Closing Arguments: Obama’s Gitmo Goodbye
It’s only Day 2 of Barack Obama’s administration — and already the new president is undoing one of the most controversial symbols of his predecessor’s eight years in office. The Guantanamo Bay prison camp was established by the Bush administration after Sept. 11 to hold and interrogate alleged terrorists. Today, President Obama ordered the camp closed within a year — a decision in line with an inaugural address in which he said that our security will emanate from humility, restraint and the justness of our cause. Some have already pushed back, wondering exactly where the 248 alleged terrorists at Gitmo will end up after the facility on Cuba is gone and worrying about the message the move will send the international community. So tonight, we ask: Do you agree with President Obama’s decision to close the military prison? Tell us what you think.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
I am proud of Obama’s decision to close Gitmo. Hurrah!
Posted by: Berta Swain | January 23, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Setting these people free is ASKING for trouble. This is a decision we will all will regret.
Posted by: Frank | January 23, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Huge mistake. These terrorists only understand “an eye for an eye” justice. The U.S. should deliver justice to them in terms they understand and by which they live their lives.
Posted by: evelyn t. vandeberghe | January 23, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
I guess obama is going to let these terrorists loose or place them in a prison in the US where they can indoctrinate the general prison population. Those 200+ terrorists will soon become 200,000+ terrorists. Big mistake.
Posted by: jack barr | January 23, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
No, I don’t think he should close. Stupid move.
Posted by: Ian | January 23, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
A stupid promise, a stupid action. Most observers, including one local to the Dallas market, says it is a show place where the detainees eat better than the guards.
Posted by: Charles H. Burk | January 23, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Another lovely liberal plan that will have consequences that we can only guess.
I will predict that at least 1 of them will kill a U.S. citizen within 1 year of release.
Posted by: Jim Klick | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
I do not agree with closing Gitmo right away, but I do agree with quickening the process and getting the criminal’s into proper hands and the innocent out and back to their family’s.
Posted by: C. E. | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Yes. It is impossible to lead from the moral high ground and so publicly ignore your principles at the same time. It destroys our government’s credibility and only makes it easier to cross the same line with citizens of this country. There has to be a better way.
Posted by: Bob Floyd | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
I believe this is the worst mistake that obama will make through out his presidency. This prison has holding suspected terrorist for a while. Why he is closing it down is beyond me. I dont understand his motives and they make absolutley no since. This prison has been working for a while now. Why stop doing something that has been working. Where are we going to put the prisoners from there?
This is an incrediably stupid decsion on his part.
Posted by: Steven | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
I think that President Obama did absolutely the right thing closing Guantanamo. It has been an embarassment to the American people for years, and we need to show the rest of the world that the atrocities that happened there were the result of a bad administration and were not the will of the American people. This was a bold move by Obama, to do this so soon, and demonstrates to both the American people and the rest of the world that he takes his campaign promises seriously and he means to do the best that he possibly can for both his country and the world. It was an action of good faith, and I was glad to see it.
Posted by: Erin | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Close Gitmo !
Posted by: Bruce Manning | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
About time due process is due.
Posted by: David | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
I agree with President Obama’s decision to close the prison. I think this will send a positive message to the world and our nation that we will abide by ethical laws that we all can respect. This will increase our moral standing both domestically and throughout the world.
Posted by: Anthony | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
I don’t think we should close it. I don’t want them in the United States. They are on an island now where they can’t escape. Leave it that way.
Posted by: Albert Simko | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
I think closing the base is a mistake. I understand that they are people and he wants to treat them humanly, however these are suspected terrorist. I don’t think we can treat them like everyday criminals. They plot and plan to destroy us. Some are willing to kill themselves in order to kill us. You can interrogate them using normal tactics.
Posted by: L Franklin | January 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
President Obama is starting off wrong by closing Gitmo. Why would any true American want it closed. Just go ahead and bring the terriorist prisoner over to our shores and then let them go because they were treated badly at Gitmo. Give me a break.
Posted by: Donna Lipe | January 23, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
I think President Obama was right in doing this today. I think his reasoning for doing it, as stated at the signing, is very good.
Even if there are problems as a result of this decision, as President Obama stated, you don’t do what is right only when it’s convenient. Also, in the event that there are problems, I would blame George Bush. Bush did what was wrong and now President Obama is trying to correct it.
Posted by: Jim Morton | January 23, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Thanks Obama, now the terrorist can get back to work and kill more innocent people. Im sure my brave and good friend that gave his life trying to catch these terrorist really appreciates it.
Posted by: Brad | January 23, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
I believe it is a terrible mistake to close Guantanamo.
Enemy combatants should not be handled through our civilian courts.
Posted by: Ernest Tidwell | January 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
He should leave the prison open. We do not need any more terrorists on mainland USA. They’ll go many places, and some will be released only to find their way back to harm Americans. We did not ask for this, but WE MUST deal with them!!
Posted by: Robert Keyser | January 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
I agree with the closing
Posted by: Dan Armstrong | January 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
I’m glad to see this horrible place being closed as per the President’s speeches and promises before the election. Nothing good happened there. We showed our darkest side there. Now we can start showing the world that we are law abiding people. and that we care about human rights and don’t just talk the talk.
Posted by: kacy1 | January 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
I agree with the decision that the President has made to close Gitmo Bay. I disagree with the way detainees are questioned and treated by Americans upholding law. The military/USA is suppose to show other countries examples not be the bad seed. I love this decision and hope that all innocent detainees are returned safely to their country and families. Detainees that are rightfully being held need to be treated as a regular detainee in an American correctional facility. We never hear of murderers in correctional facilities being waterboarded or forced feed. Why treat the detainees at Gitmo any different? President Obama has made a great decision. Great 2nd day of work!
Posted by: Natasha | January 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
I don’t agree at all. Where are they going to house these prisoners? These people who all they want to do is KILL Americans and want to die doing so. What prison do we have that is away from a large population and is 100% totally escape proof and is capable of defending itself against attacks to free these people? Once they are on US soil, you know that plans to break them out will be in the works. If you don’t think so, then you are not being realistic. This is putting many US Citizens in extreme risk on their own soil.
Posted by: Tony C | January 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
I absolutely do not approve of President Obama’s decision to close the Guantanamo Bay prison! It sends the crazy message that it is/was OK for them to cut off our soldiers’ heads, but we shouldn’t be allowed to drip water on them! I fear it is only the first of many, many bad decisions the new President will make.
Posted by: Ann Foster | January 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
do I agree with his decision on Guantanamo? Give me a break. Might as well wave the white flag now and tell all the terrorists to “come on down”! Cause they can run all over us and we will do absolutely nothing except turn the other cheek and allow ourselves and our children to be slaughtered…I think in his effort to send a humanitarian message, he flies in the face of his pledge to defend and protect our nation. I suspect we will see the results of this decision shortly – how many days do you suppose till someone decides to test his metal?
Posted by: Catherine | January 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
A!! YEA!! needless to say this needs to happen!! It was stupid to begin with..Everybody is not out to get us! I think we do more damage to our selves by being so closed minded and to protective. Like a mother hen. To continue to torture these people..if they have not told you anything by now.they are not going too and would you like our men treated like that? I am 50 and my father and brother were in the army so I know.
Posted by: Helen Howell | January 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
I am so glad that he closed this prison.
The detainees seemed to be kept for endless periods of time, and they had
no rights. The torture that they
endured – made our troops vulnerable
to like cruel treatment if captured.
This camp made us hypocrites!
I am so proud of his decision and how
the world will begin to view us.
Posted by: M. Bullock | January 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Tho most of us have no idea how hard it will be to completely close Gitmo, Obama has started the path to conforming our actions to our ideals and I could not be prouder of our country and our President. For almost eight years, I have been shamed by the existence of Gitmo.
Posted by: Sharon Zingery | January 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
No – Gitmo has it’s place. We need to keep it operating. Whereelse will these terrorist?
Posted by: Gary Clark | January 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
President Obama is doing what should have been done long ago. Better yet, it never should have occurred. It was a means of holding people outside the reach and function of our legal system. Whether those people were or are “good” or “bad”, it only make us bad to abandon our precious legal rights and system of justice in dealing with them. We should not abandon our constitutional principles and ethics, and the laws that support them.
Posted by: C J Rubenstein | January 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
BTW – closing Guantanamo doesn’t mean that they’re going to release the suspected terrorists. When the government closes a prison, they don’t just let all the criminals go – they move them to another prison. Closing Guantanamo is symbolic of a change in our policies and how we deal with suspected terrorists.
Posted by: Erin | January 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I DON’T THINK WE SHOULD CLOSE IT DOWN. WHAT DO THEY PLAN ON DOING WITH ALL THE INMATES? WHO IS GOING TO FUND THE COST TO CARE FOR THEM . AND AREN’T THEY DANGEROUS TO SOCIETY?//
Posted by: DEE | January 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I am totally against closing Gitmo. We cannot allow the terrorist the freedom to go out and plot to kill thousands more Americans. Perhaps the reason why there has not been another terrorist attack on American soil is two fold. 1) the terrorists squealed and released the details, and 2) some of the masterminds were locked up.
Posted by: Suzanne | January 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I agree with Obama on closing The Guantanamo Bay prison camp.
What to do with the alleged terrorists held there?
Read the Constitution and do what it suggests.
Robin
Posted by: robin | January 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Stupid to close Gitmo. Where do you think we are to put these people.
Posted by: Gary | January 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
I need to see the plan on what we plan to do with the prisoners. You can not just let them go free back in their own countries. They hate the USA. Hind site is 20/20. I wouldn’t want to be saying that after closing this prison and one of them attacks the USA again.
Posted by: Kim Lin | January 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
I applaud President Obama for taking such quick and decisive action on this very controversial issue.
Posted by: Niki Doering | January 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Yes, close Gitmo
Posted by: Deb | January 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
If Obama chooses to close Gitmo, where are all of the detainees going to be sent? Or is he planning to release them back into the wild? As a US citizen this is a major concern of mine and I have not heard an acceptable answer.
Posted by: Rheda Barnes | January 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
I strongly disagree with the idea of closing Guantanamo Bay Prison.
Posted by: MONA | January 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
I believe this to be a great step forward for America. Barack was elected for the sake of change and this is just the kind of progressive change that America needs. Barack needs to look at the biggest media headlines, analyze the problems with all of them, and then make a decision based upon that. Our last president seemed to make relatively little effort when it came to ending controversial issues. That is what has made the last few years so frustrating. Good job Obama!
Posted by: Will Choate | January 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
It’s about time. I hope he’ll also end the practice of swooping up people in other countries and imprisoning them.
I also grieve that he has not said a word, that I know of, in support of the beleaguered inhabitants of Gaza. He has said Israel has a right to defend itself, but how can it be right to kill so many innocent people, and to reduce their homes to rubble?
Still, I’m very pleased with Obama’s first two days, especially the decision to close Guantanamo. Camp X-Ray, as Rumsfeld gleefully called it (or someone did). Rumsfeld and Bush thought it was funny.
Posted by: Anne Sennish | January 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Gitmo.
kill ‘em
Posted by: Fran | January 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
At the end of the day you have to ask if his actions will protect or hurt the safety of the american people. This will hurt our safety by showing weakness. We are dealing with primitivs who have no regard for human life. If having him tested before this decision was made,certainly this enhances the chances of attack on our country, as captives will be given a country club treatment
Posted by: Dr C | January 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Big mistake. 9/11 changed things. We can’t prosecute these detainees like we would shoplifters. They don’t deserve the rights of citizens in a U.S. court of law because they desire to kill our citizens and destroy our country.
Posted by: Tim | January 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
They key word is “suspected”. It is utterly against our principles, that is if we really believe in them, to rob people of their lives merely based on suspicion. Either prove them guilty or let them go. The founding fathers understood very clearly that this means that more guilty people will go free, but they also understood the other option is that more innocent people will have their lives taken from them.
Posted by: Jim Morton | January 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Gitmo should close when the last terrorist takes his last breath and not before! Islamists only only stands the sword and therefore should perish by it, so if you want gitmo to close early excute them and be done with it!
Posted by: G Dev | January 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
I think it was the worst decision he could have made. I think Bush at least kept us safe from any further terrorist attacks by doing what was necessary. And I have to add that I just can’t believe how incredibly biased the whole tone of the Nightline article was. The media fawning over Obama is sickening. I truly hope he succeeds and our country gets back on track, but I would really enjoy seeing the news just reported without feeling like I am watching Obama cheerleaders.
Posted by: brenda | January 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Yes, I do agree; instead of asking what message the closing of the military prison sends the international community, we should be asking what message does keeping it open sends? It is very hipocritical of the United States to play the role of Human Rights Watchdog around the world, but then expect that our government’s violation of human rights (even those of possible and confirmed terrorist) is justified. Remember MLK “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” You can be next!
Posted by: Bertrand | January 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
This is a very scary thought. To do this in under a year w/o any form of ‘backup’ plan set, is total lunacy!
I was very excited about Obama for about 24 hrs. This ‘bomb’ he has dropped on us today is shockingly unrealistic.
Not many of us agreed w/Bush, but this was one thing he did at least semi right. And, since 911, we’ve had NO further major attacks on US soil. So, he was doing something right somewhere. If anyone believes we were not spared another horror show like 911, b/c no one tried, they are in LaLa Land.
I also don’t believe we should be ‘nice’ to people who hate & want to destroy us. WaterBoard! Do anything they’d do to one of our prisoners, to help get needed information. What’s with all that protection for terrorists?
Aren’t WE the ones needing protection from them?
If Obama can come up w/a viable alternative to that prison, than I may agree w/his decision, depending on what it is. However, he has NO plan on what to do w/over 200 potential threats to the US.
If something happens b/c of his ignorant decision, the country will never give him a 2nd term. Nor should we.
They must be dancing in their cells tonight!
Posted by: J Lavin | January 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
This is a bold and significant first step toward restoring our international integrity and moral authority. Gitmo represents a dark time in our history as a nation. All of the CIA detention centers violate the constitution and the Geneva Convention. Due process is the answer. Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and release or sentencing. Holding prisoners indefinately without trial is cruel and unusual punishement. This take a tremendous burden off our collective psyche as Americans.
Posted by: Jessica Hall | January 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
yes , waste of tax payer money.Either charge them or let them go.Out with the old in with the new.
Posted by: jerry | January 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
This is a grave error on Obama’s part. He has now given the message to terrorists that there is no longer a danger or recourse to terrorist actions. They will be set free and no longer detained. This is begging for an open market on attacks against the US. It is only a matter of time until we are attacked again on our soil. Shame on you Obama.
Posted by: Brian | January 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Yes, now where are the prisoners going to be go?
Posted by: Lisa | January 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I support President Obama’s decision to close Guantanamo. We have a lot of work ahead to restore our international standing. This is a huge step in the right direction.
Posted by: Allen | January 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I have mixed emotions about closing GITMO because it hasn’t been announced what they are going to do with the detainees. I think Washington DC would be a great place to turn them loose, far away from me.
Posted by: wannabemyfriend | January 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Well, if President Obama does close Gitmo, maybe the detainees can be relocated to Bernie Madoff’s apartment…
Posted by: Donna | January 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Yes, I do agree; instead of asking what message the closing of the military prison sends the international community, we should be asking what message does keeping it open sends? It is very hipocritical of the United States to play the role of Human Rights Watchdog around the world, but then expect that our government’s violation of human rights (even those of possible and confirmed terrorist) is justified. Remember MLK “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” You or your children could potentially be next in line to have your human rights violated….but then it would not be fair!
Posted by: Bertrand | January 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Yes, I do agree; instead of asking what message the closing of the military prison sends the international community, we should be asking what message does keeping it open sends? It is very hipocritical of the United States to play the role of Human Rights Watchdog around the world, but then expect that our government’s violation of human rights (even those of possible and confirmed terrorist) is justified. Remember MLK “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” You or your children could potentially be next in line to have your human rights violated….but then it would not be fair!
Posted by: Bertrand | January 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I am glad President Obama is starting to take the steps necessary to close the prision at Gitmo. Indefinite incarceration without trial or stated charges is not the “American Way” I was taught in school. We use to be a nation of “law and order” with a clear knowledge of what is right and what is wrong. Those differences have been blurred over the last few years and not to our credit.
Posted by: jay stankiewicz | January 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I think this is a symbolic move that the President had to make. Both to fulfill the campaign promise but also to demonstrate the return to basic American values. I think however that closing the prison does not mean the prisoners will be set free. These people allegedly attacked this country. They should be prosecuted and given a verdict as would any other criminals.
Posted by: Francisco Maldonado | January 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I think this is his first big mistake of his presidency and I,m sure it’s the first of many that he wil be making. Our country has been pretty safe after 9-11 and I,m afraid those days are over. He is opening up our country to anyone that wants to see Americans dead. Its to bad people could not see what a good man President Busch was. Obama isn’t half the man Busch was.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
psychological studies have shown that when you give a person power over another, abuse is inevitable. i feel as if this decision to close the detention camp is purely a selfish reason to bolster his self-proclaimed moral high ground. do i believe in torturing suspects in order to get information? no. perhaps the new administration should think of ways to regulate the camp and methods of interrogation, instead of shutting down the camp straight away. where are the detainees going to go? furthermore, where will future detainees be held for questioning?
Posted by: Karen | January 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
I think he is going too fast on this. What are the plans to handle the inmates? Are they going to be let go free? Housed elsewhere? If people think the staff was inhuman I wonder what the American public will think when other nations handle inmates. If a inmate won’t talk just cut the tongue out?
Torture is not good. The problem is if your suspect KNOWS you can’t touch them they have no reason to give any info. Anyone ever heard of the IRA and cordless drills? THAT is torture. Or cutting off soldiers heads (that are tied down) on the internet?
Yep hardened folks can lie even under torture. You don’t bank EVERYTHING on what one person says. So you interview others and compare info. I feel that as long as we don’t do long term damage. (break bones) there are times when force (or fear of force) is needed.
This is not a card game folks.
Posted by: Larry | January 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
What do the victims and victims families of 9 – 11 think? Did the
terrorists show any mercyg to them or families as they died excruciating deaths or left devastated families.
What would Obama do had his family been affected by 9 11 terroists?
sad day, the terroists will say ..ahhh the “softies” are back in power we can do as we wish like during Clinton years!
Posted by: Marjy | January 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
What do the victims and victims families of 9 – 11 think? Did the
terrorists show any mercyg to them or families as they died excruciating deaths or left devastated families.
What would Obama do had his family been affected by 9 11 terroists?
sad day, the terroists will say ..ahhh the “softies” are back in power we can do as we wish like during Clinton years!
Posted by: Marjy | January 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
I think it was definitely the correct thing to do. The prisoners were put there without benefit of a lawyer or anything… in essence they were pronounced guilty….. they should have had a trial. They should have been treated like we treat a possible criminal… he has rights.
Bush’s creation of that prison is an
abomination and totally against everything we as a nation believe.
I am not sure what should be done with each prisoner there,,, I think that may be a person by person evaluation based on innocent until proven guilty.
Thanks
Posted by: Don Allen | January 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
NO! HUGE MISTAKE, THAT WE WILL ALL REGRET! LET’S NOT PAMPER THE TERRORISTS!
Posted by: Stephanie | January 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Bad idea! These are terrorists determined to destroy us. Detention means 248 fewer terrorists we have to worry about.
Posted by: Jim | January 23, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Yes, I agree with President Obama in closing the Guantanamo Bay prison camp. If we are going to lead by example, then we, as a nation, have to lead by the proper and correct example, from the top down, from the bottom up, and from the inside out. Integrity: doing the right thing, even when no one is looking. Well, the entire world has been looking at us, and it hasn’t been a pretty sight. Now it’s time to correct the errors that have been made. May God bless America as we do what’s right in His eyes, and according to His word and examples. Thank you.
Posted by: K Davis, Sr. | January 23, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
The same countries that criticize us about Gitmo are probably the ones that don’t want to help with these prisoners but they don’t want them released either. It just doesn’t seen very efficient to move them to various prisons around the country when they are not even American citizens.
Putting a hold on military procedures is also confusing. Giving these prisoners rights that are reserved for American citizens only gives future terrorists more of an incentive to terrorize the world because they know that the military’s ability to extract information from them is severely handicapped. Similarly, we don’t have the death penalty because we want to kill murderers but because we want to offer an incentive for people not to kill. I just don’t understand Obama’s decision to weaken the military.
Posted by: wsquared11 | January 23, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
I am very glad that President Obama signed the Executive Order to closed Gitmo…
Posted by: DENNIS JUNIOR | January 23, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
The Gitmo prison is needed to keep the most extreme POW’s from any possable excape. They are on a island and even if someone could break out they would have nowhere to go but Cuba. On second thought we should just open the gate and kick them off the base. Let Cuba have them, they will be well taken care of there…
Posted by: Ed Blanchard | January 23, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
What pea brain came up with this idea?
Where are the criminals going to be housed?
Posted by: Allison | January 23, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
I do not agree with the closing of Gitmo…I hate to see what happens next
Posted by: Brooke | January 23, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
With the stroke of a pen, and a blip in the brain, Obama has totally forgotten the 9-11 terroist attach on thousands of innocent people in New York City
Posted by: Edward R. May | January 23, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Does anybody remember Nick Berg? These people are not criminals. Do these people really think that terrorists, and military combatants should be tried in a court of law, and given prison terms..? Do you really think that it is a good idea to have a CSI guy wandering around the battle field, or bomb site looking to see if our guys had carefully read these guy their rights?
They saw peoples heads off with ragged butter knives, and it’s because they were oppressed by imperialist westeners. We pour water on their faces, or maybe embarass them in front of their buddies, and we are nazi animals. Amazing. I sure hope that our country doesn’t face war during the reign of these people. ON the other hand, most of the wars this country has endured have resulted in the return of common sense, and a sense of proportion about what is really right and wrong.
Posted by: Mike | January 23, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am
MAJOR, MAJOR mistake! These are suspected TERRORISTS. Have we forgotten that? They do not have any ethics or any morals what so ever. They are willing to die just to make sure that Americans die. How sick is that? We sure don’t want them brought here to the U.S. Leave them where they are!
Posted by: sharon | January 23, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Close it is understandable but what do you do with the radical prisoner. You can not send them to their “Home Coountry” as they would be likely tortured or killed without a call on judgement. These are violent people that are trained to be violent. Where do we put them? On Our Homeland? I think not.
Posted by: rcg | January 23, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am
I don’t agree with this move at all.Why don’t we just surrender in Iraq and look like the weak nation when we gave up in Viet Nam.This is just what the enemy is predicting, thet the U.S.is just a paper tiger and can’t endure a long war. They can just wait and we will give up and go home with our tails between our legs.This STINKS!
Posted by: Warren E. Barney | January 23, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am
I am a life-long Republican and spent 19 years in the military, sixteen of that as an Officer. Gitmo was a DISGRACE to this Country, as were the people responsible for it and the atrocities at Abu Graib prison in Iraq. We do NOT torture prisoners. Period. It was the very first thing we learned in UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) class in Basic Training.
When we started to torture prisoners, not only did that make us no better than the terrorists, but we put every single serviceperson in jeapordy of suffering the same fate. The ends do not justify the means, unless of course you’re a Nazi.
Gitmo caused the loss of any credibility that the US had in the international community. Its closing couldn’t have come sooner.
Posted by: Allen R. Schreiber | January 23, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am
They are not all terrorists – some were turned in for bounties by personal enemies, some were in the wrong place at the wrong time and picked up in sweeps,etc. For those who are truly dangerous we have supermax prisons some of which are not crowded at all, having been built mainly to help local economies like the one in Boscobel Wisconsin.
Posted by: kaari | January 23, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
DOES ANYBODY REMEMBER 9-11 OR ALL YOU ALL THAT STUPID
Posted by: ANDY ARTIM | January 23, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
I felt safe with President Bush in office. Closing Gitmo is a mistake and it will come back to hurt the American people. I don’t sleep as well at night with President Obama in charge.
Posted by: Mira | January 23, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Obama is naive and foolish to shut down gitmo.
Terrorists dont care about American rights or the constitution.
Obama is already making a lot of Americans nervous, he has shown that he does not take national security seriously.
It seems that Obama has forgotten 9/11 and the horrors that nation went through and the tough action it took then.
Posted by: Greg h | January 23, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
This decision on the surface may seem like forward thinking. However does Mr. Obama realy believe that he was the first person in history to believe that this benevolent jesture or humanitarian act is original thinking and would serve the cause of protecting our freedom?? This is incredibly naive. Those who hate us will never remember nor care that he did this. And our true allies who know the real history of this fight did not need to see this jesture to continue to have faith in our cause.
The truely sad aspect of this act is that it only serves one’s own self fulfilment. One who wants to satisfy an inner need to add some value in their own life.
We did not need to jeopardize our saftey and security with such a naive and selfish act.
It is very likely that some of these prisoners that were released will in time come back to strike against our country. And innocent Americans will be killed. Probably long after Mr. Obama has moved on into a comfortable retirement. Sadly there will be no recourse against his reckless act. We had a constitional backbone many years ago that would put our countries saftey first and foremost! Not some liberal interpretation that fits their personal agenda.
Ex President Clinton dismantled our foriegn inteligence and we saw the affects of that move.
This is truely sad and in some perspective Un-American.
Where is his backup plan for detaining potential terrorists.
One cannot help but wonder if he is in fact undermining our saftey and security.
Really,….you have the audacity to make one of your first acts, an act that potentially undermines all Americans!!
God help to preserve this country as we once knew it. Save us from this infiltrator.
Posted by: Wayne Brown | January 23, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
I don’t understand why the prison has to be closed. I do understand why some of our leaders want to stop the types of torture that have happened. But closing I think is a mistake.
Posted by: Colleen | January 23, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
What does President Obama propose to do with the suspects already in custody if they are found guilty? I don’t think the Geneva Convention should come into play because these suspects are not an army from any specific country. They are a bunch of cold blooded killers who have absolutely no consideration for human life. They and their followers are responsible for the deaths of over three thousand people. They were also were responsible for kidnapping and beheading our soldiers. They did not adhere to the articles of the Geneva Convention in those cases, but yet they scream for it when they are in our custody. THEY DO NOT DESERVE ANYTHING! I was willing to give President Obama a fair chance, but I can already see that he cares more about protecting the civil rights of killers than protecting the rights of law abiding U.S Citizens. People can say what they want about George W. Bush, but there is no denying this truth. We never had another terrorist attack on our soil after September 11th. Maybe President Obama should learn a few things about what works and what doesn’t. Don’t mess with what works.
Posted by: Jennifer | January 23, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
President Obama Good Job. Very will calculated move…..In order to restore Americas grate image arrowed the world we must close Guantanamo, to demonstrate to the rest of the world we are still the land of democracy.
Posted by: George | January 23, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Whining, crybaby americans are to blame for the length of the war in Iraq…we did’nt show a united front behind President Bush…Terrorists took note of this pressure by the cowards here, and it gave them the resolve to continue fighting.
Closing Gitmo will further convince the terrorists of the world that we are weak….O’messiah may as well send invitations to them to attack Americans again. But O’Sideshow would rather build On his long running commercial ad campaign depicting his greatness…then keep our country safe.
Posted by: J Moore | January 23, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
HELLO??? Is he still recovering from all that partying? What the hell is this man thinking?
Give ‘em 1 year afer they’re all out, for another MAJOR attack on US soil.
He’s just proven he’ll lie down for & pity the treatment of terrorist. We are sitting ducks now, for the world to see, and he’s left us WIDE OPEN for everyone else who HATES us, to come back to destroy thousands of innocent others.
Has he forgotten he’s dealing with people who could care less about dying, trying to kill us? It’s an HONOR to them? That they are basically 1 step above total barbarians?
What good is it trying to show the world ‘We’re the bigger man’, when all they’ll do is take total advantage of it, by making us crawl & cry for mercy?
Since WHEN DOES A TERRORIST HAVE RIGHTS? They are TERRORIST! They HATE THE US. THEY WANT TO DESTROY THE ENTIRE COUNTRY! THEY SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN ANY RIGHT OR FURTHER OPPORTUNITY, TO HAVE ANY CHANCE, TO CARRY OUT FURTHER ATTACKS ON US SOIL! They DON’T belong in our prisons here, or to be allowed to go home, where they can scheme once again to rise up against us.
Obama, you have TRULY FAILED the US in just 2 days.
You will live to regret this. But not as much as the people who will lose their loved ones because of it.
Posted by: Seagal | January 23, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Yes. It was a very courageous move to stop torture & close the U.S. prison in someone else’s Country, namely Cuba. We did a shameful thing at Abu Gharib in Iraq & again at Guantanamo. President Obama is a man to be respected. Hopefully, in time, the U.S. can gain some of our lost respect back in the eyes of the world. Those detainees are young Iraqi’s some picked up just for standing around. No charges were even placed against them. Why are people worried that they would be put into American Society. I’m sure they would love to go home to their families & loved ones in Iraq. Send them there. We pay for planes to take the illegals back to Mexico so they can sneak back into the U.S. the same night, let’s put the Iraqi’s on a plane & send them to the homeland we captured them from.
Posted by: Marie Gilliam | January 23, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am
In answer to where to put the Gitmo detainees: Send them to ALCATRAZ! Jobs would be created with the renovation of the prison. It is an island, so no need to be concerned about detainees escaping into the masses. It could continue to be used as a tourist attraction with tour boats circling the island. Jump on this idea ABC and spread the word!!
Posted by: Kaycee | January 23, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am
I am proud and scared, just as scared as the rest of you but it was not a mistake, it was heroic, one man, one man can change the world i bealive that.
Not in a fairy tale kind of way but in the way that has been shown to me by history by evolution, CHANGE people, CHANGE! it is the wonder that moves us, and some don’t even belive in it.
I am glad I’m alive here and now that i can see history be writen and singed, it is an amazing feeling.
Posted by: Isabel | January 23, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Anyone who thinks all the Gitmo detainees are hardened terrorists picked up on the battlefield isn’t very well informed.
“Many Held at Guantanamo Not Likely Terrorists” LA Times 1-22-09
http://www.latimes.com/la-na-gitmo22dec22,0,2294365.story
Posted by: George | January 23, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
To close Gitmo, is in invitation for terrorist to come on in! Clear the innocent of all charges, Punish the guilty as they would you! And Sue, I totally agree with you! Thanks for your words and everyone else as well!
Posted by: Sabrina | January 23, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Oh no!
Posted by: Ed | January 23, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
This is a swift and decisive action of foolish, short-sightedness taken by a naive new president only hours after being sworn in. I expected no less from him. He is much more concerned about world opinion than punishing those that wish us genuine harm. These moves tie our hands and limit how we can deal with true terrorists. Way to go!!! Who’s side are you on anyway??
Those who say Gitmo is an embarrassment are embarrassed of the wrong things. I’m embarrassed there are actually weak and clueless people in our country who would say such things. Ass kissers.
Maybe next Obama will announce an amnesty program simply asking all terrorists to just turn themselves in. We can call it the “B. Huessin Obama Weapons to Plowshares Program”. The program will be a great success because Everyone Loves Obama. This will help spur new economic growth, fuel the new economy and restore our country’s right standing in the world. Empty words Ass kissers!
…Maybe if we coddle or simply ignore the terrorists they will go away. What do you think?
Posted by: Liberal BS | January 23, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Torture, no,keep them there. Why give them the chance to kill us. Some how some way, you & me their goal.
Posted by: Gene | January 23, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Typical Liberal mentality ..close Gitmo to free potential terrorist so we can continue to give $365 Million tax dollars each year to Planned Parenthood for abortions to kill innocent unborn babies (which apparently is not enough as Pelosi and other “left leaders” want to increase the annual amount to $700 million). Revoke the Mexico City Policy so the U.S. can send millions more of our tax dollars to foreign countries for family planning (i.e. more abortions) while millions of Americans are out of work, have no healthcare or food, need heat for the winter, and improved education. All the while the government continues to take part of my hard earned money to put into an insolvent Social Security system that is going broke and I will never see a dime of my money they took over the last 35 years! Finally as if that’s not enough the left is trying to force private insurance companies to pay for the abortions of innocent unborn babies while thousands of families can not afford healthcare already! That should really increase health insurance premiums, so even fewer people will be able to afford healthcare insurance. Some people never learn and don’t care to.
Posted by: Robert | January 23, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Obama is a screaming idiot for this decision.
Posted by: Sluggo | January 23, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Pres. Obama is not wasting any time showing his lack of leadership. If he does not have the stomach to deal with these scoundrels he should not have ran for office. These are unconventional prisoners who are conducting unconventional warfare and must be dealt with in an unconventional manner. I am curious to see what will happen to them. Perhaps they will be placed on probation and then they will change their ways. Let’s get real people.
Posted by: Pierre | January 23, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Send detainees to Allah! Please martyrdom us please. Don’t send us back to our families in disgrace! :p
Posted by: Tyrone Bryant | January 23, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Great move! Should be done in 2 months though. Bring what few real troublemakers there to USA and try them hear. Send the rest back to their home country. This will help start repairing the damage the Bushees did to our reputation.
Posted by: Gary Betchan | January 23, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am
While there may be some small danger in closing Gitmo and moving suspected terrorists to U.S. prisons, keeping it open poses a far greater danger to America’s interests and its international image (the two are closely intertwined). A very good first move by our new President.
Posted by: Terence Ball | January 23, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am
I strongly disagree with this executive order. He has kept his word to himself, NOT TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Posted by: susan runkle | January 23, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am
By Greg Miller
LA Times Staff Writer
December 22, 2002
WASHINGTON — The United States is holding dozens of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay who have no meaningful connection to Al Qaeda or the Taliban, and were sent to the maximum-security facility over the objections of intelligence officers in Afghanistan who had recommended them for release, according to military sources with direct knowledge of the matter.
At least 59 detainees — nearly 10% of the prison population at the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — were deemed to be of no intelligence value after repeated interrogations in Afghanistan. All were placed on “recommended for repatriation” lists well before they were transferred to Guantanamo Bay, a facility intended to hold the most hardened terrorists and Taliban suspects.
Dozens of the detainees are Afghan and Pakistani nationals described in classified intelligence reports as farmers, taxi drivers, cobblers and laborers. Some were low-level fighters conscripted by the Taliban in the weeks before the collapse of the ruling Afghan regime.
None of the 59 met U.S. screening criteria for determining which prisoners should be sent to Guantanamo Bay, military sources said. But all were transferred anyway, sources said, for reasons that continue to baffle and frustrate intelligence officers nearly a year after the first group of detainees arrived at the facility.
“There are a lot of guilty [people] in there,” said one officer, “but there’s a lot of farmers in there too.”
The sources’ accounts point to a previously undisclosed struggle within the military over the handling of the detainees. Even senior commanders were said to be troubled by the problems.
Posted by: Sandra | January 23, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am
well maybe ABC should listen to the people once , they are all against this mad man of a president he has no brains lets see how long it takes abc to figure out they are sitting at the side of the biggest waste of a president in history he will run the United States into the ground faster then the terrorist’s did it to New York this is a sad day for america this president just showed how far left he really is for the first time in my life I am ashamed to be an american whoops that is what mrs obama said!!
Posted by: scott miller | January 23, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am
Gitmo should not be closed. Do you think terrorists will say thank you, we now see that you are nice people and we will no longer cut off your heads. Who are you trying to impress by closing it?
It definately serves as a way around due process but we are not in ordinary times dealing with a rational enemy.
Posted by: Tom B | January 23, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
what happened to the poll abc did you remove it because most of the comments are against the president that is just fine you liberal fools your day will come!
Posted by: scott miller | January 23, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Bad move!
Posted by: Arizona | January 23, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am
THIS IS FROM FACEBOOK
supporters of Barack Obama. Politician – 4,071,751 supporters
You are a Supporter
Posted by: ISABEL | January 23, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Closing Guantanamo Bay prison camp is a major mistake that is idealistic and will one day cost lives. It is enormously irresponsible, unrealistic, and an immature decision. We cannot gather the world community in a circle around the campfire and expect everyone to lay down arms, join hands, and joyfully sing “Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya.” The idea behind taking this action is noble but the closing of this prison is naïve.
Posted by: Joan | January 23, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am
They are NOT all terrorists, you morons!
You are probably among the 75 per cent who believed Saddam Hussein helped knock down the Twin Towers and thus got bamboozled into Iraq by W. and his neocons.
Posted by: Jim | January 23, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
LA Times says so….therefore; it must be True Gospel. Give me a break!
Posted by: Jon England | January 23, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!!
Our people get their heads chopped off, burned alive, hung from bridges & left there & shot while being filmed, & they get a break from Waterboarding? Has everyone that’s OK w/this, forgotten they even killed journalist? NOT people who posed any threat to them at all?
So, we let them know that’s all OK & well to do. You won’t have to deal w/prison here at all, b/c we’re closing ours down. You can come to US soil & watch TV, play games, read more books on how to kill us, & call your friends here in the US, to laugh about how good it is to be in prison in the US! AND, hey, why not get to have your buddies & lovers, visit w/you too!? You can have them smuggle all kinds of stuff in the prison for you, so you can take them over while you’re in there.
“ATTICA” FOR TERRORISTS!
Then, get a bigger laugh as you wait to get a ‘fair trial’, that will cost US AMERICANS, MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WE DON’T HAVE! But, b/c you will be treated the same as someone who robbed a bank here, you will sit laughing in your cell, getting educated, exercised, fed well, & all your medical needs met, while Americans will continue to lose their homes, retirement, dignity, minds, & have no health insurance, or jobs.
While you’re in there, why not befriend some American Psychos, who will be more than happy to ‘join’ your cause, & you can teach them some of your ‘tricks’ they may not know about already…and, of course, vice versa!
We’ve been a mockery for countries who hate us, & now it will surely continue.
Like was said prior, they are dancing, not only in their cells tonight, but in the streets, all over the places that hate us.
Is anyone really that stupid to think that closing GTB is going to change their minds about us, & get us some respect back? I think NOT! Too much water is under the bridge now for that.
Let’s be real.
All this obscenely crazy move will do, is get us ANOTHER 9/11…ONLY WORSE NEXT TIME! And a lot sooner than anyone will think.
God Help Us ALL.
Posted by: JoJo | January 23, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am
I agree with the closing! If we can’t stand on principle, if we can’t stand on the Rule of Law, we can’t stand.
Posted by: Thinking | January 23, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am
These “detainees” at Gitmo are not US citizens charged with petty crimes. They are not uniformed enemy combatants that were “defending their country”. They are TERRORISTS. They fly hyjacked planes into civilian buildings…rig bombs to kill as many innocents as possible…saw off peoples heads… But even at Gitmo they were (at least before Obama suspended it) going to get a trial. I don’t know what Obama intends on doing with these prisioners but closing Gitmo will demonstrate to our enemies that we are a land of idiots!
Posted by: Larry | January 23, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am
He just spit on the graves of over 3000 Americans that all died in one day! Why? Because they were Americans. But Obama and his family will be safe from this day forward with the Secret Service protecting them! We on the other hand…
Posted by: Robert | January 23, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am
You know many of Gitmo’s prisoners are terrorists. This is a war. They should not be tried in criminal courts, but in military courts. And where will they go? Hopefully, the guilty will not be freed only to kill as many infidel Americans as possible. I am afraid that our safety and security will be greatly compromised. We need to ascertain guilt or innocence and quickly punish the guilty and release the innocent. And I kind of agree with Larry. I think we may be sorry–and we have no good plan.
Posted by: Sharon | January 23, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am
I can see Obama is getting right down to brass tacks. This should quickly help the economy to “make the turn”. Way to tackle the challenges that lay before us. Right on!
Posted by: Pippy | January 23, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am
What a dope. He’s just showin’ his true colors now…
Posted by: Larry Pino | January 23, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Close it. Thank you President Obama.
Posted by: Treva | January 23, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Yeah. So how many are in fact terrorists again? Sure, military tribunals are good for prisoners of war and known terrorists, I don’t disagree with that. What I have a problem is the interrogation and torture of innocent people who are suspected terrorists because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time or however the circumstances were when they were captured…. Is it ok to dehumanize dozens of innocent people if a roughly equal number are brought to justice? Do the ends justify the means? Some people may think so if it keeps us “safer”, but would you say the same thing if you were the one going through that hell? Fortunately, I personally don’t have to make that decision and I don’t envy the people who do…
Posted by: Meh565 | January 23, 2009, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Torture, extraordinary rendition, and Guantanamo are are blot on America’s reputation and a repudiation of our espoused values. Closure and humble acknowledgment of our mistakes are the only course to regain respect among nations.
What real difference is there between a terrorist, enemy combatant, or soldier fighting against us other than the label we attach? A rose by any other name is still a rose. The label does not excuse the US for failing to recognize basic human rights.
What real difference is there between American volunteers fighting Franco and Hitler before war was declared and foreign nationals fighting the US in Iraq? Both believed they were fighting for freedom as they saw it and hated the enemy. US soldiers are instilled with the nobility of protecting each other so it’s easier to demean a life to pull the trigger; and Muslims are duty-bound to protect their faith. Each sees the other as a hater.
As it turned out, some detainees are held solely on the accusations of others that are suspected to be false.
9-11 is irrelevant in most cases; the hijackers didn’t come from Iraq, they didn’t train there, and they got little material support from there.
Iraq was all about oil before Dubya took office; and the whole fiasco was a blatant violation of national sovereignty.
Posted by: Harvey Kahler | January 23, 2009, 1:59 am 1:59 am
How many more Americans have to die before the left wing liberals realize the agenda of our enemies. They hate us, they will always hate us and they want us dead. Closing Gitmo is a huge mistake and they will find out but will never admit it. I guess they would rather see dead American women and children in the streets instead of terrorists in a clean prison. They live better in Gitmo than their own countries. They need to stay there.
Posted by: Pat | January 23, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Why don’t all of you people that are so for closing Gitmo go move to a Muslem country and tell them you approve of closing Gitmo and see how long you live. Make sure you tell them your an American. You will be beheaded so fast you won’t know what hit you. By the way all of the Iraqi oil is going to China. We aren’t getting any of it. Why don’t you really find out what’s going on in the world.
Posted by: Pat | January 23, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am
They get 3 square meals a day in Gitmo and have a good roof over their heads, better than most have ever had. These people have been trained to give their lives to kill even one of us. Now we are considering making it a judge’s decision whether or not to release them? I don’t think so! I wouldn’t want a single one near me or one of my children in the cities they live in.
Posted by: Kay | January 23, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am
WHY DOESNT OBAMA JUST DRAW OUT PLANS FOR THE TERRORISTS HIMSELF(OH HE PROBABLY ALREADY DID) I THINK THAT THIS IS ONE OF THE DUMBEST MOVES A PRESIDENT CAN MAKE IN OFFICE NOT TO MENTION THE SECOND DAY IN MAKES YOU WONDER WHY HES SO EAGER TO DO SO.SO WHEN THERES ANOTHER 9-11 ALL THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS I JUST WANNA THANK YOU NOW. ITS FUNNY HOW SO MANY PEOPLE FORGET THAT TRAGIC DAY.IM GLAD MY HUSBAND IS DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY RIGHT NOW IN IRAQ FOR ALL THOSE SELFISH PEOPLE WHO REALLY FORGET WHY WE ARE AT WAR. IS IT REALLY THAT INHUMANE TO TORTURE THE PRISONERS TO GET INFORMATION WHEN EVERYONES LIVES ARE INVOLVED? IM SORRY CLOSING GITMO DOWN JUST MAKES YOU WONDER WHATS NEXT AND I HATE THAT MY HUSBAND RISKS HIS LIFE FOR A PRESIDENT WHO REALLY DONT SEEM TO THINK OF WHATS BEST FOR THE SAFETY HERE IN AMERICA. SO OBAHAM CAN SIGN AWAY AND SCREW THIS COUNTRY UP WHILE MY HUSBAND DODGES BULLETS AND AVOIDS IEDS ON A DAILY BASIS.AT LEAST HIS OTHER 2 1/2 YEARS OF BEING IN IRAQ HE HAD A PRESIDENT WHO SUPPORTED OUR TROOPS AND LOOKED OUT FOR THERE BEST INTERESTS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
Posted by: LINDSEY | January 23, 2009, 2:50 am 2:50 am
I respect President Obama’s intelligence, but this display of naivte makes me cringe.
I, too, desire peace, but idealistic acts will not make peace a reality. People such as terrorists aren’t going to see the error of their ways due to some kindness or obedience to civil rights. Far from it! They instead will see this as all the more reason to continue their plans to mass murder.
Posted by: Sam | January 23, 2009, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Yes,Yes,Yes close GITMO, 7 years held without charge or proven guilt, This is not America. The right tersest are lose and in High poisons in too many countries.
Posted by: Nick | January 23, 2009, 3:04 am 3:04 am
No,No, No do not close just get on with the trails.
Posted by: Richard | January 23, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am
Closing ‘gitmo’ is the MOST moral and right thing anyone could do … kudos to our president for his action
Posted by: Joe Richardson | January 23, 2009, 3:13 am 3:13 am
Closing Gitmo is a foolish, foolish move. The precendent set by moving war criminals into the US judicial system will haunt US security for years.
Posted by: Anon Mouse | January 23, 2009, 3:14 am 3:14 am
SEND THEM BACK TO THE COUNTRY WHERE THIER CRIMES WERE COMMMITTED. THERE COURTS ARE MORE EFFECTIVE AND I’M SURE THIER PUNISHMENT WILL BE QUICK AND LASTING.
Posted by: mtca | January 23, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am
PA, here come the terrorists! Thanks, Jack!
Posted by: Mihann | January 23, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am
No!!! We don’t need to bring terrorists into our country and supply them with our tax payer supported legal aid. What a stupid idea. Obama scares me as much as the terrorists do. At least they are out in the open about what they are instead of hiding behind a veil of a platform of “change”. It’s a change all right – just not one we want.
Posted by: Suzanne | January 23, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am
Finally, this will finally put a bottom in housing and stop the endless flood of foreclosures. I see this move as helping the rapidly deteriorating employment situation and deflation of all asset classes.
Tim Geitner is also an excellent choice as head of the Treasury which ultimately oversees the IRS. Put a tax cheat in charge! What an example. Put the bitch Hillary in charge of Secretary of State for all of her campaign support. Leon Panetta is an a superb candidate to head up the CIA with all of his intelligence background. Bama is brilliant, no?
Posted by: Tammy | January 23, 2009, 3:23 am 3:23 am
The prison camp at Guantanamo is an national disgrace and should absolutely be shut down. As we torture and hold prisoners incommunicado, without access to any meaningful legal process, we betray so many of the Amerian ideals that we claim to be protecting from the “terrorists.” We have become them.
Posted by: bill huntzinger | January 23, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am
This is irresponsible naivete from an unseasoned president. These people are NOT RATIONAL. They are pledged in Jihad, a Holy War, to KILL US. There are far more critical issues at hand than to spend the first two days creating more committees to reinvent the wheel. Guantanamo is an ideal security place to hold them. They are not entitled to priveliges under law as U.S. citizens and we are gracious by even giving them Geneva convention sanctions since they do not belong to a country that has signed the Geneva Convention. Let’s cut out the code pink grandstanding and get down to business, the Economy and our National Security.
Posted by: Mesajohn | January 23, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am
I absolutely agree with President Obama’s decision to close Guantanamo. We have lived with the shame of this embarrassment to our nation’s honor too long. I wholeheartedly welcome the return to sane, intelligent government policy.
Posted by: adrienne | January 23, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am
I disagree completely with this decision and feel it will only serve to foster a strong threat to the security of our nation.
Posted by: Debra | January 23, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am
This, one of his first moves as President, is ONLY the beginning. You, who support him wanted ‘change’? Just you wait. This is nothing! But by then the damage will be done and you will realize you were snowed and can’t do anything about it except pray, pray, pray. You will see ‘change’ alright. No freedom, no money in your pocket (just the governments) and we won’t be better off for it, mark my words this day. When you realize it, you will remember this post. God be with us during Obamas rein!
Posted by: Vickie Breedlove | January 23, 2009, 3:46 am 3:46 am
I Don’t Agree with closing GitMo. You are not dealing with “Sane, intelligent people”. These detainees are dangerous and are being treated far better than they have ever been in their lives.
This is a foolish decision. Not necessary to spend a year studying the situation with a committee. Just more wasteful spending. They will simply use our legal system with endless delays and more wasted taxpayer money defending them. In the end they will probably be released into Society. Where is the responsibliity? This is NOT a “SANE and INTELLIGENT” DECISION.
Posted by: Cheryl | January 23, 2009, 3:55 am 3:55 am
I’m a conservative who happily voted for Obama. However, I disagree with the closing of Guantanamo. It is not appropriate to try them in the US judicial system plus where are we going to put them. I also disagree on torture. In my opinion anything that creates no permanent physical damage is appropriate to interrogate.
Posted by: John Koval | January 23, 2009, 3:58 am 3:58 am
Very disappointing move! It demonstrates a lack of understanding of the hearts and minds of terrorists. It is extremely naive to think that a terrorist can be cajolled into giving up vital infomation, much less their hatred and desire to destroy the innocent people of a nation. Has he even been to Gitmo? Personally witness the aftermath of a suicide bomber? Did he see the destruction at Ground Zero in the days following the attack? Humane treatment yes, bring terrorist on American Soil and try them in our already over-burdened court system, No! These people are not American Citizens and are therefore not entitled to the same rights. I hope his advisors will help him reconsider and exercise a more prudent plan.
Posted by: Cathy D. | January 23, 2009, 4:02 am 4:02 am
I strongly disagree with this executive order. Now that Obama signed for it, we can put those terrorist inside or next to the white house, how do you think he will feel now, it is the same for any other american!!! this is just the begining of stupid Ideas just because you want to be diferent… I like to see what the bad guys are thinking now. i hope we will be safe in the future!!!
Posted by: Jones | January 23, 2009, 5:23 am 5:23 am
CLOSE GITMO! A year is too long. Its not only a symbol, it is the result of the corrupt and erroneous notion that by placing this prison on leased territory the government could avoid respecting both the Geneva Convention and US Constitution–Denying rights afforded to soldiers in war and civilians, respectively. The principle of a Guantanamo is extremely scary to any thinking person. It is a gross example of “might makes right” by people who placed themselves above the law.
Posted by: William P. Eskdale | January 23, 2009, 5:56 am 5:56 am
Obama likes to play with fire I see. OK set them all free or better yet lets set up a foreign exchange program and bring them into our homes and see if we can convert them to be good Christians and love one another. Yeah right! If they go free there will be a next time lest we forget.
Posted by: Shasta | January 23, 2009, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Don’t you think a plan would be a good idea, before we close Gitmo? Who’s stupid?
Posted by: Linda | January 23, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am
Today it is reported in the media that the #2 leader of Al-Q in Yemem was released from Gitmo in 2007. Why wasn’t this in ABCs reporting yesterday on this topic?
Posted by: Paul | January 23, 2009, 7:44 am 7:44 am
A so-called terrorist is a symptom of something more complex. The minutemen were terrorists from King George’s point of view. Obama is the first president to have understood that you must first solve the injustices generously scattered around over decades is you are to ever solve the terrorist problem. Like the atrocities committed daily by Israel towards the Palestinians with US weapons and money.
Then and only then you will defuse the hatred that is felt by many foreigners.
Closing Gitmo is a good first step towards normalizing the relations with many countries that have been trampled by previous administrations by a foolish policy based on religion and oil.
Posted by: Sergey | January 23, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am
CLOSE THE BOOK ON THIS CHAPTER IN OUR COUNTRY’S DARKEST DAYS IN THE HANDS OF ARROGANT IDIOTS. How many Gitmo detainees were released for lack of credible evidence? Over half, several more even on the last weekend of Bush’s regime Yet, after 7 years, how many have been prosecuted? We’ve been led by fools with no understanding or respect for the rule of international or Constitutional law, jeopardizing our own troops’ future treatment as POW’s and lowering our status to that of a rogue regime in the eyes of the world and many of our own citizens. Although I WOULD agree to keeping it open for the Bush regime to occupy…just be sure to throw away the key. Impeachment would of been too good for those traitors, the most dangerous threat to our system of government, way of life, and the ideals of the founding fathers in our history. GITMO: Al-Quida’s best recruiting tool! Good Riddance.
Posted by: W. Ferguson | January 23, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am
We must not profile. We must protect the civil liberties of terrorist.
Posted by: Henry Miller | January 23, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am
The decision to close GITMO is absolutely ridiculous. For the most naive President since Jimmy Carter to start his presidency by closing the most effective tool against terrorism will earmark what will end up being the worst presidential blunder of our times. Terrorists don’t respond to kind gestures. Terrorists aren’t easily recruited because they hear we have a secret prison where their comrades are tortured to get information against them. They are recruited by the promise of 72 virgins if they sacrifice their lives for their evil cause. To think otherwise is beyond stupid. It’s what will create an open door to new attacks on our soil. When this happens, Obama and the fools who support thisa action are to blame but I guaranty none of them will take credit for it. Liberals never do.
Posted by: Dean | January 23, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Knee jerk actions are always wrong and will have consequences.. When we went to war in Iraq, I felt the consequences were not well thought out and I feel the same way about the swift closing of Guantanamo.
I am sure there are real terrorist, in that camp and they need to be handled correctly. We will see if Obama turns out to be such a hero when these consequences evolve.
Posted by: Terri | January 23, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
No I don’t think Gitmo should be closed who are these people wanting it closed and the terrorist not to be hurt you cannot treat these people with kid gloves. These people hate America and want to destroy our country. Are they going to quit torturing our soldiers I don’t think so is it ok for them to cut off thier heads and Americans heads and torture our people.Americas safety is now in deep trouble and they are going to attack us again
Posted by: Etta | January 23, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Stupidity as reached its fullest potential.
Posted by: Bill | January 23, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I think that closing GITMO by this President is clearly evidence that he is motivated to make moves that enhance his immediate Political standing, at home and abroad, and is not concerned with the long term results for our Country. I believe it is a further demonstration of his unpreparedness to fill the office of President.
He will play to the grandstand that will applaud his action and does not have patient nor the experience and wisdom to understand the complete ramification of his actions from the office of president.
Posted by: Ken | January 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Well said Ken. The people who are for closing it need to be stabbed in the eye with a sharpened comb and paralyzed and have a cross written in their own blood on their chest just like one of the suspected terrorists did to one of our guards. There is nothing we can do or say to get their hatred of non radical muslimism out of them. Now Obama wants to have open dialogue with them and all rogue countries. We should have learned the first time the world trade center was attacked. Too bad Clinton let them do it again and now Obama is setting the stage for a repeat. Our president is a fool!
Posted by: Shasta | January 23, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Oprah needs to stop acting like Gitmo is a tool to guage how down we are whith other countries. Who gives a ratts as. They need to be treated like the verman they are. Thats all we need is another protected class in this country.
Posted by: Shazzamm... | January 23, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Look on the bright side. One of the camel jockeys freed by Husain might take a Jet Blue plane in a vertical dive into the white house.
Time to man up Joe Biden!!!
You can just use Husain’s Inaugeration speech.
Posted by: Shazzamm... | January 23, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
This has put more fear into my life than I thought could happen. Please do not let these people go free or transfer into our country to be released. They will strick again. Please do not even consider doing such a thing, just rethink the whole matter.
Posted by: Laverne | January 23, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I can’t believe these people that are acusing the liberals for letting these people go. You are forgetting that YOUR STINKING PRESIDENT STARTED THIS MESS
Posted by: R | January 23, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Finally we have a President that opposes touture and violations of human rights.Doing things he promised.Who knows the way hes going he might become one of the best Presidents in history.
Posted by: Carlos | January 23, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Ken (above) said it perfectly. We should all be terrified of the message this sends to the people who want YOU and ME dead. They do NOT want to be our friends, no matter how idealistic our President is, and they WILL attack us every chance they get. Closing Guantamano is akin to lying down and waiting for the bully in the schoolyard to beat you up and take your lunch money… only so much worse, in that Americans will die. It’s not a question of if, but when. My, but how we needed to keep someone with experience in that office for a few more years. What a mistake this country has made at this time.
Posted by: Lis | January 23, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
I oppose the closing of “Gitmo” for all the many cogent and compelling reasons that many of you already enumerated. But it’s a moot point. Why? Because our new naive pharoah, er president, “Let it be written, let it be done!” decided otherwise! God help us all!
Posted by: GreyHairandGreyMatter | January 23, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
The facts show that you can’t expect these terrorists not to do terror when
released. It is outrageous to think
that terrorists can be rehabilitated.
Look at the record. Over 70 released
are known to have attacked our troops.
A recent report is about one who is not
reinstated as an AlQueda leader in Yemen!
Many of these, their own countries won’t take back. How do you expect our
courts to find a place for them?
Milton Thrasher
Sarasota, FL
Posted by: Milton Thrasher | January 23, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Honor to his words as a candidate, congratulationsmand God bless America
Posted by: Jose Zozaya | January 23, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Hope, it’s the only one terrible, bloody mistake Mr. Obama is going to do.
Or, may be he’ll see statistics of Mr. Thrasher, analyse his own and find better solution.
That’s why he is a president to be smarter than we’re.
Posted by: cassander | January 23, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
The alarming part of our USA interrogating and “disappearing” people–even second generation citizens– based on ethnicity is that IT COULD HAVE BEEN YOU! Or your East Indian compuer whiz son-in-law.
The only people who would write against civilizing Gitmo, are people who have never been touched by injustice.
I had a doctoral student being hauled in–born in the US with a Sri Lahknan father, American mother–BOTH MINISTERS–because his name was Raheem, or Smith in Muslim countries.
ALSO–HOW ABOUT OUR OWN PRISONS? The methods used in Abu Ghraib are being used in the US–and we know how often our own prisoners turn out INNOCENT. The only people who would write against civilizing Gitmo, are people who have never been touched by injustice.
Posted by: IT COULDA BEEN YOU!! | January 23, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Do not agree. His experience as Commander in Chief is two days!
Posted by: Bill Wiseman | January 23, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
This is another humane side of Obama. No matter WHO we THINK these Gitmo prisoners are, they are still human beings and don’t deserve to be shuttered up for endless years….time that should be given them to actually PROVE they should be there. We are no better than the Nazis if we continue this type of concentratrion camp.
Posted by: BarB | January 23, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
This really makes economic sense in this crisis, doesn’t it?? Lets build or alter another facility on the mainland at a few million $$$$ to incarcerate these enemies so they have equal rights and another opportunity to become free to threaten us further. Lets get real!! This is a very ill advised decision economically and strategically. If we want to end torture well and good do it but keep the terrorists confined in place at GITMO that has been built and instituted for their safe keeping and human treatment.
Posted by: fred | January 23, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
“God help us all!”
He HAS helped us; He gave us obama, a much better president than some of the yahoos on this and countless other message boards deserve.
however we behave, whatever we do, certain islamic fundamentalist nutjobs will want to kill us, but closing the disgrace called gitmo is not being done for their benefit—it is being done for ours. we must start behaving like Americans again, which means showing even our enemies common human decency. justice is not only for American citizens.
don’t for a moment kid yourself that bush’s use of the constitution as his personal roll of toilet paper is what prevented another attack. with bush goin’ rogue in the post-9/11 white house, another terrorist act would have been redundant.
Posted by: moiraregis | January 23, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
If these detainees were guilty, why weren’t they tried in court–what’s taking so long? If they are guilty and they get away with crimes against the USA, then they will just go home heroes! And this will not be the last time we hear about them.
Posted by: Vee | January 23, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
I am saddened by the ignorance of those who condemn Obama. Were they to be imprisioned and presumed guilty, they would howl for their rights. Bush forgot to include any mechanism for dealing with the innocent caught up in the post 9-11 drag net. Had we done it right from the beginning, we would not have the human rights fiasco we have now. It is imperative that we restore the rule of law to anyone we arrest for crimes. You would want no less for yourself or your family. We owe the murdered innocents and their families justice! As far as handling convicted tterorist in US prisons, we are doing just fine. Read Glen Greenwald at Salon.com
Posted by: James Costello | January 23, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
shasta sez: “Our president is a fool!”
takes one to know one, shasta …
Posted by: moiraregis | January 23, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
This is the problem you have in any prison. proper sentencing and proper release. Of course we would not want to release violent criminals. We wouldnt want to do that at Cook Cty Jail. So they have to be looked at case by case. Sentenced or not sentenced. If they go back to other countries and join some terrorist group if not them someone else. Gitmo is a symbol and a nuisance. Anything that is done about this or anything else is a matter of competence. proper release would work.Throwing them into Central Park would not.
Posted by: murielschnierow | January 23, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
To those who support the closing of Gitmo. May the terrorists pick your city, town or neighborhood to visit.
Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
No he shouldn’t close it. It would be a STUPID move. Where are the terrorists supposed to be housed? My other question is, “Why are we affording them ANY rights. They are not Americans.
Posted by: Sharon | January 23, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
I would like to see the prisoners moved into the White House. If the President wants them to be released from Gitmo, He should have to keep a eye on them. That’s right Mr. President You release them, You watch them… Don’t just put it off on someone else….
Posted by: Philip Briggs | January 23, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
It was a bad idea in the first place; stop it. Send ‘em to live in Crawford, Tx?
Seriously… fair trials in the US, and US prisons if guilty. If not, make ‘em rich in their own country, subject to monitoring by trusted entities there, so they can receive the aforementioned riches on a monthly basis. An apology is certainly in order for those found innocent, but it can be blamed on the ‘war crazies’. give ‘em HOPE for a return to civilization.
Posted by: Soularddave | January 23, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
BIG MISTAKE! HUGE MISTAKE!
This is NOT the way to start off a new term in office.
So we put the “prisoners” in our military prisons and they set about converting other prisoners to their way of thinking?
What does President Obama think is going to happen here?
Gitmo may not have been the perfect way to handle suspected terrorists, but it was NOT on U.S. soil- or the mainland.
Did we not learn anything from 9/11!
Most of thes people want to kill Americans just because we are Americans.
Posted by: Ruthie | January 23, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Maybe some of these prisoners should be treated like Hannibal Lector, some not. Figure it out. Some 350 have already been released; some not.
The underlying reasoning is that torture at the hands of the US endangers US citizens to foreign torture. Ask John McCain.
Remember, some of these guys were ‘captured’ only for the purpose of some vendetta by a neighbor, and for a reward. “No actionable intellegence has come from a tortured prisoner”.
Posted by: Soularddave | January 23, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
I strongly agree with president Obama’s decision in closing Guantanamo. There are a huge number of innocent people are held but they are not actually terrorist. They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.Even after being cleared of wrongdoing, the U.S. continues to hold some of them indefinitely. We should use the money spent their to secure our country and our boarders.
Posted by: steve | January 23, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Yes I agree as long as we can find a high security prison or one has to be built and manned within one year. I do not agree with them being freed or reprogramed.
Posted by: Ranger Phx | January 23, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=6720049
Posted by: Phil Briggs | January 23, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
I agree with not freeing the guilty people if they were giving a fare trial within a reasonable time. I disagree as a tax payer to pay for people that are held in jail for no reason or for people who are waiting years for trial then after trial the same people were found not guilty.
Posted by: steve | January 23, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
BAD move unless there is a super secure island somewhere off the coast. Some of the released prisoners have already gone back to their craft in a big way. It’s obvious they will not be successful in rehabilitating them!
Posted by: Eileen | January 24, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Moiraregis,
Only a foolish idiot would empower people that kill ones that don’t convert to their religion. Hopefully Obama will smarten up and revoke his foolish executive order. We can only “hope” for him to “change”.
Posted by: Shasta | January 24, 2009, 5:57 am 5:57 am
Reckless disregard for the safety of our country. If we have another attact then it will be directly the fault of Obama. His oath said that he is to protect our contry not destroy it.
Posted by: Ray | January 24, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Wise decision. Torture gains only more turmoil, wars, angry human beings. Humane treatment calms the brain, producing more peaceful human beings.
These prisoners have been tortured so long it’s a miracle they still know their names. And, hey, how about closing some of our state and federal private prisons that are making billions on non-violent inmates, plus the fact the inmates lack adequate diets, medical care, and contact Hep. C and other diseases, then not treated .
Prison systems in the U.S. are now becoming the biggest money maker in America.
Posted by: Elizabeth | January 25, 2009, 6:11 am 6:11 am
As an Independent voter who voted for Obama I think its a Bad idea. Coincidently, my vote is considered a “swing” vote as well as moderates and conservatives who voted for him in key states(you can look it up). Hmm so what’s next? Are we going to set them free? Is Obama going to dismantle Homeland security as well? As bad as Bush seem to many remember this, AFTER 9/11 we NEVER were attacked again. If we have another 9/11 on American soil, you can bet the ranch that the moderate and some of the conservative votes who voted for Obama WON’T vote for him in 2012.It’s in the Dems best interest to make sure ou country is safe OTHERWISE Obama will be a ONE-TERM President and the Republicans will retake the White house in 2012(to the horrors of many Dem. voters)Lets be smart here, torture is wrong we all know this but setting them free is worst. Another thing to remember is that these so called “patriots”(as viewed by the Liberals) have blood on their hands. They shot and killed our boys(Americans) and are combatants on the field caught red-handed and others were caught in terroist plots. The problem is that most Americans don’t follow the news and are more caught up in STUPID trivial things like what Britney wore to a nightclub or what Angelina and Brad said about Jennifer(blah,blah,blah),or what was downloaded in their ipods. with that being said I can understand that the idiots who whip up a frenzy to the uninformed with propaganda. I just hope President Obama does the right thing and not let release these terroist or he won’t win in 2012.
Posted by: Patrick | January 25, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Now, several days after question and the President’s action, many people are beginning to wake up to how great Gitmo really is. What better place to keep the real bad guys. Away from all of us. After seeing the conditions that prisoners live with there, they should be praying they don’t get sent to a U.S. Fed Prision. Things are much tougher there. Of course, maybe the Pres will just let them go, so they can get back to their work.
Posted by: billbob | February 4, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am