Mar 27, 2009 1:09pm

Palin’s Picking a Political Fight

ABC’s Stu Schutzman from New York:

The fur is flying up north. There’s not nearly enough smoke spewing from Alaska’s Mt Redoubt to obscure the tensions between Sarah Palin and the Alaska legislature. Accusations are rampant, accusing  the Governor of refusing to accept a third of the federal stimulus money due Alaska, just under $300 million, in order to further her personal political agenda.

The Governor reiterates on the state website that she opposes growing the state government and taking federal dollars with strings attached. She asks “how we will get out of the fiscal hole we’ll be in just two years from now when those temporary funds are gone?” Members of both parties claim that’s a specious argument since states accept federal handouts all the time.

Its “outrageous,”  says Alaska Democratic Chairwoman Patti Higgins, “that we have a governor who is willing to turn down Alaskans’ fair share of federal stimulus money.” “Incomprehensible” said another.

Republican lawmaker Mike Hawker, in a rebuke to the Republican governor, says the legislature has found very few strings attached to the federal dollars. The legislature appears to be ready to overrule the governor and accept the money. The Republican president of the Senate, Gary Stevens says the governor is free to take the high road if she chooses but “I think I’d rather personally take the low road here and say I don’t want to leave any money on the table.”

In an attempt to resolve all this legislative leaders called for a meeting with the governor yesterday. They claim she was a no show. Her website says she agreed to do it by phone and they “canceled the meeting to host their own press conference.” “Absolutely false, absolutely false,” says Stevens, “We’re here, we’re available, and unfortunately she is not.” Again, that’s coming from a republican. Sounds like irreconcilable differences.

So what’s really going on here? Many believe that Palin is looking down the road to the next Presidential cycle and using this crisis to reinforce her conservative credentials with the party base. “It is very clear,” says Higgins, “that the governor is doing this just to further her own narrow political agenda and ambitions.” But some analysts believe she can have it both ways because the legislature will vote to end run her and accept the money anyway.

The political danger down the road for Palin is that she may have burned down too many bridges at home……which no amount of stimulus dollars will rebuild any time soon.

User Comments

It’s SCARY to think that this lady could have been our Vice-President. She’s not qualified to manage a Wal-Mart. palin is a JOKE…just like she was during the campaign.

Posted by: pt | March 27, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Sarah Palin is to Principles what
Dunkin Donuts is to fine dining….
I can hardly wait to see the GOP try
to nominate her for 2012…..talk about digging their own grave…hehehe

Posted by: Leprkin | March 27, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Sarah, Michelle Bachman, John bayner, eric canter, etc. all comic book characters. Hope they all run in the future. slam dunk!

Posted by: cjr | March 27, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

The left-wingers have a vested interested in destroying Sarah Palin. They want to believe that all women are liberal, pro-abortion, etc. Sarah Palin is a bright, talented, extremely attractive woman who disagrees with the liberals on just about everything. That’s why she is a threat. That’s why the liberals and their allies in the mainstream press tried to destroy her reputation by printing lies about her, attacking her family, etc. This is what liberals always tried to do. Instead of arguing the merits of a political philosophy, they practice character assassination on their enemies. How pathetic.

Posted by: Janet | March 27, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

“She asks “how we will get out of the fiscal hole we’ll be in just two years from now when those temporary funds are gone?””
MAKE THE PROGRAMS TEMPORARY. It’s really not that hard if you have adults in charge.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 27, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Janet,
Everyone was free to make their own opinion about ms. palin. (Remember the Katie Couric interview. Remember “I can see Russia from my house.”) I repeat, palin is a JOKE. If the repub’s want to nominate he fine, but even they can’t be that Stupid…can they?

Posted by: pt | March 27, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

If Sarah Palin looked like Janet Napolitano or Christine Romer, the liberals wouldn’t have tried nearly as hard to destroy her. We live in a world where style trumps substance (Obama’s election proves that). Sarah Palin’s look (youthful, attractive, slender, stylish) is at odds with the typical Republican white businessman image. The left-wingers want to perpetuate this Republican stereotype. They don’t like the idea of a young, hip, attractive woman with conservative values because it conflicts with the Republican image they want to see portrayed.

