The Inaugural Oath: Chief Justice Slip-Up
Chief Justice John Roberts is a man who has made very few public missteps in his life — but he appears to have made one when swearing in Barack Obama. Roberts slightly flubbed the oath, which then tripped up Obama. The oath is contained in the Constitution: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." But when Roberts swore in Obama, he flipped some of the words, saying: "I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully." Here’s the transcript: ROBERTS: Are you prepared to take the oath, Senator? OBAMA: I am. ROBERTS: I, Barack Hussein Obama… OBAMA: I, Barack… ROBERTS: … do solemnly swear… OBAMA: I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear… ROBERTS: … that I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully… OBAMA: … that I will execute… ROBERTS: … faithfully the office of president of the United States… OBAMA: … the office of president of the United States faithfully… ROBERTS: … and will to the best of my ability… OBAMA: … and will to the best of my ability… ROBERTS: … preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. OBAMA: … preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. ROBERTS: So help you God? OBAMA: So help me God. ROBERTS: Congratulations, Mr. President.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Tell Charlie that Richard Nixon left by Helicopter!
Steve
Posted by: Steve Lindsay | January 20, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
That’s okay – you (abcnews) spelled “inaugural” incorrectly in this headline.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 20, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Isn’t Chief Justice Roberts a repub? I wonder if he flubbed on purpose trying to make our 44th President Barack Obama, look bad?
It didn’t work because NOTHING could make our President look bad on such an historic day.
Pam
Posted by: Pam | January 20, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
I don’t think it was on purpose. He was doing it without notes.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 20, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Duh……
Conservatives cannot do ANYTHING right.
Posted by: N. Murray | January 20, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Robert was nervous. So was Obama.
Who could imagine why?
History was being made.
Posted by: Douglas Watts | January 20, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Wingers already saying that since oath was not said correctly, that Obama is not president. Of course these are the same folks denying birth certificate, etc.
Posted by: DrSteveB | January 20, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Yeah, Fox News already had comments about Obama’s presidency starting out with a flubbed oath, blaming it on Obama.
Great honeymoon, huh?
Posted by: Green Eagle | January 20, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
So, basically, he did not take the oath as prescribed by the Constitution (note the words finally were there but out of order). Any constitutional scholars out there? What’s the effect…
Posted by: JF | January 20, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
“Without notes”? Who needs notes for 40 of the most famous words in American politics?
Posted by: Darrel Plant | January 20, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
They shud fire the chief justice for not being able to read one simple line correctly, which even a 5-year old can. Why was Roberts in such a hurry…cudn’t he be a bit slower so that he could have been well repeated. Seemed as if he had to catch a flight…ridiculous moron Mr. Roberts !
Posted by: chris | January 20, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Actually the oath isn’t a constitutional requirment to become president. At the strike of noon (before the oath) Obama was already the PResident so this little muddling of oaths matters not at all
Posted by: MDK | January 20, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Hopefully, Obama will give him another crack at it 4 years from now.
Posted by: Truth Hurts | January 20, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
No effect. None. Obama became president at noon, Washington D.C. time, per Amendment XX, Section 1 to the Constitution. “The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January … and the terms of their
successors shall then begin.”
Posted by: spikebrennan | January 20, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I would suspect they will privately have him sworn in again, just to make sure everything’s kosher. When Diana married Prince Charles, they got his names wrong in the ceremony. Afterwards, they went ot a private room and did it over again, just so there weren’t any technical mishaps.
Posted by: Troyce | January 20, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Ann Althouse makes a snarky takedown based on Roberts being a “Textualist” (of the USC) and then flubbing the words of the Oath (which are in the Constitution!)
Well, how about Barack Obama’s speech? I think it was fundamentally good and stirring. He made many cogent and zingy points. I wish he’d addressed the festering Israel/Palestine issue directly, insisting that both sides talk and stop their destructive ways (terrorism, settlements and oppression.) We can’t give up on that, it hurts and costs us too much. Also, nothing about healing sexual preference tensions IIRC.
BTW, buh-bye, incurious and insolent George! It feels like a suffocating, foreboding mass is lifted off me and the whole country.
Posted by: Neil B ☺ | January 20, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Roberts is not a legitimate judge — he was selected by Bush, who was NEVER a legitimate president. He should be fired, along with every other Bush appointee. These people are ALL just as defective as the decider who chose them.
Posted by: jreed | January 20, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
once again, a child could have done easily something completely beyond the grasp of a republican.
Posted by: mike | January 20, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Taking away the civil liberties of Americans – easy.
Reading something from a cue card – not so much.
Posted by: Mysterious Traveller | January 20, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
John Roberts was a great co-pilot in Airplane!.
Posted by: joejoejoe | January 20, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Cheney – “Mein Fuhrer, I can walk!”. How perfect that he was Dr Strangelove today.
Posted by: Glog | January 20, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
The mistake was when he called Obama as “Senator”. When the noon is passed, President-elect become automatically President without taking oath. Calling him Senator was mistake.
Posted by: Sina | January 20, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Please! This is supposed to be a HAPPY occasion! Let’s not bicker or argue over who flubbed who…
Posted by: Krud | January 20, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Krud, I am simply trying to correct the factual record. Besides, the Dems would be all over this blaming Dubya for a lack of intelligence if this had happened when Dubya took the oath!
Posted by: Karen | January 20, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Dan Quale was in the stands. Perhaps he was helping Roberts with the big words.
Posted by: Delaware Al | January 20, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Karen -
If you read the transcript, you’d find that it was Roberts who made the initial mistake. Once again, you Republicans are blaming others for your own screw-ups. (And I apologize in advance for my causing your illiteracy.)
And if W had screwed it up in 2001 and 2005, y’all would be blaming it on Clinton, just as you did with everything else.
The Party of Personal Responsibility? Not in this plane of reality, I’m afraid.
Posted by: SFAW | January 20, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Please, enough of ‘the dems would do this’ as if all people would act the same because of their political inclinations.
I think it all went off script when Obama started to reply and Roberts carried on. No idea what would have been correct.
Posted by: HappyHorse | January 20, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Bush really upheld his oath of office? Word-perfectness doesn’t matter, the proof will be if Obama does indeed preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.
Posted by: Arun | January 20, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Why does crap like this continue to be newsworthy? Both were nervous, so what?
Posted by: Mark | January 20, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
As HappyHorse admits: “I think it all went off script when Obama started to reply and Roberts carried on.”
Posted by: Karen | January 20, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Mark, the point is that Obama gets a free pass on everything.
Posted by: Karen | January 20, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Did Roberts just marry Obama and the US?
“So help you God”?!?!?
That’s not a part of the OFFICIAL oath.
It’s a part of wedding ceremony oaths.
What a maroon…
Will Obama have to get a divorce when he leaves office at the end of his term/s??
Posted by: BlueTickDem | January 20, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
You guys just can’t admit BO was nervous and messed up. Stop blaming Republicans for everything, give them all a break and move on…
Posted by: fmrnavy16 | January 20, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Can this stop now?…In Mr Obama’s first luncheon as president, the affable Justice Roberts appeared to apologise, prompting laughter and a handshake from Mr Obama.
Posted by: Mark | January 20, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
I was watching that in a room full of people on campus and we all luaghed our butts off!
Posted by: frankwolftown | January 20, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
No, Republicans should be blamed for EVERYTHING. Period.
Posted by: FmrMarine | January 20, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
True, “So help you God” isn’t a part of the official oath, but it is a traditional wrapup for almost every Presidential oath. I think the only time it wasn’t used was during Teddy Roosevelt’s ceremony; he has been the only president to choose to “solemnly affirm” instead of “solemnly swear”.
Posted by: Nittany | January 20, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
The stumbling on the oath is insignificant, of course. What IS significant is that some people are trying to make an issue of it. Grow up, would you? Roberts said “President to the United States…”. Seriously, one is a professional orator who delivered a flawless 20 minute inagural speech, the other is a judge. Who do you think screwed this up?
Posted by: Daley Dunham | January 20, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
I blame Dems for pushing to divide the country so that they can have a party with Hollywood . I have come to the realization that they all suck!!! I refuse to drink the Kool-Aid, it amazes me that some of the top people running the country come from California a state that is a complete mess… And I’m supposed to feel good about the future!!!
Posted by: fmrnavy16 | January 20, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Doubt it was purposeful. Barack jumped the gun a little bit at the beginning of the speech. I think it was just an exciting moment for everyone. Cut them some slack.
Posted by: Nicki | January 20, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Personally do not like Rush, Hannity or any of the other pundits
Posted by: Fmrnavy16 | January 20, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
A professional orator when there is a teleprompter in front of him. Thank -you for acknowledging his qualifications to hold the office of president though.
Former Marine, I think we should blame not only all republicans for everything, but all democrats too. After all, both completely corrupt parties have sold us down the river and all of you D & R sheep keep voting them right back in, genius!
Posted by: Bill | January 20, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
It didn’t work because NOTHING could make our President look bad on such an historic day.
Pam
Pam….lets try the real world then….on the day of the “great celebration” (at the cost of over 110 million dollars!!!!), the markets plummeted !!!
Posted by: Mike_C | January 20, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
First I would suggest stop playing so many video games! Second, I blame both parties for slot of the mess we’re in!!! But take a deep breath and realize that the wars are also a direct result of your other boy bubba too busy with monica to take his watch seriously!!! To slam the chief justice because everyone was nervous on a monumental day is simply moronic!!! Sorry some of us were busy keeping your butt safe, to email congress every 5 minutes or helping acorn!!!
Posted by: fmrnavy16 | January 20, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Yeah, well the “so help me god” part isn’t in the constitution either but that never stopped them from slipping that in since the 1930′s. If people are going to split hairs over the other flubs they should also acknowledge that.
Posted by: Eric | January 20, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
When will you liberals ever get a clue????????
Its not Consttutitonally VALID unless the oath is repeated exactly right!!!!!11!! Technicaly, this presidentsy is NULL and VOID!!!!
Score 1 for Roberts!!
This combine with the fake berth certificat will eventually get B. Hussane OUT OF OUR WHITEHOUSE!!!!!!!!!1!
Posted by: fraidycat | January 20, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
You idiots with the birth certificate and the oath need to put away your childish things and start working for the good this country.
Stop listening to Rush, put aside your hatred, roll up your sleeves and put your patriotism where your mouth is.
Posted by: JoetheMan | January 20, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
No doubt in my mind that Roberts did it on purpose. First, his cadence was designed to get Obama to start restating the oath before Roberts was actually finished with his phrasing, so that he kept walking all over Obama’s words and interrupting his thought pattern. Then he puts words out of order, which to me is incomprehensible since he is READING THE DAMN THING. Especially since he had to know that Obama had the REAL oath memorized and that inverting words would likely screw him up and make it seem like Obama was at fault. What a jerk.
Posted by: steve | January 20, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Obama can’t read squat without the transcript.
Of course we knew that going in.
Posted by: jen | January 20, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Chief Justice Roberts appeared quite inappropriate in starting the swearing in by saying: “Are you ready to take the oath, Senator?” His tone of voice also seemed hostile. I’m sure there is no love lost between the President and the Chief Justice but even so one would think that on this occasion, like Chief Justices before him, the present Chief Justice would show some class. Amazingly, no news media have commented on this. Compare how Associate Justice John Paul Stevens handled the swearing in of Vice-President Biden who, in another incarnation, was also a Senator.
Posted by: John | January 20, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
What I find most amusing is the horrible diction and spelling of people critiquing others.
Posted by: KStro | January 20, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
The barrenness of the right wing argument is on full display here. These people are falling over themselves to criticize the president’s response to their own chief justice’s flubbing in reciting the oath of office to the man to be sworn in. What a pathetic, dingy dump the average right wing mind is.
Posted by: matt | January 21, 2009, 5:57 am 5:57 am
Why should Chief Justic Roberts have gotten the oath letter perfect? After all, the source is only the United States Constitution – not something he bothers himself with on a regular basis.
Other than the inexplicable error misplacing “faithfully” (which prompted the President to stop and silently indicate that the Justice should try again), Roberts started wrong by steam-rollering over the President as he began to repeat the starting phrase. Even if it was Roberts’s intention to use longer “chunks” of the Oath, a gentleman would never belligerantly talk over another this way.
To my mind, it was as if his job was to hold the door open, and just as the other man was going through, he pushed himself into the doorway.
It was rude, and it was amateurish.
Clearly, the President, a Constitutional Scholar, knows the document better than Roberts. Well, there’s change I can believe in.
Posted by: smnytx | January 21, 2009, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Doug Markell.. you want us to give Hussein the same support that YOU gave Bush? If we had done that the whole crowd would have LAUGHED at him for not being smart enough to repeat a few words.
Posted by: David | January 21, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am
I couldn’t believe my eyes this A.M. Diane and Robin trying to explain to everyone that Roberts messed up, and the O was “helping him out”. Sheesh! Guess who they voted for? hmm? guess? Even when Robin interviewed the O last night, he corrected her…”I think HE helped ME out..” c’mon people…all you have to do is repeat…and anyone can view the tape and see Roberts was not hesitating, but continuing on,…but these ladies said “it still cannot be determined”….will we all have to put up with this mooning for the next four years? what EVER happened to REAL JOURNALISM???
Posted by: pyrotechny | January 21, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am
When I was married I repeated what was said, if the Preacher had said: “With this ring I wed thee” that is what I would have said. If Barrack Hussein Obama had been meant to memorize the words Justice Roberts would not have been there.
Posted by: Julie | January 21, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Roberts did it deliberately to try to embarrass Obama. Roberts knows that both Obama and Biden voted against his confirmation.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Pyrotechny: does it matter at all to you that Roberts himself at the luncheon that followed the innauguration that it was HE who screwed up??????
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
When will you liberals ever get a clue????????
Its not Consttutitonally VALID unless the oath is repeated exactly right!!!!!11!! Technicaly, this presidentsy is NULL and VOID!!!!
Score 1 for Roberts!!
——————————
THIS IS WRONG, THE PRESIDENT ELECT BECOMES PRESIDENT (BY THE CONSTITUTION AT 12 NOON ON INAUGURAL DAY) REGARDLESS IF HE IS SWORN IN OR NOT!
Posted by: lesson1 | January 21, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
The odd thing about conservatives critiquing Obama taking the oath is that all he had to do was repeat after Justice Roberts. If Justice Roberts administers the oath wrong, I really don’t think anyone can say it was the President’s fault and thus he isn’t really president.
Certainly minor compared to being elected by Supreme Court decision.
Posted by: Nick B | January 21, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
maybe next time he should think about looking at the oath instead of trying to memorize it.
obviously that didn’t work.
& please “william j” , get a clue. 12 noon, Barack Obama became president. not when he was sworn in. chief justice roberts needed to get it together.
Posted by: kb123 | January 21, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
People give it a break!!! This bickering back and forth and trying to show your intelligence over dumb stuff is ridiculous. People like you are tearing the country apart. Stop calling people morons and idiots because their opinion is different than yours. Is this not America? We can have a different opinions, but does it have to be communicated through hatred, and division?Calling each other names? Who in the world do you think you are that you can spill this hatred to other Americans? I wish there is a country or a rock that some of you can live, so that the remaining Americans can live peacefully together!
Posted by: pb | January 21, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Actually Chris, the oath IS required by the Constitution. ART 2, sec 1 “Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Posted by: Joe | January 21, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
The oath of office isn’t required to be President. Chris is partially correct in that Obama became President at 12:00, 20 January, 2009 regardless of the oath. However, the oath IS required before the President can discharge his duties AS President. I’ll offer the case of President Zachary Taylor. He refused to “swear” in the oath and it took 24 hours to research the legalities to determine if he could legally “affirm”. President Polk had resigned effective at noon on March 4th 1849. Some other guy had laid claim to be the President until such time as Taylor took the Oath. It was determined that Taylor was in fact President at noon on the 4th but powerless until noon on the 5th of March when he finally took the oath.
It’s my understanding that twice in history, the incoming President made a mistake in the oath and re-took the oath a few minutes later behind the scenes to make it legal.
Posted by: Joe | January 21, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Further: It is ok to add “so help me god” to the end of the oath. The official oath is concluded with the words “United States”, anything said thereafter is irreleveant. The same goes for “Congratulations Mr. President”
as long as the additions are made after the official oath, word for word!
Ok, now that that has been solved, what other straws are people going to grasp for? And for the record: I AM NOT an Obama supporter. I think he’s an oportunistic pinhead who bought the white house for $650 million and help from CNN. But the law is the law!
Posted by: Joe | January 21, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Here’s the mistake boys and girls, in Obama’s first lines of his address he said “44 people” have taken the oath. WRONG SUCKA – 43!!!
Posted by: Joe | January 21, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
first of all it was no ones fault both roberts and obama had the whole world watching them, its not crazy that they would get nervous and have a slip up, and it doesnt matter because obama is the president now, and to the idiot up top who said roberts was not a legitimate judge and bush not a legitimate president, they were both legit wether u liked it or not, approval rating does not make you a president and who are you to bash a man who is far smarter than anyone in this chatroom because he is a bad public speaker
Posted by: mike johnson | January 21, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Easy…you libs are so nasty with your comments…They both screwed up! Obama started repeating before Roberts was finished with the first line; Roberts then rearranged the wording; Obama recognized it but still says “faithfully” at the end. All eyes were on both of them and that would make most people a little nervous. Start the healing and quit bitchin’!
Posted by: BriC | January 21, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Hopefully Obama will demote Chief Justice Roberts for his inadequacy. What an absolute idiot. As an American, I am disgusted.
Posted by: NJAndersen | January 21, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Did anyone notice that Barack Obama went on to make his inaugural address, speaking for 18 minutes without notes? We have a president who knows what he has to say. I’m proud of him, and there were lots of moments in his address when I cried out “YES”.
Posted by: claire | January 22, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I feel bad for John Roberts because this might have been caused by his seizures and/or seizure medication…
why has nobody mentioned this?
Posted by: Josh | January 22, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Wow! Honestly? One shouldn’t bash others who they don’t know because of a disagreement in beliefs, especially if one is not intelligent to use proper spelling. Isn’t everyone entitled to their opinion? Seems that is the only thing we are not entitled to anymore. They both flubbed. BriC is right -after the correction by Roberts, the President still messed it up. All I’ve heard is how we have made a monumental step, but somehow all I hear is the same hateful rhetoric…
Posted by: danny | January 22, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Mark”s comment about the chief justice aplologizing to the president at the inaugural luncheon is rather significant; but is not an admission of guilt. While I maintain that both erred during the oath, justice Roberts demonstrates complete class by taking the blame. A true gentleman would act in such a manner. If I were ever in a situation where I could deflect embarrassment off another or take the lion’s share of the blame if we were both complicit, I’d do it. Roberts did the right thing at the luncheon and gave the president the benefit of the doubt. That’s class.
Posted by: BriC | January 24, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Seriously people, get over it. Roberts was nervous and stumbled, and Obama got thrown off by it. Things like that happen when you’re on live international TV in the middle of an historic event.
Posted by: Shugo Kunisaki | January 26, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Barack Obama IS NOT the president. The oath of office was NEVER officially given. Chief Justice Roberts dutifully
obeyed his instructions to mis-recite the oath. Later in private, photos were taken of Obama and Roberts, but cameras were banned from the re-taking of the oath and no recordings were made.
Article II,Section I:8 of the United States Constitution requires that before the president can execute any duties of office, the oath of office must be taken, no exceptions.
Posted by: J Bayles | February 17, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
the president should be fired along with his chief of united state and put joahn macain and sara pailen in his office
Posted by: Bob | December 8, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am