By David Schoetz

Oct 31, 2008 12:05am

Closing Arguments: The Palin Effect Today

We reported earlier tonight that our recent poll showed Sarah Palin’s favorablity rating drop from 59 percent immediately after the Republican National Convention to 46 percent one week ago.

But she continues to electrify on the campaign trail.

So tonight, we ask you: Do you think Sarah Palin has become a drag on the Republican ticket?
 
Tell us what you think.

User Comments

NO, she is not a drag on the Republican Ticket!!!!!

Posted by: IreneScarborough | October 31, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

All I know is that they have thrown a lot of smokescreen in Obama’s direction yet she is still an unknown.
Where are her medical records

Posted by: TakingPictures | October 31, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

She has energized the Republican ticket!!!!!No wonder the Democrats are so against her

Posted by: sharon | October 31, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

yes, not only a drag on the Republican ticket, a drag on the sanity of America with her negative and sarcasticly delivered barbs.

Posted by: LynchMartin | October 31, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Frankly, Govenor Palin is the reason that John McCain is as close as he is today. She has ignigted the conservative base. Her main nemisis is the news media with questions such as this. She has been far more vetted, as has “Joe the Plumber” than Barak Obama. I would request that the news media do its job and research all of the facts and let the voters make the decision. As it is, we are not being provided with all of the facts from the mainstream media so we have to turn to the internet and other sources to get all of the facts.

Posted by: Jim Williams | October 31, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I, for one, am appalled that everyone is dumping on McCain and Palin. I will be praying for the outcome of this election and believing for the BEST outcome. Those who have been disillusioned are in for a rude awakening if Obama is elected.

Posted by: Sally LaPort | October 31, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Sarah Palin is a “loose cannon”. They
always give her a prepared speech
for good reason. I could not vote
for McCain because she wouldn’t
be qualified if something happened to him.

Posted by: Chris Gilfillan | October 31, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Sarah Palin has NOT become a drag on the Republican ticket. The only thing that has become a drag in this election is the overtly biased media and the fact that there is no longer reporting of the news in a fair and balanced way.

Posted by: Carole | October 31, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

My wife and I think Palin’s a joke. For choosing her as his running mate, McCain deserves to lose. We pray to God that Obama wins, or else our country is in big trouble. After the last eight years of sheer hell our country has gone through, how can anyone even think of voting for the Republican ticket?

Posted by: Carlton | October 31, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Palin will be the reason that McCain loses….For the good of the Republican Party, why doesn’t she step down???

Posted by: L Singer | October 31, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Sarah Palin is the MAIN reason why I am voting for John McCain. I’m sick of the negative remarks the main stream media makes about her and I’m convinced they are doing this because she is a conservative woman who is opposed to abortion. I’d vote for her to be president if she runs. I believe she is qualified, has integrity, and is capable of selecting the right people to work under her. So NO I DO NOT think she has been a drag on the republican ticket! She’s a major plus!!

Posted by: lifeverse | October 31, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

If Palin is not a drag on the ticket, it reflects badly on the electorate. She has such limited experience and knowledge of the world beyond Alaska that she cannot possibly be an effective president. Her appeal is charismatic, without any substance. She is clearly unqualified.

Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Yes, she has become a drag on the McCain campaign–she’s evolved into a joke! There’s no substance there! Please get real about this woman (coming from another intelligent, political, caring woman).

Posted by: Carol Coles | October 31, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Sarah Palin is the most refreshing, honest, and I believe capable person in politics today and it’s unfathomable to me that she isn’t way ahead in the polls. Could media hype be playing a huge part in this?

Posted by: Dan Franks | October 31, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Sarah Palin could never be a drag. She is a very informed and a bit of fresh air in politics. Pelosi should be so smart.

Posted by: Gene Richardson | October 31, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Sarah Palin is a breath of fresh honesty….NO drag to John McCain..

Posted by: Donna | October 31, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

No–she has added to the Republican ticket some real interesting facts that someone needed to say. Good for Sarah!

Posted by: Bostick | October 31, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I believe she is a huge drag on the ticket. McCain made a mistake picking her for his running mate.

Posted by: Glenn | October 31, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Yes, I think that McCain is regretting his choice of Palin. She’s had a taste of fame and it’s about her now, not him. I don’t trust her for a minute.

Posted by: Modern Woman | October 31, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I love Palin! She’s smart and the Dems are affraid of her.

Posted by: ADAM ELIZONDO | October 31, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Sarah Palin is the major reason that I will not vote for John McCain . . . a monumental demonstration of McCain’s bad decision making and disregard for the American people. Yes, she is a drag!!!

Posted by: Sharon White | October 31, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

McCain made huge mistake and poor judgement when he chose Sarah Palin for his running mate; she has dragged him down.

Posted by: Eve Welborn | October 31, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Palin is an inspiration to this campaign…she is a “real” person who understands the issues that the average (not political) person deals with in this nation. She loves God and is not ashamed to stand up for the Truth – FINALLY we have an educated, enthusiastic, and capable individual who does not allow anyone to intimidate nor cause her to compromise her stand! God Bless Sarah and God Bless the USA!!

Posted by: Christie | October 31, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

John McCain is the drag on the
Republican Party. People are confused
by the fact that the role of the
Vice President is to be the ultimate
Parrot Head for the president and
Sarah Palin is NOT running for
president just in case everybody
didn’t get that.

Posted by: Sue Frasier | October 31, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

I think after a few weeks of excitement for the GOP, Sarah Palin has only brought grief and misery to the McCain campaign. Not only is she still unknown, but how many times have they had to defend her in such a short period of time? More times than I can count. I don’t doubt that she is a wonderful person and mother, but those qualifications don’t necessarily make a great national leader.

Posted by: Jessica Albin | October 31, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Sarah Palin is in NO way a drag on the republican ticket; I really feel the news is bias towards the McCain Palin ticket, lets not forget that republicans are known to pull through in the end. I wouldn’t start celebrating so soon! Palin is a true representation of a hard working american mom, and I feel this will be to the advantage of the republican ticket with a victory in the end.

Posted by: drummer_freak | October 31, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Absolutely, she has become a drag. She is a puppet for what is put on the teleprompter and it terrifies me to think that she could become the next president if, Heaven forbid, something should happen to McCain should he be elected. She brought new life to the party at first, but her true ability has since been revealed and it is truely controlled by who is working the strings.

Posted by: JuJuOz | October 31, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

i think Sara P. is the brightest light
thats come along in a long time.
I really think the dems. are jealous
because they have such poor choices.
By the way I am a reg Dem and I am
ashamed of the party and their
Muslum choice.

Posted by: don magers | October 31, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

According to this evening’s NITELINE the question regarding SP….go online and vote….it is impossible to vote….again a skewed media….thanks for the attempt for your network to “appear” non partisan….

Posted by: tama | October 31, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

no-I think the majority of the media has shown more biased reporting than one would have imagined in a national election, focus negative remarks toward her and dismissing questions about Obama. and I am a Democrat.

Posted by: elizabeth gee | October 31, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Sarah Palin is a great add to the ticket and provided a way for McCain to reach back to the conservative base (McCain was not any conservative’s choice to offer for a presidential candidate!).

Posted by: Barack O. | October 31, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

No, she is not a drag though she has certainly been vilified by the media. I think she is an intelligent honest, hard working woman. Why don’t we talk about some of the ridiculous statements Biden has made? She is far more proven in the Executive branch with her experience as governor than Obama with his zero executive experience and no accomplishments in the Senate. What has he done?

Posted by: L Smith | October 31, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Palin was chosen solely to jump-start the republican campaign. I don’t believe she has what it takes to run our country. Now Hillary Clinton, I believe, has what it takes! My first impression when I heard who McCann had picked to run with him is “the man has gone senile!”

Posted by: Barbara | October 31, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

How can someone so closed-minded that she is against both sex education AND birth control be a helpful addition to anyone’s ticket? Give me a break!

Posted by: M.G. Ramsey | October 31, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Hard to imagine how ANYTHING could make McCain’s campaign any draggier than it already is.
PALIN IS A JOKE.
McCAIN IS A JOKE.

Posted by: Ed from MA | October 31, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

NO, Sarah Palin is a woman of determination, respect, honesty, with a desire and want to improve the quality of these United States of America. She is strength and vibrance. She believes in our founding fathers, not the arrogance of todays society.

Posted by: Sabrina | October 31, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Sarah Palin has NOT become a drag on the Republican ticket. The only thing that has become a drag in this election is the overtly biased media and the fact that there is no longer reporting of the news in a fair and balanced way. ABC is the worst.

Posted by: Bob Hally | October 31, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

I think its sad for both of them because the conservative party has become a mob scene of hateful,prejudiced,homophobes,rallying as if they are in some kind of moral panick.I give Sarah an A for effort but she is not running for president,so I would have to say yes not staying with her colleagues gameplan seems like its shown its effectiveness.She is a drag!

Posted by: curtis | October 31, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Yes she is a drag on the republican ticket. He chose her to try and get the women who were supporting Hillary Clinton…the problem is the women are too smart to fall for that AND Hillary Clinton was actually qualified to run the country!

Posted by: Russ | October 31, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Palin was chosen solely to jump-start the republican campaign. I don’t believe she has what it takes to run our country. Now Hillary Clinton, I believe, has what it takes! My first impression when I heard who McCann had picked to run with him is “the man has gone senile!”

Posted by: B. Bowling | October 31, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Drag? More like concrete blocks causing McCain’s campaign to sink and drwon in this political ocean.
Insiders in McCain’s camp state she has gone rogue and wack job. These are people who are committed to McCain and I think we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg.
She doesn’t have the qualifications. She doesn’t have what it takes to be VP. She is the one of the major factors driving me to vote Obama.
So, yes she is drag because my vote will be the proof.

Posted by: NoPalin | October 31, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Contrary to what george thinks, Sarah will be the number one reason that more people will be voting for McCain. I think your program sucks. You have a very biased show and it is obvious that obomba is who you want to win. In the last two weeks you have given him 4 times more coverage than you did McCain. Nightline absolutely disgusts me.

Posted by: Anti jackass | October 31, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Yes, Palin is a drag on the Republican Party. She’s clearly out of her league and doesn’t realize it.

Posted by: Joyce | October 31, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

If she is such a drag on the ticket why is she filling venues around the country? Over 1,000 people stood outside an event here in Iowa. It was only Governor Palin so no one can say they were only here to see Senator McCain.
By the way, how many people is Senator Biden packing in at his appearances? I haven’t seen any thing about him in quite a while? Is he becoming a drag on the ticket?
P.S. Please show some respect to all of the candidates. She is a governor and the rest are senators in case you forgot!

Posted by: IowaFarmBoy | October 31, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Sarah Palin is a joke; she knows nothing about the American issues regards economy, energy, healthcare, how to plan to win our allies back after Bush initiated all this hate abroad. She would not know one thing about keeping America safe and free of terroism. She needs to meet her family especially her Downs son and start a family relationship with them. How could a mother put her family aside to feed her huge EGO. I do not respect her. And, why is she so negative and sarcastic? America does not need someone like her running any part of our great country

Posted by: Meg | October 31, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Palin is about as bright as a five watt bulb. Bad choice from the Republican Party!

Posted by: Ann | October 31, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

What has Gov. Pailin brought to the ticket and what has she brought to the republicans? She has been a mayor of an Alaskan town w/abt 5000 inhabitants and governor of Alaska, w/over 600,000 inhabitants, the 48th ranked State. What results have occured in her 20 months in office? She has violated the Ethics law according to the Legislative committee, she has started the “gas line” which will be in litagation for years w/the Indian tribes, and she has been shunned by the Achorage Alaska paper, which endorsed Obama. I have never heard her discuss one policy in an indepth, intelligent, objective manner. Her contributions have consisted of short cynical, guilt by association poorly stated sentences. She is an embarassment to republicans, to Americans, and to the judgment of McCain.

Posted by: Ron | October 31, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

What has Gov. Pailin brought to the ticket and what has she brought to the republicans? She has been a mayor of an Alaskan town w/abt 5000 inhabitants and governor of Alaska, w/over 600,000 inhabitants, the 48th ranked State. What results have occured in her 20 months in office? She has violated the Ethics law according to the Legislative committee, she has started the “gas line” which will be in litagation for years w/the Indian tribes, and she has been shunned by the Achorage Alaska paper, which endorsed Obama. I have never heard her discuss one policy in an indepth, intelligent, objective manner. Her contributions have consisted of short cynical, guilt by association poorly stated sentences. She is an embarassment to republicans, to Americans, and to the judgment of McCain.

Posted by: Ron | October 31, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Not only is she a drag on the Republican ticket but also an insult to the integrity of the American people. However, unfortunately she has apparently attracted the attention and admiration of many folks who are more committed to the party than they are to the future of the nation, or they are prime examples of the failure of our educational system.

Posted by: J. Fredricks | October 31, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

She is a joke. If she is so religious then the negatives are not what religion is about. She is a drag on McCain, but he picked her. Tells you about his choice if something happens to him, she would be Pres. and like I said she is a joke.

Posted by: Mike in KY | October 31, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Sarah Palin has been quite an asset to the republican ticket…I can not believe people would vote for Obama…..we know very little about this man..I think to many people it’s about winning…you need to stop and think..our nation was founded one nation under God…and faith should play a big part in your dicision…we live in the greatest nation in the world ..because God has allowed us to be just that…John McCain is a good honest and faith driven individial…..my prayers are with him…if he is not elected…God help America…….

Posted by: Connie | October 31, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Sarah is not a drag. She is smart, honest and very capable. She is only running for vice president but is more qualified to be president than many others who have been president!

Posted by: joyce | October 31, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Sarah Palin is great and can only help McCain! What a shame she is so well vetted by the media when Barack has been treated with kid gloves and he is the Presidential candidate. He has done a great marketing job and like all salesman really offers nothing.

Posted by: Jose Canusee | October 31, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Only in the collective mind of the fanatic followers of O-man.

Posted by: jcarob | October 31, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I’m so over people putting Sarah down!!!! If it wasn’t for her, I don’t , know if I would have voted for McCain, because he is so DRY!!!!!!!!! She brings life to his running. She is a great Christian and that effects a lot of people in the wrong way because they know that is something to fear if you don’t live right!!!!!!!! Thank God for Sarah for what she has done with the party!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Tina Thompson | October 31, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Until McCain chose her as his running mate I was all for him, and I am a republican. Palin, to me is a stunt to try to gain the votes of women who wanted to see Hillary Clinton receive the democratic nomination. Well, this woman would love to see a fellow woman in power, however I want a qualified one. Someone who wouldn’t embarass my gender as Palin constantly does.

Posted by: Jeannette | October 31, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

No way is Palin a drag, and just because she is down to earth and doesn’t talk in circles. She calls it as she sees it, trying not to be unkind while being honest. I too am in prayer for our country, and the elections.

Posted by: Deborah Maris | October 31, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

SARAH IS A JOKE WITH A HUGE EGO WHO IGNORES HER FAMILY TO FEED HER EGO
MCCAIN IS A DESPERATE LOSING CANDIDATE
DOES HE KNOW ANYTHING OTHER THAN, ‘MY FRIENDS” NEVER HEARD ANY DETAILS OF ANY POLICIES
YEAH, OBAMA – CHANGE IS WHAT WE NEED AND ABC NIGHTLINE YOU ARE DOING AN EXCELLENT JOB OF PRESENTING INFO ON BOTH CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK

Posted by: Texas | October 31, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

BIG NO! She certainly helped Sen. McCain’s campaign. She is an asset to the party, with her down to earth personality, wit, and charisma. I was there when she visited Fort Wayne, IN and people (about 15,000) braved the cold weather, waited more than 4 hours to see and hear her speak and it was amazing to see how she energized the voters. She is smart. FYI, This is the biggest event where such a big number of people convene in our small city in such a short notice, 2 days.

Posted by: edna | October 31, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

For one thing DON MAGERS, Obama his not a(and the correct spelling is) Muslim. Even John McCain pointed that out himself but Palin let people yell such hateful things at her rallies without putting a stop to it. Palin is wrong for our country.

Posted by: Glenn | October 31, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I had given up on John McCain, then he picked a woman from Alaska for a running mate. I thought he was Crazy.
The more I hear from her the more I like her. She has more administrative experience, than Obama. He has none. It has taken her a while for her to find her voice. I only wish she was running for the office.

Posted by: DrewMusk | October 31, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I think Sarah Palin has definitely helped the Republician Party. Fox News is the only news that will give Palin & McCann a Fair Rating. This is the first time a woman has been qualified to be the Vice President of the United States. Palin is more qualified to be President than Obama is to be President. Palin has made more independent decisions that effect the People than Obama has. I have been in Politics before so I know that the News Media can be biased.Give them a break.

Posted by: Betty Smith | October 31, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

I hope she runs in 2012. She might break 40% in that general election… or maybe not. She will NEVER have broad appeal. The age of folksy know-nothings winning the presidency is over (and not a moment too soon…)

Posted by: dem in chicago | October 31, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

please Sara don’t go away.We need some humor once “W” gets the boot.Obama will make short work of you in 2012.Long live Sara!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: joe the steelworker | October 31, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

I don’t think that Governor Palin is a drag on the Republican ticket, she is a breath of fresh air and is qualified for the VP position. How about people question Obama and the change from $250,000 to $200,000 for no new taxes. Am I the only one that heard that and saw that?

Posted by: AKGF | October 31, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Of course Palin is NOT a drag on the ticket! And to all of you saying that HIllary is qualified, you must be kidding. She had zero experience (being married to a President isn’t a qualification, just like Brett Farve’s wife is unqualified to be a starting quarterback in the NFL!)

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I like Sarah Palin. Her simplicity is a breath of fresh air. Although she makes me feel good about being an American I conceded the arguments made two months ago by Nightline and CNN. An energising individual, but lacking in the political expertise to be a viable vice-presidential candidate. Her role as vice-president would be limited. Now the same news pundits tell me she is conniving and positioning herself to assume titular head of the Republican party. Is she a fast learner!?! Thank you for your insight in changing false perceptions. I commend you for promoting her. Get behind her as you have for Obama and she will be president in 2012.

Posted by: R.A.Stonecipher | October 31, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Yes, she most definitely has. She’s using her beauty and limited intelligence to charm the American public. She speaks vacuously and evasively, and she carrying out her own agenda. McCain is slowly becoming the furthest thing from her mind. Get rid of her, you may have a chance.

Posted by: shay | October 31, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

NO WAY! Sorry democrats I really feel as though you are in panic mode, you have been since John selected Sarah as his running mate! She has brought such a momentum to the ticket, I’m tired of people (really media) wondering if she’s qualified or not, I mean, shall we mention how no one on this earth new who Obama was before last year? He has had zero executive experience and coming from a college student studying political science, his plan WILL NOT WORK. Sarah Palin has been very mistreated by the media (especially ABC) they always seem to focus on the few flaws she has, can we for once get a report on the many things this amazing women has accomplished? So my response to this question is, NO she is not a drag on the ticket, McCain and Palin will pull a victory on Tuesday.

Posted by: Marc | October 31, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

On the contrary, GOVERNOR PALIN have energize me to vote against Obama, and in turn I have energize everyone in my family tree of 46 members to also vote against Obama.

Posted by: Independent Voters | October 31, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

She is an embarrasment in her own right and McCain showed very poor judgement in his choice. She certainly doesn’t speak for American professional women, mothers and would not represent our country with her flirty style – how nauseating. This is not SNL for 4 years!

Posted by: Fran | October 31, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Palin is like one of those dolls where you pull the string and she talks.

Posted by: Barbara Bennett | October 31, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

No Handicap! A great Asset to the ticket! And a positive catalyst, possibly turning around an ill conceived and executed campaign! The biased media may even fail in their biased campaign manipulation.

Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

McCain lost all chances of being elected when he chose Palin. It’s a joke to believe she can even come close to being President should the unthinkable happen. Country First? No way! This is an example of why our country is in such trouble. Instead of picking a uniter, McCain picked a sarcastic partisan.

Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Ignore my last post. I shouldn’t have drank all that cough syrup before posting…Real Texans LOVE Sarah Palin ant think she’s great! It’s the democrat elites that are quick to tell you that they are so much smarter than the rest of the country that have a problem with Gov. Palin!

Posted by: Texas | October 31, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Yes. She is a wack job.

Posted by: michael palmer | October 31, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I think Palin has been a great part of this election, Shame on ABC for pushing Obama on the nation your coverage and web site is very Obama. I think the media has tried to elect Obama. Mcain / Palin should have as much or more of your coverage. Why is there so many questions not ask or answered about Obama. My vote is for Mcain / Palin. I Hope and pray Americans will see the true Obama BRFORE TUESDAY…..

Posted by: Tammy | October 31, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

No,Sarah Palin is not a drag. As a governor she has far more experience than Obama. He has done nothing but be a community organizer, helping people in the inner city get housing loans that they didn’t qualify for and could not afford. I always liked watching ABC news–up until this election. This year their bias for Obama makes me ill. I can’t understand how anyone with an ounce of intelligence could think he was qualified to be President. I fear for the country if he is elected. We’ll be the United Socialist States of America.

Posted by: Mary Lou | October 31, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

she’s a joke!The TRUE Republican base will never let her see the light of day in 2012.They’ll blow her away in the primaries.Take it to the bank!!

Posted by: joethesteelworker | October 31, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

No, she is very optimistic and is a breath of fresh air to the republican party. She’s not a robot and saying what you want to hear, like the opposition!

Posted by: J | October 31, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Not only is she a drag on the McCain ticket, she’s a strike against all the advances women have made in our society over the last 50 years.

Posted by: kay | October 31, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

How about mentioning that Palin is a liar and hypocrite, she can’t be pro-life and pro-contraception at the same time! Contraception is a form of abortion, research it! She doesn’t help rape victims. If she chose her son, then she must believe in pro-choice.
How is she experienced for presidency if she only has a bachelors degree in journalism?
I am waiting for people to stop wondering if Obama is good enough and start feeling honored we have a man who dedicating himself so much to really solve America’s problems and acknowledging what is right for all.
Palin and McCain, guilty of illegal money scandels, McCain finishing at the bottom of class, allowing rumors to spread about Obama!
I think she is too far to the right, and it’s obvious she doesn’t even have the same view as McCain, nor even respected him. McCain is the one running for presidency, not her.
I don’t think she is environmentally responsible or gives a hoot about clean water, greener jobs, respecting animal rights or human rights for that matter.
I don’t think she speaks with any sincerity but speaks off cards like a parrot at times when it comes to anything political.
After watching the conventions, I felt extremely motivated, happy, peaceful, uplifted from watching Obama. After McCain, the opposite, depressed, angry and feel like all my education would go to waste if he were elected.
I think though she caused plenty of attention to John McCain, the maverick, but the wrong attention. Before she was chosen, I was considering McCain, I thought he was calm and genuine about solving environmental problems, but then came her, and it’s drill, drill, drill! There is no way on earth I would support her views at all!
I am currently studying ecology, psychology, conservation, environmental policy, and there is so much technology available to help business, economy, health and I can’t understand why we’re not using it!
Stop promoting the worst Republican team possible!

Posted by: CandiceK | October 31, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

No Palin has not become a drag. Your biased and negative reporting has. Palin is a breath of fresh air and has hugely helped McCain. She reprsents true change and McCain picking her shows that he is listening to what Amercians want. I wish you people in the media would go back to reporting unbiased facts instead of letting letting your personal opinions come forth as news. Your reporting of Palin has been sexist and discriminatory. And where do you get your polls, they sure do not reflect the majority of people I know.

Posted by: T. Clay | October 31, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Barbara Burnett: What a cheap shot at a sitting Governor and VP candidate. I assume your credentials are far superior that McCain should have picked you as a running mate. What a buffoon.

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Posted by: Ashley Todd | October 31, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Oh, my God! Sarah Palin? Oh, my God!! If that is what the republican party calls a good candidate I can see why they have become rabid and nonsensical.

Posted by: democratic | October 31, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Posted by: Ashley Todd | October 31, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

I think if there has been a decrease in the people who view Palin favorably it is due to the bias media
Democrat for McCain/Palin – Obama (the corrupt) scares the h*ll out of me

Posted by: Mike84 | October 31, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Barbara Bennett, aren’t you talking about OBAMA in his flashiness?

Posted by: Candace | October 31, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

No, Sara Palin is not a drag on the Republican Party, but your George Steph. is a real drag on ABC News! Why doesn’t your network at least attempt to appear unbiased, by putting somebody in that position doesn’t fall on the same side each and every time. Come on, he was Clinton’s Press Secretary. He will never be unbiased. Bring in a new fresh face. The media in this country needs to go back to the days that they only endorsed in the final days, not continually by slanting the news as they do now.

Posted by: DHH in AL | October 31, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

sarah palin is unqualified obnoxious and not too very intelligent – that hockey mom mumbojumbohas played itself out – i dont hate her and i really do feel somewhat sorry for her – she is so way over her head in this – how in the owrld can any objetiove man or woman think she could or should be one step away from the president of the us ? nice looking woman – but 6 years and for different colleges ? come on ! do the math !

Posted by: davey b | October 31, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

No she is not a drag, Sarah Palin is a very hard working and experienced women. She is just as qualified as Obama. Are you kidding me ABC, your network is becoming very unattractive to viewers who are tired of your tacky reporting towards the McCain/Palin ticket. All I’m saying is, give them the respect they deserve.

Posted by: M.A.P | October 31, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Sarah Palin is definitely a plus for the Republican party and the Presidential ticket. She is straight forward and honest. She walks her talk. What a refreshing idea! For this she has been maligned by the biased news media. She and McCain have the vote of this retired professional woman and mother.

Posted by: Donna Catlett | October 31, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

I’ve been saying all along AIP is a terrorist organization. The Palins are TERRORISTS!!

Posted by: Rev. Ike | October 31, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I just have to say, according to the Obama/Biden campaign, The Bush administration, would be the reason McCain/Palin would not get elected!!!!

Posted by: Sabrina | October 31, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

I love these Palin lovers on here.
They can’t stand what they call the liberal media, but I swear they are the biggest bloggers here. They’re eating this stuff up because they can no longer believe any thing on Fox or Lumbaugh. Go ahead, it’s okay to say that you love Obama. It’s okay to use both hands to type on here.

Posted by: democratic | October 31, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

sarah palin is unqualified obnoxious and not too very intelligent – that hockey mom mumbojumbo has played itself out – i dont hate her and i really do feel somewhat sorry for her – she is so way over her head in this – how in the world can any objective man or woman think she could or should be one step away from the president of the us ? nice looking woman – but 6 years and for different colleges ? come on ! do the math !

