By David Schoetz

Jan 5, 2009 11:54pm

Closing Arguments: Burris and the Senate Seat

There may be some awkward moments when the new Senate is sworn in tomorrow — mostly due to the controversy surrounding Roland Burris, the Democrat embattled Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich picked to fill Barack Obama’s seat. Burris arrived at BWI airport today determined to assume his new post in Washington — even as he is blocked from the Senate floor and veteran lawmakers said he will not be seated. So tonight, we ask you: Should Roland Burris be seated as the rightful senator from Illinois? Tell us what you think.

User Comments

I would love to have seen Valerie Plame in this position.

Posted by: Phoebe | January 6, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

No Burris should not be setted tomorrow…

Posted by: Debra Spates | January 6, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

NO! Absolutely not! Our disgraced governor should not have the power to appoint anyone!

Posted by: Illinois Resident | January 6, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Mr. Burris should not be seated. A new senator should be selected AFTER the investigation is completed and a determination made as to whether the governor committed a crime. If so, the Lt. Governor should make the selection

Posted by: Jadyn | January 6, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Of course not! What planet is Burris from? Where the heck is common sense? He’s not allowed to sit in the Senate seat. Stop being a bully or exhibitionist. Do it the right way and COOPERATE!!!!

Posted by: karen doney | January 6, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Legal governor (even though he is a Democrat crook!).
Legal appointment.
Legal procedure followed.
YES! Seat him! Unless you are an advocate of illegally barring an African-American, Harry Reid!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Despite the apparent legality of this appointment, it is extremely inappropriate for the Senate to seat Burris. There are too many unanswered questions concerning the Illinois Governor, and assuming his upcoming impeachment, allowing his senator to be seated would be a slap in the face to Illinoisans.

Posted by: Kyle Rak | January 6, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

No, he should not be seated. Anyone named to the position by Blogo is tainted under these circumstances.

Posted by: Mike | January 6, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Yes, I think that Roland Burris should be seated as the senator from Illinois. The governor exercised the legal authority to make the appointment. He still holds the position as governor. Furthermore, the governore has approved a special election for Rahm Emmanuel’s congressional seat and this action was approved by the Illinois Secretary of State. So, why not approve the action to appoint Roland Burris? He’s more than qualified to hold the position as US Senator.

Posted by: Aginah | January 6, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Burris may have found a legal opening to challenge for the senate seat but, he should not be there pressing the issue and creating a disharmonious environment even before Obama has been sworn in.

Posted by: miamiartexchange | January 6, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

No, Mr. Burris should definately NOT be seated in the Senate on Tuesday. He is an opportunist who was unable to be elected to any major office so he simply saw this as his last chance..but, to take an appointment from our crooked governor????? He has destroyed his reputation and to have allowed the race card to be thrown into the mix besides is simply deplorable!

Posted by: G. McQueary | January 6, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I think Burris should not be seated tomorrow because Jessie White did not signed the document. Besides, Burris is using the public money to travel to Washington, DC. Something that is completely wrong.

Posted by: Maria | January 6, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

NO, Burris will just be another squatter in Washington.

Posted by: Melba | January 6, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

No Mr. Burris should not be seated in Senate. Gov Rod had no business placing this man and Mr Burris is being used. I believe he is a very nice man but his placement is a move on Rods part to thumb his nose at the people of Illinois. I’m sorry Mr. Burris, but No

Posted by: Norma Meents | January 6, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Burris should not be seated.

Posted by: doug owens | January 6, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

I am from Illinois, and proud of our outgoing senator, go Barack! I would also be proud to call Roland Burris as our junior Senator from Illinois. He’s earned it.

Posted by: Jon | January 6, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Polosi and Reid aren’t from Illinois; they don’t have a say in who represents that state; it’s the typical WAH-WAH-WAH attitude of Democrats in congress. They have more important things to do than squabble about this and that they are concerned about the “tainted image” this appointment brings is LAUGHABLE.

Posted by: D L Welch | January 6, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Blagojevich has lost all credibility. He should have his due process, but the evidence exposed thus far seems convincing. How can he explain away his recorded conversation? He is arrogant and appears guilty. Burris was picked by Blagojevich for all the wrong reasons. He should not be seated. An election should be held and he can run for the seat. If elected so be it. It appears congress is taking the right stand on this one.

Posted by: MIke | January 6, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

YES – the governor is still the governor and has the right to make this appointment, until and unless he is impeached.

Posted by: AA | January 6, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It’s Illinois’s seat. The appointment is valid under Illinois law. Burris is qualfied. The Senate has no legitimate constitutional basis to deny seating Burris. I don’t understand what business Harry Reid has “negotiating” the IL seat. Either the appointment is valid or it’s invalid – that is a matter of IL law and Harry Reid has no authority on that point.

Posted by: Wes | January 6, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Yes, otherwise no other Senator is eligible to seat in the 100-man chamber. A governor’s exercise of a valid constitutional right cannot be invalidated by politicians acting like moralists. Democrats are taking risks with the electorate and they may implode to the benefit of Republicans.

Posted by: Nkwa | January 6, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

As an Illinois resident I oppose any person who would be appointed by Blagojevich. It’s hard to trust politicans to properly represent the states diverse culture properly, even without all the curruption, and in the mist of yet another scandal it’s made trusting this administration impossible.

Posted by: Cassie | January 6, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I think Mr. Roland Burris should be sworn in as senator to fill the seat left by Mr. Obama.

Posted by: Anderson Parker | January 6, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

NO!!!
Burris should not be seated tomorrow.
Haven’t we as a state been made a big enough laughing stock??

Posted by: Nancy | January 6, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Burris should undoubtly be seated. The Senate is toying with Illinois’s right to be represented. Look at what the last black senator accomplished. Think maybe perhaps the senate doesn’t want a repeat.

