By David Schoetz

Mar 19, 2009 11:02pm

Closing Arguments: Taxing as a Weapon

The House today overwhelmingly passed a 90 percent bonus tax for companies that needed $5 billion or more in bailout help. The Senate is considering a 70 percent tax that would apply to companies that received $100 million or more in taxpayer help via the government. And President Barack Obama said he looks forward to receiving a final bill that will send a "strong signal" to corporate executives. So tonight, we ask you quite simply: Should lawmakers use taxes as a weapon to punish? And follow "Nightline" on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline

User Comments

Taxing just to punish? I don’t think so! I think the taxing is just the start. I really do. How do Americans feel knowing their own Treasury is robbing them? Miffed I bet! I think the Obama Administration is going to do something like good ol’ Jesus Christ would do. Get the whip of cords and tell those Bastards, “This is our fore fathers house, GET OUT!!”

Posted by: Tyler Starke | March 19, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

YES, yes, yes. Why, there are tax credits set up all the time for special circumstances (ie Katrina victims) why not taxes? In any case this is legal–and just. These overpaid drones, could even be accused of illegal wrongdoings that helped bring about the near collapse of AIG-and in that case I do advocate a due process trial, but where taxes are concerned, they are not exempt. Breach of contract, since they pretty much drove the company to near collapse.

Posted by: Danny | March 19, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Tyler, your argument doesn’t follow—how does taxing a corporation equal to robbing us the American taxpayers–the right conclusion would be that were getting our money back.

Posted by: Danny | March 19, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

It’s the house’s job to be impetuous, that’s why there are more of them and they only serve 2 years. Hopefully the Senate will act a bit more sanely.
A 50% tax rate on it would seem to be reasonable. Historically, a 50% tax bracket on the highest incomes is not that outrageous. The first Reagan tax cut spent 3 years to drop the top tax bracket down to 50%. Reagan entered office when the ‘millionaires’ top bracket was 70% – he left office eliminating the millionaire bracket entirely, so the $100 million broker’s bonus was taxed at the same rate as a $300k/yr doctor.
50% sends a message without setting a new dangerous punitive precedent.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 19, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Danny:
THE TREASURY ASKED FOR THE LOOPHOLE! M,kay? THAT IS ROBBING THE AMERICAN TAX PAYER!!

Posted by: Tyler Starke | March 20, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am

So they put a big tax rate on this bonus, the people who are responsible for this whole debacle will find a way to spend it, too. Heck they will probably use it to take their wife to Paris on Valintine’s Day like they did this year. Forget the tax and get rid of the people who caused this whole situation. The politicians!!!

Posted by: larry | March 20, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I’d love to have that bonus plan, any of them. No bonuses at my job, and we didn’t even lose billions of dollars, let alone TAXPAYER dollars! Those contracts should have had a funding out clause, or deliverables for performance. How you can “earn” a bonus when AIG failed to the point that it’s now nationalized at 80% government ownership is way beyond my sense of what’s good and right. Tax 99% of it, or give it all back in protest of the taxes. Just give me my tax mone back!

Posted by: Colorado | March 20, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

article 1, section 9 of our constitution specifically forbids this, however, congress has never really cared about the constitution anyways, especially lately.

Posted by: mike in atlanta | March 20, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

The government starts by passing a bill to tax unjust income, then they can tax whatever and whoever they deem fit. This is extremely dangerous territory and the government is going to steal from those that are successful in no time.

Posted by: Josh | March 20, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Taxing as a weapon is not the right way to go, don’t fund them in the first place.

Posted by: Jim Phelps | March 20, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

This is a huge mistake. The Democrats are trying to cover their own butts because they caused the outrage but want to look innocent. They never take responsibility, you see it everytime the President reminds us that he “inherited” the crisis. It’s time to move on and deal with the issues and stop playing the blame game.

Posted by: Irving Kolodziejski | March 20, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

larry, you got it right.
The last pork barrel bill wasted more money than all of the bonus money paid in the U. S in total
What about the bonus money for the execs at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are getting. They, with help of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, caused the subprime mess.
Where is the outrage!!!!!!

Posted by: bigeasy43 | March 20, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Tax as a weapon to punish people? They already do it to smokers.

Posted by: Louise Martinson | March 20, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Taxes have always been used as a punishment. The harder you work, the more you make the more you are taxed. Whats new? The real question here is not whether they should get the bonus should they get taxed 90% but why didnt our government know or atleast look into all the details for the bailout before they gave out our money? They were in such a hurry, its always alot easier to spend someone elses money and our government is very good at it. Why not give the 90% tax money that they collect back to the tax payers and let us decide how to spend it!

Posted by: maria | March 20, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

This needs to stop! Taxes levied as punishment, retro-active laws to punish people or entities as a means to enhance a politian’s image….this is all so wrong that it is hard to fathom why the average American is willing to tolerate this behavior. Not to mention that it is a direct violation of Constituional law.

Posted by: Randy | March 20, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Absolutely no targeted unfair taxation without representation.

Posted by: AM Amey | March 20, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

This is a bad precedent. Taxes should be standard and fair. They shouldn’t be used to reward or punish individuals or companies. The bonus issue should have been address as part of the bail-out negotiations. Since it was not, the people involved in these negotiations should be held accountable.
HL Mencken once said “The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one’s time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all.”

Posted by: Joe | March 20, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

This is not only wrong, its unconstitutional. You cannot pass a law and make it retroactive. This would be the same as them lowering the speed limit then handing out fines for people who sped before the law passed. Further more just like we dont allow laws against blacks, mexican-americans or gays, we cannot allow laws against one individual company. We need to get these idiots out of congress. They don’t even understand the constitution. And don’t even get me started on Obama. Im gonna cut the national spending by proposing the largest budget since world war II. Im gonna reduce earmarks by allowing more of them than ever. And people are eating it hook line and sinker.

Posted by: Lyric | March 20, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

This is not a “weapon to punish”. The companies that are being “bailed out” in this instance are stealing from the American people, when they turn around and pay out big bonuses from that money.
Some of those people are not even employed with AIG now.

Posted by: joy | March 20, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I think the bonuses are terrible but I think congresses’ activity is really scary! Using taxes to penalize individual citzens is just not right no matter how much we don’t like what they have done. (Especially to make political points). Who will they decide they need to make an example of next?

Posted by: Jay | March 20, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I say let them keep the bonuses. the goverment know what they were doing, so they say.
the republicans want to go over the stimulas package,but it was rushed thru., and only after it was reported ,is every one mad. it’s very danagerous to let the goverment pass laws with out thinking it thru.

Posted by: dave snyder | March 20, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

I’m from the Midwest, Everyone here is feeling the pinch….EVERYONE. When we hear of $165 million in bonus’s….BONUS’S Gimme a break, the company was failing to the point of bankruptcy 4 months ago and now they are giving out a bonus. I don’t care about the contracts, or what branch they worked in, or any of the other excuses. No bonus for anyone in a failing company in the real world so why should there be a bonus in the Wall Street world. Timothy Geithner knew about this in the beginning and now he should pay with the disgrace of losing his job.

Posted by: Doug | March 20, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Congress gave them the money. At that point AIG is in control. Congress can not micro manage AIG. Taxing a target group is illegal. This is a prime example when Congress rushes into a bill. Under usual conditions of passing a bill Congressmen barely know what is in a bill of this complexity what would you think on one RUSHED through as this was. The first mistake was giving AIG any money. They should now be in bankruptcy. Sure that would have been painfull but where we are now is more painfull.

Posted by: chk | March 20, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I think what we’ve seen in the first eighty days of this administration is “business as usual” instead of a campaign promise of “change”. It’s all just rhetoric which shows exactly what our elected officials think of the citizens of this country. They think we just fell off the turnip truck. But getting to the point: do those “executives” have any performance standards or do they just get a bonus for being there. And using the excuse of paying these bonuses as a retention device just proves to me that the financial system has been allowed to do as it pleases. And what about the $62 that AIG “gave” to foreign entities. These bonuses are just a “smoke screen”.

Posted by: LR | March 20, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I don’t think this is punishment. The laws of this country have always been manipulated to address particular interests at particular times. We allow emminent domain to drive people off their property. Anyone who accepts public assistance, at taxpayer expense, is subject to using the assistance to meet essential needs.
Bonuses are not an essential need – they should give them back. Taxing them works fine for me. Bonuses should not be given to poeople who need corporate welfare. Lawsuits take forever, let them sue. They did not do such a great job, let them quit. Something smells on Wall Street, clean it up.

Posted by: Gwen | March 20, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I just say … No to any bailouts.
It doesn’t work and the money is never used for what it was intended for anyway.

Posted by: lm | March 20, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Where I come from bonuses are tied to performance…if we weren’t profitable, we didn’t get a bonus. Although I am disgusted with the bonuses I think taxing it will set a dangerous precedent for us as taxpayers. If we allow the government to pick and choose who they want to punish for making too much money by taxing them more, who knows what will be next? I fear that it would only be the beginning. I say force them to return it, or deduct it from the next installment as paymetn already received.

Posted by: Tina | March 20, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Although I am outraged by all of the bailouts and crazy bonuses, it is concerning to me when Govt gets bigger and goes unchecked; much in the same way this mess happened in the first place.

Posted by: Terri S | March 20, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Absolutely NOT – What happened to No taxation with out representation?

Posted by: Jason | March 20, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

1ST I don’t agree with the bail-outs, 2nd, I don’t agree with the bonuses. AIG seems to have been upfront with their contractual obligations, according to the news I’ve heard many in the gov’t knew of this. I know I’m only one person but this sets a dangerous precedent. How long before my $500 safety bonus gets taxed at 90%!!!

Posted by: Pat G | March 20, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

let’s go after the real criminal….
good old georgie…I could $300 + a year… couldn’t you???? and seize the assets of those crooks who stole our social security money!! Let’s see them live on $400 a month!!!!!

Posted by: bubba | March 20, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Congress is so stupid they passed a tax law which is unconstitutional. Congress needs to take a course on the American constitution. So Congress and the President can be educated enough about our constitution and laws so they can pass laws that will stand up in court and not waste time passing bills that are unconstitutional.

Posted by: Sandy | March 20, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Lawmakers have over stepped their boundries. They make it possible to get the bonuses then want to punish the recipients of them. Using tax as punishment is absurd. However, it does beg the question; If the government can open the door to tax away the bonuses of poorly performing executives then can the average tax payer walk through that door and demand a refund from the politicians paycheck when they make a series of terrible decisions?(As so many of them do). Don’t tax it back. Rectify the problem by not assuming it’s ok to create loopholes to support the multi-million dollar lifestyle of these people on the dime of millions of Americans that are struggling to pay the electric bill.

Posted by: Natalie | March 20, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

@ mike in atlanta, actually congress didn’t really care about the constitution when Bush was in power the first six years.

Posted by: Danny | March 20, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am

talk about wolves ready to feast on the sacrificial lamb–Republicans, are ready to pounce on Democrats no matter what. The gall.

Posted by: Danny | March 20, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am

AM Amey, since when does AIG represent you?

Posted by: Danny | March 20, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am

To Retroactively enforce a law, that means you had to have had a new law to begin with and Congress did no such thing, hence this tax is very much legal. As for taxing for punishment as someone else said, we already do that to smokers and we also have tax credits for special circumstances(rewards?)–NO break of the law then. This stands end of story REPUBS!

Posted by: Danny | March 20, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

This sets no precedence–only in your mind.

Posted by: Danny | March 20, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am

No. Specific punitive legislation is abusive, it’s ex post facto, it’s an abuse of legislative prerogative. The bonuses are outrageous, but the right rresponse is to attack the contracts, not to abuse legislative power. Even better would have been to insist that companies use up all their resources, including funds for bonuses and junkets, before receiving bailouts — and to cap total compensation (no matter how disguised) at the salary of the President of the US.

Posted by: Sober Adult | March 20, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

I’m not ashamed to admit, I drive a dump truck for a living. My company has contracts with both the state and federal govt. I work all year to get my bonus, and I know how I would feel if the govt. took it because of something my company did or didn’t do!!!!

Posted by: Pat G | March 20, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

I’m not ashamed to admit, I drive a dump truck for a living. My company has contracts with both the state and federal govt. I work all year to get my bonus, and I know how I would feel if the govt. took it because of something my company did or didn’t do!!!!

Posted by: Pat G | March 20, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Danny, I think you are an instigator. People on this blog have been saying congress or politician they are not singling out Dems. What is your purpose to create turmoil between the parties when there was none?

Posted by: larry | March 20, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Why should there be a problem with passing a tax bill to correct an omission in the bailout funding? It is astonishing to read how many people think these execs have some kind of RIGHT to millions of dollars from our tax funds. That’s right. Their company ran out of money to fund their bonuses. What they’re using now is MY money, your money. The correction should apply to ALL companies that received bailout funding – so it should not be a punitive action aimed at AIG. Let’s remember the point of a progressive tax system. I make more money than many other people – and I think it is completely right that I pay more taxes. It’s how the government programs that keep us safe, find health breakthroughs, and educate our children are paid for.

Posted by: PMM | March 20, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

I’m pretty much a diehard liberal but even I can’t swallow this bit of political posturing. For one thing, I can’t imagine any court upholding this law, and I think most of the politicians voting for it know that. This just lets them huff and puff for the folks back home without the inconvenience of this law being implemented, with all its potentially bad consequences.
I really don’t want the government setting private corporations’ bonus policies or levels of executive compensation. It’s one thing to set a minimum or living wage because people who make less than that require much more government assistance in terms of money for child care, housing, food stamps, etc. But to tell companies, “You can’t give out bonuses” or “You can’t pay your executives more than $xxx” is a horrible can of worms that would have unintended consequences worse than the public rage over AIG bonuses.
Most importantly, it doesn’t solve the problem, which is the corporate mindset that led AIG to be in this situation in the first place: running a legalized gambling operation (that’s exactly what CDOs are all about) within an insurance company, and contractually committing to pay exorbitant bonuses to executives whether they perform or not.
This mindset is endemic throughout the large financial firms, hedge funds, traders, etc. It’s an entitlement mindset that costs us far more than our government “entitlement” programs … trillions of dollars being given away in hundreds of companies that oversee the flow of money throughout our economy. I’ll guarantee that all the welfare cheats (a very small percentage of welfare recipients, btw) don’t cost us as much as one AIG, or one Madoff or one Standford.
And I don’t know what kind of legislation can cure that sickness at the heart of our economy. But whatever is, this bill ain’t it. This is one time I’m hoping that Republicans in the Senate will torpedo this one with a filibuster. But I doubt they have the courage.

Posted by: windrider | March 20, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

The game of bailout has been played for decades now, to keep the international banking cartels rich, so if they ever fail, the taxpayers (middle class) will bail them out, on the excuse that some horrible disaster will befall us if THEY fail. It will continue to encourage the same risky loans because they OWN congress and will ALWAYS be bailed out, so they have nothing to lose. It is theft of the middle class, and theft of my children’s future. STOP thinking its the demo-rats VS. the republic-cons. (They demonstrate they are rats, while the others con the republic.) There’s no difference. It is about the super-super rich who are at the top of these banking cartels who are ripping us off big time. The bailout money was never intended to helping everyone to benefit. It is for the sole benefit of the big banking cartels and the fed, so they can buy up more banks.

Posted by: Dennis | March 20, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am

We have to be VERY afraid of a president who thinks it is lawful to enact punitive taxation. It IS unconstitutional and he is out of control. BHO appointed Geithner, BHO should replace him rather than excuse him.
BHO has NO business on talk shows. WHERE is his decorum and sense of dignity for the Office of the President? His behavior is ludicrous.

Posted by: Rea | March 20, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am

PMM -
Those people (not all execs) have a valid contract in place – that gives them the right to the money. So, a $100K accountant who happens to be married to someone who earns $150K just theoretically got 90% of a contracted payment stolen by your federal government, and the rest possibly stolen by state/local govts. Your government is now using your money to justify robbing people – how can that not bother you?

Posted by: SND | March 20, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

You know I emailed Brian Ross to see if the would run a story on Hank Paulson. Paulson, the help of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Ben Bernecke, is the one who got this whole bail-out thing going. It would be interesting to see if he is hanging out with his old cronies from Wall Street that he really helped out with the bail-out. If you agree that a story about him would be interesting, since he has dissapeared into the wall, I urge you to email Brian Ross and see if we can get him to do a story on Mr. Paulson.

Posted by: larry | March 20, 2009, 1:36 am 1:36 am

This is our country!!! The politicans are supposed to represent US. We need to take our country back and force these people to listen to us or vote them out. There is no excuse to play the blame game except to C.Y.A. How many thousands of dollars did AIG give to polictl partys??? And how much don’t we know about??? This has got to stop!! We as indivuals have to get involved, WE have to stop this before it goes too far.

Posted by: Pat G | March 20, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

I find it all alarming. The way these smug elected officials try to play the American public for being a bunch of fools. They allowed, but once the public heard of it, now they want to put on a stage show! Folks I’m mailing my tea bags in! The AIG clowns were wrong for taking the cash, but many of us would have also. Congress, the Senate and the President they’re all going to get an ear full for many of us are preparing to march on D.C.!

Posted by: J. Richner | March 20, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

90% IS NOT ENOUGH!!!
WE THE PEOPLE that OWN 80% of AIG should tax at least 99% of the bonuses those PIGS stole from the tax payers. You see, the executive PIG that received an undeserved $6MM bonus would retain $600K @90% tax, which is still way too much. Don’t you get it? The PIGS are robbing us blind!
TAX 100% for all I care, but GET THE MONEY BACK!! ALL OF IT!! … and it would be nice if the gang of PIGS went to jail.
VOTE FOR A 100% BONUS TAX ON ANY CORPORATION THAT RECEIVED ANY BAIL OUT CASH.

Posted by: WeThePeople | March 20, 2009, 1:41 am 1:41 am

So, in answer to the question, after passing the bailout packages and then taxing the execs 90%. It’s just a little token to satisfy the public, but does NOTHING to solve the real problem.

Posted by: Dennis | March 20, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

- We the people don’t 80% of AIG – the federal government owns 80% of the outstanding stock. A shareholder isnt an owner, a shareholder is an investor.
- how is a contract written before bailout funds now considered stealing? Were the employees supposed to be psychic and not enter into agreements? Or, are they supposed to just roll over now that some people are complaining?
- what law exactly has been broken? Even the CDOs at AIGFP were legal. So, are you sending them to jail for making bad decisions? If so, better build more hails – idiocy is rampant.

Posted by: We'rethePeople2 | March 20, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

My heartfelt kudos to Dennis. Man,you hit the nail on the head. Some of these “Bailout” funds should be transferred to the Justice department so they can carry out a full scale investigation on all these Banks, Mortgage Institutions, Auto Makers, and of course members of Congress[BothParties]Dodd,Bernanke,Frank and Paulson, among this illustrious cast of imbeciles. This investigation would soon show who the real CRIMINALS are in this debacle. All we are now seeing is smoke and mirrors and cover your ass tactics in the blowing and political posturing of our Congressional leaders. Oh, Did I forget to mention Obama and his Chicago-Clinton cabinet? What Congress has foisted on the American public is tantamount to treason…and these Bastards should be exposed for what they are.
AMERICA WAKE UP…You’ve been had…

Posted by: Nachthexe | March 20, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am

The question is misguided. Congress did not use taxes as a weapon to punish. They are using taxes to get back stolen taxpayer money. That is fine, just like using tax evasion to send Al Capone to prison was fine.
Congress is not punishing anyone by what they have done. If they were seek tax payments of two or three times the bonuses from the AIG criminals, then there will be some punishment involved.

Posted by: Jack | March 20, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Jack – How is a 2008 employment contract considered stealing in 2009?

Posted by: SND | March 20, 2009, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Tax the ultra-rich, tax the ultra-rich, tax the ultra-rich!!!!

Posted by: jeffrey1234 | March 20, 2009, 3:04 am 3:04 am

This stunt is unconstitutional as it is a bill of attainder- a retroactive law targeted against a set of individuals-U.S. v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 (1965)

Posted by: woo | March 20, 2009, 3:32 am 3:32 am

Obo, Gietner, and congress are ALL culpable in this!
Now they all pretend outrage at specifically authorized bonuses that are a result of legislation THEY crafted in such haste?
THEY enacted the legislation allowing these “bonuses”, which apparently are not actually a “bonus” in the way most of us define the word.
All this scheming to deflect blame is unsavory, but adding insult to injury by ignoring our constitutions prohibition against “Ex-Post-Facto” legislation would even more appalling.
If allowed to happen, this course will set a new level of abuse against the citizens our republic, WHO will be the next victim of such misplaced congressional vengeance?
“He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”
– Thomas Paine

Posted by: Reality check! | March 20, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am

I think what Congress is doing is totally ridiculos, because the Democratic Congress is the one that allowed A.I.G. to pay the bonuses in the first place. Chris Dodd and Geitner added the bonuses to a bill, then had congress pass the bill without reading what they passed. Now their trying to blame A.I.G. for paying the bonuses that they approved. This is totally upsurd! Congress should never be allowed to pass a tax specifically targeting one group of people.

Posted by: Robert Posch | March 20, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am

Taxing as a weapon is opening a “Pandora’s Box”. This is setting a precedence of using taxes as a threat without boundaries. Our taxes are now being used to fulfill irresponsible promises made while recruiting votes in a presidential election. Now that 3 1/2 trillion dollars are on the table to “bail out banks/company’s” with no forethought about limitations and guidelines as to how the money can and cannot be used, our government has backed themselves into a corner. Now, for example the billions of tax payers money invested in AIG are being thrown away on executive’s bonuses. The Obama administration’s solution is to use taxes as a weapon as their method to “bail themselves out”.

Posted by: Mary | March 20, 2009, 4:03 am 4:03 am

Just a Bunch of BS. I do not see how this could stand.
Business has been eating our lunch for years, and will continue to do so. It has been a good old boy group tied to our politicians ever since we existed. The house had it’s say, but it will never clear the Senate.

Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Law of Common Sense:
a. Offer executive compensation when executives contributed to the success of company.
b. Do not offer executive compensation if the company failed and executives were unable to meet the objective due to their short sightedness or market condition.
Taxpayer money is a loan that a company has to pay back and should not be used as a carrot for retention or any other rewards resulting in more begging.
Taxing the bonus is a joke, there should be a criminal investigation for such malpractice

Posted by: Tim | March 20, 2009, 7:50 am 7:50 am

The lawmakers should have put these provisions in the orignal loan bill, rather than use the tax code after. But that would have made too much sense.
There will be unintended consequences of this legislation. I wonder if it applies to rank and file workers? Will some poor guy’s 5K bonus get taxed at 90%?

Posted by: Washington has gone bananas | March 20, 2009, 7:53 am 7:53 am

None of these idiots deserve a bonus. The money should have been used to reduced some of the losses experienced by AIG’s customers and shareholders. That doing so was not a priorty of these people is further evidence of their inability to run AIG as a company. I don’t want to see them taxed at 90%, I want them all fired. I see no reason for government intervention and never thought AIG should have been “bailed out” to begin with. “Bailout” only means keeping the same incompetent crooks in a position that allows them to continue to break the law.

Posted by: macy | March 20, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

I don’t think tax is right way to do. Maybe law makers can have other law to prevent the higher managers to get those bonus. If the companies are failed and laying off people, even they have the contracts, companies still don’t need to pay the bonus. O, not just the company which get Feb’s bail out.

Posted by: Ivan | March 20, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Everyone is up in arms about the AIG employees driving AIG into the ground and then receiving rewards, how about our politicioans driving the United States in to the ground and getting rewards. They are doing the same thing to our country and condemning someone to take the attention from themselves. They are truly masters of deversion and deceipt. If the American people ever wake up their joyride will be over but they are going to do their best to see that that doesn’t happen. I wish someone would total ALL the perks and compensation that Nancy Pelosi gets during the course of a year. I imagine we would faint at the figure it would come to. They are going to keep all of this hidden from us just like they do everything else. I just hope someday the American people would break free of this brainwashing from Washington and realize what truly is going on!! OPEN YOUR EYES AMERICA!!!

Posted by: larry | March 20, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Sorry mispelled deceit. stay safe

Posted by: larry | March 20, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Punitive taxation is a bad idea. Don’t go there.

Posted by: pink | March 20, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

The administration does NOT want this tax to go thre so they are “sitting “on it for a few weeks until the furor dies down – if the tax goes thru, the Hedge funds( totally unregulated and totally crooked ) said that they give money to the goveerment and that put a scare into the entire administration. That Bill will die and disappear –just like the bill Obama made a big issue of when he signed a Bill that would allow bankruptcy judges modify mortgages so people don’t lose their homes — that has disappeared and I want to know why — especially when our government gives free money to banks — when it should have been given to the taxpayers !

Posted by: Elle | March 21, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Rephraseing last comment — our administratiion won’t let this tax bill go throughbecause if it goes through the Hedge funds told Obama that NO FURTHER MONEY WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS ADMINISTRATION BY THE HEDGE FUNDS. Administration wants that Hedge Fund money so you will not see that tax bill go through,
Face it — had the job been handled right in the first place none of this would be happening.

Posted by: Elle | March 21, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Rephraseing last comment — our administratiion won’t let this tax bill go throughbecause if it goes through the Hedge funds told Obama that NO FURTHER MONEY WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS ADMINISTRATION BY THE HEDGE FUNDS. Administration wants that Hedge Fund money so you will not see that tax bill go through,
Face it — had the job been handled right in the first place none of this would be happening.

Posted by: Elle | March 21, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

take all of the bonunes back no body should get bonunes with a failing co that got bailout money from our taxs take it take it try liveing on 50.00 a week for food like me

Posted by: Douglas perry | March 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Well as a smoker paying nearly $5.00 a pack for cigarettes, I’m hear to tell you that punitive taxation is not new to the US government. Is it unconstitutional, yes.
As far as salary caps, well I think that the top salary of the top executive should be limitless ~ as long the lowest paid employees is paid a set percentage amount less. Fat cat gets a fat raise, so should everyone.
Anyone and everyone knows that the rank and file are the ones that do 90% of the work and they do it for 10% of the pay; while the executives took their junkets, flew all over the place and brought home more money that they were obviously ever worth!

Posted by: Kellee Byrd | March 24, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

It was unthinkable that after asking and then receiving the multi-million/ billion dollar loans that these guys would buy new jets, distribute the money amongst themselves – it was as shocking to the new Administration who acted in Good Faith as it was to US, the regular folks. It’s a shame they behaved so arrogantly but then, they are probably Republicans. I can’t imagine that kindof selfishness. It was a brilliant idea to attach taxes to their dirty deed. Would you trust those guys to pay back their loans? Ha! Let’s not forget it was the Tax Code that put Al Capone away. And, when tax-sheltered nations of Switzerland, Cayman Isles, etc. cough up the identities of their ‘secret’ bank accounts many of those crooks will also go to jail, including not only the con artists but drug dealers, slave traders, the Moffia and other notorious criminals who otherwise would go scot-free. Wonder what percentage is comprised of Republicans? Wouldn’t you like to know?
Yea Geithner! Yea Obama! The answer is – you guessed it: YES. Use the Tax Code to get the crooks!

Posted by: sprowlindak | April 6, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

DO you recall the “Boston Tea Party”?
The French Revolution, Spanish Revolution.
Most revolutions of the world over were caused by servitude status of the people. Neither side is correct, the human carnage is the strongest evidence of such.
The opposite extreme holds similar results, as declared by history.

Posted by: John | April 7, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am

TOO MUCH TAXING GOING ON!!!!!!! PUNISH? WHY? People’s TAX CUTS would have been a better option….versus spending ten trillion DOLLARS on what?.
Where has the trillions of pork barrel spending money gone? I know some has gone to EURO nations? Probably a whole bunch in politicians pockets. Keep the TRILLIONS here in the USA to rebuild our economy and more JOBS.(Not 150,000 jobs for illegal immigrants!!!!!))
You people in DC are down right ruthless in your spending!!!! People are laughing at you guys, and not because it is funny. IT IS A BIG FARCE! YOU PEOPLE HAVE LOST YOUR MINDS AND ARE EVIL!!! Give us a break…..160,000 new government jobs! Oh, that is really going to help! These are not black jelly beans!!!!! Spend less….remember this is a recession!? Get doing your jobs in DC…..you are getting paid plenty BY US and not fulfilling your obligations to the people or the country!!……we pay your wages, remember you can be replaced by someone who loves America and the Constitution and the Bill of Rights! Someone who LOVES THE US CITIZENS AND WHAT AMERICA STANDS FOR! WE DIDN’T ASK FOR TREASON AND TYRANY! WE WANT OUR WONDERFUL COUNTRY BACK! WE WANT OUR FREEDOMS BACK, THE CONSTITUTION, OUR LIBERTIES, ETC. BACK! WE ARE NOT A GOOD MATCH AT ALL! I THINK WE CAN SEEE THIS NOW AFTER ALL THE ‘CRAP’ THAT HAS COME OUT, AND THREATENING, APOLOGIES NEEDED, SLIPS OF THE TONGUE. REMEMBER, YOU SAID YOU WOULD NOT RAISE TAXES A DIME!!!!!!!!!???????????? OH, THE DECEIT JUST GOES ON AND ON. I SPEAK FOR MANY OTHER AMERICAN’S – THIS JUST ISN’T A GOOD FIT FOR ANY OF US!!!!!! AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC….NOT A MARXT DICTATORSHIP. AMERICA WILL NEVER BE THE SAME THANKS TO THESE ”CHANGES”; WHERE’S THE TRANSPARENCY YOU PROMISED? We want and deserve the”TRUTH”, and need to be treated w/respect…we are living human beings after all.

Posted by: Linda | April 7, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Taxes must be carefully weighed and balanced. White collar executives need to be punished just like the shoplifter if taxation is a remedy than so be it. However I believe greater policing them is a better resolve. The similarities between them is too great!

Posted by: John | April 7, 2009, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.