Another Deadly Attack…Should We Ban Pit Bulls?
ABC’s Terry McCarthy from Los Angeles:
Yet again a child is killed by a pit bull attack — a 7 month-old was killed by two pit bulls in San Antonio, TX, today, as his grandmother, who owned the dogs, went to fetch his bottle from the kitchen. She came back to find the dogs attacking the boy, and was unable to get them off the child before he was dead. A pit bull also attacked a 4 year old boy this morning near Washington, DC. Luckily he survived.
Should we ban pit bulls?
Pit bulls were bred for dogfighting, fight with little or no provocation and have a high tolerance for pain. Unlike guard dogs like German shepherds they don’t attempt to simply restrain their opponents by biting and holding — they try to inflict maximum damage by biting, holding, shaking and tearing.
According to the CDC, between 1979 and 1996, 279 people in the United States were killed by dogs. Of these, 60 were killed by pitbulls with rottweilers coming in second at 29.
In the U.S. they are banned in a number of municipalities and some counties, including Denver CO, Springfield MO, and Dade County FL. But internationally there are far more sweeping bans — they are banned completely in Ontario, Canada and in Australia, France, UK, Norway, Italy, Denmark, China, New Zealand.
There are vociferous advocates on each side of the debate in the U.S. about a wider ban on pit bulls, which are still used for clandestine fighting here. Nearly 50 pitbulls were confiscated from Michael Vick’s dogfighting operation in 2007.

Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
You can watch the video and get more information about this attack on KSAT (ABC’s San Antonio affiliate)
Posted by: Nicole Perez | March 31, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Wow. All I know is this grandmother has already suffered the ultimate punishment. I hope her kids — the child’s parents — will be able to forgive her one day. I know she will never forgive herself.
Whether or not pitbulls should be banned, I don’t know. I do know that people need to realize that these dogs were bred specifically for the purpose of dogfighting, and that viciousness is in their nature. Yes, it can be nurtured out, but a zebra will always have stripes underneath, even if you paint it white. I would NEVER have pitbulls in a house with my child, and I know some of the nicest pitbulls around.
Posted by: DK Jamal | March 31, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I don’t really know the answer to this, but the owners should bear responsibility for their pets’ actions.
Posted by: Huh | March 31, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
It’s not so much that pit bulls are hazardous to the “health” of others, it’s that pit bull OWNERS are hazardous. Pit bulls, like all canines are pack animals and they are very territorial. They’re generally loyal, playful and loving with their pack leader, i.e., their owner, but could very well perceive human infants and children as threats to themselves and invaders of their territory. Because pit bulls were bred for dog fighting, anyone acquiring one needs to have the patience to socialize the animal, and even then, never leave an infant or child unattended with this breed of dog. Human infants and children flail around, are loud and raucous — all behaviors the dogs might consider threatening and unlike how puppies behave.
Posted by: nanameow | March 31, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
I am an animal lover and have 3 dogs of my own. I would never own a pit bulls, nor would I allow my kids around any. The risk is just not worth it.
Posted by: Marie | March 31, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Excuse me, but the feelings of guilt are NOT the ultimate punishment. If that were the case, then we should never prosecute criminals… simply deep remorse would be more than adequate. If a person were truly concerned for their kin, then they would not take unnecessary risks. Do you let your kids play in the street or with guns?
Posted by: Chris | March 31, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
i am for a ban on dogs like this.and blame the owners because as owners you know your dog is capable of harming someone.there some pets we know that do not like children.
Posted by: carol jones | March 31, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Yes.
Posted by: Thinking | March 31, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
It’s not so much that pit bulls are hazardous to the “health” of others, it’s that pit bull OWNERS are hazardous.
***************************************
Yea, Yea heard all of that. Fact remains they are dangerous, can’t be trusted. Owners fault or not when the animal gets out, or if the animal suddenly attacks in it’s own home, I do not care what you say the animal did it.
Posted by: Thinking | March 31, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
I love dogs.. but feel there should be a ban on pit bulls…
The idea of 2 pit bulls attacking a helpless 7 month old child just makes me ill….
Its just that type of dogs nature to be vicious, but they do not belong around people, with hopes they will not attack.
Posted by: lm | March 31, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Should be charged with murder! Some grandmother. As a grandparent I do everything in my power to make sure my grandchildren are SAFE when they are in my charge. Charge her with MURDER!!!!!
Posted by: dameek | March 31, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
I have a black lab/shepherd mix and she is the sweetest dog I have ever owned. I do not understand the need for pit bulls as pets, considering all of the killings by that breed! The Pit Bulls should definitely be banned as pets!!!
Posted by: Rick bisson | March 31, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Banning pit bulls is not the answer. The grandmother is completely at fault. She should never have left the child unattended with those dogs. Pit bulls are strong athletic dogs who are great in responsible ADULT homes or with older children, talking 13+. Stop blaming the animals and start holding PEOPLE accountable.
Posted by: Komaki | March 31, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
I would like to see the people who are ‘for’ pitbulls to go speak to the parents of that seven month old baby.
