By David Schoetz

Mar 16, 2009 11:02pm

Closing Arguments: How to Punish AIG?

We reported earlier tonight that it may be too late to stop some of the $165 million in AIG bonuses, despite the backlash many Americans are expressing toward the insurance giant. But all of the rabble-rousing aside, if the contracts dictating these bonuses cannot be rescinded, what action do you think the government should take to signal the outrage? Tell us what you think. And follow "Nightline" on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline

User Comments

AIG by its actions has repeatedly broken the Social Contract with Americans, therefore voiding its right to respect for its contracts as we bail it out the tune of billions.
Void the contract, void the bonuses, and start hanging AIG’s executives.

Posted by: robdcee | March 16, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Fire them, and make them pay the US government those bonus amounts.

Posted by: harris love | March 16, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Fire them, and make them pay the US government those bonus amounts.

Posted by: harris love | March 16, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

It’s the government’s fault for giving them the bailout to begin with. They need to give the monies back to the taxpayers.

Posted by: Helen | March 16, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

No company should be “too big to fail.” It sends the message that it doesn’t matter what the company and its employees do, they will be bailed out, and even — in the case of AIG — awarded bonuses, presumbably from taxpayer money.
Absolutely no more taxpayer money should go to AIG, and the company should be required to pay back to the government every penny they gave out in bonuses.

Posted by: Amanda T | March 16, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

The contract and bonuses should be voided immediately The people giving them out should be penalized by firing each one involved and jailed.

Posted by: Dorothy Kreider | March 16, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

As a public school teacher I was told that a negotiated contract for a raise would not be honored. I have less available cash than the “fat cats” at AIG who claim their contracts need to be honored….hogwash. I can’t afford to pay for their arrogance, nor should I be expected to as a US taxpayer. Maybe they should go to school and teach—better yet LEARN.

Posted by: vivian | March 16, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Stop bailing out people. Then this will not happen so easily. Economy is tanking anyway regardless of what Bernanke says.

Posted by: Huh | March 16, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Once AIG gets through this & the gov’t has been reimbursed, is it advisable to break up the company into smaller units so that it’s no longer too big to fail?
Hope you all have time and inclination in tonight’s show to address possible solutions so that there isn’t a repeat performance of this fiasco in the future.

Posted by: m747 | March 16, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

If the American taxpayer bailed them out, the American taxpayer can boycott them. Hit’em where it hurts…do not buy AIG products. Get rid of the ones you have

Posted by: kamehamebill | March 16, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Former AIG head Hank Greenberg should be in the same cell sitting alongside Bernie Madoff!! The Bush administration, by removing regulations, allowed “traders” on Wall St. to “naked short” stocks driving their value into the ground and decimating the retirement saving of millions of average working Americans as teachers, policemen, and firefighters while the made millions!!

Posted by: Rich | March 16, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Why did the government not ask or inquire AIG about bonuses BEFORE throwing them money?
This so called stimulus was just a way to throw good money after bad, reward bad behaviour and save the rich CEO’s.
Quick fixes never work… and by now you would think the government would realize this… but no, they just did a stupid knee jerk reaction and threw out money, hoping to fix things… all they did was put a band-aid on a severed leg.
No more bailouts…
You seriously would think that any CEO of a big company would have the sense to realize that their company was going south and re-organize to stop the bleeding… but they didn’t… they were greedy, went after all the money they could and just sat back and waited until the right moment for the government to once again bail them out with tax payer money…
It needs to stop… no company should receive that much money because they are just too big to fail…
Let em sink … maybe then some intelligent, non greedy businesses can rise to the top and be run by people with common sense,
Maybe the contract laws should be rewritten to say that if the company is in the red, there will be no bonuses at all… no ands, ifs or buts….
We need to stop the government and WAllstreet and CEO’s from ruining this country with disgusting greed…
We taxpayers are tired of bailing out the rich fatcats of this country who are really too stupid to even run an outhouse.
NO MORE BAILOUTS….
I will say it again Obams…… NO MORE BAILOUTS.

Posted by: lmg | March 16, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Boycott AIG – they’ve gotten 170 BILLION taxpayer dollars and now they are using that money to pay bonuses to incompetent executives who are hiding behind legal loopholes. Boycott them! Let them go bankrupt! The executives who got the bonuses are as bad as any terrorists that we’ve seen. They’ve thumbed their noses at the American taxpayer.

Posted by: kamehamebill | March 16, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

This country should be reimbursed for the money given to AIG. Our citizens have allowed the government to give in good faith, yet the company has once again wallowed in greed.

Posted by: macmamaj | March 16, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Void the bailout money and put the resposibility on AIG to legally try and recoup it.

Posted by: RS | March 16, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

It is up to everyone of us not to do business with AIG or any of its subs.

Posted by: RS | March 16, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Anyone accepting bonuses should be charged with defrauding the U.S. Government and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney.

Posted by: GOP = Destruction Of America | March 16, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

AIG, shamelessly handed out bounces instead of helping others with the money. Its discussing, any other money they get should come with strings attached.

Posted by: Kathleen | March 16, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Don’t waste time trying to stop the bonus payments. Just have the IRS and the treasury come up with new tax regulations that tax any bonus payments made by recipients of TARP/TALF, etc. funds to bonus babies at a 99% fed’l rate. No conflict w/ contract law and the gov’t gets its money back.

Posted by: Len | March 17, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

DEFAULT on the EXECs ‘contracts’ and let’em get in line & sue – nice to see their names in public & watch them cry over settling for pennies on the dollar

Posted by: nuenemhy | March 17, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Let them go out of business. They need to restructure!

Posted by: alston green | March 17, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Everyone who work at AIG should be shot … just for being so unashamedly baldface about stealing OUR money!

Posted by: Susan | March 17, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I have supported President Obama on most all of his policies/ decisions to this point. Here, he needs to step out of the norm and punish AIG for this break in public trust. This bonus payment may be legal, as were all the actions which got them( us) into this situation, but that doesn’t make it right. Since AIG doesn’t seem to see the difference,our president needs to punish these actions as a outrage American. Use your power. Show that these abuses of the American trust, will no longer be tolerated, legal or not.

Posted by: Peter | March 17, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Let’s punish the AIG executives in the same manner that we have punished those in congress (dodd & franks) who were responsible for pushing the failed mortgage policies that created the current economic collapse. Oops, bad example. Seem no punishment is required.

Posted by: James | March 17, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

The problem of a legal obligation to pay bonuses to these people seems like a non-issue. If there is no other solution, simply cut their salary going forward by the exact amount of the bonus (at least).

Posted by: Jeff gardner | March 17, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

AIG should post a list of the people who received the bonuses. The division where they worked. Are they still working for AIG? The amount of the bonus and why it was paid? I would like to see the contract that could not be broken. I would like to know the details.

Posted by: carey | March 17, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Yes, that’s a brilliant idea. Cancel your policies and throw thousands and thousands of low and mid level employees world wide out of work. That will further depress the economy.
The government cannot interfere with existing contracts, it can legislate as to future ones. Put conditions on any future loans and tie them to responsbile business practices

Posted by: Patricia Sturm | March 17, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

The simple solution to the AIG bonus recipients is a lifetime IRS audit.

Posted by: Rob Solo | March 17, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

If the state of Delaware can take back $8 million from our school district several months into the academic year, if professors’ tenured status can be revoked by judges since colleges cannot maintain departments and their faculty, there is no reason why the money given AIG cannot be revoked if they had sufficient funds to give bonuses. Bonuses are to be given from the profits of a successful company, not from the taxes taken from our least citizens. How dare they! Shame! We just need smarter lawyers.

Posted by: Judy | March 17, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

This is an absurd debate. What are we talking about here? The U.S. government can do whatever it wants to do. Has anyone ever heard of emminent domain? What a joke. You can’t tell me they can’t go in and freeze those employees bank accounts and take back that bonus money. It was okay for Reagan to break the air traffic controllers union and contracts, but it’s not okay for Obama to declare AIG employment agreements null and void. Give me a break. This is BS!!! Stop the nonsense. So…we’re going to lose these “geniuses” that got us into this mess if we don’t pay them? So what. Let them walk. As a matter of fact, lets escort them into the nearest jail. You can’t tell me that there aren’t a few 100,000 other “geniuses” around that couldn’t step in and take there place. I can’t take this anymore. What is wrong with this mealy mouthed weaked kneed government? I’ll tell you what is wrong. Geithner and the rest of his cohorts are complicit. Get a spine Geithner and do your job!!

Posted by: Jay Sharp | March 17, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

If only the people who are rightfully angry at AIG would also direct some of that anger to the idiots in Washington that created this mess perhaps we would have a better chance of recovering. Nothing will change with the current Washington crowd. Most have been there for a decade or more and all are corrupt.

Posted by: James | March 17, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Fire them!! If they are making millions in bonuses they can retire by now!! Open up the jobs and hire some new people. Obviously it just isn’t working out over at AIG.

Posted by: Tyler Starke | March 17, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Fire the President of the USA and get someone into office that has some brains.

Posted by: Judy | March 17, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

they do not deserve any more of our money….nothing…they need to right all of their wrongs and pay back what they already owe…not bonuses…and the IRS should tax the hell out of them!

Posted by: Kathy | March 17, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I don’t agree with the bail out, AIG should deal with it, STOP THE BONUSES AND payback the back the tax payers.

Posted by: Becky | March 17, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Call the loan if the bonuses are not stopped or paid back. If the loan is not immediately repaid, file a demand which will force the company into bankruptcy. They are betting they are too big too fail and we the investors will not call the loan. Just do it. These people will have a lot more than bonuses to lose.

Posted by: John Miller | March 17, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

AIG claims it has a contractual obligation to pay bonuses. What’s the other side of the contract??? You get paid a bonus IF you hold up your side of the contract. Obviously, that was not the case, so the contract was broken by the other side.
If AIG can’t hire people who know their business, then they have no reason to pay those people bonuses. Incompetence does NOT get rewarded in any industry that I know of.

Posted by: Lyn Miner | March 17, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

They wouldn’t have the money for their bonuses if we hadn’t given them the money to begin with. O’bama and his Congress keep saying that they “adopted” this problem and they are just trying to fix the problems. Irresponsible spending in the trillions of dollars and being naive enough to continue to give money to those who have broken our economy, in my mind is criminal.

Posted by: Jane | March 17, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

THERE SHOULD BE A FINANCIAL MARTIAL LAW. We now have a ‘stake’ in the company —a very large stake. When can we oust the board and gut the place? Were they allowed to go into bankrupcy?? If we allowed that then the top creditor would be the US government and the undeserving could sue for their bonuses after every other stakeholder has been made whole. Perhaps those contracts become void when the corporate governance is deemed insane/incompetent. Isn’t there always an ‘extenuating circumstatces/disaster clause?’ I also want to see those job descriptions. What are they getting bonuses for?? I wish I got a bonus for every bad decision I’ve ever made.
And that notion of a contract is a contract?? Since when does the government bail out the private sector?? WE NEED A MARTIAL LAW.
Other postings on this board are stellar!

Posted by: A. Martel | March 17, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

What people are overlooking is the fact it was Obama that wanted this money given to AIG as a bailout and he has some responsiblity for his bad judgement with the taxpayers money.

Posted by: Judy | March 17, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

The US government ownes 80% of AIG, so the government should demand to exercise control–yes, we should nationalize these bailed out companies. The financial products division that caused the trouble should be shut down and everyone in that division should be fired for incompetence. It’s only some 400 people. I’m sure these people are “at will” employees and can be fired at any time for any reason.

Posted by: Diana | March 17, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

If the AIG executives collecting these bonuses truly believe they deserve them, let’s have them publicly collect their checks !

Posted by: Linda Cleary | March 17, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

They should be treated like any other company that has declared bankruptcy. Look at Delta they got out of their troubles without any bailout money. AIG should have to go through the same regimen. what makes them so special. Is it because they control the pension fund for Congressmen?

Posted by: Tony | March 17, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I think that names and pictures of each person receiving these outrageous bonuses should be posted on the internet and published in the newspapers for everyone to see. Obviously they have no moral conscience. This is not a solution but it will give us some relief by throwing darts at them.
Foregoing, contracts should be written stipulating that there will be no bonuses for failure.

Posted by: Karin | March 17, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

This is simply Outrageous…!!
How is it possible that our government would allow this to happen? Millions of dollars in bonuses to the AIG execs who are clearly responsible for their company’s fallout… they should all get FIRED instead of voiding their contracts… If these exec remain at the helm, it will be a huge liability…

Posted by: Noly | March 17, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Give it a rest. We’re all angry and frustrated but the reality is…the money is gone, it’s over. Now is the time to focus on rebuilding not scapegoating an entire organization for the actions of a small group. If there were contracts between the individuals and the company then under our rule of law the should be honored. Yes, the bonuses are tens of millions but in the overall scheme it’s a drop in the bucket. We may feel better by screaming and beating our chests but that doesn’t fix anything. And the grandstanding by politicians is sickening. Like they had no idea…please. Trying to make themselves in to crusaders after the horse has left the barn, after thy profited from corporate associations… come on. Let’s be about the business of rebuilding.

Posted by: Chuck | March 17, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

The AIG rape of America is only one example of GREED at its worst. Executive WEALTH at a time of disappearing income and resources for average families demands punishment and public rebuke.

Posted by: A.Wes | March 17, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

these people clearly don’t care about the average american, fiscal responsibility, or anything other than their own bottom line. our last president was a big fan of issuing executive orders, maybe our current president should take advantage of that precedent to help the american public and disallow any bonuses for incompetent CEOs. i would recommend life in prison for those responsible for this crisis, not just at AIG, but at all companies. however it would cost the american taxpayer to much to put these people up in prison, there are other solutions. i do not support the death penalty so make ‘em live poor. sentence them to homelessness, joblessness, and don’t let them take advantage of soup kitchens and drop-in centers. such services are for those that deserve it, these fat cats clearly do not!

Posted by: otis bright | March 17, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

We the Tax payers own 80% of AIG from this bail out. We have the controlling stock of the company. All contracts are and now nil & void. If the American worker is taking benefits and pay cuts to keep there jobs. Is AIG executives above the common peasant. What message does it send. Above the law. If they get away with this. We have become peasants. Take control before its to late.

Posted by: falsehood | March 17, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

lmg | Mar 16, 2009 11:43:46 PM has it right.
The free market works unless the government (Bush plus Obama) meddle in it. There was no board seats or rules set when the govt decided to buy ‘preferred’ shares. None of these bailouts should have occurred. The vulture capitalists and the more stable outfits with cash would have bought up the failures. The deleveraging of the banks is going to take time and now longer because the govt just had to meddle without thinking.

Posted by: La Marque | March 17, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

If the bonuses can’t be taken away,
then it should become their severance package. It should include whomever gave the bonuses out and that 160 million should be deducted from the 170 billion alotted AIG. Under no circumstances should they get anymore taxpayer funds as long as those people are still employed with AIG..

Posted by: Clint | March 17, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

I always thougt that a bonus was part of a contract only to give incentive to the one under contract to do a good job. A bonus is supposed to be paid out for exceptional work. There was no exceptional work at AIG, so why are bonuses being paid? Its my tax money and I want to know.

Posted by: Reginald | March 17, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

I don’t blame the people who do the work for AIG. I blame the top management who take the credit for the hard work their workers do. These are the bloodsucking vampires who like many ceo’s and corporate mafia that give their company’s a bad name. No common sense especially now. They have basically slap the american people in the face. They should be shown out of the country and dumped in the ocean. About half way across, with blocks tied around their ankles, because no one in the world would want them or miss them for that matter. The only problem with that idea is that they would pollute the water.

