By Thomas Nagorski

Feb 26, 2009 4:38pm

World Newser Question Of The Day

By now you probably know — the Obama budget runs north of three and a half trillion dollars. You probably also know — as a political document it has already sparked considerable debate: Is the budget fair? In particular — is it right to tax the well-to-do to create a $634 billion health-care fund? And to reduce deductions on mortgage interest and charitable giving? House GOP leader John Boehner calls the budget "a job killer," and argues that "the President is beginning to make President Bush look like a piker when it comes to spending." For his part, the President says, "We need to be honest with ourselves about what costs are being racked up, because that’s how we’ll come to grips with the hard choices that lie ahead." As for the charge of irresponsible spending — "I work for the American people, and I’m determined to bring the change that the people voted for last November. And that means cutting what we don’t need to pay for what we do." Our Question of the Day is essentially this: What do you think of the Obama budget?

User Comments

Let me demonstrate how this economic package will work.
I’m going to pull a rabbit from a hat. Now, I don’t have a rabbit and I don’t have a hat.
But Obama is going to pull $900 billion from the same thin air.
AND, he is going to cut the deficit in half by the end of his term after he more than doubled it at the beginning.
He is writing check our bodies can’t cash.
It will not work. Not once has government ever made it better. It takes the people. Government has caused this by de-regulating the lending industry. Then gave that same industry billions of non-existent money without any terms in its use. Stupid.

Posted by: clarkcurry | February 26, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

“What do you think of the Obama budget?” – ABC News
Hell if I know.
I haven’t seen enough of it yet.
Off the cuff though, I don’t see how $634 Billion for Health Care brings any of it’s costs down and it sure doesn’t help me pay for my coverage.

Posted by: Noz | February 26, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

George Piker Bush
I kinda like that, has a nice ring to it.

Posted by: Noz | February 26, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

I am growing increasingly concerned about the government’s spendng of money they don’t have to overcome an economic problem that was caused by people spending money they didn’t have.

Posted by: bkm | February 26, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Given the size of the economic crisis, I fully expected the size of the stimulus to be as drastic. Otherwise I would have thought it was just another Washington blunder.

Posted by: Doug | February 26, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

i agree with you, bkm. i don’t understand how a nation trillions of dollars in debt can spend money it doesn’t have. i’m just concerned that our money will become like Zimbabwean dollars $300 trillion= 30 US cents.
are we going to have to go to a barter economy?
this is worrisome.

Posted by: Paul Wall | February 26, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

I will support President Obama and his ideas until he is proven wrong. PROVEN wrong. We need universal health care and I am willing to pay my share to get it for me and future generations. Everyone should be willing.

Posted by: hang | February 26, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Lets see he (the big O) has spent 36 billion a day since he took office…what do I think of his budget…I wish I would have bought gold at 400 an ounce, this paper is gonna be worthless.

Posted by: samhiguchi | February 26, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

What some of you folks don’t seem to recognize is that the U.S. has been operating on borrowed money since 9/11. How do you imagine we’ve been fighting a war on two fronts? How do you think government contractors like the infamous Blackwater were being paid millions of dollars? How do you think we’ve been paying for weapons, planes, ships, helicoptors, rockets, etc., etc. if not with borrowed money? Money borrowed from Saudi Arabia, from other oil rich countries, from China. All the while the government has been very careful to keep our citizens in the dark, hiding under the catch-all shield of “National Security”, i.e., “don’t tell the children; they wouldn’t understand.” Hah!

Posted by: nanameow | February 26, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Is now the time to fix health care or to fix our energy problems.
If we can fix our energy dependence, we’ll have more money to spend on health care.

Posted by: Realilty | February 26, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

what can be done to save the economy? many people disagree with the president’s but what would they put in its place? i’m not a strong supporter of the plan but something has to be done. what happens if we do nothing? or what is the alternative plan?

Posted by: Paul Wall | February 26, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Ron Paul what does this spending mean?

Posted by: Huh | February 26, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I think most people knew the war was extremely expensive. That’s a given.
9/ll did happen; we didn’t make it up.
In l993 the first bombing of the WTC happened. If we would have taken care of business at that time, maybe we would have done better. But no, we gave our enemies eight more years to gather themselves and to get stronger.
Good going, Clinton.
Obama ran on the promise of getting out of Iraq. He’s just moving the war over to a new neighborhood. That’s all.
But he will be able to say, ‘See, we’re out of Iraq now.’
Most of Obama’s ideas is like having an elephant in the room, and everyone is pretending the elephant does not exist.
Everything is great. Just step over the pile of dung. In fact, what dung?
If you mention the elephant or the dung, then you are yelled at and called a hater.
A great speech does not necessarily equal great ideas.
Who isn’t for higher education? or healthcare? or housing? or balanced budget? or whatever else that makes life worth living?
How are you going to pay for it ALL?
2% of the population? Guess what? That 2% of the population will take their marbles and go somewhere else. That’s how the wealthy operate. I’m not saying this is good, bad, or indifferent. It is what it is.
Is Obama going to print more money?
Well, good luck with that stratergy.
It will just dilute the value further.
A sandwich will cost $50.
No. I don’t have the answeres. I just can see what won’t work.
I’m for some parts of the stimulus package; not so much for other parts.
Compromise is needed.
Before the states take their part of the package, they better look into the long term consequences.

Posted by: just my opinion so don't yell | February 26, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

I must say.. he is a great speaker, but that being said, how can a country who is in economic “Crisis” mindfully spend ourselves into a $1.75 billion dollar deficit? Personally, I think it’s crazy! To many American’s work too hard and already give so much of their money away to be told once again that they can do less with less.

Posted by: Aaron | February 26, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

ITS ONLY MONEY ? RIGHT

Posted by: Carl Diaz | February 26, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

It’s about time taxes were raised on the richest Americans. To hear some overpaid windbag whining about the end of his “American dream” rings awfully hollow to somebody out of work or struggling on the median American income.
It’s also interesting that ABC News clearly took the tax increase to be the most important element and largely turned to opponents of the President.

Posted by: Hugh | February 26, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

This is the beginning of a NANNY STATE …. Gawd help us .

Posted by: Erin | February 26, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Terrifying.

Posted by: Grump | February 26, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I want to know where this money is coming from. What’s the point of printing more money when there is nothing to back it up with. Printing more money doesn’t help anyone. The stimulus package is crap too because it doesn’t help me a single mom of 3 kids who worked last year but didn’t make enough to get any money back on taxes and apparently I didn’t make enough in 2007 either to get a stimulus check either.

Posted by: Jennifer | February 26, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I have trouble wrapping my mind around the world “trillion” in any context other than astronomy so this is a bit overwhelming. What I like about it is that he has stopped lying about the burdens on the economy and included the wars we are now fighting. I am more apt to trust his judgment for that reason. I also like the changes of emphasis. I don’t like that we are having to deal with the consequences of malignant deregulation, child of both the Clinton and Bush administrations. I wish we could take it out of Phil Gramm’s pension.

Posted by: Karen | February 26, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

The budget is beyond absurd. Obama is not even competent as a socialist.

Posted by: R. A. Wey | February 26, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Never minde the 3.75 trillion dollar budget…what about the 13 plus trillion national debt!!!! Why isn’t this talked about!!??

Posted by: Mike | February 26, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I’m disappointed that the news media are not noting that the Obama budget also includes the money allocated, but omitted from previous budgets, so that we see the real picture. Yes, he has to add to the existing budget to fix the mess Geo. Bush left us, but this focus on the total number alone is not responsible reporting.

Posted by: Kyle Bakke | February 26, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I may be young but I know a lot of money when I see it. I thought the 800 billion dollars that Congress just passed to going to correct this and now there is another bill for 3.5 trillion dollars. Insanity.
This better work or Obama is not going to be relected.

Posted by: Matt | February 26, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

This huge budget makes no sense. They tell US to pay off our bills and that pork is unhealthy. I look at the Democrats and feel that they are not in touch with reality. They don’t seem to have the wisdom that it takes to make sound decisions. They frighten me. I feel that if we come out of this, it won’t be what they did, it will be a miracle; I’m praying for one.

Posted by: Bernadette | February 26, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

The Obama administration is a clear and present danger to the people and security of the United States. His policies are irresponsible and his underlying goal is to lead this nation into socialism. This man and his co-horsts must be stopped.I think he is committing treason by these very actions.

Posted by: John Fisher | February 26, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

I think the budget is a good start. We need to give Obama a chance… The Republicans – after supporting George Bush for 8 years have NO moral authority to question this budget. Their approach of maintaining party line is simply politics as usual. If the republicans aren’t happy – let them publicly propose alternatives – not just snipe at obama’s plan.

Posted by: Jack Hiller | February 26, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Change for the Sake of change. Wonder how many of those “Hollywierds” that are in the upper part of the Tax bracket that will have to shell out more this tax year? Wonder if they will vote for Osama again?

Posted by: Papaw | February 26, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Obama may be intelligent but that doesn’t carry over to wisdom. I’ve yet to see any wisdom in his moves.

Posted by: coad | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

I COULD GO ON ALL DAY ABOUT THIS PACKAGE. HERE IN LOUISIANA THE OILFIELD HAS LAYED OFF ABOUT 100 PEOPLE TODAY. AND THIS IS GETTING JOBS–MORE PEOPLE ARE GETTING LAYED OFF–WHERE ARE THESE JOBS GONNA COME FROM? DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY ANSWERS–HELLO–REMEBER THE OILFIELD

Posted by: bECKY | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

according to my amortazion schedule, i will pay back twice what i borrowed for my mortage, plus insurance and taxes–tell me again why we are bailing out the banking industry?

Posted by: sa biedenbach | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

i think if obama’s advisors and cabinet pay their taxes then he might have a bigger budget. A bigger budget would give us a backup if his stimulus plan does not work.

Posted by: Jeremiah Anthony | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

The budget stinks, and definitely promotes class warfare. Discriminating on who can deduct mortgage interest fully is just that, discrimination and class warfare. Ditto charitable contributions. I will politely decline charitable requests in the future by simply indicating that Obama has made my contribution for me by taxing me more and not allowing me to decide what charity is deserving a donation.
I will also have to cut back on the use of small business services. Little things like yard maintenance and repairs will go back to being done by me. I put myself through college to allow me to live better, not to give my hard earned dollars to others who made different life choices. Giving people money to pay their mortgages is ridiculous. Giving a certain class of people $8,000 to buy a home is nothing more than a redistribution of wealth. Whatever happened to working for money to put down on a house?

Posted by: Vince | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

What could you possibly expect after eight years of Bush & Company stealing from the American people? Whomever was elected President after Bush was going to catch the brunt of the past policies.

Posted by: Mark | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Mr. Obamas plan is not what this country was founded on. He is turning this into a socialist society. What a shame? Why should the people be punished that actually went to college, worked hard, started businessess and achieved the American dream? Is the rest of the US going to be motivated to make more money ? No—why? they would just be taxed on it—-We don’t want to pay for those who just sit around and do nothing but waiting on handouts!!!!

Posted by: cyndi | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Well what can you say? Washington as usual. So much for cutting the pork and no ear marks, this budget is filled with them. I think President Obama left his scaple in Illnois.

Posted by: Danette Dexter | February 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Fianlly an honest budget. Sure I hate the numbers but it is not really any larger than with Bush who hid the cost of being in two wars. Talk about pulling a rabbit out of his hat… he pulled the money for Iraq and Afghanistan from somewhere certainly not his budget. We need to spend large to get large. Until the Republicans can come up with something better or workable, they should keep their mouths shut. Republican Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran is proud of being the largest pork spender in this country. Looks to me like others are trying to catch up.

Posted by: Bernie | February 26, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

First, congress has to accept it and they’ll probably add their 10cents to it as well, which will probably make it even more convoluted. However, because it’s such a huge jump in faith, it’s not something that we’re going to know how it will come out a head of time. The cards need to be played first. I just hope it plays out like Pres. Obama says. That would be a godsend that the American people are looking for. If Obama winds up with the same problems of the senate and congress not supporting him like Cliniton, then nothing he presents is ever going to pass and it will be a waste of his presidency. Hopefully that does not happen.

Posted by: Kathy Mahoney | February 26, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

With almost 60 trillion of national debt
this is taking us closer to bankruptcy and making it more difficult to push our foriegn policy with nations holding a large share of Treasury notes. A sad day for America.

Posted by: George | February 26, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

At a time when a record number of Americans have lost their jobs and have NO income, when many have to decide between putting food on the table and getting medical care, those who make over $250,000 (a quarter of a million dollars!) need to stop whining about a tax that amounts to a miniscule fraction of their income.

Posted by: Michael Burmeister | February 26, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

If healthcare is costing so much, how is throwing billions more money at it going to help? Where are the plans for spending all these trillions? Why didn’t he get the economy issue solved if it’s such an emergency before spending billions on healthcare reform & energy issues, especially he won’t let oil companies drill for oil in the U.S.???????

Posted by: d. thomas | February 26, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

I am almost speachless at this crap! It’s like the media and the people in this Country have closed their eyes. If Obama says we need it then we give him a blank check. How high do you think interest rates or going to be when we get this moron out of office in 2012? SOCIALISM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Out of Change | February 26, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

On the news tonight no mention was made of the fact that the president included in his budget the cost of two wars something which has been missing out of the last 7 budgets. Perhaps if the Bush administration had been honest with us the numbers today would not appear so high.

Posted by: Alice | February 26, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

It really angers me that people that were making $250,000 are complaining about their taxes going up when for the last 8 years they have had it pretty easy while us middle class have been struggling. Its about time we get help

Posted by: trisha | February 26, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

I pay a lot of income tax about $32000 but I feel lucky. I think Obama is spending it wisely.

Posted by: Francis | February 26, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

It is easy to spend money when it isn’t your own, and you haven’t worked for it. If he were truly “cutting what we don’t need to pay for what we do”, then why are we raising taxes? Seeing GM with another 7 Billion in the hole, after the Government “wisely” gave them bailout money, makes me concerned about how much more of this is going down the drain.

Posted by: Steve Brock | February 26, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

When you “The People” hire morans to run our country like we have the last two presidxents that includes Obama and Bush which, neither have enough sense to figure out if their backsides are drilled or punched, then, complain about why the way things are, look at Congress, look whom is the speaker of the house “another idiot” backed up by Mr. Barney that caused the same problems they are now saying they want to repair…..Give me a break folks, you keep hiring Idiots because “You like them”. Start blaming yourself, you hired the fools. Throw them out, quit pointing fingers.

Posted by: Gary Reno | February 26, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

All I can say is prop open your wallets and hang on to your butts…”big change” is coming and it’s not change you can believe in!

Posted by: jack | February 26, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

I think he’s lost his mind. You can’t just print out billions (trillions) of dollars without a serious repercussion down the road. Everyone who thinks that taxes will be cut, and that only the “rich” will be taxed more to pay for this, are delusional. We and our children and their children will be paying for this. Our country will ultimately be weakened. I hope everyone looks forward to being a 3rd world country — that’s where we’re headed.

Posted by: Bewildered in KS | February 26, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Obamas’s budget reveals his courage & sincere committment to rebuilding our economy & deliver to the American people what he promissed. He gets my vote again.

Posted by: George A. Halaby | February 26, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

He should let free interprize fix the mess. Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac wouldn’t have told the banks what they did if our government hadn’t told them too. That’s really what started this mess in the first place. It’s absolutely terrible what he is doing!

Posted by: Robert Drost | February 26, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

I think we should pass this bill. Obama knows what he is doing.
Don’t forget he is also going to cut the debt by 50% by the end of his first term.
The Republicans put us in a lot of debt. I did not see people squaking then.

Posted by: Amelia Nancy Rossiter | February 26, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Idiots all!! We must get rid of every incumbent and install someone who will show some fical responsibility. The most recent spending spree is $12,000 per person and this is just one spending bill-the annual budget. This present president will be the ruination of us all.

Posted by: Frank | February 26, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Taxing one segment of society more than another for any reason is unfair, unjust and un-American and a crime against those individuals. Mr. President, you say you are asking (don’t you mean demanding) people making over $250,000 to “chip in more”.
We already “chip in more” than the average American and have been doing so for a long time. This is one reason we can’t “chip in more” toward our own lives. Unequal taxation is unjust and needs to be abolished completely. Mr. President, I thought you were concerned about equality and justice for all. Let’s institute a flat tax for all Americans instead of penalizing those that finally make a good salary. Also, let’s keep government on a reasonable budget and stick to it like I have to do in order to pay my outrageously high taxes.

Posted by: Gordon | February 26, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

THE BEGINNING OF THE END.
OUR(SE) PRESIDENT HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE IS DOING.
THIS IS NO MORE THAN SLIDING MONEY INTO THE HANDS OF “CRACK” SLACKERS.
WHAT FOR THE MOVING OF PEOPLE FROM THE USA NOW TO MEXICO AND CANADA.

Posted by: EDWARD BOYER | February 26, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I think there should be a recall election against Mr. Obama now that he has shown what an idiot he is I’m sure many of his supporters would vote differently. And just in case this does not happen I have started to learn chineese in case they forclose on the USA.

Posted by: bob | February 26, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Solution:
1. Give every tax payer One Million Dollars.
2. Bail out Banks and Major Industries on a case by case basis.
3 Create infrastructure packages with necessary pork.
You’re Welcome.
Sam

Posted by: Sam Maturo | February 26, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

The whole money give-away is a farce – thinking the economy will come back – if they would have just given every tax payer a check for $500,000 (instead of the measley $600 received last year), you would see people being able to save their homes, pay off bills and BUY STUFF, including health insurance. Instead of giving money to those that are responsible by being irresponsible, give it directly to those that will make sure it does some good and really get our economy going again.

Posted by: ann | February 26, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Certainly the budget is fair! Let’s face it; we’re in trouble and we need drastic change. 8 years of doing the same thing over and over again got us deeper and deeper in crisis. Will Obama’s plan work? It’s too early to tell, but we know one thing…the course we were on wasn’t working. I own a small business and I’m going to be taxed more under the Obama plan. As a conscientious citizen, I’m fine with that. We’re struggling like everyone else, but I also realize not everyone one in the country has the same abilities that I did to open my own business. If my increased taxes go to help the less fortunate I see that as my duty as a citizen in the US. Should families making more than $250k pay more taxes? Hello??? Of course they should. Who cares if you started with nothing and built that into wealth. In fact, if you started from nothing and are now wealthy, you should be more willing to pay extra taxes. Its time for the American people to take responsibility for each other…how many times do you walk by a homeless person asking for money? When was the last time you gave clothing to a local chairty? When was the last time you collected money on behalf of a charity? it’s easy to do…if every taxpayer in the US gave $1 to charity, we’d raise more than $300,000,000. The current economic crisis takes a group effort. If you don’t get onboard, you’re part of the problem. If it doesn’t work, hold the administration accountable in the next election. Until then, get on board and you may be amazed at what you can do to make small changes in your town or neighborhood.

