Oct 2, 2008 9:29am

Stephanopoulos: Will the Bailout Pass the House?

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos reports: President Bush has called more than two dozen House Republicans to press them to pass the financial rescue plan, White House officials tell ABC News.

Administration officials say several of those House Republicans have already told Bush they will change their votes from no to yes on the bill.

Lawmakers in the House return from their Rosh Hashanah break at noon today, but a vote on the financial rescue package is not expected until Friday.

Democratic leaders in the House hope the new bill passed in the Senate could get more Democratic votes because of a new provision that mandates people with mental health problems are given the same health insurance coverage as people with physical challenges.

For Democrats in the House, the mental health parity issue, along with the prospect of failure and the sense they’ll be real chaos in the markets if there is failure, add up to a victory in the House, but nothing’s assured.

For House conservative Republicans opposed to the bill, the prospect of failure, the big 74-25 vote in the Senate in support of the bill, some significant tax breaks, and new protections for depositors will probably be enough to put this over the top.

User Comments

CL: We are very similar in thinking (and families – I have two sons). And I don’t disagree with what you wrote. The problem is that Monday showed that the failure of the banks/investment companies has to happen in a controlled fashion. It is the difference between using a scalpel to open the wound or tearing it with a butterknife.
I agree that the rush has been part of the problem. Things should’ve been done sooner, and planned in advance. But like most things in Bush’s administration, forethought and planning are things to be shunned. So, I’m for a partial (and temporary) loan to these companies to take off the credit burden for now – then using that leverage to either close them down (slowly) or force a buyout by another company.
Most of these mortgages need not be ‘bad debt’ if people have jobs to pay them off. Keeping jobs and businesses going right now will reduce our cost for these mortgages. I’m mad about it too, but being angry isn’t the solution.

Posted by: 1percenter | October 2, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Wow…did they just erase all that was posted on this blog entry?
I agree 1percenter except that anger can be directed in a very positive way if channeled correctly.
Here is quick short term idea to calm things on a temp basis so that REAL diligent deliberations on a REAL plan (that might actually work) can take place.
From my friend TNT:
“1. A federal moratorium prohibiting the redemption of the toilet paper sold by Wall Street as investment grade debt for 90 days. An interest rate equal to the inflation rate at implementation of the plan can be applied to sovereigns and mutual fund holders to compensate for the liquidity freeze. This buys our leaders 90 days to find a way out of this mess with some degree of decorum and should soothe the frayed nerves of many of the larger holders of the trash foisted upon them. Cost: Roughly $26 billion.
2. Fire the rascals. Every single one. No severance. No lay off slip. No golden parachute. Void the employment contracts by executive order in the interest of national security and send the bums packing. This mess was created by selling the same asset over and over and over, last time I looked this was still fraud. Once the bums can no longer harm our national financial interests, let the FBI have a field day. Cost: I don’t know. How much does it cost to write an executive order and send a Marshall out to plant a boot in some over dressed backside?
3. Do a forensic accounting of the evolution of the sub-prime waste paper. Track it from origination to current holder. Evaluate the collateral for each loan and roll back the value to the appraised value at origination. Cancel out any amount over appraisal. This is a loss to the originator (the bank) , call it a stupid tax. This revalues the underlying asset to a more realistic level. Cost: Maybe $100 million. Benefit: A real world assessment of the true depth of the problem, and a drastic reduction in the face value of the CDO’s.
4. Evaluate each mortgage under realistic terms. If the mortgage was originated under NINJA terms and the mortgagee has not improved his circumstance enough to afford the debt without federal or state assistance, remove it from the CDO pool. This is a loss to the originator. Call it a stupid tax. Re-write the terms for the mortgages that are current to current market value on a fixed 30 year and give those people a chance. They’ve been busting their butt to have the dream and have done so in the face of a deliberate corporate attempt to make them fail. God bless them all. The NINJA loans that are 90 days or more behind, foreclose and liquidate. Cost: Maybe $50 billion, probably less. Benefit : Actual equity in the CDO pool, and a societal benefit of rewarding those that pull themselves up by the bootstraps and a putting on notice of those that suck at the teat of nanny government. The salad days of Uncle Sugar are over.
5. Congress, you now have 90 days. You have a handle on the scope of the problem. The problem has been reduced to a real world valuation. Now deal with it. It will not be easy, there are no quick fixes to a problem that was years in the making. But we are Americans, as a nation we have faced and defeated adversity every time we tried. Solving this one will take time, effort, thought, and yes, lots of money. In the end though, our economic pillars will be stronger, our noses will be more attuned to sniffing out bull from our corporate and regulatory leaders, and our standing as the global driver of the money boat will be restored.”
Ive got to go make a few calls (again) to my reps to make sure they HEAR their constituents. Then Ive got to go be a bit productive at work in order to be better prepared to donate to the one federal agency that I was really hoping would become much more powerful over the next decade, the IRS.

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | October 2, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

It’s time to make your voice heard, now more than ever. Our natons financial stability is in dire jeopardy because of fools who missmanaged our financial affairs for years. Banks an credit and mortgages etc all in ruin. If there ever was a time to start over again with a better system that time is now. Call your congressman, and constituents office. Email them , fax them, crawl down to thier office if you have to and tell them to bail on the bail out. It’s a huge mistake and will only prolong the financial desintigration of America. Please get off your aster and Call your Government rep now. This problem has been going on for too long. It’s the under lieing cause that needs fixing. The system is broken and pumping more of tax payers money into it won’t fix it.

Posted by: BIGFOOT | October 2, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

(Sent)
25 September 2008
Senator:
As a former Marine, American citizen, father, husband and homeowner, it is my hope this approach/proposal outlined below will be digested and considered for action.
I have prepared a draft proposal that will:
Flat line the mortgage industry
Reset credit and lending opportunities
Inject economic adrenalin unlike that seen in the history of the United States
Restore confidence in the American Dream
This plan is called “The Chuck Plan.”
Please bear with me and digest the information before discounting it. There is critical need for radical decision-making that will salvage hope. I will refrain from getting into golden parachute discussions, or who will make money because of the meltdown, and will instead attempt to briefly outline The Chuck Plan.
You know…this might just work.
This caveat: Homeownership is the backbone of the American Dream, and that backbone is broken. It must be reset with haste and with precision. A band aid of new rule-making is a mask for indecision and profound action. This therefore calls for unprecedented thinking and behavior.
1. All homeowners who have mortgages stop paying their mortgage and are given their properties outright and permanently, and under the protection of the Federal government. This in turn will allow the mortgage industry to flat line. All mortgage payments that would have been paid now become available for immediate reinvestment, bank deposits, purchases for goods and services and educational payments, job creation, and many others.
2. Once all the mortgages are cleared off the books, all the revenues will immediately shift and be leveraged back into the economy and the American consumer would be adding rocket fuel to the economy because of the profound availability of cash that would flow through the marketplace..
3. The banking industry will immediately have available substantial money that has been produced and can be shifted under “new” ethical, oversight for mortgage reconstruction.
Scenario: If on average each of the 100,000,000 homeowners in America were no longer required to make a mortgage payment of (on average) $4,000 per month, and they owned their properties now outright, free and clear, then that monthly $4,000 would immediately be placed in banking and put to work reinvigorating the economy through purchasing power. Banks would succeed immediately, investment in stock would succeed immediately, confidence would be at an all-time high. Homeowners would still be required to carry insurance and pay assessed value taxes on their now free and clear property. The mortgage industry would collapse, yes, but the reset would invigorate the economy to such substantial degree that the wave of optimism would be incalculable.
3a. The immediate availability of cash that would flood the market outside the now flat-lined mortgage industry would jump-start the economy because of the trillions in cash that would be available immediately. The banking industry would then be healthier than ever before historically.
3b. Rough estimates: Monthly, across the nation, there are $364 billion in mortgage payments that would be forgiven/existing homeownership be made permanent with no further mortgage payments due/purchases on the market would sky-rocket/foreclosures would be forgiven and cease/the American Dream would be attainable.
3c. Rough estimate (2): Annually, across the nation, $5 trillion would be immediately available for reinvestment; consumer purchasing power would be astronomically enhanced. The economy would flourish.
4. Once the mortgage industry has flat lined, it can be reset with appropriate, ethical oversight in constructing valid policies and procedures.
5. The Federal government would now have time to investigate the mortgage collapse in its professional entirety. In this interim (I propose 12 months to develop and launch a new mortgage system); all home sales will be frozen. This may cause some to complain, but at the end of 12 months, the mortgage industry would be reset.
There are many other extremely beneficial components of “The Chuck Plan.” This is just a start.
I ask you to consider this plan and would be available to discuss with you an immediate way ahead.
Who Loses:
1. The mortgage industry collapses, but the revenues made available because mortgage payments are forgiven for existing homeowners and the subsequent availability of cash propels the economy into new heights, and is represented by cash purchases, new job starts, educational payments, etc.
2. Mortgage companies who have been exercising ethical loan practices will unfortunately be part of the reset.
Who Wins:
1. The American homeowner
2. The American economy
Extreme situations require extreme action.
Regarding the $700 billion bailout option: NO.
You know…The Chuck Plan just might work.

Posted by: Golden | October 2, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Golden,
Unfortunately #1 would start WWar III….but I do at least find Chuck Baldwin to be a man of integrity.
CL

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | October 2, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

CL: Yeah – looks like all the posts got wiped.
How do we fire folks at these companies without taking them over?

Posted by: 1percenter | October 2, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Yes all the posts have disappeared.. so I”m reposting my comment…
So when, not if, they bail out their rich friends.. the debt will be paid with working americans money…will the credit and mortgage companies then in turn let our debt disappear? Of course not.. so we.. the american people will pay twice for this.

Posted by: dani | October 2, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Golden, I’m not sure where you got your facts about the average mortgage payment in the US, but it’s not $4,000 per month. It’s closer to $1,700.

Posted by: chris | October 2, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

all the hogs are rushing toward the trough before it runs dry. even if the banks are infused with cash who in their right mind would go out and take out a car loan given the price of gas. or a loan for a home you may not be able to afford to heat this winter let alone make the house payment. given the instability of the market and very poor job projections our confidence has been eroded. so baiting us with the prospect of getting further into debt is a very, very, poor motivator.
we are in for a long period of recovery that will take years.

Posted by: colorado | October 2, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I’ve got a note to the congressmen that’s simple enough that even they’ll understand:
Vote yes on the bailout, and I’ll be voting no to their reelection in November.
Now do your jobs and work on some legislation that protects the American people from this happening again, you crooked bums!!

Posted by: DavieP | October 2, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

I think the best idea so far is the one by Hillary to have the kind of agency they had in the Great Depression, a Home Lending Administration, etc. This would focus the government on bringing together the two parties in each foreclosure, the lender and the borrower to cut a deal. In this way, neither the lender nor the borrower, would have a complete loss as happens in a foreclosure. This would forego need for futher bailouts while forcing the lenders to take the loss they deserve while not crippling them or the rest of the economy.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 2, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Wow. The Chuck plan is communism defined. Sorry, but the people who should be crashing and burning are those who took out more mortgage than they could afford. Why in the world should they get to keep those homes when they can’t live up to the agreements they signed? Why are we trying to bail out Wall Street? Investment = Risk. Risk means sometimes you lose, and you can’t make it work any other way.

Posted by: Aaron | October 2, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

I DO intend to make my feelings heard — on election day for the first time in my life I will use my vote to fire people. Of all the choices I will have on my baliot the ability to clean house/senate/whitehouse will be the driving item for me. These are all grown up people, most formally educated, some actuall intelligent but all seem to need to be reminded exactly who they work for, who pays the bills, and who thinks that they have failled badily in doing their jobs. Debates, townhall meetings, commentary — none of that can errase actual events and this voter watched the vote last night – count for count – and paid high attention to who left early, who was just following the leader and who really carred about what their vote was about to do to this country. This is not a “recovery” and it is not a “bailout” — it’s the results of not doing the job in the first place.
I feel there are a lot of people out there just like me who will make it known on election day just exactly how we feel — and who we think flunked out.

Posted by: momfelion | October 2, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

FEEDING THE BEAST
our leaders are acting out of panic and fear and injecting that into the public just like they did when they reacted to condi rice’ mushroom cloud moment in the lead up to war.
pet projects were added to the senate bill at a time when we have millions of foreclosures, and unemployment is on the rise.

Posted by: colorado | October 2, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

nancy pelosi on tv now saying that ‘if we do not act now the american dream will evaporate’ what rock does that woman live under.

Posted by: colorado | October 2, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

It is hard to imagine 75% of our Senate voted to open the check book yet again without first providing a better accounting to their constituencies for the mess, particularly the $18 million bonus to the WaMu CEO for his 18 days of work(?), or the generous bonus packages granted Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae executives while the company was failing on their watch, or how the House Finance Committee (Barney Frank)failed to heed the Regulator warnings of pending doom at Fannie & Freddie.
In November, voters will have the opportunity to give pink slips to some House and Senate members like we on Main Street would have received if we had performed like those being bailed out.
I have a feeling there is more to this mess than we (on Main Street) are being told. Looks like a case of the wolves being sent to guard the hen house.

Posted by: Skeptic | October 2, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Aaron I agree.. we can’t just blame the government for the mess we did to ourselves. Anytime anyone wants to multiply the amount of people in their state filing bankruptcy times 50 states..
And *nod* to the Investment = risk.. Wall Street is a gambling machine.. sometimes ya lose.

Posted by: dani | October 2, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Yes they removed all the previous comments on this blog site. What a pity. The people were voting 100% against the foreign-bankers bailout.

Posted by: John | October 2, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

The politicians want to ease the problem, and I am OK with the idea of using our taxes with some assurances attached. However, from what I am seeing attached to the bill, they are adding a bunch of pork barrel garbage to it that has no business being there, or will have no impact. Maybe the American citizens should just fire them all. WAKE UP POLITICIANS!!! Take care of the issue at hand.

Posted by: Concerned Citizen | October 2, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

People make good points here. People on Wall Street and the CEOs of these big companies usually draw down mad money. Along with the posibility of making big money goes the risk of losing big. Those who choose that lifestyle should not feel as if they are entitled to a safety net on the downside. That’s part of the game they play.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 2, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

UK ambassador delivers frank assessment of ‘decidedly liberal’ Obama in secret letter to British PM Gordon Brown… LONDON TELEGRAPH to reveal all in leaked letter… Developing…

Posted by: geevill | October 2, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

I’ve got a theory – the politicians who are pushing hardest for the bill are the ones who are most personally responsible for the situation:
- Bush
- Pelosi
- Barney Frank
Seems to me there are some alterior motives here. Looks like the American people’s interest are put last again..

Posted by: DavieP | October 2, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

When the poor homeowners are losing their home, the rich people still want them to bail them out. What kind of world is it nowadays !

Posted by: QQ | October 2, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

When gov’t stimulus checks were distributed, Bush & Co. urged Americans to spend their money to keep companies thriving, even though Americans now have more debt than savings on average, for the first time in history.
Then, when the people’s personal finances ran out, resulting in loan defaults and forclosures, the gov’t now goes to the people’s treasury money to prop up wall street’s insatiable greed (20 Mil for 18 days of work for WaMu’s exec, over 500 Mil collected by Henry Paulson as chief of Goldman-Sachs). The bailout will happen, but another collapse is imminent.

Posted by: DavieP | October 2, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

The house is on fire – the sane thing to do is calmly put it out. After Monday’s market collapse, I realized that there are too many people panicking. The bill must pass because there are too many irrational people out there whose panic will cause more trouble than can be contained. Like a drowning victim who flails so much they drown the person trying to save them.
It is a crap bill and this should have been better thought through, and is very risky (and could actually trigger a depression if fails), but the alternative has now become unacceptable.

Posted by: 1percenter | October 2, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

This bail out will not work. Even top economists have said so. Rushing into something in just a few days is not the answer. It took quite a while to get to this point. Hastily spending $800 Billion Dollars on a shaky plan is WRONG!

Posted by: Molly P. | October 2, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

I agree with David. It is a very simple fact. Two wrongs can’t make one right. We can’t solve our problem by making another bigger problem.
It is highly possible that the US currency will be the next victim after passing this 700 billion bailout. It is time to transform your US dollars into another form of assets like foreign currency or gold if you want to protect your asset.

Posted by: simon | October 2, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO BUYING WHAT YOU CAN AFFORD—–OR PERHAPS SAVE A LITTLE——OH I FORGOT PEOPLE CANNOT SAVE –BUT THEY CAN PAY BACK DOUBLE WITH INTEREST. WE HAVE BECOME A COUNTRY OF FREAKING NUTS.–JUST UNEDUCATED.INSTEAD OF ASKING IF YOU ARE BETTER OFF TODAY—ASK IF YOUR EDUCATION IS BETTER TODAY.
N-O——–B-A-I-L-O-U-T—-

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Henry Paulson opposed executive compensation limits for companies participating in the bailout. (Ol’ Hank accumulated more than 500 million USD during his tenure at Goldman-Sachs). His reasoning was that less companies would participate.
One question: Why would we be targeting this taxpayer money to companies who don’t need it, and would otherwise voluntarilly opt out of the program if it imposed limits on executive compensation?

Posted by: DavieP | October 2, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

—–Simon’s Rescue Plan—
We should nationalize 50% of the rich people assets. The money that we got should be enough to bailout all homeowners, national debt, and wall street.
The rest of the money from the nationalization should be also enough to give each of the American citizens a nice car as a Christmas gift.

Posted by: simon | October 2, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

HEY GUYS —THEY ARE DOING THIS FOR US ,THE MIDDLE CLASS—-WE HAVE MILLIONS INVESTED IN WALL ST.HA HA HA HA HA —WE THE IDIOTS HAVE A PROBLEM LIVING FROM DAY TO DAY—INSTEAD OF BAILOUT —THROW THE BUMS RESPONSIBLE IN JAIL—FOR A LONG TIME

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Simon,
Nice plan – it’s socialism, but then again so is the bailout. Socialism that takes from the rich and gives to the poor is still better than socialism that takes from the poor to give to the rich.

Posted by: DavieP | October 2, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

THAT TOP 10% OF US SURE HAS 100%CONTROLL ON OUR GOVERNMENT—THEY WANT MORE WE GIVE MORE—–IF INVESTED IN ALTERNATE FUELS AND OUR INFRASTRUCTURE WOW WE MAY DO ALL RIGHT.

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

LET YOUR BUSINESS DUE TO YOUR INCOMPETENCE AND SEE WHO BAILS YOU OUT——WHAT A FREAKING JOKE——TOLD MY LOCAL CONGRESSMAN IF HE VOTES IN FAVOR I WILL DO ALL IN MY POWER TO GET HIM OUT NEXT ELECTON

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

NO BAILOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It may be time for a revolution!

Posted by: truth monger | October 2, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Monger, Don’t you see the change of words they have been changing on this bailout ?
Bailout ——-> Rescue——> profitable taxpayer investment plan.
There is no bailout now. There is only a profitable taxpayer investment plan. Those guys are really genius.

Posted by: simon | October 2, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Bail them out – NOT with my money!
Congressman Joe Wilson (R) SC (202) 225-2452 – If you vote “Yes” YOU ARE OUT!

Posted by: john copeland | October 2, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

I have emailed my Congressman and told him NO to this Bailout! Get a common sense plan together but not this. I only wish I would have had known I needed to contact my Senators before they voted yes to such an expensive plan that puts me last. Congress it is time to wake up and really take the time to fix this right.

Posted by: Hopeful American | October 2, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Unfortunately you will not hear the truth from the majority of your elected officials so…
…lets simply call out what is happening here. China, India…the Saudis, you name it, are holding this toilet paper and they will not be loaning us any more money unless we bail THEM out. Got it…bail THEM out. Our officials with all of their policies over the years have sold us down the river. People here in this country have been blind.
Get it? If foreign countries do not loan us money…its GAME OVER. Instead, we will bail THEM out and hope like hell they don’t start dumping treasuries over the next couple years. A currency collapse and hyperinflation will be a REAL risk.. Mark my words. This is not hyperbole.
Good Luck.

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | October 2, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

The emails are down… KEEP CALLING!!! Hell NO to bailing out billionaires with OUR MONEY!!!

Posted by: hmn | October 2, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

I do not understand this situation. On one side 2/3 of americans are against it and on the other side both the House and Senate are for it. I wonder if the legislators and our goverment are really working for the people or for the big corp.
This is very unamerican.

Posted by: overdoze | October 2, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

An easy prediction to show just how ignorant our citizens in this country are. The VP debate will get more viewers than the vote in the House tomorrow. Shocker? Unfortunately, not one bit.
CL

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | October 2, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

How does that Beatles song go?
You say you want a reva…
…weell, ya know…
We all want to change…

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | October 2, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Obviously, there is a disengagement or disconnection between 2 sides, the representatives and their constituents, with respect to the bailout plan. It seems that in the House side, the leaders can “whip” the bill by singling out those who oppose the bill, and either coerce or sweeten them to get their votes. However, in the people side, WHAT CAN THEY DO??? Is this democracy???

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 2, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

CL, sorry to disagree with you a little bit. The American people are not ignorant. They just have suffered enough and some could like to have a little fun by watching the amateur versus the professional in the VP debate; while the other are so concern about their future because McCain is such a sickly old man that his VP president may replace him if he stop his breath one day in the WH (of course, that is…if he win).

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 2, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Its okay Sutter, you may disagree but that won’t change a painfully obvious generalization regarding the American public…they, we, have been ignorant for years. Moreover, our suffrage pales in comparison with the rest of the world.
As far as tonights debate, meaningless, just like the Presidential one. However, for comic relief purposes, I suppose there is some value. Personally, I get more comic relief from listening to people try and convince eachother which one the four clowns is better or worse than the other.
Have fun tonight.
Good luck.

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | October 2, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Where is the freedom ? where is the free press? The media decides our President? The answer is No freedom, No free press, Yes the media decides our President. I’ve been in the media for years and let me say something “do your job,back home, turn on your TV for hours, sleep with the remote control in your hands, don’t think, do your job, back home, turn on your tv”…We the media let you believe The wrong gay is the right gay. OJ

Posted by: OJ WATSON | October 2, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

VOTE YES FOR THIS BILL! I can’t believe all the purist platonist idealists who don’t live in a real world. THIS BILL HAS TO GO THROUGH. It won’t just affect the wealthy if we don’t. It will buckle our economy. YES changes need made to the system. Let’s do that after we stop the major spurts of economic blood draining the entire world economy.

Posted by: voteyes | October 2, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

reed and created real debts in fictitious money three times bigger than all real assets on earth.
Every lender/seller is now chasing everyone else’s money hoping to survive.
Next comes worthless money, and no-value assets!
But can the US ‘solution’ really be more of the same?
No it can not!
This proposed bailout will only prolong and deepen the agony.
The only long-term solution is an economic freeze with foreclosure protection and a new Bretton Woods Conference and Agreement to agree new global rules for markets, currencies and business.
The US should ask the UN Security Council to convene that.
What the US House of Representatives should do right now is guarantee all troubled mortgages against foreclosure by buying them at market value -not one cent more- and holding them in a US Treasury Account for eventual full payment to the profit of the US taxpayer.
Bailout the public!
Leave the bankers to the free market!

Posted by: Gerard Mulholland | October 2, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

This bill should pass. Anyone who thinks it shouldn’t has their head stuck up places it shouldn’t be stuck. You can hold to your free market idealism all you want. But historically this country in this kind of economic crisis has only come out through intervention. JPMorgan knew that quite some time ago. Buffet knows it now. And a lot of economists who have theory awards but little if any practical know how are opposing it. LISTEN TO THOSE WHO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND MONEY!!! Not those who sit in tiny offices filled with dusty books and make less than the average salary. This bill HAS TO PASS

Posted by: tiredofhearingNO | October 2, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Unsupervised guarantees and loophole-ridden anti-corruption measures solve nothing.
The $ 850 billion bailout bonanza is just one last greedy grasp to empty the public till into the pockets of the prime parasites on the planet.
All countries failed to regulate markets and business practise against recklessness and fraud, went mad with greed and created real debts in fictitious money three times bigger than all real assets on earth.
Every lender/seller is now chasing everyone else’s money hoping to survive.
Next comes worthless money, and no-value assets!
But can the US ‘solution’ really be more of the same?
No it can not!
This proposed bailout will only prolong and deepen the agony.
The only long-term solution is an economic freeze with foreclosure protection and a new Bretton Woods Conference and Agreement to agree new global rules for markets, currencies and business.
The US should ask the UN Security Council to convene that.
What the US House of Representatives should do right now is guarantee all troubled mortgages against foreclosure by buying them at market value -not one cent more- and holding them in a US Treasury Account for eventual full payment to the profit of the US taxpayer.
Bailout the public!
Leave the bankers to the free market!

Posted by: Gerard Mulholland | October 2, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

YES I AGREE CLAEN HOUSE VOTE OUT THE CROOKS ALL OF THEM.BUT REMEMBER WE HAVE TO TAKE ALL RETIRE MENT PLANS,ALL INSURANCE,ALL SECERT SERVICE.I MEAN EVERYTHING THAT POLITIONS HAVE GIVEN THEM SELVES.WE THE PEOPLE HAVE TO MAKE A LESSON OUT OF THEIR INCOMPATANCE,AND LIES.FOR FUTURE OF OUR GRANDCHILDRENS LIVES.OTHER WISE THEY JUST LAUGH ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK.THEY CAN NOT BE ALLWOED TO LEAVE OFFICE WITH POCKETS FULL .WE NEED TO FORCE LAWS THAT HOLE THE POLITION RESPONSABLE. FOR ALL LAWS THAT OUR OK.AND FORCE LAWS THAT PAY POLITIONS ONLY BY WANT THEY DO,AND EVERY DAY NOT WORKING NO PAY .AND IF THEY RAMROD LAWS WITHOUT OUR OK THEN POLITIONS ARE PERSONALY ,FINICALY RESPONSABLE.

