle for the hearts and minds of the American public, he has a powerful ally; the mainstream media. Yes, the same media that decided long ago that the Fraudulent One would be our President, is doing everything in their power to assist him in his unholy quest.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

erin | Aug 7, 2008 11:29:53 AM
If there’s not a problem with his birth certificate, why won’t he just produce it (as did McCain)? Why would he go to all the trouble of publishing a forgery on line? You watch and see. Don’t be surprised if a short time after his “vacation” to Hawaii, another copy mysteriously becomes available.

Posted by: done with dems | August 7, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Idiots need to take a look at what all this blather is doing
this topic needs to go away for Hillary.
Her numbers have sunk in NY …because of the contentious primary.
This coming up may take the numbers thatw were not overwhelmingly great in NY to begin with …takes the dropped numbers from the primary and will threaten Hillary losing her Senate seat…
PUMA are you people just so self absorbed that you can’t see that this issue will cause Hillary to lose her Senate seat?
not to mention this blather you are spewing is the thing that keeps her FAR AWAY from being able to be given the nomination for VP
this all hurts Hillary more than Obama.
If she loses her senate seat that’s bad… but if she doesn’t put the policies ahead of her…she is going to lose that seat…
and none of you are helping…
not to mention PUMA is half the reason she can’t pay off her debt.
You people are so stupid cutting off Hillary’s nose to spite everyone’s face.
not to mention what you are doing for the bad stereotyp of women not being in politics…
morons.
this is laying out more self folled mistakes then when people voted for George W. …atleast that was about being fooled for security…
this is about being foooled because you didn’t get what you wanted.

Posted by: dl | August 7, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

To Carol – NO – I am NOT racist – just know who is QUALIFIED to lead our country – obama is NOT! Americans that will NOT vote for obama – are NOT racist – we are SMART and will Vote for our country! Obama is an Arrogant, Radical FRAUD – his entire campaign is one big staged show with Chicago gang style tricks. Obama will never be elected – McCain is a good 2nd Choice.

Posted by: Abby | August 7, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

WHY does obama “need” a vacation – he is running for President of the USA – you do Not take a vacation – to Hawaii – his “birth” place – seems very strange! Guess his campaign will have to take over with more corrupt tricks.
Obama is a FRAUD

Posted by: Molly | August 7, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

Frank- South Hampton, don’t worry you will get over it. We are actually subscribing to you for the next eight years, believe it or not, you will not be hearing Obama, you will see Obama everydasy for the next eight years. Too bad buddy!

Posted by: John Drew | August 7, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Fred
you are wrong…beyond wrong…
and because of your blather Hillary comes closer and closer to securing that she will lose her senate seat
do you get that?
I’m not threatening that…that’s the fact…the numbers show that.
You all are hurting Hillary far more than you are hurting Obama.
oy duh.

Posted by: dl | August 7, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Why does Obama need Hillary or Bill? All he really NEEDS is the American people. If H&B want to “rule” by inheritance, perhaps they should have been born in a country that puts any type of value on that system. Bottom line: Hillary lost the nomination. Period

Posted by: Alexandra | August 7, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

dl: Nice try. Trying to convince us Hillary supporters that our continued opposition to your Messiah is hurting her, is a nice piece of propaganda, but misses a crucial point. We support Hillary, because we love our country and believe that she is the most suitable candidate. BECAUSE WE LOVE OUR COUNTRY, we are not going to support an inexperienced, ruthless, deceptive, divisive, race card throwing Obama, even if our opposition to him should have some impact on Hillary’s political career. Our country must come first, before party affiliations or even before Hillary.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Molly maybe because his daughters want to see their relatives. You guys are too much.

Posted by: erin | August 7, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Hillary Clinton is the Best Qualified to lead our country – obama is NOT.
The DNC sure picked the Weak, Arrogant, Radical FRAUD. They can still “fix” it at the convention – IF they ever hope to win back the white house.
McCain is a good 2nd choice – never obama

Posted by: Abby | August 7, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am

Mack: You are correct. The irony of Obama and his supporters throwing the race card, is that it is Obama, himself, who attended a racist black liberation theology church for 20 years, and considered its racist pastor to be his “mentor and spiritual adviser.” Talk about the pot calling the kettle black . . .

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Hillary is a SHAM! We know this because we have actual footage of her ducking and dodging sniper fire in Bosnia!
Seriously!
(Reports have confirmed that a professional sniper somehow missed by over 50 yards and that the bullets landed off-camera… a poor choice of a sniper for the country that contracted to kill her!)
Vote for McCain to start war with BOSNIA!

Posted by: Army | August 7, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

If you ask a Liberal a question they don’t like, and keep on demanding an answer, eventually they start screaming at you.
Duct tape is the only answer.

Posted by: fred | August 7, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Some Obama supporters say, as you have, that Hillary supporters should support Obama rather than McCain because Obama’s policies are similar to Hillary’s. However, they are assuming that Obama’s policy statements are the only issues in the election. Yes, Obama claims that his policies are very much like Hillary’s, but being the most deceptive politician of my lifetime, how can we know if that’s true. Moreover, after all of the recent flip-flops, who can be sure where Obama really stands on any of the issues. The only thing about which I am certain, is that he will do anything, take any position, and jettison anyone, to win this election.
In addition, before you analyze anyone’s policies, you must look at their character. Obama has shown, time and again, to be deceptive, ruthless and divisive. If anything, Obama has shown himself to be more dishonest and ruthlessly ambitious than any politician this side of George Bush. And, his 20 year allegiance to a racist and anti-American “mentor and spiritual adviser” destroys his pretense as a candidate who can bring America together. All we have left now, is a typical politician with little experience, who is trying to perpetrate on the American public, one of the most terrible hoaxes of our time.
According to a CNN poll of July 4, 2008, only 54% of Hillary Clinton voters plan on voting for Obama. For many of us, if the choice is between a centrist Republican with a Democratic House and Senate, and an inexperienced, deceptive, ruthless, and divisive Obama; we will vote for McCain. If, at some point in the future, the Democratic Party elite decides to pay attention to ALL of their membership, and field a candidate who represents the ideals of the mainstream of the Party, then I will happily come back to the fold.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Good try dl | Aug 7, 2008 11:45:59 AM, but even if it were true, I’d still continue on because allegiance to COUNTRY is even greater than allegiance to a candidate. Obama is a recipe for disaster in the USA, and will leave nothing but destruction in his socialist wake by 2012. I, and millions of other Americans, are pledged to fight this battle for the preservation of America.
allegiance to country!
McCain ’08

Posted by: done with dems | August 7, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

dl: I would guess that Hillary’s fate “matters” to you so much, partly because you are content with your Messiah as the Democratic candidate. Well, millions of us are not so content, and we will put our country over every other concern. That you would argue differently is odd.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

you people are going to lose Hillary all together because she now has numbers going lower and lower…
get informed and be adults…
this blather helps NO ONE especially Hillary.
as it is you all have now knocked the chances of her winning the VP spot to outer space.
the more this issue gets brought up the more obama won’t be able to pcik her even if he had wanted to.
idiots.

Posted by: dl | August 7, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

In 2000, Bush was an unqualified, arrogant candidate who thought he was the lord’s answer to America’s prayers. I did not support him and voted against him in 2000 and 2004. I was right.
In 2008, Obama is an unqualified, arrogant candidate who thinks he is the lord’s answer to America’s prayers. I don’t support him either.

Posted by: John | August 7, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

I hope all you Hill supporters live in swing states, otherwise it won’t matter how you vote. Blue states are going blue without you.

Posted by: d | August 7, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

If I had ever considered, as a true Independent, voting for Obama, his vulgar followers like Billy and Donna have absolutely convinced me that he is not only a fraud and empty suit but his main support is from lazy products of our many urban wastelands as well as the known ones of off-shore bankers and other recipients of the funds from big-oil and those companies that have removed jobs as well as tax monies from the U.S. Only crooks and fools would continue to support Obama.
Posted by: jeanned’arc | Aug 7, 2008 10:39:24 AM
EXACTLY!!!
GO PUMAS!!!

Posted by: HP Boston | August 7, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

“I hope all you Hill supporters live in swing states, otherwise it won’t matter how you vote. Blue states are going blue without you.”
I actually do live in a swing state, so I guess my vote does matter?

Posted by: Mack | August 7, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

One gets what one pays for. We let the creepy Clintons slide on Bill exposing himself to women and all of the other awful bits. Hillary pounded on those oor women and the country looked the other way. OK, there was this little thing about a bank being looted and a bunch of corrupt people going to jail and crooks and felons being pardoned. We know they were the most ill people to ever occupy the Whitehouse and we looked the other way.

Posted by: disambiguates | August 7, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Mack, absolutely your vote will matter. Now how about the others.

Posted by: d | August 7, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Hillary needs this to Heal
you can’t win a senate seat with 25% of the population liking you.

Posted by: dl | August 7, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

“I hope all you Hill supporters live in swing states, otherwise it won’t matter how you vote. Blue states are going blue without you.”
I actually do live in a swing state, so I guess my vote does matter?
————————–
I do too. In fact, one of THE swing states.

Posted by: John | August 7, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

“I hope all you Hill supporters live in swing states, otherwise it won’t matter how you vote. Blue states are going blue without you.”
I actually do live in a swing state, so I guess my vote does matter?
Posted by: Mack | Aug 7, 2008 11:56:53 AM
——————
ME TOO!!!

Posted by: HP Boston | August 7, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

We’ve got good ol’ Ross to thank for all the current nonsense. The Clintons would have been a somewhat interesting sidelight in American history, a womanizing egocentric Rhodes scholar with a highly activist wife from a small fly-over state who won his party’s nomination despite the same antics that had derailed previous candidacies.
But, it didn’t work out that way, did it. Billy got the advantage of an economy on its way back, the web-dot-com balloon, and a peace that effectively hid the violent movements abroad gearing up for unprecedented attacks. The Chinafication of the marketplace continued and completed on his watch, and his and her antics in the White House effectively put any chance of real change on life support.
The true strength of our country is we have survived 16 years of total nonsense at the highest levels, but the cracks are starting to show. No more old retreads needed; I’m all for a real change, with a leader who can come in without the baggage of the past, even though the name-by-association boys are still trying to hang it on him.

Posted by: Cap'n Barky | August 7, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

There can be no doubt that Hillary expects to run in 2012. She must believe Barack will lose to McCain. If that is so, she will get even with all the turncoats that treated her like crap during the primaries by backing a very liberal junior senator that has really done not much. 60 percent of the population can’t name one thing Barack is even known for. YIKES. The media manufactured this guy and now that the hype is gone what have they got???? Obama will not pick Hillary for VP. I would bet she doesn’t even want the job. She has to pretend she is rooting for him, but she is not. Obama painted the Clintons as racists and for that they will never forgive him. Now that is a part of their legacy which is far worse and damaging than the Monica issue. Bill is furious about it and I don’t see that fury calming down. What is really funny is that the very thing that everybody has disliked a lot about the current administration is abundantly true of Obama. If questioned intensely he gets very testy if not rude and he surrounds himself with only those that think just like him. He is no more open to debate than GW ever was. It is his way or the highway. McCain has proven he is the ONLY one capable of listening to both parties which is the only way to get Washington back to work.

Posted by: Susan | August 7, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Why does me following my conscience make Hillary look bad? You are trying to convince me to vote for the most deceptive and divisive candidate in modern history, so that I don’t “make Hillary look bad.” First, who I vote for is going to have no effect on Hillary. Second, as I said before, our country and our families must come first. And third, please post credible evidence of your contention that Hillary supporters who may vote for McCain is affecting her poll numbers in New York. Thank you for your cooperation.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

“The true strength of our country is we have survived 16 years of total nonsense at the highest levels, but the cracks are starting to show.”
I agree with this statement but do not agree an inexperienced marxist is the answer. Obama would make a great president for a socialist/communist country but this is something that I don’t want to see happen to america. Maybe some people do but not me.

Posted by: Cryos | August 7, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

And what has McCain done for women except vote against their well being.

Posted by: d | August 7, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

So funny..Two grubs came to my door the other day. They were grubbing for money for OBummer. I gave them 3 pennies and asked for CHANGE! Chuckle…..
MY dream bumper sticker…Leave your lights on all DAY if you are voting McCain!
Leave your lights OFF all NIGHT if voting for OBUMA! chuckle

Posted by: HP Boston | August 7, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

“And what has McCain done for women except vote against their well being.”
And what do you base this on again? I love how if someone doesn’t vote for preferential treatment for a group they are “against their well being.” Not everyone is a sucker and some actually believe in making things equal and fair in our current time and letting things equal themselves out. Preferential politics never does well in the long run and creates bitterness and resentment on all sides that never go away. The middle east, areas like the Balkans in eastern europe and countries in Africa demonstrate this perfectly but people still can’t seem to learn anything useful from history.

Posted by: Cryos | August 7, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

All I hear is stupidity barking. None of the posts here come with a valid reason to their thinking. Why? because you are throwing out opinion and making them look like facts. The “fact” is opinions are not facts unless you reason it out.
Why is Obama not ready to lead?
Why is McCain not ready to lead?
Why is Hillary in the picture?
Hillary did accept defeat to Obama already. She has not been in the race until now. Opportunist I must say that she now wants to sway things two weeks before the convention. What will she do? Use her contacts in DNC for divide and rule. I hate this tactic. You 18 million supporters dont see this? It’s cheap. It is not a fair play and I would not want to see such a degraded human being leading our nation.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Those figures often leave a mark on history – Germany comes to mind.
Posted by: disambiguates | Aug 7, 2008 12:06:40 PM
———————————-
AH yes Germany…OBUMA country!!

Posted by: HP Boston | August 7, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Cryos, do your research. For one, he doesn’t agree with equal pay for women. He thinks more education and training is needed. In 2000 he opposed an admendment aimed at providing remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex. And there is so much more. Like I said do your research before you mouth off.

Posted by: d | August 7, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Cryos: Could you give me a list of the things McCain has done for women? Any votes? anything. I would really like to see it. Thanks for your help.

Posted by: beck | August 7, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

McCain 08!

