Car Trouble: They Want A Bailout
ABC’s Jonathan Karl checks in from Capitol Hill: Big Three automakers want an even bigger bailout than anticipated. They have publicly talked about wanting $25 billion in loan guarantees on top of the $25 billion in loans already in the pipeline for energy efficient technology. But two Democratic sources who attended last night’s meetings on Capitol Hill with the Big Three CEOs say the automakers have significantly upped the ante. The new request is for $50 billion in loans and other aid — in addition to the $25 billion already in the pipeline — for a total of $75 billion. The sources say they car companies are looking for more than just loan guarantees. They also looking for help meeting pension obligations and have suggested an expensive new tax credit to be given to people who buy new cars. "That’s a lot of f—ing money," one senior House Democratic told ABC News, but "they’re in deep s–t." The source says the CEOs made an urgent pitch for the money, saying the American automobile industry is in danger of collapse, something that would have a ripple effect throughout the economy. Should the car companies receive federal money? Tell us what you think.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
What will they do with the money? Save jobs,build quickly a gas efficent car that won’t break down,at a a reasonable price or line their own pockets and continue to build over priced gas guzzlers that break down all the time?
Posted by: cissy55 | November 7, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
For a good education rent Who Killed the Electric Car at the video store. This little known documentary is a couple of years old. Auto manufacturers made pretty good electric cars in the 1990′s in response to a California law to produce a certain number of low emission vehicles. Battery technology has improved since then. I understand an overnight charge now will get you up to 150 miles before the next charge. Would you buy a car for around $25,000 that would go 150 miles on a single charge to use as your town car and keep a gas powered car for road trips and the like? I would. But, GM collected the cars they made in the 90′s from the consumers who leased them and then took them to the Arizona desert where they were crushed into scrap. The counsumers liked the cars and wanted to purchase them BUT GM wouldn’t sell them. This is an example of GM’s greed – sell large SUV gas guzzlers for short term dollars and forget about the long term problem of diminishing fossil fuel supplies. The problem of diminishing oil supplies has been around since the 70′s. The auto manufacturers in bed with the oil companies ignored the situation as well as our government – Democrats and Republicans alike – in order to make short term profits. The proverbial Somebody needs to build an affordable electric car and soon. If the big 3 auto makers won’t do it then let them fail. Remember the Volkswagen beetle? What better example of a car for the people. We the people need an electric version of the Volkswagen beetle.
Posted by: dave | November 7, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
I’m sorry, I gave all my money over the last four years to Exxon Mobile who lobbied along with Detroit to delay or eliminate higher fuel standards. May I suggest the Big3 go ask them for some of my cash. Oh and by the way, start selling products that fit the market. Stop trying to fit the market to your products. I seem to remember some of you clowns just recently publicly discussing abdicating the car market to import manufacturers and only manufacturing SUV’s and trucks for the US market. Heads squarely up the kazoo.
Posted by: vidtweeker | November 7, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
The car companys are losing lots of money why ?
Because of fuel prices and the economy right ?
Then let them borrow the money from the oil companys. They are the ones gettig richer and need a place to invest.
Posted by: cheezbawl | November 7, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I have little sympathy for companies who were shortsighted and greedy. The management stubornly ignored the need for high efficiency high mileage vehicles. They lobbied and lobbied against it and now find themselves in a mess of their own making. They could have been way ahead of the game but no they wanted the profits and made substandard products thinking the American people would keep buying it. I haven”t bought an American vehicle for 23 years because they weren”t worth a ****. Cheaply constructed and not as reliable as the Japanese vehicles I purchased. My parents were so impressed with my first Honda in 1983 that they have been buying them since 1988. They were die hard American before that. Since it was my hard earned money I wanted something that was worth it and American car makers didn”t seem to care about what they made or that it would be virtually worthless in less than 5 years. Now they come with hat in hand begging to be saved from their own stupidity. I say no to the bail out but these Automakers need to take care of their obligations to past employees at their expense. I don’t care if the top guy has to sell his own mansion and private jet to do it either as they are the ones who put these companies where they are now and made promises they can’t keep. They need to sacrifice first before asking others to do it.
Posted by: bckrd1 | November 7, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Got to agree with all of you. I firmly believe the auto manufacturers colluded with the oil industry for many, many years now, to keep gas mileage low so big oil could keep selling us their product until every last drop is gone. Oil has always discouraged alternatives to high mileage, more efficient carburetors, cleaner emmission standards. The auto industry deserves what it is getting now. They played along with big oil and gouged us. I don’t feel sorry for them one bit.
Posted by: geecee | November 7, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
It is pretty safe to say it now. The Liberals told you so!
Fuel efficiency standards were among the first this chopped by Reagan. W said conservation was not a part of a “comprehensive” energy policy. If I had a real say in the matter I will make the GOP pay for all the damage they have done to our country through their premediated dismantling of everything liberal and the horrible unforeseen ramification of their incompetent governance. 28 years of destruction cannot be corrected in my lifetime.
Posted by: NovaB | November 7, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
If I couldn’t run my business would the government bail me out? I don’t think so. Why do they think the American taxpayer should pay for their mistakes? They can’t build a car that’s worth having or they wouldn’t be in this mess. Let them go under!!!
Posted by: Katie D | November 7, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Time to stop bailing out all of these companies that can’t manage themselves (no different than the government spending itself into a deficit). They complain they need help, but the CEOs are making $50+million/year and the stockholders are losing out. I have an extensive education in business and finance and I could find millions in waste in these companies. Furthermore, they’ve flooded the market with so many cars that they’ve actually killed the resale value for many – I for one love the automobile, but I am done buying new cars, as I also advise all of my clients in financial planning, for the simple reason that I can’t stand to lose such large amounts in the first year of ownership when the car isn’t even broken in yet. I think many others are wising up to that fact as well. Finally, American automakers have so many lines of cars that they have become “Jack of All Trades and Master of None”. Toyota, Honda, BMW and even Hyundai and Kia all keep a simple line that focuses on their target market. GM has so many lines that actually compete against itself on the same model platform and body shell, save for a few body molding, trim and engine differences. For example, why build a Chevy Tahoe AND a GMC Yukon AND a Denali AND a Escalade with each of those brands requiring three different dealerships to sell them (i.e. Chevy, GMC and Cadillac)? Why not sell one model with different engine options and trim options through one GM dealership such as BMW for example that offers an X5 with various trim levels, but it is still badged an X5 and still sold by just that dealership, not 3 dealerships competing against each other for 4 different trim lines of the same platform and body shell. This way you put your R&D dollars into making a better vehicle, lower your production costs, focus your marketing dollars and provide better support to your one dealership per area rather than 3. If any execs disagree with this concept then why are you needing $25+billion to bail you out? Our country will continue to weaken as a global-player until government and the Amercian leagal system starts making people AND corporations take ownership for their own misguided, irresponsible actions.
Posted by: tsb | November 7, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
HELL NO!!! Do not give them one cent!!!
Let them merge into one!!!
They need to cut salaries starting with the CEO’s!
They are running the company in full throttle!!!!
They should be cutting back and trimming expenses!!!
People that are unemployed comes FIRST before the auto industry!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 7, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
You want taxpayer money? Fine. Taxpayers get an equity stake and oversight power. You get a cap on executive compensation and no bonuses. Don’t like it? Your call. Have fun with the bankruptcy court.
If we’re giving public money to private concerns, the least we should get in exhange is a decent return on the investment.
Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 7, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
The car companys are losing lots of money why ?
Because of fuel prices and the economy right ?
Then let them borrow the money from the oil companys. They are the ones gettig richer and need a place to invest
Posted by: cheezbawl | Nov 7, 2008 2:09:15 PM
****************************
You have an EXCELLENT POINT OF VIEW!!!!
I must AGREE!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 7, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
No, use the 75 billion to by out the companies( nationalize them) convert their factories over to making cars that run on Natural gas, electricity, Hydrogen etc. and also FIRE all the top end management. Have Government do something positive to get America off of foriegn Oil by making vehicles that don”t need it. That would create more jobs here.
Posted by: john keling | November 7, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Funny Toyota and Honda aren’t at the $$$trough…..
GM and Ford stood behind their big SUV
sales, and arrogantly denied the eventual need to produce electric and high mileage autos.
No need to reward ignorance and arrogance.
No to any bail out.
I will never again own an American made automobile.
Posted by: ron ferrell | November 7, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
I think the auto mfgrs should not get any more money. Let the “natural process” work. They have had plenty of time to do the right thing and they know it. Let the execs fend for themselves. Sorry the workers have to suffer.
We need efficient cars. And we need Detroit to lead the way in building them: We Could Lead The World!!!
Posted by: John Hartline | November 7, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
No way, no way, no way! It was bad enough that we “bailed-out” the banking industry for their horrible (and criminal IMHO) management of their businesses. Why should we bail-out the automotive industry because they can’t handle the bad decisions they made? Hey, if they can go before congress asking for money, how about me? Maybe I should go before congress and just ask for about 1.5 million to handle MY pension and “ahem”….a tax credit?
Posted by: ken george | November 7, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Not a penny. If they made good efficient cars instead of gas greedy SUV’s then I wouldn’t be driving a Honda and a Mazda. Let them go bankrupt.
Posted by: beowulf | November 7, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
It makes no sense to me to give the car manufacturers money to make more cars when they can’t get rid of what they have now.
Posted by: Barbara Hart | November 7, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
I understand most of your concerns and I agree with many of you as a knee jerk reaction. But after being appalled at the situation at hand, we need to put emotion aside, think clearly and reasonably. The number of jobs that would be lost is staggering. With over a million jobs lost in this year along…for many of you already looking for work and haven’t been able to find anything yet. Do you really want to add another million to your competition.
Not liking the decisions we have to make is totally different than making them because they are necessary!!
Sad as it is to say…the news report was right. We either pay now or we pay later. Either way we all end up paying.
Posted by: tbsopinion | November 7, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
I’m all for a bailout…it it contains some provisions:
1) must pay it all back with interest
2) increase fuel efficiency by 50%
3) electric/hybrid/flex fuel vehicles only
4) no bonuses for anyone
5)taxpayers get a stake in profits
6) remove all big oil lobbyists from the rolls.
7) no dividend payments
Posted by: SEB | November 7, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
No, do not give them any more!Because of their bad decisions, we should not allow them any more money to waste. Most of their executives are over paid for what they do. Something needs to be done, but do not bail them out again.
Posted by: Larry | November 7, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Sure, we need to give them the funds to save2.5 million jobs, but in exchange the CEO’s that run the compaany should resign as part of the deal, with no golden parachute or deal. I would like funds for my business, but if I do not get them I lose my business, unless I run it properly. Why should the CEO’s get a bye?
Posted by: skibum6 | November 7, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Yes we should help them out. A lot of innocent others will suffer when GM & ford go banrupt. 2.5 million more job seekers won’t be a pleasant site
Posted by: lizbeth | November 7, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
What about those of us who are just mere employees of the car company’s? We didn’t have much to do with how they’ve been running things…we’re just trying to work and make a living like everyone else. My husband has been in the car sales business for 30 years. Today he received a pay check for $642. This is one of two he will get for the month of Oct. Is this our fault? I don’t care where or who they get the money from. Yes, it would be great if the oil companies would bail us out but there is no chance in hell that will happen. So, now what? We need help and we need it now. We have a mortgage, bills, expenses, 2 children, just like the rest of America. You say, “Let them go under”, try telling that to my daughter……..
Posted by: KimK | November 7, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
When laying blame for the problems of the auto industry, don’t forget the UAW. Ask a farmer how he’d like to earn the same per hour with the same pension benefits! Guess they should have organized a few decades ago. But wait…how would the US afford its food if farmers were paid the same hourly wage as auto workers???
Posted by: Barbie | November 7, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
If we give them more money, FIRE the clown running the companies, take away all their bonuses (both sign-up and “retirement”). I’m sick and tired of these “top” bozo’s getting rich while a company goes under.
It’s also time the employees of these companies give a little.They want jobs and “free” medical. I’ve NEVER had free medical.
I think it’s time we stop rewarding mediocrity.
Posted by: Steve | November 7, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Heck no! Do not bail out!
I have yet to see the UAW offer any concessions. These people are little more than trained monkeys. However they think they should be paid as much as highly trained workers who are losing their jobs. I do not think we should use tax dollars to support their unrealistic wage.
If they want to save their jobs, show some effort.
Posted by: Rick Sharpe | November 7, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
There should be NO bailout for these two companies. Why should taxpayers pay for their poor decision making and lack of proper leadership? If I run my business poorly I lose money. If I run my business well and create products that the consumer needs, then I succeed. The same should apply to Ford and GM. Clearly they have not adapted to what consumers need. You don’t hear Toyota and Honda asking for money. Instead, they do what it takes to run a successful business.
If there are government credits for creating more fuel efficient cars, then let Ford and GM tap into that money, but make them accountable to create cars that meet tighter fuel efficient standards.
What about providing training assistance to the employees of these companies so they can learn new skills in an area where there are jobs?
Ford and GM should be held accountable for their actions.
Posted by: Regina | November 7, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I work an assembly line for GM. The real problem is GM will not give our UAW brothers the money we deserve. Until then, you can expect the kind of output you get from us.
Posted by: J Moore | November 7, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
If we bail them out, what concessions are the unions and management willing to make as far as compensation and benefits are concerned. If they are not willing to save their own companies, then why should we? I see that Toyota and Honda produce high quality vehicles at manufacturing facilities in the U.S., so why can’t the Big 3 produce high quality vehicles? Maybe it’s because the unions have so much security that they don’t think they need to. If the Big 3 and all their employees want job security and high compensation, make it happen byt producing the best trucks and autos in the world. If American Made is best….prove it.
Posted by: The Bob | November 7, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
I know car companies are greedy and the CEOs and management are outrageously paid – but they are not the only devils in the company – the unions are right up there with all their over the top demands. Where else can you work where you make such high hourly wage and get any and all benefits that you can think of. If the car companies want even the slightest consideration for government help they need to bring down the pay (and options and benefits-no golden parachutes or golden anythings) down to the national average for everyone in the company, from the CEO down to the lowest paid worker. The unions don’t like it – let them go look for another job.
Posted by: grice | November 7, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
My first reaction is “let them fail”. A more realistic approach is to treat the government as a lender instead of a money tree. Loan them the money with oversight restrictions and most importantly, require executives and board members to personally guarantee the debt. Small business owners have to do it. These people are highly compensated for their supposed ability to make money, what do they have to worry about if they are as skilled as they claim? My guess is they know they are shysters and won’t put their assets on the line to prove thier worth. No guarantee, no loan!
Posted by: fed up | November 7, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Federal Bailout? No. How about another idea…a national bailout. What’s the difference you ask? Why aren’t American’s who are in the position to buy new cars buying American ones? If everyone who was in the market to buy a car was buying an American car, maybe we could solve this problem together as a nation and bailout the car companies ourselves…without the federal money.
Posted by: Alison | November 7, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
/chrystler already had one bailout. Maybe if the auto industry did not pay their workers such high wages they would not be in this situation. The government should not bail them out. 7 day work weeks for years….maybe the big shots should have been watching what was going on in the plants.
sorry auto makers.
Posted by: drivingmissdaisy | November 7, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
The biggest problem with Detroit is the UAW. The unions have finally killed the goose that laid the golden egg. You can’t get paid $35.00/hr for a minimum wage job and expect your company to stay solvent. Let the UAW bail out GM. They’ve gotten fat at that trough long enough.
Posted by: DuaneP | November 7, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
The problems started way back when the Japenese produced copy items. The quality was really poor and the public new it. They decided to change that produce a quality product and they did.
GM and the rest did nothing. Now they have to start from scratch because it all about QUALITY……….
Posted by: derek walters | November 7, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Absolutely not!!!! I am sick and tired of the mismanagement of big corporations falling on the taxpayer. The small company I work for is probably going to close because of jobs going overseas and banks giving bad home loans. Will the government bail us out??? I think NOT. Let them start over and may the most competitive company win.
Posted by: s. kurdziel | November 7, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
NO! NO! Let them merge, Let them merge!!
Posted by: Ernest | November 7, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
I cant agree with nationalizing the auto industry. The quality of the product and the overhead that manages it would only be made worse.
I do wonder what would happen if Honda, Toyota and Hyundai bailed them out (?)
Posted by: craig | November 7, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
I would not support one dollar going to the automotive big three especially GM as they had an electric car that was far ahead of its time. What did GM do they destroyed them, took them back from consumers, and grinded them up. This more than 15 years ago! If they want money go get it from the oil companies not the taxpayers!! Enough is a enough!
Posted by: Tony | November 7, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
No. No. No.It is outrageous that poor management should be bailed out, only to do it over and over again. Why should we, the taxpayers finance lousy, inefficient cars, failed management, union overload, etc. etc. Let them fail. Other successful companies will take their place. Enough!
Posted by: ruth | November 7, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
We all need to sit back and think about the way we as a Country lost auto supremacy, the Japanese and their manipulation of the currency markets, their subsidising of their home companies, and the ridiculous lust our Government has for a “World Economy” that only means our standard of living will go down as the third world’s go up.
So as you and your children are frantically trying to find a job that pay’s enough to live that American dream think back when you made that decision to buy that Honda, Toyota, or whatever whos company did not need to pay health care and had their big brother keep their currency devalued so they could enjoy a profit before we even had a chance to get one off of the assembly line.
Posted by: James Brady | November 7, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Yet more bailout money for the auto industry? More of my tax money to ‘reward’ the auto industry leadership for poor decisions? Why? Already our spineless congress has lined up to “give” the auto industry billions to encourage the auto leadership to invest in clean, high mileage vehicles: something they should have done on their own initiative years ago. “Foreign” auto makers seemed to have made the right decision with high fuel efficiency vehicle research and production. Why didn’t GM, Ford and Chrysler? Greed. The American taxpayer bailed out Chrysler once. No more! I understand the implications of the ‘big three’ going belly up and the affect that it would have on the auto workers of those companies and the businesses that are reliant upon the survival of the American auto industry. But enough is enough! I am sick and tired of the auto industry continually black mailing America every few years; threatening dire consequences if their lousy decision making isn’t ‘rewarded.’ Bail out the workers and the businesses that are dependent upon the defunct American auto industry by issuing grants for retraining, and financial support but not one more dime to the CEOs that drove their companies into oblivion with their bad decisions.
Posted by: jjscchwartz | November 7, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
I never thought I would see the day that my fellow citizens could be so short sighted. I don’t care how much you THINK the U.S. auto industry has screwed up you’re talking about your neighbors jobs when you talk about letting them fail. You are all just another group of people trying to assuage your guilt over buying foreign. You would think you’d have enough sense to realize the realities of our economy and pull together but it seems you idiots would rather send your hard earned money (if you have any) to Japan and Korea. Well I hope what ever industry you work in goes to hell in a hand basket and then when you look in the mirror you can say ‘yep I did this to myself’. The U.S. auto industry builds a fine product – my daughter insisted on buying a Honda when she first graduated from college, it was a piece of junk, cheaply built, now all she drives is American, a lesson taught.
Posted by: Warhorrse | November 7, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
I went to work for Oldsmobile Division of General Motors in June of 1968 when I returned from Nam. At that time I offered plans for a Hybrid auto. I was told after the presentation “GM was going all battery or nothing.”
Do I think GM should be bailed out? NO
I do feel for the works, but not the upper level decision makers.
If we do bail them out, the people that lead GM down this path should lose their jobs, no parachutes.
Posted by: George Hartsuch | November 7, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
I would support a bailout if I also would receive compensation if my job was lost due to the economy and from poor business and personal discisions.
Maybe if the auto industry employees from top to botton, even those on pension, took a cut in pay. Maybe the price of cars would go down
Posted by: nibott75 | November 7, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
let them sell out to Toyota or some
other automaker the government don’t
need to bail them out if thy cant
manage their money thy don’t need
to be running a business.
Posted by: rick | November 7, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
NO TO AN AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY BAILOUT UNLESS FOSSIL FUELS ARE BAND. IF NOT NOW WHEN? I have no empathy for an industry that has had thirty plus years to address the basic problem of oil dependence. 1973 was a defining year for the automobile industry and poor decisions made then are part of the cause for todays problems, we should be driving electric cars or cars using hydrogen, or alternate fuels today but no the CEO of industry said “forget the environment the environment can go to hell we have cheap oil and my bonus is big and getting bigger all the time and we are helping the oil industry”. SO I SAY NO TO A BAILOUT.
Posted by: museenigma | November 7, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Are we doomed? Is what our country based on in jeopardy? Capitalisim has been what has made this country great. All the legal aliens have come to America because it is the land of opportunity. You have the right to do what you want, with in the law, start you own business, work for someone else, etc. With these opportunities comes decisions, do I work for others or do I chance it and invest in ME, knowing the return could be great, but the loss could also be devestating. What we are seeing is the government wanting to rescue those that believed in this principal when it was in their favor, but now that they are in danger of loosing, they want government help. Lets be realistic, there are to many choices in automobiles and if there are those that fall by the wayside, so be it, it is the principal of capitalisim. The strong will survive. I didn’t see anyone coming to my rescue when I started a Video store in 1985 and lost all my investment. I stepped back, picked myself up and went forward. Our enconomy is suffering, but maybe we need to take a step back in order to take 2 forward. Fallout is necessary so that the strong will become stronger and our country will be better off when we get past this hurdle. That is what we have done for years – depression, WWII, Korea & Vietnam. I did NOT vote for Senator Obama, but he is now my president, he is not an African American President, he is an American president. Until we accept that fact, the division of ethnic groups will continue to divide our country. Same with sick businesses within any industry, until we realize we can’t support all companies or industries and fall out is just a part of the rule of nature. So to answer the question, no I don’t think we should bail out auto manufactures.
Posted by: stephen b larson | November 7, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
There should be No bailouts for any of the corporatons and NONE for the Wall Street Investement Houses as they have Squandered Millions of hard earned Dollars from the American public.
Executives from these corporations have received millions of dollars in compensation at the expense of the shareholders of those companies.
Taxpayers should NOT give any money to any of these corporations as these corporations wasted millions of dollars by giving the executives obscene compensaiton packages in the millions while the average person only get about 41,000 a year.
Executives received more money in two years than the average person receives in 43 years in the workforce.
Ford and GM have far too many buildings
costing the shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars and the executives receive obscene compensaion packages and they should be investigated for malfeasance in office.
Thank you Gene – Somerdale, NJ
Posted by: Gene Anthony | November 7, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
DO NOT BAIL OUT THE AUTO MAKERS. THEY ARE RICH ENOUGH AS IT IT. THEY NEED TO BAIL OUT THE CONSUMERS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN SCREWING FOR SO MANY YEARS.
THANK BILL CLINTON FOR THE MESS WE ARE IN. HE PASSED NAFTA AND WHERE ARE OUR JOBS NOW BUT OVERSEAS.
THE GREED OF THE CEOS IN THIS COUNTRY HAVE KILLED US. DO NOT BAIL OUT ANY CAR MAKER PERIOD OR ANY OTHER COMPANY THAT ASKS FOR IT.
IF OUR COUNTRY DOES NOT TURN ITSELF BACK TO OUR LORD AND FATHER THAT THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED BY WE WILL NEVER MAKE IT. STALIN SAID THIS COUNTRY WOULD FALL WITHOUT A SHOT EVER BEING FIRED AND WHAT IN THE WORLD IS GOING ON NOW. WE OWE CHINA FOR EVERYTHING AND WE ARE BORROWING MORE FOR THE BAILOUT. NO SIR DO NOT BAIL OUT THE CAR MAKERS OR ANY COMPANY. WE NEED TO TAKE CARE OF THE HOMEOWNERS IN THIS COUNTY NOW.
FINALLY WE NEED TO GET ON OUR KNEES AND PRAY TO OUR FATHER THAT HE WILL FORGIVE US OF OUR SINS AND HELP US RESOLVE OUR PROBLEMS. THAT IS THE ONLY WAY WE WILL EVER GET THIS MESSED STRAIGHTEN OUT.
Posted by: RICK HOLEMAN | November 7, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
The ONLY way we should agree to this is: If they wanna use taxpayer money for a bailout, then they MUST change the way they sell us cars. NO more shell games about the price of the vehicle. NO more lies about the lowest finance rates. NO more bullsh-t about the carbuying process. Buying a car should be like buying a shirt, everyone pays the same price regardless of race, gender, or negotiating skills. It shouldn’t take all damn day to buy a car. US carmakers should NOT be aloud to continue raping the American consumers.
Posted by: Nathaniel Simmons | November 7, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Absolutely Not! Car companies should not be bailed out. Let them recuperate some of the BIG money they have given to their CEO’s in recent years and made them rich while they knew the whole industry was in trouble. I’m sick of paying for everybody else’s greed while I sit and watch my IRA going down the drain. AND, I’m 80 years old — too old to watch it go back up and do me any good. We worked all our lives, hard, and saved, did not live beyound our means — so why should I now be expected to help bail out those who lived by greed.
Posted by: Nedra | November 7, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Here’s the text of a letter I sent to my Senators, my representative, Speaker Pelosi, Rep. Boehner, President Bush and President-elect Obama. If you have time (and the inclination), you could send something similar and maybe, just maybe, it would be incorporated into any future bailout agreements:
I’m writing on the topic of providing money to companies that are struggling to survive in the current economic environment. There is one proviso that I feel should apply to all companies receiving taxpayer (my) money. That proviso is:
The total compensation (salary, stock options, limos, private jets, etc.) of any of the company’s executives should be no more than 25 times the total compensation of the company’s lowest paid employee.
Posted by: Preston | November 7, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Before everyone goes off the deep end, you need to remember that as a citizen you have the option of filing for bankruptcy. In most cases your responsibility, after attorney fees and court costs are pennies on the dollar.
The automakers have this option too. But ultimately we all pay, for your neighbor, for the company that didn’t pay it’s bills and shut the door and for our own greed. Tell me you wouldn’t take the perks and bennies offered to CEO’s if you were functioning at their levels? I didn’t think so. I’m not a socialist, just an unemployed realist since April of this year. WE need to stop and look to see if Credit is the Way. Is it really the best way? We have no one to blame but ourselves and it doesn’t carry labels like Democrat or Republican; African-American, Asian or whatever. At the end of the day just stop making excuses for spending more than you make – using credit – and EVERYONE should start living within their own means. Cash or don’t buy it. Not Bush or Obama can cure that problem.
Posted by: Lorraine | November 7, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Maybe the CEOs should take a paycut!!!
Posted by: Greg | November 7, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
100% agreement with these comments…make wage changes from the bottom to the top….cars need to be more affordable and quality needs to greatly improve…Quality coming coming out of Detroit is awful…industry needs to take pride in what they put out…fed up…
Posted by: Speedy | November 7, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
My 1st instinct is to say NO MORE BAILOUTS. Taxpayers cannot afford to bail out every company or institution after they make such bad decisions and get themselves in so much trouble. However, it is right that if we don’t do this now, we will only have to do it later and the many employees are the ones to suffer. How about checking out who made all the profits [CEO's etc] and MAKE them foot at least half of this bailout. After that we can bail them out with it only being a loan, and without all the perks for the guys at the top. Maybe even fire most of them, after they have paid back a lot of it. If they have to sell one or 2 of their 5 homes and 2 of their 6 cars, so what. It is their fault and their responsibility.OR bail them out as a loan and let the employees run the company, like a co-op. I’m sure with their jobs on the line they would do a better job than the rich yahoos running it into bankruptcy. We have to do things differently. The old way of handing them money when they screw up is no longer an option. It only shows others that they can get bailed out also. Someone needs to have the balls to do this right. When the average taxpayer goes bust, who will bail them out. AND who will then pay the wages for running this Country with taxes. When no one can pay taxes, because they don’t have the money, then where are we? Our dear politicians had better look seriously at this. It puts their wages on the line.
Posted by: Rose Overbey | November 7, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
First, in the 90s, GM makes an electric car for California that their owners, apparently, liked and were loathe to give up. Then they repossessed and crushed them and all of the US mfrs. let ten years go by while Toyota made the Prius, Honda made the Insight and Civic Hybrid, Smart made the Smart Car, Tesla made an all-electric supercar and even BMW re-made the fuel sipping Mini. Everyone else saw and planned for what is coming, why not Detroit? They knew, but they were in bed with Bush/Cheney and the oil companies. Like Nero, they were fiddling while America burned… more oil. If President Obama bails any of them out he will be a forgiving man indeed. As for me, I’d let them fry!
Posted by: JD | November 7, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
DO NOT GIVE THESE PEOPLE ANY TAXPAYER MONEY! And make them stop making so many cars. In 300 years, when all the oil is gone, what are our children’s children’s children going to do with all these useless automobiles? There will be billions and billions of them by then. Let the Big Oil pay for these failing companies to produce and market 75% more electric cars. If that doesn’t work for them, convert the auto plants into bike plants and market bikes as fiercly as they do cars. America is to fat anyway, a little biking is not going to hurt any of us.
Posted by: Troy | November 7, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Buying American made vehicles is something that most people don’t do anymore. Maybe if they had tried supporting “American made”, we wouldn’t be in the shape we’re in, at least not as bad. I guess you all don’t mind continuing to be in debt to the other countries that we are borrowing money from either???? And Warhorrse is correct when he said you all are talking about your neighbors, your relatives, your fellow country men…thanks for all your help!!! I hope the company you work for never has to go through this….you need to consider the trickle down effect that this will have on our country. When we, the people in the automotive industry, go belly up, I guess we won’t have the money to buy the things that your companies are marketing and selling. Good luck to all of you that are wishing ill will on those of us who work for one of the big 3. You’re going to need it when your in the food stamp line with the rest of us!!!!!
Posted by: KimK | November 7, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
You Betcha!! Government gives money to the big companies and we pay the price.
In taxes and cars guzzle gas.
Give them the money to keep people working but put some strings on it – min. 50 mpg for starters!
Posted by: jojo | November 7, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Last I heard the UAW had over fifteen thousand already on the bench drawing 75% of their salary sitting around for months/years for a new position to open up, this is just one of the downsides of UNIONS that the rest of us should not have to finance.
IF and I am against it the government bails them out then the UNIONS need to go first and level the playing feild with the rest of the market.
I am a small busniessman and it is not right to bail out other companies regardless of their size or importance, their failure will ultimately result in huge oppurtunities in the rest of the market.
Posted by: Wyndle | November 7, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Whine, Whine, Whine! When 200 million Americans all buy crap off shore and still expect to keep their jobs it is national economic suicide. I still buy American when I can. Screw the rest of you.
I bought my 88 Mustang GT 5.0 used in 93 for $9,000. I had 246,000 miles on it last month and it still looked good and ran good till a ditzy blond in a Honda turned into me. I got $4,700.00 from insurance when they totaled it.
I got my moneys worth out of it. I love Ford Cars. I just bought my fifth Ford, a Mercury Milan new a couple weeks ago and it is great.
Posted by: Ol' Time Design Checker | November 7, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
First of all, the car companies are not asking for a bailout, but for a bridge loan. The situation they find themselves in has nothing to do with fuel efficient vehicles. The lack of liquidity and available credit in the market is not providing reasonable interest rate loans to people even with credit scores of 800+. I don’t know about most of you, but I couldn’t come up with $30k in cold hard cash to buy a car. We all rely on credit for most of our large transactions. This is no different for large manufacturing corporations…they need lines of credit to keep functioning. So stop bashing the car companies. Regardless of where you live, your lifestyle will be impacted if 1 or more car companies go under. The Detroit 3 have plants, subsidiaries, suppliers, or dealers in every state in this country. A million or more jobs would be lost. Property values in your states would fall even further. The government would be funding millions more in unemployment benefits and pension liability. Common sense says that a bridge loan (which eventually gets repaid, with interest) to the car companies to get them through this tight credit time is a lot better than the crushing blow that our economy would see if one or more of them failed.
Posted by: dogbone | November 7, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Oh, and may I ask…how many of you are paid on commission alone? Have you ever experienced that? No car sales, no pay check. There are a lot of salesman, service employees, parts, etc. The list goes on. I guess we should all suffer for the decisions that the “big boy” make? What does a 53 year old man do with his life after he looses the only job he has known for the past 30 years of his life? Have any quick answers? Oh yeah, I remember what you all think…”LET THEM FAIL, LET THEM BURN”. You all need to do a gut check….
Posted by: KimK | November 7, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
We own a small business and if the government is willing to bail out all these big businesses that are making all these bad decsions, they should bail us out!!
Posted by: Mallory | November 7, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Where do I even start… ok first of all I am a proud American. I firmly stand by American made products & have faith in our manufacturing industry. I have an American flag sticker on my American car. I am not brainwashed like many other people in this country who ove imported cars. My American car is reliable and has lasted many years because I take care of it properly. The Big 3 did not create this mess. It was the consumers who wanted the SUV’s in the first place. How many did you see out on the road? Gas was cheap & everybody wanted one. Life was fun. They saw that we wanted them, so they made them and yes, they made money. Do you think the import companies really care about us more because they make smaller cars (they do make many SUV’s and trucks too and they are NOT fuel efficient…). No, they are laughing all the way to the bank at us “dumb americans.”
Now getting to the bailout. Because of Wall Street, these companies need help. Because of us too they need help. Too many of us out there turned our backs on them and drank the “import cool-aid”. The factory workers are our neighbors, our friends. We can’t turn our backs on them as they loose their jobs. Those of you bashing the UAW are just jealous that your jobs don’t offer good benefits such as free medical. These factory workers work hard. How dare people say they don’t. They are not Wall Street CEO’s. These companies are as American as apple pie and baseball. They are a part of our culture. Either way, they get help or not we the tax payer will pay for it – so pick your poison. Give them a try – go buy an American car. Let’s support our own country. Have pride, have faith.
Posted by: Jon Powers | November 7, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
For too long the American car companies have continued to build big cars & trucks while the foreign car makers were building more fuel efficient cars. I’m not againtst a loan to the car makers with some stiputlations, like an independent audit, no big checks for the bosses, development of cars that don’t run on gas & no money for lobbyists or free trip to politicians.
Posted by: Deborah S. Weaver | November 7, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
I have read many angry comments here. Fine, vent but then you had better put on your thinking caps. First and foremost, I have been employed in the auto industry for about 14 1/2 years. As early as the year 2000 I was asking why we were not producing a fuel efficient entry level car, one that got at least 35 miles to the gallon. Those with the college educations told me that I was just a wrench jockey and could never understand profits and the intracacies of such business decisions.
Next, I feel any bail out money should be EARMARKED TO BE SPENT ON UNITED STATES WORKERS AND PRODUCTS ONLY! It is the American taxpayer that has poured their taxes into these coffers to make the funds available. Because of that the bailout money should be spent HERE, used to employ citizens of the United States! Not in Mexico, not in China, not in Canada or India or any Third World slave labor country! Next there should be definite restrictions that cancel all golden parachutes, bonuses, perks, restrictions that stop any spending that is not absolutely essential to running the company!
I figured the Union hatred would surface. Someone asked what we would give up. We negotiated our last contract allowing for our entry level wages to step back to the wages made about 25 years ago! We are paying more and more for our own health care and prescriptions. Then there is the stark reality of losing one of these U.S icons. Go ahead…sink the Big 3 because you hate unions. Watch what it will cost this nation. Yes, we will lose 250,000 MORE UNION jobs but then the ripple effect is estimated to cost 800,000 NON-UNION supplier and dealership jobs! Add to that another 1.2 MILLION jobs for all of the services we buy with our union wages! That means everything from the wife’s hairdresser to the kid mowing the yard are going to suffer The total dollar estimate to this nation should one of the Big 3 crumble is that it would cost the country 125 (B) billion the first year with a second year price tag of nearly 275 (B) billion dollars!
So the choice is yours, 50 (B) billion now or hundreds of thousands unemployed or UNDEREMPLOYED and about 400 (B) billion down the road!
I don’t hear you screaming about the fat cat Wall Street crooks and cronies that caused this economic implosion.
Have a nice day.
Posted by: James Keblesh | November 7, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
So much of what is being said here and those responding angrily about poor quality and greed in the auto industry (Big3), might have have been relevant 20 years ago. I work at G.M. in Grand Rapids Mi. and our plant was just scheduled to close in`09. I’ve witnessed the poor quality and greed on both sides but can assure you, that no longer is the case. Our plants are as efficient, sometimes more than the foreign transplants. Our guality rankings and awards are numerous from Consumer Reports and J.D. Power & Assoc. At G.M.,we have worked through our past problems and are building some of the finest cars and trucks in the world, unfortunately, reputations aren,t repaired overnight. I feel as Americans, we want to BLAME someone or something for what is going on with our economy right now. I ask that you all look in your own places of employment and inside yourselves. Are you as efficient, productive, make all the right decisions etc.? Is your business faced with foreign competition that gets huge tax breaks and land from OUR government to operate here. If you search Toyota recalls on your computer, you will be amazed and hopefully you will realize that foreign automakers have problems also. If you are in the market for a new car, please look into our products and you will be amazed. We should all try to purchase American made appliances, furniture, clothing, tools,etc. It does matter and it is just what we need to do for each other and our economy right now! In closing, G.M. is not asking for a bailout as this article states, they are asking for a loan to get through the worst economic period the auto ind. has seen in 25 years. Please don’t BLAME! Let’s fix America
Posted by: John Ellis | November 7, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
I don’t think we should bail out the car companies but my question is “Why are we asking President Elect Obama to fix this problem? Especially if it is so urgent. Isn’t Bush still the President until Jan. 20, 2009?”
Every American, especially the Middle Class and the Poor are going to be paying for this mess whether the car companies get the bail out or not.
Posted by: Lori Sinnwell | November 7, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Why do many of you think the car companies are “in bed” with Exxon/Mobil and the rest of the oil companies? The Big3 were instrumental in pushing E85 technology (something the oil companies pushed-back on for years). And what about the recent $4.00+/gallon gas prices….you seriously think the car companies were thanking the oil companies for that? Most of you sound like die-hard liberals, despising “big business”. I hate to burst your bubbles, but these “big businesses” that you despise, make this country function and are responsible for our long-term viability as something other than a service industry society. If you want to live in a country which has lost it manufacturing roots, you all can move to England or other like countries. I, for one, want to stay in the states where we still design and manufacture our own products and the profits from the sales of these products stay in America. KEEP ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING JOBS IN AMERICA—–>>>>>PROVIDE LOANS TO THE CAR COMPANIES
Posted by: java | November 7, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Does anybody in ABC News remember lessons of history? How did we save 1979 Chrysler and 1981 Ford? We stopped buying their crappy products. Government refused to provide free money. Therefore both companies fixed their only problem. Chrysler replaced bean counters (stiflers of innovation) with Lee Iacocca – a car guy. An informed journalist would have read Iacocca’s book. All he did was empower engineers. No longer did bean counters design cars. (Yes – GM cars are frequently designed in the accounting department.)
His perfect example were engineers asking the part manufacturer why he was making that part wrong – why windows would rattle in doors. He said he could not make that part the way it was designed. He told bean counters who deemed it cheaper to do nothing. So Iacocca’s engineers – who now make decisions – redesigned the part. As a result, massive cost reduction AND a more reliable car.
Because this happened everywhere in Chrysler due to Iacocca, then Chrysler went from record losses to record profits in only four years. Cost controls stifle innovation and increase costs. When does a single ABC News journalist remember these history lessons?
We removed Henry Ford – a bean counter – by not buying his crap. Government refused to bail out Ford. So Henry Ford was removed. Don Petersen – a car guy – then asked the engineers to design a new car. Not design a car to get through cost controls. Petersen wanted the best they could do. Anyone knowing basic economics knows that new design takes four to ten years. That 1981 design came out when? 1987 Ford Taurus. First car designed by car guys since the 1965 Mustang. Therefore Ford had record profits in 1990.
Record profits because employees did their job in 1990? No. Record profits because of innovation in 1981 through 1986. The spread sheets can only report innovation four to ten years ago. Therefore a bean counter can never see an innovation until long after it is no longer innovative. Another fact routinely found in corporate history. Bean counters stifle innovation because spread sheets cannot identify innovation now – when it must be promoted.
Examples that demonstrate what is necessary to save GM. GM’s only problem is Rick Wagoner. Previously, he was running GM North America to massive losses. Did they promote Louis Hughes who was making a small profit in GM International? Of course not. Hughes was a car guy. Rick Wagoner was a bean counter. Now Rick Wagoner is causing massive losses everywhere in GM. He is doing to all of GM what he did to GM North America. He cost controls rather than innovate. Therefore GM costs will only increase.
Bankruptcy does not mean employee job losses. Bankruptcy means the only GM problem gets removed: Rick Wagoner and other bean counters who never worked on cars – whose entire history is finance and cost controls.
A GM car needs two extra pistons to get the same horsepower. More cylinders, valves, fuel injectors, manifolds, bigger car around a larger engine, heavier suspension, etc. Why do unions get blamed for these higher costs? Because top management spins myths rather than admit to stifled innovation.
GM could have been manufacturing the 70 Hp/liter engine in 1975. Other auto companies started doing it in 1992. (Popular Science Mar 1990 Page 82). GM still does not have 70 Hp/liter engines in all cars because bean counters – not car guys – design GM products. An informed ABC News journalist would know this since these same reasons for failure were also known in 1979 and 1981.
We saved NYC when Gerald Ford was paraphrased, “Drop Dead”. Since the Feds would not bail out NYC, then NYC fixed their only problem – bad management. Therefore NYC survived. Just another example of what would save all those GM employee jobs if we blame the man who routinely stifles innovation – the bean counter – Rick Wagoner.
Any innovation in a GM car is required by government regulation. Government regulation is the only way that a car guy is permitted to innovate? Of course. Does Rick Wagoner even have a driver’s license? A serious question. A problem so often found where top management are bean counters – not car guys. Hey – ABC News – does Rick Wagoner even drive? Henry Ford could not – another lesson from 1979/1981.
Posted by: Tom9 | November 7, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
America needs to turn off the football game and nascar race and start paying attention to things that matter. Detroit has made their bed and should be made to sleep in it. I have a college degree and a tech school diploma. I work as a telephone tech. and electrician and make about half what a UAW employee makes. The party is over. Get over it!!!
Posted by: Carl Ross | November 7, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Was in the car business for 13 years, now in the mortgage industry for the past 14years. There has to be a better way to save this economy rather than bailing out every sad company that has abused the system. Who will be there to bail out the innocent, hardworking, tax paying individuals that have kept us going? Do a good job, provide good service at a reasonable price and get kicked in the teeth at the end of the day. I have worked on commission pay all of my adult life and right now it is very scary. Where’s my incentive or bonus? No sale, no pay. I will never be able to retire at the pace the government is spending my tax dollars. I work harder and bring home less. Uncle Sam is taking more of my money home than I am. No more bail outs without provisions. The companies recieving these monies should have to pay back the taxpayers with interest! Starting with the banks that received it from day one. Put most of these hot shots in a commissioned job and they would starve to death.
Posted by: Donna | November 7, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
It’s clear the American public doesnt understand.
Quality is best in the world. Over sea American veh are rated the best,When compared to Japan top veh. The America auto writers rate veh by conditions not problems.The imports fix all issues per visit under one condition,but the US auto companies open seperate condition for each part that being replaced per visit and that would also include maintenance service thats being address at that visit.
Some of the import veh are reskined american veh that share over 10,000 part numbers but have different sheet metal to fit the product line styling. The imports is viewed by american press as a better veh,than its sister veh with american name plate.
Auto companies deal with over 23000 vendors in this county. All these vendor have serveral employee. All paying taxes and contributing to SS and Medicare.
Just one of big 3 down stream effect is 4.1 million jobs.
GM,Ford,Chrysler.contribute 10 of million of $dollars$ after 9-11 to New York,also when to New Orleans after hurricane they also donated rescue veh. Nothing was offer by Toyota Honda or the other foreign companys.
Ford,Gm,Chrysler They also organized there employee to go to these hard stuck places to help build shelters because they are americans and these big company are made of american that love and care for there well being,because there american,and thats what americans do.
Posted by: Ron | November 7, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Posted previously:
> They decided to change that produce a quality product
> and they did. GM and the rest did nothing. Now
> they have to start from scratch because it
> all about QUALITY……….
Without learning why, the comment means nothing. Whereas GM uses concepts from business schools, the Japanese used concept taught by William Edward Deming – product oriented concepts.
Highest award in America is the Congressional Medal of Honor. Highest award in Japan? Deming Award names in honor of a foreigner. Deming’s concepts are about innovation. Some call that quality. But the enemy of Deming’s concepts are business schools.
For example, a company with quality control inspectors has no quality. Business school graduates would not know that. How to increase quality? Part of that solution – eliminate quality control inspectors. Obvious to a product oriented thinker. Confusing to a business school graduate.
The industry has only two people – car guys and bean counters. As demonstrated in the other post, bean counters routinely stifle innovation. Cost controls increases costs. Car guys innovate – which is why 1979 Chrysler and 1981 Ford were saved. causing costs to increase.
Quality cannot exist if top management is Rick Wagoner – bean counter. He was running GM North America into massive losses. Louis Hughes of International Division was making a small profit. Who got the CEO job? Not the car guy. Now Rick Wagoner is causing massive losses all over GM. This is no accident. This is routinely the lesson in the auto industry.
So the bean counter blames the unions for two extra pistons in every car? Another mentions his 5.0 Liter Mustang. Obviously a low performance car designed to attract the ignorant. The numbers. 5.0 liter engine did 205 horsepower. A standard performance 3.0 liter (small V-6) is supposed to do 210 horsepower. An informed consumer knew the Mustang wasted massive energy making much noise from one of the lowest performance engines in the world. But again, do we use knowledge and numbers to know? Or do we just feel because the Mustang and Rick Wagoner are making a lot of noise?
GM will constantly keep begging for money until the man who stifles innovation is removed – Rick Wagoner.
Let’s see. The US government gave $100million to develop hybrids in the 1990s. Those cars were built. But spread sheets cannot measure innovation. Therefore Dodge ESX3, Ford Prodigy, and GM Precept – all hybrids in 1999 – were denied a market. Thank goodness we have Japan to repeatedly save American innovations – from W E Deming to the hybrid.
BTW, ABC News cannot report this. GM puts fear in all news services when the LA Times’ Dan Neil on 6 Apr 2005 accurately reported “The Pontiac G6 is a sales flop. At General Motors, let the impeachment proceedings begin.”
Posted by: Tom9 | November 7, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
please no bailouts for the big 3. they are still building, unashamedly, huge trucks and suvs. after we bail them out they’ll build more. take the money that would go to the big 3 and invest in alternative fuel research. seriously our vehicles have to get smaller and more efficient. and just because gas is cheap now don’t expect it to stay that way. toyota doesn’t need to be bailed-out and there’s a reason for that. instead of super-size we need to think smaller. either that or tax these gas guzzling vehicles till the cows come home.
Posted by: Paul Wall | November 7, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
No, don’t give them another cent! I own a small business, how come I don’t get my billions?? They build crappy cars that I don’t want to buy, so let them go, sink or swim! They are burning 2 billions a month anyway, so 25 B will only last them a year or less, what then? we act like we have too much money, bailing out all these crooks, if we start now, they will line up with their tin cups rattlleing.I can’t barely pay my taxes and now I have to support these bumps for the rest of my life. No way!
Posted by: Lori | November 7, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
I like the idea of the auto industry borrowing money from the oil industry. I also like the idea of merging companies. What I don’t like is the idea that the government would bail them out. No bailouts! I might be able to swallow some sort of government loan but it better have lots of stipulations about top exec pay and building cars that don’t need gasoline.
Posted by: pliebing | November 7, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
I say NOT A DIME for the auto industry that refused to listen to the American public who asked for fuel efficient smaller vehicles and Detroit produced the monster SUV’s and then tried to make them smaller and more palatable. The Japanese listened and most of us drive their cars because we saw the return of high gas by OPEC and futures traders. Now they all want a government bail out. Let the CEO’s with golden parachutes give up a portion to save their industry. Why should the public who was never listened to give further relief?
Posted by: Linda Boccia | November 7, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Once again, the auto industry has become the tail wagging the dog, because they are so large and employ so many. The government is reluctant to turn them down when they ask for money, for fear that saying no would result in MASSIVE unemployment and an economy in an even deeper hole for a longer period of time. The auto industry continues to be greedy, trying to wring the last $$ out of their precious gas-guzzling SUVs and refusing to be pro-active by leading the way with MEANINGFUL innovation. Instead, the public is presented with a drink cooler in the glove box (which by the way doesn’t even stay cool when the car isn’t running), heated seats which can burn the occupant or even catch on fire, TV screens for back seat occupants in order to mesmerize children with video images. (Whatever happened to books?) Need I go on?. I have absolutely NO sympathy for companies and executives who can’t run them without the government bailing them out every 15-20 years. If it weren’t for the employees who would be out of work (as I have been for more than 18 months), I’d say let ‘em fail. Oh, and by the way, NO bonuses for incompetent executives. Maybe they should have to PAY BACK the bonuses if the company gets into financial trouble. No one bails out the mom and pop stores, the local plumbing companies, the local retailer. I don’t know what the answer is, but it galls me that any industry has so much power, that they can dictate to the government what to do !!!
Posted by: Jane | November 7, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
After 4 bad new American cars, I finally gave in and bought a Honda suv 31mpg, LOVE it!Before I bought, I went to my mechanic, we became buddies since he worked on my car all the time, I asked him about a Honda, he said “well, if you bot it, I guess I won’t see you again, but if you bought a GM I’ll see you in 3 weeks”
He’s right, I haven’t seen him in over a year and the only negative is I kinda miss him, but LOVE the car, just put in gas and drive. . . .I will never buy another American car again!!
Posted by: Charlie | November 7, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
I wonder how many of the people commenting actually drive American made cars. Maybe if more Americans bought American made cars, the auto industry wouldn’t be in this trouble.
No we should not bail them out, but how about supporting them a little more. Instead of the German and Japanese auto makers
Posted by: Scott | November 7, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Did you read what was posted previously? GM makes crappy cars because too many still buy them. Did you not learn the lessons from 1979 and 1981? The only reason Chrysler and Ford were saved – we stopped buying their products. We voted out top management at Chrysler and Ford. Therefore bean counters that stifled innovation were replaced by car guys. Thanks to Iacocca, car guys fixed cost controlled designs – and Chrysler had record profits in only four years. Thanks to Petersen, the engineers finally designed the first car in 22 years – Ford Taurus.
What kills a company? Buy American. What saves a company? Free market – buy the best. Those lessons are all through the 20th Century – and discussed above. Please don’t insult anyone with Rick Wagoner’s “buy American” myths. Patriotic Americans believe in the free market – buy the best. GM still has not fixed itself because too many so hate GM as to buy products devoid of innovation.
Please learn from the technology and history. Please read previous posts. Buying GM products and giving them $billions of free money will only make the problem worse. There can never be a solution as long as Rick Wagoner remains. As head of GM North America, he created losses. Now as CEO of GM, he has created losses everywhere. Bean counters routinely stifle innovation. See GM’s Precept as but one of hundreds of stifled innovations.
Posted by: tom9 | November 7, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
No to a bailout. Instead have them start making more fuel efficient cars. The 2009 Ford ECOnetic is only sold in Europe. It is a sporty subcompact that seats five passengers. IT ALSO GETS 65 MPG. The only reason that Ford has is that Americans think diesels are smelly. America deserves vehicles that are more efficient. I believe that a vehicle that gets 65mpg would sell like hotcakes.
Posted by: Hugh A. Hilliard | November 8, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Let all of us remember we just bailed out those investment bankers who wrote bad loans and we are now paying for those non-working ideas. How many good paying blue collar jobs and every day white collar jobs did that save is my question? Now when the auto companies need the same I here quite a bit of crying and pointing of fingers and the auto companies are asking for 75 billion not 800 billion. I say let the government help them out with prudent restrictions on how the money is to be spent, like not using it to buy out your competition or paying bonuses to the upper management that put them where they now are.
Remember there are many good paying blue and white collar jobs that would be lost, in these companies and out of them, if any of these companies were lost and what made this country strong was it’s industries and those workers that put in a days work and took home a good check and spent it on goods others made and the services others provided.
Times are tough yet now is the time to help save these companies and work towards making this country strong and competitive again.
You complainers go buy some cheese to go with your whine.
Posted by: Dave Chaney | November 8, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
I SAY, ABSOLUTELY NOT!
I OWN A SMALL BUSINESS AND I GET NO BAILOUTS! IN OUR SMALL RURAL GA TOWN, WE HAVE LOST 7 (SEVEN!!) OUT OF 8(EIGHT!!) OF OUR INDUSTRIES, AND NOW WITH NO JOBS AND NO MONEY, OUR SMALL TOWN AMERICA, ALONG WITH THOUSANDS OF OTHERS ARE STRUGGLING.
WHY DON’T THEY USE THAT MONEY TO RE-START SOME OF THESE LOCAL FACTORIES THAT HAVE CLOSED ALL OVER AMERICA. THAT WILL PUT OUR PEOPLE BACK TO WORK, JUMP START THE ECONOMY, AND THEN PEOPLE COULD AFFORD TO BUY AUTOMOBILES AGAIN AND THAT IN TURN WOULD “BAILOUT” NOT ONLY THE AUTO-MAKERS, BUT THE REAL GRASS ROOTS “JOE-THE-PLUMBER”. WON’T SOMEBODY WAKE-UP! OUT OF ALL THE SO-CALLED “BRAINS” IN OUR CONGRESS, SURELY THEY COULD COME UP WITH A BETTER SOLUTION THAN THESE “DOWN-THE-DRAIN” BAILOUTS. I SUGGEST THEY ASK THE “5TH GRADERS”, BECAUSE IT SEEMS THE 5TH GRADERS ARE INDEED SMARTER!!!!
Posted by: Petalgirl47 | November 8, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
First let me make it clear I am sickened by the thought of loaning money to the Big Three. That said I have two comments. First, if we let the auto companies fail many more jobs will go with them. This vacuum will eventually be filled with Japanese, Korean, German and other auto makers selling (and hopefully building some) cars here, but the impact will be staggering. Second, while I think all three could have done more to build fuel effecient cars many people (most) would not buy them unless the price of gas went up. And it only went up when it became more scarce. WE (through our govenment) could have added a tax to raise the price and encourage conservation, but the voters would not accept it. So, like always, with our backs against the wall we look for the alternatives that have always been there.
Posted by: Sharon | November 8, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
LET GM,FORD, CHRYSLER FAIL.IN THE 1990′S CARS GOT 50MPG WHY DID THIS STOP? AS FOR THE WORKERS, I THINK THE UNION WORKERS ARE HIGHLY OVERPAID. THE UNION WORKERS ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE DESIGNED AND BUILT THESE CRAPPY CARS. LET THE DOMESTIC AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY FAIL. MAYBE THESE EMPLOIES WILL WORK HARDER AND BETTER ELSEWHERE.
I AM ALSO AGAINST THE FINICIAL BAILOUT.
Posted by: big o | November 9, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
WE HAVE A 2005 CHEVY WITH LESS THAN 29,000 MILE ON IT. SINCE THE WARRANTY EXPIRED 6 MONTHS AGO WE HAVE SPENT $2,000.00 ON THIS CAR AND HAVE TO PUT IN ANOTHER $1,500.00 IN REPAIRS AND SOMETHING ELSE IS BREAKING. WE ARE SELLING THIS PIECE OF CRAP, AND BUYING A TOYOTA. NO BAILOUT.LET THE CRAPPY CAR COMPANIES FAIL.
Posted by: WOLF | November 9, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
November 8, 2008
Re: Big (3) auto maker bailout
While we are all aware of the great importance to the economy of the big 3 automakers; are the executive prepared to take big pay cuts and forego bonuses?
It would seem that all bonuses should be based on performance. Obviously the executives have not performed well.
Thank you,
Posted by: David Cascioli | November 9, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
hey gov big wigs- i had a lot of unexpected bills this month that i hadn’t planned for. can you give me millions so that i can get back on track? i’m so sick of my tax money going to these big companies because ‘they didn’t plan ahead’… give us a break!!!!!!
