Closing Arguments: Bailout Collapse Blame Game
Less than two hours ago, Majority Leader Harry Reid announced on the Senate floor that the proposed $14-billion bailout for the struggling Big Three automakers had collapsed.
The failure came after the United Auto Workers refused to accept immediate wage cuts that Republicans were demanding — cuts that would bring wages more in line with what the foreign automakers pay their employees at U.S. plants — from about $70 per vehicle to $45 per vehicle.
Reid ominously said that he will dread looking at Wall Street when the markets open Friday. "It’s not going to be a pleasant sight."
A White House spokesman said they were "disappointed" Congress failed to act — and said they would evaluate their options moving forward.
So tonight, we ask you: Should the auto workers have been willing to take a pay cut to help the bailout pass?
Tell us what you think.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
UAW has failed their workers in not accepting immediate wage cuts.
Unfortunately, it shows a very shortsightedness, that may lead to their workers having no jobs at all.
Posted by: Jon Huston | December 12, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
I wonder what their level of pay will be while unemployed!
Posted by: Nomad | December 12, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
The UAW is being foolish. Geting a pay cut is better than having no job at all.
Posted by: cliorez | December 12, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Not only do they need to accept a wage cut, first and foremost the CEO, CFO, and anyone else that has a ‘golden parachute’, bonus’s, stocks, etc., needs to have to dump it!!! What a travesty they still have millions while asking the gov’t. to bail them out…I have no pity for their greed, or the greed of the Union. Do those poor workers think the union bosses are hurting???? The union has become a burden to the American workers.
Posted by: Annes | December 12, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Oh yeah the UAW should have given up part of their salaries…. They are the reason the automotive companies are in the position they’re in now. Its amazing the the Japanese can operate in the south and not have the labor costs that the Big 3 have… Its the UAW’s fault and so they should be part of the solution.
Posted by: Derek Brown | December 12, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Why should the suto workers be expected to take a wage cut, when we haven’t heard anything about the executives taking a wage cut. The workers have a lot more to lose than those on top.
Posted by: jJ bychowski | December 12, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Yes, the auto workers should have been willing to take a pay cut to keep their jobs. They have a reputation for the best union wages in the country. Well, perhaps the union could chip in as well.
Their families are probably living as close to the edge as we are in upstate NY, but a little less money is better than being laid off.
Posted by: Kathryn | December 12, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
How could anyone at this time in the economy not consider making a sacrifice to save their own job. A smaller paycheck is certainly better than no paycheck at all. The problem with all of our problems is the I syndrome. I can’t compromise — I can’t take a cut –I can’t work for the good of the whole
Posted by: Jean | December 12, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Absolutely the UAW should have accepted wage cuts. I’m a union member but its obvious the UAW is one of the main reasons the big three are in the position they are in. Had the UAW never been formed, all three auto manufacturers would have had plenty of liquidity to weather the market.
Posted by: Josh | December 12, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
It’s time for the auto workers to look for a job with Nissan or Toyota. There is a place for unions but the auto workers and the Teamsters are out of line and out of touch.
Posted by: e mar | December 12, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Yes, the auto workers should be willing to take a pay cut. I have worked in Michigan for 11 years for an auto supplier, we have no options when it comes to layoffs and taking pay cuts. People are making 30% less doing the same work that suto makers are earning becuase there is no union backing them. The union wasn’t formed for outrageous pay but for equality and that is gone.
Posted by: Claire | December 12, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
The US auto manufacturers need to get rid of the UAW and try to make vehicles that are more competitive with US made foreign autos
Posted by: cammpoint | December 12, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Everyone needs to make concessions to save the US auto industry, the union and its workers included. The autoworkers can no longer demand inflated wages and compensation when fellow autoworkers at Honda, Nissan, Toyota, BMW and Mercedes turn out high quality cars and trucks for far less.
By not reducing wages some, they may end up with no wages at all, and damage the livelihoods of all other Americans.
Posted by: letsBfair | December 12, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
YES the auto workers should be willing to take a pay cut to help the bail out pass! I just had to take a pay cut at my job just to keep my job and went from $54K/year to $30K/year so if I and many others that I know and have heard of have to take a pay cut, then so should the auto workers! A pay cut with a job is better than NO job at all!
Posted by: Carol Austin | December 12, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
No,the American public should not continue to pay for the failed American auto business, The unions should concede before they loose everything and kill the golden goose as they so often do. The bailouts need to end now. No more free money. Companies need to get their finances in order.
Posted by: Tim Lawler | December 12, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Of course the auto workers should have been willing to take a pay cut. A lower salary is better than no salary at all.
Posted by: anonymous | December 12, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Lower pay is better than no job and NO pay!
Posted by: Butch | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Unions should make concessions on Wages & Benefits
Posted by: John Rinhardt | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
UAW has thought they were better then everyone else. Big three deserve to go down. 4 paid holidays in November. Election day, opening of deer season, and 2 at thanksgiving.
Long overdue. Go Transplants
Posted by: bob | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Yes, they should. Hundreds of people are losing their jobs, not given the opportunity to accept a lower wage. At least they are doing better than many others. $45.00 per vehicle is better than nothing at all. also if that is what is required to get funding, then so be it. If foreign auto makers employees can survive on $45.00 per vehicle, then so should they.
Posted by: Rosemarie McMaster | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
This refusal to take wage consession show the pure arrogance of the Auto Unions. They deserve NOT to have been given any bailout
money.
Posted by: Carol Machak | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Why should the auto workers take a pay cut. They’re not the ones using private jets. Nor are they the ones that decide to manufacture cars that don’t compete. And they’re definitely not the ones making millions upon millions of dollars while leading a company straight to the ground. It’s these CEOs that don’t know how to produce. Yet feel entitled to all of these “perks”.
Posted by: username | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Of course the uaw should have taken a wage cut. I don’t feel a bit sorry for them.
Posted by: Mike Marvin | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
The UAW should have agreed to the paycuts. I live within 30 miles of 5 large plants. I would gladly take any workers job for half their starting pay with no benefits! Hopefully I can soon!
Posted by: localGirl | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
It bothers me that rank and file auto workers earn more than our best teachers. I keep hearing about salaries of 70 to 75 K a year for auto workers. Most teachers do not earn that much(unless you coach football which is a pet peeve of mine).
Posted by: Jeanne Sullivan | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
I think the CEOs should be willing to take a pay cut.
Something needs to be done about the senators who have foreign auto makers in their states.
This seems to be all about breaking the unions like Ronald Reagan did to the air traffic controllers. The rank and file union man trying to care for his family is not the bad guy here.
Posted by: Marty | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
The auto workers should have taken a pay cut as their contribution to the success of this bail out, after all they will end up loosing the said job if at the end there is no bail out. Can we all show some patiotism at this trying time?
Posted by: Chidi Ijioma | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Auto workers should definitely have
taken a pay cut!
Posted by: Di Froberg | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Yes. I think the unions are the root of the auto makers problem. Why do we even need the unions anymore?
Posted by: T. Melton | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
It’s the same thing that happened with Eastern Airlines. The employees choose to have no job over a job that pays less.
Posted by: Laura | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
The autoworkers get benefits that are far better and more expensive than the average worker. Their pay and benefits need to be brought into line with other US workers. I should not have to pay for their bailout when they are not willing to help themselves. Just like at Delta Air Lines, the union needs to take concessions or the contract needs to be broken by letting the auto companies go into bankruptcy and reorganize.
Posted by: Cheryl D. Thompson | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Our senators make 169,000 a year
uaw workers make about 50,000 a year
who should take a pay cut? uaw workers in my opinion are worth their money.US Senators are not.
Posted by: ann | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
No way, they have already taken enough cuts. The federal government needs to abolish NAFTA, that is what has caused all the problems to start with. You can’t have free trade with countries that don’t have an OSHA, don’t care about human rights.
It is funny how the folks in Congress hardly took a deep breath before voting to bail out Wall Street, but when it comes to Main Street they have no sympathy for the hard working middle class. Why should we be surprised.
I wonder how many senate seats have been bought and paid for over the years.
Posted by: Randy | December 12, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
No bailout required. Let the market fix the problem.
Posted by: t_c | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Disgusting the way Reid and D’s sold out the workers and some Jr Swineator from TN walks all over them, and then wants to cut pay of Saturn workers in his TN. Yet he was part of big dollar give away for new VW plant that is giving nearly billion away to get VW there. What a horror to tell workers they have to take wage slave pay rates so the old confederacy does not have to worry about their plants (wage) slaves being freed to living wages by a “union” again coming south.. to free the workers. Worse yet most simply have ot caught on if union wages GO DOWN, so will theirs.. So time to replace Reid and hold congress open even if they miss ANOTHER two week break. Make them work for a change., for citizens, not Wall St and banks. Terrible thing Reid did to those that voted for D’s. not a bone in his back.
Posted by: chuck | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Should financial employees be forced to take a pay cut on account of the hundreds of billions already given to their industries? Should the engineers at the big three have to take a pay cut? Why is it just the blue collar workers who have to make concessions? I do think the UAW has made life a bit too cushy for the auto workers in terms of their protection for poor work behavior and probably also benefits, but UAW workers are still middle class. Why should they be the only ones expected to make concessions?
Posted by: Jim Morton | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Yes I think the workers should have been willing to take a pay cut. We have all had to make sacrifices during these hard times. My husband is one who has taken a big cut. I’m afraid many will have to be willing to take a cut, or times are going to get much worse. God help us all.
Posted by: Karen | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
No pay cut – No Bail out. Why should taxpayers continue to support extremely high wages for poor quality cars. Toyota, builds better cars, cheaper, with reasonable pay for workers. What a shame. Maybe Toyota would want to buy or manage the big three, without their workers?
Posted by: Max Sudduth | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Lets get the facts straight – your article says $70 per vehicle… don’t you mean per HOUR (worker’s wage)… there are a hell of a lot of people in this country that would be willing to do factory work for $48 per hour, like the foreign automakers’ plants’ wages. If UAW wants to go on strike, let’s make it permanent – no sympathy here… that is just poor union leadership, unless they have a promise from the democrats who the union DONATED HOW MUCH to for campaigns??? I read $80 million… if that is correct, it appears the union has plenty of mone yto throw around – they don’t need MY TAX MONEY, to pay to elect THEIR CANDIDATES… Enough already – this is a greedy union who put themselves out of business – end of story!
Posted by: Russ | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
With people being laid off, these workers need to bite the bullet and take a pay cut and help out. They cannot expect the American people to bail them out and not have to give up something in return.
Is it better to take the cut or lose their job?
Posted by: nancy | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Should the auto workers have been willing to take a pay cut to help the bailout pass? — Absolutely not. Auto workers aren’t to blame; management created the problems. Sounds like some members of Congress are more interested in union busting than holding management accountable.
Posted by: Catherine Sellers | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
The UAW absolutely should take a pay cut. They are holding the auto industry and the American public hostage and have been doing so for decades. They have caused the US auto industry to lose any competitive edge they may have had to foreign auto makers. Wage cuts should be immediately made to bring the Detroit workers in line with the rest of the auto workers. They have a choice – get on board and be part of the solution or let the companies go bankrupt and they have nothing. Simple choice!!
Posted by: Don | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
I think the union may live to regret that decision, because it may mean that GM and Chrysler may have to go into bankruptcy.
Then the contracts get thrown out and union works for whatever the automakers are willing to pay or they lose their jobs with no benifets.
Posted by: Jim Omaha | December 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
The Union needs to face reality and cut wages to compete with foreign auto makers or let the big three take bankrupcy
Posted by: Arlette Poplin | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Absolutely!! Everybody else has done so or will have to take paycuts or loose their jobs or businesses. What makes them think they don’t have to do their part in this economy? When you have to run for your life you have to get rid of as much baggage as possible. The American auto workers have higher pay and better benefits than most other workers – now it’s time to trim a lot of fat or close shop!! Welcome to the rest of the world.
