Sep 30, 2008 3:57pm

Palin Seeks Serenity in Sedona

ABC News’ Kate Snow and Imtiyaz Delawala  report:  Gov. Sarah Palin secluded herself today at the Sedona ranch home of Sen. John McCain, using the sprawling estate’s “relaxed environment” to prepare for her critical vice presidential debate with Sen. Joe Biden Thursday in St. Louis. 

"The Governor’s debate prep today is taking place outdoors near a creek on the scenic McCain ranch in Sedona,” a campaign official said. “The serenity and beauty of this setting has contributed to what can be characterized as a relaxed environment.”

Signaling the importance of the upcoming debate, McCain’s top campaign adviser Steve Schmidt traveled to Sedona to help with the final preparations, as did McCain’s chief foreign policy advisor Randy Scheunemann, who is playing the part of Sen. Biden in mock debate sessions. Mark Wallace, deputy campaign manager to President Bush in 2004, has also been working closely with Palin, as has former Bush National Security Council staffer Steve Biegun, who is serving as Palin’s lead foreign policy adviser.

Palin has also been joined in Arizona by her husband Todd, as well as her daughters Willow and Piper, and infant son Trig. Aides to the campaign hope the atmosphere will help Palin relax and better prepare for the upcoming showdown with Biden, and allow her to focus on highlighting her strengths as a candidate.

“She’s eager to show more of what got her where she is,” the Palin aide said. “To her team, that means more of what her fans in Alaska and elsewhere know and love about her record and her fresh approach to reform.”

Palin was widely criticized for a series of interviews with CBS’ Katie Couric that aired last week, including by former conservative supporters who said she was unprepared and presented herself poorly on critical issues such as the economy and foreign policy. Palin took time out from her debate preparation this afternoon to tape an interview with conservative blogger and radio host Hugh Hewitt, in which she blasted the media’s treatment of her.

“I have a degree in journalism also, so it surprises me that so much has changed since I received my education in journalistic ethics all those years ago. But I’m not going to pick a fight with those who buy ink by the barrelful. I’m going to take those shots and those pop quizzes and just say that’s okay, those are good testing grounds,” Palin told Hewitt. “It makes somebody be even clearer and more articulate in their positions. So really I don’t fight it. I invite it.”

At a rally in Columbus, OH yesterday Palin said she was looking forward to the debate with Biden, while making a joking reference to her opponent’s age and experience in Washington.

“We are going to talk about those new ideas, new energy for America,” Palin told the crowd. “I’m looking forward to meet him too. I’ve never met him before. But, I’ve been hearing about his senate speeches since I was in like 2nd grade.”

In another interview yesterday, after the Columbus rally, Couric asked Palin whether joking about Biden’s age was “a risky thing to say, insinuating that Joe Biden’s been around awhile” given that her own running mate is 72 years old, and would be the oldest president ever elected.

“Oh no, it’s nothing negative at all,” Palin said of the comment on Biden. “He’s got a lot of experience and just stating the fact there, that we’ve been hearing his speeches for all these years. So he’s got a tremendous amount of experience and, you know, I’m the new energy, the new face, the new ideas and he’s got the experience based on many many years in the Senate and voters are gonna have a choice there of what it is that they want in these next four years.”

User Comments

From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-and-couric-on-gotcha-journalism.html
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
McCain and Couric Spar on Gotcha Journalism
COURIC: Over the weekend, Gov. Palin, you said the U.S. should absolutely launch cross-border attacks from Afghanistan into Pakistan to, quote, “stop the terrorists from coming any further in.” Now, that’s almost the exact position that Barack Obama has taken and that you, Sen. McCain, have criticized as something you do not say out loud. So, Gov. Palin, are you two on the same page on this?
MCCAIN: Now, just a minute, Katie. I have to step in here. That’s another example of the media’s “Gotcha journalism”…
COURIC: But, it was a question from a citizen. How is a citizen asking a candidate a question an example of what you call “Gotcha Journalism?”
MCCAIN: Because it was hard, Katie.
We don’t want Gov. Palin to be asked questions, unless she is prepared for them. When she is prepared, as she will be before the debate, she sounds intelligent, knowledgeable and feisty. But when she has not been prepared, she sounds lost and incoherent.
We can’t have people asking her questions when she has not had time to be prepared with an answer.
COURIC: But, Sen. McCain, I have to say, you are 72-years old. Actuarial preditions show that if you were to be elected, Gov. Palin would have a 1 in 5 chance of actually becoming President. These are perilous times–unprecedented crises in financial markets, tensions across a wide range of critical foreign policy arenas.
Shouldn’t we have a Vice President, and a potential President, who actually understands these issues, beyond the preparation necessary for a debate?
For example, here is her response to a question on the economy:
COURIC: Why isn’t it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries; allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?
PALIN: That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health-care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping the—it’s got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health-care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today, we’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.
COURIC: That answer, Sen. McCain, as noted by Fareed Zakaria, is incoherent.
MCCAIN: Yes. (nodding head)
COURIC: Well, isn’t it actually important that a potential President actually comprehend issues? That is, beyond debate preparation?
MCCAIN: No, Katie. That’s what I mean by “gotcha journalism”. It’s obvious from these prior interviews that Palin has little to no comprehension of fiscal policy and economics. For heaven’s sake, she received a “D” in macroeconomics in college! And, as I’ve I said in the past, I have little understanding of economic issues myself.
No, what’s important, Katie, is that she *sound* like she understands the issues. In the debate. If she is sufficiently prepared, she can give an illusion of understanding the issues–even if she is giving answers with the prepared and practiced spontaneity and content necessary to give that illusion force.
Given that the bar is set at the lowest standard imaginable, Katie, if she accompanies that performance with sufficient charm, we believe that media will follow, into focusing on the change from that low standard, and on those superficial entertainment values–you know, Katie, (McCain smiles through tight lips and squinting eyes and moves his hands up and down)–”She certainly appears to be more confident tonight; she appears more poised, coherent, humorous”–rather than her actual readiness to be President.
So, Katie, we want them to focus on that difference, on her debate preparation, rather than on her actual well-demonstrated Presidential unreadiness. And that’s what I mean by “gotcha journalism.”
KATIE: But if I understand you correctly, Sen. McCain, you actually believe that it’s not important that she understand the issues actually facing the nation…
MCCAIN: Right.
COURIC: On which many people’s very jobs, health and life will rely at this critical time…
MCCAIN: Yes.
COURIC: All that really matters creating a standard so low that she actually is rewarded for her widely seen and repeatedly demonstrated lack of knowledge and understanding. We would be using what is essentially a remedial standard for Presidential capability–instead of one of actual Presidential capacity.
Sen. McCain, no one can gain Presidential-level understanding in days. And in the office of the Presidency, with its intense crises and unforseeable events, she will not be prepared for each unpredictable day, as she was for the debate.
Yet you expect media to focus on these values, rather than actual readiness to be President. That’s what you mean by “gotcha journalism”?
MCCAIN: Exactly. Once again, Katie–we “gotcha.”
COURIC: How can you expect the media to fall for that?
MCCAIN: It worked for Bush.
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-and-couric-on-gotcha-journalism.html

Posted by: cara prado | September 30, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Let’s hope that her answers to Couric and Gibson won’t be what she relies on Thursday. You can’t rely on personal tidbits to successfully deal with weighty foreign policy Q’s and the like…
ttp://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | September 30, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

FREE SARAH PALIN!! FREE SARAH PALIN!!
Never held a press conference
Answers very few media or public questions
Holds radical views on abortion, religion, guns, gays…
What is the McCain Campaign so afraid of? Her being honest?
Her reputation already stinks since the largest number of Americans (49 percent) say she is unqualified to be VP.
She is a scary, radical and, as the Anchorage Alaska Daily News described her, an “extreme social Conservative.”
Let Sarah have the freedom of speech, unlike her Russian neighbor, Vladimir Putin.
FREE SARAH PALIN!! FREE SARAH PALIN!!

Posted by: Michael John | September 30, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

according to Mc Cain, Palin is qualified, ready for the duties in white House, BUT just not ready to talk to the media. I hope at the debate, she doesn’t have to have the questions repeated over and over. Maybe Palin is Mc Cains answer to his prayers but just not the voters. She already put herself at top of list Palin/Mc Cain admistration? I knew Mc Cain promised change but I did think that was the change he was talking about. Sen. Mc Cain will you also furnish her with a hearing devise so she give the right answers?

Posted by: WILHELMINA78 | September 30, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

“I’m the new energy, the new face, the new ideas and he’s got the experience based on many many years in the Senate and voters are gonna have a choice there of what it is that they want in these next four years.”
she really has no idea at all what she is doing does she? Does she realize that she is making the case right there for Obama?

Posted by: Danny | September 30, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

I’m having a hard time believing that the interview with John McCain and Katie Couric is not some kind of satire or spoof.
He agrees that he answer is incoherent and says that the question was hard…
WTF!!!
Is it for real?
Holy Cow! We are in serious trouble if the McCain/Palin ticket wins.

Posted by: Sam S | September 30, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Homosexuality is a choice people make, according to Palin in her latest exchange with Couric.
Plus more interesting stuff on Palin’s favorite newspapers and magazines:
COURIC: And when it comes to establishing your world view, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this — to stay informed and to understand the world?
PALIN: I’ve read most of them again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media —
COURIC: But what ones specifically? I’m curious.
PALIN: Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me over all these years.
COURIC: Can you name any of them?
PALIN: I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news.
Plus, a 15-years old girl raped by her father got to have the baby, according to Palin.
And she’s against the morning after pill.
Interesting stuff, isn’t it? Would make a great VP.

Posted by: herta | September 30, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

patisanship aside, this is seriously a scarey possibility here. Can there be any question that if this were an independent ticket that there would be out loud laughter? Karl Rove would rip this ticket to shreds if it were the Dem ticket. I repect her, i do, she has made some big accomplishments but lets be clear, Alaskan politics is a very small pond.

Posted by: Danny | September 30, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Katie: do you believe in the “the morning after pill?
Palin: I believe in birth control, however, i do not believe in abortion…life starts at conception:
\Katie: SO, LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT…YOU DON’T BELIEVE IN THER MORNING AFTER PILL’
Palin: i believe that life starts at conception;
Katie: , so what you are telling me is that you do not believe in the morning after pill?
that’s real fair journalism Katie…you will be looking for a job yourself soon anyway.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

CALGON take her away
AND DON’T BRING HER BACK!

Posted by: GIGI - FREE SARAH | September 30, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

She really thinks alot of herself. Not an ounce of modesty in her.
No matter what happens thursday night, the only ones who will be chanting her name are the far right nutjobs who thinks she walks on water.
The MSM already has Joe Biden losing because he is not afraid to talk and wears his heart on his sleeve… so they automatically say he will gaffe so much that she will knock it out of the park… mark my words.. the exact words that George S. and Charlie will use, is “she has impressed the world with her vast knowledge, we should not have underestimated her, She knocked it out of the park”
which is what they said when she gave her scripted speech at the RNC… not sure what speech they heard, but all I heard was a bunch of teeth gnashing comments that had no substance.
Bottom line… she is as corrupt as McSame, she is a liar and she has clue what is going on in the lower 48 or around the world and she doesn’t care.
No way will I fall for the pity party the MSM has started for Palin.

Posted by: l | September 30, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Now they’re brain-washing her, so forget about the ‘serenity’, but what Palin really should do is take some two weeks off for some serious study of and reflection on world issues.
The most shocking aspect of her personality imo, as shown in her answers to Gibson’s and Couric’s questions, is that this woman doesn’t even THINK. There’s no reflection whatsoever. So, there probably is no knowledge, for knowledge makes one aware of any issue’s complexities.
Palin is a very simple woman. Nothing wrong with that in itself, but everything is wrong with that now that she is a VP candidate.

Posted by: maria | September 30, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Sarah Palin doesn’t anyone to be concerned. She is a very qualified canditate. Someone said that she would be on some sort of special trial at the debate. Think about it. What could she possibly say or do that would make anyone want to vote for those other guys. Oboma and Biden scare me. Those two are more concerned with themselves, rather than the country.
Thanks Sarah palin for being “real”, for being honest. and for being qualified. Given the choice of the others, I would rather trust you with the country anyday.
jjsjr

Posted by: joseph | September 30, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Question: what newspapers do you read?
Palin: any that are in front of me.

Posted by: hollow | September 30, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Katie, just another dumb blonde, guess
your trying to make up for your lack of
experience in journalism!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Joey | September 30, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Question: can you name one newspaper you read?
Palin: all the ones in front of me. Alaska isn’t a foreign country.

Posted by: Gus | September 30, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

wait, is this another SNL sketch?
“He’s got a lot of experience and just stating the fact there, that we’ve been hearing his speeches for all these years. So he’s got a tremendous amount of experience and, you know, I’m the new energy, the new face, the new ideas and he’s got the experience based on many many years in the Senate and voters are gonna have a choice there of what it is that they want in these next four years”
————– uh, O.K.A.Y. where should Obama have your flowers delivered?
MCCAIN: No, Katie. That’s what I mean by “gotcha journalism”. It’s obvious from these prior interviews that Palin has little to no comprehension of fiscal policy and economics. For heaven’s sake, she received a “D” in macroeconomics in college! And, as I’ve I said in the past, I have little understanding of economic issues myself.
No, what’s important, Katie, is that she *sound* like she understands the issues. In the debate. If she is sufficiently prepared, she can give an illusion of understanding the issues–even if she is giving answers with the prepared and practiced spontaneity and content necessary to give that illusion force.
———————– HE CANNOT BE SERIOUS! can he?
IS THIS REAL?

Posted by: GIGI - FREE SARAH! | September 30, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

In other words, George W. Bush’s former deputy campaign manager is now modeling Palin’s ideas on America and the rest of the world.
Doesn’t particularly sound as a promise of the change we need.

Posted by: will Z | September 30, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Win or Lose, Palin is still a joke. A joke on us, what if she ends up president? Who’s the joke on then?

Posted by: JR | September 30, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Palin is an idiot plane and simple. What is scary is that people are more interested in sticking by their team (republicans) rather than just be honest this women is plane dumb and would be better qualified to work the McDonalds counter than any other job.

Posted by: Timmy | September 30, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

There has been a lot of talk about setting the bar low so that Sarah Palin cannot help doing well in the upcoming debate… Unfortunately, the job she’s running for in the Real World is more important than Top Debater… it’s for VP (heaven forbid, President) of the United States of America.
Has our bar for the office sunk so low?

Posted by: Derek | September 30, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Palin is the best reason in the world NOT to vote for McCain. She clearly has never given a days thought to any national or international issues. Yes, she has a degree in Journalism, one which took her 6 years to secure (and one flunk-out from the University of Idaho). I too have a degree in Journalism, and I can state unequivocally that the media IS doing its job with Palin. The fact that she doesn’t think or articulate clearly when they ask a question doesn’t mean that the question is “gotcha” or out of bounds. It simply means that Palin is unprepared, unqualified, and unintelligent on the issues. The problem is Palin, not the media.

Posted by: Alexandra | September 30, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

New released tape:
COURIC: And when it comes to establishing your world view, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this — to stay informed and to understand the world?
PALIN: I’ve read most of them again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media —
COURIC: But what ones specifically? I’m curious.
PALIN: Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me over all these years.
COURIC: Can you name any of them?
PALIN: I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news.
She reads all of them. Not just all of them, but any of them that have been in front of her “over all these years.”
And strangely enough, not one of those many, many newspapers ever mentioned the Bush Doctrine!

Posted by: sentence to nowhere | September 30, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

The liberal media is foaming at the mouth at the thought of a woman VP and a War Hero in command of the government of our country!…..instead, their misogyny, sexism and white guilt remorse have pushed their clouded minds to support a young, naive individual that has no experience in governance or foreign affairs and his only strength is the skill of oratory.
The fact is, America still does not know who the real Barack Hussein Obama is, but Americans remember Obama’s 20 year close association and blood relationship with his religious leader, priest and father image, Jeremiah Wright.
Americans remember vividly the hideous videos of Jeremiah Wright’s congregation which included Obama and Oprah, when they were celebrating in bombastic joy, the murderous attack on America on 9/11.
Americans that love our country and have always been proud of it, know Barack is a radical extremist and black supremacist that has a hidden agenda that is a serious threat to the American values we all treasure and cherish.
The sexist liberal media will not succeed in destroying the McCain/Palin presidential campaign the way they destroyed Hillary Clinton’s effort, because Americans including all the democrats that supported Hillary Clinton will make the choice to put our Country First and vote for McCain and Sarah Palin.
Country First!
McCain/Sarah Palin

Posted by: Manolete | September 30, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I have never seen so many people who claim that they know EVERY detail about Sarah Palin’s life- (Just check The Daily Kos for every bad story about Palin.)
Yet these same people claim they do NOT know enough about her and want to see her do every interview that comes down the pike- (including The Home Shopping Network.)
Which is it..??
I want to see more of Sen. Biden. That guy is hilarious. (Though, I do not think he is trying to be funny?)
No doubt, this is the most important event in Sarah Palin’s life. (VP Debate with Biden.)
It could also be the most important event in John McCain’s presidential run?

Posted by: The Angry Republic | September 30, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

She’s the new energy, the
new face and the new ideas
except she lacks the knowledge
and the brains required to
become vice president.

Posted by: anon | September 30, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Congratulations! You earned 50 McCain points for posting that.
Now jump off a bridge to nowhere.

Posted by: Slicer | September 30, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

One of many scary aspects about Palin is that Clinton, a woman who is actually intelligent and knows domestic and foreign issues, was chased from the race, and as a substitute “woman” we get Caribou Barbie.
What does that say about what Republicans (or Dems for that matter) think of women?

Posted by: Darcy | September 30, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

This woman needs to go back to Alaska and have babies. That’s the great Republican dream, isn’t it?
She seems to hate everything in the World except her own family.
Maybe now is the time to admit that she’s in waaaay over her head, and go back to
her guns and church. LOL! (Obama was right!)

Posted by: david | September 30, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Why are Palin’s kids never in school? Seriously. With such a lack of respect for education, it’s no wonder this woman, a governor, is a moron. John McCain has terrible judgement.

Posted by: Teacher | September 30, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

know Barack is a radical extremist and black supremacist that has a hidden agenda that is a serious threat to the American values we all treasure and cherish.
====
facts?
email and chain letters do not constitute fact.

Posted by: Gus | September 30, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

OMG! I am appalled that Senator Palin would use the phrase “…since I was in like 2nd grade.” Like I wonder if she knows, like, how potential world leaders, don’t talk like, that way. Very juvenille and unprofessional.

Posted by: Mistiethepup | September 30, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

McCain has lost every
war or conflict he has
been associated with.
Vietnam
Iraq
Georgia – his buddy
Saakashvili just lost
two provinces, they
broke away, all
opposition parties in
Georgia want him to
step down voluntarily
and be gone

Posted by: anon | September 30, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Why makeit about race and sexism, the other posts are about intelligence and being prepared. You’re projecting your hatred.
Se hasn’t made sense yet. She says she’s ready? No way. It has nothing to do with color, religious preferences, conservativism, gender it has to do with the person.

Posted by: CMW | September 30, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Palin is obviously about an inch deep. Even my 13 year old reads the daily newspaper. What kind of idiot can’t name a single newspaper?