See if they can persuade that family that pitbulls are really wonderful pets.
Posted by: pet vs. baby | March 31, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
It’s time to start putting the owners in jail. Pit Bulls have developed a bad reputation simply because a select group of Breeders decided to breed for aggressive traits along w/training encouraging these traits. It’s time to start going after the Breeders & Owners of such Dogs (with serious jail time & fines). In addition, SAD to say, that Breeder’s stock should be euthanized not allowed to be re-trained or bred. I own 2 large breed dogs, but I purchase from well known/respected Breeder’s who never breed a dog that shows signs of aggression of any type. Those dogs are neutered; never sold as family pets. Animals respond to love like humans. If you beat an animal or a human….you know what you get in the end! We need to stop blaming the Breed & put the blame where it deserves to be put!
Posted by: DLA | March 31, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
I own a pit bull and even though she is really good with my grandchildren I am not stupid that something could happened. We have socialized her and she loves attention and we have trained and loved her to pieces. She lives with 3 toy chihauhaus and plays very well with them. I agree it is the owners and they need to be aware at all times when there is someone around that is not usually there. My dog is 4 years old and we never had any trouble with her.
Posted by: Victoria | March 31, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
couldn’t we round up all the pitbulls and use them on the border or in Iraq or Afghanistan? These dogs love nothing better than to fight, will fight to the death, and can be very intimidating. Sounds like we could use them on the border or in wars. They have no place in a domestic setting.
Seriously, there should be a higher pet-registration fee for pitbulls that also allows AnimalControl to visit your house and look in on the dog periodically. If dog is aggressive, abused, chained outdoors but not fenced, free roaming, or has signs that has been dog-fighting it should be destroyed and person fined. If the dog causes harm to another person it should be treated as a felony assault. No “free bite” rule with pitbulls or assumption of an “accident”.
Posted by: Ed | March 31, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Why would anyone want to own a dog that they can’t leave alone with their kids, socialized or not. The kid was 7 months old, which means it probably couldn’t even crawl yet. How much of threat to the dog could it be? The dogs are dangerous and should be banned.
Posted by: Dave729 | March 31, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Its the owners that can’t handle there dogs. These dogs were bred for fighting, and are very powerful as you all know. More so then some people relize. Once they get that killer instinct going, there’s no stopping them. They shouldn’t be allowed to run lose or be allowed around children with out proper supervision. And be handled by someone that can actually control them, sometimes they even turn on there owners. These dogs should be band.
Posted by: Devoted2 | March 31, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
You say that pit bulls were bred to kill. Are you saying that these dogs are born with the genetic predisposition to kill and nothing can be done to stop them ?
If you are in fact inferring that what you say is right, you are dead wrong.
Pit bull puppies raised in loving homes do not grow up to be killers – I know this to be true. However, before some idiot jumps on the “ban the pit bull” platform, do some real studies on pit bulls get the real truth behind killer behavior and then bring it out to the public. The pit bulls have a bad name because some were by killers to kill – genetics is not the cause of their killer behavior.
Posted by: Elle | March 31, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
I dislike the government taking over everything but look at this, the owners of these dogs do not take care of there own. Maybe that is one reason why we are going to a dictator style of government, is we cannot or will not take care of ourselves we want someone else to do it
Posted by: P | April 1, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Being the owner of a pit mix and an APB standard my emotions run strong on the subject. Pitbulls are in more houses than any other dog in the US. The sheer volume indicates that there would be more recorded incidences with pits than any other. The problem as with anything else will always lie with the owner. If my dogs were ever to harm another IT WOULD BE MY FAULT. NOT THEIRS. one cannot leave a loaded gun around and not be responsible for harm done with it. The same goes for all large breed dogs capable of hurting someone or something. I just want to put this out there as well black labs bite more people every year than bullies, no linch mob going after them though. I support tougher punishments against dog owners who let the animals get into trouble. I do not support ANYTHING that would punish innocent animals and good families/owners because of a stigma given to a breed.
Posted by: Travis | April 1, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Pit Bulls are loving dogs who make absolutely wonderful pets. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure their dog is properly trained and socialized.
Before getting any pet, people should do their homework and find out breed characteristics pertaining to particular breeds to ensure it will be a good fit with them/the family. Why would you ever leave a 7 month old child, unattended, around any dog (regardless of breed)?
People who feel there should be a ban on Pit Bulls are probably the same people who feel guns should be banned because there are shootings each year. Place the blame where it really belongs, the dog owners!
Innocent Pit Bulls should not suffer because irresponsible dog owners get a hold of them. The Mike Vick story was mentioned but what was left out was what actually happened to those dogs taken from his property. Out of all the dogs taken from Vick’s kennel (47 dogs), all but TWO were rehabilitated and adopted by loving homes. Out of the two that were not adopted, one was put down to illness and the other put down to aggression.
Also not mentioned is the fact that Pit Bulls don’t even lead the list for dog bites in a year. Smaller breeds top that list.
Bottom line, people need to be responsible when owning any pet and we can’t punish all for the actions of some.