Posted by: Ken Walker | January 6, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Burris should not be seated. He made a mistake by accepting this nomination, especially with all the mess going on. Why did he allow himself to become a a pawn.

Posted by: Ann | January 6, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Mr. Burris should not be seated. A corrupt Govenor should not be allowed to conduct state Business. Illinois has one ex-govenor in prison (who swhould stay there)and now another is under fire. What does the world think of Illinois now. I am ashamed to be a citizen of Illinois!

Posted by: Robert | January 6, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

CERTAINLY!!! THAT’S THE LAW. HE WAS DULY APPOINTED!

Posted by: Bill | January 6, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

No doubt Burris should be seated since Blagojevich remains that state’s governor. Until Blagojevich is removed, he must perform all the duties he vowed to take on behalf of his state.When he took is oath, he consumated a contract to act; if he does not, he breaks his contract. Burris is not on any level a part of Blagojevichs’ breach (if, in fact, he is actually found guilty of said breach).

Posted by: Nancy | January 6, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

How is he going to get anything done with so many people upset about the situation. He spoke more like a victim today than someone who can address the concerns people have in Illinois. This circus just empowers the Republicans who can learn from the Democrats mistakes.

Posted by: wsquared11 | January 6, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Of ‘course-NO constitutional reason not to, unless we dont follow constitution anymore

Posted by: aslan | January 6, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

No he should not be seated…and if he had any kind of integrity he would not have accepted the appointment from Ill. Gov.

Posted by: Karen | January 6, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes he should be seated. Blagojevich is the governor. Period! If we are a nation of laws then stop playing around. Just because I don’t like a law does not mean I don’t have to obey it. The senate makes laws but they should also abide by them. We don’t get a chance to pick and choose. They need to set the example and recognize the appointment and move on. There are too many more important issues than worry about this. In two years, if he wants to run again, that is his business and the business of the Illinois voters.
These folks are acting like spoiled kids.
Unfortunately, too often, our legislators DO NOT look at what is good for the country but whit is whimsical to them.
Seat Roland Burris and move on!

Posted by: Fred | January 6, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

What gives Harry the power to change the decision of a duly elected governor to nominate a candidate. If so, then the guy from Colorado cannot be seated as well. Harry needs to go back to Nevada and stay there…

Posted by: Allan | January 6, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

If it seems a little unfair to Mr. Burris then thats just too bad. Our leaders should be held to a higher standard that the rest of us. If there is even the slightest hint of improper conduct, He should not be allowed to take part in making the decisions that effect the lives of everyone in this country. If we continue to accept government corruption, then we deserve the country we’re sure to end up with. This is much more important than Roland Burris’ career.

Posted by: Mike Smith | January 6, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

In these economic times Illinois needs two voices in the senate. Taxation with 50% representation is not what we deserve. I have lived without an acting US senator for over two years now, maybe even three. We do not have time for a new election, not to mention the idea of the cost in this economy. We do not have time for politics. Burris is a decent man and Illinois could and has done worse. I am so tired of all these people that act so high and mighty while our country crumbles beneath them. If the Governor did those things then let them convict him. Until then it is his responsibility to select the next senator. I may add that the controversy caused him to pick a person for the right reason. Get over yourselves, seat this guy and fix the economy!!

Posted by: Dan K | January 6, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

No. Appointment is not legal with the appropriate State certification. Why should the Senate ignore the certification and seat him.

Posted by: ChandlerG | January 6, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I thought that you’re innocent until proven guilty. No evidence has been presented to the public,and there’s been no impeachment of the governor.
Therefore, he should be allowed to continue his responsibilities, one of which is to appoint a senator.

Posted by: Jesse | January 6, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

NO WAY! Roland Burris should not be seated, the only fair way is to hold an election. Then you might have a slight chance of it being somewhat legal!

Posted by: living right outside chicago | January 6, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

He should not be seated. If he is willing to send an innocent man (Cruz) to death for the sake of winning an elected office, what guarantees do the people of Illinois have that he will not place his own interests before the interests of the people of his state.

Posted by: Mrs. E. Diaz | January 6, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I agree with Karen Doney. Burris has not done anything wrong, that we know of.
Yes, he should be seated!

Posted by: mawinfla | January 6, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Opportunism should not be rewarded. The suggestion of racism in Illinois as Obama becomes prestident is outright ridiculous. A man who can be respected can be elected!

Posted by: Mary Wickham | January 6, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

In Illinois the Governors appointment must be certified. The Burris appointment has not been certified, hence Mr. Burris should not be seated. More importantly, the appointment process has been so sullied that Illinoisans want a special election rather than more inside dirty dealing from the bottom of the deck.
Our politicians do not deserve nor do they have our trust. Unfortunately, this senate seat is being treated as just a Chicago appointment. The entire state deserves a voice. Give the people the special election. Stop inflating the cost for the special election as that excuse further erodes our trust in our elected representatives. Elected representatives who should be serving the people not abusing the privaledge we have bestowed upon the public servants.

Posted by: Mary Fanning | January 6, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

No do not seat Roland Burris. We the people should decide who is to be the junior Senator from our state in an election. Money and corruption rule in Illinois. I feel as though we have no voice in the Land of Lincoln.

Posted by: Mary Ann Ward | January 6, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

NO, ABSOLUTELY NOT. Mr. Burris has shown himself to be nothing but an extreme opportunist and an egomaniac. What person in their right mind would take an appointment from a crooked Governor who is accused of selling this very seat. Certainly someone who is not decent and personally, I think a desparado just trying to get some attention. He is making IL look more like a laughingstock each day this charade plays on.

Posted by: gpchicago28 | January 6, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

No he should not be seated -but not because he did anything wrong.The man appointing him is under indictment & should have resigned or stepped aside until the legal proceedings against him are settled.
There should have been a special election but the Illinois Democrats were afraid they would lose because of the mess with the Governor!!!

Posted by: Firedad3 | January 6, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Yes he should be seated.
Exactly when was the trial and the conviction and for that matter, where is the evidence?

Posted by: Lisa | January 6, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

The senate should support the our system of law and courts which says that a person is innocent until proven guilty. Seems simple, the govenor of Illinois has not been found guilty in a court of law and therefore should continue to execute powers given to him by the good people of Illinois. The senator should be seated.

Posted by: Revaple | January 6, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Burris & the Senate Seat:
Roland Burris is a very credible political leader with many years of proven ability as the Illinois State Comptroller and later Attorney General. He has been legally appointed by the current Governor. The only other recourse of political action would be a Special General Election which is not in the offering.
The State and Federal Government owes it to the long suffering citizens of Illinois to avoid another circus… just follow the rule of law!

Posted by: Don Foy | January 6, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Legal Gov.
Legal Apptmt.
No Secretary of State of IL certification.
NO seat.
Doesn’t have anything to do with African-American. He is either an African or an American. Born in America, and American.
Just like the President elect is the first Black President. He is as much White as he is Black and it is a disgrace that he has exploited his one-half Black to take advantage of what he is not entitled to. This is criminal.

Posted by: chk | January 6, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Somebody please get the HOOK, and get that SHAMELESS EGOMANIAC Roland Burris off of the circus stage!!! He is so desperate to be “somebody”, he has sold his soul and Paid to Play! How pathetic of an attempt at a Hail Mary than to play the race card! The evident poor judgement is a clear example of Burris’s inability to be a representative of the people of Illinois. We are embarrassed by the arrogance and mockery he’s made of our legal and judicial system, not to mention our State….put him next to the Governor for the Dumb and Dumber Club honor roll!

Posted by: Lu | January 6, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

YES!!!! i hate to say it, but we have to FOLLOW THE LAW PEOPLE!!! i realize blago is a disgrace, and a lunatic, but he is STILL THE GOVENOR. he, by law, has the right to fill the position. he didnt step down like 99 percent of the people reccomended he should do, so here we are. we cant simply overide laws when they dont favor us. if its that big of an issue, the state should change the law after the fact. i hate to say it, mostly because its all a game to this idiot, but he should be appointed.

Posted by: tim | January 6, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Burris should NOT be seated. I am a black Democrat who resides in Illinois. I am very familiar with Burris. He is an arrogant person who thinks he’s entitled to everything. He’s not taking this appointment to serve the people of Illinois. He just wants something else to add to his resume. That being said I don’t think legally we will be able to stop him. I blame the Democrats in this state who had the ability to put this seat to an election.
Just because it’s legal does not make it right. Remember slavery was legal at one time. King David had the right to send Bathsheba’s husband in the midst of battle because he was the King. However, it wasn’t right and he suffered the consequences.

Posted by: blh | January 6, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

NO! Roland Burris is a man with delusions of grandeur. He has let his desire for a higher public office blind him to the realities of the situation. the U.S. Senate and State of Illinois officials should stand firm and refuse to allow him to be seated in the Senate. Egocentric people like Blagojevich and Burris simply don’t understand normal people’s morals and ethics.

Posted by: Jane Haeger | January 6, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

yes the governor is still governor he has the power to make the appointment after all we are in united state innocent until prove guilty well come o people bring it on lets practice what we preach.

Posted by: eddie | January 6, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

As long as he is still legally the governor, any official and legal actions by Blagojevich should be honored. If his right to fill the senate position is denied, then all of his rights as governor come into question.
Burris has not been tied to, nor accused of being involved in Blagojevich’s scheme to sell the seat, so he should be seated.

Posted by: Sheila | January 6, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Anyone, black or white, who claim that those opposed to seating Roland Burris are somehow displaying racism are really disingenuous.
Governor Blagojevich showed his disdain not only for the people of Illinois but for the U.S. Constitution and our entire system of government.
Roland Burris might be a decent man, but he is not without his own conceit and arrogance in accepting a senate seat he did not earn due to a cynical ploy from a disgraced governor.
To say that those opposed to Burris becoming a U.S. Senator are racists is completely idiotic because one of the people opposed to the nomination is President-elect Obama.
Thanks to U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald and Gov. Blagojevich, the people of Illinois and our incoming president are being deprived of our rightful representation in the U. S. Senate.
There are more accommplished politicians in Illinois than Roland Burris, both black and white. One of them is a State Representative named Karen Yarborough.

Posted by: Nancy V. | January 6, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

I agree with LarryB. Mr. Roland Burris should be seated unless there is U.S. constitutional & valid reason for not allowing him the senate seat. I think America’s real problem is whether they can trust Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s decision to choose someone to fill such an important position. Otherwise, seat the man and let us move on to the pressing issue of America’s failing economics.

Posted by: Johnny S. | January 6, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Yes he should be seated. Blagojevich is the governor. Period! If we are a nation of laws then stop playing around. Just because I don’t like a law does not mean I don’t have to obey it. The senate makes laws but they should also abide by them. We don’t get a chance to pick and choose. They need to set the example and recognize the appointment and move on. There are too many more important issues than worry about this. In two years, if he wants to run again, that is his business and the business of the Illinois voters.
These folks are acting like spoiled kids.
Unfortunately, too often, our legislators DO NOT look at what is good for the country but what is whimsical to them.
Seat Roland Burris and move on!

Posted by: Fred | January 6, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

No!! This is only another of Blago’s ploys to muddy the water and deflect immediate attention from himself. He’s made Burris a patsy and Burris, due to his own avarice, egotism and greed is too dumb to understand that. He never should have accepted the appointment to start with. If there can be a special election for Emmanuel’s seat, then there should be one for Obama’s seat. The PEOPLE should decide.

Posted by: Barbara | January 6, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Roland Burris should NOT be seated in the Senate. As a citizen of Illinois, I am truly embarrassed and ashamed that we have become the joke of the nation. We are no longer the “Land of Lincoln.” Against the wishes of the average citizen of Illinois, we have become the big top of the nation hosting the most outrageous circus of all time. Roland Burris has said nothing about wanting to help Illinois heal and repair its image. He has been a good public servant to the state, but he is not representing the people of Illinois by encouraging a corrupt governor. There is no question in my mind that the Democrats will lose that seat in 2 years. God help the citizens of Illinois.

Posted by: Sarah from Illinois | January 6, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

He should be seated. Gov. Rod Blagojevich is still the legal governor and therefore still authorized to fill the seat.

Posted by: John P Chaknis | January 6, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Burris should be seated.
The governor of Illinois was not convicted of any crime, and the Secretary of Illinois gives him the power to appoint a senator of his choice, and the Governor may take the floor of the Senate to state his case. The senate hath not the power to turn away a choice for Senator in which the governor was given that authority by the state legislature and the constitution of Illinois.
It’s the law.

Posted by: Robert | January 6, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

No, he has been made the Laughing stock Senator by Gov. Blagojevich a Clown like Ray Wardingley would have been a better choice, however he’s a republican.

Posted by: bob timmerman | January 6, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Our legislators do not have the right to change the law, to justify themselves
The law is as it is written, so shall it be done;So seat Roland Burris and lets move on!Have we not more pressing matter to deal with, when will we as a nation wake up!Where is the Love!

Posted by: FC Penderwhite | January 6, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Yes seat him if the Senate and Congress want to get to work on the nation’s important issues: unemployment, education, the wars in Iran and Afganistan. But NO…if our elected representives want to avoid these issues and show us what great moral people they are…maybe the will introduce a new law to give themselves the power to review every new senator on any basis. They can tack on a paragraph to that law to increase their pensions, lifetime healthcare…and what the heck…they deserve a raise too.

Posted by: Johnny B | January 6, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

No way. Corrupt individuals should be stripped from their powers.

Posted by: Karen | January 6, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

OK, let me get this straight.
A Democrat appointed to be
A Democrat Senator
By a Democrat governor
In a Democrat state
To replace another Democrat Senator
Elected as Democrat president
In a Democrat state
Is now to be denied his seat
By a Democrat leader (Reid)
In a Democrat Senate
By a Democrat majority.
Let me guess……
IT IS BUSH’S FAULT!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

I do not think Mr. Burris should
be seated in the Senate under the circumstances. Also, if the people of Illinois had wanted him in that position, they would have voted him in when he ran for it.

Posted by: Virginia Canady | January 6, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Yes, Roland Burris should be seated. Supposedly, in America a person is innocent until proven guilty. In this case, Governor Blagojevich has not been indicted. Matter-of-fact, Fitzgerald requested an extension of 90 days to buttress or strengthen his complaints against Blagojevich. In most professions, a person is allowed to perform duties, job respnsibilities, etc. unless or until he/she found guilty. By law, Blagojevich has the right to appoint Burris.

Posted by: Carol | January 6, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

To Sarah at 12:33…
You said, ” As a citizen of Illinois, I am truly embarrassed and ashamed that we have become the joke of the nation. We are no longer the “Land of Lincoln.”"
Well, dear Sarah, I understand your shame! You are NOT the Land of Lincoln!
You lost that honor when you decided to cast your lot with Democrat criminals!!!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

I’m black and from Illinois and I do NOT think Burris should be seated. He’s just another career politician who’s got an ax to grind because he lost the gubinatorial election THREE times and the Chicago mayoral election once. To many (himself included), this is the only way he’ll EVER get another political position. He’s an egomaniac who’s only allowing Blago to play the race card to his advantage. Blacks wouldn’t vote for him before, so now he’s feigning being racially spurned to win sympathy. Shame on him!!!

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

And Sarah, you cast your lot with people who believe, “No no no!!! NOT God BLESS America! God D*MN America!!!”
Shame on you!
And shame on Illinois Democrats!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

No, Burris should not be seated. In fact Blago should be impeached for the arrogance that he conveys. He works for the people and should represent the people professionally. It is obvious that he is making the appointment as a slap in the face to everyone that challenges him.

Posted by: Jeff B | January 6, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

To LarryB: Did you forget that the REPUBLICAN criminal, George Ryan, is cooling his heels in a federal prison as we speak? He actually got convicted for pay-to-play. Last I heard, he was begging to be listed on Dubya’s pardons list!!

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

So MarthaStew, what are you trying to say?!!!
That ALL people in Illinois are CROOKS?!?!?!?! Even the one who just went to Washington!? WoW! That is quite the charge to make but you may be right!
I guess it didn’t start or stop with good ole AL CAPONE!!! And Mayor Daley!!!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Though I disagree with the antics of the current governor of Illinois and all signs guilt points towards Blagojevich – he is still the governor till he is proven guilty of wrong doings in a court of law and and whatever decision follows to remove him and strip him of his gubernatorial powers. In the mean time he has full right even during a federal investigation to excercise the powers of his goevernorship. Mr. Burris has not been named as a co-conspirator in this allegation nor is he the subject of the investigation. Why shouldn’t the governor excercise his right? It is utterly rude of the senate especially that of our senate leader Mr. Reid to have decided the fate of this innocent man. He was appointed by the governor, do the right thing and seat the gentleman with respect. Fortunately we live in a society of rules and one shouldn’t take the law into their own hands without the basic due process. what do we gain from all this shananigans ? except strip the constituents of Illinois a voice in the senate till all this foolishness can be resolved.

Posted by: Ronnie | January 6, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

And Martha, do the DEAD Crooks still vote in Illinois too?!?!?!?
;-)

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Yes Mr. Burris should be seated he has been appointed by an acting Governor that has not been convicted of any crime at this time.Seat the man and move on.

Posted by: Don | January 6, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Blagojevich is the governor and he is totally within the law to appoint the person of his choice to fill the office of senator. despite my opinion that Roland Burris is not the best person for the job, he is the sitting governor’s choice; swear the man in. As much as I dislike the Governor, he ran, he won, he is the Governor and until the proper authorities convict him of unlawful wrongdoing… need I say more?…this is America.

Posted by: J. Youngheim | January 6, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Burris is a milquetoast who’s only good at self-promotion. Not only are his kids and grandkids named Roland (II, III, etc.) & Rolanda, he’s already got this HUGE grave marker in Oak Woods Cemetery in Chicago marked “TRAIL BLAZER” with his list of accomplishments. He had hoped to put on the top line, “Illinois’ First Black Governor,” but it was left blank after his loss to Blago in 2002.

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Blagojevich is the governor of IL. Mr. Burris was appointed by the governor to fill the vacant seat. Period.
Harry Reid needs to get down to his business. Stop finger pointing and grandstanding.
Am I missing something or was Blagojevich charged with a crime, had his day in court and found guilty? Impeached?
Harry Reid don’t waste our time!

Posted by: Joanne | January 6, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am

I support Roland Burris as the next USSenitor from the great state of ILLinois

Posted by: Nelson, Leroy P. | January 6, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

No…No.. And Hell No!!!

Posted by: Daniel | January 6, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Marthastew….
maybe Burris is just getting ready to follow Illinois precedent and vote after he is DEAD!!!!
Ahhh yes, a time honored democratic tradition!
rotflol

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

No!! This is just another way of Blogo saying %@#$ you. So sorry a good man like Burris has to be involved in this unbelievable con and use of an African-American to play Blogo’s kind of a race card game. The world can see through this confidence game. This is an embarassment to Illinois and the United States. This would not be the first time a black was not granted his seat in the Senate. A bliack was elected to the US Senate in, I believe, Alabama or Mississippi during the Reconstruction era and was denied being seated by the Democratic party. What a turn around. The Democratic party hides this fact.

Posted by: Ken M | January 6, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

No, No, No, Burris should not be seated. Don’t make this a racial issue. I don’t care if Blago picks someone who is pink, green, purple, white or black, whoever he picks is just cooking their on goose if they accept, just like Burris is doing. Just another thumbing of the nose or the middle finger to all the citizens of Illinois by Blago.

Posted by: Mary from Illinois | January 6, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Yes, he should be seated. I concur with LarryB’s comments above.

Posted by: Stephanie | January 6, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Burris won’t be seated because the Secretary of State refused to sign and notarize the recommendation by Blago since he’s about to be impeached–he’s trying to cause as much damage as possible before being PHYSICALLY removed from office. Did you know that Tony Rezko was one of Blago’s biggest fundraisers?? He hasn’t been sentenced yet because he’s about to flip on Blago for a shorter sentence. The tapes are not “just talk.”

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Ahhh, yes!!!
And then there is REZKO!!!! lol
Where have we heard THAT name before?!?!?
And who was he associated with?!?!?!?!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Marthastew, THANK YOU for reminding us about REZKO!!!!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

The Governor has not even gone through a trial yet. In this country a person is innocent until proven guilty. Everyone says he’s corrupt, but it’s up to law enforcement to prove that in court. Therefore I feel he has the right to perform his duties as Governor, which includes appointing Burris. What everyone “thinks” about the Governor, doesn’t mean Burris is a bad guy. He should be accepted.

Posted by: Debbie | January 6, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

This diversion is very reckless. It is clear that many Americans as a whole are not willing to study issues and make sober considered judgments based on facts, and not simply fall for the reckless rhetoric of the often poorly informed media mavens and pundits.
Anyhow, former Illinois attorney-general Roland Burris is a well-versed legal tactician and a determined public servant. Facts are: he’s won all the state general elections in which he was a candidate by a higher percentage than any of the other candidates in those races.
The dismissive response of the media and other parties does not well serve the public interest.

Posted by: metra | January 6, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Yes. It was the Govs duty inspite of his legal problems he still has the right to appoint whom ever he choses.

Posted by: Tom | January 6, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am

I am truly embarrassed that Bobby Rush has resorted to “Al Sharpton-like” tactics of using such terms as “plantation politics, hang, lynch, or standing in the door (i.e. George Wallace)” to describe the Burris affair. Obviously, Rush’s cancer-addled mind isn’t working properly. Look, nothing was ever written in stone that Obama should be replaced by a AfAm candidate. What about another woman or a Hispanic, aren’t they minorities too? Blago’s just loving it that racial factions are turning against each other, and it makes AfAms look petty. Let Burris duke it out in a special election–like John Ashcroft, he’ll probably lose to the dead guy!! Senator Reid, STICK TO YOUR GUNS!!!! Remember, the last time someone tried this we ended up with Clarence Thomas, and we’re stuck with him until the day he dies!

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Ahhh yes, Marthastew!!
THANK YOU for also reminding us about Clarence Thomas!!!
THANK GOD for Justice Thomas and his balanced voice of reason.
Clarence Thomas…a good and decent man!
Or as Joe Biden would call him…. “A CLEAN BLACK!!!”
Those Democrats are just such funny people! You just can’t make this stuff up!!!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

No, the arrogance of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich has showen how corrupt our government is and all the favors that are given to special canadates for the position of the senate seat. First money and lets make the big bucks now- lets do this the right way, Gov. You got caught and now Illinois Gov. you should be locked up in a jail cell. This is just the tip of the ice berg leave it up to the American people, vote the new senator in office.

Posted by: Paul | January 6, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Gov. Rod Blagojevich is being prosicuted for breaking the law, now they dont want to follow the law. Is it up to Washington to pick and choose which rules they want to follow?

Posted by: David L | January 6, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

To Metra: Burris may have won Comptroller and Attorney General, but really, he was getting elected to be the state’s CPA–not a very high-powered postion, if you ask me. Basically, he won because he wasn’t seen as a threat. You seem to forget that he lost the gubinatorial election THREE TIMES!! He couldn’t even rally the AfAm “power base” in Chicago to vote for him.

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Buriss is being slimed by tbe Democrats because he is not the favourite choice of Reid.
Harry Reid – the disgusting partisan he is- has no shame and refuses to seat a highly qualified man like Burris and doing so Reid has made it clear that he has no respect for the constitution.

Posted by: Greg h | January 6, 2009, 1:49 am 1:49 am

LarryB…Clarence Thomas is a Republican. I guess there are clean and articulate Blacks on both sides of the aisle.

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Yes, I believe Burris should be seated, unless they find he has some connection to the dirty Gov’s money-making scheme. He seems a decent enough sort to fill out a partial term. A special election would take an enormous amount of time, an even more enormous amount of $$ cost to Illinois taxpayers, and a lot of missed Senate votes from an empty Democratic seat!

Posted by: Pat D. | January 6, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Given the circumstances, I was surprised that a veteran pol like Burris would choose to slide head first into the United States Senate on a Rod Blagojevich’s slime trail. Right or wrong, it’s plainly a poor decision and a decision that does not reflect the will of the electorate,even if they don’t have a say at this very moment.
Guilty or innocent transcripts of the Blagojevich wire taps reveal a stunning lack of integrity and character. Upon reading the transcripts I personally no longer feel Blagojevich is competent to make the decision. His choice was one of desperation and self preservation. Most see this for what it is and have chosen to reject it.
The law may in the end support Burris but his stay in the Senate will last until the precise moment that voters have a say in the matter.

Posted by: MD | January 6, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Greg h: Harry Reid is being slimed only because BLAGO and Bobby Rush said it was about race. Jesse Jackson Jr. and Danny Davis are both in the House of Reps. Along with Rahm Emanuel’s departure as Obama’s chief of staff, it would have left TWO vacancies to be resolved by a special election in Illinois–Senate vacancies are filled by appointment, H-of-Rep vacancies are by election. Quirky, but those are the rules. Logically (and legally), Reid talked to Blago about candidates for Obama’s replacement. Besides, Jackson’s was already tainted by a cloud of suspicion around his lobbying for the position. Blago wanted a $20-25K for his re-election campaign in exchange, as per his chief of staff on tape, which is why he was arrested too.

Posted by: marthastew | January 6, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Marthastew, you said, “LarryB…Clarence Thomas is a Republican. I guess there are clean and articulate Blacks on both sides of the aisle.”
YOU were the one who attacked Clarence Thomas! *I* was the one defending him!
Let me see…YOU are black. I am white. YOU attacked a black. I defended a black.
Hmmmmmmmmmm!!!!! ;-)
And my point was that it was Democrat Joe Biden who makes racist statements like calling Barack Obama a “CLEAN BLACK MAN” and yet you and all the other Demcorats have NO problem with that!
WOW!!!
I say that YOU should judge a man by the content of his character. But NO! Clarence Thomas is a Republican and therefore you attack him no matter how good he is!
(Just to remind YOU and everyone what YOU as a black woman said….”Senator Reid, STICK TO YOUR GUNS!!!! Remember, the last time someone tried this we ended up with Clarence Thomas, and we’re stuck with him until the day he dies!)

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 2:11 am 2:11 am

And Marthastew, YOU as a black woman are trying to deprive a decent black man of his seat in the Senate.
I as a white man say he was appointed according to the process set down in law!
SEAT HIM!!!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Marthastew, you also said, “Harry Reid is being slimed only because BLAGO and Bobby Rush said it was about race.”
You are beginning to sound like a certain uncle!!
NO! It isn’t because certain people said something. Harry Reid CALLED Gov. Blago and named THREE blacks that he did NOT want to see nominated!! Who is the racist? Which is the PARTY of racism?!?!?!
Your support of blatant racism as a black woman is stunning MARTHA!!!

Posted by: LarryB | January 6, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am

marthastew,
Roland Burris is a highly qualified, experienced, decent, educated man.
He was LEGALLY nominated by Blago.
There is no evidence Burris involved in any wrong doing.
Harry Reid has made it clear that he wants someone to his liking and Burris is not Reid’s choice.
Basically Reid is sliming a decent man because Blago did not listen to Reid. This is purely internal Dem politics and Reid is throwing out the constitution which says clearly that a governor can appoint a vacant senate seat in his state.

Posted by: Greg h | January 6, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am

For the SOB Governor Blagojevich really is I think he should have appointed himself to the seat. Could you imagine how funny it would be to see Blagoievich and Sen. Reid on the steps of the capital Tuesday morning for a photo opt before the national press!! I would have to be there for that one.

Posted by: Dole | January 6, 2009, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Yes, seat the man and get over the BS!

Posted by: mcrmf | January 6, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Yes, he should be seated if he is qualified — which he undoubtedly is. The governor’s problems with the law have nothing to do with Mr Burris.

Posted by: michael | January 6, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

There is the law, in this case both Federal law as specified in the Constitution, and the laws of Illinois.
As distasteful as the alleged sale of a Senate seat may seem, it is even more distasteful adjust the law as convenience would have it.
Until he is impeached and convicted, or until he is tried in Federal Court and convicted, or until he can be persuaded to resign, the Governor of Illinois is _required_ to appoint Obama’s successor. Unless Burris is found tainted, he must be seated and in a timely manner.
We’ve just lived through 8 years of lawlessness by an administration whose misdeeds were only rarely challenged on legal or Constitutional grounds. Let not the Democrats begin by creating their own laws of convenience.

Posted by: Richard Yarnell | January 6, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

No, Burris and Blago should have waited until everthing was clear before going to the next step. Just common sense.

Posted by: Vickie S Marlin | January 6, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am

Yes, Burris should be seated. Everything is legal. The governor is still the Governor and he appointed Mr. Burris, everything else is political boondoggle baloney.

Posted by: Atealofa | January 6, 2009, 3:42 am 3:42 am

You don’t change the fundamental principles of the law in the middle of an election. Burris is the Senator, anything but that will be corrupt and not serve democracy.
Since this now is in the hand of the Democratic Party, the same people you handed Obama four – 4 – delegates Hillary Clinton won in a referendum, I am not optimistic for the shape of democracy.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | January 6, 2009, 3:49 am 3:49 am

No…No…No…
That Gov who selected Burris is tainted based on recent news reports.
Anything Gov touches is also tainted. The average Joe American sees this.
Burris surprises me in that he doesn’t see this.
He’s using letter of the law and legal loophole to justify Gov selection of him and will fight the system to get his Senate seat that he so dearly believes he’s entitled.
Burris is another shameful example of what’s wrong around us all in these United States of America.
Whether it’s Blagojevich, Madoff, Bayou, Ponzi, OJ, Manson, Spitzer, et al…they all had one thing in common…they all believed what they were doing was justified in their own greedy mind regardless of the consequences to ethics or morality.
Burris lacks the character, ethics, and morality to do what is right. His actions shows this so clearly in his greed to use Gov selection and legal loopholes to get his Senate seat that he so badly wants.
Burris is either idiot or so blinded by his greed that he lacks the character to see that his actions are both ethicly and moraly wrong.
Burris has no conscience and lack character I want to see and expect in US Senator.
God help us all if Burris is accepted into Senate because of his lawyer ability to argue and debate the legal loopholes is the more important qualification than good moral character, conscience, and honesty.
Average Joe
****

Posted by: Average Joe | January 6, 2009, 4:04 am 4:04 am

No!
Considering the situation, the Democrats should have had more faith in the citizens of Illinois in supporting a special election to fill this position. Even if their fears had been realized and a Republican had been voted into the position…it would have been better than it being filled by the Governor.
I believe that the citizens of Illinois would have chosen the best candidate…and not determined by sex, race or “dirty politics”!
With his smug grin and cocky attitude…it makes me wonder what has motivated Mr. Burris…perhaps a healthy pension in the future…
He is not my choice now…nor will he be in the future. I have a hard time believing he would win the seat in the future…
It is time for America to find its moral compass…there HAS to be public servants that are honest and ethical…even in Illinois.

Posted by: S from Chicago | January 6, 2009, 4:07 am 4:07 am

The Gov has thrown Mark Burris into the middle of his ‘questionable’ activities of the vacant Senate seat. It’s very disappointing and Blag to do so.

Posted by: Kelso from Andersonville in IL | January 6, 2009, 4:46 am 4:46 am

Burris is a political predator to press the issue of his interim appointment to President-Elect Obama’s former Senate seat in light of the criminal corruption charges facing Gov. Blagojevich. His appointment will be, therefore, tainted, and wether he will be able to bring to bear on the senate the benefit of his many years of public service in many roles is quite questionable. However, since his reputation, as I understand it, is impeccable, and unless state or federal law is violated by seating him, Illinois needs and deserves congressional representation. Therefore, the business of the nation, which is very pressing at this moment in time, demands that the Senate seat Roland Burris
as the interim Junior Senator from Illinois.

Posted by: denkerdunsmuir | January 6, 2009, 5:09 am 5:09 am

Burris is a political predator to press the issue of his interim appointment to President-Elect Obama’s former Senate seat in light of the criminal corruption charges facing Gov. Blagojevich. His appointment will be, therefore, tainted, and wether he will be able to bring to bear on the senate the benefit of his many years of public service in many roles is quite questionable. However, since his reputation, as I understand it, is impeccable, and unless state or federal law is violated by seating him, Illinois needs and deserves congressional representation. Therefore, the business of the nation, which is very pressing at this moment in time, demands that the Senate seat Roland Burris
as the interim Junior Senator from Illinois.

Posted by: denkerdunsmuir | January 6, 2009, 5:09 am 5:09 am

Roland Burris is and always has been a Chicago Machine yes man hack. You’d have to live in Chicago to understand how little regard Burris is held in. He’s never done anything of particular notice. In his own twisted mind, this Senate appointment is the last line to be engraved on his marble mausoleum. This is the face of Illinois and Chicago Machine politics. Barack Obama stepping onto the international stage may just be the bright light needed to wake up the rest of the country to just how corrupt Illinois politics are. Obama is a product of this sleazy culture.
Read that again: Obama is a product of this sleazy culture.

Posted by: John M McCarthy | January 6, 2009, 5:36 am 5:36 am

==Burris should be seated. Everything is legal. The governor is still the Governor and he appointed Mr. Burris==
However, the Senate is not required to accept the appointment as it might have had to accept an election.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 6, 2009, 6:12 am 6:12 am

==he should be seated if he is qualified — which he undoubtedly is. The governor’s problems with the law have nothing to do with Mr Burris.==
However, the Senate has a duty, too, and it is not required to accept the appointment.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 6, 2009, 6:13 am 6:13 am

==It was the Govs duty inspite [sic] of his legal problems he still has the right to appoint whom ever he choses.==
And the Senate has the legal Right to reject the appointment.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 6, 2009, 6:15 am 6:15 am

==Mr. Burris should be seated he has been appointed by an acting Governor that has not been convicted of any crime at this time.==
Appointment is not election.
The Senate has a say-so, and it may reject the appointment.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 6, 2009, 6:17 am 6:17 am

Harry Reid and Company has made this lawful appointment of Burris as the junior senator from Illinois into a political circus.
What Harry Reid and Company have to realize is that they are not the ringmasters, but the clowns.

Posted by: USmarine0331 | January 6, 2009, 6:53 am 6:53 am

Roland Burris should not be seated. Contrary to what some believe, the appointment is not valid as Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White did not give his required signature. Thank you Mr. White!

Posted by: Illinois Resident | January 6, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

What troubles me about the Roland Burris appointment is that Harry Reid called Blagojevich with recommendations for the Senate appointment, eliminating all African American hopefuls based on his perceptions of who could win in 2010. Reid is not from Illinois, but if he were, he’d know that we are the only state in the Union to elect an African American female to the US Senate and the only state to elect 2 African American Senators. Only Massachusetts comes close with 1 black Republican senator elected in the 1960s.
Blogojevich’s problems boil down to the fact that people don’t like him, and they think he is arrogant. All the same, he was elected twice and has a job to do until he leaves office. As for the issue of race in the appointment, the rest of the country is far behind Chicago. Growing up with Mayor Harold Washington in the 1980s, I never imagined that I couldn’t succeed because I am black. Ironically, Obama arrived in Chicago as the city’s first black mayor came to power.
We are the state of Roland Burris, Jesse Jackson and Jesse Jackson, Jr., Bobby Rush, Carol Moseley-Braun, Danny Davis, Eugene Sawyer, Jesse White, and a long list of other African American elected officials and leaders. Meanwhile, Chicago has the strongest black middle class in the nation. It’s no wonder Obama came out of Chicago. It would have been impossible for him to emerge from New York or California where the weight of racial oppression is so strong and where Blacks have little power.
I like Obama, but Roland Burris has more experience holding statewide office in Illinois than the President-elect. No, Harry Reid is not from Illinois, but Roland Burris was born and raised in Southern Illinois. All Illinoisans know that Burris will fight for their rights with dignity and honor. It just so happens that the first African American elected to statewide office is qualified to assume the Senate seat vacated by the fourth black elected to statewide office in Illinois. Of course, had there not been Roland Burris, former US Senator Ambassador Carol Mosley-Braun, and Sec of State Jesse White before him, would Mr. Obama be in Washington today?

Posted by: E.D. in IL UK | January 6, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

It saddens me to see American politics sink to a new low with Roland Burris’ farcical attempt to assume the Illinois Senate seat. I am shocked by Mr. Burris’ attempt use the Constitution and legalese to provide cover for the lowest form of political opportunism. It may indeed be legal for him to assume the Senate seat: however, it is entirely lacking in this little thing called ‘decency’. FYI, there are many things in this world which are legal, but which fly in the face of what the average person thinks of as decent. Any number of politicians have prematurely terminated their political careers by doing things that, while legal, were nonetheless beneath the dignity that their office carries.
I have to wonder about the political judgment and savvy of a man who would accept an appointment to a position mired in controversy from a person even more mired in controversy. Does Mr. Burris honestly think that he can benefit from the media circus that follows his every move? How can he possibily effectively serve the people of Illinois when most members of the Senate wouldn’t want to be caught dead talking (let alone cooperating) with him? This defiant streak that Mr. Burris and Gov. Blageovich seem to have in common is most unseeming: the people of Illinois should be embarrassed to be represented by such types. And as an African American, I am offended by any attempts to frame opposition to Burris as racism: I would rather there not be any African-American senator than there be one who is an embarrassment to our people. At the end of the day, I hope that we Americans can quickly put such foolishness behind us and focus completely on the real problems that our country is facing.

Posted by: OLC in Washington, DC | January 6, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I do not think that Roland Burris should be seated. I understand that what Blagojovich did was definitely legal, although, as a citizen of Illinois, at this point, I have NO idea if Mr. Burris has ever been included in any Play for Pay schemes. (but most high positions in Illinois have) He WAS the Attorney General of our state, but has not been re-elected in years. The man is 71 years old. He hasn’t served in office for years. He wants his last chance at being a Senator. He should have had the decency to decline. Our state needed to have a special election for this position, but that would have cost us millions of dollars………not that this current problem isn’t going to cost the people in Illinois millions of dollars, anyway.
I knew that Blagojovich was going to create a situation like this, to put this man in the middle.
I am also embarrassed that Mr. Burris, knowing full well, that he was going to be denied entrance to the Senate, STILL went there. Shouldn’t HE have been embarrassed? It makes the people from Illinois look bad, as well.
It seems we are still the state of Al Capone and organized crime………

Posted by: JG | January 6, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Burris is a prime example of nothing good ever coming out of our town. He brings disgrace to the entire community, no matter what Becky Ault says to the news stations. He is bringing dishonor to Centralia and all of Illinois, just as our self-centered governor who is above even living in the governor’s mansion in Springfield.

Posted by: Disgruntled Citizen | January 7, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Of course, Burris should not be seated. There has been a financial-political connection between him & Blagojevich, so his appointment is simply more of the same political corruption that is the source of this uproar.
Moreover, naming Burris is pure racism. It’s wonderful that black Americans finally are truly part of the American political mainstream, but the creation of a requisite “black senatorial seat” is a terribly unamerican backward step.

Posted by: Beefbone | January 8, 2009, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.