Nov 13, 2008 5:47pm

Dodd to Big Three Auto: The Votes Aren’t There For Bailout

ABC’s Zach Wolf reports from Washington:

An architect of the original bailout bill said today Democrats lack the votes to pass bill giving auto companies a piece of the $700 billion bailout pie next week.

Sen. Chris Dodd to ABC News: "I want to help them if we can, but I’m not going to give anyone a blank check, so we’re going to try and do something if we can next week. I don’t think the votes are there. Candidly, I don’t think we have the votes to get that done. With no big change between now and next Wednesday, I’m skeptical."

Even after January, Democrats will have to gain some Republican support in the Senate to pass a new rescue package for the auto makers.

And that is looking less likely. Another Republican aide said every time Congress passes a rescue package for a new industry, others will line up.

"Those are not illegitimate concerns obviously," said Dodd, "And you want to put conditions on any resources provided to an industry that hasn’t managed itself very well, but its not going to serve any of our interests if a major automobile manufacturer goes out of business between now and Jan. 20th if we could step in and keep them vibrant, we might allow them to survive."

So, While the aim and focus of the TARP is elastic and evolving, it is looking less likely is that the auto industry will get in on the action.

Democrats in the House and Senate made clear earlier this week that they’d like to see some of the $700 billion go to help the troubled US auto industry, which directly an indirectly employs 1 in 10 US workers.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/11/pelosi-to-seek.html

But Republicans today indicated they will be less willing to sign a big new check for Detroit than they were to prop up the financial industry earlier this year.

"People up here don’t get it," fumed one Senior Republican aide off-camera. "Bailouts are less popular than Congress."

Be it a rescue or a bailout, any new loans to the auto industry would represent another huge outlay of taxpayer dollars and that is what frustrates Republicans, when there are no taxpayer guarantees the new money would keep the auto industry solvent.

"Spending billions of additional federal tax dollars with no promises to reform the root causes crippling automakers’ competitiveness around the world is neither fair to taxpayers nor sound fiscal policy," said House Republican Leader John Boehner in a statement today.

And if Republicans band against a bailout for the auto industry, Democrats admit there is no way it can pass this year. And it might be tough next year too.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass, an architect of the $700 billion rescue package, is said to be crafting a sub-rescue package for the auto industry, which would cut a check from that $700 billion to the prop up the US auto makers. Frank’s committee will grill the CEOs for the Big Three American auto makers in a hearing next week.

But Congress authorized $25 billion in preferred loans to the auto industry earlier this Fall. The money is tied up in red tape and must be used to update facilities for production of more fuel efficient vehicles.

Rather than dipping into the $700 billion originally aimed at Wall Street and the Financial industry, Republicans would rather retool those loans to make them more immediately available and not constrict their use to creating more fuel efficient vehicles..

Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate (and so the most powerful Republican in the land when President Bush is no longer President) has not rejected the idea of a bailout for the auto industry.

But his spokesman Don Stewart said today that Congress should consider how to use the billions in loans already thrown at the auto industry before allocating new money.

"Earlier this year, Congress acted in a bipartisan way to help the auto industry and protect jobs. The Congress passed and the President signed legislation authorizing $25 billion in low-interest loans to help American automakers retool their facilities to make the fuel-efficient cars of the future. It may be that there are changes that need to be made in order to expedite these low-interest loans. Other ideas have been floated and all will receive a review as we approach the Senate’s return next week," said Stewart.

Democrats realize that until January, when Barack Obama becomes President, they can’t get anything done without the cooperation of Republicans first in the Senate and ultimately in the White House, where President Bush is no fan of another bailout/rescue.

User Comments

THANK GOD.

Posted by: a reader in georgia | November 13, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Why should my tax dollars be used to bail out GM? GM union workers get 80% pay while on lay-off, I get nothing when I’m laid off. Plus, GM managers get company paid vehicles, usually a Cadillac every three months with insurance, gas and car washes paid for by GM. I do not want my tax dollars paying for these items.

Posted by: Dave | November 13, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

No more polluted future- alternative energy is the way to go. Just think the Middle East will be ###### at us if we stop buying their oil. I guess they’ve been hearing this rhetoric for over 30 years and they believe we aren’t going to be oil free. The Hydrogen mass transportation buses are now entering our major cities. That’s a clue. More homes are putting solar panels on the their roofs that’s another clue. Wind Mill farms are sprouting up through out the U.S. that’s another clue and hopefully it will continue this infectious pattern.

Posted by: Barb | November 13, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Why does the American taxpayer have to bailout the auto industry? Why not go to your partner in crime…the oil industry. They’ve reported billion dollar profits. I’m sure they wouldn’t mind.

Posted by: Sharon | November 13, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

I hate to say this but GOOD! Let the Dems take all the heat when this goes down the drain! For years we have been bailing the Auto Industry out! It is time for the Auto Industry to kick the Unions out! It is the Union cost that make them uncompetitive! For years the Union has rapped the Big 3! For all you union workers, I am sure that the Big 3 will be very happy to hire you back, might be less per hour but you would still have a job! Better than collecting unemployment!

Posted by: chuck | November 13, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

DO NOT BAIL THEM OUT. Giving the automakers money will only postpone the inevitable. They will not get on their feet and pay it back – they will stay mediocre and crappy as always. Time to clean house and stop pouring taxpayer money into failing and doomed institutions.

Posted by: Fuffler | November 13, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

We nreed to let the system run it´s course. The big three have fallen into this situation of their own accord. For a business to fail, thee need one of three things««« Bad Product«««« Bad management«««« or Bad employees! The Big3 have all of the above. For God’s sake, GM is introducing a new Hummer this year«««« 6mpg«««« get real!!! What are they thinking??? We should allow the chips to fall where they may! If that means bankruptcy, so be it. That will force a change««« the courts will impose new mangement and the unions will be out of the picture. There are plenty of people out there looking for work to replace the union employees. The UAW guys are making around $40/hr«««« new hires in a reorganized company would be able to come in around $15/hr. «««« And there are plenty of people out there that would love to have the opportunity! If everyone in the current businesses of the Big3 lost their lobs because of the situation, nearly everyone currently loking for an opportunity would jump tight in and fill the void! Net loss of jobs««« nearly ZERO!! As far as the proposed bailout goes—–”Spending billions of additional federal tax dollars with no promises to reform the root causes crippling automakers’ competitiveness around the world is neither fair to taxpayers nor sound fiscal policy,” Doesn’t seem like rocket science to me!

Posted by: roscoe02 | November 13, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Toyota, Honda, Mercedes Benz and BMW build cars here in the US with Union labor but you don’t see them asking for a ‘bailout’. Guess they did thier homework and the idiots in Detroit didn’t. By their own standard of a
‘free market’ they should be allowed to collapse and be replaced by those whose performance, both financially and socially, deserves reward. Same for all those ‘free market’ banks etc. who are now bellying up for their welfare checks. Free markets without responsibillity and regulation is just another form of slavery for most of us.

Posted by: YOMAMA | November 13, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I’m glad to hear there is not enough support. But keep letting your Congressional reps know you are opposed to this legal form of stealing from taxpayers.

Posted by: bugg | November 13, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

The “problem” with Bail-Outs[Wall-Street, AIG and those lining-up for a piece of the U.S. Treasury as served-up by Czar Henry Paulson}, plain and simple, is CONGRESS. 10% (54 members ) are bright and knowledgeable 90% are incompetent. And you guessed it, members of the 90% class are in charge by virtue of arcane self-rules that virtually drowned the very few competent members of the House and Senate. This whole financial mess can be traced back to Public Law 106-554 Sec.1(a)(5) titled the Commodities Futures Modernization Act circa 2001.
The realities of the financial crisis finally surface, and what do the INCOMPETENTS do, stick their collective heads up their you-know-whats, and hand the keys to the U.S. Treasury over to Henry Paulson, ex CEO of Goldman Sachs.
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy code was passed many years ago. It has a purpose: liquidate poorly run insolvent companies the likes of AIG, Lehman, GM, Chrysler, Ford and every other company receiving or requesting a U.S. Treasury/Government bail-out. Chapter 11 is a cop-out, giving time and money to the same execs who ran their companies into the ground in the first place, is nothing short of CRAZY.
Congress ( the INCOMPETENT 90% ) assume the public is as dumb as they are; the public is not. All these companies deserve to fail, and, as far as Czar Paulson is concerned, he is nothing short of a carpet bager who is embezzling the U.S. Taxpayer out of over $700 billion.

Posted by: Dcitizen | November 13, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

YOMAMA ««««« I agree 100%. The foreign companies aren’t doing great, but they’re not in the line with ther hands out either. And««« they never will be! they’re smarter that that. It’s called cut and run! If it no longer makes good business sense, then they know not to continue. Look at DHL—- it’s just not a profitable situation««« thank you very much, but we’re out of here! But these guys in Detriot don’t have a clue! They continue to invest all of their money in the development of products that no one wants! That’s first and foremost why the foreign manufacturers are here!!! Because the American public wants wht they have. Last person leaving Detroit, please turn out the lights!

Posted by: roscoe02 | November 13, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Don’t do it – if a company gets so large that it cannot be allowed to fail through it’s own mismanagement, then a company shouldn’t be allowed to get so large. Period.

Posted by: 12_angry_men | November 13, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Here is what they should do. Do not give the banks the money instead talk to all world leaders. Have what they call a jubilee in the bible. Everyone is cleared of their debts around the world. All corporations all businesses all home owners all car owners all banks, all credit cards are clear and everyone starts over with good credit because no one is in debt. Even hospitals, churches, nursing homes everyone and everything is debt free.
the banks will have money to loan to people and this time do it correctly. People will not have credit card debts so they qill spend more giving businesses more money. Corporations will be able to hire more people. New businesses will start up. the auto industry will pick up business. Everyone will be a winner here.

Posted by: alaskaerin | November 13, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

wow, I am surprised that all of the comments previous to this were so against a GM bailout. Do all of you drive Toyotas? Yes GM has not had the best business strategy in the past 15 years, but it does employ, in aggregate, many, many people. And do the person who said knock out UAW people and replace them with people who make $15/hr, that is just stupid. Who does that help? So then you have a team of workers being paid low income wages. Thinking like that is one reason why our economy was so fragile in the first place…export all of the well paying manufacturing jobs and replace them with low paying service jobs…that was a bad shift in our workforce. Plus, people making $15/hr cant afford to buy a home, which is really the root of a lot of these problems. But, although it sucks for the taxpayer, I think that, as Americans, we shouldn’t turn our back on an American company, but help them to thrive again.
Hey, plus, with globalization and all, the closing of GM would negatively affect jobs in other nations that produce the parts for cars or tires and what have you. This would further aggravate the worsening global economy.
If this came up before the Wall Street bailout, I think it would have been much more popular.
Wow, i never wrote this much on a blog or comments page before.

Posted by: chris | November 13, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Obama has made promises to the UAW and he means to keep them. The big three will get their bailout and the taxpayer will get fleeced once again. The only recourse we have is to contact our legislators and tell them no no no money for the car makers. There are other car companies in the US like Toyota who are very successful and actually make a profit. But the do not have the demands of the UAW to meet so the price per car is less.

Posted by: madvtr | November 13, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Meanwhile back at the ranch – those who moan and complain about NOT having enough hybrids and alternative fuel cars will build them in their basements! Umm – ok! Read my ID – that’s who posts on here!

Posted by: Simpleton's | November 13, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Bo from GM has been on the back of suppliers for a number of years, no breaks, no help only give, give, give to GM. Where is Bo now, what is he saying? Bo is out there with hat in hand looking for a handout from the Government. Bo are you still out there? Are you ready to help the supplier???????????

Posted by: Alex | November 13, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

wasn’t it a little while ago that someone wanted the American People to bail out the government? What happened to that situtation? Let’s ALL start thinking like our ancestors and PAY as we GO. If you don’t have the cash in your pocket you can’t have it.Or better yet let’s SAVE UP our money. I am a single mother of eight children and if I don’t have the cash I can’t go buy the food or pay the rent. Why should businesses be any different?

Posted by: Jeanette | November 13, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Since when did $15 per hour become low income? That’s $31,200 with no overtime, which I am sure you will still get. Be glad that it’s $15 /hour and not minimum frickin wage! If you can’t afford to buy a house, rent an apartment, save the 20% down payment and wait like every other responsible American. Get use to living within your means. I get so sick of hearing that “I have kids to support and bills to pay.” Hello, you made those decisions for yourself. Don’t put this on the American taxpayer’s back to support and bail you out. Tough it out like everyone else would. Trust me, you’ll be better off in the end.

Posted by: Daniel | November 13, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

The management and unionized workers in the US auto inudstry are both responsible for the mess they are in. The companies fought safety and fuel standards for decades. Even some new vehicles do not have head restraints for rear passengers! They are making Hummers and V10 trucks! Ford proudly announced it would spend $150 to upgrade their cars: $75 for the interior (which is OK) and $75 for the three chrome bars on the grill (aimed at keeping us children happy?). They really need to look at the long-term reliabilty tables in the April issue of Consumer Reports.

Posted by: McAlister | November 13, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Maybe GM should be right sized and build a few models of highly reliable cars—oops that would be Honda and Toyota NO BAILOUT STOP the Madness

Posted by: Tasha | November 13, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Just say no to unions and no to any more bailouts. Paulson/Pelosi/Reid are driving our economy into the ground to the point we’ll never recover. Maybe that’s the point.

Posted by: just say no | November 13, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

It would be one thing if the US automakers were experiencing a temporary economic anomoly, but their systemic problems go deeper and have been in the making for 30 years or more. Bailout money might keep them afloat temporarily, but I would be willing to bet we’d be right back here in 2-3 years.

Posted by: LongT | November 13, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Don’t know why the media isn’t reporting this but here’s a list of the executive compensation for the big three automakers for 2007. Get ready to seethe in anger!
Remember, this is JUST for 2007 (one year!) and includes cash, stock and other bonuses:
GENERAL MOTORS
G.R. Wagoner: $14.4 MILLION
F. A. Henderson: $7.6 MILLION
R. A. Lutz: $6.8 MILLION
G. L. Cowger: $5.1 MILLION
T. G. Stephens: $4.9 MILLION
See details here: http://www.companypay.com/executive/compensation/general-motors-corp.asp?yr=2008
~~~~~
FORD
Alan Mulally $21.7 MILLION
Donat R. Leclair $11.7 MILLION
Mark Fields: $8.4 MILLION
Lewis W. K. Booth: $10.2 MILLION
Michael E. Bannister: $8.7 MILLION
See:
http://www.companypay.com/executive/compensation/ford-motor-co.asp?yr=2008
~~~~~
DAIMLER CHRYSLER
Dr. Dieter Zetsche: 5.1 MILLION
Gunther Fleig: 2.5 MILLION
Dr. Rudiger Grube: 2.5 MILLION
Andreas Renschler: 2.6 MILLION
Bodo Uebber: 2.7 MILLION
Dr. Thomas Weber: 2.5 MILLION
See page 169 of this:
http://www.daimler.com/Projects/c2c/channel/documents/1488194_DAI_2007_Annual_Report.pdf
~~~~~
And they want OUR money to bail them out? What a joke!!!
Please help spread the word!
Angela – a small business owner who knows how to live within my means and who would never expect taxpayers to bail me out of anything!

Posted by: Angela Hoy | November 13, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I don’t need to contact my congressman. He voted against the $700 billion financial bailout. There’s no way he would support one for the auto industry. I didn’t vote for Senator Rep. Saxbee Chambliss because he voted for the $700 billion bailout, and now he’s in a dead heat runoff with his democratic challenger. And although he’s more of a slease, I’ll let the cards fall where they may. I’m tired of voting for any of these guys.

Posted by: LongT | November 13, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

No to bailing them out.. enough of the UAW with workers averaging 60k a year with a 9th Grade education. If we do.. then everybody else will be in line.. saying how about us too.
——————————–
From the Detroit Free-Press…
The Detroit City Council passed a resolution today calling for a $10-billion bailout for the city of Detroit.
Council President Pro Tem JoAnn Watson sponsored the resolution to use the money for public service employment, to fund mass transit plans and to place a moratorium on home foreclosures for two years.
———————-
See what I mean? This madness has to stop now!

Posted by: Iceberg Slim | November 13, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

oh well, who cares about 2 million jobs?

Posted by: Eric | November 13, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

No matter who gets bailed out… the next Great Depression is on the horizon.. we need to just admit it and let it happen.
GWB will be back in Texas writing a book.. while we enter the next Stone Age.

Posted by: Iceberg Slim | November 13, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Dcitizen…couldn’t agree with you about the incompetent men & women in Congress…the biggest incompetent person is PELOSI, next is REID & DODD, who is Chairman of the Senate Banking & Housing committee. I guess Dodd couldn’t forsee the banking industry failing. He is just as crooked as all the CEO’s of AIG, Goldman Sac, Bank of America, Fannie Mae & Freedie Mac.. We need California to vote out Pelosi and Connecticut to vote Dodd out. I guess this will upset PElosi & REID who demanded that Bush bails out the big 3 auto makers.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 13, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Unions are ultimately going to be responsible for the downfall of this country. Organized extortionists who are never happy with what they squeeze out of their employers. Why is GM in trouble…….because my suburban costs $50k. Why does my suburban cost $50k, because some guy who bolts the tires on has worked there 10 years and is paid $50hr plus a lifetime of pay after he retires. My friend has a thriving business pinstriping cars because Ford can’t get the union to agree to production levels and quality standards. Bunch of thugs and idiots who just don’t get it.

Posted by: Bryan T | November 13, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Think about the guys on the front lines, that have dedicated their lives to this company. The big wigs are the ones that have made bad decisions and they still take home million dollar bonus paychecks. You’d think that the bad performance over the years would have squashed that. GM has needed new leadership for years. Why don’t they forgo their bonuses for a few years to save the company from this crisis.

Posted by: Dana | November 13, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Go ahead jerks, kill the American auto industry and you get what you deserve. To be taken over by a foreign power. America is a third world country anyway.

Posted by: bob | November 13, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

the feds can spend another 8 trillion in the next 4 years without a sweat…

Posted by: fred | November 13, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

A bailout = same auto makers limping along making the same gas guzzlers, whining they’d need even MORE money to modernize with new technology and better MPGs. This has been going on 30 years or more. Just bite the bullet. No bailout.

Posted by: Colorado Dem | November 13, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Just remember, the job you save may be your own.

Posted by: Walt | November 13, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

hooray! bailing out the auto industry would have given new meaning to “spread the wealth around”–taking from the poor (me) to give to the wealthy (all UAW workers)!

Posted by: neehao | November 13, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Sure, don’t bail out the auto industry, then when you go on unemployment then we can cancel your unemployment benefits too.

Posted by: w | November 13, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Sure, don’t bail out the auto industry, then when you go on unemployment then we can cancel your unemployment benefits too.
Posted by: w | Nov 13, 2008 8:07:39 PM
——————————–
Even after bailing them out.. they will more than likely still go under.. so what difference does it make to worry about getting or not getting unemployment?

Posted by: Iceberg Slim | November 13, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

I never understood the hate for unions… Shouldn’t we be happy that some people are actually getting a living wage for hard work? These people bust their butts… most have missing fingers or other permanent disfigurement as a result of their jobs.. a lot of them die on the job… I’ve seen men fall into vats of acid… but, hey, they don’t deserve a decent rate of pay. The union bashers all blame the unions, but never eek a word of complaint about senior management who get multi-million dollar contracts…
Toyota and other foreign manufacturers use union labor here, and yet you don’t hear people praising unions as a result of that… maybe y’all should!
So, let GM fail… 2.5 million jobs isn’t a big deal, is it? I mean, what 30% unemployment in Michigan is just grand for the economy! If you let GM go down, then pretty much the great depression II will come with it!
All GM needs is some cash to float them until February, at which time, they will have scaled down enough to pay the money back… it’s not a giveaway, nor a handout, and it is going to be extremely necessary…
If GM goes into chapter 7 bankruptcy, we’re talking about a huge shock to the economy that will last 2 decades at least… 2.5 million good paying jobs are hard to replace…. not to mention that the state of Michigan will be essentially destroyed… might as well just nuke it, it would be a more merciful end to a good state with good people than what you “kill GM” folks want to do…

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

One of the best reasons why Detroit automakers should not receive a bailout can be found in a General Motors “Jobs Bank” program that, bizarrely, pays employees not to work.
A beneficiary of that program was someone named Jerry Mellon, who worked for GM until his division merged with another in 2000 and he was no longer needed. Except for a brief period in 2001, Mellon received his full salary for not working, which reached $64,500 a year by 2006. Include benefits, and the annual cost to GM exceeds $100,000.
To earn his pay, Mellon was given the formidable task of showing up in a windowless shed, sitting at a table, and doing nothing for eight hours a day for six years, according to a profile in the Wall Street Journal. Jobs Bank employees have the option of attending classes teaching such important manufacturing skills as dealing blackjack and poker. Mellon spent part of his time reading Reader’s Digest, learning how to play Trivial Pursuit, napping on a makeshift bed of chairs pushed together, or simply staring at the wall for hours at a time.
During those six years, Toyota surpassed GM as the world’s largest car manufacturer, thanks to innovations like the fuel-sipping Prius. Nissan developed the GT-R, a technological marvel with a 0 to 60 time of 3.2 seconds and a lower sticker price than the Corvette ZR1. Honda kept its focus on smaller cars such as the Civic and Accord, and saw its sales continue to increase this summer while GM, Ford, and Chrysler have slid.

Posted by: Iceberg Slim | November 13, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

“Don’t know why the media isn’t reporting this but here’s a list of the executive compensation for the big three automakers for 2007. Get ready to seethe in anger!”
But… but… but… all the right wingers say that it’s the Unions that are to blame!!! Executives are never at fault!

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Without regard for whether it is right or wrong to underpin the auto industry, Dodd talks about votes like they’re poker chips. What about talking about the will of the American people?
I think we need to boycott Connecticut until they vote this a-ole out of office.

Posted by: flotsam jetsam | November 13, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

“One of the best reasons why Detroit automakers should not receive a bailout can be found in a General Motors “Jobs Bank” program that, bizarrely, pays employees not to work.”
Blah… more union hate… pick some weird example and decide that every hard working line worker is somehow corrupt… If you want to blame anyone, blame management for agreeing to such a stipulation of the contract, not the unions who are fighting to have hard working americans get decent pay… why would anyone hate the idea of hard work being rewarded?

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

“I’m glad to hear there is not enough support. But keep letting your Congressional reps know you are opposed to this legal form of stealing from taxpayers.”
Stealing? It’s a friggin’ loan! How is that stealing! The U.S. gets interest paid!

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Nothing would make me happier than to watch the Big 3 swirl down the drain. I’m so sick of hearing about a bailout for Detroit. It would help NOTHING. Let them die on the vine. They are overdue for death. There are enough automakers (Toyota, Honda, etc) to pick up the market share. It’s high time we stop the bleeding. Thank you, Sen. Dodd.

Posted by: Jess | November 13, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

So I guess accountability has gone the way of the dodo?

Posted by: Turd Ferguson | November 13, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

“Unions are ultimately going to be responsible for the downfall of this country. Organized extortionists who are never happy with what they squeeze out of their employers.”
But, it’s great when it is the other way around, right? I mean, in your economic utopia, if no one gets paid a decent wage, how are people supposed to buy the things that get made? Answer me that, einstein?
Henry Ford overpaid his workers so that they could afford his cars… how does underpaying everyine make an economy work?
BTW, Toyota and Honda all pay the same high wages here in the US, but I don’t hear your union hate on them?

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Obama and the Dems were bought and paid for with Union money and you Camary driving intellectuals help vote them in. Exactly what do you think is going to happen this Winter?
With the stock market in the can, do you think Big 3 pension plans are fully funded?
How much would it cost for the tax payers to cover the pensions from the Big 3 that are insured by the federal government?

Posted by: Dave from MI | November 13, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Democrats sure want their hands in every Coporation, company and busisness in the country.
Complete take over of the nation coming up.
Staged and played out by the Democratic party.

Posted by: seah | November 13, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

“enough of the UAW with workers averaging 60k a year with a 9th Grade education. ”
Yes, enough with the American Dream! Everyone should be poor~ forget good jobs! They lead to ruin! We need poverty and lousy paying jobs! That’s the republican way! No wonder you guys lost!

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

WE HAVE TO GET PELOSI OUT OF THERE!! SHE IS THE RING LEADER IN ALL OF THIS BAILING OUT!!!

Posted by: nadradt | November 13, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

“Nothing would make me happier than to watch the Big 3 swirl down the drain.”
Why don’t you come up to Saginaw, Michigan and say that… bring a bodyguard!
I find it interesting that the “country first” crowd is all about America losing it’s signature manufacturing industry and trumpeting the Japanese! Some country first philosophy, huh? Sell our assets overseas as fast as possible.. well, that’s the republican way, isn’t it?

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.
That is what is being proposed here. Nothing more nothing less by both sides of the table using the term ‘bail out’.

Posted by: OrwellsPig | November 13, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

“WE HAVE TO GET PELOSI OUT OF THERE!! SHE IS THE RING LEADER IN ALL OF THIS BAILING OUT!!!”
Actually, it was your president, George Bush that started this… take some responsibility, Republicans… this is all on you and your failed economic “vision”

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Alright people, don’t forget how General Motors got into this mess. Keep saying over and over again, GMAC (the financial arm of General Motors) bought into the sub-prime mortgage market when they should have been financing automobiles. GREED and an attempt to ride the housing bubble is what pushed GM into certain bankruptcy. Oh, and they also sell cars nobody wants to buy! In addition, Park Avenue-based Cerberus and their 51 percent stake in GMAC – the owner of a massive subprime mortgage portfolio – is looking increasingly problematic. And when you factor in the sale of Chrysler to Cerberus Capital Management back in May using the derivatives in question, well you’re actually bailing out Cerberus’ Board of Directors and Top Management not Genral Motors nor Chrysler. By the way, you don’t see FORD whining. Solution: FIRE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, NO BONUSES, ONE DOLLAR A YEAR SALARIES FOR TOP MANAGEMENT, NO DIVIDENDS AND EVERY PENNEY OF TAXPAYER MONEY PAID BACK!

Posted by: Marcus | November 13, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

I don’t want to see the auto industry go away in the USA but no more bailouts.
The bailouts just reinforce bad business models. The finance and mortgage industry executive compensation should collapse down to “reasonable” limits.
What nobody wants to touch the fact that the finance industry bid up the price oil contracts to make up the failed derivatives and mortgage securities they bought. And yet we reward theses titans (clowns) of our economy.
Let’s solve the problem but not point our fingers in a search for blame because there would be a near revolution if the truth came out.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | November 13, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

First, there is plenty of blame to go around. Unions with extremely lucrative contracts. The government which unlike Japan and Korea has not imposed meaningful fuel efficiency standards on our manufacturers. The public who for years wanted to buy gas guzzlers. And the auto companies for doing everything they could to resist change. I can’t speak for the other 2 but I follow Ford and they have hired Alan Mulally who turned around Boeing and are FINALLY bringing their European models to the US. Check out ford.co.uk There is a Fiesta model that gets over 60mpg and pollutes less than a Prius. And are we just trying to prove a point. The estimates vary widely but between 2 and 6 million people could lose there jobs. The US government could lose $60 billion in the first year and $156 within the first 3 years if these companies go under. That’s paying out unemployment, tax lost receipts, etc. Are you telling me we are not smart enough to spend some money now to avoid paying many multiples of that down the road? Who is making these decisions!?

Posted by: TSnow27604 | November 13, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Xlnt decision! There would be no need for a bailout if the UAW would agree to rip up their existing contracts and replace them with wage and benefit packages that would enable the US automakers to compete on a level playing field with the foreign auto makers. The UAW also needs to get rid of all of their asinine work rules which further hampers the Big 3. It is the UAW that is killing to automakers in this country and until they figure that out the US automakers will not be competitive.

Posted by: Agnostic Free Thinker | November 13, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Lets remember that when Crysler was bailed out back in the 80′s they paid back the U.S. with interest. It is a loan not a bail out. I believe GM , Ford, and Crysler will pay the money back. We are bleeding jobs by the everday. Putting more people out of work cost everyone in the long run.

Posted by: Concerned | November 13, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

neehao…..you are right..when someone makes $30 an hour + benefits is doing very well, considering they just screw in bolts to a car that falls apart after 4 years. I forgot to mention auto worker on assembly gets paid to sit on their butt when their machine breaks down and they get overtime.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 13, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

OK, I wrote my last post and then I have read more of your statements. Are you kidding me!? You think that Toyota and Honda make fuel efficient cars because they simply wanted to? The Japanese government legislated that they meet strict requirements. Our government has done nothing of the sort. That’s why German cars that are sold in Europe have smaller diesel engines. They have to meet the EU’s requirements. Meanwhile, our government sits back and does nothing and now we find that consumers’ desires and the environment has changed and our companies find themselves on the outside looking in. Do you think Toyota sells the full sized Tundra pickup in Japan? No, they save it for the US where our appetites and legislation make it the perfect market for such a thing.

Posted by: TSnow27604 | November 13, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Mike, no the Union is not completely at fault. However, when a person gets $30 an hour + fringe benefits. That makes a person on the assembly line making $40 an hour to screw in bolts on a car that starts to fall apart after 3 years. Then if the line worker’s equipement fails, he/she is sent to the break room until his/her piece of equipment if fix…and they were paid for sitting on their butts in the break room, that is what the UAW negotiated with the Auto Manufact. That sucks. As far as the CEO’s, CFO’s and upper management, cut their pay back to $400,000 a year, no stock options, no stock bonuses, no bonuses and no bail out of their contract, & NO OVERTIME for the assemble workers.. Anyone laid off gets a 2 week pay and one month paid health insurance. That is how it is done in the REAL world not the UNION world.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 13, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

When they stop giving C.E.O/’s a million dollars a monthh….is when I will CONSIDER helping them out .

Posted by: orangecat | November 13, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

First of all, if nobody is buying the cars why are we producing more. I would not mind buying a new car but at what cost, the housing market is taking most of my money and although my car has 77,000+ mile on it I would rather keep it, because we all know how the car loses value as soon as you drive off the lot so what’s the point. However, I have been eyeing a new Mercedes, oh but that is Un-American. How about cutting prices on those new gas guzzlers and we all could buy one…But, at the same time I do worry about all the people who may lose their job. good luck to ya…

Posted by: lanawonders | November 13, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Let GM file for bankruptcy. That way the Union’s contract is can be voided by the Bankruptcy judge, CEO’s, CFO’s and upper management probably will have to take pay cuts. Bankruptcy Judge has A LOT of control on who gets paid what. I guess the Dem’s don’t wantt the UAW to be broken up…what are the Dem’s afraid of losing? PAC money
Please PELOSI & REID & DODD, tell me why you don’t want GM filing for Bankruptcy?

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 13, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

The unions at the big three are a big part of the problem. Good riddance to them all. The segments of the auto industry in this country that are doing well (Toyota and Honda) don’t have unions and the people are paid about the same. The American management that creates the need for the unions also needs to be shown the door. Good riddance to them too. American car manufacturers have been arrogant about quality, cost and customer appeal while the Japanese actively tried to improve. We are seeing the results now. I hope the union stewards and the managers are happy.

Posted by: GCH | November 13, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

” That is how it is done in the REAL world not the UNION world.”
Maybe the real world should be more like the union world! Instead of resenting union workers, why not form a union yourself and get the good benefits and wages you deserve?
I’ve worked in many a union shop, and I’ve never seen anything even close to the stories you are telling… these are all urban legends… the reality is people die or are maimed on the job every day in these plants… it’s very hard work and you are treated like absolute garbage by management… UAW workers have many years cut off their lives thanks to the toxic and dangerous conditions they work in… getting a decent paycheck for hard work is the heart of the American Dream isn’t it? Why the hate?
If you want to blame anyone, blame the fact that GM has to pay health benefits, whereas Toyota and Honda get the benefit of universal health care paid for by the taxpayer. They don’t have that burden. Make health care affordable in the United States, and business will thrive… even “hated” GM!
Listen if GM is going to fail, it’s going to fail… but, let’s face it, the U.S. economy cannot afford the loss of 3 million jobs at this point in time… if anything, GM should be eased out of business to prevent a ripple effect throughout the economy… I think you can agree with me on that…
Any money that the govenrment loans them will be paid back… If banks had any money to loan out at all, GM wouldn’t even be in this predicament… this is an unusual situation that calls for an unusual and temporary remedy. There’s too much at risk to just let an american icon go belly up without at least a fight to save it!

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

“Please PELOSI & REID & DODD, tell me why you don’t want GM filing for Bankruptcy?”
GM can’t file for bankruptcy… there isn’t enough people loaning money out there to keep them in chapter 11… if they file for bankruptcy, it will be chapter 7, which means 3 million jobs gone within a month!
Not exactly a great start to the new year, is it?

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Many taxpayers don’t realize that local and state governments had given GM plants many tax breaks and grants over the years. No more taxpayer money given to the American auto industry. Let them file bankruptcy and force the UAW to make huge concessions. The whole industry needs reorganization to make them competitive. Their products are junk and too costly. Throwing more money at a bad business model won’t solve anything.

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

the big three are not going bankrupt because of union employees. they are going broke because instead of embracing the changes that the auto industry was clearly going to have make (safety, mileage, emissions), they dragged their feet, fought legislation tooth and nail, and whined when foreign companies stepped into the breach with well-made, fuel efficient, low emission, safe, and affordable cars.
workers don’t bankrupt companies; executives do.

Posted by: antijake | November 13, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Mike, if GM filed for Bankruptcy, the creditors can’t touch their assets. GM uppers will have to go to the bankruptcy judge with a budget and a payment plan. Which means the UAW has to re-do their contract and that has to be approved by the Bankruptcy judge. All salaries are frozen or pay cuts, jobs eliminated and approved by the judge. Lets remember the GM mess also is caused by their subsidary GMAC, which made risky loans to homeowners. Which could mean that GM could double dip, getting a bail out for their bad home loans and then another bail out for the manufacturing of cars. Doesn’t sound fair to me. Ford isn’t crying about not having enough money. Toyota isn’t crying either. I also don’t feel bad for GM, because they made auto loans to individuals that couldn’t afford a new car in the first place. Zero down 6 year financing available and if you still owe a balance on the existing car loan NO problem we will roll that balance into the new car loan. Sorry but GM and UAW deserve to fail or file chapter 11. NO BAIL OUT. as for UNIONS, they suck. The brick layers/mason union couldn’t even supply 150 brick mason for a job that we got 4 years ago. The union said we have 20, and I needed 150. Just a little short. we went non-union and it has been the best thing that the company that I work for has done. Everyone gets paid the say as if they were still in the union but no fringe union benefits. Why did Toyota build a plant outside of San Antonio, so that they didn’t have to deal with UNIONS. There are no shortages of man powers either. NO UNIONS. You are worried about a worker getting injured? That is why we have workers compensation in Texas. It is easy to file as well. Or you can take out long term disablity insurance cheap if you are afraid of getting injured. UAW president for the GM plant in Arlington, TC was on the local TV, saying I guess we will have to cut back on the overtime….

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 13, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Hey, as far as I am concerned, voting for ANY additional bail-outs has become an existential threat to the incumbency of anyone I can vote for.
It was a bad idea to begin with but you got stampeded into it. OK, I’ll forgive you for the first one. BUT ANYONE WHO VOTES FOR ANOTHER SINGLE PENNY OF BAILOUT MONEY – UNDERSTAND THIS. I’M GOING TO DONATE TO YOUR OPPONENT, WORK FOR YOUR OPPONENT, VOTE FOR YOUR OPPONENT IN THE NEXT ELECTION AND AS MANY ELECTIONS AS YOU ARE STILL AROUND.

Posted by: George Hanshaw | November 13, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

For YEARS, automakers have been fighting congress tooth and nail over emissions and fuel-economy standards. It would “cost too much” to re-design and re-tool plants to make clean, fuel-efficient cars. Every time congress has attempted to pass more stringent standards, the American automakers have whined about it. (And, if memory serves, this is NOT the first time American automakers have gone to the US government asking for bailout money.)
Anybody else remember the “fuel crisis” of the early 70′s? You didn’t see all that many Datsuns, Toyotas, etc. on American roads before that. But when it got to the point that you could sit in a line for hours, waiting to buy gas, only to get to the pump and discover that the tanks had run dry, people decided fuel-economy was something they needed. And the only people making cars that had good fuel-economy were overseas makers.
Instead of gradually making their way towards cleaner and more efficient vehicles, US automakers dreamed up SUVs and Hummers. So now, when things get tight again, I have little sympathy for either the automakers or the people that drive those polluting gas-guzzling monsters.
And while I do honestly believe that “the worker is worthy of his hire”, I also think something is pretty screwy when a totally non-skilled assembly line factory worker is earning several times the wage of college graduates. I’m not opposed to unions per se, but I think — when the union keeps demanding higher and higher wages with more and more increased benefits — just to justify their existence, to the point where the company is in real financial trouble, perhaps it’s time to kick the union out and start over. I do know that Nissan plants in this country are union, but I don’t see Nissan holding their hand out.
While I would have been in favor of some government assistance in re-tooling American auto factories back in the 70′s to make them competitive in the global market, as far as I’m concerned, they made their bed and it’s time for them to lie in it.
No bailouts.

Posted by: FemaleVeteran | November 13, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

If GM filed for Chapter 11 (and it’s doubtful that they will get enough credit to remain in operation), who is going to buy cars from them? Would you buy a car from a bankrupt automaker?
As for your union rant, unions suck, unless you are in one… Unions aren’t there to benefit the employer… they are there to benefit the worker… we should all be lucky enough to be in a union… those fringe benefits you deride are worth a lot more than simple pay… Good health care alone is worth more than any salary… and without those unions to compete with, your non-union labor wouldn’t be getting that good pay to keep them from unionizing… no threat of unionization and everyone’s salary goes down!
I will never understand the union hate… envy, yes… hate, no… you’d think that if the unions have it “too good”, that you’d want to be part of the action… instead, you want everyone to be poor… somehow, that doesn’t seem like a good way to grow the economy… didn’t the republicans use to crow about wealth creation? Now, they are hell bent on destroying any wealth the middle class has…. no wonder you guys lost the election!
Well, it looks like you will get your wish and GM will go chapter 7, killing off the entire state of Michigan and 3 million jobs around the U.S.
I hope the revenge against unions was worth it! 3 million jobs is a lot to pay for resentment… instead of hating unions, organize one at your workplace!

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

I am not an economist, only an accountant, so I am not an expert. That being said, I fail to see how propping up the auto industry will help if no one is buying their cars. The botttom line is the only thing that will save a manufacturing company is to sell their product at a profit. Barring that, giving or loaning money is only postponing the inevitable.

Posted by: JillW | November 13, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

“I don’t want to see the auto industry go away in the USA but no more bailouts. ”
So, when GM liquidates all their assets… you’ll still be supporting the US auto industry staying, even after its gone?
What a ridiculous statement! If GM doesn’t get a loan within the next few months, it’s gone…. period! there will be no more U.S. auto industry to “save”

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

I don’t understand how wall street hacks are superior than the backbone of the manufacturing industry in the United States. You’d think that industries that actually make things would be more deserving of a “bailout” than corrupt moneychangers on Wall Street.

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Go bankrupt, reorganize, revitalize, and keep your dam hands off my money!!! GOT IT!!!

Posted by: hmn | November 13, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Unions are moronic when they ask for so much and they forget that there is an employer on the other side that needs to be profitible to stay in business. No profit – no jobs, sure doesn’t seem to be that difficult to understand. GM should be allowed to go bankrupt because it would be the best thing for the company in the long run. They can reorganize without the unions and once again be competitive.
The unions might have played a useful role 100 years ago but today they are an impediment to sound business practices. They simply extort money from the companies they work for and destroy American competitiveness.

Posted by: James | November 13, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Not NO, but HELL NO for a bailout package for the auto people. They made their beds, and now they are in the midst of the sheets they wrinkled. I wonder what good 50 billion dollars would do to “salvage” automakers? They are burning through billions just staying out of bankruptcy court now, and somehow 50 billion tax dollars are going to make that go away. You have got to be kidding, right? Our elected leaders probably are, BUT SHOULDN’T BE THAT STUPID. Fiscal irresponsibility got us into this mess. Poor planning, lousy management and those damned unions got automakers into trouble. The government helped screw up the rest. They all deserve the ABYSS, and start over again. Its what makes America great. BYE BYE Gunky Motors! May your management and your union people be on the same leaky boat.

Posted by: Roy Savary | November 13, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Two points: (1) Why are there so many different name plates in each of the big three companies? Doesn’t this cause a lot of pointless inventory keeping? Why can’t the cars in the US and Europe have the exactly same regulations and therefore be easily imported/exported? (2) The US auto makers have lost customers also because they do not stand behind their product: They try to deny warranty repairs and even safety recalls. Any bailout should have very strict conditions to be met by both managers and the unions. (Not much hope here. Did you notice that Congress “forgot” to specify that the banks given bailouts should not give dividends to shareholders? Oy!)

Posted by: shanti | November 13, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Mike, as I see it, there is a major flaw in your argument. Believe me, Americans will not stop buying cars if any American automaker goes under. They will just buy a car made by a different manufacturer. And, in one regard, you are correct: chances are they will buy that car from a financially sound company. If for no other reason than they will want to be able to easily get parts and service done on that new car.
So there will still be the same number of cars sold in this country, which means that there will still need to be the same number of people making cars. Maybe that car company will be Nissan or Honda or Toyota instead of GM, but — as has been shown in the past — if a company doesn’t have to deal with *unrealistic* union demands, executive salaries and perks, etc., it’s still far cheaper to build those cars in this country than it is to build them in Japan and ship them over.
So Toyota (or whomever) takes over the GM plants, re-tools them to build better, cleaner, and more fuel-efficient cars, and starts making Toyotas there. Yes, workers would undergo a period of unemployment while the factory was re-tooled, but they would eventually be put back to work.
We will NOT end up with 3 million jobs lost permanently.

Posted by: FemaleVeteran | November 13, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

We aren’t killing the American automakers by not bailing them out, they are already dead. They died a slow death at the hands of the UAW and short sighted, greedy management. If GM wants to be reincarnated they should be forced to file chapter 11 and reorganize like Delta Airlines had to do. It ain’t easy but, they will emerge a much more competitive company.

Posted by: SkyFive | November 13, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Mike- if the union workers are making a ton more than other manufacturing workers shouldn’t the salaries of these workers be looked at. Unions are most successful when the company goes out of business. They didn’t give in to demands and upheld the union mantra. It would not be the first time a company became uncompetitive and went out of business because of union wages and demand. So why is it fair that the taxes of the rest of americans go to support the union wages that are 132% higher than the entire manufacturing sector in the US. SOmething is wrong here. But don’t worry the Dems will eventually rescue them as the unions control the Dems.

Posted by: jschmidt | November 13, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

One last comment here; the money that General Motors is asking for now is to pay retirement and pensions. That is why they can draw money from the $25B that is already approved because it must be used for development of fuel efficient vehicles and retooling. So the automakers are asking the American taxpayer to pay for retirement benifits while tens of thoudands of jobs are being lost in all sectors of the economy. I don’t see the logic in that.

Posted by: SkyFive | November 13, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Bailing out the big three will be the biggest blow to capitalism as we know it. Failures don’t get rewarded in capitalism and when the supply exceeds demand the engine should stop and the automakers can go in a different direction. This is the best opportunity for the big three to be the big one and produce fuel efficient cars and ditch the fat cats and sell all the fancy assets around the globe. If all else fails get private loans or interest Bill Gates to take over the management of the automakers. Do something if Daddy Dodd does not cough up the money no one in Washington will. Don’t give capitalism a bad name, even China has made it work.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | November 13, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

The big three auto should MERGE into ONE!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 13, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Alternative energy is such a bucket of crap. I am counting on the tooth fairy and pixie dust.

Posted by: Sluggo | November 13, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Well Congress you guys have been had once again, what this tells me is the Congress needs to establish some rules that govern themselves.. 1. Joe the Plumber need not apply. 2. Should have some qualifications to govern not the PTA and the beauty pagent queen going to congress and not knowing a blanket blanket about what they are accepting or denying or voting present for.

Posted by: EYESURGERY | November 13, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Look for the union label. That is generally a business that will go broke.

Posted by: Sluggo | November 13, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

“Then the union has the nerve to ask the Auto Manufacture to pay for the loss wages while the union worker was on strike. ”
The UAW hasn’t had a strike in over a decade…
“Heck on one job I have a brick layer make close to $90,000 in one year due to all the overtime.”
That’s nice… if it wasn’t for unions, there would be no overtime… Unions made the push for overtime and helped make that into law. BTW, does that bricklayer get cheap health care and an affordable pension? Probably not! He’d be better off making less money as a union worker ‘cos of the security and benefits that he’d get…
Without the wage competition from unions, that bricklayer wouldn’t be getting the rate of pay you are giving him as an incentive to stay out of the union.
No union, no $90,000 job for your pal the bricklayer.

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Well, well, it looks like the greenhorn Obama is already preparing to get his ears clipped. There is no omniscient being when it comes to the beltway. This thing is locked in gridlock for four more years ALREADY. Looks like the only change that President Change will bring is aging. And by the way, why does his administration already look like the Clinton administration? Where’s all his own people? Oops, it seems they have no experience, so they need adults to show them the ropes. Ha Ha. I can criticize because I voted for Obama. Heh, heh.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | November 13, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

“They simply extort money from the companies they work for and destroy American competitiveness.”
‘Cos American business is always good to the American worker, right? Your whole idea of “saving” the auto industry is by totally screwing the workers… the CEO’s in your world get a free pass… In your world, it’s always the guys who work for a living who are at fault, not the management. No wonder you folks lost the election.
It’s amazing how many people here hate unions without any basis in fact… perhaps if you ever had to get your hands dirty for a living, you’d feel differently…

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

HEY I VOTE NO. SINCE IT IS TAXPAYER MONEY.

Posted by: Sara | November 13, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

“China has made it work.”
China is going to spend a half a trillion dollars bailing out there companies…
Interesting choice of example you make there… China believes in public investment in capitalism… no wonder they are eating our economy for lunch!

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

For over 30 yrs the big 3 automakers have fought the very congress whom they are begging for a bailout, over the MPG stanards set to increase the efficiency of their cars. But when the oil companies and big 3 are in bed with each other, and then you add paid off politicians, you have a circle of greed that has a tendacy to destroy a nations economy. The unions did not cause this problem.

Posted by: Roland | November 13, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

I hope the auto co.s going broke breaks the UAW for all the damage its done to this country.

Posted by: Sluggo | November 13, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Government inteference in telling the auto makers what and how to build a car is one of the major reasons they will go broke. Mileage standards are best set by what customers wish to buy. Great concept in a capitalist country HUH?

Posted by: Sluggo | November 13, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

To have a fee market society and unbridled capitalism, you must have both risk and reward as well as success and failure. This is a case of a company refusing to acknowledge that it has failed, not failing, but failed. GM has acted arrogant for years thinking they are the best automaker in the world. WRONG, they make inferior products, and have maintained the status quo in the face of tremendous change, so now they must pay the price. Take Sprint for example, for years they were the biggest cellular telephone company, they offered the newest phones but horrible service and treated their customers poorly. The now teeter on the verge, laying off people almost daily. Why; because they too were arrogant, there are multiple companies like this and the end result is always the same, they become history. GM is not failing, they have failed, they just don’t want to admit it yet, because they are hoping for one last handout from the government. No amount of Bailout money will save these companies, the Union is a disease that saps them of all their resources, then like child, irresponsibly demands more, the business model is broken and beyond repair. Bankruptcy is the best option for GM at this point, yes people are going to loose there jobs, and some will take incredible pay cuts, however, most will still have a job.

Posted by: USAUTOSRTRASH | November 13, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

There is no distinction between the UAW and management, they are one and the same. That is why “the world beater” Saturn went belly up. It was such a quality automobile too. It got 500 miles to a quart of oil.
The UAW and management working hand in hand, what a great concept.

Posted by: CryFive | November 13, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I know a GM retiree who recently received a $700 check from GM. This goes on several times a year. GM hasn’t made a profit in four years, yet their employees receive these payments. Go figure.

Posted by: Tim | November 13, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Good, don’t bail them out! My father works for Chrysler and my husband is part of the UAW and I still don’t support this. Why should we continue to give money to people that are running these businesses into the ground?! The workers don’t help matters either- they are greedy and get ridiculous benefits because of the UAW. Let the whole thing collapse.

Posted by: Melissa | November 13, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

It took a two-day strike, extraordinary solidarity and more than two months of tough bargaining for 73,000 UAW members at General Motors to bring home a new contract with unprecedented product and investment commitments.
With the protection of U.S. manufacturing jobs at the top of the union’s bargaining agenda, UAW negotiators insisted on — and won — solid pledges from GM to build specific products in specific plants.
GM also agreed to a moratorium on outsourcing, a pledge to insource more than 3,000 UAW jobs and a commitment to hire 3,000 temporary workers as permanent GM employees.
The agreement will deliver more than $13,000 in economic gains for a typical UAW member, including a $3,000 signing bonus, two 3 percent lump sums and a 4 percent lump sum. Must be nice to get a signing bonus. When I worked I never got a signing bonus, even after 10 years at the same company.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 13, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

I think it is payback time for the UAW considering the role they played in delivering a election win for the Dems and Obama.
A bailout for the UAW would be preposterous as common sense tells us that the Big 3 automakers are incompetent and their business model is bound for failure.
Dodd has the votes to deliver money for the auto industry considering the huge Dem majority in Congress, but he wants to pull Republicans along so that they can share the political blame, I hope Republicans have enough common sense to stay away from any auto bailout.

Posted by: Greg h | November 13, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Chapter 11 – reorganize their finances and change their business model, that’s the only way. Delta Airlines did it and it was very painfull for them but they emerged a leaner, more competitive company. The American automakers have a abundance of fat to trim from. What they need is a real CEO that can make it happen though. The current CEO’s can’t see past their out stretched hand.

Posted by: CryFive | November 13, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

auto industry………..you are going
to make the Airlines come a begging.
Dems-Rebublicns………Just Vote NO !!!

Posted by: Anita Yova | November 13, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Notice below GM holds 29.9 billion dollars for UAW benefits…F.U. UAW, either take a pay cut or lose your job…..Pay cut goes to uppper management as well……The agreement will deliver more than $13,000 in economic gains for a typical UAW member, including a $3,000 signing bonus, two 3 percent lump sums and a 4 percent lump sum. Active workers will see their comprehensive health care coverage continue, with dental, hearing and other benefits improved. Retired workers will have their health benefits secured by a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA), prefunded by GM with $29.9 billion in cash and other assets. The fund can only be used to pay retiree health benefits, and will remain solvent for decades regardless of the financial condition of GM.
The proposed contract will also deliver benefits to current and future retirees, with four lump-sum payments for current retirees, and a raise in basic benefit rates, the 30-and-out supplement, temporary and interim benefits for future retirees.
The company came into these talks looking to shred our contract to pieces,” said UAW Vice President Cal Rapson, who directs the UAW GM Department.
An entry-level worker’s performance bonus will be equal to 3 percent of qualified earnings during the previous 52 pay periods. Performance bonuses will be paid in May 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, based on April eligibility dates. Entry-Level Benefits
Entry-level workers will be covered by a separate benefit plan, including the following elements:
• A cash balance defined-benefit retirement plan: GM will deposit 6.4 percent of workers’ wages into a portable retirement plan, which will accrue interest tied to the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond.
• Health care plan: Entry-level workers will be covered by a health care plan, with annual in-network deductibles of $300 single/$600 family. Coinsurance will be 10 percent in-network, with an annual cap on out-of-pocket expenditures of $1,000 single/$2,000 family. To defray these costs, GM will reimburse workers up to $300 single/$600 family annually from a flexible health care spending account. Entry-level workers will be eligible for dental coverage and a vision exam after three years, and for full vision coverage after five years.
• Supplemental Unemployment Benefits: Entry-level workers with at least one but less than three years seniority will be eligible for 26 weeks of SUB. That increases to 52 weeks (which can be extended) for workers with three or more years seniority.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 14, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

I am the UAW. For all you people that despise us, let me tell you about my brothers & sisters I work with. I work on assembly line for a Class 8 heavy truck manufacturer and the men and women I work alongside are the most dedicated and productive I have ever worked with. I used to be in the service sector and it was ridiculus. I used to work with thieves, backstabbers, narrow minded bigots, and most of all lazy SOBs. Now that I’m in a union shop all that changed. The best part of union shop isn’t the negotiated contract it’s the people you work with.
We are productive and knowledgeable about our product. Many of the guys I know can assemble, fix, and diagnose every part on our truck, even variable geometry diesel turbos. Not bad for a bunch of dumb apes with a 9th grade education. Let’s not forget the dedication to our community and ourselves. Due to the slow economy half our workforce is laid off, but that does not stop us from doing the right thing. Thousands and thousands of dollars were raised thru gate drives that helped many people from American soldiers in Iraq to local children suffering from devastating illnesses.
A laid off sister was badly injured in a car accident after her medical benifits ran out and we came to her aid. Many of us also volunteer for the Special Olympics and the March of Dimes. I WILL NEVER BE ASHAMED OF MY UNION. My brothers and sisters are the best I will ever work with. SOLIDARITY FOREVER. I AM THE UAW.

Posted by: jim | November 14, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

“Must be nice to get a signing bonus. When I worked I never got a signing bonus, even after 10 years at the same company. ”
Then maybe you should organize a union at your workplace. Instead of hating others for doing well, maybe you should demand better for yourself instead of insisting that everyone else be dragged down to your level!
I don’t hear you griping about executive pay. They’ve got it much better than anyone… but, I haven’t heard any executive hate from you! Why aren’t you as jealous of executives as you are of union members?

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

“:Jim, after reading the story, I hope you and your UAW ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’ get exactly what you deserve. I mean that in the worst way.”
Why do you hate hard working americans so much? I don’t understand this republican mentality… I guess that’s why you lost the election… you hate working americans and it shows!

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

I’m a Democrat tired of you UAW boys being on vacation all the time. You think I want to use my money to bail all you slackers out?

Posted by: LaPoota | November 14, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

“I know a GM retiree who recently received a $700 check from GM. This goes on several times a year. GM hasn’t made a profit in four years, yet their employees receive these payments. Go figure.”
Yeah, it’s called a pension… maybe your company has a pension plan, too…

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

“And yes, unions are LONG past their usefulness. My wife works in one now, she had no choice by the way, and I’ve worked in them before. ”
Well, then, maybe your wife should forgo her generous medical and pension benefits if being in a union is so awful for her… It can’t be that bad if she hasn’t quit her job, yet… oh, and you should also forgo your pension money that you earned while being in those union jobs… since you hate unions so much!

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

That’s all good and fine Jim but how does that justify a taxpayer bailout of a insolvent company? The things you describe happen in other companies too yet they are folding and good people are out of work. The UAW worker is better paid and has better benefits but that is where it ends.

Posted by: CryFive | November 14, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Some people seem to have confusion about union dues. Monthly dues to the UAW are used for operational and organization efforts. Political contributions are entirely voluntary thru the membership. And FYI I have not been on vacation for some time.

Posted by: jim | November 14, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Jim, that’s all very well and good. But it’s nothing that a whole BUNCH of non-union people in this country do as well. Nothin’ all that special there.
Our economy is in a down-turn. A LOT of people have become unemployed…not just your union. And I have to tell you that, while I’m busy wracking my brain trying to figure out how in the world to come up with the money to pay my property taxes this year (so I won’t lose my house), I find it pretty hard to feel all that sorry for the assembly plant worker that’s having to consider selling his RV because gas prices rose enough that he couldn’t afford to drive it a thousand miles or so this summer.
I’m happy that a person with a formal 9th grade education got enough vocational training to be able to fix a diesel engine. But how is that supposed to make a college graduate with thousands of dollars in studen loans that need to be re-paid feel better, knowing that the 9th grade drop-out is making more money than he is?
Those of us NOT in unions also donate a whole lot of money, as well as our time, to charitable causes . Heck, even Wal-Mart cashiers earning barely minimum wage contribute thousands of dollars each year to Wal-Marts “Children’s Miracle Network.”
Don’t be *quite* so quick to pat yourself on the back. You ain’t doin’ nothin’ the rest of us aren’t also doin’ and you ain’t got it no worse than the rest of us. In fact, usually better. Because while things are a bit tighter right now, you’ve had years and years of above average wages to save some money for the tough times. But..then..maybe that money is tied up in your RV and your boat, and I admit this is probably not the best time to be selling those luxury goods.

Posted by: FemaleVeteran | November 14, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

“Good, don’t bail them out! My father works for Chrysler and my husband is part of the UAW and I still don’t support this. Why should we continue to give money to people that are running these businesses into the ground?! The workers don’t help matters either- they are greedy and get ridiculous benefits because of the UAW. Let the whole thing collapse. ”
So you want your family out of work, and are complaining that your husband gets good benefits? You want a worse life for yourself and your family? That makes no sense!

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

“But how is that supposed to make a college graduate with thousands of dollars in studen loans that need to be re-paid feel better, knowing that the 9th grade drop-out is making more money than he is?”
That’s being rather elitist, isn’t it? As republicans would say, no one OWES you a good job just ‘cos you went to college. Maybe you should try for one of those union jobs that you seemingly are too good for…

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

“It took a two-day strike, extraordinary solidarity and more than two months of tough bargaining for 73,000 UAW members at General Motors to bring home a new contract with unprecedented product and investment commitments…. When I worked I never got a signing bonus, even after 10 years at the same company.”
Maybe if you and your coworkers did the same thing, you would have gotten that signing bonus! Something to think about…

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

“Some people seem to have confusion about union dues. Monthly dues to the UAW are used for operational and organization efforts. Political contributions are entirely voluntary thru the membership.”
At least that’s what the informational flyer says, reality proves otherwise. Operational and organization efforts? Uh huh… reminds of a strike a few years ago down here in SoCal of grocery workers. Turns out they were out for I think about 3-4 months and ended up going back to work with a worse contract than was initially offered by the companies involved. Great job the union did for them. Not to mention that UNION people were working with fake names and false SS #’s during the strike! Honorable people eh? All the while the stewards and officers still got THEIR full paychecks! Yeah baby, that’s fair, where do I sign up? hahahahaha

Posted by: G | November 14, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Look at the Big Corps. that employ a tremdous amount of people that are in trouble…Steel industry, Auto industry, Airline industry and all 3 have UNIONS….Looks like the regular JOE the Plumber type of business is doing just find and haven’t run their company into financial problems like the unions. Lets add in the greedy CEO’s & upper management. For a hourly employee, with maybe a high school education, to make over $50 an hour to screw in bolts on a car that starts to fall a part after 4 years is Ridiculous. For a teacher to get paid $15 to 20 an hour to teach our kids is WRONG. Unions have screwed the U.S. in the last 40 years, sure they have looked out for their workers but at MY expense and everyone else that have purchase a car from the Big 3. The next car that I purchase will NOT be a GM or Ford. Sorry but I don’t feel sorry for anyone that works for the Big 3, let them file Chapter 11, you can collect unemployement from your Union and the Gov’t. Unless the Union bosses have spent your hard earn dues on vacations to Europe and Mexico…

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 14, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

“Admit it, you’re just sore because people *know* how good you guys have had it for so long and think it’s time you came down here to live on planet Earth with the rest of us.”
I’m not union… never have been… wish I could join one, though… it’s hard to get in a union, though… there’s been a lot of union busting over the years…
I don’t understand why you want to drag other people down though… wouldn’t you rather lift yourself up? Instead of being resentful towards unions, why don’t you try organizing one or joining one if you want a better life… why all the hate? Do you hate executives as much as you do union members?
Iowa’s a great place… you do have some manufacturing (visited a plant, there 10 years ago in Belmond), but I don’t think that you have the same sense of how important manufacturing is to America as we who live in the rust belt do. If we let manufacturing totally die in the U.S., what will become of this country when we can’t make anything anymore?
Manufacturing needs to be saved and revitalized. America cannot prosper merely as a service company. We need to make things.

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

What about those who retired from GM with a pension and health care. My parents are scared to death they will lose of this if GM goes under. They will be on welfare, then what?

Posted by: janet | November 14, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

The Steel industry is doing just fine, my friend… and Joe the Plumber… well, his plumbers union is doing very well, too…
So, kill the union hate… the banking industry is doing horrible and there are no unions there. How do you explain that, since you feel that unions are the downfall of America?
Yep, good paying jobs with good benefits… what an awful way to build up a middle class that keeps the economy going by buying things… I guess it’s better to keep everybody poor… well, that’s the republican way, anyways!

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

“What about those who retired from GM with a pension and health care. My parents are scared to death they will lose of this if GM goes under. They will be on welfare, then what?”
Most of the people here seem to be thrilled at the thought of your parents being thrown out into the street… lots of hate going around!

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Just let them go bankrupt. It’s time for these big corporate babies to grow up. Taxpayers are sick of bailing them out!

Posted by: disgusted | November 14, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

mike,
The proof is in the pudding isn’t it? If the UAW is making great cars then why are the sales figures for the big 3 shrinking? Why are non-UAW operators like Toyota thriving? GM has a huge financial burdern thanks to the outrageous compensation deal they worked out with the UAW, thats why these UAW cars are so expensive and they dont sell well in the market. Also the quality of these unionised factories is also questionable.

Posted by: Greg h | November 14, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Jim, you are more than happy to come down to Texas, where it gets a little hot in the summer and a little cool in the winter. You might even see some snow in the DFW area. If you are not use to the 100+ degree heat in the summer then stay up in MI and freeze your little Arr off. Down here in Texas, I do get my hands dirty, I do volunteer for Equest, I do volunteer for my kids schools and I do raise money for St. Judes’. Oh I failed to mention that I am a female and I still mow my lawn, ave a garden, train my own dogs, change my own flat tires and help my neighbors. I am one of individuals that Obama referred to as a person from a small town that clings to their guns and religion. I say send the CEO’s of the failed financial industry along with Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Stevens, Marzillie, Dianne Wilkerson, Board of Directors of AIG, Lehmen, Bank of America,etc, Unions-UAW’s leaders and D. Chaney to Guantanamo Bay.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 14, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

“Do you hate executives as much as you do union members?”
The greedy ones with their “golden parachutes”, totally outrageous salary and perks packages, and their company paid-for “retreats” at posh resorts where they play golf and get massages but do nothing really pertaining to business, while driving their companies into the ground and then insisting that taxpayers foot the bill for their own stupidity and greed?
You bet I do!
“What about those who retired from GM with a pension and health care. My parents are scared to death they will lose of this if GM goes under.”
Janet, this is truly unfair. I’m sure your parents are worried sick about this, and I truly feel for them. But it’s not my responsibility to pay for their retirement. I would if I could, but I’m barely making ends meet as it is.
And asking the taxpayer to cover this is doing just that. Asking me to make good on your parent’s retirement account.
One of the items on this website today talked about the CEO of Lehman Brothers having put up some art for auction, and it *only* made something like $13 million instead of the $20 million it was expected to bring.
How about we get all those greedy, over-paid executives to give back all the money they essentially stole from the businesses and give them a *reasonable* pension instead. I’m guessing, if that happened, there’d be enough money to fund the pensions they robbed, and your parents would be assured of not having to live on dog-food in their elderly years.

Posted by: FemaleVeteran | November 14, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Toyota is a young company… their U.S. pension obligations are slim at this point, and since most of their operations are in a country that has universal health care, they don’t have to pay for that, either… It has nothign to do with the UAW. In fact, GM’s labor costs are LOWER than Toyta’s ‘cos the UAW has been bending over backwards to accomodate GM… If you don’t believe me, see my newsweek article that I linked to upthread.
The reason why GM is hurting is that they are expensing a lot of stuff this year which will roll off the books in 2010. They just need a bridge loan to get them there, but banks are out of money… it’s a unique and unusual situation due to this bizarre economic crisis. Other automakers are experiencing the same losses (including the japanese ones you love so much), but they are smaller and can absorb the hit better…
This bizzarre, irrational hatred for the UAW as the cause of GM’s problems is ridiculous. GM is an old company with lots of material overhead… overhead that foreign manufacturers don’t have to deal with… it has little to nothing to do with unions… Nissan and other automakers who build here are also under the auspices of the UAW, yet you don’t complain about them.
This union hate is getting tiresome… this “bailout” (which is a loan) is an attempt to get GM over the hump. If they make it to 2010, the company is expected to be strong. Even Goldman Sachs said so in their report today. It’s getting over that hump.
If GM wasn’t responsible for 3 million jobs, I’d agree with you… but, at this time, we can’t afford that kind of shock to the system.
If they fail, you can get your revenge in a couple of years when the economy will be in better shape to take such a shock.
3 million extra people out of work is not going to help you keep your job either… those folk aren’t going to be buying things!

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Mike, my retirement plan is tied up in the stock market…mutual funds. What about MY retirement plan….Unions had a place in America but times have changed and Unions can’t be making demands that are unreasonable. For an person that screws in bolts to make more than teachers is insane. In down times everyone (including salary & hourly employees) can either take pay cuts or watch their company go under and become unemployed. As for retired auto workers.. go complain to your Union boss about all the money that you invested into their pension plan….Beside half of the money invested in the pension plan is what Ford or GM agreed to matched per the Union agreement. So be thankful that your employer match your contributions. My parents just lost $200,000 in a bank that failed…So what about my parents and their retirement money that went to greedy CEO’s?

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 14, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Mike,no OUR Congress is talking about ownership in the BIG 3….this is from ABC yesterday. A key House Democrat is writing legislation that would send $25 billion in emergency loans to the beleaguered auto industry in EXCHANGE for a government OWNERSHIP stake in the Big Three car companies. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the minority leader, was noncommittal about additional aid. In a statement, his spokesman said Congress should move to speed the release of a $25 billion loan program passed earlier to help the carmakers develop fuel-efficient vehicles. Not only do the Big 3 gets $25 billion from the gov’t, they also get tax breaks / incentive from MI,Detroit and the IRS.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 14, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Mike, hard working or not….no one deserves 30 to 40 dollars an hour to be a production associate…..unless you are putting together stealth fighters or something. The Unions and management are not good for anything…both are self serving and will end up putting the companies that they represent into Chapter 7. They need to fail and some one else open the doors. At 15 to 20 dollars an hour with OT, you will work out between 45K and 65K a year. With no education.

Posted by: Greg | November 14, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Mike, the jobless number in your post keeps getting bigger too. Don’t worry though, now that Obama the socialist is office you will probably get bailed out…you and every other sorry person/company in this country. I have alot of credit card debt because I was stupid…no one is bailing me out except for me.

Posted by: Greg | November 14, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

“I don’t understand why you want to drag other people down though… wouldn’t you rather lift yourself up?”
Mike, riding “the gravy train” has never been the American way of lifting ourselves up. In fact, it is normally seen as being rather immoral. Look at the people that bought up land for a pittance, knowing the railroad was going to go through the area, and then re-sold the land for outrageous prices. Yeah, they might have made fortunes doing it, but there’s a reason they’re known as “robber barons.”
In this country, most people see education as being the key to self-betterment. This is why so many immigrant parents willingly lived a life of extreme poverty so that their children could have the opportunity to go to school. This is why, even now, middle-class couples sit at the dining room table after their children have gone to bed and tried to figure out how they could fund college accounts for their children. Scholarships, student loans, whatever it took.
So to tell me that, after 4 years of being a “starving college student” (sometimes literally), if I want to “lift myself up” I should drop my degree in the shredder and go get myself a job doing manual labor is absolutely NUTS!
In that regard, I have to agree with Mariposa: “For a hourly employee, with maybe a high school education, to make over $50 an hour to screw in bolts on a car that starts to fall a part after 4 years is Ridiculous. For a teacher to get paid $15 to 20 an hour to teach our kids is WRONG.”
There are, I think, a number of factors that should go into determining what a particular job is worth, as far as wages. And yes, one of them is how hard the work is *physically*. I look at the guys that come by my house collecting trash each week, and I hope to heck they’re making more than minimum wage. They’re out there in all types of weather, rain or shine, 105-degrees in the shade or -20. They’re lifting heavy trash cans every few feet along the curb, and doing it hours at a time, day after day. Undoubtedly they *should* be paid more than the cashier at the local grocery store that just stands there running items across a scanner.
But that pay should also depend on the amount of time, effort and money that is spent getting the education to do it. You can’t be even an elementary school teacher in this country without a bachelor’s degree. And with good reason! We *trust* those teachers with our children every school day! And they don’t just teach our children “the 3-R’s” but life-lessons they’ll use their entire lives. Do you think chasing a bunch of first-graders around all day is any less strenous than bolting a part onto a car as it rolls by on an assembly line is?
Doctors and lawyers (among others) get paid “the big bucks” because they have to spend *years* in school to learn how to do what they do. And that school ain’t free.
And what if all the college graduates in this country all dropped their degrees into the shredder and decided they’d just go to work in a unionized manufacturing plant (where they could get at least twice the wage) instead? While manufacturing is certainly a big part of this country’s economy, it most certainly isnt the *only* thing that matters. What kind of unemployment figures do you suppose this country would face if all the graduates did that? Think they’d all be welcomed into the unions with open arms?
Suggesting that people who elect to go to school in order to get *out* of menial labor jobs and make a better living is to “drag other people down” and then attempting to try to put them down because you think that’s “elitist” thinking shows just how out of touch you really are.

Posted by: FemaleVeteran | November 14, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

“Suggesting that people who elect to go to school in order to get *out* of menial labor jobs and make a better living is to “drag other people down” and then attempting to try to put them down because you think that’s “elitist” thinking shows just how out of touch you really are. ”
I never said that… you were dis’ing union folk for making decent money for really difficult work. You were upset that someone “uneducated” might make more money than you.
My response was to turn the same hate you have for unions right back around on you… just as you feel that manual laborers don’t deserve to have a decent life, the same argument could be applied to you as well.
Hey, I’ve been there… had that college degree that earned me nothing…. I would have been better off with a union job… So, I guess I should resent union workers, then…
But, I don’t… why should I? These folks got good jobs and were able to support their families through hard work. That used to be the key to the American dream.
Now everyone wants to bust the unions… the last refuge for good paying jobs for ordinary folk, so that everyone ends up being equally poor… and that is somehow going to be good for the nation and the economy. Not only is the American Dream dying, but people are actively killing it and enjoying doing so!
That makes absolutely no sense to me at all…

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

Mike…..once again….no assembly line worker/production worker should be making 30 to 40 dollars an hour….unless you are working on some type of pay for performance and you are just that good. Unions are self serving and have not looked out for you. If they had looked out for the good of the employee and company the problems would not be so great. Just like every other big business in this country; greed is the guiding policy and greed is why we are at the crossroads we are at now. Unions are no longer useful or beneficial. There are enough laws that protect the worker. I have supervised in restaurants, textiles, auto industry(no union where I was), and laminate flooring. With OT there are several folks where I work now that will make more than my salary of 60K.

Posted by: Greg | November 14, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

It’s your delusional world, Mike. You live in it. I prefer reality.

Posted by: FemaleVeteran | November 14, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Fran, if you typed all of that; I am impressed.

Posted by: Greg | November 14, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Francis, according to good ol’ Mike here, all you need to do is go drop all your diplomas in the shredder, forget all that experience you have, and just get yourself a union job bolting parts onto cars as they roll down an assembly line. If you (and everybody else) would just do that, the whole world would be just hunky-dory.
I mean, don’t you know that getting an education beyond ninth-grade is elitist?

Posted by: FemaleVeteran | November 14, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

I think it’s funny how many Repubs are against an auto industry bailout. All of you lined up behind your party for the financial industry bailout. Why? It’s because it was for big business and big executives within the financial industry. Now you’re looking at the auto industry’s problems, pointing to the union workers, and saying it’s their own fault. LOL! Do you believe that the greed of Wall Street executives is any more acceptable than union workers being paid $40 per hour? I’m not for bailouts, but let’s point the fingers at the proper parties in ALL of these industries.

Posted by: Ron | November 14, 2008, 3:57 am 3:57 am

“Mike…..once again….no assembly line worker/production worker should be making 30 to 40 dollars an hour….”
Why not? Ever worked a line? People lose their fingers all the time… it’s hard, scary work! And management treats you like total garbage!
BTW, new UAW workers don’t get $40… the new Ford contract stipulates $16 an hour with no health care or pension benefits for line workers. So, all you union haters and right wingers should be happy… the last vestige of good paying jobs for ordinary Americans, the union job, has disappeared as well…
And FemaleVeteran, I went to school nights to get my masters degree, but I’m not dis’ing the working man like you are here… Sorry, your college degree didn’t work out… join the club. I’ve been there, too. Workers of every education level are getting screwed… and eliminating unions isn’t going to make that any better… in fact, it will make it worse, for both blue collar and white collar workers…

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am

Mike, I have supervised in a production facility of some kind for the last 12 years. The people that have hurt them selves did so because they did something they should not have done…ie…follow job procedures and safety procedures. There are very few accidents….mostly people taking short cuts….I dont think the union would have done them much good. This country has turned into a nation of consumers instead of producers and we should be focused on making the USA more self reliant….BTW…starting pay at 16.00 hour is GOOD.

Posted by: Greg | November 14, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

Ron, it is not just repubs that are agiainst the bail out, unless 99% of the poeple on this site are republicans…I dont think so. Most every one was against both bail outs.

Posted by: Greg | November 14, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

FemaleVeteran,
I’ve re-read some of your posts here, and I think I had some of your points confused with another poster. I do apologize for any hostile tone… You bring up some good and valid points…
I agree that teachers should be paid more, BTW… ironically, if they weren’t unionized, they’d be paid even less!
And yes, I definitely value education… and I think that there should be good jobs available for educated folks, but I also think that people who do hard manual labor should be compensated fairly as well… The manufacturing industry built this country, and the people who built it should get their just rewards as well.
Henry Ford paid more for his workers than anyone else… the reason why was simple… he wanted his workers to be able to afford his cars. What happens when working class workers all make wal-mart wages? They won’t even be able to shop at wal mart!
I know you are mad at the management of the Big 3… we all are! They’ve made poor choices… but, don’t let that anger doom hard working americans who deserve a fighting chance at the American dream. It’s just a bridge loan. If GM makes it to 2010, it will be in the clear, and America will be better off for it!
Thank you and have a great day! I appreciate your insight… sorry for any misunderstanding…

Posted by: Mike | November 14, 2008, 4:44 am 4:44 am

“See what I mean? This madness has to stop now!’
So, what, none of you have a plan to help *and* make positive changes for the automakers or detroit at the same time? Just want to drop the kid off of at in Nebraska???
Well just remember 2 things. You didn’t solve the problem, and the kid is still a state or two away.

Posted by: indinaa jones | November 14, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

First, Mike if your union is so great then why is your company taking a nosedive?
Second, I thought the Democrats were the party of Enviromentalism. Why would they want to bailout an industry that is responsible for Global Warming? Seems kind of hypocritical to me.

Posted by: NOBAILOUTSPERIOD | November 14, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am

Hey REPUBLICANS its okay to lose dozens of billions in Iraq to your cronies and their Saudi buddies, but try to help an american who isn’t hiding his money in off shore accounts, and its no go.
1 in 5 american manufacturing jobs is related to the auto industry, but don’t worry you can trust the red chinese to make your military equipment.
Dodd and the rest of the worthless protect the rich corprocrats can rot in hell.

Posted by: feckless | November 14, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

I only buy/drive GMC pick up trucks and when I travel and rent a rig, I always demand American made vehicles, SUV or pick up period.
I have a one year old GMC truck currently and do not want to see GM go under. But, I say NO to any bailout.
The Obamunist administration will see to unionizing every industry and the other auto makers will also go down in a few years time, like GM is now.
Market trends should dictate industry standards, NOT government mandates. The energy crisis is manufactured, to justify government takeover every of aspect of our lives.
If a bank, insurance company, auto company, anything, is going down, let it go. There is a reason for it. This becomes an opportunity for others and leads to a healthy economy.
Allowing the government to pick winners and losers in business is SOCIALISM and will BANKRUPT this country.
NO BAIL OUTS!

Posted by: noainc | November 14, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

hey lets cut the pay of all government employees starting with the congress pay them 15.00 an hour thats what they deserve govt. employees make far more than uaw members and do a lousey job lets get real here

Posted by: greg | November 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.