Posted by: Amy | September 30, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

The sexist liberal media will not succeed in destroying the McCain/Palin presidential campaign the way they destroyed Hillary Clinton’s effort, because Americans including all the democrats that supported Hillary Clinton will make the choice to put our Country First and vote for McCain and Sarah Palin.
Country First!
McCain/Sarah Palin
—————————————-
why would PRO-CHOICE DEMOCRATS VOTE FOR PALIN?
are you insane?????????????

Posted by: GIGI --- free sarah! | September 30, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

These days I read my children Palin’s Couric Chronicals as a bedtime story to prepare them for Halloween.

Posted by: helen | September 30, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

It will be pretty easy to hide a remote receiver in her hair. She’ll probably sound amazingly knowledgeable.

Posted by: Mike | September 30, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

OMG! I am appalled that Senator Palin would use the phrase “…since I was in like 2nd grade.” Like I wonder if she knows, like, how potential world leaders, don’t talk like, that way. Very juvenille and unprofessional.
Posted by: Mistiethepup
hey…Palin is a potential world leader and she talks that way..so, you are incorrect on that point alone…and like talk to the Frecnch leader…that will cahnge your mind. and like talk to they leader of Iran..like Palin makes him look like a 1st grader…like,..you make me laugh.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Why is Palin even considered for this type of position? She needs to go back to her front porch and look for the Russians! She is a joke.
PS: I have noticed that she seems to lie alot.

Posted by: patti | September 30, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

She is a horrible excuse for a mother, a mayor, a governer, a VP candidate, and a leader.God help us all if she gets anywhere near the white house.
Sarah needs to stick with what she know…abstinance only sex education and birthing retarded babies….
McCain=Unstable
Palin=Unable

Posted by: Tex | September 30, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Palin is obviously about an inch deep. Even my 13 year old reads the daily newspaper. What kind of idiot can’t name a single newspaper?
Posted by: Amy
..well, our future VP …

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Sarah Palin will fall in love with the cowboy west and change her name to Sarah Sedona and move to Arizona after she and Johnny Mac get creamed in Nov.

Posted by: Tom in Alabama | September 30, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Posted by: Tex ,,what are you guys really afraid of?..if i listen to you, there is no way America will elect an idiot like that..so, really, what are you guys afraid of?..are j=you just mad at your world and taking it out on her..or, does she really have a chance to win?.. help me out here.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

I have noticed that she seems to lie alot.
Posted by: patti
how would you like me to send you a list of all the presidents that have lied to you?

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I don’t believe that Palin reads any newspapers. In her interviews she has proven that she doesn’t. Besides, those who need the world’s quality newspapers do not support John McCain for President. McCain is the tabloid candidate. The tabloids love to report on crooks, cheaters and gamblers.

Posted by: hugh | September 30, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

McCain’s ranch is NOT in Sedona..I get tired of hearing that… It may sound more upscale, but his ranch is in Paige Springs..

Posted by: tricia | September 30, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

What? is he asking us to let her rule this country by way of a script. politics sometimes confuses me, but I cannot believe we would leave our safety in the hands of the likes of these. John McCain is not capable of putting forth a truthfull persona. He is living the tellem what they want to hear politics of the nineteenth century
It is the twenty first century I for one am tired of being lied to. There has to be someone other than me out there that gives a rats ass about the future of this country

Posted by: Richard | September 30, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

palin will help mccain win because every white jesus freak in america will now vote for mccain — she’s about as dumb as george w bush, another jesus freak — americans had no qualms about electing bush twice, so palin’s dimwittedness is no drawback — in sum, american whites vote for their likenesses — they’ve found their likeness in palin

Posted by: HoraceManoor | September 30, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Posted by: Richard ..they all will lie to you..geez, it politics for GOD sake…that’s a fact.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Posted by: HoraceManoor ..mad about something, eh?

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

be carfeful HoraceManoor…GOD is watching you.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 30, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

This is sad, I am a woman who supported Hillary,
This woman just needs to shut up and go away

Posted by: Shirley | September 30, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

when i read the comments in defense of sarah palin, or watch republican pundits defend her (and mccain’s judegement in choosing her), i simply can’t believe my eyes and ears. it is scary that people can be so utterly and completely delusional. it doesn’t matter how ridiculous these people sound, and they HAVE to know that they are literally making no sense. they simply hope to sell this load to the american public, knowing too many are ignorant enough to buy what they’re selling. this is what is scary. america is FINISHED.

Posted by: tina | September 30, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

I am surprised to see so many women being so hateful toward Sarah Palin. I guess I shouldn’t be, look how many so called feminist voted against Hillary Clinton in the primaries. I tell you what, I am pro-choice but I won’t let the democrats use that as a noose around may neck any more. Palin is a brilliant woman and it is about time we have a powerful woman in office. Wouldn’t it be great to have two women competing for the presidency in 4 years?
Obama has never done anything for the people. He has a well marketed campaign and that is it. McCain and Palin have always fought for the people.
I am a woman, and a former democrat and I am proud to vote McCain/Palin

Posted by: Linda | September 30, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Why do most people wait until they’re 75 or later to retire and spend more time with “the” family?? Does that tell you anything? The average person thinks their family is “off their rocker” and hates spending too much time with them!

Posted by: Cindy | September 30, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I think it’s really bad luck for Palin that the moderator of the VP debate is a woman, Gwen Ifill, a very knowledgeable one who is on the Board of the Harvard Institute of Politics.
Besides, Ifill is the author of The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.
Palin will not easily put Ifill in her empty tank.

Posted by: hank | September 30, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

It’s not looking good for Palin, but I just can’t vote for Obama. Obama’s had eight(?) years in the IL state legislature and two in the US senate. Has anything changed in these two institutions? Didn’t think so.

Posted by: MikeCA | September 30, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Wrong area Cindy!

Posted by: Mark | September 30, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

See Mark – my point has been proven!

Posted by: Cindy | September 30, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

So it’s true – put a hundred monkeys in a room with a hundred typewriters and they’ll eventually come up with a defense for Sarah Palin’s unbearable stupidity. (I also see that some of those monkeys know how to post on the internet.) Sure Sarah’s your kind of candidate. She represents this country’s LOWEST common denominator – those people who would defend this idiot’s credentials. You seem incapable of comprehending the difference between getting laid by a cheerleader and voting one into office. So to all you Palin-drones, you’d better get ready for Thursday night when you’ll all be crying in your beer – and we’ll be sitting over in the grown-up’s corner Biden our time……

Posted by: Laurie | September 30, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

After watching and listening to Palin’s interview with Couric, I am really scared that if this team is elected and if something thing happens to McCain, this lady might become our president! A totally incompetent person to be in that position! I am not a religious person but now I have started prying, “God please do something and don’t hand over the most difficult and critical responsibly of running our country to this nut!

Posted by: sam | September 30, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

What I want to know is where the he!! she got her children’s names. Lord of the Rings novel???? Harry Potter????

Posted by: Sarah Who? | September 30, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Sam – hide the wolves if you hear a helicopter ..

Posted by: Bill | September 30, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

REPENT America,
Get out of the mall and learn to study the issues and learn to think critically

Posted by: Iam | September 30, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Barack Hussien Obama
Wright
Rezko
Farrakhan
William Ayers
Black Phanther
Malcolm X
ACORN
They are the same kind or type of people.
It is up to you now to decide what is best for our country.
“Birds of the same feathers flock together.”
“Tell me your friends are, and I tell you who you are.”
What a scary thought ahead for our country…
Think people… think…

Posted by: Kikz | September 30, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

SNL characters – Sarah Who?

Posted by: Blake | September 30, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Laurie, you hit the nail on the head! Well said.

Posted by: Yum O | September 30, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“JUST LIES!”
1.) Selma Got Me Born – LIAR, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 – Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965.
2.) Father Was A Goat Herder – LIAR, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter – LIAR, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had
4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom – LIAR, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence in decades.
5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian – LIAR, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn’t allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
6.) My Name is African Swahili – LIAR, your name is Arabic and ‘Baraka’ (from which Barack came) means ‘blessed’ in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.
7.) I Never Practiced Islam – LIAR, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years,until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.
8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian – LIAR, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).
9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian – LIAR, not one teacher says you could speak the language.
10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience – LIAR, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn’t even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.
11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs – LIAR, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion – LIAR, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify – your classmates said you were just fine.
13.)An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office – LIAR, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn’t, and never did, exist.
14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life – LIAR, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn’t, and never did, exist.
15.) I Won’t Run On A National Ticket In ‘08 – LIAR, here you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.
16.) Present Votes Are Common In Illinois – LIAR, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.
17.) Oops, I Misvoted – LIAR, only when caught by church groups and democrats, did you beg to change your misvote.
18.) I Was A Professor Of Law – LIAR, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer – LIAR, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill – LIAR, you didn’t write it,introduce it, change it, or create it.
21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass – LIAR, it took just 14 days from start to finish.
22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill – LIAR, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation – mainly because of your Nuclear Donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
23.) I Have Released My State Records – LIAR, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.
24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess – LIAR, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.
25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America – LIAR, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill.
26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois – LIAR, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.
27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year – LIAR, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
28.) No One Contacted Canada About NAFTA – LIAR, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.
29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism – LIAR, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel.
30.) I Am Not Acting As President Yet – LIAR, after the NAFTA Memo, a dead terrorist in the FARC, in Colombia, was found with a letter stating how you and he were working together on getting FARC recognized officially.
31.) I Didn’t Run Ads In Florida – LIAR, you allowed national ads to run 8-12 times per day for two weeks – and you still lost.
32.) I Won Michigan – LIAR, no you didn’t.
33.) I won Nevada – LIAR, no you did not.
34.) I Want All Votes To Count – LIAR, you said let the delegates decide.
35.) I Want Americans To Decide – LIAR, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.
36.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate – LIAR, you passed 26, most of which you didn’t write yourself.
37.) My Campaign Was Extorted By A Friend – LIAR, that friend is threatening to sue if you do not stop saying this. Obama has stopped saying this.
38.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics – LIAR, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.
39.) I Don’t Take PAC Money – LIAR, you take loads of it.
40.) I don’t Have Lobbysists – LIAR, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.
41.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad – LIAR, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.
42.) My Campaign Never Took Over MySpace – LIAR, Tom, who started MySpace issued a warning about this advertising to MySpace clients.
43.) I Inspire People With My Words – LIAR, you inspire people with other people’s words.
44.) I Have Passed Bills In The U.S. Senate – LIAR, you have passed A BILL in the U.S. Senate – for Africa, which shows YOUR priorities.
45.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq – LIAR, you weren’t in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time, unlike Kucinich, who seems to be out gutting you Obama. You also seem to be stepping back from your departure date – AGAIN.
46.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care – LIAR, your plan leaves us all to pay the 15,000,000 who don’t have to buy it.
47.) I Only Found Out About My Investment Conflicts Via Mail – LIAR, both companies you site as having sent you letters about this conflict have no record of any such letter ever being created or sent.
48.) I Am As Patriotic As Anyone – LIAR, you won’t wear a flag pin and you don’t put your hand over your heart during the Anthem.
49.) My Wife Didn’t Mean What She Said About Pride In Country – LIAR, your wife’s words follow lock-step in the vain of Wright and Farrahkan, in relation to their contempt and hatred of America.
50.) Wal-Mart Is A Company I Wouldn’t Support – LIAR, your wife has received nearly a quater of a million dollars through Treehouse, which is connected to Wal-Mart.
51.) Treehouse Is A Small Company – LIAR, the CEO of Treehouse last year, made more than the CEO of Wal-Mart, according to public records.
52.) University Of Chicago Hospital Pay Is Fair – LIAR, your wife’s pay raise was nearly 150% her already bloated rate and the hospital is a Non-Profit Hospital, which made $100,000,000 in the last 3 years. They overcharge blacks VS whites for services, and overcharge everyone in general by 538%!
53.)I Barely Know Rezko – Only 5 Billed Hours – LIAR, you have known him for 17 years, and decided to do a real estate deal with him during a time when he was proven to be under investigation. Despite this, you divided your property and had them take off $300K before the mortgage problems started. Then Rezko’s wife buys the lot beside it that you can’t afford, saving you $625,000.
54.) My Donations Have Been Checked Thoroughly – LIAR, you only gave back Hsu ($72K) and Rezko ($150K) their money when publically called on their involvement in your campaigns.
55.) My Church Is Like Any Other Christian Church – LIAR, your church is so extreme, the pastor who married you, Rev. Wright, just got done blaming the US for 9/11 and named Louis Farrahkan their person of the year.
56.) I Disagree With My Church All The Time – LIAR, you still have yet to repudiate Wright, who married you and your wife, and you still donate large sums of money to assist the church in furthering its message – hatred and revenge. You donated in 2006 alone, $22,500 to the church that you so terribly disagree with. That is nearly $500 PER WEEK – that sure is disagreement, Senator Obama.
57.) I Have Clean Connections Despite Rezko – LIAR, you are not only connected to Exelon and Rezko, you are also connected to Hillary PAC supporter Mr. Hsu, AND an Iraqi Billionaire of ill repute, Nadhmi Auchi, who ripped off people in the Food For Oil, Iraqi deal. Seems Mr. Auchi may have helped Obama buy his million dollar property long before Obama had millions of dollars. Wonder what favors Mr. Auchi expects, when Obama leaves Iraq free to be taken over by special interests such as him.
58.) I never heard sermons like Rev. Wright’s, that have been in videos all day, You Tube – LIAR! 3 days later during your Mea Culpa BS speech you said “Did I hear controversial statements while I sat in that church? Yes I did.”

Posted by: Kikz | September 30, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Who cares how well the former Bush guys are able to prepare Palin for the debate?
Haven’t we seen enough of the “natural” Palin that tells us that this woman has no clue about the ins and outs of both national and international politics?
Doesn’t her “answer” to Couric’s bailout question tell it all?
If Palin does well during the debate it only proves she indeed is a talking puppet, a GOP mascot.

Posted by: greg | September 30, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Linda: Great…so your voting based on body parts. Palin is “brillant”….State one thing this women has said or done that makes her so brillant?

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 30, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Linda N Carolina .. well her husband has all his teeth! Yours?

Posted by: Mark Us | September 30, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

What ever happened to Sarah’s daughter’s husband to be? His My Space rant was very impressive. Maybe he also can run for office.

Posted by: patti | September 30, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Palin is pretty weird and creepy, I bet she makes funny snorting noises in the bedroom..

Posted by: Jonathan | September 30, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Would the “White Guilt” flag have a honkie bent over a trash can being smacked in the arse by Aunt Jemima??

Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

I know that most politicians do stretch the truth, and I know it is part of the game. but the American people need to stand up and take notice that we are in some serious trouble right now. It is not in my nature to be dispariging. I admire John McCain for his contributions to this country, not greatly impressed with his judgement or his voting record while in congress, but I am now more concerned with his Ability to lead. It is not enough to simply get into office, few have been the men that have done this, and even fewer that have had the welfare of the nation in heart and mind when they made it

Posted by: Richard | September 30, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Well you get what you deserve I suppose. If you get McPalin then you deserve to watch your country become the laughing stock of the planet…

Posted by: Mike Robinson | September 30, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Self-styled Cyclopedic
Sarah has fooled herself
into believing she’s a
walking encyclopedia.

Posted by: anon | September 30, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

“Linda” said:
“Palin is a brilliant woman and it is about time we have a powerful woman in office.”
Powerful, definitely. But brilliant? Are you kidding me? What is one thing she’s said ON HER OWN, without reading from a script, that was brilliant? Please enlighten us. I have been waiting for this woman to say something – not even brilliant, just coherent would be good enough for me – and I’m still waiting …
“McCain and Palin have always fought for the people.”
Palin has always fought for the people? Is the following an example of your statement?
> September 26, 2008
> Editorial Observer
> Wasilla Watch: Sarah Palin and the Rape Kits
> By DOROTHY SAMUELS
> Even in tough budget times, there are lines that cannot be crossed. So I was startled by this tidbit reported recently by The Associated Press: When Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, the small town began billing sexual-assault victims for the cost of rape kits and forensic exams.
>
> Ms. Palin owes voters an explanation. What was the thinking behind cutting the measly few thousand dollars needed to cover the yearly cost of swabs, specimen containers and medical tests? Whose dumb idea was it to make assault victims and their insurance companies pay instead? Unfortunately, her campaign is shielding the candidate from the press, so Americans may still be waiting for answers on Election Day.
>
> The rape-kit controversy is a troubling matter. The insult to rape victims is obvious. So is the sexism inherent in singling them out to foot the bill for investigating their own case. And the main result of billing rape victims is to protect their attackers by discouraging women from reporting sexual assaults.
>
> That’s why when Senator Joseph Biden, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, drafted the 1994 Violence Against Women Act, he included provisions to make states ineligible for federal grant money if they charged rape victims for exams and the kits containing the medical supplies needed to conduct them. (Senator John McCain, Ms. Palin’s running mate, voted against Mr. Biden’s initiative, and his name has not been among the long list of co-sponsors each time the act has been renewed.)
>
> That’s also why, when news of Wasilla’s practice of billing rape victims got around, Alaska’s State Legislature approved a bill in 2000 to stop it.
>
> “We would never bill the victim of a burglary for fingerprinting and photographing the crime scene, or for the cost of gathering other evidence,” said Alaska’s then-governor, Tony Knowles. “Nor should we bill rape victims just because the crime scene happens to be their bodies.”
>
> If Ms. Palin ever spoke out about the issue, one way or another, no record has surfaced. Her campaign would not answer questions about when she learned of the policy, strongly supported by the police chief: whether she saw it in the budget and if not, whether she learned of it before or after the State Legislature outlawed the practice.
>
> All the campaign would do was provide a press release pronouncing: “Prevention of domestic violence and sexual assault is a priority for Gov. Palin.”
>
> Eric Croft, a former Democratic state lawmaker who sponsored the corrective legislation, believes that Wasilla’s mayor knew what was going on. (She does seem to have paid heed to every other detail of town life, including what books were on the library’s shelves.)
>
> The local hospital did the billing, but it was the town that set the policy, Mr. Croft noted. That policy was reflected in budget documents that Ms. Palin signed.
>
> Mr. Croft further noted that right after his measure became law, Wasilla’s local paper reported that Ms. Palin’s handpicked police chief, Charlie Fannon, acknowledged the practice of billing to collect evidence for sexual-assault cases. He complained that the state was requiring the town to spend $5,000 to $14,000 a year to cover the costs. “I just don’t want to see any more burden put on the taxpayer,” the chief explained.
>
> “I can’t imagine any police chief, big city or small, who would take on the entire State Legislature on a bill that passed unanimously and not mention to their mayor that they’re doing this,” Mr. Croft said. Even if he didn’t inform her, the newspaper article would have been hard for her to miss.
>
> In the absence of answers, speculation is bubbling in the blogosphere that Wasilla’s policy of billing rape victims may have something to do with Ms. Palin’s extreme opposition to abortion, even in cases of rape. Sexual-assault victims are typically offered an emergency contraception pill, which some people in the anti-choice camp wrongly equate with abortion.
>
> My hunch is that it was the result of outmoded attitudes and boneheaded budget cutting. Still, Ms. Palin has been governor for under two years, and she’s running for vice president largely on her experience as mayor of tiny Wasilla — a far superior credential, she’s told us, to being a community organizer. On the rape kits, as on other issues, she owes voters a direct answer.
And you’re PROUD to vote for these people?