Posted by: Gary Briggs | February 26, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Obamas is turning our country socialist; redistribution of the wealth.
It’s becoming clearer day by day just how socialist minded B.H. Obama really is; maybe he’ll propose that we change the name of our country to something like …. United Socialist of America???

Posted by: Cory | February 26, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I haven’t read enough of the proposed budget but what I have read is that Obama wants to double foreign aid. WHAT!?!?!?!? How can we afford to double the already stupid amount we give to other nations when we as a country can hardly keep our own neck above water? I say we stop all aid immediately and only give a set amount to those in need after a catostrophic event. I think we should also bring home ALL our soldiers from everywhere that they are. That alone would save billions of dollars per year. Ask yourself this: would America allow a British, German or Korean base on our soil? Why should we spend our hard-earned money on bases overseas?

Posted by: thinkaboutit | February 26, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Someone needs to stand up to this guy soon or our great country will be a thing of the past.

Posted by: oldbob | February 26, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I am REALLY liking what I am hearing and what is BEING DONE!
This is the closest the people have ever come to representation in DC.

Posted by: Deborah Kuhn | February 26, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I think we should have a flat tax. That is fair. We all pay the same percent of wages. Period

Posted by: Amelia Nancy Rossiter | February 26, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Obama is clueless, he has no idea how the real world works because he has never been part of the real world. The government has always taken care of him. Now he’s trying to fix an economic crisis when he has no experience in running a state, a company, and I would bet his own household budget is handled by his wife. Stock up on food, seeds, and guns people, what money you have left won’t be worth a dime.

Posted by: T | February 26, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

P.S. To answer someone’s question, the money is coming from China, who doesn’t like US or anybody else, if they feel like it; they may be wondering why we did not accept the Republican’s proposal for 3 mil more jobs for $500 mil less. Wouldn’t have this been a stimulus package? Is this a sound investment for them? Reminds me of the movie, Blade Runner. Rent it if you don’t have it.

Posted by: Bernadette | February 26, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

As senator, Mr Obama maintained the most liberal voting record. As candidate for President, Mr. Obama tried to convince us that he was a pragmatist and centrist. Now as President, we see his real stripes in this budget outline: income redistribution unlike anything in history, and an all out attack on for profit businesses and risk takers. Since being elected in November, stock prices have collapsed more than 25%. Is America still the home of hard work and Horatio Alger, or has it adopted new heroes such as Thomas More and Francis Bacon who believed in utopian visions of equality.

Posted by: Heinz | February 26, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I guess since the afternoon “breakout” sessions earlier this week solved everything, what is so bad about a defcit 4x last year’s record?
The President needs to focus on one thing…it is the economy “stupid”!
We were promised bridges, roads and infrastructure…projects that improve
the country and provide actual jobs.
Wait until inflation makes ourrent dollar virtually worthless! Other countries that have tried to print thier way out of debt hae learned the hard way.
I thought this president graduated rom Harvard…what grades did he get in economics and math?
There are not enough “rich” people to pay the dollars he is proposing.
I want to support him as my President but I cannot accept his shotgun approach of throwing money at everything.
He needs ot wake up to realize his fellow Democrats are having a field day at his (and the country’s) expense.
Most people didn’t realize this was where we were headed whenthey voted in November. This wasn’t the “change” those that voted for Obama were prepared for.
Slow down, focus on the economy and get the worldfinancial markets settled down. Put health care on the back burner..itis too much to even consider at this point. There needs to be a sigualr focus on the economy.
Otherwise, we will either run out ofpaper or ink as we print trillions of dollars!

Posted by: ck in Ohio | February 26, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

A famous person once said, “From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs.”
Sounds like the Democrats are heading down the road to Socialism.

Posted by: Shannon | February 26, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

If you buy a foreign product, the people who made it have national health care. Here companies pay the bulk of care, which makes them less competetive.
Oil will increasingly become more expensive, so we need to pursue our own energy solutions.Considering the difficult situation the economy is in, I think he is doing the right things.People who got a lower tax rate for years, did not complain when the deficits were run up, but we can’t continue with the same policies, or we will end up a third world country, wi5th a few wealthy, and the rest dirt poor.

Posted by: J Adams | February 26, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

“Capitalism works for those who do. Socialism works for those who don’t.” When the productive Americans receive no benefit from hard work, then they will join the throng of those who don’t.
Making History, Obama’s “Central Planning” is the biggest since USSR during Lennin/Stalin, and has nothing to do with American’s priorities. The people demonized and villified by Obama are the very people that can restore our once burgeoning economy. Those “wicked” people that have been productive, the businessmen and entreprenuers of the United States of America are being robbed. The money stolen will pay many people to build bigger government and others to sit on their butts. Sorry, but this Utopia is the pure fantasy of the most leftist leader since Joseph Stalin – BO.

Posted by: Mitch from Maine | February 26, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I think he has gone power crazy with no regard for the consequences. He has killed my future.

Posted by: Harold | February 26, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Rushing headlong into the abyss is not the change we need. I strongly disagree with this crazed spending, we chastized the last administration for spending and yet we are doubling that spending in one month it is totally irresponsible and not the change I am for. He campaigned as a centralist and now his true motives are coming to the surface.

Posted by: samiam | February 26, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I am horrified. Between the stimulus package which won’t stimulate much, and this budget we are going further into debt and I am concerned for my children and grandchildren. While I think we need to do something about healthcare, and am willing to pay a little more for that, I think the whole thing needs to be studied. I am concerned that Mr. Obama is sending us down the path to socialism which I don’t want. I think new taxes will kill off the few businesses that are doing well and send them out of the country. We will be a nation of hamburg slingers.

Posted by: SandyM | February 26, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Here we go. No way are the tax increases going to be directed at those earning over $250K. Not possible with the way this socialist wants to spend. Tax charitable contributions? Perfect. Eliminate charities, because Barack is the only one who needs our money. Decrease the home interest deduction? Sure…no one is buying houses now anyway…let’s cause another bunch of foreclosures.
Hello…who are the only ones able to spend (read that “stimulate the economy”)? The very people Barack says he wants to increase taxes on. Any idiot knows that you don’t increase taxes on anyone when you want people to spend money and boost the economy. Except maybe for Marxists and Socialists.
Oh yeah…that’s what Barack is. He’s never made much of an effort to hide that. But last November no one much cared. My family isn’t close to that $250K magic number. Still, our taxes have more than doubled in the past year. George Bush is the ONLY President whose programs ever cut my taxes. Barack isn’t going to do so any more than Billy Goat Clinton did.
Wish I’d bought the same gold “hang” mentioned. We’re all going to need it, and sooner rather than later.
What do I think of the idiot’s budget? Not much.

Posted by: Craig Carlson | February 26, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

There is no way you can balance the budget by spending more than 4 times the present one. You cannot tax the rich, let alone anyone, and expect the ecomony to rebound. By taxing the working public, you take away the extra money they would have used to buy goods and services. By not buying goods and services, companies go broke, lay people off, less money goes into the pockets of the people that make the economy grow. Its simple economics. It has been proved that if you CONFISCATE the entire years wages from everyone that makes 75,000 dollars and up, that amount WILL NOT even come close to paying the budget and the so called stimulus bills they just passed. They are spending money that does not exist! If the average American did that, they would be thrown into jail in a matter of hours. Anyone who thinks all this spending will get us out of this slump, needs to have their head examined!

Posted by: Rick | February 26, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

OK So what is it that you don’t understand? Yet another bank CEO fails to understand that it’s our money that he’s using to fly around in his private jet…but is it his fault? See our generous government GAVE money to banks that didn’t need it, didn’t request it, didn’t even want it…but Washington said sure…here…take it! It’s yours compliments of the American public! So ask yourself then, why aren’t the banks lending? Why aren’t homeowners being helped with all these billions. Well, common sense tells me that there is no motivation for the bankers to do any lending? Why? Because the government is gifting them money. What motivation is there for a banker to sit across from John Q Public and listen to yet another sob story of homme loss and/or job loss9es) when, if you wait long enough, the feds will ride in on their white horses and simply hand over millions of dollars! I think I’m trading in my “appraiser” hat and donning a shiny new “lenders” hat… seems thats the way to big bucks with no effort these days!

Posted by: WIAppraiser | February 26, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Poor Americans have a unique ability to be resiliant and adaptable in tough times. I’m positive that those making 250,000+ can be equally as resiliant. It’s time that we even the economic playing field and rebuild the middle class.

Posted by: Kylee North | February 26, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

What is the big problem about trying to figure out how to fix the economy. I am not a rocket sicentist, I work in a factory that is slowing down because of the economy. But there is one sure fire way to stimulate the economy. Divide all that bailout money amoung the people that actually spend it. And there would be an instant turn around. You cou give every tax payer over 18 years old $100,000 an they would spend it. They would buy new cars, therfore no need to bail out the big 3. They would payoff ther mortgages or buy a house, That would solve that crisis. Whats the big deal, besides the fact that the government doesnt want to help out the people that matter.

Posted by: Carl | February 26, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

I watched ABC news tonight and saw a lawyer who was complaining about the Obama budget that will cost him more in taxes.He said for every $10,000 he makes over the $250,000 figure will cause him to pay another $300.00.Boohoo.I would gladly pay The additional $300.00 in taxes if I was making over $250.000 a year.

Posted by: Michael Pinkosky | February 26, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Hello, socialism! Amen to Jane who wrote about the pigs. That is exactly what is going on here. God help us all.

Posted by: Charles | February 26, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Hugh,
I’ll pay for my and my family’s health insurance…. you can pay for yours and ANYONE elses you care to. To expect the government to take care of us means we give up our independence and freedom. If public health is anything like public housing, you can have it!!

Posted by: twj | February 26, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

How in the world did this guy ever get elected? I feel like this country is being run by a first grader or worse, by Nancy Pelosi or Keith Olbermann. We have all lost our minds. Socialism would be a step up from here. This generation will never recovery from the debt this idiot and his band of morons put on America…

Posted by: david | February 26, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

It is hard to say that the budget is fair because it is very complicated. I am supporting the budget at the present time although I do not like to see increasing the national debt so drastically. I listened to the fellow from Georgia who makes more that $250,000 a year whine about having his taxes increase by $300. I found him quite nauseous.

Posted by: Dave | February 26, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I never thought I would live in a socialist country but I guess it is coming. He is taking all the “wind out of the sails” of the people that made this country great. Why work hard if you have to give it away.

Posted by: Sandra | February 26, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Is the budget fair? Yes.
Is it right to tax the well-to-do to create a $634 billion health-care fund?
Yes.
And to reduce deductions on mortgage interest and charitable giving?
Yes.
What do you think of the Obama budget?
I think the budget runs the risk of being too small. This economy is in CRISIS. It’s not simply injured or limping, it’s in full blown critical condition. People spend far too much time using incorrect labels for which they have no understanding, such as “nationalization” and “raising taxes” and “non stimulus”. Every single penny, dollar, million or trillion of dollars, works to put people to work and to grow the economy. In a crisis, many areas need to be stimulated. Many of those places are not popular and that’s just tough. True Americans wouldn’t bitch but would do their individual part – just as they would if strangers were in critical condition due to a hurricane or tornado in their community. Constructive support is not based on bitching.
As for the wealthiest, they currently benefit from a tax break at the expense of the vast majority of American workers. The repeal of this tax break does nothing to make those wealthy people suffer, it does nothing to discourage their involvement in businesses where they’re employed. Those top income earners get their wealth at the expense of other workers (a company has just so much to spread around). It’s not the other way around. Their wealth does not stimulate economic growth. Never has in anytime in any country in all of history. It is time they pay their fair share of the cost of building our economy.

Posted by: Tommy | February 26, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

We have earned our degrees, paid our bills and mortgage (did not buy a house we could not afford), saved for retirement, paid for our health insurance and healthcare, put two kids through college, saved for retirement and now the “messiah” wants a bigger piece of our pie…..It is a crime!!!!! We have lost a large portion of our retirement already, so I guess Obama will take care of us in retirement since we will be giving the government 42 % of what we work so hard for. I DOUBT THAT SERIOUSLY!!!! America is getting what it voted for. The royal shaft.

Posted by: kfloyd | February 26, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I sent letters to ABC, CBS and NBC weeks ago and asked you people to tell Obama to produce his certifiable birth certificate. I never recieve an answer. I guess you people are afraid of this idiot. But I’m not.He should be impeached and all of his staff should be sent to Iraq. Another thing most of the IDIOTS in Congress have never served in the Military. They should go to Iran also and find out what it is like to have people tryng to kill you night and day. They are all a bunch of tyrants. All they do is steal money and drive around in automobiles paid for with our tax money. Why don’t you people investigate everyone of them. Don’t be a bunch of chickens. You

Posted by: Jay Gray | February 26, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security-
Just how close to a call to arms is He willing to push. Dear Mr. President, there is no sleeping giant in America, is there, so feel free to celebrate like a Democrat who just found a lost wallet full of hundreds, Happy days are here again, aren’t they. How’bout a 40 oz’er,just think, “King of the World,and a fist full of dollars” ain’t it grand?

Posted by: robroy | February 26, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Folks, Does the word “Hyper Inflation” ring a bell???? Thats where we are heading, hold your cash, don’t spend, you heading to the cleaners. We are on unchartered economic times that other countries have tried and failed one after another. Mark my words. Obama hasn’t got a clue and Pelosi and Franks are coaching him, now don’t that give the the fuzzies?

Posted by: Gary Reno | February 26, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

America as we know it will be destroyed. All I feel right now is anger. This president has already proven himself to be a liar. We are being run by the equivalate of the Chicago mafia. Better WAKE UP AMERICA!

Posted by: Mary | February 26, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Gary Briggs: What is the name of the business you own and where is it? Have you sent additional tax dollars to the government beyond what you owed? If not, why not? What is the right amount of taxes for small businesses? 50%, 80%? It will be interesting to see what the consensus is of small businesses? Will tehy just sit back and agree to make less and work harder? Will they cut employees? Stop pay increases? Time will tell.

Posted by: David | February 26, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

What Budget plan? Billions for health care? Why is the government in the health care business? Look a the V.A. hospitals the government runs for veterans, it’s a mess. Keep the government out of the health care business. I think people are going to be very sorry they voted for President Obama and for a Democrat controled house and senate. Open your eyes America, this guy is killing our freedoms faster that any previous president and he has only been in office for a few weeks.

Posted by: James | February 26, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Since former president Bush left us in such a mess.The president has to do something espically with medical since some people abuse the medical system.I think it’s about time a president,is for the middle class and poor.And it’s about time the rich take a big hit,instead of the middle class and poor that always have to take a hit.The USA will rebound from this if people cooperate and be patience.

Posted by: cculp | February 26, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

The Obama budget is the most profound example of fiscal irresposibility I have ever seen. It is akind to me borrowing a million $ days before filing for for bankruptcy.

Posted by: TommyB | February 26, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I back Obama 100 percent. At least he is thinking and trying to do something about the health care situation.Myself I am one of the people that are falling through the cracks.I am tired of my percent of taxes going to provide health care for all goverment and state workers, medicare, medicaid, welfare and veterans when I am a working tax payer who can’t afford to buy my own, do without while I am helping pay for so many others. Its time someone thought of the idea that every citizen deserves the same treatment.

Posted by: Lisa | February 26, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I’m not panicking about anything I’ve heard so far, though I haven’t heard it all. We need a health care plan. I’m a lawyer, but I’m not bothered that the lawyer in your report will have to pay 3% more on the part of his income OVER $250K.
And I never have totally believed Judd Greg’s point that a small restaurant will lay people off if they have to pay more on income over $250K. They may go out of business if the balance sheets don’t work but, what, they’re going to stop doing dishes? I think most restaurants employ only the staff they need.
Likewise, giving Ford a tax cut won’t necessarily mean they’ll use it hire workers if no one’s buying their cars. Tax cuts are good for business (and everyone else), but the connection to jobs isn’t nearly as simple as Republicans make it out to be.
Putting the bulk of the country in a position to start buying things again will be best for business. Republicans, I think, recognize that but they seem unwilling to shake the orthodoxy that the only way to accomplish anything is by stimulating the corporations and people who have the most. I’m willing to listen to conservative ideas, but I just haven’t heard any new ones.

Posted by: Dan | February 26, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

With this budget, it appears that Obama wants to be a one-term president.
This is ridiculous, especially in terms of what he said the other night about cutting the budget and the debt. I don’t know how spending record amounts of money will achieve that goal. I wish he’d tell me so that I can spend money I don’t have to get out of debt!

Posted by: Corey | February 26, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

I was disgusted when I heard one of the men interviewed complaining about having to pay more taxes and how it’s not fair because he worked so hard to get where he is at. I’m sorry, many of us have worked just as hard to get where we are at and we all need to pay our fair share in taxes. Anyone making over $250,000 a year shouldn’t be complaining about the increase. You’re taking home a hell of a lot more money then someone making $50,000 or less. And if you are contributing to charity you should be doing so for the right reasons, not to get a tax write off. We will soon see who gives for the spirit of giving and those who donate just for a tax write off.

Posted by: Kim | February 26, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

I know 3 trillion dollars is alot but we are spending a trillion a year maybe more in Iraq. Obama was left with Geo W’s mess he is trying to fix it. I think if we spend that much money in Iraq I have no problem at all spending on our country. It really bothers me that all of you seem to have that problem. I think we should give him a chance without the criticism. It is amazing that everyone seems to forget that the prior administration are the ones that put where we are today. I hope Obama’s plan works and our country is at a better place I’m hoping in a year but it will probably be more like four. I just hope he is given a chance.

Posted by: anna | February 26, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

I am in total agreement with the President’s budget. Its about time issues such as health care and energy were addressed. I remember the gas shortage of the early 70s. Had they been funding alternative energy research since then like they should have been we might not be in such a mess.
And on the question of irresponsible people, I say take a look at the corporate execs, not the working poor paying 30% interest to them to pay for appliances and such while trying to survive.
Their pleasant lifestyle was made off the backs of the rest of us. I have NO sympathy that the rich can’t put their dogs in daycare anymore.

Posted by: PJ | February 26, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

I think they are all crazy in Washington! Hopefully at the mid term elections the American public will elect enough people with common sense to stop this madness and be able to reverse the damage being done. Common sense tells me that the way to raise revenue for the “necessary” government services would be to make it possible for small, medium, and large businesses to expand and hire more workers thus sending income taxes to cover those expenses.(better known as a balanced budget)
Penalizing businesses and individuals making more than $250,000 will do more harm than good.

Posted by: PRD | February 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

So, Obama is raising the capital gains tax, imposing the death tax, and going to kill small business owners, and probably impose national health care. And I’m supposed to believe that it won’t affect me because I don’t make $250,000 a year?? If you believe that, I have a beautiful bridge to sell you!! PS. If Al Sharpton needs health care, I’ll pay. Yeh, right

Posted by: charlie | February 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

As a news network, you really need to start questioning this administration and holding them accountable for this totally irresponsible spending on top of spending billions after billions after billions. All of the non biased polls I read show 60% of Americans are totally against the direction the President is taking us and this budget proposal could be the final nail in the coffin. Please do your job as a watchdog for the American People!

Posted by: Ed Ellington | February 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

the $3.5 Trillion 2009 budget is $600 Billion more than last year. Show the pie charts from Wikipedia… What’s the big difference… Coapare actuals.. Stop sensationalizing big numbers… Where are the new monies going? When viewed side by side, the spending increase just makes up for Federal holdouts over the last 8 years…

Posted by: MJ Harkins | February 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

So, Obama is raising the capital gains tax, imposing the death tax, and going to kill small business owners, and probably impose national health care. And I’m supposed to believe that it won’t affect me because I don’t make $250,000 a year?? If you believe that, I have a beautiful bridge to sell you!! PS. If Al Sharpton needs health care, I’ll pay. Yeh, right

Posted by: charlie | February 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I dont mind helping people, however, how about the individuals that are making just over $250K with 2 children in colleges that cost over $40K each and rising as I type…using our retirement funds so they can have an advantage in life…struggling to pay our mortgage and leaving bills so that mortgage can be paid so we dont loose our house? Oh, and hoping every day either of us dont loose our jobs. Needless to say we do not get anything from his plan.

Posted by: Terry Gahagan | February 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Lets not forget, the troubles started during the past Presidents watch. Someone was going to get stuck and at least do something!
Foe GOP House Leader Boehner, You think this problem just started? Where have you been? I suppose you were trying to get re-elected rather than addressing the problems of the Country!
With respect to the budget;
I, as many Americans, do not support any cuts to our Countries Farmers and Agriculture. This affects what we eat and drink.
As for the Financial Industry; Well, I thought the strong survive and the weak fail. Why should taxpayer $$$$$$ go to bail you out????
Welfare needs to be addressed. There are too many on Welfare taking advantage of free $$$$.
Health Care needs to be addressed. I do not have a lot of info to give a real opinion, but, there are too many without any coverage because they are not working or are elderly and have nothing. When information is available, this can be reviewed.
I am an elected official in Rural Wisconsin and very much in touch with the people I represent and their concerns. The people whom represent us and all elected officials should be in touch with the people they represent and not occupied by trying to get re-elected.
Tom J
Northern Wisconsin

Posted by: Tom J | February 26, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Obama is selling our country right out from under us. These politicians seem to have no conscience. They have children and grandchildren. What about leaving a a better country for future generations? Look at the debt they are going to inherit. We are going to end up not even being able to recognize the society we grew up in. 10′s of billions of dollars are going to support programs that support illegal aliens. The American taxpayer cannot work enough or pay enough taxes to support a never ending stream of people through our porous borders. It is so politically incorrect to speak to this because politicians don’t want to offend the largest growing potential voting block. Government has never been able to run things efficiently. With this spending bill we will never be able to account where all of this money went. This is the most frustrating time I’ve ever encountered in my life.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

I just saw on tv where 3.6 billion dollars went just for bonuses to somebody who didn’t need it and then they claimed to be losing money. Why are our tax dollars helping the rich and not the working man. Why not give the working man $500,000 or $1,000,000 and then we will be buying cars and building houses and investing. Our money government has already pissed off to these big companies, if given to the working man instead, would have already fixed the economic problem. What does the president think $13 a week is going to do and everybody is making a big deal about it and for what? A jug of milk and a loaf a bread a week. My point is until the people can afford to buy what the big companies produce, like cars, etc. then why keep on bailing them out when nobody can buy their products. You can help them until the cows come home but if you don’t help us like you’re helping them, it ain’t gonna do no good. DUH!!!!!

Posted by: Greg Storey | February 26, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Obama’s budget is all a jedi mind trick. “this is not the budget you are looking for – this is not the America you thought you lived in – we are not socialists…’
George S’s remark was correct “radical progressive” but to the rest of us means “communist!”
These aren’t the droids we’re looking for – move along.

Posted by: mark hunter | February 26, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

In world history, no nation has ever taxed it’s citizens to prosperity. This administration is trying to do it.

Posted by: John G. Adler | February 26, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Paying one’s fair share of taxes is one thing, but stealing people’s money is a crime. The government will be stealing with it’s new budget proposal. I do donate for the “right reasons” but now will be unable to do so. I also will save every penny not stolen by the government instead of doing what I have been, buying american and employing people.

Posted by: Kary | February 26, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Obama is beginning to show just how deep over his head he truly is, and his lack of experience and maturity is going to cause all of us to pay in the long run. From what I’ve seen of his so-called “administration” so far, I’m beginning to miss George Bush. I now wish I had voted for McCain/Palin, but we’re stuck now. God help us all.

Posted by: Bill | February 26, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Does any thinking person believe this budget is anything but a power grab?
More than economic disaster, our very freedom is threatened by this administration.
Audacity…….what an understatement.

Posted by: jdolson | February 26, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

3.5 trillion dollars. Money we don’t have. Funded by borrowing again or printing it. It’s not the programs,or tax hikes, or new taxes (cap and trade, which if adopted will pass through to the consumer). The problem is the Federal government is consuming a larger portion of gross domestic product. That spells less money in everyone’s pocket and hyperinflation when the spending orgy ends. Can you say Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe?

Posted by: thomas nile | February 26, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

You can look this up if you need to; it’s called a “spree”. A “budget” means the outgo does not exceed the income!

Posted by: Michael | February 26, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I think if the the president and the government officials were truly concerend with what is good for the American people they would drastically cut government spending instead of funding all the “pork” that is in the bills. Senator Charles Schumer stated that the American people don’t care about the “porkulus” in the bills. Well, I am a proud American and I DO care about the wasteful “porkulus”. Nancy Pelosi included “pork” for protection of the harbor mice in Califorina in the economic bill that was just passed. Since when is a rat more important than people, especially those who have lost their jobs and homes and can barely feed their families??? Any way you look at it, the money to pay for this runaway spending will ultimately come out of ALL of our pockets no matter what our financial status is as well as the pockets of future generations. May God have mercy on our nation.

Posted by: Betty | February 26, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

The size of this budget is truely frightening. We just heard the President say he is going to balance the budget and now he is planning to spend so much we can’t ever possibly pay it off. How can he possibly do both? There is a new spin everyday.
I have to cut back on my spending because my pay is down. If I got more money back, I would spend it on consumer items. If people’s taxes go up, they cannot purchase as much. It is impossible for any other outcome.
I work for a company that is an S corp, so the company’s earnings are treated like a paycheck. The tax hike for people earning more then $250,000 will affect our company by increasing our taxes and we are told we will have to have layoffs to offset the loss of profit due to the increase in tax.
President Obama is trying to do too much at once. The question that keeps coming up is we have to do something to help the economy. However everyday we keep hearing about how much money we have to spend. I really think it is better if we do nothing. If a company took a risk and got over their head, they should go out of business and a stronger more responcible company could purchase those assests and move on. This applies for not paying for other peoples’ mortgages, financial institutions and car companies. The govenment needs to stop spending money and live within its means before our money becomes worthless!

Posted by: J Strousse | February 26, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

It doesn’t take a lot of brains to figure out that the Dems filled out a wish list and President Obama signed off on it!!! The said part is, the left wing cannot be stopped. If Obama was the man he said he was, he would go through that Bill and VETO all that crap out!!! I hope the American people are happy because it cost them dearly!

Posted by: Bill Hugelmeyer | February 26, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I think it’s a necessary ill. We voted for change and President Obama is giving it to us. For far too long Washington has operated without fiscal restraint and this is the price we have to pay to get this economy going again. I say GREAT!

Posted by: Regina | February 26, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I think Obama’s proposed budget ought to be called the Pork n’ Beaning of America. His Democrat cronies get all the pork and the taxpayers of The United States will be lucky to have beans to eat. Recall Obama and send the Senate and House packing and I mean packing!
Solution:
Step 1. See statement above
Step 2. Amend the constitution such
that no attorney can ever hold
public office at any level.
Step 3. Pass a flat tax not to exceed
10%.
Step 4. Amend the constitution such
that deficit spending by
government is unlawful.

Posted by: Walter Carter | February 26, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

I feel our country is heading into the abyss with all this taxing and spending and will take 20 years for us to recover. I feel our country is lost.

Posted by: Becky r | February 26, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I am very concerned about what Obama is going to do to our economy. With our economy in the shape its in we don’t need to raise taxes on companies that produce gas and natural gas. We don’t need to tax individuals who produce businesses and earn a profit. The country cannot afford this budget but Obama doesn’t seem to care what me and other middle class families care about. No thanks.

Posted by: janet hodges | February 26, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

I am panicking about everything I’ve heard thus far. The day of paying for what we buy has long been attributed to antiquity.
From the lawyers perspective, the Democrats have raped the country in pork spending and thus should be held accountable to the extent of the law.
Since when is orthodoxy a bad thing? I too will be listening to the liberal ideas, but I haven’t heard one yet that saved money yet.

Posted by: Tommy | February 26, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Becky r, you’re right and Regina, I’m afraid your words will come back to haunt you.

Posted by: Kary | February 26, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

This president is already completely out of control. He fancies himself FDR and is mortgaging our children’s future with money he doesn’t have. Thing is the New Deal while successfully creating big government, did not solve the economic crisis of that time – it took war spending to solve it.
Which of those business people he is slamming in his speeches would or could propose a corporate budget that loses money year over year and keep their jobs.
We are faced with a government spending money they don’t have creating programs we don’t need promising things it can’t and won’t deliver. Can socialism be far away.
I don’t agree with everything Republicans say, but I do agree we can’t afford to spend money we don’t have, not at these levels.
The good news is in four years it will be very clear what has happened as a result – then again we can vote for change we believe in.

Posted by: gb | February 26, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

What Obama isn’t saying is that we are paying in a short term for a class war created by Reagan, both Bush families and people like Cheney, Madoff, Stanford and others who took their gains out of the country to avoid taxes extending back almost three decades. In short the debt belongs to the Republican Party and if it seems unfair to place the charge at the feet of the wealthiest two percent remember the Republicans have been trying to destroy the middle class by their public education and tax policies.

Posted by: Frank | February 26, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

I like the budget as presented. This money is being spent to fix America and we need fixing. Conde Rice went to Africa and saw the big Aids problem they have. She gave them 15,000,000 dollars that we did not have. George Bush thought that the program worked so well that he gave them another 15,000,000 dollars that we did not have.I am glad we are finally spending money we dont have on Americans.
Our President is doing his best to lead us out of this mess. An old saying comes to mind,”Lead, Follow, or get the hell out of the way!”

Posted by: John Bongiovanni | February 26, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Dear ABC, I would dare you to REALLY read this comment. Obama is cleaning up the MESS Mr. Bush left this country in, no one says a word about that! Or when he, Mr. Bush got three hundred sixty billion and still they don’t know where the money went to. I watched Inside Edition last night, and all of these politicians wives going on these trips, these movie stars and sports figures that earn ungodly amounts of money. I am so tired of hearing these rich people ( I realize they worked hard ) but I’m worn out of hearing them complain because their taxes will rise. I am a single mother working two full-time jobs with a child with disabilities. I bring home 501.00 CLEAR every two weeks from my job. I work with Special Needs children. Our job is extremely difficult and hazardous at times. We get hit, spit at punched and get paid VERY little. They talk about teachers getting a raise, but I am an assistant and even though I may not have a degree, I get in there and do just as much as a teacher, minus the paperwork and we are valuable to our teacher. Parents of these students need to go to work and need a place to have their children attend and what our pay is, well its ridiculous How can can people live on 1,000 dollars clear a month???? I really wish that Republicans would realize that the trickle down affect DOES NOT work. In all these foreclosures, the rich get richer because they go in and buy these properties for pennies. I wish people would remember who made this mess we are in. The wealthy people do not realize how stressful it is to make it in these times. And they wonder what and why our youth are so troubled? Half of the single parents can’t be parents when they have to be working more than they are at home. Mr. Bush wiped out the middle-class, thats why we are in a recession. The working class used to by 95% of the durable goods. People need to remember that President Obama inherited the mess our country is in. At least HE knows what its like to come from nothing. We all will answer one day to our maker, and the rich that only care about getting richer and think their having to bail out their fellow man, well shame on them, how they sleep at night, is beyond me. Mr. Bush had set a new record every year on the countries debt, and the Republican Party didn’t say a word. That’s all you hear them complain about now, is the debt, the debt. P.S. As far as the Octoplet mom ( I hope I spelled that right), has anyone gone after the doctor?, they keep bashing her, which she should have her tubes tied, but lets also focus on the doctor who should have his license revolked. I pray to God someone REALLY,REALLY listens to the below average and average people like myself. Thankyou.

Posted by: Ms. Patricia Robinson | February 26, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

634 billion health-care fund with no info on what it will look like or how it will function. how is this responsible for elected officials to vote for such expenditures. if our health-care system is so bad, why do those from countries with government health care come here for better and more timely care? it is reported 40 million in this country are without health insurance. the rest (over 300 million) have health insurance. why force the 300+ million into a system they do not want. this does not even touch the issue of the debt “bkm” said it. one comment above addressed energy. do the research and you will find alternate energy will never save the consumer or the tax payer money.

Posted by: V.M. Curry | February 26, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

I am appaled at this budget proposal, 3.5 billion dollars for one year. President Barak Obama aims to pay off the deffict by the end of his first term as president. My question is where is he going to get that money? He is now going to tax people who make over 250,000 dollars a year and he is going to raise the businesses tax. Who is going to create the jobs if we are over taxing the people who make the jobs? Small businesses and wealthy people create the jobs in this economy if they have to pay more then they can’t hire more people so the government collects less taxes. By the time we pay off this defficit I will be very old and very gray! I personly think that spreading the wealth is the worst thing you can do for a countries future. I really dont care if wealthy people are still making money and living the high life, because they are the ones who creat jobs and help drive the economy

Posted by: Daryl Thom | February 26, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

WORRIED ABOUT THE DEFICIT?
Why didn’t you fight George Bush when he gave the money extracted from the middle class to “the winners”.
Why didn’t you fight George Bush when he started the Iraq war — current estimated expense: $3 TRILLION DOLLARS.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Stop spending money that we don’t have.Congress should listen to the public and understand that we are tired of all that pork. Give a hand up, not a handout. A trillion here and a trillion there and pretty soon you are talking real money. I liked it better when we had a do nothing Congress.

Posted by: steve | February 26, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

if the Bush adminastration was so great why are we in such a mess. It was the republician way of doing things that have put is in this mess. It is time for a forward thing president. it will not be easy, but the republicians have given us no choice. I think all of them should just be banished to the cloak room for the rest of their term. SHUT UP.

Posted by: raymond hartman | February 26, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

George Bush didn’t create the financial crisis, banks, Wall Street did that.
The rich people earn their money and already pay both a higher percent and far more real dollars than all you complaining about them – why should they front your inability to pay your mortgage or for socialist programs by big government spenders.
Who can possibly believe that a government civil servant is going to be better qualified to make decisions about banking, or about health care. Do you want government paid health care if it means you get no choices on your provider and need some $40k a year bureaucrat deciding if you need that MRI.
The previous president left a far smaller deficit than this president has already created in his first 30 days. Keep in mine the deficit this new president is going to cut in half is not the amount at the end of 2008, but half of what he’s creating. That half will still be far greater than what was there at the end of 2008, so get over this “we inherited.”
Sure we’ve always had a deficit, but not one any where near this proposed level. We either one step away from socialism – or worse, China will step in and buy us.

Posted by: george | February 26, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

It seems as though President Obama and the Democratic party are raiding and pillaging the successful hardworking people of this country. Too bad the highranking nominees, some who are making financial desicions for the country are allowed to forget or not know that they themselves owe tremendous tax bills.

Posted by: steve | February 26, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

To me it sounds like economic terrorism. This terroristic act is far more reaching than 911 and may generate a far greater reaction. It reminds me of the reason why the colonists stood up to the British and why they held the Boston Tea Party, a demonstration against taxes (without reprentation is a different issue). The health care reform being funded in large part by reduction in Medicare and Medicaid says loud and clear “if you are over 60 your not worth saving we believe the youth is worth more.

Posted by: Ron Ashman | February 26, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

The budget is a disaster that will take generations to correct–charitable giving will suffer.

Posted by: Farley | February 26, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Like most Illinois politicians
Mr Obama is great at speaking out of both sides of his mouth.On one hand talking about fiscal responsibility because [he knows that's what most voters want to hear] while at the same time spending the country into bankruptcy.

Posted by: Ronald | February 26, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Thank goodness Obama only makes budget proposals and Congress make budgets.
Basic economics: tax it and you get less of it, subsidize it and you get more. We are taxing hard work and subsidizing unemployment, bank failures, and late mortgage payments. Why should a North Dakota rancher pay taxes to build a train from Vegas to LA? Why should a taxpayer from Oregon pay for pig smell studies in Iowa? Why should a Maine taxpayer pay for schools to be built in North Carolina? Reduce taxes and let the States raise what they need to pay for the needs of their people. The Constitution did not create a government to redistribute income. I choked when Obama said he was against bigger government.
This inflationary deficit spending will only spiral into higher oil prices and other goods bought around the world.

Posted by: Tom Weyandt | February 26, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

I have to say that this new budget is an even bigger mistake than his past 30 days of “stimulus” and spending plans. He acts like he cares about the Nation, but don’t really feel it by his actions. He is supposed to be our leader that gives us hope not lead us to destruction.

Posted by: Kim P from Texas | February 26, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Nancy Peloski took her family and others on a trip to Italy on a government 737, visited museums, had a private audience with the pope, stayed in expensive hotels – all on the tax payers dime.
What a double standard – this is how your tax dollars are gettign spent.

Posted by: brian | February 26, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

YOU CAN TELL THE REPUBLICANS!
They are the ones who IGNORED the fact that BUSH took the Clinton budget surplus and turned it into the greatest deficit in history!
They are the ones who think WAR IN IRAQ was perfectly affordable — cost is just $3 Trillion dollars.
They are the ones who think when the middle class get cancer, they have the right to go bankrupt. They have the right to go without treatment and DIE.
They are the ones who ARE AGAINST THE TAX CUT FOR 95% OF WORKING AMERICANS!
They are the ones who brought us to the edge of ECONOMIC CATASTOPHE!
Those Republicans. Good thing they are on their way Out.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

I have no problem with the tax changes. I do believe the total budget is 20% too high. We cannot burden future generations. To create jobs you need ideas and money. Where will the money come from if taxes are too high? Some programs will have to be cut.

Posted by: william | February 26, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Tom Weyandt,
Basic economics: YOU REPUBLICANS DESTROYED THE U.S. ECONOMY!
Basic economics: YOU REPUBLICANS GOT US INTO THIS $3 TRILLION IRAQ WAR!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Ever take a child to the shopping mall for the first time? They want everything with little thought of how to pay for it. This budget appears as though the President and his people walked through the “Mall”. The government has no money to pay for this except what it plunders by laws it creates. The government doesn’t create wealth – it re-distributes wealth. Re-distribution has a dampening psychological effect on national motivation to achieve.

Posted by: Bob Cornell | February 26, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Obama said in his address to Congress he could save $2 Trillion dollars. If that is so, then why any deficit? Just show us by posting the savings online. He said he was for full disclosure. So why not disclose? At Yahoo Tech Ticker today, there is a video called “In Alternative Energy Is a Giant Captial Pit, Kedrosky says: There’s no there there.” He says that these investments in alternative energy are not currently realistic. He says there is no common “platform” to go to. He uses the analogy of the PC and Macs being a common platform that allowed the computer industry to take off. I would further add that coal is subsidized at twenty times less in dollars than some of these alternative energies. Who is going to pay for that? An if Obama wants to make us less energy dependent, why not let states from Virginia to Florida drill for oil offshore as well as California (or within Alaska?) I’m for alternative energy when its affordable. There are so many things that are bad about a 3.5 trillion dollar budget that there is not enough space to comment on them here.

Posted by: smithandwesson | February 26, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

I hardly know what to say that hasn’t already been said. Your broadcast was the most depressing I’ve seen in years. Mr. Obama spoke of budgeting the way folks do their home budget. Is he a total idiot? Who can make a home budget where the spending is twice their income? Do these people really think we can get out of a hole by digging out the bottom? Will someone please help us get our country back before they destroy it for our children?

Posted by: T. Yoder | February 26, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

YOU CAN TELL THE REPUBLICANS:
They are the ones WHO CHEERED as Republican administrations took money from the middle class to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Per President’s Obama he wants to tax folks making over $250 a year. I do like this idea and it is fair. But, what I would like to see ABC start doing is to monitor how many of these rich people are moving their money offshore, especially politicians!!!

Posted by: Ronald Frazier | February 26, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

What some of you folks don’t seem to recognize that he is helping the rich agine. where is my money and my job he should help us with money but whatever u knw they help tham self.. we should get money back not companys and jobs we never see tham .. come on who get the money not us he should give us the money..

Posted by: chavez | February 26, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

I 100% do NOT agree with Obama’s budget plans. Where in the world-literally-is he going to get this money? If he thinks, “oh i can just run the money printing press and all will be fine and dandy”, he’s wrong. All that is going to do is put more money in circulation, and the prices of everthing is going to shoot up. If he’s not planning to run the printing press, then where will he get the money? Take it from hard-working people that have gone to get a good education so they could have a well paying job? Raise taxes so no one has money, except for his “life-changing” plans? I don’t know about you, but I just don’t get it. His budget plan is completely pointless.

Posted by: Annie | February 26, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

I can’t understand how we are going to pay for all of this Socialist nonsense. Whatever happened to the idea that a business/city/county/state/federal government budget must be balanced? If “we the people” ran our lives the way the government runs this country, we’d all be in very sorry shape. It is wrong to increase our taxes to cover the bailouts for those who spend foolishly. It is wrong to saddle small business with increased taxes. The jobs generated by small business are the jobs that keep this country on its feet.

Posted by: Leigh Shafer | February 26, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

We are heading fast to becoming a second rate socialist country instead of the greatest country in the world.

Posted by: Don | February 26, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Unbelievably irresponsible.

Posted by: Robert Carter | February 26, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Charlie,
The first thing a socailist does is control the media and that Obama did marvelously during the election.
The bright side of all of this is you popular media folks are going to have to pay more taxes. When you carried him across the river on your backs did you know he was going to sting you? My prediction is before four years are up the new media tune will be “a buck in the Obama hand was worth two in the days of Bush.”

Posted by: JKR | February 26, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Scary – we should not penalize Americans for wanting to get ahead in life. Taxing those who make over $250,000 to give to the poor is just not right. This will destroy many small businesses. We are heading for socialism. No one will want to get ahead – we will have a country filled with welfare recipients. Where can we get the money? Why doesn’t Obama bring the soldiers home. First it was 16 months to get out of Iraq, now it is 18 months and he is leaving 50,000 troups there for protection. How is that ending the war? How is now sending all those troops to Afganistan ending the war? Talk about politician’s lying to get elected. Obama proved that right.

Posted by: Patti | February 26, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Leigh Shafer,
What ever happened to a balanced budget? IT DIED WHEN YOU HELPED ELECT George Bush to the Whitehouse.
Remember, Clinton left Bush a balanced budget. Greenspan was worried about the total elimination of the Federal Debt!
Now, you Republicans have left us in a $50 TRILLION economic hole!
The Republicans destroyed the U.S. economy!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

52% voted for “Hope and Change”, well, you got the change! And us fiscally responsible Americans now get to pay for it for generations. This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Posted by: D.G. | February 26, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

This is nothing more than socialism – pure and simple! Redistribution of wealth. This bill punishes entrepreneurism. Why should those who have worked very hard over the years to raise their standards of living (as well as the standards of living or almost all Americans) be forced to bear the financial burdens of those who have less? Capitalism is what made this country great. Where would we all be today had it not been for people like Henry Ford, Bill Gates and Sam Walton? Where do many people of lesser means shop? WAL-MART, that’s where. The tax dollars paid by these businessmen and those like them far exceed taxes paid by low and middle-income persons, both in actual dollars and percentage of income. I am NOT a wealthy person, but I don’t expect those of wealth to pay my way or share their resources with me. They earned it through hard work and ingenuity. Those attributes should not be penalized!

Posted by: Larry Cole | February 26, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

I think Obama is out of his mind. He is an arrogant and demeaning person. He has no clue that he is destroying this great nation with his arrogant attitude. His cabinet is made up of tax cheats. He is taking care of the ones who voted for him not our nation. Didn’t he ever consider cutting spending instead of going on a spending spree. We have to live within our means and he should do the same with our country.

Posted by: Sandra Wagner | February 26, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

The government is out of control. This is no longer about taking care of America and Americans. This is about money and power. The people need to take back their government. And it’s both sides of the aisle. But the Democrats are really the worst. Especially Pelosi.

Posted by: Meg W. | February 26, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Patti,
Sorry, but the tax the middle class to pay for the tax cuts for the rich IS OVER!
Sorry, but only an amoral Republican party would say: No health insurance for Americans. If the uninsured get sick, they should DIE.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

The USA, as we know it, will soon be gone. Obama is about to destroy it. We are heading toward socialism, if not communism. IT WASN’T THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION that got us here…Carter and Clinton relaxed the requirements for getting a home loan and now we are in a mess. If Clinton would’ve done his job, while president, 911 wouldn’t have happened.

Posted by: Lindy | February 26, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

No earmarks……what’s the 9000 earmarks doing in this budget and why aren’t the mainstream media analyzing and reporting on them? Biased? Yes?

Posted by: Erica | February 26, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

To the person who says the rich will have to quit putting their dogs in doggy daycare……that is a crock!!We just had our car serviced at 100,000 miles to hopefully make it last another 100,000 instead of stimulating the economy by buying a new car which we may have done before hearing our hard earned money is going to Obama!!!Do you realize that people that make over $250,000 a year keep this retail economy going. Many in “doggy daycare” that work hard for a living will be losing their jobs.

Posted by: KFloyd | February 26, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

YOU CAN ALWAYS TELL A REPUBLICAN
They say ‘of course everyone should have health insurance’.
THEN they fight and fight and fight against it.
They say ‘no class welfare’.
THEN they fight and fight and fight for tax cuts for the rich, paid for by the middle class.
They say ‘jobs, jobs, jobs’.
THEN they call for trade deals that send JOBS, JOBS, JOBS to China where there are peasant wages and no environmental regulation!
You bet, I’m angry.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

This budget is just a rush to redistribution. I stayed in school, worked and borrowed for college and a masters degree, worked and borrowed again for a business degree, paid it all off and worked my butt off for 40 years to reach a certain level of prosperity from modest roots. Now, I’m perilously close to being the bulls-eye on Obama’s target, and vilified for achieving what I have. Meanwhile, AMT is already eliminating deductions for children and charitable giving and taxes so that my marginal tax rate is much higher than the rate tables report.
Apart from opposition to massive redistribution, the numbers don’t work. You’d have to confiscate the total incomes of upper income Americans to pay for all the worthy programs Obama and his congressional fellow travelers want to support.
We got into this fix because we all have been spending beyond our means…on government, on housing, on consumer goods, with the idea that someone else would pay for it–the wealthy, the government, the insurance companies–anyone but me. The answer to near-bankruptcy is not uncontrolled spending. This is a disaster.

Posted by: Frank Letsby | February 26, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Obama is an idiot. Sure, he may have a higher-than-average IQ, but he’s still an idiot. He did not use whatever IQ he was born with to actually LEARN anything so we’re going to be treated to years and years of redistributing the wealth in a vain effort to make everything “fair”. This empty suit that everyone is glorifying as the second coming is going to disappoint a lot of people, but the rest of us, those who did NOT vote for him, know that he’s an idiot and should be locked up for his (and our) own good.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I feel like a jerk right now because I am one of the idiots that put Obama in office because I believed his lies. Now it is obvious that his arrogance knows no bounds and this country is in very deep trouble.
I am not alone in my remorse at voting for this guy. I’ve talked to 20 other people today that feel the same way. I don’t think that there is any hope now.

Posted by: Jake | February 26, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Republicans are without morals.
Any moral person would say that EVERY AMERICAN should have health insurance.
That leaves out the Republicans!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Frank Letsby BORROWED money to get his Masters degree.
He invested in his future, even though he had to borrow to do it.
WHY ARE REPUBLICANS so ignorant that they can’t understand they idea of investing in the future?

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

WE HAVE SEEN the fruit of Republican economics.
They DESTROYED the U.S. economy!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I am sick and tired of hearing those who make more than 250,000 per year having to pay hirer taxes whine and cry. So you have to pay higher taxes…who gives a crap. You make plenty of money and you probably won’t even notice it. Try living like the majority of the population who live on MUCH LESS. But we just keep plugging along and we seem to do just fine. It’s always those who have the most who want to give the least and complain and whine the whole time about it. The poor and middle class have shown time and time again how they can pull together and give when the chips are down. WAKE UP those of you who are living high and mighty. It doesn’t matter if you scratched and crawled your way to the top. Your there now. So buck up and shut up. If you make more than most, then pay your fair share and don’t whine while your doing it. Remember to count your many…many…blessings.

Posted by: Michele | February 26, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

This is a very sad day for America and I feel sick for what we as a country have done in electing this arrogant self absorbed power hungry man to the highest office in the land. We will definitely all pay for that mistake.

Posted by: Carol | February 26, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

There is a recurring message among these comments that historic tax cuts have subsidized the wealthy at the expense of the middle class. It simply is not true, despite how often the claim is made. Official government reports make this clear. Upper income taxpayers pay almost all of the taxes in this country. The top 1% ot taxpayers pay some 40% of all taxes. The top 5% pay over 60% of all taxes paid. The bottom 50% of taxpayers pay only 3% of income taxes. The reason the State economies are taking such a hit is that their tax structures are so progressive that, when stock returns fall and the incomes of the affluent fall, there is no one left paying taxes. And the reason why budgets like Obama’s pass is because those who pay no income taxes have the majority votes to pass legislation that taxes others to pay for programs they want.

Posted by: Frank again | February 26, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

This man is quite mad.He is way in over his head because its obvious that he has no comprehension of economics.Thank you,young naive voters.You came out of the woodwork to vote for this man when you don’t understand the world.Now with his mistakes,it will be on your shoulders to pay for it all.I’m through.

Posted by: Don Foster | February 26, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Jake,
Can’t drown anyone with truthful statements. Can’t drown anyone with cogent arguments.
Read about credit default swaps. Read about asset backed securities. Educate yourself!
Jindel pointed to the poor federal response to Katrina. I guess he forgot about the Republican president who named the man who’s experience was in horse shows to be the head of Fema.
And I think you may have forgotten the Republican policy of naming regulators who believe in zero regulation, the ones who fought against regulating hedge funds and the investment banks who invented uncapitalized credit default swaps and toxic asset backed securities.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

One of the promises made by Obama was that he would eliminate earmarks…the new budget contains 9,000 earmarks. Let’s start there…let’s embrace the false words of “transparency and governmental responsibility”. Any responsible news network would shine a very bright light on the nature of this issue alone…not to mention all of the rest of the proposed budget which does nothing but promote class warfare and make promises of cash for programs that haven’t even been designed! Stations like yours were quick to inform viewers of the contents of the stimulus plan….after it passed.
This budget is more irresponsible than the stimulus plan….we are just tossing money onto a fire and standing by to watch it burn….when the fire burns low, just add more dollar bills onto the flame.

Posted by: D. B. G. | February 26, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Don Foster,
If ONLY we could have the genius Republicans who destroyed the U.S. economy running things!
Get a clue! Uncapitalized credit default swaps were invented in the private sector.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Obama makes plans to take the very food from our mouths while his buddy Pelosi in a drunken stupor at her good fortune, uses the tax dollars you earned John, to take her family on a lovely trip to Italy. How does that make you feel? Do you also support her highness so unreservedly?

Posted by: Jack | February 26, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Oh…and one more thought……everyone sees just how much the rich care about those who live on much less. Take a look at the jets they waste our hard earned money on. And how about those outrageous bonuses they gave and accepted…..stealing the taxpayers money. They should all be ashamed. You don’t see the poor and middle class having perks like that. We appreciate the fact that we have jobs and a way to support our families. And what about those who have lost their jobs. As far as I’m concerned….all those who have the most should give every bit of their wealth to those who have lost everything.

Posted by: Michele | February 26, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

you mean like Pelosi just did Michele?

Posted by: Jack | February 26, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

If Obama wants to change our nation for the better, he will DECREASE spending, not increase it. To me, President Bush’s greatest blunder was fiscal irresponsibility. Increased spending from the current administration is NOT a change of course at all.
I am firmly opposed to ANY increased government spending, be it from the Democratic or Republican party.

Posted by: Nathan | February 26, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Frank again,
Tax cuts targeted to any group are spending.
Economic effect on government: EXACTLY THE SAME.
Economic effect on the recipient: EXACTLY THE SAME.
So we have this huge expenditure, that turned the budget surplus that Clinton left into the record Bush deficit, for the BENEFIT OF THE FEW.
The CBO has studied this quite closely. Increase in economy: A tiny amount. Cost in tax recepts: VIRTUALLY THE WHOLE DEBT.
Educate yourself!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

CHANGE?! RIGHT! A change from capitalism/DEMOCRACY to COMMUNINISM!!!!!! So many campaign promises and now so many LIES and broken promises! Spending trillions of – pork barrels – is not going to help the country in any way…just make us further in debt…little about building up the economy nor JOBS for the American people! You obviously have no idea how to run a country. You knew all about the problems at hand when you campaigned for the position! You are a traitor and should step down and let someone w/experience and knowhow handle the Republic of the United States of America!!!!!!! None of the bills you’ve passed have been honest nor fair! This is NOT what America is about. We do not like the direction our country is heading! You’ve broken your pledge for transparency, bipartisanship (No hearings or debates?), morality, on and on. I’d like also to know why you still have tax evaders on your staff, namely Rahm Emanuel and Tim Geithner? And what about Hillary Clinton and Bill, re: financial deals? You can’t have two sets of rules. What’s happening to our Republic is a JOKE…but NOT a VERY funny one!

Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Nathan,
So kids shouldn’t borrow money for their education, right? THAT IS SPENDING.
People shouldn’t borrow money for their home, right? THAT IS SPENDING.
Invest in renewable, American sources of energy OR WE HAVE NO FUTURE.
Invest in education OR WE HAVE NO FUTURE.
Invest in science and technology OR WE HAVE NO FUTURE.
Invest in a universal health insurance program OR BE AN IMMORAL REPUBLICAN.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Bush in the last 4 years essentially has handed over the treasury to special interests who ultimately supported his re-election. I’m sorry to say I voted for him. He was an unmitigated disaster.
Obama is simply trying to give back to the middle class what bush has handed off to the wealthy during his term. The republicans scream tax cuts … right – the only place tax cuts went to is to line the pockets of the wealthy and CEO’s already getting more than 300 times that of the average worker They sure did not help the middle class.The rich essentially bribed the Republican Congress to give them more.The country gor what we are in now.
To all you geniouses out there complaining – not all of us have the resources and more importantly the ability to get into harvard. Some of us have an IQ of less than a hundred and work behind retail counters, waitressing, picking up trash and so on
When does the equality of a human being and his or her honest labor catch a break.
Al
Go Obama!

Posted by: Al | February 26, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

It is my opinion that Obama’s plan has more to do with some kind of massive ego
trip that he is on,he must just love to
listen to himself talk. It’s almost like
he is still campaigning for the office.
Personally his policies suck and I’m a registered democrat. He seems to be inte
nt on creating a welfare state in which
everyone feels entitled. Plus the fact
that he has appointed alot of his cronies from Chicago’s corrupt political
machine to his cabinet, making Obama look very stupid to me and I’m no rocket scientist, but I do know that my friends along with myself pay our taxes
and pay our mortgages on time and have for the last 49 years. HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED !

Posted by: Edna and Bob | February 26, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

I really think it SUCKS!!!!
Where has the stock market gone since we knew he was going to be President?
I don’t want my grandchildren and their kids to have to pay for this blunder and irresponsible leadership.

Posted by: Rick | February 26, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.
Margaret Thatcher

Posted by: anonymous | February 26, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Edna and Bob: “Obama should be impeached… because of my opinion.”
I think there might be some actual requirements named in the Constitution before you impeach the ELECTED president of the United States.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Regina: I like your list. But I would add one more. Term limits for everyone in Congress – no more than 12 years.

Posted by: Meg W. | February 26, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Yep, we’re screwed. Thanks Mr Prez

Posted by: Ed | February 26, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Yes…Jack…..just like her…and anyone else who does it as well. I’m not the only one who sees how corrupt government is. Look at the untold waste our hard earned money goes for thanks to the goverment and it’s spending. I’m not saying that this country isn’t in a mess.If there wasn’t so much waste and corruption by the gov and the wealthiest, we may not be in such dire straights. And I don’t care if the wealthiest pay more taxes, as well they should.

Posted by: Michele | February 26, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Republicans are immoral.
They say they are against ‘socialism’.
Does that mean they want to end Social Security?
Does that mean they want to end Medicare?
Does that mean they want to end medical benefits for our Vets?
Do they think the GI Bill was a mistake?

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

His talk of “personal responsibility” while creating more and more entitlements is a real joke, but I’m not laughing!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Chinese Proverb
If we don’t change the direction we are headed, we will end up where we are going.
People are upset and want to continue in the ways they always have. . . .but that hasn’t worked for 8 years. As hard as it is, maybe we need to change direction.

Posted by: Connie | February 26, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

By the way all of you irresponsible democrats out there should look at what your grand tax cut is going to net you. You should be drooling over the $13 a week that your getting. That’s $800.00 for the year
If you are economically savvy you will know that under the GW Bush tax cuts you were getting over $1200.00 a year. But I guess nobody in the media bothered to tell you that.