Posted by: Carrie | April 2, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Pitbulls are bred to often to train for fighting purposes. That does not mean that you can biologically create dogs to fight. That is like saying that white slave owners will have genetically inherent slave owner offspring. This is the stupidity of uneducated people. Pitbull ancestors were bred for their ability to herd cattle and other farming animals. It has been over time that humans have turned their ‘pets’ into fighters. This does not imply that every dog birthed from a fighting dog will be ready to attack anyone or anything. ALL blame goes to the owners of these pets and how they raise them or don’t raise them. Dogs should never be tied to trees they are not here for your security or pleasure. Dogs should be treated like any other living creature with kindness. Don’t ban the dogs ban the idiots who have pets with bad reason or no reason at all. They are the problem.
Posted by: Mike Avila | April 6, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
In 2004, of all children 1-4 years old who died, 26% died from drowning (CDC 2006). Fatal drowning remains the second-leading cause of unintentional injury-related death for children ages 1 to 14 years (CDC 2005)
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Perhaps we should really be focusing on banning water.
Posted by: Mallory Hayes | April 25, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
How many more deaths will it take until a decision on this is made. I can’t understand why people with children own a pitbull. They have killer instincts. And, if they are a good dog, they do get lock jaw. I don’t agree to eliminating the dog completely, but at least regulate how they are in public. Muzzle maybe?
Posted by: Ajlouny | April 28, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
i really think its how the owner raises the dog we shouldnt ban or kill off inoccent dogs. sometimes the only reason a dog bites is because something has provoked it and if were going to get rid of pitbulls we need to go ahead and ban other dogs… agian its not the dog its the owner/breeder…we should really look at the animal with the two legs at the other end of the leash.
and its not true about lock jaw that is a myth ive done my research
Posted by: pitbulllover | May 5, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
That type of a ban isn’t fair! The dogs have done nothing wrong. The owners are to blame, who let the dog out, trained it, and was responsible fro it? The owner. And sStatics say that labs deliver more bites pits. And third on list of top bies is the Jack Russel Terrier, so are we going to outlaw labs and Jack Russels now too? And not only Pits are banned. Many places define Pit Bull as ‘A dog of short hair, medium size, with a broad head and strong jaws.’ Wow! how many dogs does that describe? And those of you who think this is good think about this: When will it end? How many dogs will have to be banned and euthanized before we see our wrongs? What dog will be a killer next? The Lab, the Saint Benard? Who knows. Just remember; people have made dogs what they are. You as the owner are responsible for your dog, not the dog resposible for you. Ban the Deed, not The Breed.
Posted by: Kelsie | July 9, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Also, why would you leave a baby alone with ANY dog, I have a Yorkshire Terrier and I wouldn’t leave alone him. Blame the irresponsible owner/Gardian. But oh, no. It must be the dogs fault. Because it was a Pit Bull. If a lab had done this we would never have heard about it. DOGS DO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG. IF A DOG IS NOT AROUND THE CHILD SINCE A PUP AND THEY WERE NOT PROPERLY INTRODUCED, IT SEES THE CHILD AS A THREAT. END OF STORY. Deal with it. Stop blaming the dogs just because its eaiser than excepting that we, as human beings, make mistakes. And if I knew where to find that woman and tell her this to her face.
Posted by: Kelsie | July 9, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
this is a 10 yr old kid talking i have a pit named lefty he saveed my from one of his own kind! don’t ban them plese don,t go throw with this. i have hade him all my life. please for the sake of me and my pit don,t agree with this.also these are fightng pit bulls most likkeli if they got thir pit out of a aspca ti could have bin in dog fighting. trust me lefty was in it but he is a good dog.
Posted by: alise | August 1, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Pitt bulls are not the problem. Stupid people are the problem. These dogs are sweet just like any other dog. They will protect their pack human or canine. Breeders made these dogs to be submissive to humans(look it up) and aggressive against other dogs(unfortunately). They were never meant to attack humans. I bet nine times out of ten the owners of the pit bulls that attack a child/adult have been abused by their owner(s). If they attack a child it’s because they don’t know any better. Parents of children and babies need to keep their children away from dogs(pit bull or not) unless they know how the dog will react. Adults, children and babies have a different body chemistry/odor. A Dog that has not realized a baby is a human will attack the unknown object. We all have seen the movements of a baby. They are jerky, quick, uncoordinated; add the high pitched cry and a dog has a natural reaction to “defend” it’s self. Sad, I know, but ignoring this is even sadder. And lets face if kids can be very cruel to animals. They kick, punch, pull on and smack dogs. Some of you parents might be thinking”not my kid” but observe them one day and you’ll see I’m right. Of course the any dog will snap, I would too. I’ve owned 3 pit bulls and not one of them has ever attacked a person. Punishing the breed and not the act is like putting a man in jail for a crime he is not guilty of committing. It’s unfair. A dog is still one of God’s creations and among them is the loyal pit bull. Remember this, if some one beat and yelled and tortured you or kept you chained and shunned all your life, you would snap too and you who can read this are human.
