Husband’s Bank Ties Roil Waters
Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) is facing heat over allegations she personally intervened to aid a bank to which her husband had financial ties.
Waters, as chair of the Housing subcommittee of the House Financial Services committee, has taken big banks to task for their failures to help homeowners affected by the current economic crisis. But for the small OneUnited bank, Waters personally intervened with the Treasury Department to obtain millions in bailout funds, according to the New York Times and others.
Waters’ support came as a surprise, the Times reports. OneUnited, thought to be “in precarious financial shape,” had been criticized by regulators both for failing to lend enough to poor people, as well as for providing its CEO with a $6.4 million California “beachfront compound” and a Porsche SUV, according to the paper.
Waters’ husband, Sidney Williams, served on the bank’s board and “has owned at least $250,000 of its stock,” the paper found. Waters, in a lengthy statement released Friday, appeared to confirm her husband still serves on the board and owns stock in the bank.
In the statement, Waters said she was involved in talks with the Treasury Department not on behalf of OneUnited but for the National Bankers Association, to “discuss their concerns regarding the situations facing minority banks.” (OneUnited is black-owned.) Waters said she did not attend the meeting “and thus did not participate in the conversation.”
This isn’t the first time Waters has faced criticism in connection with her husband’s businesses. In 2004, the Los Angeles Times reported Williams had earned over $500,000 in consulting fees from a municipal bond underwriting firm, despite having little experience in the bond business. Williams made introductions for the company to key politicians whom his wife helped elect, the paper reported.
Waters told the paper at the time that “her family’s business interests are separate from her congressional activities,” according to the Times account.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Isn’t Maxine Waters the Congresswoman who told the CEO’s of oil companies that “the people” should take over the oil companies? Typical spread-the-wealth Democrat. I guess it never occurred to her that “the people” (at least those who own mutual funds through their pensions or 401Ks) actually do own part of the oil companies?
Posted by: Janet | March 13, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Maxine Waters challenged the president of Shell Oil, asking him to guarantee gas prices if oil companies are allowed to drill offshore. The oil man shot her down. Her response, verbatim: “And guess what this liberal would be all about. This liberal will be about socializing . .. duh . . . would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies . . . .” Maxine Waters is a socialist, just like her beloved president. She doesn’t care that the oil companies are corporations, with hundreds of thousands of stockholders, most of whom are middle-class Americans who own oil stocks through their 401K investments. She’d rather seize private property, and spread the wealth to “the people.” Thus, the “people” get to see the wealth spread their way, and the stockholders like me (secretary, 55, $47,000 a year) get screwed. Welcome to the United Socialist States of America, courtesy of Barack Obama and the liberal Democrats.
Posted by: Socialism sucks | March 13, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Waters is among the lawmakers who take my breath away – and has for many years. My wife and I simultaneously groan whenever we hear her voice. She could not realize how polarizing she is.
Posted by: tk | March 13, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
She’s entitled, isn’t she?
Posted by: Mack | March 13, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Remember Maxine’s response the next time any of her opponents gets caught with a conflict of interests: family business is separate from congressional business. So, if there are any followup questions, the response will be “racism”.
Posted by: Gina | March 13, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
She makes me ill! She must think we are pretty stupid to think her family business is never entwined with the Congressional business. Yea, right!
Posted by: Windering | March 16, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm