Sep 11, 2008 5:07pm

The Palin Interview

Charlie Gibson has just finished his first interview with Sarah Palin. It’s a global tour — Iraq and Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Georgia and Russia, and America’s place in the world. For all of you who were concerned — Charlie asked plenty of follow-ups. There were also questions about her general qualifications to be Vice President. Or Commander-In-Chief. Here are a couple of excerpts. Much more on World News this evening. GIBSON: Governor, let me start by asking you a question that I asked John McCain about you, and it is really the central question. Can you look the country in the eye and say "I have the experience and I have the ability to be not just vice president, but perhaps president of the United States of America?" PALIN: I do, Charlie, and on January 20, when John McCain and I are sworn in, if we are so privileged to be elected to serve this country, we’ll be ready. I’m ready. GIBSON: And you didn’t say to yourself, "Am I experienced enough? Am I ready? Do I know enough about international affairs? Do I — will I feel comfortable enough on the national stage to do this?" PALIN: I didn’t hesitate, no. GIBSON: Didn’t that take some hubris? PALIN: I — I answered him yes because I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can’t blink, you have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we’re on, reform of this country and victory in the war, you can’t blink. So I didn’t blink then even when asked to run as his running mate. **************************** GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, "Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God." Are we fighting a holy war? PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote. GIBSON: Exact words. PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words. But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side. That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie. GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, "There is a plan and it is God’s plan." PALIN: I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that those are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That, in my world view, is a grand — the grand plan. GIBSON: But then are you sending your son on a task that is from God? PALIN: I don’t know if the task is from God, Charlie. What I know is that my son has made a decision. I am so proud of his independent and strong decision he has made, what he decided to do and serving for the right reasons and serving something greater than himself and not choosing a real easy path where he could be more comfortable and certainly safer. ***STAY TUNED***

User Comments

From Rove’s lips to Palin’s mouth… no answers, no facts.

Posted by: Buster | September 11, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

I was scared about Sarah Palin before, but now I’m terrified.
In that excerpt above, she used 346 words and said NOTHING, and answered NOTHING!
The Emperor has no clothes…

Posted by: Andrea | September 11, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Gov Sarah Palin is really a concern, she is not doing well, she is not common, she is very rare. I am really scared off her answers to crucial issues facing America. She is a real mujahedeen who is out of control. America doesnot need more wars, but economical prosperity in a peaceful world. Please God save America from McPalin, warmongers and fearmongers.

Posted by: BKMC | September 11, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Charlie, Charlie, Charlie,
I once respected you. You asked, you hound Obama with the tough questions. Why did you go light on Palin? Why? Why? Why? Her first interview is with you and you put on the kid gloves, put her over your shoulder and burp the pit bull. No wonder they selected you to be the first…Please regain your objectivity and quit thinking with your…Please! I used to think you were better than that!

Posted by: Terresa | September 11, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Maybe she should have stopped and thought, “Gee, my daughter’s unmarried and pregnant at 17. Maybe I should consider her feelings?”

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

So neither John nor Palin thought about whether she was ready to be President? Good to know.

Posted by: Keith | September 11, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

What he needed to ask was something along these lines: “You’ve travelled very little outside of the US, and you have never seriously studied history, geography, political science, economics, international relations, or anything else related to the foreign policy dimensions of the job of Vice President. So what exactly are your qualifications for this part of the job?”

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

She’s nobodys fool. YOU GO GIRL!!!

Posted by: millertime | September 11, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Sarah Palin is someone who has my respect and i believe she and McCain will lead our country on the path that leads to prosperity and peace!

Posted by: amy | September 11, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Interesting… everyone is focusing on Palin’s qualifications, not McCain’s, yet Obama is the least experienced of all.. Very interesting

Posted by: Bill | September 11, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Wow, hard-hitting stuff.

Posted by: bartholi | September 11, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

She’s Rove’s fool. She’s Limbaugh’s fool. She’s Bush’s fool. She’s McCain’s fool.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Go Sarah and McCain!

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

No Bill – Obama is somebody who has put in the time, studied, and obviously knows a great deal about foreign policy. Palin is obviously someone who knows nothing about it. That’s the difference.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Reading those excerpts, i didn’t learn anything about her policy positions. What does this woman actually stand for?

Posted by: doug | September 11, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

And exactly when has Obama been asked a tough question other then on O’Reilly?
I’d heard this place was ultra left. It might have been understated…

Posted by: Guvner | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

But apparently Charlie is Palin’s fool. BTW, Obama is definitely more experienced than Palin.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Gibson, has was not accurate when he quoted this and stated Palin said this:
“Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?”
When in fact she said this:
“Our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God…That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that plan is God’s plan”.

Posted by: T. Smigh | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

The Obama team is on the ball!!! I bet they were just waiting for the first words so that they could offer their own spin before anyone else got to it.

Posted by: Frank | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Arrogant, arrogant, arrogant.

Posted by: Zack | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

We knew that he’d lob softballs with no follow-up so this is no surprise. Nice backdrop too, a comfortable walk on a path. Can it get any easier for this chick?

Posted by: Ohioangel | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

I mean, what better, harder-hitting follow-up to “are you qualified?” then “no, really–are you qualified?” Excellent job, Chuck.

Posted by: bartholi | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

don’t forget Hannity

Posted by: bc46 | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

She handled those questions honestly and fairly…she makes good points and it is hard to pin anything against her without looking like a hatchet-man from the liberal left ! The are squirming like worms on a hot rock right now !

Posted by: bob | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

doug, she stands for distraction. She stands for smoke and mirrors. She stands for ignoring the issues.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Palin’s son joined the army because Mom and Dad couldn’t handle him anymore. It’s all coming out, and there isn’t anything patriotic about his enlisting. Lots of young people when they get into trouble are given the option of enlisting or facing jail time.

Posted by: Phillip | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

I don’t have any problems with the way Palin answered those questions. Seems very reasonable to me!
I think the far left are afraid that Palin is some kind of hard-core religious person.
Well, she goes to a non-denominational church since 2002, and she believes that abstinence should be taught in schools, but she is NOT against sex ed. Palin never banned any books. Palin even vetoed a bill that was against GAYS.
You guys need to understand where her passion is: it’s in fighting corruption, reforming Washington, and energy independence.
Her passion is NOT about going after gays, or people who have sex, and she does not come across as a religious zealot at all.
There ARE democrats in Alaska and they like her.
Her own husband Todd is an independent.
Haven’t you guys figured out that McCain/ Palin are the closest thing to “independent/ republicans” we have ever seen?
Since when did we have a republican like McCain, who believes we need to fight global warming??
You guys need to chill, these are not the republicans we have been used to.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

ok so what experience in anything but voting PRESENT!!! does Obama have??? who is number one on the ticket??? i believe the main reason you dont hear him talking to much about Palin is because he has NO record to run on!

Posted by: carrie | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

At least she didn’t say something like: “Charlie, when comes to my experience or Senator Obama’s experience to be Vice President of this great land, let’s call a spade a spade – no one can really be ready.”

Posted by: Chas | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Obama has put in the time??? How about McCain… If your vote is for experience, then why are you siding for Obama… Think about it for a little bit… In my opinion, Biden is more qualified to be president than Obama. Biden himself said Obama is inexperienced yet NO ONE said anything about McCain’s experience.

Posted by: Bill | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

There is a certain degree of naivete in that answer about Russia. Do McCain and Palin believe that the world need another hardliners after the 8 years of Bush? I am sure that European will be wary of this kind of stance.

Posted by: Lance D. | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

If there was any doubt at all…she is 100% politician. If I was a hockey Mom I’d be ticked by her assertion that she is one of them!

Posted by: Jeff | September 11, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Obama has put in the time??? How about McCain… If your vote is for experience, then why are you siding for Obama… Think about it for a little bit… In my opinion, Biden is more qualified to be president than Obama. Biden himself said Obama is inexperienced yet NO ONE said anything about McCain’s experience.

Posted by: Bill | September 11, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

disgusted in Illinois
I am with you. I am very interested in what she will have to say.

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Terresa, you’re right. Remember he can’t seem to be too tough on a women! She needs to be treated like all other candidates. No special treatment. If she can’t handle it then get out!

Posted by: Alma | September 11, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

…Well I guess we will see then won’t we? Ultimately we will know who Sarah Palin is…

Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

This country is going to need alot more than any “God” to help, if she & McCain get elected! I am scared at the possibility of two “shoot from the hip” candidates getting elected, who could literally tear this country to shreds! And I am embarassed this has even been allowed to happen.
OBAMA-BIDEN 2008!

Posted by: nicole | September 11, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

The Obama team is on the ball!!!
——
That’s right. ENOUGH! We’re going to talk about issues whether you like it or not.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Really tough questions, ABC! McCain and Palin should hire Charlie Gibson as press secretary if they get elected.

Posted by: Ray | September 11, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

I love it. “I didn’t blink.” That’s what makes you qualified? Not taking time to consider the implications?
We’ve already had to stomach one two many presidents who rule from their gut. Can’t wait to have somebody who uses his head for a change.

Posted by: mike | September 11, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Yet, we have not had ONE decent answer from Mr. Obama to this all important question:
“Mr. Obama, what have you accomplished that should make us confident that YOU are ready to be President?”
If you are going to vet Palin with this, fine, but you need to be fair and pin down Obama to answer that, without him droning on and changing the subject!
I have NO confidence in Obama, and he is at the helm, closer than a heartbeat from the Presidency! So before you go asking questions about Palin, you need to ask these questions more urgently to Obama. 2 years on the campaign and we still don’t know a lot about him.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 11, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Bill,
Hillary said McCain had something to offer but Obama just has a speech he gave back in 2002.

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

I think America will be okay with McCain-Palin for the next 4 years … and then we will have our greatest President ever, Hillary Clinton!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | September 11, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

NADA, NADA, NADA. SHE IS PURE THEATRICAL GESTURES AND LOUD VOICE. SUBSTANCE WHERE IS IT? OR IS IT THAT YOU DID NOT ASK WHAT YOU SHOUD HAVE ASKED. BUT AFTER ALL THANKS. WITH YOUR INTERVIEW SHE PROVED TO BE NADA, NADA, NADA

Posted by: TOTY | September 11, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

When you apply for a job and is asked if you think you are ready for job, will you say “No, I am not”? What a dumb question! We are the boss and only us can say if she is qualified for the job.

Posted by: CT | September 11, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Just curious (seriously). How many of you Palin defenders would also vote Bush into another term?

Posted by: Jeff | September 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I am so ready for the issues.
Why won’t Obama debate?

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

what a joke this country has become…

Posted by: travy | September 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Hey Bill: Obama is a person who reads books (unlike Palin – well, she probably reads the Bible…). Who studies and knows history (unlike Palin). Who travels broadly and internationally (unlike Palin). Who is interested in the details of foreign policy (unlike Palin). Who has surrounded himself with experienced foreign policy and security experts (unlike Palin). Who taught at a respected University (unlike Palin). Deal with it, your candidate found the least qualified person possible and put her on the ticket, cynically knowing that ignoramouses like you would love her cause “she’s just like us.” In other words, a clueless, bigoted, religious fanatic.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

U are asking what Palins foreign policies are, yes of course she wants a war with Russia.

Posted by: Neil | September 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I have never voted for Bush and I wouldn’t now.

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

They are exactly the Republicans we are used to. Sarah Palin doesn’t believe man causes global warming. She doesn’t believe the polar bear should be labeled endangered. She doesn’t believe in evolution. She doesn’t believe in a woman’s right to choose. What’s new here?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

@doug: “Reading those excerpts, i didn’t learn anything about her policy positions. What does this woman actually stand for?”
The answer is: whatever her trainers tell her she stands for. She’s a tool being used by the GOP behind which they can attack and repeat lies repeatedly, and if anyone questions her they shoot back with victimhood and sexism charges.

Posted by: mos | September 11, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Will the drive-by media sit down and ask Obama if he is ready to lead the country? Let’s ask him the same questions about his experience. The drive-by media will not do that because they are biased and sexist! Who exactly is this man, Obama, and what are his associations? Who were is college friends? George Stefanopois went to Columbia at the same time. Did he or any of his friends know Obama? Obama lived off campus in a neighborhood controlled by Haitian drug gangs. His roommate was a huge druggie!

Posted by: Colonel Reb | September 11, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Ms. Palin, how much do you love your country?
Ms. Palin, if America was an animal, what kind of animal would it be?

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Aside from that, the fact that she says she NEVER EVEN THOUGHT about whether she was qualified to properly govern the country shows that she’s not putting country first by any means.

Even if someone is completely confident in themselves, if they REALLY loved their country, surely they would pause at least once and ask if it would be the best thing for the nation. Seriously, come on.

Posted by: mos | September 11, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Obama has agreed to debates.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

What strikes me most from this excerpt
is Gov. Palin’s decisiveness in contrast
to Sen. Obama. I want somone in the White House who our enemies fear and know has the decisiveness to pull the trigger if prompted. Would Sen. Obama check the political climate first? It is beyond his scope of mentality to think of any cause except “himself”, let alone a cause bigger than himself.

Posted by: Sherry | September 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Well Mary Lou – I’m guessing its the fact that we know Obama is an intelligent, well-read, and well-traveled person, while Palin is a close-minded, small-town, Bible-thumping redneck. Yeah, that might have something to do with why we (and the entire rest of the world) prefer Obama.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Americans are fools. The packaging of Palin proves it. This is no different than a High School Student body election. We get exactly what we deserve $4+ gas forever, endless wars and a Gov’t run by Corporate America.

Posted by: AlingtonSon | September 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Palin is an extremist. She says that “Iraq is a task from God” and talks about “God’s plan”. This is like saying Iraq is Jihad, a holy war. Whoa! We don’t need another person in power that feels God is giving them instructions, we’ve already had Bush and we can see how well that worked out. Let’s not follow “cowboy diplomacy” with “pitbull madness” (although I think she gives pitbulls a bad name). No way, no how, no Palin.

Posted by: Judy | September 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Palin did mean it when she said HER God has a “plan.” And that plan includes NO CHOICE for women&Creationsim being taught in our schools. I know many Penecostals and their views on the world as it relates to their beliefs is male dominated and wako!
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WAKE UP before it’s too LATE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Linda "Obama" | September 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

If you think Obama is inexperienced and just an empty celebrity, why would you choose one yourselves? If you think Bush did just fine, why are you now begging for change? Repubs saying they are for change is really asking for change from themselves.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

She finally talked to a reporter???? She’s been hidden away from the press until she could get a cushy one on one interview. Palin is afraid of the press? Palin is tough but can’t handle tough questions?

Posted by: Joane | September 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

I dont think anyone is afraid of Palin…we don’t know enough about her one way or another. I’m not a Palin fan but would like to hear from HER! What we need to happen is for her to have thoughtful FAIR questions asked of her. Then we will hear and know first hand. If she is ready and capable then so be it. If not then we will also know that. Please let the process take over!

Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Charles Gibson, you are a disgrace to journalism.
This person is running to be the VP of the United States of America! And yet you treat her like she’s an actor auditioning for a part.
The American people deserve so much more.

Posted by: Fred | September 11, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Mary Lou, what happens after we “pull the trigger”? Bush never thought about that, hence the mess in Iraq. ENOUGH!

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

What the heck kind of questions are these?
He should’ve asked her a follow-up like, I don’t know, umm,
“Can you name an accomplishment you’ve had regarding international affairs?”
Or…”WHY ARE YOU HIDING YOUR EMAILS?”

Posted by: Yolanda | September 11, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

About the gas…did you know they cut back on production over there to keep our prices up…they did it yesterday…dems don’t want to drill here so who’s fault is it?

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

If Sarah Palin was “not ready for Prime Time” exposure to the media, then she should not have been made a candidate for VP, nor nominated. Furthermore, why must Americans wait two weeks for an “exclusive” interview by a Disney-owned news organization (read: conservative), with less than 2 months to go in the Presential race? She’s a public servant; she should have been ready for impromptu interviews the very moment she stepped off that nomination stage at the RNC convention.

Posted by: Concerned Citizen | September 11, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

The only thing the questions in the excerpt would do is show if Palin had any brain cells. Can you look the American public in the eye and say you are ready to be VP or even President? Do you feel you are experienced? Did he really think she would say no to those questions?
Those aren’t softball questions, those are teeball questions. I really hope they are hiding those tough ones for what they are going to show on tv. But I am not holding my breath.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Are you kidding me, ABC? This is truly pathetic. You should, once again (remember the Democratic debate?), be ashamed of yourself.

Posted by: Egan Foote | September 11, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

I have voted Democrat since i was able to vote, i agree on social issue with Obama but i believe that running for the highest postion in the land requires experience. Obama is just not ready he just does not have enough time and experience under is belt to allow me to feel comfortable that he could make the hard calls that face this country.
As for Palin and the experience well after much research while her resume is some concerning she has more executive experience than Obama so although its not time for “on the job training” i rather be in the position of training a number two on the ticket that a number one!

Posted by: rob | September 11, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Amy at 5:31: Palin and McCain “will lead our country on the path that leads to prosperity and peace!”
Except for that little bit about going to war with Russia:
GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?
PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally…
“Perhaps so.” That’s about as casual as how we got into Iraq. Which is only fitting, since she’s been getting her foreign-policy lessons from McCain’s neocon advisers, who are some of the same nut jobs (Randy Scheuneman, Douglas Feith) that got us into Iraq.

Posted by: Ann Arbor | September 11, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Funny how we so quickly forget Jeremiah Wright. Obama would still be listening to that wacko’s sermons and singing his praises if Obama wasn’t running for president. Obama is the king of empty words and actions. Keep trying Democrats. It’s fun to watch you squirm.

Posted by: Jack | September 11, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

I am still undecided about who i would vote for.I supported Hillary and feel she got the shaft. Sarah Palin is not trying to take Hillarys place,nor could she. She appears to be very smart and on top of her game. She has taken on so much with having her family and her career . She has my support as a mother and someone who is down to earth. I do not have trust in Obama, I feel he is a good speaker , but brings nothing to th eamerican people. It seems as though he does not think for himself and has other people running his campaign. Is that the kind of leader we need?

Posted by: Tracy | September 11, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

We will have to watch to get all the questions, do you think they are putting up all the good ones here…no…this is a teaser…

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Hey 30yr – you know why gas prices are high? its got nothing to do with drilling – too bad you are fooled by Big Oil’s propoganda. Its because of speculation from your Repub fat cat buddies. Exxon made more money last year then any corporation in history! Turn of Fox and try actually doing some research and reading.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Boy.. this is truly the Obama site. Obama has NEVER been mayor or governor and he was only a US Senate for less then a year when he started to run for President. You guys are acting like you are voting for the high school (class) president then the President of the USA. You don’t even know if Obama can balance any budget.. because he has not had to govern any town, city or state, but you are willing to give him your checkbook to rule this country. No wonder people are losing their homes to foreclosure… too stupid to think for themselves… to eager to sign documents that they don’t know what they are signing and then playing the victim and blaming someone else because they only like to listen to words… No wonder people are voting for Obama… the stupid ones.

Posted by: T. Smigh | September 11, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

“Will the drive-by media sit down and ask Obama if he is ready to lead the country? Let’s ask him the same questions about his experience. The drive-by media will not do that because they are biased and sexist! Who exactly is this man, Obama, and what are his associations? Who were is college friends? George Stefanopois went to Columbia at the same time. Did he or any of his friends know Obama? Obama lived off campus in a neighborhood controlled by Haitian drug gangs. His roommate was a huge druggie!”
Where the hell have you been for the past 2 years. Senator Obama has been vetted, re-vetted by the media, especially Faux News, his patriotism has been questioned, his Christianity has been questioned, his wife has been questioned. What exactly DOES Palin have to offer this country as far as experience???? No general answers please, specifics? What’s that I hear?
Silence.

Posted by: Ohioangel | September 11, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Clearly, that “Lincoln said it” answer was coached– and she was having a hard time remembering what her handlers told her to say. Palin is being VERY closely controlled by McCain’s spinmeisters.
Gibson MUST ask tough follow-up questions and not just allow her toss out her pre-planned talking points.
Brack Obama is a BRILLIANT man with multiple degrees from the best schools in the nation. He knew more about goverment and international affairs at the age of 22 than Sarah Palin knows now.
McCain only (barely) graduated from the Naval Academy b/c his father was an admiral. I know people that know McCain and while they like him as a person, they admit that he isn’t very bright.
Palin had to go to 5 different community colleges and state U’s to get a degree in ‘sports journalism’. She may be fiesty, but she is an intellectual lightweight and has NO business being a heartbeat away from the red button.
As to ‘experience’… Palin’s OWN PARTY made her hire a town administrator to actually run Wasilla b/c she was doing such a poor job of it. Obama has worked with and for constituencies larger than the entire population of Alaska. Palin listed her occupation in 2005 as ‘homemaker.’
Alaska is unlike ANY other state in that every man, woman and child gets a $2200 annual oil stipend and this year Palin got the oil companies to pay a WINDFALL PROFITS TAX (like the kind Obama wants and McCain opposes) that added an additional $1200 to each citizens haul. Alaska’s bigggest problem is managing growth and Palin clearly has NO understanding of the problems facing the other 49 states.
Alaska also has the highest rate of domestic violence and rape in the country. When Palin was mayor, Wasilla was the ONLY town in ALL of Alaska that charged rape victims for their rape kits. Eventually, a law was passed state-wide SOLELY to stop Wasilla’s disgusting practice of charging victims for justice.
Palin is too limited both in her education and in her understanding of the world to be ready to represent the U.S. on the world stage.

Posted by: Bea | September 11, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Tracy,
I hope you watch tonight…I was a Hill supporter too….McCain always was my #2, no I have never voted rep. but Obama lacks experience, plus the church he went to, well his pastor offends me and Obama went there so long.

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Wow…sounds like a lot of fluff. I guess that’s why the McCain campaign wanted him over qualified journalists.

Posted by: Chris | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I think Jim asked…I am voting for McCain/ Palin but I would never vote for Bush–never have. You know why? Because I see how the media elected Bush and they have been doing the same thing for Obama for the last 20 months.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

This isn’t softball. It’s teeball and the seven year olds that play teeball are probably smarter than most of those who fall for this malarkey.

Posted by: bhciapol | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Whatever happened to conservatism? Now conservatives want to the USA to fight for every little country out there and nationbuild them back up?
Why are Republicans so EAGER for war? What’s wrong with taking care of the US for a change?

Posted by: Jacob | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“Pursuit of happiness?” So that was part of the prep, having her memorize the Declaration of Independence and trot out select phrases whenever she’s stuck? (Then, of course, the Democrats will be like, “But she was just regurgitating the Declaration of Independence,” and the Republicans response will be, “You see there? The Democrats hate the Declaration of Independence.” And the media will run with that.
And I’m sorry, she’s trying to soft-shoe her extremist religious beliefs, but there is video of her telling her former church congregation that the natural-gas pipeline she wants to build is part of God’s plan. So there she was, trying to sell the congregation on the plan by whoring out her creator. Niiiiiiice.

Posted by: greenpaz | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Come on “Jack” lets get real. You say you are “undecided”? But you dont trust Obama? Sounds like in fact you are VERY decided!!!! Lets be honest.

Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

A lot of people seem to think that these are the only questions asked. This is an excerpt and likely Charlie Gibson’s opening salvo. I think she handled herself very well, and I’m looking forward to seeing the entire program. She has gone up against the most crooked men in politics; underestimate Sarah Palin at your own peril. She is a strong VP choice, and she would make a better President than Obama.

Posted by: Astroturficide | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I really hope Gibson also asked her some tough questions. A lot of unflattering stuff has surfaced about Palin, and this task-from-God-thing was one of the few that were obviously overblown. Anybody with a brain saw that. So why pick that one? What about the bridge to nowhere? Her lies about earmarks? What about her flirting with censorship when she was a mayor? What about her giggling while a political opponent was exposed to explicit sexism on air? I can think of at least ten issues surrounding Palin that she will have a hard time explaining her way out of. But we rely on journalists to ask the tough questions and not waste precious time on obvious non-issues liek this one or the whole motherhood hysteria.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Let’s be real – neither Palin nor Obama is qualified to be the President of the US, but at least Palin is in the VP position and McCain IS ready to run our country! If Palin were a man, she wouldn’t be attacked like this. We still live in a sexist country!

Posted by: Jan | September 11, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

obamamama and johnTX … why don’t you wait for her to answer your questions before you make up your own??
… also, Obama refused any more debates with Hillary … and has only agreed to the “required” three with McCain … so what does that tell you? … and he has already admitted he was to flip in his answer at Saddleback Church!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | September 11, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

This should not be about personality. It is about the direction of this country that I fought for. SCIENCE ANYBODY? Do you people even realize all of the problems that this country has? Do you know about the Brain Drain going on? All of the best and brightest scientists in the world used to come here to the USA. Now they are all leaving and going to Europe. It is because the people of the world do not like us any more or respect the dishonest practices of the Bush Administration. We are falling farther and farther behind the rest of the world. We are not leading anything anymore, and the last thing we need is somebody who thinks the world is flat like Sarah Palin. I just think this pick is so sad, and if people in our country are too stupid to even realize that they are stupid, then heaven help us. I am ashamed that my Republican Party has so abandoned our country.

Posted by: IraqVetRepublican | September 11, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Bea said it all. Unfortunately many Americans are so anti-intellectual (proud of being an idiot for all you Repubs who don’t understand compound words) that they’d prefer a mental midget like Palin to a true intellectual like Obama. “She’s got 5 kids! That means she can run the most powerful country in the world, no problem! Plus she likes killin’ things!”

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Are we trading one Oil-oriented Vice President who shoots his lawyer friends in the face with a shotgun while quail hunting, for another oil-oriented Vice Presidential candidate who shoots wild game from aircraft with high-powered rifles? C’mon, America…

Posted by: netizen19380 | September 11, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Jim,
I live in a oil state, if we don’t start drilling and taking care of our own needs they are going to run the prices so high we won’t be able to by gas here in America.
If we had been drilling more here we would not be in this mess now.

Posted by: 30yrdem-not any more | September 11, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Amy,
Are you on something! Where is the peace, in going to war? AND WITH RUSSIA? who’s going to fight this war YOU?

Posted by: fempharoh08 | September 11, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Simple Republican political math:
Truth = Lie (repeat 100 times)
When will our media do the public a real service by asking our leaders for truth? How can we parents show our children appropriate role models when most people in public life seem to lie, and enjoy getting away with it! Lie and cheat and you’ll be rewarded, tell the truth and you’ll take second place.

Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

I like the implicit admission of guilt at the top: “For all of you who were concerned — Charlie asked plenty of follow-ups.”
Still. Follow-ups? “Governor, are you ready to lead?” “Yes.” “Now, if I may ask a follow up question: Really?” “Yes.” “Welp, good enough for me! Thanks!”

Posted by: spinn | September 11, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

You know that Obama ONLY met with Bill O’Reilly THIS WEEK!
Obama has been running for president for nearly 20 MONTHS. Obama has never really had to answer to tough interviews.
Palin is on the scene for only a few weeks and is already involved in serious interviews.
You guys are underestimating Charlie Gibson. He is very smart and tough.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Obama, Mccain, Biden all have taken the heat over the last years. They are still standing. Now it is Palin’s turn. We will know all we need to know shortly!!!

Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

It is only fair that she be asked the same questions that all the other candidates have been asked. Honestly, if she can’t stand and answer questions from reporters how do you honestly expect us the American people to make an intelligent decision on her?

Posted by: joeamerican3 | September 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

FEAR, FEAR, I SMELL FEAR!
I SMELL THE LEFTISTS ARE HERE.
and lots of them!

Posted by: jjohn143 | September 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

She seems completely unprepared, to me. And now we hear that she is already thinking about another war! Out of touch and out of control — that’s the GOP ticket this year.

Posted by: Mim Song | September 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Amy, what are your beliefs grounded on?
I would love to agree, but the totality of the evidence supports the opposite of your belief. The evidence suggests that McCain-Palin will simply continue the Neo-con agenda, which means further aggression and war. Do you know McCain’s chief foreign policy aid, Randall J Scheunemann? If you don’t, you should.
Also, there is no evidence to suggest that McCain-Palin’s economic policies will be substantially different from Bush-Chenies, which means prosperity for the few at the expense of the many. But, I suppose the the “many” are just whiners, right Amy?
Amy, belief based on fantasy is no foundation from which to make a choice for president.

Posted by: nick | September 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Jack wrote: ” It seems as though he does not think for himself and has other people running his campaign. Is that the kind of leader we need?”
With McCain with one foot in death’s door, and Governor Palin having her “speeches” written by Bush’s speech writers you can honestly bring yourself to type this? Karl Rove is running McCain’s campaign and you can honestly bring yourself to type this? Neither one of these Mavericks can speak for themselves on foreign policy or the economy and you can bring yourself to type this? Good luck in your future, you’ve just been OWNED by the Republican machine.

Posted by: Ohioangel | September 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

wow i think every single one of those questions was the same easy question and there still wasn’t an answer?
Q: Do you believe the war in Iraq is God’s war
A: I don’t know God’s plan regardless of what i said earlier, i’ll pretend i said what lincoln said instead

Posted by: Wow | September 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Wouldn’t any normal person question whether or not they were ready to be the vice president? Wouldn’t that necessarily require some deep reflection. The fact that she didn’t is very scary. Hubris in the White House has caused enough problems. Thanks, but not thanks, Sarah. And to threaten Russia with war? My God.

Posted by: Ginger | September 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

18 million people – Democrats, Republicans and independents – voted for Obama in the primaries. They chose him after listening to his speeches, watching the debates and examining his record over a 2 year period.
NO ONE has vetted Governor Palin. That is what is disturbing. We don’t know this person and her handlers are keeping her from the press – other than this interview so far.

Posted by: Mary | September 11, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Wretched. Worthless. Thanks for being a spineless toady. Thanks for standing up for infotainment and the right of every citizen in America to fed a constant diet of lukewarm pap. Thanks for nothing, Charlie.

Posted by: Mark F | September 11, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

2 more crazies for 4 more years!

Posted by: Bhrandon | September 11, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

It gets very HOT in the kitchen! If Palin cant take that HEAT….get out! If she can then its supper time!!!!

Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Wake up America you really need to get to know something about Obama. He is not what we want for our America. He is evil. Look into it before you decide about voting for him.

Posted by: Jannie | September 11, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

I’m so proud of Sarah! John McCain will be remembered as a visionary for this astonishing pick of a VP.
I look forward to seeing Sarah sworn in on Jan. 20th, alongside John McCain.
I wanted Mr. McCain to run with Mr. Kerry, four years ago. But this is so much better!

Posted by: Stray Yellar Dawg | September 11, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Anyone stop to think what would really happen if the US and Russia got into it….. I dont think Palin has. And she just got a passport this year…HMMMMMMMM, yep she has more experiance than obama all right… LMAO!! Nuclear war here we come! with Johnny on the tip and Palin on the back

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

I am glad Palin did this interview. I bet she DEBUNKS a lot of rumors!!
Almost every “negative” thing I have read about her online has been false.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

The republican concern trolls are out in full force. I’am a dem voting for palin! BAHAAHHAHHHHA

Posted by: ArlingtonSon | September 11, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Why won’t someone ask “did you stop for one second to consider that maybe your daughter didn’t WANT to become worldwide tabloid fodder? Did you worry that the people who ripped Jamie Lynn Spears and her mother to shreds might not be as supportive as they have have?”

Posted by: Adam Selzer | September 11, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

MY GOD!! This is the best we can come up with in a country of 300 million people?

Posted by: Guy From LA | September 11, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Honestly, one of the first questions should’ve been why she wouldn’t talk to the press unless it was on her own terms. But of course, by definition, he couldn’t ask that question.
That whole thing made my head explode. After years of conservatives saying “not ready on day one” and “if he can’t handle X how can he handle al qaeda”, they pick a vp who’s not ready on day one and can’t handle the press, and somehow everyone’s fine with that.

Posted by: spinn | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

So she contradicts herself with both
A) “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.”
and
B) “I don’t know if the task is from God, Charlie”
I would prefer a honest religious nut, over one who lies about their beliefs.

Posted by: AndrewDover | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Oh My God!! Please tell me that this is a horrible joke. This is the woman Republicans think is capable of understanding the complex issues facing this country. This is the woman capable of executing two wars, the economy, energy, healthcare , etc. Oh, and let’s not forget her statements about a war with Russia. Please let me wake from this nightmare. And Charlie, please go back to Good Morning America and interview celebs because you’ve shown that you are incapable of asking biting questions unless of course you’re grilling Sen. Obama. Sarah Palin has zero credibility as a viable candidate and Gibson has zero credibility as a journalist.

Posted by: Hope | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

YOu have to give her credit. She sticks to the script she is being given. OVer and over with the same bs but she is good at it and knows her role in this thing. It is up to the obama campaign and media to stop them from this kind of politics. Obama must come out swinging harder than the last couple of days. He should buy 10 minutes of network prime time and run down the list of lies from the last few days. Don’t do it on NBC. Come out swinging on the sex ad ad and tell the country that as a father he wants his 2 girls to know what behavior from others is wrong. Educating children on where they should not be touched protects children. Come out as the the father in chief and call bs on the man who left his first wife and children.

Posted by: david | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

i’m an independent, i CRIED when George Bush won the second term, i honestly thought it was one of the worst decisions america has made in decades. and it turns out i was right.
and I looooove sarah palin. you guys want to make her out to be some kind of a crazy right winger, yet she surrounded herself with people from both democratic and republican party, as well as independents when she was in office. she fired people from both of the parties, and some of the republicans she got rid of are now in jail. she is an equal opportunity offender, she doesn’t care about party lines, and that’s what we need in washington. and that happens to be what john mccain is as well. we need REAL CHANGE AND REAL REFORM, not fancy speeches about them. all that obama has done in office is travel around the country promoting his celebrity status. no action, no change, no unity.
MCCAIN/PALIN – the only sensible choice we have this year, and what a great choice it is!

Posted by: eve | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

I am a US Marine, and I am sick of the direction of this country. I joined to go fight Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban, but I got sent to Iraq, which was a waste of my time and your tax money. Even a dumb soldier like me can see that Obama is a thinking caring man who wants what is best for this country. I just do not see that with most of the Republicans. They always seem to have some sneaky agenda. They have been running this country since I was a little kid – 8 years in the Presidency and 12 of the last 14 in Congress. How can they run as Change? It is a Karl Rove Marketing Plan, and I am sickened that so many people fall for it. We need Obama in the worst way.

Posted by: USMC | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Is anybody surprised by this? Why do you think the Palin folks picked this guy? Fear is an incredible motivator. Since ABC feared getting ostracized if McCain/Palin wins, they backed off and threw her a bunch of softballs.
Hannity is actually right — Journalism is dead.

Posted by: Dave | September 11, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Amy,
Are you on something! Where is the peace, in going to war? AND WITH RUSSIA? who’s going to fight this war YOU?

Posted by: fempharoh08 | September 11, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Is anybody surprised by this? Why do you think the Palin folks picked this guy? Fear is an incredible motivator. Since ABC feared getting ostracized if McCain/Palin wins, they backed off and threw her a bunch of softballs.
Hannity is actually right — Journalism is dead.

Posted by: Dave | September 11, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

This woman knows squat she’s as crooked as the rest of the Alaska crooks. But I guess if your the least crooked of all you look good to a crupt paolitical part. Lets not forget her very first words to America were full of LIES! this is exsactly 4 more years of the same polished turd for republicans! I can here her poll numbers droping all the way from Montana!

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Everyone raises to their own level of incompetence….Palin may have reached hers as governor of alaska…

Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Well, I don’t know when Palin got her passport but she has been to Iraq and she visited the wounded troops in Germany.
Palin is a hop skip and a jump from Russia and Canada. It is likely she has had a passport for longer than you think.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Well, that was pretty bad. What issues did we discuss today Charlie?? What happened to talks about the economy, healthcare, etc. You briefly touched foreign policy so I guess you and Ms. Lipstick can pat yourselves on the back. Weak!

Posted by: Liz | September 11, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

First we need to define experience, because if we’re talking about state executive experience a la governor then there’s only been 13 presidents with more experience than Obama.
If we’re talking what it takes to be president then there is no debate because you can’t define how someone will be president, only how good of a president they are/were. Nothing can be used as a means of preparation to be the leader of one of the largest countries in the world.
If you’d like to argue this, argue against the fact that Obama has run one of the most successful presidential campaigns in history.
What it comes down to is the issues. Who you agree with, who you disagree with.

Posted by: glenn | September 11, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Obama and Biden look like America! They think like real Americans! McSurge and Palin “the puppet” are a throwback ticket from the cold war era. We should all be ready to take America to the next level. I would really be embarrassed to have an old, backwards thinking, self serving fool like McCain representing me as my President. That goes for him and his crazy nurse.
Americans (who embrace diversity) will elect OBAMA and BIDEN in ’08.

Posted by: ASHAMED of McSURGE | September 11, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Can ABC News viewers get a pre-view list of advertisers and sponsors for the multiple “platform” shows while the Sarah Palin interview will be re-purposed across (World News Tonight, 20/20, NightLine, Good Morning America, etc…)? Because, if any of them are Oil-Industry or Military Industrial Complex related, Americans should know that Charlie Gibson’s Editor-in-Chief and other über-bosses will clamp down on his questions, and not let him press the McCain/Palin ticket on the critical issues of Energy Independence and peacetime in the U.S. (Because if Gibson’s performace in this Palin interview is anything like the that awfully weak Gibson/Stephanopoulos debate moderating, this is going to be ludicrous.)

Posted by: PA | September 11, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Are you sure weren’t interviewing Bush in lipstick?

Posted by: Kelly | September 11, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

How can these supposed libs still be talking about her pregnant daughter…who is getting married.
You guys need to give it a rest. Grow up. Sex happens. 17 year olds get pregnant, like Obama’s mother did, remember?
Get over it.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Ms. Palin is ready to wear her “Runner Up for Vice President” sash in November 5th.
That she is smug and cocky enough to accept such a huge role without thinking about how it would affect her family or whether she was qualified is enough for me.
Judgement. McCain has none.

Posted by: you can quote me | September 11, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

The socialist libs are terrified and their meltdown continues. Gov. Palin has far more executive experinece than b.hussein & slo-joe combined. Well, they have zero. In addition, Gov. Palin will put America first and not surender to raghead terrorists who support b.hussein.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

“18 million people – Democrats, Republicans and independents – voted for Obama in the primaries. They chose him after listening to his speeches, watching the debates and examining his record over a 2 year period.”
NOW, THAT IS SCARY!!!! we have 18 million people in this country that wanna pick a guy with really good speaking skills and nothing else to be president. “examining his record ” – i know, and no one will ever give me back those 10 minutes.

Posted by: steven | September 11, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Eve, What are you talking about. You are so full of hatred that you don’t even know what’s going on.

Posted by: fempharoh08 | September 11, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

I guess the bots have received their programming for the day and are out spreading their cheer.
She actually wants to hold firm and not appease or apologize? What’s wrong with her. I can’t wait to hear what Matt Damon and Madonna will have to say about this.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Obama! Obama! Obama! Obama!

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

looks like Sara did a great job, can’t wait to see the whole interview!!

Posted by: Linda | September 11, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Dumbing down of America continues: McFood, McRealityShows, McNovels, McSchools, McPolitics, McCain/Palin. How sad it is to see that intellect is no longer a requirement to lead. I wonder who or what will be running this country (what’s left of it) a decade or so from now. Chimp perhaps? No too bright! Earthworm. Yes, that’s it!

Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Great job, Sarah.
McCain/Palin – proven agents of CHANGE!

Posted by: NoObama2008 | September 11, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

It is so wonderful to be in America. We have freedoms they don’t have in other parts of the world. People should use the internet to find out the truth not to sit and be fed lies. Do your own research people, stop being spoon fed by the bias media. It is your right to know everything you can but yet you settle for places like KOS to feed your anger and hate.
I left the democratic party because I finally saw who was really doing all the lying. Do you think it is normal for a place that says it is a democratic site to bash a democrat daily?…no it is not…

Posted by: new republican | September 11, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I’m so tired of the dbl. standards…
When Clinton used the words “fairy tale,” it was racism. When Obama says pig and lipstick, it was just a phrase. (even though he is supposed to be the master orator and chooses his words so well). Did anyone notice how his audience caught the real meaning right away, just like when he not so secretly gave Hillary the finger last spring.
Palin is inexperienced and scary, but Obama is bringing new faces and a breath of fresh air.
Palin’s church and religious beliefs are terrifying, but Obama’s 20 year associations with radical religious figures like Wright and Phleger are nothing to be worried about.
Palin’s anti abortion views are dangerous to women, but Obama’s support of denying medical treatment to babies surviving abortion is perfectly fine.
Palin’s experience as governor doesn’t qualify her for anything, but Obama’s state senate (sorry, 1 year in the US Senate before spending every waking moment running for President doesn’t count at all to me)experience qualifies him to be President of the United States.
Gov. Palin has the audacity to have small children and run for v.p., but Obama and all the other good old boys can have small children and run for anything they want.
I’m sick of the whole mess, it’s even worse than with Hillary. I’m disgusted with Bill and Hillary for kissing up, dumping their principles, and campaigning for the most inexperienced candidate ever to reach this position in an election.

Posted by: dwc | September 11, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Jim, Get a clue
If you know anything, don’t think Russia will back down. And Oh by, the way
they have nukes too!

Posted by: fempharoh08 | September 11, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I read that she didn’t want to be senator because then she wouldn’t be a “team MOM” what changed? Her ego or her ability to parent.

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Obama’s talking about the issues that matter, Palin’s dodging serious questions by hiding behind Abraham Lincoln (?), and McCain’s creating false and trivial controversy about lipstick. Who’s acting more presidential?

Posted by: Michael | September 11, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Here’s a fun game: go find the transcript of the democratic debate with gibson and stephanapolous. For each question they asked, recast it as a question for Palin, if applicable. Original:
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator Obama, do you think Senator Clinton can win?
New:
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Governor Palin, do you think Senator Obama can win?
Original:
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator, two questions. Number one, do you think Reverend Wright loves America as much as you do? And number two, if you get the nomination, what will you do when those sermons are played on television again and again and again?
New:
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Governor, two questions. Number one, do you think Ed Kalnins loves America as much as you do? And number two, if you get the nomination, what will you do when those sermons are played on television again and again and again?
Etc., etc. These things pretty much wouldn’t happen.

Posted by: spinn | September 11, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Bush’s experience is very similar to Palin’s, but only better, when he ran for the President – governor of a state (Texas is larger than Alaska) and limited experience of foreign policy (Bush had been to more countries than Palin). My fellow American – how does Bush perform on the job?

Posted by: CT | September 11, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

I would give her a C-. I read a report from someone who used to work for her that said that she answers questions by paraphrasing them and parroting them back. I think some of the questions she was giving answers she practiced (like the one about “task fron God” and the ones she didn’t expect she parroted back the question. If McCain is elected and somehow she becomes President we are in BIG trouble.

Posted by: jane | September 11, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Those that are making idiotic comments and judging Gov. Palin based upon a 20 second excerpt are obamas fools. He thinks the US has 57 states and you think Palin is unready to lead———I’m scared that you libs walk the earth……

Posted by: Nykrfan | September 11, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

“Dumbing down of America continues: McFood, McRealityShows, McNovels, McSchools, McPolitics, McCain/Palin.”
You are to blame too. Make no mistake about it.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Sarah Palin:
“Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.”
Adolf Hitler:
“I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator.”
A little too similar for my taste.

Posted by: mibrop | September 11, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Jan,
She would be attacked like this and probably worse if it was 10 days before taking even one question from the press and they are all softball questions. The press needs to stop treating her with kid gloves. They were never this nice to Clinton.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Spot on, DWC.

Posted by: Don | September 11, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

What does the election of either Barack or John revel about the citizens of the country?

Posted by: Pata | September 11, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

God help us all if she gets elected.
How does President Palin sound? Not good. And it could happen. Ugh.
How anyone could rationally support this ticket is really baffling.

Posted by: sigh | September 11, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

What were Governor Clinton’s foreign policy credentials when he won the Presidency?

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Amazing…
I can’t believe that the same folks that are so sure that Governor Palin isn’t qualified (no matter what the evidence is to the contrary) are so sure that Obama’s resume (which by any standard is meager and totally devoid of executive and command experience)is inadequate.

Posted by: mg | September 11, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

I am an Obama supporter and I’ve no time for Palin or McCain but I actually felt sorry for her as I watched the ABC clip. I don’t know if it’s the camera angle but she is definitely tanking, no question. She seems ‘wired’ alright (her words), seems to lack confidence and someone has obviously told her to keep saying ‘Charlie’ even though it sounds really unnatural.
I think things are going to be okay.

Posted by: Ray | September 11, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Sarah we love you….Thank you God, for Sarah Palin….!!!

Posted by: Donay | September 11, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Can you see her now? Marching across the Berring Strait with the Moose Lodge to protect her country.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 11, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Funny that all of Senator Obama’s supporters want to compare her experience with the Senator’s experience. She is running for VP. The NYT has a nice piece about Geraldine Ferraro’s VP candidacy in their archives from 1984:
“Where is it written that only senators are qualified to become President? . . . Or where is it written that mere representatives aren’t qualified, like Geraldine Ferraro of Queens? . . .Where is it written that governors and mayors, like Dianne Feinstein of San Francisco, are too local, too provincial? . . .Remember the main foreign affairs credential of Georgia’s Governor Carter: He was a member of the Trilateral Commission. Presidential candidates have always chosen their running mates for reasons of practical demography, not idealized democracy . . . On occasion, Americans find it necessary to rationalize this rough-and-ready process. What a splendid system, we say to ourselves, that takes little-known men, tests them in high office and permits them to grow into statesmen. This rationale may even be right, but then let it also be fair. Why shouldn’t a little-known woman have the same opportunity to grow? We may even be gradually elevating our standards for choosing Vice Presidential candidates. But that should be done fairly, also.”
I guess if it is Congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro (of late thrown under the DNC bus) than experience doesn’t matter that much to the NYT, but if it is Gov. Palin, all of a sudden she has to have more experience than the Presidential candidate from the Democratic party. I wonder why there is a new standard 24 years hence?

Posted by: Chris | September 11, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I saw Christine Todd Whitman on TV the other day, former governor of NJ and former head of the EPA, and I thought, “Why didn’t they pick this Republican woman? So much more of a centrist Republican, so reasonable, so eloquent and thoughtful.” Really, Sarah Palin? Are you kidding?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

How does President Palin sound? You are worried about how it SOUNDS?
How about Barack Hussein Obama.
Gimme a break.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Hard hitting stuff Charlie. Maybe you want to ask her how much she loves America next?

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Thank you God, for Sarah Palin & john McCain….!!!
Thank you God, for Sarah Palin & john McCain….!!!
Thank you God, for Sarah Palin & john McCain….!!!
Don’t miss the presidential forum tonight, it should be good.

Posted by: new republican | September 11, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

My vote goes to Michael Palin as D.P.Gumby. My brain hurts!

Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

this is a woman that said she didn’t know anything about the VP position. Two clowns running McBUSH and PAIN!

Posted by: Blue | September 11, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

One can only surmise that Gibson was well paid to ask these softball questions.

Posted by: Robert | September 11, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

This guy just posted that Texas is bigger than Alaska! LMAO!!! NO wonder the repubs are up in polls they just like to dumb down the population

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I feel the Lumberjack song coming on…

Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

You nasty Obama supporters. You make all democrats look bad.
It’s mainly the “Obama-democrats” who are SO DARN MEAN-SPIRITED.
It’s partially because of YOU people that I went from Hillary to McCain.
I can’t stand Obama’s online supporters. Some of them seem almost evil, and I am not playin’ around.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Of all the Republican comments on here, I don’t see any that actually say why she is qualified. Just pointing at Obama and Clinton (remember what peace was like?) and saying, “So what, nobody else is qualified!” Is living in a state close to Russia and being the head-in-name-only of the Alaskan National Guard really comparable to sitting on (or leading, in Biden’s case) the Foreign Policy Committee? You want to compare Biden’s experience and Palin’s? Come on!

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

This is an interview? Charles Gibson is now useless. what happened to ABC?

Posted by: John | September 11, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Sarah is AMAZING. She did a fabulous job. If the left is screaming about this interview you KNOW she did well.
At least every answer was direct and without all the hemmming and hawwing you get from Obama. A man who couldn’t make a decision if his….make that OUR… lives depended on it.

Posted by: Carole | September 11, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Texas certainly has more people than Alaska. It’s not hard to rule empty land.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Kat in the hat,
Palin got her passport in order to visit the Alaska National Guard in Kuwait (not Iraq) less than two years ago. Kuwait is the nice, safe resort country to the south where they have the R&R areas for the troops in Iraq. I suppose you should also add Ireland onto her foreign experience, since she did make a lay over there.
If you go by those trips, I should be VP, since I have been to more foreign countries (England, France, Germany, Israel, China, and many other places in Asia). Hey, China is next to Russia, and I grew up in a state bordering Canada.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

HEY CHARLIE
I will watch abc for the first time since the 90s. Just to see how tough you will be on Gov Palin and to see how you follow up or continue to repeat the questions. I have all confidence in this woman, have been waiting for a man or woman to run who will take on the bias media and ALL corrupt pols
DID YOU ever ask OBAMA a follow up or a tough question?
NOPE!!

Posted by: Ms Fran | September 11, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Kat in your hat….Hillary supporter to McCain…..haha no true Hillary supporter would vote for him….unless your voting based on body parts

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 11, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Where are all those so outraged about Michelle Obama? Is it okay that Palin’s spouse belongs to an organization that wants to secede?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Hey, Charlie, did you ask Palin what she knows about Obama serving as the Chairman on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge that Bill Ayers founded? Ya, it’s bigger than the Wooods Fund, when they both sat on the same board.
This one was about Obama and Ayers running an education program worth $160 million dollars, and then FAILING. BAD choices.
No, no one wants to talk about what Ayers and Dorhn are doing through our public schools.
lol. We are so screwed. So many people in the country are DUMB!

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“cocky wacko” should have claimed executive privilege and passed on this interview.
Terrifying.
And for breakfast, we’ll invade Georgia. For lunch, we’ll invade Russia. And for tea, we’ll press the RED button.
Then it’s time for a hockey match.

Posted by: susan | September 11, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Obama lived in another country when he was a child and says it gives him experience????
Give me a break!
Bill Clinton was right when he called it a Fairy Tale!

Posted by: new republican | September 11, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Palins’ mother would have given a
tougher interview. More like a
Palin infomercial!! She is not ready
to be VP!!

Posted by: Rectangle | September 11, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Obama only agreed to go on Fox with O’reilly with preconditions. I read that Palin wouldn’t have any conditions of what they would have to ask her. You Obamabots are just in need of a brain and a change of underwear. Obama is the one that can’t talk without a written speech and a telepromter. UHH, uhh, da, da, well…, uhh. Obama was never asked what makes him think he has the experience to be President. He’d probably say his mentors Rev. Wright, Frank Marshall Davis and Ayers gave him all the experience he will ever need. An enemy within our own Government. I never thought that would have ever happened. It’s possible now.

Posted by: carolyn | September 11, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

You think we’re passionate because we’re afraid? Far from it! We’re passionate because we’re tired of seeing a surplus from the Clinton years turn into a deficit and a disaster. We’re tired of seeing our country go from respected and peace-loving under Clinton to hated and war-mongering under Bush. We’re trying to save you Repubs and our country from more of this disaster!

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

All you Sarah Palin Haters just can’t get over the fact that Palin the number 2 on the ticket has more experience then your number 1 guy. Lol how sad!

Posted by: Coolhand | September 11, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Obama has become impossible to listen to. ugh ah ugh ah…the most telling thing I have seen in this election …Obama cutting himself off mid word from saying Clarence Thomas was not EXPERIENCED enough to be a Supreme Court Justice.

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

“Charlie, here in Alaska nobody expects the Spanish Inquistion. Our three chief weapons are…”

Posted by: Jack | September 11, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Wow. Palin sounds very impressive from this snippet. I can’t wait to see the interview

Posted by: TDK | September 11, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

This is not about Palin being inexperienced. Sges been a politician long enough to get the job, they all have. The issue is with her own words she lacks the wisdom to pause count to ten, consider, thoughtfulness. We the people must judge. Judge well my fellow Americans because the next Presidential administration will either strengthen or break OUR back. The case can well be mad that this country needs another Regan republican not the spirit of(MC)Cain. Choose Obama- Biden our best chance.

Posted by: Marty | September 11, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Some of the pro Obama comments here will be studied in political science classes someday as one reason why the Democrats lost what should have been an easy election. This is only the second time in my life I will not vote Democratic, and these type of comments just continue to remind me of what type of people Sen. Obama seems to represent. A lot of people still vote based on values and who they can trust, and people who call Gov. Palin horrible names apparently do not have a lot of values. So much for Obama’s message of “hope and change.”

Posted by: dwc | September 11, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Fear… Surprise…

Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

The trolls are so afraid of how well she is going to do…face it she is running for VP and has more experience than Obama…what a joke the dems have become…he is falling in the polls and we have to reformers running…just what Washington needs!

Posted by: new republican | September 11, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Meh. McCain and Palin will send us into World War 3. Only this time, we’ll be part of the Axis.
McCain was all ready to go to war with Russia and still claims Russia fired first (Georgia fired first, but into a area that was to secede from Georgia).
Does McCain not realize you can’t just go to war with a country with enough nuclear weapons to obliterate us?

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Wow, this interview sounds as hard hitting as one she would get in a beauty pageant. And the answers are just as ridiculous.

Posted by: J long | September 11, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

It is interesting that this new brand of DNC supporters seem to have turned into the thing they claim to loathe. They are full of anger and hate and have very few arguments to offer other than that Obama is so much cooler, so much more cosmopolitan, etc. and that everyone will love us once he is elected–interesting theory, but not really a compelling argument. The DNC has lost its way and has gone so far to the left that it no longer cares about the majority of their old constituency. Making fun of Wal-mart moms, working-class whites and rednecks is not a winning strategy. The new Donna Brazile strategy of neglecting the democratic base seems to be coming apart and being exposed for what it really is–she said she didn’t need us and now the DNC is trying to prove it by hurling insults and invective at average Americans for not being cool, smart and educated enough for their party. Good luck, maybe the Clintons will come in to try to save the ship or maybe they will wait for the Brazile/Obama/Dean faction to fail and they will come in to put the wreckage back together. We’ll see…

Posted by: Chris | September 11, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

That is exactly right.
Obama has been running for President FOREVER, and has never been put on the spot except for the recent interview with O’Reilly in which he looked like a big cookie crumbling.
The only other time he was made to answer questions he did not care for was during his last debate with Hillary on ABC where Charlie and George actually got to him quite a bit.

Posted by: SandyB | September 11, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Obama has become angry and disoriented. Ever since the announcement of Sarah Palin he doesn’t know what to do with himself.

Posted by: Coolhand | September 11, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I wanna know why we’ve strayed away from the issues. I don’t care if your a Democrat or a Republican..if you make up your mind about a candidate(VP candidate or Presidential) before really researching their stance on issues that are important to you, you’re an idiot. If so many of you support Palin, please educate me on what qualifies her to be VP?
Also, McCain has a 1 in 3 chance of dying before his 4 years is up, what qualifies Palin to be president if he dies? And please don’t bs…give me real answers b/c I haven’t been able to find any on my own.

Posted by: Liz | September 11, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I laugh everytime I hear Obama supporters trying to diminish Palin’s experience. Besides being totally unqualified to be President, Obama has made some serious strategic mistakes in recent weeks. Notably, Biden not Clinton as VP, and attacking Palin on of all things, her credentials to be VP? Someone needs to whisper in Obama’s ear that he’s running for PRESIDENT, not VICE PRESIDENT. What a fool.

Posted by: Ken | September 11, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Team Obama is on overdrive by the completely ignorant comments posted here. News flash: you are not making a case against Sarah.
Many of the comments here by Obama supporters are gross distortions which is typical of the trashing you all did to Senator Clinton during the primaries…
So far, her answers to Gibson’s questions were clearer and more upfront than anything I have heard form Obama, the man who talks in circles.

Posted by: Leisa | September 11, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I’m relatively new to this country and am very puzzled with the divide between the two sides. The McCain/Palin supporters keep giving the sneers to Obama/Biden’s and calling them liberals and elitists. In other countries, people are proud to achieve academic successes, trying to learn other cultures, publish new ideas, have a rational mind, and be able to communicate eloquently. Families sacrifices everything to send their kids to get educated and to be elitists so that they are respectable, and contribute to the country with worldly visions and progressive ideas. The answer from Sarah Palin “I’m ready” doesn’t answer anything. So we should just take her words for it? And anyone who is outraged by this must be liberal and elitist. It doesn’t take much to be a liberal and elitist in this country, it seems. Look at the crowds watching Obama’s convention speech. Does everyone look like liberal and elitist? Really, they are people who have to have 3 jobs to pay bills. They are people who finally see hope. On the other hand, “Drill Baby Drill!” was being chanted at the Republican convention. Was everyone drunk there? Why is Obama seen by half of this country as this out of touch, lofty person while he grew up in a working class single-mom family, lived on food stamps and started his career working for the poor and local communities, and every proposal he has is for the people. Why does anyone who is not rich (making $250,000 or more a year), feel they can relate to fur-wearing, country club going rich republicans? How can we trust them to have incentives to improve public schools while they and their kids all went to private schools. How can you count on them to feel our financial struggles when $3 or $5 gas price doesn’t make a difference on their life styles. They say they respect individualities, but they wire tap us. They say they are conservative but they hate the conservationists. They say they don’t want the government decide what doctors is on your net work list, but they let insurance company do this? They say they are pro-life but they risks our soldiers’ lives to fight a war that has no proof to be justified. They say their are physically responsible people and they got us into this deep debt. They tout small town value while most of them grew up in a gated community and don’t know what coupons are for. I can see why rich people love these guys, but I just don’t get it how an average American get excited about them.

Posted by: May | September 11, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

She’s embarrassingly simple minded- just like her running mate, McCain. Reform? Victory? What, who, why, when, where? Does she think we’re stupid? My 7th graders can provide more depth & context to questions.
I’m voting for the SMART people. We’ve had dumb for 8 years.

Posted by: joan from TN | September 11, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Liz, because Alaska is close to Russia, so she knows Russia. At least that’s what McCain just said in an interview.

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Francis: No, the reason I switched from Hillary to McCain is because I know Obama and those he surrounds himself with would destroy our economy and threaten our national security.
I am also a moderate democrat. Not all of Hillary’s supporers were liberal–not at all.
I do want energy independence: Do it all.
I do HATE wasteful spending in government as far as FOOLISH investments, (not most social programs).
Obama’s tax plans, along with everything I know about him, would destroy our capitalist nation, and I think that’s his goal.
Obama is not the tradtional democrat who really gives a crap about ALL working class and middle class. That was the Clinton’s. NOT Obama.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

^5 joan from TN

Posted by: bc46 | September 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

My fellow Republicans, lets take off our blinders and see Palin for what she really is. I don’t want to believe it, but she is regurgitating information that was cramed into her. There is really no substance. I personally have sons that will be old enough to fight one day. I don’t want them to go to war for someone who is not that clear on what she is talking about. (We can not allow this to happen again, you know that Bush has his eye on Iran). This is causing me to wonder. Did I just want her because I am a woman. Please, I hope the rest of the interview reveals more.

Posted by: barb | September 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

It is not republicans who want to know about Ayers, Annenberg etc…it is dems who won’t vote for an inexperienced lair.
I know I was one of them…I prefer God Bless America.

Posted by: new republican | September 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

“It’s mainly the “Obama-democrats” who are SO DARN MEAN-SPIRITED”
They viciously attacked Hillary too. I can’t wait for payback on election day.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

argument for experience and obama
1) He has ran committees (and a very successful campaign) – here are some resume highlights:
* 1983-1984 Writer/Researcher for Business International Corporation. Helped companies understand overseas markets in the “Financing Foreign Operations” service and wrote for the “Business International Money Report”
* 1984-1985 Community Organizer for New York Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), promoting personal, community, and government reform at City College in Harlem.
* 1985-1988 Director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland on Chicago’s South Side. While director grew the DCP staff from 1 to 13 and their budget from $70,000 to $400,000.
* 1992 Led Chicago’s Project Vote! push. This effort resulted in a record number of voter registrations, over 600,000 in Chicago.
* 1993-2004 Visiting Law and Government Fellow, then Senior Lecturer, in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. Taught courses on the due process and equal protection areas of constitutional law, on voting rights, and on racism and law. Helped develop a casebook on voting rights.
* Chairman, Health and Human Services Committee (Illinois State Senate)
o Spearheaded a successful bipartisan effort in Illinois to pass the broadest ethics-reform legislation by any state in 25 years, and also gained bipartisan support for his successful bills reforming death penalty interrogations and ending racial profiling by police. Worked with the Republican-led effort to reform welfare
o Also sponsored successful bills expanding tax credits and child-care subsidies for low-income working families, protecting overtime pay for workers, expanding health care for children, and providing job skills training for juveniles
o Number of sponsored bills: 65
o Number of co-sponsored bills 364
* Member, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
* Chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs
* Member, Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
* Member, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
* Member, Senate Committee on Veterans‘ Affairs
* Barack Obama has introduced nearly 300 bills during his time in the U.S. Senate, and cosponsored close to 1,000 others. If you would like a full look at his legislative efforts, search the 109th Congress at http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d109query.html and 110th Congress at http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d110query.html
2) Executive experience has no correlation with your ability to run the country. The examples are numerous of this, and McCain’s own lack of “executive” experience is quite telling at just how little it really matters. The truth is only19 of the 43 presidents had more experience than Barack Obama would have if he were elected in 2008 (this includes governor experience in the tallies).
3) Attacking the “present” vote is fine, but you may want to look at why he voted present in some of this situations (it wasn’t that he didn’t want to make a decision, many times it was because of constitutionality reasons or as a protest with his party) – and note the total number of votes he did cast (more than 4,000 total votes) – that’s a 3.25% vote of “present.” You may also want to point out/contrast that this year McCain has missed 63.8% of the votes in the senate.
4) The military has donated to Obama at a rate of 6 to 1. He has shown a level head and fortitude to make the tough – and right – decisions.

Posted by: glenn | September 11, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Did Obama ever submit to such a lengthy interview? If so, can someone provide the link?

Posted by: Roger | September 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Obama is not the tradtional democrat who really gives a crap about ALL working class and middle class. That was the Clinton’s. NOT Obama.
Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA
———-
So why are the Clintons campaigning for Obama/Biden and not McCain/Palin?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Russia entered Georgia unprovoked? I think shes misinformed. Georgia entered Ossetia unprovoked, maybe shes confused about the way the U.S. entered Iraq unprovoked.

Posted by: JJ | September 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Bopper:
Didn’t you hear that Palin was proud of her daughter’s DECISION to have her baby?
Palin is not as hard-core as you think.
She is against abortion yes, but not against contraception and sex ed.
Seriously.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Given John McCain health issues, Sarah Palin is next in line to the presidency. I would like to see someone in office who can think under pressure and vision and insight. I would love to see someone in office who did not graduate from the bottom of their college class. Sarah may have go to college but her mind certainly was not on her studies. She has 2.0 GP
A. Obama graduated with 3.8 GPA and was president of the Harvard Review.

Posted by: deltastarr | September 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

If you elect this crazy wacko you will be saying god damn america!

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Wait, our chief weapon is… “a fanatical devotion to…”

Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Leigh39: Quess what alot of Americans are bitter and we do cling to what we have left.He was Indonesia when he was 6…and what ? He was secretly brain washed. Gees…I’ve got poor relatives too

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 11, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

In reading back over the comments, I find it interesting (and sad) that the supporters of McCain/Palin largely resort to name-calling and nastiness while the Obama/Biden people engage in respectful debate.
It’s a perfect mirror-image of the two campaigns. McCain’s ads are ALL about attacking Obama and full of easily debunked lies. Obama’s ads talk about the things HE will do to put out country back on track.
Both McCain & Palin’s convention speeches were FULL of nasty, sarcastic remarks, while Obama’s and Biden’s addressed the issues and offered hope for our broken society.
I blame Rush Limbaugh– he has somehow managed to convince half the electorate that being vile and spewing insults is the same as reasoned debate. The GOP has become the party of hate.
Unfortunately for us Democrats, we are the party of ‘live and let live’ and that makes us the underdog in the current political climate. We aren’t willing to be nasty just for the sake of looking like badasses.
I am truly STUNNED that anyone can claim that Democrats are being “mean” to Sarah Palin. Palin threw down the gauntlet with her snarky ‘pitbull’ convention speech and she continues to repeat the smears on the stump. And that was after Obama defended her and told the press to lay off her family.
I think the comparison I’ve heard going around is quite apt: “Jesus Christ was a ‘Community Organizer’. Pontius Pilate was a Governor.”
One party is about ‘destroying’ their ‘enemies’ and one party is about lifting all people up whatever our differences.
I know that I am proud of the honorable way Obama & Biden have conducted their campaign. They haven’t resorted to lies and playing on fears to win political points.
I wonder if Republicans can, in their heart of hearts, say that the McCain/Palin campaign is something to be proud of?

Posted by: Bea | September 11, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Roger, I don’t have the links, but 18 months of 60 Minutes, Face the Nation, This Week, Meet the Press, 26 debates, Time, Newsweek… are you seriously comparing one interview with Cupcake Gibson to this? Now who’s drinking Kool-Aid?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

“It is not republicans who want to know about Ayers, Annenberg etc…it is dems who won’t vote for an inexperienced lair.
I know I was one of them…I prefer God Bless America.”
You said it. They refuse to believe that there are life long Democrats that refuse to vote for Barry.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

“The Obama team is on the ball!!!
——
That’s right. ENOUGH! We’re going to talk about issues whether you like it or not.”
oh yeah, you guys have been talking about THE ISSUES all right. I didn’t realize that issues included: a 17 years old being pregnant, that sarah’s child is really her daughters, that sarah slept with her husband’s friend, that sarah should stay at home and tend to her children instead of running for office, that sarah tried to turn gay people straight, that sarah cut a budget for disabled even though she tripled it, etc etc. you guys have been talking about everything BUT the issues. on the issues there is no conversation because your candidate didn’t bother to show up for his job in the senate much, so all that he’s got is talking out of his butt. there is nothing to look at as far as any issues, just what he decides that he supports on a given day. that’s why he’s spreading every rumor he can about sarah (with the help of his 30 lawyers released into alaska), to divert attention from the fact that this woman with 5 children, 2 years his junior, had accomplished more reform than obama and biden put together.
sad sad democrats and their little following. and it’s getting smaller by the hour.

Posted by: mike | September 11, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Roger, you must be kidding. Obama has given literally *thousands* of interviews.
Just go on google and type, “Obama interview” and you’ll find any number of them and you don’t have to worry about someone sending you one that is biased one way or another.

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

My friends, to claim that Palin is more ready/experienced than Obama is truly disingenuous. Obama as a US senator (albeit for a short time, but no shorter than Palin was Governor) has heard and dealt with the issues concerning Afghanistan and Iraq. Republicans like to say that Obama just gave a speech denouncing the Iraq war, he never had to vote on it (not true, but let’s agree for the sake of argument). Well, I don’t think Palin has had an opportunity to formulate an opinion to give even that one speech… This is not meant to bash Palin; I’m just saying it’s not on the record. There is really no evidence that she has been thinking about these world affairs to any significant depth. Whatever ideas she will speak now are merely the ones that Bush advisers are going to coach into her. In a speech to her church, she only managed to claim that the war in Iraq was God’s plan. Even if we give her the benefit of doubt on this (let’s just say it was an inappropriately phrased comment), it only shows that she had nothing deeper to say here.
Folks, tossing around names like Rose and Orange revolution and re-assuring us with statements like “Russia, formerly the Soviet Union” just means that she sat on a flight with a bunch of Cliff’s notes (i.e., Bush advisers now coaching her for the upcoming debate). This doesn’t mean that she has thought deeply about these issues, or even cares about them.
I’d ask Republicans to look deeper in their hearts and ask themselves… what direction is this country headed? This is not a game. This is very serious stuff. Let’s not get caught in the mudslinging. It’s quite obvious that Palin was chosen to appease the social conservative base, along with peeling off some women votes. If you belong to that base and you are appeased, then I can’t really argue with you. We just see the world differently. Best of luck. But, for the independents and Republican social centrists, take a deep look at the issues and the direction of the country before making your choice. Do not be swayed by the crazy rhetoric, both from the left and the right… this is just mudslinging.

Posted by: Truth17 | September 11, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

hey kat -
Obama only wants to raise taxes on Americans making over $250K per year, and lower taxes for everybody else. I guess complicated policy issues like that are too much for you little Republican brain to handle?

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

obamamama:
Hillary has said before that even if one can absolutely not support Obama, to please support democrats down-ticket.
Hillary is campaigning as much for Congress, maybe even more than for Obama, and it’s to pay back favors, but mainly…to make sure if McCain wins–there will still be a dem majority Senate (they vote on supreme court judges, etc).
I will be voting dem down-ticket. McCain/ Palin top of the ticket.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

“In reading back over the comments, I find it interesting (and sad) that the supporters of McCain/Palin largely resort to name-calling and nastiness while the Obama/Biden people engage in respectful debate.”
Selective reading? Bizzaro world.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

The American public and the media are playing by the republican rule book. Do we not remember how the election of 2000 went and 2004? The (Karl Rove) Republican Media Playbook was all about make the media come to you, drop the crumbs make them follow you like a pack of dogs. Give them just enough to keep them interested but don’t give them to much substance because they might then go away and really listen to the democrats.
We are falling for it again, is saddens me that the American public is once again playing themselves to be the fool.

Posted by: Erin | September 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Hey Charlie: Why didn’t you ask Obama those same questions? Can Obama look the country in the eye and say he’s qualified? What about the hubris of the junior Senator who has spent more time running for president than being a Senator? What about questions of Obama’s faith, namely the church he attended for 20 years with the racist pastor who gave Farrakhan an award? What about his good friend Bill Ayers who is an unrepentant terrorist who helped launch Obama’s political career? What about his good friend Tony Rezko who helped Obama buy his house? On and on and on. Charlie your reputation as a neutral journalist demands that you ask these hard hitting questions otherwise you will end up like the now disgraced Dan Rather. A partisan political manipulator of propaganda.

Posted by: joey | September 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

mike, the Obama campaign said to back off the Bristol. It was the super left wing extremists (yes, the left wing has their own extremists) that took that to an extreme.
If you look at what the Obama campaign and their *actual* surrogates have said, you’ll quickly realize that all that god awful witchhunt stuff is entirely media driven.

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

LOL @ JohnTX.
Shoot…I lived in Sudan half my life. That’s close to the middle east right? I should be an expert in their policies and how to handle potential problems right? I am so running for office if I ever go back :-)

Posted by: Liz | September 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Gibson’s questions appear to be softballs with little follow-up. Palin’s answers are fluff she’s been coached to regurgitate. Folks on the right who are quick to jump on her bandwagon never explain, with any detail, why they support her. They simply become adamant about defending her, and then they attack anyone who dares to criticize her (see above comments for multiple examples). In my opinion, Palin does not have enough concrete experience to be VP or (god forbid) Prez. Perhaps Obama doesn’t either. But when it comes down to it, McCain and Palin have both PROVEN, through their actions and statements, that they are impulsive and reactionary, and their campaign is resting on a carefully choreographed routine of distracting people from the true issues. There are countless lies in her acceptance speech that have now become woven throughout their campaign as part of the false-reality they are trying to sell. No, not just rumors drummed up by the media – actual facts documented in government records, quotes captured during speeches during previous campaigns, and other things your righties keep trying desperately to dismiss as liberal bias. How can it be liberal bias if it came out of Palin’s or McCain’s mouth during non-partisan events? If Palin can’t handle the scrutiny from the media, how can she possibly handle it from Putin or Chavez? Obama has PROVEN himself to be someone who thinks things through carefully before responding with statements or actions that demonstrate solid diplomacy skills.

Posted by: red | September 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

I am an independent leaning republican, and definitely not pro Obama. I am very puzzled by some people’s reactions. People like Palin because she is your “average hockey mom” and she DIDN’T go to an Ivey league school. My question is this, do we want an average guy or lady running our country? I am your average guy, my wife is PTA vice president but trust me, your average person will NOT do a good job running this country!!! We have to demand that the person running for President is above average, above average educated, above average intelligent, above average charisma, the presidency of the United States is not the job for the AVERAGE guy!!! After 8 years of having two C students in the White house, lets get a smarter person there! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Bob | September 11, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

the fact that this woman with 5 children, 2 years his junior, had accomplished more reform than obama and biden put together.
Posted by: mike
——-
Lay out all their experience, Mike, Obama and Biden. Then Palin’s. She’s got more, really? Is this new math or something?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

(Mc) Cain – PAIN – Bush ed
More of the same,
Hair trigger shooters,
Crush the backs of the poor,

Posted by: Marty | September 11, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

“In reading back over the comments, I find it interesting (and sad) that the supporters of McCain/Palin largely resort to name-calling and nastiness while the Obama/Biden people engage in respectful debate.”
OMG! No more calls, please! I think we have a winner!
Doh!!!

Posted by: Don | September 11, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

I assure those wondering, there are many of us moderates afraid of this religious fanatic backpedaling her own claims of divine authority when put on the spot.
McCain of 8 years ago was the enemy of people like this, and if I had the McCain of 8 years ago to vote for, I would, happily. But I will not vote for another 4 years of failed foreign policy, failed education policy, and failed economic policy.

Posted by: Josh in Colorado | September 11, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Bush was voted into the Presidency because people thought he was “someone they could have a beer with”.
Our leaders shouldn’t be ordinary. They should be extraordinary.

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

kat in you hat PUMA: I heard her say this: “No McCain. No way. No how.” Hard to confuse that plain speech.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

LOL. New Obama talking point:
*Enough* *issues* *no distractions* *it’s about issues*
That’s RICH! After 20 months of YES WE CAN; BELIEVE; HOPE; CHANGE! CHANGE! CHANGE!
Gimme a break.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

She is ready to go to war with Russia!!!! OMG Please people, anybody but her as the runner up!!!

Posted by: JJ | September 11, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Mclame just put this election ove rhis country with this pick. It’s very obvious I honestly can’t believe that “Mavrick” Mclame would honestly pick this woman to lead our country into a war. I just don’t buy it. and I aint going to drink this republican kool aid

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Why are the DEMS so scared of this brilliant and accomplished woman? Are they afraid we might notice just how un-brilliant and non-accomplished their pick for the POTUS is?
Do you notice all the comments that are incoherent and vulgar are from the LEFT. Please people grow a brain. Quit just spouting talking points like ROBOT, and actually read up on those running for office before you run off at the mouth.

Posted by: Carole | September 11, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Totally agree with you Bob. Its nice to find a Republican I can agree with for a change. At least we can agree, intelligence and knowledge matter! Let’s not put Sally Homemaker into the White House!

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

“. Obama graduated with 3.8 GPA and was president of the Harvard Review. ”
And over 80% of Harvard grads graduated with honors. The highest by far of any Ivy. Return on investment?

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

obamamama:
I also heard Hillary say that Obama was too inexperienced, and that both she and McCain crossed over the Commander-in-Chief threshold, with decades of experience, and all Obama has done was give a speech in 2002.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Well, kat in “you” hat, after your party decided they liked “Change” so well that they stole it, I think Obama said it best: ENOUGH!
I actually used to admire McCain. He’s not the same man he used to be. He sold out to the Rove crowd to become president. If he is elected, however, I will pray for his continued good health.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

“Obama only wants to raise taxes on Americans”
You lost me after that.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Even though Gibson is trying to make Palin look like a religious kook, Palin gives direct answers to the questions. Compare this to the way Obama stumbles about for words to make it look like he is answering a question during those rare times the media gives him a hard question.

Posted by: TDK | September 11, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

“Maybe she should have stopped and thought, “Gee, my daughter’s unmarried and pregnant at 17. Maybe I should consider her feelings?”
Yeah. I’m right there with ya. Until you try to imagine what the 17-year old would have to live with knowing that she was the reason her mother declined to be the first ever republican vice presidential candidate. You play the hand you’re delt in life and pray that you have a loving family standing beside you.

Posted by: Joe SixPack | September 11, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Wasn’t Mclame like 280th at some crappy naval school?

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Carole, where is the proof she is brilliant? What are her *actual* accomplishments? How hands on was she as governor when she resided 600 miles away from the seat of government?
I need to know where she stands on issues. This it the first real interview she’s given. That’s insane! McCain did his first interview today after a *month*.
Why are they hiding?

Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

“Well, kat in “you” hat, after your party decided they liked “Change” so well that they stole it, I think Obama said it best: ENOUGH!”
After Barry “borrowed it” from Deval Patrick.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

I voted for bush because i thought he was a good Christian man. He used religion to take advantage of the world and has made it easier for those with the means to rob this nation. I will not vote republican, the revolution is in our vote. GET RID of the republicans before they ruin, steel our draws.

Posted by: Marty | September 11, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Have to agree that Obama people seem just downright mean. And at the same time, they mostly don’t believe that real evil exists and must be defeated. And THAT must be the primary issue we focus on when voting for our next president. But Obamamaniacs want to believe that it’s only a coincidence that we haven’t been attacked again in 7 years.
Do you believe Obama can carry on this record? Or do you simply want to vote for the most popular boy in the class and “HOPE” he’ll protect you from evil?

Posted by: TriJana | September 11, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Is Obama running against Palin or McCain? Why are the dems/Liberals so afraid of her? Is it perhaps because they know the republicans will win again? Lets pull up Obama’s and Palin’s resume. put them side by side, and see who is more experienced! By the way, what has Obama accomplished as a Senator? At least Sarah is #2 for the republicans. The Dems/liberals have Obama as the head on their ticket and their #2 says Hillary is more qualified than him!!! Do we want those two as our leaders?! In essence, one has no experience, has not had to make decisions in office, voted present as Senator, and the other believes he is less qualified than someone else to be Vice President!!! Very Interesting. Only in America.

Posted by: Charlie | September 11, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

“I need to know where she stands on issues.”
Does it matter? You’re just waiting for her to slip up so that you attack her. That’s how this game is played, right?

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

I watched the video clips. She sounds great, so articulate, secure of herself, smart, and authentic. If she’s not completely ready now, she will soon be. Now I feel more comfortable voting for that ticket!
GO SARAH !!!! Nobody can intimidate you, GO GIRL!!!!!

Posted by: Metsa Rama | September 11, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

carole, we’re not afraid of what she’s accomplished. We’re afraid of what she might do if she’s president, which is a very strong possibility.
Anyone who is a governor or senator should be respected, they’ve done what it takes to get there. However, their views on the world and their policies and issues are what defines them, and frankly, hers scare me.

Posted by: glenn | September 11, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Joe SixPack, I have a 17-year-old daughter. I’d stand by her side, too, no matter what the mistake or decision she made. But I wouldn’t feed her to the wolves. Do you have so little confidence in Palin that you think this is her only opportunity to serve her country?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Someone commented that Obama and his team have been on the attack towards Palin??!! And that the Repubs haven’t yet unleashed their attacks on Obama??!! What planet are you living on????? Methinks the opposite is true. Practice this, which even my 2 1/2 year old twin niece and nephew can say, “President Obama!”
If we get McCain and Palin, this country will finish being destroyed in short order.

Posted by: Marirose13 | September 11, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Like any of you dems really care about anything but yourselves. COUNTRY FIRST!!!

Posted by: Bruce Ballard | September 11, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Palin answeed the questions that were asked. It’s Gibson that is not on the ball… So she knew she was ready, How do any of you know what she actually knows? Ahh yes speculation.

Posted by: Jo; NH | September 11, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

So serving as a governor of a state with a population equal to the size of the city of Austin means Sarah has the right amount of executive experience? Seems eight years ago we voted another governor in with more “executive experience” then Sarah and look where that got us as a country.

Posted by: Erin | September 11, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Truth17 – great post! The best on the blog in my opinion. Kudos!

Posted by: Ohioangel | September 11, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I was for Obama, then for McCain since Ms Alaska Came in with so much vigor, after watching the first interview by Charlie, “oh my Gwad” i am Sooo Not for McCain Anymore.. this woman is a joke.

Posted by: daddin | September 11, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Jo, did you hear the commander of the Alaskan NG say she didn’t do anything? I’d take his word for it!

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Democrats are afraid of Palin because the democratic party has ALWAYS had a huge women’s voting bloc.
But now the republicans are getting a bigger women voting bloc. It terrifies the democrats because it could destroy the democratic party and it even threatens the two party system.
Turns out the democratic party is more sexist than the republican party (this year).
The democrats feel that it should have been THEIR party to push through a woman to the highest office, and they are just very shocked that it will be the republicans to do it.
The democrats NEVER thought McCain would put a woman on his ticket, and so they are scared to death and attacking Palin. They should be attacking themselves, for turning into sad woman-haters under Obama’s influence.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

“I actually used to admire McCain. He’s not the same man he used to be.”
Dailykos talking point #15
At least the old person attacks slowed down after Barry selected Biden.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

I think what scared me was how she kept saying “you can not blink when making these decisions”, so does that mean that since she has access to the nuclear codes she doesn’t consult congress just starts pushing buttons?
Also, this looks very edited…

Posted by: Jullie | September 11, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Alot of republicans are saying ” she’s a wacko” but hey who cares.
Mclame Palin: PARTY FIRST

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Charlie and the rest of the wing-nuts keep talking about how Palin is more qualified than Obama. Put their resumes side by side and see how they do. Better yet, give them each a test on world history, geography, and international politics and see how they’d do. Palin might win a test on moose-skinning or slaughtering helpless animals from a helicopter, but not any real issue that one would actually need to know to be a VP.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

ABC I am appalled that you would have this interview on 9/11.
Really this is OUTRAGEOUS to have your propaganda pull for Palin and her ‘hardline’ policies on this day.
Also we need to know were you questions given to her ahead of time? was she allowed to prepare for them so her Bush speechwriters could train her on what to say? Glad she had a couple of weeks to cram for her little exam.
this is more than scary.
on 9//11 when the candidates were supposedly taking a break from campaigning and you give her a platform for their “hardline’ views?!!!!!
SHAME ON YOU ABC.
REPREHENSIBLE!!!
SHAME ON YOU !!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: lisa | September 11, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Just curious (seriously). How many of you Palin defenders would also vote Bush into another term?
_____________________________
How many of you Obama defenders are afraid of Obama FINALLY being vetted??? Just curious (seriously).

Posted by: mj | September 11, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Who is asking about Obama’s experience? before he declared his candidacy, exactly how many foreign dignitaries had he met? And he’s running for President, not VP — where’s the outrage there?

Posted by: boop | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

It’s because we care about our country, Bruce Ballard, that we speak out. Patriots are not just those who nod their heads without thinking. Patriots speak up when they see their country is heading in the wrong direction, even when they face derision from people like you.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

My Republican friends in my office are panicked by her statements. In fact, one has jumped ship already. I personally cant believe this lunatic nut job actually stated “Yes, I’m qualified to be President ! ! ! “

Posted by: Shawn | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

My Republican friends in my office are panicked by her statements. In fact, one has jumped ship already. I personally cant believe this lunatic nut job actually stated “Yes, I’m qualified to be President ! ! ! “

Posted by: Shawn | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

To many obvious edits in the interview to think that the republicans didn’t have a hand in what was aired. How many more times does she need to shake her hand to make the point that she means it…she really does.

Posted by: Jerry | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

*Charlie*
Personally, I’m afraid of her because shes regurgitating everything thats being fed to her. She could EASILY become the Pres. if something happens to McCain (which is very likely). If you’re going to take part in leading the country, at least have your own mind. I’ve already said everything I need to say bout McCain but Palin came out of nowhere and expects us to trust her. Mofo please!

Posted by: Liz | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

I haven’t seen one democrat try to argue that they’re voting for Obama because he’s a good speaker and strong headed. That’s a quality that should be found in presidents but not the deciding factor.
What I’ve heard is democrats give reasons on issues why they’re voting for Obama.
However, the big plus factor about Palin i’ve been hearing from Republicans is that she gave a great speech and that she’s a strong headed woman. What about her opinions and the issues are you for? or for that matter what has john mccain said that you’re for?

Posted by: glenn | September 11, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Eighty per cent of Americans believe our country is on the wrong track. EIGHTY PER CENT! This election is about bringing our TROOPS home, creating and keeping JOBS, keeping people in their HOMES, and finding long term solutions to our ENERGY problems. IMHO, the Democrats are playing right into Karl Rove’s hands by wasting a lot of useless talk on “what a redneck” Sarah Palin is. Well, a redneck is as good as the next person when it comes to wanting someone to lead us out of the mess we’re in. The Republicans are just getting the Democrats to say things to drive voters over to their party. Enough already! Let’s start talking about the issues that have 80 PER CENT of people ticked off and what we all agree on to get us out of the mess we’re in. And, to my mind, it isn’t more of the same old crony capitalism, lies about WMD and attack politics. People are not fools and they will soon catch on that Sarah Palin is just a decoy. Of course she’s not qualified to be VP, but that’s not why she’s on the ticket to begin with….

Posted by: A True Redneck Mama | September 11, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Straight forward answers without hesitation. Sarah Palin is a change for Washington. A change of someone who is not a typical Washington politician. She speaks from her heart and doesn’t flinch at the liberal onslaught of her character.

Posted by: bbmac | September 11, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

The only religious wacko in this campaign is Obama’s spiritual guru, Rev. Wright. Obama listened to his hateful sermons for 20 years and refused to disown him even when it came to the anti-American preaching.

Posted by: TDK | September 11, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Palin knows more about running the government than Obama does. Obama organized communities which when translated says “seperate the colors from the white in the wash”. Obama only knows how to hang on somebody elses tail and take credit for what they do, in return he gives them big bucks for their districts.

Posted by: joan | September 11, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Like any of you rich fascist Republicans care about anything but your corporations and your money!! America First! Obama/Biden Time!!!

Posted by: JJ | September 11, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

THE IMPLOSION BEGINS ! ! !

Posted by: Shawn | September 11, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Wow, what a wonderful, insightful interview. Thanks ABC NEWS. I am even more impressed with Gov. Palin! Go McCain-Palin Team.

Posted by: BryPlan08 | September 11, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

“I think what scared me was how she kept saying “you can not blink when making these decisions”, so does that mean that since she has access to the nuclear codes she doesn’t consult congress just starts pushing buttons?”
Yes as VP she is going to start pushing buttons.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

It has just become more apparent to me that without Tim Russert we will never get to the heart of the matter. I am sadden that we have not had a journalist step up to the plate Since Tim Russert’s death. No one is up to the challenge and it is very sad.

Posted by: Pam | September 11, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Mack, mock me all you want. My opinions are not talking points. McCain used to be a maverick. Can’t think of a single issue he is a maverick on these days. Help me out and name one.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

There are both Republicans and Deomcrats in Alaska. Govenor Palin has a 80% approval rating!!! She is obviuosly doing something right!!!!

Posted by: mj | September 11, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

lisa is appalled this the interview is on 9/11? Gimme a break.
You probably don’t even live anywhere near the attacks, and I know people who died 7 years ago.
Relax.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Media is so focused on liberalism. They absolutely hate the right side. It is a lopsided vision of the truth. This interview was at least a fair chance for Palin to come out into the light. Being from Alaska I know what she has gone through with the oil companies and the old republican guard. She is a strong leader with a vision and she has the guts to see it through. (and it is very American,,,,not Marxist). Obama is making transparent fake promises that will be very damaging to the American Economy.

Posted by: nate | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Wrong track? You bet. Too much corruption, no drilling allowed, taxes too high, government too big. That’s why we need McCain and Palin.

Posted by: Roger | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I love all the people on the comment board like “Buster” and others who says she did provide any facts and said nothing…..and yet you support Obama?? Also did you watch the interview? What facts could be given with these questions? Obama hasn’t had questions like this from the majority of the media. Read all these comments, every one of them is from a political spin-point. I like hillary she lost. I am trying to pick a ticket yet all I get from the media is bias and all I read from peoples commmentary is delusion

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I think someone posted earlier and I completely agree that it is a significant concern that someone would accept the potential vice presidency without blinking an eye. This exemplifies a lack of foresight, thought, and balancing of pros and cons when it comes to significant decision making…a significant flaw in the potential vice president who could potentially become the leader of the free world. Also, I think most of you supporting her because she seems to be a strong woman who balances family and career would have to admit that it is a concern that she is implying that she didn’t even stop to think about the impact on her family…she just accepted with no pause or blink of an eye.

Posted by: AF | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I think the interview is GREAT.
I am glad.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

She did A-Okay!

Posted by: Linda | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Bravo! Well said!

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Mc Cain’s choice of Sarah Palin should be seen as major insult to all Americans. She is not qualified to be on any major ticket.
But what should we expect from a man who finished 4th from the bottom of his class at Annapolis.
This country needs intelligent people to lead it right now not another dolt like Bush. That someone is Obamma who was president of the Harvard Law review.
Clinto was a Rhodes scholar also another itellect. The country did fine under his watch it’s time for intelligence in the oval office and not ignorance.

Posted by: ira | September 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Mc Cain’s choice of Sarah Palin should be seen as major insult to all Americans. She is not qualified to be on any major ticket.
But what should we expect from a man who finished 4th from the bottom of his class at Annapolis.
This country needs intelligent people to lead it right now not another dolt like Bush. That someone is Obamma who was president of the Harvard Law review.
Clinto was a Rhodes scholar also another itellect. The country did fine under his watch it’s time for intelligence in the oval office and not ignorance.

Posted by: ira | September 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

“If you’re going to take part in leading the country, at least have your own mind.”
She doesn’t have a team of 300 advisers helping to run Alaska.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

One thing is ABSOLUTELY clear…NObama has a huge number of people with a lot of time on their hands to write garbage on sites and call in to radio shows and spout talking point drivel. Perhaps they’re the people that he failed to get educated when he was a community agitator.
Governor Sarah is far more clear to me than NObama who cringes and dodges when any details of his limited and questionable past is slightly exposed. I feel confident that Governor Sarah doesn’t associate with America haters and aging terrorists.

Posted by: Rob | September 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

that should read didn’t provide any facts. I apologize the evil republicans must have made me do it.

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I am an Independent voter. I have voted for some Republicans and for some Democrats. I am a woman and I will NOT be voting for McCain and his Palin-Puppet, also known by her own words, “soccer mom/pit bull with lipstick.” Let us get “real.” Experience can be highly overrated, especially when it is highly ineffective. OBAMA was wise enough to say NO to a senseless war that has only cost dear, precious lives – US and Iraqi’s. Republicans, do you realize this war has taken more lives than the overthrown, beheaded Iraqi leader was responsible for? The war has cost us BILLIONS pushing TRILLIONS in resources, the most precious are the lives lost – blood for oil. Blood to make Cheney and his puppet Bush and their cronies richer than any of us can ever imagine. If that is the kind of experience we need, forget it. Republicans and Independents, WAKE-UP! Experience in this Presidential race equals more war, more wreckless spending of resources and lives, more tax cuts for the wealthy, more Republican rationalism for all of their poor choices for the populace. We ARE NOT BETTER OFF after eight years of puppetry. Where is the sanity of intelligent people in the US? WAKE UP!

Posted by: Terresa | September 11, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

“This country needs intelligent people to lead it right now not another dolt like Bush. That someone is Obamma who was president of the Harvard Law review.”
Bush went to Harvard too.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Do the Obama heads really think that the party of Disgrace (democrats) will be able to Con the American People with their control of the mainstream media? “Most” intelligent people in this country see right through the Tissue thin experience of Obama and his more of the same Clinton Policies that Failed so Miserably. Barak Obama reminds me of so many athletes who talk a good game and sometimes a great game, but when the action starts they are the first ones to rattle of excuse after excuse as to why they can’t get the job done. While Barak Obama is talking, people like John McCain and Sarah Palin are getting the Right things done for this Great Nation. McCain/Palin ‘08

Posted by: Jorge | September 11, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

No matter what Sara Palin answers most Obama voters will find problems with. On the other hand whatever Obama does or who he associates with will be fine, I got it. By the way War heros actually abhore wars. There is a less likely chance of a war with McCain than Obama. I believe he’d be tested within a year, where McCain would be less likely. Can’t we agree we are all biased? Is it true Obama is getting 97% of the registered black voters? To me that is pretty disturbing by anyones standard.

Posted by: leanandmean | September 11, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Hey Nate, if you are from Alaska, could you please give us back our $200 million from the Bridge to Nowhere? We’re kind of in a pinch here, and buying popularity in your home state is not real high on our agenda. How much was your rebate?

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

By the way, HOW MANY OF YOU PRO PALIN supporters just don’t want a black man as President??

Posted by: bopper | September 11, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

I’m sorry but this interview not only seems scripted, but it is extremely edited. Does anyone besides me notice how it cuts away at points? I want to see her interviewed “Unplugged” or live.

Posted by: Ohioangel | September 11, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

I CANNOT get over Charlie’s condescending tone and posturing on this first phase of the interview… like Sarah’s some silly, impetuous girl who needs to be reminded she’s way out of her league in big boy territory. I have NEVER seen him this way before… chin in, holding back his disdain–like a teacher who needs to “rein in” a wayward student. “You tell me what the Bush doctrine is, Sarah.” Charlie, you are the NIGHTMARE women in the business world inevitably encounter on their quest for success in the work world. But let’s remember, big guy, you read teleprompters for a living. Sarah makes decisions that impact public safety and quality of life. Thank God she’s tough.

Posted by: Professional business woman | September 11, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Oh yeah Roger. Drilling – that’s going to solve everything. It is incredible how uneducated and ignorant McCain/Palin supporters are about basic realities. Fact – we went to war to increase big oil’s profits. Fact – they now have the most profits of any industry ever in the history of the world. Fact – if we started drilling today that would barely make a difference. Fact – we actually have a surplus of oil, the reason the price of it is so high is because of speculation and because high prices mean more profits from the oil companies.
Drilling won’t help anything. Do a little research.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Hey nate I wish I could have your rebate…others are jealous that your state actually has a budget that affords it’s people a rebate.

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Charlie, for someone as long in the tooth as you, I would have thought by this time you’d have learned how to listen. Gov Palin gave you several credible answers the first time and you needn’t have asked them 3 times. You were too busy giving her that condescending look over your glasses. I also would have thought by this time you’d be better able to mask your true political leanings…but alas, none of your ilk seem so enabled. Network news is quickly following in the footsteps of our daily newspapers which have the life expectancy of the dodo. Keep up the bad work.

Posted by: donald May | September 11, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Yet again, the corporate controlled media throws softball questions, so that the low-information voters won’t realize that they are being fooled yet again! Attention voters: Ask why Palin hides from real questions. Ask why she does not discuss economics. Ask why she does not engage in foreign affairs discussions. Ask why she only throws out pithy bumper-sticker zingers instead of discussing serious & complex topics. Ask why she only attacks the candidates who are discussing the “real” problems. Folks, we are on the brink of economic failure, failure that was brought to you by these very same people who have moved their corporations & money out of the U.S. Ask yourself why you would consider Palin as qualified. Four more years will ensure the complete & final gutting of America as a country, leaving it an empty, pathetic shell, while the corporates reap huge rewards off-shore. As the now infamous Enron slogan goes, Ask Why.

Posted by: bert | September 11, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Palins first question GIBSON played her repeat the answer re Russia and attacking another country if threatened!!
It seems ABC picked and chose what exactly they wanted the viewers to see….it appeared to be her answers were picked and played and other words left out…
YOU bias hypocrites……AT ABC….I will never watch your station again….even the tv programming

Posted by: Ms Fran | September 11, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Professional business woman: Oh yeah, he was real tough. We women can’t handle it. Please go easy on us. Let’s put on our big girl underpants and be the women the feminists fought for. Tough. Equal. No special treatment. Bring it on.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

“Joan
People who don’t like community organizers are generally racists or facists. Which one are you?”
But it was ok for Barry to belittle her mayoral experience. A job where you acutally have to make decisions, not just stuff envelopes and hand out flyers. Al Sharpton is a community organizer, and there is about as much hate in his community as there is in Wright’s church.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

“Mc Cain’s choice of Sarah Palin should be seen as major insult to all Americans”
(yawn)

Posted by: frank | September 11, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Kat in your hat PUMA, ok since you “know” people who died there that makes you more American? Im sure it was nothing to you, obviously, but there were people all the way across the nation who still cry every day and knew noone that died there. Our Nation was attacked, not just those loved people. We ALL died a little there that day and she has every right to be offended. So you RELAX.

Posted by: JJ | September 11, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

She is a HOT head.

Posted by: Marty | September 11, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Wow! The candidates are all good people. It seems that most of you are just upset over the fact that McCain and Palin are going to be the winning ticket in this election. So get over it and deal with it and stop with the personal attacks.

Posted by: susie | September 11, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Oh Jim…why don’t you just stop typing and post a link to some liberal blogs talking points…”NO BLOOD FOR OIL” If you think we fought to make big oil money and to get more for ourselves you should may be take a look at world supply levels of oil…or you could just keep screaming things like “Rove-politics” “impeach Bush” and “republican devels”

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

If this is what she said, “Our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God…That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that plan is God’s plan”, then it’s silly to be upset about it.
I’ll translate for those who are fanboys and not really paying attention:
She stated a hypothesis that they are being sent due to God’s plan and then urged the audience to pray that her hypothesis is correct. Fair enough and quite nice really.
[if you don't know the word "hypothesis", look it up.]

Posted by: Mary | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

It’s pretty funny that are the obama supporters are on here upset that she is coming off as the reasonable person she is. Stop believing everything you read on left-wing blogs and give her a chance.

Posted by: Janny | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Yeah, John, drilling is the answer. Drop in the bucket, dude. We need better answers than drill, baby, drill. You guys have had 8 years. You didn’t drill or come up with better solutions. Move over. Enough.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Shawn
“I personally cant believe this lunatic nut job actually stated “Yes, I’m qualified to be President ! ! ! ”
“Hello” Palin has more qualifications then Obama!! Palin is the VP on the ticket Obama is running for Pres. ???

Posted by: Coolhand | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Don said: “In reading back over the comments, I find it interesting (and sad) that the supporters of McCain/Palin largely resort to name-calling and nastiness while the Obama/Biden people engage in respectful debate.”
OMG! No more calls, please! I think we have a winner!
Doh!!!
_______________
Thank you, Don, for making my point for me so nicely. Truly, I hope all the hate in your heart doesn’t destroy you. Peace.

Posted by: Bea | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

“By the way, HOW MANY OF YOU PRO PALIN supporters just don’t want a black man as President??’
Pastor Wright, is that you?

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Whenever I get down about our country it is usually when I read the bulk of fool comments by readers in these blogzones. I’ve been watching and studying Gov Palin since last Feb and spreading the word about her. The moment John McCain announced her name as his VP pick I have been thrilled and elated. She really does represent the kind of energy and reform this country needs. That’s not a quick fix. In fact, our dependence on quick fixes is part of our problem. John McCain and Sarah Palin will not give us any quick fix but will LEAD us in a new direction to strengthen American values and restore values almost lost.
Together we can re-ignite the heart and soul of this country and lead the rest of the nations who want to follow toward a real New World – not the New Order of George Soros and company.
McCain/Palin ’08. Palin/Jindal ’2012 !!

Posted by: Mary McCurry | September 11, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Please, please, please, ABC, get Charlie Gibson off the news. I just finished watching him “attack” Sarah Palin, not only verbally but with his facial expressions, which included
actually looking off to the side while asking questions. It was so blatantly obvious that Charlie disrespects and disagrees with ALL of what she said. His feelings were written all over his face. I was so horrified, angry and embarrassed with what I was watching that I had to leave the room and come right to e-mail. It’s well known out in the real world that Charlie Gibson and Diane Sawyer are so politically liberal that they squeak. Have you ever thought that you might do better in ratings if you had a liberal AND a conservative on your news shows?!
ABC, KEEP YOUR POLITICAL OPINIONS TO YOURSELVES! You’re breaking the cardinal rule in journalism/broadcasting. Let the people think for themselves! We Americans are already heading down a slippery slope, and your biased news reporting exacerbates that.
I can’t wait to talk about this at work tomorrow. I feel sure most of my coworkers will share my opinion about tonight’s debacle.
I, for one, will watch Fox News in the future.

Posted by: Linda Stoner | September 11, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

*Roger*
And what promises is McCain making that will help the American economy? How often do you hear him talk about things he will do for the economy? All I hear from him is war and foreign policy, they’re important, but they’re not the only issues on the table. What about energy? More drilling? What’s that going to do for this country in the long run? His tax cuts benefit those who make 250K or higher more than they benefit people like little ‘ol me who can barely afford nursing school. I’m sorry but John McCain doesn’t cut it. What about the military? Since he loves the war so much and wants to keep at it, why isn’t he more concerned about the soldiers fighting the war? Most of us don’t have full coverage for mental healthcare, especially if you’re a guard or reserves. When I came back from Iraq I was under the impression that the GI Bill would cover my education! $400 a month doesn’t do a thing. He wants us to keep fighting this war but he won’t give us the benefits we deserve. John McCain DOESN’T CUT IT!

Posted by: Liz | September 11, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Mack. What? Just keep selling that junk man…It must be racism. Way to move the issue foward. I also like chocolate chip ice cream because there is more white then black in it. Wow this making everything a race issue is really fun…I can see why you can’t just let it go.

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Mary McCurry, my values are just fine. Thanks, but no thanks. Instead, let’s fix the economy and get out of this international mess we’re in. I don’t need your values imposed on me. I want a president, not a pastor.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

I think the funniest thing is that Biden stated that Hillary is more qualified than Obama and would have been a better choose than him. Well if this is an example of Obama’s leadership and experience he’s really ready. Also I watched the O’Rilley interview and I have one question for liberals, Obama stated that he would lower taxes on 95% (more than the evil president bush did) of the country, and raise the other 5%, but he stated that he would delay raising taxes on the 5% because it would slow the economy down more. Well with this brilliant statement when the economy improves then he will raise taxes and “slow it back down” that’s the change we need. Maybe at the same time he will tax the oil companies more, which will make the price of oil go down (what?).
And for every one out there saying how evil the oil companies are (I don’t work for one and I drive a big truck). Go look at Exxon Mobile financial report for last year, yes they made more than $40 billion, but they had over $450,000,000,000 in sales (that’s billion for you slow people), and less then 25% was in the US. They make less than 9 cents on the dollar. Google last year made over 22 cents on the dollar, but had no ware near that amount in sales as Exxon did. But if Google did have $450,000,000,000 in sales then they would make $99,000,000,000 (Billion), and probable spend a good amount of that money within the county by hiring people “evil”, buying equipment “Evil” and so on.
This shows that Obama doesn’t know basic economics work; go to the IRS web site you can see that the top 5% pay more than 40% of the countries tax bill. And you will also see that even the IRS states that each time taxes are lowered the revenue goes up. And again for the slow people, the reason it goes up is because the population spends more money and the “Evil” companies make more and hire more people and then people in turn spend more, and so on.

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

I was very Disapointed with Charlie Gibson. It was very clear that he is not impartial and has an agenda. He was very condescending in tone and body language. I would like to see the same questions asked of Obama in the same way. Whether you like her answers or not, give Sarah Palin credit for being cool under fire.

Posted by: Bob from MA | September 11, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Taking a survey – how many people posting here are registered to vote?

Posted by: Holly | September 11, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I think the funniest thing is that Biden stated that Hillary is more qualified than Obama and would have been a better choose than him. Well if this is an example of Obama’s leadership and experience he’s really ready. Also I watched the O’Rilley interview and I have one question for liberals, Obama stated that he would lower taxes on 95% (more than the evil president bush did) of the country, and raise the other 5%, but he stated that he would delay raising taxes on the 5% because it would slow the economy down more. Well with this brilliant statement when the economy improves then he will raise taxes and “slow it back down” that’s the change we need. Maybe at the same time he will tax the oil companies more, which will make the price of oil go down (what?).
And for every one out there saying how evil the oil companies are (I don’t work for one and I drive a big truck). Go look at Exxon Mobile financial report for last year, yes they made more than $40 billion, but they had over $450,000,000,000 in sales (that’s billion for you slow people), and less then 25% was in the US. They make less than 9 cents on the dollar. Google last year made over 22 cents on the dollar, but had no ware near that amount in sales as Exxon did. But if Google did have $450,000,000,000 in sales then they would make $99,000,000,000 (Billion), and probable spend a good amount of that money within the county by hiring people “evil”, buying equipment “Evil” and so on.
This shows that Obama doesn’t know basic economics work; go to the IRS web site you can see that the top 5% pay more than 40% of the countries tax bill. And you will also see that even the IRS states that each time taxes are lowered the revenue goes up. And again for the slow people, the reason it goes up is because the population spends more money and the “Evil” companies make more and hire more people and then people in turn spend more, and so on.

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Registered holly!

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Charlie, your impatience and rudeness during the Palin interview could not have been more apparent. I know “the facts” are important, but is it a “bad thing” to be a Christian? If religion is that much of a concern, then I feel we must revisit Obama’s previous and current religious beliefs. In addition, I will be anxiously awaiting to see if your Biden interview is handled with the same demeanor.

Posted by: Keith | September 11, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

It’s funny how all these supposedly progressive feminist sorts are against KEEPING BABIES?
Pro-Choice means that you support the woman in BOTH decisions! That’s feminism! That’s progressive!
You want to JUDGE people for choosing life? It’s a choice!!!!

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

She lied. Her statment in the church had nothing at all to do with Abraham Lincoln’s quote. She was resuming the opposite…that God is on our side. If she isn’t called on this, what is credible about the interview. She’s a liar!~ Just like Bush, just like McCain, more of the same old lies.
GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?
PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.
GIBSON: Exact words.
PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words. But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side. That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

Posted by: Kevin Morgan | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

At least one of the vice presidential candidates feels they are the right candidate. I wouldn’t want someone a heartbeat away from the presidency that wasn’t sure, always asking should it have been Hilary before they made a decision.

Posted by: Allen | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Registered and always vote. All my family is the same.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Holly I am a registered democrat.
I am voting for McCain/ Palin ticket.

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

I find it interesting that many, let’s say US Citizens, are okay with a candidate that doesn’t put his hand on his heart when the symbol of freedom is being formally presented. He doesn’t wear an American Flag on his lapel, and then says he loves this country too much…to allow what? What is Obama afraid of, offending who? And what about the voting citizens that support him? Are you afraid of offending another country? or people who live in this country who are not citizens? That’s pretty scary.

Posted by: Cory | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

As I read these comments, very negative towards Gov. Palin who held her own, while Charlie Gibson looked down on her with utter disrespect and obvious contempt, I notice that most of the users of this page and commentary are from left wing liberals liberals who obviously hold to a double standard when it comes to Republican women.
TSK TSK you people. Strong talk like the Governors have kept us safer for the last 7 years than we were when the Dems controlled the Whitehouse.
WAKE UP AMERICA

Posted by: kristina | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Registered Holly!
I made my mom and brother register two! Do I get a prize or something? :-)

Posted by: Liz | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

I find it interesting that many, let’s say US Citizens, are okay with a candidate that doesn’t put his hand on his heart when the symbol of freedom is being formally presented. He doesn’t wear an American Flag on his lapel, and then says he loves this country too much…to allow what? What is Obama afraid of, offending who? And what about the voting citizens that support him? Are you afraid of offending another country? or people who live in this country who are not citizens? That’s pretty scary.

Posted by: Cory | September 11, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

After seeing the ABC interview, Palin is not ready to be President. Anyone with even a passing interest in foreign affairs is familar with the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive war and her not being able to answer shows that she was prepped with some set talking points and has no real inherent understanding of the issues.
She is not ready to be a heartbeat away from the leadership of the free world.

Posted by: The Other Ed | September 11, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Sarah Palin is very impressive. From what I know of her, she gets my respect and my vote.

Posted by: Badger | September 11, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Cory, patriotism has nothing to do with flag pins or red-white-blue ties. Get real.

Posted by: obamamama | September 11, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

It’s so discouraging hearing such hate from the left. I can list names but you bloggers know who you are. Republicans want a more balanced energy plan; Solar PV, wind turbines, Nuclear, Hydrogen, and anything to get us off crude oil. We also want jobs to stay at home. By lowering small business taxes we’d have less incentive to outsource. Stop the hate rhetoric, for everyone’s sake.

Posted by: leanandmean | September 11, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

on top of the tacky leg shot, isnt it kind of tacky to do her breakout interview on sept.11?

Posted by: shizzy | September 11, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Thanks Mary McCurry. This is not a race issue or about most of these other ticky-tack things being discussed here.
It is about re-igniting the heart and soul of this country. We need to stand together on the issues and looking at these posts I can see why America is so troubled. We aren’t trying to stand together. I feel the Republican ticket represents unity and reform which is what this country needs.

Posted by: susie | September 11, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Just watched the interview on TV. Gibson let his dislike of Palin shine through with the scowl on his face. He is supposed to be unbiased as a hard news reporter -RIGHT!
No more ABC news for me. It is indeed the year journalism died in the U.S. with all the newtwork news anchor being in Obama’s pocket.
Rah Rah

Posted by: Bill W | September 11, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Why is everyone comparing Sarah Palin to Barack Obama? Doesn’t it make sense to compare presidential candidates with each other and vice-presidential candidates with each other?
As far as Palin’s supposed lack of political science credentials – wasn’t her degree in Political Science with a Communications minor?
And Obama – not only do we not hear any answers as to how he plans to, oh, say, get us off oil dependence in 10 years, why is it that he will not release his birth certificate, his educational grades or a plethora of other items any other politician would make public?

Posted by: tooncesmom | September 11, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Its obvious that ABC has a left leaning bias. The posts prior to mine are obviously blind to reality and driven by emotion rather than facts.. Exactly what has Obama done other than give a good speech. Its a shame he can’t put together a paagraph when not behind the teleprompter.. uhh… umm.. well

Posted by: AZ fmr USMC | September 11, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Sarah did great! The media continues to help the Republicans case. You’re so blatant! I was very disappointed in Charlie Gibson. I use to be a fan; he lost my respect tonight by hounding Sarah. Appears that he is just like the rest of the liberal supporters and media. Too bad he can’t stand on his own two feet. Maybe he did; and that’s disappointing. No longer a fan! Sorry Charlie! We are scared to death of Obama!!!!

Posted by: Wendy | September 11, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Kevin Morgan you said she lied that is not what licoln said….go read what he said. He stated that we can’t say God is on our side we must hope we are on God’s side. I find nothing wrong with a mother of a service-person stating that God is on the side of our soliders; in a church. It helps people cope. She does not have to think we are waging a holy war just because she says that….or you could just keep yelling “evil bush” “no blood for oil” “impeach bush” “rove is the devil”….that all helps move us foward to.

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

As for that “didn’t blink” comment, she’s known she was being vetted for months. There was plenty of time to discuss all of the implications with her family…
And as for “community organizers”, their job description is to gather people in protest to force someone to give them something they want. Sometimes it is a reasonable request and sometimes not. The problem with Obama is that he had no success in his “organizing”. Even the asbestos removal project that he worked on still hasn’t been done, and it’s been years since he “organized” it. All Obama has done in his entire career is advance his own career.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I have to laugh at you poor fools who are going to vote McCain/Palin. Once we are at war with Russia and Iran simultaneously, we default on our national debt, and the Chinese are buying up our assets like caffeinated housewives at a WalMart sale, your houses will be foreclosed, your jobs gone, gas will be $8 a gallon and your Hummers will sit abandoned in the streets. But we’ll have prayer in schools, so you can pray that maybe you’ll learn something and wise up and elect intelligent, rational candidates next time.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

All you liberal wimps, trying to juxtapose Rove with Palin. Very weak, and hollow. Sarah became Mayor, and Governor without Rove. She is obviously a natural talent. She can stand on her record alone, Obama certainly cant.

Posted by: Badger | September 11, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Do you REALLY want Palin with the NSA databases to say nothing about the nuclear codes?

Posted by: Blue Bubba | September 11, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

She makes Obama look like bumbling fool. Which is exactly what he is.

Posted by: Lenore | September 11, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Mrs. Palin sounded SOO scripted its funny. Palin is not ready to lead

Posted by: Mac Lloyd | September 11, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

She didnt say God is with us, she said we are on a mission from God.

Posted by: JJ | September 11, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

I found your interview with Gov Palin very informative and eye-opening. I hope you ask those exact same questions of Senator Biden (word for word). I am your over-50, white women, on the fence in this election. Had a very strong inclination towards Obama. But now, with your interview, the questions you asked, the manner you asked, and her responses, I am very strongly looking more to Gov Palin for the “change” this country desperately needs.
I really take exception to the condescending way the questions were asked (looking over glasses, body language, voice intonation, etc). And please stop twirling your foot when you get bored with her response.

Posted by: Jeanne | September 11, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

“”Thank you, Don, for making my point for me so nicely. Truly, I hope all the hate in your heart doesn’t destroy you. Peace.”"
If your point was that you aren’t/can’t read the hate being spewed about Palin/McCain from the left was you “point”, then you’re welcome.

Posted by: Don | September 11, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Charlie, Charlie, your true political colors are showing as well as your biased journalism. Your interview screamed LIBERAL MEDIA.
I am disappointed. You used to report fair and balanced news.

Posted by: TaggCalif | September 11, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

” All Obama has done in his entire career is advance his own career.”
Why can’t people understand this?

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

My Reaction/Random Thoughts to Part I of the Sarah Palin Interview With Charles Gibson

| She can’t even put a proper sentence together half the time. | She has no understanding of the issues. She only repeated what she had been told by rote. She refused to answer a number of his questions by

Posted by: Inspire Emotion | September 11, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

The question I would have asked her in the interview would have been why she is even attempting to take on a job of this magnitude with a child at home who has Downs Syndrome. That child needs her undivided attention. This only tells me that she is arrogant and selfish and is putting her polital ambitions ahead of her primary responsibility of tending to her child. She never answered any question direct, but rambled around the question. But then, she is only an extension of Bush, who is the most dangerous man alive due to his arrogance and his failure to admit that he made any mistakes. God help us if they get elected.

Posted by: Becky | September 11, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Wake up America. How many times does someone need to hit you over the head come in your house and rob you? When will we make the intruder pay? It’s about policy, not about who you like to have a beer with, if you can shop at Walmart together, who has been in Washington the longest, if you are a war hero, or if you give the best speech. It’s policy!!!!!!!!! Now I know what policies don’t work. We had them for eight years with Bush. Don’t you regret that 2004 vote? I know trickledown economics doesn’t work, our current foreign policy doesn’t work, and our current healthcare system is shameful. Now who has been in power for eight years? Who had full control? What party still has the same policies along with John McCain? It’s that easy people.
I’m sure this lady is really nice. I’m sure she means well, but how strange that she has only done one sit down interview and has not answered questions on the trail from reporters live. I love this country even when people say we are stupid around the world. If you think from this interview Sarah Palin can bring along with John McCain the change we need. I think our horrible education system has caught up with us and pray for us all.

Posted by: Ron G | September 11, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Patriotism? I think that one of you Palinites should get her an American Flag pin to wear on her lapel to replace that pin of the Alaskan flag. I suppose that her true allegiance is to her husband and the Alaska Independence Party.
I mean since we want to discuss Senator Obama’s patriotism and all. :)

Posted by: Ohioangel | September 11, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Cause its not in the least bit true, “Mack.”
” All Obama has done in his entire career is advance his own career.”
Why can’t people understand this?

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Blue Bubba….Oh my you are right Gov. Palin must be so dumb that she will get the nuclear codes and single handily release all of the missles….The world is going to end thank you for opening my eyes!!!
I can’t believe this debate. She is the VP canidate people. Why are we comparing her to Obama? I love that the far left people just can’t let anything go. I liked hillary. This far left junk is making me realize I should may be look closer at the GOP

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

“Charlie, Charlie, your true political colors are showing as well as your biased journalism. Your interview screamed LIBERAL MEDIA.”
An overwhelming majority of “journalists” identify themselves as liberal.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

No one ask Bill Clinton if he had the experince to lead a country in 1992. Remember friends he was a governor before he was president. He was a governor from Arkansas and Alaska is closer to Cananda and Russia.
You go Sarah. I’m voting for you

Posted by: Robin | September 11, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Sarah Palin is for Sarah Palin, not the country. She was plucked out of obscurity and will try to make the most out of an opportunity to make it big. She will bluster and intimidate her way through everything with the help of the Republican machine. She is being used and she knows it. That’s what disturbs me about her. (By the way, Sarah – I played women’s basketball and I know your kind. Full body contact doesn’t always win the game).
And McCain. I think he thinks he DESERVES to be president because he was tortured. (Has he ever been treated for posttraumatic stress disorder?)
Both of these candidates are unstable.
Both of them want to win and they will do whatever it takes even if it means the country goes down the tubes. Together and separately they are vicious.
Neither one of these candidates is a consensus builder or a leader. They are pile drivers — ready to bash heads in to win. They may be win but the country won’t.

Posted by: bscad | September 11, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

How long can McCain’s campaign go on with this “I’m against this, but since you do it then it’s okay…” logic?
The point is, is that prior to McCain’s V.P. pick, his campaign was based on the notion that Obama is dangerously innexpirienced and that McCain has expirience.
So the criticism from the obama camp is that McCain chose the most innexpirienced person on the list.
How can McCain base his campaign on his experience and choose the most inexperienced person he could choose to be his running mate?
BUT WAIT! McCain and Palin say her experience isn’t an issue because Obama doesn’t have experience…hmmm
Same thing with the earmarks. Palin says she’s against earmarks. Says she refuses to take earmarks. But she’s been taking and requesting earmarks since she was mayor.
BUT WAIT! Since Obama also took earmarks he can’t even talk or criticize Palin.
“I say I’m against earmarks, but have been taking and requesting them my whole political career…and it’s okay because you take them too.”
Think about it…

Posted by: Ray | September 11, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Robin
Oh, yeah, being geographically close to another country is now proof of international knowledge and foreign policy experience. In an already dumb campaign, this is perhaps the stupidest claim yet to be made.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

30yrdem-not any more
“Obama is somebody who has put in the time, studied, and obviously knows a great deal about foreign policy.”
Where did you read that lie?
The Daily Kos?
Obama is a Chicago machine politician who knows little or nothing except how to run for the Senate and now President.
If elected President, he will be Jimmy Carter, Jr. I wonder which embassy will be seized by terrorists on Obama’s watch.

Posted by: slp | September 11, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

bscad….good points, I will take them into account. You know just how I like to hear “Bush is evil” and “its carl rove politics” they all really advance the cause. I really liked the part where you mocked McCains torture: very valid point…Another check for the GOP. By the time I am done ready all this stuff I will be working for McCain…sorry hillary

Posted by: zacheye | September 11, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

The interview with candidate Palin was more an inquisition than an interview. Hate to tell you Charlie but so far your behind on my score card. Your air of condescension and superiority exuded as sap from a fir tree.

Posted by: Gary | September 11, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I thought she did very well for her first time as vp pick… Obama has had years of blowing smoke which I might add he can do like no other…There isn’t anything Obama can do or say to get my vote… It isn’t for sale…

Posted by: sunshine4848 | September 11, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

“Cause its not in the least bit true, “Mack.”
” All Obama has done in his entire career is advance his own career.”
Why can’t people understand this?”
How long has he been in the Senate and how long has he been running for President? He’s doing it for you. Have you fainted in his presence?

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I haven’t been following politics very closely but was going to vote Obama (I always vote Democrat out of habit). But after seeing Mrs. Palin I have decided that I am voting McCain this time around. Thank you Charlie Gibson for opening my eyes!

Posted by: Mike Friedman | September 11, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

slp
You think someone gets to be editor of the Harvard Review and teach classes at U. of Chicago without knowing something about foreign policy?
There are these things in the world called facts. I highly recommend aquainting yourself with them.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

If you aren’t scared after watching this interview, then I don’t know what to say about you. She clearly doesn’t know what she’s talking about. She was feed talking points and even when probed, she would not stray from those talking points and give answers from her own thought process. When she did, she rambled and sounded extremely forced.
Translation, this women isn’t fit to be Secretary of State let along VP. Obama, McCain and Biden have ALL sat in that chair on Meet The Press etc and had to deal with these tough questions many times…this is the first time she’s EVER had to do it and the fact she’s never been exposed to national issues was PAINFULLY obvious.
Again, if you aren’t scared of the decent possibility that if elected VP, she could likelly be commander in chief, you can’t be watching the interview with an objective mind.
(Note: I watched the actual interview on TV which showed her head on. This interview was abbreviated and didn’t show her body language).

Posted by: Scared American | September 11, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

just once I want someone from the left leaning media question Obama with the same intensity that Gibson questioned Palin. She didn’t blink, hesitate, or equivocate like Obama does everytime he open his mouth. Are you all afraid of him exposing himself as the terribly incompetent fraud he is?

Posted by: jim | September 11, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Iran is no threat to us. Afghanistan speaks Arabic. I will sit down and talk with leaders of terrorist countries with no preconditions. I do not think the surge worked because I voted against it. – BHO
Yep, that’s foreign policy experience. Gawd.

Posted by: Fran | September 11, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

“Obama is a Chicago machine politician who knows little or nothing except how to run for the Senate and now President.”
Even the joining of TUCC was a political calculation.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Enough already! She brings a lot more to the table than Obama. And further more someone said 346 words and she said nothing. Well Obama has been talking for almost 2 years and has nothing. The man could talk about his tie for 2 hours straight. GO SARAH! SHE IS THE REAL DEAL!

Posted by: Amber | September 11, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

HRC supporter evaluating my options; after seeing Sarah Palin there’s no doubt who I’m voting for on November 4 – Sarah Palin is AWESOME!!

Posted by: Kimi | September 11, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

do you think palin even knows what the word “HUBRIS” even means? i am in the central zone and haven’t seen the interview yet, but this woman scares the bejeezus out of me.

Posted by: sarah hochschwender | September 11, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Other jim,
The surge didn’t “work.” It was covert actions that “worked.” Check out Woodward’s new book. Oh, I know, that would involve actually reading a book…but give it a try, you might learn something.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Make sure and ask her what books she wanted banned and WHY.

Posted by: Steve | September 11, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Oh Charlie, my Charlie, among them all you were MY anchor, but you let me down. Don’t treat Sarah Palin like a girl. We need to see what she is made of. HOW ABOUT HARD FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS? Did you see Brokaw try to sear Biden on Meet the Press? And Biden could answer each question. If no one gives Palin the chance, how can we see if she is up to the job? I am not asking you to skewer her, but take off those sweet little white gloves and find out if there is a there there…please! We have the right to know.

Posted by: peggylou | September 11, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Do the research: Sarah Palin and John McCain–two candidates with very short fuses. Doesn’t make me feel secure! I truly believe if they are elected that not much will change economically. Other than yours and my taxes will be raised.

Posted by: Suzanne | September 11, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

As an independent voter I watched both the O’Reilly-Obama interviews and today’s Charles Gibson interview with Sarah Palin. While Gibson’s questions were indeed appropriate and tough, I was disappointed with his demeanor: belligerent, angry, and mean spirited. The low and gravely pitch level of his voice was not normal or natural,in comparison with past broadcasts and post interview comments. I wonder whether he would have treated a man in that way. He redeemed himself somewhat in the second part of the interview.

Posted by: Fran Jablon | September 11, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

I read there was a lot of “drilling” going on at the “corrupt” EPA, but it didn’t do much to help alleviate the energy crisis! I’ll bet Wall Street is extremely thankful for “big government” right now, since it’s bailed them out, with no trade-off for oversight to prevent the banks from continuing the same insane practices (since God forbid that government would be allowed to actually watch out for taxpayers). But, I’m sure that McCain will solve all of these problems. In a perverse sense, I hope the Republicans are stuck with the huge mess they created, but I don’t think they’ll do much to clean it up!

Posted by: Yellow Dog | September 11, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Amber and Kimi,
Women like you who support Palin because you like to say things like “You go Girl!” are setting back the women’s movement by decades. Congratulations on your vacuous and superficial motivations for voting. What patriots you really are.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Now, I didn’t go back and triple-check the quote of what she made in the church, but Charlie’s quote sounds right to my recollection..
That being the case, Palin’s response is a horrible distortion. I agree that the clip (at least) of the qualifications question was soft questioning, but Palin seems to panic a little on the church quote thing. She tries to shoehorn in the Abe Lincoln quote, but WHAT PALIN ACTUALLY SAID WAS PRECISELY THE OPPOSITE OF LINCOLN’S IDEA–AND EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS CAUTIONING AGAINST.
Her statement in the church VERY MUCH presumed to proclaim the mission in Iraq as God’s will. Honest Abe is ill used by Palin here.

Posted by: Roger | September 11, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Everyone is beating this experience thing to death, Obama and Palin both don’t have that much experience but look at Bill Clinton from the big state of Arkansas he didn’t have much experience and whether you like his moral actions or not he seemed to do ok. All presidents are surrounded by so many advisers directing them which way to go its not like they will be sitting alone making every decision.

Posted by: Todd | September 11, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

As an independent I was going to wait till all the debates were over, then make up my mind. After seeing Palin I don’t need to waste my time on the debate… I’m votin Sarah.

Posted by: Jason | September 11, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Zacheye,
You know what? After reading your short list of your accomplishments I would actually and truly prefer YOU as a VP to Sarah Palin. I’m not joking. I respect education and knowledge, and Ms. Palin appears to have little of either. You at least have done some hard work in your life to be tops of your med school class. And I mean that sincerely.
God help us if Palin were to ever become President.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

“Hey Mack,
Look up above for the post that cites Obama’s resume. 100 bills introduced in the Senate. He’s the real deal. Too bad so many Americans like you are scared of the intelligent black man. Luckily one day soon white males will be outnumbered, then perhaps our country will be able to approach the greatness which the ignorant assume it already has.”
You’re entitled to your opinion, even if it is wrong.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Sarah Palin spoke with confidence and is able to answer questions honestly. She has what it takes and relates to middle class American. The McCain/Palin team will work for all Americans to get our political system back on track. She is an inspiration.

Posted by: Joanne | September 11, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Yea, Charlie, Charlie, I’ve watch many many interviews and never have I seen you act so non chalant to your victim. You closed your eyes after every question you ask her as if you could give a crap less about what she is saying, treated her as if she were beneath you, and your impartiality has never been more obvious to the viewers. You Charlie should go back and watch this interview and apoligize to her for your DISRESPECT! Shame on ABC for allowing such untasteful reporting! No matter who you vote for, REP. or DEM. this was just an outright, plain, chovanistick?, bias, demeaning interview! I will have to watch the rest to see how you finish her off Charlie, and I feel you have crossed the journalist line by showing America what you are really made of. Ummm, maybe Bob Woodruft should be your replacement? And yes I am a registered voter.

Posted by: Elayne | September 11, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

i was totaly blown away by the interview. Obama dissmissed hillary, now i’m voting palin all the way!

Posted by: Candice | September 11, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

As I suspected, she’s a beauty pageant winner that has experience reading from a teleprompter as a sports broadcaster. It’s easy to see why McCain chose her. Charlie Gibson asked very easy questions with no follow-up. After hearing her response about her readiness to be Commander-In-Chief, I would have thought that Gibson would have followed up with a difficult question about foreign affairs. This does not qualify as vetting the candidate. A simple template for Gibson’s interview should have been the questions that Biden answered during debates held to determine the Democratic nominee.

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Governor Sarah Palin is an amazing individual.

Posted by: Badger | September 11, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

i have to agree on one thing with dems: this is one lame interview.
who cares what she said in her church, and if she thinks that it’s God’s plan for her son to go to Iraq? what does that have to do with the falling economy? messed up tax system, education, healthcare, foreign relations, immigration, where is all that? is this guy on something? geesh, i really hoped to hear her talk about something sensible. this is a huge disappointment.

Posted by: maria | September 11, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Besides reading a bunch of books as well as writing a couple, please name just 3 things B.O. has accomplished while he was a senator. Just three. We want to know if there is even one piece of legislation with his name on it…
He has no accomplishments. He is running on an empty platform and he has zero experience to be President. You are better offplacing Biden on the top of the ticket and put Obama on the VP slot.

Posted by: Alex from NJ | September 11, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Mack
Check the resume again. 100 bills introduced. Now tell me about Palin’s credentials. I’d like to give her a basic geography quiz and see if she even knows where half the countries are located on the globe. I sincerely doubt it. That’s why even the neo-con strategist Repubs are so worried about her – she just doesn’t know anything, plain and simple.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

I would prefer an individual (that would be Obama – for the uneducated redneck set) who was at the very top of Harvard Law, rather then McCain who graduated 4th from the BOTTOM of his class as a party boy; and another who went to 6 community colleges – and still couldn’t balance a budget for a town of 5,900 at the time and wanted to ban books.
The key word here for the Evang-Bubbas, is education, try getting a little.
And yes Mr. Gibson, you were weak as water.

Posted by: Blue Bubba | September 11, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Regardless of what ANY man thinks “God did creat this world. !!!So you go Sarah Palin! No need to argue about it, just read your Bible!

Posted by: Elayne | September 11, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

OK Charlie, you asked Palin if it was OK to cross borders to go after terrorists. Is it OK for them to cross our borders and attack our people? I’d rather have a strong person, who is not worried about being politically correct all the time, then someone who is going to be worried about what is going to happen if we don’t react. We scream about homeland security. How can we have homeland security, without protecting our borders? I’m disappointed in you Charlie.

Posted by: Ken | September 11, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

“who cares what she said in her church, and if she thinks that it’s God’s plan for her son to go to Iraq?”
They’re trying to define her as a religous fanatic. Barry gets a pass on his religous background like everything else though.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Honesty, Character, Integrity, Judgment – what’s not to like? Character is just a gimmick to barack but Sarah Palin has LIVED it. I’m voting for McCain/Palin ’cause she’s keepen it real.

Posted by: Karen Williams | September 11, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

“I’d like to give her a basic geography quiz and see if she even knows where half the countries are located on the globe.”
Just don’t ask Barry where the Great lakes are located. That wouldn’t be fair.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Blue, I know Bubbas, and you sir, are no Bubba. Or did that state university degree go to your head? Remember, “W” went to Ivy League schools, too. How does mocking people’s class rank help your candidate?

Posted by: True Redneck Mama | September 11, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

That was a lousy interview. It looked like a grilling. She couldn’t finish one question before you jumped to another subject. She does’nt have enough experience? What about Obama? What about Clinton, Regan, and Careter.? They ran for president with no more experience than she has. She’s got my vote

Posted by: Dennis | September 11, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Karen,
Your command and knowledge of the complex issues facing the US at this time is an inspiration to us all. I’m glad that our educational system under GW Bush has done such a fine job of informing you of the crucial policy questions at stake in this election.
Yeah, girl, she keepin’ it real! Moose hunters for President! Yee-haw!!

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

We adore Sarah Palin.
Thank God McCain chose her.
She has class, guts, and brains.
In short, a superstar.
Unlike Obama,the gutless, plagurizing, racist, America-hating socialist empty suit.

Posted by: victoria | September 11, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Mack,
Nice response to my pointing out the list of Senator Obama’s considerable accomplishments. Your comeback is some obscure reference to the Great Lakes. Another stellar intellect for Palin I see.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

“mike, the Obama campaign said to back off the Bristol. It was the super left wing extremists (yes, the left wing has their own extremists) that took that to an extreme.
If you look at what the Obama campaign and their *actual* surrogates have said, you’ll quickly realize that all that god awful witchhunt stuff is entirely media driven.”
you’re right, he did distance himself from that – since his own mom was in the exact same predicament. everything else is being unearthed by his own team of people who descended on poor little wasilla (sorry, don’t know spelling for it) with the sole purpose of digging up dirt. you do realize that if mccain did that, obama would say that’s this just the typical dirty old politics.
i personally don’t think obama is some kind of evil, i believe he is severely wrong for this country, and his socialist ideas are truly terrifying for someone who grew up in communism (me). and yes, i do know his agenda, i read both of his books, and was very excited about his bid. unfortunately, he’s a hard core leftist, in his books he painted himself to be a centrist.
thank goddness mccain won the primaries, if Mitt had won i would have been left with no one to vote for.
MCCAIN/PALIN 08!

Posted by: mike | September 11, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Hey Redneck Mama,
I thought the US (and particularly conservatives) valued hard work and initiative? That means that when people work hard and do well in school we value that above people who goof off and do poorly? So, for the most important jobs in the country is it too much to ask that we get the people who actually worked and studied and achieved, instead of the slackers?

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

I find it rude that ABC doesnt give Sarah Palin the respect of showing her face while she is answering a question. Why is the camera fixed on her side profile. Scumbags.

Posted by: Badger | September 11, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

You guys are amazing. No matter what she would of answered you would criticise her.
On the question of experience, what did you want her to answer “well, not really but decided what the heck” The fact that she didn’t blink proves that she really is ready. If she would of blinked I would be nervous that would tell me she’s not ready. She stands by her convictions and doesn’t blink to pressure. Committed to the mission. What does Obama answer when asked the question? “Well, I have campaigned for 19 month” Senator, while you were campaigning she was doing some actual “Governing”.
With the Issue of Russia, well she answered exactly what is required in the circumstances when a Nato member is attacked it is the DUTY of all Nato members to help. She said perhaps so and explained it. By the way that’s pretty much what Obama answered O’railly on the same question.
The problem with the Democrats is that they were so hoping for Palin to fall flat on her feet but unfortunately for them she was strong, knows where she stands and what she believes. Now les get ready for the Out of context sound bites. Senator Obama said it best, “They think you’re stupid” Senator no, no we’re not stupid, we’re very clear and November 4 will tell.

Posted by: abe | September 11, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

“Nice response to my pointing out the list of Senator Obama’s considerable accomplishments.”
You were speaking about giving them a geography quiz and I wasn’t sure if you really wanted to go there. Yes Obama is intelligent. Is he more intelligent than, Palin, McCain, Hillary, Bill, Gore, Nixon…who knows? Is he ready to lead? I don’t think so and neither does Hillary or Biden, who are members of his own party.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

I LOVE IT!!!!
All of you praying to the almighty OBAMA-SIAH are FREAKING OUT!!
I didn’t have time to read all the posts, but noticed that some of you (with several posts each) have a LOT of time on your hands.
Good thing the REPUBLICANS are at work today keeping this country moving.
You all must be the deadbeats fighting for a place in line when OBAMA-SIAH takes my money and redistributes it.

Posted by: MA from NM | September 11, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

It’s obvious that McCain did not put coutry first. I live in the great state of Texas, and my governor, Rick Perry, is far more qualified than Sarah Palin. Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are far more qualified.
McCain pandered for our votes but he will not get them. Only those that are crazy enough to want another 4 years of inept leadership will vote Senator McCain.

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Abe
We’re not stupid, but we say “she would of” instead of “she would have.” Umm-hmmm. Not stupid. Not stupid at all.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

I think the name-calling and nasty remarks should end…from both sides.
There has been a large amount of speculation on Gov. Palin, mostly due to the fact that no one knows her. If you think you do, then you are mistaken. It hasn’t been shown where her policies are except for saying that they are the same as Senator McCain’s. But there is very little information, even on his website of his actual policies.
If she’s so ready, why hasn’t there been a little more openness to the media in the form of interviews? It makes me think that she had to be coached in what to say. Why were the questions to be asked in the interview required to be okayed by the campaign? Why has it been the same speech at every campaign spot as was given at the convention, even though, putting it politely, it’s full of inaccuracies? We need to know this person and all we’ve gotten so far are mostly rumors sprinkled with some things that have been proven to be factual that don’t put her in a very good light. This is a watershed moment in our country. I need to know more about her than what we do. Again it seems as if many have decided that they know her by just seeing some very superficial things, as the public has done in many other circumstances. We can’t have that this time. Too much lays in the balance and we are coming to the edge of a cliff.

Posted by: Graz | September 11, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

“The problem with the Democrats is that they were so hoping for Palin to fall flat on her feet but unfortunately for them she was strong, knows where she stands and what she believes.”
They think that she is an easy mark like Hillary was, although they are learning the hard way that she isn’t.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

She was obviously coached to sound tough but she came off as really cold and not comfortable with herself. What a thoroughly unlikable person. By picking someone so blatently unqualified, McCain made an impulsive, cynical choice that had nothing to do with putting the country first– it was a last-ditch attempt to save his flailing campaign. That is unforgivable and he will pay.

Posted by: lsigalov | September 11, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Palin falls flat. She doesn’t even know the “Bush Doctrine” of preemptive strikes and she’s a Republican. It took Charlie Gibson three times to get a straight answer from her on what we’d do about Pakistan, as far as going through their borders without permission to achieve security ends.
This pitt bull better never get near the button releasing nukes. Heck, she even told Charlie we should get Georgia into NATO and then said we’d defend Georgia by having war with Russia.
Republicans are gonna be sorry they chose a pitt bull with lipstick instead of somebody with experience.

Posted by: Brian Horan | September 11, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

@MA from NM
Sorry to disappoint. I became rich during the Clinton years during the tech boom. You remember those days huh?

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

I missed the interview b/c all the online info said “6:30″ — too bad that actually means 5:30 where I live.

Posted by: from chicago | September 11, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Mack,
Thank you for admitting that Senator Obama is intelligent. I believe that no, Gov. Palin is not very intelligent. Creationists are by definition not very intelligent. McCain is certainly far more intelligent – my problems with him are his integrity, his hotheadedness, and mainly his policies, not his intelligence which I think is certainly adequate.
Biden thinks Obama is ready to lead, at least now. That’s why he agreed to be VP. Hillary said a lot of things when running against Obama that she’s taking back now that she’s on the team.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

I know we are supposed to be commenting on the Palin Interview, but can anyone tell me if there’s a website that lists the issues and where each candidate stands on them?
I am undecided and it seems to me that the TV stations are biased. FOX is republican, CNN, ABC, MS-NBC are Democrats. Where can a person go to get straight answers?

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

I have never witnessed so many smart, intelligent, and intuitive people in all my life. Less than a dozen questions and you all are experts on this ladies qualifications to be VP. WOW! YOU GUYS ARE SMART.

Posted by: Alvin | September 11, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

I think its fair to say just about every person in this great country, who’s paying attention, knows there is a lot at stake with this election. We all know something has gone wrong and things need to change. We all have our ideas about why things aren’t good, and what and who could fix them. I think we all have a common purpose and interest in the US being a strong, sound, safe democracy. Why don’t you spend your time and energy researching the candidates and their positions. We don’t have to rely on sound bites or regurgitated partial quotes. We can actually read peoples’ records. We don’t have to be victims of the media bias, or even wonder if that’s going on. Just go out and get your own information. Its out there. We don’t have to be lead down some public relation guru’s path of what to see in any of these candidates. We can choose to focus on the issues and ignore the incendiary pundits. Let’s not let ourselves be distracted, pitted against each other, or blinded by the desire of any “side” to win. We all have to live under the next adminstration, and the next, and the next, and we all have to deal with whatever way the country goes. We fly or fall together. This is the most important election of my life. I’m not going to have my vote manipulated by the media, or by either of the campaigns. Identify the issues and fact check your own information. This is an amazing, exciting election. Let it be won or lost on the issues, not on who throws the best mud the farthest and with enough force that it sticks. Thanks. I’m stepping down off the soap box now.

Posted by: catattack | September 11, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

That wasn’t an “interview”, it was an attack by an obvious leftist MSM hack.

Posted by: Smith | September 11, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

“I would prefer an individual (that would be Obama – for the uneducated redneck set) ”
i’m actually as educated as Obama, and I had absolutely no idea that the word “individual” is now only used to refer to Barack Obama. I mean, i’ve heard you guys calling him “the one”, comparing him to Jesus, but i had no idea he also took total ownership of the word “individual.” So it is possible to learn something from a left wing maniac! The world is full of surprises.

Posted by: mike | September 11, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

“@MA from NM
Sorry to disappoint. I became rich during the Clinton years during the tech boom. You remember those days huh?”
Good for you. Now go adn redistribute some of that wealth in your community.

Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

MA from NM -
why would you think that Obama is going to take your money? Do you make more than 250K per year? His plan is to lower taxes for everybody making less than that. The middle class will pay far less taxes under Obama than they would under McCain. Do you understand that, or is that math too complicated for ya?

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

I am disappointed that Gibson did not hard press Palin on the ISSUES and ask Palin the same LEVEL of questions other candidates have been asked. People need to see her knowledge and capability beyond the teleprompter. From this interview, I learned nothing more about Palin’s stance on the ISSUES! No substance! McCain-Palin are more of the same. As Obama said yesterday, “How many times do you need to be hit by a 2×4 to figure out who is hitting you?” Haven’t we all learned who is hitting us after 8 years? The same policies will continue for another 4 years if they are elected.

Posted by: Woman For Truth | September 11, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Thanks Charlie for asking tough and fair questions. Now Gov. Palin has been able to tell/show us all what she thinks.

Posted by: 'nancy | September 11, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Jim, I too recall hearing that Obama would lower taxes for people and families making less than $250,000, but I don’t think he ever stated how much lower. What did you hear?

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Charlie, your interview with Governor Palin, was such a disappointment because it showed how very arrogant your behavior was as you tried your best to discredit her. You acted like a costly Philadelphia lawyer during your interrogation of this lady from Alaska. I wonder how many male politicians you have ever asked such generalized, demeaning questions
You have lost sight of integrity, honor, and politeness that is a part of unbiased journalism. I am very disappointed in your first interview with Governor Palin. You need to exhibit the same class of behavior that was afforded to you by the Governor, instead of being such a liberal maverick without courtesy.
I am sick of the liberal press, who think they are God and have initiated smear tactics on the presiding President by joining forces with many Democrats who have never gotten over the fact that Bush won the election 4 years ago.
Get with it Charlie and report some news with some class and integrity.

Posted by: Dave | September 11, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

“They’re trying to define her as a religous fanatic.”
“Barry gets a pass on his religous background like everything else though.”
That’s because his religious background is nothing more than a stepping stone to something more. Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers brought Obama up through the Chicago machine, then were thrown under the bus when the mainstream folks of America found out about them.
Obama is worse than an empty suit. He is a Marxist-leaning leftist who wants to provide cradle-to-grave government care, paid for by the evil rich.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

MA from NM -
why would you think that Obama is going to take your money? Do you make more than 250K per year? His plan is to lower taxes for everybody making less than that. The middle class will pay far less taxes under Obama than they would under McCain. Do you understand that, or is that math too complicated for ya?
and is this concept too complicated for “ya”: if you increase taxes on businesses, you’ll be paying more for everything, and the lower wage workers WILL LOSE THEIR JOBS because the employer will be paying a nearly 50% tax, which means he/she won’t be able to afford so many employees. Do you understand the concept that if you don’t have a job, you have less money? or is all that too complicated for ya? I understand you actually skipped the Bill O’Reilly interview in which your highly confused candidate actually agreed that increasing taxes on the rich is BAD FOR THE ECONOMY???!!!
Lord, you guys are just as lost on these issues as Obama.

Posted by: mike | September 11, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Vicki,
I checked it out briefly but will look at that site in more detail. It seems like a good site, thanks for the link. But I don’t agree with your summary of their voting records at all. I’ve heard that active duty military are heavily supporting Obama over McCain by the way…..

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Charlie Gibson:
What a disappointment. Your questions
were appropriate, however, your delivery
was totally a grilling. We had always
felt that you, in particular, were above
the fray — I guess not. Many friends in Bethlehem and Wilton, Connecticut feel your approach — your manner revealed more about you — than about Sarah Palin. We have all seen you
over the years do many interviews — and
this was very distasteful — just take
a look again at how you came off in this
and you will see how we all arrived at
our thoughts. Please — next time — will you at least pause between sentences. Thank you.

Posted by: Barbara Ensign | September 11, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Hey Mike,
Show me where that 50% is coming from.
The last 15 years or so we’ve seen a dramatic polarization in income inequality. In Europe, where income inequality has been lessend with progressive taxation, their economies seem to be doing better than ours. Oh yeah, and their life expectancy is longer, people report higher levels of happiness and satisfaction, etc.
And how Republicans can talk to Dems about job losses after the decimation Bush has caused the economy over the last 8 years is beyond me.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Great job Palin, you sounded sincere and unrehearse, ‘like most politicians.
Great stand on Russia, powerful comments.

Posted by: Polo | September 11, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Jim,
I spent the entire weekend checking out every bill that was voted on by McCain in pre-Obama days and every bill Obama voted on since he joined the Senate.
an example of anti-country: the amendment to the constitution that would prohibit burning of the American flag. McCain’s vote was yes, to ban the physical descration of the flag. Obama voted not to prohibit the descration of our flag.
And everyone knows that his wife is anti-American. (…”for the first time in my adult life I am proud of our country.”)…
Can you imagine a coach of a baseball team starting the season with “for the first time in many years I am proud of you?”
No thanks, Michelle. Take a hike, Barack.

Posted by: Vicki | September 11, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

and just as an aside… the “corporations” that the left are always castigating are what runs this economy…they provide jobs to individuals and pay dividends to investors. I can’t understand why such a basic concept is so totally out of reach for some people.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Ever wonder how Obama can provide universal health care, invest in alternate types of energy, guarantee affordable college education, create new jobs…and still give everybody a tax cut. He must have been ill the day they taught math and economics. Not sure where he is going to get all the money to pay for his programs, but I always thought it comes from us. If everyone is on the wagon, who’s pulling it? Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. Good luck to this modern-day Robin Hood.

Posted by: Dave | September 11, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

I truly have lost another respected icon in my life after watching Charlie Gibson’s interview. It was unprofessional, slanted, obviously pro-Obama in its best part, and rude, arrogant, belittling, smirking and smug in its worst. I have watched ABC for news and entertainment more than any other network from GMA to late night. That ended tonight–I will give you another chance after you fire this totally unqualified reporter to hold a job of that caliber. Hope someone talks down to his daughters and/or wife in such a demeaning, condescending and rude manner so he will know how pathetic he looked. So long, “American”?? Broadcasting!!

Posted by: Brenda Barnes Jones | September 11, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Sounds like a lot of people here are disappointed that Palin did not make a faux pas in her interview like Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” comment and came across far better than Obama’s interview with O’Reilly where he looked like he was terrified to be there.

Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

his interview was an embarrassment to the nation. It was obvious to anyone listening that Palin wasn’t sufficiently coached and had know idea what she was talking about (especially the part where “Charlie” had to TELL HER what the what the Bush Doctrine was). And yet, there she sat, arrogantly confident that in her assertion that she is prepared to lead on day one.
All I can say is that if America is stupid enough to vote these two warmongers into the White House, we deserve what we get. (Which, BTW will probably be WWIII).

Posted by: Lee | September 11, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Vicki,
On flag-burning, its simple. Its called the First Amendment to the Constitution. It says:
“Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.”
There is no such thing as anti-country. There is only anti-certain policies of a country. Obama is as much of a true patriot as McCain or anybody else.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Its funny to hear people criticize Palin on her experience…have we forgotten about a man running for the #1 seat called Obama? Really? And Sarah’s not qualified? Now tell me what’s scary…

Posted by: stacy | September 11, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Dave
Obama’s health care plan is not Universal health care. And McCain is also proposing tax cuts and investing alternative energy. Oh no, how’s he going to pay for it?

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

RE:
In Europe, where income inequality has been lessend with progressive taxation, their economies seem to be doing better than ours.
Yo Jim, if you don’t feel you are paying enough in taxes then send a check to the Internal Revenue Service in Washington DC.
But don’t try to show YOUR compassion with MY money.
Anytime you punish productivity and give an incentive to laziness you get – less productivity and more laziness.

Posted by: pickens | September 11, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Stacy
What’s really scary, Stacy, is people like you who vote on “personality” and can’t even be bothered to look up Obama’s extremely considerable list of accomplishments.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Fear-mongering? Just stating a fact. Obama (and most far-leaning left) want to provide cradle – to – grave govt. care. Free preschool? Free daycare? Free health insurance? Free job training? Free this and that?
And as for McCarthyism, McCarthy was looking for Communist spies that were working in the highest level of government at the time. And what no one on the left ever seems to want to remember is that he was absolutely correct. Numerous Russian cables were declassified in the 80′s which proved it to be so.
Please try to use the correct phraseology next time. I’m not a McCarthyist. I’m an individual who believes in taking personal responsibility for my life, and that of my family. I feel I am more qualified to run my own affairs than the government.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Sarah Palin will fall unless she gets up to spead on the issues. She did not know what the Bush doctrine was and she did not answer the National Security question correctly. I would ask her about the Israel and Palistine conflict and sit back with a cigarette and listen for dead air.
This women scares me …..

Posted by: solomon | September 11, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Pickens
where do you get your economic theory from? George Bush? Yes, the Repubs always do wonders for the economy. Especially if you like enormous deficits, trade imbalances, unemployment, inequality and general economic decline.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

I am a woman and I am sick of the faux sexism that the Republicans are trying to play. We have real issues of real sexism that we deal with everyday and this diminishes our fight in order to achieve equality. Everyone was all excited when Governor Palin was giving the can speech everyday but now that she was asked hard questions and did not do the greatest job answering them, Republicans are making excuses. You each should be ashamed of yourselves, not Charlie Gibson. Someone needs to be concerned about this country. Our children are dying each day and I want to know that the person who sends them into danger understands the ramifications and consequences. This is not a popularity contest and it should not be based on the same criteria. This country has a lot on the line with this race and each person needs to study the facts and stop electing our leaders based on whether you want to have a beer with them or go hunting. SHAME ON YOU! Neither one of these parties are without fault in the problems that we face but we as a people better stop making excuses and start demanding more accountability of our leaders.

Posted by: T-Bear | September 11, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Great interview.
She is a hell of a lot smarter than I thought.
This undecided voter is now voting for McCain / Palin.
I wish Obama would have answered these questions long ago.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

correction, Joe.
as for myself…

Posted by: Vicki | September 11, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

I am waiting for this interview… and watched all the snippetts. I have to say, Charlie, you are a little biting. Why hasn’t anyone done this to Obama? If it was, you would see the poor guy crumble. Not Palin, she is tough and gracious under fire. Exactly what our country needs. Obama is fake.

Posted by: dianaLA | September 11, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

@Polo:
“Great stand on Russia”
I’m not sure I heard he mention the term diplomacy. I didn’t hear her talk about the economic interests that we have with the Russians. I prefer it if Gibson was asking someone who was qualified to answer like Secretary Rice. It was the weakest answer I’ve heard in regards to Russia. It stopped short of saying our only option was to go to war with the Ruskies.

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Jana
I just love rich people born with silver spoons in their mouths who “believe in taking personal responsibility for my life, and that of my family.” Our government pays incredible subsidies to business and corporation. Hey, did you notice the bailouts going on with Fannie May and Freddie Mac? your tax money at work. Well, pardon those of us who’d rather feed starving people and make sure poor kids get an education to bail out corporate fat cats. Oh by the way, how do you feel about those Bushian no-bid contracts going to him and his cronies defense contractors? How free-market the system really is. Nothing worse than “free-market” hypocrites greedily feeding at the public trough.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Mrs. Palin gestures confidently and does her best to match prepared answers to actual questions. I guess, the worst thing a partisan politican can do is be caught not yapping for more than a few seconds.

Posted by: t o loc | September 11, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Palin has 80% approval in Alaska because if you are not with her in Alaska, you are probably unemployed and therefore dont qualify for $1200 gas credit either.
People learn quickly when it comes to keeping jobs :)

Posted by: sean | September 11, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

She has been SO coached! You can tell when she keeps repeating the same phrases over and over when “Charlie” keeps trying to get a straight answer. And do we have to hear another candidate pronounce NU-CLEAR as NU-CULAR?! She has not said anything that is new here. The repetition of “buzz” words that she was probably told to memorize makes her look uneasy rather than trying to look tough with the pointing – because she really doesn’t know what she’s talking about.

Posted by: LInda | September 11, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

If you believe Palin is more experienced than Obama you are delusional. The same type of delusion that lets you hear “lipstick on a pig” and immediately connect it to Palin.
We are in the middle (not the end) of the biggest credit crisis in a generation, and she doesnt know what Fanny Mae does. We are in the middle of two wars in the middle east and she doesnt know what the Bush doctrine is, and McCain cant tell the difference between Shia and Sunni.

Posted by: Smapdi | September 11, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

I think McCain / Palin may win ALL of Obama’s 57 States.
She knocked it out of the ballpark.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Vicki,
So, if you understand the constitution, what part of the “flag-burning is free expression and thus protected by the constitution” don’t you understand?
Criticizing your country is not anti-your country. It is an attempt to make your country better. That is the ultimate in patriotism, something you wingnuts appear to never be able to understand.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

@Frank56,
“I wish Obama would have answered these questions long ago.”
All of the candidates that ran for the office of President this year were asked the same questions about Russia and Iran. The questions posed during the debates went into greater depth and even some hypothetical situations. The only question like that was the one asking what she would do if Israel took preemptive action against Iran. She failed to really answer the question.

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Jim:
sorry to disappoint you, but I am not, and have never been rich. My father drove a truck route and my mother stayed at home. I didn’t go to college because I couldn’t afford it.
I live in a nice house now only because my husband and I work very hard for it.
And as for the bailouts, that is happening because people who couldn’t afford a mortgage were willing to borrow from someone who knew they could’t pay. Now wants everyone wants the nanny government to bail them out. I am quite outraged by the government bailout because, like I said, I work hard for my home and I resent paying for someone’s else’s poor decision.
The no-bid contract thing has been going on as long as politics has existed. Clinton was the one who started using Halliburton as contractors.
And, if you want to feed starving people and send poor kids to college, give your money to a charity. Private charities are far more successful than any government program.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

It was nice not to hear whining and crying about our Country.
What a positive message about HOPE and Change.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

“What’s really scary, Stacy, is people like you who vote on “personality” and can’t even be bothered to look up Obama’s extremely considerable list of accomplishments.” But you don’t list them? at least a few? one? two maybe? none? why but why???
so i will:
accomplishment number 1 – 3 years of community organizing where he organized people, but got nothing pushed through. basically got people all hot and heavy, and then left to go to Harvard.
#2 – ran for state senate and won through hiring a bunch of lawyers who eliminated all of his competition by pointing out petty violations so he won by default – this according to his own account in his book called “audacity of hope”.
while in state senate, he voted “present” several dozen times, and again pushed no legislation through. but don’t be mad at him for that: he was already writing one of his memoirs. so he didn’t have time to actually CHANGE anything about the lives of people he was WORKING FOR. he found it more necessary to write about HIS OWN life.
#3 ran for senate, won – fair and square. while in the senate, he didn’t push any legislations or reforms through – but don’t be mad at him for that either. he was busy now PROMOTING his memoirs, and PROMOTING HIMSELF as a future candidate for president. he didn’t find much time to CHANGE ANYTHING while working for the people of United States of America. He had to establish himself as the celebrity that he is now, so that people such as Jim can scream and clap and faint for him while he TALKS about change he never actually attempted.

Posted by: mike | September 11, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

She has not a clue!! Political parties and political differences aside, the thought of this woman running the United States of America scares the hell out of me!

Posted by: Cindy | September 11, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

also,,, I see that you tried to trick her by asking her about the Bush Doctrine…. its nice that you had the privledge to read it yourself before the interview… how many people even know what that is? Did you ask Obama about it? I wonder what his response would have been? Let’s be fair here. I have total confidence, that Palin will get up to speed quickly and has ‘the right judgement’ to make the proper choices for this country. Obama… well,,, I question his judgement… just watch him stutter/stammer along and look at all the comments he’s been making recently when he is off script – and he is at the top of the ticket.

Posted by: dianaLA | September 11, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Victoria,
Ummm…. “red” communism is a political-economic form of government in which there is no private property and the working class own the means of production. I haven’t seen anybody advocate that lately, and I certainly don’t myself. So, uh….. could you perhaps update your insults a little bit to reflect critiques of actual existing forms of government instead of long-deceased hobgoblins?

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

DianaLA
Uh… most educated people know exactly what the Bush Doctrine is. Perhaps if you actually read a daily newspaper instead of People Magazine you’d know that too? In any case, yeah, that’s probably something the VP should now. Uhh-huh. Really.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Governor Palin is defiantely far more qualified than Barack Obama. It’s not even close.

Posted by: Badger | September 11, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

“#3 ran for senate, won – fair and square.”
Tiny correction — his campaign forced his opponent to open court-protected divorce records which revealed some unsavory (but by no means illegal) details about his marriage — he wanted to take his WIFE into a sex club in France. Those records were closed to protect his son.
The Republican party in Illinois, which is RINO, forced him out, then brought in Alan Keyes who did not live here at the time, and had no chance of winning.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

i live in Illinois, by the way

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

One can certainly understand the questions surrounding Sarah Palin’s “experience” being a relative unknown outside of Alaska less than 2 weeks ago.
However, what I find laughable is the fact that questioning her “experience” only highlights the lack of “experience” at the top of the Democratic ticket. Case in point, from the mouth of babes, the Democratic Vice Presidential Nominee said on 9/10/08 “Make no mistake about this. Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be Vice President of the United States. She is qualified to be President of the United States. She’s easily qualified to be VP of the United States, and quite frankly, it might have been a better pick then me.”
If the Democrat’s own VP nominee thinks Hillary was a better choice what does it say about Obama’s sense in having chosen him as a running mate?

Posted by: Proud American | September 11, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

@Frank56,
I’m sorry to have to be the one to inform you, but this race has been decided. CO, MI, and NH are all that Obama has to carry in order to become the next President. He’s leading in OH, but McCain can have it. McCain can take FL too. McCain can have VA even though it’s a dead heat. McCain can have all those states, and he still has to go back to the Senate. He can practice his bipartisanship there, and reform himself again.

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Obama must know something about those 57 States that the rest of us don’t.
NOW THAT SCARES THE HELL OUT OF ME!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Jana,
Sorry to insinuate you were born rich. About no-bids, look at the accumulation of wealth under Bush/Cheney. Weapons corporations, check. Oil companies, check. Billionaire, check. Everybody else, nope.
There are plenty of countries in the world where the society is able to take care of their poor and educated their children properly. Guess what? They’re getting happier and more prosperous, and our economy is being run into the ground.
People don’t need to make like 500 million dollars a year – and greed and exploitation should not be rewarded infinitely.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Clueless!! She has clearly been coached on her responses and simply is NOT ready to lead this country period.

Posted by: My Opinion | September 11, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

How electoral votes do the extra states Obama invented add uo to?

Posted by: ST | September 11, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Gibson’s “Bush Doctrine” questions and the accompanying attitude were pathetic. He would never take that condescending tone with Obama, whose foreign policy credentials are no better than Palin’s. Palin was correct to call him on the vagueness of the question. It’s like asking someone “So what do you think about the war on terror?” And I have no doubt that 90% of you doctrinaire libs knew what the hell he was talking about when you first heard the question.

Posted by: Ted | September 11, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Mike,
There are a few long posts detailing Obama’s accomplishments at the state and national level above. Try reading. Its even better than listening to Rush Limbaugh.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

And as for this “experience” thing, why was no one screaming to hear about all of John Edwards’ foreign policy experience? He was a one term Senator from NC, who had spent the previous 20 years as a trial lawyer.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

I thought she did really well ! No wonder Obama is desperately going after her with his verbal attacks. The whole world is in God’s hands anyway–He will decide who becomes President.

Posted by: Evan | September 11, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Barack Obama chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Europe subcommittee, has never attended one meeting, NOR DOES HE KNOW THAT THEY DONT SPEAK ARABIC IN AFGHANISTAN. Are you kidding me? Give me Sarah Palin, please

Posted by: Badger | September 11, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Hey Badger,
Name all the languages spoken in Afghanistan. Quick, without using google.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Who am I??
I am under 45 years old,
I love the outdoors,
I hunt,
I am a Republican reformer,
I have taken on the Republican Party establishment,
I have many children,
I have a spot on the national ticket as vice-president with less than two years in the governor’s office.
Did you guess??
I am Teddy Roosevelt in 1900….Before the United States grew to 57 States.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Jim:
“There are plenty of countries in the world where the society is able to take care of their poor and educated their children properly.”
If you are referring to Socialist Europe, most countries there have double digit unemployment. The “rich” are paying huge taxes to compensate.
And, why do you think that only greed and exploitation lead to wealth? And, what do you think is too wealthy? What’s the magic number that you think would be “fair” to everyone?

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

@ST,
“You have been handed a lemon by your own party.”
Unbeknownst to you, the Republican party handed you a retread loser from the 2000 election. The Republicans didn’t think he was better than George W Bush then, so what makes them think that he’s any better than the inept Commander In Chief in office now? I know that most of them are voting based on their faith in Christ, which is understandable, but how well has that worked in the last 7 years?

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Hey Jim,
Since Badger may not know what languages are spoken in Afghanistan does that make him as ignorant as Obama?

Posted by: ST | September 11, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Walk slow and carry a big lip-stick.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

The idea that we need a preemptive strike against another nation is absurd.
There is not a country on Earth that is stupid enough to attack the USA. It would mean instant vaporization (for them). If 9/11 were a declaration of
war by an actual country, that country would be nothing but ashes now. Only
the religious lunatic fringe is dumb enough to attack America. Palin’s saber-rattling is either a) pandering to the extremist right wing for votes or b) signs of a seriously uninformed person.
And the fact that she thinks oil is the path to energy independence shows that she’s out of touch with the modern world.

Posted by: Rene | September 11, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Saddest part of all this is that in all this hullabaloo, these candidates aren’t telling us how they’ll fix the broken systems of Medicare, Social Security, and how we’ll pay for a potentially decades long “Global War on Terror”. In pandering for votes, both numbskull camps promise us the moon in exchange for our vote. I’m just sorry that McPalin and JoeBama are the two choices being offered. Unfortunately, I do not feel hopeful for our nations future.

Posted by: chrisk | September 11, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Jana,
Europe is not socialist, for one thing. if it is, then by that definition there are zero purely capitalist countries in existence. Pure capitalism in the Smithian sense just doesn’t exist. All countries have some form of progressive taxation and wealth redistribution. The reason for this is that there is never a level playing field and those with most wealth and power always can find a way of gaming the system. Thus, the greed and exploitation I refer to.
As to how much wealth is enough, I don’t have a concrete figure but making 10s or hundreds of millions of dollars while people are living in the streets and dying because they can’t afford health care is wrong. I have wealthy friends and they are in favor of paying more taxes if it will help right social wrongs. The selfish me-first attitude of the free-market crowd is not the only way, nor the right way, nor the moral way.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Obama’s a Marxist. Not in my America.

Posted by: Gary | September 11, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

@Shannon
I agree McCain was not my first choice for president, however he still better than Obama

Posted by: ST | September 11, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

“I have wealthy friends and they are in favor of paying more taxes if it will help right social wrongs.”
No one is stopping them from either writing an additional check to the government or donating part of their wealth to charity. I just wish people like you would stop being “moral” with other people’s money.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Obama’s problem is not his name.
You could put lipstick on his name and you would still have a community organizer with no real experience.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Sen. McCain was wise to choose Gov. Palin as his running mate. Her experience, judgment and worldview would enable her to be a better Pres. the B.H.Obama.

Posted by: ru4x | September 11, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

z
re: your weird diatribe.
I’m no fan of Clinton and am against NAFTA. I guess that puts us on the same side on at least something.
On Kyoto, yeah nobody has any political courage, or moral responsibility. But your guy McCain is actually concerned about global warming (as is Obama, and I, and anybody with even a faint knowledge of climate science). So what are you trying to prove?
as far as the manufacturing jobs coming back – can you document that for me? Are the wages equivalent to what they were before they left?

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

When asked what she thought about being vetted, she replied, “when I know what the VP does, I will tell you if I am interested or not.” So that means that a month ago, she didn’t know what was required. And she didn’t think about accepting it?
I don’t see how living “close to Russia” gives her foreign policy experience. Are she and McCain that naive?
She spoke in circles, gave little information. Typical…
I hope that the rest of the interview rquires more substantive information.
When anyone is tough on her, the Republicans cry, “Sexism!”. As a voter, I say, “Thanks for trying to uncover her experience.” Sexism is requiring something substantive from the men, but softshoeing around a woman.

Posted by: Deb | September 11, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

No governor…or senator for that matter…ever comes to the presidency, much less the vice presidency, with anything like the foreign policy experience that may be required during a term of office. That is why we have a Secretary of State, a State Department, a National Security Council and a National Security Adviser to the President. The more important question is whether a candidate has the ability and inclination to choose his or her advisers well and to make sensible, rational decisions on the basis of the advice he or she receives. Should it ever become necessary, I sense that Governor Palin has that ability and in addition the executive skills necessary in a president; experience not possessed by Senator Biden or for that matter Senator Obama.

Posted by: JACK | September 11, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

McPalin#1,
This is satire right? Good stuff.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

By the way…what is Joe Biden doing?
He acts like he wants to get off the ticket…like a rat leaving a sinking ship.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Hey Gary,
Do you actually know what the word Marxist means? Define it for us why don’t you. yeah, that’s what I thought. You have no flipping idea.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

@James Riman
“They are making a big deal about her religion yet OHB gets off the hook about his religious affiliation.”
It’s clear that Obama, as a constitutional law professor and a supporter of women’s rights, believes in the separation of church and state. He has been asked his opinion on faith based initiatives. I think the concern with Palin is that she believes in legislating morality and governing with a sense that God’s will is directing her decision making. These questions aren’t meant to be gotcha questions.

Posted by: Shannon,Dallas,Texas | September 11, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

To the in the closet Obama voter, it’s ok to vote for Obama. It’s okay for you to yep for mcpain and still vote from Obama.

Posted by: roz | September 11, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

I reiterate:
Democratic Vice Presidential Nominee said on 9/10/08 “Make no mistake about this. Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be Vice President of the United States. She is qualified to be President of the United States. She’s easily qualified to be VP of the United States, and quite frankly, it might have been a better pick then me.”
If the Democrat’s own VP nominee thinks Hillary was a better choice what does it say about Obama’s sense in having chosen him as a running mate?

Posted by: Proud American | September 11, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

She did not know what the Bush doctrine was. Charlie had to feed it to her.

Posted by: Ree | September 11, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

I am hardly uncaring, nor am I selfish. I just think there is a point in time when people should stop looking to the government to take care of them.
As I said before, I was poor growing up, and my husband and I work very hard now.
Taxes are fine. I have no problem paying taxes. I just think that there should be a limit as to what the government should be able to take at gunpoint from one group of people and give it to another.
And I think that it is counter-productive to “punish” successful people. The idea of having 50% of income seized by the government is hardly an incentive to succeed.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Does the Bush Doctrine apply to ALL 57 States?
I bet Palin would know the answer to that question.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

“Taxes are fine. I have no problem paying taxes. I just think that there should be a limit as to what the government should be able to take at gunpoint from one group of people and give it to another.”
Jana – I actually agree with this. But the question is to what the limit is. In Japan, for example, which nobody ever refers to as socialist, income tax rates go up to over 90%. Now I personally think that is way too much. But 50% for people making say 10s or 100s of millions, I think is reasonable and doesn’t diminish incentive.
Also, people work for reasons other than just monetary incentive.
As for punishing succesfull people, who would want to do that? But at a certain point you just don’t need more money – at some point you have enough, and that’s pretty much that. Excess beyond a certain point is just greed and as a society we don’t need to condone that.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Thank you aaron. Try to talk some sense to the wingnuts. I’m done.

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Charlie,
After your coverage at the Republican Convention I will no longer respect you or your so called reporting credentials. ABC is in the tank for Obama.

Posted by: John | September 11, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Palin has created jobs for the people in her state…how many jobs has Obama created?

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

mike Sep 11, 2008 5:37:18 PM stated
>We’ve already had to stomach one
>two many presidents who rule from
>their gut. Can’t wait to have
>somebody who uses his head for a
>change.
Funny, the last time the Demoncrats were in charge, their guy was doing a lot of his thinking further down than his gut.
Not many surprises in this interview. Gibson and ABC (like most “mainstream media”) have a long history of liberal bias. The way they conduct the interview, ask the questions and portray the subject is all expertly managed to marginalize those they oppose, or build those they support. They are pros at this.
Gov. Palin handled herself well in spite of it.
And the predictable, pathetic lib-bot sheeple whining the predictable hypocrisy about “experience” need to remember that Obama has less ACTUAL time in the US Senate than Palin does as governor (remember, he’s bragging about being on the campaign trail the last 19 months, instead of being the Senator he was elected to be). Until 2 weeks ago, Palin was on-the-job.
We’re in trouble because so many people want the government to take care of them. Hey, sheeple, it isn’t the government’s job!

Posted by: JD | September 11, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

“But 50% for people making say 10s or 100s of millions, I think is reasonable and doesn’t diminish incentive.”
But we are talking about 50% taxation on people who make much, much less than that.
Obama is considering $250,000 “rich”. That is not a lot of money for a couple with two professional careers, but have several children. (That’s not us, by the way. We don’t make nearly that much, unfortunately.)
Also, that group of people also includes small business owners (like my ex-husband) who will have to pay more in payroll taxes with the health care mandate and a higher minimum wage mandate, in addition to a higher tax rate on his personal income.
That is not only unfair, but leaving personal feelings and “morality” out of it, from a purely economical stand, it is unwise.
My ex is hardly rich. He’s not even “well-off”. If he has to pay more payroll taxes and more personal income tax, his employees will either be laid off or their hours will be cut drastically. Which will increase the unemployment rolls.

Posted by: jana | September 11, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

If McCain were to become the next president (God forbid, I don’t want another 4yrs. of the same old BS)how comfortable would you feel with Sarah Palin as the VP and possibly next President? Let’s face it, John McCain is not getting any younger. John McCain is riding on her coat tails, the only reason he’s staying ahead in the polls now is because he chose her and it doesn’t take a genius to figure out why he did. He’s a politician! Or you can look at Obama’s pick for VP, Joe Biden and his 26yrs. of experience and he doesn’t dodge the press. Actions speak louder than words. Do we want change or do we want the same old thing? You see where that got us!

Posted by: Shauna | September 11, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

She already is way ahead of Obama…no hemming, hawing or umming

Posted by: Jen | September 11, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Show me where that 50% is coming from.
The last 15 years or so we’ve seen a dramatic polarization in income inequality. In Europe, where income inequality has been lessend with progressive taxation, their economies seem to be doing better than ours. Oh yeah, and their life expectancy is longer, people report higher levels of happiness and satisfaction, etc.
i said – “nearly” 50% and that comes from the mouth of Barack Obama, O’railly interview (no, he didn’t say it flat out, you have to do your own math). he even wants to increase taxes on SMALL businesses that bring in more than 250 a year – which is just about any successful business out there. and he claims that’s what will make the economy stronger, increasing the taxes on the rich and businesses and handing out money (literally ) to the poor. but wait wait, in the same interview he says that if the economy is really really bad, than he wouldn’t increase the taxes because that would slow down the economy. doesn’t make sense to you? yeah, it shouldn’t. but he still would cut the taxes for the poor – the 95% of people (of course the bottom 50% don’t pay any taxes, so he wouldn’t be cutting anything, he’d just be giving them money). where would the money for the tax cuts come from, you ask? good question – MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING without having any resources for it. and that’s the big economic rehabilitation according to the rather confused on the whole matter Barack Obama.
I am from europe, i am an immigrant, so please, i beg you – show me where you coming from with all your stats about higher levels of happiness and satisfaction, the better economies, etc. cause that’s just laughable. have you ever even been to europe? i highly doubt that. have you noticed how many europeans are on the waiting list for a green card just to have an opportunity to come here? no you haven’t, you know nothing about it, i do. do you have idea how many europeans live his illegally, just hoping that a legislation gets passed so they can get a legal status? i didn’t think so.
I suggest you go and live in france – i’ll give you a year of income redistribution, social healthcare (i hope you don’t get sick though), maybe try starting a business (it will take almost a year for the govn’t to approve it) where you won’t be able to fire a lazy employee because you have to keep them there for 2 years because of the workers rights (thankfully sarkozy has a brain and is trying to reverse that ridiculous law,). you’ll be racing back over to the land of the free in no time my friend, in no time.

Posted by: mike | September 11, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Palin’s body language serves as an interesting reality check during the interview…it tells a lot…her clinched fist, tautly crossed legs, twisted mouth, glaring eyes and slouched posture are suspect of her fear of being discovered and evidence there is much to be desired. Frankly, edited snipets of an important interview as such is highly suspicious of credibility. We don’t see edited interviews of that nature with other well known candidates. We need to see these interviews unedited and in their entirety.

Posted by: K | September 11, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

pain knows about Russian issues and Obama knows about global issues.

Posted by: roz | September 11, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Didn’t know what the Bush Doctrine was and tried to wing it like a high school kid. Ah,hahAHAHA!
Got asked several “yes” or “no” questions several times and couldn’t decide between the two. Ahhahahaha!
Been to Canada and Mexico and a quickie to the Middle East…were there any snipers on the runway??…expert in foreign relations now??
Ah,hahahahaha! I can hardly wait until Leno chews on this!!!

Posted by: HiloBob | September 11, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

sniveled by Joe at Sep 11, 2008 6:39:32 PM
>Wasn’t Mclame like 280th at some
>crappy naval school?
Nice shot, Joe, you just guaranteed that most Annapolis grads will back McCain, even if they didn’t like him. Insult McCain, fine; insult the USNA, and they’ll sink you.

Posted by: JD | September 11, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Thanks Charlie. Thank you for pressing Governor Palin on the tough questions, and sticking with it, even pressing her multiple times to get a clear answer. We can see how “slippery” she now is, and how she’s touting the McBush policies of the Rovian RNC Era; hook, line and sinker.

Posted by: 19341 | September 11, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Does Charlie Gibson really consider himself a journalist? Did anyone else watching notice the outrageous number of blatant edits in this segment? I thought I was watching a Saturday Night Live skit. One second, Palin had her hand up making a gesture, then down on the arm of the chair the next second. Does ABC News really think the American viewers are too stupid to notice a thing like that. I’ve NEVER seen an Obama interview chopped up so much. These edits occurred right in the middle of many of Palin’s answers to Gibson’s antagonistic questions. Just when Palin was on a roll with a great answer, the clip was interrupted. I guess ABC felt the answers were too good for the American people to hear. The editing was so extensive that the sound dubbing was even off time. I completely agreed with everything THAT THE ABC EXECS ALLOWED ME TO HEAR. I guess integrity in the media is just an urban legend. And by the way, the “Bush Doctrine” question was a shameless attempt to trip Palin up. I think the way she turned the tables back on Gibson was brilliant. How often do you see Charlie stutter? Shame on you Charlie and shame on you ABC News. Your news network has shown itself to be just one-half step above the tabloids. I’m sticking with Fox News where the reporting is “fair and balanced.”

Posted by: Palin Chick | September 11, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

She answered the questions. Might be a bit more hardline than I am happy with, but I can live with that. As the military historian Donald Kagan long stated, you either take a firm stance on security matters or you figure out how to make true peace not just appeasement. And the islamfacist have already show they do not WANT to be friends in any capacities. So the hardline approach is all that is left.
The GOP has my vote now; the Democratic party did not put forward a solid performer, just another charismatic lawyer for their canidate.

Posted by: Earl | September 11, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

It is amazing how many people Gov. Palin has running scared on the liberal side. She is doing every thing right. McCain’s team is friggin genius! They found the only true-to-their-word politician in the country. Just look Northwest people. Read my lipstick, McCain Presidency!!!!

Posted by: Sharon | September 11, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

hey “Z”: if the French didn’t help the American Revolutionists, we wouldn’t have won our independence from British rule those 240+ years ago.

Posted by: Nick Iacona | September 11, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Come on tooncesmom…for your info, Palin’s degree was in Journalism, with a few political science courses tossed in. Many years ago, I took some journalism courses, and believe me, they did not require a great deal of mental ability to get through. Check out Wikopedia for her education.
While you are checking, run by B. Obama’s academic credentials…Magna Cum Laude, Harvard Law. I really think that’s pretty fair.

Posted by: Delmus Ledford | September 11, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

She is a time bomb…It is just a matter of time before she says something SO stupid that she and McCain will be laughed off of the political stage.

Posted by: Henry Flood | September 11, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

“Come on tooncesmom…for your info, Palin’s degree was in Journalism, with a few political science courses tossed in. Many years ago, I took some journalism courses, and believe me, they did not require a great deal of mental ability to get through. Check out Wikopedia for her education.”
LMAO you mean wikipedia, the people’s encyclopedia, where anyone out there can go on and change the entries. that’s funny.
i have a journalism degree with political science – exactly what sarah has. with this degree you need to pretty much be familiar with just about any issue out there. it’s pretty overwhelming. i don’t think you can compare one degree to another, especially if you didn’t go through it.
harvard law is very impressive, no one is gonna take that away from Obama. But that hardly qualifies him for presidency. John McCain has a tested IQ of 133 – anything over 130 is considered genius. what’s obama’s IQ? no one knows, he refused to release any of his records, we have no testing scores on obama, not even sats. interesting isn’t it?

Posted by: steven | September 11, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

I’m sorry, but this is a non-issue. If you carefully and honestly go over the tape of the prayer Palin made a the church, she is praying “that” our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God. She is not saying that it is such a task. You can hear the word “that”.

Posted by: Hank | September 11, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

You gave it a good try, Charlie. God knows you would have liked to trip her up. The Obamatons are seething right now, having nothing to gnaw on. Raw meat! Raw meat! Raw meat! Ha, ha! John McCain, you’re a genius. McCain/Palin 2008. Lefty-loonies: read ‘em and weep.

Posted by: Jaycee | September 11, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

he was elected the first African–American editor of the Harvard Law Review. Obama graduated magna cum laude in 199 from Harvard Law -
I doubt very much that we have to worry about his intellect

Posted by: Frankie | September 11, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Palin Power was every evident in this first interview. She is ready and determined to go after the terrorist no matter where they hide, that was very evident in her response to “Charlie” Gibson in the first of three exclusive interviews. Several times Gibson asked the same question several different ways and she answered them the same way. Her commitment to our nation is admirable, refreshing and revealed a leadership trait long needed in that high office.
Heads of states, should take notice, it should not be, if she knows those heads of states, the question Gibson should have asked, is do they know Sarah Palin
Cook Barela, Riverside, California

Posted by: Cook Barela | September 11, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

She’s definitely better looking than our current Vice President.

Posted by: Doug Stone | September 11, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

I think Sarah wanted to be famous: look at her choices in life: Broadcasting Major, Beauty Queen, TV Sports Broadcaster, a Politician. And now they are making a doll that looks like her. So she’s famous now, let’s leave it at that. We don’t need someone in office who basically only has their own agenda in mind – INSTEAD OF THE CITIZENS OF THE US! She seems to pander to her own wants and needs and can’t seem to separate her religious views from the state of the nation – which, last time I looked that was the law! Obama truly seems to put others’ interests ahead of his own.

Posted by: qualmod | September 11, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

The repubs are slick! They had this interview air when Barack was speaking on the CNN Forum! I was watching Barack and didn’t see the full interview. BUT……….the exerpts that I am viewing of the interview shows a very SCARED lady!
She looks Scared and Pissed that she didn’t know wtf she was talking about! She didn’t have a clue. When Charlie deviated from what she was prepped to regurgitate: She was drowning!
Sept 11 her son is being shipped off…there are reports that he stole liquor and vandalized school buses which is why he HAD to join the National Guard OR be jailed: That’s the way they do it in Alaska!
The NERVE of them to link it with Sept. 11th. PATHETIC!

Posted by: Stephanie - California | September 11, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Mrs Palin was fantastic, great, etc., she will make a fine VP if y’all let her.

Posted by: jjjiii777 | September 11, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Do the Obamaniacs really want to bring up things that happened in church? Really??? On 9/11??? When America’s chickens came home to roooooost!!!!!!!?

Posted by: Ted | September 11, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I watched Charlie’s face, don’t think he was too pleased with the interview. That is because most of the tv media is so bent on electing “your obama” that you don’t take into consideration that regular watchers have brains and think for themselves. The tv media has done in all their power to degrade McCain and Palin, its pathetic as you will see in November. Twist stories all you want, it won’t stop normal voters from finding the truth, so spin all you want.

Posted by: jjjiii777 | September 11, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

I lost all respect for her, we do not need another warmonger leading this country. NO VOTE FOR MCWAR

Posted by: sarah | September 11, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

God is in control, press the buttons on the missile launchers, god will guide them,,, amen

Posted by: Jess | September 11, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

If Obama is so smart why does he think we have 57 States?

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Obama has my VOTE, the other guys can;t be trusted, after all they just LIE LIE LIE LIE and the dumb people eat it up like candy.

Posted by: Frank56 | September 11, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

I can understand that Gibson had pressure from his peers to put the screws to Palin, but to me, it resulted in a bad interview. It wasn’t conversational. Gibson seemed like his opinions and intellect is superior to Palin’s. Gibson was bad. The editing was awkward. It just wasn’t good TV and it wasn’t a good interview.
This is important. Sit down. Take the time you need to have a real conversation and don’t edit it into a crappy mess.
Sarah comes across as so real and this format seems so committed to the old media format of keeping it short and artificial. There was a freaking moose walking outside the window! If I was producing the segment, I would have stopped to acknowledge there was a moose! When do you see a moose pass by a window during a political interview? Acknowledge the moose and then get back to the interview.

Posted by: Neal Campbell | September 11, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Sarah was fantastic! I look forward to hearing more from her.

Posted by: Julie | September 11, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Im a Republican and I love my country and so does S. Palin. But I remained pretty optimistic about her knowledge base until this interview. And now I know without a doubt she is unqualified to be VP or the President. SAD that we had to go down this route to shake the race up a bit. Now lets put party first. I can’t support this ticket. She is not good for America as VP or P. She needs more seasoning. Really disturing that she never been abroad before last year. Hummmmm This is a global society.

Posted by: Real Republican | September 11, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

I was soooo embarrassed by that interview, She made us in the USA look like a bunch of ignorant fools. I was expecting the spunk of her first speech. She was like a deer in the headlights of a car, stumbling with her answers, not knowing what the hell she was talking about. A war with Russia not off the table? RUSSIA HAS 6681 NUCLEAR WARHEADS. The cold-war may be over but total nuclear annihilation is still possible.

Posted by: John | September 11, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

People who are for Palin-McCain ticket (becuase you really seem to think Palin is running for Pres), fit in one of two categories. Very intelligent but more concerned about the republicans staying in office to care about the issues or just absolutely DUMB!!!!!!

Posted by: kaylamb | September 11, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

The Republicans will have to spin until they get dizzy to cover up her lack of knowledge of world events. Please don’t let her in the White House. Close the door!

Posted by: Worried from Milwaukee | September 11, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

If Americans can’t see that this person is not qualified to be president (if necessary), we’re in deep doo doo.

Posted by: Netizen | September 11, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

I thought Gov. Palin did fine. None of Charlie Gibson’s questions were particularly surprising or unusual, and I have no real complaints about his work so far. I didn’t think the interview was particularly well shot or lit, but so what? Now can we stop obsessing about hearing the woman speak? Those of us who think she is a perfectly fine choice for VICE president still think so; those of you who were not fans to start with appear not to have changed your minds, either.
I do think people should bear in mind that she is running for vice president, not commander in chief. Yes, she has to be prepared to step in should there be a tragedy, but, regardless of the handwringing over McCain’s age and melanoma history (and is there a hand-equivalent of crocodile tears– like crocodile hand-wringing?), that is not likely to happen, certainly not “on day one,” as reporters keep breathlessly putting it. Were most vice presidential candidates of the past substantially better prepared? Some, but not most. She will learn on the job of vice president, she will be surrounded by the strong group of cabinet members and advisors McCain will select, she will
be more than worthy of fulfilling the obligations of vice president. Let’s concentrate on the top of the ticket for a while, okay?

Posted by: moderate | September 11, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

John, I agree with you. Now tell me what the McCain Palin platform is again? Oh it is change right? What are they changing? OIL, WAR, FEAR. Sounds like the same tune of the last 8 years. Notice I have not made any personal attacks. I am referring to ISSUES. You do recall what those are? Now, enlighten us with the issues. Debate me on the ISSUES? COME OUT AND PLAY…

Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

As I read most of the comments posted, I do not know whether to laugh or cry… at the end of the day we have four very fine American citizens and Irunning for the highest office and I will be glad no matter who wins. But, I can comment on the fact that I believe most of these postings are riddled with personnel biases that go beyond prejudices. You should all take a step back and re-read your comments. I say, who cares about you postings? You are no better than the candidates when it comes to trashing someone you oppose!
I’ll tell you what matters to me… two of my three brothers are unemployed, I was let go by a major telecom provided (headquartered in the Northeast) due to obvious age discrimination in November 2007, both my daughters cannot afford health insurance, I have about three months left before I may have to declare bankruptcy, and neither of these candidates have even begun to address the issues. Regardless of who wins this election, we have a senate and congress riddled with “pigs wearing lipstick”. We need a drastic change! We the people have to put aside our prejudices and become better educated on what the real problems are as opposed to, what the symptoms are. (I’m sure I may have lost some of you on that one…) For example, if we had term limits on congressmen and senators, can you imagine how that may impact this country? These piglips may actually have to work in order to get things done as opposed to sucking the blood out of all of us to fulfill their own agenda. Anyone who has been in these positions longer than two terms should be ashamed because they have been inept and self indulged! I implore all of you to look past you personal biases, look around your community, get educated on what the real problems are and actively get involved in making a difference. And remember, no vote, is most likely a vote for the person you least like. I am proud and always been proud to be an American as I believe you all are…
By-the-way, our politicians do not deserve all the blame, most of the leading corporations and their CEO’s must take some of the blame also… They are the one’s that have sold out America by sending jobs and business outside the USA. The loss of job’s, tax dollars and contribution into social security all suffered due to someone lining their pockets. America is composed of different citizens then we were 15 years ago when outsourcing started. Today we have more immigrants that would be willing to perform the lower paying occupations, the internet and newer web enabled applications provides citizens anywhere in the country the opportunity to work at home and provide call center and other services etc. that are now being performed in India, China, and elsewhere. Well, just remember make sure you vote and cherish and protect this right by getting involved… Walk the Talk!

Posted by: lost-in-the-pigpen | September 11, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I have tried as I’ve matured to really listen to people without having my opinion skewed to one way of thinking while they talk; just focus in on what they are saying. I did that with Obama & O’Rielly and with Palin and Gibson. I understood their points, I may not agree with them, but I understood them. I don’t understand all the people on both sides that continually say the person they disagree with said nothing. Yes, they all make points, some good, some vague, some you agree with, some you don’t. Just because they didn’t say what you wanted them to doesn’t mean they didn’t say anything. And what is it with all the vicious name calling?
I think Sarah did GREAT!!!

Posted by: Patty | September 11, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

As already said by others, Sarah Palin is a character from a bad Disney movie. It is irresponsible to elect an inexperienced uneducated person like this from a small town and state that is so foreign from the other 49. Most major cities in the US have greater population, diversity, industry and international presence than the state of Alaska. John McCain is older than Ronald Reagan was when he left office and also has a significant history of healthcare problems. So there is a high probability that Palin could become the president of the United States. Heaven help us. My 77 year old mother would be more qualified. This is a serious problem and very disillusioning to see people flocking to her candidacy like the latest fad or hit movie. This is our life. In a day she could do 10 times more damage to world peace and the economy than George Bush did in his 2 terms. Palin doesn’t seem to know what she doesn’t know. What a dangerous situation. Osama Bin Ladin must be very pleased with this joke of a choice for VP by a major contender for the US Presidency. Makes it seem like McCain is senile.

Posted by: Mira | September 11, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Sigh. She looked terrified and clueless.
I feel bad, she seems like a very decent person. I appreciate her POV and contributions…
But running a country is not about war and demagoguery.
Peace flows from economic prosperity and opportunities across the board and the world and tolerance with FIRM LIMITS…this is something the Republicans have never really managed to implement, pure and simple.
You just can’t compare her to someone who has had close contact with humanity from the ghetto to Harvard and the world wide, throughout his life, and who has studied the law of this nation to its depths. And he’s already written a comprehensive policy plan touching every minute detail of national governance. Obama has all this going for him…go read his policies, they are on his website. Biden adds tons more, and the savvy and peer respect to help implement these ideas in a stubborn, useless Congress and an unreasonable world.
Antoher Indepedent for Obama/Biden!

Posted by: neo-independent | September 11, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

I’m independent and I’m really shock with most of these comments on this board. Most of you guys are just as crazy as the right. I also found it very disappointed no one was upset when someone made a comment (like 100 post ago) that enlisted soldiers are uneducated and were people who join to get out of jail. This statement is not correct, the military has change alot since the Vietnam era.
You have a lot educated people who join the military that have various education backgrounds and are people with high values. The fact that they are willing to give there individual freedom for are country and us is something that makes them extraordinary people.
I was glad today that both McCain and Obama agree that higher education needs to stop censoring there students from the military. Let the students have a choice and help close the gap between the military and the civilian world.
I like to end with saying, thank you!!! to anyone that has ever served this country.

Posted by: Edward-NYC | September 12, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Watching the interview with Sarah Palin is really scary! Her lack of knowledge of critical issues affecting this country and this world is freightening. I can’t understand people supporting her simply because she is a woman, and are not concerned about her lack of qualifications. God help us all!

Posted by: cb | September 12, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

To be perfectly honest, she did fine. She is not an expert on foreign policy. She’s not an idiot though. She will become far more solid on these issues fast. However, like most of our Governors, she has been doing the job she was elected to do, and doing it exceptionally well. She has other strengths that benefit this ticket. Gibson, I am afraid was more concerned about being called a cream puff than being respectful. As a woman with a Juris Doctor degree, I would have problems knowing what part of the Bush Doctrine he was referring to without clarification. It actually refers to an evolving set of policies. Good job Sarah!

Posted by: Educated Woman for McCain Palin | September 12, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

OK… so anyone watch the interview with McCain and Obama on CNN tonight? It was clean and refreshing without a slanted agenda. Both canidates were presented with the same questions. I feel both canidates did a great job! If the ABC interview was conducted in a simular manor we all would have been served better… so when does CB interview Biden?
PS: Educated Woman for McCain Palin… you married?

Posted by: lost-in-the-pigpen | September 12, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Sarah Palin is on trial !
She says she is ready to lead our country if need be.
Why can we not ask her the same questions we would ask any person of any race or gender in order to make up our minds? What is so unfair about it?
For God sakes people, wake up!
This woman would have the nuclear launch codes!
I am a woman!
I was NEVER a Hillary supporter and I desperately would love to see a woman President someday. But NOT this scary,
opinionated, uninformed and radical woman.
No Way, No How, Never.

Posted by: Chekiya | September 12, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Do you want “other” wars?
McCain/Pailin are a horrifying possibility for leadership in this country.

Posted by: Mageduley | September 12, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

My last comment for the evening.
No matter your gender, race or political affiliation, I call for all of you who believe in a God, no matter which God that may be, to pray for the people in Texas this evening as Hurricane IKE is about to wreak havoc upon all of their lives.
Put aside your pettiness and hatred for either party for at least one minute and pray for them.
It is predicted this is going to be the worst natural disaster in American history.
Good night and God Bless each of you.

Posted by: Chekiya | September 12, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

The sky is falling… the sky is falling. Oh God help us if we elect McCain and Palin.
The sky is falling… the shy is falling and we will all be killed… especially if Obama and Biden don’t make it to the hill.
The sky is falling… the sky is falling… if my canidate does not win it will be a sin…
…maybe the best thing for us all is that nobody will win!

Posted by: lost-in-the-pigpen | September 12, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Charlie,
What would you say, if you were in Palin’s shoes, and asked “what do you think about Bush’s docutrine?” Would you know what it mean?
All you reporters are taking too much power in your hand. In either a big or small way, you guys are betraying this country. Yes, “BETRAY” is the word to describe all you who get paid to say and do the things that hurt this country and the good candidates and shield the bad candidates who are pontially if not actually is a threat for this country’s security.
You guys should be wake up and defend this country and stop saying things against your conscienous that’s of you still have some left.

Posted by: john | September 12, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Well….Since experience is not required in exchange for this interview Mr. Gibson must have been offered a cabinet position from McInsain himself. Guess what Ms. Palin Russia really does have WOMD you may want rethink the “perhaps so” response. I’m surprised she can’t see them from her neighborly view!

Posted by: pignlipstick | September 12, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Charlie Gibson was a HUGE disappointment tonight in his interview with Gov. Sarah Palin. His liberal mouthpiece showed BIG time. I expected much more from Gibson but in the end he is just another drive by media operative set out to destroy the Republican party and this country.

Posted by: Susan nespor | September 12, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

I am a Canadian and have been following the American election closely. I wish Americans would finally see the truth. Your decision of who is in the White House doesn’t just impact your economy or your national security it impacts the entire world’s. You are the world leaders even with a dismal economy and strained foreign relations. Who you make Commander and Chief impacts all of us from Toronto to Timbuktu Too. Canada does 50% of its trade with America if your economic policies aren’t strong we suffer. If American banks and corporations start suffering at home people as far as India will be out of jobs. So when you make that decision don’t just think about your vested interested think about that farmer across the border whose livelihood depends on how much wheat he can sell across the border or the African who could lose his corporate job if the market grows worse. America protects not just itself from terrorism but all of us, not many countries have a large militaries so they look to you for protection and security. For all of our prosperity and safety put Barack Obama in office because if the next 4 years are anything like the last 8 this world will not survive and neither will America.

Posted by: Outsider Perspective | September 12, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Gibson hit a real low with this interview. Maybe it’s time for him to consider retirement. What an obnoxious interview! Let’s ask Obama if HE ever met a foreign head of state prior to this campaign and how about his experience in national security????? ARE YOU SERIOUS!!!

Posted by: Shay Davidson | September 12, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

OMG! She said NUCULAR! TWICE!!! Just like Bush!

Posted by: Observer | September 12, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am

I am wondering why the questions directed to Sarah Palin, have not been directed to Obama as well. What are his qualifications, running for President for 2 years as a freshman Senator?
Obama keeps saying we need change, and we do need change. However, I have never heard him say what he will change and how. Give some specifics if he thinks he is qualified to be President.
People are concerned about Palin because she MIGHT be President. Why are they not concerned about the lack of Obama experience.
I have to ask why tough questions are never asked of Obama. He is a dynamic speaker…but I want substance

Posted by: AMH | September 12, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

I sense that Charles Gibson and ABC News are working hard to find fault with Sarah Palin. Your obvious bias toward the democratic party candidate Barak Obama is showing. Gibson’s question about the “Bush Doctrine” and obvious distain when Sarah Palin didn’t immediately recognize what that doctrine was – didn’t make her look bad – it made ABC and Charles Gibson look like MSNBS and Chris Matthews. Palin is a fresh face, but her history as a public official gives me hope for the future.

Posted by: James Stevens Roach | September 12, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Mr. Gibson, I would like to thank you for doing a great job interviewing Sarah Palin. Governor Palin’s answers to your tough questions gave me the distinct impression that she is a very self confident person who is far from being qualified for a position in which she could potentially be President. I thought she did a moderately good job of keeping her composure. However, the substance of many of her answers seemed evasive or vague because she was uninformed, seemed like coached responses from the McCain camp, or seemed to be fired off without a true understanding of the complexity of the issue. Your interviews have provided a critical insight into her true qualifications, unlike much of the fluff and spin we have been inundated with since her introduction at the RNC.

Posted by: Daniel | September 12, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Obviously Gibson got a directive from above (not from God…but people who act like God) on how to engage the interview with Palin. And even though Palin is running for VP the questions were more forceful….confusing….than ever asked to Obama on international policy.
While Gibson ‘looked down’ on Palin from his high chair, his repeating of the same unclear question only made him look bias and weak. When he asked Palin if she had any second thoughts about being VP, he found this silly. Wow!!! What a silly interviewer.
I bet Gibson wishes after all these years he had a different occupation.
Still….as a man (as the saying goes) maybe he should at least tried to be respectful to Palin. Couldn’t do it though. Not in the program.
Go Sarah!!! You have nothing to feel ashamed about. Don’t let them point their finger ‘down’ at you. Stay strong!!! Maybe someday the feminists in the world will comprehend that you speak for all women….and it is not just posturing, politics and money.

Posted by: Tom | September 12, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Reading transcripts and watching the video of Palin. Charlie you really should watch the video before the question of whether or not Palin thinks we are in a Holy War. She actually said we need to pray for God’s will. I typically enjoy Mr. Gibsons interviews but his heavy sighs and condescending views over his glasses needs to be removed. Looking forward to finding out more about Palin minus any unfactual information

Posted by: tricia fritz | September 12, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

I am extremely disappointed in all of you Obama-extremists who are crucifying Sarah Palin. Why don’t you see that Sarah is an amazing and exceptional modern day women who personifies 21st century womenhood of balancing career, family, and social life. She is humble yet competitive, ambitious yet kind and most important she is honest. Politics aside! Give her the credit she deserves!!! Remember that Sarah has more experience than Obama and she is not running against him! John McCain is. Obama-extremists and Obama are obviously VERY afraid of Palin.

Posted by: krisnen | September 12, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Sarah Palin was more or less forced onto the ticket by the right wing of the Republican party. She is anti-choice, while a majority of Americans are pro-choice. she supports the shooting wolves from airplanes.She is a global warming denier, and most Americans now believe there’s an emergency and are looking for leadership. Our job is to broadcast who she really is loud and clear

Posted by: Christine | September 12, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

I missed the interview ‘live’ and have been watching the few clips available on this site. So tell me all of you Palin Nay-Sayers .. what was so wrong about her answers? She DID answer every question, though some of you suggest she did not. You obviously did not like her or are afraid of her before the first question was even posed and you feel the need to smear her at every turn. That is very un-American.
I also did some research online about the Gov’s career experience. From what I saw, she has been running businesses and governments for more that 20 years! So on domestic issues, she is ready. On foreign policy issues she has some experience, but obviously needs to grow there. But McCain is stronger than strong on foreign policy.
Now, let’s look at BOTH tickets. Dems have the #1 guy strong on domestic and the #2 strong on foreign. The Repubs have the #1 strong on foreign AND domestic and the #2 strong on domestic.
Isn’t that what we all should be looking at?
Yeah, McCain is 72. He is younger .. YOUNGER than Ronald Reagan was when he ran for his second term. YOUNGER.
So before you all pile on Palin, get your facts.
Now that I have mine, I am very comfortable with either party taking office. But I think I am leaning towards McCain. I like HIS experience in all areas.

Posted by: henhouse | September 12, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

The fact is, people are posting what they want to hear, not what was said.
Palin did NOT say she wanted war with Russia, only that IF Georgia and the Ukraine were NATO members, would we fight Russia if they invaded them. OF COURSE we would, that’s part of being a member of NATO. She said nothing that isn’t already our policy.
As far as the Bush Doctrine, check Wikipedia, it doesn’t even have a simple, clear definition of the term. It can mean many different aspects of Bush’s foreign policy, and the definition is ever-changing. Charlie’s snobbish attitude only shows his ignorance of foreign policy, not Mrs. Palin’s.
Heck, does she ask people in wheelchairs to stand up? If not, she’s already better than Biden! LOL.

Posted by: Dan | September 12, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

I am convinced she didn’t know what the word “HUBRIS” meant. Nor did she have any idea what the Bush Doctrine was. She is scary. Why do the democrats nominated always seem so much smarter than the republicans? I think the republicans relate to “C” students better.

Posted by: bulldog77 | September 12, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

I was skeptical of Palin’s readiness before this interview. Now I am convinced that Palin is not ready to be VP, and more paramount, President. Let’s be realistic – John McCain is aged there is a real chance he could succumb to death. He was a soldier for our country, and that is admirable. However, his personal choices regarding affairs, cheating on his wife, etc., makes me pause when I think about his character and ability to be honest in office. That, coupled with his special interest cronies, makes me question his ability to truly change the way Washington does business. Also, for those who will vote on the abortion issue alone, did you know that Cindy McCain agrees with abortion in the cases of rape and incest? Don’t you think John McCain will listen to Cindy on this matter? Don’t you think if Roe v. Wade could be overturned, Bush would have done it in the past 8 years? He clung to the abortion rhetoric when he ran both times. He obviously didn’t deliver on that campaign promise. McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time! Do you think that McCain is the change agent we need? ARE YOU BETTER OFF THAN YOU WERE 8 YEARS AGO? DO YOU WANT REAL CHANGE FOR THIS COUNTRY AND FOR OUR CHILDREN? If NO to the first, and YES to the latter, please think critically when you vote in November. Look past the phony accusations and study the candidates’ positions on the real issues. Economy, healthcare, education, global-warming, world-standing and stability, homeland security; these are the real problems we have to focus on. Please, for the sake of our children, open your hearts and minds, and vote consciously, not just along straight party lines. God Bless and take good care – Thank you.

Posted by: concerned mom of 2 | September 12, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Will Palin be able to convince those voters who don’t understand how important it is to have a President who is in touch with the real issues that affect ALL of us? Maybe. She has the ability to talk with conviction. But are people listening to what she’s saying? She repeats herself over and over with the same conviction, and my guess is that this is enough to convince some people that she must be right and/or know what she is talking about.
I’m am not concerned with whether she misquotes Lincoln, I’m concerned that we are placing emphasis on things that are of little consequence but to a few, and not enough emphasis on whether she is TRULY qualified to be the Vice-President of the United States of America.
I don’t care if she THINKS she is or not, I want to know for sure.
So when I watch tonight’s conclusion of Charlie’s interview, I will listen closely to her answers, I will listen closely to the questions, and I most likely will come away with the same conclusion as I did last night; Palin is not ready to serve as America’s Vice-President.

Posted by: edukate urself! | September 12, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Charles, not Charlie, Gibson, you showed your true “colors” during your interview with Sarah Palin. She didn’t back down did she? I used to like you and felt safe with your reporting. I’ve been suspect for while about what you are truly like. Now I know. Sad, sad, and sad, I feel sorry for your family. Why didn’t you grill Obama the way you did Sarah Palin? After all he is running for president. I have lost all respect for you.

Posted by: Kathy | September 12, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

It is clear by ABC’s tactics and Charlie Gibson’s cut and paste questions and editing that there is clearly a smear campaign out on Sarah Palin.
They are clearly representing one side of political arena.

Posted by: Jeff | September 12, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Palin can speak well under questioning. It’s obvious she knows more about Nato than Charles Gibson. Note her direct and careful articulation of words. She doesn’t stammer like Obama when he’s giving an answer. She doesn’t say “uh.. uh… uh..le eh eh et, me me me say this about th-th-that” as Obama does. Her thoughts and words are in sync, which shows a clarity of thought and a clear superior verbal skill, under pressure, that comes through her strong-held values. Obama can’t think well on his feet without stuttering. And his answers betray his equivocation on issues. Palin’s philosphy underlying her words is the view of 60% of Americans. And, she’s only the VP candidate, clearly superior to Obama. I believe America could weather an Obama Presidency perhaps, but Republicans have the better ticket. I am much more confident in McCain/Palin than the Dems.

Posted by: JayG | September 12, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

No doubt, Obama shot himself in the foot and elsewhere by not selecting Hillary — let his self-righteousness get in the way of good judgement. I’m by no means on the liberal side, but it’s very likely McCain would not have introduced Sarah as his running mate if Hillary had been selected. Now the Democrats will have to suffer the rest of the campaign and 4 more years (at least) because of this major mistake!!

Posted by: reege46 | September 12, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

I have never seen Charlie Gibson look so mean giving an interview. I always liked him but now I have seen the other side of him and it is obvious that he his an Obama fan. Too sad that our news media runs our country. I always thought the it was up to the people,

Posted by: reea | September 12, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Youall be plaining about Sarah bt she was gooder than most of you could do. Most my friends dont know Bush doctrine neither. I think she is better even than Mccain is.
Rodney

Posted by: rodney | September 12, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

If 10 people on the street were asked to describe the Bush Doctrine, you would receive 10 different answers.
If 10 people on the street were asked to describe Obamas plans for Change, you would receive 10 different answers.
Come November, America is going to get nothing new no matter who is elected. We have a disfunctional government run by people who’s only plan is to get re elected. So I say, at least give me a war hero with a running mate that hasn’t been sitting around Washington doing nothing for the past two years.

Posted by: Bob T | September 12, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Smoke and mirrors? 346 words and she didn’t say a thing? Sounds just like OBAMA, only he wouldn’t be as succinct as that, it would take him 2000 words to say NOTHING!

Posted by: ChicLit | September 12, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

God has shined his light of benediction on Sarah and she will lead us to justice and peace. We need her because she will pray and God will tell her what we should do. At last, a woman who knows that all the answers are in the Holy Bible.
Jesus loves you all.

Posted by: Karen | September 12, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Some things to take away from the interview:
She doesn’t know what the Bush Doctrine is.
Kept repeating the same line, “we shoudn’t second guess Israel” 4 times to be exact, even on subsequent follow ups.
I don’t really have a problem with Sarah the woman.
I just don’t want to focus on the issues. The last 8 years has put the country in a downward spiral. We just need to look at the numbers. Do we want another 8 years of that? McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time. You just need to look at that to see what the next 4 years will be like.

Posted by: hp | September 12, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Fact Check: 1) Every Vice Presidential Candidate in recent history has had extensive meetings with Heads of States!
2) The Bush Doctrine is the foundation of all that has gone wrong with our foreign policy. We are not asking employees of the Pentagon or any other service, we are not asking ten people on the street, we are asking a person who could possibly be POTUS in 3 months!
Ask any 10 people on the street who Putin is and they won’t know either, so is this our measure, our standard for picking a VP any one of 10 people on the street?????

Posted by: stormbrew2 | September 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Charlie Gibson may have looked somewhat put off, but can you imagine the harrassment he is taking from Bush and McCain handlers? All reporters must be able to ask any question they want, and let the people decide what is and isn’t appropriate.
If I was Palin, I would be angry at being “Handled” this way, either she is strong enough to handle the pressure of the presidency or she isn’t, I don’t think world leaders are going to be as meek as the press is

Posted by: stormbrew2 | September 12, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Cheerleader in Chief Barbie and her made for TV Disney movie… This is the woman the republicans want as their VP. NO WAY!

Posted by: Adrie | September 12, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Wow! It almost sounds like people didn’t hear/read the same interview. Isn’t it amazing how we come away with exactly opposite opinions.
I for one did not think that Charlie was playing softball. Charlie often came back at Sarah with the same question and with an edge in his voice when he didn’t think she had answered the question to his liking (“But do you…”). It was like a prosecutor grilling the defendant on the witness stand. I think that was very disrespectful. Sarah handled it all in a very gracious manner. I have to admire her for that and so many other things. I hope to learn much more in the future.
It is rather presumptuous of you who think she gave no thought at all as to whether or not being a VP nominee would be good for her or her family. Do you not think she had any idea that she was being considered??
Although I call myself a Republican, I often wish we could bring solutions from both sides together to tackle our national problems. It’s hard to agree with all that one party stands for. Even so, I would be very fearful if Obama were to win the presidency. His voting record has been on the extreme side of things. I am willing to give these Republican ‘mavericks’ a chance.

Posted by: CAM | September 12, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Wow! It almost sounds like people didn’t hear/read the same interview. Isn’t it amazing how we come away with exactly opposite opinions.
I for one did not think that Charlie was playing softball. Charlie often came back at Sarah with the same question and with an edge in his voice when he didn’t think she had answered the question to his liking (“But do you…”). It was like a prosecutor grilling the defendant on the witness stand. I think that was very disrespectful. Sarah handled it all in a very gracious manner. I have to admire her for that and so many other things. I hope to learn much more in the future.
It is rather presumptuous of you who think she gave no thought at all as to whether or not being a VP nominee would be good for her or her family. Do you not think she had any idea that she was being considered??
Although I call myself a Republican, I often wish we could bring solutions from both sides together to tackle our national problems. It’s hard to agree with all that one party stands for. Even so, I would be very fearful if Obama were to win the presidency. His voting record has been on the extreme side of things. I am willing to give these Republican ‘mavericks’ a chance.

Posted by: CAM | September 12, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I won’t humor the liberals who have hijacked the democrat party by calling them dem’s, Harry Truman and John Kennedy would be repulsed.
The silly remarks about Palin’s knowledge of the world and whether the world likes her as much as they like nobama
At least she knows how many states are in our glorious union.
NOT 58 Nobama folks. Try 50. Ever time nobama opens his mouth he illustrates the worthlessness of his ‘elite’ education.
Yes, yes, Nobama has had ‘hundreds’ of fawning info mmercials, but except for oreilly, no other interviews. I seem to recall the end of one recently where the ‘lady’ interviewing asked if he EVER had any doubts,,,, he flashed that BIG grin, in his sultry voice and trumpeted NEVER!! I thought the ‘lady’ was having a hard time keeping her clothes on. Tough interview.
JESUS WAS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER!!
Am I the only one that thinks this comparison is PROFANE!
How presidential.
Just in case anyone is reading this, yes of course the liberals have the copyright on uninformed arrogance and hate. It is what they do best, certainly not argue the experience of their messiah. When a person has no grounding in basic morality which comes from the experience of growing up in a loving household with religious beliefs, it is easy to become enamored of false prophets.

Posted by: transp0rter821 | September 12, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Speaking of Messiahs and prophets, people need to tb looking at that pentacostal Assembly of God church she attends in Wasilla. Even the Assembly of God church (As wacky as they are) denounced the Wasilla branch that Palin attends as heretical. The spot light needs to be put on Palin and her church before she gets to close to the white house.

Posted by: F64 | September 12, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Can you look me in the eye Charles Gibson and tell
me why you didn’t talk down to Obama – can’t believer your interview – so unfair and unprofessional.

Posted by: brendA | September 12, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

She scares me. Does hse really think we would go to war over Georgia, Ukraine? Has she no understanding of Russia’s history of having to battle invading nations on its border and its determination of “never again”?
John McCain scares me. He thought(as well as others) she is right for the job. What were they thinking!!

Posted by: PM | September 12, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Well, this will be the last time I tune in to Charlie Gibson. I actually thought he would be a good interviewer. HIs questions were fine, but he talked to her as if she was a college-age school girl being lectured by her grandpa. This is sexist in my opinion.

Posted by: David | September 12, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

After I closly listened, what came to my mind was, when I hire new employee for the job opening, on the interview they came without any experices and they pretended as if they know all and do experience. Palin is JUST hunger for power and money. I am very sorry for her husband. I wish she stay close with her new born baby, and take care of him. Instead, given all responsibilty for her daughters. Shame Shame Shame. John Mcaine, what kind of choice he brought to Us?

Posted by: woldu | September 12, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

After I closly listened, what came to my mind was, when I hire new employee for the job opening, on the interview they came without any experices and they pretended as if they know all and do experience. Palin is JUST hunger for power and money. I am very sorry for her husband. I wish she stay close with her new born baby, and take care of him. Instead, given all responsibilty for her daughters. Shame Shame Shame. John Mcaine, what kind of choice he brought to Us?

Posted by: woldu | September 12, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Typical liberal media, I wasn’t sure about Palin, but after the crap Gibson threw at her, I am going to vote for her.

Posted by: Roger | September 12, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

To compare someone like Sarah Palin to our past presidents, with a few exceptions, is ludicrous! It is scary!
This is a Rove engineered product if ever I saw one. I don’t know how people in this country can be fooled into voting against themselves so often – must be that noone reads anymore, just gets their info from FOX Disturbia!

Posted by: Bev | September 12, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

As recently stated, she is a “Cocky Wacko”.
Look to all you Republicans out there praising her, you know darn well if she were on a Democrat you would be laughing at her too.
See the thing is the Democrats picked smart people, not this Bozo. Because she can see Russia from an island in Alaska will not change that fact…

Posted by: Mr Toad | September 12, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Oh one other thing. To all the Republican voters out there. No matter who wins this race you will lose in some way or another. If Obama wins, the Democrats win the election and you lose because you voted McCain. If McCain wins though, we all lose. Do the right thing, vote Obama.

Posted by: Mr Toad | September 12, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I am tired of liberals saying “McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time”, Well if you look at Barack record, he voted with Bush 90% of the time also. 90% of the votes are to just operate the government. Its the other 10% of the votes that scares me about BO.
McCain and BO voted 90% of the time with Bush.

Posted by: Roger | September 12, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Think there isn’t media bias? Go to ” World News’ ” home page. Look at the copy next to the “ Palin on god and war “ video clip.“…..see what she meant by her “ holy war “ comments. “
Excuse me? She never said “ holy war “ …….CHARLIE DID!!!
OMG!!
Media bias case file # 2,333,959!!

Posted by: Peter Bolton | September 12, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Mr. Toad, I take issue with the statement that Democrats picked smart people, not this Bozo. I personally have talked and listened to allot of Democrats but have never thought they were smart, or intelligent, mostly just arrogant idiots.

Posted by: Roger | September 12, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Attention Bloggers: If you want readers to take your views seriously, it would help if you could put sentences together that make sense and spell words correctly…..no matter your politics….

Posted by: UseADictionaryPlease | September 12, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I don’t understand people who don’t want the person running for VP of this country to be asked tough questions. We need these people to be put under fire as much as possible BEFORE they become VP or President. We need to pay close attention to their answers. I agree with the person who related Gov. Palin’s interview with someone who applied for a position but had woefully inadequate experience and pretended to be qualified. Shooting off answers without any hesitation does not qualify someone to be VP or President. The content of their answers is what matters.

Posted by: Daniel | September 12, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Thank you, Charlie for your serious interview on serious subjects. You had a really difficult and delicate job of asking hard questions without looking like a bully. You did it superbly! Keep it up.
Loved the way you dealt with her obvious ignorance about the Bush Doctrine. Two things I would love to have seen challenged are these:
1) The Bush doctrine is justification for the war in Iraq. Her response was its ok if we are in imminent danger and war as a last response. If that’s true, how can she justify our decisions in Iraq when neither of those things are true.
2) II would also love to have seen her challenged on the whole Abraham Lincoln response. What a crock response! She didn’t reference Lincoln anywhere in that speech, nor did she say that no one knows God’s will so pray that our leaders make the right decisions, etc. She DID say … very clearly … sending our soldiers off to war was that they are doing God’s will. She did it in her church video, and also at her send off speech on 9/11.
Someone, please don’t let her weasel out!

Posted by: Lorrie Boone | September 12, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

She wants a different government but she sounds just like the rest…she answered nothing important directly, she didn’t even know what he was talking about half the time, and not one thing seemed genuine and something out of her own mouth..more political bs

Posted by: Terry | September 12, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Being an attorney I think it’s only fair that an interviewer play hardball with our public representatives. And our servants should expect difficult questions. That being said…Charlie Gibson ..you were condescending, demeaning and as far as I’m concerned you made yourself look like a real jerk! She was poised, prepared, and did a excellent job answering your questions
even though I wish she would have taken the gloves off and said “Mr. Gibson..you invented the term “Bush Doctrine” congratulations! You tell us what you means!” People wake up! Sarah Palin is EXACTLY what the founders of this country had in mind. A government for the poeple, by the people, and of the people! She’s a self made woman with real experience and real guts beholden to nobody except those she serves! We need more Sarah Palins!

Posted by: Julia | September 12, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

compare this interview with the he did with Obama last year. His “interview” with Obama consisted of background stories of Obama’s family tree. Even the interview with Edwards after the 04 convention was lightweight.

Posted by: Danny | September 12, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

And you wonder why ABC’s ratings and credibility have gone down the toilet. This only reinforces the fact that the mainstream media has a Barrack Hussein Obama agenda. I thought Charlie Gibson was reporter but I was completely mistaken. That is why I stopped getting my news from ABC a long time ago and won’t be coming back.

Posted by: Marc Guerra | September 12, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

For the first time in thirty years this old Democrat is excited about an election, I think McCain and Palin make the perfect ticket, experience and Brilliance!!!! I cannot wait to see this lady take on the Washington fatcats that have bilked and torn this country apart. Look out Nancy!!!!

Posted by: jyrenejim | September 12, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Julia I think you need to wake up. The Bush Doctrine was not a term invented by Gibson. God help this country if everybody voting is as uninformed as you.

Posted by: cj | September 13, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I think we all is forgetting the real issue here which is this woman is running for vp. Sarah Palin clearly dont know what she is talking about in this interview which sadden me. The republicans are playing the same game that they have been playing for years and its tireding. The funny thing is the republicans know that Sarah Palin is just a hoax that’s been thrown out in public to get Hilary voters and play the sexism game. The republicans is stating change but yet hands us lies and a female with no experience what so ever. Us americans people is getting frustrated with these blind sided republicans with their schemes and last 8 yrs in office that is straining the americans dollars. Sarah Palin is wrong for the vp. The republicans are distancing themselves from GWB but is still nominating a vp close to his iq. Wow when are we going to open are eyes and start making smarter choices for are leaders in america. The republicans is doing the same thing when GWB was running for office just in a different way and we as americans are fallen for it again be smarter their not different they is just more of the same.

Posted by: Nelly | September 13, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

I am so disappointed with you, Charlie. As a long time independent, that voted for both Dems & Repubs in past elections, I always depended on an honest, down the middle report and respect to both Dems & Republicans in an interview from you. I have followed you for years starting with GMA to where you should be at World News…. always fair to everyone. But you have reduced your interview with Sarah Palin to the same old “gotcha” questions that the far left has promted the media to ask. There was no respect shown to the woman that possibly could be the next VP. Why aren’t you interviewing Sen. Biden and asking him the same questions, with the SAME DISDAIN, about working while raising a family, about his earmarks, etc. No one is paying any attention to Obama’s VP pick.
Oh, by the way, it is Obama vs. McCain, not Obama vs. Palin.
Charlie, I am so very disappointed in you. You know better.

Posted by: Ltlbranch | September 13, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Everything I wanted to say was said in the Ltlbranch email (9/13/2008). I always admired you – but it appears you
are part of the “good old boys” club. Now I know why I watch Fox News which is always fair and balanced. I look forward to Bill O’Reilly interviewing
Sarah Palin. The comparison will be exciting to behold.
As Ltlbranch said – Shame on you.

Posted by: Milly | September 13, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Nelly – whose IQ are you talking about?
For someone you liberals claim is “so stupid”, GWB seemed to keep making you look like monkeys again and again over the last 8 years. Liberals have been wrong about “the surge” in Iraq, wrong about it being a “lost cause”, wrong about our soldiers carelessly murdering civilians, wrong about the 2nd Amendment…time and space precludes a complete list, but you get the idea.
“no experience whatsoever” – be careful Nelly, you’re almost describing Obama; he has no EXECUTIVE experience in government whatsoever. Palin HAS such experience, so your comment is clearly false. And you want to elect BO to the TOP of your ticket, not VP – (what) are you thinking?
“Sarah Palin just a hoax…sexism game” – you evidently thing conservatives are stupid. That’s fine, the feeling is generally mutual. We wonder why you fall for the “race card” all the time.
Any person (man or woman) who votes for any candidate because of their race or gender is too stupid to vote. THAT is why this country is in such a hash – people are willing to vote “labels”. From what I’ve seen, Palin actually walks her talk.

Posted by: JD | September 13, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Charlie, you need to work on your body language…tells it all!! Your hidden agenda was evident…out to get the “lady” and make a name for yourself among your elite peers.

Posted by: JBT | September 13, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

AF made a comment that I 100% have to applaud him on:
I think someone posted earlier and I completely agree that it is a significant concern that someone would accept the potential vice presidency without blinking an eye. This exemplifies a lack of foresight, thought, and balancing of pros and cons when it comes to significant decision making…a significant flaw in the potential vice president who could potentially become the leader of the free world. Also, I think most of you supporting her because she seems to be a strong woman who balances family and career would have to admit that it is a concern that she is implying that she didn’t even stop to think about the impact on her family…she just accepted with no pause or blink of an eye.

Posted by: Jasmine | September 13, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Sarah did a fantastic job during Gibson’s interrogation. The only problem is that ABC chose to edit out of context, set up the entire interview from the left liberal bias.
When will Obama or Biden going to get the same tough questions? I admire a woman who stands by her personal beliefs, but understands that she governs for all, not just her personal feelings.
It was a very calculated attack. Compare Gibson’s questions to Obama or Edwards vs. Palin’s.
It just confirms, that the good old boy network is shaking in their boots and sent Gibson out there to destroy her.
She held her own. You go girl!

Posted by: debi | September 13, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Women’s right to choose?
If women had the right to choose in the 60′s…… There would be NO-bama, to run for president.

Posted by: debi | September 13, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Would Obama have held up under the same interrogation as Palin?
Anytime he is asked anything off script he flounders like a fish out of water.
You can wrap a stinky fish in media bias, but he’s still a stinky fish.

Posted by: debi | September 13, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

I used to like Charlie Gibson, but after seeing the condescending interview he did with Palin…it is apparent that he is just like all the other media. I always thought he was a man of fairness, honor & respect. Well…he showed his true heart during that interview. The questions were fair but the way you spoke down to a GOVERNOR of a STATE is unforgivable. Palin obviously earned her way to the Governorship like all the other Governors. She deserves respect and honor. You showed none. I would like to see you interview Obama in the SAME manor with the same questions. ABC news was always my favorite because of you…no more.

Posted by: CSH | September 13, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Charlie Gibson’s interview of Sarah Palin wasn’t meant to be a fluff People Magazine interview. It was supposed to challenge her. It was intended to be carried out with professional skepticism. Do you think that if she and McCain were to be elected that all the reporters, let alone Senators and Representatives, heads of state, the heads of the US Military, terrorists are going to treat her with kit gloves? There are always plenty of “gotcha” questions and angry moments that any Vice President must face, not to mention President. Whoever is elected had damn well better be able to handle a little scowling and pressure, or we’re all in a lot of trouble.

Posted by: Daniel | September 13, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Hey MIlly is it?
Well Milly I’m just stating the obvious here. Can you watch that interview and actually say this woman is ready to be a vp? cmon lets be real here. This woman dont know GWB doctrine. Wow and you want to claim that im being unfair. This is not a game we cant just pick a woman because she is a woman, this country was build from great minds, man and woman black and white etc. Im not voting for Barrack because he is black im voting for him because i honestly wants a change. I feel he is a leader that can bring change in america ecomonical, financially and educationally. Do you think in McCain mind he actually wanted a woman vp? McCain been in this political game for a long time and why now decide to pick up a woman vp for change you gotta be kidding me like i say stradgies again and again, we as american as i stated before is falling for it, even you Milly. Charlie is not being unfair. He is interviewing her asking her question that you would suspect a vp should know. Charlie cant be lenient on her because she is a female. This is serious the vp position demands the knowledgement of Americans policies. Im not liberal or conservative I’m me, like Chris Rock said, some stuff im liberal about and some stuff im conservative about. I like to listen to politician view points before i come to a decision whether im going to vote for them or not. I would tip my hat off to a woman in a presidential position or vp position. But a woman that’s qualified for that position. A woman when being interviewed by any news media knows her up’s and down about americans issues and policies. A strong woman leader that when is face with sexism or being be-little,we as women dont have to shelter her and complain that she is having the hard question. when you know that those kind of question are the question that make her qualified for the vp office. Milly lets say for instance your a owner of a company, you want to increase your profits you decides to hire. Milly your interviewing,asking question that would qualify this person for that position. Now Milly set aside all politics, gimmicks etc. and lets go with plain old common sense. Milly your company is running out of business for the last 8 yrs. You know that in order to get profits to your company (country) you have to make a different choiceWe will one day have a woman qualified for a presidential or vp position white or black but i dont see it in Sarah Palin. I hope you like my metaphors. LOL keep a open mind on your decision while entering the polls.

Posted by: Nelly | September 13, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I have waited 8 years for a president who would know how to pronounce the word “nuclear”. As the end nears, I am appalled to hear Sarah Palin say “nucular” just like GWB. Could we please just have a literate politician in the white house?

Posted by: Dawn | September 13, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Is that all you can complain about, Dawn?
Wait til you see Obama without a teleprompter.

Posted by: midwestlady | September 14, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Mispronouncing “nuclear” won’t seem like such a big deal to you after you hear him go “duh, heh, duh” over and over for about 45 seconds.

Posted by: midwestlady | September 14, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

I can only believe that women with an I.Q lower then a 2 year old child will vote for mcpain.

Posted by: roz | September 16, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.