By David Schoetz

Dec 10, 2008 12:02am

Closing Arguments: Bonus Season Expectations

Bonus season is afoot on Wall Street — and the big numbers of 2007 — a reported $33 billion — will certainly not be doled out in this economy.

Executives from several struggling firms have already said that they will forego their entire annual bonuses.

So tonight, we ask you: Should every executive from struggling Wall Street firms be expected to volunteer their annual bonus?

Tell us what you think.

User Comments

YES!!!

Posted by: sam | December 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

A bonus? For what? You have got to be kidding–they should give back their salaries.

Posted by: Ellen Friedman | December 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Most CEO salaries are obscene from the git-go. Bonuses are just another fist in the jar.

Posted by: Wayne Winget | December 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Absolutely….taxpayer money should not reward these executives for their bad business decisions

Posted by: Frank | December 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

yes

Posted by: diva | December 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

This is a no brainer. Everyone has to sacrifice. News flash to the corporate officers and the sports people: NO ONE IS WORTH THAT MUCH MONEY. This country has got to stop worshipping greed.

Posted by: Linda Buier | December 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Yes give up the bonus. Those that don’t should contribute it to those that are less fortunate.

Posted by: Fred | December 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

No bonuses unless they start making money. Cut emissions with more electric cars, and hybrids that really work

Posted by: don Langston | December 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

No executive should ever take any bonus when the cash is not available to pay the bonus. If the business in not profitable and solvent…..no bonus should be taken.

Posted by: Martha Morrison | December 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

The destruction/greed that WallStreet has caused, no bonuses should be given. Millions of us have lost our jobs and we are not being compensated.

Posted by: Suzanne Snell | December 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Why should they get a bonus? I work for a global corporation, and while my division is profitable, the company as a whole has lost money. I probably won’t get a bonus for the second year in a row…and I accept that. Why should they be any different??

Posted by: Nigel | December 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I’ve always thought a “bonus” was something “extra” a person received for doing a job exceptionally well, that is, performing above the expected level. NO BONUSES!

Posted by: michael Proulx | December 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

No. They should not receive any type of bonus, in fact they should take a pay cut. If an sports teams have caps on how much a player can make then corporate america should have some type of guideline in place for Wall Street.
These CEO’s make in excess what they are worth.

Posted by: Arthella Harley | December 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Yes, I truly believe Fat Cats who are executives of struggling companies need to be in touch with the average struggling American family and consider them first since they are already receiving a much higher unrealistic salary compared to the rest of the world. Greed is not good and let us tell the producer of “Wall Street”!

Posted by: Donna Sheridan | December 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

No, the executives should not only forgo their bonusesm but should return a percentage of their past bonuses. (They could pay for their own bailouts)

Posted by: P. Barbotta | December 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Executives should absolutely give up their bonus if their company is struggling.

Posted by: Sue | December 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I think they should all give up there bonuses until the economy gets better and use it to save an employees salary. For every employee sent home they should divide their bonuses to keep someone employed.

Posted by: Janet Lighty | December 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Yes all the executives of these firms that TAXPAYERS are bailing out should forgoe their huge salaries and bonus’s. I am appalled that these people are so damn arrogant and think WE should bail them out without them giving up a damn dime. I say let them all fail if they can’t do something for the greater good.

Posted by: Teresa | December 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

yes yes yes yes yes

Posted by: Pat Salierno | December 10, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

absolutely. if they are keeping it, they should be ashamed. they make enough during the year, usually 10 times what a normal american makes.

Posted by: nicole | December 10, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Not only should they not get bonuses, they should be getting paid for piece rate work making license plates.

Posted by: Doc Bartlett | December 10, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

It is absurd to even ask if the executives should forego their bonuses! Bonuses are typically given when a company does well… and to those who do a particularly good job. These executives have none neither. In fact, they should be fired!!! All of this makes me sick! They do a terrible job and then reward themselves?!?! Then they are going to lay off workers and give themselves more bonuses? This needs to be stopped! In fact, they should be paid on a commission basis… if the company doesn’t make a profit, they DO NOT get paid!

Posted by: jon | December 10, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I do think ALL executives on Wall Street should volunteer their bonuses. Plus, they should be prosecuted. Executives in AIG should be prosecuted as well. The big three execs should also not be getting anything. It just so happens that the ones who decide are the ones benefiting when cutting jobs. They never cut management. They always cut the regular worker. None of them EVER cut their own salaries and benefits.