Posted by: ick | February 26, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

I am against any form of spending MORE money. Basic economics from high school teaches, or at least it used to teach, that if you do not have the money it is not wise to keep spending and going further in debt. This is nuts! The healthcare discussion is a farce beyond intelligent reason. The government has NEVER been able to successfully run any sort of healthcare program (Medicare, Medicaid, Champus/Tricare) – what in the world are they thinking?
If he taxes the rich – they will quit spending as much which is BAD for economy. If he raises taxes on businesses, they will cut back jobs and production – more bad news. It does not make any sense to fix stupid and irresponsible spending with MORE stupid and irresponsible spending.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, TEACH a man to fish and he can eat forever. Giving people more and more government handouts does not fix anything, it just perpetuates the problem. I am scared for our future and the future of my kids and grandkids. Leaving the country looks more and more like the only option we may be faced with.
Sick to death!

Posted by: DJ | February 26, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Insanity is when you keep repeating Republican economic policies over and over, expecting a different result.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Insanity is when you keep repeating Republican economic policies over and over, expecting a different result.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

We have to remember to look at the bigger picture. If you see only the Government and the budget and forget to consider what is happening in our neighborhood, to make the connection between what is proposed to be funded and how these issues are related then it is easy to pass the proposed budget off as foolish, or expansive. The truth is, we are in trouble because of choices and decisions we made in the past – one example, the de-regulation of the banking industry. If we don’t take the opportunity now to rectify the indiscretions of the past, we will have a serious failure and collapse. Don’t be afraid to contribute resources we have available and in potential to strengthen our society. Remember, we are in a society, an agreement between all of us that we will abide by the interest and consideration of the greater good.

Posted by: GMacMillan | February 26, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

John–It’s hard to understand your point, and your finish is arrogant and insulting, but this much I will say–tax cuts for those who pay taxes (that is, taking less of one person’s hard-earned money) is quite different from taking money from one family and giving it to someone who pays no income taxes. That is not a value judgement, just a statement of fact. The only way they are equivalent is if you believe that all wealth belongs to the government, and we are granted what portion of our earnings that our leaders allow us to have. That is not how a free market and free society work. There are a lot of reasons to create programs that support our fellow citizens in need. But we should not get confused about the fact that demanding less of those who pay all the bills is different from spending on government programs, however worthwhile.

Posted by: Frank again | February 26, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

I think the spending is needed. When people don’t have jobs the crime rate goes way up. What good will wealth do when the wealthy won’t be able to step out of their homes for fear of being robbed or kidnapped. Americans let “FREE ENTERPRISE” the wealthy, move textiles and manufacturing over seas to cheaper labor, then our LEADERS let all services be outsourced too…we have nothing left to sell to the world except our military, but we don’t collect any money for going to other countries and trying to make them stable! People need to get real, there are no jobs for people to go work! What should we do with all the people when their unemployment benefits stop…cut taxes for the rich and big companies…been there, did that, gave them LESS government and this is where we are at now. Sorry America, the moral of the story is that our business and political leaders do not have morals, hence, you have to police everyone because you can’t trust anyone, especially the richest of us…The Republican plan is socially Darwinistic, and does nothing for people who have lost their homes and jobs. Its funny that the only Republican state that gives more than it takes from this country is Texas, and that is only because there is no competition within the oil markets. Republicans, you have failed and we are reaping the effects of that failure today and will be for years to come. You want the poor and jobless to suck it up, well it is your time to suck it up, your not afraid of debt, you are really afraid that Obama will be successful as that will destroy any faith in Republican leadership and values…

Posted by: jimbo | February 26, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

For Goodness Sake,
Finally the USA has president who will honestly say what the Federal Government is spending and address spending priorities in an adult mature way, respecting reality and our ability to engage in the conversation intelligently. Does anyone think we would be in the financial straits we are currently in EXCEPT for fuzzy accounting practices and dishonesty?
Please, the entire Iraq war was sham, as was the Government’s accounting of it.
I, for one, find honest talk about budgets very refreshing. Please stop the hyperbole.

Posted by: USMC Vet | February 26, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Love it! It’s about time that the people of the United States had a president who cared about them and not the extreme wealthy. We stood up to take back our republic by voting him into office and I’m proud to see him doing his best to be true to what he campaigned for.
The irresponsible and greedy conservative era is coming to an end. Listen to them all screeching hysterically about socialism, when we just had a narrow escape from fascism. The people are rising against the elitist few – don’t let yourself be fooled by ultraconservative talk: they just want to build more MacMansions and stockpile more multimillion dollar bonuses at the expense of you and your children and grandchildren.

Posted by: Nancy | February 26, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

The government has never had a problem taxing a single segment of the population. They will raise taxes on tobacco and put extra taxes on smokers, or alcohal to tax people who drink, but they are supose to shut up and pay the tax but when you try to tax the upper class we are all to feel sorry for them and give them a pitty party

Posted by: TRAXZ | February 26, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Throwing money at a problem isn’t the best way to solve it. Restricting charitable donations because the gov. is going to take over all the feeding and care of the poor, etc. is the best way to create gov. jobs. Taxing small business that earns over (gross or net?)250,000 is the best way to eliminate jobs in the private sector.

Posted by: jan | February 26, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

It’s about time we started investing in America again, and that’s precisely what President Obama’s budget proposal does.

Posted by: Air Force Dave | February 26, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Every time President Obama speaks, the stock market tanks. Without capital investments in the nation’s companies, all of his plans will come to nothing, since tax revenues will disappear. The rich will always find ways to keep from paying excess taxes. The only thing left is more borrowing leading to national bankruptcy. “Obama Shifts Course with $3.5 Trillion Budget” means this country is going off course at light speed.

Posted by: Doowrehs | February 26, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

What’s amazing to me is how hard I’ve worked for many years to reach the bottom end of the group that will pay significantly higher taxes, and how so many who have not worked as hard, or not worked at all will benefit. Universal healthcare? Houses for everyone? Spending beyond one’s means? Bah Humbug. Instead of contributing more to society, I think I’ll spend the next 8 years figuring out how to transfer large sums of money from society.

Posted by: tired of contributing | February 26, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Hey, We just elected Robin Hood!

Posted by: Peter | February 26, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Frank again,
Econ 101: MONEY IS FUNGIBLE.
You can no more distinguish between one dollar and another than you can one electron and another. Bills have a serial number, but it has no economic effect.
There difference between the dollars coming out of my middle class pay check and the dollars FLOWING TO the pockets of the wealthy under the Bush tax program.
So yes, I am afraid it is true. The money subtracted from my pay check. The money was sent to the wealthy. It was transfered from the middle class to the wealthy.
Insulting? Take an honest look at the Republican economic theory. Republicans can’t get a sentence out of their mouth without saying ‘how important’ the wealthy are.
Read George Will as he complains about the transfer of money, in his opinion, from the ‘winners’ (read ‘wealthy’) to the ‘losers’ (read those who make less than $250K.
This is the dark soul of the Republican theory of economics. Didn’t you know?

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

This is just about as bad as the California budget. What is the point of the stimulus package if you are just going to tax businesses? Jobs aren’t going to be created, they’re going to be cut.
This is classic Robin Hood – Tax the rich and give to the poor.
It also follows another ideology: Socialism.

Posted by: Economics Major at UCDavis | February 26, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

I believe that borrowing all this money is selling our kids future. we will be selling the future of our country to the banks who are already taking more of our money because of bad practices..
This will not change what will happen, only make us more in debt.

Posted by: neil gamble | February 26, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

President Obama implied that he would generate $900,000,000,000 in taxes by taxing the rich. In what dream world does he know enough rich Americans that make $2.5 to $4.5 trillion a year to generate this level of taxation?

Posted by: Doowrehs | February 26, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

For the past 20 years, the promised bounty of globalization has been slopped up by the wealthy in this nation. What did the middle class get? 40 hour work week-GONE. Healthcare–evaporating. College for our kids–priced out of reach. National infrastructure–collapsing.
Now we’ve elected someone who’s going to expand the middle class, rebuild our infrastructure, make sure we can get decent medical help for our families.
How am I supposed to feel for the upper 5% that will have to scale down their McMansions, or the Companies that are going to have pay the taxes on the money they’ve been hiding in the Bahamas? Wait, let me whip out my violin to set the mood just right … !

Posted by: Michael Collins | February 26, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

tired of contributing,
Under Bush, you were on the receiving end of transfers of wealth, right out of the pocket of the middle class.
It is Republican orthodoxy that the wealthy are virtue. The middle class not so much.
I say, an economic theory that it is just an accident that the wealthy got wealthier while the middle class wages went backward has missed the point.
I say, an economic theory that says all that matters is efficiency isn’t really concerned with high paying jobs staying in this country.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Just one more comment. Obama has not repremanded Pelosi for having a private jet, that costs $60,000 one way to CA, and $60,000 back every weekend, using our tax money. Let’s see how much does that add up to in a year? I guess that is just a hickup amount?

Posted by: Jan | February 26, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

I am scared to death at what I see. There is not enough detail to execute the distribution of so much money and there are millions in a holding pattern. No one seems to know what the taxes will really be and so much is up in the air.I want hard working Americans to be able to work and have what they earn. It will take years to do EMR. It is an extremely difficult and time consuming task. I am not sure how much we gain by extending unemployment benefits.We need to work and earn and PRAY!

Posted by: Ga Girl | February 26, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Seems to be way too much happening way too fast…I wonder how much thought and care is going into these lightening speed decisions where multi-trillions of dollars are being spent of money that does not belong to the federal government, but to the American people…may be a trainwreck waiting to happen. Moving this fast on such monumental issues is scarey…could be a cliff ahead and we may not be able to slow down.

Posted by: Richard | February 26, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

You asked me a simple question. And my simple answer is yes, yes, yes!

Posted by: Phyllis Stokes | February 26, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

The title of this article should read: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need–Socialism in the US”
Of course this plan won’t work…taking money from those who have earned it to give it to the second-handing parasites at the bottom is a gross infringement of the principles of this country.

Posted by: Atlas | February 26, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

neil gamble,
Are you against college students borrowing money to pay for their degree?
Then it makes perfect sense that you think America should not invest in a future where we depend on renewable, American sources of energy.
Then it makes perfectg sense that we should let our industrial companies DIE under the burden of providing health insurance for their employees.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

I believe that presidents Obama’s plan is the most dangerous policy every pursued by a U.S president. Luckily we have checks and balances in our country that will allow us to somewhat reverse course or stop the insanity in two years. Hopefully it won’t be to late.

Posted by: Ken | February 26, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

I think this is absolutely WONDERFUL ! At long last, after 3 decades….the wealthy & business is FINALLY going to be forced to pay their fair share !
KUDOS PRESIDENT OBAMA !

Posted by: nthrnNYker | February 26, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I grew up in Eastern Europe and I have to say that Obama sounds very much like our leaders back there…
Yes, you did have a free state health care but if you wanted a rotten tooth fixed not pulled out you *HAD TO* pay the doctor under the table.
I only wish I was wrong… Barak – just go to Eastern Europe – EVERYBODY will tell you that socialism DOES NOT WORK!

Posted by: Agnes | February 26, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

It’s easy to be generous with somebody else’s money. The government has become like a starving beast, with no end to it’s hunger, and apparently endless taxpayer money to call upon.
I wish they would quit falling back on, “well, he did it first!” We don’t care which side of the aisle anymore. Just quit spending my as yet unborn granddaughter’s future paycheck!

Posted by: Just Jen | February 26, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Atlas tells us exactly why the Republicans like taking money from the middle class and giving it to the rich:
“…taking money from those who have earned it to give it to the second-handing parasites at the bottom is a gross infringement of the principles of this country”
Translation: The middle class == Second hand parasites

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

This should be the slogan-
“A New Era of Irresponsibility: Renewing America’s Failures”

Posted by: Frankie | February 26, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

$3.5 trillion divided by $350 million Americans = $10,000 per person. Wouldn’t it just be better to let each person keep that $10,0000 in the first place?

Posted by: Fred | February 26, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Richard-’Seems to be way too much happening way too fast’
How ‘fast’ were we pushed into diktator bush’s war of convenience ?

Posted by: nthrnNYker | February 26, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Preserves Social security till 2041.
Emphasis on health care, energy, education/Technology. There is an emphasis on bringing back the middle class, and regainig our status as the healthiest, wealthiest and smartest country in the world. Baby boomers over 55 can continue to be productive via community service, personally I would love to teach when I retire, this budget definitely.
I don’t the wealthy class is going to dissappear, to rephrase the gospel “the wealthy we will have with us always”.

Posted by: daniel | February 26, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Just Jen,
You know how they started Google?
Took an idea.
Borrowed a lot of money.
Provides something society needed.
The reason you don’t comprehend Obama’s investments in the future is that you really don’t have an entrepreneur’s spirit.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Lack of infrastructure investment and under-taxation of the wealthy is what got us into this mess. I’m not talking about people that make 200k or even 300K per year. I’m talking about the people with 10s of millions of dollars (or much more).
The more money people have beyond their basic needs, the greater the risk they are willing to take. We’ve had way too much high risk capital floating around looking for greater and GREATER risks. It’s not surprise that the whole thing collapsed.
Exactly what did we get for the excesses of the past 10 years? What if all that money had been spent on k-12, highways, bridges, damns and levies.
It’s time to reward WORK above speculation and gambling. Yes, capital investment in SOUND ideas is desirable. Unfortunately, rich people have had SO MUCH MONEY that they can’t be bother to dwell on what’s a good idea and what is high-risk gambling.
Obamas got the right idea. Tax the wealthiest a bit more and the excessive speculation will decrease. We’ll use the money to rebuild the nation instead of wasting it like we have been.

Posted by: Michael Collins | February 26, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

I trust that good decisions have been made.On caps on charitable donations, I feel the middle class will offset any losses and may even increase their donations. I wish they would elimate those caps on FICA. If all of may income has to be taxed why not tax all of everyone else’s? I wish the income taxes could be 1/2% for every 10 thousand dollars with all income being taxable. Earn 100,000 pay 5,000, everyone pays the same rate, business included. I would like for EIC to remain in force so that those people could atleast stimulate the economy at tax reward time. Yes reward because refund would no longer apply and we could elimate 95% of the cost of running the IRS. All the spoiled brats need to realize other people exist, good hard working people who deserve cridit for all they have done. I believe everything is going to work out, get over it.

Posted by: Paula | February 26, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Obama is going to destroy this country.
What is the matter with the American people, do they understand what is going on here. I do not think the American people get what this president is doing to America. This all about power and we are risking loosing our democratic form of government.

Posted by: John Kapler | February 26, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

We have a bizarre set of circumstances… A president that has never actually led anything. A congress full of people led by a president that has not done anything. A house leader that should never lead anyone… good god CA wake up and vote that woman out…
Politicians seem to be stuck on the old adage that we are Americans and we can over come this… then they need to realize that as Americans we need to actually have something we can build and sell… that will turn this around. They have endorsed giving it all away to China or India or Korea, and the American manufacturing base is all but gone. We have nothing to sell anymore that will generate jobs, to pull us out of this.
We have been sold to the lowest bidder.

Posted by: scout2112 | February 26, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

I fail to see how I or anyone esle is going to benift from increaseing tax’s. These increase’s will deminish a person’s dissposable income. We will not have the money to make purchases that will drive any recovery.
Someone try and remember where they heard “Redestribute the Wealth” from. Sound familar?

Posted by: Bill | February 26, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

this spendning bill is the most drastic, socialistic means to government we have seen in decades. Our founding fathers gave us the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Yet democrats destroy life (abortion), squash liberty (fairness doctrine bill), and now want to steal from people that have built their American dream. I am sorry we are not guaranteed happiness, just the pursuit of it. Where in the hell did someone get the idea that someone owes me something mentality?

Posted by: Mitch | February 26, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

John,
Hahaha! Did they let their investors have a say, or did they just make them do it?
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
Have a great day! Say no to wasteful spending. $200K for tatoo removal anyone?

Posted by: Just Jen | February 26, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

An amateurish presidency with absolutely no idea of what sound economics are. Keynesian economics is a complete fraud.
I’ll give some advice to Obama (and it’s free)- End the damn wars. Bring all of the troops home. Close ALL of our foreign military bases. End ALL foreign aid (no exceptions). Stay out of the market and offer NO funds for the businesses that aren’t solvent. Reclaim all of the bailout money plans. End ALL regulation of the “free market”. Abolish the Federal Reserve. Restore commodity based money per the Constitution (Article 1 section 8).
Leave Americans alone. End the Patriot Act. End all torture.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

micheal-’under-taxation of the wealthy is what got us into this mess—What if all that money had been spent on k-12, highways, bridges, damns and levies.’
That’s exactly my point ! If the wealthy & businesses had paid the same share/percentage of their incomes as the poor/middle class do and did for the past 30 years , there would be no budget deficit today.

Posted by: nthrnNYker | February 26, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

During the campaign Obama promised a tax cut to 95% of the middle class. That has now morphed into 95% of the working middle class-eliminating college students, and retired fixed income middle class. So some budget. also as feared the new leaders are funding everything they can think of , from the smallest to the largest waste projects they all could dream of and drowning us in debt for decades. nothing here sounds like reluctant cuts to anything!
save where?

Posted by: richard Mayer | February 26, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

This is so unfair to our children and grand children and great grand children. When did we become a nation of lazy people!
Why have I been making double payments for my house every month? I could have stopped making payments months ago.
What is he going to do with $3,500,000,000,000? Who does he think he is? Why are we letting him do it!

Posted by: voter/taxpayer | February 26, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Fred,
Take $3.50 Trillion and divide it between 350 million people and you get… Alaska.
Actually, you get welfare (hence the comparison to Sarah Palin’s Alaska!)
A heathy economy should:
1. Put people to work.
2. Make stuff needed in the economy.
3. Pay the workers.
4. Invest in the future (even if you have to borrow money — the founders of Google did it)
All of this has fallen apart under the Republicans.
Real wages for the middle class have been in decline since the Republicans took the Whitehouse.
Maybe it is time for some leadership! Lucky the American people hired one.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

voter/taxpayer,
Ask Bush: “Why did you put the economy into a $100 Trillion dollar downturn?”
It is not just the economy that is bankrupt. It is the whole Republican philosophy.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Has any democrat out there taken a course in Statistics?
Statistical Truth: 85% of American workers are employed by companies with 50 employees or less.
Uh..hum…It’s all about small business..stupid!
Unless you are working on the proposed LasVegas to DisneyLand rail-line – expect your employer to be hit with huge tax increase in 2 years to pay for the 789 bil in Obama pork. Oh…yes, I almost forgot…don’t complain to your boss about your 1% raise. You should be glad you have a job between now – 2 years because nothing is stimulating your employer’s business.

Posted by: Frankie | February 26, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Richard Mayer,
Were you awake during the campaign?
Obama said he would cut taxes on 95% of working Americans during the campaign.
McCain accused Obama of wanting to help people welfare, but Obama’s focus has always been on the hard working middle class. Unlike the Republicans.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

With any negotiation,you start with a high number. He’s putting the game into play.

Posted by: Denver, CO | February 26, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

You know what folks? 52% of you voted him in…AND he told you EXACTLY what he was going to do…which is now what he is doing. Redistributing wealth…what little of it is left after the last six months! That is what he promised to do! Woo Hoo…a politician who does what he promises, imagine that!
Every day I wake up and watch the news (it is like a train wreck) and wonder what liberty the government attempts to take away next. Whether it be the right to own my own labor (for those who don’t understand…that means MY income) or the right to raise my children as I see fit (see “Child Rights Treaty)…I see my liberties slowly being erased…for the “good” of us all.
Obama wants to tax people making $250K or more. This is what I envision happening…the spouse is just going to quit working to push them back into a lower income taxing bracket. Then guess what happens? Obama (although to be fair, Congress is responsible for passing the budget) is going to tax THAT income bracket next…and on and on. Do people not get that? And of course, we can’t forget about the people that want the government to “take care of them”. Give me a break people. YOU are responsible for taking care of you. Not the government. Have my fellow Americans lost all of their backbone to get up off their lazy butts and do what it takes to take care of themselves?? I agree health care needs reform…but get educated people! The reason it needs reform is because the GOVERNMENT runs it now! Hello? This is one of the largest entitlement programs! What evidence do we have that the government can do anything efficiently? Answer: NONE. Oh yeah…I want the government to be in charge of my health care. Let’s rely upon logic here people…simple logic.

Posted by: Jen | February 26, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Let me begin by saying that my husband and I do NOT have an income that exceeds $250K/year so the tax hike won’t affect us (at least THIS one won’t). However….what about the doctor who spent 4 years in college, 4 years in med school, then another 2 – 8 years specializing? Are we going to penalize these people for making more than $250k? What about their investment? Their time, their effort, their massive school loans? Ditto for other careers/job that require intensive training and preparation? Can anyone say FLAT TAX? Don’t want to beat that drum but it would be FAIR TO EVERYONE and the research shows that a 10% flat tax would solve ALL our budget problems…….

Posted by: engineerwho | February 26, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

John,
The Dems had the House and Senate. Did you forget? Also the markets didn’t start to tank until Obama took a lead in the polls.
I’m moving to Sweden. They are less socialistic than we will be soon.

Posted by: toJohn | February 26, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Obama and his administration reminds us of someone we watched at a casino routlette ta table some years ago overseas on job assignment. He was betting like there was no tomorrow,and for him there probably wasn’t. What our ‘establishment’ political parties, both sides of the aisle, have been doing for a decade or so is absolutely not what our Founding Fathers intended. Good grief, Charlie Brown. We have met the enemy and he is us, said Pogo, as he looks at Washington.

Posted by: Jim | February 26, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

As an American I have never been so afraid for my Country. Our representatives pass these major bills and policy changes without benefit of reading it and debate. How can they criticize bankers when Nancy Pelosi flies around in a private jet and she’s bankrupting the country

Posted by: vkrebs | February 26, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

In a time long long ago, in a land far far away, there came upon the face of that nation a beast called Bolshevism.
Now, it is today, and the land is here, and guess what has resurrected itself from the dustbin of history: Bolshevism.
We’re in for a rough ride, folks.

Posted by: D.N. McKay | February 26, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

In response to Mr. “Anonymous”, I SAVED every cent for my college education!
I SAVED every cent for my one and only car.
And I plan on SAVING every cent for an affordable house.
It isn’t impossible to save before you invest.

Posted by: Nathan | February 26, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Frankie,
Did you happen to notice the Republican economic catastophe?
Then, after blowing up the economy, they offer the solution: Reduce taxes on the upper 5%.
You might wonder if the GOP skipped economics in college when they ignore the economic facts of life:
Tax cuts for businesses don’t work during an economic downturn, because they aren’t going to hire until they see more customers.
Got that? Businesses won’t hire until they see more customers. Which means we need customers with more cash in their pocket.
This is why ALL economists say that extended unemployment insurance is very good for stimulating the economy.
This is why ALL economists say you should give people a payroll tax cut.
This is why this is exactly what Obama has done!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

President Obama has lurched to the far left in his budget. He’s proposing to write checks we can’t cash. Our kids and grandkids are going to pay this bill.
We hope ABC counts the responses, both pro and con, and reports the tally tomorrow.
Who would have thought that a Hollywood actor had more common sense than a Harvard grad!To grow the economy we need tax cuts across the board!

Posted by: deb | February 26, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

John,
Who do you think he is going to tax? The small business owner fall into this range to be taxed more. Don’t you remember Joe the plumber. Why do you think everyone was talking about that? Some people need to take a class in listening.

Posted by: toJohn | February 26, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

frankie-’expect your employer to be hit with huge tax increase in 2 years to pay for the 789 bil in Obama pork’
What a crock !
They are getting a ‘huge tax increase’ simply because they have been getting ‘huge tax breaks’ over the past three decades.
Now it’s time to pay the piper.
Nobody expects the wealthy or business to pay ANYBODYS way….we just demand that they pay an EQUAL share.
YES WE CAN !

Posted by: nthrnNYker | February 26, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I think Obama’s budget is 100% right on!! Thank goodness he will get us back on track! Hurray!

Posted by: RMG | February 26, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Dear John,
Once again. The Dems had the House and Senate. Did you forget again already?

Posted by: toJohn | February 26, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

The phrase, “Redirect vast sums of money from businesses and wealthier individuals to those with lower incomes…” is a very clear definition of SOCIALISM.

Posted by: OneLivingStone | February 26, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

I want freedom!!! I want to have less
goverment. Every time the politicians open their mouths the stock market crashes. We need another revolution. However, that is why they want our guns.

Posted by: Larry | February 26, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Sounds good to me. Anytime we can close the gap between the rich and the poor and create a larger middle class – it’s a good thing.

Posted by: Hank | February 26, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Eight years of vacuum in the White House has put us in this dire condition.
“Wishn’n Hopn” and more of the same “stand on the sidelines and watch” policy, isn’t the answer that is going to get us out of it.
These are the “Bold Changes” that the vast majority of American voters demanded.
This is not debt as much as it is the investment in America that will result in our nation’s children still having an America to govern for future generations.
We cannot afford to have an anemic economy for ten or fifteen years like some would accept. It will drastically jeopardize our national security and leave this nation open for our enemies to “kick us while we are down”.
The great mouthpiece, Rush Limbaugh, said that he hopes America fails under President Obama.
I have not figured who he hopes to pledge allegiance to if that would happen, but I certainly hope he does not accurately represent the attitude of Republicans who are now refusing to participate in the solutions.
America drastically needs programs that will take us off of foreign oil, rebuild bridges, roads, energy, electric grids, broadband and much more.
These are things that will make us more prosperous in the long term and for the short term, put people to work and rebuild our economy.
I’ve never seen a successful business that didn’t invest in itself, nor a successful country that didn’t do the same.
Bob

Posted by: Bob | February 26, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

YES WE CAN steal our childrens and grandchildrens future.. how much is too much? when he asks for yours, maybe? will you adore him then?

Posted by: tonthrnNYker | February 26, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

kidneystone-’”Redirect vast sums of money from businesses and wealthier individuals to those with lower incomes…” is a very clear definition of SOCIALISM.’
So what do you call the ‘redirection of vast sums of money from those with lower income to those wealthier individuals & business’ ?
THOSE DAYS ARE DONE !
YES WE CAN !

Posted by: nthrnNYker | February 26, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

This is not a Democrats Republican issue. This is about a person trying to take advantage of a bad situation and make a lot of $$$ off of us all.

Posted by: no more spending please | February 26, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

The American people voted for wealth redistribution… what happens when it’s all redistributed? Will the recipients have a spiritual awakening and think they should contribute something back or lay on the couch and flip on the free big screen in the free house and wait for the next hand out?

Posted by: brad | February 26, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

For those complaining about rolling back tax rates on the wealthiest 2% of taxpayers by 4.6%, it could be a lot worse. How about using the rates from 1955? Even with those rates, the country prospered.
Year Income Bracket Tax Rate
1955 $44,000-$52,000 59%
1965 $52,000-$64,000 53%
1975 $88,000-$100,000 60%
1985 $169,020 and over 50%
1993 (Clinton) $250,000 and over 39.6%
2003 (Bush) $250,000 and over 35%

Posted by: Chuck | February 26, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

“I will support President Obama and his ideas until he is proven wrong. PROVEN wrong.” – hang
Fine and dandy hang, the trouble is by that time it will be too late and we will all be doomed.
As responsible citizens we need to take a good hard look at what is being proposed and figure it out if it will work ahead of time so if it’s misguided we have the opportunity to stop it.
Oh, and it would be nice if the media got involved and lent a hand.

Posted by: Noz | February 26, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Houdini couldn’t make this budget work. We are rewarding non-pruducers with money we don’t have and encouraging the innovators to innovate where their assets are going instead of using them to bolster our economy. The flight of capital from this country will be unprecedented. Smart people figure it out and only tolerate so much. And our heinous congress be left wondering where are their tax dollars?

Posted by: contessabelle | February 26, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

toJohn,
I certainly remember unemployed, not really a plumber genius Joe.
George Will expressed the Republican viewpoint quite clearly. According to him, liberals want to transfer wealth from the ‘winners’, the virtuous rich, to ‘losers’, the unwashed middle class.
I have a different view. I see how the wealthy the prostituted Republican party to rewrite the rules to favor the ‘winners’ at the expense of the middle class.
Take Capt. Sullenberger, the pilot who miraculously performed a crash landing in the Hudson. His pay and his pension were shredded when the airline he works for filed bankrupcy.
Why do the employees and their pension claims come last in line when it comes to bankruptcy? That is simple enough. It is because the wealthy have wrote the check to the politicians who wrote the law to benefit… the equity owners. Surprise, surprise!
That is why George Will calls them ‘the winners’.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

contessabelle,
The middle class are ‘the producers’.
ABOUT TIME WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO KNOWS THAT!

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Call me a radical conservative, but I see this budget as nothing more than a means for forcing ideological academic theories onto the country.
This president and congress are rapidly digging a hole that is worse than the one dug by Bush and the congresses of his presidency.
Who in their right mind takes away tax deductions for charitable contributions? Only someone who thinks they can direct money better than the individual.
The media is failing the country by not examining the stimulus plan and the budget honestly line by line.
We are in desperate need of an independent media capable of separating themeselves from their ideological leanings, both left and right.
Without that, we are going to wake up one day and wonder why taxes are going up significantly for everyone, not just the rich. We are going to wake up and wonder how we continued the decade long slide to third-world status.
Obama is different from Bush but no better. He could possibly be worse and possibly worse for the economy than Jimmy Carter.

Posted by: jd | February 26, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

I read a prediction shortly after the inauguration that Obama would be impeached before the end of his first term. I think now is the time to begin taking steps in this direction. If you think jobs were leaving this country under a Republican administration, wait until the Democrats increased taxes on business kick into gear. The jobless rate will increase and before long all of us will be expecting the government to be making our house payments and paying our bills.

Posted by: Concerned Senior Citizen | February 26, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

tonthrnNYker:
What you fail to understand that those individuals who are very wealthy (and these are not the people making $250..these are the 5% of people that you claim got a tax break…these wealthy people are going to be able to continue to not have to pay taxes. Hello? The ultra wealthy of this country will, yet again, have their accountants and attorneys find the loopholes necessary to not have to pay those taxes. Obama will not achieve his goal of getting all of this tax money, so he will then come after the lower tax brackets. Or, alternatively, they could always become a democrat! Doesn’t appear they pay their fair share, now does it? Sounds like a great argument for the Fair Tax. Democrat/Republican…it makes no nevermind. It is about the revenue to the government and how they get to decide to spend it. Who pays to play?? When their is no opportunity to play (getting government favors), they will have to pay. Can you say FAIR TAX?? Let me type slower… F-A-I-R T-A-X. Did ya get it?? Do some reading..it would go along way to solving most of our ills…especially governmental curuption.

Posted by: Jen | February 26, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

It’s insanity! Say goodbye to America, the home of the brave and the land of the free, and say hello to America, the “restructured” home mortgage of the irresponsible and the land of the massive, invasive and oppressive government. Obama is rapidly killing the golden goose (producers, entrepreneurs, taxpayers, responsible citizens)and feeding it to the envious, the lazy, the illegal, and the losers who will gladly pig out until there is nothing left. We are doomed!

Posted by: bbkamm | February 26, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Say what you want about the Bush administration… My 401K has lost 20% since the Libs took over. I long for the Bush days. The anointed one is doing a great job of taking my money and giving it to LOSERS.

Posted by: brad | February 26, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

To hung: go and talk to a native American about the socialized medicine that the government gives them. It doesn’t work for them or anyone else.

Posted by: jbrown | February 26, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

toJohn,
Thanks for the old ideas from the old party.
It is my impression that the Rupublicans say that the jobs should go to the most ‘efficient’ producer.
It is my impression that the Republicans say that the market is self-regulating and all knowing and perfect and all good things come hence.
It is my impression that the Republicans say that the wealthy should pay NO income tax, NO cap gains.
These are the policies that have ruled America. And now the field they have sown has born a harvest of pestulance.
It is my impression that NO FACT will ever cause a Republican to change their philosophy, because… reality has a well known liberal bias.
AND SO FAR, I’VE BEEN PROVEN CORRECT.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

This is nothing more than socialism and another way to make millions of people depend upon government. The stimulus package is bad enough. Not one penny earmarked for immigration reform and patrolling the borders. Social programs, entitlements and medical care for illegal aliens and the 52 members of their families they bring over to take advantage of the gravy train is a big part of this crisis. So is spending money we don’t have. So this is the change we are supposed to believe in? What a joke!

Posted by: Steve | February 26, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

It is an honest budget, so obviously the republicans wouldn’t understand. Tax cuts, Tax cuts…You’ve had your tax cuts now pay the piper…
Your mess anyway…Take some responsibility for a change….

Posted by: TruthTime | February 26, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

john, actually the person dying of cancer who can’t get treatment because they don’t meet the criteria is coming down the pike courtesy of the new obama health plan: great care for those that can pay under the table only!

Posted by: tojohn | February 26, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

jbrown,
HOW MANY hundreds of thousands of people have to lose thier jobs before you WAKE UP.
This is the fruit of the Republican policies.
Uncapitalized credit default swaps were a free market invention.
Toxic asset backed securities were a free market invention.
Naked CDOs (credit insurance on other securities you don’t own == fire insurance on a house you don’t own) wer a free market invention.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

My husband and I are paying off the loans for our children to go through college, helping pay for childcare for a grandchild, drive 6 year old cars, have been on one vacation in the last 5 years. We have a mortgage we can afford. We have long term care insurance. Comfortable? Yes. Rich? I don’t think so. If we have to come up with the additional thousands of dollars President Obama wants us to pay, it will have to come from somewhere…our donations to our church, to the schloarship fund for at-risk high school students…where else?
America, what have we done to ourselves?

Posted by: Susan | February 26, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by
legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation.. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing
it..”
~~~~~ Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931

Posted by: Phil Povey | February 26, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Class warfare is NOT a responsible approach to balancing a budget. Obama doesn’t have a clue. We’re all up the creek!!!

Posted by: Dave in Atlanta | February 26, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

I START FEELING LIKE LIVING IN MY COMMUNIST MOTHER LAND SINCE AKA OBAMA TOOK OFFICE. THE DAMN GOVEMENT DOES PRODUCE JOB SO WHO PAY FOR THIS MASSIVE SPENDING? OBAMA IS STEELING MONEY FROM YOUR POCKETS AND MORE PEOPLE ARE ABOUT TO GET PINK SLIPS WHEN THOSE JOB PRODUCERS CAN’T AFFORD HIGH TAX THAT HE PROPOSES. I’M A YOUNG VIETNAMESE AMERICAN AND I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN PROUND OF BEING AN AMERICAN EVEN BEFORE HE TAKES OFFICE. WHAT MAKES OBAMA THINKS THAT HE NEEDS TO CHANGE AMERICA TO MAKE ANYONE OF US TO BE MORE PROUND OF THIS COUNTRY? I TELL YOU WHAT I’M SO FEAR OF THE OBAMA PEOPLE AND HIMSELF AS THEY ARE TAKING THIS COUTRY DOWN TO THE TOILET.

Posted by: Brandon | February 26, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

This isn’t what was promised to me. Fiscal responsibility and the reference to use a scalpel to cut spending.
Wow was I duped.
1 Trillion last week and 3 trillion this week.
I want my money back, or at the very least a re-vote. I promise I won’t vote the same way this time.
The markets loathe the man. Everytime he speaks, they drop by the hundreds.
I give…I give….uncle…uncle already. What’s it take?
How many signatures are required from the real governing force in this country. That real force being “We the People”. How many signatures required to impeach him. We are in charge, not Obama or Pelosi or Reid or any of them. We are. Maybe we need another civil war to fix this.

Posted by: Buyer's Remorse | February 26, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

tojohn,
Did you see that on the sci-fi channel?
NO DEMOCRAT has ever offered ANY PLAN that did not allow you to buy your own insurance or pay for whatever medical service you want.
Obama offered a plan during the campaign for the federal government to pay for businesses’ catastrophic health insurance premiums.
People who don’t have insurance through their employer would have the OPTION to purchase a plan from the government equivalent to that enjoyed by members of Congress.
THOSE ARE THE FACTS. But perhaps you actually prefer Republican fiction.
Every moral person knows that every American should have health insurance. That leaves out the Republicans.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Buyer’s Remorse,
Could we return Bush’s war of vanity in Iraq?
We could use the cash right now, to get out of this $100 Trillion economic hole you Republicans have given us.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

When do we get the chip in the hand?

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

I read quite a few of the opinions in this article and some fundamental assumption needs to be brought out and given some air.
First: republicans and democrats are both politicians. This puts them at a moral and ethical level just above Sea Urchins.
Second: If you don’t think that people who make more than 250,000 a year deserve more money, that makes you a socialist. If you think they do, that makes you capitalist, and if you think sometimes yes and sometimes no, that makes you a realist.
This country was founded by realists. By people who judged other people on their Individual merit (and groups by their group merit ect.) That was the American way. Prove your merit and stand proud among your peers.
To answer the question ‘What do I think of BHO’s Budget, it is honest where politically it is advantageous among the ‘independent’ voter bracket, and dishonest where he wishes for his intentions to remain hidden (through shear size if nothing else)
A question: Why would anyone hide their intentions?
I think it is dangerous due to its size. There could be a 50 billion dollar earmark for a PAC for all we know. If we don’t take the time to check it, we won’t know.
-DA

Posted by: Duncan A. | February 26, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Brandon,
Ask the Republicans who dug this $100 Trillion economic hole.
They ordered up a $3 Trillion war in Iraq.
They ordered up ZERO regulation of credit default swaps and now toxic asset backed securities.
You don’t want to pay the bill? Send the check to the Republican party.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

The BIG LIE. Every word is a calculated statement to lie to the American people. VERY DISTURBING
The BIG LIE. Every word is a calculated statement to lie to the American people. VERY DISTURBING!! VERY DANGEROUS for all Americans.
BORROWING from our CHILDREN. IMMORAL, UNCONSCIENCEABLE.
This is treason.

Posted by: Gary the Freedom Lover | February 26, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Dave in Atlanta,
You don’t like class warfare? Then ask the Republicans to reverse the transfer of money they engineered, out of the pockets of the middle class and into the pockets of teh wealthy.
Q: Why is it that the wealth of the top 5% went up during the Bush years at the same time the real (inflation adjusted) wages of the middle class went south?
A: Because that was the Rupublican goal.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

NO, EVERYONE SHOULD NOT HAVE HEALTHCARE. Where in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights is EVERY American granted healthcare?? Answer…NOWHERE!
Everyone must endure hardship at some point, and a lot will have to do it without healthcare. I’ve done it and so have millons of other people.
There are no Free Lunches or Free Puppies! Everything has a price. The sooner we get off the Obama “FREE” Bandwagon the better off we will all be.

Posted by: Dave | February 26, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Everytime Obama opens his dam mouth the stock market gets worse. I wish he would just hide under a rock for four years. This is not a republican problem where in. It is the dems that made banks lend to poor people that couldnt afford there dam house payments. Ask Barney Frank.

Posted by: dr3yec | February 26, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Yes. Richard Meyer, I was awake during the Obama campaign – but evidently you weren’t. Yes indeed Mr. Obama said he would cut taxes on 95% of working families. Sounds good right? Wrong! Obama is insulting us because he is betting that we will remain starry eyed to his speeches and not roll-up your sleeves and do simple math.
The 95% is based on year 2000 guideline for income taxes. Do you remember the suprise check you received in the mail from Feds when Bush instituted his tax cuts? Probably not. Dems hate Bush. Anyway, Obama plans on letting the Bush tax cuts lapse in 2010 which will raise the average american taxes from the 2007 level. So if you are making 75k/year, when the Bush tax cuts lapse – you will pay an extra $3000.00 in Fed taxes. If you make 50k/year – you will pay an extra $1500.00 in Fed taxes. Hence – tax increase for 95% of American families. Oh and yes, he plans on raising captial gains tax from 15% to 20%. So if you sell your non-retirement stock/mutual funds – you will get hit there too.
American citiziens are all in the same boat regardless of whether we are Rep or Dems. We can only pray that Obama’s plan will work.

Posted by: Frankie | February 26, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Why are people complaining…all Obama is doing is what he said he would do. I was warning people this day would come and to think this is only his first budget proposal. Thank God he doesn’t have a Super Majority!!

Posted by: Jim | February 26, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Gary the Freedom Lover says:
“BORROWING from our CHILDREN. IMMORAL, UNCONSCIENCEABLE.”
You must be complaining about the Republicans.
Or did you forget about the budget surplus !!! that Clinton left for Bush.
I’m sure that Bush left an even bigger budget surplus, right?

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

And another thing can someone please tell the dems to pay there taxes. Maybe we wouldnt be in this dam mess, if they did.

Posted by: dr3yec | February 26, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

I would like to thank the 65 million who voted this idiot into office. I would also like to thank Mr. Barney Frank and Ms. Pelosi for ignoring Freddie and Fannie 3 years ago when the FED and the Republicans said there was a problem with them…but Mr. Chairman of the Banking Committee (Barney-Baby) said: Oh, No, everything’s fine. Folks, we’re in this mess because of your Democratic Congress. You might also like to know that the Bush Administration questioned the way Fannie & Freddie were being run back in 2001, but the Dems shot it down. Do yourself a little history lesson…it’ll be surprizing who you find caused this dabacle. I don’t make 250 thousand a year and half of my savings (stocks) are gone…thank you once again, Democrats!

Posted by: Jerry Newman | February 26, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

It doesn’t matter, we’ll go with the 85/10/5 rule that can be applied in any situation… 85% are average or below, 10% are above average and make things happen, 5% are gifted and do amazing things. In Obama’s restrictive socialistic scheme things will go underground and create a thriving black market where the top 15% will still thrive.
I’m happily in the 10% crew and will prosper.

Posted by: brad | February 26, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

No one knows the answers to our fiscal problems, but you can’t just sit there and complain. Obama has advisors who are working for us, not Wall Street. It’s going to take several years to fix this problem. Don’t expect to see great news for another five years. The Republicans and the Democrats are both to blame for this. We all have to be on the same team. We are Americans, not Democrats or Republicans.

Posted by: Jack Morrison | February 26, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Health Insurance?? Hey I just want what he said we should all have before the election. The same healthcare they have in the congress and senate, $25.00 deductable and everything else is covered. Or was he just blowing smoke? If so hope he doubles his cigarette intake to help with the 300 billion child health care plan. You know, set by example.

Posted by: Paul Mitchell | February 26, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Frankie,
Were you in a coma during the campaign?
Obama is going to let SOME of the Bush tax cuts expire. The Bush tax cuts ***for those whose income is greater that $250K*** (filed jointly) are going to be allowed to expire.
Can you remember WHY the Republicans INSISTED on having these tax cuts expire? It all had to do with LYING ABOUT THE BUDGET.
By putting a sunset provision on the tax cut, which they never intended to allow to happen, they could write up budget deficit projections that did not include the very tax cut they love so much.
Republicans just can’t help but lie. It is in their nature.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

On the news tonight, a guy making over $250,000 a year was complaining because he will have to pay about $300 per year more in taxes. That’s less than $1 per day. I don’t think that will affect his lifestyle one bit. Too bad he’s not willing to pay $1 per day to help his country.

Posted by: think about it | February 26, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

GOVERNMENT WILL CONTROL HOW MUCH
HEALTH CARE YOU WILL RECEIVE.
IF YOU DO NOT CONFORM ….. NO HEATHCARE.
IF YOU ARE THE WRONG PARTY…. NO HEATHCARE.
If you think that using the IRS is a tool of the Government. You have not seen anything yet. Wait until your HEALTHCARE is DENIED becuase of your political views.
Our Founding Fathers feared too much power in the hands of a centeral government.
WE SHOULD AS WELL

Posted by: Medical Care Choice | February 26, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Frank again
RIGHT ON!!!!!

Posted by: Gordon | February 26, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Say good bye to the American dream. Obama is in the process of killing it.

Posted by: Frank | February 26, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

We have been on the path to total economic collapse for years….not just the last 8…however the lovely change that is now in motion will seal our casket!
We can kiss the American Dream goodbye..we have been circling the drain…life as we have enjoyed it….will be drastically different within 4 years!!

Posted by: Janet Graham | February 26, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Oh please people…this isn’t democrat or republican. Every democrat and every republican is to blame for what has been going on in Washington DC for quite some time. It didn’t start with Obama, didn’t start with Bush and it didn’t start with Clinton. It has just gotten bigger. Consequently, we are to blame for this mess because WE are the idiots that continually vote them into office. I mean, c’mon! Massachusetts should be ashamed to continually re-elect somebody like Barney Frank. He is an idiot! How much money do you think the House Financial Services Committee took in campaign contributions? Go check it out…Bank of America, CitiBank, Wells Fargo…oh they are all there. MILLIONS of dollars worth of contributions…republican and democrat alike. They are all corrupt. Again, take the money out of the picture and the politicians have to work for the people..not the lobbyists and special interests. Fair Tax…say it with me…Fair Tax.

Posted by: Jen | February 26, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I am dismayed that our great country is going down this path with no consideration for the consequences. How can it be fair to ask 2% of Americans to pay for everything. I don’t care how much they earn or have, it just is not fair. Every taxpaying American should participate when we through our elected officials decide we want government to provide something to us.
This will not work and this, along with reckless lending and borrowing, will be studied for the next three generations on how to ruin a great country.

Posted by: Fun Navigator | February 26, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Fun Navigator,
The consequences are HERE.
Republicans destroyed the American economy.
We will never forget.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Can the people of the U.S. really be so ignorant of the fact that we were already trillions of dollars in the minus because of loans from China? Why would anyone want a government that ownes us? China owns it’s people and regulates everything that each person does and look at it.That my friends is exactly what is going to happen to us, we are giving away our rights to freedom for money.God help us.

Posted by: Linda | February 26, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

HES AS CORRUPT AS THE PEOPLE WHO PUT IN IN OFFICE! CHECK THE BREAD CRUMBS.. ILLINOIS DEVELOPERS(CILINI) AND THE CHICAGO (DALEY) DEMOCRATIC MACHINE PAID $$$$ TO ELECT HIM TO HIS FIRST TERM AS SENATOR, THE PERSON WHO HAD THE SEAT WAS MAKING WAVES! THIS IS HOW HE REPAYS THEM… 3.5 TRILLION TIMES MORE!!! WAIT N SEE CHICAGO WILL GET MORE BILLIONS THEN ANY OTHER STATE.
oH YEAH WHAT DID HE DO AS A SENATOR? NOTHING BUT SPEND OUR MONEY CAMPAIGNING TO BE PRESIDENT. NO EXPERIENCE WHATS SO EVER.
mY WIFE COULD BE PRES, SHE KNOWS HOW TO SPEND LOTS OF MONEY, TOO.
LAST, THATS OVER 5O,000 FOR EACH PEROSN IN THE US. GREAT NOW I OWE CHINA 50,000!
I LIED, HE PLAYS THE RACE CARD ALL THE TIME BUT ISN’T HE HALF WHITE?
iM TIRED OF SEEING HIS FACE everY PLACE AND IM TIRED OF THIS KID TELLING AMERICA HE KNOWS BEST. YOU ALL GOT WHAT YOU VOTED FOR, THANKS ALOT.

Posted by: madeashell | February 26, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

John:
You are EXACTLY correct. And let’s not forget where is started. These loans wouldn’t have been even available had our so called regulators, aka House Financial Services Committee, loosened the requirements on lending to people who really shouldn’t have been in a house to begin with.

Posted by: Jen | February 26, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

If the republicans destroyed the economy why has the stock market not rebounded since obama took office? the stock market looks forward not backwards. I bet you will not even try to answer this question.

Posted by: to John | February 26, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Janet Graham,
Maybe the downfall began when Republicans made it a rule to never admit a mistake.
Have you ever heard any Republican admit that the war in Iraq was a mistake?
Bush’s vanity (pappy never went to Baghdad) is now estimated to have a full cost of $3 Trillion dollars. (You have to account for replenishment of equipment and ammo, and lifetime care for returning vets with brain injuries or missing limbs.)

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

What ever happened to free enterprise. Earn what you work for? Now we have to give money to people who don’t work for anything. Obama is going to get us in debt. He gets us in debt more and more each day that he is president.

Posted by: irishrose | February 26, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

to John,
To expect rational behavior by the stock market is not rational.
Seriously, the stock market has no idea and has had no idea, what new rot is going to be exposed from day to day.
The big banks are technically backrupt (meaning assets < obligations), but they don't want to use the market value of their asset backed securities.
And their losses are either completely covered by credit default swaps, or not, depending on whether the government is going to continue to cover AIG's losses.
Another reason the markets know nothing is because the future of the economy right now depends on the human factor. Businesses will not start hiring people until they see customers. There will be no customers until people see some development that makes them think we are getting out of this.
My own suggestion would be for the government to start making consumer loans. There are people who want to buy stuff, who have jobs, but just need a car loan, for example.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

I’m afraid there is NO WAY we can afford this president!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! People, you should be very, very afraid!

Posted by: Tom | February 26, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

The approach that is being taken is absolutely irresponsible. Action by itself means nothing. We are throwing out everything and starting all over again as a country. Is this the right approach? We are becoming a Socialist country if these ideas are adopted. And by the way, who says that health care should be free? It hasn’t worked so great in Canada.

Posted by: C.R. | February 26, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Obama says this is what we voted for.
Would he like to confirm that by having a special election in March?

Posted by: ragnar30066 | February 26, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

irishrose,
What ever happened to free enterprise. The truthful answer is that we have never had it, not since Teddy Roosevelt busted the monopolies.
Trully free enterprise has never worked well. When the iron and oil barrons ran the country we had child labor and an 80 hour workweek and come to work even if your kid is near death or lose your job.
We had a new taste of trully free enterprise when AIG sold God only knows how much in credit default swaps (unregulated financial insurance) without putting even 1% away into capital reserve.
Now the government is left with a choice between paying $100 billion to cover AIGs losses (so far!) or letting thousands of other financial institutions go belly up.
Markets are the product of man. Just like your government and organized religion. They are not perfect. They do not produce perfect results.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Republicans cry ‘socialist’ more often than the boy cried wolf.
When are the Republicans going to come out for the destruction of Social Security?
Be true to yourself!
We have tried your economic ideas and the U.S. economy is in the toilet. Without taking bold action, the economists think we will be stuck here for the next 10 years!
A fitting monument to the Republican arrogance.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

why doesn’t he just try to give homes to all the slum dwellers in India while he’s at it with our tax dollars.
it is the end of America and the beginning of a third world county that used to be called America and those of us with talent and resources will eventually be driven out, just as my 8th great grandfather was driven out of France in 1685. i don’t know where our future lies but it isn’t here as tax slaves.

Posted by: Linda | February 26, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Jen,
You show me where the House said: Unsecured credit default swaps? Great!
You show me where the House said:
Selling asset backed securities backed by junk mortages to banks all around the world? Wonderful!
These things were invented in the free market. But that doesn’t mean they were “good”.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I guess I’m in the minority, that is I will be one of those that is truly affected by this plan. My company employs 200+ and I’m missing where the incentive will be for me to expand my business, provide health care, employ more people and spend more money. If someone can explain to me where the incentive is to do these things I’M sure many of the other small to medium sized business owners would love to hear from you. By the way I voted for “O”.

Posted by: Bob | February 26, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Linda,
Giving all our jobs to people in India is the Republican ideal, isnt it?
Try not to be ignorant. The world pool of capital is afraid of both the stock and bond markets. These assets have fled TO U.S. Treasury bills because they are the safest place in the world.
Consequently, the U.S. government can borrow money at about 2% right now.
On the other side of the equation, there are people who want to take out a regular consumer loan to buy a refridgerator or car but there is a shortage of loans in the private market.
Logic would indicate that you want to take the resource from where it is in surplus (the government access to debt) and use it where it is needed (the U.S. economy).
And it is not just consumers who want but cannot get loans in the private market right now. Neither can small businesses. So again, logic indicates you should take the resource from where it is in surplus and use it where it is needed.
Just as a reminder: It does no good for our country if all our small businesses dry up.
Seriously, you should educate yourself as to what happened in Japan during the 90s. They didn’t deal with their economic downturn and they got stuck.
Do you seriously want that to happen here? If it happens, it will be the SECOND Republican Depression.

Posted by: John | February 26, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

This is good budget on present situation, It was nice to address of common citizen then uncommon, further they need to monitor that bank will provide money to small business then large.

Posted by: Swetu Patel | February 26, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

To Bob, the incentive is that:
1. People won’t be robbing your house or your business when you are at one or the other. You might not get shot or stabbed when you walk around the corner. Or your family might not get kidnapped for ransom like they do in Mexico Bob!
2. People might be able to buy the products at the end of your supply chain!
3. People might be educated when you go to employ them Bob.
The problem Bob, is that you are looking for what the stimulus package can do for YOU when you are doing fine! If you want a business loan to expand your business you should be able to get one easier now…but it’s not about making you richer. It’s about spreading the wealth because ten people making $50K a year is healthier for the economy than one person making $500K a year. If everyone could do what you do I guess we wouldn’t be in the mess we are in now.
If you are like most conservatives in the U.S., you pretend to be religious…well what would Jesus do??? He would really be all about cutting taxes for the wealthy so they would spend more, so poor can hopefully get our trickled down to…how quickly the conservative forget their Christian religion when it comes to money…

Posted by: Jimbo | February 26, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Make the small businesses the sucker. It is happening in Canada, Singapore, Hongkong, UK, India – as USA joins the crowd of government folks protecting their jobs.

Posted by: amber | February 26, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

The only thing about this budget that is crystal clear is that Obama has shown – yet again – that he is little more than a serial liar.
What promises has Obama NOT broken so far?
Never mind the “new” government so full of Clintonistas. Never mind all the tax cheats (don’t ordinary people go to jail for that) and lobbiests in this government that was supposed to be free of all of that. Never mind the promises about time to review legislation that were broken while the last stimulus package was rammed through. Let’s just talk about this budget.
During the third debate during the election, Obama was promising that in his government there would be a “net spending cut”. Now look at what we’re getting stuck with – where’s the net spending cut Obama promised the nation?
Meanwhile, the people that won’t say a peep about this keep squealing “Look at George Bush”. Well, Bush was nothing for anyone to brag about, but the way these people go on you’d think there wasn’t a Democrat in the country during Bush’s presidency. No Nancy Pelosi, no Barney Frank. Nope – all Bush’s fault; not a Democrat fingerprint on any of this. And now Obama is spending on a scale – just over a month into his presidency – which makes Bush’s spending look like a miser.
Karl Marx would be proud. The slogan “Change you can believe in” is going to take on an entirely now meaning when all you have left in your pockets is…
… change.

Posted by: Rick | February 26, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Bob,
I would say that the most important thing for your business is to see more customers.
Keynes showed in an economic downturn, that unless the government provides a temporary stimulus, the economy will go into a self-reinforcing loop where
there is less money in the pockets of consumers, leading to less demand for businesses, leading to layoffs and less money in the pockets of consumers.
The recently signed stimulus bill attenpts to provide this stimulus, but Nobel prize winner Paul Krugman says the size of the stimulus is insufficient (!) to replace the size of the economic production expected to be lost to the recession.
In any case, some stimulus money is thought to be more effective than others. For example, some economic classes are more likely to put “extra” money into savings than spend it. On the other hand, unemployment insurance is thought to be one of the most effective forms of economic stimulus.
Besides the hoped for economic stimulus, you may also be affect by more lenient tax loss recovery, and I believe there are also investment tax credits there too.

Posted by: John | February 27, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am

What sickens me is that I have a Rush Limbaugh loving, Republican living next to me that criticizes Obama while he collects disability from the government (he is not a veteran). I wonder where he would be without his entitlement. I bet he would have a quick 180 once those payments stopped.

Posted by: jimbo | February 27, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Rick,
Let me get this straight, Karl Rove (ur, Marx) would be proud of Obama because he has some people from the Clinton administration in his Whitehouse?
Didn’t he die before Clinton was prez?
Seriously, the only promise Obama has broken is his promise to be George Bush. Wait a minute. He never promised that.
But Obama did promise a tax break for 95% of working Americans.
Maybe you dislike him *because* he is honest and smart. The Republicans look a lot like the Dodo bird. A species who has outlived its usefulness.

Posted by: John | February 27, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

I think some of the junk you are saying is correct Rick. Both Clinton and Bush Sr. pushed for NAFTA that sent jobs to Mexico and later for Central America. Until we produce something that the rest of the world needs and wants our country will be NOTHING regardless of what party is in charge.

Posted by: jimbo | February 27, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

“The administration is attempting to redirect vast sums of money from businesses and wealthier individuals to those with lower incomes” can anyone give me a better definition of socialism?

Posted by: oneliving | February 27, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

This plan is a caricature of liberalism at its worst. (and I’m a registered Dem)
1) get OUT of Iraq now. We trashed their country and our own economy in the process. It’s one big expensive mistake and staying there is not making it any cheaper.
2) Get Osama B…just get him and get it over with and then leave. Invade the mountains of Pakistan if we have too. Get him, stick his head on a pole and then leave. If the rabble rousing starts back up, don’t waste time…come back and kick some butt and leave again until they get the message: cause problems, get your butt kicked.
3) Force a cap onto health care. No more $25 asprin. Insurance companies only get to pay so much and only get to charge so much. Hospitals can not sue patients for the rest nor can they refuse service.
To remained licensed, every year insurance companies have to go before a board and prove how they are streamlining their operations. The most streamlined gets their hefty application fee refunded.
4) get some control over the TARP program. CEO and execs that run the company into the ground go to jail. Period. They have their assets sold, their houses foreclosed and get to live like the rest of us if they screw up. If they do their job and grow the company, fine…they can have all the millon dollar bonuses they deserve.

Posted by: J | February 27, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I believe we have finally seen the change this country needs. The Bushwhacking years are done! Reality is setting in on the republicans and ABC news. I can only imagine what FOX news is saying, but since I will never watch FOX news again, someone else will have to tell me. Wait…I dont care!! I am tired as a working man, earning 50K to pay for the rich peoples luxury, it is time for the rich to pay!! As for the budget, finally someone TELLS us what it really is! What a relief!!

Posted by: Daveypa | February 27, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

oneliving, a better, in fact, the educated answer is that church is the most pure form of communism…but we know that conservatives just use it as a front to look like “good people”.
J – I agree with everything you said, but none of your solutions create more jobs, or stop businesses from sending them overseas. I happen to work for the United States LAST American owned and based semiconductor company. They are depending on the Taiwan government to give our company the money to move our research and development overseas…pitiful…Is this what you support???

Posted by: jimbo | February 27, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I agree J! The healthcare in this country horrible, top to bottom. When people will not see doctors, because of the bills it is not only wrong,,, it is as immoral as killing innocent civilians in war, because that is what is happening, IN AMERICA, by not giving them the healthcare thats needed!! yet the republicans will take the healthcare corporations millions for re-election, spin an new scare tactic…and bingo…they got the golden ticket!!!

Posted by: Daveypa | February 27, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

It was the first time last week I agreed with Glenn Beck when he was arguing with Bill O’Reilly. Beck essentially said that if this stimulus package does not go through, and it is not successful then the poor will eat the rich. He specifically said the word “revolution”. The wealthy really should be thanking Obama for staving off what is a reality if people get poor and hungry enough. Obama has seen it close up in slums of Chicago. Get it through your heads…people will, steal, cheat, and kill when they get poor and hungry enough. Everyone that wants the United States to remain a nation should pray that that Obama is successful.

Posted by: heavyguns | February 27, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Did I see correctly that the gentleman interviewed on ABC news said that he earned over 250 K and probably would not be able give to his favorite charities…as much, and they would be affected?? Give me a break…and increase of $300 in taxes is going to break a man earning over 250K?? did I miss something?

Posted by: Daveypa | February 27, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

You know, when you add up the numbers and look at the spiraling cost of the budget deficits that Obama says he wants, I really believe he is just setting this country up to collapse. How exactly do we pay for all this? I don’t care how much you tax the rich, or business, or all of us, nothing is going to take care of this vastly ballooning debt except bankruptcy. I guess that’s what’s next, after his second term and he’s safely out of the way. Bush got us firmly on the path, now Obama is just kicking that can on down the road.

Posted by: dwain | February 27, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

John,
I understand the end of the line, people do need to have money to spend, spending increases demand for products and business should expand. That part of the plan is fine but the other part appears to put the clamps on small business. For example if you hire an employee for 60,000 it cost the business approximately 90,000 to keep that employee due to FICA, Payroll tax, Workman’s Comp, 401 matching and the big one “health care” which is usually 30 -40 percent to the employee while the employer picks up 60 – 70%. With the tax structure being proposed this makes hiring decisions very difficult. In addition you have decisions for new equipment (machines, trucks, shop tools). These expenditures by small business is what creates jobs for other industries.
Oh, by the way Jimbo I’m not worried about me, I’m not talking GM or one of our great financial institutions, most small business is a little more structured like a family. I do care about my employees and they like me. I think they appreciate their jobs and benefits and fortunately we are still in good shape.

Posted by: Bob | February 27, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

There you go BOB, sounds like a man with experience in the employment end. But lets imagine a structure without workmans comp and healthcare costs from insurance company’s. If we can get healthcare for everyone, everyone pays, based on what they earn, not the company’s, eliminate the wealthy insurance companys and the people who make milions from people getting sick. I bet your cost would go way down, guess what, more employee’s. People making millions from people getting sick is wrong!! At least the budget has something with healthcare attached to it.

Posted by: Daveypa | February 27, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Obama’s push for change is something to appreciate, even if you disagree with his policies. Republicans, remember before he was put in office your president signed a larger, ineffective spending bill.
The people of this country are selfish.
Three thoughts….
1, it is the responsibilty of the people to elect officials to lead our government in a way that provides equality for all citizens. As it stands the separation of races and classes in this country shows that equality can be found for few people which is why the healthcare bill is a wise investment.
2, We are running out of fuel. That is a fact, it will run out. So we need to invest in the future of our country and force a change. Which is exactly what he is doing. If socialism by definition is paying more taxes to fix major problems that run rampant throughout the country then I guess Obama is a socialist. If not, then he is a president that is doint something that others were unwilling to do. Which is bear the complaints of the selfish, money hoarding, sinful hearts of we, the American people.
3, What sacrifices have you ever had to make? Why do you deserve so much from the government but are willing to give so little? Why does the homeless man on the street, the one you stereotype and thus believe yourself to be better than, not deserve your help? The truth is you could have been that had you not been given your circumstance. That comes from God or chance or whatever you want to call it. Either way, you my friends could be on the street. Don’t act like your work ethic got you everything you have. Come down from your tower. Its self-righteousness like this that brought down Jerusalem and it is what is tearing down this country. So take a deep breath, be thankful for what you’ve been given, and have a little hope that our country might have the one guy in office who really sees the problems and has some legitimate (while costly) answers to fix them.

Posted by: chase | February 27, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Chase…AMEN!!!!!!!

Posted by: Daveypa | February 27, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

(USSR) United States Socailist Republic.We were warned ,nobody listened.

Posted by: rb | February 27, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Daveypa,
Universal health care is here its just not called universal health care. If you have no insurance, go to the hospital and say so, it doesn’t really matter because those of us making money and or those of us with insurance pay for that person. Granted that is why the cost is high for people with insurance but universal care will not make those cost go anywhere, they will simply be shifted to business and individuals paying taxes. Universal health, will create a brand new health care market with different tiers relating to the quality of health care you get. When a prospective employee comes in for an interview he will ask “do you provide health care”, then he will ask “what type”. That is where the competition will begin with employers to offer superior health care and the cost will be virtually the same as it is now except the small business will be paying through taxes all those premiums for people who fall in the “universal” bucket. The additional taxes will choke small business and to avoid this the government will label it health care but it won’t be the type of care people will happy with. Superior health care will continue to be an important part of any employers benefit package.

Posted by: Bob | February 27, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

CHA-CHIIIIIN!!!Man, this guy can sure spend money. Npw, THAT’S change your GOING to believe in, whether you like it or not!!

Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | February 27, 2009, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Obama’s budget is a HUGE mistake. Unfortunately the ENTIRE country is going to have the pay the price of his lunacy. (But he’s still cute…) Stupid is as stupid does; It doesn’t matter how high your IQ is. Just ask the dope addict with two PhDs.

Posted by: LynnB | February 27, 2009, 3:38 am 3:38 am

No debt has ever been resolved by creating more debt.
The stimulus bill is not about creating jobs or economic growth. It’s about Liberal agendas, expanding government control and pork spending to make good on the promises made for the money donated to get Obama elected.
The pork programs that Obama claims will stimulate jobs arn’t even going to start for a couple of years, so with all the unemployment, guess who’s paychecks the Feds are going to confiscate to pay back the debt the Liberals thugs are forcing on the private sector? If you guessed “everybodies”, your right! Even the Chineese who have been buying up America left and right are now afraid of a US economic collapse and money coming from them has slowed.
As far as increasing taxes on the rich, 62% of America’s taxes are already being paid by only 7% of its citizens. So why do all of you whinners with your hands out think its fair that those who earn more money should dole out more to pay for idiots who can’t run a business. Why should they or any other person be expected to pay for health care for everyone else, including illegals? In a Capitalistic society, no one should. And the Federal Government is not set up to consficate money from American citizens to give to private businesses or pay everybody’s doctor bills. It’s against Constitutional Law. If they would quit stealing from everybody’s paychecks, people could afford to pay their own health care, as it was meant to be. The reason health care costs are so high now is because the Feds interfered. If anyone thinks universal health care is a good idea, then do some research on the British and Canadian health care nightmare. The Feds don’t care about any citizens health, they care about having control over every thing and everybody.
Obama’s spending spree is now up to $3.6 trillion. I don’t know what mental block has John so hung up on the Bush Administration but it’s time he stopped worring about what was and start thinking about what is. And what is, is three times more debt than Bush racked up!
What’ya gonn’a do Patriots, stand by or stand up?

Posted by: G8sFord | February 27, 2009, 7:00 am 7:00 am

John:=
“You show me where the House said: Unsecured credit default swaps? Great!”
The House Financial Services Committee is largely responsible for overseeing this industry. They allowed these credit swaps to take place. And, no I don’t think they are great. You are losing me here, John.
“These things were invented in the free market. But that doesn’t mean they were “good”.”
I NEVER said they were good. I am not sure what your point is. The free market in it’s free form would be a disaster. There HAS to be regulation or oversight of these markets…we are living the reality of lack of oversight (given to our elected officials in Congress) right now.
Let’s take this to the level where it started and where everybody can truly understand.
The House Financial Services Committee recommended, and Congress passed the lowering of standards in lending, back in Clinton’s term. George Bush helped it along by not doing anything about it when they lowered them, yet again, in the first part of his first term. In lowering these lending standards, people who could not afford a house at all, or purchase too large a home for their income, were allowed to do just that.
I have news for you all…These companies are STILL doing this. Just last week, I received in the mail, at least three offers of refinancing which included debt consolidation (into the mortgage), 3/1ARM and an interest free loan. No…I am NOT kidding.
The oversight necessary should not allow these companies to offer these products. Yet, right on the refinancing offer, it states: “ECONOMIC STIMULUS ACT of 2008 has allowed the Federal Housing Authority to temporarily adjust lending policies.” Right there in black and white! This is absolutely outrageous!
Obama and Nancy can throw every one of the Taxpayer’s dimes at this problem, providing bailout after bailout…but in it’s simplest breakdown..if the lending standards don’t change…the situation will continue to get worse.

Posted by: Jen | February 27, 2009, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Oh…and one more thing…we are NOT entitled to have universal health care. Give me a break! Go live in Canada or Britain and then come back and tell us you think universal health care is a good idea. Yes, it needs reform..but why? Let me say this really slow…BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT ALREADY RUNS A GOOD PORTION OF THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ALREADY!!! Doh!

Posted by: Jen | February 27, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am

I am 100% behind the President even though I will pay more taxes with his new budget. He is telling the American people the truth which they are not used to. It will be painful, but it is long overdo! The wealthy have had all the rules bent in their favor for the last 8(almost 16) years. We finally have an intelligent, fair-minded President working to make life for all Americans better.

Posted by: Rose Seaton | February 27, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am

a new morning, more “good” news on the stock market, courtesy of obama’s “change you can believe in”.
is everyone stocking up…if not, you had better get started cause the worst future imaginable, again courtesy of obama, is headed your way!

Posted by: Jake | February 27, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

My husband was told that their bonuses were being put on hold. This is a company that is actually doing well. But the company is looking ahead, in order to avoid having to lay off employees. For this I am not complaining for my husband still has his job. We pay our bills on time. We do not and have never over extended ourselves. We have tightened our belts in our household. Why isn’t the government tighten their belts instead of spending more where we don’t want it or need to? I do not want socialized medicine, it doesn’t work. Look at our neighbors up North. I have family in Europe and they pay for private insurance because the socialized medicine they receive is horrible. Is that what we want? Why are the banks we are bailing out still getting bonuses when their performance has failed? What are they being rewarded for? A low performance. Again my husbands performance has been exceptional and his bonus was put on hold. Wake up Washington and stop these millions of dollars in bonuses being paid off to executives that have failed. I feel like suing the government for allowing these low life’s to still receive bonuses based on the stimulus money that we the honest hard working middle class is paying for. Obama wake up and smell the coffee. Why are you being bullied by Pelosi and Franks? As for the Bush admin: have we had any terrorist attacks? No. I felt extremely safe in the last 8 years and don’t feel as safe today. I pray to God every day that He guides the USA.

Posted by: Anna | February 27, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

I have never been more certain than this moment that I voted for the right candidate…McCain.

Posted by: Anna | February 27, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

I am so very disheartened by hearing my fellow Americans dog each other out on these comments. Where is the love, folks???? We are all in this together!!! Let’s get real and have some respect for each other, recognize and embrace our differences. That is what America is all about. There are solutions to our problems!!

Posted by: Marie | February 27, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

The positive: Honest reporting of the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
The negative: The government is asking us to absorb some “pain”, but not sharing in it themselves. Why no pay freezes? How about all of those trips by congress and their families on military jets? Why not a cut in staff for the White House and congres?
How can we continue to spend more money than we take-in? If he really wants his programs for healthcare, education and the environment, then make the painful cuts in other programs. Raising taxes on the wealthy won’t come close to paying for all this. If you taxed the top 5% of earners at 100%, it still wouldn’t pay for his programs.
Also, how is it “fair” that 40% of the population pays no income tax?

Posted by: Peter | February 27, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

All this talk about taxing the rich.
Let’s do it the right and just way. We need to institute a FLAT TAX of about 10% for everyone. There would be no loop holes for the rich (and by the way $250,000 is NOT rich) so they would pay their fair share and the middle-class and poor would pay their fair share. Get the picture here. FAIR and EQUAL. That was what America was founded upon. Additionally, it might surprise some of you who are hell bent to over-tax the “rich” to know that those of us who you consider rich have NO loop holes whatsoever and have been paying through the nose already. And now, it’s proposed to add additional tax burdens on top of the oppressive taxes we pay already. This is not whinning! It is a fact! And, I’m sick and tired of the inequality!
FLAT TAX! FLAT TAX! FLAT TAX!

Posted by: birdi | February 27, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Marie,
These blogs reflect your comment that we are indeed a nation of differences. We all have the right to speak out and give our opinions. I do not believe however that we must embrace those differences. We can listen to them and reflect on them but certainly not have to embrace them.
Regardless, you seem like a very nice lady.

Posted by: birdi | February 27, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Obama is just spouting retoric to conceal the agenda of the elite who put him in office to do as much looting as they can before they implement their New World Order. What we are seeing is just the consolidation and liquidation of countries by the banksters.
All will lead to a tyranical police state and enslavement.

Posted by: Richard | February 27, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Jen,
I will simplify it for you. Private companies invented these dangerous financial instruments. They were encouraged by the profit motive.
The government failed to provide sufficient oversight. Fair enough. What did you expect of regulators appointed by a Republican administration?
Cops go after the fence, the people who accept stolen goods, because they understand that without a place to sell stolen goods there is less motivation to steal.
Private individuals discovered that they — by taking advantage of the antiregualtion sentiments of Republican regulators, appointed by a Republican administration — they could profit by selling questionable mortgages and reselling them in the form of asset backed securities to foolish and greedy investment banks down the line.

Posted by: John | February 27, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

John
Boy John, not everything in the whole world that goes wrong is due to the Republicans. Pretty soon nobody will read nor pay any attention to your blogs because we know all you are going to do is bash the Republicans.

Posted by: birdi4 | February 27, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

John:
I have news for you…this type of lending that has caused this crisis, goes much farther back than the last eight years. Make no mistake..both parties are responsible. To think otherwise is just plain ignorance of the facts. Look who has been on the House Financial Services Committee…formerly known as the House Banking Committee…none other than Barney Frank and Chris Dodd..and if I am not mistaken, I believe Barney Frank is the chairman. Correct me if I am wrong..but I think he is a democrats. But that isn’t really my point…you, in fact, have missed my point completely. The government itself is completely corrupt because of the lobbying money flowing into it for special favors. Pay to play. Don’t pay, don’t get to play. This is EXACTLY how these ridiculous financial products were made available to those who wanted something for nothing and for those who wanted to take advantage of people who didn’t have enough sophistication to know better. The banks make their contributions in return for the government either looking the other way, adopting rules and or tax loopholes for these companies to benefit from.
Republicans are not at fault for all that ails America. Quite the contrary…I believe the citizenry as a whole is responsible for what ails America as our legislature is merely a reflection of the general public.

Posted by: Jen | February 27, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

a future of economic servitude for ourselves and our children
reminds me of …
Exodus 20:5 … punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation …

Posted by: OneObservation | February 27, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

His budget isn’t set in stone until Congress approves it.
He is using such large numbers as bargaining chips; kind of like what he should have done with the tax cuts in the bailout bill. He will be able to negotiate the numbers with Congress down to a level he needs in order to run the necessary programs. So, it will decrease. How much will it decrease, I don’t know. BUT, it will take Democrats and Republicans and the American people to help bring it down.
As much as I hate to see a lot of spending when the economy is in the toilet and dumping our dept on future generations, FDR had to spend money in order to create the programs that got people back to work, which started the economies slow recovery back then.
The only thing we can do until the economy finds its bottom is hold our head up high, and be confident that everything will work out.

Posted by: tstudent10 | February 27, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

I over $100,000 in taxes. I receive the same government services that the guy who pays $10,000 receives. Why does Pres Obama think is should pay more taxes?

Posted by: Disappointed | February 27, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Mr. President
Why are we giving the Palistinians $900 million when our own country is sinking further and further in dept.
I thought you were going to help us!!! Your own country!!!!!
ABC maybe you can ask the president the same question.

Posted by: B | March 2, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

I heard him say just a week or so ago that there would be NO ear marks. Liar, liar pants on fire.

Posted by: carol kilcoyne | March 4, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

We’re all going to suffer from what Obama is doing. How can ANYONE justify spending the amount of money he is spending? The well to do individual or business owner will have no incentive to be that way when they can get aid or when everything they worked so hard for means nothing. Moving to another country is starting to sound a lot more appealing to me..

Posted by: D F | March 11, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

I do not agree with the current plans for spending. If Obama wants to “redirect vast sums of money from businesses and wealthier individuals to those with lower incomes” what is the incentive for anyone to enter the business world and try to make money for themselves? It seems this is just encouraging people to be lazy, not strive to work hard and attempt to make money, and simply live off of the hard working people and government. Why is it fair to punish people making money, and give it to people that cannot? It just seems that this is a Robin Hood story where there are too many poor people around, and that is the only reason Obama got elected.

Posted by: derik f | March 12, 2009, 2:06 am 2:06 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.