Posted by: Cindy | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
the rest of the world is giving up alot to survive, why should the guys/gals at the uaw. be entitled to more than most of the world, let it collapse, and let the fools learn the hard way, i grew up in union town(decatur, Il) and they had the same attitude now most of those jobs are gone.
Posted by: aliholle | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
The UAW is under no obligation to accept reduced wages, just as we are under no obligation to bail them out.
Chapter 11 may be the better route (with the government acting as a guarantor for warranties) instead of the “Brige Loan” approach.
That way, the UAW contracts can be “restructured”, or the UAW can fade to black along with the inefficient business model of US carmakers.
Posted by: Fred | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Yes, Yes, Yes,
This is exactly why the automakers are in trouble! the almighty, self-preserving UAW! They would rather be on welfare than save an industry.
Posted by: Chuck | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
auto workers take a pay cut? You betcha. Our Buick is a piece of cr*p! Our Honda is wonderful. The Honda people should get more.
Posted by: John Muraski | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Yes, and they should be relieved of all costs associated with retirees.
Posted by: j r | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Why should the UAW shoulder the blame for the Auto makers bad strategies? After all, no one at AIG or any of the banks that have been bailed out have been asked to take pay cuts, or even to forgo expensive meetings or bonuses.
The real question is why can’t the Republican senators put aside politics long enough to recognize that whatever problems exist in the auto industry, this is not the time to put millions of jobs at risk?
Posted by: Rose | December 12, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Yes, UAW members who have been overpaid and have had unprecidented benefits and unrealistic work pratices for years should give up some of them to save their jobs. They had better get realistic very fast because if the auto companies file bankrupcy their contracts will become null and void and they will have to accept a lot less than what they may be able to bargain for at this time. Or the worst case they will lose their jobs and end up without work or working for 20% of what they now enjoy.
Posted by: Bob Hanson | December 12, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
no they should take a pay cut its very hard out there now for people these days and things are not getting cheaper and i feel like they only asking for a loan they never they wont pay it back so what are you guys trying to do step on the lil guys again we are sick of that always the lil guys have to give up something
Posted by: old factory worker | December 12, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Of course they should have taken a pay cut. If they want to use my tax dollars, they should be expected to make some sacrifices too. Keeping the wages at their current levels would just mean they’ll burn through the “loan” sooner and come back for more.
The southern automakers are doing relatively well, in part because they pay less.
Posted by: Judy | December 12, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I suppose the u.a.w.will want to hang on to their free VIAGRA as long as they can.The U.A.W must go.Why do you think walmart is so successful.
Posted by: mick | December 12, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Yes, auto workers should agree to wage cut. Not only that but agree to build better quality cars as well. I blame them for the low quality and high(er) costs. Remember, but for their contracts where else would they draw such high wages. Obviously, if they could get such high wages elsewhere, they would not strike and fight for the contracts, and go work elsewhere. Their demands for higher wages and benefits through coercive means such as strike and work slowdown can only be equated with protection money charged by the mobsters.
Posted by: Minoo | December 12, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Unbelievable! I grew up with the saying ‘beggars cannot be choosers’. Isn’t something better than nothing? We are at the highest unemployment in 26 years, take the job!
Posted by: Fore Shame | December 12, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
The UAW members should most certainly be willing to take deep pay cuts to help the bailout pass and stabilize auto manufacturing and keep thier jobs. They played no small part in getting the Auto Companies in this precarious positon, now they’re demanding payback for large contributions made to Dems by having them pimp congress to keep thier jobs and elevated pay … just tell them “no thanks, you made your bed, now sleep in it”!
Posted by: Ron | December 12, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
The auto company’s made a terrible mistake for not taking a cut in pay to help the bailout. They must want to go home and relax, because their plants can’t stay open with out help.
Posted by: Minnie O'Quinn | December 12, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
The Auto workers should not have to take a pay cut. Where are the cuts that the Bond Holders will take.
The Banks recieved Billions with few restrictions. Also did they get rid of the Aircraft.
Look at AIG they plan to pay Bonuses, for there Executives that ran the company into the ground!!!!
Posted by: Charlie W | December 12, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Yes, they should be willing to help save their jobs. Take a pay-cut, until the economy gets back on its feet. As it is they stand to lose everything, If, the Auto Industry, files bankruptcy. God Bless them!
Posted by: Sabrina | December 12, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
The greed of the UAW is legendary. It is outrageous. It is the primary reason for the current financial problems of the auto makers. For them to be unwilling to accept substantial paycuts at this time is unforgivable. I hope the Congress allows the Big 3 to go into bankruptsy. Then the Union will have to accept paycuts. Union auto workers (and federal government workers) are without a doubt the most overpaid workers in America.
Posted by: Duane Dale | December 12, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Absolutely the autoworkers should have been willing to take a pay cut. There has to be some give & take OR maybe they shouldn’t ask the government for help. How can you ask for help & then say “but we aren’t willing to give up anything”. If the government was willing to step in & bail out the company I work for (which is closing in 3 weeks) I would be willing to take a pay cut.
Posted by: Lynda | December 12, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
No, I do not think the UAW should have accepted wage cuts as part of this bailout. As part of the last contract, UAW already accepted wage cuts for employees and benefit reductions, and higher co-pays & deductables for both employees and retirees.
I strongly believe that if any further cuts (including wages, benefits and bonuses) are to be made it should be with management. Especially upper management. Beginning with the CEO and working all the way down through management.
Posted by: Linda | December 12, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
OH, puhleeze. Did they demand salary cuts for the bankers and wall street hotshots when they bailed them out? No, they got to go to a fancy resort.
The working people in the auto workers unions get paid a lot less than the people on Wall Street who caused our economy to take a deep dive. These workers have not been responsible for the BIG THREE continuing to design and build cars and trucks and SUV’s that don’t economize on gasoline, and don’t work as well or as long as Japanese cars do.
Stop the war on Unions and working people.
How much of the billions to the banks have gone to help homeowners?
The BIG 3 are asking for a lot less than the banks and wall street.
Posted by: anna | December 12, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Yes, if they truely want to be part of the solution a major pay cut is expected. It would seem that the Union wants to continue to be part of the problem. Their saleries and benifts are killing the auto industry. Chapter 11 is the best bet for the American people. Nothing is going to change unless the Auto workers are forced into CUTS. There is no place for Union policies in 2008 and beyond. They are past their usefulness. I am thankful someone (s) in the Senate are looking out for the tax payer. Between the bailouts and Illegial Aliens America has been sucked dry. Change is needed.
Posted by: Marisa | December 12, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
I think they are lucky they got the opportunity to even get help. I don’t think it is the governments job to pick and chose what industries it wants to help. In my hometown the paper just listed two big local businesses that are closing – where is their bailout?
If the automakers want a cheap loan why don’t they ask the oil companies? With the profit margins they recorded since Hurricane Katrina, they have all the taxpayers money. Maybe if the government had tried to do something about the oil crisis, people would be still willing to buy the useless gas guzzlers these automakers are producing. Better yet, if companies did not have to pay so much for gas, then they would not have had to raise their prices for goods such as food, people would have more money to spend and we would not be in the middle of a recession.
So yes, they should have taken the price cut, because now they may end up without a job.
Posted by: lholts | December 12, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Yes, the auto workers should be willing to take a pay cut to help the bailout pass, if it has to pass. That is a big part of their troubles to start with, and blame must be laid on the U.A.W. If not for them the auto workers wouldn’t be paid such riculous wages and have such ridiculous benefits that the auto companies can’t afford to keep up the payroll. I am currently laid off from the carpet industry and I would really love to sit home on my duff for two years and receive full pay. Also, the government is not down here bailing out the textile industry. Why should taxpayers give money to the automobile executives to squander when it will probably never be paid back. If they can’t meet expenses now, how in the world can we expect them to suddenly turn everything around and make enough profit to pay back the billions they are groveling for?? Let them go into bankruptcy like everyone else in their shoes and come up with solutions to their problems on their own.
Posted by: Carolyn Styles | December 12, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
It is amazing that the Republicans are DEMANDING wage cuts from the workers and not Management and more amazing is the no cuts or controls were put in when OUR money was given to the banks- WHY? To add insult to injury nobody has a clue what the banks did with the money. It did not go to help people get credit to buy cars or pay their mortgages. The banks has added more fees to the consumers making thing harder (Citibank has added a $10.00 transaction fee when your line of credit. I call this a discount bounce check fee). If we do not help the Auto workers many more families will be unemployed. I believe the Senate is now trying to make up for the mistakes made in NO control of the money to the banks. Take some of the money allocated to the banks and transfer to the Auto Industry. Again, the banks have done nothing for the People.
Posted by: An Angry Tax Payer | December 12, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Only a fool would choose greed over job security.
Posted by: Corky | December 12, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
I had a friend who worked for a Japanese
company for 6 years they let her go because she stopped the line to much to suit them. they fired her after 6 years. that is WHY we need a union
Posted by: ann | December 12, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
A classic case of “All or nothing!” If they want to keep their jobs, they need to insure their companies don’t fail. I believe bankruptcy will allow the domestic auto companies to get out from under the weight of the unions.
Posted by: Mike Mumford | December 12, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
This is absolutely amazing! No one asked the financial sector employees to take wage cuts in thier bailout!!! I worked in technology for a local bank for nearly 13 years and last year was laied off due to the sale of our bank to a Canadian held bank. Now my husband who has worked for Chrysler for nearly 17 years is in danger due to the mess that these Republicans have created! Oh, and we happen to live in Kokomo, Indiana the #3 fastest dieing town in the United States. Thanks Republicans! We need more unemployment!
Posted by: Marcy | December 12, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Something is radically wrong when $40.00 per hour workers have to bail out $74.00 per hour workers. The bail out was not to bail out the Auto manufacturers, it is to bail out the Unions. They have destroyed the Auto Industry just as they have driven other industries out of the U.S. If the auto workers want to keep their jobs, they must divorce from the $300,000 to $500,000 per year union bosses.
Posted by: James Duck | December 12, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Shouldn’t it read $70 per HOUR, not vehicle… Plenty of Americans will work for $48 per hour in a CAR FACTORY!!! Goodbye greedy UAW!
Posted by: Russ | December 12, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Should the auto workers have been willing to take a pay cut to help the bailout pass? Yes. Now since the United Auto Workers do not want to help fix their problem then they should fix their problem without the Governments assistance. This is the problem today some people do not want to sacrifice anything in order to help their own problem. Instead they want someone else to do all the fixing while they sit back and watch.
Posted by: toni | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Of course they should have accepted pay cuts! The autoworkers are arrogant, overpaid, whining jerks that deserve to lose their jobs. Let ‘em go bankrupt and reorganize. They make crappy cars anyway that are too overpriced! I’ll stick with my Toyota! It’s NEVER in the shop! Yet my friends Ford Truck ($50,000) spends more time in the service department than on the road!
Posted by: sandy | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
No the auto workers should not be expected to take a drastic pay cut. The union workers have given alot of concession already. Why do they have to be at the same pay scale as the foreign auto workers in southern states? The cost of living in these southern states may not be as high as the auto workers in Michigan face. I am very disappointed in our goverment. The financial industry was given money without the grilling that the auto industry received. The economy is what is putting the auto industry at risk. And who caused the economy to crash but our goverment elected officials.
Posted by: Pat Shiemk | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
This situation is ridiculous. If they (the workers)do not work the government has to pay unemployment,so its as broad as its long. Either way the taxpayer must pay the bill.
Posted by: Randall Fowler | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Unions were done servng their purpose back in the 1950′s. They should be dismantled and tossed out.
The only choice the UAW workers should have been given is take the pay cut or quit, there are PLENTY of unemployed people that would be more than happy to take their place at a fair wage!
All unions do now is create and promote greed and less opportunity for people. People should be paid on merrit, you want a raise…EARN IT!
Posted by: MilitaryMom | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
UAW’s greed and Executive stupidity is what got them here in the first place. YES, workers should accept a 50% pay cut, or lose their job to someone who would really appreciate the opportunity.
Posted by: LTCBoss | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I feel that workers unions were originally developed years ago for a very good reason. However, like everything else, over time they have gotten out of hand politically and have become too greedy. It is a matter of survival at this point. Everyone’s lives/livelihood is at stake in this country, by not cooperating on some level it will result in a tricle down effect of self destruction. If they just take a realistic paycut at least they will have a job tomorrow. Is the beligerance worth the end result? What are they thinking? Save our countries economy, stop the selfishiness and greed!
Posted by: susan murray | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
The UAW is the reason the auto makers
have been going down the garden path with those outrageous wages, health benefits, and layoff pay that have driven Detroit to the brink. And when push came to shove tonight, the UAW would rather lose their jobs than help their companies by cutting back while there is still time. Russian roulette with the Congress!
Posted by: Andrew Tarkington | December 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
No, the workers shouldn’t have to cut their wages in order to help the bailout. They weren’t the ones who created the problem, and as taxpayers this means that they are going to be paying for this bailout twice. Employees shouldn’t be expected to keep employing company afloat.
The automakers dug their own grave, and now they should have to lie in it. The great thing about capitalism is that it rewards entrepreneurs who are resourceful and innovative, and businesses that are run poorly and with too much greed eventually collapse; it is economic Darwinism. There’s a reason the dinosaurs didn’t survive; they were unable to adapt.
If the automakers had made smart, frugal business decisions over the past several decades, they wouldn’t be in this situation. Instead of focusing on newer technologies and developing more fuel efficient and alternate fuel vehicles, they continued to put out gas guzzlers from single-purpose factories. The car companies that are doing OK now looked ahead and recognized that they needed to be flexible. They designed their factories to be multi-purpose, so that they could produce multiple types of cars on one assembly line and modify production according to demand; they consistently produce higher MPG cars at a lower cost. They don’t waste money on private jets.
The sad part is that if this bail-out doesn’t come through, many of these workers will lose their jobs because plants will close. The workers, who aren’t responsible for the automakers’ financial problems, are the ones who will end up paying for it, one way or another.
Posted by: Erin | December 12, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Maybe the UAW officials would like to take a cut in union dues instead of the rank and file taking pay cuts. The union is more interested in lining its pockets than it is in its members or the country’s economy.
Posted by: Wanda in Ohio | December 12, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Its sad we help aig and do not ask for consessons 700+billion and do not want to help the back bone of the USA. I ask you who will pay the taxes when millions of jobs that are going to be lost? I ask all that voted no to step down from there seats THANK YOU P.S. GET ready for the real depression
Posted by: gerald smith | December 12, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
How stupid are you people? Stop listening to the lying media.
Our economy is crashing because nobody can afford to buy anything on $14 an hour jobs.
That is what the UAW workers have already been cut to.
There’s nothing left to cut.
They are lying to you.
When will you fight for what you work for instead of letting the speculators and “investor class” have it all?
You FOOLS.
Posted by: Sandy | December 12, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
I think the auto workers deserve what they get paid. The republican senators want to break up the unions.They want to keep the middle class at a low rate.Also they have foreign companies building plants in thier areas. They want to keep the rich above all others. We see what the trickle down affect does unemployment freclosures.
Posted by: Joseph | December 12, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
No Bailout! If possible all of the other companies that have received aid should have to turn in a report on how the money is being used and include on the contract that is cannot be used for raises or other business trips.
Why do we have to bailout companies that do not have good business management. This sounds personal and they should file for bankruptcy. Every American is having a hard time with their bills, gas, mortgage, and living week to week on what they make. Is anyone giving us money to keep on going. No we do with what we have and do what we have to do to keep going.
We budget ourselves and cut down on luxuries so we can continue to go forward.
All of these companies need to look at where they are spending their money and cut all the luxury from their budget at least until they get back on track. Some of the business meals, luxury conference trips, expensive hotels, airfares, limos, etc. are not all necessary.
We are all having a hard time and some of us have been having a hard time even before the recession.
Posted by: Mary | December 12, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
The fact that the union does not see that it’s a big part of the problem is a great example of why the bailout will not work. Look at what happened to the airline industry? The big US automakers have been losing money long before the economy turned sour. Instead of rewarding the same old establishment, why not give the bailout in the form of a tax credit to those who purchase a car? it will start to move inventories and breath some life back into the industry. While they’re at it, maybe it’s time for the US auto industry executives to take accountability for putting themselves in this situation and adapt or face extinction.
Posted by: Nick | December 12, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Folks the $70 cost is also run up by retired and health care and is NOT a real cost to measure against. The $45 in south is not real wage either, most in southern auto not getting 12/hour.. This is simply union busting.. and when unions go down so does your pay.. THE ONLY THING that build the middle class was unions.like them or envy them. they got you your pay and they build the SUVs’ you so loved to drive and CONGRESS gave the tax breaks to buy the SUVs. Where was all the upset at trillions going to banks-wall st? Wake up folks this is just union busting, the final page in Regan’s plan. Read a bit on unions history, they may have got a bit more then you feel they should, but they also were the reason most got real pay and medical etc. Kill them and watch what happens, think abotu it before you get jealous of what they have and ask, whom will stand up for me with the company, and the answer is, be careful what you wish for..So got to ask, why NO comments on shutting down fire and police unions?
Posted by: bill nashville TN | December 12, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
No! Republicans love to drive the working man into nothing! Their number one goal is to desolve the unions. Let the hard working men and women retire without pension, who cares, just so there is a large profit! That is the reason they want the automakers to go into bankruptsy! They want no middle class, just poor and rich. Guess which end most Americans belong to? Billions to the financials, no questions asked, but castrate the auto industry for a measly $25 billion, that supports millions of jobs. They are out of touch with the mainstreet, and that is why I think republican party ultimately will destroy themselves!
Posted by: Michael Skrgic | December 12, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Not only YES, but HELL yes. Why do they think what they do is any more important than the rest of us working 2 jobs to make ends meet. They should be grateful they EVEN have a chance to have a job. Companies file for bankruptcy and employees go packing with empty bags.
I’m sick and tired of all these “special” segments of the workforce being given major bailouts because of indulgence, top heavy poor management that allowed their company to crater because they didn’t keep their eye on the business and become proactive months and years ago.
Get a grip auto workers, you are NOT the only people in the workforce. Your job slapping metal together is no more important than doctors and surgeons, yet some of you make twice as much and don’t even have to worry about malpractice insurance.
Your arrogance disgust me and Washington should just say what Nancy Reagan said over 20 years ago….
JUST SAY NO!!!
Posted by: Charlene | December 12, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
The politics on the hill are out of control, and at the taxpayer’s Expense! Sure the autoworkers needed to contribute with concessions, their perception of “entitlement” is not real world, and they were simply wrong this PM to hold out. On the other hand, our elected officials in Congress are playng dumb (perhaps not) and feel compelled to put politics over solving real and serious issues that are destroying American families. During the past few weeks, they have basically told Americans not to buy American cars any more. What!? Wall Street swings are the result of what they do and say/announce these days. Has anyone checked the “Speaker’s” trading activity lately? There should be insider trading laws which prevent elected officials from trading duirng periods when their actions can deliberately and predictably influence the market!
Posted by: Biz DeLique | December 12, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
The UAW are a bunch of greedy, arrogant people. This union has played a huge role in the fall of the big 3. I have been in support of a bailout until now. Let the big 3 die! Bankruptcy will take the power away from the corrupt UAW and force the big 3 into long overdue restructuring. We will all benefit from this in years to come.
Posted by: mike | December 12, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
all unions should be busted. they have been holding america’s manufacturing hostage for years. america does not negotiate with terrorists.
Posted by: gary | December 12, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
I think maybe congress should be paid the same that foreign politicians are. Who do they think is paying for their bloated pay/benefits packages? When we are all making $15.00 per hour, with little or no health care, exactly who is going to be contributing to the income tax base?
This is another attempt to break the backs of unions, after all they are to blame for most of the problems we are facing in this country, right? Also, has anyone considered the fact that the employees of the auto companies are the best customers. Cut that pay and who will be in the market for ANY automobile? I guess it’s still okay to subsidize the foreign companys, 4 plants in Alabama alone have been given help in the form of tax breaks and other goodies totaling about 4 billion dollars. And, do not even bring up the Wall Street bailouts, it sickens me that any of the overtaxed wages of autoworkers went to the fatcat accounts, no questions asked. By the way, where exactly is that money today?
The autoworkers have given wage cuts in the last 3 contracts. They have kept up their end of all the agreements with the company. They also agreed that $1 of their pay would go to the retirees. This crisis is not caused by hourly workers, they have no say in how the company is run. When they lose the base rate, get ready for the trickle down effect in your paycheck, how’s that sound to you?
Posted by: N Pompa | December 12, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Everyone is to blame for this debacle, but the UAW is very near the top of the list. Giving up the jobs bank is not nearly enough in terms of concessions in trying to save these 3 companies. It’s inconceivable that the big 3 can avoid bankruptcy without reducing their production and legacy costs. The UAW is going to lose in the end, and will have nobody to blame for their head being stuck in the sand. They will be lucky to have any jobs after the big 3 enter bankruptcy. I’m still scratching my head over how poorly congress handled this as well. It’s like the president, the house and senate all live in separate worlds. Classic partisan behavior. Unfortunately, this will cost the taxpayer more than ever by the time we have to pay out the unemployment and medicare for lost jobs and retirees that lose their health benefits. Not to mention the lost tax revenues from everyone in the industry. At this stage in the recession, we should have gotten something done to prevent further damage. Shame on everyone for not rolling up their sleeves, but especially UAW for not accepting what was clearly necessary to make the industry viable.
Posted by: Andrew | December 12, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
When taxpayers nationwide are required to kick in tax dollars to keep the Big 3 operating, the UAW’s must give in to salary cuts. They will still make more than most of the taxpayers who are being required to pay their salaries. Times are tough, UAW must be reasonable.
Posted by: Abby | December 12, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Being a retired UAW member of 32 years, I feel that the UAW members have already made enough concessions!!! The retirees have also made enough concessions!!! It is the MANAGEMENT or more so MISMANAGEMENT that has gone on for YEARS….and management always had a deaf ear to the REAL problems from the people who ACTUALLY worked with the products day in and day out. ANd no matter how good or bad the profit margin is THE CEO and upper management STILL received HUGE bonuses, where we saw NO PROFIT sharing……something we got in lieu of giving up OTHER benefits//to never see more than a few hundred dollars!! When management recieved these outrageous amount of money. If it was not for the economy going totally bust, I would tell the BIG THREE NO MONEY!!! But the ones that it will affect the most, unfortunately will not be them. And THEY KNOW that. ANd i am glad theat the Union finally stood up and said NO MORE!!! I know WE, the UAW, members will be the “bad guys” in the press, but if you really do your investigation, we have given up alot. People like myself, that worked for GM for 25 years, then becoming Delphi, thru no CHOICE of our own, have already took a 50% wage cut, have no pension, like I have….it is basically their own 401K, and they have to do that with 50% of the wages, and also have no where near the health benefits that I had. SO, with all the SAVINGS, have we seen the price of a car come down….NO! FOrd/Visteon, the same scenario. And there are many UAW jobs, within GM, that also have taken a 50% wage cut. And this PROBLEM can also be blamed on AMERICANS…..when i hired into GM, the NORM was to buy AMERICAN..you dare not drive a foreign car in the parking lot, or risk it being keyed…..and the slogan was BUY AMERICAN>>>>THE JOB YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN!!!! So, if you are laid off, or worrying about your future, look in your driveway first!! And it is SO hard to find any electronics that are built here, again, the americans CHOSING to buy the cheapest…….and now who owns us CHINA!!! NAFTA did not help, but the AMERICANS not PROTECTING OUR OWN, was the real devil in this. So, thaks you UAW, for taking a courageous stand, in light of knowingly being the scapegoat of ridicule. I feel better knowing they still have some backbone left….like i said if you look over the years we have given up alot in the last few contracts. New co pays, coinsurance deductibles for retirees, who are on fixed incomes. And the last contract GM and Ford got off the hook for cost of health care, turning it over to the UAW. So, GIVE ME A BREAK….it is the Rick W., CEO GM, that showed their true colors, showing up in private jets….almpost cocky that they would just get the money, cause they know what their collapse would mean to the economy……thanks to our government for pointing that out to everyone. Like i said, THEY never conceded anything, life went on as usual for them, whether things were good or bad. Shame on all of them and the foriegn buying americans….which unfortunately NOW include UAW members!! Thank God the time I worked that people stood by the motto, and I was abole to get my time in because PEOPLE did that!! Thanks for listening! For all of the country, I surely hope the government bails them out, cause it will be a total collapse of the local communities if they do not get the money. I just hope that all the CEO’s are fired!!! No severance pay…just fired like any other worker….a pink slip and gone!
