By Justin Rood

Oct 1, 2008 10:59am

Another Private Palin Email Account?

News of yet another private email account for Sarah Palin could affect the Troopergate probes by the Alaska state legislature and the state personnel board, the Washington Post reports this morning.

Palin and a close circle of aides had accounts on the “PalinForGovernor.com” domain, a privately-run domain she had used for her campaign, that paper found.

A technician described to the Post how he set up email accounts for Palin and others this spring at the direction of aide Frank Bailey. Bailey denied the account as “completely inaccurate” and told the paper “we haven’t used that domain in a long time.”

Emails have been used as important evidence as details of the Troopergate scandal have unfolded in the public eye.  Palin used emails between herself and aides to argue that Walt Monegan, whose firing is at the center of the scandal, had a “rogue mentality” and refused to work within the administration’s wishes.  Recently, Monegan has said he has other emails that prove otherwise.

User Comments

Will she be allowed to have a yahoo account too? Just B-Essing with her BFFs about that dreamy President of Georgia or that cool guy from Pakistan?
Lord help us all. When did the Republican party begin to sound like an episode of Hannah Montana?

Posted by: Christine | October 1, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Is this what the 30 drones came up with in Alaska? I’m referring, of course, to the lawyers and researchers that the Obama campaign sent there to dig up ANYTHING that can be used aagainst Gov. Palin. The fact is, most people who are not in the liberal progressive camp could not care less about this Monegan thing. She has every right to get rid of any public employee in her domain for whatever reason she deems necessary. End of story. BTW: how many e-mail accounts does Obama have? Why isn’t his illegal campaign funding a concern of ABC News?

Posted by: LARRY K. STAIDA | October 1, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Wow, Larry K. Staida! re: “She has every right to get rid of any public employee in her domain for whatever reason she deems necessary. End of story. ” You sure don;t let the little things stand in your way do you? Like the LAW or the CONSTITUTION! In that respect, you’re a perfect Republican. ANd if the shoe were on the other foot, and a Democrat governor were firing Christians for no other reason, I’m equally sure you’d tell a different story. Typical GOP secretive, lawless, hypocritical attitude.

Posted by: Strepsi | October 1, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Is she that dumb that she had to have a technician set up a simple email account? Really?

Posted by: alfredo | October 1, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Why are you making this about Obama, he did not use her Illegal accounts she did, stick to the facts, if she had not been hiding all this stuff just maybe there wouldbe nothing to probe. But then again she is perfect and knows extactly how to run this country and she is ready to be presedent, seeing allher experience in foreign policy. Ummm NOT lol those are not facts I am sticking too lol

Posted by: SMH | October 1, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

NO, you can’t just “get rid” of anyone she wants, ESPECIALLY when there’s a conflict of interest.

Posted by: Sushi | October 1, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Yeah… like Bush had every right to fire those attorney generals. You folks amaze me.

Posted by: sus | October 1, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

“She has every right to get rid of any public employee in her domain for whatever reason she deems necessary.”
Really?! Really? Are you sure you don’t want to back up on that statement just a little? We have employee protection in the U.S. for a reason.
BTW, I do think that Troopergate is an important issue. Palin’s actions reveal what kind of leader she is and would be in the White House. Do we want another leader who practices cronyism and secrecy?

Posted by: Glenn | October 1, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Mr. Staida, you are mal-informed. Quit spreading information you have been apparently too lazy to verify.

Posted by: ezra | October 1, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Guess she’s not quite so dumb after all – or has some smarty-pants operatives/lawyers around her. Can’t wait to see what she sent from Bristol’s e-mail account.

Posted by: bureaubasher | October 1, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Lets get into some focus here.
If Palin fired Moneghan for not firing a trooper ( yes a former brother in law or any trooper) who tasered a 10yr old boy I APPLAUD her.
Obama openly embraces a known Domestic Terrorist who planted more bombs than Tim McVeigh, Eric Rudolph and the Unibomber added TOGETHER and you want me to be concerned over some nitwit getting fired by his BOSS?? Get Real people.

Posted by: Dennis D | October 1, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Ayers participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the United States Capitol building in 1971, and The Pentagon in 1972, as he noted in his 2001 book, Fugitive Days. Because of a water leak caused by the Pentagon bombing, aerial bombardments during the Vietnam War had to be halted for several days. Ayers writes:
Although the bomb that rocked the Pentagon was itsy-bitsy – weighing close to two pounds – it caused ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ of damage. The operation cost under $500, and no one was killed or even hurt. In that same time, the Pentagon spent tens of millions of dollars and dropped tens of thousands of pounds of explosives on Viet Nam, killing or wounding thousands of human beings, causing hundreds of millions of dollars of damage.[13]

Posted by: Dennis D | October 1, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Sorry, there libs, but Monegan served at the pleasure of the Governor.
Which means Palin could fire him if she wanted to.
In addition, if my memory serves, Monegan was offered a different position and turned it down.
Not too many people in the workforce get that oppotunity when they are “fired”…they may get it when, however, they have a work agenda/ethic that doesn’t meet the requirements of one particular superior.
Now try to remove your veil of hate for Palin and lift your blinders to Obama and think long and hard about what you are about to unleash on this country if Obama is elected.
Obama is a Socialist with radical friends intent on destroying America as we know it. To many of us it is obvious, but those of you who believe smooth talk trumps all are in for a very rude awakening.
Wake up and research a little on your radical candidate…you might learn something.
McCain/Palin 2008

Posted by: sharprightturn | October 2, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

“Yeah… like Bush had every right to fire those attorney generals. You folks amaze me.”
First, it is US attorneys, not ‘attorney generals.’
Second… yeah, you mean how Clinton fired 93 US attorneys at the beginning of his Presidency. (Bush fired eight.)
Surely, you hadn’t forgotten about Bubba’s massive firing. Surely.

Posted by: Ruy Diaz | October 2, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

SMH -
Palin has as much foreign policy experience as Obama and HE is running for President.
(Except for maybe his Messiah tour or Europe and the Middle East in July)
It makes me laugh to see liberals talking Sarah Palin down when their own candidate has NO executive experience unless you include his Directorship with the Chicago Annenberg Challenge with his buddy William Ayers, the terrorist, at his side.
In addition, your Saviour, who claims to understand how average Americans live never even set foot on the mainland of this country until his early adulthood.
I’d also challenge you to name just one of Obama’s “friends” and “mentors” who has shown an outward and unabashed love of America….
Most of Obama’s mentors and relationships include people who follow the book of Socialism and Alinsky principles. They hate America as She is and will lie to transform her as they see fit.
Do your own research if you don’t believe me…look up William Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Louis Farakkhan, ACORN, Weather Underground, Jeremiah Wright, Raila Odinga, Cloward-Piven Strategy,Michael Pfleger….to name a few.
McCain/Palin 2008

Posted by: sharprightturn | October 2, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

“Monegan is an “at will” employee. She can fire him for any reason or no reason at all.” may be true but the state trooper she was trying to get fired is a civil servant,so if it’s proven she was putting pressure on her “at will” employee to fire him,it’s conspiracy and in fact illegal!

Posted by: sure sure | October 3, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

I just tried palinforgovernor and was instantly redirected to the McCain/Palin website. Why, if there’s nothing to hide? These two spend more time covering up than campaigning. Palin is dirty and the truth will eventually come out. I just hope it comes out before the election. I also hope someone hacks THAT server and fully distributes ALL her email.

Posted by: rshaub | October 4, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Sarah Palin, as governor of Alaska, does NOT have the right to fire for whatever reason she wants . . . hence the reason the state senate committee, including a majority of her own party, voted unanimously to investigate the discharge of Walt Monegan to determine whether she had abused the authority of her position. And Sarah Palin knows she does not have the right to fire for whatever reason she wants, which is why SHE AGREED, initially, to fully cooperate in the investigation. That is before she set her sites on the second highest office in the land and decided that the stakes of being cooperative were too costly in the face of more ambitious goals. While it doesn’t surprise me that Republicans are so callous and would support Walt Monegan being fired simply because he refused fire another man who had the audacity to have once been married to Palin’s sister, and have gone through a bitter divorce with that sister. I am an attorney and guess what? Divorces are bitter. People say and do things that are not nice and are incredibly hurtful. They are highly emotional and very charged situations. And in this case – the judge who presided over Palin’s sister’s divorce wasn’t chastising the ex-husband for being difficult, he was chastising Sarah Palin’s sister and HER FAMILY (i.e. SARAH PALIN saying back off and leave him alone, see Court orders which were not fabricated by the Democrats as they existed prior to her entering the presidential election process). In all my years and with all the bitterness I’ve seen and the terrible emotions I’ve counseled people through, I’ve never seen a family so intent on deliberately campaigning to destroy an ex . . . . and then Palin attains the highest executive state office in Alaska and tries to use her influence to get the ex fired even after being warned by the to stop doing that! In other words, she tries to financially destroy this man. And when Monegan refuses to partipate she fires him, and she destroys his career. And might I remind you that Monegan had a long and distinguished career. He was very well respected in the State of Alaska in his field. And you republican folks are saying it’s no big deal? It’s her right to do that? That, ladies and gentleman, is a classic case of abuse of power. And it is most relevant to this campaign because she can and most certainly will do similar things as the VP . . . people will certainly upset her and what sort of systematic campaigns will she embark upon to destroy them personally and professionally? And anyone who doesn’t join on that campaign will be tossed in the food line right along with them. Perhaps if you happen to be one of those who cross her you’ll feel differently after your career and livelihood is destroyed because of her petty vengefulness and abuse of power. It may not be quite as brutal as executing someone, but it is the financial equivalent.
And for those that are trying to say how is this any different than a new president coming into office and appointing a new cabinet? Please?!?!? There are those that hold top offices, those who are political appointees who know that when there is a change in administration that will likely be replaced. That’s a changing of the guard and is a civilized process. It is very different than an abuse of power . . . . being fired because you refused to do something unethical at the direction of your supervisor.
Many, many government employees are not at-will employees and cannot be terminate without cause and due process.
And we do have employment laws that protect even at will employees. Some of you republicans may want to read up on them.
I know that sometimes those pesky civil rights get in the way of the republican agenda, but once in awhile it helps to remember them . . . they’re the laws that demand we act with humanity.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 4, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I totally agree with this investigation. If she is innocent, why is she aquechling it? This is not something to sneeze at. I hope that Rachel Maddow stays on this probe. Since McCain is not looking good, do we care? Yes. Even if they lose, Palin will have to face the 670,000 people of Alaska.

Posted by: Dan Kelly | October 4, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Pailin If you nothing to hide, What is the problem..
If they throw her out, she can come to Texas and run for Mayor in any of the many Cities that have a population greater than the state of Alaska.
Of course if you come to Texas, and start lying to us Texas boys, we are likely to tar and feather and sent you back to Alaska.

Posted by: Terry w Norwod | October 9, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

I can’t believe how twisted the truth has gotten here. The first and most important twist is that Walt Monegan was not fired. He was asked to serve as director of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. Rather than take the new job, he went to his friends in the Legislature to try and keep his old job.
Second, and this is the big point everyone seems to miss, Sarah and Todd Palin, wanted Wooten fired when she was Mayor, not Governor. Later she was elected Governor, she hired Monegan as Public Safety Commissioner.
I could go into all the “he said” “she said” here, except it is Monegan doing most of the talking. He said that Todd Palin still wanted Wooten fired when his wife became Governor. Fine, he wasn’t elected and didn’t give up his right to have opinions. Sarah felt that asking Monegan to try to get rid of Wooten would be micro-managing and told Todd to “cool it.”
Remember though that Wooten was disciplined by the State Police, before Sarah and Monegan showed up as Governor and Public Safety Commissioner respectively. The union sued and got the suspension reduced to a week. Reopening that would have been a non-starter even if the Governor and Monegan wanted to do so.
What was not water over the dam was Monegan going to the legislature to get the budget for his office increased. (Not the State Police budget, but the office of the Commissioner for Public Safety.) You may disagree with Sarah plans to streamline bureaucracy instead of expanding it–but she was elected on that platform.

Posted by: Robert I. Eachus | October 12, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

The guy who hacked into her personal email (son of a Democratic congressman) said he couldn’t find anything bad. Why wasn’t that the headline?
How many people here can set up their own email account on a personal server?

Posted by: BlueState | October 24, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Did you look at the constitution? As governor she can fire anybody she wants to. Her people serve at her pleasure. Same goes for any other executive – governor or president.
The probe found she did nothing wrong in firing her police chief. It pointed out a problem with her husband calling him to complain about a violent trooper.

Posted by: BlueState | October 24, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.