Posted by: Another Sarah | March 27, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Purely political moves by Palin. She is no longer doing her job as governor of Alaska, but rather trying to set up for a possible Presidential run in 2012. The Alaskan legislature should prep themselves for continuing responses such as this, at odds to what might be best for the people of Alaska. Palin First 2012, Alaska Second.

Posted by: Ordermonger | March 27, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

All Palin is doing is political grandstanding… plain and simple.
She and her minions have no clue on what they are doing…
Palin cannot do anything at all and she proves if constantly…. just let her open her mouth and moronic dribble comes out.
I hope the Republicans push her as a front runner, it will just show how stupid they are.
All Sarah Palin knows how to do is WHINE, WHINE, WHINE.
Thats president material… YOU BETCHA.

Posted by: lm | March 27, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

When it comes to money there are few politicians that would not sell their souls for a few bucks, the Alaskan legislatures are no exception.

Posted by: david | March 27, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

janet, Palin is no more of a threst to us “moderates” than Ann Coulter is. The only thing Sarah Palin is a threat to is the Republican party that lost so many memembers thanks to her stunning performance last year.

Posted by: tjsills | March 27, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

In the beginning, I wrote Sarah Palin off as a beautiful but inexperienced politician, not ready to be president. I think I was right. I was struck, though, by the visciousness of the liberals and left-wing mainstream reporters who attacked her and lied about her. Apparently they saw something in her that I missed. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have tried so hard to destroy her.

Posted by: Janet | March 27, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Anyone who turns down this WAIST of taxpayers money, I admire! This country is going to be sooo deep in debt our great grand kids will be paying for it!

Posted by: Justme8811 | March 27, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Yeah David and Palin is willing to sell the souls of her people to make her political point just as many other Govonors have been willing to do. What a gal.

Posted by: tjsills | March 27, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Why does the right-wingers always drag President Obama into discussions about Failin Palin? They are not on the same level.. He is president, and she is a defeated VP candidate.

Posted by: sachet | March 27, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

This is fantastic news. It shows two things:
A) She’s still incompetent and can’t manage a PR issue.
B) Rank and file GOP still love her.
Which makes her viable and damaged at the same time. Great for democrats.

Posted by: bubba | March 27, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Speaking as Alaskan we support Gov. Palin in speaking out on this issue.
There is an attitude pervading certain sectors of this country that the stimulus and any federal money is “free money” (a term used by an Obama supporter); may I remind those peoples that this money is from the sweat (virtual and real) of people who work for a living and could put that money to better use elsewhere.
Palin is from the category of people our Founding Fathers expected to populate our government, not the career criminals and parasites occupying offices from President on down.

Posted by: Rumiko | March 27, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Stupid is as stupid does, maybe Caribou Barbie should have asked Limbaugh what to do.

Posted by: JR | March 27, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

The liberals who attacked Sarah Palin are also the same liberals who attacked Hillary Clinton. They condemned her because her husband cheated on her, they said her “experience” in the White House amounted to ZERO, they took innocent remarks out of context in order to make her look like a racist, they even accused her of “pimping” her own daughter.
It’s interesting that the left, the supposed champion of women and minorities, tried so hard to destroy not one, but two, women attempting to shatter the glass ceiling.
It’s even more intersting that the liberals who once laughed at Hillary’s experience were the first to applaud her appointment as Secretary of State. Funny. When she was running against Obama for the nomination, she was a ###### ##### with no experience, but now she’s a fine citizen with the experience necessary to be Secretary of State.
Never underestimate the hypocrisy of the liberal Democrats, or the depths they will go to in order to destroy their political enemies.

Posted by: Janet | March 27, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“She asks “how we will get out of the fiscal hole we’ll be in just two years from now when those temporary funds are gone?””
MAKE THE PROGRAMS TEMPORARY. It’s really not that hard if you have adults in charge.
Posted by: jhw539 | Mar 27, 2009 1:56:38 PM
THE PROBLEM IS IF YOU ACCEPT THE MONEY IT IS NOT TEMPORARY. YOU HAVE TO CHANGE YOUR LAWS TO MAKE THE EXTENSION OF UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PERMANENT. THE STIMULUS MONEY WILL BE GONE AND THE STATE WILL BE STUCK PAYING FOR IT AND MOST STATES CANNOT AFFORD IT WRITE NOW. THE STIMULUS HAS MANY STRINGS ATTACHED. SHE IS TRYING TO BE RESPONSIBLE WITH FUTURE TAX PAYER MONEY

Posted by: OBAMANATION | March 27, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

I think some of you really need to seek professional help. Obama was not mentioned even once in this article so where do the Obama attack comments come from? That is so pathetic.

Posted by: Dee | March 27, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

At least Sarah Palin can make a speech without a teleprompter. That’s because she doesn’t need a machine to remind her what she believes and thinks. When you have a firm set of beliefs and principles, you can talk without a script. If you’re a Socialist who hates his own country, you need to stick to the script.

Posted by: Janet | March 27, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Texas was (still is?) undergoing the same conversation. The state laws would have to be changed to extend the unemployment benefits and the state would be stuck with it long term. It would be irresponsible to not consider the full implications. I do not see the media jumping all over Texas FOR THE EXACT SAME REASON. Wonder why?

Posted by: Jennifer | March 27, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Sarah Palin is a bright, talented, extremely attractive woman who disagrees with the liberals on just about everything. That’s why she is a threat.
========================================
She is no threat. Just a sad example of what conservatives view as being execeptional. She is the epitome of mediocrity (actually, less than mediocre). So if Republicans continue to pin hopes on those of mediocre intelligence and whose judgements are entirely routed in mindless ideology and they will continue to marginalize their relevance in American politics.

Posted by: indy_voter | March 27, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Her problem is that she’s a bad liar. She lied when she said she was exonerated by the ethics probe, just flat out lied. Now she’s lying about a meeting with her fellow republicans. Just flat out lying again.
Whether it’s better to have politicans who are good at lying rather than one who is a stinky liar is a philosophical question that I cant answer.

Posted by: bubba | March 27, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

The Republian “whack job” strikes again!
I would think citizens of Alaska are becoming awfully embarrassed by such an anti-intellectul clown.
Moose Barbie is a prime example of the morally and intellectually bankrupt Republican Party. Of course, she is the “best and brightest” Republicans have to offer. She leads the Republican “Brain Trust.”
Sarah……….Honey…….Sweetie…… “It is better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.” Do yourself and us a favor, and shut up.

Posted by: Sammy | March 27, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Janet: Oh my my! There is nobody feeling threatend by Ms. Palin, millions of people simply see her for what she is. She wasn’t even “attacked” in the press, the statements attributed to her were her own, sans teleprompter! The media (all media) dug into her personal life and that was unfortunate, but the basis of our derision was the fact that she is a lightweight!!

Posted by: shelleyt | March 27, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Jennifer, good point. Texas doesn’t have Sarah Palin as governor, and the liberal media still has its knives out for Sarah Palin. Apparently, they still consider her a threat! Funny how a little bitty woman, 105 pounds soaking wet, can instill such fear in the left-wingers and their allies in the mainstream press. No wonder so many people are tuning into Fox and conservative talk radio.

Posted by: Janet | March 27, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

If you wish to know what is really happening in Alaska, and how they feel about their Governor; She is loathed up there, witness the recent dire straights her constituents are in and her almost total lack of concern or action on their behalf.

Posted by: shelleyt | March 27, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Pardon the interruption here…but the folks with no job who have exhausted their benefits and have zero income….what exactly are they supposed to do?? Does these self-centered politicians care about them? Nope…not at all….they need to be “tarred and feathered”….and shown the way out the door….

Posted by: Phil | March 27, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Phil – Could not have said it better. As an employee of the Dpet of Labor helping people file those unemployment claims and find a new job, I completely agree with you. Our beloved Sonny boy also turned down parts of the stimulas package tho not the unemployment part. It gives these people a bit more breathing room and a little more time to locate work. Come election time tar and feathers will not be necesary here in Georgia.

Posted by: tjsillsga | March 27, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Palin is the reason my husband and I voted democrat for the first time in 20 years. That lady scares us !!

Posted by: classylassy | March 27, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Gov. Palin is right in accepting Stimulus money with strings attached and is right in not applying Stimulus money to programs that require multi-year funding. Plugging a hole now that will become another hole in 2 years is not prudent. Money that can be applied to one-time programs should be accepted but not for continuing/multi-year programs. She is no different from a number of Governors who don’t want to be caught in a fiscal trap in 2 years. That isn’t grandstanding – it’s holding to conservative principles. It appears from comments that many people can’t tolerate a smart, thinking, and conservative woman. I guess that they want women like Clinton and Pelosi who love to spend other people’s money and dictate our freedoms while making their millions and being highly privileged. I suspect that many critics can’t hold a candle to Gov. Palin and love to attack her to try to bring her down to their level. I would love to examine the qualifications of the person who said that Gov. Palin couldn’t run a Wal-mart but who probably voted for a person for President who has never run anything, much less been a mayor or governor.
If anyone wants to see what’s happening they should look up the story on how to catch wild pigs. It’s what Obama is doing to our nation with our own money.

Posted by: Bill | March 27, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Janet, in saying the following:
“The left-wingers have a vested interested in destroying Sarah Palin. They want to believe that all women are liberal, pro-abortion, etc. Sarah Palin is a bright, talented, extremely attractive woman who disagrees with the liberals on just about everything. That’s why she is a threat. That’s why the liberals and their allies in the mainstream press tried to destroy her reputation by printing lies about her, attacking her family, etc. This is what liberals always tried to do. Instead of arguing the merits of a political philosophy, they practice character assassination on their enemies. How pathetic –
you’ve just described the tactics of the GOP. Sarah Palin destroyed her own political career. Katie Couric nor any other news anchor is responsible for Palin’s dumb responses to questions. Sarah Palin is the vice presidential candidate who had such violent and scary supporters within her ranks who shouted “kill him” in response to her comments that Barack Obama “pals around with terrorists.” And liberals are responsible for this, you say? Please!

Posted by: SierraBW | March 27, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Classy – me too. Scary woman.

Posted by: tjsillsga | March 27, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Has anyone found out about the payback yet, all the ramifications to her constituants??? Has anyone thought for one second that Palin may have a legitimate viewpoint as far as economics go. Do you all know how much it’s going to cost the entire U.S.A. for years to come? Higher taxes big time!!! I know much of it may be necessary, but I think paying for golf courses and other items that were sandwiched into the bailout were certainly not necessary. I think Palin is being responsible. The oil companies are still helping the economy out in Alaska. They really do not need more payback in their future. I think they need to find out how much it’s going to cost them and how long it will take to pay it back before they decide to grab the money and run.

Posted by: Sharon | March 27, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Seems the majority of republicans in her own state dont have any tollerance for her narrow views and governace of the best interest and responsibilities ato the citizens and needs of her own state. Doesnt surprise me, she had a few seconds in the spotlights and now she thinks she is presidential material in 2012. That assures another 4 years for President Obama. She is good lookin but has a pea for a brain and an ego the size of Alaska. Even her own state party wants her out she is so vain.

Posted by: Jay | March 27, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm


“She asks “how we will get out of the fiscal hole we’ll be in just two years from now when those temporary funds are gone?””
MAKE THE PROGRAMS TEMPORARY. It’s really not that hard if you have adults in charge.” – jhw539
There’s no such thing as a temporary government program.

Posted by: Noz | March 27, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

I understand why Sarah wourl turn down the money. She already got paid for the Bridge to Nowhere and used that money as she wished. Perhaps Duh Palin figures she has already taken more than can be justified. I would take offense at the conservatives or the liberals either one trying to destroy Ms. Palin. They don’t have to, Just let her talk. She can do a better job destroying her political chances than anyone else.

Posted by: MIke Morrison | March 27, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Palin Helps Alaska Get Rich Off Oil While the Rest of the Country Suffers AlterNet. check out Google and find out if Palin is a loser or not…each and every person in Alaska gets $3,200 per year whether they want it or not…thanks to the oil companies…are you all nuts???? I think the legislature is just a tad greedy…

Posted by: Sharon | March 27, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

It is disturbing to see how few people can actually understand what they read. There is nothing in this article that ‘attacks’ Sarah Palin. The people quoted as being upset with her are, for the most part, Republicans in her own state. She didn’t show for a very important meeting with the state legislators and then tried to shift some sort of blame to them.
Speaking as an Alaskan, I can see her lack of real leadership from my house.

Posted by: Writing from Alaska | March 27, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Palin Helps Alaska Get Rich Off Oil “While the Rest of the Country Suffers AlterNet. check out Google and find out if Palin is a loser or not…each and every person in Alaska gets $3,200 per year whether they want it or not…thanks to the oil companies…are you all nuts???? I think the legislature is just a tad greedy…”
This is totally incorrect – that was a one year PFD payout plus a one time energy rebate. It is expected that the PFD may go as low as $68 in a few years.

Posted by: Writing from Alaska | March 27, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

This Lady have shown on several occassions that she’s not very bright. Definitely a chip off a block of the BUSH CLUB!

Posted by: Dante Kaputo | March 27, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Unique Alaska finances helped her spend money while keeping taxes low
Published: September 19th, 2008 12:27 AM
Last Modified: September 19th, 2008 03:29 AM. I think you need to do more reading. As long as the oil flows in Alaska the citizens will reap the benefits.

Posted by: Sharon | March 27, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Alaska has the highest drop-out rate in the Nation…and Palin is rejecting money available for education….she is also rejecting the energy stimulus money because it requires uniform building codes…gee…that’s a real stringent thing to impose…
She needs some tar and feathers to go with her Sax Fifth Ave wardrobe…and told to go home.

Posted by: Phil | March 27, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Janet:”This is what liberals always tried to do. Instead of arguing the merits of a political philosophy, they practice character assassination on their enemies.” — That a statement like this is lost on the repubs after the last 8 yrs is, well – hilarious. Seems to be a basic tenet or republico life: Lie and accuse, lie and accuse – lest someone catch you in your own lies and accusations. And they call themselves Christians.

Posted by: RepubFlipFloppers | March 27, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Hi, I live in Texas, and I can see Alaska from my window; And it’s smokin, ya betcha

Posted by: Richard in Texas | March 27, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

It seems strange, The the governor of Alaska and any other governor for that matter who could turn their backs on a Stimulus that extends unemployment benefits. The whole concept of the stimulus package is to give the laborers of their respective states a little extra time to find employment. Another thing is that some of the money will be used for education. Now I don’t know about anyone else, but if we don’t educate our children for the future, there will be no future. Education is the back bone of our country. They are the ones who are going to lead us into the future. Anyone that thinks that we don’t need to insure a good education is a fool.
Just how many politicians do you think never got a formal education. (none).
We have to give the admistration a chance to prove or disprove the promises. I might remind you about “Fultons Folly”, the Wright brothers,Alexander Graham Bell, and all the others who dared to believe they could & did.

Posted by: joshua0729 | March 27, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

You go girl!!! Imagine , a state that lives and thrives on it’s own budget. Not at all like Washington and the Democratic party. With every free? handout, excuse me I mean stimulus, comes a ton of programs, waste and corruption and political manuvering which usually means the money didn’t get done what it was intended to do and the program runs over budget or ends and more political finger pointing begins, and of course Palin is the one who will get the blame….taking money from Washington is like living on credit. Stick to your guns girl, some battles are worth the fight.

Posted by: tdgeet | March 27, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I base my opinion of Sarah Palin on her stated belief that humans and dinosaurs co-existed, and her claim that she could see Russia from her home. Both statements (and others) indicate someone who is ignorant. She, and other conservatives who only use character assasination to argue against the Democrats — claiming that people are “liberals” as though that were somehow not a virtue — would be and have been a disaster for this nation.

Posted by: Ian MacFarlane | March 27, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

How is Gov. Palin decision not to accept the federal stimulas money any different from other governor’s? There have been at least 2 others who have come out against taking this money. Also whoever says this is free money has not looked down the road to the future of our children who will be responsible for paying the interest and our grandchildren who will be paying for some of the principal. These personal attacks against Gov Palin are a reflection of the bias & bigotry common in this political climate. It seems that all any political party member cares about is advancing their own agenda, and to Hell with what is best for this country and the American citizens in it.

Posted by: Roxanne | March 27, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Palin still ‘gets’ to dems.
It’s great!

Posted by: hh | March 27, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

tdgeet…
YOu’re right…go girl…I can’t have educated Alaskan’s in my state…they wouldn’t vote for idiots like me…plus there might just be a huge drop in FFA graduates…(Future Felons of America)…and that could have drastic budget implications for my criminal justice and prison industry…
Why worry about going green in Alaska…we have so much oil and gas and we haven’t even gotten around to destroying our wilderness areas yet…that will take care of those pesky wolves and moose herds…going “green” in Alaska means we won’t have to burn fuel shooting them from helicopters…that will be our contribution to reducing global warming…and as for education…we’re already exceeding our quota for turning out illiterates…what more could we ask for??? We don’t need any stimulus money…unless there is some more dough in there for a bridge to nowhere…we need a few more of them…

Posted by: Phil | March 27, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Sarah Palin was a poor example of what women are capable of in every walk of life. can`t believe McCain actually vetted her before he chose her. I was interested in him before he chose her . No way afterwards.

Posted by: Barb | March 27, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

oh and i forgot to mention…the most important reason to avoid education is that folks might suddenly understand that word PER-DIEM…you know…the dough you are supposed to get to cover expenses when you ARE AWAY FROM HOME…they might get confused and think I shouldn’t get paid for those days when I’m home…and I wanna get paid either way. I need the dough…my Sax 5th bill is huge and the GOP ain’t paying it anymore.

Posted by: Phil | March 27, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

palin and the GOP have nothing to offer but opposition.they have no hope for themselves or our nation.except to hope for the failure of others.welcome to the modern GOP were the motto is personal power and politics before people or country.

Posted by: Michael | March 27, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Trying to be smart, bu oh so run of the mill at the same time.
The RNC really needs to find a new script. this “tactic’ is about as transparent as the window glass it was drawn up on.
Even dim witted independents (Darryl the Contractors)can read between the caverns in this “logic”
This hasn’t received any traction in any other states it has been tried in other that to display the producers perspective that the voting public is REALLY stupid.
try again Sara, Bobbie and Co.

Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | March 27, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Ya’ll are getting kinda tough on the repubs and the conservatives. You know they are just funnin witcha right? Trying to compare Sarah and Hillary is like trying to compare a weiner roast with a Steak dinner. No one is really stupid enough to think she is ready to be president, but she was eye candy during a long political season. Kind of funny too. But the Repubs will put up a much more seasoned, principled candidate next time around. There are too many independents that are moderate and thank good ness for them!

Posted by: Chief P | March 27, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

please,please,please!!!! give as much press as possible to Palin and Jinndal, also limbaugh, need lots on him…let’s discuss his being a junkie and morbidly obese at the same time. Yes siree bob,these are the idiots that’ll insure our once great nation to the rubbish heap.Palin will probably make Todd defense secretary and Jinndal well outsource the whole deal to Pakistan. In any case it’ll never happen, these folks are morons and don’t have a chance.

Posted by: dago in chicago | March 27, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

I don’t “trash Palin” because I’m frightened of her. I trash her because she’s a blathering bimbo. There was a time when the Republican Party could mount a respectable intelligent argument in defense of their ideology. People like William F. Buckley and Barry Goldwater were worth listening to, even if you disagreed with them. But they’re dead now, and it seems that intelligence in the Republican Party died with them. When their ilk get replaced by the likes of Palin and Limbaugh, you might as well run Bozo the Clown for President, because at least he’d have the decency to admit that he’s noting but a bad joke.

Posted by: Tim Haugen | March 27, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Nice. Lot’s of sniping from both sides ridiculing the other, and only a few reasonable voices to be heard.
My 89yr-old father and I each voted Democratic for the 3rd time in our lives last year (he voted for Truman, I voted for Clinton his 2nd term, & we both voted for Gore). Why? Because the Republican party we both admired and fought for is a pale imitation of what it once was.
Sarah Palin is not a role model for true conservatives; she parrots talking points she doesn’t understand, and her actions belie her words so often she even makes my 10yr-old daughter blush with embarrassment.
I am not a fan of the entitlement mindset I see on the left, but for the last decade true Conservatives have been ridiculed by our own party. So-called Conservatives like Coulter and Limbaugh creep me out; they are extremists just as clearly as leftist whackos like Rahm are.
How I dream of another Barry Goldwater now; a man with real principles who refused to pander to the freaks. Hell… I’d settle for the McClain of five years ago, before he tossed his principles aside.
At the rate the GOP is going, my father may never have a chance to vote Republican again.

Posted by: 55yr-old Conservative | March 27, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

These articles about Sarah Palin are a good thing. Come 2012 we can refer back to theses articles and use them to elect Palin as our first women President.

Posted by: John Demeter | March 27, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

It seems that Sarah Palin has taken a bum wrap, First of all with that nasty Katie Couric asking her all those lefty-commy questions like what papers or magazine she read. Then there was that shot gun wedding of her kid that ultimately went sour, that certainly was not fair for the press to cover, even though she dragged those kids onto every stage in sight. And isn’t it every moms right to pose a photo shoot with her kid by a dead moose? And then there’s that wardrobe, what republican wouldn’t want to take care of her closet? And incidently, there’s more money in building bridges to nowhere than there is in building bridges to somewhere, right?? We’ll get back to ya on that Katie

Posted by: Richard in Texas | March 27, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

“Trying to compare Sarah and Hillary is like trying to compare a weiner roast with a Steak dinner. No one is really stupid enough to think she is ready to be president,” – Chief P
You’re right Chief P, that wiener roast is right where she should be as Secretary of State.
You may also have a point saying she’s too stupid to be president after losing to a community organizer with no experience and a sparse resume.

Posted by: Noz | March 28, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

I find it interesting that people on this site who are presenting themselves as the more sophisticated, intelligent, and educated sect are the ones who are using the most base language to express their dislike for a single person whom none of them know on a personal level.
If you would bother to do a little research, you would find that about 13 governors have refused either part or all of the stimulus money.
What is odd, is that ABC would pick Sarah Palin to spotlight and present the situation as if she were the only governor making this choice.
Governor Palin’s ratings are still in the high 60s-in spite of the all of the dogs nipping at her heels. In fact, her ratings are as high if not higher than the man whose name many of you have called upon for salvation.

Posted by: cr | March 28, 2009, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Don’t forget that most of the career GOP politicians in Alaska hate her, because she took down their state party chairman for corruption and defeated their beloved incumbent governor, Frank Murkowski.
All recent polling in Alaska shows that she’s still popular, with ratings higher than Obama’s.

Posted by: VidOmnia | March 28, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

What where those ‘strings attached’ ?
How many millions/billions would of accepting the questionable money cost Alaska taxpayers over the coming years.
Back in the Carter administration towns where given buses in exchange for a commitment to maintain bus service indeffinatley. fewer then 2 percent of all taxpayers in some towns that accepted ‘bus money’ have ever used the service yet all taxpayers pay indeffinatley. Look at the specifics before opinionating.

Posted by: JAMES NYMAN | March 28, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

does your statistic of 2% include last year when gas was 5 bucks or more per gallon?
Unlike European nations, we have discouraged mass transit solutions….free Hummers to the rich and SUV’s have been what has been pushed..which is short sighted and frankly stupid….we don’t even have a bullet train…
Sounds to me like Carter was way smarter than we’ve been…

Posted by: Phil | March 28, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Free hummers?
Who is getting free Hummers? Some of you sound like a bunch of victims who have the notion that the poor are poor because the rich are rich.
That’s a real poverty mentality outlook.
The difference between the rich and the poor is not money…it’s opportunity and timing. Yes, the rich have more opportunities, but who were they when they snapped up their first opportunity?
Barak Obama is rich. Who is poor becaue Barak Obama is rich? Are you?
Bill Clinton is rich. Did he make his money off of your back?
John Kerry is rich-married to the Heinz heiress. He snapped up an opportunity. Yes, and since the criticism by most mainstream media and many bloggers is that Republicans are the party of the rich and uncaring, don’t forget all of those…
Rich Democrats. Ted Kennedy,
Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Charles Rangel, Tim Geihtner, Mort Zuckerman,
Ted Turner, David Letterman, Julia Roberts, Barbara Streisand, George Clooney, Steven Spielberg, Calvin Klein,
Seal,Bruce Springsteen and the list goes on and on.
So-people get over it! You aren’t poor because some else is rich.

Posted by: CR | March 29, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“She asks “how we will get out of the fiscal hole we’ll be in just two years from now when those temporary funds are gone?””
MAKE THE PROGRAMS TEMPORARY. It’s really not that hard if you have adults in charge.
Posted by: jhw539
———————————-
Brilliant Observation! Now wher ein this administration are you going to find ANY adults!

Posted by: Mike_C | March 30, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am

“Janet,
Everyone was free to make their own opinion about ms. palin. (Remember the Katie Couric interview. Remember “I can see Russia from my house.”) I repeat, palin is a JOKE. If the repub’s want to nominate he fine, but even they can’t be that Stupid…can they?”
————————————-
pt ,
You guys sure get a lot of mileage out of that one. Lets see what about Biden …
” When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed. He said, ‘look, here’s what happened.’”
yep, too bad you buffoons didn’t focus on gaffs on both sides of the aisle, but then when do lefties EVER look at both sides?

Posted by: Mike_C | March 30, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Palin and all the other republicans governors who voter against the Obama stimulus package is not entitled to any of the money. These republican governors allowed their stupidity ruin it for their state and we should not award stupid behavior of any kind from anyone. Their rejection of the stimulus package should be awarded to a needy state who voted for the package. If we do not award good behavior and punish bad behavior, then we will get another Bush.

Posted by: James Davis | April 1, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Mike_C:”Brilliant Observation! Now wher ein this administration are you going to find ANY adults!”
So after multiple attempts to destroy our country the scales have fallen off the conservotards’ eyes. NOW they’re sincerely interested in adult leadership. Too bad they’re about 8 yrs too late. It’s gotta just grate on them every time someone remindes them of their supreme stupidity.
Please oh please, GOD – Palin/Limbaugh in 2012!

Posted by: Mangalore | April 3, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Janet: Not all women are left wingers. We have some mighty fine women out there ie.Hillary Clinton, Napolitano,and some fine republicans,too. She is not one of them. She is a joke…

Posted by: talmag | April 4, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I only wish that the current presidential administration had some principles on which it would stand, instead of bowing to its political base. Look at the decisions President Obama has made since he took office and tell me that they weren’t based on politics. How naive are you on the left?

Posted by: jjsmith | April 4, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.