Posted by: Mabel | August 3, 2009, 3:06 am 3:06 am
Pit Bulls are vicious animals. Every city should have a ban. My dog was attacked by a pit bull. After enough prying, we go the jaws to open. The scary thing was a child was nearby when this happened. You are insane if you would leave any child near this type of dog. Yes, other dogs will bite, but I have no problem saving my kid from a basset hound that got out of control. Until…a kid dies, then real life hits and they will feel guilty about the death for the rest of their lives. Terriers – even Jack Russells are trained to grab a hold of an animal, not let go (I know, their jaws DON’T lock) and shake whatever they have until it dies. Pit Bulls, Dobermans, German Shepherds, Chows should all be euthanized. This seems strong, but you will feel the same way when you watch your 2 year old’s throat being ripped out because someone thinks they need to be tough in suburbia. These are sick and vicious dogs and belong in the zoo or fending for their lives with the tigers in Africa.
Posted by: Joe Jones | August 23, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
I have 3 Bit bulls ,2 blue pits and one low rider,I also had a Curr dog which was the one that. I had to have put to sleep for biting a guy on the neck,he had bite 3 people so they said I had to put him to sleep.my pits do nothing but sleep all day and wait to be patted.I believe it’s how you raise them just like children.
Posted by: Clarissa | August 28, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
How can you want to ban a breed because of an owner STUPIDITY to not properly socialize and train their dog.
I have NEVER met a “bad” APBT in my WHOLE LIFE when working with dogs.
The APBT was not bred to kill humans!
Any dog that is poorly trained is capeable of doing the same damage as an APBT.
The American Temperament Testing Society shows a pass percentage of 84.1%passing rate for APBTs.
While the english setter came in at 77%,
The Great dane at 79%
The Grey hound at 81%
The GIANT SCHNAUZER at 75%
ETC..ETC..ETC.
SHOULD WE BAND ALL OF THEM TOO?
Remember, it’s the APBT today that is banned, but your breed tomorrow.
Keep that in mind.
Posted by: Kc | September 6, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
While we are at it, let’s ban German Shepards, Rottweilers, Dobermans and any other breeds that might be seen as “tough” and “protective” because those are the breeds irresponsible dog owners will gravitate to when Pits are banned. How about instead of banning Pits, you have to have a permit for one and if something goes wrong because of negligence, there are consequences.
This ban is like holding everyone after school because two punks misbehave and the class can’t control them.
Posted by: The Emperor | September 13, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
This is ludicrous. If this is truly a case of a bad breed and good owners then how come the pitt is the most abused breed in America?
I’ll tell you. It’s because people think of them as fashion statements and treat them poorly, train them to fight. I had a pitt taken from my uncle’s home and put in a dog fighting ring where he died because he was a well trained dog.
I know it’s a traumatic thing to lose someone to an animal, but that trauma leads to illogical reasoning. And you shouldn’t punish breeders, show handlers, and loving owners by destroying a breed because of someone’s paranoia. Yes, paranoia.
I love the “Well if your kid died blah de blah” If my kid died I’d blame the owner. I may be shaken up, but this is logic NOT emotion.
I would go so far as needing a license to own one or go go through a test or course because then the dogs would go to loving homes instead of fighting rings. This breed needs HELP not persecution.
By the way, they’re American Pit Bull Terriers and they were bred for bull baiting not fighting, so get your stuff straight
Posted by: Stephanie | October 10, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Really people?
Are you really so ignorant to think that this is the norm in pit bulls? A pit bull is a dog bred to fight OTHER DOGS! When they were first being bred, a dog showing aggression towards his handler or any other human was put down. These pit bulls were showing horrible temperament for their breed, and this is not common. In dog fighting, pit bulls are desired not only for their strength and pain tolerance but also their willingness to endure severe cruelty and neglect without turning on their masters, or their LACK OF HUMAN AGGRESSION.
No dog of any breed should be left alone with children, especially one that young and defenseless. The grand parent is at fault here for leaving a young child alone with two large strong dogs. This is a prime example of an irresponsible owner giving pit bulls a bad name.
To say that you would never own a pit because “it’s not worth the risk” is truly ignorant. Any dog is capable of aggression. This is just another hyped- up story that the media tells us to further the great pit bull debate. A pit bull is no more vicious or aggressive than a shepherd or a husky but these are considered “great family pets.” Why? Because of irresponsible people creating the problem and ignorant people jumping on the bandwagon.
Posted by: Ashlee | October 12, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Pitbulls are not killers..they;re actually the most playful and caring dogs. They were named nanny dogs in the 1950′s. Owners are the ones responsible for the wrong doing of the dogs who are violent. Doctors say children mirror they’re parents ..if a child see’s his father hit his mother he will more than likely do the same as an adult. Well if a dog is taught non agression he will not be aggresive but if he is taught to kill he will do as he knows. Point blank period its the owners fault !!
Posted by: Christina Lopez Farradaz | October 23, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
There is an amazing amount of ignorance being posted on this topic. Pit bulls are not people aggressive by nature. One of their original uses was caring for children. One of the few breeds to have ever been specifically used for this purpose. Banning a breed of dog because of a human issue would be like punishing rape victims for being raped. These dogs are victims and people seek to further victimize them because of media sensationalism and fear based stupidity. Pathetic example of the human condition.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Funny because I have a pitbull and know at least 3 other people’s pitbulls and they are all the biggest, most harmless babies. It is not always in their nature. It is how in how they are raised. We to to ban people who dont know how to raise a pet, and people that abuse pets,not pitbulls.
Posted by: Amanda | November 5, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
it’s terrible that the children were attacked but any dog could do that.. it’s not just pit bulls. and if the child wasn’t attacked while the grandmother was out there and was attacked when she wasn’t supervising then the child must have done something to the dog. just for the record pit bulls were not originally bred to be fighters they were bred to be a bull herder and keep the farmer safe. people just train them the wrong way and because they look intimidating people think they are… don’t speak before you know.. unless you have a pit bull and actually train it right then you shouldn’t have any say in the situation.
Posted by: krissy | November 8, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
anyone who is “FOR BANNING PITBULLS”. You are all a bunch of cowards and selfish people. Yea the pitbull kiled the little baby which was wrong. But do you know how it was raised? what if the owners didnt feed the dog? What if they were mistreated?. I have a pitbull and he loves my little cousins.. WHICH ARE BABIES!!!!You need to stop looking up PITBULLS KILLING BLAH BLAH BLAH. maybe you ignorantpeople should look up. A PITBULL SAVES A LIFE!!!
if you have a good relationship with the dog you should have no problems
Posted by: Pitbulls Are The shi### | November 18, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
no, dont ban any dogs. so the owners messed up. no dog is dangerous or hazardous unless the owners make it that way! dogs are born deadly! and they werent bred for fighting, it was animal herding. i own 5 pitbulls, and they have never hurt any one, except for loving them to mych! dont ban the breed!
Posted by: Shelby | December 5, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
While I find what happened to be sad and disturbing, the fact is that the owner is at fault. I have a 2 year old pit bull name Oscar, we rescued him from a well known non-kill shelter in Orange County NY that rehabilitates all dogs that come into their care. We have taken many steps to socialize him correctly and while I love my dog, I also know better than to leave him alone with a child ANY AGE. That being said, those of you saying BAN PIT BULLS..please do your research..if you did you would know that they were the poster dog for the USA during WW2 and not bc they are fighters. During the early 1900 they were “nanny dogs”, yup thats right they were nanny’s to young children. So before you read these horrible stories for face value, please remember that any dog can attack its only pits that get in the news,also, they rate in the 85.3% for temperment testing, well above boarder collies and the usual family dogs. Owners need to socialize any dog correctly..not just pits..
Posted by: Anne | December 7, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
My neighbors have pitbulls and I have two small children… I have confronted them about the threat that the beasts present to me and my family and have promised to shoot the dam things if I see them again off lease near or on my property..
Ban those stupid dogs.. It is not fair to children… I have no time for morons that care more about animals than people..
Posted by: joe strusinski | December 24, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
How many people have to die? There are laws prohibiting wolves and wolf-hybrid dogs as pets because they are dangerous. Yes, if well trained and socialized properly, pit bulls and other aggressive breeds can be nice pets. The problem lies in the fact that no one can be sure that their pit bull didn’t come from a family of aggressive fighting dogs. My dog was attacked and nearly killed by a pit bull when he was 8 months old. The pit bull didn’t bark, it just ran out of an open sliding glass door and clamped on to my yellow lab’s neck. Fortunately labs have excess skin around there necks and the dogs owner and I were able to get the dog to let go. Guns are highly regulated because they are dangerous, especially in the hands of children. Guns, however, can’t dig out under the fence and kill the neighbor’s kid. I love dogs, I hate to see them mistreated and I wish that all dogs would be well trained and socialized properly. Pit bulls and other aggressive dogs pose a very serious threat to public safety and should be banned. Do you trust a complete stranger with the keys to your house? Then why would you entrust your children’s life to them?
Posted by: Chris | January 10, 2010, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
that previous bloggger should have their head examined. This type of animal has generations and generations of aggressive behavior bred into them. They may be a gentle dog for 99 percent of thier life but when they “flip” the potential for disaster is more prevelant compared to when another non agressive breed does the same. This fact has NO counter due to the strength and nature of the beast.
Posted by: lablover | January 12, 2010, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Theese dogs should not be Ban!
I feel bad about the child but theres a stereo type people give theese dogs.
they are actualys safer then golden retrievers!
They are strong but very gentle
People have done this…its very sad!
Posted by: noeya | January 20, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
I honestly don’t think pitbulls should be banned. We should look at them as a pet not weapons!!! I read a article stating that pitbulls are the most family oriented pets. We shouldn’t be blaming the dog for those attacks.. what we should be doing is blame the owner for not training the dog to be a pet!!! Souldn’t it be the owners responsibility to train the dog.?? A dog can’t train it’s self.. Now that we are talking about banning them why don’t we just ban German Shepards.. Before we used to see them as dangerous dogs, which are now patrolling our streets!!!! If a lion can be trained so can a dog!!! If some one owns a pitbull they should send it to get trained by a proffesional. Like people say, don’t judge a book by its cover!!!
