The Big Three Meet With Pelosi
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl reports: The CEOs for the Big Three automakers — General Motors, Ford and Chrysler — and the head of the United Auto Workers union met with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership this evening. Their message, apparently, was a blunt one: We need help and it can’t wait until next year. "We need an infusion [of cash] now," a senior auto executive told me today. The meeting lasted for an hour and twenty minutes but no announcements were made. Chrysler and GM are both scheduled to announce their earnings tomorrow, and the results are expected to be grim. Analysts have been speculating for months that one of Big Three was at risk of bankruptcy — now some say it could happen before the end of the year. Would more loans save them? That’s what the Big Three are asking for: Congress has already approved $25 billion in loans for developing fuel-efficient technology, but the money is tied up in red tape. Detroit wants that money freed up and another $25 billion in flexible credit to stay alive. It’s a bailout that would be a tough sell in this lame-duck Congress, but the prospects of an automaker bankruptcy may scare lawmakers into action. The Big Three employ 240,000 people and support another 5 million jobs dependent on the auto industry. There are 14,000 dealerships in Congressional districts across the country, all hurting and many on the verge of bankruptcy. There is precedent for a federal helping hand for the auto industry. In 1979, the federal government’s bailout of Chrysler cost $3.7 billion (when adjusted for inflation). While critics argue that that bailout ultimately weakened the auto industry, supporters point out that Chrysler ultimately repaid the loans with interest at a profit to the U.S. Treasury. –With reports by ABC News’ Dean Norland.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Do the taxpayers have to bail out everybody??? This is ridiculous!
Posted by: Danny | November 6, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Here’s a novel idea? Why don’t American car manufacturers build better cars? Maybe they would sell more and not be crying for a bailout. I’m driving a 1998 Toyota Camry that is still running great. Most 1998 American cars are in the junkyard or their owners have spent thousands of dollars on car repairs. When I buy a new car, it will be another Toyota. My last two American cars almost put me in the poorhouse with needed repairs.
Posted by: Kaliwind | November 6, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
please bail my 20K in credit cards out and my 600k mortgage too! enough, of bailing, put the money towards building new economies! not old ones…..
Posted by: what a old geezer | November 6, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
ugh. bah.
that is all.
Posted by: bah | November 6, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Insanity.
Posted by: Bugg | November 6, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Call every congressional representative and senator and pressure them NOT to bail out the auto makers. We’re just now beginning to find out that the bank bailout was a scam – banks are using that money to buy other banks not to help grow or sustain businesses. The auto makers and the banks need to sink or swim. That’s the way of the world. And it’s time to finally admit that it’s the unions pulling these companies down and preventing them from succeeding. Doesn’t anyone remember in the recession of the 1980s when the auto makers almost failed?? They adapted and survived then.
Posted by: Momma Mellie | November 6, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
GM, Ford, Chrysler and the Unions have overall made usch horrible product both in design and quality for such a long time. GM’s only real product are SUV’s, same as Ford, Chrysler has its Minivans.
I say let them buy each other, or let them go out of business…….no one wants their products.
Why would I provide them a loan when they are going down the tubes anyway?
Posted by: Bob | November 6, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
We need cash now? Sorry we are not a socialist country. Too bad, you made bad choices!
Posted by: concordesf | November 6, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
The Big Three: I know there are people that would have a problem bailing out the Auto industry and count me with them, unless the Government finely said, I will help but only if you give the consumer a car that gets 250 miles to a gallon with a 20 gallon tank.
That is what is needed to recapitalized the middle class. [see APTIRA] This model would make the price at the pump irrelevant. The way forward is silicon valley with battery technology or the air car [TATA motors India].
Talk with Google’s Dan Reicher and its Recharge IT and bio-reactor initiatives.
Thanks
Rick
Posted by: Rick Shipley | November 6, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Pelosi is a hore…will sell America down the river to gain favor with the unions. Out of hope in Nevada.
Posted by: rog | November 6, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
If Big Government is going to be the place we go to when we can’t pay our bills, we need a division to help the regular folks because energy rates are going up, food costs are going up, the cost of sending kids to college is going up, the cost of going to the doctor is going up and nobody is offering any solutions for us to cope! We’ve had to make sacrifices to live within our means – big companies should be forced to do the same.
Posted by: Twilight Zone | November 6, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Sorry to point this out but these are YOUR democrats in action. Geez, we don’t want to drive these companies/jobs overseas do we?
Posted by: nomomoney | November 6, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
There’s the novel Idea? Buy another Japan car?? You are part of the problem with American Car industry. Chevy and Ford build great cars, Chevy works close with Toyota and Ford with 5 EU companies, so the problem is not build a better car, the problem is the other markets taping into our markets and and the economic crisis, and final the high oil costs. Our gov. needs to force the industry to make higher millage car with the least emissions which is where Japan and China are beating the US.
Posted by: Mel | November 6, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Helping to build something tangible makes more sense than pouring money into pure speculation, “the market”. Bypass the banks and let the auto industry make direct loans. That will free up credit. I say help all the car manufactures that produce cars in the United States. Not just the Big three. One condition being that only new fuel efficient technologies are eligible for Federal funds.
Posted by: Tim | November 6, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
These are the same three that have been getting rid of American workers, and getting rid of American Jobs in record numbers. And now they want what?
Return the American jobs you took away. Create more American Jobs. And hire in record numbers American citizen workers. And if any American Citizen is unemployed, you have to hire him/her first before even thinking of hiring anyone else or going anywhere else.
Time to do what other countries do to protect their work force.
Posted by: mere | November 6, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
For all of John McCain’s criticism of Obama for being a “socialist” look at what is going on with the feds buying stakes in financial and insurance firms and looking to rescue 1 or all 3 of the Big (well not so big any more) 3 US auto makers — all of this has very little to do with anything coming from Obama. The UAW is killing the US auto industry with their high wage and benefit packages for their assembly line workers who probably average 9th grade education level. Look at the UAW wages and benefit packages compared to the foreign auto makers with plants in the US. It’s no wonder the Japanese and European auto makers are killing us. The UAW better wise up in a hurry or most of their members will be working at places like Burger King and WalMart.
Posted by: Agnostic Free Thinker | November 6, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Save them for America. Let the Wall Street Bankers die instead. Blue-collar Americans out time is now. Lets put big taxes on overpriced foreign cars to pay for it…
Posted by: Jack | November 6, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
If Big Government is going to be the place we go to when we can’t pay our bills, we need a division to help the regular folks because energy rates are going up, food costs are going up, the cost of sending kids to college is going up, the cost of going to the doctor is going up and nobody is offering any solutions for us to cope! We’ve had to make sacrifices to live within our means – big companies should be forced to do the same.
_____________
Calm thy nerves. O will sets things aright. He said so.
Posted by: hurray for O | November 6, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
PATHETIC! FOR DECADES all they did was manufacture GAS Guzzling SUVs and 8 cylinder monster trucks… Now they want to bailed out too? Where does it end??? I say Let them Fail…
Posted by: Squierghia74 | November 6, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Let them go and put everyone out of work.
Posted by: rwbapgeon | November 6, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
No bailout for the Big 3 auto makers. Only make them bridge loans that they have to pay back to the feds with interest. As a condition of the loans all of the UAW labor contracts have to be re-negotiated with new wage and benefit levels that are comparable to what the Japancese and European auto makers with plants in the US are paying their workers. As a taxpayer, I am not interested in subsidizing a bunch of overpaid UAW workers.
Posted by: Agnostic Free Thinker | November 6, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
z
Posted by: steve | November 6, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Do NOT bail these wasteful fools out along w/ the banks. My old ’77 F-150 is still running strong and I expect it to last me another 30 years since I take good care of it. It may not get the best mileage, but it is a testament to how well they used to build them compared to todays’ vehicles. If the big 3 can build a vehicle that is both fuel efficient and long-lasting, then I’ll buy another one. Until then, if my truck lets me down, I’m looking to Toyota or maybe Honda for my next purchase. Build a better truck, and we will buy them. However, you cannot have OUR tax dollars to save your overblown butts from the fire!
Posted by: Dave | November 6, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
I know, let’s raise their taxes!
Posted by: nomomoney | November 6, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
the US auto industry does not deserve any bail out money….
A bloated arrogant management system, building vehicles plagued with recalls
Give me a break.
I’m behind with my house payments.
I think I will ask for an audience with Pelosi.
Posted by: steve | November 6, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
The US auto companies have only themselves to blame. Poor quality, lousy reliability and overdependence on giant SUVs did them in. Didn’t the Japanese teach tem anything? NO BAILOUT!!
Posted by: musquash5 | November 6, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I am not surprised that the car manufacturers are close to bankruptcy. The standard of English in most of the comments here is shocking.
Posted by: Pat Finn | November 6, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
What these automakers need much more than cash is to stop making Navigators and Excursions and Yukons and Hummers and Aspens, and start making smaller, more fuel-efficient and alternate-fuel vehicles. Why does Chrysler have an Aspen Hybrid, but not a hybrid PT Cruiser or Sebring? The workers need relief: the execs need to get their heads where the sunlight is and face reality.
Posted by: Jordan | November 6, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
ME TOO! I need cash now and I cannot wait till next year.. BAIL ME OUT Ms Pelosi!!!!!
Posted by: Jeremy | November 6, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
well, lets think about it, 5,000,000 jobs, that are related to the auto industry, 240,000 union workers, how much do these folks make? say $60000 on an avg. thats billions of dollars gone from the us economy. think your 401k sucks now, wait until that happens. if your not affected by the auto industry, some how , friends , family, you have no life. i guess you would rather bailout the few ceo’s in the world than the millions. and guess what the ceo’s still have their money even if the gov’t didnt help them.
Posted by: greg b | November 6, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
They can just move jobs overseas and get cheaper labor.
Posted by: Mot | November 6, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
this is bs. it all started with lending people money who couldn’t afford to pay it back and then letting these oil companies run up gas prices. i’m no politician but i can certainly see that the rising gas prices directly affect our economy. gas is a NEEED not a luxury. wake up washington!
Posted by: fed up | November 6, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Maybe the government should just buy the auto companies and make the cars themselves. Then all tax payers can be given a standard government-issued car every few years.
Posted by: ME in Maine | November 6, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
These are the same automakers who lobbied in cahoots with the oil industry throughout the 90′s when they should have been concentrating on improving fuel efficiency instead of selling trucks and SUVs. If there’s to be a bailout then there have to be conditions for that bailout. Those conditions would include hiring only American (and perhaps Canadian) workers, a mandate to improve gas mileage across the board of at least 25% over the next 10 years, and a requirement for their corporate executives to cut their salaries at least in half while investing another half in the company. Far too much sacrifice has been given by the average auto worker and far too less by the executives they work for. If these executives are not willing to make the sacrifice then it’s obvious they are more interested in themselves than making a sacrifice to save one of America’s greatest industries.
Posted by: John from Maine | November 6, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I went into debt this year with over 100k in medical expenses, After the heart attack came the stroke of lawsuits for payment. Too tell you the truth it would have been cheaper for my family to just die, Where the hell is my bailout, any help at all? Let the Big three burn and go down in flames , They all practice fraud tactics with selling vehicles from past insurance claims, FORD is the worst with this scam.
Posted by: FreshMeatz | November 6, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Pelosi, Reid, and Obama got a lot of handouts to give. Look even pro-teams are looking to get there sign on bonuses this year so they can avoid obama’s tax hike.
Posted by: Mark | November 6, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
We shouldn’t be bailing out ANYBODY. You make poor decisions, you lose. That’s capitalism and the free market economy. Our government is prolonging the pain of this economic downturn by providing these shady executives with the means to keep receiving their obscenely lucrative paychecks for running their companies into the ground. When you were a kid did you yank your bandages off very quickly and wince a little from the smarting, or did you slowly peel them off, agonizing over the pain of each little hair that got yanked along the way?
Posted by: Sean | November 6, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Having lived in Detroit for 35 years and worked for the Auto Industry, I can tell you the Industry is a bunch of arrogant, greedy, wasters of all types of resources, not just money. The comparison of them to Wall street is a good one, but not because it’s a different industry I have to say the comparison isn’t totally fair.
From the inside I saw ineffeciencies and waste that would make the laziest slobs of the world cry. That is what they need to fix. Giving them a handout does not help them, but keeps them complacent in their own condition. This is why Japanese companies are kicking their hindquarters. The Japanese know how to control waste, manage and keep their resources (including their workers! – WITHOUT UNIONS!) and actually want to prevent the same problems from happening over and over again. How many Japanese companies have been bailed out? And if you can tell me they have, the numbers won’t be even close.
I think we have to stop the thinking that the “foreign” car companies are criminals that prevent our companies from succeeding, swallow our pride, and start REALLY learning something from them.
Posted by: Michigan Evacuee | November 6, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
I want to point out to all of you that say this does nothing for the American people, what about all the AMERICANS that work for the big three auto makers? Many dealerships are going out of business losing jobs making our economy worse! These companies need help to sustain their business and keep jobs here in America. So those who gloat about buying foreign cars are part of this problem. So much for patriotism.
Posted by: Buy American! | November 6, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Posted by: greg b “well, lets think about it, 5,000,000 jobs, that are related to the auto industry, 240,000 union workers, how much do these folks make? say $60000 on an avg. thats billions of dollars gone from the us economy. think your 401k sucks now, wait until that happens.”
That is the same old argument industries give whenever they need a tax cut, a bail out, or any other type of government favor. The reality is that yes, jobs will be impacted if the company fails – but other industries will replace those jobs. It might be time to finally admit that as a nation, manufacturing is no longer our strong suit because labor is cheaper elsewhere. Retrain the out-of-work laborers in jobs that are understaffed right now – we’re in the midst of a nursing shortage, did you know that? Border Patrol is hiring – and lots of other industries are still strong.
By the way – my 401K is invested mostly in T-bills and bonds so is not impacted by the stock market – if you are still invested in energy or industry, I strongly urge you to cut your losses and invest in something more secure.
Posted by: Honey made | November 6, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Taxes will rise for all, just wait.
Posted by: Mary | November 6, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
My husband just got layed off of his job at a local newspaper. Where’s yout bailout?
Posted by: lms28023 | November 6, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
The three American auto corporate elites will not recive any type of billion dollar bail-out because America is almost bankrupt, and can’t afford to continue to make money which is woprthless. America is looking more and more like Nazi Germany, which was run by the National Socialist Democratic Party. The leader of Nazi Germany was a “white God,” name Adolph Hitler, and now the name of our American Colored God, is Barrack Hussein Obama. Will America suffer the same fate as WWII Nazi Germany?—High Inflation, worthless currency—leading to World War III?
Posted by: RedGods | November 6, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Howdy
I made all my mortgage payments, but with the economy I am falling behind. Do you have a plan where I could miss a few payments, like about 6 months.
What the h… is Pelosi up to, is this her responsibility???
Somebody fill me in..
Posted by: Wally | November 6, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
CEO’s and Upper Management… are the problem, in most major companies, NOT The workers. The Workers are actually doing the work of 3 people while These Corrupt Fat Bloated SOBs Run the company into the ground while giving themselves Bonuses and pay raises.
Disgusting!
Posted by: Squierghia74 | November 6, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Buy American! – Yes, dealerships are going out of business, but the automakers have had centuries to adapt their product line to make a successful product. The airline industry is suffering – they are surviving by forming alliances with each other and international airlines. US automakers received a bailout in the 1970s – they should have learned their lesson then. They did not. It’s not the consumer’s fault that foreign auto makers market a better product – you can’t guilt car buyers into buying an inferior product. Where’s the logic in that??
Posted by: Lullaby | November 6, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Well, this is what all of these big companies and corporations want, an easy way for them to get more money and profit. Is any one of them caring about if consumer (the general public) can afford their product or not?? Definitely not; so i think until they start working with the consumer (us) with honesty and financial concern, then they will deserve some help.
Posted by: dave | November 6, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Buy American! – sorry, my previous post should have said the automakers had “decades” not “centuries” to improve their product line.
Posted by: Lullaby | November 6, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
American car companies have been devoid of soul since the early seventies and have been run into the ground. American automobiles used to be pieces of art, the products of amazing creativity. They have turned into bland, disposable pieces of crap AND they want us to bail that out?!! I would say they had better come up with an extremely dynamic business plan with severe penalties for the heads if things fall through!
Posted by: Ford Fairlane | November 6, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I have no problem with lending the auto manufacturers more dollars provided that the funds are used to re-tool for gas efficient vehicles, only. As for operating costs, the unions are going to have to give a little pertaining to benefits and salaries. A 20% pay cut (across the board) is better than unemployment, and full insurance and lifetime insurance coverage is not a market rate/term any longer. The auto industry was in bed with the oil industry, and look where it got them. When gas prices soared over $4/gallon, car sales slumped. The market for big cars and SUVs is not going to come back, no matter what gas prices drop down to; Americans are too smart for that. Its time the auto industry cut their umbilical cord with oil and stood on their own. I say let the oil industry collapse; let’s work with the auto manufacturers, provided the really listen to America’s needs, which are not big, expensive gas guzzling tanks.
Posted by: RohnertPark1 | November 6, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Everybody’s got their hand out. I tell you folks, we are witnessing the downfall. We can’t keep printing money forever.
Posted by: a reader in ga | November 6, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
ONLY if they quit making these stupid gas guzzelers…and if they quit those stupid pendilum commercials… Nancy, please, we need a break on this stuff here…
Posted by: wayne | November 6, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Why should we bail the 3 auto giants? They were forewarned years ago to start developing fuel efficient cars. Instead, they continued to manufacture trucks and gas-guzzlers. And they reasoned out: THE CONSUMERS WANT THESE BIG TRUCKS!…They dont deserved to be bailed out.
Posted by: jojo.tan | November 6, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Banks got the bailout money now the carmakers want a cut to. Our goverment will support big business but does nothing for people loseing there savings in the broken market.
Posted by: Victor | November 6, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Detroit does have a quality problem, but not as bad as 10 years ago. Well, except Chrysler. Part of the problem is the UAW – the American automakers are drowning in commitments to heathcare and pensions… it’s a problem worse than Social Security because SS will bankrupt the US in 40 years, while the automakers are going bankrupt now. The fact that the UAW is going with the big 3 to congress indicates to me that any bailout package would partly support the continuation of the UAW’s failed socialist programs. I’m against my taxes and my children’s taxes being raised so that the UAW can survive for a few more years.
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
You people are the reason for the bad economy with the psychlogical thinking that American cars are crap. As many low mileage cars as Toyota, vehicle ratings have proven that also. Must be white collar people. Hope your son is real smart, if not 9hr dollar an hour job for him, no matter how hard he works. You wants jobs, but your thinking is unamerican. 80 percent of the new price of a Toyota goes to Japan, to sit in their banks, earning interest there, ivested there. Toyota plants are not even union.
Posted by: Brad | November 6, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I really think that the Obama movement should spend money helping fuel stations all over the U.S. convert part of their property into a hydrogen of other fuel source and overhaul the car companies by having them remove the engines or reconfigure the ones ones already made for the alternative fuel. It’s expensive, but if we are going to bail out the car companies it should be done with a purpose that keeps them trying to say it will take several more years before we are there. If citizens can’t afford the cars available now, especially due to fuel, then we need to make a deal with these car companies in order to make this a win/win situation.
Posted by: Gabriel Haze | November 6, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
CEO’S STILL MAKE MILLIONS DOLLARS A YEAR AND WE HAVE TO BAIL THEM OUT….
Posted by: Stupid CEO | November 6, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Let them fail. The UAW is half to blame, and their turtle like reaction speed to market changes is the other. Why prop up companies that are run based on ancient business practices. Someone else will swoop in, pick up the pieces, clean house, and bring them back…but it shouldn’t be the US citizens. If it is I want one free car of my choice down the road. Seems only fair.
Posted by: Thradar | November 6, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Hey NAncy! I’m about to lose my house because I spent all the money on Binge gambleing. My wifes creditcards are maxed out because she’s a shopaholic. Oh yeah, and I’d like to purchase a couple of franchises and give myself a big raise & year end bonus. When can I get the money?
Posted by: proscene2545 | November 6, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
PALOSI IS JUST A MORON – SHE IS THE BIGGEST LOSER SINCE JIMMY CARTER HAS HARD AS IS TO BEAT THE OLD FOOL.
WHAT A WASTE AS A HOUSE SPEAKER – SHE COULD HAVE DONE SO MUCH – AND SHE DID SO LITTLE.
Posted by: A CITIZEN | November 6, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Let the Big Three go down. They closed plants and fired thousands to move to Mexico and overseas so they wouldn’t have to pay a decent wage and benefits. Now they’re crying because no one is buying their cars? How can we if you put us out of work? The Big Three may be American owned but most are not made by Americans. I, for one, will only by a vehicle made in America, by Americans. If that means I buy a Toyota then so be it. At least I will be putting food on the table of an American family.
Posted by: Linda/Michigan | November 6, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Gabriel Haze – the energy dept. actually does have a grant program in place to help gas station owners convert some of their tanks to alternative fuels, especially E85 ethanol. It’s one of the few good programs started by Bush. Hopefully Obama will give the program some added ooomph.
Posted by: Just another taxpayer | November 6, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
To those of you who think the unions are to blame, think again. Read the history of unions and why they were started. You can thank unions for 40 hour work weeks, holiday pay, overtime pay, sick days and vacation pay. Non union facilities can hire and fire at will and take away benefits whenever they feel like it and there is nothing you can about it. You are at the mercy of the employer.
Posted by: Linda/Michigan | November 6, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Please tell Danny that my 1983 Ford LTDII Stationwagon still runs fine and probably will not take a rest until a Hydrogen powered Cobra conventable is available.
Posted by: Hugh Coleman | November 6, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
For years I owned Chrysler, Ford, GM, got tired of working on them, tired of the recalls, tired of wondering when my wife’s car will break down next. Since then I’ve owned a Civic, Camry, Forester, and Odyssey. Beyond typcial wear-n-tear, no major issues. Ford makes a good car nowadays, so I hear. I also like Buick. I just can’t buy one and continue to bust my bank account. That said, the US govt won’t let all 3 fail, and they shouldn’t. The impact to “main street” is too hard. That girl at school- her dad works on Ford’s assembly line- and they have 2 mortgages to pay. It’s not his fault that the automaker’s leadership stunk. My opinion, a bailout should occur, not hastily, and should be tied to several conditions such as executive salary and bonuses, worker compensation (ie securing the jobs w/o letting the UAW push the companies into bankrupcy… again), improving quality, alternative fuels, etc.
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
these idiots need to FAIL! why should we bail them out when their GREED caused them to end up in this situation?? this is an INSULT TO THE COMMON FOLK! LET. THEM. FAIL.
Posted by: nadradt | November 6, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
If you can’t run with the big dogs, get out of the race. Ford, Chrysler and GM have no one to blame but themselves for not producing a wide selection of models to compete with the foreign automakers. Case in point, they gave in to America’s consumerism and focused on big, NON-fuel efficient SUV’s and look at where they’re now.
Posted by: David | November 6, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Tuff luck. If they had spent years building better quality they may have been ok. Let them get their needed money from the big profit Oil Companies. They both need eachother to make money and stay in business.Just a note: I voted Obama but it wouldnt break my heart to see worthless Nancy Pelosi go away. She has been worthless and a big reason the economy is in such a mess.
Posted by: CW | November 6, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
if its actually a real honest-to-goodness loan that will be repaid with interest (along with tangible collateral ie; luxury mansions ,jets ,yachts ,factories etc etc..) , then fine. its high time that big companies like these 3 useless cream puffs have to provide some reassurance as to their ability to repay these taxpayer provided “loans” that means providing some kind of tangible collateral to be collected if they default ,just like the average joe has to do when they go get a loan.
credit worthiness needs to be enforced from today on at ALL LEVELS OF THIS SOCIETY…NO SWEETHEART DEALS FOR ANYONE…BUSINESSES THAT BORROW FROM THE TAXPAYERS BETTER PAYBACK WITH INTEREST OR THEY SHOULD BE NATIONALIZED…NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS…
they dont pay up? then the taxpayers get themselves a car company or two ,a few private jets and some yachts ,some luxury mansions , lots of high end real estate ,etc etc…
Posted by: bah | November 6, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Ford messed up when they stopped upgrading and stopped producing the Escort and Taurus cars/station wagons to focus on gas guzzling SUVs and Pickups. I had a 1993 Ford Escort for 9 years till someone hit me…it was a great car.
I still have a 1998 Ford Mustang convertable…no problems with it.
I looked at new Ford, Chevy, Chrysler cars in 2003 and also recently. All are crap or too expensive.
Posted by: stevenga777 | November 6, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
how can car companies pay UAW members big wages and great medical benefits and huge retirement benefits in a world economy where costs are lower in other countries? All the liberal democrats are driving cars designed in foreign countries where the employees are paid much less. I bet Nancy Pelosi drives a foreign car or two.
Posted by: brian | November 6, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Linda/Michigan-
No, the UAW is not responsible for the automaker’s leadership decisions. The automakers – all of them – owe more in healthcare and pension benefits than the company’s net worth (shares outstanding x cost per share). These companies cannot continue to be run at a deficit- just like the US govt runs at a deficit- because it is not good for the economy. I am all for reducing executive pay, but even that will be a drop in the bucket compared to the overall commitment the automakers face. Eventually, common sense says that they will need a bailout (the Chinese have been bailing out the US govt for years by buying US bonds). In my opinion, the US auto industry is confronted by 3 issues: quality, executive compensation, and union demands. The are not balanced.
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Steepens: Well therein lies the issue, doesn’t it? You’re quite right – what about all of those jobs if we don’t help them? Not only the people who work in the car plants – all the others – from manufacturing components through to the car dealerships. If all three fail – the jobs loss would be incredibly high. Oh dear. What a mess. Is it time for American Manufacturers to pull out from their tax havens and cheap labour overseas and start helping this Country out or what?? They just going to let us go under??? This is getting ridiculous. All that talk about working on fuel efficient cars … never doing it … and now they are all going bust??? What’s next?!!!
Posted by: chester burns | November 6, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Let me vent just a second about Nancy Pelosi. I voted for Obama. Glad I did. But this worthless Pelosi and gang made Americans suffer just so we would blame the Republicans and Bush. She made all these great promises 2 yrs ago and did absolutly nothing. Remember when they were going to vote on the energy bill and found it a good time to take off instead of voting. I hope the Dem congress gets their act together. They toyed with our well being and finances and energy, just so we would blame someone else and fill their own agenda. If I am wrong correct me.
Posted by: CW | November 6, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
It is shameful that these big corps have guts to beg for money and small businesses have no where to go… Individuals have no where to go…
Is this the CHANGE they will bring??? Huh
Posted by: sri | November 6, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
The true republican party will come out of it. We need ideas not “Joe Da Plumber”
We need republican ideas for 21st Century..
Pelosi is a partner of Bush
Posted by: sri | November 6, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I’ve owned an AMC Hornet, Plymouth Duster, Dodge Shadow, two Ford Escorts, a Cadillac Cimarron, and a Honda CRV. My Honda was BY FAR the best car I ever had. No breakdowns, no repair bills, no getting stranded, etc. American cars are crap. I had a 1984 Escort that left me stranded when it had only 5,000 miles on it. I was living in Boston and it was the middle of winter. I will admit my 1996 Escort did better, but I had to put thousands of dollars into it just to keep it running. I just bought a new car – a Honda Accord. I love it! American car manufacturers should be allowed to go under to make room for new American car companies started by bright American engineers. The Big 3 are huge drain on the American economy -always looking for bailouts. Just let them die already.
Posted by: sunshine voter | November 6, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
CW: Not wrong in my opinion. I’d say you are spot on. There’s a muddy bi-partisan paw print on this mess – I get the impression everyone just stood around watching it happen – or oblivious to it. Remember the French President when the Bail Out first arose in our consciousness? He was angry and was quoted in the media as having concerns that countries across the world keep in touch with each other on a daily basis about financial matters – yet all he ever got told from America was that everything was fine … and then BOOM. The economy tanks! Point being … This didn’t sneak up on us — some many people should have seen this coming and they just let if fall. I would like to see Obama reshuffling were he can. I think he will. The guy has a hell of a lot on his plate and has to hit the floor running. Also, a lot of this isn’t going to wait till next January. I don’t envy his job, frankly. He’s got his work cut out for him.
Posted by: chester burns | November 6, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
It is a bit confusing to me. I voted for Obama because of many reasons. One being, that after Bush, I didnt want to reward the Rep with 4 more years. Now–The Dem lead congress has failed just has bad, if not worse for the last two years and yet on Tuesday were rewarded with more Dems. What am I missing?
Posted by: CW | November 6, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
so let me get this straight: we bail out banks, car companies, insurance companies, and every one of these industries have management that walks with bonuses, parachutes, perks, and out of control salaries, options and executive health care plans but the minute I am late with a credit payment, or my mortgage seems to be an overwhelming overhead, I am on my own. I want these people accountable.
Posted by: jt | November 6, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Incompetent managers, lazy overpaid workers half of which that can be replaced by robots, unsavvy marketing depts, pathetic r&d, and hands-out palm up executives.
Instead of our government bailing them we should let them go under and use $10 million to erect a 1000 foot tall monolith in Detroit as a warning to future societies as a warning of what happens when you do everything possibly wrong in a business model.
TR
Posted by: TR | November 6, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I can’t wait to see how this shakes out. Be prepared for another stock-market dive on Friday (unless it was already priced in today’s 500 pt drop?). What would be interesting is if some 3rd party- like Toyota, Kia, or VW- would ante up billions to buy part of a US automaker (maybe this has already happened to a small extent?). Or maybe one of those conglomerates from the Middle East will infuse a bunch of cash, just like they did for our ports, real estate, and financial system. This could become real interesting…
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The probleme is not about giving a helping hand to the big companies but the tax payers are giving CEOs millions to put in their pockects while the sheriff is kicking them out of their homes.
we can afford business as usual. if a company is going bankrupt why is it that the CEOs are still getting millions in salaries? something is wrong with that.
Posted by: Joseph | November 6, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Question, as I just do not know. Is Pelosi’s position a voted-in type position or is it an appointment by the President and could Obama remove or replace her? Sorry but just curious.
Posted by: CW | November 6, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
PELOSI…I am a middle age white female and my 401k plans needs a bail out due you and the Senate deciding to spend, spend and spend my hard earn tax paying money… I will bet that after OUR lovely gov’t bails out the auto industry, the airline industry will be next with their hands out….American Airlines will be the first in line…American Airlines, you deserve to go under the way to screwed the pilots, machinist, stewarts in giving up pay raises, they have to pay more for their health insurance and then CEO, Gerard Arpey personally took a $10 million dollar bonus last year…along with upper management….You are the worst airline in the country…you make Baniff look good……Get ready America for the CHANGE is just starting……
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 6, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
My job takes me inside all three automakers as well as their competitors (Japanese & Koreans). I make a living on all of their success, but I got to be honest, the Americans automakers have and never will be worthy of a handout, until they show the same level of management, work ethic and quality of their competitors. Let’s face it folks, they dug their own hole and everyone is pointing fingers at one another, THEY (management & UAW) have only themselves to blame. Don’t blame the consumer for not wanting their products and certainly don’t ASK US to flip the bill!!!
Posted by: Brian - San Jose, CA | November 6, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
American car manufacturers decided they didn’t need to provide Americans with energy efficient vehicles, they didn’t need to concern themselves with reliable transportation for the minions.
They built bigger and bigger vehicles that were huge gas hogs. So here we are, the day of reckoning and what do they want now, but the rest of America’s money, along with Wall Street, USA, gimmee, gimmee, gimmee. Sucking us dry!
Posted by: nygranny | November 6, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
The Big 3 US automakers have got to totally rethink how they operate. That includes decertifying the UAW and paying their low skilled workers with their 9th grade educations what their skill levels would fetch in a non-union business. Also, get rid of the ridiculous union work rules that only hamper production and reduce efficiency. Times are changing, we’re in a world economy now and the UAW had better realize it or pretty soon none of their members will have jobs. Instead, they will all be working at very low paying service sector jobs making (if they’re lucky) $8/hour.
Posted by: Agnostic Free Thinker | November 6, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Japan got serious about fuel efficiency in the 70′s. GM was late in understanding this. If they could look further than quarterly profits and took the long view on things, they probably would not be in the financial shape they are in today.
Posted by: Dale Wallace | November 6, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
brian i will tell you exactly why the big 3 are now crying for taxpayer $$ its because they havent spend profits on much of anything other than the ceos salaries over the last 30 years ,thats why.
this problem had got nothing to do with anything liberal or democrat ,youre just still crying because obama won.wah.
brian why are all these companies going under/about to go under left and right? surely NOT because of any democratic anything. the republicans have been bailing out these 3 useful corporate goons since ww2 because they used to be a vital war industry .
the fact is ,as alluded to in the article above, too much of these kinds of sweetheart taxpayer low interest “loans” actually hurt auto (or any) industry competition and the bloated fat that is all over these 3 cream puffs is disgusting evidence for my argument.
i say its time to stop now,let them fold.
some rich capitalist will retool and reopen the plants , if theres a profit to be made…if not then so be it.
the question most taxpayers are asking is:
why should uncle sam aka the us taxpayers support some companies and not all companies? why not just let them fire everyone and use the 50 billion they want for a loan as unemployment checks?
hmm?
starting down the slippery slope of corporate socialism took its root solidly on the republican watch ,history will remember that.
the real problem is that these automakers products suck ,just read the posts.
ford bought volvo and suddenly ,overnight , volvo sucked.
same with chyrsler and mercedes.
these 3 companies are the epitome of whats wrong with much of older corporate america …outdated ideas ,outdated factories ,extravagant ceo pay and benefits ,union corruption and blackmail, inferior product etc etc, to the point of the company having to be subsidized by the taxpayer because they are losing money and threatening to shut down and fire everyone ,thus throwing the economy (including the taxpayers who wouldnt float them the sweetheart loan ) in the toilet and flushing twice.
insulting isnt it?
Posted by: bah | November 6, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Linda/Michican….Unions did serve a good purpose in the 20′- ’50′s However, the Union presidents have enjoyed spending the union workers dues on needless spending…on like on themselves..like going on vacations in Hawaii. A construction company had to go non-union because the Mason/brick layer union couldn’t supply the company 100 Union brick layers to this company…so they had to go non union…..I don’t believe in paying someone $20 an hour + $400 per month + union fringe benefits which will come to paying someone that screws in a bolt $30+ dollars an hour…
sorry but your union over priced your skills and that is why the Big 3 are getting their butts kicked by Toyota & Nissan…
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 6, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Both House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid need to resign their leadership posts because they are dividing forces and not unifying forces. US Senate majority leader Reid wants Independent McCain ally, Sen. Joe Lieberman, punished. Reid said no official decisions have been made. An aide to the Nevada Democrat, however, said Reid was leaning toward removing Lieberman as chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. President-elect Obama needs to removed these two, Reid and Pelosi, from their positions since they are wrong for America to move forward.
Posted by: IAWildcats72 | November 6, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
They have no shame! ‘Woe is me….give us money’….how pathetic is that?
Stop corporate welfare!
Posted by: eddie | November 6, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
The Unions gave a bunch of money to Obamas campaign. Now they want a little something for their support and the Dems will give it to them.
I wonder if Obama will show up for the vote?
Posted by: over it | November 6, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
We are becoming a socialist country and it has nothing to do with Obama raising taxes on upper income Americans. GM & AIG can’t have it both ways. If the expect the government to bail them out then they have to be willing to accept more regulation.
Posted by: Agnostic Free Thinker | November 6, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Hey everyone…Big 3 Auto’s manufactures will give anyone a loan…no matter if you don’t have a job, are homeless and not a penny in a bank….Don’t even have to have a car to trade in…..Sounds like a good financial program to me that
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 6, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
There is a perfect opportunity here for a startup automaker, or a subsidiary of an established American company, to enter the market with some smart, fuel efficient, quality automobiles. I’m afraid if we leave it up to Big Oil and the Big 3 then we’ll be stuck with the inefficiencies and pollution of the internal combustion engine forever … forever… forever… (echo effect)…
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Let them go under and maybe other car companies will step in to their facilities and fill some of the void. The companies that step in will not hamstrung by the union wages and pensions.
Posted by: auenv96 | November 6, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Really excellent comments. I can only say I agree. Communism doesn’t work. It’s been tried. As in the case of the financial bailout, the people have spoken. Congress paid no attention and passed the financial bailout anyway. Will they listen this time? With the election over and their seats safe for another two years, I fear the worst.
Posted by: Stefan Schreier | November 6, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“over it”….
if gov’t leads the people and the lobbyists are leading the gov’t, then who really leads the county? 8b
Rhetorical…
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Pelosi & Reid…since you screwed up the Wall Street Bail Out….try not to mess the Auto Bail Out…This time please put some type of language in the plan that ALL Bonuses, stock options. stock bonuses are frozen to all CEO’s, CFO’S, Upper Management & ALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS……
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 6, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
There were signs of fuel shortages as well as environmental concerns back in the 70′s. With lacks mileage and emission standards unchecked by our own government. That is when the Japaneese automakers invaded, with a good product. The big three continued to have the “American” attitude, that no one can touch us. Vehicles grew became bigger, govenment regulations unchanged, the American public KEPT BUYING THEM. They did not have to buy them but they did in record numbers. So who’s to blame? Is it the government with no real regulations or the big three with their build it a they will come attitude. Maybe it’s the public who is willing to keep buying them.
I agree that the big three should have been looking at the bigger picture and developing something for when an energy crsis such as this occured. Remember it was not a matter of “IF” it was a matter of “WHEN” it would happen. So here we are unprepared again.
Now Greg B is right if all those people lose their jobs as well as the other businesses effected what do you think that will do to our economy then? I’m from Michigan. I have a home there but I am working out of state because I can’t find a job there, I miss my family. What do you think will happen to the value of my home or any possible work for me there in the future? By the way “How well does a Prius handle in a foot of snow?
So who do you want to point the finger at now? If you want someone to blame take a look in the mirror. We all have sat by and let it happen. We didn’t stay on top of our congressmen and women pushing for more stringent regulations. We also kept buying those gas guzzeling cars and trucks.
I am not a fan of bailing anyone out the big three, wall street or otherwise. Bailing them out may be necessary but instead of blogging why don’t you e mail your congressmen and women and let them know that this bailout should come with some SERIOUS conditions.
Posted by: LBee | November 6, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
let convert to socialism
Posted by: bail out | November 6, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
UAW members make between $140,000 and $150,000 for salary and benefits. This used to be really hard work but I am not so sure now but regardless this is a hell of a lot of money. If they bail out auto, airlines are next, shipping,farmers back on the dole,etc. Money that we do not have unless a large increase across the board is to occur.
Posted by: William | November 6, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
OH PLEASE…My 2005 Ford mustang is a big hunk of junk. W/ only 22,000 miles, all brake pads and rotors have been replaced due to inferior parts and the bad list goes on… My 1999 Camry w/ only 135,000 miles, one set of brake pads and the good list goes on.
Posted by: A Realist | November 6, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Well said Tim…What a joke huh.
Posted by: A Realist | November 6, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
William…..you got to be kidding, right? UAW member making $140,000 for screwing in a bolt? gosh ya’ll deserve to lose your jobs….or have your salary reduced by 30%….Maybe Pelosi will need to add more language in the bail out plan…like if you want to keep your job then you will have to take a 30% cut in pay…everyone that works in the auto industry…..
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 6, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Right on mere!!
Posted by: A Realist | November 6, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
I know this is going to draw ire, but…
Liquidity froze during the depression also. The market turned around when the US gov’t infused cash into the financial system in 1931 (date? maybe 1933, can’t remember off the top of my head). Bernanke is a scholar on the Great Depression, he knows as much about it as anyone. I think the infusion of cash will work, but it wont be overnight. The economy has to work through the glut of forclosures and bank failures awaiting it, which is far from over. We’re not in a depression yet, so hopefully the debate remains academic (unemployment peaked around 50% during the depression). So, I think it’s smart to layoff the bailout plan for a few years- then make your comments. A few weeks/months isn’t enough time. I have no info regarding the bailout of non-financial institutions. That was my 2 cents.
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
I have had better luck with my fords than GM products. In Texas it is very easy to steal the Chevy pickup truck and with Mexico several hours away, you just said bye, bye to your truck…Three years ago I purchase a Tahoe and it will be my last GM car. I hope that I can drive it another 3 years before I purchase a foreign manufacture car.
Toyota did build a plant outside of San Antonio…..
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 6, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
NO BAILOUT!!!! Enough already!!!!! NO more handouts!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: nonono | November 6, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Lets connect the dots…Housing Industry makes loans to people that can’t afford that expensive of a house. Homeowner has zero money to put down and has debit up to their ears..Bank doesn’t do its job, varifying applicatants income, credit check because the upper management has put a quota on how many home loans that the banks HAS to do this month, inorder to get their bonus. Same thing on the Auto side…if you owe money on your current car….no problem we will roll that amount into your new loan on your new car…do we see the same thing going on in other industries…YES…furniture stores, Circut City, Best Buy, etc… Get ready for the hand outs and the people that live with in their means are going to get screwed……
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 6, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
My old 1989 Acura Legend with 186K miles, and looks like I will finally just get tired of driving it.. after 10 years. Before that had many GM products, that did not even last 50k miles before things started failing and dropping off.
So I say let the big three die.. don’t worry as other manufactures waiting to replace them, with superior products.
Posted by: Iceberg Slim | November 6, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
I say decertify the UAW and pay the Detroit auto workers wages and benefits more in line with what the foreign automakers in this country pay their non-union workers. Get rid of the asinine union work rules. This will go a long way to making the Big 3 competitive. US automakers will not survive as long as the UAW has a stranglehold over them. As a taxpayer, I am not interested in bailing out the Big 3 so that UAW workers can continue to be paid ridiculously high wages and benefits. Screw ‘em — let them go work at WalMart after they bankrupt the US automakers.
Posted by: Agnostic Free Thinker | November 6, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Bye… Bye.. “Big Three”.. no bail out for you.
We can “Not” afford to fund expensive Union Worker severance packages.
Enough is enough of this madness.
Posted by: Iceberg Slim | November 6, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
There was a massive outcry over the bank bailout. We wrote our Congressmen in unprecedented numbers, and the will of the people was made known; Congress gave us the finger and passed the bill anyway. Then, to show them who’s boss, we threatened to vote them out. Most were re-elected for another term. They’re going to do whatever they want, and we are powerless to stop them. Pelosi, Frank and their ilk are accountable to no one. Just bend over and take it.
Posted by: Stoney | November 6, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
The auto workers are building the cars to specs. Thats their jobs. Its the disign engineers, the upper level managers and ceo’s that are not doing their jobs. Cut their pay. Why would you blame a union guy for building a car that was designed by a salary guy? The union guy makes half the money the engineer makes. The design engineers do what the their salary bosses tells them and they do what the CEO tells them.
Put the blame where it belongs. Just dont lone them any money until they can show they are going to build something that can get great gas milage and is dependable. Then loan them the money to build it.
Posted by: Loan it | November 6, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Need to restrain unemployment. Letting a bunch of companies go under will have a spiraling effect on the economy, affecting revenue streams of most other companies. Letting the Big 3 fail would be counterproductive to any economic stimulus. I realize that our higher taxes will support any bailout- but it’s a necessary evil because I’m concerned about economic shockwaves affecting my employer (a university), potentially affecting my ability to provide for my 3 young children (1 mo, 2 years, 5 years). Failure of large corporations has the potential to affect all of us in much larger ways than higher taxes. Say to any unemployed person who has little mouths to feed, “at least you’re not paying higher taxes.”
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
The CEO’s of the big three failed to have the vision that low oil prices will not sustain forever . They were selling Hummers and Navigators to soccer moms drving in city traffic . What would make them think that the consumer would always buy these pieces of junk . What should have been done is to have the vision to look ahead and do some research and development on improving the quality and design of their cars and build efficient vehicles they might not have needed to Beg .
Let them bankrupt they are building chitty cars and for those who did not see their failures long ago and bought those companies stock oh well maybe we all learn to pay for our lessons.
Posted by: DA | November 6, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Unions do not make business dicisions for the the automobile industry. To blame the unions is simply crazy. Senior managers make business decisions, and not union leaders. If the automobile industry7 goes belly up, millions of people will be out of work. Do we really wantr a depression? I do not think so.
Posted by: DonLB | November 6, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
WHY SHOULD THE TAX PAYERS BAIL OUT THE AUTO MAKERS LET THE OVER PAID UAW WORKERS TAKE A PAY CUT. 30% WOULD MAKE SENSE
Posted by: CHRIS | November 6, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Let’s give the auto makers a bail out–with strings. Sell all existing gas guzzlers at garage sale prices. For every worker who they give a two year contract to and or every worker they help find an alternative job, they get so much $ that has to be used to develop energy efficient automobiles.
Posted by: KC | November 6, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
In 2007 a controlling ownership in Chrysler was bought by Cerebus…..Cerebus is a private equity firm…..
To quote a newspaper at the time…
“Private equity firms use money provided by pension and hedge funds and wealthy private investors to acquire all or part of public companies and take them private, often to reorganize and later sell at a profit.”
The price per share of the deal was between 55USD and 85USD…..the price of the shares now is about 3USD.
This isn’t about the car industry. It is about a bad investment.
Posted by: kansai | November 6, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
DonLB, while I agree that the unions do not run the Big 3, they have a huge influence on the bottom line due to the pension and health benefit obligations that have made the US auto industry business model mired in debt. So, the UAW does in fact need to take some responsibility for the finiancial positions of all 3 major US automakers. If GM, Ford, and Chrysler do not restructure their business models to include cutting UAW-pushed benefits, there will be NO benefits (to retired or current employees) because there will be NO jobs. If I misunderstood your statement then I apologize- want to keep it friendly but make a point that I think may have been missed! 8)
Posted by: Steepens | November 6, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Uh, the “big 3″ make the fugliest cars on the road and have done so for years. What really gets me is that they build the same car and glue plastic trim on it in different places and then sell it under different names — GM is notorious for this. Come on, gang, get a real design team.
Posted by: Andrew | November 6, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Man these guys have some brass. We’re supposed to bail them out because they have fleets of huge gas guzzling SUV’s that nobody wants anymore. These auto companies are part of the problem. Let them go under.
Posted by: jamesx | November 6, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Why shouldn’t the Feds give a grant to the Big 3? Government has given grants or tax free zones to foreign car manufactures for decades. Without the UAW and lower foreign car operating cost, leaves the cost of American cars $2900 more on average. With quality from GM & Ford surpassing Toyota & Honda it should make a good investment. We better, or the Fed will have to bail the whole Midwest. The Fed did it for New York & Chrysler!
Posted by: w72indian | November 6, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Big gas guzzlers are no longer an essential part of the US landscape. For hundred years the automakers have reigned supreme as a leading employer and vehicle manufacturer now there are more cars than the demand for them and so it would be against the capitalistic principles of supply and demand to pay to produce what we don’t need anymore. In addition they have already received 25 billion for making fuel efficient hybrid cars which are in demand. To give them 25 billion more so that they can pay lucrative severance packages and healthcare packages to their senior executives at the tax payers cost would be another travesty of justice. I had said no to bailout and I have to say no to any more hand outs to the auto makers. The tax payers need a relief from the massive losses in retirement savings. We need more biomedical research and support for innovation that will contribute to new treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease and cardiovascular diseases and universal healthcare before we need any more gas guzzling cars. The automakers have to be creative. All 3 automakers can merge and form one giant company call it American Motor Company to compete with the Toyotas, Tatas and Mercedes. They can then consolidate their assets and sell off plants and tools and property that is not required and maybe reduce their payroll by giving out incentives to retire, take pay cuts or be laid off and take up the new green jobs that are on the horizon. USA cannot become a socialist country, especially not for the very symbols of capitalism who had a a good drive so far and like the rest of the tax payers angry with the losses in their savings, we have to say enough is enough. Don’t squander the tax dollars, the party is over. The executives from the 3 car companies can buy shares to cover the 25 billion in new investment. I cannot understand what these managers are being taught by the school and colleges of management. How can so many businesses be so irresponsibly mismanaged that they have to take the begging bowl to Washington DC. NO MORE bail out to the automakers.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | November 6, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Most of you just have this foreign mentality and not that the American cars are crap or gas guzzlers. I have owned probally 50 or 60 vehicles, all except one American. Have had good luck with all. I currently have a 97 Sable(33 mpg highway),2007 Mercury Milan(32 mpg w/V6 highway),and a 2005 Lincoln TC which gets (27 mpg highway. I doubt that there are any foreign cars equal in size that get any better mileage than these examples. Hogwash on gas guzzlers! I am an American who is proud to support American companies and not send most of the profit to Japan or where ever. Two things is for sure, I will never buy a foreign car,and I will never vote for a Democrat of any kind.
Posted by: Edc | November 6, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
I feel bad for the hourly laborers if the American auto companies collapse. It is not their fault that management was so inept for so long. But I just can’t see another bailout. Where does it end? Should the debt I’m incurring helping my kids through college be bailed out? Of course not. We need to reinstill personal and corporate responsibility.
Posted by: Poco | November 6, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Capitalism requires risk and sometimes failure! Big 3 meet Capitalism. These companies have been run like crap for decades, bad management, bad unions! These companies pay retired employees like they are kings, cut the strings and get on with it, my retirement is my responsibility, not the responsibility of the us government, union or every consumer in America. and as for those who complain about the foreign car manufactures, apparently they have something right, and well, apparently the arrogance of the big 3 will allow them to finally fail, bailing them out is an even worse idea that the bank bailout (didn’t think that was possible), call your congressman, senator and say HELL NO!!!
Posted by: plaindude | November 6, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Gotta love that free market capitalism.
Rise and fall on your own merits, welfare is for slackers, blah, blah, blah. In case anyone hasn’t noticed,
the entire concept of our ‘system’ has imploded just like the old communism.
Looks like those European social democracies have it right. Duhhhhhh !!!
Posted by: YOMAMA | November 6, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
They stepped up now, because Obama already pledged the $25-billion on the condition that they build more eco-friendly cars. They just came to Pelosi to pick up the check. This is part of Obama’s “spread the wealth” philosophy; only it’s working in the opposite direction of what his supporters and detractors thought he meant.
Posted by: huh? | November 6, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Here’s change we can believe in! Big government bailing out the big three. Only now it’s the Democrats! Praise the New Boss, same as the Old Boss.
Posted by: me | November 6, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
American made cars are CRAP!!!!
My 1997 Nissan Altima runs smooth but my company GM car (new) is total crap and is in the shop every other week.
Have you seen the prices on American crappy cars?
Posted by: Dave | November 6, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
I’m sorry but the writing was on the wall 10 years ago. Japan saw it and adjusted and we kept building big log wagons, assembled poorly and made of crap. Now they want money?? Does anyone realize that the Japanese cars we buy here have more American parts in them than the AMERICAN cars do??
Posted by: Alvincool | November 6, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I have an idea, lay off the over paid executives, Lower car prices so normal working people CAN afford one, and quit closing plants, which trickle down to millions of lost jobs. To Hell with the car companies and all these bail outs. Nobody is bailing out the middle class… we’re just expected to keep taking it in the rear and coming up with more so that the fat cats can keep being fed.
Posted by: jim | November 6, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
The goverment could also help by not buying Toyota vehicles for their federal fleet. While vacationing in New York City the federal building was surounded by a large fleet of white Toyotas. Maybe if our goverment supported US manufacturers they wouldn’t be in as bad a shape as they are.
Posted by: Dean | November 6, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
What we need is for the workers to become more like robots. They need to work for minimum wage with no overtime or health benefits and work 16 to 18 hours a day 7 days a week. then the CEO’s and such could get bigger bonuses and shareholders could get bigger profits. No need to worry about engineering a quality product that gets next generation fuel milage because we can make up the difference with robot wokers. Then, when we turn the blue collar guys into robots we can start turning low end management into robots also. Of course there will always be a family member or a friend of the family that gets to be human and gets promoted out of the robot classification but thats ok, because we need someone to make a little money to buy the cars.
Posted by: Robots needed | November 6, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
American buisnessmen have no honor. If a Japanese ceo’s company loses millions and billions of dollars he jumps out of
a window and such to preserve their countries and family honor. Our CEO’s and bosses take multi million dollar bonuses and head to the golf course while laying off thousands of workers.
Posted by: Honor | November 6, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
There is a large contingient of people at the heads of these corporations that think that they are entitled to obscenely high salaries beyond that of the President. We, as the public, have been constantly told that these are the “rock stars” of industry and business wants them rewarded as such. We are told that these individuals live in a different world with less accountability to the common man. Well, we haven’t had to bailout any other “rock stars” with government money in past history that anyone can recall. Taxpayer money does not come without significant attachments to reality. The government cannot justify bailing out corporate salaries with taxpayer money, unless the salaries and stock grants come into line with reality as well. While it may be tempting for government officials to emphasize that they are “lending” to the auto industry, they do so at their own political peril. Financial reality is here for the common man. The corporations that don’t respect the taxpayer’s situation will not maintain sales. Government officials that don’t respect the taxpayer’s situation will be voted out of office (regardless of their party).
Posted by: TheOneToAsk | November 6, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Feeding the auto-industry is like feeding a drug-addict. Once they get the money, the next day they’ll waste it in smoke.
Invest the money in the next generation electric car manufacturers like Aptera, Telsa. These people are true entreprenuers who will take risks and innovation to succeed, not waiting for bailout. Switch all auto workers to work for these new competitive companies. The world don’t need GM, Ford or Chrysler anymore.
Posted by: Pete | November 6, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Can someone figure out exactly how much taxpayer money American’s have wasted so the Big 3 can pay union thugs $60 a hour to build crappy cars?
Seriously, I grew up in Toledo and every few years, the GM would threaten to close the Jeep plant and the city would fall all over itself to keep them there. Tax breaks, incentives, you name it.
I say let them go out of business. Survival of the fittest. If people wanted the American auto industry saved, they would have bought American cars.
Posted by: ninjaboy | November 7, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
whoever says we are not a communist nation is wrong, especially regarding the republicans. Here is my proof: the outsourcing of 80% of american manufacturing to COMMUNIST CHINA, run by thugs and the COMMUNIST MILITARY, in exchange for the brutal enforcement by that regime of guaranteed low wages, no health benefits, no unions, no environmental regulations, no insurance, is the marriage between PURE CAPITALISM and COMMUNISM. And the result is the abortion of the AMERICAN DREAM. Whatever this frankenstein baby made by the republicans in love with the communists, it is resulting in a murderous monstrosity. It has weakened the heartland of america to the point where all they have left in middle america is their faith, minus reason. for if christians should try and vote in the very people who are destroying their jobs, then it would seem insane. but htey are being given meager table scraps of no abortion. these republican communists are selling our country to communist china. are they becomming more democratic as the strategic theory went? it is an open question. the double digit annual growth they have thanks to us has given them a confidence that they can do anything. except maybe make safe food, give people freedoms, protect the environment, or plan for the future. to be continued
Posted by: mitchel eisenstein | November 7, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am
Ask Big Oil.
Posted by: DobermanSpencerDobermanSpencer | November 7, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am
Abolish all the unions. Trim the wothless workers, adjust the remaining employees pay so its based on performance and skill (inicluding the exec’s), make quality fuel efficient cars that last, offer better warranty’s.
Costs will plummet, sales will sky rocket, profits will soar.
There’s your bailout. Some consulting agency would probably charge millions for this advice. You just got it for free. (Can you say DUH!!??)
Posted by: mnryefarmer | November 7, 2008, 5:44 am 5:44 am
Stop looking for handouts deadbeat auto makers if you actually made cars people wanted, that were reliable and held resale value you wouldn’t be in this situation. Accept responsibility for your mismanagement and poor decisions. If you can afford to give 3,000 cars to the RNC for the convention and giving your CEOs bonuses while your company and stock tanks you don’t deserve squat! Go under there are other car makers around the world we don’t need you it’s a global economy the consumer has other choices! Thank Bush and the Republicans you keep donating to while they drive BMWs and Acuras. Anyone voting to give them one penny should go the way of Thelma Snake err Drake.
Posted by: Hege! | November 7, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am
Cuts prices on their cars this will only keep them artificially high, there would be a huge going out of business sale Hummers half price LMFAO.
Posted by: Hege! | November 7, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am
I like the blogger who said Japanese businessmen and executives have honor, if they ruined their companies they’d jump out of a window not expect freebies from the taxpayer. No we have the CEO of GM on you tube, what a joke! Where in the Constitution does it say people exist, work and must pay for corporations? Thomas Jefferson would roll in his grave.
Posted by: Hege! | November 7, 2008, 6:13 am 6:13 am
It is pretty twisted I have a friend who worked for Chrysler in NY and he retired at 55 with a full pension and health benefits. That’s great but I can understand how that drains a business multiplied bUnions aren’t bad but times are changing so concessions have to be met on both sides. Executives should also not be getting bonuses and tons of money.
Posted by: Hege! | November 7, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
SQUIERGHIA74 STATES:
“PATHETIC! FOR DECADES all they did was manufacture GAS Guzzling SUVs and 8 cylinder monster trucks… Now they want to bailed out too? Where does it end??? I say Let them Fail…”
Reply: The Big Three gave Americans exactly what they wanted ‘BIG’ automobiles and when gas prices were low NOONE cared about gas mileage … letting the companies fail doesn’t effect only their employees – it also effects every employee of their suppliers and that just may mean you or your neighbor!
Posted by: MOREREALISTIC | November 7, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
We need to let ALL of the american auto makers collapse. The unions have dug their own grave with their greediness. They have driven these companies into bankrupcy and deserve to suffer the consequesnces…
Posted by: topset krett | November 7, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
let them collapse, they will be replaced by car companies that will build what we need, high mileage, safe cars with low to moderate price tags. the auto industry has been sucking us dry for decades and lining their pockets without complaint, now that we aren’t playing along any more, they want a handout? don’t bail them out, buy them out, and fire all the management, no pension, nothing, just unemployed, and hire someone that knows what they are doing.
Posted by: idiots | November 7, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
The Big 3 don’t deserve all of the blame. The consumers have to bear some of the responsibility as they generated the market demand and the Big 3 responded accordingly, turning out SUVs, trucks and other gas guzzlers. The consumers simply kept their eyes on their short term and immedeiate needs. The gas crisis of the ’70s should have woken them up and compelled them to demand more fuel efficient vehicles, but when gas supplies once again became plentiful, they took their eyes off the long term and went back to their old gas guzzling habits, and the Big 3 obliged.
Posted by: Roger3323 | November 7, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
The Big 3 don’t deserve all of the blame. The consumers have to bear some of the responsibility as they generated the market demand and the Big 3 responded accordingly, turning out SUVs, trucks and other gas guzzlers. The consumers simply kept their eyes on their short term and immedeiate needs. The gas crisis of the ’70s should have woken them up and compelled them to demand more fuel efficient vehicles, but when gas supplies once again became plentiful, they took their eyes off the long term and went back to their old gas guzzling habits, and the Big 3 obliged.
Posted by: Roger3323 | November 7, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Buy American! – Yes, dealerships are going out of business, but the automakers have had centuries to adapt their product line to make a successful product. The airline industry is suffering – they are surviving by forming alliances with each other and international airlines. US automakers received a bailout in the 1970s – they should have learned their lesson then. They did not. It’s not the consumer’s fault that foreign auto makers market a better product – you can’t guilt car buyers into buying an inferior product. Where’s the logic in that??
Not only will I not take the blame for buying Toyotas and Hondas (all made in the USA) but it seems no one here is ready to take the blame for buying Hummers and Suburbans and Explorers. The writing has been on the wall. Everytime I questioned someone about why anyone would have such a gas-guzzling vehicle when we have men dying in the Middle East, I got derided as some kind of fool.
Let these companies fail and have Toyota and Honda take them over. They will make the changes that are necessary.
Posted by: easy in NO | November 7, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
UNBELIEVABLE…IM SIXTY TWO AND WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO RETIRE. MY TAXES ARE OUTRAGEOUS BECAUSE OF UNION PENSIONS. STATE WORKER PENSIONS. TEACHER PENSIONS. FIRE & POLICE PENSIONS. NOW THE AUTO MAKERS NEED MONEY FOR THEIR OUTRAGEOUS PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT PACKAGES. UNIONS ARE KILLING THIS COUNTRY AND NOBODY HAS THE GUTS TO SAY SO. NOW ITS TIME FOR THE AUTO MAKERS TO START PUTTING SOME OF THEIR OWN MONEY BACK INTO THE SYSTEM TO MAKE IT WORK AND MAYBE THEY WOULD BE MORE ACCOUNTABLE FOR IT. STOP TAKING MY HARD EARN DOLLAR. WHO WILL BAIL ME OUT…..
Posted by: JUSTJOAN | November 7, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Congress and President will bail out the auto industry. There is no other way around that. Loss of millions of jobs and decreased revenue for the government is not an option.
I don’t like it anymore than most people here, but I say, fine. Give the big three our money, with a significant interest and make sure that the money is not spent building and selling the same types of car in the market today.
With a loan of this nature, they should be forced to put only fuel efficient vehicles and significant portion of those vehicles must be hybrids. NO choice should be given in how our money is used. But if it will be given, so be it, just make sure it helps Americans in the long run, as well as the short.
Posted by: Jerry | November 7, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
In my opinion,the government doesn’t need to spend tax payers dollers all they have to do is repeal N.A.F.T.A., and allow Detroit to do what it has done best for over a hundred years,build cars.Stop building parts in Mexico,stop assemly of cars in Canada,bring it back to the U.S.[just informational for those of you who think that the big three build an inferior product, i've never owned a G.M.vehicle that had less than 400000 miles on it.]
Posted by: smoot1974 | November 7, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Pensions are ruining the economy? Lets see, where I live the UAW folks pension is 53 dollars for every year they worked. That’s 530 bucks a month for 10 years service. A while back one of the executives from wamu I believe got about 20 million bucks for a severance pay after his company went belly up.
Another guy got 10 million for 3 weeks of service after our tax dollars had to bail them out. They cut our pay 10% then the VP got a 2 1/2 million dollar bonus. That’s just one guy. Some execs got more some got less. Somehow people believe if you cut workers pay then the money somehow comes back to them.
That’s a fantasy if I ever heard of one. It just goes from one hand to the other, and then it all gets lost in the stock market. Except for what was spent at the country club and on foreign cars. I think a porshe is what our VP prefers. How much did a union guy make back in the 80’s compared to now? How much was an executive’s total package then compared to now? You took money from one guy, gave it to the rich guy and he just lost most of it in the stock market instead of it going back to the local economy.
Posted by: Pensions? | November 7, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I wonder what brain has Pelosi has. She always base her decision on emotion no logical sense at all. If we have such people manage our country what can we expect. Just like GM, FORD AND CHRYSLER.. our country is just going down the drain if we manage it just like the big three. Let them fall. I will let them suffer first before I do.
Posted by: Josh Ooi | November 7, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
so
1)in theory I played by the rules paid my bills and got my pension with healtth benifits. But since something went wrong you don’t want to pay me anymore.
Or 2 I didn’t “play by the rules” I was cut throat and sought the lowerst bidder(most likely overseas) and sold for a large profit and made a fortune you want to tax me out of existance.
How bout reality for a change
1) for many many years we have regulated a standard of living which is unsustanable as a large segment of our population ages into retirement and is artificialy kept alive by “advances” in medicine.
2)education is NOT a cure for hard work nor is printing more money
3)If the number of potential payors in a system decline and the overal cost of any system increases (for whatever reason) the per payor cost must increase.
4) If the cost of being a payor outways the payment for being productive ALL ProDUCTIVE ACTIVITIES cease to exist or will obviously need “bailing out”
5)what if all the whiners are right what will you do to EAT when money as we know it is worthless
6) next time you go to “work” ask yourself this. What that I did today would be needed if no-one was required by law, or contract to pay me to do it.
Posted by: Mark D Adams | November 8, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
we are just bailing out the union pension and health plans, call it like it is. so you want us who work at small business, to bail out these greedy union guys, just because they supported Obama? the auto company’s could just file chapter 11 and go on with out the oppressive labor agreements they signed when they had no competition.
Posted by: big jim | November 10, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
When is my mortgage being bailed out anyone know ?
Posted by: philip | November 12, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
I’m not any happier with the decisions made in Detroit than most people. At the same, there had to be a huge market out there, people wanting SUV’s and other gas hogs for the industry to be able to sell them. I also agree that most execs are overpaid and the golden parchute they get when they leave, sometimes after a very brief period, is scandalous. I do however, shudder to think what will happen if they are allowed to fail, since there are thousands and thousands of people whose jobs are tied into the business.
Interestingly, the Japanese companies are partly owned by their government and both sides have managed to be benefit from these partnerships. We can’t let Detroit crash and burn, but there is definitely a great need for restructuring, rethinking and so forth. I don’t understand the business about the red tape holding up the loan for energy saving design and manufacture out of Detroit. That should be released and there should be oversight to insure that there is actually follow through on cars that require less fuel to go further.
Posted by: sam | November 16, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Folks: This ain’t about Wall Street greed or the CEO’s high pay; that’s all chump change compared to the billions in obligations for UAW retirees (and current workers) health care plans. Bankruptcy by the big three throws that in the trash, and is the only way US automakers can compete. Those who have come to expect the health care and pensions promised to them are in the same boat with those who took easy home loans they couldn’t repay. All the “good old American” tradition of living above one’s means. The UAW was abetted by the big three, as were the borrowers by the banks. There are only two ways out: “socialism”, which is now called “democratizing wealth” (and which didn’t work), and learning to live frugally. If the feds would exempt from taxes anything you saved, you alone could work your way out. Let them exempt what you pay for health care and education, too; those help you become productive to build greater income and greater tax base. Then add a generous ($12K per year per person) exemption for necessary living expenses, and tax the rest darn high, maybe 33%.We’d learn to live within our means, to stay healthy and get education, and be able to support the government we need, not the that one the campaign contributions and under-the-table payments to congress bought.
Posted by: tom beebe | November 18, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
I’m completely without words on this subject. To say that were greedy, is ridiculous, they work hard for their benefits. Do we go around saying everyone in their industry is greedy? No because it’s not right. Everyone is willing to say “don’t give them money”. So, if the government doesn’t every hard worker at these plants loses their jobs and then thousands of families are suffering. You don’t think that will make the depression were going through worse? To say that the employees make $75 an hour is astonishing, it’s more like 28.00 and we pay for almost all of our medical bills. My husband works for Chrysler and I have bought over 9 dodge cars over the past 10 years, and I have NEVER had an issue with them. I will NEVER buy a japan or china made car. I support 100% what we make in the U.S. The government is going to get this money repaid to them by Automakers. These companies have been around for ever and to let them go belly up would be a shame.
Posted by: Candi | November 18, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
I may feel a bit sorry for the workers but not enough to bail these 3 egotistical companies out. The corporate executives and the unions are both to blame and need to be held accountable. These companies have been given plenty of time and warning to start producing fuel efficient autos at a reasonable price but neither has happened. When you know that $2,000 or more of your American car’s price is going to pay benefits for retired workers then there is definitely a problem. Let the workers rely on their own 401k, medicare, medicaid and social security like most of us have to do after retiring. Get rid of the unions and the overpriced executives for a start!
Let them find a way to bail themselves out, this is getting absurd.
Posted by: David | November 20, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
WHAT CAN I DO GOT NO JOB!
GOT NO GAS TO FIND JOB!
FOUND MIN. WAGE JOB 45 MILES AWAY!
WON’T EVEN COVER EXPENSES!
IS IT MY FAULT!
I CAN’T SAVE MY SELF!
HELP BEFORE I DO SOMETHING ILLEGAL!!!!
Posted by: bill | February 6, 2009, 4:23 am 4:23 am