Posted by: Barbara Forrest-Ball | September 30, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Mark Us; you post like Palin talks…are you related?

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 30, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

People get the leaders – presidents and vice presidents, they DESERVE.
This time they deserve Palin

Posted by: rufus | September 30, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

No Jim – it would have a picture of Malcolm X on it caressing Joy Behar’s fat shoulders!

Posted by: Charles | September 30, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Blake, thank you for that one. LMAO!

Posted by: Sarah Who? | September 30, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Hide your wolves and dogs .. she’ll send people to kill em from a helicopter! BOO!!

Posted by: Mark Us | September 30, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

McCain is pulling the October VP Debate Surprise—He is hiding Sarah in Sedona, and has hired Tina Fey to debate Biden—-I can see Russia from Arizona too!

Posted by: BENIGHSE | September 30, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Think about it. It’s scary.
A computer-illiterate McCain
in charge of 14-trillion
dollar economy.
You want real scary?
An unstable and hotheaded
McCain with his finger on
the button.

Posted by: anon | September 30, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

In ref to cara prado’s post at 8:06 PM
Is that conversation for real? or is that the new SNL skit for this coming Saturday nite????
Nobody can be that stupid….I repeat, NOBODY CAN BE THAT STUPID….duhhhh

Posted by: Sandy | September 30, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Palin will do well in the debate.
The pressure is more on Biden. He can’t really attack her without being “sexist”. (And you can’t ask her a question without being “biased”.) Biden is by far the more qualified and experienced, so people will expect him to be fluent in all aspects of politics.
The bar is so low for Palin now, it would be hard to screw up. If she doesn’t fall off the podium and just says a few condescending, sarcastic remarks, it will be taken as a success.
Most of America feels she’s not prepared to be VP,but the flag waving lemmings will buy it. They could care less about her ability. She’s “the new energy, the new face, the new ideas” right? After all, she said so.

Posted by: Palinism | September 30, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

It is a shame that we have to waste so much ink on an incompetent person like Sarah Palin
I thought this was the most advanced western country. What happened?
Did everybody lose their minds?
Are you really going to give the reins of this country to an uneducated, right wing extremist?

Posted by: jane | September 30, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Palin is a brilliant woman….
++++++++++++++++++++++
Please explain how you came to that conclusion.
Seriously, what indicator does one use to declare Gov Palin “brilliant”?
No sarcasm, I just can’t believe someone would use that word. “Driven”, “Tenacious”, “Conservative” perhaps I could understand. But, “brilliant”?

Posted by: Uh, ok? | September 30, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

US politics is getting increasingly stupid by the day. It is just a matter of time that countries like China and India are going to race past it in every conceivable field. That will be a sad day for all Americans.

Posted by: A proud American | September 30, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Anyone wanting to see Palin’s strategy, check out how she admits that she can’t name a single news source she reads, but does it in a way to make Couric defensive:
http://palincounter.blogspot.com/
I’m sure that Palin will say nothing in the debate, but do it in a way that half the country will think she’s just great.

Posted by: billthomson | September 30, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Sarah, go home. Your family needs you, your party does not, & neither does Arizona.

Posted by: Ron Sampson | September 30, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I am surprised Billy Clinton was not there giving her advice,he is on one of McCains ads.OH talk about two faced liars,,,,,,,,,he is the top of the list…Wait until you see the ad,Make your blood boil,Sore looser Clinton….we all say to you TS…..

Posted by: indp voter | September 30, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Cut and paste bloggers, especially ones that have no credibility, just spewing rants, are a waste of space.
Could you be more generic next time?

Posted by: Kikz is a Dikz | September 30, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

McCain is the name of a cactus in Sedona Arizona

Posted by: for real | September 30, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

It’s really a no win situation for this country. Palin will be mushing her sorry ass back home to AK come November, but that still leaves us with the liability of all her dissapointed sycophants. Hey, maybe next year you can refer to her as a GILF (Grandma I’d Like to….).

Posted by: Laurie | September 30, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

People get the leaders – presidents and vice presidents, they DESERVE.
This time they deserve Palin
===================
Awe man, what did we do to deserve that! We can’t be that bad as a whole are we? We’re sorry. We’re really really sorry!

Posted by: We deserve better | September 30, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

McCain stinks so bad he has to give himself nicknames like the maverdick and the sheriff. Now Palin has to tell you waht she is and give herself a nickname also. Ever see George Costanza try to get everyone to call him T Bone? They ended up calling him coco the chimp. Fitting.
Complain & Whalin’ aught-8

Posted by: Lone McCain Blogger | September 30, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“I hope she doesn’t ask us all to pray for construction of an oil well again”
Church of Wasala

Posted by: The Congregation | September 30, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

From: http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-and-couric-on-gotcha-journalism.html
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
McCain and Couric Spar on “Gotcha Journalism”
COURIC: Over the weekend, Gov. Palin, you said the U.S. should absolutely launch cross-border attacks from Afghanistan into Pakistan to, quote, “stop the terrorists from coming any further in.” Now, that’s almost the exact position that Barack Obama has taken and that you, Sen. McCain, have criticized as something you do not say out loud. So, Gov. Palin, are you two on the same page on this?
MCCAIN: Now, just a minute, Katie. I have to step in here. That’s another example of the media’s “Gotcha journalism”…
COURIC: But, it was a question from a citizen. How is a citizen asking a candidate a question an example of what you call “Gotcha Journalism?”
MCCAIN: Because it was hard, Katie.
We don’t want Gov. Palin to be asked questions, unless she is prepared for them. When she is prepared, as she will be before the debate, she sounds intelligent, knowledgeable and feisty. But when she has not been prepared, she sounds lost and incoherent.
We can’t have people asking her questions when she has not had time to be prepared with an answer.
COURIC: But, Sen. McCain, I have to say, you are 72-years old. Actuarial preditions show that if you were to be elected, Gov. Palin would have a 1 in 5 chance of actually becoming President. These are perilous times–unprecedented crises in financial markets, tensions across a wide range of critical foreign policy arenas. Shouldn’t we have a Vice President, and a potential President, who actually understands these issues, beyond the preparation necessary for a debate?
MCCAIN: Gov. Palin understands these areas very well, Katie.
COURIC: Here is her response to a question on the economy:
COURIC: Why isn’t it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries; allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?
PALIN: That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health-care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping the—it’s got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health-care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today, we’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.
COURIC: That answer, Sen. McCain, as noted by Fareed Zakaria, is incoherent.
MCCAIN: Yes. (nodding his head).
COURIC: Well, isn’t it actually important that a potential President actually comprehend issues? That is, beyond debate preparation?
MCCAIN: No, Katie. That’s what I mean by “gotcha journalism”. It’s obvious from these prior interviews that Palin has little to no comprehension of fiscal policy and economics. For heaven’s sake, she received a “D” in macroeconomics in college! And, as I’ve I said in the past, I have little understanding of economic issues myself.
No, what’s important, Katie, is that she sound like she understands the issues. In the debate. If she is sufficiently prepared, she can give an illusion of understanding the issues–even if she is only giving answers with the prepared and practiced spontaneity and content necessary to give that illusion force.
Given that the bar is set at the lowest standard imaginable, Katie, if she accompanies that performance with sufficient charm, we believe that media will follow, into focusing on the change from that low standard, and on those superficial entertainment values–you know, Katie, (McCain smiles through tight lips and squinting eyes and moves his hands up and down)–”She certainly appears to be more confident tonight; she appears more poised, coherent, humorous”–rather than her readiness to be President from an objective standard. After all, using the more important standard of Presdidential capability, she has already demonstrated that she is unprepared to be President.
So, Katie, we want them to focus on that difference, on her debate preparation, rather than on her actual well-demonstrated Presidential unreadiness. And that’s what I mean by “gotcha journalism.”
KATIE: But if I understand you correctly, Sen. McCain, you actually believe that it’s not important that she understand the issues actually facing the nation…
MCCAIN: Right.
COURIC: On which many people’s very jobs, health and life will rely at this critical time…
MCCAIN: Yes.
COURIC: And that all that really matters creating a standard so low that she actually is rewarded for her widely seen and repeatedly demonstrated lack of knowledge and understanding. That we would be using what is essentially a remedial standard for Presidential capability–rather than one of actual capability.
Sen. McCain, you seem to be actually suggesting that we should decide that she is ready for the Presidency, simply because, after preparation, she has improved. Even though just days earlier, time after time, she was unable to give coherent answers on these subjects.
No one can gain Presidential-level understanding in days. And in the office of the Presidency, with its intense crises and unforseeable events, she will not be prepared for each unpredictable day, as she was for the debate.
Yet you expect media to focus on these values, rather than actual readiness to be President. That’s what you mean by “gotcha journalism”?
MCCAIN: Exactly. And they will. Once again, Katie–we “gotcha.”
COURIC: How can you expect the media to fall for that?
MCCAIN: It worked for Bush.

Posted by: gritter | September 30, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

One of many scary aspects about Palin is that Clinton, a woman who is actually intelligent and knows domestic and foreign issues, was chased from the race, and as a substitute “woman” we get Caribou Barbie.
What does that say about what Republicans (or Dems for that matter) think of women?
Posted by: Darcy
That is exactly why we are going to vote Palin in this round, so dems never can use gender as a reason to exclude the better resume for Obama types again. Women have finally got enough power to corrupt the vote, and we will end this bias once and for all.
Your granddaughter and mine will read that we shoved a woman into the White House, instead of being in our shoes in a generation.

Posted by: woman citizen | September 30, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Woman citizen – I was trying to follow your twisted logic and syntax when I suddenly realized that would be anti-evolutionary. Let me state it simply for you:
ALASKAN BUSH DOESN’T BELONG IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

Posted by: Laurie | September 30, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Speaking of dumb look again at the list of the latest Democratic President hopefulls.
Gore,
Kerry,
Obama
Losers all.

Posted by: dukas | September 30, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Governor Palin has character. I am sick to death of oily politicians with one hand in the government money pie who play politics with my national security and finances. McCain/Palin have my vote because I trust them. A year ago I had never heard of Barack Obama. And the more I look into his background the more alarming information comes out. I don’t think that tough economic times call for more socialism, more handouts and more taxes and that’s exactly what is in his mostly hidden tax plan. Also, I happen to like freedom, thank you very much. Obama’s background is filled with thugs (like those we saw in the caucuses who physically intimidated Hillary’s supporters. I really don’t like that stuff. It’s not what America is all about.

Posted by: joInAmerica | September 30, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Woman Citizen you need to grow a pair (of ovaries). Voting for Palin would indeed be a corrupt vote, you are right about that.

Posted by: Real Woman Citizen | September 30, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

NEW VETS NEED OUR HELP
VETS “The New Generation of Veterans” and their Families put this together & sent it to Obama after last Presidential Debate.
We need to help them go viral – on Digg & others. So we have to have 3000 Diggs to get it to go Viral!
Friday’s debate made it clear that Barack Obama will bring the change we need on issues facing service members, veterans, and military families.
Barack demonstrated his judgment on 21st century national security and foreign policy challenges, and an understanding of what it will take to show real global leadership.
A huge number of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are supporting this campaign. In a recent study, donations from deployed troops went 6 to 1 for Barack.
http://my.barackobama.com/nextgenvets1
Barack has the vision and judgment to be an excellent Commander in Chief — and the debate made this extremely clear.
He also demonstrated that he’ll be a fierce advocate for the middle class, with plans for the economy, health care, and energy independence that will keep us strong at home and abroad.
Veterans, military families, and those concerned about our national security and foreign policy need to spread the word that Barack Obama is the candidate with the judgment to lead us in this defining moment.
Please share this video today:
http://my.barackobama.com/nextgenvets
Thanks for everything you do,
Veterans and Military Families for Obama

Posted by: Sue M Vet for Obama | September 30, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

What I don’t understand is why Palin agreed to be interviewed by Couric. Talk about a light weight – she has to be the worst MSM interviewer there is. Palin is a better governor than Çouric is a journalist. Palin’s resume is thin but I am more comfortable with her as the #2 than I am with Pelosi as the #3. What surprises me most about all of this is the venom on the left. Especially from women. It reminds me of high school when the new girl shows up and the popular girls can’t stand the competition. It makes them feel all insecure and threatened so they lash out. Grow up girls. Disagree but show some class while doing so.

Posted by: Josie | September 30, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

That woman there thats from that state up there, you know Alaska. Well, she’s scary there you know, she shouldn’t be anywhere near that White House down there.

Posted by: Complain and Whalin | September 30, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

McCain gets schooled by the View.
Palin gets schooled by Couric and some guy in the philly cheese steak line.
Obama goes on O’Windbags show and gets pummeled with questions which he bats out of the park.
COmplain and Whailin is right

Posted by: Forty Miler | September 30, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Josie, there you go again relying on Palin’s weather girl past. I saw the footage she blew that too. You should put down the ice cream and change your pad.

Posted by: Complain and Whalin | September 30, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I swear to God, I can’t tell the difference any more between parody and straight reporting.

Posted by: Lilly | September 30, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Did Sarah have her 14 year old daughter drop out of school along with her 17 year old daughter Bristol?
And she said she was breast feeding her infant when she was selected by McCain. Did she abruptly stop that, because the baby goes back home to Alaska when dad goes?

Posted by: Truth Matters | September 30, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

is mccain kidding? this man lacks the temperment and judgement to president of the united states. how in the world can he tell anyone that gov. palin is ready to be president when he has shown her weakness by taking her to an interview and sitting by her side like a father who has taken a trouble child to the school for some problem the child has caused. she’s not ready for primetime.

Posted by: emmanuel davies | September 30, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Woman Citizen, your syntax is so confused I can’t figure out what you are trying to say: are you Sarah Palin?

Posted by: rosaflor | September 30, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I just can’t believe that there people in the U.S. who really believe that Palin is prepared to step in for a 72 year old with cancer…didn’t we learn anything from Bush? I would hope that we would have the smartest and brightest, not the cutest and folksiest! Just so no one accuses me of being sexist…I’m female and embarrassed by her.

Posted by: Healthcare for All | September 30, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

If everyone here is afraid to have an experience person on the ticket…. don’t vote for Obama!
You guys talk about stupid. This is a guy who talked about the 57 states. This is a guy whose ego is so big, he thinks evil dictators will give up because he smiles at them. God help us all if Obama is elected. The terrorists are counting on it.

Posted by: Kevin | September 30, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Joey wrote:
“Katie, just another dumb blonde, guess
your trying to make up for your lack of
experience in journalism!!!!!!!!!!”
Reply to Joey:
Ahaha!! You hit the nail on the head!
:-)

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Don’t understand why nobody talks about Biden or Obama unqualified? When Biden says Roosevelt talked on TV in 1929 and Obama said 57 states and my muslim faith, no media seems to care about it. Then when Palin says something (even it’s only to a voter) and the media just tries to blow it up. Is there still unbiased report which has credibility?

Posted by: ohioforMP | September 30, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Go Lou!… (Who pays attention to dumb blond Catie Curic, anyway?)
Dobbs: Biden Makes ‘Many More Misstatements Than Sarah Palin’
An astounding thing happened on CNN Monday evening: not only did Lou Dobbs say that Democrat Vice Presidential candidate Joe Biden makes “many more misstatements than Sarah Palin,” but he also chided Wolf Blitzer and the “Situation Room” crew for failing to point it out during their Bash Sarah session.
In preparation for the upcoming vice presidential debate, Blitzer brought on CNN analysts Gloria Borger and Jeffrey Toobin, as well as “The Weekly Standard’s” Steve Hayes, to handicap the event.
As you might expect, Palin was the butt of many jokes leading Dobbs to marvelously inject the following during a mid-segment promo for his upcoming program (h/t NB reader Kevin Groenhagen):
Well, Wolf, I’m shocked. I wish you guys would take it easy on Joe Biden, because I think you’re being really unfair to him, just because he makes so many more misstatements than Sarah Palin. But, anyway, I’m sure you can sort that out.
How delicious. What follows is a partial transcript of this exchange: (follow link)
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/09/30/dobbs-biden-makes-many-more-misstatements-sarah-palin

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Sarah will do just fine in this debate. She was confident and unblinking in the Alaska governor’s debate. Here is part of the actual transcript.
Q: Suppose Senator John Doe puts forth a constitutional amendment that would outlaw abortion even in cases of rape or incest, and he asked you to attend the announcement and support him in that. Would you do it?
Palin: You’re, you’re asking if… in front of me were legislation that I would be asked to sign?
Q: No, if he was going to put forth a constitutional amendment, and he just wanted your support, you know, as a party member, as the leader of the state.
Sarah Palin: Um, I would. I would. And it’s no secret that I’m pro-life and I don’t hide that and nor am I ashamed of that but I am pro-life and yes, a, a proposal like that, I would stand by it.
Lies lies lies! Our brave Sarah said plain and simple.

Posted by: Pubby | September 30, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

hell no; is mccain serious with gov. palin as veep? poor judgement and bad choice. i think mccain has blown off his chances. what a joke?

Posted by: seihdi | September 30, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

What’s scary is Kikz and his comments. How unfortunate for you to have to carry the burden of such hate/fear…everyone comments are saying that Palin just isn’t ready to be VP but your attacks on Obama are vicious and downright scary. I don’t know where you get your information but you need to stop reading it. One final comment. Why do you all think McCain chose Palin over all the other qualified women who have been working years for the Republican Party? Surely there are more qualified republican women whom could give Hillary a run for her money, so why Palin? I just think some of you women are not clearly thinking about this issue. Just look at how he treats her, he watches over her every move, she’s his puppet on a string, she’s being used and that you should be angry about, and it will not be long before Palin’s husband will start to raise questions about the ill treatment of his wife. He will not be able to stand back and watch how she’s being used…just another bush campaign manager bag of tricks to get you naive people to vote for McCain. He doesn’t like her any more than the people posting likes her. And that’s for real.
He needed her to get the mainstream vote and you all fell for it. Once you realize it you’re going to be peaved.

Posted by: igottitdidyou | September 30, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

GOP hitting Joe Biden for gaffes.
WASHINGTON–The Republican National Committee is turning up the heat on Joe Biden on Wednesday. Their oppo team is keeping tabs on what they consider gaffes at the Biden Gaffe Clock
Not to pile on, but here’s what Biden said on Tuesday at the National Jewish Democratic Council: In recounting his 1972 race for the Senate, Biden said, “I was a 29-year-old kid nominated for president, excuse me, nominated for senator.”
Source:
Chicago Sun-Times
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/09/gop_hitting_joe_biden_for

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Unlike Clinton, Biden Gets Pass for Saying He Was ‘Shot At’ in Iraq
When Hillary Clinton told a tall tale about “landing under sniper fire” in Bosnia, she was accused of “inflating her war experience” by Barack Obama’s campaign — but the campaign has been silent about Joe Biden telling his own questionable story about being “shot at” in Iraq. (story continuous here)
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/30/unlike-clinton-biden-gets-pass-saying-shot-iraq/

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Video: Joe Biden Gaffes Continue
By Lynn Edwards
Sep 13, 2008
Joe Biden likes to listen to himself talk and that often leads to some of the most awful gaffes imaginable from the mouth of the man that wants to be vice president. While the media world is trying desperately to get Republican nominee Sarah Palin to slip up Joe Biden is spilling out gaffes galore.
The media is missing most of it. Are they bias and pulling for the Barack Obama and Joe biden ticket? The “Southern Gentleman” notes that “Some may not realize that Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden made a slight mistake in his introduction of Senator Chuck Graham.”
See the video here. http://southerngent.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/other-joe-biden-gaffes/
The New York Times points out that at a campaign stop this week in Missouri, Biden urged the paraplegic state official to stand up to be recognized. “Chuck, stand up, let the people see you,” Mr. Biden shouted to State Senator Chuck Graham, before realizing, to his horror, that Mr. Graham uses a wheelchair.
“Oh, God love ya,” Mr. Biden said. “What am I talking about?” Can you imagine the catcalls for Sarah Palin to resign if she did anything like that? Biden is a legendary blowhard that is in love with his own voice and often just blurts out whatever is on his mind at that leads to some really embarrassing moments.
Source:
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272622683.shtml

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Obama gaffe – in fact a lie that he said during his debate with McCain…
Fact Check:
Kissinger Defends McCain’s Iran Stance
September 26, 2008 11:54 PM
ABC News’ Kirit Radia Reports: Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger came to the defense of longtime friend Sen. John McCain following Friday’s presidential debate saying he “would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level.”
“Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality,” Kissinger said in statement issued by the McCain campaign.
Source:
ABC NEWS
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/fact-check-kiss.html

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Obama was unknown to most of us a few months ago. And his supporters clearly don’t know or want to know anything about his past (which is chock full of ultra-leftists, felons, Black Panthers, corrupt political machine members and so on.)
Sarah Palin is honest. She stood up to the corruption in Alaska and had Republicans and Democrats put in jail for cheating the people. Obama rolled over 100% of the time for the Daley political machine. If you’re going to vote for him at least look into his background.

Posted by: joInAmerica | September 30, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

The 3:00 AM call to the White House…
If Obama bin Biden answers that “3:00 AM call to the White House” he would forward it to…the United Nations!!!!
Is this what you want America?
Do not vote left-wing-liberal Obama bin Biden to be our next Commander in Chief. It took 3 statements by him (after talking to his 300+ foreign policy advisors) to kind of condemn (he still did not even come close to it) Russia for invading a democratic and sovereign country….And, this while Senator McCain, Senator Clinton, our government, and ALL our allies – blasted Russia’s invasion of Georgia! Even China turned its back to Russia on the Georgia issue despite the fact that the Russian leaders – Medvedev (Putin’s hand picked puppet) and Putin himself were courting China’s support on the Georgia conflict!! Ha-ha!
Go McCain-Palin ’08 :-)

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Whats wrong with you people.When McCain says that she is qualified- SHE IS QUALIFIED- what more interviews or proof do you need? McCain nerver lies and he has done his home work. Don’t you trust him. After allhe is Mavreik Rebublican. No one can be better. Vote McCain

Posted by: Tiger | September 30, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

joInAmerica wrote: “If you’re going to vote for him at least look into his background…(which is chock full of ultra-leftists, felons, Black Panthers, corrupt political machine members and so on.)
Yeap- and this is a must watch video for ALL Americans:
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

jjssr! if being “qaulified” means sounding like an IDIOT! well …hell! let my 3 yr old run then for pete’s sake…so out of touch is frightening…actually frightening to think what would happen to this country if mc cain and his “dog and pony” show actually win this election. say your prayers now ppl – the end will be right around the corner!

Posted by: joly | September 30, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Watching Palin in action, it occured to me that Madonna and the Olsen Twins are more qualified for he job of VP than she is. All three have more executive experience than Palin, routinely handle larger budgets than Alasks’s, and have all traveled more extensively than Palin.
And imagine what the Olsen twins could accomplish with thier ability to be in two places at the same time.
Wonder Twin Powers ACTIVATE!

Posted by: Comparable to Lincoln | September 30, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Boooo…Biden – the man with the 29+ years of experience who can NOT keep his mouth SHUT! He has made more gaffes in one week than Palin has made in her entite career! And, that is a fact!
Biden Gaffe Triggers Trio Of Ads
http://adspotlight.nationaljournal.com/2008/09/coal_ads.php

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

“The political landscape here is littered with people who have underestimated Sarah Palin,” said Eric Croft, a former state representative who ran for the Democratic nomination in Alaska in 2006 ==>
No doubt, Palin may have the last laugh.. !!!!
I saw some of her Alaskan debates and she was very very articulate and intelligent– far from the airhead image we have today. She got an 80% approval rating, after all…
My take: She made a sheer deliberate airhead move to get the Dem guard down.. and then when the voting time comes, she ATTACKS em with her real self! She’s known to keep huge secrets, so this may be a maverick trick between only McCain and her.
Hey.. Biden… WATCH OUT.. (and get some botox to compete with her!)

Posted by: Dolphin | September 30, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Even More Biden Stupidity…
Joe Biden quote:
“When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the
television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed. He said,
‘look, here’s what happened.’”
Sen. Joe Biden, in an interview with CBS News. Of course, as Reason
points out, Roosevelt wasn’t president in 1929 and televisions were
still experimental.
Ssshhh!…Biden thinks he’s really smart.
Source:
Google Groups – Even More Biden Stupidity

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

I’m just looking forward to the debate this Thursday. I want to hear about FDR being president in 1929 and TV was also available that year. Oh and how Biden was shot down, his views on plagerism, and why he differs from Obama on coal plants.
LOL. Should be a hoot.

Posted by: No Obama | September 30, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Wouldn’t it be interesting if the liberal press or anyone for that matter applied the same scrutiny to Obama and Biden that has been thrust upon McCain and Palin? No one could stand that level of scrutiny. Fairness no longer exists in the media. Their basis is beyond belief.

Posted by: fred | September 30, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

But I’ll bet Biden can name at least one newspaper.

Posted by: Comparable to Lincoln | September 30, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Hmmmm….
Obama campaign urging people to watch debate on CNN
Chicago Sun-Times
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/09/obama_campaign_urging

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

I am sorry- I posted an incomplete link in my previous comment. Here is the correct link:
Obama campaign urging people to watch debate on CNN
Chicago Sun-Times
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/09/obama_campaign_urging_people_t.html

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

The Biden Gaffes are ignored by the biased media. Obama Baby, you are a product of the corrupt South Side Chicago political machine. A community organizer for Acorn which has a long and rich history of fraud. You are UN-AMERICAN and I don’t want you anywhere near the Oval Office… Have a nice day.

Posted by: Stand Up Chuck | September 30, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

I think it is a matter of religion. Do you want liberation theology or a Christian from Alaska.
I think the democratic hate machine is ready to morph full force into something like the Hitler Youth. The emotional ranting of the democrats is off the chart.
If Obama loses, we can expect “the end justifies the means” democrats to really get crazy.

Posted by: lately | September 30, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Sarah Palin is the victim of a bias media. They do gotcha journalism. When Sarah was in the pizza parlor, reporters could have done stories about all the people there who loved her. But no, they focus on the questions about Pakistan. They know Pakistan isn’t next to Alaska. It’s all just so unfair. But it is going to backfire on you haters, the more you pick on Sarah, the more people will be driven to vote for John McCain! You can’t win!

Posted by: Pubby | September 30, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

“I am prepared. I have that confidence, I have that readiness.” Sarah Palin
So what we are seeing is the real McCoy. She not going to get any better.

Posted by: doug | September 30, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

McCain’s running mate’s performance in these interviews is absolutely atrocious.
Why didn’t he choose Romney? If he had, he might have better chances of not losing this election.

Posted by: Joseph | September 30, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Palin is great – a real human being with strong convictions. More than that she is a really decent person. She has an 83% popularity rating in Alaska.
If America chooses those who do not like the people of America, that is their choice. The media is disgusting.

Posted by: lately | September 30, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Sarah could have named lots of newspapers and magazines… if she wanted to. She said she reads just about everything that comes her way. But that Katie Couric is so bias, you can see the hate in her eyes. She pushes and pushes the same question at Sarah. I don’t blame her for not going into details… Katie Couric is just plain rude!

Posted by: Pubby | September 30, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Annaloh wrote: “The Conservatives better hope that she’s also been given a few lessons in basic English Language principles and vocabulary, so the viewers can at least understand what she’s trying to say, even if it has no substance.”
Reply to annaloh:
Her English is perfect – in fact she is extremely articulate! After all she was not elected Governor of Alaska because she did NOT speak English.
In the mean-time, I suggest to you “smartie” that you start taking some Spanish lessons because in the tragic event that your Barack-this-is-above-my-pay-grade-Obama is elected as our President, we are all going to have to learn how to speak Spanish! Isn’t that what he said in a stump speech during the primaries?! Oh yes, that is exactly what he said!
I have nothing against Spanish people – I am an immigrant myself. However, I do have an issue with Obama telling me or any other American what language we must learn how to speak, while we live and breath in the United States of America.
I came from a European country myself but I learned enough English to function in this great country – never having expected that the American people learn to speak my own language. As a token of respect for America, who welcomed me in its soil, I learned how to speak the language of its great people – not expecting it to be the other way around.
Having said this, I do believe in education and that speaking foreign languages is important. But NOT because Obama says that we must all learn how to speak Spanish!
How much Spanish does Obama (or Biden) know anyway? Enough words probably to impress the Spanish voters on the campaign trail!
ABC News Blogs
Stephanopoulos: Palin Can’t Afford a Debate Mistake
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoul-10.html?cid=132902457

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Annaloh wrote: “The Conservatives better hope that she’s also been given a few lessons in basic English Language principles and vocabulary, so the viewers can at least understand what she’s trying to say, even if it has no substance.”
Reply to annaloh:
Her English is perfect – in fact she is extremely articulate! After all she was not elected Governor of Alaska because she did NOT speak English.
In the mean-time, I suggest to you “smartie” that you start taking some Spanish lessons because in the tragic event that your Barack-this-is-above-my-pay-grade-Obama is elected as our President, we are all going to have to learn how to speak Spanish! Isn’t that what he said in a stump speech during the primaries?! Oh yes, that is exactly what he said!
I have nothing against Spanish people – I am an immigrant myself. However, I do have an issue with Obama telling me or any other American what language we must learn how to speak, while we live and breath in the United States of America.
I came from a European country myself but I learned enough English to function in this great country – never having expected that the American people learn to speak my own language. As a token of respect for America, who welcomed me in its soil, I learned how to speak the language of its great people – not expecting it to be the other way around.
Having said this, I do believe in education and that speaking foreign languages is important. But NOT because Obama says that we must all learn how to speak Spanish!
How much Spanish does Obama (or Biden) know anyway? Enough words probably to impress the Spanish voters on the campaign trail!
ABC News Blogs
Stephanopoulos: Palin Can’t Afford a Debate Mistake

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Hmmm, check this out…
ABC News Blogs
Stephanopoulos: Palin Can’t Afford a Debate Mistake
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoul-10.html?cid=132902457

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I am sorry- by mistake I re-entered the same comment twice.
To the moderators- please delete my duplicate entry above. My computer froze and I pressed the “post” button twice. I apologize for any inconvinience that this may have caused you.

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Sarah Palin is the victim of a bias media. They do gotcha journalism. When Sarah was in the pizza parlor, reporters could have done stories about all the people there who loved her. But no, they focus on the questions about Pakistan. They know Pakistan isn’t next to Alaska. It’s all just so unfair. But it is going to backfire on you haters, the more you pick on Sarah, the more people will be driven to vote for John McCain! You can’t win!
Posted by: Pubby | Oct 1, 2008 12:56:00 AM
———————————–
but you see, i don’t really CARE about the people who love her, I care about PAKISTAN.
Wait, are you being sarcastic???
IS THIS A TWILIGHT ZONE?

Posted by: GIGI - FREE SARAH ! | September 30, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Sarah could have named lots of newspapers and magazines… if she wanted to. She said she reads just about everything that comes her way. But that Katie Couric is so bias, you can see the hate in her eyes. She pushes and pushes the same question at Sarah. I don’t blame her for not going into details… Katie Couric is just plain rude!
Posted by: Pubby | Oct 1, 2008 1:04:06 AM
——————————
You really should meet this dude Hugo Chavez, RUUUUUDE! lol oh wait, yes yes… we’ll shelter Sarah from rude people like so.
ptfffffffffff…

Posted by: GIGI - FREE SARAH | September 30, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Pubby wrote: “…But that Katie Couric is so bias, you can see the hate in her eyes. She pushes and pushes the same question at Sarah. I don’t blame her for not going into details… Katie Couric is just plain rude!
———————————
Catie Curic is competing with Campbell Brownose – the witch of CNN! They are both mean and rude!!

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Gigi, I can tell right away you are a hater. You said you don’t care about people whose hearts are full of joy at the thought of hope and change that Sarah is bringing to this great country of ours. Give her some time to learn about foreign affairs. John McCain’s campaign strategist is asking for fewer foreign affairs questions in the debate. It would be too bias with Biden’s foreign relations experience. So calm down…. she is a quick learner who will soon have all the right answers on Pakistan and Chavez too! Remember, she won’t be taking office until January!

Posted by: Pubby | September 30, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Many political pundits are talking about her lack of credentials with good reason.
Here are what a lot of notable people have said including many from her own party regarding her qualifications as a potential vice president.
A respected feminist blogger said, “the decision to select Palin as the candidate for [VP] is the most insulting, anti-feminist choice John McCain and the Republican Party could have made.”
Karl Rove criticized Tim Kaine’s 3 yrs experience as Governor and his mayorship of the 105th largest city before McCain chose Palin (who has less experience).
AP reported that Palin issued “dismissive attacks on Barack Obama and flattering praise on her credentials to be vice president – the reproach and the praise stretched the truth.”
Frank Rich of the NYT states that “The McCain campaign’s claims of a “full vetting process” for Palin were as much a lie as the biographical details they’ve invented for her.”
“Mayor Sarah Palin behaves like a petulant, spoiled teenager,” according to a Wasilla flower shop owner.
Republican Commentators Overheard Discussing Palin pick as “cynical” and “gimmicky” and saying that “It’s Over.” Also stating, “The most qualified? No!”
Former NYC Mayor Ed Koch, who endorsed George Bush in 2004, said that Sarah Palin “scares the hell out of me” and is backing Obama.
Alaskan Republican Senator Lyda Green said, “It’s been very difficult to work with her. I wish there had been more vetting.”
John McCain said during the Republican primaries of Romney and Giuliani, “I am prepared. I need no on-the-job training. I wasn’t a mayor for a short period of time. I wasn’t a governor for a short period of time.”
“Her governing style raises a lot of hard questions,” said University of Alaska history professor Steve Haycox.
Wasilla colleague Ms. Chase said that Sarah “scares the bejeebers out of me.”
Over 140,000 women of all ages and backgrounds have posted comments on why they are against Sarah Palin as a VP nomineee.
Dan Fagan, conservative talk show host: “No politician is so popular and charismatic that they should be above accountability and telling the truth. Not even Sarah Palin.”
“My cringe reflex is exhausted,” said conservative columnist Kathleen Parker after watching her interview with Katie Couric.
Palin’s expectations for the debate are so low that a McCain aide said, “Joe Biden is going to have to destroy her for it to be perceived as a victory for him.”
Howard Kurtz writes that leading up to the vice-presidential debate, “some journalists say privately they are censoring their comments about Palin to avoid looking like they’re piling on”
Joe Scarborough of MSNBC television and a former Republican Congressman, said Palin “just seems to be out of her league” on national issues.
Rich Lowry, editor of the conservative National Review magazine, called her interview with Couric “dreadful” and warned that “she risks damaging her political brand forevermore.”
Bob Herbert, NY Times columnist writes that “the idea that the voters might install someone in the VP’s office who is too unprepared or too intellectually insecure to appear on, say, “Meet the Press” or “Face the Nation” is mind-boggling.”
Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone writes that “the scariest thing about John McCain’s running mate isn’t how unqualified she is — it’s what her candidacy says about America.”
David Frum, former speech writer for President Bush, says, “I think she has pretty thoroughly — and probably irretrievably — proven that she is not up to the job of being president of the United States.”
Rebecca Traister of Salon writes that “sympathy with Palin is a disservice to every woman who has ever been unfairly dismissed based on her gender, because this is an utterly fair dismissal, based on an utter lack of ability and readiness.”
CNN’s Cafferty, on viewing Palin’s analysis of the bail-out, called it “one of the most pathetic pieces of tape I have ever seen from someone aspiring to one of the highest offices in this country.”
Conservative columist Kathleen Parker wrote that “Palin’s recent interviews all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out of Her League.”
Conservative columnist Kathleen Parker says that “only Palin can save McCain, her party, and the country she loves. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn.”
Michelle Goldberg of the Nation writes that “the religious right can be confident that they’d have a fundamentalist in the White House with Sarah Palin.

Posted by: PaulinVanc | September 30, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Sarah Palin photoshopped…
It is so embarassing that it took a foreign newspaper to set the record straight about this issue, while our own media clowns have not made an effort to let us know that these “trashy” photos of Palin – circulated on the Internet – are FAKE! Apparently the “O’Bammies” are so desperate that they have come to this to “trash” Palin…
Sarah Palin in pictures and video
The Sunday Times – London, UK
By Nico Hines
Photoshopped! A familiar refrain and a common tool for mocking the political elite – with Sarah Palin, however, it can be quite tricky to work out which of the pictures in circulation are real. (story continuous here)
http://timesonline.typepad.com/uselections/2008/09/sarah-palin-pic.html?OTC-widgets&ATTR=tolblogs

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

As a woman and mother of two girls who would dearly like to see a female vice-president, I cannot abide John McCain’s choice. Anyone that argues that Sarah Palin is a good choice for Vice President of the United States is either not being intellectually honest or has a very low intake of information. Please do your research on Governor Palin with an open mind–for the sake of our country (and your children’s futures).

Posted by: Megan | September 30, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Quote: “CNN’s Cafferty, on viewing Palin’s analysis of the bail-out, called it “one of the most pathetic pieces of tape I have ever seen from someone aspiring to one of the highest offices in this country.”
Reply to PaulinVanc:
Jack Cafferty is an idiot.

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Us Magazine Hit Hard by Canceling Subscribers After Palin Attack
By Warner Todd Huston
Courtney Hazlett over at MSNBC’s “The Scoop” is reporting that thousands of “Us Weekly” subscribers have not only called the magazine to cancel their subscriptions — some reports say up to 10,000 cancellations have occurred — but have also contacted advertisers and expressed their outrage that they are advertising with the celebrity news magazine that would so blatantly try to destroy Governor Palin.
Hazlett is hearing that the editorial board of “Us Weekly” had thought they pegged it right that media pressure and attacks would see Palin pulled from the McCain ticket even before her debut speech. Because the media had so quickly swarmed to destroy her, they thought she was toast before she even had the chance to accept the nomination.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/09/05/us-magazine-hit-hard-canceling-subscribers-after-palin-attack

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

They don’t ask Obama or Biden all these gotcha question!

