Oct 31, 2008 4:48pm

Palin Pushes Tax Creep Argument

ABC News’ Imtiyaz Delawala reports: Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin charged that Sen. Barack Obama’s tax plan is “so phony that it’s already starting to unravel,” continuing an argument made by her running mate Sen. John McCain this week that the Obama campaign’s level for who will receive tax cuts is creeping downward.

“Now, his whole tax plan, really, it is, it’s so phony that it’s already starting to unravel, and we’re gonna call it the way that we see it,” Palin said at an afternoon rally in York, Pa. “It seems like every few days, we’re getting a new definition now of middle class, according to their plan, whose taxes he says he won’t raise on the middle class.”

Palin pointed to a comment made by Obama supporter Gov. Bill Richardson in a radio interview this morning, in which the New Mexico governor cited $120,000 as the income level where Americans would receive a tax cut under Obama’s plan.

"What Obama wants to do is he is basically looking at $120,000 and under among those that are in the middle class, and there is a tax cut for those," Richardson said.

Palin pounced on the remark, adding it to Sen. John McCain’s attack earlier this week after Democratic vice presidential nominee Sen. Joe Biden cited $150,000 as the income level where Americans would receive a tax cut.

“And just this morning, Gov. Bill Richardson, a top surrogate for the Obama campaign, he who is working so hard to get Obama elected, Richardson, said Obama’s tax plan would define middle class as $120,000 a year and under,” Palin said. “So now, we’re down to less than half the original income level and, just give it a little more time, and Barack Obama will be back to raising taxes on folks earning $42,000 a year. We can’t let this happen.”

A spokesperson for Richardson responded that he misspoke, meaning to say that those making less than $250,000 would not see a tax increase.

The Obama campaign added that neither Biden nor Richardson’s comment reflected a change in the maximum figure of who would receive tax cuts, maintaining that those making up to $200,000 would receive a tax cut, and only those over $250,000 would have their taxes raised.

“Gov. Richardson admitted that he simply misspoke, and yet Sen. McCain continues this dishonest, desperate political attack to distract voters from the fact that his low-road campaign is being rejected by voters across the country,” Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said, responding to comments Sen. McCain also made today referring to Richardson’s remark. “The truth is that Sen. Obama wants to give tax breaks to 95 percent of workers and their families, while Sen. McCain’s plan provides no tax relief for more than 100 million Americans.”

User Comments

OBAMA IS A COMMON MONKEY.
WHAT PART OF THAT DON’T YOU GET?

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

If Palin needs a definition of ‘Creep’ all she needs do is look at her running mate.

Posted by: Deep Release | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I’ve listened and read many, many things over the last few months regarding Sarah and the only glaring facts I can grasp about this incompetent woman is she is vindictive, contrary, hypocritical, tunnel visioned and quite frankly, out of her depth in any political arena. Please, please, shut up and go back to Alaska where the Elk that she shoots roam.

Posted by: Ed | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Desperation, desperation, desperation.
“….
those making up to $200,000 would receive a tax cut, and only those over $250,000 would have their taxes raised.
………”
Is it really that difficult to understand or are Republicans really that dumb?
I know she took 8 years and 6 schools to get a college degree and he graduated 5th from the bottom, but common guys this is not rocket science.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Sarah Palin has no clue about taxes…
This from a woman who cheated on hers and evaded taxes from not claiming travel expenses and per diems.
So she should really take a good look at herself before smearing someone else.
Her words are a joke and so is she.

Posted by: lmg | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Granny Toot – can you be any more childish and racist – referring to black people as monkeys – what a disgrace you are! I am so glad that the people of the country are turning away from all the discrimination – the younger generation have it right – you are old news!

Posted by: malkittens | October 31, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Obama has been so much more restrained and respectful in his remarks about McCain. The harshest word he has used has probably been “erratic.”
But SP could never be so diplomatic, either in American politics or in foreign policy. She is just a naturally divisive, negative, trashy person. Ugh. She’s a divider, not a uniter. That’s not what this country needs right now.

Posted by: had enough | October 31, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Yup, bash Obama. That’s all Sarah and Johnny can do.

Posted by: Ken | October 31, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Yuk, Granny Toot. You sound hateful. I don’t know how you could imagine that a comment like that helps your side. It just makes you look bad.

Posted by: JJ | October 31, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

well granny toot if thats how you feel. i am not a racist and thats why i,m voting obama.

Posted by: Dan the repiblican | October 31, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

At least Obama has a plan thats more than the other side cn claim. And spresding the wealth is making funds available for education, alternate energy, repair pf highways and bridges what is the matter with this . Some people must think with there feet.

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 31, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

As a republican I say Sarah Palin is Creepy to me. McCain is old and we all know that his health is not intact. McCain will loose due to his non undestanding of the economy and the undestading of the working middle class. His judgement on picking Palin has proven to be a disaster. Sarah Palin is not ready to lead this nation, period. I will vote for the best team and that is Obama/Biden. I urge all undeciders not to look at personalities but to look for who will be best for this nation. Lets put everything aside our diffrences, attitudes and vote smart this time, for Obama. In regards to what Sarah Palin said, I just cant belive anything she has to say. She needs to go back Alaska nad face her charges of abusing her powers, period.

Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Will Palin ever address her own problems, her ethics violations, her padding her expense accounts, her defrauding the state of Alaska?

Posted by: JR | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

If racism’s all you got, you got nothing, and you will never be ‘nothing.’

Posted by: thorfinn | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

LATE UN DECIDERS VOTE SMART, VOTE FOR THE BEST TEAM!!!
OBAMA/BIDEN

Posted by: JOHN | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Palin’s the CREEP. Hope you have your ticket ready for Alaska.

Posted by: betsy | October 31, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Truth is… Obama has a plan in mind to raise the underclass and working class to the level of middle class. His increased tax plans to begin with are on the rich. He’s never given anyone his word that he will not tax the middle class. It’s just not, as he states, in his “first plan”. To raise the underclass and hte working class to the level of the middle class – the middle class itself must be heavily taxed – reducing their standard of living but making things “fair”… asn the underclass is raised up to the same level with them. If anyone doesn’t realize these are the longterm plans of Obama – they have not studied his speeches from the past, his ideology, and been objective. What he first does is “Phase 1″ of “change”. His goal is equal income for the underclass. The middle class will be taxed at the same level as the upper class in his plan. Has to be. 40% about. Show me how he can raise the underclass to a “living wage” and make them equal to the middle class without heavily taxing the middle class and lowering their standard of income?? In the meantime, jobs are going to be lost. The middle class is going to be taxed out of existence anyway – due to job losses he creates, and higher taxes on them.
Why people get starry eyed and “believe the best” of a politician is beyond me.
Believe the truth instead. Shees. Why try to make this “Camelot”. This is the real world. Let’s not get so caught up in “image” and learn to get our feet on the ground and understand truth.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Obama’s tax plan does change on a whim. Here in an article that he did an interview with newsweek in April2008. In April, he said that under $75,000 would see no tax increase. It has changed 4 times since then…..http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_15/b4079017876246_page_2.htm

Posted by: mom | October 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

palin is such an annoyance… i hate her voice and she’s such a phony!!! her daughter STILL is not in school (the pregnant one) and her drop out boyfriend…
this woman comes on the scene as a self-proclaimed pitbull w/lipstick, but can’t take ANY criticism, won’t release medical records, and expects special treatment because she’s a woman. we would NEVER have put up with this if it was hillary, so why the heck is she so special??
GO BACK TO ALASKA AND HIBERNATE…. FOREVER!!!!!!

Posted by: nadradt | October 31, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

When the bipartisan commission in Alaska released their report concluding that SP had committed ethics violations in firing the state trooper, SP called a press conference and announced “I’ve been vindicated!!”
Talk about someone with no handle on reality. And worse than that, no respect for the truth. I don’t want someone like that anywhere NEAR the White House.

Posted by: Al B | October 31, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

whoever that person posting as “granny toot” is – is just trying to get us to be outraged. And…of course…we all are…but…it doesn’t surprise any of us that have seen the monkey doll at the rallies…the ignorant comments out of many of the supporters…the blatant racism which has never been adequately condemned by MCCain or Palin and so on. Their whole campaign has been utterly disgraceful and many of the Republicans I know including my mother are absolutely sickened by it.
As far as the tax comments are concerned…Senator Obama has consistently given the same numbers over and over and Governor Palin knows it. It’s too bad his surrogates and running mates misspeak from time to time. It really isn’t that difficult…maybe they’re getting tired…but the man at the top of the ticket has been entirely consistent on this point.

Posted by: karronna | October 31, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Obama said $250,000, Obama still says $250,000, is the problem that Palin doesn’t know the difference between 250 and 120 or is she just plain lying again?
Maybe that’s the problem with her expense accounts, she can’t count.

Posted by: JR | October 31, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Rose, how much of your income are you willing to give up for these things?? How much of your income can you spare to bring the underclass up to the middle class?? Why don’t you sign your entire paycheck over to the government so that they can provide all tehse programs. Then show up at their window and apply for benefits.
You work for them now. You have no money you can call “your own”.
How will you like living like that??
How willyou like being like a person on welfare with the government in total control of your life??
“spread the wealth around”… is just away to appeal to people so that the government can gain control of people’s lives like they already have of the underclass. They want to control all America. It’s going to happen here. I can tell because people are so blind and don’t think through the facts.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

When will people realize the ther is no way for Obama’s plan to work he is all talk.

Posted by: dave | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

It’s not just Mr. Obama’s tax policy that is phony, it’s Mr. Obama himself. When we see him as a phony, Mr. Obama responds that the Washington system is broken. There’s no faker candidate in our history.

Posted by: young_voter | October 31, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

“so phony that it’s already starting to unravel”
TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE.

Posted by: Ed from MA | October 31, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

JR,
When did Obama ever commit to NEVER in 4 years raise taxes on the middle class??
He didn’t. He said all his plans depend on the economy. However, his “change” means that the underclass and working class are going to be brought up to equality with the middle class.
That means he must, after “Phase 1″ raise taxes on the middle class.
He will redistribute their wealth to the lower class/working class.
He wants a living wage for all people and massive universal programs.
Get it?? Communism being phased in. That’s the “change”. He uses other words – but all of these universal programs with the the lower classes equal in income with the middle class will require full blown communism like they have in China.
That’s your “change”

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

John McCain just announced he wants the capital gains tax to be reduced to 7%.
What John knows, and you need to know, is that rich people don’t get their income from a salary like you or me.
Instead, they structure their contracts to receive their pay in the form of capital gains.
For example, a CEO might receive a salary of $125,000. But this same CEO will receive 10,000 “stock options”.
What is a stock option? Well suppose that Apple’s stock is at $125/share. Apple’s board of directors (and I’m not picking on Apple, one of our great companies) will give Steve Jobs 10,000 stock options that entitle Mr. Jobs to buy stock at $10/share.
So Steve buys 10,000 shares of Apple stock at $10 and sells it for $125. That’s $1,400,000 in profit.
I bet you wish you could by Apple stock as a discount like that.
But really, Apple is not selling stock to their CEO. They are making a cash transfer to him, as pay for his services.
But to the IRS man, this is CAPITAL GAINS.
So our CEO (really, I’m not picking on Steve Jobs either) is going to pay the highest income tax rate on his “salary” of $125,000.
But his main compensation, $1,400,000 is taxed as capital gains at a reduced rate.
If John McCain becomes president, the wealthiest Americans will pay 1/4 the tax rate as a hard working waitress making $50,000 a year!
* * * * * *
Here is the new John McCain tax program:
John McCain’s plan:
Wealth redistribution.
From you.
To the rich.
millionaires: 7% cap gains tax
middle class: 25-28% income tax
Wake up!
Wake up!
Wake up!
Wake up America!

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

“They want to control all America.”
sounds like the neo-cons to me. We’ve had 8 years of Fascists trying to control ALL of America, time to change that and put America back into the hands of the people.

Posted by: JR | October 31, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Personally I can’t stand Palin but I don’t understand why any of them should have to release their medical records. Seems like a huge violation of their privacy.
Couldn’t we have a nonpartisan board of physicians who would review each candidate’s records, give them a physical, and give them the thumbs up or down? Or possibly some kind of summary/rating of their health?
If any of the candidates has had a venereal disease, eating disorder, whatever, it doesn’t seem to me like it’s our right to know such deeply private information. And I certainly don’t want to hear about John McCain’s hemorrhoids : )

Posted by: Jess | October 31, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

The saddest part is knowing that Senator McCain and Governor Palin actually believe that we’re going to buy their stories and overlook the truth. I really expected more out of John McCain. His campaign has been a disaster, primarily because of his running mate and his sudden pandering to the FAR right elements of the Republican party. How he can sell his soul to the party machinery and then call himself a maverick — and he says it with a straight face, like he believes it — that’s just beyond my comprehension.

Posted by: Ron in Nebraska | October 31, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

the only thing phony is the McCain and Palin team. Any votes they win will be because the people who choose them happily buy what they are selling. I am 50 something and have never seen such a lying campaign in all my years. They are disgraceful.

Posted by: Annie | October 31, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Wednesday night, John McCain admitted on the Larry King show (CNN) that Barack Obama is not a socialist!
But what about the 300 times that he and his running mate have called him this inflammatory name in their speeches????
If you say something, that you know is untrue, doesn’t that make you a LIAR?
IS JOHN MCCAIN A LIAR?
WASN’T HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC?
WHAT DOES THE 10 COMMANDMENTS SAY ABOUT ‘BEARING FALSE WITNESS’?

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I wonder how many of those who are are critical of Sarah Palin on this blog are actually Obama staffers who fill up blogs such as this one to make it appear like there many are on his side?

Posted by: tom | October 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

She’s a moron.

Posted by: Congolezza Rice | October 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I believe that no matter how contradicting Obama’s policies are and how many promises he broke, he may still win as Americans desperately want change. Americans may think that no matter what kind of change and as long as it is the change from Bush, there is no harm trying.
Americans are idolising politicians. Maybe it is time for Republicans to get new blood of idol quality to strengthen Republicans.

Posted by: ashleyfranc | October 31, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Obama wants to tax capital gains up to 28%. That means that people who have saved for retirement will see Obama steal 28% of that money. Where will it go?? Wealth redistribution to people who don’t work.
He’s committed himself to bringing the underclass up to the middle class. That’s what he’s said ALL HIS CAREER.
What he syas is his tax plan for “Phase 1″ of change… is just PHASE 1. He’s goign to tax working people and give the money to the underclass and tax the living daylights out of the middle class. He never promised he wouldn’t.
And a Democratic Congress is already saying htey want to raise taxes on the middle class.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I guess Gov. Richardson is either stupid, dumb or ignorant when he said that he misspoke….If you were any Obama supporter, you would know that Obama has been preaching $250,000 is the cutoff amount that would NOT see a tax increase…However, We the American people that have been LIED to by Obama are just now figuring out that the cut off amount will be $120,000. I wonder what other promises that Obama has told will become LIES…..90 or 100% of his promises??????

Posted by: 55Mariposa | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Hey Eve I am willing to give it all up as long as it staYS IN THIS COUNTRY

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

“I wonder how many of those who are are critical of Sarah Palin on this blog are actually Obama staffers’
probably about half as many as there are McCain staffers calling Obama a socialist or a communist.

Posted by: JR | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

IS THERE ONE McCain supporter with the guts to answer this simple question:
Is John McCain willing today to call for the end of all government programs that redistribute wealth, including Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance?
FOLLOW UP QUESTION:
Is John McCain, by his own definition a socialist? Or is he merely a demagogue???

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Steve_NJ – to answer your question, the republicans really are that dumb.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Obama is trying to unravel the U.S. Constitution to enable his socialist agenda. American people who are planning to vote for this socialist on Tuesday truly cannot be aware of the potential disaster that may be awaiting the U.S.
The fact that Obama admits this is on AUDIO, and just now hitting the airwaves is testament to how the media has NOT DONE THEIR JOBS IN DIGGING UP THE TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA.

Posted by: ml | October 31, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Conservatives don’t make idols out of politicians. Reprobate ungodly people worship politicians. Idolatry breaks the first commandment. Pagans do that.
I think idolatry will be sticking iwth the Democratic pagans.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

ev posted: “spread the wealth around”… is just a way to appeal to people so that the government can gain control of people’s lives like they already have of the underclass.
ev, this is deeply paranoid. Obama’s plan is just a shifting of the tax burden. Bush skewed it to favor the very wealthy. Obama wants to push it back to favor the middle class. These things shift back and forth every few years, they always have.
It’s not that radical. We already have tax credits, e.g., for first-time house buyers. Is that a handout??
We already have tax brackets. Obama just wants to shift them somewhat.
Like I said, it isn’t that radical. And the chances are, you would benefit under Obama’s plan.

Posted by: MK | October 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

ev, this is from the LA Times (a republican rag) on Oabam and capital gains:
— Families with incomes below $250,000 would pay current capital gains rates (a maximum tax of 15% on gains on assets held more than one year). Those earning more than $250,000 would face an increase — a top rate of 20%.
— The top dividend tax rate would remain the current 15% for those earning less than $250,000, but would rise to 20% for those earning above that threshold.
— For single people, the tax increases above would apply to those earning more than $200,000.

Posted by: JR | October 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

ev,
Please explain which part of Obama’s tax plan comes anywhere close to resembling what you descibed?
As always, you folks like to distort, exadurate, and basically make up things that Obama proposes.
So how about you “think through the facts” before you rant. Don’t tell me what Palin or McCain said will happen in their “scary world” of “socialism”. Tell me waht OBAMA said in HIS tax plan.
The FACTS are, Obama proposes a tax system we had as recently as 8 years ago.The same rates we had under Bill Clinton.
And the fact is, the economy thrived with those rates, small business start ups INCREASED, big business profits INCREASED, and the middle class was by far better off.

Posted by: Think Through the Facts | October 31, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Tom,
I can’t speak for the others, but I am not a blogger for anyone. I just have opinions, and the one I have of Governor Palin isn’t very positive. I’m an independent voter and certainly not rabidly pro-Obama, but he’ll get my vote come Tuesday. John McCain has pretty much guaranteed that.

Posted by: Ron in Nebraska | October 31, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

I’d like to push Palin. Down.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 31, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Palin is a Kunt ! I dont know a Single Person that likes Her !

Posted by: Knut | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Social Security is money I have paid into the system and my employer has matched. What’s wrong with Social Security is the governmetn “taking over” a deposit of 13% of workers income ALL THEIR LIVES… and controlling it. The socialist aspect of it we’d all like to see END. We’d like a DIFFERENT retirement program. But it would be WRONG to take away the money that people paid into all their lives. You cannot take benefits away from retirees. That’s wrong.
However, I would like an account statement of all the money I personally put into SS with my employers matching amount… and I’d like a pesronal statement instead of all that money going into a “pot” and disappearing.
That would be much better. I’d like control over my own assets, thankyou.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Gee ev, I thought you were a normal person until your last post. Excuse me but I don’t deal well with nut jobs.
I think it was the idolatry and pagan crap that got me.

Posted by: JR | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

You know it is a no brainer, Just don’t make over $200,000 and your taxes won’t go up and as for the middle class wake up out there the last 8 years got rid of that class your either rich or poor.

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Sarah Palin seems to rely mainly on spin and innuendo like all small-minded racist right-wing Republicans. Who is fooled by this crooked woman?

Posted by: iamwomaninMI | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

ev,
CHECK OUT THE FACTS:
(From taxpolicycenter.org)
Obama wants to raise cap gains back to their pre-Bush level of 20%, but only for those making $250,000 (for married couples).
You erroneously said 28%.
You erroneously said this applied to everyone.
PLEASE CORRECT YOURSELF.

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Knut… you belong in prison with a mouth like that you’re probably a rapist and a murder and a thief… the dregs of society to say something like that on a public forum.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

ev,
When is John McCain planning to announce the end to the evil Social Security program?
May I suggest the next time he is in Florida???

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

“Phase 1″. I’ve seen him quoted on the 28% amount and for it. He’s only discussing “Phase 1″ of a larger plan for change. A Democratic Congress is going to phase in full blown socialism in short order.
What he says for “Phase 1″ plan is not the totality of his plan. YOu must research his overall ideology and what he has stated overall as his total plan for “change”. Then you’ll know more about the real plan that his campaign is stating as only “Phase 1″.
He NEVER SAID he wouldn’t progressively raise taxes. Of course, no one in the MSM was as pointed as Joe the Plumber to call him on his larger plan and view.
Do you really think you know things based on looking at his campaign site??
You must check the larger library of Obama. Honestly, unless you’re a paid blogger, you really should go deeper than the surface, imo.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Sarah Palin is a Bush Clone. Nothing on The Issues just FEAR & INSULTS. It wont work this time. Barack has Too Much Support. There will be books written on how the McCain Campaign failed because of this..

Posted by: No Fear | October 31, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

ev,
Are you aware that Alaska has an oil production tax?
Are you aware that Sarah Palin spreads the wealth of this tax to Alaska residents, $2,200 for every man, woman and child, $8000 for a family of 4.
DO YOU LIKE PAYING FOR Sarah Palin’s generosity every time you fill up at the pump?
“Spread the wealth” — Sarah Palin

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Once again, SOMEONE ELSE says something and McCain and Palin tell everyone that is what Obama said.
These two have just become a pathetic sore on American politics. Sad, because McCain, at one time, appeared to have some dignity and self respect left.
Palin is simply McCarthyism for the 21st century.
She knows nothing but devisive hateful rhetoric. Check out her campaign in Alaska. She never really proposed crap. All she did was tear down the old governor.
If you challenge her rediclulous accusations, she claims either yells “sexism” or now, that her “1st amendment rights are being violated”?
I’m so glad Americans see through the dangerous lack of knowledge she’s trying to cover up. Wonder if Alaskans will figure it out next?

Posted by: Gonna Lose? You Betcha! | October 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

ev,
WHEN IS JOHN MCCAIN GOING TO ANNOUNCE THE END OF THE EVIL SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM?
WHEN IS JOHN MCCAIN GOING TO ANNOUNCE THE END OF THE EVIL SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM?
WHEN IS JOHN MCCAIN GOING TO ANNOUNCE THE END OF THE EVIL SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM?
WHEN IS JOHN MCCAIN GOING TO ANNOUNCE THE END OF THE EVIL SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM?

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Rose Symanski, you say that “it’s a no brainer, Just don’t make over $200,000 and your taxes won’t go up. ”
So you and everyone you know has been making sure not to get any promotions, because they might get into a higher tax bracket?? You do know we have tax brackets already, right? And we have had them going back 100s of years, through Dem and Repub administrations. It’s nothing new under the sun.
It just seems like people are suddenly all up in arms about progressive taxation without understanding what it is, or understanding that we already have it.

Posted by: Chris H. | October 31, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

ev,
DO YOU LIKE PAYING FOR Sarah Palin’s generosity every time you fill up at the pump?
DO YOU LIKE PAYING FOR Sarah Palin’s generosity every time you fill up at the pump?
DO YOU LIKE PAYING FOR Sarah Palin’s generosity every time you fill up at the pump?
DO YOU LIKE PAYING FOR Sarah Palin’s generosity every time you fill up at the pump?

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

“I wonder how many of those who are are critical of Sarah Palin on this blog are actually Obama staffers who fill up blogs such as this one to make it appear like there many are on his side?”
Hahahahaha!! Yeah! That’s right. And all the hundreds of thousands of contributors to his campaign are from the Middle East. Tom, I know you are drinking the Sidney McCain Kool-Aid but leave the vodka out of it, okay?

Posted by: Vicki | October 31, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

McCain is not going to end Social Security. I don’t know anyone who would be for it. Those who are promised benefits must receive them as promised. However, I would personally like to see “choice”. I would like to see a statement of all contributions in my name and I want a statement of them. Then I would like an opportunity to “opt out” and use my funds differently.
13% of my income for life should pay for a very nice retirement for me. I’d like to see change as someone who is not near retirement age… but I would not want Social Security benefits taken away from older Americans.
Do you really need to make such statements to support your socialist candidate because Marxist socialism is the “change” he’s planning to phase in to America??
He even said recently that anyone who things that socialism is bad they’re just “selfish”. We should all give up our paychecks so he can redistribute the money and make the underclass equal to the middleclass is what he has said throughout his career as his ideology. His numerous statements and agreement with the Marxist NP party prove that.
That’s not hyperbole. That’s the truth of the matter and it’s historically documented in his own words and his membership in the NP party.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

ev – Your too easy. Vote for McCain – he actually used the real word on his Wife in PUBLIC !

Posted by: Knut | October 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

LMAO…………still laughing

Posted by: Kenneth W. of Minneapolis | October 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Who is buying Obama to be the next President? I suspect that the $4.00 per gallion gas was raised by the Arabs to destroy the US economy. And that would turn the focus of the average american from security to economy. Then the Arabs have poured millions of the dollars they earned from the inflated gas prices towards Obama’s campaign via Swiss bank accounts through credit cards where no one would know who was contributing. Isn’t anyone concerned about the nasty anti-american characters Obama has associated with, the money he has received to put him in office and the fact that the media has not investigated or brought up George Wright and Bill Ayers. Bill Ayers, BTW, dedicated his book Prarie Fire to Sirhan Sirhan the assasin of Bobby Kennedy. Wake up American – Bin Laudin is counting on us to be so stupid>

Posted by: Judy Jarrett | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

We’d like a DIFFERENT retirement program.
—————–
I suggest we go with McCain’s idea of investing it in the stock market.
That’s the capitalist way to secure our future!
Sure would have been great to see your social security drop 70% in two weeks right before you retire wouldn’t it?

Posted by: Why I Like McCain | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

JMC,
You don’t have a brain in your head, or you are not using it in honest discussion.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Palin’s life is unraveling before her eyes. Let’s begin with her daughter getting pregnant out of wedlock. Palin believes in abstinence, and her daughter doesn’t, obviously. 2ndly, Palin wanted her nieces and nephews to have an unemployed dad so Palin abused her powers as Governor. 3rdly, she used taxpayers monies to pay for her children to fly, be fed, and housed where their mother went. She has been found unethical in using government monies. If she wants her children, she must pay for them out of her pocketbook. 4thly, she met with bidders for natural gas pipelines, and she gave the bid to TransCanada Gas, one of her friends, which goes against rules of ethics. 5thly, she took earmarks for bridge to nowhere, and now using these earmarks for her choices, not the intended request for the bridge to be built, 6thly, she used her staff as she was mayor to help her sell her home and stated to county officials she would fix a problem on the house and she didn’t, 7thly, she lied about her opponent she was running against for Governor and used slander and libel against her opponent, 8thly, she allows her husband Todd to all government files and records, although he isn’t a government official or hired employee, 9thly, she hasn’t been able to get her rallies to behave; 10thly, she appears to be racist and a bigot in her actions since there aren’t black attendees at her’s or McCain’s rallies and events and she allows them to call out offensive names, smears, and murderous points of views. If there are blacks, they can’t be seen. Lastly, she and McCain want to keep Jim Crow Laws in effect in the south to intimidate, and this is why they both support the lies and smears with information that is very untrue, slanderous, and libelous. They support Masons, SkinHeads, White Supremists, and others who manipulate and intimidate others who are different. I am a white woman who endorses Obama.Biden with Clinton for change 2008. Palin isn’t the type of woman I want to represent me. Understanding journalism and corporate communications in organizational behaviors, I know that she and McCain would have already been fired from their jobs, and charges brought against them in the real world for their abusive tactics of bullying and smear campaigns of lies, deceit, and distortion. Get real, be smart, get knowledgeable and elect the wise, calm, cool, fit and ready for duty with honor to serve our country, the United States of America. Elect Obama.Biden with Clinton for change 2008.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Palin’s life is unraveling before her eyes. Let’s begin with her daughter getting pregnant out of wedlock. Palin believes in abstinence, and her daughter doesn’t, obviously. 2ndly, Palin wanted her nieces and nephews to have an unemployed dad so Palin abused her powers as Governor. 3rdly, she used taxpayers monies to pay for her children to fly, be fed, and housed where their mother went. She has been found unethical in using government monies. If she wants her children, she must pay for them out of her pocketbook. 4thly, she met with bidders for natural gas pipelines, and she gave the bid to TransCanada Gas, one of her friends, which goes against rules of ethics. 5thly, she took earmarks for bridge to nowhere, and now using these earmarks for her choices, not the intended request for the bridge to be built, 6thly, she used her staff as she was mayor to help her sell her home and stated to county officials she would fix a problem on the house and she didn’t, 7thly, she lied about her opponent she was running against for Governor and used slander and libel against her opponent, 8thly, she allows her husband Todd to all government files and records, although he isn’t a government official or hired employee, 9thly, she hasn’t been able to get her rallies to behave; 10thly, she appears to be racist and a bigot in her actions since there aren’t black attendees at her’s or McCain’s rallies and events and she allows them to call out offensive names, smears, and murderous points of views. If there are blacks, they can’t be seen. Lastly, she and McCain want to keep Jim Crow Laws in effect in the south to intimidate, and this is why they both support the lies and smears with information that is very untrue, slanderous, and libelous. They support Masons, SkinHeads, White Supremists, and others who manipulate and intimidate others who are different. I am a white woman who endorses Obama.Biden with Clinton for change 2008. Palin isn’t the type of woman I want to represent me. Understanding journalism and corporate communications in organizational behaviors, I know that she and McCain would have already been fired from their jobs, and charges brought against them in the real world for their abusive tactics of bullying and smear campaigns of lies, deceit, and distortion. Get real, be smart, get knowledgeable and elect the wise, calm, cool, fit and ready for duty with honor to serve our country, the United States of America. Elect Obama.Biden with Clinton for change 2008.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

ev,
Are you aware that Alaska is the Number One recipient of federal funds.
And that Sarah Palin, Queen of Pork, hired a Washington lobbyist from TED STEVEN’S staff when she became Mayor of tiny Wasilla, Alaska (5500 population at the time)???
DO YOU LIKE PAYING FOR Sarah Palin’s state every time you pay your federal taxes???

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Judy Jarrett…How about John Sidney McCain’s current friends and associates? Y’know like convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy? Convicted felon Charles Keating?

Posted by: Vicki | October 31, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Anyone who is near retirement in the stock market is advised to pull back into conservative funds as they approach retirement.
The stock market over any 10 year period has produced an 11-13% average annual return.
There are times when the market plunged 20-40%. AS people just chill out and hold the fort… they wait for the market to bounce back.
If that is interrupted by knee jerk reactions to short-term losses and market adjustments… that’s not how to invest longterm in the stock market.
People who are not int he stock market for the longterm should not be in the market.
People who invest in the stock market are the ones who become wealthy in the US…and how people making 50,000 a year who invest regularly become multimillionaires.
I’ve seen it often.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Judy Jarrett – The Republican party is in a steep decline because their ideas are out-dated and out of touch. Thinking like yours is just going to keep you in denial. It will keep you from reflecting and learning where you went wrong. And if you don’t see that your party did go wrong, well then your blindness is probably total and incurable.
But waffling on about Bill Ayers and other rubbish is not helping you or your party or anyone.

Posted by: NY | October 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Read my lips! No tax increase for anyone earning less than $250,000.

Posted by: LongT | October 31, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

The stock market needed to adjust because it was corrupted by government programs that forced bad loans. Those loans went bad. Funds went bad. Companies started going under due to the volume of bad loans.
Solution?? Don’t let the governmetn force bad loans.
The market, left alone, would recover and bounce back.
Government programs brought down Wall Street.
Congress’ fault.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

I’m glad that Obama at least offers an alternative, McCain wants the Same, that’s right John follow Bush all of the way. The only thing I know about John McCain and Sarah Palin is that they offer nothing but dirty nasty politics. We are tired of hearing all of their junk. We all remember how unraveled and erratic that John McCain became during the financial crisis. He suspended his go-nowhere campaign to go to Washington and do nothing. He just appeared to be in a daze.
I was a Hillary supporter and wasn’t quiet sure who I would vote for in the general election but when I look at the organization that Barack Obama was able to put together and the success that he had raising funds for his campaign and remained a gentleman during throughout his campaign against McCain and Palin, then it has to be a no brainer who the better choice would be to run the country anyway. John McCain’s campaign on the other hand has been one mistake after another, I just don’t think that we would be able to trust his judgement in a crisis, especially considering his response to the recent financial crisis.
I also think that Obama’s tax plan will help get this country back on the right track. It’s unfortunate for all of us that the Bush/Cheney and 6 years of a Republican Congress’s policies have put the country in such a bad way.

Posted by: Congolezza Rice | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

You all should leave Gov Palin alone – just because she gets her information from the Republican email fantasy trail and from Joe the Plumber (look out Todd he is moving in there)
She can’t wait to lead the Senate – change the drapes – etc –
You now she just threatened to drill baby drill and the price of Oil came crashing down – remarkable
You know not to get off bashing the McSame/Failin thing – but does not the price of Oil up/down swing feel like someone out there is pulling your strings? Does mine
If the answer to the energy issues has anything to do with fossil fuels than the answer is more of the same BS we’ve all had since 1972 –
The answer the energy crisis is to get off fossil fuels – in effect find a solution that uses something else – something that is not Oil and not Sand – the problems in the middle east will go away when we stop sending all our wealth there – end of story –
The Palin/McCain or is it McCain Palin hard to tell in the end here – the Republicans tell us we need to stop sending out money to countries that don’t like us – the fact is those countries would just sell the Oil to other countries that do not like us – so when you hear drill baby drill – think some rich republican is going to get richer – you and I are going to get screwed -
We need a new power source – technology that we own and protect – and we make and sell to others – no more of this globalization crap -
Globalization – you know what that means America? Think we outsource everything so rich guys make more margins – and you and I all work at the mall –
btw just kidding about leaving Gov alone – tell what you think of the carnival show the republicans are giving us -

Posted by: StopTheBots | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

I used to support Sen. Obama, but why do people think Sen. Obama is a unifier? Because he says he is? why do people think he listens to the other side? Because he says he does? He said small-town Pennsylvanians are “bitter” that’s why they “cling to their guns and religion,” and he says their bigotted. nevermind you don’t have to be bitter to value your right to bear arms enshrined in the United States Constitution, and faith! He says it’s a way to “explain their frustrations.” How does he figure? really, has he ever talked to a small-town Pennsylvanian? that’s not listening to the other side, that’s making stuff up about people you look down on. Sen. Biden said paying higher taxes is “patriotic.” Sen. Obama said people who don’t want to pay higher taxes are “selfish.” now I don’t doubt that Sen. Obama and Sen. Biden want the best for our country. I don’t doubt that they think tax-and-spend is the way to go for peace and prosperity; I respect that, but I disagree with that. and Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin wouldn’t call Sen. Obama and Sen. Biden names. They used the most straight-forward, matter-of-fact term they could have possibly used: Socialist. They didn’t call him a Nazi (National SOCIALIST Party), they didn’t call him a Communist, they even made sure they were pushing a democratic, Western European socialism, like France as opposed to, say, Romania. I don’t feel like Sen. Obama is reaching out to me when he says, “if you don’t agree with my tax policies, you’re greedy,” and “if you don’t agree with my tax policies, you’re unpatriotic.”

Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 31, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

All of you Obama supporters who think his tax plan is the best for America need to read “Basic Economics: A citizen’s guide to the economy” by Thomas Sowell. It is a non-partisan, non-political explanation of how every economy of the world is governed including ours. You are arguing against economic laws that cannot be altered or fooled. You might as well convince yourself that you can defy gravity.

Posted by: nick | October 31, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

To Grandma Toot…
You truly are to be pitied! I always
wonder how people like you survive
when you are so filled with hatred!
Heffelfinger

Posted by: Heffelfinger | October 31, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

**SARAH Palin is a political supeStar! I only wish she was a democrat. She is a very good politician (from mayor to govenor to VP choice….wow!). She should be taken seriously!
OBAMA/Biden 2008

Posted by: Kenneth W. of Minneapolis | October 31, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

LongT,
When did Obama ever promise that he would never increase taxes on those making less than $250G??
Plus, did you realize that your taxes ARE going up next year – because he refuses to hold the fort on a Bush tax decrease?? Net result: tax increase.
Also, he’s going to invoke a $100′s of billion dollars a year “energy tax” that’s going to hit all America pretty hard. But he didn’t tell you about that either.
He IS coming back after hte middle class. He is a socialist who has stated his plan to transfer your income to the underclass as a longterm goal.
“Phase 1″ of what he’s saying to get elected is NOT his longterm ideological plan for “change”.
Are you really unaware of his ideology and history and background and statements that you don’t realize what his “change” is??
Let me give you a clue. Go back and look at his infomercial. In the first couple minutes he said that he wants to “redo” how govenrmetn has functioned for DECADES. This is his change: redistriubtion of wealth to hte underclass.
Always has been. Always will be.
That’s his “change”. What he’s promised to do in “Phase 1″ in campaigning is JUST PHASE ONE.
Go ask him the question and show me an ironclad promise that he will NEVER in his 4 years raise other taxes. You won’t find it. He’s got numerous plans to raise taxes by various menas he’s not talking about…. and NO ONE asked him about… he’s not been “vetted”.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

If anyone has studied Political Science or Economics, it would be easy to see that there is no way Senator Obama can come through on his campaign promises. Politicians can lie but Math does not.
Abe Lincoln

Posted by: Abe Lincoln | October 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Latest from ZOGBY: MCCAIN MOVES INTO LEAD 48-47 IN ONE DAY POLLING

Posted by: MCCAIN TOOK A LEAD | October 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

ev,
YOU SAID IT WAS SOCIALIST.
And no one can deny that the purpose of the Social Security program, from the day it was invented by FDR was to transfer wealth from one group to another.
The first person to receive Social Security did so 4 months after it was started. This retired woman (a widow I believe) received Social Security the rest of her life, paid for by working Americans.
And it has been that way ever since.
And you know what, before Social Security, senior citizens were commonly seen homeless, broke, unable to work, destitute before FDR.
FDR knew this was INDECENT. Any ‘true’ American would know this was INDECENT. Any Christian would know this was INDECENT.
So FDR invented Social Security, to make sure that every senior citizen would have a social guarantee, that this nation would not stand by and watch this indecency.
Because some people never make enough money to pay the Social Security benefit , and others make enough money that they can live quite comfortably, this MORAL nation transfers the money from the well off group to the needy senior citizens.
And obviously, some Americans contribute as much as they get out. Not everyone has a life of minimum wage or low wage jobs. Thank God for his generosity.
AND JOHN MCCAIN KNOWS EVERYTHING I JUST SAID IS TRUE. THAT IS WHY HE WILL NOT END SOCIAL SECURITY.
BECAUSE HE BELIEVES IN WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION TOO.

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Do you people honestly sincerely not KNOOW that Obama’s commitment is to tax the middle class to transfer the wealth of the middle class to the underclass as civil rights “reparations”??
Did you read his 2001 interview?? Have you studied the ideology of Revernd Wright, etc??
Civil rights reparations through Marxist socialist wealth transfer in redistributions has been Obama’s belief system for decades.
Study up. Get past the MSM and do some independent study. Don’t believe what you read… that it’s “complete truth”. It’s the surface of a veneer.
Go back and learn what he’s been saying for 20 or more years… and learn the truth of Obama’s “change”.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

So what are all you McCain/Palin Kool-Aid drinkers going to do after November 4? Cling tighter to your guns? Start going to your local KKK chapter meetings again? Right racial slurs on the bathroom walls?

Posted by: Vicki | October 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Obama is a Socialist. He took campaign welfare to fund his dead end campaign. No wait, that was McCain.

Posted by: cajunLafayette | October 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Sarah Palin says she doesn’t know why most women don’t support her candidacy or why others believe she is unqualified to be vice president, but she says that makes her determined to keep fighting.
Well, let me see if I can give you a couple of reasons why.
Palin: ‘I don’t know’ if abortion clinic bombers are ‘terrorists.’
Top Salary in McCain Camp? Palin’s Makeup Stylist
Alaska’s largest newspaper endorses Obama
Palin Explains What Parts Of Country Not “Pro-America”
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/25/palin-calls-barack-sambo-and-hillary-a-bitch/
Palin Claims The Vice President Is ‘In Charge Of The U.S. Senate’
Palin abused her power, legislative inquiry finds
Palin Lies About Oil Exports
Sarah Palin Hates America
Palin still doesn’t know what a VP does
Joe Vogler and the AIP
Todd Palin – Alaska Independence Party
Sarah Palin Champions Barbaric Aerial Hunting of Wolves
Pastor Told Palin’s Church Jews Control Economy
Palin asks “What does a VP do?”
Palin Claimed Dinosaurs And People Coexisted
Get Your War On: Sarah Palin and the Rape Kits
Palin linked electoral success to prayer of Kenyan witch-hunter
Let me know if you want any more reasons.
http://barackforus.com/category/palin-facts/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

and her plan if she could understand it, will give tax cuts to Exxon….

Posted by: raknyc | October 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

So, JMC, are you saying you are consciously for the transfer of wealth from the middle class paycheck into underclass income??

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

McCain has voted over 40 times in the last 4 years to cut Medicare and Social Security. Now he wants to cut Medicare and social security benefits to pay American families for the $5,000.00 insurance credit he is promising to pay for health care cost. Let’s see, I pay over $6000.00 annually in premiums for 3 people, over $7500.00 for deductibles, and $4000.00 out of pocket, which are copays. That’s a total of $17,500.00. Next year I will pay $20,500.00. Now, will that $5000.00 be worth taking from my parents and grandparents Medicare and all of our social security benefits, leaving them less, and we have to pay more.
McCain’s and Palin’s math is very fuzzy, just like McCain’s choice of Secretary of Treasury Phil Gramm. His bank UBS has been asked by EU to put aside over $70 billion dollars, and USA banking officials have asked his bank to set aside over $40 billion dollars. Do you want that type of financial fuzzy math to run your monies in the U.S. Treasury?
Get real, be smart, and knowledgeable. Elect Obama.Biden with Clinton for change 2008.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

ev is a NON-ISSUE. She had no response for her vicious attack on me. Typical Republican RACIST !

Posted by: Knut | October 31, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Sarah Palin wants the victims to pay for their own rape kits. Are you sure this is the woman you want in the White House? Pass it on!
In this week’s GYWO, no means no, unless you have 500 bucks to sink into your own rape investigation. When the guys start looking into this whole rape kit situation, lots of questions come to light. Most pressing among them being, just how into rape are McCain and Palin anyway? How much money should your average rape victim keep in checking? And is Wasilla really the premier destination for globe-trotting rapists?
http://barackforus.com/2008/09/23/get-your-war-on-sarah-palin-and-the-rape-kits/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I find it amusing whenever I get on these sites and they become active. It’s like the Obama staffers monitor for activity… and start blogging whenever there is activity.
Communist propaganda machine… like ACORN and the NP party.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Mr. Obama is the most BS candidate our country has ever known. He spent 4 millions dollars on an infomercial, promoting himself as a product, “Made in America” when it could just have been “Made in Indonesia”. His infomercial is no different than the exercise machine infomercial.

Posted by: young_voter | October 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Knut, I’m an Obama supporter, but you lost all credibility with your first comment. No-one’s going to take you seriously after that.

Posted by: Tim | October 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Hahaha. . .Palin should know quite a bi about being a phony. Phony maverick. Phony reformer. McCain’s campaign was right when they said she was a diva.
Has the Republican Party purged so many of the moderates out that it is impossible for them to find ANY candidate that appeals to the mainstream of America?

Posted by: kevinbgoode | October 31, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

ExxonMobil has record earnings and McCain wants to lower their taxes. How many Democrats and Republicans have records earnings this quarter? Not me. I’m voting for Obama/Biden! Are there that many ignorant brainwashed people that think McCain will really help them? McCain has 13 cars and 7 homes! GET WITH IT AMERICA!

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

As we have seen, ABC’s, cbs and Nbc’s attempt at voter suppression is not going to work and neither are these false misleading polls they promote.. Gov Rendell today called on people to get out and vote, and in HIS words, “the polls are closer than u think” John “the coward” Murtha, is begging for another Million to try and keep his seat lmao, Good try ABC . but most people are smarter than that, Even as Obama keeps attorneys busy with allowing dead and purged people “voting” that still will not be enough as Tuesday will show us..

Posted by: review this left wing censors | October 31, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Obama is a creep and a thug.
Creep is a GREAT word.
Socialist, liar -
Wake up you people

Posted by: Alec | October 31, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Oh and for sure these user names are maybe two people at most
Dave
young_voter
Ed from MA
tom
Ml
Ev
The ones who suggest that we are Obama’s staff because we all see thru the crap Tom – that is word for word on anotehr blog – different name – your not Tom there – cheeky fellows – sounds more like the underdogs staffers – maybe Joe the Plumber himself – sounds like a crappy little job but somebody has to do it -
Oh better – if the McCain campaighn had staffers doing it – they outsourced it to China or maybe India to get a sub minimum wage price -

Posted by: StopTheBots | October 31, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

I find it amusing whenever I get on these sites and they become active. It’s like the McCain staffers monitor for activity… and start blogging whenever there is activity.
Fascist propaganda machine… like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh..

Posted by: JK | October 31, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Abe,
According to the non-partisan ‘Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’ says that McCain would increase the deficit in 2013 by $229 billion to $400 billion.
They also say that Obama would increase the deficit $262 billion to $316 billion.

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Did you people know that John McCain gave 27% of his income to charity in 2006; 28% of his income to charity in 2007.
When the Government doesn’t tax people of wealth, do you know how much money goes to charity??
Do you know how many charities will be put out of business by raising taxes on the upper 5% by 13%??
Charities do better work than government. Less overhead. MOre efficient.
John McCain gives much to charity.
I htink Obama gave maybe 1% of his income.
Don’t attack John McCain for his money… he gives to charity at a very high percentage rate… and I htink that should really be respected by fellow Americans who appreciate the goodness in people.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

McCain is an idiot and Palin is a disgrace to the human race.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

well ms. rice since you no very little of Mr McCain,he is a decorated war hero who has served his country and the other gentlemen,has had the luxury in his life to set around and compare our great country to NAZI GERMANY….SO PLEASE ALL of you flakes out there,please keep your STUPIDITY to a minimum PLEASE!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: chad | October 31, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Multiple newspapers have confirmed reports in blogs that Sarah Palin’s town charged rape victims for their forensic exams while she was mayor. Now CNN has covered the story, interviewing the sponsor of a law aimed at ending the practice. He finds it hard to believe this practice could go on without the mayor’s knowledge. Watch:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/22/cnn-covers-palin-rape-kit_n_128424.html

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Has anyone else noticed that gas prices are on their way down with the departing of Bush/Cheney from the White House? Now if we can just get out of that phony but costly war the country will begin to mend. Of course Bush and Cheney’s good buddies at Haliburton made out like bandits from the war as well as Blackwater. They used our taxpayer dollars to create havoc that in the end would line their pockets deep.
As a taxpayer regardless of whose tax plan is in place my bigger concern is where and how is Washington spending those tax dollars that I am paying to run this government of my country. I certainly didn’t have in mind attacking a country without WMD’s especially at the cost of Billions of $$$ each month. Bush has been a total failure leading us to the brink of depression, the last time this country was in a depression the commander in chief was another Republican, Herbert Hoover. Enough Already!

Posted by: Candi Delite | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

I can just see the 2012 Repug ticket now…Palin and her running mate Sam (Joe) the wanna be plumber

Posted by: Vicki | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Rich Americans represent 5% of wealth in America. McCain wants to continue Bush’s tax cuts and distribute more of the wealth to these 5% who are the rich and rich corporations. 95% of Americans are the remainder of Americans who Obama’s tax cuts represent.
The rich and rich corporations will tell any lie, cheat at any cost, and gamble their souls to the devil, him or her self, to win this election to keep from paying any taxes. Of course most of the Communist Republican right regime send most of their incomes to other countries, money launder, and commit fraud daily at the expense of 95% Americans who have to pay taxes that the rich don’t. This is Communist Republican Right regime where the top tier Communist Party leaders get the most, members get next most, and the rest of people give all their income and possessions to the government of the Communist Republican Right guard. Sound familiar.
You do realize that monies made over in other countries is tax that isn’t collected in this country. Therefore, Bush.Cheney.McCain.Palin all receive their royalty checks free and clear of no US taxes. Sad but true.
Think. Be smart, be wise, be knowledgeable and elect Obama.Biden with Clinton for change 2008.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Knut – you were out of line -
ev – wow take your med’s darling -
Lets stay on track here -

Posted by: StopTheBots | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

WHO IS JOHN McCAIN? Read below.
I wish I could say I was surprised by this, but let face it: there were signs. There was John McCain’s long opposition to a national holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr., his use of racial epithets, his love of racist jokes, and the increasingly racist tone of his campaign.
It seems that John McCain was a member and sat on the board of the US Council for World Freedom (”USCWF”), an organization noted for its extreme ideology, racism, and anti-semitism. This organization has been described as “largely a collection of Nazis, fascists, anti-Semites, sellers of forgeries, vicious racialists, and corrupt self seekers.” Why on earth would John McCain associate himself with such a group? Why would he take a leadership position with it?
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/07/mccain-tied-to-radical-anti-semitic-racist-organization/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Nick at 9:58 PM is 100% correct. But God forbid anyone read a non-partisan, non-political explanation of how an Economy works. “Those who don’t learn from the past are doomed to repeat it!”
Abe Lincoln

Posted by: Abe Lincoln | October 31, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Julie,
If you had a positional statement towards Palin, that would be one thing if it was stated respectfully. But when you attack people, it reveals hate and a poor characteron your part.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

ev,
People SHOULD give more to charity when they have more. John McCain has 7 houses and 13 cars. Please. There’s no comparison between his wealth and Obama’s. He’s an older and far wealthier man. I wouldn’t expect to give more than my father, for example, who is far older and far wealthier than me. That’s not how it works.

Posted by: JK | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Palin’s Pastor Agrees God Punishes Jews Who Don’t Convert
http://barackforus.com/2008/09/19/palins-pastor-agrees-god-punishes-jews-who-dont-convert/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

First Biden says it is patriotic to pay more taxes, now Obama says it is selfish to oppose tax increases.
“John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic. You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”
This reveals the basic underlying philosophy of the Left – that one cannot possibly be charitable unless they use the GOVERNMENT to redirect their funds. Obama assumes that people who don’t want to pay higher taxes are somehow “selfish”, but that’s only true if one assumes that the so-called rich won’t do anything else with their money except sit around like Scrooge McDuck, counting it constantly. Most people today invest it, which creates jobs, or spend it, which creates even more jobs, or donate it to CHARITY — which works much more effectively and with much less overhead than filtering it through government bureaucracy.
Those who earn the money want to direct it in the manner they see fit, in the most efficient manner possible. That’s not selfish, it’s just common sense. Only someone in love with government power could see it as anything else.

Posted by: The People's Republic of Obama | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

AN ALL OF THE PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT LOVE THE WORD IDIOT!!!!!! just remember that most of you are morons waiting to be PROMOTED TO idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: chad | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

When do we see MCCAIN/PALIN tax plan ..all day long we hear about Obama’s. Is it because the Mavericks have no plans for America and spend all their days listening to Obama’s message so they can copy a few ideas.

Posted by: fed up of bloggers | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

So did Senator Biden “misspeak” when he said $150,000 was the point where one would be taxed? In many cities, that’s a hardworking nurse and her policeman husband! So working couples are to be penalized by Obama now? The young people are beginning to realize Obama is against their economic interest. Two young graduates from college or grad school, burdened with loans, are now going to be in a higher tax bracket just when they are starting out, courtesy of the Redistributor in Chief!

Posted by: anne1244 | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

ev – You’ve clearly Lost Your Mind like McCain. You didnt answer my response – McCain called his WIFE that IN PUBLIC !
Quoting John McCain: Come on up Joe. Joe ? Are you here Joe ? Joe ? I THOUGHT you were here Joe ? SILENCE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Well Then…….”Your All Joe The Plumber!” What a IDIOT ! I’ve Never Laughed so Hard in My Life !!!

Posted by: Knut | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Gg,
It’s not true that people who make over $250,000 a year are evil. Some of the most wonderful people I know are multimillionaires who give their lives to serve others. They go rebuild where Katrina has devastated. They give their hearts, their lives, and their money to charity.
Making a lot of money doesn’t make a person evil any more than making less than $250,000 makes a person good.
It’s not what you make, it’s what you do with it.
Obama’s half brother is living in a 6×9 shanty in a Kenyan slum.
Can you please explain that??

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

We are in this mess because of Deregulation of the banks.
Keating was hit with a $1.1 billion fraud and racketeering action, filed against him by the regulators.[4] Asked whether his contributions had bought him influence, Keating said: “I want to say in the most forceful way I can: I certainly hope so.”
MCCAIN WAS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY KEATING!!!!
Keating was convicted in January 1993 of 73 counts of wire and bankruptcy fraud and served more than four years in prison before his conviction was overturned.
Keating was was a longtime friend and associate. McCain met Keating in 1981 at a Navy League dinner in Arizona where McCain was the speaker. Keating was a former naval aviator himself, and the two men became friends. Keating raised money for McCain’s two congressional campaigns in 1982 and 1984, and for McCain’s 1986 Senate bid. By 1987, McCain campaigns had received $112,000 from Keating, his relatives, and his employees.
After McCain’s election to the House in 1982, he and his family made at least nine trips at Keating’s expense, three of which were to Keating’s Bahamas retreat.
Google McCain and Keating scandal and you’ll read more.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Chad, decorations are for Xmas! Get over it, I’ve know other POW’s and they sure weren’t capable of running the country and neither is John McCain all he can do is pass out vicious attacks on Obama.
I also recall reading an article where John McCain stated at a gathering “that the reason that Chelsea Clinton was so ugly was because Janet Reno was her father”. Chelsea was around 11 years old at the time. No, that’s not the type of character that I want represent my country.

Posted by: Congolezza Rice | October 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

The cost of living in California is so high that $250,000 income is middle class.

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Zuq,
The rape-kit claim is dubious at best. The police chief (who was named by Palin) wanted victim’s insurance companies to pay for the rape kit as part of the victim’s medical care.
Some other towns in Alaska really did seem to want to have the victim’s pay for the kits. Alaskan state legislatures wanted to pass a law requiring each town to pay for the kit. The Police Chief in Wasilla opposed this, saying he had no budget for this… The law was passed anyways.
* * * *
But Sarah Palin still started construction on a ice rink WITHOUT FIRST obtaining title to the land. Wasilla had to reach a settlement (pay off) the land owner, about a million dollars in compensation.
Original estimated cost: $1.5 Million
Final cost: $15 MILLION DOLLARS
Who paid the bill? The tax payers of Wasilla are still paying off the bill!
This is the woman John McCain chose for her ‘executive experience’ after meeting with her 1 time and without having his team vet her first.
Even McDonalds makes you come in for 3 interviews before hiring someone!!!

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Does John McCain “pal around with terrorists?”
Certainly McCain’s continuing “association” and relationship with the convicted Watergate burglar and domestic terrorist G. Gordon Liddy might suggest that is the case, if we are to apply the standards drawn by the McCain campaign.
In 1998, Liddy gave a fundraiser in his Scottsdale, Arizona home for McCain’s senatorial re-election campaign — the two posed for photographs together; and as recently as May, 2007, as a presidential candidate, McCain was a guest on Liddy’s syndicated radio show. Inexplicably, McCain heaped praise on his host’s values. During the segment, McCain said he was “proud” of Liddy, and praised Liddy’s “adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.” From the program:
LIDDY: Your experience in the Hanoi Hilton is remarkable. I mean, I put in five years in a prison [for masterminding the Watergate burglary, and associated crimes], but it was here in the United States, and they didn’t torture – the only torture that I had was being forced to listen to rap music from time to time.McCAIN: Well, you know, I’m proud of you. I’m proud of your family. I’m proud to know your son, Tom, who’s a great and wonderful guy. And it’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon. And congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.
Which of Liddy’s “principles and philosophies” was McCain referring to? Liddy’s advocacy of break-ins? Firebombings? Assassinations? Kidnappings? Taking target practice with figures nicknamed Bill and Hillary?
During the same period that Bill Ayers was a member of the Weather Underground, Gordon Liddy was making plans to firebomb a Washington think tank, assassinate a prominent journalist, undertake the Watergate burglary, break into the office of Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist, and kidnap anti-war protesters at the 1972 Republican convention.
Re: Liddy’s “continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great:” Did McCain mean to include Liddy’s instructions to listeners of his radio show in 1994 (around the time Ayres and Obama were on a board together discussing education programs and other plots) on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents (aim for the head)?
If ATF agents attempt to curtail a citizen’s gun ownership, Liddy counseled, “Well, if the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests.”
More recently, Liddy explained making the Clintons objects of shooting practice: “I did relate that on the 4th of July of last year, when I and my family and some friends were out firing away at a properly-constructed rifle range and we ran out of targets, and so we – I drew some stick figure targets and I thought we ought to give them names. So I named them Bill and Hillary, thought it might improve my aim. It didn’t. My aim is good anyway. Now, having said that, I accept no responsibility for somebody shooting up the White House.”
The Liddy-McCain symbiosis has been mentioned in a number of posts on the Internet – mostly by bloggers and sites identified with The Left. But the documentation of their interaction (Liddy has also contributed financially to McCain’s presidential campaign) is not a matter of Left or Right: It is astonishing that, given the prominence of the Ayers matter accorded by virtually every “mainstream” news outlet in America, there has been virtually nothing on the subject in the major newspapers and broadcast networks. This is a real journalistic failure and abrogation of responsibility.
Is Liddy any less a domestic terrorist than Bill Ayers? It is a zero-sum argument, for sure. I do not believe, incidentally, that John McCain shares the most abhorrent of Liddy’s values, as expressed in Liddy’s actions during the same period that Ayers was a Weatherman – and which Liddy continues to express, unapologetically, to this day.
But McCain has now become so unmoored from the principles he once espoused, so shameless in his courtship not only of the Republican “base” but in his eagerness to unleash a poisonous arsenal of character assassination and guilt-by-association – and plain-and-simple incitement of people’s fears and prejudices – that, now, inevitably his and Sara Palin’s rallies and campaign events have taken on the aura of mobs at times.
“Kill him,” a man in the crowd responded last week, when Palin declared -yet again – “He’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country.” In Virginia, the State Republican chairman announced a set of talking points to campaign volunteers – stressing the incendiary connection, reported Time magazine, between Barack Obama and Osama bin Laden: “Both have friends that bombed the Pentagon. That is scary,” the Republican chairman said.
The most recent McCain ad on the subject shouts, “Obama worked with terrorist William Ayers when it was convenient” – perhaps suggesting, indeed, even that the candidate was there planting bombs.
The intended message of the McCain campaign is, of course, that Obama is less than patriotic – enunciated even by the candidate’s wife, Cindy: “The day that Senator Obama decided to cast a vote to not fund my son when he was serving sent a cold chill through my body,” she recently told a crowd of several thousand, which also heard her husband and Palin sound similar notes. (The chairman of the Lehigh, Pa., County Republican Party, William Platt, “implored the crowd to work hard to elect McCain or wake up November 5 to see ‘Barack Obama, Barack Hussein Obama,’ as the president,” reported The Washington Post.)
Like Cindy McCain, the campaign’s “Ad Facts” also trumpet – misleadingly – the only troop-funding bill that Obama voted against, in 2007 – without noting that Obama first voted for the bill, in a version that included a timetable for withdrawal. Nor did Cindy McCain mention that her husband, too, voted against the troop-funding bill – in the version that contained withdrawal language.
Thus has John McCain embarked on a scorched-earth death struggle for the presidency – cultural warfare that knows no bounds, exceeding perhaps even the mendacity and ferocity of the campaign waged against him by George Bush in 2000, and of which McCain once said there was “a special place in hell” for the Bush operatives who smeared him. (McCain also said of the Swift-boat attacks against John Kerry by Republicans in 2004: “I deplore this kind of politics. I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable.”)
The lethal weapon of the McCain campaign’s dreams is the explosive allegation that, in Palin’s words – Obama “pals around with terrorists.” McCain, wisely, did not raise the matter himself in the last presidential debate. Why?
At the time, much of the commentariat attributed the omission to McCain’s purported concerns that Obama would respond by reciting the history of McCain’s “association” with the S&L swindler Charles Keating, for which McCain was cited by the Senate Ethics Committee early in his career, for exercising “poor judgment” for intervening improperly with federal regulators on behalf of Keating, as part of the infamous Keating Five scandal.
But the more likely explanation of why McCain avoided a debate confrontation about “palling around with terrorists” is McCain’s very real – and recent – symbiotic association and praise for another (not Ayers) domestic terrorist emblematic of the Vietnam era: G. Gordon Liddy.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

This attack is baseless without the dumb comments from Biden and Richardson. Obama and his campaign have never said anything about sub-250k taxpayers getting hit with a hike. It’s only been Biden and Richardson, but it’s still fair game because of that.
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | October 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

As for this so-called income tax break for 95% of taxpayers (40% of whom aren’t paying taxes anyway but will get checks from the rest of us under Obama), what about the increased social security taxes, estate taxes, and on and on that Obama is proposing? Now he is saying it is “selfish” to want to keep your hard-earned money rather than paying it over to him so he can write checks to folks who don’t even pay taxes!

Posted by: anne1244 | October 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

“The cost of living in California is so high that $250,000 income is middle class.”
ev,
You must be in some place with ready access to drugs.

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Nick who posted at 9:58 thinks that Obama supporters “are arguing against economic laws that cannot be altered or fooled.”
Well, Nick, The Financial Times just endorsed Obama the other day. (That’s an established and authoritative international financial newspaper, for anyone who doesn’t follow this stuff.) They aren’t in favor of ALL of his policies, but all told, they believe he will do the best job on our economy.
I think that carries a little more heft than your remark, with all due respect!

Posted by: Benjamin | October 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I am beginning to think Palin is a pathological liar, and McCain is just purely psychotic in his tactics, rhetoric, and distortions. He will cheat, lie, distort the truth and use malicious slants to get his way. He’s nothing more than a spoiled military brat who disrespects American taxpayers equipment. The Navy planes he crashed are at today’s cost $2.2 billion dollars each. He crashed over 5, and heavily damaged a ship carrier that cost billions to repair similar to the terrorists who ripped the Navy ship in the middle east in the 1990s. He is dangerous, risky, showing signs of dementia, and his vp choice is even more dangerous, risky, and will cause WWIV, a nuclear devastation that will vaporize you and your children into the atmosphere.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

ohn McCain, who has harshly criticized the idea of sitting down with dictators without pre-conditions, appears to have done just that. In 1985, McCain traveled to Chile for a friendly meeting with Chile’s military ruler, General Augusto Pinochet, one of the world’s most notorious violators of human rights credited with killing more than 3,000 civilians and jailing tens of thousands of others.
The private meeting between McCain and dictator Pinochet has gone previously un-reported anywhere.
Read more here.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/28/mccains-private-visit-with-chilean-dictator-pinochet-revealed-for-first-time/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

So where is everyone going to go for healthcare when the doctors retire due to high taxes on their $250,000+ income??
What are we going to do when we already have a shortage of new oncologits to treat cancer anticipated… and Obama tax increases cause people to say, “forget it… I’m not going to go to school that long, work that hard, spend that many years preparing to be a doctor… just to have the government tax away my income when I finally establish a practise.”
Where are you people goign to go for medical treatment when you find out doctors aren’t willing to work cheap?? By giving 40% of hteir income to the government??

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Ev – of course your figures are distorted. Moving on from your wrong dollar amounts… let’s also remember that Obama would simply give money to charity. McCain on the other hand would give his adopted Bangladeshian daughter food & shelter and call it charity. He would also give Sarah Palin’s well worn campaign clothing to charity. Of course he would claim these as $$$ charity on his taxes.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

“So did Senator Biden “misspeak” when he said $150,000 was the point where one would be taxed?”
Posted by: anne1244 | Oct 31, 2008 10:17:13 PM
That is so outdated.
Obama started at $250K, then dropped to $200K, Joe Biden adjusted it to $150K earlier this week, and today Bill Richardson lowers it to $120k. Either Team Obama really doesn’t understand their own policies, or they’re trying to make sure that no one else does. What does that tell people about the competence of this campaign and its candidate?
Remember these guys thought it a virtue to pass a non-binding budget resolution last spring to raise taxes on everyone making over $42k a year!
“Rich” is whatever the Democrats need it to be to raise funds for all their vast Socialist plans.

Posted by: Redistributive Justice | October 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Vote for a Leader that Leads and does not whine, does not panic.
Vote to change the direction this country is going -
Obama/Biden 2008
Vote for Hope
Good Night

Posted by: StopTheBots | October 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Alaska’s largest newspaper endorses Obama
The Anchorage Daily News, Alaska’s largest newspaper, endorsed Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama Sunday after declaring Gov. Sarah Palin “too risky” to be one step away from the Oval Office.
“Like picking (Republican presidential candidate John) McCain for president, putting her one 72-year-old heartbeat from the leadership of the free world is just too risky at this time,” The Daily News said.
The newspaper said Obama “brings far more promise to the office. In a time of grave economic crisis, he displays thoughtful analysis, enlists wise counsel and operates with a cool, steady hand.”
The Daily News said since the economic crisis has emerged, McCain has “stumbled and fumbled badly” in dealing with it.
“Of the two candidates, Sen. Obama better understands the mortgage meltdown’s root causes and has the judgment and intelligence to shape a solution, as well as the leadership to rally the country behind it,” the paper said.
The Daily News said Palin has shown the country why she is a success as governor. But the paper said few would argue that Palin is truly ready to step into the job of being president despite her passion, charisma and strong work ethic.
“Gov. Palin’s nomination clearly alters the landscape for Alaskans as we survey this race for the presidency — but it does not overwhelm all other judgment. The election, after all is said and done, is not about Sarah Palin, and our sober view is that her running mate, Sen. John McCain, is the wrong choice for president at this critical time for our nation,” the paper said.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

McCain is an old goat who sold himself out to the king of professional complainers, Rush Limbaugh. The McCain campaign offered zero in the way of hope, instead giving us hatred, incompetence, “Joe the Plumber,” and a daily dose of hypocritical musings from Palin, a woman who’s one crow’s foot away from obscurity.
What happened to the GOP brand, anyway?

Posted by: Deputy_Bob | October 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

“I am beginning to think Palin is a pathological liar, and McCain is just purely psychotic…”
Posted by Gg
- – - – - – - – - -
You’re just beginning to think this??
Both those ships have sailed my dear.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

? – Let’s say corporation taxes are increased. Are the prices of their goods you buy going to stay the same?? Or are they going to go up??
And when those prices go up – whose really paying for the Obama tax increases??
The companies… or those who buy what the company sells at marked up prices??
Who pays, really?? You do.
Haven’t you thought this out a tad beyond the idea that hte rich are going to get taxed… and you’re not going to pay the price??
American consumers will pay the price – and jobs will be lost.
That’s reality when the government can’t say to a company, “I’m raising your taxes – but you can’t raise your prices. I wnat YOU to pay this tax – not your customers.”

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I’m a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight…..
* If you grow up in Hawaii , raised by your grandparents, you’re ‘exotic, different.’
* Grow up in Alaska eating moose burgers, yours is a quintessential American story.
* If your name is Barack you’re a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.
* Name your kids Willow , Trig and Track, you’re a maverick.
* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.
* Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you’re well grounded.
* If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black
President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that
Registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law
professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over
750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate’s Health and Human
Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state
of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs,
Environment and Public Works and Veteran’s Affairs committees, you don’t have any
real leadership experience.
* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6
years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the
governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you’re qualified to become
the country’s second highest ranking executive and next in line behind a man
in his eighth decade.
* If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful
daughters, all within Protestant churches, you’re not a real Christian.
* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and then left your disfigured wife
and married the heiress the next month, you’re a true Christian.
* If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of
birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society.
* If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex
education in your state’s school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up
pregnant, you’re very responsible.
* If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who gave up a position in a prestigious
Law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to
raise a family, your family’s values don’t represent America ’s.
* If you’re husband is nicknamed “First Dude”, with at least one DWI conviction and
no college education, who didn’t register to vote until age 25 and once was a
member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your
family is extremely admirable.
OK, that makes it much more clearer now…

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Obama will have to spend 15 more million on infomertial

Posted by: Liam | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

The reason we haven’t seen Palin’s medical records yet is she is having the Medical review board to fraudulantly change them, which is a felony, but she doesn’t care. She will again abuse her powers and use her cutsy and folksy way to bribe the medical board to release fraudulant medical records. This happens all the time until someone gets caught, then “there is a major problem” of fraud that produces prison time for her and the criminal she got involved with her “one more” distorted truth. But she will get out and say, everybody does it.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

PLEASE READ ALL OF THIS. THIS ANSWERS MOST OF THE COMMENTS THAT WERE POSTED.
Sen. John McCain has long promoted the idea that he is a “straight-talking maverick” who challenges his party and stands up to his president. However, despite the media misrepresentation, McCain has not strayed too far from President George Bush’s line, especially on issues important to working families. McCain is not running for a term of his own; he is running on an extension of the agenda laid out by Bush in his fi rst two terms: tax cuts for the rich, privatizing Social Security and outsourcing jobs.
McCAIN VOTES WITH BUSH
McCain Voted with the Bush Administration 89 Percent of the Time. Since President Bush took office, McCain has supported Bush’s positions 89 percent of the time. McCain’s support of Bush’s policies reached as high as 95 percent in 2007. [Congressional Quarterly Voting Study, 110th Congress]
SHARES BUSH’S ROSY VIEW OF THE ECONOMY
Bush: Economy Is Inherently Strong. “I believe we can find common ground to get something done that’s big enough, effective enough so that an economy that is inherently strong gets a boost to make sure that this uncertainty doesn’t translate into more economic woes for our workers and small business people,” Bush said in the Cabinet Room. [Associated Press, 1/23/08]
McCain: Underpinnings of Economy are Strong. “I still believe our fundamental underpinnings of our economy are strong, but it’s obvious that we are facing challenges which will require actions such as the Federal Reserve took today.” [“Lou Dobbs Tonight,” CNN, 1/22/08]
*
McCain Says Economy Is Strong (Video)
WANTS TO MAKE BUSH’S TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY PERMANENT
Bush: Make Tax Cuts Permanent. During his weekly radio address, Bush said, “To keep our economy growing, we need to ensure that you keep more of what you earn, and Congress needs to make the tax cuts permanent.” [Presidential Weekly Radio Address, 1/7/06]
McCain: Make Bush Tax Cuts Permanent. “I think it’s very important that we make the Bush tax cuts permanent. I voted to make them permanent twice already.… And if we don’t make the tax cuts permanent, then they will experience what amounts to a tax increase.” [Republican Presidential Debate, MSNBC, 1/24/08]
*
McCain Voted for Tax Cuts for the Wealthiest Americans at the Expense of Working Families. McCain voted for a $60 billion tax cut bill benefiting families with incomes $100,000 or higher. The tax cuts would follow equally drastic cuts in spending on programs vital to working families. [S. 2020, Vote #26, 11/18/05]
*
McCain Waffled on Tax Cuts. (Video)
McCAIN WANTS TO PRIVATIZE SOCIAL SECURITY
Bush: Fix Social Security Through Private Accounts. “As we fix Social Security, we also have the responsibility to make the system a better deal for younger workers, and the best way to reach that goal is through voluntary personal retirement accounts.” [President Bush’s State of the Union Address, 1/28/08]
McCain: Only Solution to Fix Social Security Is Private Accounts. “There is only one solution if Social Security commitments are to be honored without breaking the backs of the next generation: bold reform— genuine reform—that allows workers to invest some of their Social Security savings, privately, in higher-yielding accounts.” [Cato Institute]
*
McCain Voted for Bush’s Social Security Privatization Plan. In 2006, McCain voted for the Social Security Reserve Fund. The GOP proposal would shift Social Security’s annual surpluses into a reserve account that will be converted into risky private accounts. [SCR 83, Vote# 68, 3/16/06]
McCAIN SUPPORTS BUSH ON PRIVATIZING AND OUTSOURCING JOBS
Bush: Outsourcing Makes Sense. In 2004, the president’s economic report to Congress said, “When a good or service is produced more cheaply abroad, it makes more sense to import it than to make or provide it domestically.” [InformationWeek.com, accessed 2/26/08]
McCain: Global Economy Results in Outsourcing. “I’m not going to bring back a lot of these jobs. I can’t because with a global economy they’re headed the other way,” McCain said. [Technology Daily, 12/4/07]
*
McCain Supported Bush Administration’s Plan to Privatize and Outsource Federal Jobs. McCain voted to support Bush’s efforts to privatize federal jobs. The Bush administration has led a major effort to outsource and privatize hundreds of thousands of federal jobs, including those of 350 workers at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. [H.R. 5631, Vote# 234, 9/6/06]

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

McCain/Palin can only talk about Senator Obama’s plan. I have not heard what the McCain/Palin tax plan is….DO they even have one? McCain if you want anyone to take your seriously….give details of your ecomonic policy and not your version of Senator Obama’s

Posted by: Val | October 31, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Benjamin, thanks for posting that, about the Financial Times, the conservative financial newspaper, endorsing Obama.
As one commenter said:
“When a paper that is even higher-brow than the Wall Street Journal endorses Obama, his credibility in financial circles is well established.”

Posted by: LB | October 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Just ignore granny toot who is starving for attention and has self esteem issues. Just don’t respond, since it will give Granny toot an ego boost that isn’t healthy.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

zuq…the secret service investigated that “kill him” thing and found it to be baseless. get your facts straight. i find it sort of ironic that the party that is supposed to be so respectful of everyone no matter what their angle is so utterly tasteless in their flogging of sarah p. you all act like a vampire being sprayed with holy water.

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

mo it’s palin who’s phony…and everyone knows it.

Posted by: hank jr | October 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

So, let me get this straight Mr. Straight Talk. Can you handle a little Straight Talk? McSame’s argument is to give companies tax breaks so that they can hire more people. Right, because that’s what they’ve been doing over the last 8 years. Right, it all makes sense now. BUT WAIT. Every time I look over my shoulder, another job is being outsourced to India or China. Yet, you want to give these companies tax breaks? Are you stupid John McCain? Your plan allows companies to get wealthy. How? Because they get the job done for the same charge while having it done for a fraction of the cost. What does that do for me and you? That’s right. Looking for a job that no longer exists. Anyone that is voting for you owns a big company and makes over $250K. Anyone else should be tested for stupidity.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

well ms.rice i cant argue with that other than to say sometimes the truth just HURTS…they both are UGLY as Sin….BUT that still doesnt address or compare to one comparing his or her own country to NAZIS or to say that the document that GIVES us our freedom and makes us the envy of the world,is a fatally flawed CONSTITUTION!!!!!!

Posted by: chad | October 31, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Jukebox John keeps changing his tune
It’s obvious that the McCain campaign and the RNC have decided to go after Barack Obama as a flip-flopper. What’s equally obvious, though, that Republicans couldn’t have chosen a worse narrative.
McCain & Co. seemed to stumble on this line of attack almost by accident. They’d experimented with a variety of memes in recent months, none of which had any real salience. The right settled on “flip-flopper,” in large part because it’s the closest available, already-written Republican narrative, and in part because McCain staffers haven’t been able to think of anything else.
The irony, of course, is that the McCain campaign couldn’t have picked a more hypocritical line of attack. Below you’ll find a comprehensive list of reversals from the Republican nominee, numbered and organized by category for easier reference.
Remember, McCain recently said, “This election is about trust and trusting people’s word.” Just a few days prior, the McCain campaign admonished Obama for trying to “have it both ways” on issues.
I should note that there’s nothing offensive about a political figure changing his or her mind once in a while. Policy makers come to one conclusion, they gain more information, and then they reach a different conclusion. That is, to be sure, a good thing — it reflects a politician with an open mind and a healthy intellectual curiosity. Better to have a leader who changes his or her mind based on new information than one who stubbornly sticks to outmoded policy positions, regardless of facts or circumstances.
So why do McCain’s flip-flops matter? Because all available evidence suggests his reversals aren’t sincere, they’re cynically calculated for political gain. This isn’t indicative of an open mind; it’s actually indicative of a character flaw. And given the premise of McCain’s presidential campaign, it’s an area in desperate need of scrutiny.
The perception people have of McCain is outdated, reflective of a man who no longer has any use for his previous persona. What’s wrong with a politician who changes his or her views? Nothing in particular, but when a politician changes his views so much that he has an entirely different worldview, is it unreasonable to wonder whether it’s entirely sincere? Especially when there’s no other apparent explanation for six dozen significant reversals?
McCain has been in Congress for more than a quarter-century; he’s bound to shift now and then on various controversies. But therein lies the point — McCain was consistent on most of these issues, right up until he started running for president, at which point he conveniently abandoned literally dozens of positions he used to hold. The problem isn’t just the incessant flip-flops — though that’s part of it — it’s more about the shameless pandering and hollow convictions behind the incessant flip-flops. That the media still perceives McCain as some kind of “straight talker” who refuses to sway with the political winds makes this all the more glaring.
Here’s the list.
National Security Policy
1. McCain thought Bush’s warrantless-wiretap program circumvented the law; now he believes the opposite.
2. McCain insisted that everyone, even “terrible killers,” “the worst kind of scum of humanity,” and detainees at Guantanamo Bay, “deserve to have some adjudication of their cases,” even if that means “releasing some of them.” McCain now believes the opposite.
3. He opposed indefinite detention of terrorist suspects. When the Supreme Court reached the same conclusion, he called it “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country.”
4. In February 2008, McCain reversed course on prohibiting waterboarding.
5. McCain was for closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay before he was against it.
6. When Barack Obama talked about going after terrorists in Pakistani mountains with predators, McCain criticized him for it. He’s since come to the opposite conclusion.
Foreign Policy
7. McCain was for kicking Russia out of the G8 before he was against it. Now, he’s for it again.
8. McCain supported moving “towards normalization of relations” with Cuba. Now he believes the opposite.
9. McCain believed the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Hamas. Now he believes the opposite.
10. McCain believed the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Syria. Now he believes the opposite.
11. McCain is both for and against a “rogue state rollback” as a focus of his foreign policy vision.
12. McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.
13. McCain was against divestment from South Africa before he was for it.
Military Policy
14. McCain recently claimed that he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”
15. McCain has changed his mind about a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq on multiple occasions, concluding, on multiple occasions, that a Korea-like presence is both a good and a bad idea.
16. McCain was against additional U.S. forces in Afghanistan before he was for it.
17. McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”
18. McCain has repeatedly said it’s a dangerous mistake to tell the “enemy” when U.S. troops would be out of Iraq. In May, McCain announced that most American troops would be home from Iraq by 2013.
19. McCain was against expanding the GI Bill before he was for it.
20. McCain staunchly opposed Obama’s Iraq withdrawal timetable, and even blasted Mitt Romney for having referenced the word during the GOP primaries. In July, after Iraqi officials endorsed Obama’s policy, McCain said a 16-month calendar sounds like “a pretty good timetable.”
Domestic Policy
21. McCain defended “privatizing” Social Security. Now he says he’s against privatization (though he actually still supports it.)
22. On Social Security, McCain said he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Soon after, asked about a possible increase in the payroll tax, McCain said there’s “nothing that’s off the table.”
23. McCain wanted to change the Republican Party platform to protect abortion rights in cases of rape and incest. Now he doesn’t.
24. McCain supported storing spent nuclear fuel at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. Now he believes the opposite.
25. He argued the NRA should not have a role in the Republican Party’s policy making. Now he believes the opposite.
26. In 1998, he championed raising cigarette taxes to fund programs to cut underage smoking, insisting that it would prevent illnesses and provide resources for public health programs. Now, McCain opposes a $0.61-per-pack tax increase, won’t commit to supporting a regulation bill he’s co-sponsoring, and has hired Philip Morris’ former lobbyist as his senior campaign adviser.
27. McCain is both for and against earmarks for Arizona.
28. McCain’s first mortgage plan was premised on the notion that homeowners facing foreclosure shouldn’t be “rewarded” for acting “irresponsibly.” His second mortgage plan took largely the opposite position.
29. McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.
30. McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.
31. McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.
32. McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.
33. In 2005, McCain endorsed intelligent design creationism, a year later he said the opposite, and a few months after that, he was both for and against creationism at the same time.
34. And on gay adoption, McCain initially said he’d rather let orphans go without families, then his campaign reversed course, and soon after, McCain reversed back.
35. In the Senate, McCain opposed a variety of measures on equal pay for women, and endorsed the Supreme Court’s Ledbetter decision. In July, however, McCain said, “I’m committed to making sure that there’s equal pay for equal work. That … is my record and you can count on it.”
36. McCain was against fully funding the No Child Left Behind Act before he was for it.
37. McCain was for affirmative action before he was against it.
38. McCain said the Colorado River compact will “obviously” need to be “renegotiated.” Six days later, McCain said, “Let me be clear that I do not advocate renegotiation of the compact.”
Economic Policy
39. McCain was against Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy before he was for them.
40. John McCain initially argued that economics is not an area of expertise for him, saying, “I’m going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues; I still need to be educated,” and “The issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should.” He now falsely denies ever having made these remarks and insists that he has a “very strong” understanding of economics.
41. McCain vowed, if elected, to balance the federal budget by the end of his first term. Soon after, he decided he would no longer even try to reach that goal. And soon after that, McCain abandoned his second position and went back to his first.
42. McCain said in 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and falsely argued that he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.
43. McCain thought the estate tax was perfectly fair. Now he believes the opposite.
44. McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain was asked if he is a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”
45. McCain has changed his entire economic worldview on multiple occasions.
46. McCain believes Americans are both better and worse off economically than they were before Bush took office.
47. McCain was against massive government bailouts of “big banks” that “act irresponsibly.” He then announced his support for a massive government bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Energy Policy
48. McCain supported the moratorium on coastal drilling ; now he’s against it.
49. McCain recently announced his strong opposition to a windfall-tax on oil company profits. Three weeks earlier, he was perfectly comfortable with the idea.
50. McCain endorsed a cap-and-trade policy with a mandatory emissions cap. In mid-June, McCain announced he wants the caps to voluntary.
51. McCain explained his belief that a temporary suspension of the federal gas tax would provide an immediate economic stimulus. Shortly thereafter, he argued the exact opposite.
52. McCain supported the Lieberman/Warner legislation to combat global warming. Now he doesn’t.
53. McCain was for national auto emissions standards before he was against them.
Immigration Policy
54. McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. In 2007, he announced his opposition to the bill. In 2008, McCain switched back.
55. On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own bill.
56. In April, McCain promised voters that he would secure the borders “before proceeding to other reform measures.” Two months later, he abandoned his public pledge, pretended that he’d never made the promise in the first place, and vowed that a comprehensive immigration reform policy has always been, and would always be, his “top priority.”
Judicial Policy and the Rule of Law
57. McCain said he would “not impose a litmus test on any nominee.” He used to promise the opposite.
58. McCain’s position was that the telecoms should be forced to explain their role in the administration’s warrantless surveillance program as a condition for retroactive immunity. He used to believe the opposite.
59. McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.
60. In June, McCain rejected the idea of a trial for Osama bin Laden, and thought Obama’s reference to Nuremberg was a misread of history. A month later, McCain argued the exact opposite position.
61. In June, McCain described the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. Bush was “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country.” In August, he reversed course.
Campaign, Ethics, and Lobbying Reform
62. McCain supported his own lobbying-reform legislation from 1997. Now he doesn’t.
63. In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.
64. McCain supported a campaign-finance bill, which bore his name, on strengthening the public-financing system. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.
65. In May 2008, McCain approved a ban on lobbyists working for his campaign. In July 2008, his campaign reversed course and said lobbyists could work for his campaign.
Politics and Associations
66. McCain wanted political support from radical televangelist John Hagee. Now he doesn’t. (He also believes his endorsement from Hagee was both a good and bad idea.)
67. McCain wanted political support from radical televangelist Rod Parsley. Now he doesn’t.
68. McCain says he considered and did not consider joining John Kerry’s Democratic ticket in 2004.
69. McCain is both for and against attacking Barack Obama over his former pastor at his former church.
70. McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.
71. In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.
72. McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.
73. McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.’” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.
74. McCain believed powerful right-wing activist/lobbyist Grover Norquist was “corrupt, a shill for dictators, and (with just a dose of sarcasm) Jack Abramoff’s gay lover.” McCain now considers Norquist a key political ally.
75. McCain was for presidential candidates giving speeches in foreign countries before he was against it.
76. McCain has been both for and against considering a pro-choice running mate for the Republican presidential ticket.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Val,
When an economy moves into a recession, tax increases run the risk of deepening the recession, triggering depression, lengthening the recession.
Increasing taxes at this time would not be a course an economist could agree would be good for jobs, the economy, or thereby… the middle class.
If we were experiencing a “boom”… I think the taxes would still be wrong and would “end the boom” and make it go bust with stagnation.
However, when the economy is a “bust”… and you are hellbent on raising taxes… are you prepared for hte depression it will cause??? In your desire to “get even” with people who make over $250,000?? Because you’re really quite jealous of people who are more blessed than you are??

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

anne1244,
The 95% figure describes working families. They are paying taxes — payroll taxes.
But I understand. You don’t want anyone to have the chance to get a foot on the ladder.

Posted by: John McCain's Conscience | October 31, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

If you people wanted ot make over $250,000/year… why didn’t you go to college for 10 years, study your brains out work really hard, go through a residency… and become a doctor??
Why didn’t you do it??

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Palin Governor of Alaska Less than 2 years? Playing hooky pays off for Palin
Seems like she was home a lot more than she was in the office.
Despite all of the discussion of Sarah Palin’s performance as governor of Alaska, there has been little analysis of the simplest measure of performance: attendance. As Woody Allen said many years ago, “80 percent of success is just showing up.”
The Washington Post recently reported that, in her first 19 months as governor, Palin billed the state of Alaska per diem charges for 312 days she spent at her home in Wasilla. Palin’s staff has explained that it was appropriate to bill the state for expenses related to Palin staying in her own house because her “official duty station” was at the state capital of Juneau, where the governor’s official office and mansion are located. But that argument raises a different question: How much time did that leave for her to spend at her “official duty station”?
Nineteen months totals 578 days, but after subtracting weekends and holidays, it is only about 397 workdays. Assuming Palin did not routinely bill the state for staying in her own home on weekends and holidays, she would have spent no more than 85 workdays in the state capital over the course of her 19 months in office, even if she traveled nowhere else in Alaska or outside of the state. That compares with 168 days that the Alaska Legislature was in session during the same period.
One of the state’s leading papers, the Juneau Empire, described her attendance like this:
“Palin has spent little time in Juneau, rarely coming to the state capital except when the Legislature was in session, and sometimes not even then. During a recent special session called by Palin herself, she faced criticism from several legislators for not showing up personally to push for her agenda. Someone at the Capitol even printed up buttons asking, ‘Where’s Sarah?’”
Why does the governor of Alaska need to be in the state capital? There are two big reasons — and probably many smaller ones. The first big reason is that she appoints most of the people who manage the 15 departments of Alaska’s state government, containing more than 100 divisions and employing more than 50,000 people. Nearly all the department heads and division directors are headquartered in Juneau. E-mails and telephone calls alone are not effective for the governor to get advice, give directions and follow up to ensure that appropriate policy is being implemented. It is obvious that the ability to fully monitor the performance of the bureaucracies any governor has chosen to lead is greatly restricted if the governor does not spend significant time on the ground where the operations of government are housed.
But also of great importance is the governor’s ability to work with the legislature to update state policies and offer new programs for improving governance. Any effective governor must work on an ongoing basis with not only the leadership of both houses in the state legislature to build consensus and draft the governor’s proposals into language that both houses can accept, but also committee chairmen and recalcitrant members whose votes are needed to support key portions of the governor agenda.
It appears that in the upside-down situation that has occurred in Juneau over the past year and a half, almost all of the members of the Alaska Legislature were in the state capital far more often than the governor.
One member told the Juneau Empire, “At a time when [Palin’s] leadership was truly needed, we didn’t know where she was.”
One has to wonder whether the chef at the governor’s mansion that Palin takes credit for firing may not have simply left the job out of sheer boredom.
When I was first out of college, I worked for a period as a bill drafter for the Missouri Legislature. At that time, it was the practice for the governor to apportion thousands of state patronage jobs to members of the Legislature to pass on to their political supporters. Although some of these jobs paid little more than minimum wage, they were very much in demand because they were so-called no-show jobs: You could collect your paycheck without regularly reporting for work. Some individuals were able to obtain two or three such jobs and still work outside of state government as a real estate broker, bank employee or in some other private sector job.
Hopefully, Missouri’s and all state governments have fully abandoned such corrupt and wasteful practices. But every governor faces an ongoing challenge to ensure that each employee provides a full day of work for a full day of pay. That challenge is certainly greater if the governor is found infrequently at the “official duty station.” It is still greater if state employees realize the governor is being rewarded with state revenue for staying at home.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Are you guys prepared to hire a President with no executive experience, only 2 years in the Senate, to go negotiate with Ahmadinejab??
ARe you prepared to face nuclear attack because, as Sarkozky states, Obama shows real immaturity and a lack of ability to comprehend foreign relations??
Are you prepared to be nuked because visions of the sugarplums of higher taxes on the “rich” are dancing in your heads??
What price are you willing to pay for your greed??

Posted by: ev | October 31, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Ms. Palin loves to Shoot & Kill Animals from my Helicopter. She shreiks with Joy when she Kill Momma Wolf on first shot. She not a Baby Killer – she a Momma Killer.

Posted by: Bush Pilot | October 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

It’s quite obvious several people don’t know what they are talking about. If you would join up and voluneer as a person who registers new voters, you would already know the process. But I’ll excuse your ignorance since your don’t know the process. The people have to swear in, take an oath to register new votes legitimately, and turn in this information. The county officials input this information, even Acorn’s records, and places this information into a data base that can be purchased by any party or affiliation, at a hefty cost. They have all voters information, and they can check out the information themselves, but they like to throw up flags that aren’t there to divert attention from their own flaws of distortion and deception. Most findings are that Republicans are the worst offenders in voter fraud and disenfranchisement of voter polling precincts. Republicans like to use deflection tactics. If you understand psychology, then you will understand what deflection means, which is to have your bad behaviors look like it’s the person or persons you are targeting. It’s a type of mental issue that is of bully and intimidation. Similar to military strategies when something goes wrong, and deflection to the enemy although it wasn’t the enemy who committed the crime.
Check it out with your local voter’s registration division in your county or commonwealth.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

What a disgrace that some refer to Obama as a monkey. It would sure please me if people like this were shipped off to a place they might like better than America. Oh, I just remembered, they will get that chance when their final days on earth arrive. Do you suuppose they will have a good excuse to explain their comments to the one who created all of us ? You may not like him for unknown reasons, and you do not have to vote for him, but when you make degrading remarks directed toward him, or his family, you only show you own profound ignorance with such comments. You would make a real diplomat for foreign relations, maybe Obama could give you a job in somewhere nice like ambassador to the artic circle.

Posted by: 73t0ms | October 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

For anyone who wants to know anything about govenor palin. just type in Govenor palin baby born. There you will find articles and blogs from people in Alaska in The month of may who were shocked that she was pregnant ,and did not look like it then, articles on the birth that were not anounced at the hospital registry of births. Then she said her water broke in Texas and she took a 10 hr plane ride to Alaska in labor. When won of the bloggers herard about this they said that she was a maverick. Well ask your mom or any woman who has had kids, you will not be seven months pregnant on a 5th child and not show. SECONDLY NO AIRLINES ARE GOING TO LET BOARD A PLANE IN LABOR. Yes, Palin is apathological lyer. All who agree with her like her and respect her should visit the Alaskan news papers to find out about her. These are not left wing people comming up with stories. these are the local newspapaers who have been covering her since her carrier. Thats why she still will not present her records. Unlike people who cintine to say Obama was born in africa. His birth is on line.

Posted by: mary derricotte | October 31, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Just because a guy is more diplomatic, vs. whoop ass, doesn’t mean they’re immature in foreign relations.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Obamanites keep slammin Sarah. Your losing alot of women voters who really resent how she is being treated whether they agree with her politics or not.

Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Zuq, thanks. I am copying that and sending it to my friends.

Posted by: CajunLafayette | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I have plenty of great posts on my personal blog. Go to http://www.BarackForUs.com for more info and feel free to share with your friends.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Mary daricotte…i don’t know you, but i am truly embarassed for you. you have just made an ass out of yourself. sarah p has more class in her little finger that all of you obamites have in your entire population COMBINED. you all have shown your true colors throughout this campaign. the THUGOCRACY LIVES!
GIRD YO LOINS, PEEPS!!!!

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Has anyone gone to the site about Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain. It’s shocking all of the stories about McCain.
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Where is Palin’s medical records???

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Wrong John McCain’s Conscious bad breath. No one has said anything about keeping anyone from climbing the ladder. Your argument has already been lost. You have no facts basing your claim. If you really wanted to change the system, have already found these facts and submitted them to your U.S Congressman or U.S Senator. Change comes from you and me to make change happen for others. But most rich people and rich corporations are just purely lazy and entitled. They are worthless. Give most people opportunities and they will go for them. Joe the Not Plumber doesn’t represent my America. I don’t support skinheads or white supremists or Masons. They are very spooky individuals and groups that are dangerous to our society and world as a whole. They are control freaks who McCain and Palin support. Again John McCain’s conscious, you have no case.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Don’t let any of your friends be that one missing vote on Election Day. Enter their names and email addresses below to send them each a personalized version of this video with their name in it.
And don’t worry—after we send out the link to the video, we won’t email your friends again. And we’ll never sell or distribute your email address or your friends’ email addresses.
http://www.cnnbcvideo.com/taf.html

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

referring to him as a monkey is rude an offensive,but how about giving equal time to the Pastor he loves!!!!!you know the America hating,white people hating Pastor who loves to YELL GOD DAMN AMERICA….IT KINDA MAKES THOSE COMPLAINTS SEEM IMMATERIAL……………

Posted by: chad | October 31, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Why is it not relevant that Sarah Palin’s husband has been a part of the Alaskan Independence Party (AIP)? According to published reports the Director of Division of Elections in Alaska, Gail Fenumiai, has stated that Todd Palin registered in October 1995 to the Alaska Independence Party, a radical group that advocates for Alaskan secession from the United States. The founder of the Alaska Independence Party, Joe Vogler, once professed his “hatred for the American government” and cursed the American flag as a “damn flag.” Besides a short period of a few months in 2000 when he changed his registration to undeclared, Todd Palin remained a registered member of AIP until July 2002 when he registered again as an undeclared voter. What was special about 2002? That was when Sarah Palin entered state politics as a Republican. Todd Palin has already shown an extraordinary involvement in his wife’s career, even sitting in on meetings and reading emails that should have been private. If Michelle Obama had been part of this party the Republicans would be attacking her full force. Is it not relevant because Todd Palin is white, or perhaps because he’s just a good old country boy?

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

People People, let’s get wise. Both are liars as I have yet to see a candidate produce exactly what they campaign. Set taxes aside because this is America and since the early 80′s the government has been shrinking the middle class. What has McCain or Palin provided us in the future of America aka our childrens education and medical benefits? I’m from Ilinois, old Gov. Ryan raised taxes 2 days after he got in office and that was after campaining that he woudl not.
Granny Toot, unplug your computer and go sit out on the porch and chew some tobacco. Your days and thoughts are over with that backwoods mentality.

Posted by: Gee Gee | October 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Gg…Change comes from you and me to make change happen for others. But most rich people and rich corporations are just purely lazy and entitled. Give most people opportunities and they will go for them.
that is what’s wrong with your and all those who agree with the “bottom-up” philosophy. you make your OWN opportunities and take advantage of them. you don’t wait for someone else to give them to you.

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

“So Sambo beat the bitch!”
This is how Republican Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin described Barack Obama’s win over Hillary Clinton to political colleagues in a restaurant a few days after Obama locked up the Democratic Party presidential nomination.
According to Lucille, the waitress serving her table at the time and who asked that her last name not be used, Gov. Palin was eating lunch with five or six people when the subject of the Democrat’s primary battle came up. The governor, seemingly not caring that people at nearby tables would likely hear her, uttered the slur and then laughed loudly as her meal mates joined in appreciatively.
“It was kind of disgusting,” Lucille, who is part Aboriginal, said in a phone interview after admitting that she is frightened of being discovered telling folks in the “lower 48” about life near the North Pole.
Then, almost with a sigh, she added, “But that’s just Alaska.”
Racial and ethnic slurs may be “just Alaska” and, clearly, they are common, everyday chatter for Palin.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Take a look at this video. John McCain states “I HATE THE GOOKS”. WHAT A RACIST? How can anyone support this clown?
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/06/john-mccain-i-hate-the-gooks/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

JR we have had a president for the last 8 years try to control the world, a lot of people call him a dictator, if you didn’t agree with his politics you were a terrorist remember that, I do…..Chris just remember with Mcbush your health care will be taxable and that can put you in a different tax bracket you won’t have to worry about a promotion putting you there your health insurance will do it for you!!!!

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

WHAT A JOKE.
IT’S PALIN WHO’S UNRAVELLING.
SHE SHOULD GET ON HER FREAKIN’
BROOM AND FLY BACK TO THE NORTH POLE….
AND LAND IN RUSSIA.

Posted by: CHUCK | October 31, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Zuq… you are a liar. that is pathetic.

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Ev – My guess is that you’re a radical nut who believes that McCain/Palin are the “chosen” candidates.
You’ve accused Obama of communism, you claim to “know” what he will do and won’t do when he’s elected, you “know” he’s lying, you “know” that Obama’s brother lives in a “shanty”, you “know” how much the candidates give to charity; you call names like dumb, stupid, ignorant & pagens, you accuse a poster of being a sexist and most likely a rapist.
You judge as though you have authority to do so.
You talk as though you have a crystal ball.
And then you want to talk to me about my relationship with Christ?
For your 411 I do go to church, faithfully. I pray, faithfully. I have a personal relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ.
I can also think for myself.
By using that God given gift of thinking; I also have a postional statement on Sarah Palin (as you requested). Let me restate it.
I think she is a disgrace to the human race.
I think she is despicable (to use your word again) when she calls herself a Christian and yet has no regard for anyone but her own selfish ambition. She has displayed zero ethics. She is a poor excuse at best for a mother.
Shall I go on, because the list seems endless?
John McCain also is a poor excuse for a moral republican or a moral human for that matter. He treats people as if they are pawns in his game of life.
Why is it OK for you to be rude, judgemental and opinionated; but when another person states their opinions suddenly you want to stand behind a God card?
You have a lot in common with McCain/Palin so I can see how
you would favor them.
They’re nuts & so are you.
Good Day.

Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Why do we let assholes like this get away with this racism? How many racists do we have in this country that would continue listening to this clown. Anyone who has ever listened to Rush knows who he supports. By listening to this, I’m sure you’ll realize who he is not supporting. Fight these racists pigs. Let’s send them home crying in November! YES WE CAN! OBAMA/BIDEN 08! When we all (that’s right all of us) go out and vote on that fall day, remember the hate and the lies that the GOP campaign has brought. Voting for McCain and Palin will be voting for a bridge to nowhere.
Check out this ignorant video.
http://barackforus.com/2008/09/19/rush-limbaugh-is-a-racist-pig-without-lipstick/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

OBAMA IS A COMMON MONKEY.
WHAT PART OF THAT DON’T YOU GET?
————–
You must be one of those “special needs” people that Palin speaks about. Except your special need is that you are a douchebag.

Posted by: FactCheck | October 31, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Thank you for reminding me that Gordon Liddy is still alive. He looks like Hitler. Liddy is a scary individual who has psychotic points of view that are intrusive and quite dangerous. I wouldn’t be surprised if he were involved in Kennedy’s assassination since Liddy is possibly and closely involved in John Birch Society, a white supremist groups housed in Dallas, Texas.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

WHO IS JOHN McCAIN? Read below.
I wish I could say I was surprised by this, but let face it: there were signs. There was John McCain’s long opposition to a national holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr., his use of racial epithets, his love of racist jokes, and the increasingly racist tone of his campaign.
It seems that John McCain was a member and sat on the board of the US Council for World Freedom (”USCWF”), an organization noted for its extreme ideology, racism, and anti-semitism. This organization has been described as “largely a collection of Nazis, fascists, anti-Semites, sellers of forgeries, vicious racialists, and corrupt self seekers.” Why on earth would John McCain associate himself with such a group? Why would he take a leadership position with it?
John McCain’s membership in this group goes a long way towards explaining why his brother Joe McCain goes around referring to everything he doesn’t agree with as “communist.” In the eyes of this group Jews, Blacks and Communists are all pretty much the same thing.
I don’t see how anyone who calls themself a friend of Israel could be involved in any way with such an organization, let alone sit on its board and coordinate its activities. When it comes to racism and anti-semitism, John McCain has a lot of explaining to do.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/07/mccain-tied-to-radical-anti-semitic-racist-organization/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Possible reasons why Governor Sarah Palin have not release her medical records:
1)The baby belongs to the 2nd daughter?
2)She had an abortion?
3)She had/have a STD?
4)Her first born is not her husband?
5)Drug or Alcolhol Abuse?
6)Mental Issues??????
What is she hiding?????
NBC’s Nightly News is still waiting!!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Barack the Liar.
Obama said last April 2008 that everyone above $75,000 a year will have their taxes raised.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_15/b4079017876246_page_2.htm
Guess the flip flopping Barack decided he needed the votes of the $75,000-200,000 a year folks.
Make no mistake about it. Once this bastard’s in office, he will raise everyone’s taxes in his massive re-distribution scheme. Read Karl Marx for the Obama economic plan.

Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Yea Reverend Wright got thrown under the bus for now. Kind hard to explain 20 years of hate the white devils.

Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 31, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Robin, I’m a liar? I have live video showing most of my comments. I’m just showing the facts. I know you probably weren’t aware of it but it’s time I expose the GOP and there criminal and racist past.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Ed,
Shut up. I seem to remember a young governor that had absolutely zero experience at the federal level, but was a governor of Arkansas. He seems to have put his foot in his mouth several times as well as other extremties in someone else’s mouth.
That being said, he did do an ok job in the whitehouse.

Posted by: Wade | October 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Granny toot you are a pathetic coward I wonder u=if you would have the guts to make a remark like that without the anonymity of the internet. You are nothing but a cheap pathetic racist deviate.

Posted by: Dan B | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Well, if we’re going to play the Guilt by Association game, let’s go!
Perhaps McCain would like to explain these associations to the American people, including why he chose to appear on G. Gordon Liddy’s radio show less than a year ago and praise him.
Help spread the word – make this viral. Learn these facts to rebut smears against Obama’s ties, post them on your blogs, share them with others and email them to the editorial pages of your local newspapers. You CAN make a difference.
Jim Hensley, Convicted Felon
G. Gordon Liddy, Convicted Felon
Charles Keating, Convicted Felon
Raffaello Follieri, Convicted Felon
Rick Renzi, Under Indictment
Rick Davis, Freddie Mac Lobbyist
Charles Black, Lobbyist for Dictators
Richard Quinn, White Supremacist
Pastor John Hagee, Bigot
Pastor Rod Parsley, Bigot
Todd Palin, Member of Secessionist Group
Andrew McCain, Resigned Manager Savings & Loan

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

No, they didn’t find anyone who would tell who actually said those words. It was heard in audio, but no one would claim who said it. They know that it is a felony and imprisonment immediately. So they “mummed” their mouths.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

MOST? Ha, that’s rich. i bet you have been abducted by aliens more than once in your life, eh?

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Pastor Told Palin’s Church Jews Control Economy
KagroX from DKos discovered last night that a new video of Sarah Palin experiencing a laying of hands at her church in Wasilla shows Sarah Palin’s preacher telling the congregation – with Palin present and about to join him on stage – how Christians need to take over control of the business world, especially banking, just like the Jews (Israelites) have done. He then goes on to say that the fact that non-Christians are running the banking industry is the cause of all of the recent scandals. Hmm… so, Palin’s solution to the economic crisis, run the Jews into the sea?
I’ve excerpted the “Jews control the world” party of the video, then showed about a minute of the part where Palin comes up (which actually takes place a few minutes after the comments about Jews. Here’s a transcript, and following that is the video:
The second area whereby God wants us, wants to penetrate in our society is in the economic area. The Bible says that the wealth of the wicked is stored up for the righteous. It’s high time that we have top Christian businessmen, businesswomen, bankers, you know, who are men and women of integrity running the economics of our nations. That’s what we are waiting for. That’s part and parcel of transformation. If you look at the — you know — if you look at the Israelites, that’s how they work. And that’s how they are, even today. When we will see that, you know, that the top transporters (?) in the lands, we see, you know, the bankers, we see the people holding the parts (?), they are believers, we will not have the kind of corruption that we are hearing in our societies.
SEE THE VIDEO
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/02/pastor-told-palins-church-jews-control-economy/
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/02/sarah-palin-witchcraft-and-war/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

I admire and listen to and watch on christian television. Dr. Fred Price, Dr. Creflo Dollar, and Dr. Bill Winston all black men no hate just the word of God. Now if Obama was mentored under their teaching I would feel differently about his judgement.

Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 31, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

COMPARING THE OBAMA AND MCCAIN TAX PLANS
Posted by admin on October 30th, 2008 | Categorized as Other Facts
It’s really simple. Click the link below to compare Obama and McCain’s Tax Plans.
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/taxes/Tax_Plan_Comparison_FINAL.pdf

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Young_voter, you are what you say, you’re young and naive. McCain and Palin are phoney and spoiled brats. Neither one have grown up. They would love to go to Never Neverland with Peter Pan, Tinkerbell, and Wendy. Their leadership is just a big made up stories, with make belief characters and script.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Benjamin – I dare say, with all due respect, that those who endorsed Obama at the Financial Times would have a very difficult time harmonizing Obama’s tax policies with the fundamental economic principles explained in Thomas Sowell’s book. Your ignorance is so obvious. You have no idea, really, why they endorsed him. You most likely do not even know anybody there. You would rather trust the reputation of a publication whose motivations can never be discovered instead of sound economic laws that have been proven over and over again for hundreds even thousands of years. How is it that people can be so blinded about how an economic engine runs when it is so easy to study it.

Posted by: Nick | October 31, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Don’t Let Up Barack Supporters
Please watch this video. As silly as it is, it can be true. FOCUS!
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/31/dont-let-up-barack-supporters/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Palin “terrorism depends on who you kill and what u blow up”
WATCH THE VIDEO ROBIN!
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/31/palin-terrorism-depends-on-who-you-kill-and-what-u-blow-up/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Palin statigy is to keep throughing trash and people will forget to ask the questions like what plan do you have that is different from the bush plan. and the answer is none however i will spend the last 4-5 days trashing obama until you can’t think you will just hate. Sarah Palin the deciever. What does she have on that old man that he would have walked past women in the senate or congress to get a woman with 4 kids and unmarried a daughter who just had one and one ont he way who has legal problems in Alaska, what did she bribe him with.

Posted by: mary derricotte | October 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Rick Sanchez V. Michael Goldfarb: McCain Spokesman Wusses Out On CNN
Oh, dear. Michael Goldfarb, who’s clearly better off blogging about ABBA and criticizing people for playing Dungeons and Dragons, just pooped his pants on national television. The McCain campaign is making a last ditch effort to make SCARY MUSLIM NOISES at Barack Obama, and since Goldfarb doesn’t have any sort of reputation worth salvaging, it figures that he’d be doing duty here.
But CNN’s Rick Sanchez calls Goldfarb out for the hypocrisy of hyping a sinister connection between Obama and a guy that McCain funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to, and from there, Goldfarb goes right off the rails, refusing to answer Sanchez’s questions with anything other than intimations. Repeatedly asked to name a second anti-Semite that Obama allegedly “pals around with,” Goldfarb does nothing but issue hollow, Page Six-style intimations.
What a gutless wonder. And here I’d been led to believe that this campaign took its cues from some kind of war hero.
WATCH
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/31/rick-sanchez-v-michael-goldfarb-mccain-spokesman-wusses-out-on-cnn/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Where’s Billy Jack when you need him to make changes that are necessary to change society for the better.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

McCain and Palin, let’s get this straight.
First they said, he’s a Liberal.
Then they said, he’s a terrorist.
Then the said, he was an Arab and Terrorist.
Today, they call him a socialist.
Let’s put the facts out there. Name calling will not get you anywhere. Why can’t McCain focus on the issues. His plan for economy, the war in Iraq, healthcare are all garbage. They sound exactly like the last 8 years. Take a look at this picture. (100,000 people strong in a rally in St. Louis).
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/18/scenes-from-the-trail-100000%e2%80%b2-in-st-louis-for-obama/
You can’t stop the movement for change!

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

HEY zuq,we are discriminating,we dont like UNAMERICAN,neomarxist diatribe in the land of the free and home of the brave!!!!!!!LIBERALS SUCK!!!!!GO SOMEWERE else and create your own welfare state….IN FACT WHY DONT you give some illegal,non english speaking garbage YOUR HOUSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: chad | October 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Zuq….do you see dead people?

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Please read this. It’ll make you really think.
If you are biracial and born in a state not connected to the lower 48,
America needs darn near 2 years and 3 major speeches to ‘get to know you.’
If you’re white and from a state not connected to the lower 48, America
needs 36 minutes and 38 seconds worth of an acceptance speech to know you’re ‘one of us.’
___________________________________________________________________________
If you get 18 million people to vote for you in a national presidential
primary, you’re a ‘phony.’
Get 100,000+ people to vote you governor of the
47th most populous state in the Union, you’re ‘well loved.’
_____________________________________________________________________________
If your pastor rails against inequality in the United States of America,
you’re an ‘extremist.’
If your pastor welcomes a sermon by a member of Jews for Jesus who preaches
that the killing of Jews by terrorists is a lesson to Jews that they must convert
to Christianity, you’re a ‘fundamentalist.’
____________________________________________________________________________
If you give your wife dap on stage, it’s actually a ‘terrorist fist jab.’
If your daughter licks her palm so that she can slick down your youngest
child’s hair on national TV it’s an ‘adorable moment.’ (Seriously,
forget about abstinence only, teach these folks some grooming skills).
____________________________________________________________________________
If you’re 18, black, and impregnate a 16 year old girl, you’re a
‘registered sex offender.’
If you’re 18, white, and get a 16 year old girl pregnant ‘life happens.’
_____________________________________________________________________________
If you’re a black man and you use a scholarship to get into college,
then work your way up to being the president of the Harvard Law Review,
you’re ‘uppity.’
If you’re a conservative and your parents pay your way to
Hawaii Pacific University . . . you only have four more schools to attend over
the next five years before you somehow manage to graduate (it might be five
more schools over the next five years. No one has yet verified whether or not
Palin was actually ever registered at the University of Hawaii at Hilo).
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
If you spend 18 months building a campaign around the theme of ‘Change,’
it’s just ‘empty rhetoric.’
If one week before your party’s national
convention you SUDDENLY make your candidacy about ‘Change,’ that’s ‘red meat.’
____________________________________________________________________________
If you’re a minority and you’re selected for a job over more qualified
candidates you’re a ‘token hire.’
If you’re a conservative and you’re selected for a job over more
qualified candidates you’re a ‘game changer.’
______________________________________________________________________________
If you live in an Urban area and you get a girl pregnant you’re a ‘baby
daddy.’
If you’re the same in Alaska you’re a ‘teen father.’ (Actually,
according to your own MySpace page you’re an F’n redneck that don’t want any kids,
but that’s too long a phrase for the evil liberal media to take out of
context and flog morning noon and night).
_______________________________________________________________________________
Black teen pregnancies? A ‘crisis’ in black America.
White teen pregnancies? A ‘blessed event.’
________________________________________________________________________________
If you grow up in Hawaii you’re ‘exotic.’
Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, you’re the quintessential ‘American story.’
_________________________________________________________________________________
Similarly, if you name you kid Barack you’re ‘unpatriotic..’
Name your kid Trig, you’re ‘colorful.’
_________________________________________________________________________________
If you’re a Democrat and you make a VP pick without fully vetting the individual you’re ‘reckless.’
A Republican who doesn’t fully vet is a ‘maverick.’
_________________________________________________________________________________
If you say that for the ‘first time in my adult lifetime I’m really
proud of my country’ it makes you ‘unfit’ to be First Lady.
If you are a registered member of a fringe political group that
advocates secession that makes you ‘First Dude.’
________________________________________________________________________________
A speech given without proper citation from twenty years ago is
‘relevant information.’
A DUI from twenty years ago is ‘old news.’
___________________________________________________________________________
And, finally, if you’re a man and you decide to run for office despite
your wife’s reoccurrence of cancer you’re a ‘questionable spouse.’
If you’re a woman and you decide to run for office despite having five
kids including a newborn with Downs Syndrome… Well, we don’t know
what that is ’cause THAT’S NOT A FAIR QUESTION TO ASK!

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

If you watched any Godfather movies, McCain likes to think of himself as the “Godfather” of the mafia. He loves to gamble with the crap shooters. It’s illegal to gamble with any government money, bank money, or any other financial instrument that belongs to the government. How do we know whose money he uses to gamble with?
Does he have Geisha women waiting for him in his room? We just don’t know do we? Do we want crap shooters going on in the Oval office or Geisha women hanging from the rafters giving McCain body massages in the White House? We just won’t know if he is elected, will we?
Be smart, be wise, be knowledgeable, and elect Obama.Biden with Clinton for change 2008.

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Gg…Keep the Change!!

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Where are Sarah Palins medical records, is that the November surprise?

Posted by: EYESURGERY | October 31, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Chad and Robin, I wish that people who don’t vote for Barack wouldn’t get his tax break. Wouldn’t that be interesting? Their kids wouldn’t get education cuts for college. That would probably make you think a little harder about who you would vote for. As a voter, I don’t vote for my party just to vote for my party. I do my research. I’m just sharing my research. Vote for the guy that has one house and represents you more than you think. Skin color should not be the only reason.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

granny toot you should be ashamed of your self.

Posted by: shosilk | October 31, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Free Printable Obama Biden Signs? Get Them Here!
I stumbled upon this link that has links to pdf’s that are great for printing your own Obama sign. You can easily get one printed at Staples or a Kinko’s or anywhere that prints pictures and then get them laminated. I actually got them printed at Costco for about $2 and went to Staples and them laminated for about $2.
http://obamamedia.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/free-printable-obama-biden-signs/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Zuq…Obama does not now, nor will he EVER represent me. he is diametrically opposed to everthing I hold dear. good luck with the videos.

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Eve and greed I was always under the impression that rich people were greedy that’s why they were rich, In my city the rich are rich because they don’t pay their bills and on every street there is at least a dozen for sales signs in front of the homes, my measly 20 grand a year can prove I am not greedy, what about you Eve????? And truth be told both will raise your taxes because this country is in bad shape with a deficit that will never get paid off. 10 generations from now will be still paying it off, not a very nice thought but the truth always does hurt.

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

As I lay my final posts tonight, can I remind my neighbors who happen to be Republican.
Colin Powell Endorses Barack Obama for President
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/20/colin-powell-endorses-barack-obama-for-president/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

McCain’s Temperment – We Don’t Need Another Cowboy For President
Watch the video below.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/15/mccains-temperment-we-dont-need-another-cowboy-for-president/

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Colon Power is NOT a Conservative.

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

House leader calls Democrats pacifists, hawkish Jews
Rep. Thaddeus G. McCotter, Michigan Republican, has no problem dividing the world into twos: globalist and traditionalist Republicans, optimists and Irish Catholics. And when it comes to Democrats, pacifists and hawkish Jews.
“Despite some of the neoconservative Jewish members that they have, that are very hawkish,” he said, “they generally tend to be more of a pacifist, multilateral party.”
In a 90-minute interview Wednesday with The Washington Times, Mr. McCotter displayed a willingness to draw very sharp distinctions, saying of his fellow Republicans: “What you really have are globalists versus traditionalists. Globalists tend to view America as an economy, not a country. The traditionalists tend to view it as a country: a very delicate microcosm, a collection of individuals with different hopes, dreams, aspirations.”

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

McCain and Palin have been socialists since birth. McCain comes from a military family, and the military are paid by taxpayers. Palin’s parents were educators, and paid by the state and federal government, which is socialism. Military are exempt from taxes when they are on duty, live on bases, and shop at commissaries. Who pays their tax, we the taxpayers do? Who pays the exempt taxes of educators, we do the taxpayers.
McCain and Palin deserve each other since they don’t respect government property and rules. McCain has crashed at least 5 planes at a cost of $2.2 billion dollars each. The engines are at least $1.5 billion each. Palin doesn’t have any respect for ethics and laws since she choses to break most or all of them. She has no respect for others, except her chosen friends. Sound like a GWBush. Let’s see Cheney.Rove.Rumsfield. of the 3 Muskateers who also distort, repeat unethical breaking laws since they think they are the law. How many more days of Bush.Cheney. Let’s give them the Texas Boot. I’m a real Texan and Rove and Bush are wannabes, since both were born out of state, Bush in Connecticutt, and Rove in Utah, but they like to claim Texas is their homestead and birthplace. Again, distorters of the truth like McCain.Palin. Where you see failed Bush.Cheney you see McCain.Palin

Posted by: Gg | October 31, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Robin,
HOPE you CHANGE your mind and vote for Barack. We need your vote.
Have a good night.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

All of these inane attacks against Palin are ridiculous. How about sticking to the real issues such as exactly what was her and her husband’s involvement with the AIP /and why, and if/why she feels that giving a dispersement to the people of Alaska from oil revenue is indeed spreading the wealth/socialism. This other stuff is petty and sickening.
If I remember correctly a former Alaska governor gave each Alaskan citizen a tax rebate of some sort…may have been from oil revenue, can’t remember, but that was many moons ago and there is that precedent-not Palin’s brainchild.
Many of us get tax refunds-is that socialism? Is taxing itself socialism? I think not. We pay into the government’s maintaining of infrastructure…supporting people on an ongoing basis is socialistic. I believe in a national sales tax, but as far as the income tax, everyone should pay their fair share, and I do think that the top tier should pay a lower percentage since they would still cover who knows how many non-paying citizens…a hybrid regressive tax system, that evens out towards the middle with a reasonable cut off.
Also, the former Alaska governor ran and won on the AIP ticket-he became Republican when he realized what loons the AIP top dogs were.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

P.S. Check my posts daily at http://www.BarackForUs.com for daily posts. There are a lot more that I will be sharing over the next few days that will shock many people.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Zuq…i admire your enthusiasm…i’ve already voted…McCain/Palin are my peeps!!! Peace!

Posted by: robin | October 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

IF Obama becomes pres… and he give a 1000.00 tax breal that means if your in a 15% or 17% tax bracket, you’ll get 15 or 17 dollars off your tax money you qwe the feds…. Whoopiee!!!! With All the other, flip flops, back tracks, 180′s and changes he made thru this whole ordeal…. I just don’t trust him.

Posted by: Georgie from Ohio | October 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Palin…….Now she can’t add and subtract.

Posted by: Newsrook | October 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Peace Robin. I respect your right to vote. This is your country as well as mine and we both need to work together to succeed.

Posted by: Zuq | October 31, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

I was talking with my wife and was referring to an Obama interview today. Three times I said “President Obama” without even thinking about it. At this point it seems so natural it just comes out. You know what? It does have a nice ring to it.
In her 30 years of voting my Republican wife never voted for a Democratic presidential candidate before. She just smiled at me when I said “President Obama.” Well, the “way low place” probably isn’t really “frozen over” but she IS voting for Obama. Yep, “President Obama” has a nice ring to it.

Posted by: Looking Forward To It | October 31, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Palin…….Now she can’t add and subtract.

Posted by: Newsrook | October 31, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

I think its just absurd that Obama spent $3,000,000 on a infomercial that was 30 minutes of the same boring rhetoric that he has been shoving down our throats for months. If you do not think that was a stupid political arrogant stunt then you are just plain delusional.

Posted by: frankly my dear | October 31, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

All of you that talk about tax cuts being so much and who at what level of income have absolutely no control over what is really going to happen no matter who wins the election. Do not be taken in by empty promises of tax cuts. Reality sucks but it will become apparent that tax cuts are out of the question if Obama wants to give away money to his constituents.

Posted by: BeJo | October 31, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

OK…….What else could we expect on Halloween. PALIN……Hop on your broom and fly back to Alaska! You can’t add, you can’t subtract. You wouldn’t know your own tax plan let alone Dems. And this thing could be our next President. OMG

Posted by: Newsrook | October 31, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Communists!
Socialists!
Vote for a real change…
Try a 3rd party!
Keep America the Democratic-Republic that it is and not turn it into National Socialist State that Obama wants…that HIS handlers are pushing US towards…He’s not a monkey; he’s a puppet!

Posted by: American Capitalist | October 31, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Voting for Obama is voting for Amercia to change into communism. I’m a US citizen and I aproved this message.

Posted by: vegas | October 31, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I thought that she said the media was hurting her first amendment right, by showing the world her negative talk. I thought she wasn’t trying to put Barack down. Will someone please help her make up her mind?

Posted by: Eventually, someone will tell the truth | October 31, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

“What he really meant to say…” has to be the most famous phrase of Obama’s campaign.

Posted by: independentview | October 31, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

The problem with Obama’s tax plan is that the companies that earn $250,000 will have to relocate over seas. Then where will we find jobs?

Posted by: generous_and_helpful | October 31, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Granny is a racist pig. What part of that don’t YOU get.

Posted by: jt | October 31, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Is that all Sarah Palin can talk about till Tuesday? Just go to the official website (http://www.barackobama.com/index.php)The tax info is there and has never changed.
Stop speaking this mindless dribble.

Posted by: Juice | October 31, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Vote for Obama! …So that us Alaskans can have Sarah Palin all to ourselves! ;)

Posted by: Jennifer | October 31, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

I can’t wait to hear Palin say, “Sir, Yes Sir, Mr. President Obama, Sir”. Can’t wait…

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

This Obama plan sounds evil and Socialist, kind of like tithing.

Posted by: Superman | October 31, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Granny will also be saying “My President, the President of the United States of America, President Barack Obama”. Yes, Granny too will have a new President.

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Obama’s plan will tax people and companies whose profits are $250,000 or more. If they are reinvesting in their business to grow it, then they won’t exceed that profit level and everybody will win. More jobs for everyone. It’s big business that has shipped our jobs overseas in spite of the free money they have received from the Republicans.
I know, let’s keep doing the same thing hoping for different results. Helloooo

Posted by: Superman | October 31, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

People here too often confuse the terms “socialism” and “communism.” Allow me to clarify.
Socialism supports a strong, central government that has the authority to regulate the economy. It advocates for the community being partially responsible for the education and well-being of its citizens. It maintains that political power ultimately belongs to the governed, who elect leaders to represent them. The United States in and of itself is and always has been a social democrary. It has never been a truly capitalist society because we have always had economic regulations, public schools, hospitals that are required to privide care for those in need, and democratic elections.
Communism is an extremist form of socialism that results in a totalitarian state. In it, the government controls everything about the lives of the governed. There is no personal property or free speech. Dissenting opinions are strictly forbidden. The Soviet Union was, and China, Cuba, and North Korea are communist countries.
When people accuse Barack Obama of being a socialist, they do themselves an injustice. They show that they have no clue about the fundamentals of the American government.

