Oct 1, 2008 6:23pm

Should Gwen Ifill Step Aside as VP Debate Moderator?

With one day to go till the Palin, Biden face off…there’s news about the debate’s moderator Gwen Ifill.  The PBS journalist is working a book titled "Breakthrough:  Politics and Race in the Age of Obama".  ABC’s Teddy Davis and Matt Jaffe report that the McCain camp is ‘sowing doubts’ about how the author of a book featuring Obama can be objective.  "I think that Gwen Ifill is a professional and I think she will do a totally objective job because she is a highly respected professional," said McCain to Fox News. "Does this help that she has written a book that is favorable to Sen. Obama? Probably not. But I have confidence that Gwen Ifill will do a professional job."  Agree?      

User Comments

If she is biased, yes she should step aside. (obviously she is biased)

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 1, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

mccain says he has no problem with her
but lets get something straight
the book was made public before she was selected as the moderator
both campaigns must accept the moderator for all debates
so this leaves you with two acceptable answers
1. the mccain camp didnt do their homework and this displays how inept they are
2. they knew and didnt really care, but now they can use this as a scapegoat issue if palin does terribly

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

We shall see. The rest of the media is in the tank for Obama so I would be hard to find someone who was not biased.
Oh how about Opera?

Posted by: Emily | October 1, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Ifill has a financial interest in the outcome of the election. If Obama is elected, she will sell more books. She has spent hours interviewing the Obamas for her book. There is a clear conflict of interest and she should never have accepted the job.
Most of the media, including Ifill, is in the tank for Obama in this election, but isn’t there a point at which it’s too blatant?

Posted by: Keith | October 1, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Once again a MSM member is caught advocating for a specific canidate and questions about her objectivity are raised. She claims she will be objective, but how can you really trust her? Here its the appearance that counts not her professionalism. Iflil should step down as the moderator so there is no question about her bias.

Posted by: jim | October 1, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

She did not make the book public before the campaigns agreed to her being the moderator. She drools all over Obama, while she could not hide her contempt and hatred for Sarah Palin while covering the Republican National Convention (at first I thought she was drunk, but I think she was just filled with hate for a woman who dared to question the One).

Posted by: austintx | October 1, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Whoever picked her obviously did this on purpose. Very nasty, very mean-spirited. You should have someone up there who is fair and not biased!

Posted by: Ann | October 1, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

I think it is very telling that none of the “major news networks” can even bring themselves to put the story of Ifill’s conflict up on their websites. What happened to fact checking and holding all of our politicians (regardless of their party)accountable? Journalistic news, and the investigative news reporting of the Watergate era is DEAD!

Posted by: Jennifer | October 1, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

no
same team
same tactics
they will find anyway possible to excuse her ineptness.

Posted by: dl | October 1, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

I don’t think this is an issue worthy of any discussion but because the McCain camp has been in the business of distracting from the real issues, I prefer that Gwen steps aside so that her asking the questions doesn’t become the big news if Palin happens not to do well.

Posted by: frosty | October 1, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

I think that the moderator can be crucial to the success of the debates through his or her approach to the candidates. If the moderator is biased, it would be very difficult to be fair. Since Gwen has a bias, she should step aside for a moderator who has not publically embraced a presidential candidate.

Posted by: Karen | October 1, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Same ol BS to try and get a certain one
elected!!!!!! we will soon be a second
world country. It’a shame………

Posted by: Joey | October 1, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I’ve always liked Gwen Ifill. She delivers the news and provides commentary that is intelligent and well balanced. That said, with this book, she has shown her private preferences in this election and should step aside like any good judge with a conflict of interest.

Posted by: mpct | October 1, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

The media is so pro Hussein….she’s got a book coming out….I think that she shoudl step down and let someone who is a more professional acting moderator step in….let’s play fair.
Of course, if Palin can just answer the questions straight forward, she should have no trouble out shining ‘lost Joe’.

Posted by: Evelyn in Phoenix | October 1, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

She hasn’t even written the small chapter on Barack yet. But she apparently wrote a long and glowing chapter on Colin Powell. So which “tank” does that put her in?

Posted by: Derek | October 1, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

They should replace her with Olberman The Countdown man. Obama’s supporters are just too strong – they are everywhere. It still doesn’t change that Obama is very fake.

Posted by: young_voter | October 1, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I really think she can be objective and I’m a McCain/Palin supporter. We shall see tomorrow night.

Posted by: mary kay | October 1, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

I agree with the last comment….

Posted by: Joey | October 1, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

She should step out as moderator. She has probably already briefed Biden on all the questions to make him look better. Surely there is somebody else that can do this job.

Posted by: carolyn | October 1, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I guess Brokow should remove himself from being moderator, as he has said McCain is an ICON!

Posted by: lions2tigers | October 1, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Hey, she works for PBS doesn’t she?
You’re darn right she is biased!

Posted by: Jim | October 1, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Bhrandon…We get that you are for Obama. Yet again another bias on a question of fairness. If you and one other person was in the same position for a job interview, how would you like it if the interview was conducted by somebody you knew favored the other person over you? Try to be fair.

Posted by: carolyn | October 1, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

GWEN IFILL IS A TRUE PROFESSIONAL … WHAT CAN SHE DO AT THE DEBATE BESIDE ASK QUESTIONS TO BOTH CANIDATES WITH THE WHOLE WORLD WATCHING HER? … THIS IS JUST ANOTHER TRICK BY THE REPUBLICANS TO TRY TO COVER UP THE REAL ISSUE OF PALIN BEING WAY OUT OF HER LEAGUE …

Posted by: jamesearlc | October 1, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Just another move from the McCain camp pushing the “Poor Sarah” narrative. Seems a long time ago that Palin critizised Hillary for her “perceived whine” about the media.
Gwen Ifill is a well respected journalist who also moderated the VP debate in 2004. The McCain camp approved the selection of her. Now stop whining and show a little confidence in your candidate.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 1, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

I believe she should step aside, but as with the press so far – it would only be newsworthy if it affected Obama negatively. I just wonder why they don’t just go ahead and wear Obama shirts. It is not like they hide it. They won’t report anything negative on the “One”. Why don’t they say anything about his preacher or the board member activist? If it were McCain or Palin they would. Hopefully, people will wake up soon and start watching stations that report the REAL news!

Posted by: Donna | October 1, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Why is it that everytime McCain is losing in the polls, he wants to change something. This time it’s the moderator for the Palin/Biden debate. McCain knows that there is no bias with Qwen Ifil. She’s been doing this for a long time. Just because she has a book coming out about black politicians and Qwen is a black woman. So for McCain and Palin this is a bias. I wish race wasn’t an issue anymore. People should vote for the person that’s going to bring America back from the brink of disaster. Obama/Biden will. McCain/Palin won’t. They will run America like they have run their campaign, negative.

Posted by: LF | October 1, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

I THINK THE PEOPLE WHO WANT HER TO STEP ASIDE ARE STARTING TO SEE THAT THIS ELECTION IS GOING TO BE WON BY A LANDSLIDE BY OBAMA …

Posted by: jamesearlc | October 1, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I don’t understand why no one is getting on the McCain campaign??? They HAD TO AGREE TO HER AS THE MODERATOR, DIDN’T THEY? If (as with not vetting Palin) they didn’t take the time to check out the proposed moderators, then they have no reason to complain. The truth is, they are looking for any excuse to CANCEL the debate because PALIN IS NOT UP TO THE CHALLENGE—she is not well versed in world issues and has no clue as to what it means to be the VP or heaven forbid, the POTUS!

Posted by: realitycheck | October 1, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Keith: “Ifill has a financial interest in the outcome of the election. If Obama is elected, she will sell more books.”
I believe it is complete incorrect to say that she’ll earn more if Obama is elected. This is a history book and the election will be history before it comes out (nothing in the book will impact the election). Repeating McCain’s talking point does NOT make it true.
And again, this was public knowledge when the McCain camp agreed to have her moderate the debate. Perhaps they thought it a good thing since it gave them the chance to play the victim (Republicans love their persecution complex) while being secure in the demonstrated knowledge that she was in reality an impartial moderator (she did the Cheney-Edwards debate in which Cheney was widely viewed to have done very well by coming off as a seasoned statesman rather than Darth Cheney).

Posted by: jhw539 | October 1, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Donna: ” They won’t report anything negative on the “One”.”
You are lying. Reverend Wright. Rezko. Ayers (that thin slander was in a high-profile debate even). Bitter”gate”. All of these have received front page, many-cycles of play.
Read what you wrote again. It is a blatant, OBVIOUS LIE. Why should anyone trust any of your opinions?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 1, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

As a republican I really belive that it does not matter at this point. The real Sarah Palin was on display all last week and this week. I really belive that she does not have a clue of whats going on. Maybe shell do better in the debate but reality is that she is being coached. I am so hapy that the truth is finally known to all the American people not just here in Alaska, Sarah has employeed all of her high school firends to work in areas with no experience. This is a miss a huge miss judgemeny on behalf of John McCain, Sad.

Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Based on recent events, McCain is hardly in a position to question other peoples character.

Posted by: James | October 1, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

I agree. The Sarah Plain tomarrow is not the real her….The real Sarah was just awfull!!!!!

Posted by: Jess | October 1, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

I think everyone is looking at this the wrong way. It doesn’t matter if Palin isn’t up to the challenge, or McCain’s camp approved Ifill, or Ifill stands to make money. We are a country that lives on our integrity and Ifill should not have agreed to moderate becasue she is the one who wrote the book. The other mistakes point to issues within the camps; however, they are not the root problem with this debate. We all will make our decisions in NOV, and the debate we all know will end up being the candidates spouting off sound bites, not true resolutions to issues.

Posted by: WWilley | October 1, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

With the biased coverage I have seen on almost all news networks, it probably doesn’t make any difference. Obama is being crowned president before the election. No one seems interested in covering his connection with ACORN and it’s portion of benefits in the rescue package now before Congress. I just hope this country can survive the idiocy.

Posted by: NewsbyObama | October 1, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

NewsbyObama: “No one seems interested in covering his connection with ACORN and it’s portion of benefits in the rescue package now before Congress.”
Republicans are starting to sound like the guy at the bar who keeps telling the same stale joke every night and then mumbles angrily about how everyone in there is a bunch of stuck up snobs when they don’t laugh.
We’ve heard about ACORN. It’s about as damning as John McCain’s record as a hellraiser in college/Academy last century. So sorry we’d rather focus on the issues than tinfoil-conspiracy theories of Right Radio.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 1, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

No, she should just announce prior to question one, “in the interest of full disclosure, I have a book being released on Random House on January 20, 2008, entitled, ‘Breakthrough: Race and Politics in the Age of Obama.” That ought to do it.
I mean, the “Age of Obama?” How does that not sound similar to the “Age of Aquariuuuussss?”……”Aquariussss!”
Oh yeah!…this is the dawning of the Age of Oobaama, okay sorry bout that.

Posted by: Wade | October 1, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

It really doesn’t matter when it was learned that Ifill is writing a book in which she clearly favors Obama. There is no impartiality here, and that’s the driving factor. She should definately step down. Rather, the RNC should request she step down. I’m so tired of the Republicans taking all this crap from the bias media and left wing, mean-spirited folks like Olbermann. Really, what more can the dems make up and spin about the republicans anyway? So no harm in demanding Ifill step down!

Posted by: DK | October 1, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

DK: “It really doesn’t matter when it was learned that Ifill is writing a book in which she clearly favors Obama.”
Yes, it does. It directly reflects upon McCain’s competence or his willingness to stand by agreements he has made.
“Really, what more can the dems make up and spin about the republicans anyway?”
Any example? Or just a hollow talking point?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 1, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

If Gwen Ifill takes a neutral stance on politics, I would be interested on her personal take (or what her book says) about Clarence Thomas or Condoleezza Rice. Why not a no-brainer, non-risk taking title like the Age of Condoleezza? Isn’t it a major milestone for this country to have had a world reknown leader like Condoleeezza Rice? I’m just curious. Maybe Ifill has a chapter or 2 dedicated to these great conservative leaders. Hmmmm…but then again they are conservatives. Never mind.

Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Of course she should step aside. Just look at the shameful way that the networks aka mainstream media has treated Gov. Palin. If anyone feels she is not biased, perhaps they would be open to Rush Limbaugh and/or Sean Hannity moderating a debate between McCain/Obama. It cuts both ways. This just makes me sick, modern journalism is a joke…

Posted by: Missy | October 1, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Smith – the word is TRULY – no “e”.
Missy, you are correct. Gwen should step down. She stands to gain on her book deal. This is conflict of interest.
Where are the ethics?

Posted by: kb | October 2, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

These Guys are politicians and they sure know how to turn the tides in their favor.
McCain is worried that rcent days have shown that Mrs Palin has both limited knowledge of Domestic and International Affairs. She only seems to do well when issues about Alaska are being discussed.
The fear is so morbid now that they would have preffered that the thursday’s debate never holds.
That was why McCain played the stunt of suspending his Campaign and asking for a postponement of his the first Presiential Debate with Senator Obama.
Allowing Gwen Ifill to moderate is like giving Ammo to McCain’s Arsenal.
If Sarah Palin performs badly, they will use Gwen Ifill as a straw to hold on to justify her poor performance.
A Governor of a State that doesn’t know any other Supreme Court judgments apart from Roe vs Wade?
I suggest that Gwen Ifill steps down and allow another Moderator to handlethe debate.
Be that as it may, I wish to point out that the name of the Moderators were made public to allow either of the Campaigns to show its reservation.
McCain’s campaign kept quiet and waited for less than two day to the debates before complaining.
This action is unpresidential and it smacks of great despiration when a party to a game decides to change the rules mid-way.
Isn’t there a maxim in law that says “Volunti non fit injuria”?

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | October 2, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Reminds me of the Dolphins vs Pats last year…NFL and the Dolphins said, “they should blow us out they are undefeated, we are just going to go and play”…Just because they expected to lose, they searched for excuses ahead of time…This moderator thing isnt an issue…She can’t ask one candidate a question without asking the other one THEE EXACT SAME QUESTION…Stop fishing for excuses for this woman. She is a big girl. This isn’t a high school talent show. Our country is at stake.

Posted by: Dem-4-Life | October 2, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

What if Hannity was the moderator?
What would the dems do?
What if Michael Reagan was moderator?
What would the dems say?
The fact remains: it IS conflict of
interest – the woman wrote a book on
Obama – praising him. I’m just guessing; I guess she WANTS the book
to be successful, right?
Palin will do fine; you can’t fake
good character.

Posted by: kb | October 2, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

kb: “the woman wrote a book on
Obama – praising him.”
This is a lie. The book is not written, yet you KNOW all about what is in it?
What a bunch of whiners. If McCain has a problem with this he should have done his homework when he approved her as a moderator. Her book has been no secret since well before she was suggested as a mod. Whining to the press won’t help us when McCain gets conned by Putin or Chavez or the French at the WTO (oops – nevermind that, he’s already happy to throw Boeing under the airBus).

Posted by: jhw539 | October 2, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Absolutely she should step aside. The fact she isn’t just shows the overwhelming favoritism of the press towards Obama. The press should reprot fairly and evenly and not ignore trends of their ‘favorite son’. It is absolutely ridiculous. Kind of like giving a referee $100,000 to make favorable calls. Absolutely un American. Whos owns the airwaves we are watching this on? What foreign corporate board are we listening to this week?

Posted by: John Colwell | October 2, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

If Ifill was the unbiased professional she is said to be, she would have declined the moderator roll when offered.
Afterall, it is argued here that her book had been announced beforehand.
While the full content of the book is not known, its advance summary certainly is. It’s intended release date…January 20 could not be a more brazen attempt to cash in on an Obama win.
One is forced to conclude that MS. Ifill is infact an umpire who has already placed her bet.
That her media peers defend her shows that they have no scruples either.

Posted by: Jim Hale | October 2, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Oh, you’ll be glad to know that there
is huge interest in ACORN.
ACORN (Assoc. of COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
for Reform Now) faces “the fight of its
life over an embezlement scandal and leadership crisis”. It hit Orleans
Parish Civil District Court today -
Oct. 2. – This was in the Time Picayune
paper.
Sometimes justice is slow.
But what goes around, comes around
eventually. It looks as if Justice hit
the fan today.
Can’t wait for Fannie & Freddie to be
investigated. It’s really going to hit
the fan. A lot of people won’t like it.
But you can always cry “Liar”!

Posted by: kb | October 2, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

wow!!!
Gwen Ifil IS a professional.
she won’t gain any more or less by whomever wins in Nov.
The book isn’t ABOUT obama. it is about a new generation of politicians.
another excuse from McCain’s crybaby campaign; another false issue and accusation. those folks are so desperate.

Posted by: ccc | October 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

More Democrat fraud.

Posted by: midwestlady | October 2, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

If this Gwen Ifill was so almight professional, she would have known that this constitutes a conflict of interest.
She’s going to have to prove to me that she’s not a racist fraud and a cheap partisan hack, because I see ever sign to the contrary.

Posted by: midwestlady | October 2, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

The book has a title – right?
It’s about Obama in this age – talking
about breakthroughs – Right?
She is WRITING A BOOK (THE VERB SHOULD
HAVE BEEN IN THE PRESENT TENSE).
She’s not bashing Obama? Is she?
Come on dems. Tell the truth.
Or you could just nitpick this to death.
ACORN is no being investigated for a big
scandal – lets see where that lies -
Obama constantly positions himself
with people who are shady.
The FBI is indeed looking into Fannie and Freddie – let the chips fall where
they may. We are in this together people.
All money look alike. You lost; we lost
lets see where the road leads to.
I just want the truth – I don’t really
care who is the guilty party.
I do,however, want justice.
It took l3 years for justice to catch
up with OJ. Justice will not be denied;
whichever way the chips fall, I do
want the truth be known.
How about you?
Oh, by the way, I do take back regarding
a question about Gwen.
She was fair; I like her.
She will gain from her book just from
shear exposure. But good for her; I
do like her. Now I’m willing to look
at my own beliefs. Are you?

Posted by: kb | October 4, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.