Posted by: JP | March 17, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Reward Failure? Let them file for bankruptcy…No more bailouts!!!!
Our representatives are idiots as well.
They do not represent the taxpayer and do not deserve our vote.
Where is our representation? This is outrageous!

Posted by: Anita Miller | March 17, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

If the Auto Makers and the Auto Workers can renegotiate their contract to help keep the car manufactors operating, then why not AIG? The bailout should not be used to pay these hugh boneses for puting a company out of business. The government should close the doors on AIG and send the Big wheels to jail. That is what would happen to us REAL WORKING americans if we were to rip the government or anyone else off like we’ve been ripped off.

Posted by: bigbud | March 17, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Treasury should get as much of the money back as possible and sue for the rest as a bad faith agreement. No more help or money to AIG. The government should replace all insurance policies with AIG affiliation.

Posted by: Bill McCarthy | March 17, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Any AIG officer accepting bonus money ought to charged with malfeasance and breach of public trust.

Posted by: David | March 17, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

AIG should be broken up, and soon!

Posted by: Leslie Lykes | March 17, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

The angry reaction to AIG’s bonuses should not be directed only at the recipients of the bonuses; our leaders in Washington let us down with the bailouts – rewarding poor management at our expense. Expect to see higher taxes. Our leaders, Republican and Democrat alike, no longer represent those who put them in office. Is anyone else out there thinking “No taxation without representation?” We can’t really hold another Boston tea party – dumping tea in the harbor wouldn’t prove a thing – but we sure can dump the leaders who did this next election cycle!

Posted by: WashingtonElite=destruction of America | March 17, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

The ignorance displayed by elected officials and the news media about economic and financial affairs is deep and distressing. 120,000 people are employed at AIG and only a few 450 are involved in financial products which wrote the insurance contracts guaranting the mortgages which were securitized. The inflamatory news coverage and irresponsible comments by elected government officials puts the lives and safety of 119,000 people at risk.
Why aren’t you attacking the foreign governments and banks who have received taxpayer funds during this crisis?
Isn’t the truth that the government’s failure to understand economic and financial matters has created this disaster. It isn’t the 120,000 people at AIG who are responsible.
Why aren’t you condemning the people who lied on mortgage applications about their ability to pay their mortgages. They are the people who have caused this mess. Why aren’t you condeming the elected officials who urged people to own homes and pressured banks to issue mortgages to *minority* buyers who did not have income sufficient to support a house? Why aren’t you attacking Alan Greenspan? Why aren’t you condeming the heads of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and their tens of millions in salary?
And finally, do any of the overpaid media personnel and their sensational and irresponsible *reporting* merit thier excessive pay?

Posted by: Katherine Casey | March 17, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Public employees salaries are frequently published in newspapers from information available under the Freedom of Information Law. Since AIG is now 80% owned by the taxpayers the media should file FOIL requests for the names & bounuses these 400 or so AIG employees involved & then publish them.
Further,the Government should notify AIG & the “guilty” parties that if they do not agree to forego the bonus the IRS will preform a detailed audit of their past three year tax returns.
My guess is that will result in most crying “uncle”. If our politicos can’t pass tax muster I doubt the high rollers can’t either.

Posted by: Carl | March 17, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

publish the names and their bonuses if they do not agree to forego their bonus

Posted by: John | March 17, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

If AIG had not received bailout money they would have gone bankrupt. The contracts for bonuses would not have been honored so why should they now. What kind of company gives bonuses that are not tied to how the company is performing anyway? Obviously, that is the problem!

Posted by: Laura | March 17, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

If AIG had not received bailout money they would have gone bankrupt. The contracts for bonuses would not have been honored so why should they now. What kind of company gives bonuses that are not tied to how the company is performing anyway? Obviously, that is the problem!

Posted by: Laura | March 17, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

What contract of integrity did AIG execs/ceo’s keep with Americans that we should continually be raped by their lack of integrity and says who are they entitled to anything other than prosecution for and seizing of their assets (dishonest ceo’s and execs who caused this atrocity) and why would we believe their lack of integrity would allow them to fix anything they caused? There are plenty of unemployed geniuses out there to replace the canned and prosecuted ceo’s and execs, which is what should be done with AIG conartists. Seems like lots of Madoff’s in many fields and bail them out why? Lots more corruption here needs cleaning and prosecution as well. Wake up and look it in the face. Print the names of all these execs and their pictures for us who have been robbed to see who these freaks are that feel entitled to more.

Posted by: wilbert99 | March 17, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

It apears as though nothing will be done because they are saying that they have a contraqct, well how would they have honored the contract if the government did give them $175 billion dollars?
Would they still have honored the contracts?
When your company doesn’t make a profit, how the hell can they pay a bonus to their employees that ruined the company.
I must have missed the boat or something here.

Posted by: John | March 17, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

How about this: AIG says it can’t rescind the bonuses because of a contractual obligation. So go ahead and rescind the bonuses anyway–then when the people who are schedule to receive the bonuses file their lawsuits, it will all be tied up in court…until AIG goes files for bankruptcy re-organization–at which point those bonus contract will be under the supervision of a bankruptcy judge…who can then just say “no’ to the bonuses.

Posted by: Brad | March 17, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

detroit was told that it needed to renegotiate its’ union contracts before it would be able to get govt. money. aig execs are not union employees, but the basic idea should be the same. the people who accepted those “bonuses” should be ashamed of themselves. if they are unwilling to return the monies, they should be terminated.