Posted by: Will | August 7, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

We have a winner…JOHN! Come on down!
“In 2000, Bush was an unqualified, arrogant candidate who thought he was the lord’s answer to America’s prayers. I did not support him and voted against him in 2000 and 2004. I was right.
In 2008, Obama is an unqualified, arrogant candidate who thinks he is the lord’s answer to America’s prayers. I don’t support him either.”
Alright, let assume your few statements for the two match. Obama and Bush are totally, totally, totally different in policy and thinking. You cannot realistically compare the two for being anything close to similar. I wont put the obvious reasons as to why.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Sean | Aug 7, 2008 12:08:30 PM
Why is Obama not ready to lead?
-spent only 143 actual working days as a senator
-His opinion that the surge would create more violence against American troops was dead wrong
-has no military experience, unlike his rival, Sen. John McCain
-his energy plan lacks substance (in some areas is just laughable, got my tire gauge handy). He and Pelosi and friends REFUSED to address the energy situation before going on vacation, thus proving the point that they are out of touch with the needs of the American people. Their outright refusal to deal with something so key to our individual lives and the overall economy is just a small foretaste of what we have to look forward to under an obama dictatorshi…oops, presidency.
There’s plenty more but that’s a start.

Posted by: done with dems | August 7, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

Jay: Typical Obama cultist response. All attacks, no substance.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

We can argue back and forth, cut each other down, whatever. The fact remains, with this recent insurgence of Hillary and her supporters, this inevitably, will have serious negative consequences on Obama. Its plain to see, that the Democrats are not united this year, and probably wont be. This plays right into the hands of the GOP. Whether its the DNC, Obama, or Hillary, fact remains, there will be no unification. We all should practice saying, “Welcome, President John McCain.”

Posted by: jack | August 7, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

“-spent only 143 actual working days as a senator”
Senate experience is a requirement for presidency? Can you check for me how much experience did Teddy Roosevelt have?
“-His opinion that the surge would create more violence against American troops was dead wrong”
Chalk one up for yourself there.
“-has no military experience, unlike his rival, Sen. John McCain”
LOL…military experience. How many presidents have had military experience? Did FDR have one? 4 terms and no military exp? wow.
“-his energy plan lacks substance (in some areas is just laughable, got my tire gauge handy).”
His energy plan is better than McSame’s. Do your math. His plan considers the safety of American people and his plan will work for a longer time than McDrill’s.
“He and Pelosi and friends REFUSED to address the energy situation before going on vacation, thus proving the point that they are out of touch with the needs of the American people.”
“thus proving?” lol.
“There’s plenty more but that’s a start.”
Don’t get me started on McCain’s case.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Jay | Aug 7, 2008 12:42:27 PM
More of the same. Don’t have time for this. Moving on to find intelligent life elsewhere. LOL yourself all the way to the coming McCain presidency.

Posted by: done with dems | August 7, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

its clear to anyone that Senator Clinton is the only candidate capable of being the best President that our children, our troops and our country needs right now

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Typical McCain supporter tactics though:
1) Use the same attack over and over again.
2) Be ignorant, regardless.
3) Have no rational thinking
4) Accuse of name calling, when none of that is being done.
5) Troll

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

obama/mccain would be, by comparison, only fair or decent, at best

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Jay: You are now 0 for 2 in the substantive comment department. By the way, please post the “unsubstantiated BS” which you are talking about. Thank you for your cooperation.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Poor, poor Obama . . . he is tired. Does he have any idea of what actually being the President entails . . . or is it just a fantasy of his egotism. Of course there is dissension in the Democratic Party; it’s called Democracy.
Hillary may support Obama but that is no reason for many of us to. We feel that the DNC disrespected Hillary and by extension us and we will not get in line and follow orders. If Hillary’s name is not on the final ticket, many of us will vote for McCain in November.
Obama’s only chance to win is with Hillary as VP.

Posted by: Lynn | August 7, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

I used to have so much respect for Bill and Hillary Clinton. Her supporters are whining about not being heard and not getting respect. How do you think Obama’s supporters felt during the primaries when she said McCain would make a better President than Obama on more that one occasion? I can tell you this. I know a lot of Obama supporters and if she doesn’t do everything in her power to help him win now, she will not win in 2012. Obama’s supporters will remember that she wasn’t behind him and her and her supporters caused the loss and they will make sure she loses in 2012. Obama also has 18 million voters. Remember this the next time you hope Obama loses so Hillary can run in 2012. She needs Obama’s supporters as much as he needs hers. Don’t forget. We won’t.

Posted by: Deestar77 | August 7, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Emmery I’m against teaching that in public schools as well.