Posted by: Jason | October 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Palin says that Obama is a Socialist. She is probably an expert in that assessment seeing how she can see Russia from her house.

Posted by: CajunLafayette | October 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Hey ABC, I can see you have connections to the GOP… why else would you post anything this PROVEN IDIOT from Alaska has to say? She is an obvious embarrassment to the GOP itself! Who actually listens to Sarah Palin? You? Me? no… only the GOP arm-twisted media outlets like ABC…

Posted by: Who listens to Palin anyway? | October 31, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

What I want to know is: Why has John McCain been holding out on his whole “I know how to get Bin Laden”? How many of our service people have died while he is holding on to this information? Why hasn’t he shared this information before now? Shameful

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

The fact that most Americans don’t understand Socialism, Communism, and Capitalism is precisely the reason that McCain/Palin are throwing the word Socialism around. It is McCarthy era tactics. Many people think a program with socialist tendencies is a Communist Plot.
In fact, I keep hearing people talking about Socialism versus Democracy.
It should be Socialism versus Capitalism. Socialism is not about how you vote or if you can vote, it is a strategy for financial systems.

Posted by: Superman | October 31, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Is there no moderator for comments like Grandma Toot’s??? What a small mind she has.

Posted by: Leslie | October 31, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Actually Grandma Toots is some old guy, in a dingy backroom, sitting in a dirty bathroom – and he really needs a shower. I’ll bet that greasy keyboard gets stuck on “dumb” all of the time…

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

This attack is baseless without the dumb comments from Biden and Richardson. Obama and his campaign have never said anything about sub-250k taxpayers getting hit with a hike. It’s only been Biden and Richardson, but it’s still fair game because of that.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | Oct 31, 2008 10:21:07 PM
Matt, In April2008 Obama’s magic number was 75,000. Here is the interview he did with businessweek…..http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_15/b4079017876246_page_2.htm

Posted by: bo | October 31, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

GOP’s criteria selection for their VP nominee: Beauty queen. (Check.) Hockey mom. (Check.) Perpetually pregnant. (Check.) Under investigation for misconduct in public office. (Check.) Communications degree. (Check.) No experience in national domestic policy. (Check.) No experience with foreign policy. (Check.) Needs $150,000 for wardrobe, hair and make-up. (Check.) Accepts 27 million in earmarks for Wascilla, though falsely proclaims she is against earmarks. (Check.) Totally unprepared to take on the presidency on Day One. (Check.)……………………………… Sarah Palin’s our gal!

Posted by: Dannie | October 31, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

If you want to give away your own PB&J sandwich to a friend of yours who forgot their lunch, that’s cool. It’s called charity. It’s the conservative thing to do.
If the teacher comes and takes half of your sandwich and decides to give it, agaist your will, to the bullies that tease you endlessly about your dumbo ears, that’s socialism.
You don’t want me to give my money to others that I think need it. You want to tax me and “spread the wealth” to those people from whom you can bribe a vote.

Posted by: Mark Garnett | October 31, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Listen….imagine that if Sarah Palin looks ugly; but with the same thinking, idea, act & move as well as background; will you vote for her? If your answer is yes, you can stay with your decision. If your answer is no, you better not vote for her. Otherwise you are just voting base on your lust which has nothing to do with the future of your country.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 31, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Besides the article I can’t believe that Americans have so little respect when writing comments as to insult people. It was only 40 years ago you all had the Love, Peace ideas?? Your generally low life rude insulting, no respect or pride? Treating even your potential presidents and vp with disrespect. I think America is in one huge social sink hole. Now on the article. Palin is stating a truth about what she heard Obama campaign saying about there plan. Palin is one intelligent woman. She even descriped the role of the VP correctly and Biden discribed it incorrectly. If you don’t believe me go read the article of what a VP is at Fox news. It is titled Did Biden get it Wrong? You Betcha. Ok now past the insults and onto something intelligent about the issues. You either cut taxes or you don’t. In the current circumstances you Americans should stop wanting tax cuts and just save and work hard and save your country. Obama’s plan will likely not be able to be carried out because there is not funds to do it. Something like the saying when you See Pigs Fly. So forget Obama’s bankrupt America plan. If you like him because you like him then vote for him. If you want the easy road and to be spoiled some more go for it try to suck every little $ and benefit you can out of the USA. If you have any sense of decensy then go the hard route, stop spending so much, save, help your neighbhor and vote for McCain. It may also save you from something like watching Obama having his head cut off when he tries to sit down with people on the other side of the world and have a tea party.

Posted by: CaRainbow | October 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Besides the article I can’t believe that Americans have so little respect when writing comments as to insult people. It was only 40 years ago you all had the Love, Peace ideas?? Your generally low life rude insulting, no respect or pride? Treating even your potential presidents and vp with disrespect. I think America is in one huge social sink hole. Now on the article. Palin is stating a truth about what she heard Obama campaign saying about there plan. Palin is one intelligent woman. She even descriped the role of the VP correctly and Biden discribed it incorrectly. If you don’t believe me go read the article of what a VP is at Fox news. It is titled Did Biden get it Wrong? You Betcha. Ok now past the insults and onto something intelligent about the issues. You either cut taxes or you don’t. In the current circumstances you Americans should stop wanting tax cuts and just save and work hard and save your country. Obama’s plan will likely not be able to be carried out because there is not funds to do it. Something like the saying when you See Pigs Fly. So forget Obama’s bankrupt America plan. If you like him because you like him then vote for him. If you want the easy road and to be spoiled some more go for it try to suck every little $ and benefit you can out of the USA. If you have any sense of decensy then go the hard route, stop spending so much, save, help your neighbhor and vote for McCain. It may also save you from something like watching Obama having his head cut off when he tries to sit down with people on the other side of the world and have a tea party.

Posted by: CaRainbow | October 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I guess McCain had to go to bed early? Obama has been campaigning late for several nights. Maybe McCain had to work on his concession speech…

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

CaRainblow – all the “heads of state” all over the world will be saying “Yes, Sir, President Barack Obama Sir”. Your threat about having someone’s “head cut off on TV” needs to be investigated by the Secret Service. Ijit

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Anyone who thinks Obama will improve their lives will be very dissapointed if he is elected. He wont do half of what he’s promised, the numbers just dont add up. He’ll have to cut benefits and raise taxes to do everything he’s promised, typical politician promise anything to get your vote….

Posted by: ynot | October 31, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Come on CaRainblow – practice with me: “My President, the President of the United States of America, President Barack Obama” woooooOOOOOOOooooooo

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

“Anyone who thinks Obama will improve their lives will be very dissapointed if he is elected.”
You are right if you think the economy could get any worse.

Posted by: CajunLafayette | October 31, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

This election is going to be very very close. Like a difference of 150 electoral votes.

Posted by: CajunLafayette | October 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Palin fits that old joke well – How do you know Palin is spouting a line of crap? Answer: Her lips are moving.
By the way, McCain never came back in a national election. In the Republican primaries, before his so called comeback in New Hampshire, polls had him ahead in New Hampshire before the election. He also locked up the nomination early. This is different. It is a national election and he is not only behind in the polls but trending down in far too many states to win. Unlike many others that lost their retirements in the stock market crash brought on partly by McCain’s deregulation binge, his support of the Bush tax cuts at a time of increased spending, and his support of a costly war in Iraq where we will spend nearly a trillion dollars with little to show for it here at home, McCain can afford to retire and spend his remaining days in luxury picking this mansion this week and that one the next. He looks like he needs the rest. My friends, let him retire; it’s best for all of us.

Posted by: Straight Talk | October 31, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

I’m Hillary supporter voting for McCain/Palin Tuesday!
NoO’blame-a….commi organizer!

Posted by: American Girl | October 31, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Obama is going to lose this election and eveyone will look around wondering what just happened. It’s easy to see what happened but I wont waste my time trying to explain it now. We’ll let the press do that after the election! We will be lucky to have it all settled before inaguration day……

Posted by: ynot | October 31, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

American Dude – Practice with me: “President Barack Obama, My President, The President of the United States of America, Barack Obama”. Come on – a little practice and it just rolls right off the tongue. I suppose you will finally be able to take a shower on Tuesday night? It may make you feel better, wash some of the tears away…booooOOOOoooo hoooooOOOOooooo

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

ynot – denial is not a very healthy condition. Try this: “President Barack Obama” – do it over and over again until it just doesn’t hurt anymore, ok?

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Please note I have voted Obama, do not think I know everything, feel I am a true blue American, and decided Democrat over Republican solely due to the train wreck of half truths and lies that prevail.**************************
All of this discussion on the capitol gains tax… correct me if I’m wrong, but I strongly support a heavy burden on them. If you are a middle class, working or retired person, the majority of your capitol gains would be in your IRA account and therefore would not be taxed till you withdrew them. On the other hand, the rich take huge capitol gains in lieu of large salaries so capping them as McTrainwreck has proposed would once again favor the wealthy alone. I think the 250 K threshold B.O. has given is a bit too high, but then if I’m middle class it would be in the bottom one percentile. My largest yearly wage was less than 42 thousand dollars. Now in retirement I am feeling the pain that many less fortunate have felt for years. Please vote for the man that has shown his opponent some respect, the one that was not a prisoner of war but has a admirable education, the one the one who due to his education would surround himself with people that could “protect us” better than Mr. 100 year war guy. Do the smart thing, vote for the one who has the smarts to take us back on a level playing field with the rest of the world. You have seen another one with lack of education and what a few years under his administration can do not FOR but TO America… Obama/Biden 08 and 12

Posted by: Bula Bob | October 31, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

granny, what part of sen. obama do you call “monkey”? yes, i don’t get that. next time you comment, make it intelligent.

Posted by: rahmati | October 31, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Please note I have voted Obama, do not think I know everything, feel I am a true blue American, and decided Democrat over Republican solely due to the train wreck of half truths and lies that prevail.**************************
All of this discussion on the capitol gains tax… correct me if I’m wrong, but I strongly support a heavy burden on them. If you are a middle class, working or retired person, the majority of your capitol gains would be in your IRA account and therefore would not be taxed till you withdrew them. On the other hand, the rich take huge capitol gains in lieu of large salaries so capping them as McTrainwreck has proposed would once again favor the wealthy alone. I think the 250 K threshold B.O. has given is a bit too high, but then if I’m middle class it would be in the bottom one percentile. My largest yearly wage was less than 42 thousand dollars. Now in retirement I am feeling the pain that many less fortunate have felt for years. Please vote for the man that has shown his opponent some respect, the one that was not a prisoner of war but has a admirable education, the one the one who due to his education would surround himself with people that could “protect us” better than Mr. 100 year war guy. Do the smart thing, vote for the one who has the smarts to take us back on a level playing field with the rest of the world. You have seen another one with lack of education and what a few years under his administration can do not FOR but TO America… Obama/Biden 08 and 12

Posted by: Bula Bob | October 31, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Me thinks “American Girl” is more of a republican troll :)

Posted by: Mack | October 31, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

The Wall Street Journal
October 31, 2008 – 1 hour ago
Obama: “I Love Rich People”
When he is in Pennsylvania or Ohio, Sen. Barack Obama is the ultimate populist. But when he is in the affluent sections of Florida? The so-called wealth-spreader senator reveals an affinity for the wealthy.
Associated Press
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. speaks at a rally in Sarasota, Fla., Thursday, Oct. 30, 2008. For most of his campaign, Sen. Obama has decried the rich getting rich and the middle and poor losing ground. Last week in less-affluent Orlando, Fla., he argued that the Bush tax cuts (which would be continued by Sen. John McCain) “give more and more to those with the most, and hope prosperity trickles down to everyone else.” (For a restaurant waiter’s view of redistribution see this entertaining letter in the Chicago Tribune).
Yet Sen. Obama appears to have warmed to the wealthy. Last night at a rally in Sarasota–saturated in recent years with wealthy retirees, golf courses and waterfront mansions (some now foreclosed)–he sought to counter Sen. McCain’s claims that he was a “socialist.”
Sen. McCain has jumped on Sen. Obama’s plans to raise taxes on those earning more than $250,000 a year (or is that $150,000) and keep them the same or lower for the rest of America.
“The reason that we want to do this, change our tax code, is not because I have anything against the rich,” Sen. Obama said at the rally. “I love rich people! I want all of you to be rich. Go for it. That’s the America dream, that’s the American way, that’s terrific.”
Of his tax plan, he added later that it would help everyone in America have a better chance at success. “John McCain and Sarah Palin, they call this socialistic,” he said. “You know, I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”
So what do you think Wealth Report readers? Was this a new campaign message to appeal to Richistani voters? And do you think Sen. Obama really loves the rich? What would happen to Sen. McCain if he said the same thing?
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/10/

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

A surprise on Election Day…
Well it has been over 192 HOURS sense McCAIN / PALIN Campaign said they would release PALIN’S Medical Records!
BUT NO RECORDS YET…I’m glad this is not a 3AM CALL, the response time is terrible. How long does it take to LIE and FAKE Records?
McCAIN / PALIN
LIES before HONOR

Posted by: kimb54 | October 31, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Barack Obama has refused to release his medical records. Instead, the public will have to make do with an undated letter signed by a doctor which assured the press and the American public that Obama was “in excellent health”.
When John McCain delayed releasing his medical records to the press last May, the New York Times thundered to it dwindling readers:
“No presidential candidate should get to the point that he has locked up his party’s nomination without public vetting of his health.”
–New York Times, on John McCain in May 4 2008 “Missing Records”
Six months later, the New York Times is predictably silent on the still-secret Obama medical records.
http://www.bloggernews.net/118332

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Obama will say anything to get elected, just as he did with the Iraq war. In 2002, he was surrounded by extreme liberals, so, guess what, he’s against the war. In 2004/5 new in the senate he supported it. In late 06/07, to get the left wing of the party, he opposed it again.
On taxes its the same. At any criticism from McCain he changes the plan. Now he’s promising tax cuts to 95% of workers? 40% of those pay no tax now, so they are going to get a welfare check? This guy is a lunatic.

Posted by: jstacey | October 31, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Update America:
–Tax cuts for working class families – Before the commercial aired, Obama had already begun BACKING AWAY from that idea because of the financial crisis, although Obama didn’t acknowledge it in the 30-minute infomercial . More Obama flip flops.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | October 31, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Well we don’t want the whose downs syndrom baby is it really come out, or do we… more lies to cover up takes longer to doctor medical records my dear

Posted by: Bula Bob | October 31, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Hello all, tonight all I can say about this is………….Obama and the democrats will take over control of the mismanaged and ill guided government.
The era of trickle down is over…all that trickled down was the WTC…along with our savings, retirements, and family.
Goodbye King George, and Darth Cheney…The only honorable one amongst you is the secretary of state…She at least stuck her neck out and survived the administration…everyone involed has been indicted or quit…Thanks for the memories…

Posted by: Ed theTech. | October 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Update America:
Even with Buffet, Powell and Volcker, Obama still does NOT KNOW what to do about the financial crisis. Paul Volcker was strong conservative under President Reagan. Obama is a liberal? Obama is the greatest FLIP FLOP in political history.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | October 31, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

What about Obama’s medical records?
October 30, 2008
By Ed Morrissey
ABC goes after Sarah Palin for not releasing her medical records this week after less than two months on the campaign trail. Palin promised last week that she would release them “early” this week, and Kate Snow impatiently noted yesterday that Wednesday is the outer limit of “early”:
Governor Palin’s campaign still has not released any information regarding her medical records despite frequent requests from the news media and the campaign’s own assertion that they would release this information soon.
On Sunday morning, Palin spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt told ABC News that the campaign had planned to release information on her medical history early this week.
Today is Wednesday. …
Aides suggested privately that there was nothing to hide in the records, but that it was simply taking a while to call doctors and round up the appropriate information to release.
But an entire week?
Kate, I have a suggestion. Call all of the physicians you’ve seen over the last 20 years (or even 5) and tell them you want copies of your medical records. Tell them you need them ASAP. See if you can get them in a week, in a releasable format for the press. Do that, report on it, and then see whether waiting one whole week is so difficult.
And while that investigation continues, check ABC’s reporting for the story on the release of Barack Obama’s comprehensive medical records. That will take Snow a little longer, because it never happened. In May, the campaign released a 276-word summary of Obama’s medical status, but that’s all. While the media hounded John McCain for detailed records last spring because of his skin cancer, they have shown no such curiosity over Obama, a lifelong smoker with at least a significantly elevated risk for cancer and heart disease. Obama also hasn’t had a checkup in over a year, which made the summary a little dated when it was released.
While ABC frets over the medical records of a non-smoking 44-year-old mother of five, where’s the concern over the smoker who’s running at the top of the Democratic ticket? Why hasn’t the national media shown the slightest interest in Obama’s health records?
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/30/what-about-obamas-medical-records/

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Who is Palin again? Wasn’t she voted off in episode 3? I am so tired of this woman & her name & all the stupid stuff she has to say.

Posted by: Palin is on a sinking ship | October 31, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Heard about the latest find? A book written by Bill Ayers praising Sirhan Sirhan for killing Bobby Kennedy (you know the brother of Bamas fav Pres). Book is “Prairie of Fire” look it up. You people need to wake up, this guy is the anti-christ!! Its one thing to want change, its another to elect domeone who could become the 21st century Hitler or Lenin. I beg all to please at least stop and think. If you think McCain will not help you the way Obama will at least McCain is a safe bet, Obama is a big question mark!

Posted by: David of Baltimore | October 31, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

A few more days and she’ll be wailin palin and a couple more she’ll be where she belongs, fading in the rearview along with McSwine and the Rovepublican party. Dang it’s all I can do not to start the party now !!! 8 years in hell about to start recovery.

Posted by: YOMAMA | October 31, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Dear update America… being able to put your own pants on correctly give you no credentials… kinda unfair telling a lie and then deciding who may respond credentials or not…
But that is the Republican way now isn’t it…

Posted by: Bula Bob | October 31, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

AP – Associated Press
Obama’s prime-time ad skips over budget realities
By CALVIN WOODWARD – 1 day ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was less than upfront in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.
Obama’s assertion that “I’ve offered spending cuts above and beyond” the expense of his promises is accepted only by his partisans. His vow to save money by “eliminating programs that don’t work” masks his failure throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are — beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
A sampling of what voters heard in the ad, and what he didn’t tell them:
THE SPIN: “That’s why my health care plan includes improving information technology, requires coverage for preventive care and pre-existing conditions and lowers health care costs for the typical family by $2,500 a year.”
THE FACTS: His plan does not lower premiums by $2,500, or any set amount. Obama hopes that by spending $50 billion over five years on electronic medical records and by improving access to proven disease management programs, among other steps, consumers will end up saving money. He uses an optimistic analysis to suggest cost reductions in national health care spending could amount to the equivalent of $2,500 for a family of four. Many economists are skeptical those savings can be achieved, but even if they are, it’s not a certainty that every dollar would be passed on to consumers in the form of lower premiums.
___
THE SPIN: “I’ve offered spending cuts above and beyond their cost.”
THE FACTS: Independent analysts say both Obama and Republican John McCain would deepen the deficit. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates Obama’s policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years — and that analysis accepts the savings he claims from spending cuts. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, whose other findings have been quoted approvingly by the Obama campaign, says, “Both John McCain and Barack Obama have proposed tax plans that would substantially increase the national debt over the next 10 years.” The analysis goes on to say, “Neither candidate’s plan would significantly increase economic growth unless offset by spending cuts or tax increases that the campaigns have not specified.”
___
THE SPIN: “Here’s what I’ll do. Cut taxes for every working family making less than $200,000 a year. Give businesses a tax credit for every new employee that they hire right here in the U.S. over the next two years and eliminate tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. Help homeowners who are making a good faith effort to pay their mortgages, by freezing foreclosures for 90 days. And just like after 9/11, we’ll provide low-cost loans to help small businesses pay their workers and keep their doors open. ”
THE FACTS: His proposals — the tax cuts, the low-cost loans, the $15 billion a year he promises for alternative energy, and more — cost money, and the country could be facing a record $1 trillion deficit next year. Indeed, Obama recently acknowledged — although not in his commercial — that “the next president will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals.”
___
THE SPIN: “I also believe every American has a right to affordable health care.”
THE FACTS: That belief should not be confused with a guarantee of health coverage for all. He makes no such promise. Obama hinted as much in the ad when he said about the problem of the uninsured, “I want to start doing something about it.” He would mandate coverage for children but not adults. His program is aimed at making insurance more affordable by offering the choice of government-subsidized coverage similar to that in a plan for federal employees and other steps, including requiring larger employers to share costs of insuring workers.
___
THE SPIN: “We are currently spending $10 billion a month in Iraq, when they have a $79 billion surplus. It seems to me that if we’re going to be strong at home as well as strong abroad that we’ve got to look at bringing that war to a close.” These lines in the ad were taken from a debate with McCain.
THE FACTS: Obama was once and very often definitive about getting combat troops out in 16 months. (At times during the primaries, he promised to do so within a year.) More recently, without backing away explicitly from the 16-month withdrawal pledge, he has talked of the need for flexibility. In the primaries, it would have been a jarring departure for him to have said merely that “we’ve got to look at” ending the war. As for Iraq’s surplus, it’s true that Iraq could end up with a surplus that large, but that hasn’t happened yet.
The Associated Press
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=Obama%27s+medical+records&nolr=1&sa=N&start=10

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

For all you Obama-haters, this is America and I suggest you “love it or leave it”.
Obama will become President of the United States on Tuesday, Nov 4th and…
…THERE’S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT

Posted by: Akinyele | October 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Update America:
Famous Obama quotes to look forward to:
1.) I owe it all to my many lies and words of deception.
2.) I know I am not really the first Afro-American President, but I’ll claim that along with my other false claims.
3.) I did that which Nazi Germany could not do, I use only propaganda to invade the USA.
4.) I made fools of only the fools.
5.) I love P.T. Barnum saying, a sucker is born every minute.
6.) I solved the financial crisis the easy way, I printed more money.
7.) It is great to draft all those young people with the selective service to keep them under government control.
8.) I gave everyone great national healthcare, I told everyone to take two aspirins at bedtime and call each other in the morning.
9.) This is only the beginning of my failure, wait until you see the disastrous end.
10.) I gave it my all, the voters gave their all, and now we are all broke.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | October 31, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

For all you Obama-haters, this is America and I suggest you “love it or leave it”.
Obama will become President of the United States on Tuesday, Nov 4th and…
…THERE’S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT

Posted by: Akinyele | October 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Update America:
No one hates Obama because we don’t know who he is to hate.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | October 31, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

akinyele
Obama cannot win on the merits and if its close and Obama tries to steal it we will expose the issue you dont think racism will be a problem but it will take you down take you down take you down to chinatown… 6pts up nationally on election day or Obama is toast!

Posted by: JG | October 31, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Update america
I think the whole Obama landslide thing they are pushing is a fairy tale… lol Press Clinton will get the best of them yet they are too much halfwits to understand it Obama will resign from the senate after losign the election a dream gone by the wayside

Posted by: JG | October 31, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

McCain will win the election sane people see through deception. The past associations with marxists, racists and terrorists. The redistribution of other peoples money is the straw that broke the campaigns back. Obama forgot that even people who don’t make much have pride and aren’t stupid enough to be bought by this con man.

Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Heard about the latest find? A book written by Bill Ayers praising Sirhan Sirhan for killing Bobby Kennedy (you know the brother of Bamas fav Pres). Book is “Prairie of Fire” look it up. You people need to wake up, this guy is the anti-christ!! Its one thing to want change, its another to elect domeone who could become the 21st century Hitler or Lenin. I beg all to please at least stop and think. If you think McCain will not help you the way Obama will at least McCain is a safe bet, Obama is a big question mark!
Posted by: David of Baltimore
——————————-
Once that pathetic Bella Pelosi referred to Obama as “God’s Gift to America”, the “sheep” stopped questioning their “Chosen One”!
I bet the “sheep” that follow Obama are as “hypnotized” as those “sheep” which followed Karl Marx. That is how the Bolsheviks came to power.
I bet only morally sound patriotic Americans would get angry at Barack Obama for having associated himself with someone who was praising Sirhan Sirhan for killing Bobby Kennedy. The Democratic Party is keeping quiet about this “travesty”.
Bobby Kennedy and President John Kennedy will be turning in their graves with the audacity of Barack Obama, those who nominated him, and those who may vote for him.
Shame on you ALL DEMOCRATS.
Shame on you Barack Obama.

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Dear Joe the Plumber,
Per the Tax Policy Center, here is how Obama’s tax plan breaks down for “individuals” :
$0-$18,891 = $567 tax cut
$18,982-$37,595 = $892 tax cut
$37,596-$66,354 = $1,118 tax cut
$66,355-$111,645 = $1,264 tax cut
$111,646-$160,972 = $2,135 tax cut
$160,973-$226,918 = $2,796 tax cut
$226,919-$603,402 = $121 tax increase
$603,403-$2.87 million = $93,709 tax increase
$2.87 million-plus = $542,882 tax increase
Update America does not respond to reason.

Posted by: Update America | October 31, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Shame on you, Natasha, for losing your mind.
This is America, love it or leave it. I’ll gladly buy you a one-way ticket back to the land of your immigrant ancestors.

Posted by: Akinyele | October 31, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

OBAMA IS A MONKEY LIAR AND CAN GO TO HELL.

Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

OBAMA IS A MONKEY LIAR AND CAN GO TO HELL.

Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

You will be calling that “monkey liar” Mr. President in approximately 96 hours. I know you must feel very depressed about that, as well you should.
Might I suggest you leave the country immediately. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. This is America. LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT.

Posted by: Akinyele | October 31, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

WHY TAX INCREASES ON PEOPLE THAT MAKE MORE MONEY? Percentage is percentage. If tax is 30% of revenue, then someone making 40k would pay 12k tax and someone making 300k would pay 90k tax. For people out there that think the guy that makes 300k should pay a greater percent in tax, it is just down right wrong and unjustified socialism. 90k in tax is already outragous. Right now I’m just another broke d#^k but I heard my dad say he paid 70% tax one year back in the 70′s then ended up dying broke. Just because someone has a windfall one year, doesn’t mean they can repeat it every year and thats how being self employed works. Stop trying to spend money that isn’t yours to start with, Democrats = assho%#s!

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

If Barack Obama is a socialist, then George W. Bush is a communist AND a socialist. Only a Republican communist would nationalize the banks, as Bush has just done. Only a Republican communist would take over AIG, the largest insurance company in the world and a publicly owned company, as Bush has done. Only a Republican communist would create a bailout bill that authorizes the government buying up mortgages all over the country to the tune of $300 billion intaxpayer money. If there is a socialist politician in this country, it is the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

Posted by: Akinyele | October 31, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

ALERT!!!!
OBVIOUSLY, ANTI-AMERICAN RADICALS PERHAPS OBAMA SUPPORTERS HAVE COME UP WITH THIS NAUSEATING ITEM. (SEE BELOW)
TO THIS DAY, NEITHER OBAMA NOR THE DNC HAVE DENOUNCED AYERS BOOK WHICH IS DEDICATED TO THE KILLER OF BOBBY KENNEDY.
*****
Experts: Sirhan Sirhan Did Not Kill RFK
MASHANTUCKET, Conn. — New forensics evidence presented Tuesday during a symposium at Foxwoods suggests Sirhan Sirhan did not fire the fatal shots that killed Sen. Robert Kennedy in 1968.
Experts from all over the world met Wednesday to discuss problems in crime solving during the annual symposium, hosted by the Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science. This year’s event was about conspiracies and solving complex crimes.
Dr. Robert Joling, a forensics investigator who has studied the Robert Kennedy assassination for almost 40 years, determined that the fatal shots must have come from behind the senator.
Sirhan, however, was 4 to 6 feet in front of Kennedy and never got close enough to shoot Kennedy from behind, the investigator said.
The other evidence was the Pruszynski recording. This is the only audio recording of the assassination. Another scientist analyzed it and concluded that at least 13 shots were fired from two different guns.
Philip Van Praag, a forensic engineer, said he made three discoveries.
The first two demonstrate that there must be more than one shooter, he said. The third conclusion is that the shots fired by the second shooter matched the firearm a security guard behind Kennedy carried.
Joling and Van Praag presented their findings together, although the two investigated the Kennedy shooting independently. They had never met until last year. During a seminar, they realized their separate findings were perfectly wed.
Tell me, do you Bushies ever get anything right?
http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=832725&boardsparam=PostID%3D23853488

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

WHY TAX INCREASES ON PEOPLE THAT MAKE MORE MONEY?
Maybe we should ask Warren Buffett, the richest man in the world.. Tom Brokow did just that:
Tom: You’ve talked about in your own office, for example, you pay a much lower tax rate with all of your wealth than, say, a receptionist does.
Warren: That’s exactly right, Tom, and I think the only way to do it is with specifics. In our office 15 people cooperated in a survey, out of 18, I didn’t make anybody do it. And my total taxes paid, payroll taxes plus income tax, mine came to 17.7 percent. The average for the office was 32.9 percent. There wasn’t anybody in the office, from the receptionist on, who paid a lower tax rate. And I have no tax planning, I don’t have an accountant, I don’t have tax shelters. I just follow what the U.S. Congress tells me to do.
Hmmmm.. ok, how about the other wealthy out there?
Tom on set: And to further prove his point, Buffett has challenged .. he’s offered a million dollars to charity to any of the Forbes 400 richest people who can show on average that they pay a higher tax rate than their secretaries pay, but so far, Brian, he’s had no takers.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/21543506
And McCain would like you to pay a little more in taxes so Warren can pay a little less.. what a guy!

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

If Barack Obama is a socialist, then George W. Bush is a communist AND a socialist. Only a Republican communist would nationalize the banks, as Bush has just done.
Posted by Akinyele |
——————————–
BOZO- you are in twilight zone. You obviously do not evn know what socialism or communism is since you have the audacity to compare a “temporary emergency economic plan” to “socialism/communism” as a political ideology/system of governing a country.
Obama and those who support him are
NEO-COMMIES!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I believe our whole tax system is a crock of sh!t anyway… Money changes hands on a regular basis, right. How many times does a dollar have to change hands being taxed at 30% before the govt has consumed it totally. They pump trillions into the economy knowing damn well it ends up right back in their pocket anyway. Just makes me want to quote the old movie line “I’m fed up and I’m not going to take it anymore!”

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Oh Natasha dear.. please give us a call. It will save us from having to make a trip and wasting all that gas!
1-800-225-5324
We look forward to speaking with you.

Posted by: Sam | October 31, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

For the “naive” that may not even know what “NEO-COMMIES” means…
NEO-COMMIES = NEO-COMMUNISTS = OBAMA SUPPORTERS

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

If anyone is a communist, it’s McCain; after all, he sat on the advisory board of the US Council for World Freedom, whos parent organization was founded by neo-nazis and the former president of communist china. he is one scary dude! even the former supreme commander of NATO thinks so. Of course, I can see how a russian like Natasha would be drooling all over him.
BOOOOOOOO!!!
i personally don’t want a communist in charge, and don’t care for paying more taxes so the rich can pay less.

Posted by: BoogieMan | October 31, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Fine, lets all join together and demand a flat tax rate of 20% that has no loop holes for rich or poor. 20% Tax on profit, period! Does that work for you?

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

For all you Obama-haters, this is America and I suggest you “love it or leave it”.
Obama will become President of the United States on Tuesday, Nov 4th and…
…THERE’S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT
Posted by: Akinyele
———————————
For all of you Neo-Commies, this is CAPITALIST AMERICA! If you do not like it, you and Obama – the “Community Organizer” – can pack your bags and head to Cuba, North Korea, or perhaps Russia to organize some Siberian Gulags ans spread some wealth around over there.
Morally sound patriotica Americans will not allow our country to become the land of Obama’s “New Experiment in Communism”.
You get it, neo-commie??

Posted by: Natasha | October 31, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

I live in Illinois………….obama is my sen.if u don’t think he is going to raise everybodys taxes…..your just not listening ……WAKE UP ……..the change he wants is in our freedoms…..turn off your court room show …..and listen to him speak…………

Posted by: vince | November 1, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

PUTIN IS ON THE PHONE? TELL THAT BRO TO WAIT A MINUTE, UNTIL I CAN STOP STUTTERING. WHAT? NUCLEAR MISSLES HEADED THIS WAY? TELL HIM I HAVE A PLAN FOR HOPE AND CHANGE, AND I’LL GET BACK TO HIM AS SOON AS I FIGURE IT OUT!
Posted by: k
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/obama-will-say.html?cid=136007211#comment-136007211
———————————–
The 3:00 AM call to the White House…
If Obama bin Biden answers that “3:00 AM call to the White House” he would forward it to…the United Nations!!!!
Is this what you want America?
Do not vote left-wing-liberal Obama bin Biden to be our next Commander in Chief. It took 3 statements by him (after talking with his 300+ foreign policy advisors) to kind of condemn Russia (he still did not even come close to it) for invading a democratic and sovereign country – Georgia.
And, this while Senator McCain, Senator Clinton, our government, and ALL our allies – blasted Russia’s invasion of Georgia! Even China turned its back to Russia on the Georgia issue despite the fact that the Russian leaders – Medvedev (Putin’s hand picked puppet) and Putin himself were courting China’s support on the Georgia conflict!! Ha-ha!
Go McCain-Palin ’08 :-)

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

TAXES: Let’s put it this way: You just moved away to college with your three buddies and decide to rent a house instead of staying in the dorm. Two of you work part time at McDonalds for say $5 bucks an hour and your third friend lands a great part time job making $10 bucks an hour. Do you make your friend making $10/hr pay 1/2 the rent??????? Or just his fair 1/3 share of the rent???

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

WOW – THE NEOCONS ARE REALLY RUNNING SCARED! SO FUN TO WATCH.
PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
HAS A NICE RING TO IT!

Posted by: REPUBS-ARE-IDIOTS | November 1, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Obama is a lying con man.

Posted by: Ryan | November 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

“If you were the boss, who would you hire???”
SERIOUSLY, THIS IS A NO BRAINER!!!!
Posted by Kate Buckingham
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/obama-will-say.html?cid=136007211#comment-136007211
—————————————
Kate- It is NO brainer once ALL morally sound patriotic Americans are done watching this presentation…
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
AMERICA THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE!

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

palin’s a hypocrite. all the dirt on this idiot??
she should of stayed in alaska. heck, now they don’t even want her! should of thought about the fall out before accepting the vp nod, “without a blink.”

Posted by: nadradt | November 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

i may not be crazy about obama, but with palin on the other ticket, he’s the lesser of two evils.
mccain might of stood a chance if he had of put someone who was actually qualified on the ticket. as an educated female (mba) this insults my intelligence…

Posted by: nadradt | November 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Palin can’t even handle a press conference.. how are we expected to think she could handle complex issues like ‘taxes’? Of course, since they take more money from taxpayers than any other state, I can see how she feels deprived when Obama says he wants to give more to the middle class.
Vote McCain if you want to pay more in taxes so the rich can pay less. Doesn’t make sense to me, but it sure does to some of the less educated!

Posted by: Sarah | November 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

What dirt? nadrat sorry your “mba” doesn’t do it for me either… it’s just a piece of paper for sitting through some classes. I’ve worked with mba’s that had no common sense at all.. you sound like the same!

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

And to further prove his point, (Warren) Buffett has challenged .. he’s offered a million dollars to charity to any of the Forbes 400 richest people who can show on average that they pay a higher tax rate than their secretaries pay, but so far, he’s had no takers.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/21543506
Warren Buffet pays 17.7%.. his secretary pays 28% in taxes.
Got to love McCain.. wants the middle class to pay more in taxes so the rich can pay even less than they already are.

Posted by: zion | November 1, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

WOW – THE NEOCONS ARE REALLY RUNNING SCARED! SO FUN TO WATCH.
Posted by: REPUBS-ARE-IDIOTS
———————————-
WOW – THE NEOCOMMIES = NEO-COMMUNISTS ARE REALLY “SLEEPING BEAUTIES” WHO HAVE BEEN HYPNOTIZED BY MARXIST/RADICAL BARACK OBAMA’S “PRETTY SPEECHES”!
That One – that Radical One – if elected would be because he spent 660 million dollars to “BUY” this election. Oh yes, he spent all that money to promote his “Big Ego”, while he has the audacity to speak about the pain he feels for the “middle class” – the HYPOCRITE!
Instead of promoting his “Big Ego” on prime TV the other night he could have given the 33.5 million dollars that he spent to some food banks that are struggling around the country.
That’s OK, we appreciate the fact that Obama’s “spending spree” on prime TV and on his campaign “extravangaza” gave us a “sneak preview” of his “future spending sprees”, that is if he His Audacity is “coronated” as Emperor of Obama’s “American Union” (as in Soviet Union).

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I have average Americans stand up to me and say to me, Senator McCain, all these years of running deficits, we’ve accumulated this debt. We’re paying more interest—as much interest, almost, on it as we are in spending on national defense. We ought to pay down that debt, and not saddle the next generation of young Americans with it…. Look, Alan Greenspan just recently said we shouldn’t have these massive tax cuts like Governor Bush is proposing. We should pay down the debt. But working families need the tax cut.
John McCain in 2000 blasting his own tax position in 2008 and supporting Obamas. Funny how things change.
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/2/5/mccain-on-the-bush-tax-cuts.html

Posted by: JohnM | November 1, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

All these disparaging comments about Palin… Just wishing she would disappear… I guess that’s just goes to show that the left fears her impact today and tomorrow.

Posted by: Mirgc | November 1, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Sarah, please point me to the last press conference Obama has held??? All we’ve seen of him has been scripted… even his responses to the latest critical issues: Russia and the economy. He doesn’t think on his feet or for himself.

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

********************************
BARACK OBAMA’S “PRETTY SPEECHES”
********************************
They are pretty aren’t they! I love listening to him.. he is so articulate and gives real detail.. not like that general political grand plan with no plan stuff McCain gives. Even McCains web site lacks any detail. He can’t even say how he is any different than Bush on any issue.
Barack Hussein Obama in 2008!

Posted by: raja | November 1, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Palin can’t even handle a press conference…
Posted by Sarah
——————————-
She may do better than Biden! Ahahaha! Are you joking? How many press conferences has Biden done, hah?
Biden has made more gaffes in 6 weeks thna Palin has made in her entire career.
Oh yes, Biden the 6th term Senator whom the Obama campaign has kept away from reporters this week after his repeated gaffes in previous weeks!
Oh! I know…the left wing liberal media clowns are not “beaching” about Biden’s gaffes…they are on non-stop a “witch-hunt” for Sarah Palin.
NEOCOMMIES!!!
BOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Obama has only been in the senate for three years but he is the second highest receivers or donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
All Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008 (follow link for complete list)
Dodd, Christopher $165,400
Obama, Barack $126,349
Kerry, John $111,000
McCain, John $21,550
All Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/09/18/all-recipients-of-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-campaign-contributions-1989-2008/

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

O.k. everyone time to take a little reality break and stop screaming. I like to think of myself as an intelligent person and one who studies facts. I’ve been an Obama supporter but I also read more than blogs and news articles.
In a campaign that has been as well run as Obama’s I find it hard to believe that he would not explain the numbers better. I’ve studied economics for years and there has never been an instance where taxes where raised and investment went up.
Remember 1992 Bush vs. Clinton round 1. Bush promised.. “Read my Lips- NO new taxes!” He raised them and he got FIRED! Now we have guy (obama) who admits he wants to raise taxes. That’s fine but don’t act like you’re doing us a favor. I like most of you are employed by someone with money. If that person gets their taxes raised then someone in our small firm will have to go. Look around and see which of your neighbors you would like to lose their jobs. You say, it’s only the top five percent. Okay, then take five percent of neighbors out of a job.
Your argument might be, “then they can make it up in the cost.” Again, who pays for that? The consumer who is the 95%. The fact is no one should have to pay more taxes. That’s not a republican or democratic position, it’s an American position. Did anyone read about the Boston Tea Party? We sent young boys into battle for that tax.
I need rich people to be rich. When they’re rich they invest and when they invest I have opportunity. The more opportunity the more demand for my skills the more demand for my skills the more money I make. If you don’t work and want government to provide your needs then fine but don’t make the rest of us pay for it. Remember JFK, he was a fiscal conservative and a man who believed that Government should get out of the way. Government should be a tool or maybe a foundational element of society but it should never be the answer.
I wish it wasn’t so but the more I’ve studied Obama’s numbers the more they just don’t add up. Take a few minutes and read something other than a blog. History not only tells us where we’ve been but where we’re headed.

Posted by: Dem Lifer | November 1, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

hey nadrat… is this your school song:
“one day, one night, saturday’s alright” sound familar, probably where you got that mba if your voting obama…

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

McCain came to his running mate’s defense when asked on “GMA” about comments by former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, a McCain supporter, who criticized Palin’s qualifications for vice president.
“Give her some time in office and I think she will be adequate,” Eagleburger told National Public Radio. “I can’t say she will be a genius in the job.”

Great.. a dumber Bush and an ‘adequate’ VP.. that’s what you get when you scrape the bottom of the barrel I guess. How depressing.

Posted by: FLVoter | November 1, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Inside Today’s Bulletin
Saturday, November 01, 2008
Is Sarah Palin The New Reagan?
By: Dr. Charles W. Dunn, For The Bulletin
http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20126738&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8
Insurgent Leadership
Just as president Reagan became the leader of a conservative insurgency in the Republican Party that ultimately propelled him into the Oval Office in 1980 so, too, has Sarah Palin led insurgent reform movements to become mayor of Wasilla and governor of Alaska. As a reformer she became the perfect fit for John McCain’s image as a maverick challenging Washington’s “Beltway establishment.”
Governors of states always have more executive experience as compared to senators.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Obama is a lying con man.
Posted by: Ryan
—————————-
The Boston Herald
It is what it is: Obama allied with scoundrels
Saturday, October 11, 2008
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view.bg?articleid=1124922

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Claim: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gave Obama large campaign contributions, second only to Senator Dodd.
Fact: Partially true but misleading
Reality:
It is true that, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, the second highest recipient of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac contributions is Obama. However, these are from individuals who work for these companies, not the companies themselves (which would be illegal). Top spot is Sen. Chris Dodd with $165,400, with Obama being number two with $126,349. McCain has received $21,500.
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html
Interestingly, if you look at contributions from Fannie and Freddies boards of directors and lobbyists, who are technically not employees, McCain has received a total of $169,000 and Obama has received $16,000. Combined, McCain has actually received more funding ($190,550) than Obama ($142,349) from these financial giants.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/10/us/politics/10fannie.html

Posted by: FactCheck | November 1, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Well … consider th source. I wouldn’t trust Governor Palin to balance a small town’s chequebook. Not after what she did in Wichita.
And about that shrill accusation about the “Middle Classes being redefined every week”, and the income cut-off point for tax rebates.
Why not look at the table of income distribution in the US here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States
The percentage of American households earning less than 100k per year is 84%. The percentage earning less than 150k annually (what Obama talked about) is 94%. By interpolation that’s about 2% per 10k, so “Richardson’s cutoff” (if his words carry more weigh than Obama’s) would fall at 84% + 2 x 2% = 88%.
Meaning 88% of all Americans would still get a tax-cut, and 12% wouldn’t. That’s not Socialism by any means or description.
And trying to parley this into a cutoff at 42k per year (as Governor Palin does) is just plain dishonest (or stupid; take your pick).

Posted by: Golodh | November 1, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Update America:
A recent poll for Governor Sarah Palin is heavily slanted Democrat and can’t be taken seriously.
This past poll holds a higher accuracy because it has more equal participation of Democrats, Republican and Independents; Sarah has a higher popularity rating then McCain, Obama and Biden. Sarah’s is 58%, McCain and Obama 56% and Biden 41%.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

The left wing liberal media clowns did not report anything about this…America think before you vote… This “spilling of beans” may end up in a “Presidential Impeachment” – in the event that Obama is… “Coronated”…
********
Obama fundraiser, convicted of fraud, spills beans
The Associated Press
By MIKE ROBINSON – Oct 11, 2008
CHICAGO (AP) — Jailed political fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko, the Chicago real estate developer who helped launch Barack Obama on his political career, is whispering secrets to federal prosecutors about corruption in Illinois and the political fallout could be explosive.
Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, whose administration faces multiple federal investigations over how it handed out jobs and money with advice from Rezko, is considered the most vulnerable.
Rezko also was friendly with Obama — offering him a job when he finished law school, funding his earliest political campaigns and purchasing a lot next to his house. But based on the known facts, charges so far and testimony at Rezko’s trial, there’s no indication there’ll be an October surprise that could hurt the Democratic presidential nominee — even though Rezko says prosecutors are pressing him for dirt about Obama.
“I think this strikes fear into the Blagojevich administration and the Statehouse Democrats but not into the Obama campaign,” says state Sen. Kirk Dillard, R-Westmont, a John McCain delegate to the GOP convention but an old friend of Obama.
Rezko, 53, a real estate developer, was convicted in June of scheming to use his clout with the Blagojevich administration to squeeze $7 million in kickbacks out of a contractor and seven money management firms seeking to do business with the state.
Within two months, Rezko was seen in U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s office, along with his attorneys.
There has been no official confirmation that Rezko is talking but his sentencing has been postponed indefinitely and both sides say they are going to “engage in discussions that could affect their sentencing postures.”
“They never would have delayed the sentencing if he weren’t talking — it’s proof positive,” said Jay Stewart, executive director of the Better Government Association of Chicago.
In addition, attorneys say federal investigators have been questioning Blagojevich contributions around the state using information that only Rezko could have supplied. Finally, courthouse personnel requesting anonymity because grand jury probes are secret said Rezko has been repeatedly brought from his cell to the U.S. attorney’s office to talk to prosecutors.
Rezko could have a lot to tell. He has raised millions of dollars in campaign money for many Illinois politicians and according to federal prosecutors used his clout to control appointments to state boards.
Obama has sent to charity $159,000 that Rezko raised for his campaigns for the state legislature, the House and the Senate. Rezko raised nothing for Obama’s White House run.
Obama’s name came up in testimony at the trial four times, twice in connection with an obscure legislative memo, as a guest at a Rezko party and when defense attorney Joseph Duffy told jurors his client was a friend of the senator.
None of the witnesses accused the Democratic nominee for president of doing anything improper.
But questions concerning Obama’s relationship with Rezko linger, particularly over Rezko’s role in the purchase of the Obamas’ home.
The two have known each other for years, starting when Rezko offered Obama a job after he graduated from Harvard Law School in 1991. Obama didn’t take it, but a friendship developed.
The men talked politics frequently and occasionally dined together with their wives.
In 2005, the Obamas paid $1.65 million for their home near the University of Chicago. The sellers wanted a parcel they owned next door to sell on the same day, and Rezko’s wife, Rita, was the buyer. At the request of the Obamas, Mrs. Rezko later sold them a 10-foot strip of land to enlarge their lot. They paid $104,500.
The deal took place while Rezko was under investigation and when details of the cozy relationship surfaced, Obama said it was a “bonehead” error to have asked for the additional land because it looked like he was getting a favor.
“I regret it,” Obama said at the time. “I’m going to make sure that from this point on I don’t even come close to the line.”
McCain and vice running mate Sarah Palin have mentioned Rezko little if at all. But Republicans have aired a television ad focusing on Rezko. And McCain aides have repeatedly tweaked their opponent over the real estate deal in e-mails to reporters.
“We’re delighted to have a debate on judgment with Barack Obama, who bought his million-dollar mansion in a shady deal with a convicted felon,” McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said in August.
Blagojevich, meanwhile, got a black eye from the trial.
One witness testified that Blagojevich talked about hiring him for a major state job while his $25,000 donation to the governor’s campaign fund was lying on the table.
Two attorneys testified that Blagojevich hinted that they could get lucrative state contracts if they raised money — possibly for a future White House campaign.
Obama’s name has not surfaced in accounts of the investigation since the trial. But Rezko himself raised it in a letter to the judge months ago.
“Your Honor, the prosecutors have been overzealous in pursuing a crime that never happened,” he wrote. “They are pressuring me to tell them the wrong things that I supposedly know about Gov. Blagojevich and Sen. Barack Obama.”
© 2008 The Associated Press.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hQmszDq4LOiRMcYNSaUdrmvTcB2AD93O8N500

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

The Associated Press watched it, and surprisingly, the 30-minute infomercial also failed to impress them:
“Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was LESS THAN UPFRONT in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.
Obama’s assertion that “I’ve offered spending cuts above and beyond” the expense of his promises is accepted ONLY by his partisans. His vow to save money by “eliminating programs that don’t work” masks his FAILURE throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are – beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.”
Calvin Woodward reports that Obama misled viewers on at least five key points in his 30-minute final argument:
–Health care costs – Obama claimed his plan would lower costs by $2500 per year per family, but it DOES NOT. In fact, Obama can’t point to any particular cost reductions. He plans to spend $50 billion over five years on modernization and chronic-disease prevention and presumes that this will lower costs in the future, but in the meantime it RAISES COSTS at least in the short run on everyone (the $50 billion doesn’t come out of thin air).
–The Pay-Go of his plans – NO, he hasn’t demonstrated that he’s found the revenue for his spending, despite his claims last night. Non-partisan analysts believe that his spending programs will ADD at least $428 billion to the DEFICIT in his first term, and that’s if you accept his non-specific pledge to cut spending in other areas.
–Tax cuts for working class families – Before the commercial aired, he had already begun BACKING AWAY from that idea because of the financial crisis, although Obama didn’t acknowledge it in the ad.
–The “right” to affordable health care – Obama DOES NOT guarantee coverage in any of his plans, at least not for adults.
–Getting out of Iraq – Obama noted that the US spends $10 billion a month in Iraq and talked again about “bringing that war to a close” — but he’s BACKED AWAY from his previous pledges to get out on a strict 16-month timetable, which is as fast as the remaining units can be properly withdrawn.
Break:
Obama adjusts the tax numbers repeatedly. Obama is not sure about the financial crisis because of his lack of executive knowledge. Obama is scrambling to win votes with empty words, promises and deceptions.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

The candidates are drawing lines in the sand–when I think most American’s favor their privacy–its going straight to Gov. that our finances will be reviewed under a magnifying glass..when we should be relying on Checks-Balances…ETHICS has seeped into the citizens life on a TAX PLAN…where Taxes should be reviewed as Statistics of accomplishments–instead..the FAMILY becomes a research project in Washington D. C.//..its a sham–finances-taxes-paychecks all fall into the common accomplishments..BUT NOW–we get a kick away from ETHICS–and are being pulled along by earnings like these should always be written into Washington’s business day…McCain seems less likely to be a spy–but Obama and the demacrats are pulling our lives(along)like a cheap game.

Posted by: Mark S. M. | November 1, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Let me tell you something, the day a country elects a military man for president, you can say GOOD BYE to democracy.
Posted by: GIGI
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/obama-will-say.html?cid=135994165
————————————-
You do not even know the definition of democracy is or where it was even born! Go hit some history books, BOZO and then come back here to tell us that a retired war hero – POW, who almost lost his life for our country (regardless if the war he was fighting was right or wrong he was fighting for AMERICA) would cause the end of Democracy.
Hide your freaking face – UN-AMERICAN IDIOT. Your MARXIST Savior of the “masses” (the sheep) will end democracy in America.
Yes, morally sound patriotic American people want a war hero as our President. We do not want “whinners” – Harvard “elitists”, who forgot their brains at Harvard and ended up working with terrorists, drug dealers, and other Chicago criminals (he has the audacity to call it “community organizing”. Oh! I know…he speaks well!

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Simply speaking—Obama is a spy.

Posted by: Mark S. M. | November 1, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

-I’ll be flying my American flag upside down-
You should already be doing so.. this Country has been in distress for some time now.
Posted by: [un]Concerned American
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/obama-will-say.html?cid=135994165
————————————–
BOZO- I will be swinging our flag with pride and dancing with McCain-Palin and all patriotic Americans to the tune of this video…watch!
A USA Military History (Tchaikovsky 1812 Overture)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6370539579217643597&hl=en
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Why doesnt Palin ‘push’ her medical records??? Is she waiting until AFTER the election?

Posted by: JoeShmoe | November 1, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Considering what the McCain campaign has already said about Sen. Obama, everything said now by either Sen. McCain or Sarah is rehashing the same utterly stale themes. But hey, there are four more days of the campaign to fill. We’ll endure it and then those of us who haven’t already voted finally get our say.

Posted by: Leslie M | November 1, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

All this attempt by ‘Christians’ to wave the flag against ‘socialism’ fails to realize that a utopian spirit, a desire to aid one’s less fortunate fellows, is the basis of the teachings of the Nazarene who practiced, voluntary poverty, was a vegetarian and who was raised in and was part of the Essesne/Nazarene communities of his time and called for the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth now and practiced it.
See the ‘Origin of Christianity: the Pacifism, Communalism and Vegetarianism of Primitive Christianity.’ I think what they’re slinging mud about is having a social conscience and loving your neighbor as yourself…
and McCain ‘the war hero’ who started philandering on his wife who’d cared for their 3 children while he was a POW because she was no longer a swim suit model and was four inches shorter due to all the operations just showed what a self-serving conniving man. How moral is that? And then he divorced her to marry a 27 year old beer heiress!!! That is not a moral man no matter how desperate you are to vote for a Republican. McCain’s an ambitious man as Julius Caesar said of Brutus according to Shakespeare… John McCain could deinitely be head of the ‘immoral majority’ and perhaps Palin ought to spend more time at home to keep her children from getting pregnant. Ambition, blind ambition, in action versus those who are truly trying to ‘love their neighbors as themselves’ without the extreme greed and ambition factor. There’s nothing wrong with utopianism in action. That’s what the Bible is actually all about, isn’t it. Any good Samaritans still out there or are you araid you’ll be labeled a socialist? UTOPIAN is a far better word for those persons working to bring true equality, equity and justice to all … that’s patriotic.

Posted by: ljw | November 1, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

she’s a creep….she’s a loser…what the h3ll is she doing here??

Posted by: jeff kolrners | November 1, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Tax creep? We have CEO’s in the pharmaceutical and oil industries making BILLIONS of dollars and only paying 15% tax, if that, while Americans in need of medicine have to do without in order to eat and pay the rent. We have defense contractors making billions off Bush’s (that McCain supported) wars with no-bid contracts locating their head offices off-shore in order to pay NO TAXES. Tax creep – give me a break!

Posted by: Mike | November 1, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Why doesnt Palin ‘push’ her medical records??? Is she waiting until AFTER the election?
Posted by: JoeShmoe
—————————————-
Why doesn’t That One “push” his complete medical records??? Is he waiting until after the election, hah?
Obama’s Medical Records:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iKcZ3qcCmyo/SQJm4cqVNrI/AAAAAAAAKvg

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama
America wake up! The American Marxists/Socialists/Communists have posted this proclamation right on Barack Obama’s official website (see link below)
Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama
“This group is for self-proclaimed Marxists/Communists/Socialists for the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency. By no means is he a true Marxist, but under Karl Marx’s writings we are to support the party with the best interests of the mobilization of the proletariat. Though the Democratic Socialists of America or the Communist Patty of America may have more Socialististic values, it is pointless to vote for these candidates due to the fact that there is virutally no chance they will be elected on a National level. The members of this group are not Leninists, Stalinists, etc. and do not support or condone the actions of North Korea, China, Cuba or any other self-procalimed “Marxist States.” They do not in anyway represent the Marxist philosophy nor do they represent Socialism/ Communsim. We support Barack Obama because he knows what is best for the people!”
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/group/MarxistsSocialistsCommunistsforObama

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

The name “Natasha” (Russian?) sure sounds socialist (communist? Marxist?) to me.

Posted by: Mike | November 1, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

I don’t really care about the bickering any more! There is NO way I am voting for a republican this time!

Posted by: Me | November 1, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Her campaign needs to look inward by constantly attacking Obama they are and have promoted him. No-one has a clue what she stands for except lies, extravagant shopping, extravagant hair coiffes and scandals.

Posted by: angel | November 1, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Tax creep? We have CEO’s in the pharmaceutical and oil industries making BILLIONS of dollars and only paying 15% tax, if that, while Americans in need of medicine have to do without in order to eat and pay the rent. We have defense contractors making billions off Bush’s (that McCain supported) wars with no-bid contracts locating their head offices off-shore in order to pay NO TAXES. Tax creep – give me a break!
Posted by: Mike
————————————-
NEOCOMMIE- If you do not like CAPITALIST AMERICA, there is always Cuba and North Korea, to where you and other Obama “NEOCOMMIES” can go to “spread the wealth around”.
Or you can also go to Iraq as a contractor and make a bundle of money. Nobody is hoding you back. By the way, there are many former “socialist” EU countries, the corporations of which have plenty of contractors in Iraq.
Oh, by the way, Europe is abandoning their FAILED SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT and turning to AMERICAN STYLE CAPITALISM! (it is mind blowing that THE OBAMA NEOCOMMIES want to take our country backwards to …SOCIALISM! If Obams has it his way, our country will be trailing behind the EU, RUSSIA, and CHINA – under Obama those countries will be the new superpowers. Hmmm, I have a feeling that even India will be doing better than a SOCIALIST AMERICA!
For your information – contractors doing business overseas are also taxed in the United States. Contractor or not, if you have “earned income” abroad YOU PAY PRORATED TAXES IN BOTH COUNTRIES.

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

The Chicago Tribune
Editorial
Problems with endorsing Obama
October 21, 2008
My, my. In their dumbfounding endorsement of Barack Obama, it seems to me that members of the Tribune’s editorial board must not have first read some pages in their own paper. Obama’s negatives have been cited ad nauseam, so I won’t repeat all of them. But there are some downsides in his candidacy that were not addressed in the unpersuasive endorsement statement, and they are a big deal to me. They include:
• The senator is a radical socialist with stated preferences for the Marxist notion of redistributing the wealth. Does the editorial board want the U.S. to morph into the socialist model of a dying Europe? Does it want our culture destroyed?
• With the likely veto-proof Democrat majority in Congress, a President Obama will have the opportunity to name justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. Is it the desire of the editorial board to have a leftist majority on that bench to creatively rewrite the Constitution and restructure society without regard to what citizens may think?
• Much closer to home, the editorial board has observed the wonderful things that happen in Illinois when one party controls Chicago, Cook County and the state. Does the editorial board want the entire nation governed as miserably as is Illinois with Democrats controlling the White House, Congress and the judiciary?
I don’t advocate any of these destructive directions for our country.
—Charles F. Falk, Schaumburg
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-1021vplettersbriefs0oct21,0,3600252.story

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

The Wall Street Journal
Obama’s Tax Plan Is Really a Welfare Plan
Barack Obama’s tax plan is the opposite of supply-side economics. He proposes to raise marginal rates for just about every federal tax. He also proposes a raft of tax credits that taxpayers can receive if they engage in various government-specified activities.
Moreover, the tax credits would mostly go to those who pay little or nothing in federal income taxes. His trick is to make the tax credits “refundable.” Thus, if the tax credit is for $1,000, but the taxpayer would otherwise only pay $200 in taxes, the government would write a check to the taxpayer for $800. If the taxpayer pays nothing in federal income taxes, the government would pay him the whole $1,000.
Such credits are not tax cuts. Indeed, they should be called The New Tax Welfare. In effect, Mr. Obama is proposing to create or expand a slew of government spending programs that are disguised as tax credits. The spending on these programs is then subtracted from the total tax burden, in order to make the claim that his tax plan is a net tax cut overall.
On the tax side of the ledger, the details released by his campaign last week confirm what a President Obama has in mind for our most productive citizens. The top individual income tax rate, for example, would be increased by 13%, to 39.6%; the next-highest rate would be raised to 36%. The top rates on capital gains and dividends would rise by a third, to 20%
The Social Security payroll tax would be raised between 16% to 32% for families making over $250,000 a year. This means that the real returns these people get from their lifetime payments into the retirement program will be driven below 0%, according to my own previous research, which was published by the Cato Institute and elsewhere.
Mr. Obama also wants a permanent federal estate tax, with a top rate of 45%; his health-insurance plan includes a new payroll tax on employers; and he also contemplates several increases in the corporate income tax, including a new so-called windfall profits tax on oil companies.
Then there is the spending side of the ledger. Mr. Obama proposes a fully refundable Making Work Pay Tax Credit, which would have the government pay out $500 to each worker and $1,000 to couples — reminiscent of George McGovern’s 1972 election proposal for the government to send a $1,000 check to everyone.
His American Opportunity Tax Credit would provide a $4,000, fully refundable tax credit for college tuition expenses. His Mortgage Interest Tax Credit would provide a 10% credit — refundable — to offset mortgage interest payments for lower- and middle-income families. His Health Care Tax Credits, which the campaign says “will ensure that health insurance is available and affordable for all families,” include “a new refundable 50 percent health tax credit on employee premiums paid by employers.”
Currently existing tax credits would also become spending programs in the Obama tax program. The Savers Credit would be made fully refundable, and would be expanded, according to the campaign, “to match 50% of the first $1,000 of savings for families that earn under $75,000.” The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit would be made refundable and expanded to allow “low-income families to receive up to a 50 percent credit on the first $6,000 of child care expenses.”
The Earned Income Tax Credit is already refundable. Mr. Obama would expand it to “increase the number of working parents eligible for EITC benefits, increase the benefits available to noncustodial parents who fulfill their child support obligations, increase benefits for families with three or more children, and reduce the EITC marriage penalty, which hurts low-income families.” In short, welfare spending is to be increased by paying more money out to low-income income tax filers.
The latest Congressional Budget Office data shows the bottom 40% of income earners already pays no income taxes. Indeed, they receive a net payment from the federal income tax system — meaning from the taxpayers — equal to 3.8% of all federal income taxes, because of the refundable tax credits under current law. The middle 20% of income earners, the true middle class, pays 4.4% of federal income taxes.
Overall, the bottom 60% of income earners pay less than 1% of federal income taxes on net. When “tax credits” primarily go to this group in the form of checks from the government (rather than a reduction in their tax burden) it is simply an abuse of the language to call the spending a tax cut.
Consequently, to say, as the campaign does say, that the candidate’s tax plan is a tax cut on net — and that it would limit taxes to 18.2% of GDP — is grossly misleading. The Obama tax plan would sharply increase real taxes. It also would come nowhere near to paying for the massive increases in federal spending he has proposed, including the spending that is disguised in the form of refundable tax credits.
The Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121910303529751345.html?mod=most_emailed_day

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

Obama admits he supports Marxism during an interview with Bill O’Reilly on Fox News…
*** The Obama NEOCOMMIES [KGB] Squad has blocked the video but the text of the interview is still posted.
By Scott Miller
Karl Marx, author of The Communist Manifesto, penned the recap of his basic economic philosophy below:
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”
Barack Obama, in an interview with Bill O’Reilly on Fox News, admits that he shares the above Marxist economic theory. Watch this (5:47 into the clip, but watch the whole clip):
“If am sittin’ pretty, and you’ve got a waitress who is making minimum wage plus tips, and I can afford it and she can’t, what’s the big deal for me to say I’m going to pay a little bit more… that is neighborliness”
No Senator, that is Marxism. What kind of dementia makes these liberal Marxists think they have the right to tell someone else, another free human being, how much money they should or should not have? It’s none of your damn business Barack… but the hell out!
And some of you thought I was exaggerating when I said this clown was a Marxist…
Obama Admits He Supports Marxism
http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=550

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

If Obama is elected and his foolish taxation scheme forces my business to lay off workers, won’t I be justified in cutting loose those with Obama bumper stickers on their cars first?

Posted by: mrbubbleintrouble | November 1, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

If Obama gets elected, which the Marxist moron probably will, I am cashing in my 401K, consulting my accountant and opening up a Swiss bank account to hide my money in. Bammy is not going to get my money and give it to lazy good-for-nothings who refuse to work as hard as I do for what I have got. Spread the wealth? Heck no!!! I am keeping my money and Nobama will not get it.

Posted by: Jennifer | November 1, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

“Of the 50 states, Alaska ranks….blah blah blah…”
Posted by (un)Concerned American
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/obama-will-say.html?cid=137263015#comment-137263015
————————————-
Hmmm, at least you know how many states there are in the Union, BOZO!
Obama thinks there are 57! (poor thing…he got confused with the 57 states of Islam!)
REUTERS NEWS
May 9 – On the campaign trail in Beaverton, Oregon, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama mistakenly tells a crowd that’s he’s been to 57 states – with one left to go.
Reuters Video
Obama: I HAVE BEEN IN 57 STATES
http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=82127

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

granny toot.. you are the stain on the shirt of intelligence that the advances in science, engineering and education just cant seem to wipe out. It’s a sad reality that ignorance, bigotry, predjudice and hatred will forever blight the advances of mankind.

Posted by: Reg Nullify | November 1, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

Obama Soviet Anthem: Hilarious …. :>
http://www.wikio.com/video/389423
*O’ Hail the Messiah Lord Obama
Glenn Beck Parody base on the Hymn “Gimn Sovetskogo Soyuza” (The National Anthem of the Soviet Union)
P.S. if Obama is elected, we should consider this “anthem” for his “coronation” (it appears to be in line with his “Marxist/Radical” political ideology and his “overinflated ego”).

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

I just think some people are not getting Mr. Obama over raising tax. For America to grow back to the position it has always been financially tax as to be raised. Whether McCain or Obama wins this election tax will go up at some point. But at least someone is bold enough to say we is going to increase tax. Republicans are not honest at all about increasing tax and that is going into the Bush administration that has failed for 8years. the national debt will keep on rising and the economy will nose dive.Obama should and would be accountable for the extra revenues he is requesting and the republicans are like we are not responsible to anyone as we have not made any promise.I am a British but i think America dont want to experience another 4years of hardship to a government that dont think it should be accountable to the public over how they manage the countrys economy and finances.Democratic government rarely fails when in power and the new president should be from a party that has a track record of producing great leaders and president.

Posted by: Aaron | November 1, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Someone predicted Palin would be unmasked. If anyone is the phony in this election..It is her. She has been caught in so many lies even denied she spent 150,000 on clothes and the next day McCain said they had returned some of them. These are the sleezy folks who should not be voted in office – Palin we hope you a safe journey back to Alaska.

Posted by: Jerry | November 1, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am

There are all kinds of taxes. Bush-Cheney, McCain-Gramm’s idea of making the rich super rich and the Middle Class jobless was a kind of reverse socialist tax. Look at the U.S. today. Millions are out of work and millions more on the edge. Retirees have lost over Two Trillion in retirement fund value. People have lost homes, pensions, health care, the ability to send their children to higher education. Meanwhile, the rich CEOs have gotten hundreds of millions for leading laying people off and leading their corporations into bankruptcy. McCain’s adviser Carly Fiorina got a 40 Million Dollar golden parachute at HP and mostly what she did was lay thousands off. McCain’s advisers are former lobbyists and CEOs who got rich working for the the corporations which stabbed the middle class in the back. There was a “make the rich richer and the Middle Class jobless” tax under Bush-Cheney, McCain-Gramm. And that will continue. McCain will keep the Bush tax cuts for the rich. He will give huge tax cuts to corporations including billions to companies like Exxon which has the largest profit in history last quarter. He will tax health care premiums and essentially do away with employer-matched health care plans. The whole Bush-Cheney, McCain-Gramm philosophy led us to where we are. We need someone with a different philosopy, a philosophy which puts the Middle Class first, and that someone is Barack Obama.

Posted by: Joe Barone | November 1, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Hi Natasha,
Are you saying republicans are not going to raise tax?
If that is what you think, then you have been miss informed.
there are different types of tax
Progressive, Regressive and Proportional Tax.
For a country that is struggling financially at the moment, Progressive Tax is the best of the tax to apply which is the more you earn the more you pay that is how most economy operates even the United Kingdom.
I think America should quit this stuff of Socialism – That is not the definition of Socialism
Socialism is sharing the produce equally within a country
If CEO could be having $2million bonus and you are talking about socialism, No, that thought is false

Posted by: Aaron | November 1, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

McCain cannot wait to bring that adulteress to the white house. They have been trying to keep everything hush hush to keep the press from getting hold of the news that Sarah Palin had an affair with her husband’s best friend and business partner. Who is the baby’s father. Is that how it’s going to be.

Posted by: mary | November 1, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

All I keep seeing from John McCain and Sarah Palin is attacks of desperation. I used to think highly of John McCain but he has not run a clean presidential campaign, he has lied more than Obama (check http://www.factcheck.org/ for more info), Sarah Palin could never be a good president, neither of them understand the economy and frankly I think they are more likely to push hard for congress to authorize another war.

Posted by: Nathan | November 1, 2008, 3:33 am 3:33 am

Update America:
Catholics are lighting prayer candles for John McCain and Sarah Palin to win the election. The Catholic Church cannot sponsor political candidates, but the parishioners of the church are free to support John McCain and Sarah Palin. Catholics across the United States of America know the importance of John McCain and Sarah Palin winning the election for the White House.
We are asking Baptist, Latter-Day-Saints, Jews, and Christians of all denomination to pray to God for a John McCain and Sarah Palin victory.
May God hear our prayers to lead us from the deceptions and lies from the ones that oppose the free will of all men and of all women and may John McCain and Sarah Palin be lifted up to victory.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

A common monkey is more qualified to be President than Sarah Palin

Posted by: blindhowlin | November 1, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

She (and sadly her strongest supports) are the most malicious group of people out there.
Enough with the malice – perhaps her witchdoctor wasn’t able to cure her after all!

Posted by: EM | November 1, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

Obama’s tax policy isn’t creeping down … McCain, on the other hand, is revising his on the run. There is an article on this website which details the plans he now has for decreasing tax on the wealthy – a very drastic measure designed, out of desparation, to attack the cashed up and greedy. Most of us don’t fall into that bracket – and those who do have plenty of money are not all greedy or self serving. Many of them also want a better deal for the Nation that has given them the opportunities for success. They are happy to give back. So McCain, Again, strikes out. He keeps bending over backwards to reach out to fringe elements: Fundamentalist extremes in his own party, Right Wing Nut Jobs, The Greediest element among the wealthy…add it all together, and you have less than 20% of the nation as a whole – and that’s being generous. The group of people he continues to ignore? The majority. The Middle Class. GOP are so used to ignoring middle America, I guess it’s just force of habit with McCain. DON’T FORGET TO VOTE, PEOPLE. DON’T ASSUME WE HAVE IT IN THE BAG – EVERY VOTE COUNTS. VOTE OBAMA!

Posted by: chester burns | November 1, 2008, 3:43 am 3:43 am

Obama did not sell Mighty Putty or The Juicer in his infomercial last night, but it would have made the production a lot more interesting.
The Associated Press watched it, and surprisingly, the 30-minute infomercial also failed to impress them:
“Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was LESS THAN UPFRONT in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.
Obama’s assertion that “I’ve offered spending cuts above and beyond” the expense of his promises is accepted ONLY by his partisans. His vow to save money by “eliminating programs that don’t work” masks his FAILURE throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are – beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.”
Calvin Woodward reports that Obama misled viewers on at least five key points in his 30-minute final argument:
–Health care costs – Obama claimed his plan would lower costs by $2500 per year per family, but it DOES NOT. In fact, Obama can’t point to any particular cost reductions. He plans to spend $50 billion over five years on modernization and chronic-disease prevention and presumes that this will lower costs in the future, but in the meantime it RAISES COSTS at least in the short run on everyone (the $50 billion doesn’t come out of thin air).
–The Pay-Go of his plans – NO, he hasn’t demonstrated that he’s found the revenue for his spending, despite his claims last night. Non-partisan analysts believe that his spending programs will ADD at least $428 billion to the DEFICIT in his first term, and that’s if you accept his non-specific pledge to cut spending in other areas.
–Tax cuts for working class families – Before the commercial aired, he had already begun BACKING AWAY from that idea because of the financial crisis, although Obama didn’t acknowledge it in the ad.
–The “right” to affordable health care – Obama DOES NOT guarantee coverage in any of his plans, at least not for adults.
–Getting out of Iraq – Obama noted that the US spends $10 billion a month in Iraq and talked again about “bringing that war to a close” — but he’s BACKED AWAY from his previous pledges to get out on a strict 16-month timetable, which is as fast as the remaining units can be properly withdrawn.
Break:
Obama continues to deceive America voters. Obama supporters talk about Governor Sarah Palin, but Obama keeps lying to be the president. No one can believe a person that continues to lie about his program and continuously deceives the voting public. Obama supporters cannot substantiate their rhetoric.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Udate America | November 1, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

Obama did not sell Mighty Putty or The Juicer in his infomercial last night, but it would have made the production a lot more interesting.
The Associated Press watched it, and surprisingly, the 30-minute infomercial also failed to impress them:
“Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was LESS THAN UPFRONT in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.
Obama’s assertion that “I’ve offered spending cuts above and beyond” the expense of his promises is accepted ONLY by his partisans. His vow to save money by “eliminating programs that don’t work” masks his FAILURE throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are – beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.”
Calvin Woodward reports that Obama misled viewers on at least five key points in his 30-minute final argument:
–Health care costs – Obama claimed his plan would lower costs by $2500 per year per family, but it DOES NOT. In fact, Obama can’t point to any particular cost reductions. He plans to spend $50 billion over five years on modernization and chronic-disease prevention and presumes that this will lower costs in the future, but in the meantime it RAISES COSTS at least in the short run on everyone (the $50 billion doesn’t come out of thin air).
–The Pay-Go of his plans – NO, he hasn’t demonstrated that he’s found the revenue for his spending, despite his claims last night. Non-partisan analysts believe that his spending programs will ADD at least $428 billion to the DEFICIT in his first term, and that’s if you accept his non-specific pledge to cut spending in other areas.
–Tax cuts for working class families – Before the commercial aired, he had already begun BACKING AWAY from that idea because of the financial crisis, although Obama didn’t acknowledge it in the ad.
–The “right” to affordable health care – Obama DOES NOT guarantee coverage in any of his plans, at least not for adults.
–Getting out of Iraq – Obama noted that the US spends $10 billion a month in Iraq and talked again about “bringing that war to a close” — but he’s BACKED AWAY from his previous pledges to get out on a strict 16-month timetable, which is as fast as the remaining units can be properly withdrawn.
Break:
Obama continues to deceive America voters. Obama supporters talk about Governor Sarah Palin, but Obama keeps lying to be the president. No one can believe a person that continues to lie about his program and continuously deceives the voting public. Obama supporters cannot substantiate their rhetoric.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am

It’s a sad reality that ignorance, bigotry, predjudice and hatred will forever blight the advances of mankind.
Posted by: Reg Nullify
——————————-
Pardon moi??
Please do not start with these “melodramatic” – sympathy invoking comments – about race, bigotry, hatred… blah blah blah…
If you had read my comments carefully, you would have realized that my issue that I oppose
SOCIALISTS/RADICALS/MARXISTS here and elsewhere, ie. Europe. The same way I oppose Obama’s radical ideology here, I have opposed Socialist leaders in Europe. Do you see “race” to have anything to do with my views on “European Socialism”?
Whether you like it or not, the issues we discuss pertain to Obama’s character, judgement, and political ideology. Did anyone turn around to say that the reason people questioned Bill Clinton’s character or Edward’s character regarding their “extra-marital affairs” was because he was white? Oh! I see, if Clinton was Afro-American and under the exact same circumstances someone had tried to “impeach” him. half of the country and the media would be “screaming” about “race” or we would have had a new civil war?
Please stop diverting from legitimate concerns about Obama’s character, judgement, political ideology, and experience by “waving the race card.”

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

At a time that Europe is awakening up – turning to the “right” after years of “failed socialism” it would be a crime to elect Marxist Obama as the next President of the United States of America.
Even France learned the lessons of its “failed socialism” and elected conservative Nicholas Sarkozy – a staunch friend of the United States. And here we are…Americans are about to let our country be destroyed by MARXIST BARACK OBAMA!
The following video is for the geopolitically savvy and morally sound American patriots – not for the “Obama Communist Youth”!
*****
A most remarkable speech: Sarkozy’s Speech Before the US Congress (video)
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/
“France’s new leader Nicolas Sarkozy gave a speech before Congress that was, dare I say, almost…Reaganesque. He called America “the greatest nation,” among other platitudes.
You can view the whole thing here, and I really think you should all watch it.
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/
He speaks of America in such glowing terms that you almost wonder if he isn’t, in some ways, more American than certain Democrats I could think of.
What’s particularly interesting is that, years ago when the Bush presidency was new and Iraq was a fresh issue, the left told us constantly that George Bush was making America less popular in the world. Yet during the President’s term in office three of our traditional allies (Canada, Germany and now France) elected leaders that displaced virulently anti-Bush and anti-American leaders with people more of Sarkozy’s temperament (Stephen Harper in Canada and Angela Merkel in Germany).
Sort of almost seems like…that whole “less popular America” thing just isn’t true.”
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am

AP: Obama aunt from Kenya living in US illegally
WASHINGTON (AP) – Barack Obama’s aunt, a Kenyan woman who has been quietly living in public housing in Boston, is in the United States illegally after an immigration judge rejected her request for asylum four years ago, The Associated Press has learned. Zeituni Onyango, 56, referred to as “Aunti Zeituni” in Obama’s memoir, was instructed to leave the United States by a U.S. immigration judge who denied her asylum request, a person familiar with the matter told the AP late Friday. This person spoke on condition of anonymity because no one was authorized to discuss Onyango’s case.
Information about the deportation case was disclosed and confirmed by two separate sources, one of them a federal law enforcment official. The information they made available is known to officials in the federal government, but the AP could not establish whether anyone at a political level in the Bush administration or in the McCain campaign had been involved in its release. Onyango’s refusal to leave the country would represent an administrative, non-criminal violation of U.S. immigration law, meaning such cases are handled outside the criminal court system. Estimates vary, but many experts believe there are more than 10 million such immigrants in the United States.
The AP could not reach Onyango immediately for comment. No one answered the telephone number listed in her name late Friday. It was unclear why her request for asylum was rejected in 2004.
Onyango is not a relative whom Obama has discussed in campaign appearances and, unlike Obama’s father and grandmother, is not someone who has been part of the public discussion about his personal life.
A spokeswoman for U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Kelly Nantel, said the government does not comment on an individual’s citizenship status or immigration case.
Onyango’s case—coming to light just days before the presidential election—led to an unusual nationwide directive within Immigrations and Customs Enforcement requiring any deportations prior to Tuesday’s election to be approved at least at the level of ICE regional directors, the U.S. law enforcement official told the AP.
The unusual directive suggests that the Bush administration is sensitive to the political implications of Onyango’s case coming to light so close to the election. Kenya is in eastern Africa between Somalia and Tanzania. The country has been fractured in violence in recent years, including a period of two months of bloodshed after December 2007 that killed 1,500 people. The disclosure about Onyango came just one day after Obama’s presidential campaign confirmed to the Times of London that Onyango, who has lived quietly in public housing in South Boston for five years, was Obama’s half aunt on his father’s side. It was not immediately clear how Onyango might have qualified for public housing with a standing deportation order

Posted by: USA-NC-08 | November 1, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?
Remember, this was written by a
highly respected Democrat….
http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081017light.html

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

I’m voting for Obama, but Palin’s right that his tax plan is phony. What she doesn’t say is that so is McCain’s. Independent analyses indicate both men’s promises would add over $300B to the national debt. But if either one told the truth about what needs to be done to straighten out America from the tremendous damage to our infrastructure and debt done by the Bush Admin, they wouldn’t get a vote.

Posted by: Mickey | November 1, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

I’d like to hear her speak, without notes, for 15 minutes about the McCain tax plan. She cannot go forward under the campaign banner “I don’t understand our tax plan, and won’t tell you about it, but I do know his is wrong.”

Posted by: Sheila | November 1, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

Palin really needs to SHUT UP!

Posted by: Lochini | November 1, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

I don’t know who Mark Gregg is but I am glad this
letter is circulating. It puts into words what many
people feel.

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am

She doesn’t even do her own returns. All she know about tax is spelling T-A-X. Now please go back to A-L-A-S-K-A before you embarrass us females.

Posted by: Lochini | November 1, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am

And Gregg you are a big time RACIST. You just don’t know it and giving all this crappy 7 excuses. God save you.

Posted by: Lochini | November 1, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

John McCain says he is very proud of Sarah Palin, well I am very proud of my daughter. I have two teenage grandsons that are very civic minded and have watched the race carefully. My daughter has explained to them the dirty tactics that are involved in the McCain/Palin campaign and that they are never to conduct themselves in that manner no matter the opponent or had bad they want something. They have always been taught to be honest and tell the truth no matter the consequences. McCain and Palin are horrible role models for the young and leads them to believe it is ok to be dishonest, lie and spread scurilous rumors about someone else. McCain and Palin are people at their worst.

Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | November 1, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

“So irrespective of what the polls look like, we have no choice but to show up en masse and unequivocally reject Republicans like Sarah Palin –… Imagine what an undisputed electoral victory would say to Republican strategists like Bill Kristol who suggested to John McCain that the easiest path to victory was the politics of fear. …There are a lot of things to ridicule about Sarah Palin’s incomprehensible speaking style, her pathological dishonesty and her backwards, simplistic views on the issues. But it’s her politics of fear and division that must be wholly rejected on Tuesday because it’s too terrible to imagine waking up one week from today in an America that rewards the awfulness and fear which she and her subterranean allies require in order to politically exist.

Posted by: James | November 1, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

A DICTATOR’S ENDORSEMENT FOR BARACK OBAMA…
Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi marking the anniversary of the U.S. air raid on Libya. The address aired on Al-Jazeera TV on June 11, 2008:
“Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi: Obama Suffers Inferiority Complex That Might Make Him Behave “Whiter Than the White.” He Should Be Proud of His African, Muslim Identity. Ben-Gurion Gave the Green Light for the Killing of JFK ….”
TEXT (Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008)
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1791.htm
VIDEO – Qadhafi: Obama is a Muslim – Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/gaddafi-obama-is-a-muslim/2563816338/?icid=VIDURVNWS07

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

MIA: Marxists: Marx & Engels: Library: 1848: Manifesto of the Communist Party: Chapter 2:
To ALL morally sound patriotic Americans:
Please take a look at Marx’s list of goals for communism in chapter two of “The Communist Manifesto”
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm, you can see that socialism has already made great advances in the United States.
But in particular pay attention to No. 2 — “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.”
MIA: Marxists: Marx & Engels: Library: 1848: Manifesto of the Communist Party: Chapter 2:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
Obama and Marx: A crash course
© 2008 Northwest Montana Daily Inter Lake
http://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2008/10/22/opinion/columns

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am

Who better to throw the kitchen sink than Palin. Of course, Joe plumber makes it easier to remove the pipes to free the kitchen sink. McCain knew how much Joe the plumber could be exploited when it comes to throwing the sink. It is the economy stupid and you don’t get it. McCain Palin have no plan to get the economy back on track so they are just trying to scare people into making desperate decisions. Obama has taken the higher ground and stayed out of the mudfight and will prevail for that reason more than any.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | November 1, 2008, 4:24 am 4:24 am

Obama fundraiser, convicted of fraud, spills beans
The Associated Press
By MIKE ROBINSON – Oct 11, 2008
CHICAGO (AP) — Jailed political fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko, the Chicago real estate developer who helped launch Barack Obama on his political career, is whispering secrets to federal prosecutors about corruption in Illinois and the political fallout could be explosive.
Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, whose administration faces multiple federal investigations over how it handed out jobs and money with advice from Rezko, is considered the most vulnerable.
Rezko also was friendly with Obama — offering him a job when he finished law school, funding his earliest political campaigns and purchasing a lot next to his house. But based on the known facts, charges so far and testimony at Rezko’s trial, there’s no indication there’ll be an October surprise that could hurt the Democratic presidential nominee — even though Rezko says prosecutors are pressing him for dirt about Obama.
“I think this strikes fear into the Blagojevich administration and the Statehouse Democrats but not into the Obama campaign,” says state Sen. Kirk Dillard, R-Westmont, a John McCain delegate to the GOP convention but an old friend of Obama.
Rezko, 53, a real estate developer, was convicted in June of scheming to use his clout with the Blagojevich administration to squeeze $7 million in kickbacks out of a contractor and seven money management firms seeking to do business with the state.
Within two months, Rezko was seen in U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s office, along with his attorneys.
There has been no official confirmation that Rezko is talking but his sentencing has been postponed indefinitely and both sides say they are going to “engage in discussions that could affect their sentencing postures.”
“They never would have delayed the sentencing if he weren’t talking — it’s proof positive,” said Jay Stewart, executive director of the Better Government Association of Chicago.
In addition, attorneys say federal investigators have been questioning Blagojevich contributions around the state using information that only Rezko could have supplied. Finally, courthouse personnel requesting anonymity because grand jury probes are secret said Rezko has been repeatedly brought from his cell to the U.S. attorney’s office to talk to prosecutors.
Rezko could have a lot to tell. He has raised millions of dollars in campaign money for many Illinois politicians and according to federal prosecutors used his clout to control appointments to state boards.
Obama has sent to charity $159,000 that Rezko raised for his campaigns for the state legislature, the House and the Senate. Rezko raised nothing for Obama’s White House run.
Obama’s name came up in testimony at the trial four times, twice in connection with an obscure legislative memo, as a guest at a Rezko party and when defense attorney Joseph Duffy told jurors his client was a friend of the senator.
None of the witnesses accused the Democratic nominee for president of doing anything improper.
But questions concerning Obama’s relationship with Rezko linger, particularly over Rezko’s role in the purchase of the Obamas’ home.
The two have known each other for years, starting when Rezko offered Obama a job after he graduated from Harvard Law School in 1991. Obama didn’t take it, but a friendship developed.
The men talked politics frequently and occasionally dined together with their wives.
In 2005, the Obamas paid $1.65 million for their home near the University of Chicago. The sellers wanted a parcel they owned next door to sell on the same day, and Rezko’s wife, Rita, was the buyer. At the request of the Obamas, Mrs. Rezko later sold them a 10-foot strip of land to enlarge their lot. They paid $104,500.
The deal took place while Rezko was under investigation and when details of the cozy relationship surfaced, Obama said it was a “bonehead” error to have asked for the additional land because it looked like he was getting a favor.
“I regret it,” Obama said at the time. “I’m going to make sure that from this point on I don’t even come close to the line.”
McCain and vice running mate Sarah Palin have mentioned Rezko little if at all. But Republicans have aired a television ad focusing on Rezko. And McCain aides have repeatedly tweaked their opponent over the real estate deal in e-mails to reporters.
“We’re delighted to have a debate on judgment with Barack Obama, who bought his million-dollar mansion in a shady deal with a convicted felon,” McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said in August.
Blagojevich, meanwhile, got a black eye from the trial.
One witness testified that Blagojevich talked about hiring him for a major state job while his $25,000 donation to the governor’s campaign fund was lying on the table.
Two attorneys testified that Blagojevich hinted that they could get lucrative state contracts if they raised money — possibly for a future White House campaign.
Obama’s name has not surfaced in accounts of the investigation since the trial. But Rezko himself raised it in a letter to the judge months ago.
“Your Honor, the prosecutors have been overzealous in pursuing a crime that never happened,” he wrote. “They are pressuring me to tell them the wrong things that I supposedly know about Gov. Blagojevich and Sen. Barack Obama.”
© 2008 The Associated Press.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hQmszDq4LOiRMcYNSaUdrmvTcB2AD93O8N500
I hope everyone teaches their children about these facts.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am

LANNY EDWARDS,
I KNOW YOUR CANIDATE HAS NOT LIED,CHEATED,OR MADE RIDICULOUS STATMENTS IN THIS RACE !!!

Posted by: reddog0216 | November 1, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am

A common monkey is more qualified to be President than Sarah Palin
Posted by: blindhowlin
———————————-
And, I suggest that you take the “Dumb Test” to find out if you are really dumb!… :>
The Dumb Test
http://www.quizrocket.com/dumb-test/1?tr=Take%20the%20DUMB%20TEST!&tr=Hey%20Dummy!!!!!&trt=9&gatherer_id=100522&utm_source=ValueClick&utm_medium=Pop&utm_campaign=DumbTestR1

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

The only thing I have left to say about this election is think of your children’s and grand-children’s future. No matter your political orientation, think of how these campaigns have been run and how the candidates have conducted themselves. The way these campaigns have been run is an example of how the future of this country will be run. If we pick the candidates that have a plan, we have a chance at a better future, if we pick the candidates that got elected through lies and vicious attack on their opponents and has no plan, the future of this country looks very dim. The choice is ours to make!!

Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | November 1, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am

Anything said with the intent to deceive, is a lie.
As a Christian, I am appalled at Sarah Palin’s continued deceptive speeches. She does not represent the Christ that I believe in.
As for Obama’s “socialist” tax plan, even Alan Greenspan has stated that there is too much disparity of wealth in this country. And as an individual that will be probably be affected by Obama’s tax plan, I’m still voting for him!
Sen. McCain’s senility is beginning to show through. Didn’t you just love his talk in Western PA? “Senator Obama’s supporters have been saying some pretty nasty things about western PA, lately. (Crowd boos in background) And, you know, I couldn’t agree with him more!” It was a great moment!

Posted by: AnyMouse | November 1, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

Palin is a damaged good. First impression in politics is always the lasting impression. The McCain campaign has a good reason to hide her from the Press; she is a loose canon and all lipstick and no substance.
This is a pick that should not have been made in the first place. All this talk about her becoming the leader of the Republican Party after 2008 is just wishful thinking. She may appeal to a small segment of the party but will never be taken seriously or become the flag bearer of the party.

Posted by: iinwosu | November 1, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am

Sarah Palin, a Neiman Marxist

Posted by: blindhowlin | November 1, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am

Obama may have received an excellent education – thanks to this great country that gave him the opportunity. Unfortunately he forgot his brains at Harvard.
If “coronated”, that Marxist/Radical one, will be responsible for the destruction of our country. And, those who voted for him will be equally responsible and accountable to the rest of the morally sound American people.

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am

Hmmm…Gaza Arabs for Obama ’08!
([ISRAEL/INTERNATIONAL] IHC News, 29 October 2008)
1. Abu Jayyab and other Arab residents of Gaza have been running a freelance phone campaign for Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama in the final days of the US presidential race. According to a recent article in the Al-Hayat Al-Jadia daily, Gaza Arab support teams use Internet sites that allow free calls from which they randomly phone individuals in the United States and urge them to vote for Obama. Other forms of support for the Democratic senator have issued forth from the Hamas-controlled region in past months: A July 2008 probe into Obama’s received donations alleged he had accepted $30,000 in 2007 from two Arab brothers living in the Gaza Strip. Additionally, during an April 2008 radio interview, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh’s political advisor Ahmed Yousef said, “Actually, we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will [win] the election.” Republican presidential candidate Senator John McCain commented in response it was clear why Hamas would not want him to be the American president, and if the terrorist organization favored Obama then people could make judgements accordingly. A Reuter’s telephone poll released 29 October revealed Obama holds a four point national lead over McCain. A recent survey of 500 Israeli Jewish adults commissioned by the Rabin Center for Israel Studies showed Israelis overwhelmingly prefer McCain to Obama. If given the opportunity to vote in the US presidential election, Israelis would choose McCain by a margin of 12% over his Democratic opponent. (Sources: INN/IHC)
2. French President Nicolas Sarkozy has reportedly described US presidential candidate Barack Obama’s stance on Iran as being “utterly immature,” and composed of “formulations empty of all content.” Sarkozy’s criticisms, made during closed meetings in France, reached Israel’s government in recently forwarded reports. According to a senior Israeli source, Sarkozy fears Obama might “arrogantly” ignore the policy of five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany who maintain a united front on Iran. The French president is concerned Obama will open a direct dialogue with the Islamic Republic with no preconditions. Sarkozy has repeatedly expressed disappointment with Obama’s views on Iran since meeting with the Democratic senator in July 2008. He is of the opinion Obama’s stance is not crystallized and too open. Aides to the French president who held separate meetings with Obama’s advisors left talks with similar impressions and expressed similar disappointment. (Sources: Haaretz/IHC)
http://www.infoisrael.net/cgi-local/text.pl?source=2/a/ix/291020081

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am

Ahahaaha!…
Obama just realized that we have one President at a time! At least, that is what he recently told President Sarkozy of France!… (see article URL below)
Yes, after Obama got blasted by Germany’s Merkel and the media (here and abroad) for giving that pathetic speech in Berlin – the speech that will NOT be going down in history as Obama imagined it – now he turned down Sarkozy’s invitation to attend the economic crisis summit on Nov. 15.
I guess Obama – the “hypocrite” – did not want to hear the music again and also did not want to be seen together with President Bush and Sarkozy (Sarkozy is a right wing conservative).
Of course, we know that Obama does not like to associate himself with “right wing conservatives”…he prefers the company of “terrorrists/socialists/radicals/communists/marxists”!!
Obama declined Sarkozy’s invitation to the “Economic Crisis Summit”, which France’s President Sarkozy is organizing in Washington but Obama had no problem touring Europe and giving a speech in Berlin! His Audacity went to Berlin but did not even visit our wounded soldiers at the Ramstein airforce base.
Read the full story here…You will also find an international level “gaffe” by Biden that Europeans paid attention to but the American people do not even know about it. That is because our left wing liberal media does not like to report negative things about their “Chosen Ones”.
This is just a partial comment from the story as published in the International Herald Tribune:

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:45 am 4:45 am

What a freaky ##tch she is. She is dumber than a box of rocks! Go back under your rock up in Alaska and be a mother. You have a son and daughter that both dropped out of high school, a daughter that is pregnant and unmarried, and a special needs child that will require a lot of your time as he ages. You have a husband who is an idiot – but that is okay. So are you. You went to 5 universities to get your BA in HOW MANY YEARS? You may not even be as sharp as a dull butter knife. And you have a running mate who looks more like a velociraptor with those deformed arms than he does a human. I know that will irritate people who think I am trashing their “hero.” I don’t care. Go look at the reports out there and tell me that you can prove those are a result of his pow years (which personally I am tired of hearing about since there are other vets out there who suffered the same fate) AND I am not convinced that he got them that way. It is just as likely that he got them during one of the FIVE TIMES he crashed jets AND destroyed a ship because of a crashed jet! You really are all fools of a magnitude that I have never seen before! DUMB AND DUMBER need to go home and take their idiot families with them – don’t let the door hit them on the way out!!!

Posted by: durrs | November 1, 2008, 4:47 am 4:47 am

Update America:
Sarah Palin is not anti-Jew anti-white. She is pro-Christ and His love lighting her dedicated life. That is the impetus of her service to others. That is the motive that propels whatever she does. Consequently, unlike Michelle being warped by a cult, Sarah Palin has been molded by scripture’s counsel.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

The economy hurts the GOP everywhere. People remember how the rich got super rich and the Middle Class got jobless. After all, McCain wants to keep the Bush tax cuts for the rich, tax health care premiums and do away with employer-matched health care programs, and give billions of dollars in tax breaks to corporations, even to oil companies which have had the most profitable year in their history. Meanwhile, what will happen to the Middle Class under McCain? They’ll be left behind just like always.

Posted by: JAB | November 1, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am

Play Video Video: AP Top Stories AP Play Video Video: Obama delivers closing argument in radio address AP Play Video Video: Obama increasingly confident CNN WASHINGTON – Barack Obama’s aunt, a Kenyan woman who has been quietly living in public housing in Boston, is in the United States illegally after an immigration judge rejected her request for asylum four years ago, The Associated Press has learned.
Zeituni Onyango, 56, referred to as “Aunti Zeituni” in Obama’s memoir, was instructed to leave the United States by a U.S. immigration judge who denied her asylum request, a person familiar with the matter told the AP late Friday. This person spoke on condition of anonymity because no one was authorized to discuss Onyango’s case.
Information about the deportation case was disclosed and confirmed by two separate sources, one of them a federal law enforcement official. The information they made available is known to officials in the federal government, but the AP could not establish whether anyone at a political level in the Bush administration or in the McCain campaign had been involved in its release.
Onyango’s refusal to leave the country would represent an administrative, non-criminal violation of U.S. immigration law, meaning such cases are handled outside the criminal court system. Estimates vary, but many experts believe there are more than 10 million such immigrants in the United States.
The AP could not reach Onyango immediately for comment. A reporter went to her home Friday night and no one answered the door. A neighbor said she was often not home on the weekend. Also, Onyango did not immediately return a telephone or written message left at her home. It was unclear why her request for asylum was rejected in 2004.
The Obama campaign declined to comment late Friday night.
Onyango is not a relative whom Obama has discussed in campaign appearances and, unlike Obama’s father and grandmother, is not someone who has been part of the public discussion about his personal life.
A spokeswoman for U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Kelly Nantel, said the government does not comment on an individual’s citizenship status or immigration case.
Onyango’s case — coming to light just days before the presidential election — led to an unusual nationwide directive within Immigrations and Customs Enforcement requiring any deportations prior to Tuesday’s election to be approved at least at the level of ICE regional directors, the U.S. law enforcement official told the AP.
The unusual directive suggests that the Bush administration is sensitive to the political implications of Onyango’s case coming to light so close to the election.
Kenya is in eastern Africa between Somalia and Tanzania. The country has been fractured in violence in recent years, including a period of two months of bloodshed after December 2007 that killed 1,500 people.
The disclosure about Onyango came just one day after Obama’s presidential campaign confirmed to the Times of London that Onyango, who has lived quietly in public housing in South Boston for five years, was Obama’s half aunt on his father’s side.
It was not immediately clear how Onyango might have qualified for public housing with a standing deportation order.
___
AP writer Elliott Spagat reported from New York.

Posted by: Buck | November 1, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

WHEN HAS ANY AMERICAN LISTEND TO THE FRENCH….THEY DID NOT EVEN GO TO WAR WITH US IN IRAQ….FORGET THAT FRENCH CRACKHEAD…OBAMA IS 10X SMARTER AND HAS BETTER MORALS…

Posted by: Libby Dole | November 1, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am

Update America:
–Tax cuts for working class families – Before the commercial aired, he had already begun BACKING AWAY from that idea because of the financial crisis, although Obama didn’t acknowledge it in the ad.
–The “right” to affordable health care – Obama DOES NOT guarantee coverage in any of his plans, at least not for adults.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

WHEN HAS ANY AMERICAN LISTEND TO THE FRENCH….THEY DID NOT EVEN GO TO WAR WITH US IN IRAQ….FORGET THAT FRENCH CRACKHEAD…OBAMA IS 10X SMARTER AND HAS BETTER MORALS…
Posted by: Libby Dole | Nov 1, 2008 8:57:23 AM
You forget something Obama wants us to be just like the french!!!!!

Posted by: reddog0216 | November 1, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

No wonder, why the “New York Post” journalist/s got kicked out of NEOCOMMIE Obama’s campaign plane!
They had endorced McCain and published this article just 4 days ago. Well, yesterday they were “thrown out” of Obama’s plane.
So much for those “Greek Columns” at the DNC Convention, which symbolize the birth of democracy in Ancient Greece. Obama is “trashing” free speech and “democracy” in America the same way he “trashed” those Greek Columns… (needless to say many in the Greek – American Community feel offended and will NOT vote for Obama.
***
OBAMA & THE ARABS – WHY MUSLIMS SEE HIM AS ONE OF THEM
NEW YORK POST
October 28, 2008
‘OBAMA! Inshallah!” – Obama! Allah willing! That slogan, scribbled on walls in Gaza, indicates the hopes that Barack Obama has inspired among Arabs.
While Obama has tried to push his origins into the background, his “Islamic roots” have won him a place in many Arabs’ hearts.
One columnist, Mohamed Al-Menshawi, hails Obama as “the candidate with Muslim roots” and as the “harbinger of solidarity between Americans and the Muslim world.”
Another, Al-Jazeera’s Aala al-Bayoumi, notes: “Had it not been for Obama, Arabs would not even bother to follow the US presidential race.” What makes the difference is Obama’s “Islamic and African roots.”
Marwan Bishara hails Obama’s “radical politics”: “For the US to vote in an African-American progressive liberal would certainly mark a departure from the hyper and violent conservatism of the Bush-McCain camp,” he writes. An Obama presidency “would be better for both the US and the Arab world.”
Obama especially appeals to pan-Arab nationalists angry at the United States for having ousted Saddam Hussein. Obama’s promise to leave Iraq gives pan-Arabs their only chance (albeit slim) to destroy the new Iraqi democracy.
While radical Arabs, including the Hamas leadership, favor Obama, most Arab officials are wary of him. They fear his inexperience and leftist connections might destroy all that has been gained in Iraq, provoke a bigger mess in Afghanistan, trigger a war with Pakistan and open the way for Khomeinist hegemony in the region.
Note that Obama wouldn’t be the first politician with Muslim roots to lead a major non-Muslim country. Carlos Menem, a Muslim of Syrian descent, served as Argentina’s president from 1989 to 1999. But he dropped his Arab-Islamic first name and adopted his baptismal Christian name before entering politics.
Obama, by contrast, has retained his Arabic-Islamic names. (Barack means “blessed” and Hussein means “beautiful.”) His family name is Swahili, an East African lingua franca based on Arabic. Arab commentators note that his siblings also all have Arabic Muslim names. His sister is called Oumah, Arabic for “the community of the faithful his older daughter, Malia, bears the name of a daughter of the Caliph Othman, who commissioned the compilation of the first edition of the Koran. That Obama’s stepfather was also a Muslim (from Indonesia) strengthens the empathy that many Arabs feel for him.
The Syrian regime has also indicated its preference for Obama, not least because President Bush forced it to end its 29-year military occupation of Lebanon. Buthaina Shaaban, an adviser to President Bashar al-Assad, has welcomed Obama’s call for radical change in US policy. She writes, “The change suggested by Obama is essential not only for the US but for the entire human family.”
Also enthusiastic for Obama is the Lebanese Hezbollah. The party’s No. 2, Sheik Naim al-Kassim, went as far as inviting Americans to vote Obama as a step toward peace with Islam. (The party disowned his comments as “personal opinion.”) Pro- Hezbollah columnist Amal Saad-Ghorayeb has no doubt that Arabs should welcome an Obama presidency because “African-Americans are more sympathetic to Arabs because they, too, are oppressed.”
Hussein Shobokshi, a liberal Saudi commentator, predicts that “Obama’s ascent to power in America would mark an important moral transformation in the superpower and is a healthy indicator of the long-awaited improvement in the international arena.” He envisages a new system in America in which “nongovernmental institutions will participate in the political decision-making process in an effective manner,” while “capitalism will undergo fundamental adjustment.”
Another liberal writer, Diana Makkled, sees Obama’s success as a sign that America is still the place where dreams are realized. That a man with a Muslim-African background might become president “could only take place in the US, not in the banana republics we live in,” she writes.
Arabs welcomed and widely commented on Colin Powell’s assertion that, even if Obama were a Muslim, it should not be held against him.
Some columnists have also noted Obama’s close ties to a number of Palestinian radicals, including Rashid Khalidi and the late Edward Said, as signs that the senator would change US Middle East policy in the Arabs’ favor. Strengthening that impression was an interview the Rev. Jessie Jackson granted to several Arab media outlets, including Al-Jazeera and the popular Internet newspaper Elaph, in which he promised an end to the United States’ allegedly pro-Israel policy.
Not all Arab commentators are struck by Obamania, however. His flip-flops on issues – including the future of Jerusalem, withdrawal from Iraq and dealing with the Iranian nuclear threat – have prompted some to counsel caution.
Tareq Al-Houmayed, editor of the daily Asharq Alawsat, warns Arabs not to expect too much: “Every American president would be governed by American interests. Obama’s understanding of politics is not important here.”
Abdulrahman al-Rashed, a Saudi commentator, also notes that no president can radically alter US global policies. He advises Arabs to neither have exaggerated hopes nor be dispirited when Obama tells the Israelis “more than they hoped to hear” to win Jewish support.
Amir Taheri’s latest book, “The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution,” is due out next month.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/10282008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obama__the_arabs_135632.htm?page=0

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am

PUT PALIN IN PRISON NOT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IT IS IN VERY BAD SHAP NOW IT WOULD BE A HOLE LOT WORSE SHE IS JUST LIKE G.W BUSH SHE IS A CRIMINAL THAT IS A FACT SHE NEEDS A LONG TIME AT CLUB FEB

Posted by: RAMBOW | November 1, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am

Update America:
Sarah Palin has sat under biblical preaching. She has committed her very soul to the Christ of the Bible, not the prophet Jesus prayed to by the Obamas.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credential

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 5:02 am 5:02 am

Update America you can now kicks rocks like McRage and Sarah Falin on Nov. 4th. Beeyatch!!!!

Posted by: Trip | November 1, 2008, 5:04 am 5:04 am

Update America:
Michelle Obama, if living in the White House, would produce a secularization of this Republic. She would work tenaciously alongside her husband to envelope our country in the Islamic mindset for she is a mask Muslim.The Jeremiah Wright hold is very much still there—in both Michelle and B. Hussein.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am

Update America:
America stands at a most crucial crossroads. If Michelle Obama is chosen as first lady, the nation, except for some act of divine mercy, is doomed. That is not hyperbole. That is fact.
If Sarah Palin is chosen as Vice President, America will be blessed because of a genuine Christian servant seeking to discover Creator God’s will in daily life.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am

Update America:
Michelle Obama was brainwashed by anti-Jew anti-white pro-Muslim Jeremiah Wright in his political factory known as the United Church of Christ in Chicago. She subscribed to his cultic teachings; otherwise, she as an educationally trained mind would have exited his congregation long ago.
Wright preached vehemently blasphemy in sermonic deliveries time and again. Obamas sat in the pew taking all this in as gospel truth. They permitted their children to be so indoctrinated. Much of what Wright preached was anti-American to the core.
Update America does not respond to any Obama supporters without credentials.

Posted by: Update America | November 1, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am

You forget something Obama wants us to be just like the french!!!!!
Posted by: reddog0216
——————————
Ahahaha!..
The thing is that even the French kicked the Socialists out! Obama wants us to become like the Socialists that Sarkozy’s Right-Wing-Conservative Party kicked out!
3 of our major allies (Canada, France, Germany) have elected leaders which have replaced anti-Bush/anti-war politicians.
Wake Up America! Europe, Russia, China will end up to be “THE CAPITALISTS”, while under an Obama NEOCOMMIE regime – YEAH THAT ONE OF HOPE AND CHANGE – our country will be pehaps may end up trailing in 4th place! Is this what you want America?

Posted by: Natasha | November 1, 2008, 5:14 am 5:14 am

Well, we no longer have to work or do anything: Obama will solve all our problems.
Obama will pay our mortgage
Fill our gas tanks
and put food on the table
He will provide new clothes and cars for everyone.
The only problem that Obama has is that Obama can not help his own relatives living in huts and on welfare. How is He going to help the rest of Us?
Hey Obama walks on water!! He makes manure taste good!!
The Messiah has arrived., Lol.

Posted by: Trump Bryant | November 1, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Yet another lie from Mrs. Pinnociho.

Posted by: GWP | November 1, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Natasha,I bet you have “KING GEORGE”posters in your bedroom?

Posted by: 1Painter | November 1, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Obama nuts Why do you dispute facts Tell me in his infomercial did he or de he not say 200,000 on working families???? Did he or did he never mention Nuclear power .In his debates did he cleary state Nuclear power and did he promise a tax reduction on any working family under 250,000??

Posted by: reddog0216 | November 1, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am

GOP’s criteria selection for their VP nominee: Beauty queen. (Check.) Hockey mom. (Check.) Perpetually pregnant. (Check.) Under investigation for misconduct in public office. (Check.) Communications degree. (Check.) No experience in national domestic policy. (Check.) No experience with foreign policy. (Check.) Needs $150,000 for wardrobe, hair and make-up. (Check.) Accepts 27 million in earmarks for Wascilla, though falsely proclaims she is against earmarks. (Check.) Totally unprepared to take on the presidency on Day One. (Check.)………………. Sarah Palin’s our gal!

Posted by: Dannie | November 1, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am

If Obama becomes President within six months Obama will start butchering and gassing Christians and Jews.
Why?
A.- Obama is a born a Muslim and was a practicing Muslim until the age of 28 which makes him a secret Muslim.
Today I sold all my stocks and bonds and are in cash 100%.
I bought Guns food and Gold and are looking for a safe country in Europe.
Remember the smart Jews in Germany who didn’t believe in Hitler’s “Change”, they sold everything and moved to neutral countrie and lived. The others believed Hitler and were butchered and gassed.
I’m leaving for Europe soon. White civilization is about to end in the US and I don’t like the law of the Jungle.
May god save us all.

Posted by: Trump Bryant | November 1, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

It’s very simple. 200k or less = tax cut. 250k or more = tax increase. 200k-250k = no change. How can something so simple be twisted so many ways? GOP!

Posted by: Cosmo | November 1, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am

It’s very simple. 200k or less = tax cut. 250k or more = tax increase. 200k-250k = no change. How can something so simple be twisted so many ways? GOP!
Posted by: Cosmo | Nov 1, 2008 9:32:36 AM
Thats not what he said and you know it you can put any spin you want on it.He cleary stated 250,000 working family or less = tax cut now he has changed it own up to it he either lied or shifted his posistion.

Posted by: reddog0216 | November 1, 2008, 5:36 am 5:36 am

Has Obama ever miss spoke regarding his tax plan? Nope. Why is it that McCain and Republicans always try to hold him accountable for other people’s misstatements?

Posted by: kryminalll | November 1, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am

Simple math/logic lesson for the McCain supporters: there are three options – DECREASE, INCREASE and STAY THE SAME. If Obama says people earning over $250,000 will see an INCREASE that does not mean that he is promising people under $250,000 a DECREASE. All along they have said: 0-$199,999 DECREASE, $200,000-$250,000 STAY THE SAME and $250,001+ INCREASE. It is that simple.
The debatable point is whether people in the $150,000-$250,000 range will be better off under Obama or McCain, and the answer is that there is no real difference, unless you have a strong opinion on their healthcare plans (which I do: McCain’s plan to tax health insurance sucks). Since I earn less than $150,000, as do most people, I am better off under Obama for taxes at least.
Question: Did Palin ever release her health records. She is the only person who had not done so. Are we going to find out that this pro-lifer had an abortion? I am not sure why else she would hold back.

Posted by: Limorkil | November 1, 2008, 5:39 am 5:39 am

The ONLY reason people are voting for McCain is they cant stand the fact that a “HALF” BLACK MAN could be president!GET OVER IT FOLKS!,This is nearly 2009,Judge people by CHARACTER,NOT BY COLOR!I cant believe people want another “KING GEORGE” but then again we,re kinda getting use to being SCR#WED!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: 1Painter | November 1, 2008, 5:44 am 5:44 am

Limorkil,
That is not what he said and If you think his healthcare plan is better vote for him .My point is he and biden keep lowering the number Biden said the other day 150,000 well I will bet anyone he changes that if he gets elected even lower.Obama will drag this economy in to the sewer if he follows his tax plans but hey you will have healthcare but no job so good for all right

Posted by: reddog0216 | November 1, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am

Trump bryant,BY !Have a good flight! BY !

Posted by: 1Painter | November 1, 2008, 5:50 am 5:50 am

Sounds like Update America needs and actually update himself.
Michelle Obama rocks and if she were running for VP that would be a VP that makes sense. She’s intelligent, has a great sense of values and down to earth. What does she have to do with it anyway?
Palin who by some random force of nature with her JOURNALISM degree (no offense journalists) found her way into running not because she’s got any good ideas or because she’s “qualified”, but because The GOP was trying to pander to the womens vote, silly them as always not understanding what women want or how they think, especially educated and independent women. Why would those progressive women vote for a ticket that promotes Palins sexist values…oh er…I mean “traditional values”

Posted by: Valerie | November 1, 2008, 5:50 am 5:50 am

O Yeah, Trump,Take that dam skin-head JOE THE PLUMBER with you!

Posted by: 1Painter | November 1, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

Valerie ,
I know Valerie she be home taking care of those damn kids

Posted by: reddog0216 | November 1, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am

…….’NEWS FLASH!THIS JUST IN!SARIE PALINS MEDICAL RECORDS ARE IN!……EVERYTHING CHECKS OUT “OK” BUT …….BABY DUE IN EIGHT WEEKS!……… BABY IS “HALF BLACK”…….HEE!HEE!

Posted by: 1Painter | November 1, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am

THAT DAMN OBAMMY, HE NEVER COMES TO SEE ME.
NOW HE COMES HERE, HE JUST DOES IT FOR HIMSELF.
THAT DAMN A$$HOLE!
I TOLE HIM, YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON MICHELLE, BUT IT’S STILL A GORILLA!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | November 1, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

Adjusted for inflation that 100,00, is more like 50,000. So it actuality, he’s taxing not only those on the edges of the middle class, even the working poor.
Do we really believe that the monetairy value of a government benefit ever matches it’s cost? Look at your govt. benefits, and tell me if that is the case. If so, you’d be the 1st person I knew of. They are better off writing you a check for the value of your share the the Corporation of the United States of America; and letting you live out your life on your own means. Take the GDP divide it by population, we would be millionaires. And we could take care of ourselves. Google Walter Burien, or Comprehensive Annual Finacial Reports Exposed. The moey is there to take care of every US citizen, but the elite will never let you get your hands on it. (That means Obama and McCain too FYI)

Posted by: hmn | November 1, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

UNFAIR TAX SYSTEM: Let’s put it this way: You just went away to college with your three buddies and decide to rent a house instead of staying in the dorm. Two of you work part time at McDonalds for say $5 bucks an hour and your third friend lands a great part time job making $10 bucks an hour. Do you make your friend making $10/hr pay 1/2 the rent??????? Or just his fair 1/3 share of the rent??? Why doesn’t everyone agree on a 20% flat tax for everyone with no loop holes! That’s the beauty of percentages, make more, pay more! Seems like the fair solution to me!

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

I just saw this comment elsewhere:
The LA Times seems to think it’s not in the public interest what went on at the Jew bashing party Barack Obama attended at his friend Rashid Khalidi’s house.
I was thinking…if the LA Times doesn’t want Americans to know, maybe Professor Khalidi will let us know.
He does not take calls from journalists…only private citizens…
Call 212.666.5463
Amazing little thing that Google search…
I spoke with him today…check out my blog to find out more…
http://scattershooting.wordpress.com

Posted by: americanpatriot | November 1, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

No medical records for Sarah Palin – very odd.

Posted by: hottopics | November 1, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Please tell this lady to go home. This found abuse of power Governor does not tell truth.
Her knowledge of all facts is critically lacking.

Posted by: Sharonklim | November 1, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

PNA Publishing just released a new hardback this month, “Sarah takes on Big Oil.
A fact-based book about Gov. Sarah Palin’s stormy relationship with Alaska’s ‘Big 3’ oil producers, “Sarah takes on Big Oil” was written by Kay Cashman and Kristen Nelson, the longtime editors of Petroleum News, an Anchorage-based weekly newspaper and the state’s only standalone oil and gas publication.
As people seek to learn more about Alaska’s first woman governor, a recurring question emerges: How did she meet the challenge of balancing the interests of the people of Alaska against those of the state’s major oil and gas companies?
Cashman and Nelson are the ideal team to deliver a three-dimensional portrait of the Palin administration and the unusual circumstances that have bracketed her leadership. Over and over, the authors are asked if they wrote the book on behalf of Palin.
“We wrote the book because it was timely and interesting. Our newspaper doesn’t publish editorials, much less advocate for particular candidates,” Cashman said. “And the book is owned by the same company. We presented the Big 3 oil producers side of the story in the book, as well as that of the Palin administration.
This is a solid read. You’ll not only learn a lot about Palin’s qualifications, you’ll learn a lot about the oil industry and how it operates.
For book excerpts visit: http://www.sarahtakesonbigoil.com

Posted by: AK Woman | November 1, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Why can’t people understand that their would be no refund if you did not work and pay taxes.Every one that works pays taxes use you head people.Some may pay less because of income,size of family,interest rates on margages etc but if you do not work and pay taxes you get nothing so quit your bellacking and look at the truth of the matter instead of going off half cocked about something that has been around forever.We have always had a progressive tax code.

Posted by: maryjane | November 1, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Every time I think Sarah Palin has finally reached bottom, she seems to find some new depth to crawl into. Never have I heard so much baseless venom and hate-mongering coming from someone who, frankly, is standing on thin ice. Neither Obama nor Biden have been convicted of ethics infringements or abuse of power; both Palin and McCain have faced those charges, and Palin was found guilty. Now she’s being investigated for falsifying travel documents (read: fraud – charging Alaska for costs of flying her daughters around the country). C’mon…this woman doesn’t have 2 neurons sparking simultaneously. We need to send her somewhere very quiet.

Posted by: Alexandra | November 1, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

where has Michelle been lately? They got that hoe locked up in the closet with her big a$$ and big mouth!

Posted by: HIDEY HOE AND THE MOFO | November 1, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

So now the almighty Barack Obama has decided that if I want to hang on to my hard-earned money rather than hand even more of it over to the federal government, I am selfish. Let me explain why I think it would be better for me to hang onto that money than to hand it over for him to redistribute as he sees fit.
Don’t get me wrong—I do not mind paying my fair share of taxes. Last year, all told, I paid close to $100,000 in taxes. And I did so gladly, without trying to hide any income or take advantage of any loopholes. But what Obama is proposing is not just asking me to pay my fair share. He wants to raise my income taxes and to eliminate the ceiling on other taxes. And Democrats are now also planning to wreck my retirement fund by eliminating the tax savings.
So what do I do with all that money I currently get to keep? Well, I think my spouse and I are good stewards of what we have earned. We give well over 10% of our income to charity. We give money to our local soup kitchen, the local humane society, Empty Stocking Fund, Girl Scouts, our church, the Heifer Project, the Red Cross, Salvation Army, and more. (In addition, we do volunteer work and last year donated over 60 toys to the Toys for Tots drive and hundreds of pounds of food and supplies to a local animal shelter.) So I honestly do not see us as selfish.
What else do we selfishly do with our money? Well, we added an employee to our small business and hoped to add two more next year. That employee is on track to make over $60,000 plus benefits this year, far more than he earned on his previous job. If Obama raises our taxes and lowers our income (because, believe me, his economic policies will prevent our economy from recovering from the current recession and that will mean less income for our company), we will not be able to hire those additional workers. Once we hire someone, we are committed to providing generously for that employee with pay and benefits—rather than take the chance that we could not keep them long-term, we would not hire them. So I honestly do not see us as selfish.
Oh, and we selfishly spend our money on American goods and services. I bought a GM vehicle a few years ago and planned to replace it next year. If more of my money goes to taxes, I will have to cut corners elsewhere, so the car, still serviceable and paid for, will just have last a while longer before I can replace it. That’s a sale the American car industry will lose. I also spend money hiring American workers to mow my lawn, wash my car, groom my dog, etc. If I have less to spend because it’s gone to taxes, I will have to cut back on these services, which I can do myself. I spend money at local restaurants when we eat out regularly and tip generously (at least 20%). I am a marvelous cook, however, and if Obama is using my money elsewhere, I will have to cut back on dining out.
My spouse and I do not live an extravagant lifestyle. We have a modest home, two vehicles, a child in college (the other one, in grad school, pays his own way). We do, however, spend our money wisely. We circulate money in our community and we contribute to the success of countless other small businesses. We also share generously with worthy causes. So I’m sorry, Sen. Obama, but I honestly do not see us as selfish. And you will not gain my vote by claiming we are.

Posted by: moderate | November 1, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The vile that is said. I tried to reade the comments. By far the most mean and disgusting comments are from the Obama supporters. Moderate comments are a bit long winded but by far the most pleasant to read. My comment about Obama is this. He said the other day Sharing is a good thing and if he wanted to share his Peanut Butter Sandwich with a friend at school it is a good thing.
Exactly it is his choice to share the sandwich with whom he wants. Not his teacher taking his sandwich and giving it to the class bully.
Look out America he is going to come take you sandwich and give it someone he likes not who you like

Posted by: busco | November 1, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Tell Sarah Palin the found guilty of abuse of power as Governor of Alaska to go home.
This lady has already been found to lie and persecute people as her own personal vendetta!! Don’t be fooled by this lady who is more like “wolf in sheep’s clothing”!!!
Once she gets home she will be welcomed with law suits!! Top civil rights lawyers are all excited and state she has committed serious harm to those she attacked!! Cases will be big for such high well known profile cases!!!
Big time Republican attorneys can not stop all this time. McCain will discard her when he can!!
I have the government, attorney, agency, court PDF files to prove she is a very dishorable person!!

Posted by: Sharonklim | November 2, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

As we all know, the story told by a “Liars”… their story changes every time the repeat it. Obama’s closest advisors are helping him to reveal the weakness. His ambition to win the White House doesn’t allow to tell the truth about raising taxes! Only a “Charlatan” can try to avoid providing all documents “required” by “all” candidates and try to take Americans for granted. Obama is different… he may not even be eligible! Stop it! God is watching!

Posted by: margarita | November 2, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Sarah Palin IS a “tax creep”: she has bought into the GOP mantra that ALL taxes are bad. Moreover, Palin seems to have accepted that wealthy people should not be required to pay taxes commensurate with their income: she, McCain and almost all of the GOP continually express that wealthy people should pay no more in taxes – indeed less in many cases – than do poorer people.
This is especially disingenuous of Palin, given that she bills herself as a bible-believing Pentecostal Christian. The bible sets forth the ONLY God-approved structure of a tax system, which is based SOLELY on a percentage of INCOME. (The biblical scheme is based on a system of “tithes” – 10% of income – of which there were FOUR tithes – one due only every third year – for a total of 33% of GROSS income.)
I doubt very much that ANYBODY earning more than $200,000/yr in the U.S. is actually paying 33% of gross income in taxes. Indeed – as Warren Buffet has demonstrated – the very wealthiest people in our nation generally pay taxes at a much lower rate than do lower-middle-class wage earners: Buffet pays about 17% of NET income whereas his receptionist pays 30%.
Particularly in the area of war and foreign adventurism, it is the wealthy who benefit the most from our nation and our government – and it is also they who pay the least for the privileges they enjoy. This is simply NOT SUSTAINABLE. Until our nation sets a tax standard that is actually commensurate with ability to pay and benefits actually received in the form of income-earning opportunities, it will not and indeed cannot prosper.

Posted by: Jordan | November 3, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.