Posted by: antijake | March 17, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

The employees of American General Life & Accident Insurance Co. sure are not getting bonus money. As an Insurance Agent we are like any other working class person. Working from paycheck to paycheck. We have to work to survive. The Big Wheels of the AIG should be held accountable for their actions. They should be ashamed of themselves for even taking bonus money when the goverment continues to bail them out. Shame on them! They should be greatful to have a job. I wish someone would purchase AGLA as quick as possible because I take pride in my job and AIG is hurting us.

Posted by: DEC | March 17, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

The government should inform AIG that they want the whole $175 billion dollars back, but none of our elected officials have the balls to do that.
That is what the banks are doing every day to people who can’t pay their mortgage, so why should AIG be diffrent.
Let AIG fold there are other insurance companies who are capable and financally sound to take over their clients.

Posted by: John | March 17, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

This is the perhaps the luniest thing since the creation of the the FED or the Federal income tax.
No problemo though, I think the best solution is to simply deduct it from most all of the political office holders salaries, and especially all those congressmans and senators who voted for the bailout in the first place along with President Obama, Vice-President Biden, and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and we can start out with Congressman Barney Frank and Senator Chris Dodd and just go down the list from there.
Now if that doesn’t appeal to you, well how about just making AIG pay the money back directly to the American people who right now could use a little bailing out themselves, and just make them hand back a billion or two and divide it up equally and only available for those folks who are certainly in need now and definitely not the greedy fat cats who possibly themselves may have even helped get this country into the mess we’re now in anyway.

Posted by: John DiStefano | March 17, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Our lame government leaders should have allowed these “bailout” companies to go into reorganization Bankruptcy which would have allowed for a review of all contracts. Reorganization Bankruptcy does not mean they are out of business but it does provide for protection of assets. Then the receiver could have had oversight of our money.
I voted for change but it appears it is just more of the same. Knee-jerk reactions, fear mongering and lame leadership. We are the laughing stock of the world.

Posted by: Dave from Indianapolis | March 17, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am

AIG, Citi, and BofA are too big to fail now for sure and the taxpayer is on the hook. Your government at work.

Posted by: La Marque | March 17, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I thought bonuses were for a job WELL done. The personnel at AIG did NOT. What
is AIG’s criteria in respect to this?
The prevailing argument for paying out
these bonuses is to keep the ‘best and
the brightest’. If those execs at AIG fall within that realm, we are in trouble. AIG received their last payout
because of it’s so-called intricate web
of investment policies worldwide. If AIG
was to collapse, all would be lost. I say…cut them off and let the chips fall were they may. How worse off could we get?

Posted by: licentious | March 17, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

AIG should be required to payback every dollar of the bailout money that went out in bonuses. The should not be able to receive anymore money from the federal government and the management of AIG should be forced to resign. AIG should be broken up and sold off to the highest bidder.
If the government (Oboma) realy is serious obout helping the ecconomy, instead of throwing away money to companies that have not lowed prices for their goods or services and giving out bonuses with taxpayers money, but gave the same amout divided amoung all taxpayers that are not in management with these bailed out business, we would be out of this mess alot sooner. What is wrong with giving the money back to the taxpayers (since it is the taxpayers money to begin with) to decide where to spend the money. No matter what the taxpayer would do with the money would help get the economy moving. It doesn’t matter if the taxpayers pay off their homes or go buy new ones or go buy a car or put th money in the bank or in a box. When it gets spent on investments or material stuff the government will make back money in sells and gains taxes, the banks will have mor money to give out for loans and payoff debt and the housing and auto markets will startmoving again.
The economy grows when there are more buyers then sellers, so give the money to the buyers.

Posted by: Daniel Carmody | March 17, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

We can’t changte all of these greedy people overnight, but we can make it less desirable for them to get these big bonuses. Ask Congress to create new reporting catagories for W-2′s that are called “bonus”and “stock options taken,” the latter to include the total amount of money saved over the purchase of the stock on the open market. Tax these 2 boxes at a straight 95%, no exceptions or exemptions. The bobuses would be less desirable and the government would get a lot of money.

Posted by: gail | March 17, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Since you said on your report that the people whom got these bonuses have contracts that can not be revoked. Then I say let AIG fail!!
I am tired of Wall Street crying give us money but it is a waste to give it to our victims. I am tired of Wall Street putting us down talking about us as if we are nothing. Their are Doctors , Engineers, Lawyers, Former CEO’s now living in RV’s and Tents.
They are not seeing a penny of this stimulus money. People whom entered into legal loans with banks, then that bank rose the payments upon those loans so high only someone working on wall street could make those payments.
Yet I and the rest of us so called useless people are giving for a second time billions of dollars to wall street to keep them afloat. They take the money go on as they did before their nose’s in the air with their tin cups in hand.
But these same people say to HELL with the middle class those same people whom gave us money. They don’t deserve it! Well I say Wall Street does not deserve it let them all burn in hell and jump from their wall street offices after losing all their wealth.
I think it is time for a French Style Revolution I am sharpening my guillotine just in case.
I hope that soon all of the so called experts wil realise that this world economy experiment that was very profitable for a time. Just does not work in the light of day. That the rules and laws set up in the past that was called isolationist actually now make a lot of sense.
Now the whole world is going down to ruin, deluding themselves that World economics works. When we can all see that it does not as the dominoes continue to fall. The chain reaction cannot be stopped I am afraid we are all falling to ruin?