Posted by: erin | August 7, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

what kind of pathetic excuse for a political or even historical expert seriously attempts to compare obama to Theodore Roosevelt? TR was a governor, Asst. Secretary of the Navy and a soldier with field experience….and don’t let anyone tell you that experience as a senator or legislator is more similar to the responsibilities of the Presidency than a governorship….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Worth repeating, please read! Thank you so much for your thoughtful, reasoned post!
================================================================================
A roll call for Senator Hillary Clinton at the Democratic Convention has nothing to do with narcissism, entitlement, fat menopausal bitter women, or being a sore loser. It has everything to do with History. It needs to be recorded in History that the first woman to campaign and run for the office of President of the USA was a serious contender, coming very close to securing the nomination. History will also study all of the reasons that this did not happen. There will be a symbolic roll call and Hillary, the consummate professional, will cede her delegates to Obama. This is how it is done, how it used to be done when all of this business was conducted at conventions instead of back rooms. Not to do this would be very injurious to the millions of voters, male and female, old and young, rich and poor and middle class, who voted for her and there were sufficient of those for others to claim she was “harming” the process and needed to “get out of the way”. The process of voting for the candidate of your choice cannot be harmed as long as people are expressing their choice, but, the deed is done, and this roll call is a MUST. People need to get over their bitterness and hostility; I have and, if I can, the rest of you can, too. Afterall, you got what you wanted and you should turn your angst and anger on to where it belongs. Along with all the rest of the history made in this primary election was the unprecedented showing of a woman campaigning for the office of President.
Posted by: tomay | Aug 7, 2008 10:45:13 AM

Posted by: Bea | August 7, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

“If you’re not legislating God, you’re legislating sin.”
OMG one of those guys. Emmery! Did god ask you to talk bad about someone?
“Obama also is against teaching Creationism and Intelligent Design in our schools.”
Why can’t you teach your kids about it at home? No time? but you got time to post here. By teaching Creationism and Intelligent Design in our schools, you are forcing knowledge. You are taking away the freedom. That’s what Republicans are about? Taking away freedom? Pro life? Pro Creationism? The people cannot choose for themselves what they want?

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

most of obama’s lemmings are whiners and political babies who don’t understand history, can’t appreciate the hypocrisy of themselves and their candidate and believe the world revolves around them and their candidate and anyone who disagrees in the slightest is either a racist or an anti-American and obsolete…..their arrogance will make them miserable in their personal lives because reality is far different from the delusional world they have created for themselves this past year

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

by the way, not all of obama supporters are like this….just many…

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

and how inspirational can a candidate be, when he advocates change and progress, but his supporters display sexist and racist behavior to those who supported Senator Clinton? http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8762.html

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Strong words there Chris.
Assumption is what I call it. And opinion is what you may call it.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

obama uses semantics to avoid lying when he says he doesn’t take money from lobbyists and drug companies….(he only takes money from their ceo’s, spouses and has them on his staff)

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

obama uses semantics to avoid lying when he says he doesn’t take money from lobbyists and drug companies….(he only takes money from their ceo’s, spouses and has them on his staff)

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

jay, you are obviously a brick wall, so my hope of giving those who care about making the best decisions for their children, our troops and America does not apply to you….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

sorry….my hope of giving those who care about making the best decisions for their loved ones the information necessary to make such a decision obviously does not apply to you….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

“In 2000 he opposed an admendment aimed at providing remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex.”
No what this law and more current attempts due is try to stretch out the statute of limitations to allow more lawsuits. These type of lawsuits often require the company to prove they didn’t do the accused rather than have the plantiff prove the company did. Electronic record keeping only goes back so far so it gives the lawyers free money. The law benefits lawyers and guess who major contributors to democrats are and guess what profession the majority of democrats consists of? That’s right; lawyers.
Beck you again seem to miss my point in that “what did mccain do for women” indicates he should make special laws for women. I believe in equality regardless of gender, race ete and don’t believe in special treatment.

Posted by: Cryos | August 7, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

sean, given your support of obama, it is no wonder that you did not read my entire post……i never said ALL obama supporters are racist and/or sexist…..just many or most….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

All I hear about is why not to vote for Obama. How about why we should vote for McCain. But I want to hear policies not how much he loves this country.

Posted by: erin | August 7, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Isn’t it funny and ironic that many of the Obama supporters who rip the Clintons now were likely big Clinton supporters from 1992 through 2007? Yes, Bill Clinton is a deeply flawed man, but his presidency was a largely successful one. Can Obama supporters at least admit that?

Posted by: John | August 7, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Chris, you missed mine when I said. “Strong words there Chris.
Assumption is what I call it. And opinion is what you may call it.”
Many/most…where did you pull that stat out from? Rhetoric. Dont worry about it.
Some of the people here are pointing out so much about his non dedication to god and his choice on not teaching Creationism in school. Most Obama supporters are liberal. The more you point that out the more you strengthen their votes.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Jay: Evidently you don’t know the difference between lies and opinion. A lie is an intentional misstatement of the truth. An opinion is not a lie, and each of us is entitled to one. In my opinion, your Messiah is deceptive and divisive. In your opinion, he is perfect. You and I are different, that’s all. One more thing: Insults and name-calling are the last resort for those who have no argument.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

“Isn’t it funny and ironic that many of the Obama supporters who rip the Clintons now were likely big Clinton supporters from 1992 through 2007? Yes, Bill Clinton is a deeply flawed man, but his presidency was a largely successful one. Can Obama supporters at least admit that?”
Neither funny or ironic, John. I supported Billy myself. He was the right choice to lead us in the mid 90s. That’s why he succeeded. The right policy, the right time. Things have changed. It’s 2008 not 1992/1996. Gas was between $1-$2 back then. Gas is $4 now. We weren’t spending buttload on Military.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Obama wants to focus on anything but his own character and judgment. He cannot erase a 20-year relationship with a racist and anti-American pastor who he considered to be his “mentor and spiritual adviser,” by merely making a public denunciation required by his falling poll numbers. This transparent gesture won’t fool anyone but his most ardent supporters. The press has really let us down regarding Obama by not vetting him sooner. Perhaps they will make up for it by investigating the nature of Obama’s religion; black liberation theology. Why? Because anyone who would subscribe to such a racist theology for 20 years, is not fit to be President of the United States. Rev. Wright cites James Cone as his theological mentor regarding the theology Obama has been soaking up for the last 20 years. Here, in his own words, is James Cone’s description of Obama’s so-called religion:
“Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community. Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”
If one attends KKK meetings for 20 years, it is not unreasonable to assume that that person is a racist. If one attends a racist black liberation theology church for 20 years, like Obama did, it is likewise not unreasonable to assume that he is a racist.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

i can understand the emotional high many may get when listening to obama speak and how enthusiastic they are getting about politics, many for the first time…..but such passion, coupled with more than a few examples of how the same positive passion can turn negative, is very disheartening and not unlike the mental state most of dubya’s supporters act with….dubya won in 2004 because people said they would “like to have a beer with him”……obama’s getting large crowds and his campaign is often described as a “movement” because many are enamored with him, rather than his policies……i’ll be the first to admit, Senator Clinton’s candidacy appealed to me because I was already familiar with her, her resolve throughout the years, and the Presidency of her husband, which to any sane and reasonable person, was a successful time for America…..obama, by comparison, is youthful and energetic, but he is in no way more capable and ready, and his past dealings, his choices in friends, his actions and his political nuances for his own benefit contradict his own words which have enraptured many……he is a hypocrite, and when change is the biggest asset you are championing, hypocrisy will invalidate any credibility or political capital you might have had….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Outside of her emotional female database, Hillary Clinton has the remaining support of what has to be mostly homosexual men!
The logic to this is simple…. the way Hillary Clinton ran her campaign against Obama was disgraceful and disgusting…. And NOW ….only gays can be found holding their hands high and screaming her name nowadays.

Posted by: TheTruth | August 7, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

jay, the difference between me and you is i’m doing something to make this world better

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

The only “change” Obama is truly interested in is changing his address to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Chris: We need Obama supporters like Jay. His hate a vitriol only serves to galvanize Obama’s opponents.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

at the end of the day, i am still able to look my child in the eyes and sleep well at night KNOWING I support the best candidate for the awesome responsibilities of the Presidency, Senator Clinton……i highly doubt anyone else supporting the lesser candidates (mccain/obama), can say the same thing….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

“Jay, the difference between me and you is i’m doing something to make this world better”
What do you do?
Good responses Fred and Chris. I will answer them after lunch. Can’t come up with good ideas on empty stomach.

Posted by: Sean | August 7, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

“Cryos, do your research. For one, he doesn’t agree with equal pay for women. He thinks more education and training is needed. In 2000 he opposed an admendment aimed at providing remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex. And there is so much more. Like I said do your research before you mouth off.”
D I would counter with go do research on what happens who you make preferential politics a centerpiece of policy. There are plenty of areas of the world like the balkans in eastern europe, the middle east and some countries in africa to show the effects. Zimbabwe is a prime current example of the effect that these type of politics have on a nation in the long run.

Posted by: Cryos | August 7, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

and its of no consequence to me if others who disagree describe that as ignorant or crazy…..before all else, my concern and responsibility is to my family, and I have already acted pursuant to such responsibilities by supporting the best candidate for their best interests….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Everything the Clintons say or do is underscored by reservations. These two phonies need to fade away into the history books filed under corruption!
http://klintons.con

Posted by: Bob | August 7, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

and unlike your messiah, i say what i mean and mean what i say, i don’t exaggerate the extremist nature of my schoolmates to make myself look better (in interviews with old schoolmates describing their portrayals in his autobiographies), i don’t subject my children to even occasional rants of ill-will and hatred in our church, i don’t claim grand principles while violating them in spirit, i don’t vote present a great deal of the time i have the responsibility to vote yes or no, i don’t pretend to be about change and i don’t let my minions do my dirty work for me……its not righteous or pompous to find the flaws with yourself and your candidate, its my responsibility as a voter who sees the mistake being made….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

One last question before I go for Obama supporters. Outside of his rhetoric (which now seems to change as necessary), can any Obama supporter point to any Obama actions/accomplishments that you believe provide a positive indication as to how he would govern?

Posted by: John | August 7, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

and given your inability to recognize the mistake, its only obvious that you would fall back into a defensive posture, criticizing my logic and questioning my motives, because you have already invested so much into this one person, to fail him now would be to question your own judgment……and how could you do that?

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

i feel sorry for you jay, but at the same time, i want to help you….and if you feel that is pompous and arrogant, that’s fine…..i don’t need your approval to argue for what i know is right…..as for religion, i was responding to another poster’s call for god in the classroom, which is how that side argument/comments got started from my end…..we may probably agree on that topic, that neo-conservatives are anti-christian in actions, if anything, because all they support and call for (disharmony, exclusion of other religions, hatred for gays, etc.) is directly against the teachings of god/jesus…..i have become very wary of those who try to inject religion into politics because, more often than not, their agenda runs counter to such teachings….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

John, I am voting dem because I am a dem and I am concerned about the Supreme Court. You can vote Obama out after 4 years but justices are there until they retire and I won’t chance a conservative court for the next 20 plus years. Even with a dem congress one will eventually get through with McCain as pres.

Posted by: erin | August 7, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

jay….i supported Kerry in 2004 and he lost as well….does that mean my judgment was flawed then? even you would say not…..just because our candidate loses does not mean they were the wrong choice, it just means more people thought their candidate was better, and my argument is that their judgment is flawed, and millions of others have agreed with me…..it only supports my argument that your logic is flawed when you consistently fail to comprehend my statements, as you have done so yet again…

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

time to go, take care all….and jay, take a logic class….it won’t be the panacea for your poor reasoning skills, but its a start….

Posted by: chris | August 7, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Jeremy you are wasting space unnecessarily so most people will ignore your post. I agree with you on the Saddam invading Kuwait that most people don’t know and is an issue where republicans and democrats were dirty. Saddam let people know he would invade Kuwait before he did. Kuwait was undercutting OPEC and Iraqs economy was going in the tank so the Kuwait invasion was one of the only realistic options for Iraq to not bottom out.
I don’t like a lot of things republicans (realistically the neo-cons not actual republicans in my opinion) but I don’t see the answer being voting in a marxist who is more concerned with redistributing americas wealth around the globe than in americas interests. A balance in politics is needed.

Posted by: Cryos | August 7, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Frank,
The fantasy world is crowded with all the Obama supporters fantasizing Obama’s qualifications to lead this country!! Keep dreaming and maybe if he is ever elected and not selected, your world will coming screaming back with a jolt of reality.
Democrat not voting for Obama

Posted by: Maureen Lokken | August 7, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

“Obama also is against teaching Creationism and Intelligent Design in our schools. If you’re not legislating God, you’re legislating sin.”
Is McCain for it? That would be a deal breaker for me.

Posted by: Mack | August 7, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Yes, Hillary Clinton lost. This now has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. Instead, it’s a choice between Obama and McCain. Obama has virtually no track record, which leaves us with what he has says are his positions. Yet, Obama now changes his stance on positions on a weekly if not daily basis. What does Obama really stand for besides hollow and meaningless cliches? Add in his obvious arrogance and unhindered ego (yes, Obama, we know we have all been waiting all this time for you to come along) and we have quite a poor candidate.
As for McCain, I’m no big fan of his either. But at least I know where he stands. There are much worse things in this world than 4 years of a McCain presidency and Democratic Congress. (One of those things may likely be a Obama presidency and Pelosi-Reid Congress).

Posted by: John | August 7, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Barack Obama’s Resume:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Jay: Congratulations!!! Another Typical Obama cultist response. All insults, no substance. You have a perfect record so far. Your Master would be proud.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

To FOB, and other Hillary voters planning on voting for McCain:
McCain is staunchly pro-life, and he has stated repeatedly that he wants Roe v. Wade overturned. He has promised to appoint right wing judges to the supreme court- a lifetime appointment.
McCain has voted against raising the minimum wage over and over, and voted against letting women challenge sexual discrimination and unequal pay from their employers.
McCain has opposed insurance companies from paying for womens’ birth control, while approving mandatory insurance coverage of viagra for men.
McCain has voted to cut funding for afterschool programs and preschool childcare.
McCain has fought ardently against women’s issues and family issues.
If you supported HIllary, it makes no sense to vote for someone who has actively worked against Hillary and the things she has fought for her whole life.

Posted by: jds | August 7, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Pelosi is putting a risk a democratic congress. More and more people are questioning the democrats “I’m trying to save the planet” on my dime. Don’t bank on demos holding congress through ’10.

Posted by: xmarks | August 7, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Jay said: Apologies, Fred. Your posts tend to not only be incredibly weighty and insightful…but downright genius. We can only aspire to be as witty and brillant as you.
_____________
Thank you, Jay

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

An Obama Presidency + Pelosi-led Congress =
Hello Socialism.
Hello Higher Taxes.
Hello Nanny State.
Goodbye America.

Posted by: Beth | August 7, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Obama is sinking fast and I am soooo glad. I had faith the American people would wake up and they did. I, too, am a Hillary supporter who is now supporting McCain. I shudder to think what this country would be like with Obama at the helm.

Posted by: Terry | August 7, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Why shouldn’t her name be put in nomination and a roll call made? It has been done since the 1800′s. Oh, I get it, they were men. Just like she was constantly pushed out of the race, even though no man never has ever been asked to leave the race.
I am so sick of “party unity” being used as a reason to halt democracy. Is this the USA or a facist country? If they don’t show her this respect, I will become active in the Puma movement.

Posted by: rrow | August 7, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Is John McCain more representative of the democratic party’s values than Obama is? Of course he is!!
Obama is a socialist not a democrat. He represents the mind-set of elitists who want to re-engineer the American way of life.
Real democrats will vote for McCain!
____________________________________

Posted by: Thermal | August 7, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Terry said: Obama is sinking fast and I am soooo glad. I had faith the American people would wake up and they did. I, too, am a Hillary supporter who is now supporting McCain. I shudder to think what this country would be like with Obama at the helm.
_______________
I agree 100%. Thank God people are starting to see the real Obama. The more we find out about him, the worse he looks. I pray that by November, his numbers have fallen such that his chances are negligible.

Posted by: Fred | August 7, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

The media acts like Obama has not committed gaffes. His list of gaffes in long and astounding. Snubbing troops, 57 states, can’t admit the surge worked, walls coming down in Belfast, ignorant of Illinois bordering Kentucky, inflating tires already inflated equals new oil drilling, Presidents of Canada and Iraq, snubbing Clinton, we need more white people, kicking out American Muslims, hugging Evan Bayh but fist bumping his wife, ……

Posted by: geevill | August 7, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

BHO critizes that Mccain 35 years in washington didn’t realize the energy crisis. He 20 years in the church is not aware of Wright’s view and preaches. He became aware only after Media played it. Give me a break. What he can do in Whitehouse. At least in senate he can vote ‘Present’ .Based on his all association he does not deserve to be elected in my opinion for even senate. He can go back to his community prganizer

Posted by: lydia_k62 | August 7, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

DEESTAR77!!!! You said it BEST!!! If you thing Hillary is going to run in 2012 then you and Hillary better remember everything you did and said during this campaign. That’s right…there are 18 million Barack Obama supporters as well… and we are disgusted with many of you. You tell us you are voting for McCain and then you turn around and say you’re mad because Obama hasn’t retired Hillary’s debt.. Are you freaking kidding me?? What nerve!!!!

Posted by: Lisa Lewis | August 7, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

“He must recognize that he won this contest more narrowly than a primary has ever been won. He needs her half of the party. It’s my opinion, that it will be a huge risk if she’s not on the ticket.”
I totally agree with “a reader in GA”. The easiest way to unify the party would be to put Hillary on the damn ticket. She’s AT LEAST as qualified as every single name that has been mentioned; and 18 million people actually voted for her! What if the situation were reversed? Obama’s supporters would be screaming for her to pick him for VP. And rightly so! There is plenty of precedent for this type of pairing of primary opponents from JFK-LBJ to Kerry-Edwards. The fact that Obama seems to have rejected this obvious route to party unity and an almost guaranteed victory in NOv with a doubly historic ticket shows an incredible lack of judgment and political maturity.

Posted by: cadbury | August 9, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am

OBAMA and his supporters showed NO respect to HRC and her supporters during the campaign, HE now deserves NONE for Himself.

Posted by: bo | August 9, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Was torn between Obama and McCain for a long time now, however, I’ve made my mind up to vote for McCain. Reason, Obama was DEAD set against counting Florida and Michigan in the primaries, because he would have lost the nomination. Now, after the DNC gave Florida and Michigan 1/2 votes, Obama supported that, because he knew Hillary would not get enough delegates to clinch the nomination. Now, after all this, Obama wants to give FULL votes to Florida and Michigan. This is pandering to its fullest, arrogance, conceitedness, etc. Obama supporters, if you can’t see this, you are definitely BLIND to the tactics of Obama. I hope Hillary puts her name in the roll call, I hope she walks away with the nomination. Obama is a liar, cheater, and self-absorbed monster in this race. If not, Hillary, then I’ll vote for McCain! I challenge America to do so as well….keep Obama out of the White House

Posted by: k | August 9, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.