Posted by: Khadija Echevarria | December 10, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Not only should executives of Wall Street corporations not take a bonus any company that canceled employee bonuses should not take a bonus.

Posted by: Donna Thompson | December 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Absolutely no one should receive a bonus, actually their salaries should be drastically cut. These are the greediest bunch of people in all of business!

Posted by: Albert F Lucarini | December 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Absolutely. Those Wall Street execs should not only forego their bonuses, they should take what they would have made in bonuses out of their own personal fortunes and donate that money to the thousands who have lost their jobs since the start of the recession.

Posted by: J.M. Bowers | December 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Every executive should forgo their annual bonus. Bonuses are reward for working hard and doing well. None of these companies have done well. In fact they have almost singlehandley destroyed the financial system in our country.

Posted by: Mary-Ellen | December 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

I think they should not get any bonus when the company is going bankrupt. They should be fired. They are not doing their jobs correctly or they wouldn’t have to file bankruptcy or ask for bailouts. They do not deserve their hugh salaries.

Posted by: Jane Graves | December 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Definitely every executive from a struggling Wall Street firm should forego their annual bonus. I can’t believe after cheaping hard working Americans out of their life savings and retirement investments, that they can even think about a bonus. Just the fact that they would even consider taking one shows how greedy they are. What they need is to feel the pain that so many of us are feeling after losing 10s of 1000s of dollars.

Posted by: Dave Kavanagh | December 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

YES, they shouldn’t be getting their bonuses. Why should we be rewarding failure?

Posted by: Tom | December 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Bonuses…from what? From the millions of dollars lost by the hard working citizens of this country who faithfully invested their hard earned money in their company 401k plans only to watch them lose 2/3 of their value in a very short period of time due to mismanagement by Wall Street execs? I’m sure those same executives aren’t losing sleep over how to pay for their mortgages, their kids education, or the monthly electric bill. I am disgusted by the hubris of these people! And disgusted that this administration gave a blank check to greedy executives who made one last play at “someone else’s money.”

Posted by: L K Snider | December 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

most definitely!!! The companies many of those individuals ran, and are supposed to be responsible for, are getting bailed out by the government, and yet, people like me, who go to work every day, to get a salary that covers basis and nothing else, are not getting any help from any one, let alone bonuses. It is ABSOLUTELY unfair and offensive to even talk about them getting year-end bonuses.

Posted by: CJ Pena | December 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

No, they should not be expected to. If, the executives truly want to help keep the jobs of many employees. They should seriously ponder the thought. With postive thinking, and an open mind.

Posted by: Sabrina | December 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Absolutely! They are already wealthy men to begin with and they do not need it. Why should they be considered better than everyone else and continue to amass money they will never spend while the Fathers of small children are reduced to collecting aluminum cans to
sell for scrap, or even worse, just to feed their children.

Posted by: Budd and Jan Taylor | December 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Wall Street management give up any thing would be a first. Their greed is disgusting and an embarrassment to the USA. Not only should they give up their bonus – but they should go to jail for what they have done that led to the ruin of others lives with their greed. BAH HUMBUG to them.

Posted by: Pat Koss | December 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Not one of these crooks should get one red cent of bonus money. None of them are going to go personally bankrupt if they do not receive any extra money. Plus, isn’t a bonus given if the company makes its yearly budget and predictions. Obviously, these idiots didn’t accomplish thier goals. In any other profession, if an employee fouls up this badly they get fired. I’m still waiting for people to get fired. But, I won’t hold my breath.

Posted by: SNY | December 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Of Course, they should be expected to forego any bonuses especially with all the bailout money given to prop them up.
I’m wondering why Wall Street wasn’t made to jump through the hoops that the automakers are being forced to for all the money that Congress gave them?

Posted by: Richard | December 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Should every executive from struggling Wall Street firms be expected to volunteer their annual bonus?
Absolutely, they squandered are investments, IRA’s, you name it, they mis-managed it. How about firing the whole lot of them along with the most corrupt government I have ever seen in my 46 years of living! I look forward with dread on the change we can believe in. I will miss the United States of old.

Posted by: Chuck Remm | December 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I think if the company is experiencing
problems the CEO should fore-go thier bonus.

Posted by: LV | December 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

By definition, a “bonus” is paid to those having demonstrated extraordinary effort in achieving the success of the company’s goals. It is beyond belief that these greedy managers would even begin to consider a bonus in a year when they rode heard on the failure of the free market system…and in most cases the failure of their companies, either literally or through lack of goal achievement.
Not only should these managers not receive a bonus, they should return a portion of their base pay (which is also extraordinarily high for the awful performance they have shown)…or face criminal charges for defrauding the country of its very core economic security.

Posted by: jim klock | December 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Any struggling company should forfit bonuses. How can they expect the government to help when they don’t particapate in making it better. The other issue is giving up bonus or loose company. That is the problem with the government stepping in and people don’t have to make these hard choices. A job is better than no job. Unless, of course, you have saved so much in bonus money that your covered and what happen to everyone else, the lower income people, doesn’t really matter.

Posted by: Camille Huettl | December 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

NO CEO should expect a single dollar in a bonus. We have the worst ecomcoy in forthy years and the nerve of them to ask taxpapers to struggle while CEO “s enjoy bonus monies is truly a slap in the face to the people struggling to just get by

Posted by: barbara galati | December 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

YOU BET YOUR SWEET ASS THE EXECS SHOULD FOREGO THEIR BONUSES. UNFORTUNATELY IT WON’T HURT THEM A BIT. UNLIKE THE AVERAGE FAMILY WHO NEED ONLY MISS ONE DAY WORK AND WITHOUT PAY TO THROW US INTO A TAIL SPIN. THEY MAKE ME SICK AT THE THOUGHT OF THEIR GREED.

Posted by: PEGGY CASTILLO | December 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Every executive SHOULD volunteer their bonus. Tax payers should not support their lavish lifestyle while so many do not even have the money to live on.

Posted by: Shirley | December 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It’s unconscienciable that any executive, or employee at any level of a failing Wall Street firm, should get a bonus. It makes absolutely no sense to compensate for poor performance while the investments of millions have tanked so signficantly this year. Investors have lost faith and confidence in these firms, as well as the credit rating companies who failed to raise red flags and gave highly risky investments and firms favorable ratings.

Posted by: Joel Augen | December 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I certainly expect them to. Expect meaning that is what I would expect of them as an authoritative figure, which I am not. As an observer, I don’t necessarily expect that they will, but I certainly hope they will.
I think only in exceptional cases, for justifiable reasons, should someone receive a bonus at a company that didn’t turn a profit.

Posted by: Jim Morton | December 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Given that the writing on the wall should have been in all CAPS even in 2007, I was amazed to learn that 33 billion was doled out in 2007.

Posted by: Amazed | December 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Comparing the working conditions and perks of Wall Street CEOs to those of the average person, who wouldn’t want to be one? They should show their gratitude by working for $1 a year.

Posted by: Dan Liftman | December 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Not only should they give up their bonuses, they should give back all those they,ve received for the last 8 years, and not have ANY salary for the next 8 !!! If they had any class they would do this on their own !!!

Posted by: gloria | December 10, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Not only do we believe the Wall Street mucky-mucks should indeed forego their greedy, undeserved, unearned “bonuses”, but so shall all the CEOs and “celebrity” members of boards of directors!
Earn? No one can “earn” that kind of money respectably and honestly!

Posted by: Mary Pat | December 10, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Yes, it is obvious that if they need a bailout they have not properly and strategically pointed their company in the proper direction. A bonus is for excellent work or exceptional effort, not a general part of your compensation unrelated to the companies growth due to your efforts. AIG has been the major abuser of this due to their inherent culture. If it weere a small business, the owners might even forego part of their salary to make sure there creation lived and prospered in the future. As others have said it is truly obscene. No bonuses, cashing of stock options if a profit exists. Otherwise, bankruptcy and chapter 11 would have been the proper vehicle to shape up an the officers.

Posted by: Louis | December 10, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Absolutely they should be expected to volunteer their annual bonus!!! Don’t fly $30,000,000 jets or drive your $500,000 cars and complain that you need a bailout because your company is struggling!! How much do these executives have storied away? I think the only reason they WOULD NOT want to forfeit their annual bonus is because their bank account will only say 32 million instead of 35 million!

Posted by: Jessica | December 10, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes they should voluntarily forego their bonuses especially if they did not meet their stated objectives for the year. There may be certain executives or functions that DID meet objectives (HR? Operations?)within a company,so if an exec EARNED his/her bonus as quantifiably defined then I’d be okay with them receiving it. Still, if a Wall Street firm is struggling isn’t it a foregone conclusion that the executive leadership wasn’t doing its job? That more leaders failed than suceeded?
Here’s a better idea: they shouldn’t just voluntarily forego their bonuses, they should donate them into a pooled fund for what will surely be the newly unemployed who won’t be able to make it on unemployment alone, and won’t be able to qualify for other government assistance.

Posted by: Karen Talavera | December 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

ABSOLUTELY not!!! Abonus is for a job done exceptionely well. Bankrupt, bailout, forced mergers/sales are indicators of a job done well. In fact, salaries should be reduced and perks of office lost.

Posted by: ivy | December 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Not only wall street but other companies as well!If they are going to cut benefits and do layoffs the top executives from any company should NOT get any bonuses!!!! Bonuses are given when a company is doing well, why should they get bonuses when we are paying the price in our 401k”s!!

Posted by: Elaine | December 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

YES!

Posted by: Amanda | December 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Yes of course they should decline these bonuses for as long as it takes their companies to return to operating in the black, They should also reduce their paychecks. Not saying they should work for $1.00. but they definetly should not be earning millions [which is coming out of the taxpayers pockets. If the auto industry is having restrictions put on their loans-then there should absolutely be restrictions placed of the financial institutions.

Posted by: Roberta | December 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Yes they should we as tax payers are asked to bail them out, thire own empolyies are let go if they can not make payrole so why not. It is time the the big wigs to put up or stop asking for gov. help. If you are in a failing compamy, you are not entitled to a bonus. 33 billion is insane in todays world, it was insane last much less this year.

Posted by: Brad | December 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Absolutely !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Butch | December 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Capatolism is taking risk and getting rewarded for it as well as taking risk and suffering is the risk does not pay off. Why then are we bailing out pricate companies for their losses..This is not capatolism, it is socialism. It is a slap in the face, when they give thenselves bonuses with OUR money. The government is doing us a hugh dis-service by doing this. These companies should have taken their lumps when their bets failed like we are doing. The average person is not getting a bail out or a bonus for making bad decisions.

Posted by: Chris | December 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

YES!!! Every executive of failing company’s should give up their “over-the-top” saleries and bonuses for several years, and their future saleries should be regulated. Their greed is the reason this country is in the worse recession since the depression of ’29.

Posted by: James Black | December 10, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

It is amazing to me that this discussion of bonuses and the executives that would consider it as their right to accept that money is thought of, as it seems, theirs! People have lost, are lossing or are looking for jobs and they would consider receiving or requesting the BONUS!
When I worked in a position that offered the employees a Bonus for the hard work that was done to keep the company ahead of the competion, that was truly a Bonus, but in today’s economy, GIVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE A BREAK!!!

Posted by: Sheila | December 10, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

They say when someone gets laid off its just business its not personal.
To the person that gets laid off and has to make major cut backs or looses everything its not just business its personal.
My answer.
No one gets a bonus if its means keeping just one employee for one more week!

Posted by: CE | December 10, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

YES!!!! They should be fired, not rewarded. They were at the helm when their companies went down the tubes!! Why should they be rewarded for that??

Posted by: Brenda | December 10, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Absolutely…I am a Professional and business owner. Lets all feel the pinch of even those with less or at least take less so those around you might have a little more. You might gain a little respect around the watering hole. Maybe… just maybe their might be someone with a Tiny Tim that could use it more than you Mr.CEO or President. This might be the year to start using the phrase…”Better to give than receive” for those who Have to those who are in need.

Posted by: Chuck Newton | December 10, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Not only they should volunteer to do that, they should all be fired for mismanagement and for failing their companies. I found it cocky that some of these guys believe that they deserve a bonus in term of millions while street people are being laid off. Why should taxpayers money be used to pay for their vacations and bonuses when in the same time they are laying off white collars? Yes they should give up those bonuses and stop mocking main street people.

Posted by: TRESOR | December 10, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Absolutely NO BONUSES, the CEO’S should take a pay cut like the rest of us

Posted by: Cindy | December 10, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

no bonuses and help out the big three we help the banks

Posted by: danny | December 10, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

yes they should give up thier bonuses.
they claim to be leaders, when will they start acting like leaders?
they have not been leading they have been seeking profits. there is a difference.
if they were leading their companies they would have been looking out for the companies as a whole not just the profit margin.

Posted by: northstar | December 10, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Here’s an idea: Eliminate all CEO positions and use the money saved to hire more low level workers.

Posted by: Dan Liftman | December 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

They absolutely should forego the bonuses.
I am CEO of a new and upcoming company and I couldn’t imagine taking a dime from my company if it were in the same dier situation as some of these. They need to put greed and selfishness on the back burner and think survival, especially when the livelyhoods of others are dependant on it.

Posted by: Cheryl Riddle | December 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

YES. The reason these companies are in trouble is because these owners and CEO’s are greedy. Prices keep going up so they can continue to live their lives in luxury while the rest of us struggle. Boscov’s is a good example. The owners are willing to put up a MILLION(S) of their own dollars and the state of Pennsylvania is going to help them with the rest of the money they need. How does a bankrupt owner come up with millions of dollars????

Posted by: Marcia | December 10, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Another yes,especially BANK OF AMERICA execs, but those greedy people don’t care what the not-so-rich-and-powerful masses think

Posted by: hrhjune | December 10, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Do I think the big guys should forego their bonuses?? Yes, yes and a thousand times YES!!

Posted by: Nan Coats | December 10, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

YES! It is these corporate executives’ greed that got us into this mess, therefore, they can bail out their own company. I agree with others in that these executives need to be brought down a few notches and let them see and feel what their employees go through. These executives can dig their own way out of the mess that they created.

Posted by: Susan | December 10, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Yes they should give up their bonuses as well as being fired without severances just like any lower level worker would be for failing to do their jobs. CEOs don’t think twice about jerking the little guys bonus or donating to charity in the workers name who was already counting on his/her bonus for their own families needs.

Posted by: Debbie | December 10, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Absolutely,it would and should be their contribution to the bailout.

Posted by: Jack Rips | December 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

If I, as an employee performed my job the way the CEO’s have, I’d have been fired a long time ago. Should they get a bonus? HELL NO!!! They should be on their way out to pasture because their usefulness is no longer needed. Let Gov Blago and all the CEO’s join Gov Ryan in adjoining cells.

Posted by: the Cook | December 10, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

I feel that the Executives and CEO’s have raped the people & the economy here in this Country for too long. Now it is time to turn the tables on them. No I do not feel that they should receive ONE RED CENT. I also see that they are trying to get all that they can get, in other words, CUT and RUN, before President Barack Obama is sworn in. STOP THEM RIGHT NOW.

Posted by: Ms. Lillie | December 10, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

The term “billion” is thrown around so regularly now that I am led to believe that Americans really do not want to comprehend what that numerical amount really means because true comprehension would require the reality of riots in the streets.
Spell out $1 billion dollars in zeros and it is $1,000,000,000 or $1000 million dollars. $35 billion in bonuses is $35,000 million ($35,000,000,000) dollars in bonuses handed out last year to the lucky few simply because they worked in the financial sector where people use money to make money. Most of us simply cannot comprehend that amount of money, we just accept the monetary terms in shorthand without the zeros.
It has been reported that the stock market lost almost $$3,000,000,000,000 this year in value and the government and quasi-government agencies – the Congress, the Treasury, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve – have injected almost as much into the seized financial markets to keep the whole system alive.
I lost my job yesterday due to the financial mess created by these Wall Street executives. To utter the word bonus should be an insult to the intelligence of the ordinary person. How could anyone receive a bonus for losing so much money and by extent undermining the economy? This couldn’t possibly be the intent of the bonus system or of capitalism itself.

Posted by: abs | December 10, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

you people are totally unbelievable, to even ask that executives in corporations that are going down the drain, and need financial help to keep the business from going under, have to be asked to consider giving up bonuses, why those money greedy vultures should not only forgo the bonuses but take pay cuts also when making over hundreds of thousands of dollars a year salaries, but of course they would rather fire all the real workers, and watch the company go out of business, rather than cut their paychecks, and if you give them any money in the form of a bailout, the first thing they will use it for is to give themselves, bonuses and pay raises, oh yeah and if there is any money left afterwards then they may hire back some of the workers, to get the company up and running again, but of course there is not enough money, so they will want to be given some more free money, and so it becomes a vicious circle, and I don’t see how you so called educated people can’t see it, or most likely don’t want to, after all you over paid people support that merry go round system, don’t you?

Posted by: William A Edwards | December 10, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Yes, I believe that they should not only give up their bonuses but also atleast one months salaries. I don’t think that any company should give anyone CEO or not a bonus this year. We are in a resession and the companies should keep their money so that they will not have to ask the Government for HELP! I do not get a bonus and I work hard all year. I do not just sit back and let everyone do the work for me and then expect a bonus and a fat raise at the end of the year and neither should the CEO’s.

Posted by: Roxana | December 10, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I find it very funny and odd, in an sad kind of way, that getting bonuses for Wall Street big wigs (at any level) is even brought up in any board room this year, throughout the Financial and Securities Industries.
The only Bonus, that should be Seriously Considered, by Everyone involved in the Financial and Securities Industries, the Federal Reserve Board and definitely including SEC Chairman Cox and Treasury Secretary Paulsen (and also add in President Elect Obama’s new picks for those positions), is that THEY should GIVE, to The REST OF US (that Faithfully keep investing, Honestly, in America and it’s Future) the Proper Transparency and decent Fair Play in all the various Marketplaces (NYSE, NASDAQ, AMEX, CBOE, etc.) that WE ALL DESERVE, for the New Year and into the Future (which I hope will be Bright, at some point).

Posted by: Dan from MN | December 10, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

I had already turned off my computer when you possed this question at the end of your show, I got up immediately to respond. I am appalled that CEO’s and Senior Managers of organizations, who already make millions in salary & bonuses, year after year, would hesitate for a second in agreeing to this suggestion. I’m willing to bet you that in companies where the CEO’s and Senior Management KEEP their bonuses that there are some layoffs of the little people to make it possible. As my stock and 401(k) slowly disappears during my first 5 months of retirement, I now need to go back to work! I can assure you that they are not concerned like the rest of us, except to protect their bonuses and salaries.The grilling the Big 3 got from Barney Frank’s committee should be applied to ALL banks & CEO’s that took government money, making sure that they understand that we are watching them closely and we, the American people & stockholders, expect changes in how they do business.

Posted by: mg | December 10, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Yes, they absolutely should forfeit their bonuses. Can’t imagine any executive with a conscience would pay him/her self a bonus.

Posted by: KAS | December 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

ABSOLUTELY! Nobody should be getting a bonus this year!

Posted by: linda watkins | December 10, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

No they should not get a bonus. A bonus is for performance. Most should not have received them last year. And the bonuses are too much as it is. Just how much do these people need to live on anyway? Their greed is destroying the principle the stock market was built upon–the average person can own a piece of a company. What a thought, I can invest in something big and important even though I don’t have enough to buy a large company. When the average person’s ownership is trashed by the damage these huge bonuses and salaries cause to the company–not to mention the poor decisions of those getting the bonuses–then Wall Street needs to decide if they really still need us ‘average’ investors and our dollars!

Posted by: A Mueller | December 10, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

I feel that executives that are slated to receive a bonus should not take them. They should make sure that the hard working employees stay employed. I just don’t understand why they feel they need a bonus. They are not the ones busting the tails everyday in the trenches. Happy Holidays.

Posted by: Cynthia | December 10, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Absolutely. In fact, I think that the corporate executives that work for the bailed out companies should be required to pay bonuses back to the company that they have received over the past 5 years. Then, they should be fired. After all, they were in power and allowed the company to fail in the first place while continuing to take bonuses when they were not showing any profits. Why bail them out and let them remain in office just to create more financial problems at the taxpayers expense.

Posted by: Denise | December 10, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Are they smarter than a 5th grader?
Doesn’t look like it!

Posted by: Petty | December 10, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

i wonder when they were linning their pockets with millions of workers retirement and health money how they sleep at nites. they should work for low wages no one is worth that amount of money even ball players, between our goverment and run away farm welfar which is in the billions no wonder we are are broke once they get in office they line their pockets and have the best health coverage on the planet and gosh i wished i worked for a few years and had tons of money when i retired its a crime we let this go on with our coes and elected goverment members farmers you have senior citizens living off nothing and they get 10 20 dollars for food stamps and at their ages they have more expensive diets or more health problem where they need different food heck they might want to cook a meal for their kids and cant afford it but you have kids you get it and lots of it car payments insurance utilities rent medical money and they think we dont need help with food come live at my house for a few month after that high gas we are broke and can not recoupe it doctors visits it takes it all we have to many greedy self center coes and govermnet people who are the worst crooks ……

Posted by: e wallls | December 10, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

i wonder when they were linning their pockets with millions of workers retirement and health money how they sleep at nites. they should work for low wages no one is worth that amount of money even ball players, between our goverment and run away farm welfar which is in the billions no wonder we are are broke once they get in office they line their pockets and have the best health coverage on the planet and gosh i wished i worked for a few years and had tons of money when i retired its a crime we let this go on with our coes and elected goverment members farmers you have senior citizens living off nothing and they get 10 20 dollars for food stamps and at their ages they have more expensive diets or more health problem where they need different food heck they might want to cook a meal for their kids and cant afford it but you have kids you get it and lots of it car payments insurance utilities rent medical money and they think we dont need help with food come live at my house for a few month after that high gas we are broke and can not recoupe it doctors visits it takes it all we have to many greedy self center coes and govermnet people who are the worst crooks ……

Posted by: e wallls | December 10, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

No bonus merited! All salaries and other perks should be cut by 50%.

Posted by: Eddie | December 10, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Of course they should not receive bonuses. Bonuses used to be a way to reward exceptional performance — not performance that has decimated Wall Street and taken Main Street with it, further eroding the overburdned middle class now saddled with bailing them out. I cannot believe the level of greed and lack of conscience from these Wall Street executives who show no remorse and no empathy for the suffering they have caused with their excesses. They are proving themseles to be the sociopaths (the hallmark of which is no remorse or empathy for others) depicted in the documentary that was released a few years ago about the corporation as psychopath (an old term for sociopath). Not only should bonuses go, but CEO and other senior management remuneration should be substantially decreased. For the top dog at Lehman to run his business into the ground and walk away with close to $500 MILLION over 8 years is insanity. He should be forced to give $492 MILLION of that back to the bail-out fund (the $1 million a year he would get to keep is extremely generous). And so should the others donate to the fund, including Paulson who walked away from Goldman Sachs with $50 million (a little like the fox guarding the hen house, don’t you think?). There’s something wrong when a CEO can make $5 million, $10 million and more in a single year. No one is worth that. If their pay and bonuses totaled in the $300k range, then there would be an incentive for them to behave responsibly. If their livelihood was tied in with the success of their businesses, as it should be, then they would work for the betterment of the business rather than for their personal short-term gain and the agrandizement of their insatiable egos. When they can make in one year more than most of us will ever see in a lifetime, they have no personal stake in the success of the business they are ostensibly employed to serve. If it folds, they can walk away wealthy. Ben and Jerry’s had it right in the way top pay couldn’t exceed a reasonable percentage over bottom pay. I’m sorry for the tone of this, but I am irate and feel it’s time for the masses to rise up and take this country back (and start to pay a living wage to teachers, psychotherapists and others who care about society and are investing in people rather than using their intelligence to come up with the next selfish money-making scheme like sub-prime mortgages and ninja loans). Let’s face it, if this economy folds, these fat cats can purchase their own islands and bail out of this country on their yachts and private jets, leaving the rest of us holding the bag.

Posted by: Eileen from Boston | December 10, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Not just expected, but forced to give them up! And not just bonuses, but their salaries as well! Lets face it they not only failed their companies, but they failed America. In the real world people lose their jobs for this big of a screw up! I am sickened that these Wall Street idiots have been allowed to put the American economy into a tail spin and no one has asked them if they would be willing to work for $1.00 like the idiots in congress have asked the idiot auto executives to do! Or, why is it that we haven’t heard congress ask any CEO of these financial institutions or AIG to step down like they are requesting from the Autos? I for one would like to see some financial CEO heads on the chopping block! And our elected officials aren’t any better! What the heck do we have a banking committee for and how about the Federal Reserve and every other financial committee, where were they? They are just as much to blame! Maybe that is why we haven’t seen heads roll because they are all in bed together! It seems to me that these high paid executives (of all industries) and our own elected officials are just so completely out of touch with the reality of the average person. They make such stupid business decisions because they make too much damn money, and because they don’t have to pay any personal consequences for their stupid decisions. Those who pay the consequences are those of us who work hard everyday to put food on the table and gas in the car. I for one am sick of the greed! I believe there should be caps on CEO salaries and our elected officials should not get to decided their own salaries and raises. The American people should get to vote on what we feel is an appropriate salary. Maybe it would make our officials more honest, more trust worthy and more in touch with the reality of their Constituents if they knew we the people were deciding their financial fate.

Posted by: LR | December 10, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

There should be no “bonus” and the outrageous salaries must go way down. The same is true for sports figures. Companies who cannot pay their employees and their creditors should not pay the outrageous costs for advertisement that allows sports players to draw rediculous fees for their services, including signing bonuses.

Posted by: Ben | December 10, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

ABSOLUTELY NO BONUSES UNLESS THE COMPANY EXCEEDED ALL EXPECTATIONS. DID NOT HSVE ANY LAYOFFS, AND THERE WERE NO GOVERNMENT SUBSUDIES IN THE PAST 5 YEARS. NO BONUSES!!!!

Posted by: Pamela | December 10, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

You’ve got to be kidding! Of course, they should all forfeit bonuses.

Posted by: Sharon | December 10, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

As a business owner, when my business isn’t making money, neither do I! What makes these exec’s think they deserve million dollar bonuses on top of the millions of dollars they get as their salary when they are asking me, the tax payer, to pay them? I can’t even pay myself right now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Trisha B. | December 10, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Not only should they not get bonuses, they should forgo their paychecks. I did hear that one CEO said he would reduce his annual salary to $1.00. He’s not the first one ever to have made such a move, but more of them should take a humble lesson. I firmly believe that any bailout should explicitely stipulate that absolutely no bonues or outrageous severence packages be awarded any of them. How could they even consider using any funds so when their companies are on the verge of collapse?!!! Any “worker bee” would have been fired outright for having been so incompetent. Haven’t the tax payers already lost enough? How far down is your 401K because of this?

Posted by: T.O. | December 10, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

This is no scarifice since they have been raping the systemm long enough.Why should they be insulated from what they help create by poor management and foresight.

Posted by: D. Brand | December 10, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Yes,Yes,Yes are they kidding they should all give back their yearly salary and see what the rest of the unemployed people are dealing with at this time. STOP THE GREED!!!! Get Real

Posted by: Carol | December 10, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Could NIGHTLINE do a segment on the wages and salaries of the employees of AIG, Bank of America and any other financial institution that recieved any of the TARP monies? We have been repeatedly bombarded with story after story about how much the wages are at auto manufacturer plants but nary a whiff of a story about the wages of the financial institution employees other than the top execs. PLease, NIGHTLINE, give us the rest of the story and let the public decide who is making too much money, is it truly the auto plant line worker or the financial institution employee? Why have we heard no stories about the financial institution employees, other than top execs, having to make immediate wage/salary concessions in order to get “We the People’s” money like what is being demanded of the auto plant worker? And the auto industry is only asking for a fraction of the money we have thrown at Wall Street. Just asking? Oh yeah, no bonuses and there should be immediate wage/salary concessions by all employees of the financial institutions, just like the manufacturers.

Posted by: Mark | December 10, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Yes! Imagine how much money those companies would have if they had not given out all of these ridiculous bonuses in the first place. Maybe they wouldn’t need a bailout.

Posted by: Hilary | December 10, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

The companies need the money more than the CEO’s and other top management. They should forgo their bonuses and cut their salaries by at least half until the company they work makes a profit. Why are these people still being rewarded for BAD decision.

Posted by: Michele | December 10, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Why should they get any kind of bonus when they have allowed the car companies to be in such financial downfall. I have probably cared for them in the hospital and their families and cleaned up their vomit and wiped their butts but I am not even getting a free turkey this year and don’t even make as much as auto workers and I have a college education. How is any of this fair?

Posted by: Ann | December 10, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

NO BONUS, NO STOCK OPTION, NO SALARY, NO JOB, just like the thousands of employees they have laid off. Failure should not be rewarded . . .they need to be replaced. If the company loses money so should the leaders.

Posted by: J Keith | December 10, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

LET’S CUT TO THE CHASE!!! DO YOU KNOW WHAT GOOD OLD FASHION AMERICA DOES WHEN MONEY IS TIGHT??? SELL, AUCTION, DONATE, OR FOR HEAVEN SAKES GIVE. EVERYBODY WHO DOES IT KNOWS ” GOOD THINGS COME BACK WHEN GIVEN. IT WILL COME BACK SEVERAL TIMES BOUNTIFUL AND BETTER” AND THAT IS OH-SO-GOOD. I’M SO SICK OF SEEING WALL STREET CRY. THEY LOOK SO UGLY AND PITTIFUL WHEN THEY CRY. WALL STREET, JUST CLOSE THE CURTAIN YOUR ACT IS DONE IT’S TIME FOR THE REAL PEOPLE TO GET REAL REWARDS, REAL RECOGNIZATION, THE REAL BONUS. SO WALL STREET ” SAY HELLO TO MY LITTLE FRIEND… REALITY” SEE YA REALITY IS CALLING FOR THE DESERVING WHICH IS YOU TOO BAD

Posted by: Lisa | December 24, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.