Posted by: pat | November 9, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
1) Don’t bail out all three. It’s a free market after all, so save us some cash and only bail out one of them, and make it contingent upon hefty conservation standards. If one survives, the others will find their way back someday.
2) Instead of loaning them the money to waste, set up a low interest loan program to stimulate small businesses, since small businesses are hurting so much, and employ so many.
3) Instead of loaning it to the car companies, set up some reasonable loans for taxpaying citizens who are impacted by the collape, and who will need it to survive the situation. But DON’T BAIL OUT the big companies!
I’ve owned several Fords. The last one I bought in 2000 for $18K, and traded it in FOUR YEARS LATER for $2K. It was a piece of crap. They got themselves into this mess. They didn’t offer to bail me out the money I lost.
Posted by: Cat | November 9, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Let them go. They have hindered progress in the US and world for years and we would be better off without them.
Posted by: Eben | November 9, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
They did not hesitate to buy out the trolleys and scrape them at the turn of the 20 century. Now with the knowledge that oil will run out, the money would be better spent using GM employees to build mass transit equipment that is efficient/electric or ___.
They always wasted money retooling. Why not learn from old VWs example. Make a model and improve it until it beats everything at that price range. Bugs didn’t rust, got 35 miles per gallon and was easy to fix.
Posted by: rjf | November 9, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
This industry is needs to adapt to the market. This is the economy we live in competition will prevail the best product for the consumer. Auto Manufacturers spend more money on marketing the newer models to the public to “keep” selling to maintain their greedy profit levels.
Electric vehicles such as the RAV Electric Vehicle cost equivalent to a 111.1-mile-per-gallon to keep. General Motors Sold the Patents to the batteries that run this vehicle to TEXACO, Yes BIG OIL.
Chevron-Texaco own the rights to the worldwide patent to the EV95 battery that runs this vehicle.
In California the environmental state. CARB eliminated most of the Zero Emissions Vehicle requirement, allowing for car manufacturers to move to making Hybrids: half electric / half oil.
Public money should not be used in this manner. Forgive the working man for not wanting to trade in their vehicle in such a tight market. Auto should start making solar panels and develop hydro-electric power sources.
Posted by: O.C. | November 9, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
ty for the information…
Posted by: busby seo test | November 9, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Obama should not give any money to them
unless it they start building green vehicles with smaller engines…..If the
Chinese & Japanese & Indians take over so
be it….at least the vehicles will be more efficient for this day & age !!
Posted by: g.loups | November 10, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am
how in the world can everyone out there blame the union worker….for crying out loud they just went to work everyday, standing on their feet, going to the bathroom when they were told they could, eat when they were told they could and then did the same thing day after day….and you want to do this for 30 years, or longer, before you retire????…we have taken cuts in our pensions already as well as paying more for prescriptions and medical visits….we are all not sitting on our a____ and collecting money. We voluteer in our communities, school, hospitals, etc..just another example of Americans bashing Americans….I have neighbors who drive foreign cars and cannot for the life of me understand why….does anyone out there know the true story of the VW bug, and how many of our veterans fought against the Japanese and Germans and now we drive their cars…oh well…..just my comments………
Posted by: Judy Lemaster | November 10, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
the auto industry has been selling their high mileage technology to Big Oil for a while now. Let Big Oil bail them out. It was shortsightedness on the auto industries part, not America’s. I remember in 1986 or somewhere around there that Honda’s civic was getting around 46 miles PER GALLON. Does no one remember these cars? I do. Now they tout their FIT as some smart great gas mileage car at 34 MPG. WAKE UP AMERICA. We are being fleeced bigtime.
Where did these high mileage cars go from 30 years ago. It’s a bunch of crap.
Posted by: brian | November 11, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
So sad when the big 3 are all standing in line with their hands out just waiting for a bailout.
All 3 have known forever that their cars are made like crap, overpriced and not fuel efficient.
Case in point:
One 1997 Cadillac Catera sitting in my garage after having the tranny go out while on vacation in Illinois. One Joliet dealership wanted 4000 bucks to get a crated remanned tranny in within 7 days…what a bargain…lol. Rented a truck and a flat bed trailer and hauled that car back home, where my hubby, who is a mechanic, rebuilt the tranny for 1400 bucks and it now runs like it should have when we bought it.
Another fine GM (Saturn) product, a 4 cylinder front wheel drive 2003 Vue SUV, sitting out in the driveway because the tranny went out once again. This will make the 4th one in 90,000 miles on the odometer.
So, I am back to driving my 1992 Honda Accord Wagon, with 163,000 miles on it, as I know it is dependable and gets me where I need to get to without breaking down.
Have to agree with all of the posts above that we do not need to be bailing out the car companies because of their lack of foresight with tax payers dollars. When you decided to collude with big oil, you better go after them for the bucks you want to get yourself out of a jam.
It’s a crappy economy right now and big car makers are not at the top of my list for help.
I feel a free market system is the way to go with all these idiots, who have run these companies into the ground, can just go under and suffer the consequences the same as Joe Blow does when his business is not making it.
Suck it up FORD, GM and CHRYSLER….You make crap, you treated all your car and truck buyers like crap after the sale of your crappy vehicles and now its time to sit down and get a big spoon so you can dig into that big bowl of crap.
Posted by: Mere | November 11, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
The wages that are paid to auto workers are outrageous! $40 an hour is extremely high, and if they want to look at saving money they should combine the big 3 and not put this burden on the tax payers if they go into bankruptcy. I am a military member and if anyone deserves to make $40 and hour we do!
Posted by: James | November 17, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am
Fire the CEOs. They didn’t do their job. What? Do they want a pat on the back. Replace current management or let them collapse. They won’t be the first company to fail and they won’t be the last.
Posted by: Eldorado | November 19, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
DO YOU WANT AMERICA TO DISAPPEAR? We must help the car companys. We helped the banks and they had a party. So we will have stiff stipulations for the car companys to recieve the loans.3 or 4 million people out of work could be our END.We are also to blame,we wanted the big SUV,S. ADMIT IT.Where do you work? Trickle down is a fact of life. TRUCK DRIVERS,MACHINISTS,SERVERS,HOME BUILDERS,INSURANCE SALESMAN,LOCAL STORES,WAL MARTS,CHILD CARE,ALL OF US, PARTS STORES ,ALL OF US … WE WILL FEEL THE EFFECT! WHAT IS WRONG WITH A MAN MAKING 40.00 DOLLARS AN HOUR? CEOS OF BANKS ,INSURANCE, CAR COMPANYS , YOU NAME IT MAKE MILLIONS NOT BREAKING A SWEAT. TO TAKE CARE OURSELVES WE MUST! I NEVER THOUGHT IN MY LIFE I WOULD WORRY THAT AMERICA COULD DISAPPEAR. I DO NOW. I FEEL I HAVE LIED TO MY CHILDREN. WHEN DID WE STOP TAKING CARE OF EACH OTHER? WHEN? WHEN? I DO CARE! TO THE NEW PEOPLE OF MY COUNTRY, I KNOW YOU CAME HERE WITH A BELIEF OF A NEW LIFE . I AM SORRY FOR THE GREED YOU HAVE FACED. THE JOBS YOU DO ARE NOT JOBS WE WOULD NOT DO , BUT THEY ARE JOBS WE WANTED PAYED FAIRLY FOR AND RESPECTED FOR. GREED PUT YOU IN THOSE JOBS WITHOUT THE SAFETY PROTOCOLS THAT ARE HUMAN. WHAT GOOD IS THE BAIL OUT OF THE BANKS IF 3 TO 4 MILLION MORE PEOPLE ARE OUT OF WORK? WHO WILL TAKE OUT ANY LOAN? NEW PEOPLE TO THIS LAND WILL SOON FEEL AS IF THEIR OLD COUNTRY IS RIGHT HERE! I BELIEVE IN YOU , AMERICA , STOP , BREATHE, THINK, THINK , LOVE!
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
I find it funny when the commercials on tv say AMAZING 30MPG highway. my 1990 car gets 45 in the city. And these new cars are maybe .2L bigger. My freinds uncle made his car to get 120 mpg NOT KIDDING he was a genius, and next thing you know, he was gone along with all the stuff in his house. this was in a weeks time.lol
Posted by: Jeremy | April 2, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm