By Chris Francescani

Sep 15, 2008 2:30pm

There’s Something About Sarah

Time to pull on the tallest rubber boots I can find and wade into the Palin discussion. Are women, particularly working women, talking about anything else these days? Judging by the conversations I keep having, I’d say no. And the chat is confused, passionate and deeply divided. Here are just a few of the comments I’ve heard recently:

"I love Sarah Palin. Finally someone who just gets what it’s like to be a mom." (stay at home, mother of three)

"Why can’t we ask how she’s going to do it all? I feel like I shouldn’t even really say it but I have 3 kids and I know I was exhausted and fuzzy headed until they were a year old. There’s no way I’d have been able to run for Vice President." (mother of three, federal government employee)

"I feel so energized by Palin. I just never got that with Hillary but now I feel it’s great to be able to vote for a woman." (self employed in retail, new baby and two older boys.)

"I thought we’d realized men and women, dads and moms, we just are different. I feel like that is one of the advances we’ve made in the last few years but with Palin it’s like that’s not allowed." (lawyer, mom of 2)

And all this is before we even get on to experience, issues and politics. The debate over whether, how, why Sarah Palin is running for office while bringing up her kids is of course a sidebar to the bigger issue of whether she is the right person to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency. It’s a distraction Democrats are right to avoid. But that doesn’t mean the rest of the country isn’t talking about it, pretty much nonstop.

When Newsweek has as it’s cover What Women Want (written in red lipstick – can we drop that cliche, please!) then clearly this conversation between friends, colleagues and neighbors is going national. What I’m not sure about is how representative of most working moms Gov Palin really is. In all the conversations I’ve had, I’m not hearing women say – "Wow, I wish that was me."

They might want her to do it, I’m not so sure they want to do it themselves.

Katty

User Comments

When will she FINALLY face the press?

Posted by: Deep Release | September 15, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

1. Palin was a cynical, politically motivated pick for McCain. He wanted to try to steal Hillary supporters away from Obama. If it succeeds, it’s Hillary’s fault – she should step into the discussion more forcefully than she has.
2. Palin is nowhere near qualified for the position and everywhere knows it.
3. More and more stories are coming out on her pettiness and vindictiveness in hirings and firings – troopergate is NOT an isolated incident.
4. She really should stop lying about the bridge to nowhere. She supported it.
5. She tried to ban books. She should stop lying about that too.
6. She said that global warming was not man-made. That’s almost unbelievably dumb.
7. She told Charlie Gibson she had insight into Russia because the Russian land mass is visible across the Bering Strait. That is also unbelievably dumb.
8. She had sexual assault victims Pay for their own rape-exam kits when she was mayor of Wasilla. That is insulting to all women, everywhere.

Posted by: jon in maryland | September 15, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Different women want different things. Obviously, not all men want to be in politics, and not all men who want to be in politics have a wife who is supportive of that. So, it is alright that not all women want to be in politics, and that not all women who do want to be in politics have a husband who is supportive of that. Palin is a woman who does want to be in politics, and she has a husband who is supportive of that. What cannot be understood about that?

Posted by: vicki | September 15, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

What should we expect, voters voted Bush in two times, they are against the war buut they want to vote McCain in office because he claims he knows how to fix the mess he started in the first place. So why shouldn’t the votes vote for some women that has no experience except a big mouth. THe problem with the economy started with Reagan deregulating everything and McCain was a big supporter of allowing private business to self regulate and look what we have, but lets make him president because he can lie with a straight face.

Posted by: The Unshrub | September 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Sarah Palin is a real woman and the liberal women – including Claire and Katty (who would want to be known as “Katty”) just can’t handle it. She’s a true 21st century woman. Go ahead, Sarah. Do what you know needs to be done. Maybethe community organizer could take some lessons from you.

Posted by: Gerry Box | September 15, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a mom of five children contesting for any office even the office of president. If men can do it why cant women do the same. The question is whether she he/she has the requisite knowledge.
I am professional and I support my wife in her professional career as well. She has risen to the top in her career because she is qualified.
My problem with the Palin story is that she is not ready to be VP and the McCain campaign only put her out there to rally the far right wing of its base. I know so many moderate republicans who are also not happy about McCain’s choice and I am one of them!
Any objective person out there knows that Sarah Palin is NOT ready to be VP and its more scary that she may end up becoming Potus if McCain wins. We may need to keep praying for him.

Posted by: Ro | September 15, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

I hope that everyone looks beyond the fact that there is a woman running for VP, and starts looking into exactly what this woman is about. The more I read, the more I dislike. She is against the Native American, and has tried to take away their fishing rights (did she not just state in her speech in Colorado today that her and her husband own a fishing company) Seriously everyone needs to go beyoun gender and look into thi person that could one day be asked to step in as President, should the Republicans win this election.

Posted by: PMW | September 15, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

that bush woman in a skirt with lipstick DOES NOT SPEAK FOR ME!

Posted by: angie | September 15, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

She’s Cheney with female parts and less experience being a politician. No change there except maybe her speaking in tongues. Any woman who values her rights would NOT ever vote for Palin. She’s female, that’s all. That’s not enough. She is not progressive in anyway except for herself.

Posted by: Brenda | September 15, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

she may be able to handle it
but as far as the issues we face
it’s bad when the comedienne who plays you on TV is actually more qualified and more equipped to and more well read and well spoken about the issues
than the candidate.
I say …you juts watch…don’t be surprised if they pull a “Dave” and Plain starts looking a lot like Tina Fey (lol).

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 15, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

jon,
Great list, here are a few more.
1. It took a state law to get Palin to stop charging for rape kits, even though the state asked them to stop
2. In the interview with Gibson, she stated Alaska provided 20% of the US domestic supply of energy. In actuality, Alaska provided only 2.4% of the energy provided (oil, coal, nuclear, hydro, etc. make up the energy used in the US). It supplies 14 % of US produced oil, but only 4.8% of all the oil supplied to the US.
Being a woman, I would have hoped for a better representative.

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

it needs to stop about her being a woman. that is not the issue. her positions on economy, environment, abortion, the war, and education, these are important. Her very relevant experience and record as mayor and govenor. Finally her seeming inability to tell the truth while campaigning. It goes far beyond stretching facts or telling only half the story. She speaks with the full knowledge that what she is saying is false and specifically designed to win an election. 8 years of that is enough.

Posted by: Jason | September 15, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Gerry…a true 21st century woman would not try to take away womens’ rights. Palin is a woman who lies and abuses power. Palin is a woman who passes judgement on people but the rules don’t apply to her. Palin is greedy and self-centered. She’ll be sweet as pie to your face but as soon as you turn your back…watch out. She is a stereotypical “fake”. It’s unfortunate that so many woman are willing to take her at face value without researching what she really stands for.

Posted by: maryanne | September 15, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Breaking News
Tina Fey was kidnapped last night and dragged to a secret meeting in the white house.
From out of a back room Karl Rove, D!ck Cheney and John McCain come out and approach her saying…
“Tina…we made a mistake…we think you are more qualified to be the Backup leader of the free world and we are going to switch you out…
reports of your early demise will be solicited tomorrow…that you were attacked by a mass of terrorist on the streets of New York…who were upset about you making fun of Sarah Palin…
but we understand now that you understand these issues and have more know how and qualifications than she has”
“Tina will you serve your country?”
Tina – “well what is going to happen to Gov Palin”
Cheney – “uh she will be vacationing in …uh” (looks at Rove)”in Saudi Arabia at one our secre…our secret vacation places”
“oh”
Rove..”how do you feel about mooseburgers?”

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 15, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Does anyone actually think that Todd would be willing to move to D.C. and be a house husband? He will doubtless be on the first plane back to Alaska, and the kids will be raised by nannies.

Posted by: Joel | September 15, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

I’ve been told Sarah Palin ordered “Vice Presidency for Dummies”, “Where in the World is That Country”, and “Famous Republican Platitudes” from Ebay.
So by GOP standards she’s now ready for the job. (Just don’t make her answer any more questions. Only let the party tell you how qualified she is.)
Why on earth would ANYONE want their leaders to be “just like them”?
Do people really believe that because she has kids – THAT makes her qualified?
“You can see Russia from an island in Alaska” IS NOT national security experience. The fact that they even tried to imply it should sound LOUD sirens about how DANGERIOUSLY unqualified she is for the job.
Do we not want the leaders who will guide our nation to be brightest individuals in our country?
Nah, let’s go for the mediocre mind and the newest female member of the ‘old boy network’. Because, “she really understands me”.
Palin has a jouralism degree. She got a D in macroeconomics! She was mayor of a tiny town barely bigger than my old high school. Where her greatest accomplishment was building an ice skating rink that went over budget and ended up in court.
What exactly do people think Palin is actually going to do other than take orders from the power brokers who control the Republican party? She has already proven to be nothing more than a parrot who reads the speeches she has been given.
In her ONE and ONLY intervew, she showed America why a VP should be vetted prior to accepting the position.

Posted by: More Wasted Space | September 15, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

More liberal gibberish.
Next, we’ll hear how Saras is also responsible for:
Global warming, global cooling, global whining, the flu, VD, cancer, herpes, rabies, jews, catholics, satanists, protestants, illegal immigration, dysentery, malaria, the banking mess, the monster from Loch Ness, high blood pressure, low tire pressure, big oil, big business, nobody’s busines, blah, blah, blah, blah…..
Socialists are scared of her and are pulling out all the stops to villify her, without knwowing America is no longer fooled, thanks to Al Bore and that internet invention of his.
This is getting sooooo boring…

Posted by: Joaquin B. | September 15, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

More liberal gibberish.
Next, we’ll hear how Saras is also responsible for:
Global warming, global cooling, global whining, the flu, VD, cancer, herpes, rabies, jews, catholics, satanists, protestants, illegal immigration, dysentery, malaria, the banking mess, the monster from Loch Ness, high blood pressure, low tire pressure, big oil, big business, nobody’s busines, blah, blah, blah, blah…..
Socialists are scared of her and are pulling out all the stops to villify her, without knwowing America is no longer fooled, thanks to Al Bore and that internet invention of his.
This is getting sooooo boring…

Posted by: Joaquin B. | September 15, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

hey, if you don’t like Palin have kids and running for VP, how do you feel about Obama, having kids, telling black men they need to raise their kids, and then running for President?
why doesn’t HE wait 8 or 12 years till his kids are out of the house,, put off his dreams til he’s done what he tells other men to do?

Posted by: trettione | September 15, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

You can put lipstick on a pig, but you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.
PALIN DOESN’T CUT IT.

Posted by: Ed from MA | September 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Being I am more conservative, this comment will fall flat to those with this blog. Palin is authentic and she’s someone that you can trust. Even some of the liberal writers out of Alaska are saying that Sarah governed as a centrist not as a person who imposed her personal views on her governing. Looks even better as a vice president.
I think you can make her into a radical as the left (women/men who cannot tolerate another point of view), are doing, though, it will fail. Look at all of the bias stories on Sarah.
I think we should begin looking into the reporters’ personal lives. What’s good for one, maybe good for the other as Grandmother says. No wonder it’s so difficult to have good people coming into politics. See Sarah’s case.
Off topic–And what’s up with the ViEw, that Abc goofy video.. saying they gave John McCain a fair interview! Geez, what a spin to put out there today by Barbara and Whoopi. They are such frauds/do anything for their ideas/ agenda. They couldn’t be more bias if they came in as substitutes for themselves. They lost a lot of respect and viewers. They do not represent me nor my grandmother. One day, the truth will come out that the left is on the wrong side of goodness.

Posted by: Christie | September 15, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

The bottom line is this. She scares the hell out of all these liberal woman She has VALUES and she stands for what is right!!! The only thing that this lady doesn’t support on woman issues are their ABORTION issue and that is the thing why they are worried Woman has a choice before that drop theirXXX

Posted by: Bobby | September 15, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Hey Jon in MD; who should pay for rape kits? I’m thinking most patients in a hospital have some way of paying for tests, most of us taxpayers foot the tab for tests for other things, so it could go either way- point being, mayors have to decide how to pay for things and perhaps this management decision was made for reasons you aren’t privey to. As a moderate Dem voting for McCain, I don’t appreciate you far lefties continuing your hijack of our party with the ultimate / ongoing Monday morning quarterbacking, innaccurate self-serving assumptions that may be PC to the world, but the heart of the country, the mods on both sides of the isle who actually value responsible choices that include sacrifice, know better, which is why McCain will win. I’d rather get some effective balance back with some moderate Dem in the Whitehouse, unfortunatley Nancy P and Harry R and the rest of you immature, oh so brilliant, yet solution-less socialist elitists have picked another way-too-far to the left, albeit charismatic and visionary, loser. If Barack wins, I’ll support him, but he won’t. Watch, and perhaps turn from your nasty, deceived ways.

Posted by: Don | September 15, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

We need rubber boots when that woman talks…..the crap gets mighty deep.

Posted by: beck | September 15, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

i find it astounding that biden left his young injured sons who were still devastated by the death of their mother and siblings bedside to pursue his political aspirations. but yet when a woman proposes to do the same it becomes an issue. sarah who has a huge loving extended family, and a supportive husband is certainly up to the task all the way around.

Posted by: nevada | September 15, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

the worst most ill prepared, uneducated about the issues…unaware of facts behind the issues…
that we have ever seen in our nation.
The worst and most selfishly crappy and wrecklessly destructive decision we have ever seen by a Presidential candidate.

Posted by: dl | September 15, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Hillary was pounded very hard by media on “sniper fire”. At least we saw video of her landing in Bosnia.
Palin’s claim being in Iraq and Ireland (turned not to be quite true); and a lot of false exaggretions make a lot of women (even men) not to envy her.

Posted by: Peace | September 15, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Obama talks of equal pay for equal work. McCain hires women. Sorry, liberals, your chickens will come home to roost.

Posted by: Kitty | September 15, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

All this fuss because she pro life and 80% of woman are pro life
What issues does she not support That NOW embraces For the liberal this all about social issues

Posted by: Pam | September 15, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Palin “has values” “someone you can trust”
are you people kidding are you reading the reports out of Alaska…
she is a freakin liar…
who uses power for personal gain
who doesn’t have a clue about the massive issues we are facing as a nation
who actually didn’t have theat executive experience as they have portrayed…
whose husband has been emailed on every other issue she decides…
do you think ANY of the other candidates email their spouses on issues as much as it is becoming clear Palin does…
adn her husband WAS a card carrying member of the LIBERATION party in Alaska…
he loved our country sooo much he wanted his state to secede.
this is crazy…you people are either crazy or just plain stupid.

Posted by: dl | September 15, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Bobby,
There is another article on abcnews.com you may be interested in reading about rape and domestic abuse in Alaska and how some of the plans to work on these problems have suddenly stalled on her desk. Then there is that whole pay for the rape kit (that could run $1,000) and the testing in Wasilla, at least until the state had to pass a law to stop that practice.
Also, don’t think that just because a woman is liberal, that she supports abortion. Many of us want the choice in the cases of rape, incest, or if our lives are in danger. Palin does not support any choice in terms of abortion.

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

The liberals are worried that God will be left in the public square..you remove that and anything goes..culture rot even more… but they seem to ignore the Founding Fathers whom brought God into each aspect of life, liberty and justices. I cannot stand what damage the left has brought onto our society. It’s madness. Now, they have a man running for president who is friends with William Ayers, who bombed buildings and said he didn’t do enough and that guy was at Obama’s and Michelle’s house. It’s crazy, they are insane. McCain will beat in a landslide.

Posted by: Christie | September 15, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

This woman is scary and she is not telling the truth on 99.9% of her questions.She will set this country back yearsssssssssssss.If you vote for her because she is a woman and so are you ,you will be the first ones to scream when you get the same ole crap that is on Washington now.Do you home work before you cast a vote for her.

Posted by: indp voter | September 15, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

The real problem is that Palin’s family is in a big mess and nobody is talking about that reality. Her state has the highest rate of rape in the USA and nobody is taking about that. Women who are raped were asked to pay for their medical exmans and nobody is thinking about that. I do not know how anybody cannot understand that Palin is not real, she is a real creation of the republican party and McSame’s campaign.

Posted by: BKMC | September 15, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Just curious, ABCnews, but why are you focusing inordinate amounts of time to tell us silly things about Palin and her career, but you are not investigating at all the spectacular account on the New York Post today, stating that Obama tried to delay the Iraqi troop withdrawal, for his own political needs, which not only violates the Logan Act, but practically an act of treason? Is this not important to you? Is this not important to the American people? Or are you so in the tank for Obama that you refuse to be journalists and get at the truth?
Just curious.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 15, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Mack, in the interview with Charlie Gibson, it is clearly stated that she thinks the exception for life of the mother is correct. State the facts, not what you wish she said.

Posted by: Kitty | September 15, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

The difference between Obama and Palin when it comes to having children and seeking office is that Obama will have the support of a spouse.
If we knew for sure that Todd would stick by and serve his woman, that would take the issue off the table. Until we actually know Todd’s plans, we’ll have to continue to wonder whether they have included their children’s best interests in the equation.
He doesn’t strike me as the kind of guy who would be a stay-at-home husband. He strikes me as the kind of guy who would race his snowmobile even if he had a broken arm….

Posted by: Joel | September 15, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Joel. He’s manly. Get over it.

Posted by: Kitty | September 15, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

This is why women shouldn’t be able to vote, all they’re seeing is that she’s a women and they think it’s time for a women to have a higher job. We don’t look at her policies and what she’s really about. We see she has breasts and swoon over her. THIS WOMAN VOTES FOR WOMEN RIGHTS!
OBAMA 08!

Posted by: Emily | September 15, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I know one thing–some liberal women are mean. The ultra left women and men are very hateful. I know not one person in my life that is as this mean and hateful as some of the liberals that I have met on line. So, it’s clear they hate Mrs. Palin. Hate can’t be good for all.

Posted by: Christie | September 15, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Don,
When a family member is murdered or beaten, is the family asked to pay for the forensics? If your house is broken into, are you asked to pay for the material they use to collect evidence? Rape is one of the largest under-reported crimes in our society. Then you ask people who may not be able to afford $1,000, to pay for the kit and tests, and to be violated again in order for them to collect the evidence. But I suppose you probably subscribe to the “she asked for it” club.

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

ABC – you just won’t concede that one extra percentage point on your Polls will you? Everyone else has.
McCain / Palin ’08

Posted by: Jill Mitchell | September 15, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

ABC – you just won’t concede that one extra percentage point on your Polls will you? Everyone else has.
McCain / Palin ’08

Posted by: Jill Mitchell | September 15, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

It’s really getting under their skin, and they are losing faith in their Messiah.

Posted by: Kitty | September 15, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

RE:
This is why women shouldn’t be able to vote,
It’s a right for them to vote. It’s sad the schools are introducing minds of not trusting their country to so many new voters..sometimes, even teaching them America is bad. That’s really sad to see this happening to your country that you love and would fight for or have fought for.

Posted by: Christie | September 15, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

She had them install a tanning bed in the Governors House. Maybe she used some of the money from the plane she “sold on ebay” to pay for it. LMAO.

Posted by: Patty H | September 15, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Kitty,
Thanks for the small correction. I lost interest in the interview and did not watch the whole thing. Of course I noticed you did not mention the contradiction with what I said about rape and incest. Was that also mentioned?

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Palin is a 19th century woman. She lives in a state that has no idea how to handle budgets in red, children leaving school before graduation. She has been sheltered and has no idea what is going on in the world as evidenced by her answers in the interview. It looks like she doesn’t even keep up with current events. that is NOT a woman of the 21st century

Posted by: NC Female | September 15, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Emily, are you voting to make your guilt go away? Like Obama will bring all sides together. Sure…the chicago way.. Nancee and Howard picked this guy over Hillary. That’s a woman who was mistreated so you are not for women’s fairness. Get a better answer.

Posted by: Christie | September 15, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

For those who chuckled with Charlie as he spoke down to a very accomplished woman about “the Bush Doctrine”, Krauthammer has some enlightening thoughts for your progressive, closed minds.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTU5YmYzNjU2MThhOTFiZWNmNjE4MTc5MzY3ZGRkMGY=&w=MA==
Typical MSM arrogation. The news dept of ABC will be part of its economic downfall, unless they let Stossel set the agenda. Gibson’s thinking is more out of touch, and more intellect-challenged than Rosie O’Donnel

Posted by: Sam H | September 15, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Amazing how Democrats were blasted for picking a “celebrity” canidate but now the right can’t seem to get enough of their “rock star”…But then hypocrisy has always been a strong republican trait.
Seems they have no problem with their new “messiah”…

Posted by: Patty H | September 15, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

REPUBLICANS keep wanting to say we don’t like Palin because she has kids, or she’s a woman, or she wears lipstick.
No. Actually we don’t like Sarah Palin because SHE DOES NOT KNOW ENOUGH TO SERVE as Vice President. ANY completely UNKNOWN person entering the race with two months to go would be under the exact same scrutiny. Her ONLY interview showed America how frighteningly unprepared she really is! Since they’re afraid to let her have any press conferences, that’s what we know about her. And the more we read about her record, the SCARIER she becomes.
We don’t like her because she is a RIGHT WING radical. She represents the RIGHTEST of the RIGHT. She will set women back 40 years if given the chance.
McCain sold his integrity, he sold his honesty, and HE SOLD OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY after picking Palin. He put our nation at risk by chosing her.
McCain has had to lie everyday since the convention to try and convince voters Palin has any real credentials. Even Karl Rove is saying McCain is not passing the truth test. YES, KARL ROVE CALLED McCAIN A LIAR.
So forget the rhetorical and fake “outrage” over Palin’s treatment. Welcome to national politics Ms Palin. She says she’s ready for the job, but obviously she is not.
And don’t think you are anywhere close to Hillary Clinton. Hillary would run circles around McCain ands Palin combined.

Posted by: REAL Women of America! | September 15, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

The Palin pick was a reckless choice by McCain to use sexism as a gimmick for political leverage. That hurts all women.

Posted by: Paige | September 15, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

if you guys will just focus on the issues, you would realize that this is not an issue of personality…its a battle for all our lives here…nationally and globally.
When you’ve all gotten over your prejudiced perception, please remember that America is near collapse and need some sharp minds who can relate to the global economy.
America is borrowing heavily from China, Wall Street is near collapse, all the jobs in America are being shipped overseas and global respect is declining fast for the American brand
I supported Clinton before she became desperate during the primaries…with this singular action of stumping for Obama, she just regained my respect cos she has just proven that it was not just a personal ambition for her… her bid for presidency was about the issues.
and it will help us all if we would focus on the issues… this is not a hollywood rivalry of celebrities…its about our lives, our future and our children
people…lets get back to the basics

Posted by: Sarah | September 15, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

It has nothing to do with who should stay home and take care of the children. Let the family figure it out. Nannies raise a lot of children. What it has to do with is that she is scary, unprepared and being prepped by the neocons. The neos were wrong about all decisions of the war and mainly concerned about the rights of Israel. The same group that got the trust of Baby B (and now Mc) had also told Clinton that they would support him if he took out Saddam. They are not Dems or Reps — they are neocons and have their own agenda. This is the third party rising in American politics without general knowledge.

Posted by: diana | September 15, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Bottom line: If McCain/Palin win, we will most certainly see this headline again:
As the London Times headlined when Bush was re-elected: “How Can 50 Million People Be So Dumb?”

Posted by: chell | September 15, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

For those who chuckled with Charlie as he spoke down to a very accomplished woman about “the Bush Doctrine”, Krauthammer has some enlightening thoughts for your progressive, closed minds.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTU5YmYzNjU2MThhOTFiZWNmNjE4MTc5MzY3ZGRkMGY=&w=MA==
Typical MSM arrogation. The news dept of ABC will be part of its economic downfall, unless they let Stossel set the agenda. Gibson’s thinking is more out of touch, and more intellect-challenged than Rosie O’Donnell’s.

Posted by: Sam H | September 15, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

So many people think Palin is a ridiculous choice, and I don’t understand why the media is shoving her down our throats. More and more I see the hype of Palin as mass media attention, NOT positive attention/interest from all the women of America.
Give me Hillary back, pant suits and all. Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: zonay52 | September 15, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

As a democrat and a Hillary supporter, there is NO way I will vote for BHO. After he was selected I decided that I was going to vote for Mccain and now Sarah gives me yet another reason to do so. No way, No how, NO Obama/Biden!!

Posted by: brigitte | September 15, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Palin is not “like us.” She is not a real working mom- those of us in the real world do not get to set up housekeeping- a crib and swing- in our office and bring the baby to work everyday. Of course, other articles say that she “worked from home” 312 out of 365 days last year and then billed the state of Alaska a per diem allowance for her and her husband. It sounds like a great gig if you can get it , but it’s not the reality of what working moms face evveryday. Her answer about firing the town librarian to Charlie Gibson was a total lie – Palin said “its an old wives tale.” Well no, it is true. And of course how she hires her unqualified friends for state and local positions. This woman has no clue- she is no Hillary and she’s not a “real working mom.”
I am not sold on Obama either- Hillary is my candidate

Posted by: Angela | September 15, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Sarah Palin is that woman you work with that doesn’t quite have what it takes in education and knowledge for advancement, but she knows just enough to be dangerous. She can speak convincingly well enough to fool those around her that she’s qualified for any job.
So now that she’s been placed in this position, and as you pull back each onion layer (sorry Shrek), you get to see where she is truly lacking. This is why she’s in hiding. This is why she is still unable to talk to the press. You saw her with Charlie Gibson, she needs additional talking points to be prepared.
Not Ready for Primetime Sarah should go back to Alaska and brush up on a little more US education. She definitely is NOT Hillary Clinton. The last time I checked, Hillary didn’t use flash cards in debates.
As a woman, I can’t vote for her just because she’s a woman. Right now she is fitting the stereotype…not quite fit for the job based on knowledge and education, but she’s hired strictly because of her looks.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Hey check out narconews.com
Sarah Palin had a private tanning bed installed in the governor’s mansion in 2007!!

Posted by: erizn | September 15, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Stick a fork in her — she’s done.

Posted by: hang | September 15, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Fascist writer Westbrook Pegler, an avowed racist who Sarah Palin approvingly quoted in her acceptance speech for the moral superiority of small town values, expressed his fervent hope about my father, Robert F. Kennedy, as he contemplated his own run for the presidency in 1965, that “some white patriot of the Southern tier will spatter his spoonful of brains in pubic premises before the snow flies.”
It might be worth asking Governor Palin for a tally of the other favorites from her reading list. – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. 9/15/08

Posted by: hang | September 15, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

What small towns and small population states “value” is the perpetual slide of pork heading their way from the large cities and large population states. Stop talking about small town values, Governor Palin. You are nothing but the cynical leader of a bunch of successful beggars. Next time you have something to mouth off on when you disparage “big-city” values try saying this: “Thank you.” And then, shut your hole.

Posted by: hang | September 15, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

No way, No how, NO Obama/Biden !

Posted by: brigitte | September 15, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

McCain AND his supporters continue to co-opt the democrats themes and messages. Republicans are still looking for their originality.
No way, No how, No McSame/Failin!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

One thing I don’t get it, if Sarah Palin is such a feminist, why does she need her husband to be in her official meetings? Does she need his advice or permission?

Posted by: MJ Parlier | September 15, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

John McCain, Sarah Palin…
this is why other countries refer to us as dumb americans.
And for those quick to denigrate those ‘other countries’…they are surpassing the US in test scores, intelligence, graduates in Engineering, Science, Technology Innovation.
This country is so stuck on stupid and old bias, they vote for the uneducated and belittle the educated.
America = stuck on stupid

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

MJ, I thought he was her security guard. You know she needs one, on account of how she looks and all…

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Brigitte and Angela,
I don’t understand how you can say you were for Hillary and are now voting for McCain. (Brigitte, espcially after he picks Palin????) They are not substitutes for one another. Their values are on opposite sides of the spectrum. It was a hard fought primary, and I think you are damaging all the hard work Hillary put into her campaign by abandoning everything she stands for and voting for McCain. You may not agree with all of Obama’s views, but his are closer in line with Hillary’s than McCain’s are. Hillary wanted to move women forward, not have them step backwards by voting out of spite instead of using their heads by looking at the issues.
This is one of the first times a former primary rival is stumping for the one on the ticket. That should tell you something about how Hillary feels about this election and who you should vote for if you supported her.

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

the out of touch obama crowd believe that all americans are cosmopolitan big city elitists. the truth is that most states are comprised of small towns, and small town people-who by the way vote and fight your wars. i realize that many of you actually believe that you are the only inhabitants in the universe-that is elitism. snubbing your nose at small town folks only makes you and your candidate obama sound like snobs-now do you get what we mean by elitist snobs like obama and his supporters? it has nothing to do with money. but hey thanks your arrogance will cost obama and the democrats at the state level the election.

Posted by: nevada | September 15, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Obama supporters bring fear and chains. Palin is bringing a smile and cookies. Obama supporters want to talk about Bush. McCain and Palin want to sit down with us and talk about the hole we’re in and how we are going to dig out.
Guess what the Americans will vote for?
Jabez Stone didn’t have to go to hell and he was guilty. He had a lawyer who finally realized that a jury doesn’t just vote the facts, they vote their hearts.

Posted by: len | September 15, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

SARAH PALIN IS TEFLON, CANT TOUCH HER… MOST OF THE WOMEN IN THE MEDIA ARE CYNICAL AND ANALYTICAL..
THE REST OF THE WOMEN I HAVE SPOKEN TO DONT CARE..
HERE IS A MOM, WHO LOOKS LIKE THEM. PIPER WIPING HER BROTHER TRIG WITH THAT MUCH SALIVA DID IT FOR ME. .. THIS IS ANYONE’S FAMILY– I LIKE THESE PEOPLE.. NOT OBAMA AND CERTAINLY NOT BRING OLD BIDEN..
THERE IS SOMETHING YOUNG ABOUT MAVERICK MCCAIN. THE PICK OF PALIN SAID, THAT IS A MAVERICK.

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | September 15, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

hillary is campaigning for obama because her political future (job) and her legacy leave no options-she has to toe the party line-we don’t.
also hillary like all the libs are terrified that if mccain wins it will be a vice president palen versus hillary ticket.

Posted by: nevada | September 15, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I wonder if she’ll let McCain use her $10.000 tanning bed.

Posted by: bhciapol | September 15, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Nevada,
Thanks for the generalization, but Obama supporters are not big city elitists. I grew up in a small city, and my parents live in a small town. All of us are for Obama, and definately not elitists. I would never say the McCain supporters are all backwards thinking rednecks from specks on the map, because unfortunately, I have friends in big cities who support McCain.

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

nevada,
Funny, I seem to remember the Clintons both giving very good speeches about supporting Obama before Palin was announced. I doubt either of the Clintons have to work again at a job, so if she really didn’t want to campaign for Obama, she could say no. But then, that only shows that she puts country first, and not her pride. It takes a strong person to go out and campaign for the person who won after the battle Obama and Hillary had. Why cheapen that by defecting?

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Who’s being elitist? Republicans always assume that anyone outside of the “big city” must be one of them….

Posted by: Patty H | September 15, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

For those who chuckled with Charlie as he spoke down to a very accomplished woman about “the Bush Doctrine”, Krauthammer has some enlightening thoughts for your progressive, closed minds.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTU5YmYzNjU2MThhOTFiZWNmNjE4MTc5MzY3ZGRkMGY=&w=MA==
Typical MSM arrogation. The news dept of ABC will be part of its economic downfall, unless they let Stossel set the agenda. Gibson’s thinking is more out of touch, and more intellect-challenged than Rosie O’Donnell’s.

Posted by: Sam H | September 15, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

what Palin is bringing:
guns babies bibles
top 3 on the neocon list
nothing else matters

Posted by: Gus | September 15, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I grew up in a small town in PA. Yes, I’m educated, (much more than Sarah) and I’m also a military veteran.
I support Senator Obama.
And that doesn’t make me elitist. I’m just your average working mother and grandmother.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

How can you trust someone who can blatantly lie about pursuing earmarks, and lie about inappropriate firings? In both cases, she could have said she was a changed woman, that she had made mistakes, but instead she only defended her actions. How can you trust this person?

Posted by: JoeOvercoat | September 15, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

i remember during the obama hillary primary season obama male supporters posting blogs saying i am not sexist i would vote for a woman ‘just not that woman’ meaning hillary. now you say i am not sexist i just would not vote for that woman again-sorry the argument has worn thin and shallow.
but now hillary is your hero give me a break. you think we forget the horrible vile manner in which hillary and US her supporters were treated by obama supporters. but now she is the standard bearer for women candidates?
mccain palen the ticket for me.

Posted by: nevada | September 15, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Great! We have the dems pres candidate who has zero experience, but talks a good fight (depending on his audience)and a VP that’s a career politician. The reps have a pres candidate that a career politician and a VP candidate who has zero experience and talks a good fight. Hmmm…seems like mirror images to me. Can we have a do-over please? I don’t like any of them.
McCain wants to stay in Iraq indefinitely. Obama wants to add more troops to Afghanistan. No end in sight for either of them. Can we have a do-over please?
Oh, am I saying the same thing? So are the dems and reps! Wake up America. Regardless who you vote for, things will remain the same. You’re all just fooling yourselves.

Posted by: Bzdet | September 15, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Nevada,
If you comments are directed towards me let me set some things straight. First, you are making broad generalizations about Obama supporters. There were as many over the top zealous Hillary supporters saying outrageous things about Obama and his supporters as the other way around. Second, I was on the fence about voting for Obama or Hillary in the Texas primary until the last minute. It was how she answered a few questions that pushed me towards Obama. I have admired her since she was the First Lady. Third, I am a woman.
I would have been happy with either Obama or Hillary running for President because both had the same basic platforms for what they wanted to do to help the country. That is why I don’t understand why Hillary supporters can abandon all of what Hillary worked for by voting for McCain/Palin who is opposite on many issues from Hillary.

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

TJ, THE CLINTONITE THERE IS SOMETHING YOUNG ABOUT MAVERICK MCCAIN. THE PICK OF PALIN SAID, THAT IS A MAVERICK.
__________________________________________________
McCain cowing to the far right wing of his base to pick a woman he only met once, did not vet and was not his first choice is not a “maverick” – it’s irresponsible.

Posted by: Paige | September 15, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

The Hypocraciy of the Republican party is so disgusting it makes my head spin. Sarah Palin was an impulsive incompetent decision by am impulsive incompetent Elderly Senator who all his life has had an angry renegade streak and a temperment not suitable to lead any Nation much less the United States.
Sarah Palin and her Followers term themselves christians but tell blatant lies.
Further it has always been puzzling why republicans want the Government to manage peoples personal lives but allow commercial institutions to do whatever they please.
Finally, women are proving that they are not about substance they are about show and image. Carly Fiorinna will call anyone sexist who dare to question Palin’s nomination for the VP post.
Many are closet racists and it is time reverse sexism be exposed for what it is.

Posted by: mal | September 15, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

This is truly sad…
only in biased and bigoted america can a black man have worked 3 yrs as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate’s Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 151 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran’s Affairs committees, and still be labeled as having zero experience.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Ah yes, women are going to vote Republican because a woman can’t be trusted with decisions about her own body, but multi-national corporations can make decisions affecting all mankind without regulation.

Posted by: Paige | September 15, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

JoeOvercoat
Look at Obama’s record on earmarks in Chicago…it’s no better…worse even. Refer back to my comment at 4:43.

Posted by: Bzdet | September 15, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

It’s rather humorous how hard people are looking for things to hold against Sarah Palin. She must REALLY scare the Democrats who ensured that Barack Obama was the nominee. Well, you’re stuck with him, and trying to make things up about Sarah Palin won’t change that fact or make Obama look like the Messiah to anyone but those you’ve already convinced.
That’s not to say Palin doesn’t have faults and who doesn’t? Is she inexperienced in national politics? Yes. Is that concerning? Maybe. However, if that’s the argument against her, then Obama needs to be taken out of the equation as presidential candidate. He clearly has as little – and in some ways less – experience as Sarah Palin does, and he also has questionable ties, questionable moves and a problem with the truth and accountability.
I find it astonishing that people believe McCain has had a free ride from the press, the same people who cry about the press being against Obama. Are you kidding? Obama has had the biggest free ride in the history of politics. I’m all for historic candidates – whether it’s a woman or someone besides a white man – however it’s time to move beyond how great it is “historically” to elect someone and look at who is actually the best candidate. Sorry, Obama just doesn’t cut it.

Posted by: traci | September 15, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

i did not say that any of you specifically by handle are elitists-but you sure responded pushed your buttons eh!
what i said in a general way is that snotty, snobby, demeaning, ugly characterizations of others who do not agree with you come off as snot nosed elitism. and it has hurt the democrats. are you guys intent on
political suicide or what? look you did the same thing with hillary supporters and alienated a vital group for obama. now you are handing the election to mccain with this same approach.

Posted by: nevada | September 15, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Obama may have worked 3 years as a community organizer… he was hired at the age of 23… but he became disillusioned at the little progress he was able to make. People have to want to help themselves. He may have tried to be vehicle to lead them, but he wasn’t successful.He thought real change comes from the bottom up, not top down. But if he couldn’t success at a local level on a small scale basis, what makes you think he can succeed on a large scale basis as commander-in-chief? Do you think he worked in soup kitchens and the like? Can any of you democrats come up with any real accomplishments he made as a community organizer?

Posted by: Fran | September 15, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

The vitriol against this fine stateswoman is reason enough to support her. She is opposed only by the smug, the greedy, the naive and those who are bought and sold. Brave, virtuous hardworking Americans adore her.

Posted by: ali landry | September 15, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Wow the liberals are going crazy. A woman in the whitehouse and not their woman.
And how stupid are the rest of you women, that do the bidding for the democrats just so they let you get rid of unwanted pregnancies.
Notice I said let you, like you need permission from all the old men in this country to do what you want. Stop asking for permission and vote for Palin it will be a step out of the kitchen and into the whitehouse.

Posted by: olderwoman | September 15, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

“Questionable tie, questionable moves and a problem with truth and accountability” I think we can apply this to gramps. I am 65 years old, a nurse and believe I can say this — a 72 year old man is too old, plus the years between one onset of melanoma and the next is, at the most, 8 years. McCain is pushing past 6 years. Palin could well be President within a year or two. Everyone who relates to her “because she is one of us”, ask yourself this question — Would you be ready to be President in one or two years?

Posted by: diana | September 15, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Nearly every argument used against Palin here can be said for the PRESIDENTIAL candidate no less, by the name of Obama. Lacks experience: yes, Has a family: yes, Supported Bridge to Nowhere: yes, Used people for own political gain: yes. BUT the key for me, is that Palin does not associate with and befriend radical and racist ministers, radical and activist groups, people who have been charged with felonies, and have a habit and record of having voted ‘present’ on critical issues. All of this is very foolish behavior for someone who wants to be president. While Obama may not be a racist radical, his friends and associates are, and we all know what happens to those cronies when one is elected to an office. Are those the people we want surrounding and encouraging OBama to promote their own personal agendas? He is their puppet, their “front”man… the man with the look and the eloquent way of speaking. Obama clearly has no backbone… look at his record… look at the political races he won by default. Look at his stance on the hard issues: “present”. It’s the biggest con I’ve ever seen in this country and the sad thing is, I don’t even think Obama realizes how he managed to catapult to his current position either.

Posted by: msa123 | September 15, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

One of the signs from the Alaska protesters….
“Sarah is so far right, she’s wrong”
Those people KNOW Palin…take heed.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

mack i have always been a democrat just like my ancestors. but i am switching to independent.
i don’t really care who wins at this point yet. i just want to see whoever wins win based on the issues not on who did the best job of smearing the other and his supporters. isn’t that the mantra of the republicans? think kerry and gore? that is not my democrat party-my party abandoned me i did abandon the party. why bothers me and why i am jumping ship is for one the huge poor judgement issue in not selecting hillary as obamas v.p. was obama afraid that a smarter more experienced woman would outshine him? and the selection of joe biden an empty gaffe machine. for me it reeks of a contender obama who is insecure needs all the attention, has poor judgement, and was arrogant enough to believe that he had it in the bag and could go it alone without a strong v.p that is a scary choice for potus.

Posted by: nevada | September 15, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

I think there is alot of jealousy going on because Palin stole the spotlight from the almighty Obama. And she’s just the VP nomination! What’s up with that?! Wish they’d study his every word and action and background as fiercely and thoroughly as they have Palin’s. I know it’s hard to admit when you’ve chosen to follow a puppet for president… and I agree that the choices are not great. It’s not like McCain is so great. But AT LEAST he is his own man. He is decisive, he has voted on hard issues, even went against the grain to stand up for his beliefs… When has Obama stood up for his beliefs – prior to this campaign?

Posted by: msa123 | September 15, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

For those of you that don’t read, or can’t read…. ==rollineyes==
Everyone keeps going on and on about Hillary not winning, Hillary not being selected…
Hillary Clinton did NOT, I repeat, DID NOT want to be vetted unless she was selected to be the nominee. Now we ALL know, or at least should know, that is not how the process works.
She did not want her finances raked over unless she was selected. That meant that both she and Bill had to be vetted, since he is a former President.
That was the main reason she did not want to provide her tax returns during the primaries…remember, she said she would provide them only AFTER she was the nominee.
Please get smarter people, this country, our childrens future, is at stake here.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Obama has been through the wringer, for the last two years. Where have you all been? Oh, waiting for the old man to pick somebody…and not paying attention.
Now theres a surprise.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Your uneducated, disingenuous arguments make you look biased and bigoted.
Stop listening to hannity and limbaugh and read more. sheeeesh

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 15, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

I for one, have never listened to hannity or limbaugh in my life. All that one has to do is check out history, lay out the facts, and it’s really very clear.

Posted by: msa123 | September 15, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Fran, he pushed the city to do testing in all city apartments for asbestos. I would say pushing the city into finding and getting rid of a carcinogens in the apratments they run would be a big accomplishment.
Traci, there were things coming out about Palin within 24 hours of the announcement of her on the ticket. Don’t really have to look that hard.
msa, Palin is married to a guy who was part of a group to make Alaska its own country, and McCain had his 70th birthday party on the yacht of a guy just convicted of fraud and money laundering. Palin goes to a church that condemns all other religions. So much for not interacting with radicals and felons.
Also, check the information about the present/abstain voting. Obama only voted present around 120 times out of the approximately 4,000 votes in the Illinois Senate. McCain has voted abstain (not voting) more times than Obama (53% to 40%) over the same time period.
http://www.babeled.com/2008/08/31/an-honest-comparison-of-obama-mccains-senate-voting-records/

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

nevada,
I don’t anyone has heard anything about how the decision was made in choosing Biden over the other people being vetted for the VP position. But at least they went through a longer vetting process than 15 minutes. If Palin did not wear a skirt, there is no way the republicans would have gone through a vetting process and still chose her with ‘troopergate’, her daughter, her husband’s association with a free Alaska group, and a law requiring her to stop charging victims for forensic kits and testing. Fortunately, so far, the media has been not been sure how to bring any of that stuff out without being labeled sexist for reporting the truth. They went through the same thing early in the democratic primary with Obama, but soon got over it. I think we are just now seeing them starting to take off the kid gloves with Palin.

Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Only Liberals are completely obsessed with this woman….the party of tolerence? Not much. Gov. Palin is the only candidate of the 4 who had to make Executive decisions DAILY for the people she governs. SHE IS the American Dream…..humble beginnings, college grad, marries High School sweetheart, PTA mom, City Councilwoman, Mayor, Governor and now McCain’s first executive decision….kudos Sen. McCain! Gov. Palin represents more of the us in the U.S. than any other candidate, and she will be a quick learner, sponge at your side. I can hardley wait…and I love between the two candidates there are 12 children, some adopted, some special needs.
Gov. Palin has a “Mr. Mom” in Tood, her own mom and day, two sisters, one with a 13 year old special needs kid….this is one family that will take care of each other, no matter how this election turns out.
COUNTRY FIRST!
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN EVEN BEFORE HE PICKED PALIN!

Posted by: Debra | September 15, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Mack….Palin had been vetted for four months and knew she might be asked to be VP for that long.

Posted by: Debra | September 15, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Mack…I don’t think you want to discuss fraud and money laundering on your candidate’s side (Nobama)….he has criminal, terriorists and racists tied so close to him it’s laughable he’s still in the race, but it’s his race that keeps him here…a white guy would have had to drop out last March when all this came to light AFTER his 11 primary wins.

Posted by: Debra | September 15, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Obama was a community organizer after his lost drug years (early 80′s)…he got some asbestos removed…wow. Wrote a couple of books (self serving) worked 143 days in Senate and said he wouldn’t run for Prez…gave a speech and is running on that as Hillary said.
NO WAY NO BAMA NO HOW.

Posted by: Debra | September 15, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

First, I am curious after reading these blogs why it seems as though Palin is the one running for the presidency, not Mc Cain. If I am not mistaken, the presidential race is between Mc Cain, Obama, and the other assorted candidates who get NO press time. Is this a representation of true democracy or really the media machine run by the three or four “good ol’ boys”? At the end of the day, ALL politicians are basically the same. I do not see any difference; same backbiting, same non-informational dialogue, same rhetoric. Again, another election with a choice of the lessor of two evils. I have not heard any discussion or representation of true conversation and ideas that are or can be supported by the “common man”. Bureaucratic dialogue does NOT mean change.
The people need to mobilize and become responsible for the change they desire. They need to mobilize and write their congressional officers to have their voices heard. ALL lobbying monies need to be refused AND all laws that are passed by congress to reduce the chances for “lined pockets” must be adhered to with the utmost of accountability. Loopholes are always found in any law written. Information is always translated in a way that is understood by the listener, not by a majority. This does not ALWAYS make it right, correct, or honest.

Posted by: Debra | September 16, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

I have been very focused on the election this time around and hope that our future does not depend on a man that has to read his speeches and a women that HAS NO EXPERIENCE TO RUN THE COUNTRY.I am also getting tired of the news focusing on Palin it’s like they forgot who the real canidates are.Wake up we need Obama his wife is a true first lady.

Posted by: sally | September 16, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

All Obama had to do was choose Hillary – he would’ve been certain to take the presidency – but, he just couldn’t do it. Evidently he’s intimidated by strong women – first Hillary and now, Palin – who has absolutely shaken him up. I certainly question his judgment, as well as how badly he wants the job, since he didn’t do the most obvious thing he could’ve done to win. On the other hand, McCain showed wisdom, courage, and political savvy with his choice. And the fact that he kept it secret just chaps the media severely. It’s really funny to see the seasoned “old man” show the “kid” just what years of experience means.

Posted by: Lisa Bell | September 17, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Let’s remember that in any of the conservative “religions of Abraham” (Christianity/Islam/Judaism) the man/father and male leader primacy is a core belief and practice.
These are strict patriarchal, hierarchical belief and behavior systems. The woman’s role, and children, along with anyone of lesser status (including males) is to support, with no questions, the decision, actions , proscriptions and actions of the higher-ranking male(s).
These are the also laws and practices of the early human hunter-gathers and tribes — less so early cities. They are embedded in our brains.
To not do so, or even question this worldview is seen as immoral, evil and to be aggressively defended against since it challenges the core beliefs and activities of these, and parts of our, cultures.
In the Middle East they literally give their lives to defend these beliefs and rules.
Palin, by doing all the macho stuff, is merely viscerally demonstrating that she actively, visibly supports aggressive, sometimes violent male activities and prerogatives. How better to support your man, and all men, then shoot with them and skin the carcass?
This speaks, immediately and deeply to many, many women and men around the world.
These are not beliefs or practices that can be reasoned with, discussed or questioned. Somehow we must live along side.

Posted by: KevX | September 21, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

I am a loyal viewer of GMA and also a very capable professional. My organization is doing a major exhibition in NYC October 6-8 and have contacted GMA receiving the response that you are not interested. After watching many inane coverages of very in consequencial things I am actually very disappointed to say the least. Please visit our wheat field on October 6 at South Street Seaport….

Posted by: Marcia | September 29, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.