Posted by: Tanya Masters | March 17, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

AIG should be required to give the money back to the treasury. The President said he would be watching how money was spent and that what AIG did will NOT happen again! He should be a man and demand the money back or every one who received the money is robbing the American people and the Government and should go the Prison for at least 10 years per million dollars received!!!

Posted by: joseph mccoy | March 17, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

I second the suggestion of Len on March 17 to stop wasting time trying to break contracts or withdraw bonuses, but tax at a 99% rate any bonus payments received by employees of companies receiving bailout funds.

Posted by: Carol | March 17, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

This is such an appalling situation. What a bunch of corporate thieves there are at AIG. I pray there is some way the Obama administration can stop the payment of these outrageous bonuses from a company that has received “bailout” money from the American taxpayers. It is unconscienceable.

Posted by: Lisa | March 17, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

it is b.s if aig keeps giving bonues at that amount when they have failed. i bet the deal was when they made money they get the bonuses, why should the GREEDY, execs get money while every one else suffers. to me its called coporate greed that does not give a hoot about the public but themnselves. these execs should be jailed for taking advantage of the public. to me they should ( the ogvernment) should start letting the aig contracts out to other agencies and let AIG die.

Posted by: jeff | March 17, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Not another cent for AIG! There has to be a limit somewhere. It makes me sick to see these fatcats pocketing millions and billions while record numbers of Americans are being thrown out of their homes. Let them suffer the same fate as anyone else who commits flagrant offenses: flagrant punishment. I think they should be allowed to fail.

Posted by: Gary | March 17, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

The government should call the “loan” the taxpayers gave to AIG due immediately for at least an equal amount to the bonuses they gave to their so-called irreplaceable employees. The American people want the President to set an example – and this is the time to do it. All other employees of all other companies are not indispensable – and neither are these AIG people.

Posted by: rmjdbm | March 17, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Does not the government own 80% of AIG? Take over the company, get rid of these creeps that ran it into the ground, find a way to get the bonuses back and stop this insanity.

Posted by: Fred H | March 17, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

As a veteran of the insurance industry, it is clear that these executives are paying themselves large short term bonuses because they don’t believe in the viability of AIG for the long term. This is a literal instance of “Take the money and run.”

Posted by: FX Ganis | March 17, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

All bailout funds irresponsibly given to crooked and greedy execs while those at the bottom who actually do the work get nothing. Let these businesses fail and let hard working competent people back into workforce. Far too many attorneys and congress as well are over compensated ego maniacs supposedly serving the public –doing no such thing. Self serving greeedy idiots all . Auto industry same thing. They destroyed the state of Mich. knowing full well excessive gas hogs and wealthy greedy status seeking individuals—ceo’s — causing these same problems as the afforementioned already noted. Drug companies right up there with these crooks as are hospital execs. Look at the atrocious behavior they allow and enable in the labs with primates which are abused for the sake of greed and called research for the betterment of our medicine? Get real!evil is what these actions exemplify – Satan is real. More importantly, God is watching and waiting….

Posted by: wilbert99 | March 17, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

I agree with Leslie Lykes! I believe it is time to hold both Democrats and Republicans responsible for the current situation with AIG. Maybe its time for our anger at AIG and the government handling of the bailouts with a constructive force such as new political party focused on financial responsibility.

Posted by: Steve F | March 17, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Bring corporal punishment back. Spank these execs. Spank them with vigor.

Posted by: Huh | March 17, 2009, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Let AIG fail, it’s time to clean up the house. Taxpayer own 80% we should have the say so. btw, we should not bail them out in the 1st place.

Posted by: soben | March 17, 2009, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Take back the bailout money from AIG. Demand to fire all of the executives demanding the bonuses, including Edward Liddy. With so many honest, and talented professionals out of work, I’m sure we can find new talents to fill their roles. Then demand the bonus money that may have already been paid out to be returned by these AIG executives, or have them face indictment and jail. We’ve become the biggest enabler for disgusting and sinful behavior and it needs to stop. If these people have not been paid, then fire them immediately and prohibit them from suing anyone to collect any money from anybody.

Posted by: Monkey Wrench | March 17, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

Since there appears to be little that the government can do to prevent AIG from paying outthe bonuses, they should use the most powerful and feared weapon at their disposal the IRS. Since the proposed marginal tax rate for those who make over 250K is thirty nine percent, I would propose taxing the bonuses at 139%, and promise those that receive the bonuses that the IRS will be auditing their returns each and every year from now on.

Posted by: Joe | March 17, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am

there must be a clause on this contract. If the company does not make enough money, then no one gets bonuses. And we know this company did not make any money. They collapsed. I think they are just ‘conviniently’ saying they can not get their hands ‘dirty’. If there is a will there is a way. They got bailed out, they need to show appreciation to the taxpayers. Show true workmanship.

Posted by: Ernesto | March 17, 2009, 4:01 am 4:01 am

1. “Too big to fail” is true.
2. The amount of the bonuses is insignificant to both AIG and the government. Having AIG pay the money back is an empty gesture.
3. Voiding the contracts is legally messy.
What we need here is a legal way to steal the money back. (Can you say IRS?…sure, I knew you could.) Congress should pass a special “Outrageous abuse of taxpayer funds” tax provision that sets the tax rate on bonuses paid by companies receiving bailout money at 100% and simply take the money back via income tax. Would that be legal? Would that be fair?