Posted by: COMMEN SENCE | October 3, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

I AGREE WITH THE CHUCK PLAN.YOU PEOPLE THAT KEEP REFERING TO THE FACT THAT HOME LOANS TO PEOPLE THAT OVER REACHED IS A FACT.BUT I HAD TO BUY DOWN ON MY INTREST RATE,$10000.00.I HAD TO PUT DOWN PAYMENT ANOTHER $15000.00,I ALSO HAD TO JUMP THREW HOOPS AND LOSE TIME AT WORK TO JUMP THREW HOOPS.AND THIS WAS ON A HOUSE THAT WAS $75000.00.AND DO TO NAFTA MY PAY WAS CUT AND WORK HAS SLOWED DOWN.I HAVE PLAYED BY THEIR RULES.AM I DESERVING TO LOSE MY HOME,I HOPE NOT.MY DEAR WIFE &I ARE LOSING TIME WITH OUR SON TRYING TO KEEP ROOF ,FOOD,HEAT.NO MAYBE THE CHUCK PLAN DOES REWARD A FEW PEOPLE THAT OVER REACHED,BUT YOU SHOULD REMEMBER THAT BANKS.LENDING ORG. TELL LIES TO GET HOMES SOLD.ASK YOURSELF WHO DESERVES TO LOSE,LENDING CROOKS OR OUR HOME OWNERS.WE NEED TO BE UNITED EVEN IF SOME MIGHT BENIFIT THAT MAY NOT DESERVE TO….BUT I FOR ONE DO NOT WANT PRACTACING CROOKS FANYMAY OR POLITIONS TO BE INCHARGE OF MY HOME THAT MY BLOOD AND SWEAT WENT INTO.THEY HAVE NO FEELINGS THEY WORSHIP MONEY.HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IN CHINIA,JAPAN OR RUSSIA OWED THE DEBT ON OUR HOMES.THIS BILL IS ALOWING ONE PERSON IN CHARGE,OF WHO YOUR DEBT IS SOLD , AND ANY PROFITS THAT ARE MADE OFF THE SALE HE IS ABLE TO DO AS HE WANTS WITH NO OVERSITE.THE CHUCK PLAN PROTECTS ALL HOME OWNERS.BECAUSE LIKE HE SAID WE WILL BE ABLE TO HEAT OUR HOMES,BUY FOOD,LIVE AND NOT JUST EXIST TO PAY TAXES.AND THE PEOPLE THAT SHOULD LOSE,LOSE ALL.

Posted by: COMMEN SENCE | October 3, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

UNITE…..UNITE……UNITE…..UNITE….UNITE…..UNITE UNITE UNITE….THIS IS THE REAL SOLUTION IS IT NOT.RIGHT NOW ,NOW IS REALY THE TIME TO REMEMBER.DEVIDE ON SMALL THINGS IS HOW THE POLITIONS KEEP GETTING RICH OFF OF.WE ALL KNOW THAT THESE PEOPLE THREW GOD OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS,AND OUT OF GOVERNMENT.WE ALL CAN AGREE THAT POLITIONS MADE LAWS TO FILL THEIR POCKETS.(WE LOST JOBS) TELL THEM TO GIVE OUT OF THEIR POCKETS IF THEY FEEL THIS IS THAT IMPORTANT SHOW THEIR IMPORTANT.PROVE THAT THIS WILL WORK FIRST.THEN IF THIS DONT WORK THE MAJORTY WILL NOT LOSE.JUST POLITIONS.IS THIS NOT BETTER FOR THE COUNTRY AS A HOLE.LETS START MAKING THEM PROVE THESE GAMES WILL WORK BEFORE WE GIVE.AFTER ALL THE POLITIONS WILL BE MAKING THE LAWS THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO FIX,RIGHT IS THIS NOT WHAT THEY WANT US TO BELEAVE.HA HA. PROVE IT WORKS FOR 20 YEARS FIRST..WITH YOUR RICHES POLITIONS….THIS IS THE BEST WAY FOR THE COUNTRY…POLITIONS PROVE FIRST. THEN WE WILL THINK ABOUT. YOU PAY FOR MY HOME THE FIRST TIME. BECAUSE THE CONSUMER NEVER PAY 2 X ON THE SAME PRODUCT.

Posted by: COMMEN-SENCE | October 3, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

There will be none, not one, incumbent returning for another term that votes affirmatively for any, even one dollar, of bail out money. What part of let the chips fall where they may doesn’t Congress understand? We put you people in those positions to do as “we” tell you. Not for you to do as you think is best for us. Step aside for honest people to take over. Any politician who votes to give more money or underwrite a bad debt is not a representative of the American people. You are thieves of the highest order not statesmen.

Posted by: Maxify55 | October 3, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Just a comment from a not uninvolved European:
I understand the unease of taxpayers regarding such a bailout package, but remember:
- Americans lived on easy credit for years and (overall) consumed much more than they could afford
- This was financed by low interest rates (Greenspan), which only enabled the banks to give mortgages at such rediculously low terms
- taxpayers profited from the taxes earned on this financed consumption for more than 10 years (also billions of USD)
- now the party is over and your banks are going bust. this means no easy credit, no consumption,(as we see starting this week) the rows of jobless people will become much, much longer and your pensions will go down the drain as well.
- living in Europe I could be relaxed. I dont care if your pensions collapse and you are jobless, but unfortunately your banks draw our banks and pensions down the drain as well (WE DID NOT CONSUME TOO MUCH OVER YEARS)
The US claimed for many years a leading role in the world. Politically, it has ruined its reputation in the rest of the world with the Irak war. Now, it is on the way to do so economically as well.
I hope very much congressmen have just a little more economic knowledge than the average american posting in this blog, then they will hopefully understand that THERE IS NO WAY AROUND THIS BAILOUT PACKAGE. Costs doing nothing are by far larger – not only for the Americans, but unfortunately for all other countries as well.
AMERICANS – YOU NEED TO PAY THE BILL FOR YOUR GOLDEN YEARS AND DONT STEAL AWAY LIKE THIEVES !

Posted by: European | October 3, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

AMERICANS – YOU NEED TO PAY THE BILL FOR YOUR GOLDEN YEARS AND DONT STEAL AWAY LIKE THIEVES !Posted by: European | Oct 3, 2008 8:58:11 AM ************************** I do not doubt that there is enough debt to go around for all of us but your socialistic ways must be stopped at our borders. This system of government and economy “must” be allowed to free float or we’ll have a Messiah/Stalin type President up for election. Oops, did mis-speak?

Posted by: Maxify55 | October 3, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am

@ Maxify55
A apologize for the emotional and a bit drastic last sentence in my post (I like you, Americans), but on your side, please recognize that the old socialist/ capitalist scheme does not work any more in this century.
The division of the world in socialist = bad Europeans and fee market = good Americans is completely outdated. (We see how pure free market ideology is just on its way to fall apart)
So put away your ideological sunglasses for one moment and have a clear look at economic realities… (BTW – I am economist by profession and owner of a small company – so no ‘socialist’ in your scheme)
Give the arguments a thought !
PS BTW – just a little remark – you mentioned Stalin and the Messiah in one sentence – I am not sure if you really stick to this if you would know how many people Stalin killed…. ;o)

Posted by: European | October 3, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

PPS Stalin is dead (fortunately), communism died (fortunately), capitalism is the only choice left (and the best among all systems) – The question now is to save this economic system before economic destabilization causes more serious consequences.
Look at history (forgive me old European) – in the 1930ies there was the great depression and a fundamentally wrong (=no) reaction of all central banks at that time. Central banks at that time thought they should let the market regulate this (hear !). The market didn’t and result was a crisis that destabilized the world economy in a drastic way, thereby laying the ground for the wars that came after. (the Germans voted for Hitler not because, but at least on the background of an economically disastrous situation).
History does not repeat, but lessons should be learned….
So, better a bailout that saves the capitalist system than any uncontrolled development where we do not know where it leads to.

Posted by: European | October 3, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

European,
The idea that we have had a free market in America is one of the biggest misconceptions out there.
You speak of how Allen Greenspan’s low interest rates contributed to this mess. That’s because they are artificially manipulated. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t blame artificially low interest rates and then say that the free market does not work. Government intervention helped get us into this mess, and monetary policy contributed greatly. We don’t have a free market here in America…we have not had one in many years.
And we have a corrupt government on both sides of the aisle. Very corrupt. Criminally corrupt. And the majority of the people in this country simply allow it.
After all, as long as American Idol is on, what difference does it make, all is well.
Embarrassing.
Good luck.

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | October 3, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

European, unfortunately those european banks are waiting on our Congress to bail them out too.. your governments must accept responsibility for their own bad choices as well.
And thanks for re-affirming my original thought on where I stand about the Bailout. Not only do I not want to help the rich folks out in America.. I don’t want to help rich Europeans overseas either.

Posted by: dani | October 3, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

there go the some of the comments again..wonder who owns ABC ha

Posted by: dani | October 3, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.