Posted by: Pubby | September 30, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

CNN-Campbell Brown: “Mother of 5 shouldn’t be a VP”
Quote: “Amazing to me the fuss about a Mother of Five not being suitable for a VP position. Nancy Pelosi has five children and 7 grandchildren and has been in political life a long time. There are 16 Female Senators, 5 Rep. and 11 Dem. most of whom have two or more children. And this just scratches the surface, it’s a non-issue. Go Sarah!” Posted by: M Rhodes of CA.
Bingo!!! I agree 100%!
Campbell Brown – the maniac of CNN – had a special report on this – bending obviously out of shape (as usually) about how Sarah Palin was going to juggle 5 kids and the VP position!
I suggest to Campbell Brown to resign from her position at CNN and stay home to juggle her 8 month old baby! She will be doing us a favor – no love lost here!
Sarah Palin’s private life and how she juggles her 5 kids is none of Campbell Brown’s or anyone else’s business! Besides, why she has not asked Joe Biden why he did not abandon his career as a Senator to stay home with his two children after that tragic automobile accident in which he lost his wife? If she had asked such question she would have been fired and rightfully so!
Why is this neurotic/maniac of CNN – Campbell Brown – so obsessed with Sarah Palin?
CNN needs to put her on some sort of tranquilizers…I am worried about Campbell Brown’s ability to be a fit mother with all these nerves of hers!
Campbell; remember…what goes around comes around! Leave Sarah Palin alone and mind you own darn business! Get it, BABY?
US News & World Report Blogs
10 Things that you didn’t know about Sarah Palin
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/2008/08/29/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-sarah-palin.html

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Pubby wrote: “…But that Katie Couric is so bias, you can see the hate in her eyes. She pushes and pushes the same question at Sarah. I don’t blame her for not going into details… Katie Couric is just plain rude!
———————————
Catie Curic is competing with Campbell Brownose – the witch of CNN! They are both mean and rude!!
I don’t think it’s hate you see in Katie Couric’s eyes, but more disbelief and confusion, I think she is just trying very hard to understand what Palin is saying, and wondering why she won’t answer a simple question.
What’s wrong with answering the question? Isn’t that a good quality to have as VP or President? You want someone in office who is going to dodge the question?
“President, what about the financial crisis?”
Palin: “Oh, I am so ill at what’s going on just like every other American, I …it’s about job creation, that’s it, yes, job creation and health care”…
“President, why are Americans losing their jobs?”
Palin: “oh, it is horrible, just horrible, you poor thing, I know, me too, I just lost 20,000 dollars in my stocks, let me put Air Force 1 on ebay, that will bring back the economy heh, poor you, I know how you feel”…
I hope you remember that when Palin is in office, and remember exactly why you supported Palin even though she can’t answer the questions!
Enough is enough, we don’t need someone who is dumber than Bush!

Posted by: all4Obama | September 30, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

I heard the Hugh Hewitt radio interviw and Gov. Palin DID NOT “blast” anyone. She was wonderful, and HERSELF, which is what she needs to be Thursday night. She knows what’s on her resume as a Governor (more than Obama has ever done) and she should know how to sell herself. She has more EXECUTIVE experience than the other three. Senatorial experience is different.
I don’t really care about the number two candidate…as AMERICANS ALWASY VOTER TOP OF THE TICKET…100% OF THE TIME. Dan Quale was a horses a–. Palin energizes millions of women, whether lib/Dem women want to admit it or not….I’m not waiting another 24 years to vote for one, although the minute Hillary was out, I was in Camp McCain….as the Obama is unacceptable.

Posted by: DLM | September 30, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

CNN-Campbell Brown: “Why did Palin subject her daughter to this scrutiny?”
Campbell Brown- you are an obnoxious partisan Moron!!!
Next time, wash your mouth before you speak about Sarah Palin. Perhaps we should talk about your “daddy”, should we?
Wikipedia: Campbell Brown
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_Brown
HillaryClintonForum.net
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=27154
Palin Sexism Watch Blog:
http://palinsexismwatch.blogspot.com/2008/09/campbell-brown-why-did-palin-subject.html

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Remember this headline ….
A vote for McCain is just 4 more years of this guy …

Posted by: PaulinVanc | September 30, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

WHO is Campbell Brown….
“In 1999, her father James H. “Jim” Brown Jr. was indicted for lying to the FBI during a routine investigation and served time in a Federal prison and resigned his post, he is an expert on Louisiana politics. [6]
On April 2, 2006, Brown married her second husband Daniel Samuel Senor (born 1971), a Republican consultant who regularly appears on Fox News.[7][8] Brown converted to Judaism, her husband’s faith;[9] the two were married in an Orthodox Jewish ceremony.[10]
On June 24, 2007, Brown announced on Weekend Today that she and her husband were expecting their first child.[11] On December 18, Brown gave birth to a son, Eli James Senor, named after his grandfather, James Senor.
Her first marriage was to Peregrine “Pere” Roberts, President of TSC Realty in Bethesda, MD.”
———————————
To Campbell Brown I say:
What goes around comes around, BABY !!!
I am Natasha and approve this message.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_Brown
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=27154

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Ahaha…ha!
Campbell Brown Suddenly Concerned Over ‘Lack of Experience’
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/30/campbell-brown-suddenly-concerned-over-lack-experience

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Katie Couric doesn’t know when to stop. She asked Sarah what newspapers and magazines she read. Sarah told her she read most of them. That’s a good answer. But Couric pushes… what specifically? Sarah answered again, all of them and any of them. Another good answer… But not good enough for Katie! She pushed AGAIN… Can you name a few? Sarah is such a blessed giving person she gave Couric a third answer… a variety of sources. Just more condescending, gotcha journalism! I don’t hear reporters asking Obama or Biden what they read!

Posted by: Pubby | September 30, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Speaking of double standards….
Ms. Campbell Brown & Jon Clown – as in Jon Klein – President of CNN, and the rest of the “24 hour media circus” had the audacity to question the fact that Palin’s husband had a DUI, 22 years ago! But at the same time I did not once hear the above clowns grilling Obama about his “drug use” and other “extracurricular activities”!!!
Go Sarah Palin! Give some of these pathetic far-left-wing-liberals in the media the medicine that they deserve…Better yet, IGNORE THEM!
Like you said, during your RNC acceptance speech – that little “flash news” gesture to the obnoxious media -”I am not going to Washington to seek your good opinion”!!!
C’ est magnifique !!!!!!

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Pubby- like you mentioned earlier, I also think that Palin is bluffing! I think she is doing it on purpose to tick the media off and at the same time “trick” the Obama camp in thinking that she is really “naive”! I am sure she could have named one or two newspapers – ie. NY Times, Washington Post, etc. Anybody could have just done that even if they have never bought a newpaper in their life! It was Curic who was stupid not to get Palin’s drift that is Palin was making Curic looking like a “witch”!!
Should we start praying for Biden?.. :-)

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I will not be able to take her seriously because her knowledge will not be genuine, but coached. It will not be Palin talking, it will be her advisors and McCain talking through her. That’s all she is… a puppet. A dumb eager puppet. I feel sorry for her. She should get out now while she still has some dignity.

Posted by: kmdmydav | September 30, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

The mother of all flip-flops:
Iraqi surge exceeded expectations, Obama says
LANCASTER, Pa. – Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama said Thursday that the escalation of U.S. troops in Iraq, which he had opposed, has succeeded in reducing violence “beyond our wildest dreams.”
And check this out… This latest revelation by Barack-this-is-above-my pay-grade-Obama comes in less than 24 hours after Sarah Palin stated in her speech that her opponent [Obama] never mentions the word “victory” except when he speaks [pretty speeches] about his own campaign!!
Does the man think that we are stupid and perhaps missed that part in Palin’s acceptance speech? Or does he think that we are so naive not to realize that he just listens to what the other side or the media clowns say and then flip-flops according to where the wind is blowing?!
Come on Obama – the American people have already figured you out…When the heat is on, you start flip-flopping left and right – right and left!
And of course, Campbell Brown and the rest of the left-wing-liberal media idiots have not mentioned a darn thing about this latest flip-flop by Obama.
Booooooooo, Campbell Brown- make sure nobody attacks your “Obama” icon about his latest…”mother of all flip-flops”!
Question: Could Obama be suffering from “multiple personality disorder”???!!!

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

kmdmydav- Funny you said that…I happen not to trust your top of the ticket – perhaps he should have just get out of the race when he still had some dignity that is before the truth about his pastor’s (of 20+ years)anti-American sentiments became known as well as Obama’s connections with terrorists (Ayers) and other “persons of interest”.
Palin looks like a rose in comparison to your #1 – top of the ticket! Last time I checked around he – Obama was running for President – NOT Palin. Please make sure you remember that on November 4th!!

Posted by: Natasha | September 30, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

They are NOT going to question their “Chosen One” – “God’s Gift to America”!
Quote: Jake Lewis wrote: “I don’t recall Mrs. Brown asking the same tough questions regarding Obama’s lack of foreign policy experience, his drug use, his ties to domestic terrorists, to explain how he purchased a $1.5 million home (yea…middle class) on a state legislature’s salary, his refusal to vote ya or na while serving in the state legislature, or why in his 3 1/2 years as a senator he has not sponsored one important piece of legislation? Oh! I understand now…he speaks well.”
Posted by: Jake Lewis | September 04, 2008 at 01:43 PM
BINGO!!
Dear Jake Lewis, you hit the nail on the head! But Ms. Campbell Brown and Jon Clown – as in Jon Klein – President of CNN – have been listening apparently to Nancy Pelosi…..they are NOT going to question their “Chosen One” – “God’s Gift to America”, as Bella Pelosi refers to Obama!
Can you imagine if Senator McCain had said that Sarah Palin was “God’s gift to America”? They would be reminding him about the separation of Church and State!…

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid, Frank … for starters.
Now that is as scary as it can possibly get!

Posted by: john b | October 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

If you were the boss, who would you hire???
OBAMA: Harvard law professor, Juris Doctor of law degree, constitutional law expert, Senate committees: foreign affairs, homeland security, veterans affairs, family, education, health.
BIDEN: Juris Doctor of law degree, Senate committees: Foreign affairs (chair), economy, health, crime, women’s affairs, education, technology, environment
McCain: graduated from the naval academy in the bottom 5% of his class, senate committees: economy, environment, official conduct (arguably the 3 biggest Republican failures!!!!!!!!!)
PALIN: went to 6 different universities before finally getting a BA degree in journalism, no domestic or foreign policy experience but can see Russia from her house.
SERIOUSLY, THIS IS A NO BRAINER!!!!
If you vote McBush/Pitbull, the fate of your country will be in jeopardy.

Posted by: kate buckingham | October 1, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

She does not read papers. That is why she does not provide the names. Sarah Palin go back to Alaska. And Republicans find another more intelligent human being as a VP candidate. I do not want to have a person like Palin as a VP. I prefer a person who is smart and knows about the issues. She does not know anything. I thought the Republicans would pick a competent person. On this one, you are 100% wrong.

Posted by: Patty | October 1, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am

VP DEBATE MODERATOR RELEASING ‘AGE OF OBAMA’ BOOK ON INAUGURATION DAY

Posted by: rodney | October 1, 2008, 3:33 am 3:33 am

Gov. Palin certainly has a few hurdles to overcome in this debate! Turns out that Gwen Ifill, the moderator, is currently writing a book as a glowing tribute to the Obama campaign. Is this the kind of reporter who passes for “fair and impartial” at PBS? Has everyone in the media now abandoned all pretense of decency and fairness in their frenzy to fool the public into electing Barack Obama??

Posted by: Brightfame | October 1, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

The only place where Sarah Palin would be of good use is in my bed.

Posted by: Dan | October 1, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am

The co-founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.
In 2001, the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN, for which Khalidi’s wife, Mona, serves as president. The Fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002.
Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund’s website. According to tax filings, Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2000.
Obama served on the Wood’s Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.
Ayers, who still serves on the Woods Fund board, contributed $200 to Obama’s senatorial campaign fund and has served on panels with Obama at numerous public speaking engagements. Ayers admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. governmental buildings in the 1970s. He is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
The $40,000 grant from Obama’s Woods Fund to the AAAN constituted about a fifth of the Arab group’s reported grants for 2001, according to tax filings obtained by WND. The $35,000 Woods Fund grant in 2002 also constituted about one-fifth of AAAN’s reported grants for that year.

Posted by: GoUSA247 | October 1, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am

A newspaper article today says John McCain’s aides have put pressure on the organisers of the upcoming vice-presidential debate by voicing concerns that Sarah Palin will be challenged by an unusually large number of foreign policy questions following her recent poor interview performances.
It’s not fair to challenge Sarah just because she is inexperienced. She will get lots of experience once she is in office. Until then, that bias moderator needs to BACK OFF!

Posted by: Pubby | October 1, 2008, 6:30 am 6:30 am

The “unbiased” moderator of the VP debate … Ifill releasing pro-Obama (Age of Obama) book that Focuses on blacks who are ‘forging a bold new path to political power’.
They should allow a co-moderator -
Ifill showed her hate for Palin when she trashed Palin’s speech at the Republican Convention.

Posted by: susie | October 1, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

FLIP FLOPIN’?
that is SO 2004
Nice try, it’s not gonna work this time (what? you really think we suffer the same chronic case of Amnesia all Republicans do?)
Better, Hotter Phrase?
the case of the Wondorous Dr. McJekill & Mrs Palin
lol – how nice of McCain to show his true self while holding his pitbull on a leash.

Posted by: GIGI | October 1, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

Ntasha – the press has been asking these questions of Obama for 14 months…where have you been?
BTW for all of you suddenly worried about the moderator – get over it-the McCain camp agreed to Ifill ages ago and now suddenly you are worried about objectivity. Whatever this is just another example of “hey look over there” not at our candidates or campaign!

Posted by: pthomas KY | October 1, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

It’s not fair to challenge Sarah just because she is inexperienced. She will get lots of experience once she is in office. Until then, that bias moderator needs to BACK OFF!
Posted by: Pubby | Oct 1, 2008 10:30:28 AM
————————
Are you serious?

Posted by: GIGI | October 1, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Katie Couric doesn’t know when to stop. She asked Sarah what newspapers and magazines she read. Sarah told her she read most of them. That’s a good answer. But Couric pushes… what specifically? Sarah answered again, all of them and any of them. Another good answer… But not good enough for Katie! She pushed AGAIN… Can you name a few? Sarah is such a blessed giving person she gave Couric a third answer… a variety of sources. Just more condescending, gotcha journalism! I don’t hear reporters asking Obama or Biden what they read!
Posted by: Pubby | Oct 1, 2008 3:03:13 AM
——————————-
“gotcha journalism”
what a lame excuse for lazyness and utter lack of common sense.
half the people on this board could have answered that 700billion dollar question.
stop making excuses for her.

Posted by: GIGI | October 1, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

Quote: “The “unbiased” moderator of the VP debate … Ifill releasing pro-Obama (Age of Obama) book that Focuses on blacks who are ‘forging a bold new path to political power’.”
Sometimes you just can’t help it but to laugh in times like these. Look how all the ‘palin’ supporters are coming out in droves already making excuses for what even they think will be a crash and burn for their chosen one.
If she can’t handle the debate, the media and the reporters like all the other candidates, then that should be waving a big red flag in front of your face that anyone can see. Unless you are blind of course, which it seems that many are.

Posted by: aj1221 | October 1, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

joseph,
You are joking, right? Palin is isn’t even qualified to be governor of Alaska from what I can tell. The problem with Republicans is that always value symbolism over substance. Palin was supposed to be symbol of youth, reaching out to women, feistiness, and reform at the expense of experience and deep thought on resolving complicated issues. She is a mockery right now…

Posted by: indy_voter | October 1, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

ONE DAY LEFT PALIN!!
There’s only one day left before the debate Palin…
You and McCain can play down expectations, you can talk about being “Joe six-pack” whatever you want. However sweetie, this is the big leagues and you are going to get beaten shamefully. Not by Joe Biden, but by yourself!!
My guess is by Friday morning you and the rest of your family will be on a Greyhound bus back to Alaska, tickets courtesy of the Republicans…
Your stupidity will be so obvious, that even the dumbest of your redneck supporters will desert you!!!
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Daisy | October 1, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Daisy- Americans will be highly entertained by the gaffes of a person with 29+ years of experience vs. someone – Palin – who was in 2nd grade when Biden became a senator!!
We have already watched a preview of the highly amusing Joe Biden and his gaffes – 4 of them last week alon!!
GOP hitting Joe Biden for gaffes.
WASHINGTON–The Republican National Committee is turning up the heat on Joe Biden on Wednesday. Their oppo team is keeping tabs on what they consider gaffes at the Biden Gaffe Clock
Not to pile on, but here’s what Biden said on Tuesday at the National Jewish Democratic Council: In recounting his 1972 race for the Senate, Biden said, “I was a 29-year-old kid nominated for president, excuse me, nominated for senator.”
Source:
Chicago Sun-Times
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/09/gop_hitting_joe_biden_for
Ahaha…ha!!
Here is a preview of what to expect tomorrow Americans:

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Go Lou!… (Who pays attention to dumb blond Catie Curic, anyway?)
Dobbs: Biden Makes ‘Many More Misstatements Than Sarah Palin’
An astounding thing happened on CNN Monday evening: not only did Lou Dobbs say that Democrat Vice Presidential candidate Joe Biden makes “many more misstatements than Sarah Palin,” but he also chided Wolf Blitzer and the “Situation Room” crew for failing to point it out during their Bash Sarah session.
In preparation for the upcoming vice presidential debate, Blitzer brought on CNN analysts Gloria Borger and Jeffrey Toobin, as well as “The Weekly Standard’s” Steve Hayes, to handicap the event.
As you might expect, Palin was the butt of many jokes leading Dobbs to marvelously inject the following during a mid-segment promo for his upcoming program (h/t NB reader Kevin Groenhagen):
Well, Wolf, I’m shocked. I wish you guys would take it easy on Joe Biden, because I think you’re being really unfair to him, just because he makes so many more misstatements than Sarah Palin. But, anyway, I’m sure you can sort that out.
How delicious. What follows is a partial transcript of this exchange: (follow link)
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/09/30/dobbs-biden-makes-many-more-misstatements-sarah-palin

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Another Obama gaffe – in fact a lie that Obama said during his debate with McCain.
Fact Check:
Kissinger Defends McCain’s Iran Stance
September 26, 2008 11:54 PM
ABC News’ Kirit Radia Reports: Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger came to the defense of longtime friend Sen. John McCain following Friday’s presidential debate saying he “would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level.”
“Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality,” Kissinger said in statement issued by the McCain campaign.
Source:
ABC NEWS
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/fact-check-kiss.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

The 3:00 AM call to the White House…
If Obama bin Biden answers that “3:00 AM call to the White House” he would forward it to…the United Nations!!!!
Is this what you want America?
Do not vote left-wing-liberal Obama bin Biden to be our next Commander in Chief. It took 3 statements by him (after talking to his 300+ foreign policy advisors) to kind of condemn (he still did not even come close to it) Russia for invading a democratic and sovereign country….And, this while Senator McCain, Senator Clinton, our government, and ALL our allies – blasted Russia’s invasion of Georgia! Even China turned its back to Russia on the Georgia issue despite the fact that the Russian leaders – Medvedev (Putin’s hand picked puppet) and Putin himself were courting China’s support on the Georgia conflict!! Ha-ha!
Go McCain-Palin ’08 :-)

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Kikz: great job. You wrote 58 paragraphs of great info. One for every one of Obamas 57 states + 1

Posted by: bombem | October 1, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

A must watch for all media clowns and to everyone that reads this blog:
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/v
ideo.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Sorry- by mistake, I split the link in my previous comment… Here is the correct link:
A must watch for all media clowns and to everyone that reads this blog:
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Kate Buckingham wrote:
“If you were the boss, who would you hire???”
SERIOUSLY, THIS IS A NO BRAINER!!!!
—————————————
It is NO brainer once you are done watching this:
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Video: Joe Biden Gaffes Continue
By Lynn Edwards
Sep 13, 2008
Joe Biden likes to listen to himself talk and that often leads to some of the most awful gaffes imaginable from the mouth of the man that wants to be vice president. While the media world is trying desperately to get Republican nominee Sarah Palin to slip up Joe Biden is spilling out gaffes galore.
The media is missing most of it. Are they bias and pulling for the Barack Obama and Joe biden ticket? The “Southern Gentleman” notes that “Some may not realize that Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden made a slight mistake in his introduction of Senator Chuck Graham.”
See the video here:
http://southerngent.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/other-joe-biden-gaffes/
The New York Times points out that at a campaign stop this week in Missouri, Biden urged the paraplegic state official to stand up to be recognized. “Chuck, stand up, let the people see you,” Mr. Biden shouted to State Senator Chuck Graham, before realizing, to his horror, that Mr. Graham uses a wheelchair.
“Oh, God love ya,” Mr. Biden said. “What am I talking about?” Can you imagine the catcalls for Sarah Palin to resign if she did anything like that? Biden is a legendary blowhard that is in love with his own voice and often just blurts out whatever is on his mind at that leads to some really embarrassing moments.
Source:
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272622683.shtml

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Biden garbles Depression history
September 23, 2008
Joe Biden’s denunciation of his own campaign’s ad to Katie Couric got so much attention last night that another odd note in the interview slipped by.
He was speaking about the role of the White House in a financial crisis.
“When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed,” Biden told Couric. “He said, ‘Look, here’s what happened.’”
As Reason’s Jesse Walker footnotes it: “And if you owned an experimental TV set in 1929, you would have seen him. And you would have said to yourself, ‘Who is that guy? What happened to President Hoover?’”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Biden_garbles_Depression_history.html?showall

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Boooo…Biden – the man with the 29+ years of experience who can NOT keep his mouth SHUT! He has made more gaffes in one week than Palin has made in her entite career! And, that is a fact!
Biden Gaffe Triggers Trio Of Ads
http://adspotlight.nationaljournal.com/2008/09/coal_ads.php

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Unlike Clinton, Biden Gets Pass for Saying He Was ‘Shot At’ in Iraq
When Hillary Clinton told a tall tale about “landing under sniper fire” in Bosnia, she was accused of “inflating her war experience” by Barack Obama’s campaign — but the campaign has been silent about Joe Biden telling his own questionable story about being “shot at” in Iraq. (story continuous here)
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/30/unlike-clinton-biden-gets-pass-saying-shot-iraq/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Even More Biden Stupidity…
Joe Biden quote:
“When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the
television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed. He said,
‘look, here’s what happened.’”
Sen. Joe Biden, in an interview with CBS News. Of course, as Reason
points out, Roosevelt wasn’t president in 1929 and televisions were
still experimental.
Ssshhh!…Biden thinks he’s really smart.
Source:
Google Groups – Even More Biden Stupidity

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Barney Frank’s Fannie (Mae) Love Connection
Barney Frank, the pansy in chief of the House Financial Services Committee, has an ex-spouse in the employ of Fannie Mae.
Prominent Democrats ran Fannie Mae, the same government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that donated campaign cash to top Democrats. And one of Fannie Mae’s main defenders in the House – Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., a recipient of more than $40,000 in campaign donations from Fannie since 1989 – was once romantically involved with a Fannie Mae executive.
The media coverage of Frank’s coziness with Fannie Mae and his pro-Fannie Mae stances has been lacking. Of the eight appearances Frank made on the three broadcasts networks between Jan. 1, 2008, and Sept. 21, 2008, none of his comments dealt with the potential conflicts of interest. Only six of the appearances dealt with the economy in general and two of those appearances, including an April 6, 2008 appearance on CBS’s “60 Minutes” were about his opposition to a manned mission to Mars.
Frank has argued that family life “should be fair game for campaign discussion,” wrote the Associated Press on Sept. 2. The comment was in reference to GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin and her pregnant daughter. “They’re the ones that made an issue of her family,” the Massachusetts Democrat said to the AP.
The news media have covered the relationship in the past, but there have been no mentions since 2005, according to Nexis and despite the collapse of Fannie Mae. The July 3, 1998, Reliable Source column in The Washington Post reported Frank, who is openly gay, had a relationship with Herb Moses, an executive for the now-government controlled Fannie Mae. The column revealed the two had split up at the time but also said Frank was referring to Moses as his “spouse.” Another Washington Post report said Frank called Moses his “lover” and that the two were “still friends” after the breakup.
Stuck on Stupid
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Bailout Vote Failure Blamed On ‘Bela’ Pelosi Speech
Watch video here:
http://stuckon-stupid.com/
Nancy ‘Bela’ Pelosi squelched the survival of the 700 Billion Dollar bailout. Pelosi’s speech before the vote blamed the Bush Administration and Republicans in general for the failure.
Here is what the moron said:
PELOSI:
When was the last time anyone ever asked you for $700 billion?
It’s a staggering figure and many questions have arisen from that request. And we have been hearing a very informed debate on all sides of this issue here today. I’m proud of the debate.
$700 billion. A staggering number, but only a part of the cost of the failed Bush economic policies to our country. Policies that were built on budget recklessness when Pres. Bush took office, he inherited Pres. Clinton’s surpluses – four years in a row budget surpluses on a trajectory of $5.6 trillion in surplus. And with his reckless economic policies, within two years, he had turned it around. And now 8 years later, the foundation of that fiscal irresponsibility, combined with an “anything goes” economic policy, has taken us to where we are today.
They claim to be free-market advocates, when it’s really an anything goes mentality. No regulation, no supervision, no discipline. And if you fail, you will have a golden parachute and the taxpayer will bail you out.
Those days are over. The party is over in that respect.
Democrats believe in a free market. We know that it can create jobs, it can create wealth, many good things in our economy. But in this case, in this unbridled form, as encouraged and supported by the Republicans — some Republicans, not all — it has created not jobs, not capital, it has created chaos. And it is that chaos that the Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Fed came to see us, just about a week and a half ago. It seems like an eternity, doesn’t it? So much has happened. The news was so bad. They described a very dismal situation.
Stuck on Stupid
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

The Obama Campaign Admits Barack H. Was A Kenyan Citizen Until 1982
Barack Obama’s own website designed to fight the alleged smears against him and his campaign admits that Barack Obama was, in fact, a Kenya citizen until 1982.
Will the MSM pick up on this?
FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Henry Sez…..Shame On You Barack!
Kissinger Unhappy with Obama)
“Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality.”
-Henry Kissinger
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

C’ est magnifique!….. :-)
CNN’s Campbell Brown Smacked Down By New McCain supporter
http://patdollard.com/2008/09/cnns-campbell-brown-smacked-down-by-new-mccain-supporter/
Apparently they have taken the video down – this to show you how obmoxious the witch of CNN – Campbell Brownose – was toward this new McCain supporter…
But the story is still out there…
Let’s All Watch One More Time as CNN’s Campbell Brown Gets Put in Her Place
Because it’s Friday we should take a breather and enjoy watching CNN blowhard Campell Brown get put in her place.
Scenario: Brown, fanatical water carrier for Barack Obama, can’t come to grips with the fact that former Hillary Clinton fundraiser Lynn Forester de Rothschild now supports John McCain.
Brown gets mean, defensive, and perhaps a bit angry before calling Rothschild a bitter elitist. Rothschild was fine up to that point and then makes Brown eat her lunch.
Added bonus, Rothschild explains to the world why a Hillary Clinton supporter should want to support John McCain. Groovy.
Partial transcript:
BROWN: All right. Lynn, let me ask you finally. I mean, I understand you’re still a Democrat. You’re not going to leave the party.
DE ROTHSCHILD: Right.
BROWN: To some people invariably, it’s going to sound like you’re bitter. Hillary Clinton didn’t get the nomination, this is your way of getting even.
DE ROTHSCHILD: You know what, Campbell? Barack Obama went and he called the people who have guns and cling to their religion bitter. The people out, you know, who are the rednecks or whoever are bitter. If bitter is the easiest way for you to rationalize that I truly with all my heart believe that John McCain will be a great president, then call me bitter. But it doesn’t really advance the dialogue, Campbell, sorry.
BROWN: All right.
Source:
http://www.webloggin.com/lets-all-watch-one-more-time-as-cnns-campbell-brown-gets-put-in-her-place/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

‘Bitter’ Campbell Brown Brought to Heel by Lynn Forester de Rothschild
By P.J. Gladnick – September 19, 2008
It was a beautiful sight to behold. The obviously pro-Obama Campbell Brown snarling throughout an interview at the heels of former Hillary Clinton fundraiser and now McCain supporter, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, for “daring” to switch sides. After several minutes of accusing de Rothschild of everything from being an elitist to acting as a traitor to the Democrats, Campbell Brown set herself up for the grand slam dunk by Ms Rothschild using the very words of the Lightworker to turn the tables on the CNN interviewer. First we see in the transcript how Campbell Brown begins with an elitism charge against de Rothschild (emphasis mine):
CAMPBELL BROWN: Now to the political story that everybody has been buzzing about today, the prominent Hillary Clinton fundraiser and big- time Democrat who came out for John McCain. And it’s not just that she is switching sides, it’s what she says about Barack Obama. She calls him elitist. That word a bit surprising for someone who is married to a billionaire. So let’s ask her about it.
Joining me live now, Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild. Lady de Rothschild, is it OK if I call you Lynn?
LYNN FORESTER DE ROTHSCHILD: Please call me Lynn, Campbell.
BROWN: I absolutely will. So, you have to understand how ridiculous this seems to a lot of people. You’re a Rothschild. You’re married to a billionaire. You were a millionaire before you married him.
You’re a jetsetter. You live between New York and London. And yet, you’re calling Barack Obama an elitist. Are you not a member of the elite?
DE ROTHSCHILD: Let me tell you what informs my support of John McCain. I grew up in a middle class town in New Jersey. My father worked two jobs to put four children through college, law school, and medical school. We were taught that we were blessed by God to live in the greatest country in the world. And if we worked hard we could have anything.
And the truth is, I have it. I don’t have to be doing what I’m doing supporting John McCain, but I am doing it because I really believe it’s John McCain and Sarah Palin who will keep this country the way that I was taught this country.
BROWN: OK. But the point –
DE ROTHSCHILD: They are the great Americans.
BROWN: But I think –
DE ROTHSCHILD: So, please, you know, the class war that Barack Obama would like to declare in this country to divide people is so wrong.
BROWN: OK, we’ll stop there.
DE ROTHSCHILD: I have basic –
BROWN: Just stop there for a second. Let me ask you a question because you didn’t answer my question. I assume, I guess that you came up through a middle class background. But I was accurate in describing your lifestyle, is it not?
(CROSSTALK)
DE ROTHSCHILD: Let me — right, you did. You described my lifestyle.
BROWN: OK. But let me ask you specifically to tell me, then, what has Barack Obama said that has caused you to come to this conclusion that he is so elitist and out of touch?
DE ROTHSCHILD: OK. I wrote this piece in the “Wall Street Journal” last week if you want to look at it. What I said is that the Democratic Party has a very bad history with the likes of Adlai Stevenson and people who think they are grander than the rest of us.
Barack Obama –
BROWN: So what makes you think — what’s he said that makes you think this guy thinks he’s grander than the rest of us? Specifically, be specific.
DE ROTHSCHILD: You know what? OK, a lot of it is you know it when you see it. This is a person who went to Berlin to speak to 200,000 people. This is a person who made speeches about how he is the one that the world has been waiting for. He came into this campaign talking about audacity. Where I come from, audacity is not a good thing. It’s modesty and simplicity and being in politics to help people…
BROWN: OK.
DE ROTHSCHILD: … not to advance yourself.
BROWN: But — but –
DE ROTHSCHILD: That’s why I admire John McCain. What I said in my piece –
Then Campbell Brown suggests that de Rothschild is somehow a traitor to the liberal cause:
BROWN: But let me ask you — let me ask you about the issues here, because if you look at the major issues in this election, the war in Iraq and the economy, what everybody in all the polls says are the most important issues in this race. Hillary Clinton, the candidate you supported and you worked hard for, she could not be any more different than John McCain on these issues, but her positions are nearly identical to Barack Obama.
So it sounds like the issues aren’t important to you, aren’t what you’re voting for. You’re voting on personality, right?
DE ROTHSCHILD: Campbell, no, you are so wrong. First of all, Hillary Clinton is not in this race. So let’s talk about John McCain and Barack Obama. No one –
BROWN: But the whole point of you being here, Lynn, let’s be honest, is that you were one of Hillary Clinton’s biggest supporters and biggest fundraisers so you making a switch is what’s making news. Anybody else making a switch wouldn’t make news. So I’m trying to get at what it is about Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama who are identical in all of these –
(CROSSTALK)
ROTHSCHILD: OK, let me tell you — let me tell you why I am a Democrat. I am a Democrat because I believed — I believed in the Democratic Party’s sense of fairness, sense of fair rules, and most of all, that they would be there to protect the middle class, the family I came from, the town I came from, the people I care about, the people who make America great. I believe in this — OK.
And now, ladies and gentleman, we come to the moment you’ve been waiting for…the grand slam dunking of Campbell Brown. First Campbell inadvertently sets herself up by calling de Rothschild “bitter”:
BROWN: All right. Lynn, let me ask you finally. I mean, I understand you’re still a Democrat. You’re not going to leave the party.
DE ROTHSCHILD: Right.
BROWN: To some people invariably, it’s going to sound like you’re bitter. Hillary Clinton didn’t get the nomination, this is your way of getting even.
And now the slam dunk:
DE ROTHSCHILD: You know what, Campbell? Barack Obama went and he called the people who have guns and cling to their religion bitter. The people out, you know, who are the rednecks or whoever are bitter. If bitter is the easiest way for you to rationalize that I truly with all my heart believe that John McCain will be a great president, then call me bitter. But it doesn’t really advance the dialogue, Campbell, sorry.
Ouch! And now Campbell Brown limps away into the distance:
BROWN: All right.
Well, thank you for being here, Lynn Forester de Rothschild. Appreciate your time tonight.
To truly savor the slam dunk moment, you really need to see the video of this encounter. It was reminiscent of a wayward dog being brought to heel by Barbara Woodhouse.
Source:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/19/bitter-campbell-brown-brought-heel-lynn-forester-de-rothschild