Posted by: andy b | March 17, 2009, 4:15 am 4:15 am

Punish them for what? They did what was legally required of them in signing contracts. They would of been sued for twice as much if they did not honor the contracts.
This is what you all wanted with Obama and his bailouts anyway. Taking your money so someone else gets it to fu-k you.

Posted by: Democrat | March 17, 2009, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Let it collaps! That way they all loose thbeir jobs, along with all their partners that are sucking us dry anyway.

Posted by: Thinking | March 17, 2009, 6:10 am 6:10 am

The AIG bonuses are a dribble in a tidal wave of money that our politicians throw around like there is no end to it. If anyone was serious about being responsible for tax payer dollars a good look at how high ranking federal employeees retire on our dime often times investing little time to get the great benefits.
This moaning and groaning about AIG is populist mumbo jumbo.

Posted by: david | March 17, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am

These people should pay back the money they owe the americans

Posted by: lynn | March 17, 2009, 6:47 am 6:47 am

So these people got away with a some our money. So What. If we are serious about reform, then we simply declare these contracts null and void, as the President has the authority to do, and ask for the money to be returned in a reasonable amount of time, say 48 hours. If the money is returned, as a reward the person gets the priviledge of continuing to have a job (albeit in a different department within AIG) in this economy. If no money, these people are declared federal felons (no contract and they have stolen federal money) and 2 things happen. First the persons identification and all relevant personal dat is forwarded to a new federal task forse designed as a federal collection agency. They in turn locate the person and proceed extract the desired amount of funding to be returned to the Government. Secondly, and if the person survives item one, the person is fired from his/her job at AIG. Easy response here since we actually put people to work in this troubled economy with the expansion of the new federal collection agency!! It is win/win situation for everyone!

Posted by: patriot | March 17, 2009, 7:12 am 7:12 am

The big questions is what did the administration know and when did they know it? After all, they were still prepared to hand over tens of billions to this company only days before this bonus story broke.
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | March 17, 2009, 7:17 am 7:17 am

Bonus is based on performance – AIG has
failed! So therefore, they should be fired.
That should break any contract. They have
broken the contract by rewarding bad
performance. What is so difficult about that?

Posted by: Alberta | March 17, 2009, 8:04 am 8:04 am

I am sure that if the wordings of the contract is reviewed critically, a reason could be cited to stop the payment. Let the other party sue and the court and jury decide. Since this was not done at the outset, I wonder what else we do not know about the situation.

Posted by: jbrownski | March 17, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

AIG has a moral obligation to do the right thing. We all know that won’t happen. And many of their employees that received bonuses were under a contractual obligation.It dosen’t make it right, it makes it so.I for one don’t want to give our government that much power. We allow them to override any contract then it will be possible for them to have more control over the average person’s life.This is a complex situation with many reasons for the mess we’re in. And there’s no simple solution. What I find even more sickening are the politicians spouting their outrage, knowing full well they have no legal recourse.They were part of the problem.

Posted by: Bea | March 17, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Fire them…boycott…string em’up…what nonsense.Stop and think about it. It’s not just the fat cats that AIG employs. And as usual the little guy will suffer the consequences.Do we really need more people in the unemployment line? Take it back to where it started, the last administration

Posted by: peanut | March 17, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am

People lying on their mortgages? Are you kidding? It’s not a resume. Loan officers and their backhanded policy ripped off the people with little understanding of what was going to happen to their interest rate. And the defaulted loans are just a part of the collapse. Not to mention the millions that have lost their jobs, sometimes husband and wife working for the same company. In the paper last week the county I live in has an 18.4% unemployment rate. Keep in mind those are just people that filed and can draw unemployment, putting the unemployment rate even lower. What do you think happens to your morgage, your health insurance, and your car when you lose your job? You lose them too…

Posted by: Nikki | March 17, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Audit, audit, audit. The whole place. Start with the CEO and work your way down to the janitor. Bet we can recover a few funds from that company of criminals.

Posted by: Steve Peck | March 17, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

I think congress should pass 105% tax on AIG bonuses paid to people since AIG started receiving government bailout money. Either they can do the honorable thing and refuse the bonus or they can pay 105% tax on it. either way the tax payers are treated fairly.

Posted by: Charles Kuether | March 17, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

America (and companies like AIG) is being Destroyed by Grred.
These Bonuses are the real problems…
Because “short cuts” in making money to get Bonuses is Destroying hard work and real ethics… They’d sell their mother out of a 1% bonus!
So any Bonuses given to AIG employees should be TAXED 125% (that will put a stop to that type of problem) and those who are only getting their own pay – which SHOULD be what people get for working – give them a 10% cut in income taxes.
And Pass a Law, that hench forth… ALL Bonuses are to be Taxed 95% – Not including INCOME TAX for regular saleries. We need to put an end to the Bonus Unethical behavior problems of American Business.

Posted by: Chris | March 17, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Why are politicians upset? They approved it, they gave the additional 30 billion a couple of weeks ago without restrictions. AIG earned it as AIG’s two largest political contributions were to our President and Chris Dodd. A couple hundred thousand into the right hands yielded big returns for AIG. Now the threat from the administration is they will not get another $30 billion unless they return the $165 million, what a deal, these AIG executives are brilliant.
Remember this is the administration and Congress of no more earmarks. Now there OK. So just call this an earmark and all will be OK.
This is change we can count on, these politicians can spend our earnings and those of Americans who have not been born better than anybody we have elected before.
Unfortunately, the only ones who have voiced concern about the politicians giving away our $ is the Chinese government. They see the change we can count on and as our banker they do not like it.

Posted by: larry | March 18, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

let those screw-ups work for free until they get the mess they helped create finally gets corrected.

Posted by: work for free | March 18, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Let’s get real. The bonuses are less than 1/10th of 1% of the bailout. Just call them “earmarks” and Congress will have no problem with them.

Posted by: Glen | March 18, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Given the argument that AIG is critical to the US’s economic survival, so it must be rescued, it would be reasonable, if there was any criminal wrong doing uncovered, to charge said executives with Treason.

Posted by: RR | March 18, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Aig is basically an insurance company and it bought it’s own insurance when it donated to the political campaigns of all of the polititians. Now they are getting the proceeds of the investment they made in those contributions.

Posted by: larry | March 18, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am

They should all be thrown into jail like common criminals. The american taxpayers have been had by these AIG executives. They were given this money in trust that they would do the right thing with it. And they turned around and walked out the back door with. That’s called stealing where I come from. I would compare them to the “Looters” during Hurricane Katrina. They all just took everything they could get there hands on because they thought no one was watching. Let’s round all these clowns up and hall them off to jail.

Posted by: Andyrooney | March 18, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

These 400 or so people that caused all of this had better relize what they are really doing. They are putting thousands of their fellow empoyees jobs at risk. I don’t believe I would take any amount of money if I knew I was going to be despised and hated by everyone. I say to them, you better think about it long and hard because that money isn’t going to make you happy if you cannot go anywhere wher you know you are despised and not welcome. If you accept the money I pity you!

Posted by: larry | March 18, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

So, AIG screwed up. They aren’t the only ones. Let’s face it. The $165 million is a pittance compared to the risk our Congress has exposed us to through their own greed and laziness. Congress played a significant part in the downfall of our economy, yet, they get to keep their jobs, benefits and pension. I say, cut Congressional salaries in half, make them pay for their healthcare and dump their pension…we’ll see who is really interested in serving the American people at that point.

Posted by: CongressIdiots | March 18, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

The government now owns a bunch of stock in AIG, Citigroup and B of A. They have contol of these companies effectively- this is the kind of control that Microsoft fought so hard to get at Yahoo (and failed to). The government needs to use that clout and do what any successful corporate raider would do- fire most (if not all) of the directors of the company if need be, fire some executives, maybe even fire a few managers or employees if need be, and hire people who will go with the new program. The government needs to find leaders who will define that program, though. New laws need to be in place, for sure. The things that led to the fall of AIG- were they illegal? Risk-taking was encouraged, and short-term gains for a few were valued over long-term safety of shareholders and stakeholders (including employees). The government should use its new power to hire people with ethics (and those ethics should be defined). By the way, punishing the executives or managers is not the same as punishing the company. Replacing some people at AIG on the board of directors as well as in the executive ranks would definitely send a message to Wall Street, investors, workers, EVERYBODY!!!! Heck, the stock would go UP if they did that, and replaced them with the right people!

Posted by: David R | March 18, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Is Congress going to give back their Salary? They passed The Community Reinvestment Act. Clinton had the regulations relating to this act so it would encourage more loans. (Sub Prime?). Congress failed to oversee Fanny and Freddie. Congress made the rules for loans to banks. Congress and the administration should work for $1 a year and give the income to people losing their houses. That’s my “Fairness Doctrine”

Posted by: Jack | March 18, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Profiteering during War is a capital offense……..start with Haliburton, KBR, Blackwater and work toward the bank and wall street CEO’s. The executions could be on pay-per-view, so parents could monitor their children’s viewing…….soda and popcorn would be optional, of course.

Posted by: Sammy | March 18, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Why is everyone all of a sudden going crazy over $165 million? Where is the outrage over the billions bilked from the system and given to the contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan (not even taking into account the lives lost and affected) in what was unquestionably fraud and incompetence?

Posted by: coltergeist | March 18, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

When you write the legislation that allows the $165 million BOBUSES to be paid how you talk about PUNISHING AIG?
If you had taken the time to read the legislation BEFORE you VOTED on it you could have corrected it before the VOTE was taken

Posted by: John | March 20, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Let’s stop with the punishment and start with the cure:
1. In the 80s, AT&T was deemed too big to fail and had arrogant ways.
2. To cure the problem, the owners divided AT&T into a number of Baby Bells.
3. We own AIG. AIG itself is a holding company. It has around nine companies. One is the division that did all of the bad deeds and is hurting. Almost all of the others are profitable.
4. Legally seperate the divisions into independent firms. The profits from each one could be used to pay the taxpaper back.
5. The losing division could be liquidated over time.
We had this problem before and solved it. Let’s use the same model again.

Posted by: beto | March 21, 2009, 6:29 am 6:29 am

Too big to fail…wonder how spin doctors it took to come up with that? Reorganize and sell off chunks till we have our money back ~ and for pete’s sake DON’T let them waste hundreds of thousands of dollars more in taxpayer money on changing their name!
Wolf in sheep’s clothing!

Posted by: Kellee Byrd | March 24, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.