Does Sarah Palin HAVE to talk to the Press? What do you Think?
Named to the ticket a week ago. Introduced to 37 million viewers through a convention speech on Wednesday. She’s spoken at various McCain campaign events. But still, Sarah Palin has steered clear of reporters and their questions. Speakers at the Republican convention this week bashed the press and their handling of Palin’s family story. At what point does a candidate for higher office have a responsibility to take questions…to interact with reporters? Thoughts?

Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
She doesn’t have to talk to the press. And, in turn, I don’t have to vote for her.
Posted by: George | September 5, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Palin absolutey has to talk to the press and explain why she is spending the “bridge” money on a road to no where. Also why did she feel ist necessaasry to impede the ethics investigation by her state legislature on the firing of her state safety head over his refusal to fire her brother-in-law She should also explain how being a mayor of a town of 9,000 and two years as governor qualify her to be the GOP vice president, if elected
Posted by: Ronald J McDonald | September 5, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Absolutely. That’s a part of the territory. If Obama, Biden and McCain have to talk to the media, so does she.
Posted by: Roger | September 5, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
I cannot even fathom how this is a question that has to be asked.
Posted by: Jeremy | September 5, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Can’t talk to palin, Thats reform for ya.
Posted by: michael | September 5, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I’m with George……
Free country – she doesn’t have to talk to the press………..
Just like I don’t have to vote for the McCain/Palin ticket……
And dont worry – I won’t – LOL
Posted by: Mark | September 5, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Sarah Palin is this unknown face that McCain picked. She could be the president. Don’t you think the American people should know who would be representing them and what are her policies, beliefs etc. I think she has hidden baggage that the Republicans are trying to hide.
Posted by: Ray fromCalgary | September 5, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Yes, she needs to talk to the press.
We have a right to know about what her views and opinions are on the issues we the american people are facing.
For the McCain camp to not allow her to grant interviews is only saying to us that they do not have the confidence in her to speak on her own.
To only allow her to speak with scripted speeches is ludicrous.
She has alot to answer to and we deserve the right to know these answers.
Her speech on wednesday night was void of any talk of how she as VP would change our economy, stop the war, create jobs and other very very important matters.
Posted by: lmg | September 5, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
I think North Korea and China are the only places where they tell ya who you can and cant talk to…
Transparant government, good job McCain
Posted by: Carla | September 5, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Most definitely Sarah Palin should have to talk to the press. No other candidate would get away with not communicating with the media (unless this was Russia). But, McCain is too busy training Palin so that she knows everything that she needs to know about foreign policy, the Lower 48 states, handling difficult media questions, how the US economy works, etc. I expect her to “lose it” at the VP debate.
Posted by: Michael J | September 5, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
At least, she needs to answer voter’s questions directly!
Posted by: alf | September 5, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
They’re managing her introduction to the political process quite well actually.
Big impact introduction, let the press dig up the initial dirt so they can see what it might be and prepare for the backlash and questions, big impact speech that draws 37 million curious potential voters, take the big bump in the polls with your message waving in the wind . . . . THEN throw her into the world for a whupping and a whipping.
She’ll probably be fine.
Posted by: Bob | September 5, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Sure she should talk to the press but only the objective press.
She doesn’t have to talk to the obama propaganda machine that masquerades as the press.
I’ll let her make that call as I trust her far more then most of the so-called press of today.
Posted by: Nick | September 5, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
She has to carefully choose who she gets interviewed by if she wants to win. She needs friendly interviewers. FOX news comes to mind. But no real journalists.
Ellen and Oprah are absolute musts for her.
She must have conditions on what can and cannot be asked for everyone but FOX news.
Posted by: GreggW | September 5, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
You mean they are going to keep her under lock and key like they did with Dan Quayle? Ooh, great pick John. Why didn’t you just stick with your bosom buddy Lieberman? I mean one good Democrat deserves another? Romney, McCain, Lieberman, Guiliani, remember when there actually WERE Republicans in the Republican party??? The republican party deserves to elect Obama, if they were anymore backward they’d be back in time.
Posted by: argh! | September 5, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
The press is scum. Palin has to talk to the people, not the press.
Posted by: Jane | September 5, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
If she has nothing to worry about then why wouldn’t she talk to the press? McCain can’t keep her in the background forever.
Posted by: Enviro | September 5, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
She has no responsibility to talk to reporters. Who are you to demand she talk to reporters after the disgusting behavior of the press last week?
Why would anyone want to talk to the press? Reporters can be trusted only to twist the truth into lies and fabrications to match their ideology. One must surrender all ethics and integrity to become a “journalist.”
Posted by: P K | September 5, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Turn the question to John McCain:
How can she be ready to take over as president if she is afraid to answer unscripted questions?
So little is known about her, and so many questions have come up, I would say the American public should expect her to provide virtually unlimited access.
I don’t have a high opinion of McCain, but at least he has answered questions put to him. Or at least he used to!
Posted by: John | September 5, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Obama is lowering the field expectation, experience and honesty. I wouldn’t be surprise if I see a college student running for the US President if Obama wins this time.
Posted by: young_voter | September 5, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Can an ABC journalist go back and find the longest Obama went between his “press availabilities?” I think it was a fairly extensive length of time.
At the same time, he had earlier been interviewed and did, indeed, answer questions. (remember when the Chicago reporters chased him down and made him answer questions about Rezko? He answered 8 and then said something plaintive, like, “give me a break. I just answered, like, 8 questions.” Then he ran away.)
And yes, I believe Palin needs to talk with reporters as well. I don’t believe it necessarily has to be this minute.
Posted by: beth | September 5, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Whether she HAS to talk to the press is beside the point. I’m sure she is eager to talk to them, and to explain her views and actions she would like to take. The lady is not one of the old career politicians that are well versed in talking for an hour or two, and say nothing. She has decided to take action to help the country, and will do so if given the chance. The leftist media is trying to discredit her in any way they can, and they have been campaigning for Senator Obama from the start. Truth, honesty, and fair play, mean nothing to the media of today. Most of them are interested only in selling a book.
Posted by: Lloyd Revalee | September 5, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
YES. Unless she wants to leave us with the impression that she is only sarcastic, negative,and condescending. And that she likes to ridicule community organizers. And be-little the historic nomination of the first African-American of a major party.
That’s all we have to go on at the moment based on her performance at the convention.
Posted by: GS | September 5, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I thought she was supposed to be tough.
Posted by: obamamama | September 5, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
==She doesn’t have to talk to the press. And, in turn, I don’t have to vote for her.==
However, you weren’t gonna vote for her anyway. So, so what?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
==It will come out what a scam she is…==
Even if you gotta make it up, or make a bigger deal outta something than it is.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
John McCain may be afraid to let the press question Palin, but his biggest fear should be what happens if she doesn’t talk.
Posted by: hang | September 5, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
PLEEEEEZZZE!!! If this individual is in line to potentially be president of this country, i want her to answer the same probing questions and be accountable for her positions as any other candidate would. When she accepted the offer, she put her life and family under the microscope just as Barack Obama and Joe Biden did. We don’t know very much about her, so YES, she should be asked about issues that she may ultimately be dealing with. The voters of the country need to have EYES WIDE OPEN here. We know an awful lot about McCain, Obama and Biden. Sneaking this virtual unknown in at the last minute does not exclude her from scrutiny. In my mind, it makes me more suspicious and curious about her. I don’t care about whether or not she drives to work or what she wears, I want to know how she might handle an international crisis with North Korea and the potential of engagement. I want to know exactly how she plans to undo the gigantic mess her party created. I want to know if her husband loves the United States since he was a member of an organization that actively sought to secede from it. I want to know how she intends to convert her “experience” of managing a state with a population half the size of my city (San Diego)to managing the United States. I want to hear more about her attitude towards the role God would make in her administration. Mitt Romney had to answer that one, so did Obama and McCain. I want to know which books she told the librarian in Wasilla to ban. I want to know how she can defend her “abstinance only” attitude while her daughter is shopping for a wedding dress. There are LOTS of questions that need answers. She said yes, she opened the door. I think the person is a political lightweight and I would love to have her prove me wrong. So far I’ve heard nothing that makes her a viable choice any more than my VERY smart sister who has 3 kids and runs a school district in another state. I have a pretty savvy neighbor who is a personnel manager for a large corporation, coaches little league and barbeques a mean pork loin. He’s got some pretty good ideas about how to change the country, too. Why was this person THE BEST THEY COULD FIND…? I think the answers to our questions may be illuminating.
Posted by: Mary Mary | September 5, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
“Pay no attention to the woman behind the curtain.”
Posted by: jock59801 | September 5, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Absolutely.
If she could potentially be the Vice President some day she should ask questions so we get to know her views.
She needs to be on Meet the Press.
If she isn’t ready for primetime than how is she going to be ready for the Vice Presidency.
Posted by: Barbara | September 5, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Lets not forget how the press trumped Obama over Hillary and she was democrat.
Do any of you really think a republican is going to get a fair shake from most the so-called mainstream media?
Many of these so-called professional mainstream journalists were slinging dirt at her before she even introduced herself at the RNC.
Nobody with critical rational mind will ever believe Sarah Palin will get a fair shake from the kind of media the world hasn’t seen since fascism ruled in Germany.
Posted by: Nick | September 5, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Where is the rush forSarah Palin to talk to the press? Press and media knows everything about her and reported exhaustively about her. They know and reported more than she knows about herelf. What additional information press will get out of her? The press and the media is pure racist and sexist.
Oprah won’t even consider to sit with her because of her color. What a hypocrisy?
Posted by: P. Joseph Raju | September 5, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I hope to never hear from her again.
Posted by: linda n carolina | September 5, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
If I was MCSAME.. i wouldn’t want Beauty Queen Palin to talk to the press either..what is she gonna say when asked about Foreign policy.. I’m want WORLD PEACE!!…lol What a joke, wake me up Nov. 4th.. OBAMA 08
Posted by: Lawrence | September 5, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
A Pitbull with lipstick and no bark or bite.
Posted by: JP | September 5, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Of course. the more she opens her mouth and demonstrates her cold, uncaring attitude to the rest of America, the more votes Obama will get.
Posted by: community organizer | September 5, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
PALIN ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT HAVE TO TALK TO THE PRESS.
THE PRESS IS OBAMAMANIACS AND THEY ATTACKED HER FOR OBAMA .SOME STILL ATTACK HER AS A WAY TO SAVE OBAMA.
WELL,SHE MADE IT CLAER SHE IS LIABLE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND NOBODY IN THE MEDIA.
GET A LIFE.. SHE HAS THINGS TO DO..
TJ, THE CLINTONITE, NOW VOTING MCCAIN/PALIN 08— AND I DONT CARE WHAT DNC TELLS HILLARY TO TELL ME.
Posted by: TJ | September 5, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
News organizations don’t represent me. I represent me. She has to talk to me, not to reporters who, it has been shown already, are in the tank for NObama.
It’s like “The View” where there are three Libs against one Conservative. The Libs aren’t treated as one, rather three, and, so, after one Lib speaks, another Lib speaks, then the other, and only then does the Conservative get to speak and try to respond to the three Libs. So, it’s her one answer to three other answers, and it appears, to the observer, that the Libs have the edge since the Conservatives cannot hope to answer everything three Libs say. The Conservative has three Libs coming at her from all sides, like a pack of dogs.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
No, she doesn’t have to talk to the press. But John McCain has teed her up to be Vice President and she expects to be she needs to tell us who she is and what her policies are.
But she doesn’t have to talk to the press – and we don’t have to vote for her. The Republican Party seemed to think she was brilliant because she could smile and speak at the same time -that’s training for Miss America; not Madame Vice President.
Posted by: Grand Rapids | September 5, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
She does have to talk to press. We have a right to know what she has to say if she will be vice president. President/vice president is a job that will affect everyone. How can we hire her for the job if she hasn’t interviewed for the job? Besides why wouldn’t she want to talk to the press? She has plenty to say when she’s the only one doing the talking.
They don’t want her to talk to the press because she doesn’t know what’s going on outside Alaska.
They’ll fill her with all of this information for her to regurgitate, then let her talk to someone who will go very easy on her.
Posted by: Leslie | September 5, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Well, Nick, what a sterling piece of objectivity your comment displays. Sarah would probably love to talk to you.Hee! Hee! Hee!
Posted by: Kate | September 5, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Yes! McCain will have to loan Lieberman though to whisper in her ear. And that speech writer Scully would be nice, too.
Posted by: mila | September 5, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
She should talk to the press so we can get to know her more. This Sunday Joe Bidden is on “Meet the Press”, and Barack is on “This Week”. She has no reason not to go on unless she is hiding something……prehaps lack of knowledge and experience on the serious issues the country is facing today.
K-Burns
Posted by: K-Burns | September 5, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
So far all we know is what the press has found about Ms. Palin. If she is to be Vice President, and possibly president, then she should take and answer questions put to her directly. The American public have the right to know who they are voting for. Right now, she is acting suspiciously like someone afraid to reveal too much. Sure, she reads a speach prepared by others well, but lets hear some unscripted straight talk from the woman herself. Way to important..
Posted by: Jeanne | September 5, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
==the more she opens her mouth and demonstrates her cold, uncaring attitude to the rest of America, the more votes Obama will get.==
Only, so far, it’s working the other way.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I agree with George. She doesn’t have to talk to the press. And I DON”T have to VOTE for her!
and I will not vote for her. Who does she think she is imposing her views of Pro-life, Pro-gun, no birth control…and she will not talk to the press? What is she afraid of? Guess she can read a speech real good but on her own?
Obama will win
Posted by: brigbarb | September 5, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
How else will most of the population of the U.S. discover who and what she is?
She is an in-your-face person – the bulldog who doesn’t shy from biting other people. She told Hillary to “get tougher” – so of course Palin should answer some questions – the sooner the better.
And as a Christian, I am appalled and distraught over her performance. At least McCain used to be humble….
Jesus was a community organizer – Pontius Pilate was a governor
Posted by: pollenville | September 5, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
SO the Mccain campaign wants to sell us on his pick of VP that she can go toe to toe with Ahmadinejad or Putiin, yet she can NOT go toe to toe with George Stephanopoulous?.?
Posted by: Peggy | September 5, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Just give her sometime. It’s only less than a week she appear on the ticket.
Is ‘s her duty to talk to the media. However, the media need to behave themself. From what I ‘ve seen last few days, the media didn’t behave well and get burned. The American are not stupid. They can make their own opinons. The media should stay away from framing the candidates in one way or the other. Just the facts please.
Posted by: maleasiansmoker | September 5, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
It took Obama almost a year to talk to some reporters, he said he was “busy” lmao
Posted by: hillary is still the one | September 5, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
She is afraid.What do you expect of someone that cannot spell potato.America deserves better than that.Discuss pressing issues at hand not name calling.Her experience is zero.America is the largest democracy on earth and must not be in care of off McCain and empty Pilan. Think about this.
Posted by: mike | September 5, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
==The American public have the right to know who they are voting for. ==
However, news-gathering organizations don’t have the Right to impose on her, and she has the Right to ignore them. They don’t represent me. She must talk to me, not to untrustworthy reporters.
Libs want reporters to chew on her cuz they want them to do their dirty work for them.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Hey Incrediable can you add. Obam got like $10,000,000 in donations after her rip on community organizers etc in her speech. How much of a bump has MCcain gotten of her?
Posted by: community organizer | September 5, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
==Is ‘s [sic] her duty to talk to the media.==
Where is this spelled out?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Does Sarah really need the approvals of the drive-by media? She has made it clear in her acceptance speech. Listenning and comprehension are two different factors, I guess.
Posted by: mtr2311 | September 5, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
but i agree with George. no she doesn’t have to talk to the press, but i don’t have to vote for her either. and won’t.
Posted by: brian | September 5, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Just because someone can read a speech that was written for her does NOT make that person qualified. You don’t really know that she believes what was written for her. She delivered the speech well, no doubt about it, but that doesn’t make her anything more than a good actress.
Posted by: mary S | September 5, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
==Hey Incrediable can you add. Obam got like $10,000,000 in donations after her rip on community organizers etc in her speech. How much of a bump has MCcain gotten of her?==
I don’t care about the money. I care about support, and the polls show she is more popular than NObama.
In any case, you thought NObama would be WWAAAYYY ahead by now, and you’re disappointed it isn’t so. Gee, what happened???
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
She does not have to talk to the press. I think she will, but she does not have too.
Posted by: J | September 5, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Honestly, who would vote for Palin. Not talking to the press, being interviewed on the Sunday shows, like ‘Meet The Press’- you can’t get elected without answering difficult questions and demonstrating that you have the knowledge and judgment to lead the country. Right now, we only know that Palin can read a teleprompter and deliver a speech written by former Bush speech writers. Does anyone know if she took any history classes in college? What were her grades? We know that she has no experience to be VP or president, but does she have even basic knowledge of history and world affairs? People have to remember that a vote for Palin for VP is really a vote for Palin for President. It’s really that simple. The press needs to step up and not be intimidated by the Karl Rovian Republican tactics that try to indite the press for being too tough on Palin. Nonsense as usual.
Posted by: Jennifer | September 5, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
What are you all talking about? Palin has already talked to the press. That is, the entertainment press. Didn’t you all read “People”? She even volunteered details about her family!
With the McCain campaign flashing the POW card and the gender card, what can you say? Authoritarian regimes like China have definitely found a thing or two to learn from them.
Posted by: Chris | September 5, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Well if she is gonna get peoples votes she is gonna have to speak on something. We know very little about the lady and this is why she is being “attacked”by the media. They are scrambling to find anything on her that they can. notice noone is talking about her daughter now.
Posted by: community organizer | September 5, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
==Just because someone can read a speech that was written for her does NOT make that person qualified.==
Nobody said it does.
However, all political speeches on the national level are ghost-written.
The point is that the speech covered everything on her list. That’s all that matters.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Yes, she absolutely does. Every candidate in this race has had to and continues to answer hard questions about their records, policy positions, and claims. She is running in the number two spot for the presidency of the United States. She could serve as vice president and potentially as president. And we know virtually nothing about her. She’s a self-described “hockey mom,” which tells me virtually nothing.
She also needs to face real questions from real voters–not campaign plants–about what her positions are and what her plans are to take this country forward.
The vice presidency is always a serious job, but she is running with a 72-year-old man who has a series of health problems.
So, yes, she needs to face the press.
Posted by: mary | September 5, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
CBS today poll: 46/46. What’s up with that?
Posted by: mtr2311 | September 5, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
She doesn’t have to talk to the press.
Not a problem.
And I will still vote for the McCain / Palin ticket.
Posted by: Jon Do | September 5, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
==…who would vote for Palin. ==
Uh, you wouldn’t, and that’s ok.
I would, and so would a quickly-increasing number.
We know you people are worried. You should be.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Incrediable- Hopefully that will change when real Christians who want to help and care for all of Gods children cast their votes.
Posted by: community organizer | September 5, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
==CBS today poll: 46/46. What’s up with that? ==
It’s above the pay grade of NObama supporters who cannot believe that their guy isn’t blowing McCain away by now.
It’s also above the pay grade of Ayers and Rezko and community organizers.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
>>>Hey Incrediable can you add. Obam got like $10,000,000 in donations after her rip on community organizers etc in her speech. How much of a bump has MCcain gotten of her?<<<
McCain wouldn't have gotten anything since he stuck to his word to use public financing for the general election. Obama on the other lied and went back on his promise; I guess integrity isn't one of the things you learn from being a community organizer.
Posted by: Sharrdd | September 5, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Why should she seek the press’s approval? Most of the posters in here have made up their minds on whom they’ll vote for so why should she speak to them? To what end? You people are ridiculous !
Posted by: CS | September 5, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
I want to hear Sarah Palin stand in front of a panel of top notch journalists who know how to ask the right questions in a probing way, no harrassment, but pointed and direct. I want to hear how she handles herself without a script or earpiece. If she can support herself with substantive and informed positions, then I guess I’m wrong and would consider voting for that ticket. If they protect her and keep her in seclusion, we’re all going to wonder why. There’s way too much at stake this time to get caught snoozing. I’m also concerned about the integrity of the the balloting again. Everyone should be fully on guard come Election day. Honestly, I think the facade will crumble before then. Sarah Palin needs to back up that whiny mouth of hers without a teleprompter. Joe Biden’s biggest problem will be to take her apart with some sense of gentility. Can’t wait!!
Posted by: Mary Mary | September 5, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
==Hopefully that will change…==
What will change? It would be nice if you would include a quote, for reference, so that I know what you’re talking about.
==… when real Christians who want to help and care for all of Gods children cast their votes. ==
Jesus said that God’s children are those who are born again, and that their mission, as His was, is to spread the Word of God’s Reconciliation.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
This family values fraud is unfit to be VP and DANGEREOUSLY unfit to be a heartbeat from the presidency of a 72 year 4 time cancer survivor!!!!!!!!
Posted by: michaelinphilly | September 5, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I’m done with McCain, I WAS a ‘community organizer’ for his campaign going door to door for him because I believed in him and his party. My party walked all over their own supporters who are out there breaking their backs for him. I’m hurt the way they attacked community organizers because that’s what I considered myself in McCain’s campaign donating my time organizing events on the ground…
I’m now undecided.
Posted by: Micaela | September 5, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
I’m done with McCain, I WAS a ‘community organizer’ for his campaign going door to door for him because I believed in him and his party. My party walked all over their own supporters who are out there breaking their backs for him. I’m hurt the way they attacked community organizers because that’s what I considered myself in McCain’s campaign donating my time organizing events on the ground…
I’m now undecided.
Posted by: Micaela | September 5, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Members of news-gathering organizations don’t represent me.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Members of news-gathering organizations don’t represent me.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
No one has to talk to the press, but is anyone going to be stupid enough to vote for someone with that much to hide. I am sure a few of you are that stupid but not me. I will only take the McCain ticket into consideration if she comes out and answers all the questions that have came out about her in the last few days.
Posted by: Seth | September 5, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Are you kidding? OF COURSE SHE HAS TO. Many times — and not just to Fox News or People. She, like all of the candidates, must make herself available to all types of media, whether liberal or conservative.
Any assertion that candidate for VP that doesn’t talk to the press before the election is profoundly absurd!
She must prove that she is capable of withstanding the spotlight if she is to vie for this job. If she isn’t, the voters should know well before voting.
Posted by: Mark, Seattle | September 5, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Yes….and He also said love your neighbor as yourself – the most important commandment of all.
And that real religion is this: to care for orphans and widows…
Posted by: pollenville | September 5, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
==I’m done with McCain…==
So, vote for NObama and get mo’ of what you don’t want.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
If you can vote present and not write or sponsor anything of note you should run for president on the independent ticket Micaela, being a community organizer you have just as much experience as Obama.
Posted by: Sharrdd | September 5, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Very good question. I think a candidate for public office has a certain responsibility to be accessible and that means to field questions from the press. If they don’t, then that is news in itself. Candidates should know that it really peeves the members of the press when they’re snubbed. Remember when Chelsea Clinton wouldn’t talk to the press how they ripped her apart – saying for example that she was “being pimped with the superdelegates”. If you don’t talk with the press, they will retaliate big-time, that much I know.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 5, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
You all crack me up !
You only want to vote in your skin color no matter Obama is a known drug pusher, lies, is a racist and now is crying because a crooked female might be a VP.
Word is once McCain wins, the fem movement will but a hit on him so she can be the president.
You all treating this like one of your computer games but in this case when the games crashes so will this country in a major revolt as both parties are crooks and this country is about to pop when people vote solely on skin color, if they wear panties or not, gay, illegal aliens or have no pride in their own country.
Posted by: 99vette | September 5, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Palin was sprung on the US seven days ago, SEVEN, SEVEN DAYS AGO to run for the second highest office in the land by an irresponsible, besotted old man who wants to be President because he was a POW forty years ago.
What we have learned so far from media digging, campaign leaks, people destroyed by her, Alaskan legislative hearings on her abuses of power (public record), etc., is that she is a loose cannon of questionable character.
Since the people who should have vetted her either did and are covering up or did not and are stonewalling hoping to the questions go away.
No way are they going away.
Factchecks indicate that Palin lies continuously even in her acceptance speech.
Today, she made outrageous charges that Biden and Obama have persecuted her personal life in the media.
When pinned down to cite examples, neither she nor her handlers could, because they have not persecuted her.
They have treated her with kindness and respect which is more than she has shown them.
More of her lies.
She just thought she could attack everyone with impunity with no questions asked by pulling the whiner, victim, sexist cards.
She had the nerve to call Hillary Clinton a whiner.
Look who is The Whiner.
While her boss McCain, The Joker, failed to do his job for the good of America, it is up to us the people and/or our free press to demand answers.
This woman even backs Alaskan secession which is treason.
Who does she think she is?
The Whiner is about to find out that she is not above the law or scrutiny.
The pitbull just lost her lipstick.
Posted by: susan | September 5, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
==Jesus was a liberal…==
Actually, no he wasn’t. He was intolerant. He said that He is the ONLY Way.
==… and a community organizer. ==
He organized no community. He preached to and taught them, bring them God’s Message of Reconciliation for Salvation. NObama did nothing like that.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
==…it really peeves the members of the press when they’re snubbed.==
Good.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
==…it really peeves the members of the press when they’re snubbed.==
Nobody takes them seriously any more anyway.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Clearly she is unprepared to answer questions on the domestic and foreign policy issues she would be questioned about. There is no doubt a desperate effort is underway to prep her so she appears knowledgeable and confident in these matters in the vice-presidential debate… the very issues a vice-president must be conversant with. Will there be enough time? Her failure to face the press now is proof of her unreadiness. Qualified to be VP? I don’t think so! I am seriouly alarmed that she is being hailed as an acceptable candidate for this position. Being an energetic mom with an inclination to civic duty and a comfortable manner at the microphone may be cause for admiration by some who share her values/ causes, but these things do not qualifiy her for the job of vice-president.
Posted by: Valerie | September 5, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
The libs and the drive-by media are going nut and they probably do not know what to do next. After targeting and trying to destroy a 17 year old girl to get to her mother and it did not work. What’s next and how much lower can they stoop over?
Posted by: mtr2311 | September 5, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Palin will talk to the press, and will show up at the VP debate. I wouldn’t be surprised if the McCain campaign entirely snubs NBC and CNN though, and that wouldn’t bother me at all – IMO they are not needed to win. I was pleasantly surprised that Obama went on Fox News and positioned himself hawkishly in the first portion of the interview; it is yet another sign of the obvious nervousness on the left. While the conservative base has been made rock-solid, the left has never had the promises of 2006 delivered, and the Obama primary promises are dissipating as the national goes forward. Hillary on the ticket, somewhere, anywhere, looks better and better in hindsight. But then again, so did the surge.
Not sure, though, that the MSM can manage to compose intelligent questions on the issues of the campaign. So far they’ve been attempting to destroy Palin. It’s quite interesting how few people know, for example, that Obama was born out of wedlock, or that Obama used hard drugs. I know almost nothing about Michelle Obama or the girls through the MSM after 18+ months – I knew more about Palin’s husband and children in 48 hours, and she’s only the VP pick. For example, as everyone now knows, it’s ‘news’ to the MSM that Palin’s husband had a DUI over 20 years ago and that her daughter is pregnant out-of-wedlock. The double-standard is obvious. (And what do those community organizers do, exactly, for ACORN anyway?)
The funniest thing, though, is that the bruhaha has resulted in record viewers for the RNC and $10 million in donations to McCain/Palin just in the period between the Palin and McCain speeches, and crowds today on the stump so large that they were turning people away from a street venue in Wisconsin.
I’m loving it.
Posted by: Jon Do | September 5, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
==Obama sponsored over 800 bills in Illinois, including getting people off welfare and ethics reform. Voting present is a commonly used in the Illinois state senate. Everyone from both partys does it.==
One guy, over 140 times?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
The fact that the right wing talkers and “Jon Do” are focusing on the assumption we are nervous and not the issues sais allot.
Posted by: Seth | September 5, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Mr. Incredible – you sound very angry.
Obama is not Jesus – but he does seem to show more compassion toward the less privileged people in our society and world….
How does anyone survive on minimum wage these days? And pay off college loans?
Or feed a family on $4 loaves of bread?
Drive to work on $4 gallons of gas?
Posted by: pollenville | September 5, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Can you say desperate? The Republicans are scrambling to compete with the the Democrats. Why else would McCain make such a desperate pick in Palin? They believe people are going to vote for them because she is a woman? Hello! Maybe she should be qualified for the job first. The Democrats are smarter, represent more of the US population, and are ready to lead this country back from hell!!! The white, rich Republicans can keep their unqualified woman vp wanna be, she will be back in Alaska soon anyway!
Posted by: Sherry | September 5, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
hey mr. Incredible, the news gathering organizations may not represent you, but I’m really glad they exist. If not for them, we might not know about these people who try to gloss over their past and try to sell us with empty promises and zero substance. John McCain has been alive for a LOOOONG time, so we need someone to do the historical research to keep him honest. Same with Biden and Obama, the digging is done and the information comes out. With Palin it seems the vetting didn’t take long since she hasn’t done much in her life. Honestly, it’s really been mostly about her personal life which seems to be a little “spotty,” what with the troopergate thing and now her preggies daughter. Actual legislative experience beyond her job as mayor of Wasilla ( higher attendance at my son’s college football game ) has little to do with V.P. status. Oh wait, she did get snagged up in that “bridge to nowhere” business, first supporting it and then changing her mind when public opinion set in. Yep, she is the PERFECT choice for John McCain. I only hope that voters got smart after 8 years of embarrassment at home and abroad. Don’t get caught up in the distraction away from the issues…forget that Obama is black and Palin is female. This is not an election about genitalia or melanin. Please stay focused on what will be the best choice to take our lives to a better place. Who do you want standing toe to toe with world leaders in a crisis? I want the person making decisions for this country to be SMART, COOL UNDER PRESSURE and WISE. John “hothead” McCain? Sarah Palin? PLEEZE!! Sarah Palin is NO Hillary Clinton, don’t be fooled. Let her get up and answer some questions so the american public can see what they’re selling.
Posted by: Mary Mary | September 5, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
mtr2311, next we are focusing on the issues and Sarah contradicting herself. She was for the bridge to nowhere, received federal funds, and then was against it. She is against earmarks, yet she got Alaska 500 million from them. This is not a reformer, this is a hypocrite.
Posted by: Seth | September 5, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Sarahs small town went 20,000,000.00 in debt with her as mayor. Way to refrom Sarah, Good Job!!!
Posted by: Seth | September 5, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Mr. Incredible – yes, He was moved with compassion for the lost. But how do you reach anyone who is starving, hurting, isolated, broken, lonely? He always gave them comfort – or food – or healing – or understanding first…. He cared for people and understood their needs.
Posted by: pollenville | September 5, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Why is insanity and rush talking about as being nervous, instead of trying to promote what there ticket has to offer??? The RNC had a 4 day convention without even mentioning a single plan for healthcare or the economy. What a joke. Instead they spent most of our time reminding us John was a POW. As much as we appreciate Johns service, he is in no way ready to be president. VOTE OBAMA BIDEN 08
Posted by: Seth | September 5, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
==Mr. Incredible – yes, He was moved with compassion for the lost. But how do you reach anyone who is starving, hurting, isolated, broken, lonely?==
He said that we shouldn’t be concerned with the things of the world, rather eternal things.
== He always gave them comfort – or food – or healing – or understanding first…. He cared for people and understood their needs.==
Not worldly needs. His first mission was to give the Word of God. He didn’t want them to come to Him for the things of this world, rather the things of the next world.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
==The Republicans are scrambling to compete with the the Democrats. ==
You keep thinking that.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
== He always gave them comfort – or food – or healing – or understanding first…. He cared for people and understood their needs.==
Jesus didn’t want them coming to Him for worldly things, rather His Ministry.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
I enjoy thoughtful and clear minded commentary. Unfortunately this blog is loaded with mindless garbage. Not really engaging. Thanks for those of you, on both sides of the debate, who have interesting ideas to offer. Stay smart, stay inquisitive and keep asking questions. Look beyond the packaging. Engage in conversations and keep an open mind. When the time comes the best any of us can do is make an informed decision. I say this for all parties and affiliations. GO VOTE!!!!!
Posted by: Mary Mary | September 5, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Come on people, do you honestly believe that she will NEVER talk to the press? I think she will soon, just not right now. After the major networks trashed her for several days, why would she want to talk right now? She especially shouldn’t talk to the biggest Obama supportors…oh…that would be the major networks, Oprah, Ellen…..
Remember, Oprah is the one who launched Obama’s career. He is kinda like her little pocket pooch.
Posted by: ohiogirl | September 5, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Mary S, Now you are talking issues after all the low-blows. What do you want to ask Sarah about? The failure of the surge in Iraq or the 25% increase on Capital gains or the windfall profit tax on the Corp. or the socialized health care or the Global warming hoax? It is a bit too late to have serious talk now, isn’t it? The credibilty of the drive-by media is nearly zero rating after 18 month of testing of their bias reporting. This election is nearly bought and paid for but there is a GOD that the thing in human term we call it re-possesion and that is about to happen. BTW. I am having a nice dinner at a nearby restaurant, I will be nice today to the waitress since she smells like the supporter of OB, I promise that she will receive a nice tips. It is a good day and for that I need to be generous.
Posted by: mtr2311 | September 5, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
can anyone beleive this is a question that people are actually arguing “no” on.?
no woonder Bush Cheney won twice.
same tactics…cover the mistake…silence the witness…and draw fire toward the press.
Posted by: dl | September 5, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
ohiogirl
I’ll be happy to see her speak to the press and answer all the questions about Russia and terrorism and constitutional separation of powers and her thoughts on science and her explanations of why she doesn’t buy into man made global warming in the face of the facts…
and how she sees trade being effected
and whether China and India’s massive growth should be no big deal since it doesn’t effect global warming and her reasoning behind subjegating science to her religion with creationsim…
and how she see her policies forwarding women in the face of the fact that THEY DON”T
and what exactly did she mean when she said she said “no thanks to that bridge” and kept the money
and what her understanding of NAFTA is …
and who is associated with who when it comes to the shia and the sunni
and the list goes on…
all the questions that Obama , Biden, McCain, Clinton, Hutchinson, Romney, Ridge, Lieberman, snowe, collins, etc…all can answer in detail.
can’t wait to hear her histroical perspective on the korean conflict or where her “energy expertize” outside her call for more oil and less than 20 months helping an oil economy dependent state legislature that only runs 90 days out of the year get a pipeline built.
this is a joke
Posted by: dl | September 5, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
oh and how she sees immigration working since she got her first passport a little over a YEAR AGO! How old is she…and this is the expertise we are going to count on to make decision whether or not planes carrying hundreds of Americans should be shot down in the middle of a crisis..
this woman who doesn’t think science and facts are better than her faith when it comes to policy and proof.
uuuuuugggghhhh
Posted by: dl | September 5, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
I believe Americans have the ability to smell a scam, and this one stinks. Once the hype is over and the real campaign starts up again we’ll get a good look at Palin. The GOP reached into it’s bag of tricks and picked the most obscure, unknown and unlikely choice they could, hoping they could slide her through with a minimum of scrutiny. Good luck with that…and wouldn’t it nice if we could get past the whole POW thing? Great, McCain endured. What does that have to do with my family and our financial well being, our health care needs and the spike in unemployment( news today ) that is plagueing our nation? What can Palin possibly offer in the way of foreign policy and relations when she’s never been anywhere? Has she EVER met the leader of another country? EVER?? Why is this so hard for people to see through? Man, turn off the t.v. and read stuff. Use your heads. Listen to your gut.
Posted by: Mary Mary | September 5, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Ready to Lead on Day One. Ready to Meet the Press – Never.
If the american people elect this ticket we will be the laughingstock of the world (we’re more than halfway there already).
Posted by: BMS | September 5, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
And how long has it been since Obama’s talked to the press in a Q&A session. ANSWER: A long time!
And will Obama ever take the tape of of Michelle’s mouth so she can get in front of a microphone in an unscripted environment? ANSWER Never!
Posted by: Aston | September 5, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
I’m sure Palin will hold a press conference as soon as Obama does.
Posted by: Aston | September 5, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
As a candidate for VP she has a responsibility to all Americans to answer questions and to explain in her OWN words, not Mathew Scully’s, her values, beliefs and intentions as regards her political position… same as all other candidates!
Posted by: Pru McDonald | September 5, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
However, she owes nothing to the news media.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Gee, as long as we’re talkin’ about secession…
Did you know that NObama supported a bill by Hawaii U.S. Senator Akaka that Akaka admitted could have let Hawaii secede from the Union, hmmmm:
In the following tidbit, where it tells us who supported the bill, it says that Clinton and NObama did:
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
So, then, who wants to talk about “secession” now?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
BMS, Aston,
Obama spoke with your “leader” Bill o Reily yesterday and had a press conference with other reporters after that?
When will these red army soldiers realize that people like Hannity and Rush play them for their $100 million contracts? Of course a republican administration would mean this top 0.05% of the society would pay less taxes than any of y’all.
Posted by: jay | September 5, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
All of a sudden, the Libs are quiet about “secession.”
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
To talk one should have something to say.
Sarah has displayed only one of these capabilites.
Posted by: Empty Pant Suit | September 5, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
It has been 7 days since Palin’s name was first revealed to the country & she’s already spoken several times…to the people; not the incompetent, bias reporters focused on smearing her, rather then finding out who she is. Not so long ago Obama was never heard of either, and went weeks w/out talking to the press..but did not get crucified as this woman has for the past week. Hands down she has a proven track record that she is ready to lead this country; the jury is still out on Obama. One of the first most important decisions a nominee has to make is who will be his running mate…Obama blew it, McCain proved his genius!!
Posted by: marie | September 5, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Sarah “Baracuda”!
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
No, of course she doesn’t have to talk to the press. As a matter of fact I hope she doesn’t.
Talk about the final nail in the coffin.
Posted by: Order | September 5, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
==of course she doesn’t have to talk to the press. As a matter of fact I hope she doesn’t.
Talk about the final nail in the coffin.==
You, on the Left, including the press, like to think that you have the final say-so. That’s changed cuz we are all wise now to the Lib bias in the news media. We don’t take them, nor other Libs, serious.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 5, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Of course not. The only good Republican is a completely unvetted, unknown Republican. Once you get to know them, it’s pretty much over.
Posted by: Dema | September 6, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
With a voice like hers the less she says the better.
Posted by: William | September 6, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
Considering the hatchet job that most of the media is doing on Sarah Palin, if I were in her shoes, I would treat most reporters as if they had a severe case of herpes (as in don’t get close to them!) Given her abysmal treatment, and the comparable treatment given to the mainstream media “annointed one” I don’t blame her a bit.
She needs to do some vetting herself. She needs to vet reporters. If they are not dedicated to the proposition of unbiased journalism, she needs to ignore them. Once they cross the line, they, and the agency they work for, should be ignored as irrelevent.
Posted by: James | September 6, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
She should talk to the press, and I’m sure she will. But she definitely has a point that the media is quietly but solidly behind Obama, and advocating for him in subtle ways, so that she and McCain aren’t and won’t get fair treatment. For one example, take what she said in her speech about selling the governor’s private jet. She said she put it on eBay. Just in the last few days I’ve seen it discussed in an ABC News report on her “bending the truth,” a whole story about the line in the Chicago Tribune, and similar mentions elsewhere. The Tribune story claims it was “implied” that she sold the jet on eBay. That’s true only if you’re listening with bias. I’m quite sure if it had been a Democrat/Obama, the press would have used just the imagination necessary to recognize that speeches often don’t lend themselves to complete stories. Examples are often just to illustrate certain ideas. Her point was she decided the jet was unneeded and she put it up for sale, and then she moved on to the next idea. She probably mentioned the eBay part to show she’s part of today’s society and up on technology, etc. So what if the jet ultimately didn’t sell on eBay? It would have been one thing if she hadn’t actually had it on eBay, or if after eBay didn’t work out, she’d turned around and not sold the jet after all, but neither is the case. It actually wouldn’t have made sense in a speech to say, “I put it on eBay but the deal fell through, so then we ended up selling it offline.” I’m sure the people in the media know all this. It is just the press digging deep to frame her as dishonest using anything and everything, and being dishonest itself. Who’s going to call the “objective” media on it? And what about when McCain first announced his choice of Palin and MSNBC ran the line underneath that said, “How many houses does Palin add to the Republican ticket?” That’s objection “breaking news” reporting? And there were some in the media who also tried to make an issue out of Palin saying she wanted to know exactly what the Vice President does each day, completely ignoring the “exactly” and the full context that she wanted to be sure the job would actually involve having substantial duties. I’m sure left-wing media watch groups aren’t going to speak up about this and the many, many other instances of biased coverage in the election. McCain and Palin are right about the media being against them.
Posted by: Erika | September 6, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Sarah Palin should be held accountable for her record and she should talk to the Press. But since this isn’t happening, and this is a major challenge to the media from a party trying to hoodwink the public into thinking she’s anywhere near competent, they’ll wait until her “poise” will carry her through a few rough spots and until she’s sufficiently coached. The real question is will the press STAND for it? They shouldn’t. The talk shows should be focusing instead on bringing in major journalists, constitutional experts, senior party members who remember Ferraro and Eagleton and who can point out that from all sides, all parties, keeping someone from the press that republicans claim can be president with a 72-year-old running mate is the low road–despicable, manipulative, dangerous. This is a time for the median to play THEIR hand responsibly and show the nation.
Posted by: jane p | September 6, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
==Sarah Palin should be held accountable for her record and she should talk to the Press.==
She’s not accountable to members of the news media, and the news media is not our representative.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Given that Governor Palin has been a candidate in the Presidential election for less than three full days, I would think that she deserves some time to anticipate questions and prepare how she wants to say what she wants to say. At what point in time should that happen? When she has has more than 3 days to prepare her thoughtful answers not as a governor of Alaska but in the broader context of a national candidate. Also consider that only a few days ago, her children found out their Mom would be on the road for the next two months — they have started school this week. Isn’t it fair for her to make sure they are settled in to comfortable routines.
Posted by: Wisdom | September 6, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
==Given that Governor Palin has been a candidate in the Presidential election for less than three full days, I would think that she deserves some time to anticipate questions and prepare how she wants to say what she wants to say. At what point in time should that happen? When she has has more than 3 days to prepare her thoughtful answers not as a governor of Alaska but in the broader context of a national candidate. Also consider that only a few days ago, her children found out their Mom would be on the road for the next two months — they have started school this week. Isn’t it fair for her to make sure they are settled in to comfortable routines. ==
Now that is sane and sensible.
However, in the vicious, predatory atmosphere created by Libs, the Libs aren’t interested in sane and sensible. They want her in a position of vulnerability, and that means in a position of not being prepared so that she can stumble. It would be a setup. Thank God that we can see that coming. So, that’s not gonna happen.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Sara is not talking to the press,yet the Republicans are trying to force Oprah to have Sara on her show. Looks like they’re trying the old divide and conquer tactic. I mean,are they trying to get Oprah to debate her? Do they want
Posted by: Tlee | September 6, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
I also wanted to ask, do the Republicans want to Oprah to cook dinner for her too? I mean,come on!
Posted by: Tlee | September 7, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Palin should talk. She must. Alaska was in great economic standing when she took office… so what was there to manage? She’s a reformer? She was running against a fairly unpopular governor anyways… big deal… govern NY or CA effectively, then you’ve done something. the only people this woman is out to please are right wing extremist. she’s out of touch with mainstream America. Sic her Tom Brokaw!!!
Posted by: Bhudda Flii | September 7, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
@ wisdom…
when you are seeking the 2nd highest position in not only our land but THE WORLD it’s country first…remember the slogan??
no one would ask obama to avoid the press to put his kids on the bus, or biden to sit pretty until his son deploys to iraq (which is happening). are you serious?
Posted by: Bhudda Flii | September 7, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
@ James…
i understand your point, but the big deal is that after she said she PUT the plane on ebay, the top of the ticket, mccain, said she SOLD it on ebay for a profit… this is a clear indication that he still doesn’t know this woman as much as he’d like us all to believe. she was merely a last minute pawn forced upon him by the GOP in opposition of lieberman. plain and simple.
Posted by: Bhudda Flii | September 7, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Incredible said:
Gee, as long as we’re talkin’ about secession…
Did you know that NObama supported a bill by Hawaii U.S. Senator Akaka that Akaka admitted could have let Hawaii secede from the Union, hmmmm:
In the following tidbit, where it tells us who supported the bill, it says that Clinton and NObama did:
=====================================
and nobody cared about Hawaii, because what do they have to offer? Alaska’s got the black gold!!!
Posted by: Bhudda Flii | September 7, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Gag her or let her talk; it really doesn’t matter. The Obama camp can even take a holiday till election day. The economy does all the campaigning 24/7 and it is telling me in a fairly convincing fashion not to vote for a Republican for at least the next 50 years. The world needs some major healing after 8 years of neglect and outright abuse. I’m tired of the same old white guys in suits messing things up so I’m going with a brand new face and a strong, thoughtful intellect this time. No way, not ever again, will I ever vote Republican!
Posted by: Rod | September 7, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Bhudda Flii,
McCain speaking mistakenly over something minor like that given all else he and the other candidates have to think of beyond just what they say to the public could be understandable, and it certainly isn’t dishonest. I see Jake Tapper just did a story on McCain’s mistake. The two stories I referenced, though – “On Obama, Earmarks, Palin Less Than Honest” (ABC) and “Palin claim on eBay plane sale doesn’t fly” (Chicago Tribune) did accuse Palin of dishonesty on the eBay matter, and as I said, that’s obviously ridiculous. That in each case it gets by at least one writer and one editor really says something about the depth of the media’s objectivity.
I also just haven’t seen the media going after anything having to do with Obama with anywhere near the same level of determination. Have they ever labeled him as being dishonest and “bending the truth” for how he answers questions on his association with William Ayers, for example, such as during the Democratic debate in Philadelphia: “This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense, George.” Obama didn’t reply to the part of the question that asked about him launching his political career in Ayers’ living room, but the media isn’t interested in digging deep into this angle – just the opposite. The least said, liberal reporters seem to feel, the better.
Posted by: Erika | September 7, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Talk to the press? That’s not the issue. It’s talking to anyone asking her hard questions so that the American people can know what she really is all about, what her stands on issues are, what policies she supports. That doesn’t mean FOX, or Oprah or The View or some planned town hall meetings. She needs to be grilled. The Repubicans can keep ‘excusing’ her absence from anything because of the so-called liberal media but that’s a sham and the American people know it. ABC grilled Obama, Bill O’Reilley grilled Obama but some how, the same Bush ‘control’ of McCain and Palin have prevented us from seeing how they would answer the same questions. So let’s just ‘become’ Russia and China and not allow ‘disrespectful’ or liberal biased questions to be asked. What horse manure. But as long as the media play along, we will once again elect people we know nothing about and pray for our well being. America, you ARE becoming Russia. How does that feel?
Posted by: Debra | September 7, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I have heard the ABC’s Charlie Gibson will be interviewing Gov. Palin this coming week in Alaska. The week of Sept 7th
Posted by: Steve | September 7, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
This is a test for Charlie Gibson as well as Governor Palin. I believe he was chosen to interview her because the McCain campaign believes it will be a softball interview. The Main Stream Press had better show soon they are not still cowed by the right wing. I think it’s worked to the point the media is often too cowardly to do their jobs as journalists, because they’ll be called “liberal” if the conservatives don’t like the question. Do your job Charlie, and ask some questions with authority on issues that she needs to address. The American people deserve that kind of questioning of all candidates, no matter who they may be, and especially newcomers to the national scene. The screaming of the right wing will happen no matter what.
Posted by: Cavebear | September 7, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Come on people, back off from little ‘ol Sarah. She doesn’t HAVE to answer any questions, until she’s finished with VP for Dummies.
Posted by: get informed | September 7, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
I’m with George and Michael.
FREE COUNTRY- She doesn’t have to talk to the press………….
Just like I don’t have to vote for Mccain/Palin ticket…………
But you know what……
I will vote for the Mccain/Palin ticket.
“COUNTRY FIRST”
Posted by: Carlos A. V. | September 7, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
9-07-08
I just watched your biased story about Sarah Palin and her supposed snub of the press! The press just can’t stand it that they haven’t had a chance at an interview with her. Your network is so pro-Obama it is disgusting. I quit watching Good Morning AMerica because Robin Roberts is so biased about Obama I want to puke! Why don’t you ask Obama why he only agreed to a few debates? Seems as if he can’t speak too well without a script either as shown in his performance with Rick Warren. I will definitely be watching a different network in the future.
Posted by: Mary McGuire | September 7, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
This is total BS!!!! If Palin is as bold as she portrays, why not talk to the press? If they win, all of us will get screwed, big time!!!! Whether we like it or not. And it will be worst than Bush and Cheney. McCain just wants to win the election, he doesn’t give a damn about the American people, Palin, Evangelicals or anybody else. Palin is McCain’s new mouthpiece in more ways than one. And it seems she will do anything to help him win. Even if it means exploiting her family to get the job done.
Posted by: dlp | September 7, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
When you interview Palin next week, I expect you to be just as tough as you would on any another political contender. Ask tough, probing questions. If she is being treated special, or there is a list of questions not to ask her, I swear I will never watch abc again, which would be a shame because all my favorite shows are on abc. I can alway find other channels to watch though…there are hundreds of them. Treat her just the way you treated Bill Clinton. All’s fair in love and war.
Posted by: LouAnn | September 7, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
I’m glad to see you are interviewing Sarah Palin. Let’s see if you have any journalistic integrity, and call her on her many misstatements and lies about her own record — for example, her lies about the Bridge to Nowhere. But I’m not holding my breath – mainstream media reporters don’t dare challenge the status quo.
Posted by: Jeff | September 7, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
I want to hear her tell the public how she plans to gain Victory in Iraq, while ending the war responsibly?
Posted by: Paula | September 7, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Two questions for Sarah Palin are fair game. Firstly, what is her sense of the scientific basis for global warming and secondly, what is the origin and age of the dinosaur bones we find all over the earth? Global warming? Evolution? What does she think? We have a right to know!
Posted by: William Strauss | September 7, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
I hope the questions that are put to Ms. Palin are challenging ones that require substantive answers about real policy issues. There is very little time before the election for people to get to know who she is and exactly what her actual qualifications are.
Posted by: Kathleen | September 7, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
She should be asked about her views about killing baby wolves so that Alaskans don’t have to compete with them when they go moose hunting.
Just last month the Alaska DEP pulled 14 one month old wolf cubs from their dens and shot them. I’m sure she’ll present their position under the guise of conservation or ‘kindness’ but it is obviously and clearly a ploy.
Shooting adult wolves from airplanes and slaughtering the cubs is indefensible.
Posted by: clint | September 7, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
So she chose ABC–well of all three major networks that is the better one, I think Charlis Gibson can be fair without being condesending–unlike Katie Couric–however, it still is so transparet that the major networks are all in for OBAMA–and the general public can see through it…I just think you are all gonna be sooo sad when McCain/Palin is the winner in November–that is why most of America has switched to viewing Fox for the news–the only FAir And Balanced network!!
Posted by: ATOM | September 7, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
She should talk to the media, but the questions is who to talk to? By choosing ABC, it is probably the best choice. MSNBC and FOX will slant it match their networks rhetoric, so ABC is the best place to start. I really don’t blame her for going slow as most of the media tried to slaughter her within 5 minutes of the announcement because they were not told before the public. As for the baby wolves comment, if you eat any kind of meat, then something is getting slaughtered to feed you, so if you eat meat, don’t complain!
Posted by: JW | September 7, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
If ABC wanted to do something different then why not request questions be submitted to Palin by the general television viewership?
If the candidates want to relate to the general public and ‘bring about change’ then the general public needs more of a say in the interviewing process.
Posted by: Ivan | September 7, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
If McCain and Palin want votes they really need to both start talking to the press and everyone else about the real issues effecting us all.
Posted by: AnnD52 | September 8, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
It doesn’t matter a whole lot because it will more than likely be more lies.
Posted by: kgj | September 8, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Hey Sarah,Stop hiding and come on out and fight!
Posted by: Brabara in Ashland OR | September 8, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Mr. Davis declared that Mrs. Palin is going to talk to the press when she feels that they respect her. Are we facing a diva? or maybe she doesn’t know yet very important issues about this country and she is trying to learn as fast as possible before she is facing in front of the media her lack of knowledge?
It is very dangerous that we start already having issues about the real truth.
Posted by: Susan | September 8, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
Mr. Gibson
Please do not make a repeat of the last interview with Obama and Hillary – your getting a second chance – do not waste it.
Ssk real questions. We do not care if she shoots moose or if her daughter is pregnant or anything about her main dude. I want to know what she is going to do about our economy, why she feels she has the right to tell woman what to do with their body, why her state gets the largest earmarks and wht is her hand in that abuse, why she wants to burn books, why she flat out lied about the bridge to nowhere or the plane sale fiasco, why she attended so many different colleges.
Also, I do not want talking points – or a diatribe on McCain’s POW experience.
If your reading from a script with canned questions and responses your not a journalist your a pitchman for the republican party and this is not an interview its an infomercial.
Whats next – Magic erasers?
Posted by: george simon | September 8, 2008, 3:43 am 3:43 am
Sarah, Are you crazy! you lost my vote
Posted by: Tony | September 8, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am
Remember McCain’s ads about Obama being a celebrity? Wonder where that went, now that Governor Palin is the media darling. She appears to be George W. Bush in skirts, but can talk better and is attractive, which carries its own power in America. For those of us who are not “low information voters” and vote on issues, the media needs to do their job and ask tough questions. I’m afraid they’re so star struck with the new celebrity, few will. The interview with Charlie Gibson, if not hard hitting, will release her from appearing with other media outlets. The McCain campaign will say. “See, she did go before the press, what’s your problem?” Be tough, but fair, Charlie, do your job.
Posted by: Cavebear | September 8, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
What is all this gibberish about not asking anything about her personal life — when everyone else’s is exposed? This woman already has a full time job – being a mother. Let’s accentuate that when one of her five children has special needs. She has no place in office even if she were qualified, which this voter doesn’t believe she is….and to put some “hockey-mom, lipsticky pit bull” into the highest office in the land in the likelihood that something may unfortunately happen to an aging war hero (and McCain has my respect for endurance as a POW 40 years ago)….are you joking? And crediting her with a speech written by someone else? Are you alert America? Good grief, people -say this isn’t happening….this Palin-McCain ticket…..
Posted by: Maggi | September 8, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
How can you even ask that question, unless of course you are preparing us for further loss of our civil liberties? At the moment I am worried that Charles Gibson is in cahoots with the McCain campaign. Although I really wanted Hillary Clinton to be our next president, I was horrified by the questions Charles Gibson’s asked Obama during the primary. I am sure that’s why the McCain campaign selected Charlie to do their supposedly unbiased interviews. I fear Mr. Gibson is going to give the hard questions to Ms. Palin ahead of time, that she is being prepped to memorize the answers, and that he is not going to “interrogate” her the way he has other candidates–sexism in another direction. My hope is that Charlie will question Palin as sternly as he would a man. If I sound angry, it is because I am frightened–scared that this country is turning into a location for a bad movie where my hopes and dreams for success and the American dream will be dashed by this country’s self-centered preference for babes, guns, and creationism. I shudder at the reality that what this election is coming down to is racism and what we must look like to people from everywhere else on the globe. Charlie Gibson,it is imperative that you do the job of reporting that we expect you to do, that you do not provide Palin with the questions ahead of time, and that you do not let your personal preferences or fear of reprisals from the McCain campaign and your buddy Brit Hume influence the interview process. You may be an anchor, but you have lots to prove about your integrity. You’ve lost my trust. Whether you regain it, depends on the authenticity and depth of your interviews with Palin. I asasume you will not let the McCain camp see the interview before it is broadcast and that you will not edit it to make Palin or you look better than you were during the interview. Please reassure us of this BEFORE the interview.
Posted by: Becky | September 8, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
I understand that ABC will have the first opportunity to interview Sarah Palin.
Please do not waste it by giving her the forum to “whine” (HER words not mine*) about the allegedly “sexist” treatment she and the GOP seem to think she has received. The plain truth is that there are MANY things in her resume and life that lead the American people to legitimately question whether John McCain did ANY vetting on the woman he would put ‘a heartbeat away’ from the presidency and we need to know more about this woman and her world view.
I don’t want to hear ANYTHING about her family. They are not relevant and please don’t let her use them like the human shields she has been making them. I want you to question her on the apparent inconsistencies in the claims she makes in her stump speech and the actions she took as mayor/governor (‘Bridge to Nowhere’/earmarks.) I want to hear why she thinks that book banning is OK. I want to know more about her work for Ted Stevens’ 527. I want to know why her husband, who has only a high school degree, sits in on state business meetings and is copied on official emails.
Too many important questions remain unanswered about Sarah Palin.
Speaking of questions, I do hope that she will not be receiving them in advance. That would be HIGHLY unethical on your part.
PLEASE do your job and make Sarah Palin go beyond her canned, snarky applause lines and tell us WHY she thinks she is ready ‘from day one.”
Posted by: Bea | September 8, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
As a woman and former Republican, I absolutely think Ms. Palin has to respond to the media’s questions. First of all, as a woman I feel that Sen. McCain insulted women as a group by selecting someone as Palin to run for the most important job in the entire world simply because of gender — this was a true political decision and not in the interest of this country in light of climate of the world. As a voter, I believe the only anyone can make an educated decision to be able to cast a vote is to know the candidate and his/hers position on the most important global issues, but also qualifications, social positions, etc. Hopefully Mr. Gibson will ask in-depth questions of Ms. Palin and not some generic questions which will result in the usual political rhetoric. Additionally, I am hopeful that ABC News and Mr. Gibson will disclose to the country what if any “conditions” were placed/negotiated resulting in the “award” of this interview to Mr. Gibson. I am very frustrated with these elections because for the first time in my adult life I — a regular viewer of multiple news media — have realized the biases in reporting. I want actual facts and less pandering. I want to have clarified the various reporting — Palin attended five colleges in six years; her governing style — cold; her decisions in cutting budgets for social issues in her state; and yes, her daughter’s pregnancy. I believe it is truly hipocritical that she opposes sex education in schools for abstinence and her underage daughter gets pregnant. She has reduced her state’s budget for special needs patients and she gives birth to a child with special needs. While this is very sad, we as constituents need to be able to understand what she will do on specific subjects. Ms. Palin is beautiful, has a beautiful family, etc., etc., etc., but there are far more qualified Republican women in government for McCain to have undermined his party by choosing Palin.
Posted by: nancy valladares | September 8, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
And now Charlie’s about to interview Palin. A white knuckle moment (sarcasm intended). You don’t think it’s a coincidence the RNC chose Charlie given a) his shameful behavior, (along with Stephanopolis) in the winter, and b) his penchant for asking mostly Larry King-esque questions of people he likes, you know, like “What’s your favorite snack food while watching tv?”
Hard hitting it ain’t gonna be, that’s for sure, folks. Fluff, well, in a word, yes.
Posted by: Steve Hollis | September 8, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Yes, Sarah Palin has speak to the press in order to let the American people know her views on the world situation (to include our domestic situation), how these problems should be handled and the policies of the campaign she is supporting. I understand she will be appearing on ABC Thursday night – will this be a scripted questioning, will she have a copy of the questions that will be asked ahead of time so she can study and appear to give an informed answer, or will this be an actual interview?
Posted by: Lynn | September 8, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
I believe she should put on a town hall type forum for 2-3 hours, hosted by CNN or someone, and allow the public to either call in or email their questions. I too want to hear what she has to say, without a teleprompter or note cards to aide her answers. If she’s pitbull enough, she’ll be honest in her answers. If she’s going to politicize her answer by going off on a tangent about something else, the host (hostess) can bring her back to the question. If she refuses to answer and instead wants to use the forum for her own, personal bully-pulpit, America will see her for what and who she really is and is about.
Posted by: Jo | September 8, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
ANY person who is potentially the highest or second highest ranked leader in our country has a responsibility to it’s citizens to demonstrate and explain their qualifications.
Why would anyone in America NOT want to know? As for so many that decry the intense pressure on her, the other candidates have been in the news for months and years. Her time in the spotlight by comparison is less the a month, not to mention the fact that the big surprise of her bursting on the the scene was calculated to focus all attention on her. Frankly, with all that’s going on within the US and the rest of the world, this new poster-child
had BETTER be able to live up to the hype. When you compare dealing with nuclear weapons, wars and various world leaders vs. dealing with the American media, do you think that using ‘sexism’ as an excuse will make it better?
If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Any candidate that can’t stand up to the press, certainly won’t be able to stand up for OUR country our for OUR needs.
Posted by: karen poels | September 8, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Do bulldogs have lipstick?
What ? Ths is a no brainer !
Of course she does. !!!
The real question is ” Will she? “
Posted by: Dev Verdi | September 8, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Nope. The press needs to go stick its collective head in the john. We’re sick and tired of all of them twisting the truth constantly.
I used to get the biggest kick out of Ronald Reagan when he used to walk by the press and wave and smile. That’s what Governor Palin should do too.
Posted by: midwestlady | September 8, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
I want her to be asked questions about leaders around the world and whether she will be sent to funerals, etc. to represent this country. For example, the Kayabizinga of Bosoga died last week. Would she have attended the funeral if she were VP now? Does she even know which continent that is in?
Posted by: eiolg | September 9, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Lets be truthful here, if we were to sit down and reflect on our views I think we would find that we “trust all” and “mistrust all” at the same time. For those of you who haven’t figured this out yet…its call being independent. Lets face it, neither Party is going to do everything they say they will. We know this because history has shown it to be true each and every 4 years. McCain /Obama and Palin/Biden in either case will do the best they can but they will fall short of success in the eyes of Americans. So, if we can accept that both Party’s will have success and failures then it really doesn’t matter who you pick because there is no way to measure who would do the best job. So who do you choose and why? Certainly not totally on ability or capability as its all a matter of opinion and arguable as well. For me, I feel it’s important to remember that we can teach a person a job but we can’t teach the essence of a person. In business there are many people who do wonderful work but certainly not completely equal. Sometimes the difference between good and great is directly related to the essence ( spirit, heart, soul, fortitude, grit, mind, character and so on ) of the person. So, as you listen to the candidates also try and get a feel for the person ( the essence of who and what they are ) because this could be the tiebreaker you are looking for.
Posted by: Gary | September 11, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
This investigation was started before Palin was picked for Vice President by McCain and said she welcomed the investigation. Now, however, it’s being turned into Bush politics by McCain, and, stretching it even further, his camp is blaming it on Obama. And this is what we will have in the White House if, God forbid, the McCain/Palin ticket is elected? MORE OF THE SAME and I, for one, am sick of what they’ve done to us. We do not need four more years of this!!!
Posted by: JTW | September 16, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am