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Exposed! The Democrats’ Coverup Of The Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Crisis (video)
This video is a must watch… (please follow link)….
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Hmmm, see what the “O’Bammies” have been up to…
Obama campaign urging people to watch debate on CNN
Chicago Sun Times
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/09/obama_campaign_urging_people_t.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Obama’s Class War “So Wrong for America”
Friday, September 19, 2008
Lynn Forester de Rothschild, appearing on Campbell Brown’s “Election Center” on CNN, offered one of the most trenchant arguments against Barack Obama’s presidential campaign I’ve heard in months.
Forester de Rothschild grew up in middle class New Jersey, and she says the class war Barack Obama would declare is “so wrong for America,” via Newsbusters:
Here’s the introduction from her Wall Street Journal essay:
If Barack Obama loses the presidential election, it may well be the result of a public perception that he is detached and elitist — a politician whose expressions of empathy for hard-working Americans stem more from abstract solidarity than a real connection to the lives of millions of citizens.
Suggestions that Sen. Obama has failed to relate to working- and middle-class voters in swing states have dogged his campaign for months. His choice of Sen. Joseph Biden as his running mate only marginally corrects the problem.
While Obama supporters attempt to dismiss the charges about their candidate’s perceived hauteur, they confuse privilege and elitism. Elitism is a state of mind, a view of the world that cannot be measured simply by one’s net worth, position or number of houses.
Source:
American Power Blog
http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/obamas-class-war-so-wrong-for-america.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Go Lou !!
Dobbs: Biden Makes ‘Many More Misstatements Than Sarah Palin’
An astounding thing happened on CNN Monday evening: not only did Lou Dobbs say that Democrat Vice Presidential candidate Joe Biden makes “many more misstatements than Sarah Palin,” but he also chided Wolf Blitzer and the “Situation Room” crew for failing to point it out during their Bash Sarah session.
In preparation for the upcoming vice presidential debate, Blitzer brought on CNN analysts Gloria Borger and Jeffrey Toobin, as well as “The Weekly Standard’s” Steve Hayes, to handicap the event.
As you might expect, Palin was the butt of many jokes leading Dobbs to marvelously inject the following during a mid-segment promo for his upcoming program (h/t NB reader Kevin Groenhagen):
Story Continues Below Ad ↓
Well, Wolf, I’m shocked. I wish you guys would take it easy on Joe Biden, because I think you’re being really unfair to him, just because he makes so many more misstatements than Sarah Palin. But, anyway, I’m sure you can sort that out.
How delicious. What follows is a partial transcript of this exchange:
BRIAN TODD, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, Wolf, McCain campaign officials say they believe Sarah Palin is a valuable asset to them. They’re holding firm on that. They say she’s able to energize voters, really connect with them. They also believe that her public missteps have been way overblown.
But Sarah Palin is now under a microscope to prove just that.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
TODD (voice-over): At the very least, Sarah Palin’s getting valuable training on where political curveballs might come from — like from a grad student in a South Philly cheese steak joint.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So we do cross border, like Afghanistan to Pakistan you think? VOICE OF GOV. SARAH PALIN (R-AK), VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: If that’s what we have to do to stop the terrorists from coming any further in, absolutely, we should.
TODD: On its surface, a position that seems more like Barack Obama’s. It prompts her running mate to say on ABC’s “This Week” we’re on the same page.
MCCAIN: She shares my view that we will do whatever is necessary. The problem is you don’t announce it. You don’t say to the Pakistanis, we’re coming in unilaterally and carry out operations.
TODD: But as she prepares for what’s clearly her most important public appearance of this campaign, GOP strategists say the stakes for Sarah Palin and the McCain campaign have been hyped up considerably over the past week. McCain’s gambit on the financial bailout raised them, as did Palin’s own performance in a CBS news interview parodied on “Saturday Night Live.”
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP FROM “SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE,” COURTESY NBC)
TINA FEY: Ultimately, what the bailout does is help those that are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy…
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: (INAUDIBLE).
FEY: Oh, it’s got to be all about job creation.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
TODD: McCain campaign officials tell us they’re not worried about Palin’s debate performance. They say some of her other answers in network interviews show she understood the issues.
Campaign aides say Palin is going to Senator McCain’s ranch in Arizona to prepare and that some top staffers from the senator’s campaign will help her. Analysts say she’s got a tall order to show command of the facts and not look rehearsed.
LISA BURNS, MEDIA ANALYST, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: If she’s not comfortable at this point, she needs to do whatever it is that takes for her to get more comfortable so she can say a few things that are possibly off script, yet, of course, are still going to represent McCain’s stance on these issues.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
TODD: So Sarah Palin has clearly got to demonstrate command of the issues, but not look heavily coached.
Now, GOP strategists we spoke to say that while Palin’s own gaffes have contributed to the pressure on her here, it is also true that right now expectations for her are so low, that all she’s really got to do is not make a major mistake and not really lose this thing — Wolf. BLITZER: Thanks very much, Brian.
Let’s get back to our panel, Gloria Borger, Jeff Toobin and Stephen Hayes.
All right, guys, is that the sort of the standard, Steve, that she’s got to simply avoid making a major mistake?
STEVE HAYES, “THE WEEKLY STANDARD”: Well, I think she certainly benefits from low expectations. But I think she’s got to do more than that. I mean what’s happened, I think, is that the McCain campaign has kept her so bottled up for so long, that she sort of lost whatever rhythm and whatever natural instinct she has to do these kinds of interviews.
What would have been much smarter is to put her out for a series of short interviews on local television networks, have her get comfortable behind the camera, have her talk more. For one thing, if she were talking more, we wouldn’t be quite as focused on every single word that she says, which I think is where she now sees herself.
BLITZER: She does seem, Gloria, just on that Katie Couric interview, to have lost some of her self-confidence over these past few weeks.
GLORIA BORGER, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST: Oh…
BLITZER: If you remember, the speech she delivered at the Republican Convention in St. Paul and then you compare that to that interview, it’s like day and night.
BORGER: Yes. I mean, she looks like she’s lost her self- confidence. I mean you can just imagine, they’ve been sitting her down with a list of 150, 200 questions you need to know the answers to. She’s cramming. She’s desperately afraid of going off script. If she goes off script, she’s afraid she’ll contradict what John McCain has said.
And, so, as a result, she censors herself. And when you censor yourself, you’re not as good. And so she’s trying to work this out. And I agree with Steve, I think they’ve made this much more difficult for her.
All I can say is she’s sitting against Joe Biden and Joe Biden has some debating problems of his own. So, you know, it’s going to be interesting to watch the two of them together.
BLITZER: Although I will say this. I moderated some of those Democratic presidential debates when he was participating. Even though he didn’t get many votes, he did pretty well in those debates, Jeff. He’s a pretty good debater, although occasionally he says, shall we say, not necessarily the smartest of things.
(LAUGHTER)
JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN POLITICAL ANALYST: His biggest problem is that he’s a windbag, is that he talks too much. But he’s fortunate in that there will be time limits in this debate.
I think, in fairness to Sarah Palin, we have to point out that the idea of debate camp is not some kind of remedial education program for her. All candidates do this. They go away and they prepare.
The problem is that she’s gone into the witness protection program. She’s just — she’s not being seen in public, which is customary for people running for national office.
So I do think that this business of expectations, as we’ve discussed before, is a totally phony issue. I think the expectations should be the same for Biden and for Palin. They’re both trying to be vice president of the United States. They’re both trying to be a heartbeat away from the presidency.
BORGER: Right.
TOOBIN: So they both should be in capable of doing it.
BLITZER: Well, Steve, the ridicule she’s facing — the “Saturday Night Live” skits, the Tina Fey stuff and all of that, how damaging is it?
HAYES: Well, I think it’s damaging. And I think you have a lot of people who don’t, you know, maybe watch the news shows as much as we do and some who get their news from places like “Saturday Night Live” or Jon Stewart’s show or what have you. You know, they pay attention and they see her mocked. And I think the sense that people take away from that is that she’s not to be taken seriously.
And that’s why I disagree a little bit with Jeff, because I think that that lowers the expectations for her. And because of the scrutiny she’s been under, it’s natural that those expectations would be lower.
BORGER: And when you hide a candidate, when you sequester a vice presidential candidate, people start asking the question, well, where is she and why haven’t they put her out there and what is there to hide?
BLITZER: Well…
BORGER: And that’s really hurt her.
BLITZER: We’d love to have her here in THE SITUATION ROOM if she’d like to join us. She’s more than welcome.
All right, guys. We’ve got to leave it…
TOOBIN: Wolf…
BLITZER: We’ve got to leave it there.
TOOBIN: Wolf, don’t hold your breath.
BLITZER: I — well, you know, I…
(LAUGHTER)
BLITZER: I’m an upbeat person, an optimist by nature.
TOOBIN: Yes, you are.
BLITZER: All right, guys, stand by.
Thanks very much.
Remember, Thursday night, our coverage for the vice presidential debate will begin right here in THE SITUATION ROOM.
Lou Dobbs is getting ready for his show that begins at the top of the hour and he’s going to give us a preview — Lou?
LOU DOBBS, HOST, “LOU DOBBS TONIGHT”: Well, Wolf, I’m shocked. I wish you guys would take it easy on Joe Biden, because I think you’re being really unfair to him, just because he makes so many more misstatements than Sarah Palin. But, anyway, I’m sure you can sort that out.
Audio
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/09/30/dobbs-biden-makes-many-more-misstatements-sarah-palin

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Re: Campbell Brown & Jon Clown!!! (as in John Klein, President of CNN)
Quote: “I never in a million years thought I would be adding my own comments, but here goes it. First off, I am not committed to any presidential party as of yet, therefore, I am not partial to any one side. Second, I believe for the educated obvious reason, that those who congratulate Ms. Brown are those who undoubtedly do so on a partial basis. This, Ms. Brown/Tucker situation is not about the questions and the alleged unprepared response of the Republican party, and this is not about the Republicans “running from CNN.”
I watched the entire segment unfold and I was appalled. I kept thinking, out loud, as Ms. Brown kept hammering her questions in the interruptive fashion that she continued, “would you just shut up and let him talk.” I was really wondering what CNN would be thinking of this disgrace, of Ms. Brown’s hostility, of Ms. Brown’s very personal agenda, of Ms. Brown’s lack of professionalism and if that was not enough, of Ms. Brown’s conclusive “baby” remark. Wow! Unprofessionalism at its best.
Ms. Brown, this is very personal for you, isn’t it? I have been noting your biased opinions for a long time. I just laughed at how miserable it must be to actually feel so jealous to the point that you literally lose control. I wonder, what got under your skin? This situation was intolerant and hostile, and I would say quite embarrassing. Your colleagues and station know this as well. I can see the “clean up” they are trying to do on your behalf in spite of the fact that John Klein “says” he supports you.
John Klein; bad move not to acknowledge to the public a poor performing employee such as Ms. Brown. Anyway, have it your way Mr. Klein, things have a way of working out in the end. Although I am including an opinion, its really no skin off my back. I can only change what I have control over and I decide for starters to just tune you and yours out. You have had plenty of time to quell Ms. Brown, this situation is not a first, its just the “straw that broke the camels back.” She has been disgusting for a long time. I hope, John Klein, you reprocess your priorities.”
Posted by: Anita A. | September 05, 2008 at 02:14 PM
LA Times
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/campbell-brown.html?cid=129291166#comments

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Miss Obnoxious – Campbel Brown – sooner or later will have the same luck as MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann, who was demoted just a couple of weeks ago for being Mr. Obnoxious!!!!!!
We want the idiots of all 24 hour “news for dummies” networks to give us just the facts – not creating the news according to their personal political agendas.
Miss Brownnose is the worse of all journalists in the history of CNN…she is a disgrace to serious journalism.

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Who is Campbell Brownose…
Let’s Take A Look At Campbell Brown’s Family
by Dave Gibson (9/4/08)
A few days ago, CNN anchor Campbell Brown went on a very personal attack against Republican Vice-Presidential candidate and Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds was giving Brown an interview, when she decided to place the focus of the conversation on the Governor’s 17-year old daughter Bristol, who is pregnant.
Brown said: “Tucker, though, this obviously putting this young woman, Bristol Palin smack in the media spotlight at what’s already got to be a very challenging time in her life. I mean, how do you respond to people who wonder why her mother would have subjected her to this scrutiny by accepting this high-profile position?”
Brown went on to say: “I recognize that in an ideal world, it would be private. You know, this is a presidential campaign. Nothing is private. The world is watching and if we, you know, as much as everyone might want to give this young woman her privacy, you know that’s not going to happen. And so you do risk putting her through an incredibly difficult process by accepting this job if you’re her mother. You can’t deny that, right?”
Well, this is obviously not an ideal world. Nor is it any longer a world in which the press gives legitimate, unbiased coverage to any and all candidates. This is in fact, now a world in which the press has decided to join the side of the leftist Democrat Party, and attack the Republican Party. Night after night, that same press ignores the fact that Barack Obama launched his political career at the home of unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers, while attacking the parenting skills of Sarah Palin.
Since CNN’s Campbell Brown has changed the rules of the game, and it is now evidently appropriate for the mainstream media to question a candidate’s parenting skills and focus on the behavior of the candidate’s family…Then it is also fair to examine the behavior of those related to those members of the press who pose such questions.
In 2003, CNN’s Campbell Brown’s father Jim Brown served six months in federal prison, after being convicted of lying to a federal agent, during a fraud and conspiracy investigation involving Cascade Insurance Co. At the time, Jim Brown was serving as the insurance commissioner of Louisiana, a position which he was forced to resign after the U.S. Supreme Court refused his appeal for the second time. Brown continued that position’s legacy, as the two previous insurance commissioners were convicted of taking bribes and illegal campaign contributions from insurance companies, and still sit in federal prison.
So I would pose this question to Campbell Brown: Since the world is watching you…Do you think it is fair to your father to place this kind of scrutiny on him, since he is a convicted federal criminal? I mean, I know that it has to be painful for him. So don’t you think that you should have ended your journalistic career after he was convicted and resigned in disgrace? You want to be a good daughter don’t you?
We are currently seeing the most illegitimate campaign coverage in U.S. political history. We have seen so-called journalists become nothing more than cheerleaders for the left, and press secretaries for Barack Hussein Obama. In fact, I believe that the Obama campaign should have to list the glowing coverage provided by MSNBC as an in-kind campaign contribution!
I as a true conservative, now find myself in the unusual and uncomfortable position of defending the Republican Party presidential nominee. However, when the left-wing ignores major issues, and so alters their coverage to paint the Democrat as basically the next messiah, and stoops so low as to attack a child…I have no choice.
If those who often cheer for our enemies and hate this nation so much that they would refuse to report the truth as it relates to the success of our troops, as well as to the more than questionable past of Barack Hussein Obama, no one who loves this country has any choice but to support Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin.
http://newsbyus.com/index.php/article/1440
CNN, John McCain’s camp at odds following confrontational Campbell Brown interview
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/campbell-brown.html?cid=129044476#comments

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Campbell Brown: “Why did Palin subject her daughter to this scrutiny?”
Campbell Brown- you are an obnoxious partisan Moron!!!
Next time, wash your mouth before speaking about Palin. Perhaps we should talk about your “daddy”, should we?
Wikipedia: Campbell Brown
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_Brown
HillaryClintonForum.net
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=27154
Palin Sexism Watch Blog:
http://palinsexismwatch.blogspot.com/2008/09/campbell-brown-why-did-palin-subject.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

The mother of all flip-flops:
Iraqi surge exceeded expectations, Obama says
LANCASTER, Pa. – Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama said Thursday that the escalation of U.S. troops in Iraq, which he had opposed, has succeeded in reducing violence “beyond our wildest dreams.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26550764
And, check this out… This latest revelation by Mr. – this is above my pay-grade – Barrack Obama – comes in less than 24 hours after Sarah Palin stated in her acceptance speech that her opponent [Obama] never mentions the word “victory” except when he talks [pretty speeches]about his own campaign!!
Does the man think that we are stupid and perhaps missed that part in Palin’s speech? Or does he think that we are so naive not to realize that he just listens to what the other side or the media say and then he flip-flops according to where the wind is blowing?!
Come on Obama – the American people have already figured you out…When the heat is on, you start flip-flopping left and right – right and left!
Let’s see now if Campbell Brown took notice of this flip-flop by her “Chosen One”!… She is so pathetic – so far, she has not mentioned a thing!!!
Booooooooo, Campbell Brown- make sure nobody attacks your “Obama” icon about his latest…”mother of all flip-flops”!
Question: Could Obama be suffering from “multiple personality disorder”???!!!
NSNBC News
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26550764

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Pollster.com has the results of 17 separate polls, including the respected Gallup and Rasmussen polls. Obama leads McCain in EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

the mother of all flip-flops. MCain on deregulation/regulation.
could he be suffering from “multiple personality disorder?”

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Speaking of double standards….
Ms. Campbell Brown & Jon Clown – as in Jon Klein – President of CNN, and the rest of the “24 hour media circus” had the audacity to question the fact that Palin’s husband had a DUI, 22 years ago! But at the same time I did not once hear the above clowns grilling Obama about his “drug use” and other “extracurricular activities”!!!
Go Sarah Palin! Give some of these pathetic far-left-wing-liberals in the media the medicine that they deserve…Better yet, IGNORE THEM!
Like you said during your RNC acceptance speech – that little “flash news” gesture to the obnoxious media -”I am not going to Washington to seek your good opinion”!!!
C’ est magnifique !!!!!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

she’s not going to Washington, period, Natasha, unless as a visitor.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

They are NOT going to question their “Chosen One” – “God’s Gift to America”!!
Jake Lewis wrote: “I don’t recall Mrs. Brown asking the same tough questions regarding Obama’s lack of foreign policy experience, his drug use, his ties to domestic terrorists, to explain how he purchased a $1.5 million home (yea…middle class) on a state legislature’s salary, his refusal to vote ya or na while serving in the state legislature, or why in his 3 1/2 years as a senator he has not sponsored one important piece of legislation? Oh! I understand now…he speaks well.”
———————————
BINGO!!
Dear Jake Lewis, you hit the nail on the head! But Ms. Campbell Brown and Jon Clown – as in Jon Klein – President of CNN – have been listening apparently to Nancy Pelosi…..they are NOT going to question their “Chosen One” – “God’s Gift to America”, as “Bela” Pelosi refers to Obama!
Can you imagine if Senator McCain had said that Sarah Palin was “God’s gift to America”? They would be reminding him about the separation of Church and State!…
US News & World Report
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/2008/08/29/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-sarah-palin.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Obama would be a great film star…
(Btw, he is the one running for President – NOT Satah Palin!)
1. Yes, Sarah Palin is being drug around in the dirt because she is a Republican woman and how dare the person call Sarah a Caribou Barbie! That is one of the most sexist comments, yet. Also, for the one who called her “trailer trash” that just shows to me that it is not the Republicans who are elitists but the Democrats.This should be very offensive to those whose homes are trailers and who don’t make a six figure income.
2.It keeps coming up about the Bridge to Nowhere. Obama has ALSO been in favor of MANY things and then changed his mind….Israel/Pakistan…Russian/Georgia, etc. but NO-ONE dwells on that. In fact, he can’t make a decision; he just goes with the flow after asking dozens of advisors. He is charmismatic, I will give him that but charisma isn’t what we need. Some of you mentioned that McCain’s heroism doesn’t qualify him for the White House…well,okay then…neither does being a charismatic celebrity. Obama would be a great film star. He loves the spotlight. He’s an eloquent speaker. I’ve heard that John McCain is not. Hmmm…someone who’s become good at smoothly eloquent speaking probably has learned to make words work for him and twist them when necessary and people won’t even notice.
3. I’ve noticed that some are comparing Palin’s lack of experience and background to Obama. How come they are not doing the same comparison on McCain and Obama? Why is Joe Biden not the one that is being compared to her? At least, I have not seen much to that;maybe someone can fill me in on somewhere I could see this.
4. It seems Palin has so many sins in her life and McCain, too. Then,I guess the Democrats are without sin. They are presenting themselves as perfect. Too bad the voters are not nearly as perfect as Obama. In the Bible, there was a story about an adulteress that was getting ready to be stoned to death. Jesus told them “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” The Dems have done a great job of casting the stones and hitting Palin.
And, let’s not forget the Democrat who was President, and even though I’m not a Democrat, he did a decent job of the duties in office, yet he was an adulterer while in the office that he was elected to, disappointing Americans, but in this whole election,no one, not even the Republicans (except this one) has brought that up;(which is right thing NOT to do)maybe, it is because we all have skeletons in our closet. Have you ever thought what would come out if you ran for office?
5. The newstands are full of articles tearing Palin down, but I’ve yet to see the faces of Obama (the liberal media’s little darling) or Joe Biden on the covers presented in a negative way. I agree with one blogger who said that these publications are only ruining themselves. Let’s do real journalistic reporting…report the facts, Jack on both sides, both negative and positive and let the readers decide. I would absolutely LOVE to see an article in a mag that compares Obama to McCain and in the same mag Palin to Biden, side by side on issues, skeletons in the closets, biographies, awards and honors….maybe in the form of resumes so the American public could compare and then at the polls hire the ticket they think would be the best for the job.
6. Finally, and then, I’m through. I understand it may be good to understand the candidates’ views based on their faith but it is a little undeserving to undermine one for “praying” that God’s will be done. Our country was founded on a faith in the One True God, The Creator and our laws and values were built upon the Christian faith, but now, it’s not politically correct to be a Christian,no one must renounce their deep beliefs in order to please everyone. I couldn’t see one bit of hatred in the video that has been circulating where she spoke at her church in Alaska. Praying for someone does not cause hatred or racism or sexism. Their beliefs in their faith did not say they hated gays,only that they would be praying for them. And, in the privacy of a church building, they may do whatever (within the law) that they believe. Now that Obama has disowned his pastor, no one has mentioned anymore about how that church shaped his views. They are afraid to because of the venomous rhetoric that came from the pastor’s mouth. Does anyone know what Biden believes;have they gone to a church he attends or does he attend one? What about McCain? What are his religious values? So, then, why does that play into the equation with Palin? I could understand if she were part of an anti-government,hate religion. The most she could be convicted of in her faith is saying that she believes in praying to God, asking His will for the country. Go back in history to other presidents; many were men who prayed or sought God’s will. At least, the great ones did.
Thank you, both Republicans and Democrats for letting me air my feelings. How, sometimes I wish we didn’t have parties. I can’t stand the division and hatred that ensues. Especially when we say “United we stand, Divided we fall.” Let’s just let each other vote our consciences or faith or whatever standard and quit yelling at each other. I really hope that people in other countries don’t read our comments because it will show the United States are not so united after all. And…I will be praying for this election, that God will put in the candidates He wants (and, although I will vote Republican which is voting based on my faith) I know that whichever party gets in will be because God put them there “for such a time as this” and I will relax and support the Preident of the United States and respect the office.
Posted by: Gloria | September 09, 2008 at 01:43 AM
LA Times
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/campbell-brown.html?cid=130091336

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

McCain has 19 former lobbyists for Freddie/Fannie working in his campaign. McCain leads in the dollar amount received in contributions from Freddie/Fannie. McCain called himself a “de-regulator” 17 times in the last six years. McCain voted 90% of the time with Bush, yet calls himself a “maverick?” McCain voted against veterans health care bills 5 times since 2003, voted against safety equipement like flak jackets for reservists, voted against mandatory rest periods between deployments and was against the new GI Bill and yet claims to be a great supporter of the military? P L E A S E!

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

McCain was against regulation before he was for it. It’d be funny if it wasn’t pathetic.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

William J. LePetomaine wrote: “she’s not going to Washington, period, Natasha, unless as a visitor.”
Once the investigations about Obama’s “sweet-heart deals” with confirmed terrorists such as Ayers, etc. are over, perhaps we could send Obama bin Biden back to Kenya and not even allow him to come back to the United States even as a visitor…
A must watch for ALL Americans:
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Barney Frank’s Fannie (Mae) Love Connection
Barney Frank, the pansy in chief of the House Financial Services Committee, has an ex-spouse in the employ of Fannie Mae.
Prominent Democrats ran Fannie Mae, the same government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that donated campaign cash to top Democrats. And one of Fannie Mae’s main defenders in the House – Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., a recipient of more than $40,000 in campaign donations from Fannie since 1989 – was once romantically involved with a Fannie Mae executive.
The media coverage of Frank’s coziness with Fannie Mae and his pro-Fannie Mae stances has been lacking. Of the eight appearances Frank made on the three broadcasts networks between Jan. 1, 2008, and Sept. 21, 2008, none of his comments dealt with the potential conflicts of interest. Only six of the appearances dealt with the economy in general and two of those appearances, including an April 6, 2008 appearance on CBS’s “60 Minutes” were about his opposition to a manned mission to Mars.
Frank has argued that family life “should be fair game for campaign discussion,” wrote the Associated Press on Sept. 2. The comment was in reference to GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin and her pregnant daughter. “They’re the ones that made an issue of her family,” the Massachusetts Democrat said to the AP.
The news media have covered the relationship in the past, but there have been no mentions since 2005, according to Nexis and despite the collapse of Fannie Mae. The July 3, 1998, Reliable Source column in The Washington Post reported Frank, who is openly gay, had a relationship with Herb Moses, an executive for the now-government controlled Fannie Mae. The column revealed the two had split up at the time but also said Frank was referring to Moses as his “spouse.” Another Washington Post report said Frank called Moses his “lover” and that the two were “still friends” after the breakup.
Stuck on Stupid
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Obama was 8 years old when Ayers was with the Weathermen, Natasha. Obama knew him as a professor at the Univ. of Ill. Chicago. On the other hand, the convicted felon and economic terrorist Charles Keating, who ruined thousands of individuals, was a bosom buddy to McCain.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

good thing Barney Frank is not running for President. LOL @ Natasha, grasping desperately at straws

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

The Obama Campaign Admits Barack H. Was A Kenyan Citizen Until 1982
Barack Obama’s own website designed to fight the alleged smears against him and his campaign admits that Barack Obama was, in fact, a Kenya citizen until 1982.
Will the MSM pick up on this?
FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

What about McCain’s good buddy, pastor and endorser the Rev. Haage, Natasha? Familiar with his pronouncements? McCain has yet to repudiate him.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Exposed! The Democrats’ Coverup Of The Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Crisis (video)
This video is a must watch… (please follow link)….
http://stuckon-stupid.com/

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

The fact that Kenya recognizes dual citizenship or automatically considers those born to their citizens has NO effect on US Law, Natasha. Learn your facts! Hawaii was a state by 1961. US law has NEVER recognized dual citizenship. Get a better argument. And what is your point about using his middle name?

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Obama’s Class War “So Wrong for America”
Friday, September 19, 2008
Lynn Forester de Rothschild, appearing on Campbell Brown’s “Election Center” on CNN, offered one of the most trenchant arguments against Barack Obama’s presidential campaign I’ve heard in months.
Forester de Rothschild grew up in middle class New Jersey, and she says the class war Barack Obama would declare is “so wrong for America,” via Newsbusters:
Here’s the introduction from her Wall Street Journal essay:
If Barack Obama loses the presidential election, it may well be the result of a public perception that he is detached and elitist — a politician whose expressions of empathy for hard-working Americans stem more from abstract solidarity than a real connection to the lives of millions of citizens.
Suggestions that Sen. Obama has failed to relate to working- and middle-class voters in swing states have dogged his campaign for months. His choice of Sen. Joseph Biden as his running mate only marginally corrects the problem.
While Obama supporters attempt to dismiss the charges about their candidate’s perceived hauteur, they confuse privilege and elitism. Elitism is a state of mind, a view of the world that cannot be measured simply by one’s net worth, position or number of houses.
Source:
American Power Blog
http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/obamas-class-war-so-wrong-for-america.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Even though Obama is a Christian, I must wonder if you are a hater of Muslims, Natasha? What percentage of the world’s Muslims are terrorists, do you think? Let’s say there are a billion Muslims in the world. Ten percent? That would be 100 million terrorists? there could not even be 1% that are terrorists. So if the number of Muslims that are terrorists is very small, what are you saying by using his middle name? What about our citizens who are peaceful, law abiding Muslims?

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Guess you cannot answer any questions

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

“Concerns About Palin Grow, Even Among Conservatives”
Christian Science Monitor, 9/30/08

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“Palin’s Conservative Problem”
Washington Post blog, 9/30/08

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

“Conservatives Against Palin: The List is Growing”
Huffington Post, 10/1/08

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 1, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Tired of uneducated losers posting messages…
Hey, uneducated left wing liberals – do you even know what the “Truman Doctrine” is? I am certain that McCain and Palin do, trust me….
otherwise you are in for a big surprise – the best is yet to come from Sarah Palin!!
History 101 for the uneducated left-wing-liberals led by “geopolitically” inept and clueless “Campbell Brown, CNN Family & Friends”
History Lesson 1: Truman Doctrine
video ID:
wmQD_W8Pcxg
History Lesson 2: NATO vs. Russia
video ID:
vU8bbgzfJu8

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Palin4President wrote: “Obama would like to have tea with the terrorists.”
———————————–
Yeap, and the location…downtown Tehran. He will be having tea while he watches the President of Iran and his “puppets” hanging a few people in public view…
I am Natasha and approve this message
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoul-10.html?cid=133000497#comment-133000497

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Some fool wrote: “Barack Obama believes in globalism.”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoul-10.html?cid=133000497#comment-133000497
—————————————
Barack Obama believes in Marxism.
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Quote: “We do need any more whinny republicans to destroy it [the economy] further. Go Home McCain/Palin.” Posted by: The One
————————————
Reply to “The One”:
We do not need a Congress controlled by the Democrats to destroy the country and the economy further. That is exactly what they did in the last two years that THE DEMOCRATS had control in both the Senate and the House. What did the Democratic MORONS do for two years, other than sitting around doing absolutely NOTHING – NADA….NADA! It is NOT the President that makes the laws – he just signs them! It is your freaking left-wing liberal representatives that have the lowest approval rating ever in the history of any Congress – even a lower aproval rating than President Bush!
Go Home Obama bin Biden.
Source:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/campbell-brown.html?cid=129044476#comments

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

William J. LePetomaine wrote: “Blah blah blah…What about our citizens who are peaceful, law abiding Muslims?”
————————————-
I have absolutely nothing against our law abiding Muslim citizens – unless of course they have had “sweet heart” dealings with domestic terrorists, marxists, drug dealers etc. In that case they are not soooo “law abiding citizens”.
Obama’s Terrorist Bill Ayers
Dakota Voice, SD – 9 hours ago
This video puts things into context for those folks who so far just haven’t wanted to deal with this dirty fact surrounding Barack Obama. Bill Ayers, as you … (story continuous below)
Dacota Voice
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2008/10/obamas-terrorist-bill-ayers.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

AmericanAndProud wrote:
“[Natasha]Fear not little one, the big scary black man is here to help you, not to cause harm. The fear should be in grandpa who wants to go to war with the world, and that little one, will not happen as long as there are intelligent rational people in this country who vote based on reason instead of fear.”
Reply to AmericanAndProud:
Oh yeah, let’s turn this to a “race” issue! How convenient, indeed!
The truth is that while I have tremendous respect for a “humble” big black man, whose name is Collin Powell, I have absolutely NO respect for the “arrogant” little black man, whose name is Barack Obama. Get it, baby?!
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoul-10.html?cid=133000497#comment-133000497

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I bet, Obama does not even know what “NATO ACT” stands for.
NATO Allied Command Transformation Command Video
NATO ACT Command Video “We are NATO’s forcing agent for …
Search Google for video ID:
v=ryuQ0EznYy8

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

For than matter, I doubt if even Biden knows what “NATO ACT” stands for! It would be soooo funny, if Palin was Biden that question and Biden’s answer was sometging like “it means that NATO gets its ACT together” or something like that! Obama would dump him from the ticket – once of course he learned himself what NATO ACT really means!… :-)
For those of you, who want to be enlightened in global geopolitical and national secutity issues, search for the official “NATO Allied Command Transformation” – Command Video
NATO ACT Command Video
“We are NATO’s forcing agent for change, leading the continuous improvement of Alliance capabilities to uphold NATO’s global security interests.”
For more information visit:
http://www.act.nato.int
Or search google for video ID #:
v=ryuQ0EznYy8

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Perhaps, some of you left-wing-liberals would be able to understand why Palin keeps repeating the statement “Alaska is so close to Russia” if you had some clue of what NATO ACT is…
Trust me – it is not what you may think. In fact, somewhere here you will hear something about “proximity to the United States”…
NATO ACT stands for “NATO ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION”
And here is the official NATO ACT COMMAND video:
NATO ACT Command Video
“We are NATO’s forcing agent for change, leading the continuous improvement of Alliance capabilities to uphold NATO’s global security interests.”
For more information visit:
http://www.act.nato.int
Or search google for video ID #:
v=ryuQ0EznYy8

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Timmy – “Palin is an idiot plane and simple. What is scary is that people are more interested in sticking by their team (republicans) rather than just be honest this women is plane dumb and would be better qualified to work the McDonalds counter than any other job.”
Um, Timmy: Ever hear the one about glass houses and stones? “Plane and simple”? More ironic yet – “plane dumb”?
I would suggest you learn to spell before you pick up that next stone.

Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

To uneducated and geopolitically inept left-wing-liberals:
If you think that Sarah Palin as the Governor of Alaska – a state that is only 1.5 miles away from the Russian border – is NOT in the loop of NATO ACT such as this one below – either you are really naive or you must be smoking something funny!!
May 16, 2008
ACT and JFCOM host Joint Forces Reserve Orientation Course – videocast
VIDEOCAST
http://www.act.nato.int/media/5-Multimedia/Vidcasts/080514jfroc.wmv
For a more information regarding ACT:
NATO ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION
http://www.act.nato.int/
NATO ACT Multimedia Library
http://www.act.nato.int/content.asp?pageid=520

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

To uneducated and geopolitically inept left-wing-liberals:
This is just one example as to why Palin keeps referring to “Russia’s proximity to Alaska”.
To the obmoxious Catie Curic, Campbell Brown, and the rest of the media clowns:
Have you understood yet what Governor Palin was trying to tell you – idiots – when she made the comment about Russia’s Putin peaking into our airspace?
Read on media partisan morons…(and this below is NOT an isolated incident, trust me).
Russia bombers get NATO escort near Alaska:
Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:51am EDT
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL2659163020080326?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

To the media morons and all other left-wing-liberals-socialists-communists:
Just do a Google search with keywords:
NATO+ALASKA+RUSSIAN+BOMBERS
Now, perhaps you can shut-up and stop making fun of Palin’s remarks about Russia’s Putin peaking into our airspace…idiots!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Google search…
Results 1 – 10 of about 53,000 for NATO ALASKA RUSSIAN BOMBERS
Just one of the “eye catching” items about which Americans are clueless. We have fallen asleep a long time ago because the liberal media simply does NOT want the voters to know – they do NOT want McCain to use it as a campaign talking point, you know…(they think that we are stupid)
There you have it…
NATO fighters again accompany Russian bombers near Alaska
RIA Novosti
09/04/2008 12:11 MOSCOW, April 9 (RIA Novosti) – NATO fighters accompanied Russian Tu-95 Bear strategic bombers on a regular strategic patrol flight on Wednesday, a Russian Air Force spokesman said.
Four Bear bombers and four Il-78 aerial tankers conducted a patrol mission over the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean and performed aerial refueling, which is the second exercise of Russian bombers near Alaska in three weeks.
“During the flight over neutral waters near Alaska, the Russian planes were accompanied by NATO fighters,” Colonel Alexander Drobyshevsky said.
Interceptions of Russian combat aircraft by NATO fighters have been a common occurrence since Russia resumed strategic bomber patrol flights over the Pacific, Atlantic, and Arctic oceans last August, following an order signed by President Vladimir Putin.
Drobyshevsky reiterated that regular patrols of Russian strategic bombers do not pose a threat to other countries, and Russia always issues prior warnings of their patrols.
He said that the main purpose of these missions was to train pilots in instrument flight and aerial refueling.
Source:
Global Security
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2008/04/mil-080409-rianovosti04.htm

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Just last month…
How is it that we are not hearing anything about this from our “24 hour news-for-dummies” networks???!!!
BBC News
Last Updated: Friday, 17 August 2007, 16:37 GMT 17:37 UK
Russia restarts Cold War patrols
Russia is resuming a Soviet-era practice of sending its bomber aircraft on long-range flights, President Vladimir Putin has said.
Mr Putin said the move to resume the flights permanently after a 15-year suspension was in response to security threats posed by other military powers.
He said 14 bombers had taken off from Russian airfields early on Friday.
The move came a week after Russian bombers flew within a few hundred miles of the US Pacific island of Guam.
A few days ago Moscow said its strategic bombers had begun exercises over the North Pole.
Flexing muscles
“We have decided to restore flights by Russian strategic aviation on a permanent basis,” Mr Putin told reporters at joint military exercises with China and four Central Asian states in Russia’s Ural mountains.
“In 1992, Russia unilaterally ended flights by its strategic aircraft to distant military patrol areas. Unfortunately, our example was not followed by everyone,” Mr Putin said, in an apparent reference to the US.
“Flights by other countries’ strategic aircraft continue and this creates certain problems for ensuring the security of the Russian Federation,” he said.
In Washington, state department spokesman Sean McCormack played down the significance of Russia’s move, saying: “We certainly are not in the kind of posture we were with what used to be the Soviet Union.”
“If Russia feels as though they want to take some of these old aircraft out of mothballs and get them flying again, that’s their decision,” he told reporters.
One of the reasons Russia halted its flights 15 years ago was that it could no longer afford the fuel.
Today Moscow’s coffers are stuffed full of oil money, says the BBC’s Rupert Wingfield-Hayes in Moscow, and the Kremlin is determined to show it is still a military power to reckon with.
‘Shadowed by Nato’
Russian media reported earlier on Friday that long-range bombers were airborne, and that Nato jets were shadowing them.
Itar-Tass quoted Russian air force spokesman Alexander Drobyshevsky as saying: “At present, several pairs of Tu-160 and Tu-95MS aircraft are in the air over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, which are accompanied by Nato planes.”
Nato said it was aware of the flights but had no comment on whether Nato planes were in attendance.
In last week’s incident near Guam, the Russian pilots “exchanged smiles” with US fighter pilots who scrambled to track them, a Russian general said.
The US military confirmed the presence of the Russian bombers near Guam, home to a large US base.
Last month two Tupolev 95 aircraft – dubbed “bears” according to their Nato code-name – strayed south from their normal patrol pattern off the Norwegian coast and headed towards Scotland. Two RAF Tornado fighters were sent up to meet them.
Russian bombers have also recently flown close to US airspace over the Arctic Ocean near Alaska.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/6950986.stm
Published: 2007/08/17 16:37:09 GMT
© BBC MMVIII

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

REUTERS
Russia bombers get NATO escort near Alaska: reports
Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:51am EDT
MOSCOW (Reuters) – NATO forces sent jets to escort two Russian long-range air force bombers patrolling neutral skies near Alaska on Wednesday, Russian news agencies quoted the defense ministry as saying.
Russia’s military has resumed its Cold War practice of flying regular patrols far beyond its borders, and in the last year has also sent turbo-prop Tu-95s over U.S. naval aircraft carriers and the Pacific island of Guam.
Accompanied by two Il-78 refueling tankers, the two Tu-95 “Bear” bombers flew for 15 hours over the Arctic and Pacific oceans, Interfax news agency quoted Russian Air Force spokesman Alexander Drobyshevsky as saying.
“In the course of the air patrol, long-range aviation aircraft were escorted by NATO jets in the region of Alaska,” said Drobyshevsky.
Originally designed to drop nuclear bombs, the Tu-95, Russia’s equivalent of the U.S. air force’s B-52, is a Cold War icon refitted for surveillance and maritime patrols.
Russia, in the eighth year of an economic boom driven by high global oil prices, has raised military funding after years of neglect following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The Russian navy has finished construction of mothballed submarines and restarted large-scale naval exercises that shortages of fuel and spare parts had made a rarity.
Analysts say the Kremlin is using its reviving military might to support a policy of projecting Russia’s power again on the world stage.
But some military observers say the Russian armed forces are still hampered by a shortage of combat-ready assets and that the exercises are primarily a public relations exercise.
(Reporting by Chris Baldwin; Editing by Catherine Evans)
Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USL2659163020080326

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

If the fact that the left-wing-liberals have shut-up here is a preview of how Palin will make Biden swallow his tongue – for a change – tomorrow’s debate shall prove “quite interesting”
:-)

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Dan wrote: “The only place where Sarah Palin would be of good use is in my bed.” Posted by: Dan
————————————
Has anybody told you that you are a sexist PIG !!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Joey wrote: “Katie, just another dumb blonde, guess your trying to make up for your lack of experience in journalism!!!!!!!!!!”
Reply to Joey:
Ahaha!! You hit the nail on the head!
Catie Curic is a dumb blonde and Campbell Brown is the definition of “shrill” – a mean and rude brownose.
:-)

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

MSNBC Live Vote
Do you think PBS’ Gwen Ifill was a smart choice to moderate the vice presidential debate? * 107944 responses
Yes, her stellar political record speaks for itself.
30%
No, there is a clear conflict between her moderating duties and the book she’s authoring.
70%
Not a scientific survey. Results may not total 100% due to rounding.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26979447/?GT1=43001

Posted by: Natasha | October 1, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Governor Palin – A Star Is Born!!
Appropriate finale for last night’s debate!
A USA Military History (Tchaikovsky 1812 Overture)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6370539579217643597&hl=en
God Bless America!
McCain for President 2008!
Palin for President 2012!

Posted by: Natasha | October 3, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

Congratulations Governor Palin! You have warmed our hearts with your honesty and humble straight talk! This is exactly what our country needs!!
Keep smiling, you are on your way, America’s Princess !!
America salutes you and Senator McCain!
Handel’s Music for the Royal Fireworks
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/prom-palace-music-for-the-royal-fireworks/416649911
God Bless America!

Posted by: Natasha | October 3, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

nopalin2009 wrote: “I was embarrased for Palin. If McCain-Palin win in November, then America has truly gone to hell.”
Reply to nopalin2009:
Hmmm, speaking of who is truly going to hell…Is your name Keith Olberman? Or perhaps Campbell Brown?
The left wing liberals, socialists, marxists – Obama bin Biden supporters – and all “24-hour-news-for-dummies” networks are truly the ones going straight to hell…trust me, BABY!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 3, 2008, 5:50 am 5:50 am

Some fool wrote: “Barack Obama believes in globalism.”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoul-10.html?cid=133000497#comment-133000497
—————————————
Barack Obama believes in Marxism.
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | October 14, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.