By David Schoetz

Dec 13, 2008 12:02am

Closing Arguments: Obama and Blagojevich

President-elect Barack Obama, whose vacated Senate seat is at the center of this scandal, has not been accused of any wrongdoing, and has made repeated public calls for Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s resignation.

Obama also pledged to reveal to prosecutors any conversations between his staff and the governor’s office after conducting an internal review. But until that review is complete, the Obama team is refusing to answer any questions on the topic.

So tonight, we ask you: How has President-elect Barack Obama handled the Illinois scandal? Do you think his team is being forthcoming enough?

Tell us what you think.

User Comments

I think that Obama is just as sneaky as ever. He sure won’t turn over anything that makes him look bad with the Illinois governor!!!!!

Posted by: Becky White | December 13, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

I can’t believe that everyone wants Presiden-elect Obama to do anything. He does not even take office until January 20,2009. We should not even be asking him for comments or advice. President Bush should be asked. After all, he’s still the President until January. Strange how all this comes to the forefront now. America is really twisted. We need Jesus…..

Posted by: Dorothy Gooley | December 13, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Why must we wait while they get their story straight? Is this not stonewalling the press? Don’t we have a right to know if our incoming President or his staff was involved?
Come on media, do your job!

Posted by: JcD | December 13, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

He needs to be more forthcoming…looks like he is hiding something. I think he will say whatever he needs to in order to protect his image.

Posted by: mark | December 13, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

He pledged to reveal the info to reporters, not prosecutors. The prosecutor if you recall, Mr. Fitzgerald, made it very clear that Obama was not implicated in any way. He actually made quite a point of it at least twice during the press conference. I have to take him at his word. It appears, however, the press is ready to implicate him for something anyway.
I think Obama has handled the case fine. However, the media has gone overboard. Everything is on tape. You will know soon enough.

Posted by: Carole R Williams | December 13, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

If guilt is found then it is early, the President will be Joe Biden. And we can all thank god for that.

Posted by: Mike in Ky | December 13, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Like a same old, same old tired politician. Now we’ll have carefully parsed lawyer language on every occasion so everything can be denied. It’s a shame because he apparently had nothing to hide and offered nothing through his surrogates. But to suggest his staff had no conversations takes us all to be stupid buffoons. Equally condescending is trying to make us believe that there was no feedback to him after the meetings. Is he isolated in a soundproof booth until the 20th?

Posted by: getreal | December 13, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Here we go again.If you have nothing to hide, why can’t you answer questions???
Obama should be coming out very strong against this incident, not acting like see no evil,hear no evil. He grew up in Chicago politics and he has nothing to say, WHY?

Posted by: Tired of crooked politicians | December 13, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

This is what happens when the bias media
for 2 years completely ignored the warning of many shady association
that Barak H. Obama had and was concern
of American people. the media did
a disservice to this country for their
cover up, now we know he is what the
corrupt Chicago politic presented to us
and the country is going to suffer. He
as usual has not been honest about this
issue, and the fact is going to come out this time. I am sure the drive by
media is going to stay bias again and continue their cover up.

Posted by: soraya sussman | December 13, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

president elect has every right to protect the integrity of his election, i feel that blagojevich has always been a thorn in the side of most of the decent people in illinois, yes he is from the chicago area, and they have thier problems but there are still decent people and as a republican who voted for mc cain, i feel obama should have the right to make sure no one in his team did anything illegal or immoral

Posted by: aliholle | December 13, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Obama is starting to look exactly like Bill Clinton… The fact is it takes no time to talk to your newly named chief-of-staff if you want to know the truth… The only reason for the delay is to cover something up…

Posted by: Joe | December 13, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Obama is handeling this as the President of the United States should…
Waiting for all the evidence to be in before commenting. He is not going to be
pressed into commenting before he is ready by the media masses.
…Good Bless Him!!

Posted by: Karen | December 13, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

JcD is right! The media needs to pressure him.

Posted by: mark | December 13, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I think that Obama has handeled this poorly…but I think that the press is somewhat responsible for this. Had you guys done your job in the election instead of swooning over him like a long lost lover maybe the possible coming scandel in the middle of a recession/depression could have been avoided. At least with the Clintons their bagage was out in the open for us to make an informed decision. Coming from Chicago and knowing people that have been involved in the politcal process, the chances of Obama rising to power as quickly as he did without being at the very best slightly tainted is near impossible. I am not saying that he is Daily, but he definatley is not Lincoln. Of course, we might have had a better clue before the election had you guys done your job. So which is he?

Posted by: Pete | December 13, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I think it’s impossible for Obama not to have talked to the governor about who would replace him. Certainly he must have had some interest in the state that launched his political career. Was he able to just turn his back and walk away unconcerned about who would represent his state? I absolutely do not believe that. It would be so much better for the whole country if he would just tell us the truth!

Posted by: Mary Arnold | December 13, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Ah the snarky right-wing soldiers spreading hysteria and propaganda…nothing new here…good to see familiar faces and voices trumpeting the righteous agenda and unfounded innuendos. God bless America.

Posted by: Slim Shady | December 13, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Look, Fitzgerald listened to the phone calls and says Obama isn’t part of it. Why the hullaballoo?
Blago should go, someone ‘clean’ should appoint a new Senator (or an election should take place) and life goes on.

Posted by: MIguy | December 13, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

I believe Obama is handling this issue exactly the way he should. I think it is very wise in this controversy hungry enviroment where things get spun into the rediculous so easily to release his information as requested after his staff review as most would in his position. As has been said there is no apparent wrong doing even suspected on his part.

Posted by: Claude | December 13, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

right-wing nothing. I actually am for the democratic way of handleing this economy. It is the killing of babies by liberals that I have a hard time getting past. Cells that reproduce. How is that not life. Getting off the subject…How about true investigative reporting. Follow up on the money trail in the attached link. It will give you a clearer picture of Chicago politics.
http://www.ilcampaign.org/blog/labels/Gov.%20Blagojevich.html

Posted by: Pete | December 13, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

As if the president-elect does not have enough on his plate with two wars, a failing economy, prospect of the 3 automakers going bankrupt and making sure his cabinet is in position… Really, he has little time to get this transition going smoothly – so why take up valuable time and energy with this Governor who behaved like a two bit criminal? Key investigators are saying Obama is not implicated, so let him focus on what’s important — taking the reigns of a faltering U.S. and getting us back on track.

Posted by: Janet | December 13, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

I think it’s high time that Obama admit that he’s guilty of SOMETHING!! He must have done something bad or otherwise he wouldn’t say he didn’t! That’s how criminals think!
Right?

Posted by: R Mutt | December 13, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

I hope that Obammas flopping on campain finance once the money started pouring in for him during the election is not an indicator to future or past corruption. I really do hope for the best. We do need a great leader for these difficult times.

Posted by: Pete | December 13, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

My my where we stand on President Obama seems to be coming out in dsome of these responses.
No matter how we feel he is our President we need to support him or at least stop snipeing at him and give him a chance. If you don’t like him vote him out nest time around.
As to this particular subject, he is President ELECT not President till January 20th. I think he is doing all he can with out stepping on W’s toes.

Posted by: Barbara Whipple | December 13, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Your Government has handed out two trillion dollars to banks, and we do not know to who or why.
Yet the press is running around with it’s super cape on trying to link Obama to some two bit scandal.
Find out were the Two trillion went, that will sure reveal a scandal.

Posted by: Thinking | December 13, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Obama is handling this scandal as well as can be expected. Everytime someone does something wrong and he is associated with them, he becomes a villian. This is a corrupt world. If you dig into any of these politicians’ business, you will find some kind of wrong doing. I think that the media and many others are being unfair to imply that Obama was part of the scandal. Yes, I believe that Obama or his team gave the governor a list of people that he recommended. It is not his fault if that list was misused. The
media & others have scrutinized everything that the President Elect has done. I do not remember any other president having to go through this kind of scrutiny. And to Pete, what do you call digging into Obama’s life all the way back to his birth? Should they have dug into the time of his conception? I am so disappointed at how mean and inconsiderate, so many people are towards President Elect Obama.
Obama knows that he has to be extra careful about anything that he says or does. Again I say “yes”, he is handling this properly, because he must be very sure he knows the exact words that have been transpired between his team and the governor of ILL.

Posted by: Nancy Smothers | December 13, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

To Nancy, I am being misread. I really do like Obama although I disagree with his stance on choice. He is one of the great speakers and possible unifiers of our time. My frustration is directed at the press. CNN would not be talking about how the media has given Obama a pass today if there was not some truth to it. All I am saying is that this would not be the story that it is, had the media really investigated him and his Chicago ties during the election. Really, follow the link that was left and you will find that companies do not get approved to bid on contracts unless they donate money to political campains. Follow that, there is a huge story there.

Posted by: Pete | December 13, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Nightline get your post straight, you morons: Obama also “pledged to reveal to the press” not prosecutors. Prosecutors have already said they have no business with him on this issue. This entire issue, as regards to Obama, is completely press generated. You losers have nothing better to do with your miserable lives. Pathetic losers.

Posted by: Kevin | December 13, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

The prosecutor has said Obama has done nothing wrong. Is it now the job of the press to manufacture scandals and crimes? This is incredible. The governor himself said on tape that Obama’s people did nothing wrong. This is a non-issue being blown out of proportion by a bored-to-death press corp. Obama said give him a few days to talk to his people and see who knew what and when.
As for Rahm, he’s been a first grade moron in regards to handling this issue.

Posted by: Kevin | December 13, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

My final comment. Would someone from ABC news respond? Do you guys feel that you (being the mainstream media) gave Obama a pass during the election? The Clinton’s stuff was out there and Hillary could have won. Blinding Charisma is dangerous. This is not a comment against Obamma. I think he could be great.

Posted by: Pete | December 13, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

Snark-hunting…for those who thrill in the endless hunt…for NOTHING, because the truth doesn’t matter, as long as the enemy is still standing. Hmm, perhaps witch-hunt is more apropos. Gotta love the right-wing commandos.

Posted by: Slim Shady | December 13, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Here we go again with the right wing trying to either create or dredge up trouble on any thing they can on the Obama administration. There is absolutely no reason to believe that the Obama people had anything to do with the problems that the Governor of Illinois is facing. Yet the right will just not let it alone. We have serious problems facing our nation at this time, but instead of allowing the Obama people to do their jobs for our benefit, the right would prefer to cause trouble for theirs.

Posted by: David Williams | December 13, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

He is doing just fine. The law will take care of the corrupt governor, as will the Illinois legislature et. at.
He is busy with his transition team and cannot be bothered beyond what he already told the press.
The press, including ABC, should be patient, not persistent. Make a judgement AFTER all the facts are in.
Jumping to a conclusion is the typical way “we” have traditionally screwed up.
Change is coming, thank God!

Posted by: Steve Mizera | December 13, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Obama’s behavior is absolutely correct. Investigation is ongoing. The media want and need a scandal to sell papers/magazines/TV.

Posted by: patrick | December 13, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

It is a shame that Obama can not answer a simple question with a simple answer. It is totally unamerican. He should learn to shoot from the hip, shoot first and ask questions later. If he is wrong we’ll forgive him as our attention span is very short and it’ll never be mentioned again.

Posted by: Jack L. | December 13, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

President-elect Obama is not answering questions as a FUTURE PRESIDENT! He is not president yet, but when he becomes one I fear for the unanswered questions. He is just running away from the question and will not give a direct answer. All the way from the economy, to the corrupt system in Chicago. Don’t tell me Obama does not have close ties to the Governor, there from the same state, worked together and from the same political party! America Spoke Nov. 4th and its unfortunate. Honestly, I want to know what PRESIDENT BUSH OUR PRESENT PRESIDENT THINKS.

Posted by: William C. | December 13, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

Barabara Whipple, Bush doesn’t have anything to do with the Blagovich selling the Obama senate seat so why even bring up Bush’s name? Of course, Obama talked to Blagovich about who to give the senate seat to. That’s how politics work in Illinois. This is just Chicago machine politics in action. Obama is lying. Both Blagovich and Obama came from the same corrupt politcal sewer in Chicago. I’m from Illinois. Corrupt Chicago machine politicans run our state and have run it into the ground. I didn’t vote for blagovich and I didn’t vote for Obama. Obama is corrupt and he is a major liar. That’s why it is taking him several days to get his story together to tell us STUPID American people. But I’m not that stupid. And fot those that think the federal prosecutor exonerated Obama, he did not. The prosecutor merely said that Obama was not the focus of this criminal complaint because this complaint was for Blagovich. That doesn’t mean he isn’t working on a complaint for Obama.

Posted by: Sandy | December 13, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

wouldn’t it have been nice if all of the candidates had been scrutinized like pe-Obama. There is a sexual frenzy to his detractors, what a lynch mob!Since when did we start holding someone responsible for lying. I’m sure the press will keep count of every hair that falls from Obama’s head while this administration salts the land and fouls the waters with a smile, he does the work without compensation.. Dehumanizing is what we seem to do best though, that’s what sells and I don’t see that it matters, glad I don’t have to bring a child into this mess.

Posted by: ggmael | December 13, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am

So, Chicago politics is dirty palm greasing thuggery.
PEBO marinated in it and used it to snake his way up!
Blago is just the flavor of the month, and he will have a lot to say if things get too stickey for him.
It is a good thing that “Chicago smack down” is now in full view!
Books were written about this stuff during the election but media control kept them tamped down! :(
Those chickens are coming home to roost! :)

Posted by: aware2u | December 13, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

So he’s refusing to answer questions until he can give an honest, complete answer. How shocking. I suppose the press would prefer him just to make some uninformed guesses so they can have a headline…

Posted by: jhw539 | December 13, 2008, 4:45 am 4:45 am

Pete: “Do you guys feel that you (being the mainstream media) gave Obama a pass during the election?”
I don’t understand the myth that Obama got a pass. Rezko is a household name. Rev Wright was played endlessly. Obama was grilled about whether the surge he opposed was actually successful (including a particularly brutal press conference in Jordan). Obama’s popularity overseas was spun as evidence of him being a lightweight. He was continuously portrayed as inexperienced, despite many years in public office. Ron Paul is well known as a Dr, yet inexperienced Obama is the one who taught Constitutional law at the collegiate level.
How did the press give Obama a pass? By not pretending he’s a Muslim terrorist or something?

Posted by: jhw539 | December 13, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am

Emanuel talking of his Family is way wierd.
Michelle obama did when asked question on an issue once, it was so out of context is was strange.
Almost like their primary concern is the health and welfare of their kids.
Makes you wonder if these people have been threatened.
Mr Obama and his team have worked with Blago on finding a replacement. They were extremely Happy and Proud of it in the interview they gave.
Do you want to bet, Obama teams guy wasn’t going to get named to the seat and they are the ones who called in the feds. That would give them immunity and keeping their name out of it and not be prosecuted.

Posted by: seah | December 13, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

If only the media was this curious about where the bailout money went. Maybe we would get some answers if reporters did their jobs reporting about things that are important to the American people.

Posted by: ERIZIN | December 13, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

I think we have to wait for …50 years to find out the truth.

Posted by: Alison | December 13, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

All you racist out there that want to pin a portion of this scandal on a black person I think Jessie Jackson Jr. is your prime target not Barack Obama. Barack had absolutely no knowledge of the dirty politics that were going on in Illinois but I can’t say I believe anything Jackson is saying about his involvement in this case.

Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | December 13, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Yes, it’s a witch-hunt…courtesy of the right-wing agenda. Only thing missing are the torches and the pitchforks…

Posted by: New England Patriot | December 13, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

“He is busy with his transition team and cannot be bothered beyond what he already told the press.”
Dumb statement of the day. No more phone calls please, we have a winner.

Posted by: Don | December 13, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

It’s always a “witch hunt” when the right tries to find corruption. Geez, everyone sells Senate seats, right? Business as usual for the left.

Posted by: Stan | December 13, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Right-wing foot soldiers…masters of subterfuge, smoke and mirrors, and double-talk…what’s not to like?

Posted by: Sam | December 13, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Obama is just another corrupt Chicago politician. There were clearly links between his people and Blags. Rham Emmanuel was on the conference call where the governor basically asked what he could get for naming the replacement senator. How dare Obama try to parse words to hide this? It also appears there may have been communication between the prosecutor and the Obama campaign. It certainly seems weird that Fitzgerald would have stopped the investigation just before people could be caught offering bribes. This is especially concerning since Emmanuel was involved. This whole sordid mess requires a special procesecutor be assigned so we can get to the truth.
Bottom line Obama handled this very poorly if he was not involved in any wrongdoing. I believe he was and that is why he lied about no one in his team having contacts with the governor.

Posted by: lynn | December 13, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

I agree, this is a witch-hunt, not for the truth, but character assassination of Obama. Shame on America.

Posted by: TJ | December 13, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Lynn,
To go a little further – If Emmanuel was on the conference call then he knew that an illegal demand was being made. He would be culpable if he did not report the attempt by the governor to in essence bribe the soon to be president.

Posted by: Curt | December 13, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Indeed. Shame on America. Auctioning Senate seats should be legal, and those knowing or condoning such actions should be left alone. (/sarcasm)

Posted by: Stan | December 13, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

All the liberal loons who think this is a witch hunt must have forgotten how they treated president Bush. You cannot have it both ways. If going after every decision a president makes is OK for liberals then it is also OK for conservative. Deal…
The next four years (unless Obama is impeached before then) will be a very long time for the Barry defenders. This man was not properly vetted by the press and by extension the American people. He is a crooked Chicago politician – exactly how did he buy a house that he would never have qualified for based on his income? The press could not get over their love affair with Barry long enough to actually look into his past and it is our entire nation that will suffer when his past is finally revealed. After all, anytime a president fails it hurts us all.
The writers question about how Obama responded to this scandal is funny. Why should Obama do anything but stonewall and lie? The press is going to give him a free pass no matter what he does. Why would Obama feel any need to act ethically or to be open? The press will not step up to challenge Obama until their reputation has been completely detroyed by their sycophantic water carrying for our first affirmative action president.

Posted by: James | December 13, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Obama is handling the issueperfectly.
No intelligent person jumps to a conclusion without gathering the facts first. This is exactly what he is doing right now.

Posted by: FM | December 13, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Of course, FM. After all, this is supposed to be the “most open and transparent transition in history”.
Blah, blah, blah…

Posted by: Stan | December 13, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Obama handling of this would make slick Willie proud! First, deny you have any involvement and that no one from your team is involved. Second, after evidence is produced that shows there were contacts, say you will investigate. Third, and this is the important step, look for a patsy you can throw under the bus to protect yourself.
If Mr. Obama could also throw in a “that’s not the governor I knew” that would make it even sweeter.
Willie’s back!!!!

Posted by: Make me an offer | December 13, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

FM, if Mr. Obama had any intelligence he would not have denied that there were contacts in the first place. That was just major league dumb. Giving the perception that you are hiding something usually means you are.

Posted by: Make me an offer | December 13, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Stan:
I agree with you fully, most and open transparent transition. Is this issue of Blago part and parcel of his transition?
I do not think so to my views.
The problem belongs to Blago, he brought it and he alone should own it. He showed he is greedy like any other former Gov. who acted so, but not the Pres. elect.

Posted by: FM | December 13, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

People can only relate, and remark on things they know. If we each know something different, then are only fair ground, is to discuss that which is common to each of us. I have written several times to KHQA TV about the article written by Alexia Hunt. They have since pulled it, and will not answer my questions. Briefly: Two articles written. One by a woman saying that Blago and Barry were going to meet to discuss his replacement. KHQA retracted that one saying they do not know if they met. Second article, said they did meet, and did discuss the replacement. KHQA has pulled that one from their site. However I have a screen capture of it, and have it up on my site. I have sent the link to everyone I can think of, but the media does not want it. Why? Anyway, some of us on the right do whine a bit, but some of us have reasons to do so. If you care to see both articles by KHQA here is the site where the screen captures are:
http://www.barrysobamanation.com/

Posted by: 51773 | December 13, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

“Is this issue of Blago part and parcel of his transition?
I do not think so to my views.”
I respect your views, but there is no possible words that can separate this issue from Obama’s transition. This was his Senate seat that we’re talking about. Why not just open the records if there is nothing to hide? Nope, Obama must first sanitize the records and make sure that he has someone on his staff that can take the hit if one is to come. That’s not what I call open or transparent.

Posted by: Stan | December 13, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

People can only relate, and remark on things they know. If we each know something different, then are only fair ground, is to discuss that which is common to each of us. I have written several times to KHQA TV about the article written by Alexia Hunt. They have since pulled it, and will not answer my questions. Briefly: Two articles written. One by a woman saying that Blago and Barry were going to meet to discuss his replacement. KHQA retracted that one saying they do not know if they met. Second article, said they did meet, and did discuss the replacement. KHQA has pulled that one from their site. However I have a screen capture of it, and have it up on my site. I have sent the link to everyone I can think of, but the media does not want it. Why? Anyway, some of us on the right do whine a bit, but some of us have reasons to do so. If you care to see both articles by KHQA here is the site where the screen captures are:
http://www.barrysobamanation.com/

Posted by: 51773 | December 13, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

How likely is it that Blags doesn’t have info on Obama’s past? Is Tony Rezko going to take the fall for Obama or will he sing to avoid jail? Will Obama’s ties to Broadway bank and the Giannoulias family corruption be the next “opportunity” for Mr. Obama to practice his crisis response? Will Obama’s ties to Odinga’s attempt to force sharia law on Kenya be next?
The list is very long. But hey, he has that “D” next to his name so he has a get out of jail free card at his disposal.

Posted by: Greg | December 13, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

President-elect Obama is handling the situation just fine!!!!
The whole situation centers around Blago and Jackson!!!!
CASE CLOSED!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 13, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I am concerned for you, 51773. Posting information that proves an Obama lie could be very dangerous to your health. I hope you have a good hiding place and lots of ammo.

Posted by: James | December 13, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Speculators, why don’t everyone wait to see if Blago have anything to say on his arrest, wiretapping or any implication of President-elect Obama, Jackson or anyone else!!!!
Right now, everyone is throwing pebbles hoping to trigger a TSUNAMI!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 13, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Stan:
The problem is not the Senate seat. The problem is, it was for sale.
Who wanted to sell it was Blago not Obama.
Obama gave it away officially the man incharge (the Gov.) wanted to make the profit out of it. He must be hold
answerable.

Posted by: FM | December 13, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

LOL Lanny,
“Barack had absolutely no knowledge of the dirty politics that were going on in Illinois ”
That is the biggest laugher today. Obama won his first election by having all three of his opponents thrown off the ballot. His laywers had opponents divorce records unsealed not once but twice to win another election.
What, you don’t remember all the stories about that during the campaign?
(By the way no one rises in Chicago politics without the nod from Dailey. Confirm Sandy?) Maybe he is the Fitzy’s mark.
BO met with Blago the day after the Presidential election. I don’t suppose the “empty seat” came up at all do you?
Why wouldn’t it? But why deny the meeting or that any of his advisors talked with Blago about it?
The media saw him go into the meeting . Now you can’t find any witnesses.
Sorry Rahm, you’re the fall guy this month. Make room under the bus.

Posted by: Greg MI | December 13, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

The idea that the PE and/or his staff has not spoken with the Gov of IL with regard to the open Senate seat, is just plain unbelievable. Why deny if you have nothing to hide? The statement the PE made calling for the Gov to resign is premature. We still operate under the Constitution (if just barely) which entitles “innocent until proven guilty”. So far, there has been no trial and verdict. And while Mr. Fitzgerald may have wire taps of the Gov talking nasty and speculating on what he can get in return for something, unless they have proof that he actually acted on these words, there will be no guilty verdict. While the Gov’s words may make him seem guilty of something, so do the PE’s. Transparancy? I don’t think we have seem much with the PE, despite his claims. The secrecy with regard to his birth records, college records, medical records, and his travels in the 1980′s put the lie to transparancy.

Posted by: Michiel W | December 13, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Let me get this straight, FM. If Obama or his team knew about what Blago was doing, you’re fine with that and will be kewl with leaving him out of it?

Posted by: Stan | December 13, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

This whole Hot Rod deal went down on Tuesday—- now it’s Saturday—– how long is it going to take for Odrama to get his story straight??? Whatever happened to “transparency”? Something sure must be in need of investigating! It’s simple “what did you know and when did you know it”? It’s a good thing this wasn’t a 3am crisis call to the WhiteHouse hot line—- we’d all be toast by now!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 13, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Carole R Williams—- So, how long do we wait for his “transparecy”??

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 13, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

“Who wanted to sell it was Blago not Obama.”
Prosecute the drug dealer, not the user. Bust the prostitute, not the John. 10-4.
Great logic. It would be hard for someone to come up with a bigger excuse for a crime involving the sale of a friggin’ Senate seat than this. I don’t know what, if any, involvement Obama/team had, but to bury one’s head in the sand with this sort of cavalier denouncement is tantamount to not reporting a rape.

Posted by: Don | December 13, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I don’t understand all the fuss regarding Blagojevich. He is a Politician and this is normal behavior for these people. If anyone in the United States thinks that becoming an elected official is not a license to steal I have some swamp land in Florida I would like to sell them.

Posted by: Rich Bruderek | December 13, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

My friend Stan, am glad we are back to my earlier remarks.
We do not need to jump to a conclusion now until we are fully informed of the facts.
What happened, when, who told who.
Pres. elect said we will all be notified as soon as everything has been clarified to him.
I ask you to be patient. not longer than next week you will be informed.

Posted by: FM | December 13, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

WORST PRESIDENT ELECT EVER!
Obama and this whole Democrat gang are the most corrupt ever to attempt to fraud their way into the WH.
Obama won’t produce his long form birth certificate BECAUSE HE CAN’T.
Now instead of Illinois corruption contained to Illinois, the Democrat Culture of Corruption is taking their rank stinking corruption nationwide.
MERRY FITZMAS CHUMPS! The tentacles of the Democrat Culture of Corruption run long and deep and straight through the Obama inner circle. People are getting squeezed and singing left and right.
To quote the Democrats of the last eight years “Nobody is above the law” – you either believe it and stand by it 100%, or you don’t. If you don’t believe it and stand by it than shut your yap about Bush and the Republicans.
To quote the Democrats of the last eight years “Dissent is the highest form of Patriotism” – - you either believe it and stand by it 100%, or you don’t. If you don’t believe it and stand by it than shut your yap about Bush and the Republicans.
My how the high and mighty High Horse DemocRATS have fallen and have yet to fall much more.

Posted by: Obama Crime Watch | December 13, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

That would only make sense if Obama was the investigator, FM. He’s not, and he promised an open and transparent transition. He’s not being open by any stretch, in most people’s opinion – including mine.

Posted by: Stan | December 13, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Whoa!
This Bloggavitch case reminds me of the following public obsessions:
“war mongering ” (read, “media hype–one Fox commentator saying, “If Obama has nothing to hide, why the lack of response?,” public overreaction (look at this page alone), avoidance of both sides of the issue being clearly explored (what was said, who found the information and brought it to light, what’s in it for everyone including the media to blow up this case–beyond getting the facts and justice served?), emphasis on the semblance versus the facts–no one talking at all about what leads them to believe the evidence is not fabricated–circumstantial just like in Iraq)leading to our misdeeds in Iraq.
Also like Throwing money at the Bail out without a clear accountability steps –giving up our Congressional role as overseer of the People’s money and allowing Tresury to change the terms and conditions at will.
Also feels like The years of Clinton- bashing the Grand Ole party conducted in their desire to not just oppose but eliminate the Clinton administration–White water a case in point that was never proved but cost us millions in congressional oversight and so on.
This country is SO distracted and off the mark with what our priorities are.
This said, can’t we see we DO need a higher power, you name who it is–I agree it’s Jesus for me.
Do a kind act for yourself and someone else TODAY. Get on with doing your part for making important real change.
If you want 4 to 8 more years of distraction and gossip, I’m turning off my TV, radio, and internet FOR GOOD and will stop buying products that allow this kind of unmeasured character assasination.
Abby

Posted by: Abby | December 13, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Me thinks Abby will be living in a cave for the rest of her life. Let us know how the crickets taste! LOL.

Posted by: Don | December 13, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

I like the “dissent is the highest form of patriotism” comment. Now that Democrats control everything in Washington we can tee off on them for their misdeeds. As we saw during the Bush years, the misdeeds can be real or perceived, simply does not matter. Patriotism demands that we take action!
Obama was an idiot to not disclose the contacts he and his team had with Blago. He is making it easy for us in the loyal opposition to be patriotic.
Maybe we can extend the analysis of Obama to un-american and true americanism as Jennifer Granholm advocates. If you disagree with me then you are un-american. Agree with me and you are an American in good standing. Democrats are just pathetic.

Posted by: James | December 13, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Of course Obama can not be tried.
They set Blagojevich and called in the feds to silence him.
Oh Obama

Posted by: seah | December 13, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Obama needs to come clean. I’m not buying any of it. Clearly, there needs to be an investigation of Obama because he won’t tell the truth.

Posted by: tina | December 13, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

“emphasis on the semblance versus the facts–no one talking at all about what leads them to believe the evidence is not fabricated–circumstantial just like in Iraq)leading to our misdeeds in Iraq.”
The tapes of “Blaggavitch” aren’t facts? Circumstantial?
Don’t answer. The rest of your run-on sentence answers all I need to know about your motivations.

Posted by: Carson | December 13, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

seah is right. Why did they stop the investigation before the chumps that were open to trying to bribe the governor to name their candidate could be caught red handed. Could it be that Fitzy was afraid the bait would have attracted an offer from Rham Emmanuel?
Why oh why did this investigation stop when it did? Maybe the press could stand up and do the right thing by asking this question.

Posted by: Fred | December 13, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Fred, I heard that they busted Blago when they did because they didn’t want him naming the individual (probably JJJr, ’cause he was willing to pay the booty) to replace Obama.

Posted by: Stan | December 13, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

I want REAL transparency!
What Obama promised during the campaign.
He needs to live up to his words!

Posted by: junior | December 13, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Obama should be investigated. When a Republican is accused of a misdeed Democrats use logic similar to: “the mere fact that we don’t have all the facts and can’t prove wrongdoing demands that we investigate further to find some”
Obama blew his response. He is actively trying to scrub anything that implicates him, including removing press stories that detailed the meetings he had with Blago. Open and transparent – yeah, right…

Posted by: Fred | December 13, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

I tend to take Mr. Fitzgerald at his word when he says that Obama is not involved and I also think that transparency will prove this.
I don’t beleive Obama in any way is as deceitful and corrupt as the Republicans, especially Bush and Cheyney. Afterall they lied to the American public and got us into a war. Their lies killed and maimed Americans. Wasn’t it Bush and Cheyney who just refused to answer any questions on any of their scandals and then they had the nerve to paint anyone who dared question
them as being “unpatriotic.”
But this is about Blagojevich and having said all that I do believe that Blagojevich should be impeached and if it could happen today it wouldn’t be soon enough. Blagojevich should have no political career whatsoever after this.

Posted by: I've had it | December 13, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

There’s never a bad moment to bash Bush/”Cheyney”, for imaginary causes, is there? Even in a forum that has nothing to do with either of them. BDS is so in vogue.

Posted by: Don | December 13, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

“Bush lied us into war”?
What does that say about the Democrats in congress who voted as a majority to authorize enforcing the UN sanctions?
If Democrats are this inept, having viewed the intelligence laid out by the Clinton Administration and also by leading nations around the world about Iraq, and in fact Iraq did have a nuclear weapons program underway, a pile of yellow cake and chemical WMD’s, then they have no business in leadership positions.
Democrats are either “the smartest people in the world” as they love to claim, or a “dummy” like Bush can so easily fool them.
You can’t have it both ways and its about time the American people hold the Democrats accountable for issuing the vote to go to war.
Oh wait, Democrats have a what 5% approval rating in congress?
No matter, the Disasta From Illinois is now upon us, we have only seen the tip of the iceberg of what is being uncovered regarding the Democrat Culture of Corruption.

Posted by: Elton | December 13, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Why do you think Hillary has never apologized for her yes vote for war?
Its because she knows the real deal and the truth.

Posted by: Darcy | December 13, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

I tend to believe Mr. Fitzgerald when he says that Obama was not involved and I think transparency will prove this.
Obama is in no way as corrupt and deceitful as the Republicans, especially Bush & Cheyney. Afterall, didn’t they lie to the American public aband get us into a war. Their lies killed an maimed Americans, They also refused to answer any questions about their scandals and then they dared to paint anyone who questioned them as “unpatriotic”.
Having said all that this is still about Blagojevich. I think Blagojevich should be impeached and if that could happen today it wouldn’t be soon enough. Blagojevich should have no policical career whatsoever after this.

Posted by: I've had it | December 13, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

OK, “I’ve had it”, you’ve said that twice now. Isn’t it time you move on to the stolen elections in 2000 and 2004?

Posted by: Don | December 13, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

HMMM… don’t you think that the Democrats voted for war on the CONTRIVED information they were fed by Bush & Cheyney? Had they been given the accurate info maybe the war wouldn’t have happened.
Oh, and by the way in 1998 the Clinton administration had information as to Bin Laden whereabouts and went to congress for their support in going after him. But the REPUBLICAN congress didn’t give the requested support because they said Clinton was just trying to direct attention away from his affir with Lewinsky. Repubs were so intent on getting Clinton that they neglected the public’s best interest for their own personal vendetta. Clinton’s affair was a personal private matter not something the country should have been involved in.

Posted by: I've had it | December 13, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Obama has said he didn’t have anything to do with the scandal and Blagojevich’s own words exonerate Obama from wrong doing, what on earth should Obama do that he hasn’t done. Make up something?

Posted by: JR | December 13, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

JR said, “Obama has said he didn’t have anything to do with the scandal”
Weeelllll then, I guess that settles it. NOT…
We need an investigation from a special prosecutor to know what happened.

Posted by: Fred | December 13, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

I’ve had it,
You are right, Clinton’s affair was a private matter in so far as it goes. However, when he lied under oath he then made it into a criminal matter (not to mention allowed unautorized persons to have unprotected access to the president being highly irresponsible). If Obama does not wise up and admit ethical lapses then he will find himself impeached. The cover up is usually what gets politicians in trouble not the initial crime. I thought Obama was supposed to be smart. Sure does not seem very bright to me.

Posted by: Manny | December 13, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I just read the following on C-SPAN.
“UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNDER SEAL
V. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, and
JOHN HARRIS”
What I see is an undercover campaign since 2001 to investigate Blagojevich on corruption charges.
I see the words “probable cause”–the federal government has tapes, testimony etc. So, there’s enough evidence in the government’s mind for a trial–not a lynching.
OK. Here’s a different subject.
Where is the “gray” in politics?
I think other media are picking up this thread.
We see this in nearly all politiician’s–they both support one another with campaign funds and also appoint their supporters in their administrations. Happens ALL THE TIME.
Surely we don’t want our leaders to be bought off and this IS the alleged scandal. Sounds good if you look at the world in black and white.
Does anyone else see the hypocrisy? ACROSS THE BOARD, it’s almost a “don’t ask, donn’t tell” state of affairs.
A politician by federal law cannot accept specific amounts of money from someone and then hire that person where the hired person has measurable gains and where the politico hiring the person has demonstrated with valid, and credible evidence that he or she is motivated by desires to payback, accrue future political favor, and so forth.
BUT if such illegal statements are not there and only the actions–its 100% legal. Correct?
I know its the law so I understand that’s what it is–but laws can be changed.
We’d have to live on the moon–or in my so called “cave”– to not have some kind of gray in all of this.
One more thing–that talk about a check being on the table while Blagovitch was discussing hiring a supporter–could that be defended as entrapment? In that case Blago… seems mostly guilting of talking too much in a high risk situation. The federal document seems to imply that had they not had the money on the table the conversation would have meant something else.

Posted by: Abby | December 13, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Then that proves that the Democrats are not “brilliant” in fact they are “Dumber than Bush” if “dumb Bush” can so easily dupe them on such high matters of war and peace. Thus proving the case that the Democrats are the “Stupid Party” and have no business in leadership positions.
I would rather have a smart scoundrel than a bunch of so easily fooled wind bag Democrats. Hillary has never apologized for her war vote and most other Democrats who voted for war have not apologized for allowing themselves to be “lied to” Why? Are they not supposed to be the guardians? No, they are just Democrat Culture of Corruption defenders.
BTW, nobody was lied to. If that’s the case than the evidence was so flimsy that every Democrat who voted for war should be out of office.
But we get it. The Democrats would rather have the Hussein regime taking over the Middle East. Sorry, we hung your boy “Hussein” – too bad you don’t like it.
And Blago will hang the new Hussein regime by its own Democrat Culture of Corruption petard.

Posted by: Elton | December 13, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Obama is doing the right thing… he is probably working with the US Attorney to find out all the facts before coming out talking – because all of you Republican idiots will turn it all around anyway! Hey Republican idiots, if you don’t like Obama, then move to another country – doubt there is one that will listen to your stupidity, though! Of course, they might pay America to take you back…

Posted by: Sandi | December 13, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Manny
The point is he never should have even been asked about the affair. It was private and personal affecting only his family not the counrty, but this was the avenue used to get Clinton. This was done betting that he would not admit the affair to the country as his wife didn’t know of the affair. If they did want to “get” him on something then the questions should have been about perceived questional matters of government in the adminisration or policy decisions concerning the country not about a personal private matter on which our country was forced to waste millions of dollars not to mention time.

Posted by: I've had it | December 13, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

nice re write of history.
Obama didn’t make the call for blago to resign till more than 30 hours later
No-can-act Barack was,as usual, waitig for someone else to lead.
is he corrupt in this case?
who knows, the FBI ended the investigation before Blago was actually bribed.
Why

Posted by: tralala | December 13, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

“he (Obama) is probably working with the US Attorney to find out all the facts before coming out talking.”
LOL!!!!

Posted by: Sami | December 13, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I was surprised that he didn’t hit hard (like usual) on the crisis on the first day.
Barack is SO into the law that it was clear that he didn’t want to say anything that could jeopardize the investigation – BUT – I wanted him to say what he said at the press conference the first day. However, I think he wanted to read the transcript before he commented on the case.
When he did read the complaint for HIMSELF – He SAID and DID ALL that was necessary.
EVERYONE knows the man and his team are CLEAN as CLEAN gets. The rest of this stink is just voulutres hoping to catch him or his team dirty – WHICH THEY ARE NOT.
I find it SHAMEFUL the way the MSM and the GOP are scrambling for dirty news. It’s like a man TRYING to catch his FAITHFUL wife CHEATING. It’s sick! We have a GOOD new President and we should be GRATEFUL and HAPPY about that.

Posted by: Independant Woman | December 13, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

EVERYONE knows the man and his team are CLEAN as CLEAN gets.
Ummmm. Did this just come to you through osmosis or something? Madam Cleo?

Posted by: Don | December 13, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Indi Woman is hitting the Kool-Aid
early today. Not worth a rebuttal.

Posted by: Greg MI | December 13, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Barry talked to Blago. Click on screen capture.
http://www.barrysobamanation.com/

Posted by: 51773 | December 13, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

First of all, Ladies & Gentlemen, this is not about about Mr. Obama or any member of his team. This is about keeping out the most qualified person to sit in that Senate seat. Republicans are very angry that Obama won the election and anything they can do to stop his inauguration, they will do it. Republicans want that seat badly and if they have to kill two birds with one stone, they will do it! Look at all the lies..even the mob says they had nothing to do with Blagoevich. The IL Republican machine wants a republican in that senate seat. They do NOT want another African-American in that Senate seat.That’s too much control for AA’s for them. If Mr. Blago’s attorney says it is not what we think it is, I believe him because I know him to be a man of integrity. If he even suspected Blago of being guilty, he would not have taken the case. Even the IL Supreme court would not touch the governor because of what evidence they saw. They all see this for what it really is..a Republican lynch mob.

Posted by: chgowhtlady | December 18, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Some black leaders think the only qualification that is important about who fills Obama’s senate seat, is the color of his or her skin.
That the persons has to be black.
Isn’t this going above equality?
Isn’t this saying a person who is white, or any color other than black, isn’t qualified?
Aren’t they sounding like reverse rednecks from the 50′s?
For years I have heard how people shouldn’t judge other people by the color of their skin. Are they exempt from those anti-racist ideals?
How is it, they are allowed to spew racist remarks and racist ideals with impunity?
If the person who gets the job, turns out to be Black, how will all this BS about the color of their skin going to make them feel?
Like they “Are Somebody?”
I think not. I think they will feel like the ‘black skin’ reason they were chosen, will make them, and their talents, their qualifications, their ambitions, and their reasons to serve the people, of no consequence.
Thank you Laura, you made me feel better about myself.
Original Story:
http://www.suntimes.com/news/washington/1331127,CST-EDT-laura15.article

Posted by: 51773 | December 22, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

There are so many people who are so upset because the majority of Americans voted for President elect Obama, and looking for anything to say he is not qualified.
To all of you who know who you are
Don’t hate the player hate the game….
and realize who made a mess of this economy, and still doing some truly terrible things.

Posted by: Dee | December 27, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.