Posted by: Annette G | February 4, 2010, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
pit bull dogs were Not bread for fighting
they are just like any other dogs,I KNOW AND MANY PEOPLE KNOW THAT PEOPLE LIKE THAT VICK AND PEOPLE JUST LIKE HIN SHOULD BE BANNED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH,THEY ARE THE REASON INNOCENT DOGS GO ON THE ATTACK,LOOK WHAT THESE DOGS GO THROUGH,BECAUSE OF THESE PEOPLE.
Posted by: daniel spears | February 11, 2010, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
OKAY THEN! I completely disagree. The fault is completely the grandmother and also who ever is responsible of the dogs or who raised them. All dogs have an aggressive feeling and all dogs have the ability to attack someone. It all depends on how the owner treats/raises the dogs. I dont know the ratio for dog attacks in america but unluckily Pitbulls are at the top because people raise pitbulls to be aggressive since they are very strong. The people who should go to jail are the ones who own the dogs and train them the behavior. My brother owns a pitbull and i have felt his strength. But he is the most lovable dog i have ever met. The reason is because my brother (the owner) disciplines the dog when its bad and trains it very well. So…. NO BAN ON PITBULLS
Posted by: Dwalsh | February 28, 2010, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Orlando,Florida , we need to push the gov.rep. to push this law until it pass, we do not have to see more kids dying because the “Ego” of pitbulls owners.
There are a lots of nice dogs out there why choose a vicious killer that likes to attack small children. Ban the pitbulls now!!!
Posted by: edgars | March 17, 2010, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
I have 2 pit bu7lls im deeply sorry for what has happened to these children, but i would never let any baby within reach of any dog, b ecause we never no what is in a dogs mind
there are just as many people bit by little dogs does that mean we should ban all little dogs to, it is not the dog if you raise them with love they are so repectful to there masters
i love my pitbulls. i also have poodle and they get along good
any dog can turn into a monster you never no when ,dont feed your dog see how he will turn or put in abusive home and see if that dog is good
people who own pits must act responsabe so we can have our breed we love so much
and no i dont feel the grandmother should go for murder she will hAVE TO LIVE HER LIFE WITH WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT ISenough sentence for anyone to indure, we have become a nation of hate and blamers we all must have a heart we all that have dogs love are dogs so i say yes to the freedom for us pit bull owners to hAVE OUR DOGS AS MUCH AS THE NEXT DOG OWNER
Posted by: Tammy | March 31, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
It’s weird how people act like pit bulls want to be abused and think that the owners didnt do anything to make a pit bull hostile
Posted by: Joe | April 7, 2010, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Okay, NO. APBT’s were bred for dogfighting, yes, and have a tendency to be dog aggressive. (Also, there are many types of dog aggression – same sex, on leash, off leash, etc) But Pits were NOT bred to be human aggressive. Quite the opposite, they are people dogs through and through. Only an idiot would keep a Pit as a guard dog. And a dog should never contribute to someone’s ego.
Are Pits dangerous to humans? Yes. About as dangerous as any other dog breed when provoked. However, Pits are among the most stable dog breeds and rank even higher than the Golden Retriever the “perfect” family dog in ATTS (Temperament standards).
Bite statistics are unreliable, anyway, as most dog attacks go unreported. Lay off the Pits. They’re dogs
Posted by: Heather | April 28, 2010, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
You people are so ignorant, you cannot blame the animal, of course it has intent to attack but so does a poodle… Even us humans have intent to attack, ever thought of that? Pitbulls are truly a loving breed and actually love children thus proving the fact that the nature and temperment of aggressive pits lay within the hands of unworthy an untrustworthy owners, you cannot cast out a breed simply because of it’s history. That would be the equivalent of ridding children whose parents might have been murderers just simply for the fact that you think the child might be a murderer too. I am terribly heartbroken for the family of this young infant, my condolences to them. And the attacking dogs should be put down, yes. Remember any dog can be dangerous all depending on the owner, even the smallest of dogs. Pitbulls are a beautiful breed and do not deserve to be banned, banned meaning stripped out of houses and put to sleep regardless if they’re aggressive or not, even if they’re child friendly and a family member, punish bad owners, not the breed.
Posted by: Pitlover | June 14, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
I THINK STUPID PEOPLE SHOULD BE BAN NOT PITBULLS!
Posted by: LMAO | November 16, 2010, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
It’s not so much that pit bulls are hazardous to the “health” of others, it’s that pit bull OWNERS are hazardous.
***************************************
Yea, Yea heard all of that. Fact remains they are dangerous, can’t be trusted. Owners fault or not when the animal gets out, or if the animal suddenly attacks in it’s own home, I do not care what you say the animal did it.
Rofl r u listening to yourself? take away pitbulls and dogfighting owners will just move on to the next best fighting dog.
Sad story, but this happens all the time and not just with pitbulls, the media likes pitbulls more because its more dramatic. Dogs are like children, they get jealous only difference is, these children have claws and fangs and only think of the present and not the future or the consequences of their actions. If u see any tension between a toddler and an old dog that u have, then u should fix that with a trainer or yourself if u think u can.
Posted by: the rational one | December 29, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
they also dont know their own strength, so from this artical i wouldnt totally rule out the fact that the dog might have been playing. and to say that they have a disposition to be aggressive, might be true towards other animals it is not towards humans as the breeders and owners didnt like to get bit when pulling the dogs apart during fights. Also statistics say that small dogs are the most aggressive, even more so then pit-bulls.
Posted by: the rational one | December 29, 2010, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Everyone is completely wrong about these dogs.
1: they weren’t originally bred 2 fight they were bread As game dogs. So if that’s the case let’s ban all hounds & whatever other hunting dogs there are.
2: I have a American Pitbull she is 2 yr old now. When we got her she had been abused/neglected. She is the nicest most loyal dog I ever met. She is very people friendly & will let anyone in my house. She’s even good with my two cats.
Why should we treat these dogs like crap when it’s the morons who train these dogs to fight?
Instead we should just lock them up so they can’t fight em.
Their great great great dogs. Screw banning them!
Posted by: SaKiD1 | February 4, 2011, 12:17 am 12:17 am
i think banning pittys would be wrong because we made them to be bad and its our job to right our wrong and two wrongs dont make a right and if we stoped breading them there wouldnt be as mant and it woudnt be such a problem
Posted by: claire | April 11, 2011, 10:42 am 10:42 am
wellpit bullls can be the best dog in the world or they can be a ferocious beast its the owners job to train them right and if they dont thats not our problem they’ll just get banned from having a dog
Posted by: jaki | April 18, 2011, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
If everytime a pit attacks someone we scream ban but if that’s the case humans shops be banned as well… Why do they blame the dog such ignorance in this world it breaks my heart…
Posted by: Kasper | May 16, 2011, 7:11 am 7:11 am
I Ment should
Posted by: Kasper | May 16, 2011, 7:12 am 7:12 am
It’s amazing how UNEDUCATED so many of you are on pitbulls. Many dog attacks are labeled as “pitbull” attacks because of the hype around them. In this case, if this even was a “pitbull attack” its because of poor owners. You cannot blame the dog for not being trained and cared for properly.
In fact there are about 10 dog types that are simply labeled as pitbulls because people are too ignorant to find find the real breed.
Throughout history pitbulls have been known as “nanny dogs” for how WELL THEY ARE with children!!
Yes some sick people have bred these dogs to “fight” for entertainment. But this was done by abusing these loving creatures to make them mean.
Plenty of famous people have owned these dogs as companions too. I have two of my own pitbulls and they are the sweetest dogs in the world. If you even leave for 10 mintues they greet you like you’ve been gone all day. The only downside of a pitbull is all the sober from those big tongues because they’re always giving kisses, and anyone else who owns a pitbull knows exactly what I’m saying.
Stop believing everything and start researching. Punish the deed and not the breed. Bad breeders and owners are at fault.
Posted by: Ashley | July 8, 2011, 1:54 am 1:54 am
ok 2 pitbulls attack the child what about the pomerainian that killed a 9 month old in 10 min while mom was in the bathroom. Did you know most of those so called attacks on people from pitbulls were actualy mutts. They were labled pitbulls because of there big heads and to get more attention from viewers. Stop bashing the breed and ban the deed people train the dog when you chain a dog up in a yard and pay no attention to it like its a yard ornament what do you expect. People are selfish and need to take the blame yes the breed can be dangorous but thats why we are supose to be smart. all dogs can bite and just like humans some can be born with problems. watch your kids around dogs you dont know comon sence people. and for those who think theres no chance for mistreated pits popsicle is an outstanding example that they can be changed even when people do evil things. stubby the pitbull is a war hero saving our soldiers, popsicle found in a freezer is a great narcotics dog finding over 3000 pounds of cocain. i can keep on going so people blame the owners its there ignorance that allows this.
Posted by: cindy | August 12, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am
The thing is, sure, it may be the owner’s fault. HOWEVER, there are just far too many instances where owning one of these dogs has led to an accidental death. Yes, its your fault if your dog hurts another person- however, the sheer fact that 2/3 of deaths caused by dogs were from pitbulls, accidental or not, still leads us to believe that we should ban these dogs.
We aren’t banning the dogs because it’s their fault, per say, but rather because it is far too easy to have an accident happen.
Posted by: Ryan | September 7, 2011, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
RYAN I’d like to know where you get your asinine comments? Such as “2/3 of deaths caused by dogs were from pitbulls”???? Maybe that’s what’s REPORTED but its not ACCURATE. Do you know how many lives pitbulls have saved? It is the OWNERS fault if a dog acts out and hurts someone, not for just pitbulls but any dog. Here’s a little cold hard FACT for you about pitbulls and their temperament test considering they pass higher than many other common and beloved dogs. Feel free to educate yourself a little! =]
“Aren’t pitbulls mean and vicious?
No more vicious than golden retrievers, beagles or other popular dogs! In a recent study of 122 dog breeds by the American Temperament Testing Society (ATTS), Pit Bulls achieved a passing rate of 83.9%. That’s as good or better than beagles … 78.2%, and golden retrievers … 83.2%”
ATTS.ORG
Posted by: Ashley | October 2, 2011, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Let me add to that the “general population” of dogs breeds run around 77% in their temperament tests. Pitbulls live to please their owners. They are very well around humans when they grow up in a stable, structured, loving enivronment.
Posted by: Ashley | October 2, 2011, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
i have 4 pit bulls and they never hurt anyone
Posted by: Cat | December 15, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
They should not be ban, I have one and he is a loving dog, he has never hurt my 4 year old,my 9 year old, and my 13 year old. The trainers are the ones who make them mean. I can take my pit bull out and have no problems with him. so no they should not be ban. my 13 year old can take him out for walks and she has no problem with him. but I do agree that they will attack but they do protect you. but people do not give them a chance, they shot or give them back if they do one little thing wrong. Pit bulls are good dogs!!!!!! Just give them a chance to live a good life. IT IS UP TO YOU, TO MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE!!!!!! Do not make them shuffer, for things they can help or do not do. YOU CAN LOVE THEM. GIVE THEM THE LOVE THEY SO VERY MUCH NEED!!!!!!!! help them
Posted by: danny girl | December 15, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
can’t help*, they can’t help
Posted by: danny girl | December 15, 2011, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
if u guys think they should be banned u should be banned i agree with Danny Girl i know her Pit Bull and she knows mine they are both nice dogs. they never hurt anyone. i trust her around my new born baby who’s 2 weeks old now stop saying they are suppose to be banned !
Posted by: Cat | December 15, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
i agree with Cat and Danny Girl! ik thier pit bulls and they are so nice i love them to death!
Posted by: alex | December 15, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
i agree with danny girl cat and alex they are good and loving dogs
Posted by: lisa | December 15, 2011, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
i agree with those three girls, they are good and loving dogs
Posted by: lisa | December 15, 2011, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
so many of you, including the author, are disgustingly uniformed. pit bulls are regarded as dangerous because of biased uneducated media coverage like this. dogs bite and attack all the time but it’s always grossly over reported when it’s a pit bull. saying they are vicious by nature is so unfair and stereotypical that it’s laughable. any strong dog that is not trained properly is a threat to others. the question should not be, should we ban pit bulls, but rather, should we banirresppnsible idiots from owning dogs? please stop spreading malice and misinformation and jeopardizing the lives of a wonderful breed. I adopted one recently and have been volunteering with them and spending time with them for years. do some research before you open your mouth. so unprofessional.
Posted by: amy | December 17, 2011, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Breed Specific Legislation is ignorant. People are killed and injured by horses every day, so by the same logic I demand that we ban all horses. I remember a few years ago a baby was killed by two Lab puppies as it was left alone in a swing at its grandparents home. Not only did these dogs kill the child, they ate his feet and legs. Nobody ever mentioned that it was the dog’s fault, all the blame was placed on the irresponsible owners who left the child alone with the animals. If you ban pits then you have to ban dogs in general. Before you jump on your soap box and demonize pits do a little research on the history of the breed. Any pit that showed human aggression was put down because even the fighting dogs were household pets and had to be handled by strangers as a rule. It wasnt until the gang members and drug dealers started breeding human aggression into their dogs that this other type of pitbull showed up. So if you just have to ban and euthinize something, start with the gang bangers and drug dealers and leave our dogs alone!
Posted by: Jerry | December 18, 2011, 1:50 am 1:50 am
hey pit bulls are nice dogs dont believe then who cares suck it
Posted by: cathrine leeses | December 20, 2011, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
those girls are right pitbulls shouldnt be banned if anything should be banned its people who hate pitbulls
Posted by: cathrine leeses | January 4, 2012, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Wow.. Unbelievable amount of ignorance being spewed here. People really need to educate themselves. First off “pitbull” refers to a myriad of breeds. Secondly far too many people are making baseless statements about some perceived danger of dogs that supposedly “love fighting”. No… PEOPLE train dogs to fight. PEOPLE torture them to make them fighters. PEOPLE do all sorts of horrible things to dogs and make them the way they are. Violence is not an inherit trait of pitbulls. If someone’s pitbull is trying to attack people, then WTF was that owner doing to it? My pit would never hurt a soul although before I rescued her it was very clear that many many a soulless being had done unpseakable horror to her. Pits are loyal, intelligent, athletic, and guess what.. GREAT AROUND CHILDREN!!! They aren’t called “the nanny dog” for nothing. They take all kinds of abuse from kids and just lick in return. I had a friend as a kid whose family Dachsund ripped his infant sister’s face off.. Had to have major plastic surgery done. Should we ban Dachsunds? More than likely if that family had a pit instead that little girl wouldn’t have been mauled so viciously. I wish people would educate before they insist on something. Most people posting here about pits don’t know ANYTHING about them.
Posted by: Matt | January 11, 2012, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm