By David Schoetz

Nov 19, 2008 12:04am

Closing Arguments: A Bailout for the Big Three?

Executives from the Big Three automakers — GM, Ford, and Chrysler — were on Capitol Hill today asking for a $25-billion share in the government’s $700-billion bailout.

These once-titans of American industry are running on fumes. Without a lifeline, they warned, millions will lose their jobs. They even went so far as to say national security could be put at risk if they are allowed to fail.

But lawmakers are reluctant to direct taxpayer money toward the auto industry — and the future remains unclear for Detroit.

So tonight, we ask you: Do the Big Three deserve a share?

Tell us what you think.

User Comments

Yes, absolutely. We can not let them fail!

Posted by: Michael | November 19, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Please bailout the big 3, our whole economy will collapse w/o them

Posted by: steelworkers affected too | November 19, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I support the government providing loans to the auto industry if they can provide a plan to become profitable and the loans should be paid back by them.

Posted by: Nancy | November 19, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Heck no! They blew it! Toyota designed the Prius, creating waiting lists of eager, loyal consumers. “Who Killed The Electric Car” came out in 2006 showing what GM did with their technology.

Posted by: ch | November 19, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I personally feel that we should not bail out the auto makers. They can make less cars and make them more efficent. They have a tendency to be over priced. NO! Do not bail them out. They can find a way to get out of this hole themselves.

Posted by: Wilma Hutchison | November 19, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

NO!

Posted by: Amy | November 19, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I personally think that if these corporations need that much money to bail them out then they don’t need to be in business in the first place. Toyota is doing well. American car corporations pay thier CEO’s, engineers, and workers too much in the first place. This is why I personally think they have become desperate for money. If you would manage your money right in the first place and put it in the right places, this wouldn’t happen. I don’t think we should bail them out.

Posted by: Brooke | November 19, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

No to ALL bailouts — I want to know how much the “Big Three” paid their top executives in bonuses in the last year?? No company should be paying “bonuses” when they are not making a profit.

Posted by: Marilyn McKelvey | November 19, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

NO!!!

Posted by: Sandy | November 19, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

The automobile management teams (CEOs, etc) should first cut back their salaries before asking for the bailout $, it seems a bit ridiculous while they are getting high pays and everyone else suffering yet they wouldn’t want to cut their own $ to help their own businesses? Hypocrite. (same goes to those who ask the money to then spend it on parties or bonuses…)

Posted by: Johnny | November 19, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

If the Big 3 go bankrupt, someone will buy the plants, etc., and produce cars for a much cheaper price.
The autoworkers and all suppliers will still have work with the new owners of the car factories.
Why doesn’t anyone report on this? All they report on is that everyone will be out of business – Yes, that is true, just the owners and stock holders.

Posted by: K Michael Berliner | November 19, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Do it now or pay heavily later

Posted by: Drew | November 19, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

No way should we bail them out. They have been the fat cats for how many years. The only fair way would be to tell all the upper managment that they get no fat checks and no bonus’s at all NOTHING!!

Posted by: Dennis | November 19, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

You think the economy is bad now, let the big three fold and we will all be on the soup line. Why bailout AIG and not the automakers when 5 million jobs are at stake.

Posted by: Brad J | November 19, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Let them get what they deserve… they have no foresight… they should file bankruptcy and recover thru that channel if they can!

Posted by: Robert Schneider | November 19, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

My brother went bankrupt as a very hard working farmer and family man in the 80′s. No one bailed him out. His wife had catastrophic medical bills from a chronic illness at the same time. The government didn’t bail them out. He died of a heart attack at 42 y.o. We need to bail out the working people in the middle class, not the rich people. The farmers are the heart of the food chain. There was nothing more important than that. The government is off track. Judy Davis

Posted by: Judith M. Davis, LADC | November 19, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

no let them file bankruptsy they mismanaged the business.Ceo heads should roll.

Posted by: mark | November 19, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I don’t think we should bail them out.

Posted by: Roberta | November 19, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Yes. General Motors is asking for a loan, not a bailout…regardless if we lose the auto makers and all the associated jobs we are headed for depression, not recession.

Posted by: Linda Crenshaw | November 19, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

The big 3 automakers should be allowed to fail. Only then can they get rid of the overpaid and ineffective management that got them into this situation. Other automakers are still doing well and opening new plants. What happened to the big profits they made when the economy was strong? Did they share it with the taxpayers? Why should they be rewarded for overspending on themselves instead of making sure that their business was in good order.

Posted by: Gerald Hamilton | November 19, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

No. They don’t deserve a bailout or in better words a handout. The economy is not failing their business, their business is failing our economy. If they want a handout then they should expect regulation; if they don’t want regulation, they shouldn’t expect a handout. Americans are at fault and just because automakers or financial groups or even blue collar workers bet on them and were wrong doesn’t mean that the government is responsible to heal their pain. If a governement is failing its because the people are failing. No the automakers don’t deserve any rescue. If they receive a penny ‘we the people’ will never learn.

Posted by: Ted Graham | November 19, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Auto industry is important to USA and should get the help;and should be made a loan and time date the payback with interest. USA need to learn how to make that bailout money make money, and put stipulations on each loans . make it known it will help thoes that help the people.

Posted by: linnyC | November 19, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

hell no we shouldn’t bail them out.
everyone envolved took profits/income without planning or investing for the changing auto markets/demands, and they want us to pay the price, ta hell with that. Let them send the money they took back and work at it differently for a few years.

Posted by: kent | November 19, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Yes, I think they deserve help more than the greedy banks that have caused the bulk of this mess to start with.

Posted by: David Arlt | November 19, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

NO! No Bail-outs period! These inflated paychecks, greedy CEO’s have mismanaged and overcharged us far too long to be looking for hand-outs. They blew it and they should pay for it. Let the people benefit from the $700 Billion of our money! SCREW THEM! Where’s the money they made when things were good? I’ll bet their families were living large. Too bad they weren’t smart enough to look ahead. They deserve to loose their jobs and don’t deserve one penny of our money. The entire government needs to be overhauled if they continue to pay criminals for misrepresentation, greed and fraud. We should start with congress. Get rid of them all and replce them with independents or someone that will actually work for the people. We have watched the greed and corruption for long enough!

Posted by: Eydie | November 19, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I don’t believe they should be bailed out…Look at what happened with the last bailout, one company, which I won’t name, sent people on a vacation, not using the money for it’s original intention…What would happen with the auto companies if they’re balied out I wonder? If they’d “bail me out” by sending me $100,000.00, tax free, then I’d say go ahead and bail the auto companies out. No one bails me out…I feel for the workers, but I doubt the workers would benefit from the bailout. Only the company executives would benefit. I know what that’s like, as one time a client tried to get raises to us workers, and what happened instead was that the contract wasn’t worded properly, so the company took and kept the money and didn’t help the workers out.

Posted by: Bernard | November 19, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

No way! They fought all legislation for higher fuel economy. Now no one wants their products. Let the oil companies bail them out!

Posted by: US Taxpayer | November 19, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

This is a no brainer. We cannot outsource our largest industry out to a foreign country. This will signal the end of the middle class in America. The rhetoric of ideology has no place in this decision. If the industry goes bust, so does America. I have never seen so many with so little against labor and decrying a decent living wage. We are in foreclosure because salaries have not kept pace with inflation. Not because people bought more house than they could afford. Who is making more money than they did 10 years ago? I am not. The other kicker in the discussion are politicians questioning why foreign companies can build cars cheaper. The answer is: The foreign companies do not pay health insurance, the government takes care of it.This decreases their worker costs. All roads lead to government working for people. After all, we are the ones who pay into it. (duH)!

Posted by: Gail Choice | November 19, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I can remember when I was raising two children back in the 60′s & 70′s. Inflation hit and it was difficult to make ends meet, but I was reading what wonderful things the automakers union was doing for the autoworkers. I was making $3.75 in a responsible position as a secretary, but men and women in the auto factories were making 4 times that because they could use a screw driver . Let’s be serious, the union and the execs living “high on the hog” w/hugh bonuses should NOT BE BAILED OUT.

Posted by: Sharon hecht | November 19, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Absolutely not. They have not changed the way they do business in 50 years. Without a dramatic change in the bloated method of getting products the public wants at a price they can afford.

Posted by: Roger Steelworker | November 19, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I’m in debt so who is going to bail me out.I say hell no to the bailout.

Posted by: DAVID JOHNSON | November 19, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

The White House is willing to help the financial instuitions of this country, but no the auto companies. And they certainly are vital to this country, as they have already said. What about upper management?? I have not heard one statementfrom them, that they would be willing to give up some of their thousands and thousands of dollars for the sake of their companies!! Its about time they sacfrice as the UAW already has.

Posted by: Jerry | November 19, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

No bailout! The greedy Big Three made this mess and they should live with it.

Posted by: Patricia | November 19, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Help us help them or give are country to china it’s a no brainer! As a U.A.W worker myself I feel we have lost enough over the years and so has our country if we can send billions of our hard earned money over seas why shouldn’t we be more apt to help our own.

Posted by: lori | November 19, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

The Big Three didn’t have the smarts to keep up with the smart designers and stayed with antique land yaughts. They were non profitable before the recent economy problems. Simple answer – NO. Help the workers individually not the bonus grabbing executives.

Posted by: Ron C | November 19, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Yes, I think the BIG 3 should get a bail-out because Our country is in enough trouble with unemployment. This would be a snowball effect we can not emagine. Put guide lines on it and make them build only in AMERICA. This will help employ americans too. Thanks for letting me comment.

Posted by: Diann Holder | November 19, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Bail Out? No Way!
“Remember this your whole life through, tommorrow there will be more to do;
and failure waits for those who stay,
with success made yesterday.
Tomorrow you must try once more,
and even HARDER than before.”
No more bailouts for $71.00 high school graduates with ONE skill. FORGET IT.
Let’s look for a new young FORD/Crysler/GM who can make energy efficient cars, for those who use AND NEED less. WE CAN’T AFFORD YOU….we need to Change. NO BONUS’s for boneheads….Change!

Posted by: Jean | November 19, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

So wait…no one buys there cars so they want us to just pay them anyway with our tax dollars? If they made cars half as well as Honda & Toyota, they wouldn’t have anything to worry about. I don’t think the bailout that has already been passed was a good idea, I certainly wouldn’t want to add to it. Let unsuccessful businesses die, teach them that they can’t all go crying to the government for help when they mismanage things.

Posted by: Matt Bailey | November 19, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Absolutely do not bail out the auto companies. Give them a chance to restructure and to re-negotiate the union wages and agreements that have led to some of their problems. Limits should be placed on executive salaries and packages to prompt a move away from the obscenely high pay they receive. They need to make the cars that people want and can afford and that get GOOD gas mileage, like the cars they make for foreign countries. They need to keep their work force employed so they are not added to the unemployment rolls. I am afraid that if we bail them out, they will abuse it just like AIG. If any more money is just handed out, it should have HEAVY strings attached.
We need to put more money in our citizens’ hands so we can afford to buy things, then more products will be sold and there will be a need for more to be manufactured. Where’s the common sense in Washington?????

Posted by: Kathleen Murtz | November 19, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

GM, like most americans, don’t understand that there is not an endless supply of money. By bumping themselves to the front of the line they are taking money from all americans who are loosing there homes and have lost there jobs or working at half of their former wages. We need to focus on our goal….
stabalizing the whole not feeding the greedy.

Posted by: dan sutherland | November 19, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Definitely not. When is this all going to end? Whatever happened to being responsible for our own actions. They keep making bad choices and expect us to pay the price. Deal with it the same way the public does when they screw up. No more bailouts.

Posted by: Rita Robinson | November 19, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Bailout….absolutely not without serious wage reductions across the board. The executives and unions have had a stranglehold on the car makers for 40 years. I have a hard time feeling sorry for a guy that sits on a hydrolic chair putting screws in a carseat for $ 29.00 per hour….that guy makes more in one week ($ 1,200)than I make all month ($ 1,030) and because of his inflated UAW salary, I can’t afford to buy the car he is making and they wonder why car sales are dropping……DUH-H-H-H

Posted by: LW Terry | November 19, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Yes, I definitely feel those three automakers deserve share of the bailout money because job losses will affect thousands of americans. Retirees, families with children, parts suppliers, car dealers and many more will suffer. Also there will be a domino effect on other businesses. America can’t survive without any products made in America. It is no brainer.

Posted by: Beverly Franks | November 19, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Help Them you help other countries but not your own. Give are country the help we need. We need the big 3 to stay in Buisness so we all stay in Buisness.

Posted by: Joe D'Agnese | November 19, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

frick no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: kent m. | November 19, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

no way. after sending most jobs out of the country and ruining countless lives and families, let them suffer as the rest of us are.

Posted by: k p | November 19, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Listening to C-Span today you realize how futile a bail-out is for the auto industry. You might as well pour money down a black hole, better still help homeowners. The return may be better. Listening to CEO of the big three, you realize their plants are sitting idle while they continue to pay salaries as usual. I believe in unions but this is ridiculous. Everyone from the top down is collecting as usual, unaware that their way of life has changed permanently. Putting money after it will not help. The industry is going doiwn anyway because a temporary bridge won’t help because the consumers are missing, not just can’t get credit but don’t want credit and aren’t going to buy because they can’t afford to buy. Pull the plug, reorganize and begin again with the court to help sort it out.

Posted by: Julia | November 19, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Why does Congress have no problem with bailing out Wall Street and such a big problem with bailing out mainstreet. Detroit has been in a recession for at least 3 years and a depression for the past year. We were suffering while the rest of the country was oblivious and the admistration was telling us that the fundamentals of the economy are strong. My husband and I have been small business owners for 30 years and we are being forced to close in the next month.If there is no bailout, the business closings will be monumental and the impact, beyond what those so far from mainstreet can even begin to imagine. The auto industry is the backbone of manufacturing and shouldn’t be ignored while the fatcats in the banking industry get their six figure salaries even if they don’t get their additonal bonuses.

Posted by: w schwartz | November 19, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I don’t think that the government should bail out the Auto Industry. They have made their bed let them lye in it. Let them file BK and regroup together like the airlines have done. Get rid of the top management people they have gotten them in this position of despair – I’m sure there are some good employee w/o a job from Wall Street that could run the companies much better than what they have had.
They definetly don’t warrent a bailout. Out financial indurstry does.

Posted by: Debbie Smith | November 19, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I watched the entire interview of the 3 CEOs from GM, ford and Chrysler and also the President of the UAW union, and a professor from the University of Maryland. My impression is that both GM and Chrysler deserve to be fed to the dogs, and should be placed into Chapter 11 reorganization with takeover bids actively sought by the Obama administration from the likes of Tata of India and Hyundai of South Korea. Tata is developing teh Air CAr, that all of the American press is ignoring, that runs on compressed air up to 35mph with NO pollution and over 35mph to 80mph there is an auxiliary gasoline engine with and 8 gallon gasoline tank – but get this – it gets 108mpg!! Yes – you read that right! They are the ones who should have the opportunity to buy up the plants and retrain the workers to build cars and trucks that will free us from the clutches of the Arab oil cartel, once and for all! But here in America the jerks are not gtold about this and are content with their pigatha SUVs that get 10mpg, now that gfasoline is back down near $2.00/gallon from over $4.00/gallon less than 6 months ago! Tata plans to have it here in the USA in 2010!!!???
Why don’t you get off your lethargic asses and go to India and do a special with Tata Motors about how they re developing this – having bought up the patents from a French engineer who is in a town on the French Riviera! Maybe Tata should do an allinace with Ford???
Why won’t your system accept my website of http://www.sunshinekillsvampires.com ?

Posted by: RON HARTMAN | November 19, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

If taxpayers could bail out the banks and insurance compananies, why should not they bail out car makes? It is not at all clear why is the hestation? 25 billion is way less than 700 billion. Those who in the Congress are saying that car makers did not plan properly and theeby should bepunished, forgot that the banks and insurance companies did the same and they were bailed. What congress was doing when speculators drove the oil price through the roof? We want car companies to receive the life line.

Posted by: Alpana Ray | November 19, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

absolutely not as an american enterprise there bound by the same rules and regulations as the mom and pop grocery store the government wouldnt think twice about them.further more 90000 ayear for assembly workers i think not.let them the unions and big business suffer like the rest of us.the partys over now find a job.

Posted by: dominick leogrande | November 19, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

yes
i just don’t get the argument that wall street deserves a bail out and not the auto companies. They are asking for $25B while AIG alone has received $130B and it’s not enough.
And then there is the argument that $25B will not change their business model and make them solvent and they should have seen this coming. well, the feds should have seen this coming and put forth some controls 6-12 months ago. And if the feds and wall street didn’t see it coming how can they expect anyone else to have seen it coming.
my personal opinion is that the $700B has a much higher chance of being wasted on wall st than on any other industry

Posted by: bil | November 19, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

No bailout for autoworkers earning more than $70 an hour by those earning less than half tht amount. The problem has been brought on by greed. Don’t expect or ask the tax payers to finance greed.
He is a fool who thinks we can spent ourselves into prosperity.

Posted by: S. Jerome Elness | November 19, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

No loans at all. Do not give them one dime. Show them the door. It is time to let them sink or swim.
I am not buying if they do not get the money they are going to be gone next month. This Fear and Scare started 8 years ago and everyone saw it worked so well. Our new Terrorist are these Companies. Let them claim bankruptcy and get their business in line.
definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants.

Posted by: Lenora | November 19, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

before asking for a bail out, the board members and the upper management personels should first give up their “golden parachutes”, take a non-reimbursable temp pay cut of 30%-40%, and cut their expanse accounts by 50% or more since their decisions were the cause of the problems instead of always asking the laborers to take a cut in pay and benefits

Posted by: robert | November 19, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

It sounds easy enough to bail out the big 3 auto makers, but will we as taxpayers be shafted?? Will the automakers learn a lesson from this or just make the same mistakes? Maybe the top executives can for-go big bonuses or high salaries to help save their companies? Im sure they will not make any sacrifices and even possibly collect more compensation if they receive a government bail-out. That is one of the reasons they have gotten themselves into this mess–Greed and more greed! Why are the middle class and the poor always the ones to suffer when big corporations make huge blunders? Before throwing the automakers a lifesaver, at taxpayer expense, maybe we need to examine where and how they have been spending money over the past several years. This is a big decision and should NOT be decided over a few meetings with the CEOs begging for money!

Posted by: John | November 19, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Detroit has lost sight of the what the average person can afford and have priced themselves out — no matter the reasons a car should not cost more than a house. NO BAILOUT

Posted by: Abernathy Popoofnick III | November 19, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Our government should not bailout the three automakers. I think it would be like sending our money down the drain. They are not willing to change to the production of cars that are needed today like other countries have already done. It would be better to give new US car makers a chance with financial help. They could give many laydoff people a new job.

Posted by: Maria Matthews | November 19, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

The Big three need Chapter 11 rather than a BAIL OUT.
A bail out would mean more of the same that they have been doing for the last 50 years.
If they go into CHAPTER 11 the auto companies would have to do some changes. One thing. they might realise that TOYOTA has their labor cost at only $44 per man hour rather than the $71 that FORD, CHRYSLER, and GENERAL MOTORS are now paying. This $24 per man hour is caused by the UAW.
They would also have to restructure their product lines and just might start building better autos.

Posted by: David Johnson | November 19, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Yes, we should give the Big Three the bridge loans they need. Without the Big Three our country’s economy will be devastated, as well as our 401′s and every other asset 99% of this country’s citizens have at this time. This is part of the chance we have to rescue our country from the mess it it is in due to the current White House administration.

Posted by: M | November 19, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

i have been in two ford plants 10 yrs ago and these people still make over twice what i make not counting their benifts. unless the uaw is willing to make concessions on pay(reduce their pay by a third) i have absoultley no sympthy for any one working for the big 3. the uaw is the first thing wrong with these companys both coparate and the uaw must make consessions or i would rather let them close. if the big 3 won’t agree to consessions then which would they rather stay open and make consessions or close i don’t think the uaw understands that they don’t have what the american public want’
s but they are now dealing with americans who will not pay for their higher standard of living or benifits.

Posted by: richard | November 19, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I can’t imagine a healthy economy ever again without the big 3. Who would be left to buy anything?

Posted by: Katherine | November 19, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

There was a email going around stating if each registered voter received 250k each from the 700billion bailout it would END the American crisis. Auto industry would rebound, foreclosures would cease,students would have funds for college and best yet, the funds would be taxable so we would be paying ourselves back!!!!
NO to the auto bailout-YES to the American people bailout!!
Linda

Posted by: Linda | November 19, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

I do not believe we should be bailing out these automakers. They have had plenty of time and opportunity to retool and curb the American appetite for gas-guzzling vehicles. Letting these giants fall will pave the way for new and environmentally conscious auto makers which will begin their efforts focussing on vehicles that are less dependant on fossil fuels. However catastrophic, the time has come for an end to irresponsible American manufacturing. We, as Americans need to be more environmentally responsible and must begin taking the lead for change in the world.

Posted by: Bill H. | November 19, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

The CEOs of the big three companies all have salaries and bonuses totaling over 8 million dollars a year. Hmmmm? I would say HELL NO!!! They can bail their own selves out!

Posted by: Lynn Chizek | November 19, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

I definately think the auto industry should get the bail out. Millions depend on them to live.One in 10 American jobs depends on U.S. automakers. Nearly 3 million jobs are at immediate risk. U.S. personal income could be reduced by $150 billion. The tax revenue lost over 3 years would be more than $156 billion. If these companies go under it would be devastating.

Posted by: Lee | November 19, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

America, whether you like GM Ford or Chrysler or not, now is the time to be rallying around your industry. They have restructured, and they know they need to start producing like Toyota. We need these guys like it or not. Without them our economy is doomed. They are this country’s economic base. These are the guys that won us World War 2. Without an industrial base, I don’t care how technologically advanced we are as a country, we might as well be third world. REMEMBER, IT IS NOT JUST THE AUTOWORKER THAT LOSES IF THEY GO DOWN, EVERYONE IN AMERICA WILL BE AFFECTED FROM THE INDUSTRY, TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL COMPANIES, INSURANCE COMPANIES, RETAIL, COLLEGES, THIS AFFECTS EVERYTHING PEOPLE. SO WHETHER YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH GM, BACK THEM JUST THIS ONCE.

Posted by: ryan | November 19, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

yes the big 3 auto companies should be bailed out; because if they fall, we all fall. This is America, and we’re all in the together. We all know about dominoes.
That is what it well be. America will fall like a row of dominoes. We can’t afford such a thing at a time like this. We’re experiencing enough major crisis’. This just may take up over the top. Crime and poverty will triple, and a depression will occur in a state worse than the one we had in the last century.
If it’s ever a time to pull together, it’s now. ONE MORE THING> I think every American making less than $80,000 should be forgiven of all their debt and allowed to start fresh.

Posted by: Mary Moorehead | November 19, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

why should we bail out an atiquated us industry that refuses to move into the future & produce energy efficient cars.
GM was producing an effective Saturn coupe for California. The program was scapped, the cars destroyed & now they want $$ to keep producing cars that have not improved in mileage since the early 80′s.
Let them file for bankruptcy & move on like the airlines. WHY should the taxpayers fund a company that is supposed to function on a business model- not a charity…
The auto industry has brought this upon themselves. Granted the current economic climate has brought this to the forefront, this would have happened sooner later as the big 3 bevome a face of the past becuase they refuse to be innovative & competitive… it is therir own fault.
And it is unfortunate for those in related businesses, but they should have realized that for the last 25 years they have been riding on the coat tails of an American Industry that has survived on the strength of its past, NOT it’s vision for the future.
As in life, ignorance is bliss?
Now the “b;iss” must hit the fan…
They have screwed over the consumer & the environment for years, now it is time to pay the piper… NO BAILOUT, file for bankruptcy, or close…

Posted by: scott | November 19, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

No, the american auto makers have had their chance time and time again to learn lesson which they have not. Maybe if they have to go under then start over without union. Who can afford their cars when the workers and CEO’s make so much money. Unions had their place and served a purpose years ago but they are not needed today. Lots of other people make it on less than these people are making and live great lives.
NO BAIL OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I for one don’t want to pay for the greed of the unions. And after all part of this money is money I paid in working for alot less than they get. And hey I am still out there making a living.

Posted by: Barbara Smith | November 19, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

We are kidding ourselves if you think that bailing out the Big (3)three is going to fix anything, remember we have been though this before. Put a limit on the amount of Japanese cars and trucks that can be sold annually in the USA or slap high tariffs on each car (like Japanese do American cars) and the problem will fix itself.

Posted by: Richard Suellen | November 19, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Isn’t it one of the principles of democracy that if you become too big and can’t adjust quickly enough to economic situation you will fail and you SHOULD FAIL. We the taxpayers can not be held responsible for bailing out private companies just because they are too big to fail. What happened to previous financial help provided by president Clinton to help BIG three build more fuel efficient cars. It was wasted. Japanese companies put their OWN money and were able to make profit paying CUSTOM fees for each car imported to US.

Posted by: Marcin | November 19, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

THE ULTIMATE ECONOMIC STIMULUS PACKAGE (NO BAILOUT FOR THE AUTOMAKERS EITHER!!!!!!!
GIVE THE POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!!
THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 200 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE US OVER THE AGE OF 18. THE NEXT 700 BILLION DOLLARS SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTIED AS FOLLOWS:
A) DIVIDE THIS 700 BILLION DOLLARS EVENLY AMONG THE GAINFULLY EMPLOYED WHO FILED 2007 TAX RETURNS AND NON-WORKING ELDERLY AND DISABLED WHO OWN MORTGAGES. THIS TOTALS NEARLY $350, 000 PER INDIV. AN IMMEDIATE 30% TAX WILL BE LEVIED PER PAYOUT; GIVING ELIGIBLE CITIZENS $245,000 TO SPEND LIBERALLY; SENDING 210 BILLION BACK TO THE GOVT. POT.
B) A “FEDERAL CARD”, SIMILAR TO A CREDIT/DEBIT CARD, WILL BE ISSUED THROUGH WHICH ALL MONIES WILL BE APPLIED, MONITORED AND USED. THOSE CURRENTLY APPLYING FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION, HAVE OUTSTANDING STUDENT LOANS, OWE BACK CHILD SUPPORT OR OWE ANY STATE OR FEDERAL BACK TAXES SHALL HAVE FUNDS DEDUCTED (UP FRONT). THE NEW “FEDERAL CARD” WILL BE USED FOR TAXABLE PURCHASES AND/OR PAYMENT. CITIZENS WILL NOT BE ABLE TOWITHDRAW CASH.
C) HOARDING OF ANY SORT WILL RESULT IN ACCOUNTS BEING INSTANTLY FROZEN.
D) CITIZENS WITH MORTGAGES WILL BE ENCOURGED PAY THEM OFF OR APPLY LARGE SUMS TO MAKE PAYMENTS MORE MANAGEABLE. (INSTANTANEOUSLY SOLVING THE MORTGAGE CRISIS.
E) LONG-TERM INTEREST-BEARING SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLANS WILL BE ENCOURAGED.
THIS SUGGESTION WAS EMAILED TO ALL GA CONGRESSMEN BEFORE THE FIRST 700 BILLION DOLLAR WALL STREET BAILOUT WAS OFFICIAL, HOWEVER, ONLY JOHNNY ISAACSON RESPONDED; ALBEIT IN AN UNINTERESTED FORM LETTER.

Posted by: Joe & Madge Buskey | November 19, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Not no…But hell no!!! The auto industry is rotten to the core. This is just another ploy by greedy industrialists to dip their hands into the taxpayer cookie jar. I think the american public will soon see what a HUGE mistake the congressional bailout of Wall Street is going to be in short order, and they have no one to blame but congress…It’s a crying shame that american politicians never learn from history. Let’s not make the same mistake twice !!!

Posted by: The Pro from dover | November 19, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

I am having such difficulty trying to understand why the 250 billion dollar bailout for the financial companies got passed so quickly and yet the Big Three has to grovel for a share of 25 Billion. The cascading affect of these companies failing is as devastating as the financial institutions. Is it because our government fatcats are heavily invested in the financial institutions? I wonder. I don’t think any of the Bush administration is invested in the American Auto Industry. I think this country needs to get back to thinking about what is good for this country instead of any other country.

Posted by: Judy Chomicz | November 19, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Years ago the American people took to the streets and marched to show a united voice when it was time to demand change from our elected leaders. Now it appears we just bend over.

Posted by: Ron | November 19, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

No bailout. The US automakers have failed to produce energy efficient auto’s. My first home cost $27,500 – today thats an average auto. What is wrong with this picture. Also, my company car is a Toyota Prius getting 54.7 mpg. I don’t like buying foreign but Detroit doesn’t get it. It is time to drop the prices, lower those inflated salaries and make the cars as fuel effecient as my Prius. NO BAIL OUT.

Posted by: Pam | November 19, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I ABSOLUTLY FEEL THE GOVERMENT HAS TO HELP THE BIG THREE, OR THE RESULTS WILL BE DEVASTATING…..IT WILL BE A DOMINOS EFFECT THOUGH THE NATION IN A MANY WAYS!…WE HAVE GIVEN OUR COUNTRY AWAY PIECE BY PIECE, AND NOW THE PILLAR OF MANUFACTURING IS ABOUT TO CRUMBLE..THE PROFITS MADE BY FORIEGN CAR COMPANIES, DOES NOT STAY IN THIS COUNTRY…NOR ARE THEY SURPORTIVE OF OUR NATION IN TIMES OF NEED…9/11 IS AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE..HOW CAN WE BE WILLING TO HELP AIG, THE CREDIT CARD COMPANIES, AND THE BANKS AND WE DON’T CARE ABOUT THE LITTLE PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR THE BIG THREE? I TOO, BELIEVE THIS IS ALSO A DEFENSE ISSUE FOR THIS COUNTY..INTERESTING THAT NO ONE MENTIONED THE ARTICLE FORBES MAGZINE WROTE PRAISING FORD FOR THE OUTSTANDING JOB, THEY ARE DOING TO TURN THE COMPANY AROUND, OR CONSUMERS REPORT SAYING FORD IS COMPARABLE OF BETTER THAN TOYATA OR HONDA IN QUALITY AND RELIABITY…OR THAT FORD PUT 1,000 WORKERS BACK TO WORK, TO MEET THE DEMAND OF THE NEW F-150,….NEW MANAGERMENT ISN’T THE ANSWER FOR FORD, THEY GOT THAT TWO YEARS AGO, THEY JUST NEED TO TIME TO COMPLETE THE TURN AROUND..UNFORTUNATELY THE GOVERMENT DOESN’T UNDERSTAND THE CAR COMPANIES, PERCEPTION IS EVERYTHING!! AND BANKRUPTCY WOULD DESTORY ALL THE PROGRESS FORD HAS MADE.

Posted by: shirley jean peters | November 19, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

No one is bailing my real estate related business out. I was forced into bankruptcy. Being treated like you are an idiot is the rule of the day in bankruptcy court. A real reality check. It brings you down to where you never wanted to be but it is a real eye-opener. At least you realize what went wrong even if you can’t correct it. Maybe those in the big 3 really need to live like the rest of us!

Posted by: Beth | November 19, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

DO NOT bail out the auto industry. Its time the greedy pay the price. They caved in to the unions, the workers made more than they should, as did the executives. If they didn’t save enough money, let them join those of us who have paid their exhorbitant prices for poor quality, and actually worked hard for what we have, and saved as best we could. Let’s buy from the foreign car makers building in the US who ARE making money because they are not saddled with union demands of unreasonable wages, excessive medical benefits and retirement contributions. Time for you to see how the other half lives. The stronger companies and individuals will fill the gap and hire people who are happy to have a good day’s pay for a good day’s work. I can’t believe the media and the politicians are so afraid to put the blame where it belongs. The unions served a very important function in the growth of our country, and now contribute to its demise.
And let those buyers who stepped ignorantly into the subprime mortgage market lose their homes and go back to renting. Especially let the greedy lenders fail.
We bailed out Amtrak and the airlines, how many times? and still no better. Let Darwinian Capitalism work.
Unfortunately, those who orchestrated the downfall will not suffer. But shame on us for letting them do it and get away with it. But let it stop here.

Posted by: Bill | November 19, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I do not think America should bailout the automakers. The automakers have not produced efficient or energy saving cars which the govenment has ask of them. If the automakers get help in the bailout, their employees will continue working and making an income along with producing cars that main street people can not afford since we (main street people) are not employeed and have no income. America will have a surplus of unaffordable cars. The automakers are stalling for what is the inevitable. Closing of their companies and unemployement for their employees.
Why should the automaker employees maintain their high incomes with all their benefits when us on main street have lost our jobs, been told to work one less day a week, benefits have been cut and/or lost our homes. The automakers have not sacrifice anything.
Final thought. Do you give candy to a child that misbehaves? No! So do not give the automakers a bailout since they can not produce efficient or energy saving cars.

Posted by: Deborah Ross | November 19, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

If a company, any company cannot sell their product, goes out of bussines, and stays out of bussines, and many companys do, and they don’t blame it on the economy beign weak, or beg for help from anyone, or at least at the scale o help that this companies are asking for, and if they do ask fo help, and if they do go out of bussines, let’s look at the way the company was ran by the CEO’s, very high bonuses, salary for worker’s at $70/hr, cheap made cars that guzzle down at the gas pump, and many are called back during an entire year, i personally own a small bussines and i know how hard it is to keep it, but it should not be anyone’s fault if i can’t run it, spoiling failure should not be an example in any situation, at least not in my lifetime, you fail you move on too new things, why try to do the same thing over again if you failed at it, maybe they should be in a different industry, or the government should help the companies names , but fire everybody at the top and start new, and fresh under new management

Posted by: horia | November 19, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

THIS IS TO BARBARA SMITH. YOU MIGHT BE MAKING A LIVING NOWBUT IF YOU LETTHE BIG THREE GO DOWN, MARK MY WORDS IT WON’T BE LONG TIL YOU ARE NOT MAKING A LIVING. YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK.

Posted by: RYAN | November 19, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

if toyota america, honda america, bmw america, can make a profit, without asking for handouts, then why can’t the supposed big three ????? they have a bad business model, overpriced labor, fat cat executives with humongous saleries, why should these people get
tax payers money to keep screwing up ???? they have had more than ample time. only the fat cat executives, overpriced labor, etc. will lose out.
supply and demand will take care of the rest. all the new and used car lots i see ore over flowing, there are no shortages, just a shortage of buyers whom can afford to purchase, it is called a shaking out, survival of the fittest.

Posted by: w. lee | November 19, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

No, absolutely not! If anyone should be getting bail out money, it is the American taxpayer. Send me a $25,000.00 check made out to GM, send my neighbor a $25,000.00 check made out to Ford, so on and so forth. Don’t you think we’d go out and buy a new vehicle, if we had those checks in our hands? Wouldn’t that boost the economy and keep our auto industry going? Same thing for this bogus Wall St. bail out, it would be a lot less expensive to send every taxpayer $200,000.00 than it would be to just hand over $700 billion dollars to Wall St. What would I do with $200,000.00? Pay off my credit cards buy a house, new tv and appliances. I’m sure many other middle class Americans would do the same or close to it. Would that not be a boost to our economy? Why are we giving $700 billion to the people who blew it to begin with?

Posted by: Deborah | November 19, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

GM and Ford should receive a “loan” under very strict guidelines. Those two have been bailed before.
chrysler…..SHOULD GET NO MONEY UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES!!!! They were bailed out with taxpayers money before; then allowed a foreign entity (germany) to take control of the company. After the germans “ran the company into the ground” / gained automotive secrets and future innovations, they wiped their arses and lefted. The germans are/were receiving fanancial assistance from the United States for “reconstruction after WWII” until recently…..within the last 5 years. SO HELLS NAWL FOR CHYSLER getting any “bailout” from taxpayers/the government…..there are out rape the american people just george bush has done. The United States Federal Government should never allow the sale of a company to once it has recieved assistance/taxpayers hard-earned money from the US Federal Government….because it screws the US taxpayers!!!!

Posted by: Vincent H. Hunter | November 19, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

NO!!!!! The American Auto Industry could have and should have changed their ways 40 years ago. We had the technology then thanks to the Germans and the Volkswagon. Maybe if they had to make ends meet from the top on down with what this nations’ school teachers and staff make then we would see a difference. Heck, my 2001 Isuzu Rodeo gets 21mpg with 90,000 miles on it whereas a 2008 Ford, GM, and Chrysler only gets 24mpg. GET REAL. LET THEM FAIL.

Posted by: msnhlc | November 19, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

I was a staunch advocate for the US auto industry until the early 2000′s but time after time after time the US automakers get into trouble they improve their quality just enough to sucker in just enough people to stay afloat. They don’t deserve a bailout — they have sucked enough blood from US citizens and positively should not get our tax dollars as well. As history has proven, they will again abuse our good will and as for me and the thousands of other people ripped off and finally awoken we wont’ ever be suckered in by any of the big 3 again.

Posted by: Trav | November 19, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

No bailout for the Auto industry. Let them go to the Bankrupcy Court and restructure their inefficient and bad business operations.
Don’t waste the taxpayers’ money on them.

Posted by: earthling19 | November 19, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

FOR ALL OF YOUR INFORMATION OUT THERE WHO THINK TOYOTA IS DOING SO WELL, TOYOTA STOCK WAS AT 120.00 A SHARE 4 MONTHS AGO. TODAY I THINK IT IS AT LIKE 60. IT HAS FALLEN 50% IN 4 MONTHS. JAPAN IS ENTERING A RECESSION AND TOYOTA IS WORRIED THAT THEY EXPANDED TO QUICKLY IN NORTH AMERICA. THEY TOO ARE WORRIED ABOUT GOING UNDER RIGHT NOW ALSO. SO DON’T THINK THINGS ARE SO ROSY THERE EITHER.

Posted by: RYAN | November 19, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

No to bailing out the auto industry!
They should have put more money away for such times. They should cut their CEO salaries and other top brass salaries in order to keep the company afloat. Go to 4 or 3 days a week. We are all making cut backs and changes. If they can not read the market and ask consumers what we want in an automobile then hey, pay the price.
I think we Americans should ask for the remainder of the 700 Billion back, the money is not being spent in the manner we were told it would be, and just as predicted, ‘undeserving money hounds’ are coming to Washington to get some if it! But not the home owner , no they get nothing of the 700 Billion…is this fair? it is the consumer’s money?

Posted by: David | November 19, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

The very core of so many retired employees depending on pensions from
GM would be devastated if the company
should be dissolved. We do depend on
this for our livlihood. So I am praying
for a bailout. I do believe the Company
is the recipient of an economic meltdown
that is effected worldwide. Mistakes or
not without the bailout the trickle down
effect would be devastating. Who in
their right mind wants that to happen.
If the bailout does not happen, I fear
our country would be in a depression
instead of a recession.

Posted by: Sharon | November 19, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Absolutely not. When the rest of the country was working for a buck or two above minimum wage for a “general help”position, union workers were making twice as much and striking to get more! I remember a neighbor of mine bragging about the fact that he got his new son-in-law a position that paid just shy of $25.00 an hour (in 1970) to drive a vehicle 500 feet off the assembly line to the “holding area”.
Helloooooooooooooooo! At the time, my husband was an executive chef at a “posh” Boston restaurant, working nights, weekends and holidays and was making the equivalent of $11.73 per hour AND he was on salary… NO OVERTIME IN HIS WORLD! We were renting a studio 40 miles from his job and I was waitressing for .98 per hour plus tips at a “nice” steak house in town (I walked to work as he took the car to get to his “higher paying job” nearer the city. Hellllooooooooooooo.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, but in the meantime, Toyota, among others, were building a superior, less expensive vehicle and quietly ‘sneaking’ in the back door. I remember saying as a naive “yuppy” in the early 70′s… I’ll never purchase a car made in Japan!!! And then I did and had one of the most pleasant and satifying purchasing/ownership experiences of my adult life. The car was drop-dead-gorgeous and drove/rode like nothing I had ever driven or riden in my entire life (my Dad’s career was auto body repair and I drove my first car at the age of 10.)
ABSOLUTELY not.. the US car industry created the situaiton they are in today. I still work two jobs and will be damned if I will bail out a “union” worker.
And let’s not forget their right to strike and the many times they exercised that right while the rest of us sucked it up and worked 40 hours and were grateful to have a steady job.
M. Strand
Yarmouth Port,MA
508-737-2140
P.S. I know you will never call me, but I thought I’d include my number just in case

Posted by: M. Strand | November 19, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

No. The Big 4 (U.S. Govt. & The Big 3) have been partners in wrongdoing for way too long. The Big 3 are not “Good Americans”, for they are simply “Money Hungry”. Lobbyists & U. S. Senators have worked together to prolong and stifle progress in saving energy, creatng safer cars, and honoring their workers with jobs.
If they expect money from the taxpayers, then they should live up to drastic demands that will help the country today, not ten years from now. We were able to turn plants into producing whatever was needed during WWII in an efficiently swift manner. The Big 3 should have to live up to drastic demands if given any of the taxpayers money. Most importantly, there should be drastic penalties if they do not honour their committments. They have had it too easy and are given too much time in which to act. Does the government allow such leniency to any common taxpayer when the IRS wants to tax citizens for simple insurance reimbursement of casualty damages to their home as if they earned income?
Our family stopped buying U. S. made cars because there are other cars that are better, safer, and a better value. The Big 3 do not deserve to be rewarded one bit, for they have been scamming the citizens and our government for far too long.

Posted by: J. Amprazis | November 19, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Any time you put money out there – everyone wants it. My problem is this -why are people so disconnected with the middle and lower class of people in this world? We are the ones who make them rich. They should have some respect for us.
I say, if they decide to award this money to the Big Three, MAKE THEM ACCOUNTABLE TO WHERE AND HOW THEY UTILIZE THIS MONEY. They should not protest. They tend to be irresponsible
with someone else’s money. Sorry, but I believe we all are important and should be respected as such.

Posted by: Curbelo | November 19, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

No. We should not bail out the big three. I feel the 25 billion should be handed out to the taxpayers in the form of vouchers of $12,000.00 per household to purchase a car from one of the big three. It could be handled like the FCC has handled the analog to Digital TV conversions. You make an application for the vouchers and have a 90 day time frame to use them or they are not good. The money then would start with taxpayers and work up to the big three through their dealers producing sales. If they give them the money now and no one is buying cars because they don’t have the money to purchase them, then six months from now the big three will still be in the same position. They will crawl back for more money.

Posted by: Jane King | November 19, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

We bailed out funds for our war and the recent mortgage industry, why not the auto industry.? With these bail-out funds should come strict accountability so that no one should be getting bonuses, paid increases or severence packages during these bail-out periods. What a shame that systems are suppose to be in place to protect against such financial abuse, yet it keeps happening! Leaders of all these industry crisis should be held accountable and kept under strict control if they’re receiving bail-out funds. There’s the real challenge: maintaining control of executives of any company.

Posted by: LLV | November 19, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Both Ford and GM build and design cars that are wildly popular in Europe but will never sell them here because they think that Americans won’t buy them, all the while we continue to buy Honda’s, Toyota’s and cars built in Europe. This dilusional way of thinking is what got them in the situation they’re in now. The American car manufacturers continue to build cars that fail and break down while makers from Japan and Europe build cars that seem to be more dependable and reliable which may ensure the customer coming back to make a purchase when the time comes to replace or buy a another vehicle.

Posted by: Edwin | November 19, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

NO I do not think the auto makers should be given a tax payer supported bailout. If they are I will certainly never in my lifetime buy another one of their cars. They are failing on so many levels they are simply not viable and no amount of money will change that. Does it occur to any of the government geniuses bankrupting our country with their out of control spending-these bailouts are only the latest example, that putting off the inevitable will only make things worse.

Posted by: terri | November 19, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Why do people call it a bail out when it is a loan that will be paid back with interest? Helping the auto manufacturers is an investment in America’s future, an investment that will earn financial rewards for everyone involved: the government, the workers in the car plants, the suppliers, the car dealerships, the salesmen, all the support businesses where the workers shop and eat and are entertained. If some people never earned as much as a factory worker in a car plant, well, I was a teacher and I never earned as much as a doctor. But then, I probably wasn’t smart enuf to go to medical school. Is it jealousy that is causing some very selfish people to oppose this plan to secure stability to an important part of our national economy?

Posted by: Rosemary Bramson | November 19, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Why do people call it a bail out when it is a loan that will be paid back with interest? Helping the auto manufacturers is an investment in America’s future, an investment that will earn financial rewards for everyone involved: the government, the workers in the car plants, the suppliers, the car dealerships, the salesmen, all the support businesses where the workers shop and eat and are entertained. If some people never earned as much as a factory worker in a car plant, well, I was a teacher and I never earned as much as a doctor. But then, I probably wasn’t smart enuf to go to medical school. Is it jealousy that is causing some very selfish people to oppose this plan to secure stability to an important part of our national economy?

Posted by: Rosemary Bramson | November 19, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Bail out? Sure let’s bail out big oil! The airline industry! I think we should give all that bail out money to the citizens of america. The real citizens! Not the immigrants! Foreinors! The ones that were born and raised in the states deserve that money.

Posted by: Chad | November 19, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Absolutely not they’re the one’s that have taken part in vexing our economy

Posted by: Kevin | November 19, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Absolutely Not!!!
Will they bail me out too? I could use a billion to help my economic situation. Where do I stand in line at?

Posted by: J | November 19, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

considering the number of jobs involved and further detriment to our economy, if cool heads can find a way, then it would be prudent to give some well-thought out assistance. it just depends on how much the unions and white collars are willing to sacrifice. $40k, plus decent benefits (including excellent health insurance) is plenty for an average family to live on. and if the white collars want to make their resumes look good for the future, then they should be considering short-term sacrifices to prove their loyalty to their companies (and hopefully to the U.S.). i have sympathy for the retirees, but as long they have enough to live on (again, including excellent health insurance to make for an even field), they have enough. until the economy recovers, we all need to be willing to make temporary cut-backs.

Posted by: Larese | November 19, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Bail out? – no – bankruptcy is the best medicine for the entire auto industry. Ch 11 reorg. is the only way the big three can shead its dead weight, dead product lines, and over bloated union contracts. If they want to truly last then they need to file. The 25 billion will only prolong their slow death and in the end just take more of our money with them.

Posted by: R Noonan | November 19, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

NO!! They blew it. Nobody bails out the American people — why then a mega-billion industry with less-than-responsible practices? For what? It will only perpetuate the cycle of national debt and lead to more trouble.

Posted by: Lisa | November 19, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

The bottom line is if we do nothing and let these companies fail, MILLIONS and MILLIONS of people will be out of work. We are screaming recession now the fall out of this type of financial failure will leave the auto industry and every other industry or business in failure also.
I don’t know who frustrates me more, these companies who are in trouble or people commenting about them. We do not need to bail out company CEO’s or the unions. We do need to look at the whole picture and make better decisions than the companies made. You cannot sit back and think you are punishing only the company heads and unions by not helping them out. It makes more sense to give the companies a hand and make sure they understand they must repay the people. We should demand a share of the company and repayment with interest of any money given to them. The unions should be required to get off their behinds and use some of their millions and to make as many reasonable sucessions to the company as possible. I would rather have a job payiny me $5 or more dollars less an hour (with no reduction in medical coverage) than no job paying me $0 and no medical benefits. We need to take our emotions out when making decisions on who to help and use our heads to clean up the mess and make sure it never happens again.

Posted by: Marizetta Moore | November 19, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Joe & Madge Buskey, My hat is off to you!
I like your plan! How come no one on Capital Hill can figure that out?? Ever thought of going into politics? Let me know if you do! I’m with you, the only ones who should be getting bail outs are the American tax payers!!

Posted by: cjdj | November 19, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Toyota, Honda, and Nissan have proven that a better product can be built at less cost.
In my home state Nissan has a plant that builds trucks and they are adding more workers. Next year the Toyota Plant, being built in the Northeast corner of the state, will open production.
Honda has a plant in central Alabama. All three of these plants are away from the UAW.

Posted by: David Johnson | November 19, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Payback is Hell!! This is the perfect storm for me. I am 48 and have been screwed by each of the big three dinosaurs at least once. Currently have a lemon lawsuit against Chrysler and they will probably file for bankruptcy before we go to court. Happiness is seeing all three of the big three dinosaurs close their doors once and for all. If they are salvageable and need a bailout, where is the business plan. I haven’t seen any of them offer a business plan. And what are they going to do about their legacy costs. Are they going to dump their pension programs off on the taxpayers? And what are they going to do about the costs related to organized crime? I meant organized labor. If they were so great why is Toyota and Honda not beating down their doors to buy them. This is a no brainer. No, No, No to bailing each of them out. It is not congresses money to loan and its really not even the taxpayers’ money to loan since congress would have to borrow the money to loan them. Let the big three dinosaurs go the chinese government directly for a loan. The chinese government is setting on $2 trillion U. S. dollars. Sell their lies to them. By the way, the big three dinosaurs have an excuse for their current financial dilemma: They are still trying to figure out a response to the 1973 Oil Embargo. LOL
Michael Parker
Batesville, AR

Posted by: Michael Parker | November 19, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

yes we should let them fail, I’ll tell you why — I currently drive a ’98 Saturn wagon that gets 36mpg in the city and around 42mpg highway — GM/Saturn doesn’t even make a hybrid that gets this kind of gas mileage. My ’98 outperforms every 2009 model. Like a person in a bad relationship, America needs to see this industry for what it is and let it go. Put that money toward outplacement, retraining the workforce or at least to a company that has improved upon its own product in ten years. Anything less is gross irresponsibility and a waste of our money.

Posted by: Heidi | November 19, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

HECK NO! The governement doesn’t bail me out if I dont have money to pay for my car. Why they should do this for the companies? Ask the CEOs to give their salaries adn sign in bonus back. Not with my tax dollars. Enough. Why we should bail out a rich industry? People go out and find other jobs. Anyway the money is not going to the employees , is going to the sharks. NO AND NO.

Posted by: esther pereira | November 19, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

All of you that say no to the bail out, I have a question for you. Have you supported the car companies or are you driving one of the foreign jobs? When are we going to start supporting OUR companies instead of all the foreign ones. I think congress should give them the money because this is not a bailout, these are bridge loans to be paid back not a handout.

Posted by: Chris | November 19, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Absolutely Not!! How can we tax-payers keep bailing out all those irresponsible CEOs? They mismanaged the businesses and lined their own directors, CEOs’ pockets with millions & millions of dollars years after years. Bailing them out will not improve their businesses but putting immeasurable burden to our next generations. Let the law of nature takes its course and better & more efficient companies will rise up. The politicians have to stop misusing the taxpayers’ money for their political gains.

Posted by: hm | November 19, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

No! The greed of the car companies has finally caught up with them. This failure will be a learning lesson for the car companies as well as those who watch them fail.

Posted by: Bo | November 19, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

YES,TO BAILS OUT IS THIS NOT AMERICAN JOBS THAT WOULD BE LOST.DO WE WONT MORE PEOPLE TO BE WITHOUT A JOBS?

Posted by: GARY | November 19, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Remember Lee Iacoca he set the example during the last Crysler Motors Gov’t loan, by cancelling his salary, I believe until the loan was repaid.
Maybe that is to harse, but I believe a 50% pay cut for all those executives in the companies involved should be mandatory,with salary restrictions for changing jobs and/or companies.

Posted by: George Nicol | November 19, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

We should give the automakers the loan they are asking for, not a bailout. We did that for Chrysler and it was paid back with interest several years ago. Of course some regulations should be included regarding bonuses to executives and salaries as well as improving gas mileages. These companies have the problem because the financial institutions are not giving them credit. Thousands of people will be out of work and that will cost us even more than the initial loan.

Posted by: Rosemary Smith | November 19, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Having worked in both the steel and auto industries I know what just a downturn in the automotive sector can do to other industries. Failure of any one of the three auto companies will create economic consequences the country as a whole will be extremely hard pressed to deal with

Posted by: Rich | November 19, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Yes, bail them out! Why? They’re too big to fail. By the same token, bail American people out. They are too big to fail too.

Posted by: Wade | November 19, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Food for thought … Back when before the financial institutions started going under, after screwing American people in foreclosing on properties … where was the Big 3 automakers?
They were not making waves about the government bailing them out? They were still putting out all those gas guzzlers even when the price of gas was above $4 a gallon.
Back before the price of gas went up, I didn’t see where any of the Big 3 Automakers were working on higher gas milage cars … they were still putting out those gas guzzler vehicles.
One would think, they were in a partnership with the oil companies who better not come up next wanting a bail out for them, too.
I think that the average salary can return to what it might have been back in the Hoover era … LoL … I know I have a two week part time job with the GM company where at the time, I was getting $13.85 an hour, and I’ll I had to do was put in three bolts every time a vehicle came by my area.
The cost of employee’s are getting too ridiculous these days. Everything in the World, needs to come down in prices, without the service suffering.
Maybe this new “Change” we are about to get into … can improve on the price of things … without all these companies requesting bailouts.
Let the CEOs of these companies, give back to their company’s rather than receiving these golden parachutes … the employees who do the work, are not getting any silver parachutes …
Oh .. Bush !!! We don’t want you back in Texas .. try moving to Alaska !!!

Posted by: Sloebehr | November 19, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

The government must finance the auto industry with a “bail out”. The auto industries effects so many jobs in our country that if the 3 big closed it would have a devastating impact. The big 3 aren’t a single business that, as a government, we are deciding whether or not to lend them money. The auto industry is an intergrated part of the entire American economy.
Yes, the government needs to give them the “bail out” now but as President-elect Obama said on 60 minutes Sunday night, we should give them the money to build a bridge that is going somewhere. The big 3 must show they have a written strategy on how they will use the money to pay existing debts, and most importantly, a research and marketing team that develop cars that will sell.

Posted by: Anne | November 19, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

No, don’t bail them out. Let them start fresh from the ground up. Those “dinosaur” executives/management need to be released and get some new blood with ingenuity and creativity.

Posted by: Mike | November 19, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

To David:
Why didn’t you save some of that BIG MONEY the UAW was getting for you when you worked in the auto plant?
I’m a disabled trucker that has to live on Social Security Disability. I tightened my belt and cut cost and I now my money last to the end of the month.

Posted by: David Johnson | November 19, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

“As goes GM, so goes the nation”
I think we should give the auto industry the “loan” they are asking for.

Posted by: Moses | November 19, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

no. Let Toyota and other companies who have shown that they can compete buy them. They don’t have to be American owned.

Posted by: Geoff | November 19, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

After reading some of these other articles, all I see is greed and mis-understanding of Global economy. The Big 3 are asking for a loan, not a hand-out. Do any of you that are against the bail-out, or I should say loan, understand how many people this will effect. This is really a trickle down effect that will impact all Auto workers, Car Dealerships, Auto Parts Shops, repair shops, tires shops, mom and pop stores, restaurants, gas stations and we could go on. This is imbedded in our economy just like oil is. If you think Toyota and Honda are going to pick up the slack from the big 3, you better think again. Lets face it, none of us like the idea of our money bailing out the Big 3 Automakers, but it has to be done if we, Americans, want to survive this tragic mess in our economy. The Big 3 were starting to get their act together when Wall Street created this mess we’re in, that has affected the entire world, not just our country. Just one more thing, I do agree that the Big 3 need to do some re-organizing and that should be part of the loan agreement. By the way, my husband and I are GM retirees.

Posted by: Carol Armes | November 19, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

NO…..They should not be bailed out.
NO…..They should not be given a Loan.
This would be sending businesses the wrong message for poor management. Management and the directors should be held accountable for their poor judgment. Let capitalism work its course and keep the government and my tax dollars out of this. I do not want my money invested in these companies, nor do I want to have our government involved in this. Just look at their debt to asset ratio. If I went to a loan company with that, They would simply say. Sorry Sir, we can not make you a loan until your ratio and
scores improve. If we do bail them out or loan them the money then this is the same as the financial institutions did with the poor mortgage loans to those that didn’t qualify as a good risk.
Where or what is the standard and do they meet the qualifications?

Posted by: Mike | November 19, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Yes, by all means we should bail them out!!! Mr. Paulson did not hesitate to bail out Goldman Sachs where he took home over 140 million dollars, then he changed the rules for the bailout after congress approved 700 million or billions for the banks and others companies such as AIG and the like. If Americans would buy American cars instead of foreign cars, we would not be in this mess. We did it to the industry. I hope that you see the foreign car markets don’t buy our cars. Why should we help their economy. Charity begins at HOME-USA first. We always say we are proud to be Americans, but we buy from Japan, China, and everywhere other than home. Now we are suffering from lead poisoning in our toys, inferior products and the collapse of our industries here at home. We can’t trickle down economics when all of our monies are going overseas. we have sold our future to foreigners. Go figure, when will we learn to take care of home first???

Posted by: Edwina | November 19, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Yes please help bail them out. The down fall and all the job loos thain will just roll in a down hill spiral affecting all people will cost all of us much much more than the 25 bil that we would pay nw. PPL you will only wish when that time comes that we could go back and do something fo that same cost. COME ON 7oo bil to the housing industry and not even 25 Bil for the big three auto. Lord help us all

Posted by: Rex Mansker | November 19, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

If Americans had supported the Big 3 instead of buying foreign, they wouldn’t need a bail out but because of something that is not their fault–yes, they should get the help. However, I don’t think the help has to be from the federal government. In my small town in N.C. a small car mart had to close their doors just yesterday and declared bankruptcy. For this, I think it may be time for the state of N.C. to take a more active part in these bail outs. We also had several people from Georgia-Pacific layed off. They were given the bad news during an “appreciation dinner”. On of the employees said it was “The Last Supper”. Bail outs give people hope but they need to act urgently. It needs to be done yesterday! These people are hurting! Christmas is coming up and cold weather. No time to be homeless and without a job.

Posted by: Barbara Dowell | November 19, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

To Esther Pereira about what cars we drive: I have switched to foreign cars because they last longer and are more efficient gas-wise, AND they are SAFER!
Did you know many foreign cars are built HERE in the USA???!!?!?
wise up America, get out of your shell, such ignorant people here wanting old mechanical designs–the big 3 car companies just pretty up the outside of their vehicles and sell decade old mechanicals underneath!

Posted by: Mike | November 19, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

No bailout. If the workers and CEOs have overextended themselves because of their inflated wages, to bad. I’ve asked people I know that have higher than average income why they think they deserve those incomes, their responses were that they have a new home payment, a couple of new cars, a boat, a camper, etc. My question to them was “who signed their names to those purchases?”

Posted by: Tim | November 19, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

I was born and raised in nortwestern Ohio, I left in 1983 and it has’nt changed. It’s all auto and when am I going to get laid off next. I have been in Denver CO. since and have never been out of work and have been successful at my own buisness for over 10yrs on the side and over yr full time. so where do they get off saying we owe them this money. they said where is are shair how dare they say that this is there $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ it is are $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ they want shuv it up there ass………………………

Posted by: RIchard Shenkel | November 19, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

No! Let the big Petroleum companies bail them out. After all the two are closely related and the big Petroleum companies have had a wonderful profit this year. With big car they will continue make profits and if the big three go under well they will be effected. So I only see it as a very important factor for the petroleum companies no me the over taxed, over worked us citizen.

Posted by: Ray | November 19, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Canton Mississippi and Montgomery Alabama IS NOT FORIEGN but those towns have auto plants that are owned by foriegn companies

Posted by: David Johnson | November 19, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Yes, they should be loaned the 25 billion they request. How many of you with American made cars are willing for your cars to suddenly become “white elephants” in the garage, with no availability of parts to keep them going? Are you really willing to let millions more people go on unemployment benefits at your expense? Think about what the loss of these industries means to you personally!!! E-mail your reps in Congress this very minute to support the loans to GM, Ford, and Chrysler!

Posted by: Carleen Wallace | November 19, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

absolutely NO, it seems like a waste to help some overpaid personel, they need to make cutbacks like everyone else, or go down, I have a business that completed a huge($65000.) job this year that was never paid to me, I did all the cutbacks and borrowing and sell off I could to try to make up for it, and still be able to pay the labor of my emplyees and the bills from vendors that accumulated as a result of the job, I think helping out ppl like me that do all we can everyday to stay on the right track is what will “bail out” the economy, let US have an offer of help and see what we might buy, I’d love to pay the health insurance bill that is now past due, or the wishes of buying a new care for my family or just a new stove, the auto and the insurance industries (and any others looking for handouts)need to take a few lessons from the common working man/woman and dig themselves out of their trouble or go down, as could happen to us in our business,it is always a risk and there is never a guarantee from failure, join the club of reality,

Posted by: miche | November 19, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

its so fustrating that we can’t say what realy needs to be said. I ment shuv it up there ass’s G#%^$ dam$%^&^%$

Posted by: RIchard Shenkel | November 19, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

It is astounding that people are shouting ‘no’ to allocating a loan to the U.S. auto industry without blinking an eye. Losing the auto industry in the country would have far reaching effects for many years to come. While the U.S. auto industry has built substandard products and engaged in shady practices in the past, this can be said about most other industries as well. They have changed significantly in recent years, and U.S. cars, in particular GM and Ford, are now on par with the best in the world as far as quality and driving experience. Don’t believe it? Drive a Cadillac CTS, Chevy Malibu, Saturn Aura, or Ford Flex.
The fact is that the money the auto industry is asking for is a bridge loan to get them to the time when their renegotiated contracts with the UAW begin. Calling it a ‘bailout’ is somewhat inaccurate. Unlike what many people on this board say, the last time the government ‘bailed out’ an auto company, it was with Chrysler, which was a loan, which was paid back with interest.
If we’re willing to GIVE $700 billion or more to the financial sector, which peddles assets that aren’t entirely tangible and have questionable value, but aren’t willing to LOAN $25 billion (a relatively paltry sum)to help an industry that actually produces things and employs literally millions of people in this country, and maintains a high level of technical expertise within our own borders, what level of understanding have we come to? The ‘educated’ people who are against helping the U.S. auto industry better get their heads out of the clouds. If the auto industry in this country goes under, we’ll be well on our way to ensuring that the only skills we’ll be good at in this country will be waiting on people at checkout counters, cleaning buildings and bathrooms, and updating spreadsheets (for those of you in the white collar sector). Reeaally think about that last sentence, and it’ll make sense.

Posted by: Chris E. | November 19, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

ITS EASY TO ‘JUST SAY NO’ BUT WE SHOULD HAVE ALREADY DONE THAT … OOOPS I GUESS WE DID!!! BUT CONGRESS REFUSED TO LISTEN TO US & WENT AHEAD WITH THEIR BULL!@#$%^&* IDEA ANYWAY TO THE TUNE OF 700$BILLION+…. WHO BELIEVES THIS WILL END ANY DIFFERENTLY?? & THEN WHO WILL BE NEXT IN LINE, HAND OUT, WAITING FOR A PIECE OF THE ACTION?? (wheres the line form?) NEW AMERICAN REVOLUTION ANYONE??

Posted by: TOM | November 19, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Only if they take the big, I call gifts away from the CEO & top management.I have a good sugestion,put the fat cats on the assembly line & let them earn a living to see what it is like to actualy earn a living for once in there lives.

Posted by: George | November 19, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

NO NO NO ! This is out of control. They all need to be taking pay cuts to help save there company.
It is all out of control MY TAX DOLLARS Helped bail out insurance companies .. I just had surgery guess what
MY INSURANCE WONT PAY ME !!!!!!
Maybe all the car companies need to join together we will drive made in AMERICA cars with all the great minds behind its design.
Them people working on those production lines make 23 to god knows an hour.
I weld for 13.50.. I must be stupid.

Posted by: Denise Cooper | November 19, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Let them reorganize or merge under bankruptcy.

Posted by: Magic | November 19, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

No–no–no– what happened to the companies that put a percentage of their profits back into the company instead of their pockets like other companies do to improve their businesses and strive for improvements to stay ahead.

Posted by: judy | November 19, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

I live in the Kansas City area- we have the GM plant, and also the Ford plant here . It would be devastating to the economies of both Kansas, and Missouri if these plants don’t stay open. There are many small businesses, and suppliers, and trucking companies that depend on the Auto Industry here, and in fact, throughout the whole United States, many people besides the auto workers will be unemployed and lose their jobs too.The impact of these companies closing will cut right through main street America-They bailed out wall Street- they should bail out the companies that employ main street.

Posted by: Tina | November 19, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

NO and HECK NO!!! They will keep our money and still go under with billions in their pockets and everyone else still out of work. Give us consumers the billions and maybe we will buy their cars – MAYBE. If they get bailed out every business in the country deserves to be bailed out also. The bailout has done nothing for the economy anyway and bailing out car manufacturers will not help but put the country more in debt. I don’t believe they really need help. I think they just want the free money to pocket.

Posted by: Kevin K. | November 19, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

“Yes bail them out” We must look at the total picture, whether your upset with the CEO’s or the product they produce; it doesn’t matter. People will lose their jobs. It’s hardworking people trying to put food on their table to feed their families. Please, lets have some compassion.

Posted by: Debbie | November 19, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

The U.S. automakers and other big companies begging for and receiving “bailout” millions and billions are extorting money from American citizens. The dictionary defines “Extortion” as; “To obtain money by threat or abuse of authority.” Were any of these companies owned by Henry Ford, the Rockefellers and the Kennedys, to mention just a few. Have they lost their wealth? No!

Posted by: steve mueller | November 19, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Where do the bailouts end? If we do “loan” the money to the automakers is there a carefully devised plan to turn the industry around? What about the current legacy costs and the pensions that are being paid? These issues are enormous and complex and 25 billion will not resolve them.
Without a complete reversal in the way the big 3 automakers do business here in the US, no amount of money will save them.
It may be time that we allow them to fail, learn to be smarter consumers, more productive employees and allow people and products that are competitive and innovative to rise to the top. This may cause us grief in the short term but it will eventually right the ship of free enterprise and give us back our dignity.
I vote no on the bailout, but if it happens let’s make sure it’s a hand-up and not a handout.

Posted by: LaMar | November 19, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

For too many yrs the automakers did not face reality and has ignored what has been primarily a direction that was headed for making money without a thought about concentrating on building vehicles that make sense, there is no sense in the creation of Hummmers, Trucks, SUV’s, gas guzzlers all except for catering tp the road hogs, and for the profits that eminate from concentrating on their production. Their executives have been over compensated for jamming our roads. The scandinavian example should be MODEL for moderating the big three. They deserve to go down in flames for their contributing to the highway nightmare we find on our roads and to polution that is poisoning our environment. POASITIVELY NO BAILOUT!!!!

Posted by: Dolph Zielinski | November 19, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

THE GOVERNMENT CAN HELP ANY COMPANY BUT PLEASE USE THE REGULAR BANKRUPTLY LAWS AND POLICIES IN HAND AND LET THEM 3… REORGANIZE AS THEY DID FOR THE DODGE BOYS, BACK WHEN THE U.S., HELPED THEM THEN. WHY THE SPECIAL TREATMENT AND LETTING THEM OFF THE HOOK, AS USUAL PRACTICES AND POLICIES LOBBIED BY ALL THE LARGE MANUFACTURES INSIDE THE POCKETS OF OUR CONGRESS PEOPLE. LOOK AT THE LOAN SHARKS, THE BANK ROBBERS AND THE LIFE INSURANCE PEDDLERS IN CONGRESS AND THE WHITE HOUSE. 800 BILLION REASONS TO SAY.. TAXPAPERS SHOULD PAY, AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN…DO ANYONE PROTECT THE U.S. TAXPAYERS ?????????? LIKE THE WAR WITH IRAQI? A FALSEHOOD OF TRUTHS, FOUND TO BE A MADE UP REASON TO GO TO WAR AND NO ONE GOES TO JAIL, FOR ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL LAWS, BROKEN BY WAR LIES!!!! WHO REALLY CARES ABOUT WAGES SLAVES, AND AMERICAN INDIANS?

Posted by: WALTERHOO | November 19, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

I don’t believe they really need help. I think they just want the free money. If the fools running this country had half a brain they would give the money to the middle class americans. That would stimulate the economy far better and faster than giving it all to the corrupt financial institutions and the poorly managed auto manufacturers. If the American auto manufacturers can’t design cars that people want it won’t do any good to throw money at them. They will still fail, just a little slower is all, and we will be out 25 billion dollars.

Posted by: John | November 19, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

I am so angry that all those billions of dollars were stolen from us hard working middle class americans and given to the wicked, corrupt financial institutions and they don’t have to account for where it all went. WHAT FOOLS RUN OUR COUNTRY??? TO GIVE BILLIONS AWAY WITHOUT MAKING THEM ACCOUNT FOR WHERE IT GOES. OF COURSE IT IS JUST GOING IN THEIR POCKETS. FOOLS FOOLS FOOLS!!!

Posted by: Kevin K. | November 19, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

We bailed out Wall street, AIG and several other banks but I haven’t been helped by any of these bail-outs. I stil can’t get a loan for a house that is paid for. I have excellent credit. What are they doing to help the taxpayers? They got several billion more than the auto companys are asking for.
My daughter works for a company that makes parts for the big 3. She does not have a union job and is not making the big money that union workers do so she works two jobs. She and many others need to keep these jobs so she can buy grocerys, buy clothes and school supplies and utilize small business. She needs to pay her house payment and taxes all this helps the economy. Take away the millions of jobs from the manufacuturing industry and you will see that it will make a difference to almost every person or someone in their family in some way or another. This is for the taxpayers.
Make restrictions for the big 3. Make them hit the executives and the unions hard but don’t deny the workers. Make this a loan that has to be paid back. We help other countries lets help our own.

Posted by: Donna | November 19, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

We are kidding ourselves if you think that bailing out the Big (3)three is going to fix anything, remember we have been though this before. Put a limit on the amount of Japanese cars and trucks that can be sold annually in the USA or slap high tariffs on each car (like Japanese do American cars) and the problem will fix itself.

Posted by: Richard Suellen | November 19, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

I find it amazing how many people here keep characterizing this situation as the American automakers asking for free money. They are asking for low interest loans from the government because there is no credit available to them. They have to repay the money. The government may ask for equity as collateral, but the money still is to be paid back, like Chrysler did – ahead of schedule- while facing bankruptcy in the early 80′s. Chrysler would probably be fine today if they were not bought out by Mercedes. Before they were bought, they were they most profitable car company on a per unit basis. Mercedes came in and sucked all their cash to fund their expansion, leaving a product starved carcus of a company when Cerebus bought them out.
We must extend help to the big 3 not for the sake of the unions or the CEO’s, but to maintain the intellectual capacity to manufacture complex products. Yeah, foreign companies can probably take the excess capacity, but all those profits will go elsewhere. I’m especially fearful that the Chinese will be the ones who come in to buy the remnants of the Big 3. Do we want to allow the Chinese to come into this market with impunity and fill their government’s coffers with money? The U.S. government is already doing thi in the form of interest payments on its debt.
Many people here chastise the Big 3 for making all these gas guzzlers, but who is buying them? Do you think they would be made if they did not sell? and until the recent gas spike, economy cars were not bought in sufficient numbers to fuel the expansion of those models. When the gas crunch hit, the Big three made provisions to shift there lineup accordingly. But some people act like you can change a line up with the snap of a finger. It takes several years lead time to approve a product and begin the long process of federal certification.
some people here also maintain that the Big 3 have have not demonstrated a plan to get profitable. First of all, I know at least GM and Ford are very profitable outside of North America. Second, they have downsized their workforce – white collar and blue collar – substantially through buyouts. They just signed historic contracts with the union that would put their costs on par with the foreign companies who have factories here. They were going to place the pension burden on the union and remove a huge debt from their books. The only problem is that contract doesn’t realize cost savings until 2010. Due to the credit markets and general economy, they do not have until then. Ford in particular seems to have the best plan moving forward, bringing over their highly acclaimed Euro models and speeding up the development of more fuel efficient vehicles.
People think that bankruptcy will allow the Big 3 to shed the unions and debt and come out as leaner companies. The problem is they will need to get financing to get through Chapter 11. Without the government loans, they will not be able to avoid Chapter 7 liquidation. Not only that, would you buy a vehicle from a company with that kind of uncertainty?
Unfortunately too many people have not forgiven Detroit for bad experiences they may have had in the 70′s, 80′s and 90′s. It’s too bad as Detroit is making the best cars they ever have from a quality standpoint and many have been praised as equal or better than the foreign competition. It will be too bad if these companies are not able to prove that to America.

Posted by: Carlos | November 19, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Commentators say that the American Consumer is the base of the Economy, and the American Consumer isn’t spending.
My suggestion: Instead of bailing out banks and auto companies, bailout the Consumer. If the Feds bailed me out, I’d pay off my mortgage, car loan, and credit cards. The mortgage companies would have money, the credit card issuing banks would have money, and the auto loan banks would have money.
And with my bills paid off, I’d go out and shop ’til I drop for a Very Merry Christmas! Problem solved!

Posted by: Eric Terashima | November 19, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

NO NO NO …………The Big three
Auto Makers have failed themself’s
over and over again…..
The Untied States Needs to get rid of
Caveman Companies That depend on a
bailout as a normal means of operation.
THE UNITED STATES COULD GIVE THEM
THE WHOLE 700 BILLION AND STILL THEY
WOULD BE BACK FOR MORE …

Posted by: Anita Yova | November 19, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

No, absolutely not (provide a bailout to auto industry)…they dug their own grave.

Posted by: D Sarles | November 19, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

Bail out ONLY IF THEY PRODUCE AUTOS THAT USE ETHANOL, BATTERY OR SOLAR POWER. NO MORE GAS GUZZLERS!!!! Let’s move into the 21st century like major South American countries have already done.

Posted by: Cathryn Baillie | November 19, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

OK OK OK The Auto makers need a loan
let them go to the Banks…
the Banks will look over their loan
application and just tell them
NO NO NO…………. lol. but true…

Posted by: Anita Yova | November 19, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Hell no, all those mortgages that bombed out, homes loss, people losing their jobs, no one is bailing them out. Tell the Big 3 to join the club.

Posted by: Esther | November 19, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

NO! The American automakers have been building hugh gas guzzling cars for years. They think 25 mpg great. HARDLY! We need cars that get 100 mpg and soon cars that don’t need gas at all. You couldn’t pay me to buy one. Then they pay their employees over $70/hr? That’s almost as obscene as their cars. The big three are dinosaurs and you know what happened to them. You don’t bail out losers. Bankruptcy can only be good for them.

Posted by: Janet | November 19, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Let market forces prevail, it’s the American way. The automakers did nothing to give us the green technology we needed and are using the economy as an excuse for their own failure and as opportunity to rip off the American taxpayers. Let them be reorganized under existing bankruptcy law. Perhaps Toyota will purchase some of the better ones and make them profitable, finally.

Posted by: Brad | November 19, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

No, let some rich dude come and buy them out…. so they will learn, that being greedy and not managing there financing will teach them a lesson….Note: when the big boom was making them money , why did they raise the bar!!!

Posted by: Miguel D. | November 19, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

No, let some rich dude come and buy them out…. so they will learn, that being greedy and not managing there financing will teach them a lesson….Note: when the big boom was making them money , why did they raise the bar!!!

Posted by: Miguel D. | November 19, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

The chairman of GM blamed his companies situation today on the current economic crisis. Showing he’s in complete denial of how badly he and his partners have run their company and industry. Trying to blame the Big Three’s losses on the current housing meltdown is like blaming the Iraqi war on the Hottentots. I currently drive a GM car. A 1995 Saturn SL1. There’s no way I would buy a new GM because none of them get better mileage than the 35-37 mpg I get with my current vehicle.

Posted by: Doug | November 19, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

Government support or bailout of the defunct auto conglomerates is unnecessary and harmful. The current motor transport system in our country causes 35% of all environmental damage. I am saddened and discouraged to see Congress continue to reward the most greedy and aggressive members of our society. Anything that will change the status quo should be pursued. There are many innovators across the country working on transport alternatives to make the country safer and cleaner, why rob them of resources to reward the greedy. In our little town of Creswell pop. 4000 one man lives in his shop so he can build a 100 mpg car, another has designed and sold sold 44 personal electric vehicle kits. I have helped the kit designer with supplies, tools, time and built one of the kits. I have worked on an electric pusher trailer for recumbent bicycles or velomobile commuters and am awaiting a velomobile kit. Use of large high speed fossil fueled motor vehicles has made our roads unsafe, drained small communities and neighborhoods of business and culture, ruined our health, increased our trade deficit, and funded terrorism. Let the car companies who have promoted large deadly vehicles die the death they have earned, let the workers and innovators salvage the factories from bankruptcy, I believe they will do a more responsible job even though they have not mastered lobbying or grantsmanship.

Posted by: Ed Gunderson | November 19, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

No, we should not bail them out. They should have had foresight and realized what they were headed for when they continued to focus their efforts on building gas-guzzlers. Sure, a collapse in these “Big 3″ companies may have a huge, detrimental effect for our lifetime, but ultimately I think it’s a tough lesson that’ll have to be learned. We can’t keep thinking of trying to ‘fix’ things in the short run; we have to think of how our actions, now, will impact future generations (after all, necessity is the mother of invention… if we ‘need’ a shift in our perception of dealing with industry, technology, economy… then maybe this is just what our country needed.

Posted by: Olma | November 19, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

HELL no. Let the big oil companies bail them out. They have enjoyed 40 years of record profits. Where did the money go? No one is bailing out the little guy and the big 3 are making threats to the government…NO NO NO….Live in your budget and stop whining.

Posted by: Kathy Studholme | November 19, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

They’re asking for a $25B “bridge” over hard times. At the end of this bridge is a sink hole.

Posted by: xyz123 | November 19, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Absolutely not!
Going into bankrupcy will resolve some of the problems they’re facing now & have in the past…

Posted by: yuv | November 19, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

NO, we shouldn’t bail out automakers. I had to cut back to 32hrs, so I could keep my job. Why shouldn’t they take a cut back!!!!!! Oh I got a idea, take on a partime job. Like the rest of us……

Posted by: Ana Cruz | November 19, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

If they can bail out the banks and financial inst. that have poorly invested they’re investors money that has been invested in and out of our own country then they should bail out the “Big 3″ its not just the manufac. of the autos its everyone affected by that. If they close, so will the suppliers to those plants, surrounding business that offer products and services to the employees of those plants, the dealers, the suppliers to those dealers, and surrounding business that provide services to them .. its a huge trickle down. 1 out of 10 people in the US would be affected by this…. including myself who works for a dealer in Silcon Valley. Oh and by the way do your research the carbon footprint on that little Prius everyone thinks is so great…. its not. As for fuel mileage my domestic large suv gets the same fuel mileage as a Honda Pilot, a Toyota Highlander, Sequoia, and the Nissan larger suv.

Posted by: Sandy | November 19, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

No Bailout! How come the auto industry wasn’t producing energy-efficient automobiles sooner? Everyone saw the price of oil climbing higher and higher and the auto manufacturers kept on producing gas-guzzling SUV’s and they kept getting bigger and more expensive.
Who the heck is going to end up paying for this bailout? The taxpayer????????
How about a bailout for the working class???? Maybe then we could pay bills and not worry. Look what happened as soon as the government bailed out the banking industry – some executives went on a week-long, all expenses paid holiday and spent the money like there was no tomorrow.
We need a lot of changes. Maybe some of the benefits that our politicians are receiving should be cut off, (including a pay freeze for a few years), so they could see how it feels to wear a “different” pair of shoes. Then they would be more sympathetic to their constituents!

Posted by: Renee | November 19, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

I’m Sorry about the auto indurstry. I truly am disappointed with the leadership of the auto industry who on one hand has lobbied for the CAFE levels to remain low while they were supersizing their autos and now are pleading poverty. Any executive who has the audacity to say they didn’t see this coming is out of touch with reality. The true fallout will be with the auto workers who need the handout directly to them as producers. Let’s keep them in their homes, pay their bills for a couple of years and retool the plants for more effective vehicles or other forms of emerging technologies

Posted by: mgd | November 19, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

hell no, lets start with the middle class bailout. this is what chapter 11 is for the airlines did it and surived, let the autos companies do the same..why should my taxes continue to make the rich richer….

Posted by: bob | November 19, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Hell No. They dug their own grave by not producing a product that sells. Period. Let the free market run its course without the Feds getting in the way. It’ll all work out as it has in the past.

Posted by: Tim Finley | November 19, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

Why should the american taxpayer be asked to support companies that have dug their own graves due to mismanagement. I say No way.

Posted by: Deryl Oldham | November 19, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

WHEN AND NOT IF THE BIG THREE AUTO MAKERS
are shut down…. It will not mean that
they go off the face of the earth..
others will step in and buy up the plants
and setup a system to make money …
The jobs will not be lost in fact ..
we may overtake the foreign Auto makers
In sales of cars … parts ETC.

Posted by: Anita Yova | November 19, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

I dont think they need bail out. Sure it will not help our economy but they will not fail. This is not a problem that has just popped up, The Big Three had to see this comming and did nothing to prepair, to them it is just the Bottom Line ! They need to start with cutting back on their exorbitant salaries and and working on just breaking even to stay in business by selling the gas gusler at a 10% over cost price to cover expences, instead of a 1000% profit. you see the bail out would only help them see a better bottom line and who will eventually pay the Bill ? Right, The Tax Payer ! !
JUST A THOUGHT– If the Big Three did go under, do you think that the CEO’s would let go of their severence Pay ?
I BET NOT ! !

Posted by: John Contreras | November 19, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Well lets see mmmmmm NNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO Why allow thee companies to blow more money and refuse to build better cars. $60k for a hybred SUV is the idea of a green car to make it cheeper to have how is 60k cheeper? Why should men who bonus is like 100 times more than a middle class person makes okay to keep getting when they run the company into the ground. The car dealerships have add to this by the crazy loans and high price for the car. Where i a $600 a month car payment okay? Then trade in your car and get upside down on a car? The whole auto industry needs to be redone. Why not allow anyone to get a car with 10% intrest? payments in $250 to $300 a month. WOuld you be able to make money mmmmmmm yes. This is where the greed of the banks and finace people come in. With points hold back thru banks if you get someone a higher intrest rate to get more money on the back end. So no Mazda Toyota Honda Hyundai and Kia are doing just fine. Mazda is a division of Ford auto any way. I mean a B1500 and the Ranger are same truck just different name. The MAZDA Navajo was same a Ford explorer. So again those care companies have not a single problem. So again let them go bk and deal just like the rest of us are. OR here is an idea give part of the 700 billion to the people to buy a new car cash or credit and see how that would boost the economy. Screw giving Banks or anyone else and give to the people to spend and pay of debit or loans and this would jumpstart everything.But no everyone wants to give money to the same people that put us in the situation we are in. And we expect a different out come? How stupid can we be? Do the same thing over and over again why?

Posted by: Bradley B | November 19, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

We invented the automobile, taught the Japanese how to make them, and over time the American automobile industry fell asleep at the wheel; American innovation disappeared and quality steadily dwindled. “American made cars” today have become a hodgepodge of foreign manufactured parts that come from places with substandard or nonexistent quality control.
So, today 100 years after Henry Ford debuted his Model T and revolutionized the way people move, we find the “Big 3″ begging for a handout from us the American taxpayer. I vote for a resounding NO to any type of bailout, instead let’s provide incentives to consumers willing to adopt “green automobile” technologies that help our environment and economy.

Posted by: Marvin | November 19, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am

I say no! Let the big three suffer. If my son inherited money and then spent the money unwisely I would not give him any money unless it was a loan. Even if the big 3 borrowed loans from the government, the big 3 would still make lousy cars.
I purchased a dodge Caravan (1993) in 1993. When I parked my van on the slight hill that my driveway provided the van would roll back and lock into gear. The only way to unlock the gear box was to taken a hammer to it. I brought that problem to the dealer and his remark was I don’t care. The technology existence at that time to prevent that kind of problem. Honda and Toyota have that little Gadget in its cars and truck 7 years before 1993. America’s auto industries are not about making quality cars – it’s about money and now there isn’t any money. The auto industries want big daddy to come to the rescue. The big 3 should File for bankrupcty and stop crying to daddy.
I had a problem with my Honda’s account and I wrote to the CEO of Honda. Within nine days I had a respond and the problem was solved. Since that time I have purchased 2 Toyota and 2 Honda cars. If that were the big 3, I would have never heard from them. Again, let them crash and burn. I have no sympathy for the big 3. They have been ripping ‘Main Street’ off since the Ford T assembly line. The only reason the the Big 3 are crying is because the CEOs want the Golden Parachute’ – To walk away with 25 millions dollars or more for doing lousy ‘carmanship.’
Eric in Costa Mesa.

Posted by: Eric | November 19, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

No 25 billion$$ bail out for GM, Ford or Chrysler. Remember the Savings & Loan debacle of the 80′s,?. Enron, World Com, and Tyco, Goldman Sachs, (Henry Paulsons employer). The rich get richer and the poorer pay for their dishonesty. Stop the financial chaos, only honesty and integrity should be rewarded

Posted by: Jean higgins | November 19, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

Yes, I think that helping the auto industry out is a much more direct way to help our economy than to give it to the financial sector and encouraging them to lend. It worked with Chrysler in the 80s.

Posted by: David Williams | November 19, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am

Absolutely, we should provide a bail out to the auto industry providing they make some adjustments to employees compensation and executives salaries and bonuses.
If we can spend over 500 billion dollars in Irak we should be able to help one of the major industries in this country.

Posted by: Edgard Parrales | November 19, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

The US government should absolutely not bail out the auto industry. The management of these companies, particularly GM, have given into union demands over and over again. This is the major reason why GM is now in serious financial difficulty. The AVERAGE union employee of General Motors now receives about $72.00 – $73.00 per hour working on an assembly line. I ask you, how many middle class Americans make over $150,000 per year? The answer is, only those who work for GM and they don’t even have a college degree. Teachers and college professors earn about half that amount. Something is definitely wrong here! I vote no on the bailout of the Big 3! If they go under, it is their own fault by giving in to the unions. Honda and Toyota make far superior cars anyway. If the government bails out the auto industry, it is the American tax payers that will bare the cost. Why should the all American taxpayers be required to share in the cost to pay for the incompetence of the management of the Big 3, particularly General Motors?

Posted by: Phil | November 19, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

i think that we should let the Big Three Automakers go into bankruptcy. They need to declare chapter 11 bankruptcy which is called restructuring. It forces businesses to stream line their companies while paying their debts for a few years and then they are in the clear. Congress should not be bailing-out failing capitalistic enterprises. Capitalisim means that when a business starts to fail, it either fails completely or is bought-out by some other free market enterpeneur. Everyone knows, you do not continue to throw good money after bad money. This still is a free market economy (Capitalism) right?

Posted by: Brian | November 19, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

Yes, please bail these people out. The company that I work for is a supplier to these industries, and if they go under it is so true that it will be catastrophic to our economy,and millions of people will be laid off of their jobs. I do not condone their actions, but I do agree with assisting these industries as long as there are stipulations placed on the loans.

Posted by: sandy | November 19, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am

If you don’t – unhitch the horse and prepare to ride it to the soup kitchen! LOAN now or pay heavily later!

Posted by: Marcus | November 19, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

yikes- no way bail them out. Let them fall as they should- isn’t that what capitalism is all about? The workers in Detroit not only make alot/hour, but get over 95% of their pay when “laid-off”! Who else gets that?? Bring a Toyota and a Honda branch up to Detroit- Why would that not be an option to the people in Detroit? Because then they would make— what I make after 30 years as a nurse with my masters, contributing to the health care of my communities. This is about another group (besides Wall St) wanting more than is right. I don’t have one friend who has an American car- There is a reason- Our economy is based on capitalism. Let them fall-

Posted by: virginia | November 19, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

I don’t think it’s a good idea because “Big Business” is just that. These companies have always made out like bandits in a good economy or bad economy. I think their failure ties in with lower gas prices. Somewhere behind the scenes I think the “Big 3″ got with “Big Gas” to lower prices so “we” would buy their cars. Also, I don’t agree with the big salaries CEO’s and Execs make in all these companies. The Feds need to regulate these businesses so that their employees are paid equal/fair wages like regular employees instead of paying assembly line workers huge salaries/big benefit plans. Half of a new cars price tag is the salaries that made the car to begin with. Now they need “US” to buy their cars-yeah right. GM is pestering me to vote in their favor of a bail out because I am a “Loyal” customer. Nope, not from me. Personally me I like seeing these guys sweat it out like the rest of us, maybe they can shed a few pounds like we have these last couple of years…

Posted by: Oscar G | November 19, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

No, we should NOT bail them out. They can sell assessts and retool and learn to value engineer like any company. We do NOT need 10+ models of each car company. A sedan, coupe, truck, SUV and minivan are enough. Make them bring back production of parts to this country and make them stop giving anything longer then a 36mo loan. If you can’t afford a car, you shouldn’t buy one! Aren’t they paying attention?

Posted by: Lisa Camera | November 19, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am

NO WAY! They fly a corporate jet to D.C. to ask for 25 billion taxpayer dollars at a cost of $20,000.00, and could have flown comercial from detroit for $288.00, first class for $870.00. Their problem is they cant manage money! The taxpayers loosing their homes are not going to be buying no new cars anyway. So how is a bail-out giong to help them recover?

Posted by: ROBERT BOWIE | November 19, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am

I see everyone’s point of view and arguments. What I am curious about is what role the the United Auto Workers Union will play in this deal. They have a major influence in this industry. I’m sure if the deal is approved, they stand to gain a significant amount, then the Big 3 will come back asking for more money. The government and all these big businesses tell us, “The Taxpayer,” that we should handle our finances in a more responsible manner. I personally would tell them to “Practice what you preach!” Furthermore, I wonder if there is any oversight yet of the persons put in charge of the BILLIONS of dollars already given out. I’m sure a year or two later we will have another Congressional investigation like the one involving the contractors in IRAQ and everyone says, “We had no idea this was happening.” These are supposedly college educated people but they sure as heck are not using one bit of common sence. Get You Act Together ! or “We The People” will have to take some drastic measures because many of us are sick and tired of flipping the bill and going without programs that benefit the health and welfare of us all. Thank You

Posted by: Alejandro Lopez | November 19, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Yes. By all means help the auto industry now. If our government won’t help industry, but will only help investment bankers who don’t produce ANY product, we won’t have any decent, safe products in the very near future, and we will be hit by economic devastation! Wall Street didn’t ask for help – they demanded it! They told the President and Congress to jump, and our leaders responded, “How high?”
I agree with the post that advises Congress to help the auto industry or hitch up your horse and head for the soup kitchen.
This is not the time to demand that Detroit do what the government didn’t make them do earlier. Americans wanted SUVs not that long ago, remember? Check your garage. See if you bought one. If you did, you need to be supportive of the auto industry. They did what you wanted.
Business and industry comply with whatever regulations our Congress and regulators impose. No regulations on the financial sector brought the credit mess we have now which is affecting autos. If you think American Fords, Chevvies, and other American cars are so bad, how many of you will like the tiny $2,500 cars that are being sold in India, or similar ones Europeans have had for years? We won’t have the choice of a Ford, Chevvie, or Chrysler in the future – rather, mostly more unsafe, foreign products.

Posted by: Janet | November 19, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

I think its essential that the Big 3 automakers fail. Its better that they fail now and quickly and all at once rather than in a protracted slow long dragged out way that will cost the taxpayers and the country near limitless dollars and suffering. At least a well defined failure has limits and an end-point in sight.
The age of the automobile is over. It is essentially a failed technology based on old world small scale 18th century ideas and technology. There were autos before there was even a hint that radio was possible or that atoms had electrons and could fission, or that men could fly.
The only justifiable use for petroleum in any amount whatsoever is in aviation. Petroleum use should be banned everywhere else, sooner the better, and new ideas forced to come into being.
Until the Old dies, the New will not appear. Change is always somewhat painful.
The only other real world option is all out military global war, which historically is the usual remedy for deepseated Recessions and Depressions in the world at large. A failure to accept change intelligently usually forces change through violent revolutions and military upheavals.
Let the big 3 fail. In fact, lets help them die and find a newer better way. The solutions are there. And they start by wiping out that cesspool of corruption known as Wall Street and making a fresh start with honest men who are true patriots in every sense. And we can get rid of the ethics-free Harvard School of Business while we’re at it, where they breed these Wall Street monsters.
Its a Good Life. If we want to make it so.

Posted by: William Dobni | November 19, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Hello! Does anyone remember Lee Iacoca? (back in the 1980′s) He CUT his executive salary to $1.00 and told the unions ” I have NO jobs at $17/hr and I have several thousand at $11/hr. Take it or leave it. They took it. The big three could start with ending the unions and cutting their own salaries and NOT flying to the conference in their PRIVATE jets. Maybe the big three NETWORKS could ask the American people for suggestions as to how the Auto 3 should MANAGE this free money. Look at AIG, they HID their SECOND big dollar meeting. The hotel staff couldn’t even mention the name. The big 3 have been complacent and not very pro-active. There need to be a lot of checks and balances, maybe even an outside money manager. This would only be the beginning.

Posted by: Cindy Wilson | November 19, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

It is not a bailout, it is a loan.
This is no different than a home owner taking out a second mortgage to cover some unexpected medical expenses or to pay for college tuition.
It is time we call this by the correct term. Loan that will be paid back with interest.

Posted by: K2 | November 19, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

If these 3 CEO’s would do the same thing Iococa did and take a $1 per year salary until their company is afloat maybe the taxpayer woulddn’t balk quite so much at bailing them out. The Ford CEO alone makes 28million/yr. That is outrageous. Making millions while the company tanks. They need to file bankruptcy and get rid of the unions. Maybe then they can make cars we want at prices we can afford. I for one will NEVER buy a vehicle from the BIG 3 as long as they are run by greedy unions and these CEO’s. They might get my tax dollars, but that’s all the money they’ll get from me!!

Posted by: mom | November 19, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

What gets me is instead of pushing their more efficent cars they are spending millions on TV commercials for people to buy their gas guzzlers. Scrape them & make small cars.
How about the jerks all flying to DC on private jets!!!
Fire them all and start from scratch.

Posted by: cissy55 | November 19, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

i think we should not bail the big 3 out without a lot of concideration on the payback with interest.if i borrow money i know i will pay more than i got ,so if i have to do this so should the big 3. i also think there is no one in america worth 27 million salary a year to fly around the 2orld doing nothing.

Posted by: tom | November 19, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

In an effort to share the “other side of the domestic auto story,” here are just a few very good internet links that demonstrate the HUGE imbalance in automotive trade we have with just Japan and South Korea alone. I don’t know how in the world our elected officials ever allow our Country to tolerate such “Protectionist” trade practices, but extreme trade restrictions and currency manipulation like this place the domestic auto industry in a position of being unfairly accused of poor business practices while prevented from competing on a level playing field.
2007 Japanese auto exports to the US total 7 million vehicles, while U.S. auto exports to Japan total less than 14,000 vehicles.
2007 South Korea exports to the US total 773,000 vehicles, while US exports to South Korea total less than 6,200 vehicles.
The following are very good Articles worth reading, and will give a more fair and balanced view of the domestic auto industry.
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=view&id=4514
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070713/AUTO01/707130388/1148
http://www.autoyensubsidy.org/
http://www.capacity-magazine.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=235
Having said all this though, I don’t want for a minute to suggest that the domestic auto industry is not partially to blame for its own ills. It’s true:
The domestic auto industry has relied too heavily on large vehicle, high profit margin, sales for too long and over looked the small car market. The very market where young and new customers are developed. This is definitely changing, albeit by necessity and no doubt a little late.
Domestic quality went down the toilet from 1970 to 1990. GM, Ford and Chrysler will pay for these sins for decades to come. This too, however, has changed dramatically, and I would argue that domestic vehicles today are built to the same quality standards as the Japanese.
The domestic auto industry is also saddled with a century of legacy and structural costs that have taken far too long to trim down. I can tell you from first hand experience though, that these costs have been pared back exponentially over the past few years. Just to name a few, GM alone shed 100,000 jobs over the past 3 years, made historic changes in the UAW labor agreement, reduced pension benefits, and eliminated pensions for new hires after 1999. Medical benefits are also no longer provided to retired salaried and hourly workers, and the wage rate for all new UAW workers has been reduced to $14.50 per hour.
In short, these are just a few huge and dramatic strides in the right direction that are simply not being fairly or properly portrayed in the media, and set the stage for a sustainable, and highly profitable organization in the very near future, given normal economic conditions. For this reason, please do your part to set any ill informed friends or political leaders straight on the facts as GM, Ford and Chrysler continue to make their plea for a Federal Loan (NOT Bailout). Share this note, and spread the facts if necessary. I think it’s fair to say that if this Country’s political leaders (Republicans and Democrats alike) had done their job in the first place, we would not be facing the most severe economic recession, and credit freeze since the Great Depression, and GM, Ford and Chrysler would not be in the situation they find themselves in today. The lock-up in the credit markets, the crash in real estate values, and the severe drop in consumer confidence as a result of this recession was not caused by the domestic auto industry. It is, however, the sole reason for the continued drop in monthly automotive sales, at times approaching 45%.
And for those who advocate Bankruptcy, that is simply not an option, and again another ill informed, simple minded, knee jerk, feel good, verbal quick fix. If the domestic auto industry didn’t already have problems, sales will drop to zero if a consumer products company, like GM, Ford or Chrysler goes into Bankruptcy. Would you buy a car from a Manufacturer who went into Bankruptcy, knowing you will need Warranty service for many years to come. The Airlines can get away with it because consumers have to fly, and their financial downside is limited to the price of one ticket if they stop flying tomorrow. Auto Parts makers get away with it because the consumer does not buy axles, steering wheels, and tie rods. And then, dare I say, there’s the aspect of corporate accountability and responsibility for managing or mitigating the agreements GM, Ford and Chrysler have made. Seems today, that doesn’t count for much when you listen to our politicians and the media suggest we just go BK. It’s almost enough to tarnish your pride to be American anymore.
So, let the world know there are two sides to this story, and there is SIGNIFICANT reason to help the domestic auto industry at a time like this, and recognize there are more than 10 million jobs to be lost if a deaf ear is turned on the industry for all the wrong reasons. You can bet that Japan backstops their auto industry… at all times, and at all costs!

Posted by: Fred | November 19, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

It is absolutely absurd to bail out the “Big Three.” These companies CONTUNUE to pay their C-Level executives exorbitant compensation packages but fly around the country in private jets spending non-existent funds on themselves. Have they even looked within to take a look at cost savings? What have they done to truly compete with Toyota? What have they done to meet the ecological crisis? The fall of the Big Three may cause major disruption in America’s economy on multiple levels, but this correction is long overdue.

Posted by: j | November 19, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Once they grab the 25 billion the party continues until they blow that on excessive wages and union restrictions. After some months how much of the taxpayers money will a company under chapter 11 pay back? Greed should stop sometime.

Posted by: Bill | November 19, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Only if all parties (Labor, mgmt, suppliers, etc) agree to terms such as: same wages and costs as those used by Toyota, Nissan for US manufacturing, no bonuses for ANYBODY, at least 1/3 of health premiums paid by current and retired workers (like the rest of the US workforce), freeze on COL increases for retirement benefits.

Posted by: M Williams | November 19, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

…a lifeline? No – a LEASH, yes.
This is a foil (sp?) for the root of the problem which is healthcare costs – the root of THAT problem being the % of every healthcare dollar that goes into execs pocket. THAT is the PRIMARY reason for this continuing problem.
Conditions I would support throwing a LEASH:
1. Get rid of exec leadership (with severance pkg of $1, PERIOD – no healthcare or retirement or stock, et al)
2. Reorg the company similar to Southwest Airlines model (i.e., worker-owned)
3. ANYthing manufactured by any of these companies from here on out MUST adhere to strict green-based requirements, PERIOD.
4. COMMIT to NO FURTHER LOBBYING WHATSOEVER of govt. for either $ or altering regulations re emissions, mileage, et al.
5. Filling any and all engineering and design slots ONLY from graduating students from American universities, PERIOD.
6. 50% of ANY profits made during first 6 months to go ENTIRELY to American public schools and all profits after this period to be distributed amongst the workers
7. All executives to work 1 day a week in the community in local hospital emergency rooms

Posted by: L | November 19, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

This “LOAN” to bridge this industry until this country can get it’s economy rolling must be made. I agree that top managers in these companies and these companies as a whole have not reacted when opportunity knocks. That being said, we as a country cannot afford this blow to our econmy. The $25 Billion dollar loan is nothing compared to the lost taxes that those jobs and related loss of jobs would mean. We need to do like Chris Matthews said, limit the top managers salary because they have basically failed as capatilists, around 400k, and we need to fall in love with the automobile again, whether it be electric or some other type of green fuel,The Big 3 have a great opportunity here and last but not least we need to give people a chance to go to work out of high school where they can make a descent wage and raise a family otherwise the American middle class will only be something that will be in history books. Yes To The Loan

Posted by: Swami | November 19, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

If they really want to restructer their company, maybe they should start with theirselves. How can you take a PRIVATE JET to go ask for money? It seems to me they want the money to bail themselves out, not the workers that do all the work for them. Private jets, what a joke!

Posted by: Diann | November 19, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Yes! It is essential to the well being of our economy to help the auto industry weather their financial storm largely caused by the greed of Wall Street and large oil companies. The failure of the U.S. auto industry would cost America more than $156 billion in lost income taxes and unemployment costs and the loss of over 5 million jobs in the next several years (not to mention millions of additional bankruptcies and fore-closures). Support for the auto industry allows it to continue its transformation and progress that began well before the current economic crisis. U.S. based auto manufactures, in conjunction with the UAW, have taken major actions to restructure their business to be fully competitive (UAW agreement-Fall 2007), and additional actions have been taken to eliminate raises and discretionary bonuses for executive and management employees. Great technological progress has been made in recent years. Many new hybrids, alternative fuel, and electric cars are scheduled to hit the market over the next few years. It would be a shame to waste these developments and the potential job creation they could bring to Main St, America. More info at http://www.gmfactsandfiction.com

Posted by: Joe | November 19, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

I don’t feel that the American taxpayers should have to bailout another industries because they have come on to hard times. It was enough that we are having to bailout the banks of this country. How about the rest of us small businesses that have fallen on hard times? What do we do we can’t just come before the government asking them to bail us out of our hardship. Enough is enough I say let them figuer out just like the rest of us what they are going to do fix the mess they are in. What about all those billions of dollars they have made in the past selling all these over priced automobiles and now they are crying broke GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!!

Posted by: Teeya | November 19, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Two words! HELL NO!
It these auto execs can spend that kinda money to fly in personal jets, they can’t manage money from us taxpayers. Forget it, guys, cause you just don’t get it!

Posted by: D | November 19, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Are there no other options than simply giving them money? I’m thinking that it could be a win-win situation for the auto industry and the struggling consumer if the government gave tokens to us US citizens could be used toward the purchase of new, American-made cars. The consumer is given much-needed relief and the auto industry gets a huge boost in revenue!

Posted by: Laura | November 19, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

I do not think we should be bailing them out. The top executives all use the company private jets for travel at a cost of $20,000.00 per trip. One of the CEO’s lives in Seattle and flies to work in Detriot. I think this is overkill. How many times a week does he fly back and forth. Does he use the jet for vacations. I do not think the taxpayers should pay for this kind of waste.

Posted by: Cowboy | November 19, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

RIght now, the proposed limit on the exectives’ compensation PACKAGE (i.e., salary + percs) is way too high. Industry often justifies these idiotic and obscene amounts of $ by claiming “we won’t be competitive” and “won’t draw the level of leadership…” bla bla bla bla -
Excuse me, EXECS USING PRIVATE JETS to get to and from here and there – how does that demonstrate critical thinking skill and management smarts? Even if the govt. sets a limit that is adequate on these pay packages, these guys who are presently in these positions need to go and along with them needs to go this dried up BS excuse for paying people more than any American NEEDS to get along comfortably.
TIME FOR A CHANGE – YES WE CAN!