Posted by: davey b | October 31, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Sarah Palin is the manifestation of the Christian Taliban in America. A fundamentalist is someone who reads a holy text and, without any interpretation or context, acts upon it. That has been a reoccurring theme of Palin; acting without thinking and on blind ideology.

Posted by: Deathscythe9 | October 31, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Palin is a huge asset…but raising questions about someone seems to be the way the media runs people down. So,why has Obama not provided a hard copy of a birth certificate and documented his educational record…could he be hiding something ?? So little scrutiny for a president. Shame on the DNC and MEDIA !

Posted by: Dave the American | October 31, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

On these comments-they should put Who they support (McCain or Obama) then
We will know why they like or dislike Sarah Palin as a running mate.

Posted by: BillSmith | October 31, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

CandiceK:
Thanks for your support and delivering my list of talking points – just don’t forget to keep under wraps that I don’t have any real experience either, and please don’t mention any of my controversial friend (Ayers, Wright, Resco), and keep it between us regarding my belief that we should spread the wealth around (from each according to his ability, to each according to his need), and finally e-mail the LA Times and tell them not to release that video of me looking spathetic to the PLO until after the election. I’ve got to keep the winds of change a blowin’ before anyone gets wise. Thanks for your support and send more money – love BO

Posted by: Barack O. | October 31, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

No, she has not been a drag except in the imagination of the media, and the Left. She is a breath of fresh air, and can speak without constant uhh’s, and Duhh’s!
She will be a fast study, and I would trust her judgment over that of Obama. What executive decision has he ever made and been responsible for, other than hand out $50 to $100 million of other peoples’ money (that he did not earn) thru and with Bill Ayers, the educator that wants to indoctrinate kids–not educate them, and the Chicago Anneberg Challenge?

Posted by: martin | October 31, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

I don’t think Sarah Palin is a drag at all to the ticket. I am a single mother of three children; Palin is hard working and represents the average american person. I’m sick and tired of this network always finding some way to look down on the republican ticket, I’m going to stop watching this network and switch to one that delivers the facts without being biased. Especially George Stephanopolis or however you spell his name, please please please replace him! McCain and Palin will take the white house I’m positive.

Posted by: Dinah | October 31, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Yes, Sarah Palin has become a drag on the Republican ticket. Yes, she does have her charm but that charm doesn’t hide her blatant ignorance. No amount of “coaching” is a substitute for taking the time of educating/informing yourself. Anybody aspiring to be appointed to the highest office of this great country should educated/informed. She is yet another negative stereotype on conservatives. John McCain is a great candidate that deserved a better educated/informed running mate.

Posted by: disappointedtexans | October 31, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Sarah Palin is the second best candidate running. It won’t take her anytime to absorb the details of being in WAshington politics. She is wonderful on the campaign trail. I watch her on C-Span all the time.

Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Yes, Sarah Palin has become a drag on the Republican ticket and I personally cannot wait until she goes back to Alaska. She is the reason why John McCain is not going to win this election. She is very negative and very ignorant when it comes to what’s going on in the world outside of Alaska. I’m so tired of seeing and hearing from and about this woman. As a woman myself, I’m embarrassed for her.

Posted by: Mina | October 31, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

She and her husband are terrorists and could benefit from the Annenberg Challenge themselves. Neither finished college.
HERE ARE THE REAL PALINS
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/14/151519/61/145/630389

Posted by: Ashley Todd | October 31, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

I never seen Palin as a drag.
It’s the media who WANTS her to be a drag.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | October 31, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Obama is a huge asset…but raising questions about someone seems to be the way the media runs people down. So,why has Palin not provided a hard copy of a medical records and documented her educational record…could she be hiding something ?? So little scrutiny for a president. Shame on the RNC and Fox and Lumbaugh !

Posted by: democratic | October 31, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

This has been an absolutely crazy pre-election season. I’m all for change, but let’s be realistic. Anybody that thinks that their foreign policy is enhanced because they can see Russia from their state is more than ignorant; they’re unqualified! Besides, why would you want a job that you don’t know what the job description is? In a word, yes, unfortunately, Sarah Palin is a drag to my Republican party!

Posted by: angry republican | October 31, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

I don’t put ANY stock in your polls because they are slanted to your bias toward the other candidates. Sarah Palin is very impressive and will go far.

Posted by: Charles | October 31, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Sorry for the repost – but I had to fix a few typos for B – joe b.
CandiceK:
Thanks for your support and delivering my list of talking points – just don’t forget to keep under wraps that I don’t have any real experience either, and please don’t mention any of my controversial friends (Ayers, Wright, Resco), and keep it between us regarding my belief that we should spread the wealth around (from each according to his ability, to each according to his need), and finally e-mail the LA Times and tell them not to release that video of me looking sympathetic to the PLO until after the election. I’ve got to keep the winds of change a blowin’ before anyone gets wise. Thanks for your support and send more money – love BO

Posted by: Barack O. | October 31, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Palin has got more going for her than Obama, McCain, and Biden combined.
It is plain scary to think that even though Obama does not know how to salute much less honor the American flag that he could become commander of one of the worlds most powerful armies.
Hitler was elected to power by promising “Change.”

Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

She set women back 100 years!!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Posted by: Ashley Todd | October 31, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Obama has got more going for him than Palin, McCain, and the GOP combined.
It is plain scary to think that even though Palin does not know how to salute much less honor the American flag that she could become commander of one of the worlds most powerful armies.
Hitler was elected to power by promising “Change.”
I also forgot that McCain can’t salute either since he cant raise his arms above his arm pits. That’s a sure sign of being unamerican.

Posted by: democratic | October 31, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Sarah Palin is the reason my husband and I are voting for McCain. She is a breath of fresh air. We need her in the White House. She is not ashame of our flag as is Obama. How can a President who doesn’t respect our flag think that he can lead our arm forces. Obama said he didn’t want to offend any one by saluting the flag. Does he thing he can be president and not offend anyone? Our prayers & voices are with Sarah & John. GGGooooo Sarah!!!!

Posted by: Penelope Tryon | October 31, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Ashley Todd:
Thanks, but enough with the links already. If I wanted to even more media bias than the mainstream media already provides I could go to the daily kos and read their wacky left wing stuff on my own.

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

No! There was an article in today’s Washington Post entitled, “McCain Chief Loyalist Has New Role.” Reading it gives insight to the confusion within the campaign. However, the loud anger against the Republicans since so many dislike the president is the biggest reason that McCain has such a tough time. The real smoke screen is the media choosing the president for us and telling us all how to vote. Instead, there should have been better reporting to compare the statements of each campaign with fact. Not enough honest reporting this election.

Posted by: Stephanie | October 31, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

The most obvious effect of the Palin choice is America’s belated notice of media bias. Have you noticed that their new buzz story is the bias itself. They can’t resist beginning to acknowlege it as it has gone so far over the top. They start looking at each other’s stories and even they can’t deny it. Palin endures despite all attempts at ruin. Joe the plumber, Barbara West, don’t worry about the attempts to ruin you as well, honestly will prevail at the end. Real questions aren’t the enemy, lack of questions are.

Posted by: Journalismdied2008 | October 31, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Posted by: Larry | October 31, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

No, she is not a drag on the ticket. The true drag on the Republican ticket is the financial system collapse, which simply highlighted our contracting economy. She continually draws thousands and thousands of people to here rallies. She continually electrifies her audiences at those rallies. Her favorable ratings have dropped because she has willingly been the attack dog for the ticket. She is being negatively targeted in the polls because the attacks aren’t working. In actuality, the attacks aren’t working because the economy is trumping everything, even the questionable associations of Senator Obama. The economy and the unpopular Bush presidency has put a heavy weight on this ticket. Sarah Palin has helped to lift this ticket back into contention.

Posted by: allisongayle | October 31, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Now Penelope Tryon, lets see this documentation that you must have that says that Obama doesn’t salute the flag and is ashamed of it. You don’t and you can’t. Palin is unfit. Isn’t she the one married to the fellow who wants Alaska to leave the Union? It sounds like Palin the bimbo and her useless husband are ashamed to be Americans and I bet they don’t salute the flag or recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Holy Crap!!! you want these anit-americans in the white house? When’s the last time you saw McCain or his wife wearing their american flag lapel pins? NEVER!!!!

Posted by: democratic | October 31, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

democratic:
Nice. You insult McCain for not being able to raise his arms? He is a war hero who spent YEARS in the Hanoi Hilton being tortured during VietNam, but I’m sure you had a hard life too taking in all those no-nuke concerts. What a moron!

Posted by: Jose Canusee | October 31, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

I can’t believe anyone would think she is a drag to the Republican party. What I do find myself wondering is why all the major news broadcasts except FOX don’t tell what is really going on with Obama! If he is elected, people will get a change alright, but definitely not for the better. Has anyone looked at the people he has been associated with?–Not just one radical–first there’s that minister from Chicago that is such a hater of the whites (kWhich Obama listened to for 20 years or so), then the association with his “acquaintance” Mr Ayers, now this guy that was the speaker for the PLO when it was pushing for the elimination of Israel. I think the LA Times is in big business not letting the American People know what is on that tape-and then let the people decide. Oh yes, I guess it is also O.K. with lots of folks that literally hundreds of thousands of the unborn will be aborted if he is elected. God will definitely punish us more. And then there are the gays and lesbians! It seems to me that the design of humanity was a natural thing-1 man and 1 woman. This country has really become sick!

Posted by: sking | October 31, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

As an Independent voting Obama, I can say she’s not a drag as far as the deep Republican base. Once you get outside the Republican base she is a HUGE drag for the entire candidacy. When you have people at her rallys saying they approve of Bush and he was a good President.. that shows you who she is electrifying on the trail — Republicans.

Posted by: Chad | October 31, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Since when saying that he can’t raise his arms is an insult? He can’t raise his friggin arms above his arm pits. He wasn’t tortured. You need to read the transcripts of those who were there with him. They say he sang like a bird.

Posted by: democratic | October 31, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

The only thing that represents a drag on the two candidates is the very negative commentary by the media, including you.
George is so biased it is laughable. You can quote him in a most negative way before he uses that stupid report card, and trying to be more negative–can’t be done. The smirk on his face is probably from his left over days with the Clintons.

Posted by: rln | October 31, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

No, Sarah is not a drag on McCain. She and disastrous Obama are the only reasons I would even think twice about voting for pathetic McCain. Why am I not surprised that major media that will not even mention Obama’s extremely questionable citizenship, would even ask this question. I bet if she gets a favorable reaction to this “poll” you somehow will “forget” to mention it. It is truly amazing what liberal spin has done.

Posted by: Pamela HACKNEY | October 31, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Every night we hear your cheep shots on McCain and Palin. We hear no substance for Obama. It’s the same with the other media stations. It’s pathetic. Sarah is a wonderful person with true american values and experience. We need more people like her in politics across the country. Give her a break. Show some courage and report the undistorted truth.

Posted by: fedupwithnightlinebias | October 31, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Sarah is a breath of not only fresh air but unabashed candor. Nice. How amazing in politics to just hear it…just have someone say what is on their minds. Not some hidden programmed agenda. She is totally real. Totally easy to relate to. She took on the good ol’ oil boys in Alaska and refused to play the backroom games. She stood her ground. I say she is one tough cookie. An asset!

Posted by: Deerly Love Nature | October 31, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

like I said before,she’s a joke!The TRUE Republican base will never let her see the light of day in 2012.They’ll blow her away in the primaries.Take it to the bank!!

Posted by: joethesteelworker | October 31, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

After the initial wow factor of Sarah Palin, American’s have started to realize that her views are too extreme. That is why her popularity is decreasing.
However, I believe the real problem with the Republican campaign is their continued focus on fear and negativity. If they could find a candidate who was truly intelligent and had great ideas that appealed to the masses, perhaps we would see a campaign focused on issues and a more positive message. I cringe every time I see the Republican commercials that slam any American who does not happen to agree with them. I don’t see that happening on the Democrat side.

Posted by: Brenda | October 31, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

It is amazing! Every story that ABC runs on Obama has a positive spin to it; every story on McCain and/or Palin has a negative twist to it. We are aware that your ABC tracking polls are bent toward Obama; thus, the bigger than almost everyone else’s disparity in the percentage points. You are not interested in reporting the news, but in shaping the news. No doubt, Obama is your candidate, and you have gone to great lengths to “bend” your various reports to make him look good; and, conversely, to make McCain and Sarah look bad. Even the way you have phrased this question proves my point. But to answer you question with a straight-forward answer: No, she is not. Your reporting, however, is. Frankly, as those who are to “report” the news, you should be ashamed. You are only distoring the news in your (i.e., Obama’s) favor. How very disappointing ABC has become!

Posted by: Phil | October 31, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Palin is not the drag, McCain’s constantly slamming Obama is. McCain is constantly putting down Obama and telling lies on his campaign stops. McCain just keeps getting angrier and angrier. He’s like a loose cannon already, cause he thinks he’s not winning in the polls. Hey him and Palin are typical republicans, give a tax break to people making over $500,000 a year, Palin is just George Bush in a shirt, abusing her power to fly her kids around at tax payers expense and firing anyone who pisses her off.

Posted by: Roxanne | October 31, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Whoever is posting as Barack Obama, the joke’s on you. Like Palin and the rest of the dumb Republicans following her,is that all you can come up with, Ayers, Wright, and Resco? Pretty pathetic. And for the poster who commented that Obama was a Muslim, please Google him at least before you post lies. And even if he were Muslim, so what. Stop being a bigot.

Posted by: Mina | October 31, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

All you neocons need to head back over to Fox or get on the hold line to talk to Lumbaugh. But, darn it all, you are always on here praising the liberal media. Go Obama!! A real citizen of the United States of American, with a real college degree.
Let’s see, it took Palin 5 colleges to get her degree and McCain graduated almost the bottom of his class. Oh, My!!!! Is this the new brain trust?

Posted by: democratic | October 31, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Sarah Palin is fabulous. She’s like part of my family. I don’t agree with her politics but no matter she can take care of business and I can trust her with my life. Can’t say that I can say that about the “mystery man” Obama or the gaff a minute Biden. As a former way left liberal, it’s amusing and unbelievable to me that I received a welcoming citation from the Republican Party, today. I never received that from the Democrats. Then again, I’m not sure there are Democrats anymore.

Posted by: Catherine | October 31, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Wake up you guys! The only reason you think Sara Palin is a joke is because the media has told you that she is. Of the last 69 stories of Palin on NBC, CBS and ABC in the last month, ONLY 2 WERE POSITIVE STORIES.How is that possible???? http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081030/pl_politico/15103
Use your own minds folks. Don’t believe what the biased media is telling you about Sara Palin and don’t believe what they say about their new Messiah, Obama. They must think you are just stupid sheep. Well, stop counting sheep and WAKE UP before it’s too late!

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Qualifications for VP:
1. Be a breath of fresh air.
2. Love the flag
3. Have charm and be wonderful
4. Be mocked by the liberal media
5. Fool an old man regarding all of the above.

Posted by: doug | October 31, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

In the words of Amy and Seth on Weekend Update…Really, Brenda, Really? You don’t see that happening on the Democratic side? Huh…Really? Really? Don’t be mislead.

Posted by: ConcernedforBrenda | October 31, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

I haven’t seen one post complain about the total control the right wing has on AM radio.Why is that?

Posted by: joethesteelworker | October 31, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

she is the reason i will not vote for McCain, she has made women in politics look like a joke, too bad she wasn’t up against Hillary, she would be running home to Alaska with her Joe 6 pack and kids.

Posted by: Linda | October 31, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

She’s absolutely NOT a drag on the ticket. Anyone who understands what true conservatives want would get why we embrace her wholeheartedly. If she wasn’t on the ticket, McCain would be trailing by 20 points in every poll. She brought us McCain-wary voters out of our shells and to the voting booth!
McCain/Palin ’08!

Posted by: Bored on the Right | October 31, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Joe, Joe, mainstream media. Not AM radio. Stay with us Joe.

Posted by: joethesteelworkersbud | October 31, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

To you, joethesteelworker, the right doesn’t have a hold on am radio. Conservative talk radio has to raise its own advertising revenue just like liberal talk radio does. It’s not Rush’s fault that nobody wants to listen to the likes of Randi Rhodes spewing her hideous hate and never make a cogent point. When liberal talk radio can pay its own way, it has a place at the table.

Posted by: Bored on the Right | October 31, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

………it’s all the same to me,BUD

Posted by: joethesteelworker | October 31, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Mina:
Thanks for your support. I already told the other kool-aid drinkers…errrr I mean supporters not to mention my shady associations and the fact that I am not willing to interview with anyone anymore before election time. We are so close to true change in this country after I fix those holes in the consitution with real Marxist….errrr I mean Obama policy. Just ignore these bible and gun clinging Republicans. love BO

Posted by: Barack O. | October 31, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Everyone should read this article about Sarah Palin in the New Yorker by Jane Mayer, title “The Insiders”
She is definetly a lying two-face Washington Insider!!!!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Liberal talk radio can’t stay afloat, huh. Remember they have to have listeners to succeed, right? No listeners is the Right’s fault um… how?

Posted by: joethesteelworkersbud | October 31, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

most definitely yes, frankly she scares me and I pray to god she doesn’t get elected.

Posted by: joejo | October 31, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Sarah Palin is awesome and is in no way a drag on the McCain ticket. She is the main reason my family will all be voting for McCain/Palin!!!

Posted by: Jose Canusee | October 31, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

If the Republican Party wants to define itself as the party of the religious right, and people who don’t care about a leader’s intelligence, experience, ability to get the whole country to pull together, or suitability for the task as long as they’re “like them”, then Palin hasn’t been a drag on the ticket at all. She’s exactly what that substantial portion of the Republican Party wants.
Of course, that’s why the Republican Party has just turned itself into a fundamentally irrelevant political power for at least the next 8-12 years.
There are plenty of people who have fundamentally conservative beliefs, who have far more experience and leadership ability and the ability to appeal to a broad swathe of Americans. If McCain had had the foresight to choose one of them as a running mate, this might be a real horse race at this point.
Can anyone who has heard Palin’s extraordinarily empty-headed responses to actual live questions (as opposed to the canned platform speeches she so ably delivers) truly believe that this is the best leader conservative America has to offer? Do you really want to elect someone who has burned every possible bridge with the Democrats and the center? How could she possibly be an effective leader?

Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

NO!!! Sarah is not a drag on the ticket. She’s a big attraction to the ticket.

Posted by: Bill the Retired Guy | October 31, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Palin in not a drag for republicans. Sisterdearest09 should read something less slanted/biased.

Posted by: UG | October 31, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

You are so right Chris. She is nowhere as good of a salesman as Obama is with his phony baloney. What a gift to be able to talk for hours and say absolutely nothing but the change and hope chant.

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

I think Sarah Palin in great. She has almost as much experience as President Bill Clinton and George Bush did when they were elected. She is a proven reformer. I for one was pleased with John McCains selection. I am a female senior citizen for what it is worth. The media has beaten the Republican Party down with their reporting.

Posted by: Marti | October 31, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Go ahead and keep accusing McCain of “attacking” Obama. You’re right! Why should we know the personal history and relatioships of the man who will run the most powerful country in the world? We should just take his and the media’s word for it. Why should we care? We are all dumb sheep. baa baa baa.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Barak Hussein Obama has no qualifications to be President of the United States of America..look at his resume, or lack thereof, a great speaker that promises everything to everybody..sounds a bit like Hitler, Castro, Stalin, Mussolini, etc. great orators that capture the masses with eloquent talk, no real substance and a hidden agenda…Osama Hussein Bin Laden Obama as President? Wow are we really this ignorant????

Posted by: Gary Tirpak | October 31, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

“I can see Russia from my house”!!!!
What a breath of dumbness for the Republican Party!!!!
People will go for ANYTHING!!!!!
EIGHT YEARS OF BUSH was not enough!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Posted by: Glenn | October 31, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Amen Gary!

Posted by: Texas | October 31, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Sarah Palin is definitely not a drag on
the Republican ticket. I first heard
of her the day before John McCain chose her for his running mate. I was elated that he chose her, and I have not been disappointed at all. I’ve talked to
mom’s at soccer games, and to dad’s at
cubscout meetings–we all like her
straight talk, her strength, and her
obvious intelligence. It’s easy to see
why the democrats and the liberal media
try to discredit her. She has come out of left field; she has the ability to make real, beneficial change in Washington. I applaud John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Holly | October 31, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Sarah Palin is not only a drag on the ticket, she is a danger to the country. John Cleese was hitting the nail squarely whan he called her a “pretty parrot”.
What little substance she shows is hate filled and negative.

Posted by: Sara | October 31, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

….OK bored and BUD…….that makes sense and I’ll assume the opposite is true also. Anyway,will you endorse Sara in 2012?

Posted by: joethesteelworker | October 31, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Oh boy, here come the daily kos kooks with the link spam again-

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Look from what I know of the far right she fits right in.
The rest of us do not like her, but the Far right is not known for making well though out decisions They are typically Knee Jerk in reaction, have an end times mentality, and therefore see no future. The attempt to bring forth the second comming of Jesus is their compelling drive.

Posted by: Thinking | October 31, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

When I want to shape a political opinion, who better to consult than John Cleese? Moron.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 31, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Sarah Palin has not won over the left wing, Hollywood and the media. Is that a surprise? If the Republicans had nominated a saint or the real messiah, the MSM would have attacked him while getting thrills and chills up their leg over Nobama.
Governor Sarah has done her job–she has energized the Republican social conservatives and dramatically increased the contribution$$$ and participation of Republican women. Watch them turn out the vote…
BTW Does the MSM remember Harry Truman? The same criticisms of lack of experience and parochial viewpoint were leveled against him, yet most historians today would agree that he turned out to be a better President than most and certainly better than the Democrats who have followed him.
The truth is that we don’t know if Sarah would make a good President, but her track record of accomplishments certainly exceeds Nobama’s. No one has yet answered the question that the media refuses to ask–what has he ever accomplished? Nothing there but a nice voice, a pretty face and the rest is vaporware…
Americans led like sheep off the cliff of Democratic Socialism at the very time that the Europeans are abandoning it. They can see that our unemployment rate is much lower and our incomes are 30% higher–why doesn’t the MSM ever point that out? If we elect Nobama and he implements the economic policies that he talks about when he lets his guard slip, we will rapidly leave the ranks of high productivity/high growth economies. That’s the inevitable result of resisting the economic forces of gloabization. We protect 20 million niddle-aged union members at the expense of 300 million consumers. Sure works for France and Italy, no?

Posted by: DNoyes | October 31, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Get out and Vote Obama and get others to to the same. Help do your part on keeping Palin out of the White House.

Posted by: Glenn | October 31, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

@Sara
I totally agree w/ your comment.

Posted by: Mina | October 31, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Wow a Daily Kos link. Could you have put a more extreme leftist link? How about huffington post while your at it…or nbc or abc or cbs…
This is exactly what I’m talking about! Stop following the media so blindly!
Listen, would you buy a house just because the realtor told you so? No! The realtor is going to tell you that everything is great. She wants to sell you the house. But if you were serious about buying that house, you would hire inspectors to see if it is sound. That’s all we’re asking democrats to do here!!
Find an unbiased source to see if the Obama foundation is really sound. What are his principles, what has formed him into what he is today…only you can answer that by doing the research.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

Merci Beaucoup DNoyes

Posted by: Jimmy | October 31, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

nooo way will the Republican base let Sara even smell 2012!!Sorry but she spent her 15 min and will be DOA in the primaries.Bye….bye….Sara

Posted by: joethesteelworker | October 31, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Mina – just in case you missed it the first time I wanted to offer this pearl of wisdom to you too – When someone wants to shape a political opinion, who better to consult than John Cleese? Moron.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 31, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Just in Get Breaking News Alerts
…………………….
A former Republican Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, and one of John McCain’s most prominent supporters offered a stunningly frank and remarkably bleak assessment of Sarah Palin’s capacity to handle the presidency should such a scenario arise.
He prayed that we do not get a crisis with Palin and that she is not ready. He made his statement on NPR
Huffigntonpost

Posted by: james | October 31, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Republicans are excited about Palin because she is much closer to true conservative values than McCain is. She is the only reason this race is gettting closer by the day and will allow them to win on Tuesday.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 31, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

No, I think she’s actually a breath of fresh air in this screwed up election. If everyone would stop worrying about the insignificant things maybe we could get down to the issues that really matter. Tonight George was talking how great an asset Biden has been to Obama, but a few weeks ago all I heard about was what a mistake it was to pick him. The choices have been made, lets move on & talk about illegal immigration or about the corruption that is going on in this financial mess we’re in!

Posted by: kate | October 31, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

Bill,
There are good reasons to be cautious about Obama, even if you support him, as I do. But the question on the table is whether Palin is a drag on the Republican ticket–not whether you like Obama.
McCain would not have even considered Palin as a VP candidate if she were male. She had no experience that would prepare her for the presidency, and has shown virtually no interest in any policy matters outside of the U.S. border, or even outside of Alaska’s border. She has little education, and apparently no knowledge or even interest in foreign policy, the environment or economics. Can you say with a straight face that if she were a man named Ed Smith and had exactly the same experience and personality and beliefs as Palin that you would have believed him to be the best choice for VP?
McCain made the huge mistake of believing that not only could she charge of the conservative base (at which she’s succeeded admirably) but pull in all the disgruntled Hillary supporters. Obviously that was a grave miscalculation.
Intelligent conservative thought leaders have expressed extreme dismay at McCain’s selection of Palin (Peggy Noonan, Christopher Buckley, and Colin Powell, just to name a few). Do you think it’s their distorted liberalism or a biased press that has made them all declare her unfit to be a VP?
Did you notice that the very conservative Anchorage Daily News–a paper that should know Palin better than any other–has departed from its tradition of endorsing Republicans (including Bush in 2004) to support Obama this time around?
The Chicago Tribune has not endorsed a Democrat for President in its 161-year history until now.
The Los Angeles Times has not endorsed a Democrat since 1972
Overall, 38 of the newspapers that endorsed Bush in 2004 have switched over to endorse Obama this election year. You can’t claim that it’s the liberal media that’s at fault. These are Republican-leaning papers. And every one of them mentions the inadequacy of Palin as one of the reasons why they are endorsing Obama over McCain.
She has extraordinarily high negative ratings in the polls, and that negative rating increases with every one of her pitbull attacks.
Has she been a drag on the Republican ticket? She did succeed in getting the 22% of the country who still tell themselves that Bush is doing a good job excited. But, she’s probably done a better job of driving Democrats and Independents to the polls to vote for Obama than she has in getting Republicans to vote for McCain. I’d call that a drag. Wouldn’t you?

Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

We love Sarah Palin! Vote McCain/Palin 2008!

Posted by: Texas | October 31, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

Ugh! This is so frustrating. More liberal leftist references…huffington post? NPR? Hello!
SO Sara Palin’s not ready to handle a crisis?? Well, hate to break it to you but she’s not running for president.
How about the guy who is actually running for President? DO YOU REALLY THINK OBAMA IS READY TO DEAL WITH A CRISIS? Biden dosent think so, even Clinton in his speech yesterday indicated he didn’t think so either…
McCain. I’ll say it again. McCain. He is the best person to handle any crisis.
By the way…People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones…

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Listen to the charges coming out about Palin from the McCain camp itself “diva”, “wack-job”, etc. Then check the latest polling data.
SHe’s a drag on the ticket. No doubt.

Posted by: bubba | October 31, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Julie – believe it or not, I have done plenty of unbiased research on all the candidates. You would be wise to do the same instead of just slamming the side that doesn’t agree with you. There have been questions raised on BOTH sides about potential scandalous actions and/or associations. Don’t assume that people who aren’t voting for your candidate are blindly following what the media reports. Accept the fact that the majority of Americans just feel Obama is the better candidate.

Posted by: WinningGracefully | October 31, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Sarah Palin has not been a drag on the Republican ticket. I think George should run for President because he knows a lot of stuff about politics. Could he handle the digging into his past and getting run down by the media as well as Sarah does?

Posted by: Cash | October 31, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

The republicans are going to come out in droves to vote for Sara Palin and John McCain. Join teamsarah.org to help get the word out…
The supermarkets are going to run out of tissues for all you weeping democrats when your hypnotizing messiah loses on Tuesday.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

@Jimmy
The comment you posted at 2:17a.m., shows that you are one of the biggest morons who have posted thus far.

Posted by: Mina | October 31, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Chris,
No I wouldn’t. Palin is certainly not a drag on the ticket, and yes, even an Ed Smith would be fine given the same experience and beliefs. In fact, that sounds very sexist to suggest that it is Palin’s gender that is drawing approval from Republicans. The “conservatives” you mention I would suggest are little more than right leaning moderates looking to continue to be invited to the parties of whomever gets in power in Washington and they are hedging their bets. No real conservative would support Obama or the radical views he offers. McCain is not conservative, but he is the GOP candidate and by choosing Palin for her experience as Governor and her beliefs, not her gender, is why she is great for the ticket.

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Well said, Bill.

Posted by: julie | October 31, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

As hard as I try, I cannot understand how all the anti-Palin sheep can think/claim that Palin is not qualified for VP and yet still believe that Obama is qualified for Pres. It has nothing to do with support from newspapers or high profile people. It has to do with demonstrated experience, of which Obama has none. Palin would make a better Pres than Obama. So, why would you support him. Sort out the important facts and quit getting caught up in the media machine. Palin is only a drag on the republican ticket to those who can’t see the forest because of the bark on the tree in front of them.

Posted by: UG | October 31, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Hey “ConcernedforBrenda” – I have been to rally’s on both sides, I have been barraged by political ads from both sides, and watched all of the debates..
overall the tone of the Obama campaign has been much more positive and focused on the issues than the McCain campaign. This is what the American people are responding to. Hope over Fear!

Posted by: Brenda | October 31, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

@Mina
Actually the comment posted at 2:10am is even better and was created just for you.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 31, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

WinningGracefully, that’s all I ask. I’m proud that you are doing your duty as an American and making an informed choice, even if its not the choice I would make. Good luck to you on Tuesday!

Posted by: julie | October 31, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Thanks Julie.

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

IT IS ALL ABOUT SARAH!!!

Posted by: james | October 31, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

Sarah Palin a drag? I think Sarah Palin is fantastic! I think you are the drag. Why does the press try to turn the American people against ANY Republican candidate and treat BO like some god? The man lacks character and I doubt he is even a citizen. His citizenship was given up in order to live as a citizen in Indonesia. Why do you conceal his past and dismiss serious matters regarding BO and try to demonize someone of excellent character like Sarah Palin? Do you really read these blogs you request everyone to voice comments to? If so, why don’t you pay attention to what the majority of American citizens with common sense and brains write to you? Or is this just to fake caring what people think?

Posted by: Miriam | October 31, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

The media hatred against Palin is very evident and I think most Americans are aware of it as well.
The media ignored Obama’s radical links while going after Palin’s wardrobe.
Another pro-Obama report from the Night line, another nail in its credibility.

Posted by: Greg h | October 31, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

As an independent voter, and former officer of the Missouri Young Democrats, I was leaning toward voting for Obama – though I had not yet made up my mind for certain – when Sarah Palin came onto the scene. But after reading about her career and actual administrative experience it became clear that she is the real agent for change. And, now, as the campaigns have unfolded, I’ve learned that she has more *relevant* experience than Obama, McCain and Biden combined. And I think that experience is crucial for this election. She’s balanced budgets, run families, towns and an incredibly diverse state and the vast majority of her constituents LOVE her.
As a result, and due to her way of energizing an audience and communicating with a crowd, I believe that she has been a huge boost for McCain. She seems to be a young, female version of Reagan in terms of her mass-communication skills. I think she’s going to be the reason that I vote for McCain and I know and/or work with dozens of woment who are claiming the same thing…
Take that for what it’s worth – she is and continues to be a huge problem… FOR THE DEMOCRATS.
This election seems to be 1972 all over again, and I think the outcome will probably be the same once the dust settles.

Posted by: Thomas J. Clinton | October 31, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

Palin is like a long drag on a Virginia Slims. Her lack of intelligence is like a cancer on our society. If she and McCain win, I’m moving to Vancouver.

Posted by: Obama Voter | October 31, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

absolutely not. She is fabulous. If it were not for the economy, and the dislike for the current administration, she and McCain would be elected.

Posted by: Ovington | October 31, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

No, not a drag.
Palin Power is real and will be talked about for decades to come. John McCain is brilliant and I cannot wait to see him as our President.

Posted by: The Camera Hunter | October 31, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

No, she has been vetted more than the democratic nominee for president. Where’s his medical records? One written page–not

Posted by: Carole | October 31, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Count me in as another Republican who’s going to vote for Obama this year. The McCain of 2008 is a changed man from the McCain of 2000.
And Sarah Palin is an embarrassment to national politics, and the sooner she returns to governing the wilderness, the better.
Hell, maybe she’ll be the GOP nominee in 2012, which will just guarantee another 4 years of Obama.
Those of you who continue to rant for Palin, do me a favor next Wednesday morning after you finish blaming the media for the loss. Go get a passport, take a vacation, and shoot some wolves from a helicopter. It’ll clear your head.

Posted by: Frank | October 31, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

It depends; neo-conservatives seem to find appeal in cornpone Palin. Progressives view her as an unethical extremist who is embarrassingly not qualified. It’s baracuda party style versus noble intellectual substance.
For the office of vice-president, a heartbeat from #1, people, we no longer have the luxury to afford another dummy just cuz she knows how to chug a cold one after the hunt.
Political leaders need to be smart – really wise. Integrity, consciousness, stability, wisdom and substance are vital and that’s why I voted Obama/Biden.
Republicans have been in power overlong and have lost their way. They’ve trashed our country while distributing all the favors to the wealth class/corporate cronies. It’s time to move the country forward with Democrats leading the way – for, by and of the people.

Posted by: Bette Bartell | October 31, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

No she is not a drag on the campaign. What is a drag is the way ABC twists the news in favor of Obama. Palin is a breath of fresh air and I agree she is a huge problem for the Democrats.

Posted by: Clyde | October 31, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

I originally was a support of McCain, but I believe he picked Palin for the wrong reasons. Not for the good of our nation, but to lock in the conservatives vote. I find it very upsetting when McCain tells voters how good a vice president she would be. I respect McCain, but he wouldn’t be a able to sell me a bridge.

Posted by: Barry S. | October 31, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am

Well I think that she helps rally the extreme religious conservatives to a large extent but I also think that those are the same people who would already be seriously considering a republican ticket. In my mind the point of her running as a candidate was to energize the folks in the middle, the undecided, and with such intense views I wonder if she really can accomplish that without alienating some of the very people I believe she was selected to influence.

Posted by: Anshar | October 31, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

I’m college-educated (MSEE top 12% of my grad class), 42, upper middle-class, married with two wonderful children, own my own home in an affluent NJ suburb of NYC and consider myself successful. And, I’m a person of color.
I think Sarah Palin is exactly the type of person we need in a position of leadership in this country – and I’m voting for McCain / Palin because of her. She is the furthest thing from a detriment to the Republican ticket.
The Presidency is a LEADERSHIP job and she has got leadership written all over her.

Posted by: Rashid P. | October 31, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

It is amazing to me that people continue to believe that Palin is qualified to be Vice President. She has shown time and time again that she is not a deep thinker nor one who apparently researches her information. We should want someone who embodies a admirable level of intellect, insight of the critical issues and a willingness to unify all Americans. I do not believe she exemplifies any of those traits. We need a different type of leader at this time in our history. The McCain/Palin ticket has been one of the most dysfunctional, nasty and ugly campaigns that I can recall and I am a senior citizen. If McCain’s presidency operates the same way that he has ran his campaign, we will be far worse than we have during the last eight years and that indeed is a horrible thought.

Posted by: Paulette | October 31, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

No, Palin is not a drag on McCain. She has more executive experience than either Obama or Biden. She has run a city and a state. The city of Wasilla (9000 population) is larger than the company that employs me. Alaska’s state budget is $24 billion and 15,000 in population. As evidenced by study after study for the past two years (e.g. UCLA, Pew Research), the U.S. media is anything but a free press. Instead, it has prostituted itself to the liberal cause, and resorts to character assassinations, deliberate amnesia relative to facts, faulty logical arguments to support a predisposition to anything that even smells “liberal” and consequently has lost all objectivity except for the classified ads. The U.S. press is now a propaganda machine in the same class as TASS during the Cold War. And since they are all in the tank with the Dems, they have lost all credibility with the Great American public. Their circulation is in the tank. IN fact, The New York Times was rated as “junk” (BBB-) by Moody’s this week and GE may have to sell NBC to keep itself solvent. If you want to know both sides of the question, read The Wall Street Journal.

Posted by: Jim Rogers | October 31, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

You know I was undecided till I heard Palin talk in an interview I’ll vote for Dems now.
Einstein was sitting on a park bench the first person walked up and asked if he could sit down Einstein asked what’s your IQ he said 160 sure sit down they talked all his theory’s the next person came along asked if he could sit down what’s your IQ 120 he replied sure sit down they had a great chat. The next person came along asked to sit down what’s your IQ 80 was the reply Einstein said you voting for Palin.

Posted by: Nick | October 31, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Wow. Wake up Dem’s. Your rhetoric on Palin is that she is not experienced enough to run the country == she is not running for president! WHY DON’T YOU ASK THE SAME QUESTION ABOUT YOUR OWN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE? The media insist that no one is quite ready to be President and that Obama will learn as he goes..well, then so will Palin learn as she goes. OBAMA has very little experience and is lucky enough to have
money behind him….lots of it. I wonder who he will be obligated to once this election is over? The American people or those who are literally paying his way into the White House. As far as the economy is concerned – 1) The Democrats helped get us into this mess, Barney Frank and his gang 2)our economy goes thru cycles almost every 30 years- regardless of who is president 3)our economy has the unfortunate burden of a costly war – a war provoked when 2000 innocent, civilian Americans were blasted to bits. By the way,there are those that find it very coincidental that a couple months before the election, the economy is suddenly a “disaster”…just in time to blame the Republicans and get Obama in office. Democrats are very
fortunate to have the (liberal)media in your court. Voices representing opposing
ideas/values are cast aside and ridiculed. There are Americans still
out here that will not allow our right to be heard to be taken from us.
Dare to read some of the books out there regarding Mr. Obama (careful, you may be woken out of your hynotic state = yes, Mr. Obama is a GREAT communicator and actor, as is his
wife. Mourn for this country if
Barack wins – America will never, never, be the same.

Posted by: For America | October 31, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Definately! While McCain was my to-go-guy, his poor choice in a running mate, more importantly his running mates style of hypocritical attackism, has turned my faith over to the OBama campaign.She is the Brittany Spears of of the political parties and while she may get the attention from the masses, there is little believable substance in her words. The rhetoric that comes out during her speaches sounds more like her own casting rather than that of a true running mate for John McCain!

Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Sarah Palin is not ready for a news conference, let alone VP. Amazingly, she has be both a drag and a boon for the Republican Party. I am a Republican and I can’t stand it; I am almost ashamed that this is supposed to be the best we could present to the country.

Posted by: Gman3 | October 31, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Well, my own IQ is 155, and I’m voting for Palin precisely because of the way she talks. She offers none of the nonsense I’ve heard from Joe Biden’s asinine vocal flourishes, Barack’s empty, $3-4T, promises or the sycophantic spewings of Nightline’s incompetent anchors.
She is the single refreshing voice for the entire election season – primaries included.

Posted by: Roger That | October 31, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

With all respects to Senator McCane, Governor Sara Peilin and of course all of you, I think that the Peilin effect to the Republican ticket has been by all means good. I think that the effect was cooled off by Senator McCain by not falling in sequence with all the energy, momemtum and excitement that created the great choice. I see it as a generic difference in the ticket.

Posted by: Jose | October 31, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

Bill,
I wasn’t suggesting that it is Palin’s gender that is drawing approval from Republicans. To the extent that Republicans are supporting her, it’s presumably because they agree with her beliefs, they like her personality, and believe that she will be a strong advocate for the philosophy and politics that they believe in.
But, they would presumably also have been very approving of many other conservative Republican political leaders, some of whom are women, who would have had much stronger appeal to independents and conservative Democrats, and been much less divisive.
As far as your characterization of Obama’s views as “radical”–I haven’t heard one radical idea from either candidate. There are certainly differences in approach and substance.
About the most radical suggestion Obama has made is to let some of Bush’s tax benefits for the wealthy expire. You may think that’s a bad idea, but that doesn’t make it a radical idea. It just means that you disagree.
Setting aside for a moment the ludicrous charges that have been levied against Obama by a rather rabid group of people trying to build up their media ratings, what actual fact do you know of about Obama’s platform that you consider radical? Where’s the radicalism? You remember Palin’s statement paraphrasing Reagan saying that she had to stand up to this great threat to democracy (i.e, Obama and his “radical” ideas”) now, so that she wouldn’t have to explain to her grandchildren why she let democracy be destroyed?
You might look at the context of Reagan’s speech. That great threat to Democracy that Reagan was warning against? – It was Medicare! If you think that Medicare and public transportation and bank regulation and Social Security are all radical, Socialist ideas that you are against, then you’re probably right in characterizing Obama’s ideas as radical.
McCain’s handlers and McCain himself I think veered off from what could have been a very successful campaign. McCain was an honorable man who did, I think, do what he thought was the right thing. He was a consensus-builder and used to do what he thought was right, regardless of what people would think of him. He used to act in an honorable way. Unfortunately, that was who he was in 2000. That’s not the McCain that’s shown up running for office in 2008.
I think that there’s much to like and respect in McCain’s platform (though I think that Obama’s approach is more often right than McCain’s is). If McCain had spent his energy talking about what he believed in and specifically how he was going to bring America out of the horrible situation that has evolved over the last 8 years I think he’d be doing much better in this race. Instead, he let himself be swayed by the Karl Rove-inspired belief that to win is all that counts, and smearing your opponent is more important than showing that you have good ideas and would have a steady hand on the tiller.
Do you remember one of his first attack ads that claimed Obama supported teaching sex education to kindergartners? It turns out that was based on an Obama vote for a measure that would support teaching kindergartners how to identify and avoid inappropriate sexual advances from strangers. So, either McCain believes that kindergartners shouldn’t be taught how to protect themselves, or (more likely) he was willing to knowingly and outrageously misrepresent Obama’s actual position in an effort to turn voters off to Obama. Either way it’s contemptible.
Multiply that by all of the other equally ridiculous efforts by the McCain camp to smear Obama, instead of focusing on how McCain’s policies are better for America, and it’s not surprising that people have a lower opinion of McCain now than they did when he won the primaries.
If McCain has spent half as much effort on showing why he would be a good choice rather than spending so much energy making up stories about why Obama would be a bad choice I think we’d probably be looking at a McCain presidency in January. But, he decided to take the low road, and he’s paying a heavy price for it now.
McCain has said numerous times that if only Obama had agreed to town hall debates, he (McCain) wouldn’t have had to start running such a nasty campaign. Excuse me? Obama won’t do things McCain’s way, so McCain’s obligated to drag the campaign deep into the mud? That makes no sense at all.
Though the Bush administration seems to be perfectly fine with having the world hate us, it’s actually not in our best interest to be seen as a violent, unreliable, uncaring country, interested only in acquiring wealth regardless of the cost to others. Even forgetting the moral element, it reduces our authority in the world and tends to lessen our influence and harm our exports. Polling around the world shows an overwhelming preference for Obama. See, for example, http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/bbc_elec-us08/. If you think repairing America’s severely damaged standing in the world is a good thing, the rest of the world is telling you that it’s more likely to happen if Obama is elected.
No. McCain deserves to lose this election. I think that you’ll find Obama will be a good, and maybe great, president. He’s going to be much more middle of the road then the McCain campaign would have you believe. You’re not going to like everything he does. I probably won’t either. But let’s get real here; he’s not some radical communist come to take away your guns, empty your bank accounts and rape your women. He’s a good man taking on an impossible task, and will be doing it with a lot more grace and graciousness and bipartisanship than McCain and Palin would have shown.
I have no doubt that you’re going to vote for McCain despite anything I might say. But I sure wish you and all the other McCain supporters were voting for him because you think that his policies on health care and the economy and the environment and on judicial appointments, and his leadership ability etc. are better than Obama’s. Instead, McCain’s created an environment that’s been dominated by his efforts to sow fear and hatred, aiming for people’s basest instincts instead of their highest. Win or lose, America is the worse for McCain’s anything goes campaign.

Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

Elementary my dear Chris,
All that verbiage, and yet you’re wrong. Or, methinks you doth protest too much.

Posted by: Holmes not Watson | October 31, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am

Chris,
Actually, he IS some radical communist.

Posted by: Not Disclosed | October 31, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am

Have any of you run for Governor lately?
Until you walk in someone elses shoes
you can only guess/speculate at what life is like for Sarah Palin. She is criticized for not following in “lock step” with McCain = what do you want,
someone who cannot think for herself?
I applaud her for finally breaking free
from the grip of the “machine” and I hope she becomes even more controversial. Obviously, if she were
a Democratic candidate, she would be
treated differently in the
media. Sound bites and “man on the street” footage would be most favorable for any Democratic female candidate. Wake up America before it is too late!

Posted by: Motor City | October 31, 2008, 4:02 am 4:02 am

Here to say I apologized on my post it was meant as a joke but as I read it looked like an attack. I do apologized to let everyone know I am a first time voter never endorsed either candidate and will and should of kept quite both are very qualified candidates. I will speak Ill of no man or should we say person and speak all the good I know of everybody.
Ben Franklin

Posted by: Nick | October 31, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am

Boy, I do not type fast enough to keep up…
Palin hmm…I don’t care what the reasons that are given now, she was picked to try and get all the women that were disappointed that Hillary was not the nominee in the democratic party to vote for McCain. Palin even joked about it in the beginning. It was a political move. Has she has gotten much of the republican base all pumped up? Yes. Do I think that everyone is honestly asking and saying what they want to about her? No I do not.
Why, the biggest thing is the way everyone dropped the hot potato of abstinence only. Ya know if ya can’t make abstinence only work in your own family, what right do you have to try and force that view on an entire nation?
We can ask a hypothetical question but you never know what you will do until you are really faced with the situation in reality. What would Palin’s answer have been if she had been told that her daughter was going to die if she tried to deliver? Or what would she say if she were told she could loose them both if the pregnancy went to term? Could she stiff upper lip it and let what ever was going to happen happen? How many mothers could? How many mothers would say even though they knew that in all probability their daughter could go on to have other children, that they without changing their minds were willing sacrifice their daughter on the alter of teaching abstinence only? Now yes there are many interventions that take place now to keep both mother and child safe but there are still those situations that occur for which there is no help. Everything is theoretical until life shoves it in your face.
My question is would she be able to stand behind her convictions? I am certain the answer that will come to many is, well of course she would, she has her son in the military, which by the way why is so much made out of that and so little about Biden’s son. But back to Palin. Her adult son chose that. I am asking what would she choose for her minor daughter? Have they talked about it? What has her daughter said? Has her daughter thought about the possibility that she could die in childbirth? These are not questions that are out of line to ask. And I have not heard anyone ask them.
With the information that was provided to her by her parents she felt she was adult enough to have sex and accept the consequences. Why is it that now is she not adult enough to handle people talking about the very real subject that teaching abstinence only fails and failed her? And let us be adult enough to know that talking about the subject of abstinence only is not a condemnation of the daughter. But in the light of having a president (some will say that she is only running as his second, well what is it something like 1 out of 5 of our presidents have come from the death or resignation of the elected president. And what is the average life expectancy for a person that has been treated for melanoma? It is not unrealistic to factor her into the equation of voting for him. And what was it only 3 or 4 days ago that Obama’s life was threatened?) …so do we want a president that would try to force abstinence only on the entire country when it failed in her own family? These are legitimate questions.
Did she intend to get pregnant out of wedlock? I highly doubt it. But then maybe she and he did, maybe they thought he was shipping off to Iraq…fill in the blank as you wish. But then why not get married first? Did she simply fall prey to the passions of the moment? If that is the case did she really think through what it meant to be a mother? Did she choose not to buy a condom because of the way she was taught to think about sex? Does she wish she could be living her life as a non-pregnant teenager? Does she wish she had not gotten pregnant? Which does she wish more that she had used birth control or that she did not have sex? Or is it neither, did she want a child from her boyfriend that was going off to war? That can all be so romanticized in a young mind. Is she getting married simply because it is the politically and religiously correct thing for her to be doing? Or do you think the republican machine or the church is not so callous as to insist on her carrying to term and marrying the father? Or at least paint that picture until after the election.
You don’t think that the Palin family at large was huge opportunity that the McCain machine was just salivating over? To the machine the Palin family provided a poster child not only for abstinence only, but to support the war, appeal to women voters, appease the religious right, appease the right to lifers, appease big oil, etc. all wrapped up in the illusion of a maverick that would fight for the little guy. McCain and the red machine must have just been over the moon. Here was an entire family that oozed potencial political opportunity.
Honestly how long after they announced Palin did the mantra become, “Drill baby drill.” And almost instantly the topic of abstinence only was taken of the table as a subject under the guise of protecting the daughter. Which lead to virtually no discussion about Roe v Wade. Which I ask you to read your constitution and think about what rights go away if it is not presumed that you have a right to privacy. Which is the grounds that Roe v Wade was decided on. If you do not have a right to privacy how do you have the protection form illegal search and seizure? Are your bedroom activities then private? If there is no presumed right to privacy in the constitution what in your life is not subject to scrutiny? Your life not Joe Shmoe down the street, YOURS? But then the Republican Party is the one that served up daily does of fear and brought into being the patriot act. That alone is reason enough for me to vote a straight democratic ticket this election.
Also should a child that does not have the same resources as Mrs. Palin’s daughter be forced to make the same choice? What if another woman choose to raise her daughter differently? What if you choose to teach her daughter as I was taught that sex is best saved for marriage but I (my mother) have seen enough to know that things happen and this is what you do so that you do not irreversibly change the course of your life, so that you do not contract any disease or get pregnant. And yes we even had the abortion talk. Why because I almost lost my mother to childbirth. My father was brought into the delivery room and told you are here so that you can choose if you want your wife or your child to live. They had two options left try to turn the baby or crush his skull and save my mother. The doctor had been pleading with my father to get a vasectomy. He knew this day was coming mom’s deliveries had been hard and she had had three miscarriages. No one but my mother had the right to make that decision but the doctor wanted my dad there in case mom could not make the decision, and mom wanted to know dad’s thoughts. No option should be off the table and that decision is PRIVATE. One that is between the mother, the father if the mother chooses, her doctor and her God.
What did my mother do…we will never know, the doctor was able to turn my brother.
He knew it was the last chance and if it did not work only my mother or my brother would be alive. It was a place and time where there were no other options.
But think about it with a republican house, senate, president and almost a majority in the Supreme Court for 6 years what has stopped people from over turning Roe v Wade?
In my opinion these are the options that exist…1) Roe v Wade really is good law and we have the right to privacy, 2) if Roe v Wade were over turned what would the republican party use to fire up evangelical Christians, 3) that the political fall out from saying Roe v Wade is bad law and the right to privacy does not exist in the constitution is too great.
Personally the constitution does not make a lick of sense with out the presumed right to privacy.
Well it’s too late I type too slow and I am too tired.

Posted by: northstar | October 31, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

Gee, I have been obliterated with MULTI – million dollar campaign ads from the Obama camp for over three years and NOT ONE ad has EVER criticized or smeared McCain- Obama has been the personification of fair play – RIGHT!!! The difference between McCain and Obamais that McCain is forthright and a straight shooter when he has something to say. Obama is a smooth operator (he is surrounded by duplicitous strategist) and can jab away at McCain in the most guileful manner.

Posted by: Sandman | October 31, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am

She is a real political animal. I hope she is a drag — many polls and pundits say so. Even in-fighting –tut! tut! If they cannot do better during the campaign, what might happen later? Fortunately, only the far right has been energized and we won’t have to find out. Palin will be back though. She has a good sense of humor — that’s about all.

Posted by: Carol | October 31, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am

The Republican Party made a big mistake in choosing McCaine and Palin. As neither has had anything postive to say or good to say. It would be the Bigest mistake of McCaine and Plain win the Presidency and Vice Presidency.

Posted by: Paul Hood | October 31, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am

Palin is a drag on the Republican ticket when the Party has to reach out to anyone but its neocon and Evangelical/Pentecostal base.
She seems to have energized them and I am not sure if they would have ever come through for McCain alone.
Her views are too extreme to ever make her a serious ‘national’ figure and will drag the Party down permanently if she is chosen to lead it.
As a Democrat, I hope she is chosen.

Posted by: susan | October 31, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am

Palin, Joe The Plumber, and a few more people are the victims of the liberal media bias.
For Palin, the best examples for this type of bias is the handling of her daughter pregnancy which had nothing to do with the election. Yet, the media made a big noise out of it. ABC Charles Gibson even compared Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy to the Gustav hurricane in his opening of the World News “Good evening. Tonight we have 2 storms. One in Louisiana, the other, Alaska.” American journalism is dead since that day.
For Joe the Plumber, the media acted as a bunch of communist thugs when they digged the information from this guy (note that Ohio authorities have charged the woman who accessed Joe’s information and released them to the press).

Posted by: nononsense08 | October 31, 2008, 5:06 am 5:06 am

No, not a drag! Sarah is a woman of great strength to speak out against the liberal agenda. The media has not been kind to her, but then again the media has a liberal slant, and is never kind to republican candidates.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am

If you think that George Bush is dumb and makes a lot of gaffes, god forbid (if they win) something bad happening to McCain leaving Palin to run the country. We will definitely be the laughing stock of other countrys. This woman with the journalism major just is not sophisticated enough to handle responsibilities of big government.

Posted by: johnnylee | October 31, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am

“i can see Russia from my house”
This is one of the most stupid or ridiculous political statement i’ve EVER, EVER heard!!!!!!
oh i forgot….Abstinence!!!Even her daughter proved her that it’s the worst idea EVER, EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So yes!!!she’s a drag, yes she’s an embarrassment for the GOP, for women!!!!!!!
I’m still deeply convinced there are other smarter and more experienced women in the GOP than that lady

Posted by: Avembe | October 31, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am

Sarah is not a drag on John McCain becoming president. If the Dems get in office the first thing they will do is not renew the tax cuts that Bush put into place. That is a tax increase…they don’t tell you that. You take away his writers and teleprompters and he has nothing.

Posted by: George | October 31, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am

ABC and Night line should at least be truthful about what they say and not be so bias. John and Sarah are going to surprise a lot of people.

Posted by: George | October 31, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am

Yup Sandman i do agree with you i think that’s what the Chinese call the soft power, kind of strategy these guyz are actually using…
BTW HRC,Bill,Biden, Michelle and Barack are now campaign all around the swing states…when they are only 2(Mc CAIN and Palin) on the other side
Astonishing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Go Barack

Posted by: Avembe | October 31, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am

The McCaine and Palin ticket for Republican President and Vice President of the United States is a big Joke. 1) is that John McCaine is told old to be President. 2) Sarah Palin is not ready to be VP or President of the United States. 3) If both get in to the highest office this Coutry is going to be in big trouble. Just because McCaine was in the military he is no MacArthur or Eisenhower because niether were prisoner of war. Since running for President, all McCaine has talked about is his time in hanoi Hilton. Everything we heard from McCaine is the same we heard from George W Bush.

Posted by: Paul Hood | October 31, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am

I was orgiginally leaning towards McCain,until he picked his VP running mate Sarah Palin. I did some background research on her and was very unpleased at what I found out. She is NOT for gun control, she’s against embryonic stem cell research, she is against abortion “ONLY” in cases where the mothers life is threatened. Gov. Palin also turns her back to Science. She recently ridiculed an earmark for a Fruit Fly study. The Fruit Fly is an insect used in the lab. The Fruit Fly earmark was for the study of Autism. Didn’t she say she wanted to HELP special needs children. She blocked critical information which would have proven the danger which Polar Bears are facing. She tried to block the Polar Bear from being put onto the Threaten Species List, which would have made drilling in ANWR difficult. Luckily she failed there. The Polar Bear was just added on to the Threaten Species List. I am a Christian, but feel that some of her views DO NOT belong in Washington D.C. at a level of Presidency or Vice Presidency. Her views are much to extreme for such seats in Government. She has also made a comment on more than one occasion about changing McCain’s views on abortion and drilling for oil in ANWR. She will lead in a way that SHE WANTS to lead. YES, I feel that Gov. Palin is drag for Senator McCain.

Posted by: Rae | October 31, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am

Sarah Palin is a racist and a right wing extremist. She is not only a drag on the republican ticket, she has limited knowledge, exposure, ideas and understanding of issues beyond Alaska. only people like her will ever imagine her in the role of US VP.

Posted by: dupsie | October 31, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am

lifeverse – with an attitude like yours, no wonder the rest of the world laughs at us, thinks we’re stupid, and has lost all respect for us. Republicans criticize Obama supporters for “falling for the hype.” But Palin supporters have fallen for the worst kind of hype. She’s a radical right-winger who knows only “her” issues but will be a serious danger to the freedoms and welfare of America. She could not possibly be a leader of ALL the people. Only HER people. She’s not a joke. She’s a disaster waiting to happen.

Posted by: counting crows | October 31, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am

To any thinking American, John McCain’s political fate was sealed when he chose Sarah Palin as his running mate. It’s got nothing to do with either her gender or background, it’s simply that she just doesn’t cut it as a potential commander-in-chief, full stop.

Posted by: Ulyanov | October 31, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

Palin helped McCain pick up votes on the far right, but she has cost him far more.
Moderates hate her negativity… and you can’t win if you don’t have the bulk of moderates. Her future? If she should decide to run in 2012, her base will be the narrow right wing base…. minus moderates and liberals. She might as well not even try.
Palin, a definite drag on McCain.

Posted by: Gus | October 31, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am

Sarah Palin is not a drag – the Media makes her sound terrible – are you afraid for what she stands for – Honesty & Justice, She has more experience in the Gov and done more good for it than Barack ever did. Go McCain & Palin – win! win! win! Can’t stand all the lies Barack is giving out!!

Posted by: Ida | October 31, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Hey TakingPictures you are worried about Medical records while others are worried about Obama’s birth Certificate! Do you know that there are several cases pending right now, one with the The U.S. Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court is being asked to help the nation avoid a constitutional crisis by halting Tuesday’s election until Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama documents his eligibility to run for the top office in the nation.
Democratic attorney Philip Berg had filed a lawsuit.
It is widely known that Obama has not produced a ‘BIRTH CERTIFICATE” only a Certificate of Liev Birth! Totally different.
Do you honestly think that people would waste their time taking something all the way to the Suprem Court if they felt this was not a serious issue?
Why won’t Obama just prduce the “Birth Certificate? Why has the Governor of Hawaii sealed his Birth records which means only Obama can gain Access to them? Something does not smells right here!

Posted by: chuck | October 31, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am

Honesty and Justice Palin stands for, where the hey you been for the last two months????She is as bad as Stevens who just got nailed…My gosh.You are living in a different world then we are.

Posted by: NH voter | October 31, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

The Obama campaign’s attack on Palin are racist and sexist, just like what he did to Hillary. We really have to question what kind of a man Obama is. It is too bad that the press doesn’t call him on it. They sure jump on anyone who attacks Obama: we can’t even speak his middle name (Hussein)!

Posted by: tina | October 31, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Nut case is what she is.

Posted by: kiwiw | October 31, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

LOL racist an sexist, what a joke. She brought most of it on herself. What papers do you read, “all”, specifically, “all,” “I see Russia from my house”, I’m a hockey mom [who wears Prada], I’m not unethical [but you abused the public trust in a personal vendetta], etc.

Posted by: thorfinn | October 31, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

When someone says I am voting for Obama because I am old and I thought I would not get to Vote for a black man shows he is being voted for because he is black and thats why he is geting 98 % of the black vote. That would be Okay if he had a brain.

Posted by: RON | October 31, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Sarah Palin is a symbol.
A living example of John McCain’s carelessnes.
Was John McCain thinking about the welfare of the country or the needs of his campaign?????? The question answers itself, doesn’t it?
If you listen to her incoherent statements to Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric, the later of which were repeated word for word by comedian Tina Fey, you could hear her trying to mash talking points into something with little resemblence to an english sentense.
This lady couldn’t name any national newspapers or news magazines.
This lady couldn’t name a single Supreme Court decision (except perhaps Roe v Wade). One wonders if she even knows how many people are ON the Supreme Court, much less their names.
This lady thinks the Vice President is ‘in charge of’ the Senate.
This lady admitted that she never thought about national or international issues, in an interview just weeks before John McCain made her his pick.
This lady, as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, started construction of a ice skating rink BEFORE THE TOWN OBTAINED TITLE TO THE LAND. That’s right, she started construction on private property without the permission of the owner!
The original cost estimate: $1.5 Million. Final cost, including settlement with the land’s owner, $15 MILLION DOLLARS. Wasilla continues to pay for her mistakes even today.
On the other hand, PALIN PRAISED OBAMA’s energy policy in August! Look it up on Google. ‘palin praised obama’. NBC has a ‘first read’ article on this.

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 31, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

She is a drag on the ticket and for all women, let me count the ways:
1) let her husband run all over her office. What respectable working woman would EVER do that, she single-handedly sets us all back!
2) keeps questioning why we are asking about her clothes and no other candidates? That is because the other 3 purchased their own, there is no question.
3) she was CONVICTED of ABUSE of POWER by a 10-4 Republican topped committee and the ress has all but given her a pass on this. The Obama campaign has stuck to the issues and McCain. They have stayed away from her.
4) she has stolen from her State! A 4 hour presentation in NY turns into an all expense paid vacation in NY at the Essesx House for her and her 3 daughters. Seriously, she is an outsider!
5) Her husband is a member of the AIP, a known terrorist organization but she can’t stop talking about Obama’s associations. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! But she is sleeping with Todd and this is while he was an active member. Ayers was decades away from his bad behavior and a contributing member of society. Her husband was just in her office bossing around her staff and trying to get people fired.
6) she sat in her church, this is undisputed, while the Jews for Jesus representative spouted that the Jews in Israel were responsible for violence perpetrated against them because they were non-believers. This was weeks before she was chosen, when she knew she was on the short list.
I could go on.
She is bad for Republicans, bad for McCain, bad for Alaska, bad for women.

Posted by: Rosalee | October 31, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

She is a drag on the ticket and for all women, let me count the ways:
1) let her husband run all over her office. What respectable working woman would EVER do that, she single-handedly sets us all back!
2) keeps questioning why we are asking about her clothes and no other candidates? That is because the other 3 purchased their own, there is no question.
3) she was CONVICTED of ABUSE of POWER by a 10-4 Republican topped committee and the press has all but given her a pass on this. The Obama campaign has stuck to the issues and McCain. They have stayed away from her.
4) she has stolen from her State! A 4 hour presentation in NY turns into an all expense paid vacation in NY at the Essex House for her and her 3 daughters. Seriously, she is an outsider! Only when it is convenient in a stump speech, otherwise she works the system like a pro.
5) Her husband is a member of the AIP, a known terrorist organization but she can’t stop talking about Obama’s associations. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! But she is sleeping with Todd and this is while he was an active member. Ayers was decades away from his bad behavior and a contributing member of society. Her husband was just in her office bossing around her staff and trying to get people fired.
6) she sat in her church, this is undisputed, while the Jews for Jesus representative spouted that the Jews in Israel were responsible for violence perpetrated against them because they were non-believers. This was weeks before she was chosen, when she knew she was on the short list.
I could go on.
She is bad for Republicans, bad for McCain, bad for Alaska, bad for women.

Posted by: Rosalee | October 31, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

I just want to go on record saying that Sarah Paling is not a drag to the republican ticket. I have some serious questions concerning the kind of campaign Obama has run. Why did he agree to not take public campaign funds and then go back on his agreement? Why do we not have a valid birth certificate as to his place of birth? Why is he tied to so many shady characters? I do not trust him. He is a liar and a cheat. That is not what the American people deserve. He admitted himself that he is not experienced. Bill Clinton said, “Since when do we elect a president based on one year experience in the Senate.” WAKE UP AMERICA! REMEMBER 911.

Posted by: Ignorance Is Not Bliss | October 31, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Palin has become a big “crybaby” for the ticket. Everytime Obama comes out with something new she needs to carp on it like it is so wrong. She can only relate to shame tactics like Ayers and constantly say them over and over-she has no new view points except what the party is telling her. She is also now taking jabs at John McCain and that shows she is not happy with the promise she may have received. She is totally inept in grasping or understanding the problems with America and its people-she needs to go – somewhere else!

Posted by: paracsi7 | October 31, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Palin is McCain’s BEST ASSET.
She’s the kind of woman many of us other women in the world aspire to.
She takes a lickin’ but keeps on tickin’! I am proud of her. She always is the better “woman” no matter who attacks her.
She rocks!
SHE IS THE REASON I VOTED MCCAIN/PALIN 2008!

Posted by: Pit Bull Lover | October 31, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Chris,
Obama clearly has radical ideology, but I believe he is doing his best to keep it hidden from voters until after the election. 20 years of Pastor Wright? Launching your political career at Bill Ayers home? If Barack is as intelligent as every one of his supporters believes he is, there is no way he doesn’t know what those associates around him believe. By centering himself around this crowd for years, it leads one to conclude he agrees with their views.
Since you mention McCain could have picked a less Speaking of a divisive choice for VP, why didn’t Obama choose Hillary? She clearly had enormous support, almost more than his own, and instead he picks Biden, who was barely able to muster 1% of the vote as a candidate? The conservative movement has been hijacked by the notion that we need consensus building and to work hard to please the moderates. Nonsense. That is a key reason why McCain is not walking away with this election. All the former McCain lovers in the mainstream media and independents (who lean much more toward agreeing with liberal concerns) moved on to the Obama tent and it is a waste of time to worry about how to woo them back.
Why won’t the LA Times release the video of Barack celebrating with former Palestinian operative Rashid Khalidi? Just another example of how Obama is not being honest about what he believes, and in fact is tacking to the right to get elected. Honestly, a democrat discussing tax cuts? Sounds awfully Republican… To me, it seems that most Republicans fear that if he is elected, the true Obama will appear and move extremely left, closely aligning with Pelosi and Reid and look for a filibuster proof majority in the House and Senate to promote views that the majority of Americans would not agree with. The other path sought is through the judicial branch and activist judges, again because the socialist ideas he promotes would not gain support through legislative ballots and a majority of voters, so legislating through the bench is required.
I am not concerned about who the rest of the world would like to see as our leader. Especially European nations like France who is going broke as the government attempts to support its citizens. In fact, as you point out, there are several countries who may support Obama as the inexperienced and weak candidate simply to further their own agendas.
Lastly, you are correct. Nothing you could say could possibly change my vote, as I fully believe in the founders of our country created the greatest nation on Earth, where freedom (including freedom from big government) was guaranteed in our founding documents. I do not believe Obama agrees with limited government and limited power. Wouldn’t it be interesting to read his thesis from college? Sadly, no one will release it, which prevents another potential clue into the beliefs of the mysterious man who can talk for hours without really saying anything. To borrow on George Stephanopoulos’ Report Card theme, he gets an A for marketing and salesmanship, but an F in substance and honesty.

Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Sarah Palin is a boost to the GOP ticket, despite what “the media” promotes. If you independently dig deep, you find quite an opposite story from what mainstream shares. I can fill a website with details as I’ve got folders full of data. She lives what she believes and states. She follows the intent of the founding fathers. No, she isn’t a career politician for 20-30 years experience, so she’s not going to sound like one, nor is she a liar (oppps! …I meant “lawyer”), like most other politicians.
Our country’s 3 INDEPENDENT branches are run by 1 group of folks, which was never intended by the founders. We are a REPUBLIC, not a “democracy” (or more precisely a democratic republic). Palin represents views consistent with our founders, and our founder’s faith in God. Of course, if the citizenry has faith that “God does not exist”, then they won’t appreciate that our historic strength ultimately comes from God, not man. My opinion… Take God out of the picture and we as a country will (continue to) suffer the consequences. May God bless our country and the election. No, Palin isn’t “perfect” nor is McCain nor Obama. Looking forward, I’d easily have greater confidence in Palin than in Obama based upon faith; By faith, I have nothing to fear.
P.s.- bring on the attacks, liberals! ;-)

Posted by: James Bond | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The question should be–Is McCain a drag on Sarah? I wouldn’t be voting the GOP without Palin.

Posted by: rich schlenz | October 31, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Palin is not just a drag on McCain. Palin I snot just a drag on Red America. Palin is not just a drag on Blue America. Palin is not just a drag on rich or poor America. Palin is not just a drag on young or senior Americans. She is a drag on the United States of America. Oh yeah, and according to her own campaign staff – she is a drag on diva’s and whacko’s too.

Posted by: JJ Flash | October 31, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

The biased media has been the drag on the Rep ticket! Where is the media to tear apart Obama’s life and all of his mistakes, especially being mentored by a radical fanatic who hates and damns America, his Pastor of 20+ years!!!
Sarah has much more hands-on and even time on the job than Obama! Why is the media not making an issue of that? How about his citizenship and his REAL birthplace? He refuses to answer! Since when do presidential running mates of either side get a free pass from the press or even the citizens of this country? If Obama was born in Kenya then he certainly should not be allowed to run for Pres of the US!!!! Get into Obama’s business and tell the truth so the rightful side can win!

Posted by: C Smith | November 1, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Bill,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments.
Obviously, you’re a true believer in the conservative message. You must find it very painful to have to vote for McCain/Palin–neither of whom is much of a true conservative! For example, McCain just proposed that the government spend $300,000,000 of the bailout money to purchase toxic mortgages. In what way does that promote accountability either on the part of the banks or of the homeowners? And Palin took over as mayor of Wasilla which had $1 million in debt, and left it $15 million in debt (mostly taken on to build a hockey rink she wanted). She’s certainly no fiscal conservative.
From my perspective, your fears about Obama seem to me to be the product of the McCain campaign’s focus on trying to smear Obama.
If you look into any politician’s acquaintances you’ll certainly find people who may be reprehensible–e.g., Wright and Ayers for Obama. But, you’ve got Palin married to a man who is so unpatriotic he belonged to a political party that wants Alaska to secede from the United States. So why does Obama having attended Wright’s church and listened to his sermons make Obama unworthy of office, but Palin’s choice of someone to be her husband who hates America so much he wants to secede doesn’t tar her with being unpatriotic? If you’re going to damn Obama based on his so-called associations, you should be doing the same with McCain and Palin.
I think you’ve been drinking McCain campaign’s KoolAid about Obama’s radicalism. Since his own campaign decided that the American public just wasn’t going to buy his substantive positions enough to elect him (which they’ve admitted publicly), the only path he saw to winning was to try to scare people out of voting for Obama. That’s when he took the low road and put most of his efforts into making up scary stuff about Obama, and blowing relatively unimportant associations all out of proportion.
As I said before, Obama’s a middle-of-the-roader, and while you’ll never agree with his political philosophy, I suspect that you would consider any Democrat’s agenda “radical.”
In any event, since it looks like Obama’s going to win on Tuesday, we’re all going to have 4 years to see if your fears are justified or not. I’m sure they’re not. All I’d ask is that you and people who share your beliefs at least take a look on your own at what he actually does–not what Hannity or Limbaugh say that he does–and then be honest about whether you still consider him radical. And I promise you to do the same!
By the way, I agree with you that America’s constitution is one of the greatest political documents in history, but I’ve read it and don’t see any provision in there that guarantees freedom from “big government”. If you hate big government, then you must have loathed Ronald Reagan and both Presidents Bush–all of whom expanded our government considerably.
Oh well. there isn’t a government in the world that’s going to be able to satisfy all of its citizens, and Obama’s will be no exception to that rule.
The saddest part of it all is that no matter who gets elected president, he’s going to have a virtually impossible task on his hands–a mini-death spiral in the U.S. and world economy, two wars draining the lives of Americans and weakening our military and draining our national wealth, global climate change, and an incredibly fearful American public. It’s going to take this country more than a generation to recover from the mess that current and previous administrations have made of it, and I doubt that I’ll live long enough to see it.

Posted by: Chris | November 1, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Hey, check out “Obamas Mama” on You Tube.
Since there are those that are still on the Bristol Palin pregnancy saga, how
about Obama’s own mother who was not
exactly the virgin queen. Obama is a great manipulator – he knows how to smear his opponents in such a high mannered way. Americans are like
sheep….followers with very few leaders…that is why the young and poor are so easily led to slaughter.

Posted by: Ivana | November 1, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

Sarah Palin personifies ladylike behavior and not only is she “not a drag”, but she has energized this campaign like no other candidate.
BO and Biden are the ones who have made more gaffes than any others. I suspect BO’s erratic comments are not mispoken, however. I believe his slipups are unavoidable because that is his truth coming out. Biden is just a farce!
If you, the media, would simply report the news and not try to “make” the news, we would all be better off. I am sick and tired of hearing your commentators correcting the gaffes for the Dems. Let them say what they wish and suffer the consequences.
Katie Couric should be forced to listen to her own sophomoric interviews 100 times each as punishment for the way she tried to put words into Sarah Palin’s mouth and then,(Couric) ran to McCain and lied about what actually was stated.

Posted by: gigi | November 2, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

She is a zirconic Russian diamond, attractive & determine; yet unreal and cost less.

Posted by: Sutter197 | November 2, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Sarah Palin rocks! Just the fact that there are so many blogs about her proves she rocks-no one cares about Joe Biden-even as vp!

Posted by: deb | November 5, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Gov. Sarah Palin was good for the party and good for America. The news media can make the best look like the worst. The media’s agenda was more apparent than ever before. The media selected Obama and was not going to give anyone else a fair hearing. This hurts the whole process. Watch-out when they start to turn on him, and turn they will.

Posted by: Larry | November 6, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

If she actually had an education and some brains, it would have worked.
No one knew her. Obama came out in 2004 at the Democratic Convention and made a fantastic speech. Who is Palin. Never heard of her till a few months ago.
She was totally out of her league. McCain should have known better.

Posted by: Joe White | November 6, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Wow! Interestingly impassioned views. I think for the most part, the dems and liberals appear to be vicious and without a real point in their replies. At least the conservative replies can make one without being angry.

Posted by: Rita | November 6, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

With concerns over McCain’s age, the choice of Palin as a running mate was a particularly bad and irresponsible choice. It made me question McCain’s judgment enough that I voted against him. Palin may have rallied people, but what I observed was a frantic reaction to her misleading sound bites with no depth. We don’t need a cheerleader misleading the nation. The thought of her handling foreign affairs with the same lack of finesse should make any reasonable person vote for the other party.

Posted by: Nancy | November 6, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Why don’t you attack Biden? Mainstream media is in the tank for Obama! Palin has been more articulate and has shown to be very smart. You guys didn’t have a one on one with Biden. I think Palin did a much better job for McCain than Biden did for Obama. ABC should point out some positive aspects of Sarah Palin instead of just the negative.

Posted by: lee | November 6, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

McCain did not and could not speak as well as Obama. Today’s winners have to be able to project their personalities as well as articulate their ideas. Not even close! It was okay to pick Palin but sell the public on why and address the experience and worry over his health. He did none of those things. At this time America needs a confidence builder and has to have an image changer. Obama will deliver that.
I admire Palin for offering her services to her country. Lots of people point and complain but few step up. Also maybe just maybe the real prejudice
in this election process was against women. Hillary was undoubtedly a more deserving candidate than Obama and would have likewise garnered a landslide victory for the Democrats.And like or not she would have a very strong talent group to draw on to help her govern. But was America ready for a woman President? Maybe the males with their egos etc. need to step back and allow women to shape the nation. It’s their turn. How many male Presidents do we need?

Posted by: barrie | November 7, 2008, 5:06 am 5:06 am

I am embarrased by the media’s blind eyes, and hiding the real facts from the public prior to this election. All the news we are still hearing is still biased Democratic. During the campaign Biden and Obama could do no wrong but everything Palin and McCann said or did not say were the real topic of the news, not the politicans platform. At least Palin added enthusiasm to the campaign, she is NOT a Washingtonian nor does she have a Senate mentality. She is a real person with a family for all the younger people to associate with and all their real problems…a real playground for the press to be negative. If she had not been on the ticket, what would you have talked about! It would be interesting to see if Biden and Obama could answer the producers questions without seeing them in advance BUT they were not put on the spot by the producers, if so, they cut interviews out immediately, which was smart of us Democrats. Fair is fair and neither the network owners, producers or anchors are in reporting the political news. Our democratic candidates won the White House, now it is time to be positive about the losing Republican team. McCann has served this country for long years and is a war hero. So much positive news to report and his beautiful gracious wife has a huge heart with charity for children; leave the Alaskan lady alone, she did not ask for this spot but she did accept it and I know she would have been an asset to this long living McCann politican. I believe you were afraid of her popularity because of the huge crowds, her positive and fresh outlook. Were are from the “old boys” networks. Honestly, embarrased by your media and mostly the producers that make the decisions. Embarrased by Katie Couric’s behavior and all my democratic friends are embarrased by her biased statements. Sorry, I have no desire to every watch her again. In fact, soon as I hear her voice I turn her off. (We remember her when she first started out but we will not go there because that is not positive.) The fact is Palin was an asset to the campaign, republican or democrat, and added interest and became very popular because of her new spark. Media should have loved her and her freshness but no, media is always digging for negative, media knew a lot of negative on the democratic side and NEVER used it – biased. Sorry, but I am so upset by all this negativeness and wish you would get a little more positive – AT LEAST FAIR. Constantly trashing the Republicans, only relate positive Democrat news, and on and on tells us who is running the networks. If Palin had been running as VP on our Democratic ticket with Obama…bet you would have been loving her up, along with him! Think outside of the ticket, politicians are politicians, people are people, put yourself in their shoes before you interview or report negative news. Sorry, I am still disappointed with all my favorite anchor people, yet I know we all have bosses. I think that campaign was way too long, and too much money was wasted to buy the White House seat. I am a Democrat.

Posted by: Doris, MD Democrat | November 7, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Sarah Palin seems to have very low IQ. There is no thinking process in her eyes when she talks. I think she can make a great Game show Contestant or Mrs. Alaska over 40. Her bikini photos show her bottom quite big so she will need to work hard to lose her rear end.
Hope her marriage is good so she can stay at home for a very, very, Very long time.
Dust in the Wind!!!

Posted by: Julie Smith | November 9, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

Sara Palin was a breath of fresh air and NOT a drag on the McCain ticket and just what our country needs. How does one get the experience to do a job she’s never done. Someone gives her a chance. Sara Palin is a woman not afraid to stand up for what she believes and then fights to make a difference all the while trusting God with her life. I hope she stays in politics, making a difference in whatever position she is hired for or elected to. We need more people like her running our great country. It’s time people in America stop following everyone like sheep and step out and make their own decisions not what everyone in their life thinks, but what they think is right.Be an individual like Sara Palin is! We need more people like her in government. The best thing we all can do now is pray for America. Jesus is trying to get our attention. Anyone listening?

Posted by: Christine | November 13, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.