Posted by: michele | December 12, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
I am a union member who took a 42% pay-cut in the state of Michigan to help save the airline that I work for. I had no choice in the matter. Now, my husband has taken a 50% pay-cut to save his company that is a supplier to the auto industry. The UAW has to get off of their high horse and face reality. If they keep up their high salary demands, they will all be out of a job soon.
Posted by: Mary | December 12, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
only 10% of the price of a car represents UAW wages. Even by adding another 20% for material cost u still have 70% of pure profit.
Unions created the 40 hour work week. Unions created workers benefits.
Unions created vacations, sick days and paid holidays. If u ask them to take a pay cut what do u think will happen to ur pay? and if they did take a pay cut would auto CEOs lower the price of a vehicle? Even vehicles built by $1 an hour Mexicans still cost the same as the ones built by $30 an hour Americans. So what does lower wages change? CEO bonus, that’s all.
As a UAW worker i would have been willing to take a wage cut, however, there were NO proposals presented by congress or the auto CEOs…
Posted by: ustin | December 12, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Thank you Marty~Start with the Republican Senator from Alabama . The state gave over a billion to foreign Auto manufacturers to come to their state . Eliminating the American made vehicles is eliminating the competion. Wouldn’t his no vote be considered a conflict of interst case?
Posted by: Carol | December 12, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
I am sorry that the UAW can’t see the harmthat they have done by not excepting the cut in pay to half of that they are receiving now if the forgin auto workers can make it on $45.oo including bennifits. Then whats this world comming to. I’m a 100% Disabled Vetern and with my SS Disability income don’t come nearly as much per year as the members of the UAW
Posted by: Jefff | December 12, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
How many Wall Street bankers were asked to take immediate wage cuts in order to get bailout money? Did AIG get asked not to pay it’s shareholders dividends? Did any Wall Street bank executives get told they would not get a bonus if their company got any bailout money? The answer is no to all of these questions. This is just another example of the haves getting the money while the have-nots go to their tables hungry or watch the bankers take their homes.
Posted by: algwriter | December 12, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Yes, the UAW should have agreed to take pay cuts. At least most auto workers would still be able to feed their families. A smaller income like that of many non-union families is still better than no income at all.
Posted by: ron | December 12, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
I think the republians senator have a serious problem with reality, sure lets let them go belly-up and watch are unemployment go up to 12 to 14 percent and the government have to pick up all the additional expenive of the health care and the retirement from the three company’s, then you figure in all the other suppliers that would go under, I wonder if even the forigen company’s would be able to get parts to build cars .. I feel like this is the last horrah for the republians to control what may happen in the country and they want to be the ones to cripell the country before the democrats take over the mess that already is going on .. we all know that the uaw employee’s have had their head in the sand much to long, but are you going to make them take the blame for all this, that’s just horse $hit .. when you can give all the banks and finanical sector all this money with know strings at all .. you sure did not see them having to come in and BEG FOR THEIR 350 BILLION DOLLARS SO FAR .. I think the auto makers get that it is time for them to put their house in order, and the uaw knows that the sweet ride they have had needs to change … it is going to cost the U.S.goverment 10 times more if the company’s go under and who knows how much longer it will take for the encoomy to get back on track .. the auto industry is the backbone of the country, lets just break it and watch how much more we all will suffer … IDOITS THAT WHAT WE HAVE FOR SENATORS, I GUESS …. like congressman Reid said , we all see tomorrow how the stocks far off the face of the earth .. DUMBER AND DUMBER .. THIS IS NOT FUNNY AT ALL .. STUPID AND DUMB
Posted by: dcbeef54 | December 12, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
I have been a union member my whole life but now feel that it is time for us to realize how close we are to a national and global catastophe. Yes, we, the union workers, are not responsible for the economic disaster that we find ourselves in. That is the fault of our politicians, bankers and lobbyist who have raped this country, blinded by their unmitigated gaul and greed. There will be time to address that in the near future. But for now, everyone is going to have to sacrifice if we are to have any hope of recovery. The UAW can be the catylist. Set the standard for which everyone will have to negotiate and come out the hero or stand your ground and walk together into the worst depression in US history. It’s your call!
Posted by: George R. | December 12, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
The reason why the US auto companies cannot make money: Unions! They continue to refuse to make concessions. Unions are doomed. Everyone will lose their jobs now. UAW thank you, you have just confirmed to the American people that you should not exist.
Posted by: Lynne McCoy | December 12, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Wow. I sure hope the UAW are happy that they, for the most part, shoved us into a depression. Forcing 3 of the largest companies in America to go bankrupt, and then destroying their chances for help from the government, all because they had to be stubborn and wouldn’t take a minor pay decrease that so many other Americans who are fortunate enough to not lose their job, have done and will do. Happy Unemployment UAW! You earned it!
Posted by: Me | December 12, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
I guess the real question is how greedy one company, one manager, one person can really get. Taking a pay cut is only a drop in the bucket to where the real problem lies. Of course the “blue collar” workers feel the pinch. The real problem is with management and how greedy a huge corporation really is! What good is applying a band-aid to a cut without a good anti-bacterial ointment? The bail out would just cover the wound. Ointment needs to be applied to the real problem…upper management! How big can your bonus be while the company is going down the drain?
Posted by: john everett | December 12, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Having worked in a Gm dealer ship for 20 years I must say that back when the dealer started the cars had a lot better quality than they do now. And now I drive a Subrau Forester. The cars that are put aut now are pices of JUNK. ASnd the unions are the bigest cause of the problem. They make more cars , but they don’t take any pride in there work. so why can’t they take a cut in wages. We all are having to cut back, so why can’t they take a cut. They should cut out some benifets also.
Posted by: James Fleming | December 12, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
The bridge loan for the automakers should have passed. I am more disappointed than ever that the Senate could not get passed their bias to do something good for the people that work for the auto companies. The biggest terrorists in this country are the sorry excuses we call our political representatives. They are trying to destroy the middle Americans, this not right. Auto workers pay taxes in this country as do the auto companies. This talk of taking a wage cut is ridiculous coming from a Senate that makes four times what the average auto worker makes.As an auto worker I would gladly work for less if I could afford to live on less. I do not live high on the hog from the money that that I earn as an auto worker, but I do have a decent life. Please excuse the auto companies for caring about there workers. The badgering of the auto indusrty that has been going on in Washington is shameful on the part of the elected participants. The reason American auto companies have higher cost is the legacy cost from retirees. Can America afford to strip away retirement payments to former workers. Also when I don’t work I can’t pay taxes. I have never been so dissapointed in America in my life. What a bunch of buffoons that we have in Washington. I am sorry that I even had to write this.
Posted by: vicki | December 12, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Thank God I drive a Hyundai. Great Warranty, Great Mileage, Great Price. Good ridance to Ford, Chruysler & GM. Now let’s have a real auto maker turn Detroit back into the Motor City it once was.
Posted by: John the Great Pumpkin | December 12, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
The United States of America was dealt a death blow by the arrogance of grossly overpaid Senators with taxpayer funded health care. Many auto manufacturing transplants offer higher wages and better benefits than the domestic automakers. The UAW has given great concessions during the last few contracts, even giving back our pay to fund the VEBA for the retirees who Senator Corker and others want to take the hit for the arrogance of GM management. Our bosses still drive company cars and receive pay far in excess of Toyota counterparts. The biggest difference between the big 3 and the foreign car makers is that we have a huge number of older citizens who Senator Corker believes should be denied any retirement after a lifetime of backbreaking and dangerous work in very unhealthy environments. Senator Corker and friends can continue to “earn” their hugely gross salaries for a part time office job while our senior citizens will suffer. I blame all Americans for their greed and their hatred of all things American. We have a need to condemn anything made in American and rave about foreign made products (and now services). The Harbour report shows that our GM Wentzville plant has been the most productive full size van plant in North America. Indeed, many GM products are cheaper, better quality, and higher mileage than foreign vehicles whose profits go largely to support the nationalized health care system in their home countries. Also, when we lose our jobs, we will take a little bit more of a pay cut when we decide to compete for your jobs. We are used to working in dangerous and extreme conditions for far longer hours than the average American worker does. I am working on my resume as we speak. Yes, I have a college degree, extensive IT training, and a perfect attendance record over a lifetime of working second shift. If I must choose a large pay cut where I work or offer to take the job you do now for a bit of a savings for your company, I know what I will do. When the US economy slips further into the abyss, remember what you drive drives America.
Posted by: Sharon | December 12, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Let me see if I got this right. The economy has been in the tank for the last couple of years. A major American industry is in trouble. We can bail out the airline industry, we can bail out the banks, but when it comes to “loaning” money to the auto industry, the American workers have to get something taken our of their hide, or it’s a no go. Have the workers in the financial industry been penalized, and forced to give up some of their “not so hard earned” money? Are we looking to bust up unions? Decimate labor laws? Why? Why do American people want to make their fellow Americans suffer? Do people really think that union workers are living high off the hog? Why? Who feeds you this bull crap?
Posted by: colleen | December 12, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Well the union workers can refuse. There is such a thing a shooting yourself in your foot. Is less money better or no job at all. They will hurt themselves too.
The other question is has top management been pulled in and properly acessed as far as their income. We need to know these things so we have confidence things are going in the right direction.
Unions think they are such bully’s and they can always get what they want.
Posted by: Camille | December 12, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
What about aig 700+ billion? NO concession’s there? The auto Ind. is the back bone of the USA. They gave concessions for the last 10YRS. The ceo’s need to take concessions no one is worth 5 MILLION A YEAR. GET ready for the real DEPRESSION.
Posted by: gerald | December 12, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Lot’s of blame to go around… But the resolution has to start somewhere… I am disappointed the UAW would save a penny to lose a dollar. I watched the airlines, specifically American Airlines go through a similar thing down here in Dallas and the union took a pay cut and kept AA out of bankruptcy. They’re still struggling mainly because of the recent idiotic gas price increase but the union saved AA at the time. Frankly car prices are too high!! It comes down to the benefits the Big 3 continue to pay out for current and retired employees where the average american is paying more causing significant issues as well. Cut CEO pay, get rid of thier fat bonus structures and for god sake take a pay cut to save important jobs.
I can’t wait to see how my 401k takes another big hit when the market reacts to this shear stupidity!!! Thanks UAW!
Posted by: Tom | December 12, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
I met some of the retired auto workers in Brownsville,Texas where they were spending the winter. These people worked on GM’s assembly line. They were worried about gas prices and whether they could afford to fill the tank on their 40′ motor home and maintain their 5 bedroom house in Michigan on their retirement pay. I have no sympathy for them, they are over-paid for what they do and need to come down from their high and mighty position that their Union leads them to. They need to learn to live like the rest of the people in the world.
Posted by: John Savage | December 12, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Maybe the Republicans Senators have finally stepped up to the plate to start getting us real with the rest of the world and what we have to face to be competitive now and in the future. Hopefully this type of required reform will also be extended to Wall Street. Unless we get serious with many of the reforms, we will all be bald instead of just having an unattractive haircut. Bravo for the Republican Senators who have finally showed the courage of their convictions!
Posted by: C. E. Christoffersen | December 12, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
No for wage cuts! The auto workers had to contribute to the bank bail out now they get the PRIVALEGE of having to contribute their salaries too. I don’t think so! I voted Republican but am now really glad they lost.
Posted by: Carol in Chicago | December 12, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
One thing that helps put things into
proper perspective is that half a pay
check is still 100% better than no paycheck at all. We have become accustomed to high living and when that is on it’s way out we can not deal with it. But make no mistake. It is on it’s way out. So, what must we now do to keep something we can live with: “PAY CUT!”
But, it must begin at the top. Either
stop the multi-million dollar bonuses
or divide it with all employees.
Or better yet, pay off the current pensions.
But most of all, learn how to make the best cars in the world, as we once did.
No one takes pride anymore in “Made In America!” We made the car. All others are the imitators. And yet the students have surpassed the innovator of it all.
Was greed so rampant that as long as the cars were selling nothing esle mattered?
In final thought, the union may prove to be the worst enemy of all. In their obstinance, they will cause this bailout program to never be.
Posted by: Orlando Torres | December 12, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Of course the unions should have accepted wage concessions – it’s a complete no-brainer. What an excellent example of greed and arrogance. The golden goose is on life support and they are pulling the plug.
Executives accepting millions in compensation while managing a failing company fall into the same category.
None of these people get it. Like the people at AIG don’t get it, spending hundreds of thousands on a luxury resort soon after they had received a bailout. The actual amount spent at the luxury retreat is a drop in the bucket – the problem is these people’s sense of entitlement goes on and on and on ……………
Posted by: Kirk | December 12, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Yes, the unions should have taken the wage cuts and the executives should immediately give up their bonuses and perks. On the other hand I read that Majority Leader Harry Reid added to the bill a wage increase for Federal judges. That is an outrage to use this critical situation to get “extras” through. That type of action is a big part of our government’s problem.
Posted by: Lynn | December 12, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
JUST keep buying foreign products and don’t grip about your minium wage job you will have to live off of. BUY MADE IN USA
Posted by: gerald | December 12, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
To all of those who are screeming that Republicans are screwing the UAW and how much the Senators earn. I agree that Congressman have sweet deals but that is besides the question. You jokers who love to blame Republicans for anything and everything are just the worst kind of cynics. Wall street was not bailed out – bankers were given loans to help them have money to lend because Democrats forced banks to make loans to people who could not afford houses they bought. Wake up, you morons and stop looking at Republicans to blame for everything. In this case, Republicans are the only ones looking out for the taxpayers!!!
Posted by: A. Mancin | December 12, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
No wonder why car prices are so high… I am all for companies helping out in retirement much like most pensions, but as heatlhcare costs skyrocket (another Nightline story and American tragedy), companies just cannot compete carrying the bazillion retired employees full benefits year after year. My company won’t. My parents companies didn’t, why does the UAW continue to force this in the CBA? I know working in the factories is backbreaking work, but don’t tell me my parents (non factory) didn’t work just as hard.
Let the Senate give the retired employees a payment for thier benefits and take that arbitross (sp) off of the American company (grandfather) and let’s create better solutions for savings plans for retirement.
Posted by: Tom | December 12, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
This is yet another example of how outdated the need for unions are in this country. Greedy unions with over the top benefits are the CAUSE of GM’s financial crisis……union wages have priced these companies out of the market. Most Americans don’t make anywhere near what UAW workers make………yet they have the gall to ask American taxpayers to bail them out. This is ridiculous. I’ve bought my last car produced by the UAW!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | December 12, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
The American people are not stupid. “Wall street” investment bankers get a colossal bailout with no strings attached. But the working class union members have to make concessions on wages as a precondition for the auto companies to receive a fraction of what the banks received. The handling of the current financial crisis has sent a resounding message as to “who” is valued in America. Our politicians were perfectly willing socialize the risks of doing business for wealthy bankers. So why are auto workers being asked to make concessions on wages in order to receive the same treatment? I think congress should just cut the façade; they can scream “apples to orange” or paint pretty word pictures with their favorite choice of euphemism, but this hypocrisy is just to hard to miss.
Posted by: Jake | December 12, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
That’s it republicans, kill the last major manufacturers in the nation, what do you people care about 2 million more unemployed, you have yours and I’m sure you drive European cars anyway.
Pisss on the the middle class.
Posted by: JR | December 12, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
The reaction by the UAW – refusing to accept pay cuts – shows one half the reason bailing out the automakers would have failed. The other half is the insanely high pay of the execs and their belief that they’re entitled to live like princes while refusing to make the kind of cars the people want to buy. At least we found out *before* our money was thrown down the toilet.
Posted by: Kelliann | December 12, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
The UAW is selfish and short-sighted. If the Big 3 go down it’s not just the autoworkers who lose their jobs. It’s all the other vendors who supply parts and materials to the auto industry who lose their livelihood too. The Union has outlived its usefulness. In years when the rest of us took pay cuts and got no bonuses — UAW workers continued to get all of those things. It’s time to get rid of the union, streamline management and turn our auto industry into a viable and productive part of the market place again.
Posted by: Karalyn | December 12, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
I think some of you have lost your minds. Why are you telling the auto workers that they need to make more concessions? Their wages hav already been cut in half. What about telling the CEO’s that they have to [not only not take their bonus]take a pay cut instead?If any of you had had the chance to have a union fight for your rights, you wouldn’t be squealing sour grapes.
Posted by: Roberta | December 12, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
The greed of the UAW is outrageous and must be controlled if we’re to have any kind of success making the big 3 competitive again. The unions ruined the airlines, and that required a cycle of bankruptcies to clean up fat and inflated contracts. Other industries needed the same housecleaning before good management policy could rule the day. Now it has come to the auto industry! If the UAW doesn’t make huge wage concessions, the companies will ultimately die, with or without government assistance. It’s time for strategic thinking; something alien to the union bosses.
Posted by: Bob Steinerd | December 12, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
The UAW needs to get realistic. If they want the American taxpayers to bail their industry out, then the workers themselves have to contribute to helping keep the industry afloat. Wages are fairly high and a 5-10% paycut could go a long way in keeping their jobs and getting their respective companies back versus a collapse which will not keep them nor all the secondary support jobs (dealers, service industry etc) afloat.
Posted by: aj | December 12, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
I agree that the CEOs should take a hefty cut but the unions need to also help. What other outs are there to avoid a collapse? Even a bailout is only a temporary loan. The bottom line is that both management and employees need to sacrifice or the end is inevitable.
Posted by: aj | December 12, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Auto workers have mortgages, car loans, schooling costs, etc. like everyone else. No loan no job, but decreases in their wages or benefits could cause the workers & retirees to lose whatever they have and cause extreme hardships.
THE FACTS:
GM’s total hourly labor costs are now $69 including wages, pensions and health care for active workers, plus the pension and health care costs of more than 432,000 retirees and spouses.
Toyota says its total costs are around $48. The Japanese automaker has far fewer retirees and its pension and health care benefits are not as rich as those paid to UAW workers.
Posted by: Betty | December 12, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
There is an unrealistic expectation in this industry that they are deserving of maintaining current pay while asking for billions of dollars at the expense of others. The great majority of Americans work hard in difficult situations and have to make due with the pay they are given. In the last two years my husband has earned an income less than 30% of what it once was without a choice in the matter. We have made many cutbacks and are making due so far, and are thankful that he sitll has a job. For the auto workers to refuse a paycut while asking for so much seems so out of touch with what is happening to so many.
Posted by: Loren | December 12, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
We gave our employees the choice of working one day less a week, so no one would lose their job. They were wise enough to agree. In past bad times, my brother and I took no pay. You do what you gotta do.
I hope Obama doesn’t feel he owes the unions, and put a burdon on the backs of all other American workers.
Posted by: dorde cedic | December 12, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Betty, you forget that a collapse will leave the autoworkers with ZERO wages to pay for their mortgages, loans, schooling etc! #69/hr is about $138,000 per manyear vs. $48/hr at $96,000. maybe a lesson to fund benefits up front.
Posted by: aj | December 12, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Yes, the Big 3 most definitely need a bailout. It is a loan, not a gift. The average union worker performs the job duties he/she is required to do. It is the engineer who designs the product, it is the supervisor who oversees the workers, it is the CEO’s and executives who are making the decisions. It is also the executives and CEO’s who reap multimillion dollar bonuses, whether the company is making a profit or floundering. The average union worker wage is greatly exaggerated in the media. Allow the CEO’s to take a drastic reduction in their pay and leave the hourly worker alone. They are not greedy, just making an honest wage for an honest days’ work. Their job may look easy on television, but they have performed it over and over, day in and day out. There are not many people who can do such repetitious work. There are a high percentage of new hires who are in tears at the end of their first day and many do not make it the first week before they walk off the job. The hourly worker could not say he/she could work next year for a wage of $1.00 as the CEO’s of G.M. and Ford offered. The Chrysler C.E.O. is already working for $1.00 per year. The unions are actually quite beneficial and whether you are a union worker or not, you have benefited from a union. You enjoy a 40 hour work week, overtime pay for over 40 hours, a safe workplace, healthcare, and equality for workers. The foreign auto factories pay their employees here in the U.S.A. and the profits are returned to their country of origin. When these foreign auto factories have been in our country a little longer, they too will have a higher financial burden when they have retirees’ pensions and healthcare to pay. The foreign countries also impose a higher tariff on the U.S.A. autos exported to their country. We need to impose equal tariffs on foreign autos being imported to our country. The quality of the American autos/trucks, etc. is equal or better than foreign autos and Americans need to support American made products. How many in the House of Representatives and Senate drive American made vehicles? How many of them drive a foreign vehicle?
Posted by: Tona | December 12, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
FYI, concessions HAVE been made…Repeatedly.
One such concession is that contributions are being made to help cover health care benefits to the tune of about $2500.00 a year. It was arranged to come from negotiated wages, so has never been called a “co-pay” so none of you will ever acknowledge it exists I’m sure. You’re too busy being jealous of those of us who actually went out and applied for jobs and were persistent enough to actually pursue it till we got in the door. Any one of you could have done exactly what we did and possibly gotten my job.
The truth is that odds are a good share of you wouldn’t last an entire shift in the plant I work in. Many new hires, even summer temps, don’t make it till the end of their first shift and still more don’t last a week.
It took 4 years of college courses and working full time plus to do the job I do there. Similar to the teachers mentioned in an earlier post, and other careers I can only assume you’d deem worthy of making a decent living. And I work year round. Honestly, based on how often my son is home from school for scheduled days off, I’m guessing they have at least as many “holidays” during their partial year of work as I do in my whole year. Toss in summer vacation and I’d bet they win that contest.
Would I take a pay cut if that’s what it takes. Generally I do what it takes to take care of my family so I suppose, within reason. I have bills to pay. But I’d expect the same at all levels of the business, not just hourly…again. I’ll also expect the same of those folks on Wall Street who got their hand out, and in the banking industry. Actually, I’m thinking with the deficit our government has, maybe they should take a pay cut as well, and lose their benefits, or at least some of them.
I’d also request that we start comparing apples to apples when it comes to the wages I supposedly receive. I think the media should publish everyone’s total compensation package so we can see just where folks stand. I’d love for them to explain that some of the reasons things seem so disproportionate between domestics and transplants is that they don’t have the legacy costs that domestics have as they haven’t been here long enough to have acquired many if any retirees to be supported. That they most likely don’t need to ask for BRIDGE LOANS because they already have received assistance from our government in the form of incentives to move in and continued support in the form of (UN)fair trade rules and regulations. Our government has created and perpetuated one of the least level playing fields ever in the name of global trade or political correctness or whatever it was that prompted them to sell out American workers.
Do I believe the unions have outlived their usefulness? No. No more than I believe that employers in general will do what is right simply because they are “nice guys” They do what is right because unions fought for workers’ rights to safe work places, and 40 hour work weeks and so many of the other things we ALL have that will most likely go away if/when there is no one there to make sure corporate execs have rules to follow. Welcome back to the sweat shop mentality.
I earn good money. I EARN good money. I work hard. I take pride in my work and do my level best to make a product I can be proud to see on the showroom floor. It’s heavy, smelly, dangerous work and even as one of the younger people in our plant (at 46) my body shows signs of the abuse the job has done to it. One shoulder repaired (for the most part but still painful) the other in need of repair, knees that scream in pain daily, loss if hearing despite religious use of hearing protection, cracked skin on my fingers from the solvents used to clean the Kevlar gloves we’re required to wear are just a few of the signs of how “easy” we have it.
No one in our plant sits around doing nothing. There aren’t enough of us left to have that luxury. When I started there 17 years ago, there were 3700 people employed at our plant. Now we’re down to around 1400 and till they announced our plant was closing in 2009, we were producing much more product than we ever had. Even the very few folks, who, since the closing announcement in October, were in the hated Jobs Bank, were pulled to perform “non-traditional work” filling in where departments were short handed or to cover vacations. They were working. I say “Were”, as that concession was made already in an effort to appease the fat cats on Capitol Hill. I noticed that the media was pretty quiet about that too though.
I appreciate anyone who has actually bothered to read all this. Especially anyone with a mind still open enough to be even a little receptive to the other side of this story. It’s been extremely difficult for me and for my children to see their mom being so hated and terrible things said about me by people who have never even met me simply because of where I work. Especially when they know how hard I HAVE worked.
My job was most likely going away anyway with the announcement of our plant closing and my 17 years most likely not being enough to allow a shot at what I’m sure would have been one of very few transfer possibilities, so I’m doing my best to prepare for another change in career and getting used to the idea of there not being much out there at any level, much less one that will support a family, and one with a member who has some chronic health issues at that. I’m in skilled trades, but the trade I’m in, is not one that has many prospects for women so reality is that my trade won’t help me either. Oh, I’ll find something because I do what I have to for my family. Despite being a lazy UAW auto-worker.
Posted by: One of the Hated | December 12, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Remember when the steel industry was big? Remember when the steel unions were big? We’ll be saying the same thing about the auto industry and the UAW soon.
Posted by: TC | December 12, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Let me see if I have this right?(Betty)
The annual cost per employee at GM is $143,520 plus the pension cost for all those retired?
Does this include the “Jobs Bank”?
SWEEEEEEET DEAL!!
Posted by: Nomad | December 12, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
YOU Fools do not get it do you,. THE UAW is turning over USA worker wages to Toyota and KIA, Honda, as the deal by the confederacy was UAW gets foriegn auto plant wages. and NO they are NOT paid $48/hour.. like some clowns think, SO for a moment engage brain.. do you want YOUR PAY determined by a foreign firm;s wages to their workers, as if OK for auto then OK across the board. SO before you drool all over self, at least learn what was being demanded.. would you take 50% or more if foreign firm moves here (often like VW in TN,getting billion dollar tax breaks for moving to TN). you want your pay based on what foreign firms pay? Be careful what you wish for as might just happen. The only reason a middle class existed in USA was due to unions as most had to pay same or near same for workers that were not union or they would leave for union jobs. So stand up for USA workers as that is your future. Most posts seem done by less then informed and terribly jealous as they have no representation as such, no say.
Posted by: chuck | December 12, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
In past bad times, my brother and I took no pay.
That, I Think if you look it up is not legal. But then again I do not believe you anyway.
Posted by: Thinking | December 12, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
My husband is a a big three worker, has been for 12 years. At one time he did make crazy money and received huge bonus, worked over time and holiday pay. Unfortunately we lived accordingly.
Over the past 7 years it has been cut, after cut, after cut. In wages, in health care, and in overtime. He has watched the people he works with disappear as they are let go and the jobs are outsourced to foreign countries. BUT the cuts still come and we take them with thanks that he still has a job. What would have been another cut? NO SUCH OFFER WAS MADE to the workers, to the people who are struggling to keep their homes and feed their families, they were NOT ASKED to take a pay cut. Cause yes they would have. 10%, 20%, 30%, lost of vacation and holiday pay. Leave us with a source of income and health benefits for my kids.
I have come to shy away from telling people my husband works for the big three. they hear the name of the company and think we are living the high life. What is the high life? because we don’t know it. The old “good times” of working for the big 3 are gone and have been for many, many years. The only ones who still profit from the sales of a car are the CEO’s. Have they given up anything? let them sell their houses, their cars, their jets, their luxurys and give up not just their salaries but their bonus to help bailout their companies. To help save their employees jobs.
So while u are debating if the auto workers should have been willing to take a pay cut to help the bailout pass, I want to know who did they ask? Who made the final decision of no they won’t take it? Is this media garbage, or the government using the union as a scapegoat, or was it really offered but never presented to the workers?
I want to know who is going to be responsible when my husband loses his job.
In the beginning we didn’t live responsible, but we buckled down. and every year with each cut that came we buckled down more and more and more. We depleted are savings and our emergency savings. we are now living less than pay check to pay check, do to the pay cuts and loss of overtime.
Just like the rest of the country we are struggling to feed and clothe our 4 small children. We have gone to one car, a junker at that. We are about to lose our home, the banks not having a program to help us. We have very little credit debt, which we pretty much stop paying because ALL our “great UAW money” goes to housing and food. Our kids have already been told we are not doing presents for Christmas. Have u had to tell your 7 year old that? See if they understand economic crisis. Then after an empty Christmas we get to tell them we are losing our home!
So YES offer us the pay cut we will take it.
Posted by: wife of an auto worker | December 12, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
The republicans don’t give a damn about the average middle class individual other than to suck them dry. (gas prices until recently) If all the leaders of the auto industry are willing to take a substantial pay cut to boost their businesses who cares, they make a helluva lot more than the average auto worker. It’s the high level executives that had no foresight or brains to manage their companies in a manner which would have prevented this. They should all be removed and new leadership brought in to give the workers some confidence that the same people won’t screw them over again. There’s too darn much politics in all of this to begin with. I feel sorry for the workers who are just trying to survive while all these execs live in luxury even though they screwed up multi-billion dollar companies. It’s utterly ridiculous.
Posted by: anonymous | December 12, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
I am a retired G.M.employee,I think the union did just what it was supposed to do and that is to protect the U.A.W. members of which I’m a proud member.Because our contract agreement have nothing to do with the state of the of the U.S.auto industry.It,s the uneaven playing field that was created by our government.Honda,toyota are allowed to flood the U.S.market when there is a limit on the amount of american cars that can be shipped over there.Most of their plants are built in southern non union states.If the big 3 U.S.auto makers are allowed to go under the foriegn auto makers are going to go under too.All those foreign auto workers are realy going to suffer as well as all you out there thats crying crucify them.I think right now most of the blame falls on our elected officials who seem to have forgotten who sent them to Washington in the first place.They had just given billions of dOllars to the banks with no strings attached,the C,E,O.s from the auto makers come asking for loan not a bail out the backbone of the economy and they got treated criminals.Our elected officials are the ones that should be out of job.
posted by James Renford 12/12/08
Posted by: james renford | December 12, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
It’s OK for tax payers to sacrifice, but ask a union worker to do with a little less to save their own job, that’s just going too far. Wake up America!!!
Posted by: John Janisieski | December 12, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am
HEY CHUCK!
Did you notice, you are the arrogant UAW worker everyone on these blogs have been talking about!
You seem to be the one that doesn’t “get it”. Almost everyone in this country has had to tighten their belts, regardless of the cause. Unfortunately, the UAW would rather “cut off their nose to spite their face.”
Citing the other stupid moves made by the politicians does not justify your cause.
I am surprised there hasn’t been a justification via referencing the “Actors Guild”.
Besides… don’t get too upset. The politicians are just putting on a show for the nation. I think Detroit has paid enough in Washington to get their way.
Posted by: Nomad | December 12, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Everyone involved in any bail-out (auto management, unions, banks, mortgages, etc) should take a cut. Plus NO bonuses this year for anyone! All benefits and fringes cut to the basics. We are all cutting to the basics at home, and it is our tax dollars that are supporting these people.
Has anyone seen the video of Ford’s automated plant in Mexico. It is beautiful and very efficient, but can’t happen here because of AWU.
I really want to buy everything made in USA. Give us the chance to do so!
Posted by: demiler | December 12, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
let them fall flat on thier faces! i dont want my money going to car co. when they did not keep up with trends. its thier own faults they cant see past the money! the people working for them deserve to fall with them for not taking the cut. its better then not having a job at all. i would LOVE to make $45 an hour!
Posted by: shante | December 12, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
I don’t know how to translate a given dollar amount per car to an hourly or yearly salary, but these numbers constitute a 40% salary reduction. So if a worker is making 75k/yr this reduces his/her salary to 45k/yr. That is quite a cut such that anyone with a family taking that cut would probably have to relocate as well as cut back quite a bit on other living expenses. No union worker is going to take a cut like that without a fight. I expect that there will be new negotiations leading to a much lower cut. As far as unions go, doing away with unions for blue collar workers would most likely lead to the same unacceptable conditions that preceded unions. To compete, businesses would reduce salaries as much as possible. Even the “good guys” would fall in line in order to save their businesses and/or to raise their bottom line as much as possible.
Posted by: Jack Seltzer | December 12, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
Definitely the workers should take a
pay cut if they want to keep working.
We, the public, should not bail them
out. They need to wake up and realize
what a mess the heads of the big 3
made and what a mess our economy is in.
Many people are working for a lot less
than the people the the auto industry.
Posted by: gkenney | December 12, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Wages and taxpayer money etc. Well folks this weekend when you spend another PM watch some clowns, as goes every weekend 52 a year, watch some clown manipulate some sort of ball, in a arena you paid for, get millions per year, or some talking head in media or on screen,, get millions.,and huge tax breaks..and you get all upset about UAW turning down same wages as foreign firms that moved here, FROM UNION Nations and send the profits home. NOTE car prices have little to do with worker wages, quality is NOT a line worker decision, big cars were built and Congress gave big tax break in SUV.,we done as that is what most of YOU wanted to drive. USA cars if you’d look up data are about same quality as foreign but since most do not know hubcap form radio,they do not know about quality. So just rave on, watch you pitcher being paid $3K per toss, or some guy negotiatiing another $25 mil yearly contract. or billions for endorsing shoes etc. and be sure to keep current on Brit and Paris.. as the government ends the middle class.that the unions, their strikes and all got for you. but most to stupid to know it., Amusing how the dumbed down blame unions for cost of cars as if you note, the foreign firms charge about same for their car.. Guess the dumb down of USA will do what no other nation can, defeat the USA from with in..as most to stupid to stop and see what this one is to do.. eliminate the mid class.. READ some facts on the whole thing. before you appear dumber then some of the posts seem to show.
Posted by: chuck | December 12, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
I am a former GM employee 25 yrs ago I choose to find a less profitable more stabile career. I was also tired of the vast amount of uneducated feloow employees feeling entitled to making 6 figure salaries 25 years ago. Some only had 6th grade educations but do to being in a union felt they were entitled tot he world. They bragged of how little they had to do to make such a substantial wage. I am sure times have changed by I grew up with an honest work ethic and I was very disatisfied in several departments in the Lordstown plant in Ohio. People seems to glorify themselves on making high salaries by ripping off the company perhaps times have changed but I will neber thing well of unions due to that experience. I saw waste and greed amognst everyday blue collar workers not only execs. I now work in the schools make a modest income but help children and see little greed. I am horrified over the Auto workers stupity and self centerness. I have seen many concessios made by airline workers, medical worker ( having frezes for years without the general public being aware) and teacher making meager salaries forever. Then I see people making CARS? feeling entitled- ENTITLED for what possible reason???? I will never buy an AMerican car again even if they stay in business. I am very disappointed when the educators of our children and the nurses who save the publics lives have taken concessions and trained for years to help the public are willing to sacrifice income what are these people thinking???????
Posted by: Thenry | December 12, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am
After the bait and switch of the banking bailout I say let the big three file chapter 11 and let the workers take out their frustration on the UAW president when the contracts become nul and void making it impossible for them to even think about getting anywhere close to the wages they were making. I for one have no sympathy for the $77 an hour auto worker which forces me to buy japanese products because of the overpriced amercian made vehicles…
Posted by: W K | December 12, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
What auto worker makes $77 an hour? or even $45k a year?
that’s the point, the uaw has taken pay cuts over the years. they have made sacrifices.
I do agree, it is a shame that our country does not see that our teachers and nurses are better paid with better benefits. But not only them the police, fire fighters, garbage men, etc. But we all know the pay and benefits when we take a job.
Posted by: anonymous | December 12, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
The only ones that need to take cuts is the CEOs… It is a slap in the face that the auto industry is asking its workers to take cuts when they are the ones responsible and it is the workers, not the bosses, that are hurting!
Posted by: bob | December 12, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am
I feel sorry for all of the employees that may lose their jobs; and it won’t only be the auto employees. But they and we are all part of the problem; we wanted it all given to us, we buy above our income hoping to pay later. Well, later is NOW and payment it due. We all are going to need to pay up, help each other and live within our means.
Posted by: Mgadohc | December 12, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Gimme a break. These overpaid auto workers have had it too good for too long. The same goes for the CEO’s who are worth less than their high school dropout employees.
Bankruptcy, baby!
Posted by: Rich | December 12, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am
I think that the auto workers should be willing to take a pay cut. But, I also feel that the people on Wall Street and with the banks that received the bailout, should take a pay cut. Why is there a difference??? Or is big business more important than the everyday worker that keeps big business big. I think they are both equally important.
Posted by: pjo | December 12, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am
No bailout for the Big Three automakers. They should do what every other company has done and will continue to do – - file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy because that is the condition in which they find themselves. Continental Airlines did it – twice – and they are the stronger for it today. Yes, some jobs will be lost, but these companies will be able to continue operations under supervision of the Bankruptcy Court, preserving the majority of jobs for the time being. They will have to restructure themselves, which should have been done decades ago. Check out the article on GM in the current issue of FORTUNE magazine. I, personally have shied away from Detroit iron because of quality and performance (gas efficient), first, then styling and features. My 1991 Honda Accord has over 300,000 miles and is still going strong with very little fender rash. I bought it when my 1981 Chevy got Chevy’s disease at 100,000 miles – it fell apart. Bankruptcy – that is the correct path to follow today!
Posted by: Jim Rogers | December 12, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am
I don’t blame the auto workers. I think this was a ploy by the Tennesse Republican and all republicans to break the unions. I’m not in a union and think that unions are out of touch with the changing times. However, while unions have seen significant declines due to changes in the market place. Unions have made a significant contributions to this country the fact that our trade pacts don’t force countries to pay people fair wages is a moral hazard. The unions won contracts with the automakers the fact that the automakers have placed themselves in this situation is not the workers fault. Republicans have gotten this country into this mess they should clean it up. Now they want the automakers to make their cars in foreign countries and bring them here. I think it is the law makers that should take a pay cut for their poor work equal to what they are asking the workers in the auto plants to take.
Posted by: Ira | December 12, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am
Seems like the dems are again willing to give away our hard earned money with no accountability. The union should have accepted the pay cut. Having a job is better than no job at all. It seems that maybe they think they’re better than the companies making superior products for less cost. Just as they pay for workers that don’t even show up to work they will end up getting the same by ways of a welfare check. Good riddance. Let the companies claim chapter 11 reorganization and restructure all wages including the ceo’s.
Posted by: Lara Semenoff | December 12, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am
Seems like the dems are again willing to give away our hard earned money with no accountability. The union should have accepted the pay cut. Having a job is better than no job at all. It seems that maybe they think they’re better than the companies making superior products for less cost. Just as they pay for workers that don’t even show up to work they will end up getting the same by ways of a welfare check. Good riddance. Let the companies claim chapter 11 reorganization and restructure all wages including the ceo’s.
Posted by: Lara Semenoff | December 12, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am
At the beginning of the industrial revolution where workers were more or less treated like slave labor(currently similar to the sweat shops in the far east) unions served an important need. As time has gone by workers and unions alike have taken advantage of their collective power to get ridiculous wages and benefits.
I would love to get $35 an hour to screw widget A into widget B all day long. In the whole scheme of things you could get a kid out of high school or who hasn’t finished high school to do the same thing for $12 or $14 and he would think he hit the lottery.
I hope that the workers/union who rejected this gift of a bailout realize that in this market any job is better than no job. They can complain all they want about the executives making this and that but ultimately they collectively are a bigger part of the problem.
Posted by: Ryan | December 12, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am
Any working man or woman that ever votes Republican after watching this is nuts .
the Republicans gave billions to the banks who then gave it to there shareholders as dividends then they gave the bank more money
Republicans have no problem giving money to workers that shower before work and wear suets and thumb there noses at hard working Americans who have to shower after work
Posted by: Terry | December 12, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am
Capitalism is a fancy word for survival of the fittest.
Government owned industry belongs in communist nations.
How can we expect to bring in the next generation of profitable US business if we keep this dieing monster alive? I say, let the vacuum begin.
Posted by: Rick | December 12, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
UAW -
You’re operating under old school pension entitlement rules of 1970-80. The world has changed and with it those entitlement rules. I’m not willing to pay my tax dollars to support your entitlments while I’m working to put bread on table for family of 5. Shame on you for expecting me to support your guaranteed unemployment job bank and your pension benefits that I don’t have. Shame on you for thinking you’re a special class of people entitled to those old school benefits and for me to pay them. Yes, I wish I could get your benefits too but not at the expense of hard working people in my City, State, or United States of America. Don’t be greedy…Ask not what your country can do for UAW…Ask what UAW can do for your country…Your old school beliefs are passed and new school is here and has caught up with you and GM management. You must change and adapt to new school or die with old…and that is the harsh reality…and you are not special class of people better than me or other people in America….
*****
Posted by: sammy | December 12, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am
I wonder what the head of the union Mr. “Butterfinger” thinks now?? Anyone out there recently laid off willing to be trained and work for $45 an hour? Hello?
Posted by: Marcus | December 12, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am
What a lot of people keep saying is the UAW but I have news for you – the dealers, the suppliers, parts companies, etc etc who do NOT make $75 an hour are going to lose their jobs now!! Are you happy?
Posted by: Henry | December 12, 2008, 5:03 am 5:03 am
Why should the UAW take another pay cut and benefit cut, that is all they have been doing; most auto workers took a 25%-50% paycut a year ago. It would be nice to see the management of the auto industry take a cut. Everyone always wants the little people to take a cut, when for the most part all the little people live paycheck to paycheck. And yet the management of U.S corporations are paid and unbelievable amount of money.
It’s not right to bailout the banks, and companies like AIG, especially after they went and had their big party at the California resort, their bailout should have been revoked after that little escapade.
It’s a very sad state of affairs how GREEDY we have become as a country; and how executives of companies believe that they are entitled to millions and millions of dollars even as their companies are sinking. I would like to see the executives/management give up a portion of their salaries to help with their companies bailout, it seems only right.
Posted by: Marie | December 12, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am
What are the American people thinking? Why does it always come down to the blue collar workers, which are dwindleing away fast, by the way, to take more cuts!!! More blue collar jobs are lost everyday. Bail out for the big banks was ok, it barely made news, oh I forgot they are part of the upper class!! How about that 300,000$ party AIG through for themselves after they got handed billions with hardly a question asked. Go ahead people, let the UAW sink, and see how fast the trickle down theroy affects you! George Dubya can call this a ression, but we are not blind, the depression, the fall of the stock market is just around the corner!! China will be running the country next and that is not a joke!!!
Posted by: sherry | December 12, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am
I’ll be out and about today – and in my disgust of ALL OF YOU who have purchased Honda’s and Toyota’s I’m going to key every one I see on my way into stores!
Posted by: Jonathan | December 12, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am
Sad Day for America
When the government bails out international banks and brokers.
Then refuses to save the jobs of American workers.
Time to buy food and put your money under the mattress.
Your job will be next.
Posted by: seah | December 12, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am
EVERYONE SHOULD TAKE A PAYCUT!
IF YOU WANT THAT JOB TO BE THERE LATER, TAKE A PAY CUTT!
YOU WOULD BE HELPING YOUR SELF AND THE REST OF AMERICA!
IF YOU ARE UNWILLING TO DO SO, THEN TAKE YOU UNEMPLOYMENT CHECK WITH OUT BLAMING THE REST OF AMERICA!
MANY AMERICANS THIS WEEK AND NEXT WILL BE OUT OF WORK AND NO ONE IS TRYING TO GIVE THEM A LIFE LINE, BUT BECAUSE YOU WON’T TAKE A REDUCTION OF PAY, YOU WILL FALL!
EVERYONE WHO WORKS FOR THESE COMPANIES SHOULD TAKE A PAY CUT, NOT JUST THE LINE WORKERS!
Posted by: tonya | December 12, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
ABC is perpetrating a LIE knowingly.
Here are what the workers make on the average.
UAW $27/hour
Toyota $30/hour
Mitsubishi $26/hour + bonus
So UAW workers salaries should instead be increased.
What makes the cost of making a GM car higher than a Toyota for example is not the worker salaries, it is management and process inefficiencies that the CEOs are unwilling to reform.
If the big 3 fail, the Repugs are DEAD.
Posted by: Steve_NJ | December 12, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am
The unions have made some concessions to get their labor rate for NEW workers in line with that of the foreign manufacturers. However, the pension plans and extravagant benefits for former workers and even the new workers make these concessions meaningless. The overall labor rate at GM remains 50% above that of Toyota ($73 versus $47). This cannot continue if the US auto makers are going to recover. If this disparity is not addressed then no taxpayer money should be spent on a bailout.
As to those who say the financial bailout didn’t demand the same; the financial system does not overpay it’s rank and file employees. Some executive pay was excessive but the bailout included provisions to prevent golden parachutes and other executive bonuses. I still opposed the financial bailout on principle but that industry has a legitimate chance to survive based on past performance – the US automaker cannot succeed unless major restructuring is included in the recovery plan.
Posted by: James | December 12, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
I am AMAZED at how many people have opinions without COMPLETE and ACCURATE Data.
In regard to some folks opinions about the auto-works wages and the media’s hype of $70 an hour pay and having to get down to foreign car-makers wages…
Here is accurate data – The oft-cited $70-an-hour wage and benefit figure for UAW workers inaccurately adds benefits that millions of retirees get to the pay of current workers, but divides the total only by current employees. That’s like assuming you get your parents’ retirement and Social Security benefits in addition to your own income.
Hourly pay for assembly line workers tops out around $28; benefits add about $14. New hires at the Detroit Three get $14 an hour. There’s no pension or health care when they retire, but benefits raise their total hourly compensation to $29 while they’re working. UAW wages are now comparable with Toyota workers, according to a Free Press analysis.
Also, think of this. If you have 400,000 people working directly for the Big 3 and each one of them pays $20,000 a year in Fed, State, SS taxes that is $8 BILLION dollars a year that will no longer be FLOWING through Federal and State accounts. Can we really afford not to have that money flowing? Also consider the approx. 1.6 MILLION people that have jobs that DIRECTLY will be affected? I work for a power company in Michigan. Since more and more plants are closing we aren’t selling as much power. Not only that, but people aren’t paying their electrical bills because they are loosing their jobs. So, we are already cutting contracting jobs now.
Honestly, folks you don’t have a CLUE how big of a problem this is.
Posted by: BKing | December 12, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Steve_NJ,
Nice try…But,the overal labor rate at US automakers is over $70/hr. That is compared to $45-50 for Toyota and other foreign manufacturers. The difference is not the base salary but the pensions and other benefits. You are correct on one point however; if the unions want to keep their base salaries and still meet the requirements under the Republican plan, then all they have to do is cut their pensions and other benefits. When this is the case it really makes you wonder about the arrogance of the UAW. All they need to do is agree to benefit reductions and their companies could get the loans. Yet another example of the unlimited greed found in the UAW.
Posted by: James | December 12, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Lets remember that concessions affects not only the worker but also everyone they do business with. That means the barber needs to cut their price, the restaurant needs to cut their prices, the grocer needs to do the same. How about the banker who allowed you to take out a loan that you both knew you could never pay off using my money. How about the top execs who feel they are above all this with great bonuses.
Now blame the whole thing on pensions does that mean you are for euthanizing your parents? They gave up a protion of their wages to allow them to have a life after working.Take that away and give it to the execs since they need it.
Now who do you blame for all this???
Posted by: Doug | December 12, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I say let the American auto companies fail. When a business is mismanaged at the top and the workers dictate salaries and benefits it will not work. In true American fashion, when they are gone someone will see an opportunity to come in and buy assets at pennies on the dollar and start a new company. The new company will look at the bottom line and pay CEO’s and blue collar accordingly. The product will be better because of competition in the market place and the desire to survive.
Posted by: Auggy | December 12, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Times are tough, unfortunately people will have to take pay cuts. Management should also take pay cuts. I wish I made as much as UAW workers! I think these companies just need to go bankrupt and reorganize and try to become more efficient. Look at Kmart, they went bankrupt and are still around.
We can’t bailout everyone!
Posted by: Hilary | December 12, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Read all the comments this AM, and it appears most are about as stupid as can be found anywhere, none know what a burdened labor rate is, none know what a huge impact on USA, a CH11 file by GM would bring to ANY business the did business within 90 days of file (read CH11 547c), most do not understand this is just union busting, car prices are NOT based upon worker costs, why can’t USA export to our “trading partners”, that perhaps those that whine about “I took pay cut,or I wish I made” are in that mess because they had no union or other defense,”take it or go”. Others in airlines etc “unions” did NOT honor other unions when on strike, and as such had to cave in.. You union haters seem to have zero knowledge of what the full impact of taking down unions will be.. the economic failure is NOT auto or unions fault, it was a Wall St scam gone bad. The plan is simply take down unions as Confederate states that gave billions to foreign auto companies, whose profits AND USA dollars go offshore, via favorable rules set up by Congress.. are costing you money. Demand trade laws with ALL we “trade” be changed to either mirror our “Trading partners” or we tariff. You fools do not quite get it, if auto wages get locked into what foreign firms pay their people, and NOTE even our nuke plants owned by foreign firms as is a whole bunch of “USA companies” we have just become the third world labor center. How sorry and stupid are some of the posts, but USA is now way down list for education and other measures of powerful industrial nation and some of fools post on this one more then proves it. Wake up fools, this is just the start of finally doing away with Middle Class. and time to stop with spineless “oh well I only get this and best we can do”. as that is a menu for failure, what a bunch of sheep. “I had to take it etc”. well you do not, stand up for a change. You have been ripped off and the unions etc had little to do with it, just like gas at $4/gal, it was the money folks, not the oil that drove it up.. Please, just get facts, smarten up, you are being sold out and unions are not the real root issue…just a the workers do not set car prices.. do you really think it costs four times a much to build a Cad then it does a Escort?
Posted by: chuck | December 12, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I just read the last comment and realize who the fool is. When you company is going down and you demand your company pay you top wages and benefits and will not put some skin into the game to keep it going you have a problem. A person working on the line with no education does not deserve to make more money then all the other jobs in America that require only high school education. The folks that work on the line at the auto plans deserve the same wages as the employees at McDonalds’ and not a penny more along with the same benefits. It is the same level job. If they got the same wages and benefits we would have very affordable American build cars but the works are greedy so let them be unemployed, there are a large number of people who would love these jobs
Posted by: Helen | December 12, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Helen wrote The folks that work on the line at the auto plans deserve the same wages as the employees at McDonalds’ and not a penny more along with the same benefits. It is the same level job.
H, be careful on how big a net you cast on such remarks, might not get cop or fire service.. You are amusing in your post of how labor is rewarded.. suggest you visit any machine shop and tell them how simple the work is.. you sound like some lib arts major who cannot find real jobs. Education is not the key factor in wages…as teachers paid less then cops.. and most with tech and eng degrees not paid as well as marketing types. so good try but you do not have a clue..sounds like someone is a bit jealous.
Posted by: chuck | December 12, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Did we not learn anything from the financial crisis we’re still in?!?! First, the housing bubble bursts, and then the credit markets seize up putting the already shaky economy even closer to recession/depression. Congress and the WH come up with a bailout that’s supposed to help banks start lending again, but they buy more assets and pay bonuses. So, taxpayers still see no relief, no help for people losing their homes, and the economy is still tanking. Meanwhile, the execs on Wall Street are keeping their compensation packages, parachutes, stock options, etc. and we are in an economic holding pattern that is affecting other sectors of the economy, nationally and globally. The main premise for the bailout was because they were too big to fail and the impact on the fragile economy would be draconian.
The Auto now also needs help, in part because they are affected by slumping sales (i.e. credit still unavailable to consumers) but also because of bad management decisions that have been eroding marketshare for some time now. A modest rescue pkg for them would be helpful if for no other reason than to keep them from bankruptcy and keep millions off the unemployment roles, which would further damage our concussed economy. And the Senate couldn’t pass this package because salary concessions from employees were not agreed to by the unions???
I’m perplexed here and somewhat miffed by this. So, let me get this straight…we’re facing a recession, the american middle class has been getting squeezed for years now, peaking at this juncture when real wages for working families have been shrinking, while the cost of living has been consistently increasing (fuel, food, utilities, etc) and we want these employees to make wage concessions in order to save the auto industry?!?! What about the Executives?!?!…who in order to recover from their first PR blunder of taking their individual private jets to DC to ask for money have now seen the error of their ways and have agreed to take a salary of $1 if the package passes. While that makes for some good spin, it doesn’t amount to much given that most of their compensation comes from other incentives (see above examples for Wall Street) and the Senate wants the EMPLOYEES to make concessions?!?! I don’t get it. What about CEO’s who run companies into the ground and walk away with MILLIONS for their handiwork, leaving the employees and taxpayers with the tab. REAL compensation reform starts with the executive suite and not with the employees. Good for them that they have good benefits. They deserve them!!! All working families deserve a living wage and benefits to provide for their families. If the Senate wants to penalize someone for the auto industries failures it starts at the TOP!! I find it utterly disgraceful that the Senate couldn’t pass this bill because of that issue, when in the balance, the impact on the weakened economy of this industry going under would be catastrophic. It makes even less sense to deny this assistance to the auto industry after what we just did for the financial industry. I don’t recall anyone asking stockbrokers, traders, or fund managers, or CEOs to forgo any of their compensation. Why pick on these employees?? America must quit this race to the bottom. It doesn’t serve us in any way that benefits our economy, companies, working families, or our global competitiveness. It’s patently unfair to the men and women who have been dedicated employees for generations in some cases in these companies. I recall just a couple of years ago, a particular airline claimed to be in dire financial trouble and wrangled major concessions from it employees union only to turn right around after that and grant salary bonuses to it’s executives. That’s the kind of slap in the face to our hard working men and women that they don’t deserve. And the auto workers don’t deserve to be held hostage in this case because of years of bad management by auto industry executives. Pay attention America. This is simply more proof that we need to finish the “house cleaning” in Washington, DC that was started in November. Let’s “git ‘r done” (in the midterms)!!!
Posted by: Randy | December 12, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Randy
Thanks for intelligent post, but it seem all to many are simply so poorly informed the facts do not matter and they buy into media reports that are about as far off as out useless media is capable of doing. Amused at the simple minds that say “Go bankrupt”, seems those GED dropouts do not have a clue as to the impact of that one. Amazed at how poorly informed most of nation has become.. I no longer worry about Big Three, but the whole nation if some of the fools posting is representative of USA knowledge. Really like the fools that buy into “workers paid $70/hour” as shows exactly how stupid the public is becoming.. Does not take much to sell the fools on myths and more so since many seem to be not to well employed, but obviously being paid what they are worth. What a uniformed nation we have become, but bet at least 50-75% of them can tell you their favorite sports team stats.. RIP USA, seems you are going down as the dumb count goes up..
Posted by: chuck | December 12, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
For everyone thinking if workers would just keep giving up 50% of their wages each time a situation occurs, then at some point we will all have paychecks and working at jobs but at what cost to us as individual families?
There is an old story of how to boil a frog. It really seems that is what the Repubs in D.C. are doing to us and most are accepting it in theory.
If you throw a frog into boiling water it will jump out. But if you put it in cool water and slowly warm the water until the frog cannot move, the frog will not attempt to jump out or try to save itself.
It appears that is what is happening to us. We want to blame each other rather than top management or Congressmen who give billions to foreign countries to build companies who hire Americans at low wages with no benefits who will dislike those who have benefits. Not a lot of unity there for Leadership. Believe me, if there were no unions, safety measures would not exists in the other auto companies.
Start thinking of why we are being pitted against each other and who is really gaining $$$$$. Not the average worker.
Posted by: tch1928 | December 14, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
My husband put in over 30 years of his life in the auto factory. We sat and watched the local paper print the lies on wages the workers get. One day I asked him where the other money was. When the media writes GM wages it encludes” Hourly wage, what your insurance would be worth if you had to pay it out, what your vacation would be worth if you got it, What your benefits of buying a car or truck if you could afford it.Services that the office give you if you need some advice. My son works at GM for $12.an hour far cry from the 30 0r 40 you talk about. He is forced to take vacaton when the company shuts down. Even if the Kids can’t get out of school. We pay our Medicare a month plus our deductable, then we pay GM deductable, then copay and co-insurance. deductable. They pay 80% but that is only on a few things. No shots, no office call, No emergency room if they think you should have taken care of it yourself at home. Oh yes, they then add what they might have paid to the number they tell the media that you get per hour.
If you work for mcdonalds you get $7.00 an hours Full Medical. THey pay for office calls and shots. Deductable is less then a third of what we pay. Free drinks and 1/2 price meals. But because you are paid under poverty level, YOu can go to the goverment and get help with your rent, electric, gas, free doctors. free babysitting while you work. Free food and money for clothes and shoes, But GEEEEE those Union workers are putting everyone in the poor house. Lay all these people off and take the retirees money then we can stand inline for our free stuff. see if your price of cars go down, See if you get more gas out of your tin box that you drive. See how safe you are in that forign made car. Oh yes and when your job comes up for grabs I hope that the Russian, germans someone ove there takes it and move to the east. Then you can get in that line with us. IF there is a free country left. GOD BLESS AMERICA
Posted by: Nola Kettle | March 30, 2009, 5:06 am 5:06 am