Posted by: LeashYESLineNO | November 19, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

CONDITIONS TO BE MET BY AUTOMAKERS:
1. 25 HOURS A WEEK served in SOUP KITCHEN and EMERGENCY WARD of public hospital for EACH executive
2. ELECTRIC CARS NOW! Not later, maybe, or someday but NOW, PERIOD!
3. Take a 90% trade-in value on all of cars we are all now driving that are not green
CONDITIONS TO BE MET BY LEGISLATURE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVT:
1. A SERIOUS UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE PROGRAM IN PLACE BY ROLL OUT OF FIRST ELECTRIC CAR ready to buy
2. MOVE THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION OUT EARLY (many here who have posted would likely volunteer to help – I’ll personally haul crap and bake spaghetti and pizzas) and move up the innauguration by 30 months

Posted by: CR | November 19, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Yes with this condition: GET RID OF HANK PAULSON – He has FAILED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: tr | November 19, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

hi i work at gm in michigan and i for one will never give a dime to help at a gate collection or help at getting money for a hurricane or like twin towers becouse when it came down gm donated a truck to the people of new york and people gave at gate collection ps the union all give in to a lot of charitys

Posted by: jojo | November 19, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Please no more bailouts for anyone. especially with bloated salaries for executives and executive perks plus bloated wages for union workers and excessive union due fees and pensionn plans feeding a bloated beast. And especially not Chrysler. Merceded couldn’t make money when they owned them and dumped them. A private investment group bought them at a steep discount thinking they could make money and they are failing. So why should we invest more in a proven failing enterprise? Add to that they are a private company so their books are not open for public viewing either. Please stop the welfare corporate and otherwise.

Posted by: getreal | November 19, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

NO!! Two of the CEO’s had the nerve to say they wouldn’t give up a penny of their salary! Some nerve – asking us to bail them out when they won’t do a thing on a personal level to remedy a situation that is THERE fault!
They are NOT failing because of the economy! They are failing because of their poor management for many years.
No – no bailout. Sorry!

Posted by: mb | November 19, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

My answer is emphatically a no. I am very familiar with the working conditions that automobile assembly line wokers endure. The wages that are paid to these workers are unrealistic compared to the average wages paid to even professionals. The amount of skill required to perform these jobs is very minimal, the skill required would be compared to the education of the average eighth grade student. The retirement benefits that these employees get when they retire are unbelievable, more than college educated people. This is the work of the UAW who also by the way command huge salaries, all of which by the way add to the total cost of the vehicles they are producing. The foreign automobile manufacturers in this country seem to be able to manufacture very desireable automobiles without the aid of the UAW and at the same time are able to pay their employees a desireable wage along with benefits. These same foreign companies manufacturing automobiles here in the USA with American labor and American parts suppliers seem to be able to manufacture the automobiles Americans need, all as to style, quality,and the fuel economy, and at a price that is affordable. I think that if management of a company cannot operate that company effeciently enough to make a profit they do not belong in business.

Posted by: Tom & Fran | November 19, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

NO bailouts for the 3 big spenders! If the USGovernment bails out these guys then they should be bailing out all those small businesses that are struggling. SMALL BUSINESSES have more employees than all 3 and are spread all over the United States. THEY DO NOT HAVE OVER PAID EXECUTIVES OR MANAGERS. SHAME ON OUR GOVERNING BODIES WHO ARE EVEN THINKING OF A BAILOUT!

Posted by: Jeannette | November 19, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

This is just an idea on the auto crisis. The auto companies are having problems making cars because no one has the money to buy one, but they want the goverment to aprove a loan for the tax payers who live pay check to pay check to be taxed for, but no one is saving us. My idea has bugs that would have to be worked out, but maybe… People right now have no money to spend, some of our problems is transpertaion problem to. We are either making payments for cars, paying on repairs to keep the one alive that they have or just don’t have money to get anything. Why not make a auto stimalas package that sends a voucher for a car to one of these american made cars to dealership per household, like the stimalas check. Let us go and be able to get a vechical from the lot, be shown what dollar value and years are avaiable and take one home. If you want a better dollar value vechiale, your voucher would go to a deposit. The would give us extra money per household, move cars off the lot, for the car companies to be able to keep people working making new ones. This would also help the enviorment, which better fuel & admission vechials on the road. Give the auto company the money from each voucher redeemed. Now you have people not minding help them because they are also helping us. If you just give them money, what will it do? It won’t keep jobs, because production is still down because vechials are not being sold. It would give CEO’s extra money to hang out w/the AIG bigwigs and the lavish spa’s in the mean time, us main street people are losing our jobs because we can’t get to work, now have money to pay our bills and keep maintance up on our vechicals. Driving our children around unsafe. I leave the rest up to the smart people who are not doing a thing to help me and mine out.

Posted by: Bobbie Jean | November 19, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

They’re as deserving or undeserving as Mae and Mac. I think the stipulations on any bailout starts with new executives with salaries somewhere closer to our stratusphere. If the current management could manage 25 billion, they wouldn’t be in trouble now. I say kill the person jets, exec. dining hall, outrageous salaries for not doing there job. Like Romney stated in an article, cut their salary and they get a raise when the company shows a profit. The raise obviously shouldn’t exceed the profit. The rules apply to management and non management. Lower pay or no pay. If I bet on a horse and lose, I’m broke. The government wouldn’t bail me out.

Posted by: txBren | November 19, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Re exec compensation – Give those guys Palin’s suits and clothes from the campaign and let them sell them on eBay and keep whatever they can get.
Give the rest of the 25 billion to the workers and let them manage the company on condition that they immediately put into production electric cars that are truly competitive and usable.

Posted by: CC | November 20, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

No we should not bail out the Big Three. Bad management got them into trouble and firing them would be a good start in the right direction. If we bail them out we will be rewarding them for a job badly done. One question for you all? If you do a bad job at work are you rewarded for it? If you continue to do a bad job what happens? Need I go on?
Billy Carson

Posted by: Billy Carson | November 20, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

We can bail out the Big 3 and it will affect the economy now. We can make them file bankruptcy and reorganize in this economic environment. Or we can close them down, but we need to remember people will by more foreign cars which operate more efficiently. The 3 CEO’s if a bailout is given should all be fired. Their public relations and their efforts to show how and how much money they need was never answered because they believe they will get the money. Let us not forget AIG which received money and took their executives on a $440K spending spree of so-called meetings that could have been held anywhere for very little money.
Unfortunately we have to deal with these matters which have shakened the economy, however there needs to be strict restrictions that include firings and arrests if Federal monies are not handled properly by these private corporations.

Posted by: The Real Issue | November 21, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

No to the bailout!!! Let the companies go under, let them start over. SELL those corporate jets!!! Sell your 3 other homes!!!

Posted by: Billy | November 21, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

I liked Jay Leno’s idea of giving the $25 billion to the American public to buy a Ford, GM or Chryler. They sell a lot of cars, jobs are saved and we all get a new car!
Seriously speaking, I don’t think the government should bail them out. Flying their private jets to go ask for bailout money clearly shows they are out of touch with the average American and illustrates the lack of judgement which contributed to their current financial troubles.

Posted by: Joel | November 21, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

we need to bail out the base of the pyramid…the bottom of the food chain…or everything will die.
now i may not have this quite right but it is my belief in japanese corporate structure…lay offs and firings begin at the top and the highest paid employee can only make ten times what the lowest paid employee makes. how solvent would these companies be if the multimillion dollar wages got cut?
we need to be able to support our families on a base level. wasn’t the goal of the fifties that we could raise our families on one income and on forty hours a week? wasn’t that the goal? i know there will always be those occupations that don’t by necessity fit neatly into that profile but that was the goal wasn’t it?
now instead of creating a solid base we are top heavy and it is perceived that those on top earned every penny they have through their own hard work, yeah right.
someone has just written a book poking holes in that myth of the self made man.
…well where would those at the top of the pyramid be without the base? without the janitor, the farmer (hell cities themselves would be hard pressed to exist without a farmer in the field putting an apple on steve jobs plate) the secretary that that writes all the letters her boss signs…if the top man had to actually do all the work that needed to be done to create the wealth he enjoys…well lets just say i don’t think his life expectancy would be very long.
so do i think we need to save american jobs, hell yeah. do i think we need to give out 18 million dollar golden parachutes? expletive of your choice, no.
but do we need to make the auto industry accountable and provide us more energy efficient cars? you bet.
even in the global economic dare i say looming depression…toyota is looking forward, creating evermore fuel efficient cars…and honda, hell honda is working on a plan that where your power source for your car will also be the power source for your home and business. and no it is not nuclear.
by the way we do not have any real way to deal with nuclear waste. what bury it in a mountain where it sits like a ticking time bomb for thousands of years because no one will admit we really do not have a safe way of dealing with it? we think it is safe but we do not know it is safe. so we’ll will bury it and hope that nothing we did not think of happens.
chernobyl anyone? love canal, and one that happened on an indian reservation that i never seem to remember the name of! people try to plan for worst case scenarios but…an o-ring? a piece of foam? failing to run a 10 dollar test on the most expensive telescope made? and they knew that needed to be done yet human error. so we continue to create and propose creating more nuclear waste that we really don’t know what to do with?
and pay attention to where your local plants are…what happened when say there is a nuclear accident on the st. lawrence sea way, the columbia, the mississippi? what happens to the planet then?
but…BAIL OUT? i am sure flint michigan wishes something would have been done years ago to really fix the big three.
we need to save american jobs.
we do not need to save ceos that only seek to line their own pockets and cut retirement and health care funds before they cut their own wages. i know there are heads of companies that don’t do that but…damn it’s hard to find them.
we need to build the base of the pyramid.
if our foundation crumbles everything from the bottom up fails.
we need wages that can support a family on a single income, with good health coverage, and education.
i am not saying that women should not work…or anything like that. simply that when the time comes that a couple wants to raise a family, one of the parents priorities should be able to be the children and the home. that should not be a privilege to have the time to raise your children. kids require time and parents should not have to run in two or more separate hamster wheels just to keep the house running and squeeze the kids in between their jobs.
now i know there are situations that work well for having both a job and kids…but the majority of people i know have been running like crazy to keep the wolf from the door for years. they are not wealthy they are barely making it.
if kids really were this countries priority…their parents would also be this countries priority. we would be paying them enough to live on.
might we need a little old fashioned form of protectionism…maybe.
why…companies can always find cheaper labor…in some places what our citizens need just to get by for a week is a wonderful salary for someone in a “developing” country for a month or more. what does that really mean if we continue to follow the current paradigm?
our wages will come down. they will not go up or even stay the same if those on top can feed their labor needs with cheaper labor, they will cause all they are thinking about is increasing their margins. they are forgetting that if they keep going down this path americans will, as we are now stop buying. feed the base, people keep talking about the laws of economics while ignoring the laws of nature.
and we must do away with the myth of…our country being able to be populated only by people whom all have upper end jobs.
we will always need janitors, waitresses, burger flippers…plumbers, my dad was a plumber…trust me he was never in danger of having to pay increased taxes under obama’s plan.
we need to stop looking down our noses at those kinds of positions and pay them a dignified wage.
have you looked up the minimum wages in the states lately?
and then looked at how many companies actually have to pay the set minimum?
just because a state has a set minimum it does not mean everyone in the state gets paid that minimum.
and saving social security???
how many of you know that unless it has changed for this year, that you do not have to pay into social security after 90,000.00 dollars. meaning anything oprah, your boss, the banker anyone who makes over 90,000.00 is not subject to social security tax. how about that.
social security was not intended to be one persons personal bank account nor was it intended to be a slush fund. it was intended to be a safety net for americas citizens. and if you are making enough to pay your own way in your retirement? why are you even accepting social security benefits?
shouldn’t there be a point where you as a citizen of this country can opt out of social security benefits until there comes a place and time where if you need it you can sign up again.
i have to stop doing this. too late. but one thought runs into another.

Posted by: northstar | November 21, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

The jets might have looked bad, but Nightline’s coverage of this fact is tabloid fodder, not news.
Do you really want the CEO of GM wasting an hour in the airport terminal? Do you think it woul dbe appropriate for him and the management team to discuss new projects, marketing plans, etc out in the open on a plane?
How many members of the congressional committee have not flown back and forth to DC in a private jet? Committee hearings are fine, if they actually want to uncover facts/explanation, but the grandstanding wastes everyone’s time and solves nothing.

Posted by: Marc | November 21, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am

that last bit does not read smoothly.
they only pay into social security on the first 90,000.00 dollars they make.
say they make 250,000.00 a year they do not pay into social security on 160,000.00 a year.
why?
i know people whom have been told you don’t get social security because you did not pay enough in and i know ones that only recieve 374.00 a month.
yet a person makeing 250,000.00 a year leaves 160,000.00 out of the kitty?
why?
if every dollar were put into the kitty would social security be in trouble?

Posted by: northstar | November 21, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

I think that the government should give the money to the taxpayer. Then we can buy the cars already sitting at the dealerships. If we have to pay back the loan anyway at least we have a shiny new car in the driveway to show for it. And the automaker gets the money that they would have received anyway. But now they have to restock the dealerships instead of using the money on expensive jet rides or fancy vacations.

Posted by: Don F | November 21, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Speaking as a highly-paid executive, there is no reason these CEOs should not sacrifice all for their companies. After all, they were willing to take credit for the success. Kill all corporate jets. Salaries to $1 (ala Lee Iacoca, if they can remember that far). Break the unions (sorry, but you make much more than your education or skill level support in the real world). If necessary, let the companies fail and resurrect themselves as viable, sustainable entities that compete on a level playing surface.

Posted by: R Paske | November 22, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I would really like to see these companies help themselves first by taking pay cuts all the way around the companies. From the big wigs at the top all the way down the line. The assembly workers make, I heard, 73.00 an hour. Is this true? I would give anything to make 73.00 A DAY!! And the big wigs, ugh. With their outrageous pay and bonuses and perks. Tighten you belts just like the rest of us are having to do. I’m having a hard time with Christmas coming-Whose going to bail me out????? Are your families going without this Christmas? Surely not.

Posted by: Laura Goolsby | November 24, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Let them fail. They’ll be back, better than before.
Atleast then they can get rid of that stupid union and their ridiculous demands.
Oh those workers will squeel at first, let them sweat a few months then they’ll be begging for a job at a fraction of the wage. Then the prices of cars/trucks can come down so they are more affordable. Win, win.

Posted by: All starts with that union | November 24, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Bankrupcy is a tempting concept. They would most likely return wiser, more efficient and more realistic. The CEO salaries are just a tip of the iceberg. They (the BIG 3)are in this position because time after time we have feared the chain reaction of the auto industry failing. Workers with outrageous salaries and benefits, bullying the nation. IF we LOAN this irresponsible industry money, CHANGE must be outlined and reinforced. I say NO… We don’t bail out other fools.
jc

Posted by: jc | December 3, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Maybe this HAS to be done, but only with GREAT restrictions… No salaries, no bonuses, no vacation trips, no expense accounts. Union salaries & benefits are ALSO too high – these are tough times for all of us. Back down now – or have nothing later!!!
Remind me – Didn’t the USA bail out Chrysler motors already once before?????????? AGAIN???? – NO!!!!!!!
I haven’t bought an AMERICAN made vehicle since 1980 when you started making JUNK! The Japanese knocked you out cold, with quality, quality control, price, service, economy, etc.!!. I don’t know what could possibly make my family ever go back! You EARNED your bad rep!……….

Posted by: Marianne | December 11, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

I am so thankful that someone had the sense to stop this insanity. The unions have whined and complained and had their way too long. Get real. No one is worth what you think you are worth. You have brought about your own ruin. Start working for more realistic wages and be proud of a job well done. I hope that the CEO’s of the auto companies will show what leaders they can be by working for no more pay than what their workers get during this crises. Lead by example. Integrity is priceless.

Posted by: nh | December 12, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

All of your CD mastering needs are right here!

Posted by: master your cd here | March 28, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.