Mar 19, 2009 6:54pm

Question of the Day: Should the Names of Those Who Got Bonuses Go Public?

Yesterday, New York’s Attorney General Andrew Cuomo won a battle when a
court ruled that the names of the Merrill Lynch employees who received
big bonuses back in December should be handed over to his office
.
Now, Cuomo wants to take the names of bonus recipients to the public.   

Cumo’s steps are part of the effort to ease the public outrage over the massive bonuses given to employees of companies such as Merill Lynch and AIG. The House of Representatives took steps today to remedy this — voting to heavily tax the money
doled out by large companies that took federal bailout money.

The outrage over bonuses has sparked a movement to bring transparency to the secretive
world of Wall Street compensation.  The thinking is that since the
taxpayer is on the hook, everyone deserves to know who is getting
rewarded.  Bonuses and business as usual needs to end.

But yesterday, in the hearings on Capitol Hill, the chief of AIG made a counter point.  Edward Liddy said his employees are at the center of a ferocious storm of public anger.
The company is receiving threatening notes including one that said,
"All the executives and their families should be executed with piano
wire around their necks."

Our question:  Should the names of those who received bonuses be made public? Tell us what you think.

User Comments

Hell Yes!!!!!

Posted by: Larry | March 19, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Yes publish the names and addresses too

Posted by: Mister Vance | March 19, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Yes the names should go public.

Posted by: Richard Warner | March 19, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

No – they should be made known to the IRS – and the 90% tax collected – along with the other $100′s of thousands back taxes owed by these receipients of bonuses! IRS needs to get more aggressive in pursuing back taxes. Maybe we wouldn’t have to keep printing so much money the dollar value becomes nil.

Posted by: mary | March 19, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Of course they should be public. If you are that greedy and that incompetent at the same time,your name should be made public, especially to your owners;;;;; the American Taxpayer!!!! Bank of America CEO, Citigroup CEO, JP Morgan/Chase CEO’s and all the others that took both TARP money as well as bailout money. Pam A

Posted by: Pam Anderson | March 19, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

No. Someone’s child is going to get killed over this and it’s just not worth it. The names should not, under any case, be released; lives could be ruined.

Posted by: Cathy | March 19, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

YES! YES! YES! OH! CAN I SAY YES?

Posted by: Judy | March 19, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Absolutely!!!!! If they are afraid, well so is the vast majority of American people because they have lost their jobs, their 401 K’s, perhaps their homes and who knows what else. Why reward the people who helped put us where we’re at?????

Posted by: Pam Anderson | March 19, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

No. The names should not be made available to the “general public.” There are too many maniacs out there that will take matters into their own hands and too many unstable people who have access to guns.

Posted by: Wayne | March 19, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

No, the names should not be published. The anger we see from senators is so much political posturing.

Posted by: Kay Coppin | March 19, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

no

Posted by: James | March 19, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

What purpose would posting the names serve? Only a miniscule number of people would know these people and they probably already suspect their friend was one who received a bonus. Approval to pay the bonuses was either directly or indirectly given by a representative of the administration, and as the Pres said yesterday, “the buck stops there”. It’s clear to me who’s ultimately responsible for the bonus flap. You can watch him on Leno tonight.

Posted by: Joe in Atlanta | March 19, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

They took public money, now there name should be public too!!!

Posted by: Val | March 19, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

It’s clear to me who’s ultimately responsible for the bonus flap. You can watch him on Leno tonight. Joe in Atlanta | Mar 19, 2009 7:13:47 PM
You are wrong – Joe – but you must get information from FIXNEWS!!!!

Posted by: Melanie | March 19, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Sir: I think the names of everyone in congress who took money from A.I.G. should be made public in every newspaper in america.Everyone is screaming at A.I.G., but most are trying to avoid saying they took money from them.Lobbyist should be kicked out of washington—-we won’t have decent government until this happens.thanks, perry r

Posted by: perry | March 19, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

No. They were given the chance (by Republicans who have been anti-regulation forever)to gain financially and they did. Lowdown, but I wonder which one of the “Hell, yes!” people would take those bonuses themselves and run like hell.

Posted by: Cathy | March 19, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Yes. These people deserve the public shame. They also deserve the protection of the law from the nuts who threaten them and their families. Accepting bonuses in return for having caused this national problem out of greed gives new meaning to the word “egregious”.

Posted by: DrunkPigeon | March 19, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Oh GIVE ME A BREAK! Those people who received our tax money did so for selling hedge insurance at an insurance company. And apparantly they did a good job. It was not their fault that congress made their job leagal in 2000.
Making insurance salesmen/saleswomen a scapegoat for a bad economy is just lunacy.
The finger pointing by Congressmen makes me sick! I do not see any of them standing up and taking responsibility for this fiasco!
And Republicans point at Gietener and saying they are mad at him? He JUST STARTED trying to fix the mess they got us into.
Release the names to a bunch of lunatics? What have we become….

Posted by: KC in Houston | March 19, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Yes they should unless it is returned. But so should the names of those congressmen who voted for the bailout money who have investments with AIG be released. This is a multi country company why is only the US giving them money. Does the government have a retirement account that is not insured with AIG Retirement? No insider requirement if no voting rights on their retirement investments.

Posted by: Lynn | March 19, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Absolutely, their names should be made public. We, the American taxpayers, have a right to know who we paid for services that helped bring our economy to its knees!!!

Posted by: Carey | March 19, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

yes – AND ONLY YES “IF” your are willing to give congress YOUR personal information so they can dig up stuff on you! Come on people wake up! Terrioist
have more privacy rights! The Democrated
Congress knew exactly what they were doing. So my final answer is definately
NO NO NO NO NO!!!!

Posted by: PBC | March 19, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Absolutely, without question. There should not be any debate about this at all.

Posted by: Corky | March 19, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

to take a step back. should a company that failed, which renders contracts void, should they have gotten them?

Posted by: judyb56 | March 19, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Absolutely not. It’s the employer who offered the bonuses. This hasn’t been called greed until now. For the most part, from what we’ve been told, these executives are doing “the right thing”, giving the money back and for those that don’t, the IRS and Congress will make sure they are charged 99% of their money in taxes. This is how it’s supposed to work – our legislators are working for us (hopefully)?

Posted by: Patty/Virginia | March 19, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

NO, do not print the names. Where is the outrage over Franklin Raines taking 90million dollars from Fannie Mae as it was being run into the ground and why wasn’t Barney Frank upset about that???
Why won’t the big brave Obama go on Sean Hannity or Rush or anyother conservative talk show??? NO GUTS!!!!

Posted by: Pam in OK | March 19, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Of course they should be made public. If that was done, there would be no need to try and recover the money. The shame and harassment of these individuals would force them to refuse or return the money, and if it didn’t, they would have earned it thru suffering.

Posted by: Jessee | March 19, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Yes, their names should be made public. We need full disclosure and this is as good a place to start as any.

Posted by: Terri Curtis | March 19, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

HEY CUOMO, READ THIS GUY!
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled companies that started the financial mess we are in, are set to give $1 million bonuses to some of their executives. These two companies were bailed out by our government at the cost of hundreds of billions of dollars. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac plan to do the same thing AIG did with their tax-money bailout – give some executives $1million bonuses.
Don’t let it happen!
Please send an e-mail to your senators telling them not to approve these bonuses! The four largest recipients of political donations by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from 1989 through 2008 were Sen. Chris Dodd ($133,900), Sen. John Kerry ($111,000), President Barack Obama ($105,849), and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ($75,550).

Posted by: Dave & Carol | March 19, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

No. I don’t think this information should be made public anymore than I think anyone’s personal information should be made public. I fear that releasing these names would only fuel revenge. We need to be putting our energy into fixing the system that allowed this to happen in the first place.

Posted by: PBO | March 19, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

No, they should NOT be made available to the public OR congress. Too many angry and unstable people with guns out there. What they did was not illegal, just unethical. But then, there are a lot of people out there who are unethical.

Posted by: Bruce | March 19, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

No, someone will end up getting hurt or possibly even killed.

Posted by: Greg | March 19, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

hell yes and more

Posted by: hanna m | March 19, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

NO! Invasion of Privacy. Names to the IRS is sufficient.
Most do not wish them physical harm. Hitting them in their pocketbooks is truly where it will hurt them and get their attention.
They did, after all, fail. What kind of idiot would have written a contract that would have guaranteed a “performance” bonus even when their performance was clearly a failure? Shameful!

Posted by: Len | March 19, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

It was Bush that gave AIG its first $120 Billion without Congress’ approval or any stings attached. AND – it was NOT part of the first stimulus package signed last November!!! Why don’t we get the money from BUSH and Cheney (especially Cheney and his connections to Halliburton and their subsidiaries that don’t pay US taxes but get all kinds of no-bid US Defense Contracts!!!

Posted by: Mel | March 19, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

I don’t understand why they haven’t already been made public. We, the American taxpayers, are the majority owner of AIG now. The company should be totally transparent to us.

Posted by: Tony | March 19, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

The definition of bonus is additional gratuity for a job well done. AIG rewarded the masterminds of the collapse of AIG and they get WHAT? Publish all names of those who have not returned the checks UNCASHED and prosecute the idiots who signed the checks.

Posted by: MaryO | March 19, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Absolutely not! Those bonuses were lecal under contract. The government should look to themselves and stop the over spending that government is doing! The constitution makes no allowance for the government bailing out companies. This is a capitalist economy. Let those companies that are in trouble fail. That will end the depression faster than what the government is doing! What the government is doing is what was done during Hoover and Roosevelt, and it didn’t work then! It didn’t work in Japan either. It just prolonged the hard financial times. The government and media need to quit pointing fingers trying to divert the attention of the American people from what is really going on!

Posted by: Annette | March 19, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Don’t think so. If any of the rest of us gives Congress a wedge will we be happy to have our name braodcast to the world? These guys and gals signed contracts and if contracts are now illegal what makes any of us think any contract we sign will be honored.
This mess is the result of an incompetent congress and they are playing folks like a fiddle to deflect their neglegence.

Posted by: david | March 19, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Absolutely Not!!! The same people who want the names disclosed would be the first to complain about a lack of privacy if it was happening to them. Remember, these recipients are private citizens, not public officials. Let’s point the blame where it belongs…Obama, Pelosi, and Dodd.

Posted by: John in Salem NH | March 19, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

No, because it sets a terrible precedence of invasion of privacy. This is a public company until the govt decides it wants to completely run it. People should be more concerned about the infringement of privacy rights than getting their thrills off of being angry at AIG employees. This is the bigger concern about releasing names and salaries. Be angry about Congress and the Obama Administration which passed the stimulus bill under the ruse of exigent circumstances which allowed the loophole.
Where are the civil rights lawyers and organizations screaming to save privacy rights?

Posted by: laffingbilly | March 19, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled companies that started the financial mess we are in…
Dave & Carol | Mar 19, 2009 7:40:43 PM”
Hey GUY and GIRL – you are SO wrong!!! This AIG mess started with Phil Gramm in December 2000… A few days after the Supreme Court made George W. Bush president in 2000, Gramm stuck something called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act into the budget bill. Nobody knew that the Texas senator was slipping America a 262 page poison pill. The Gramm Guts America Act was designed to keep regulators from controlling new financial tools described as credit “swaps.” These are instruments like sub-prime mortgages bundled up and sold as securities. Under the Gramm law, neither the SEC nor the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were able to examine financial institutions like hedge funds or investment banks to guarantee they had the assets necessary to cover losses they were guaranteeing.
And continued with Bush’s June 2000 speech about banks and lending institutions (including Fannie & Freddie) relaxing their regulations to make sure that people who could not normally qualify for mortgage loans got them anyway!!!

Posted by: Melanie | March 19, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

oops, i should have stated this is a non-govt company.

Posted by: laffingbilly | March 19, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Yes they should publish the names. We the public deserve to know who the shameless people are that are willing in this tough economy to hold out their hands and accept millions of public dollars with no remorse and be able to sleep at night. They earn seven figures a year while i strugle with peanuts as a check. Let them use sell their gold garbage can’s and high priced paintings to pay for security for their families if they are so concerned about the welfare. They were not worried about my welfare.

Posted by: Slytrini | March 19, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

No, the names should not be made public. The level of outcry from people making threats has been above and beyond common human decency. How about making public the names of those threatening these lives with piano wire and the like? The money was a contractual bonus and above all else, it’s only money!

Posted by: lefthandedtubaplayer | March 19, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

I think they should publish the names. This will make executives at other companies think twice before they try to loot a company.

Posted by: Derek | March 19, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

No they shouldn’t be made public. These were contracts set up long before the bailouts. This has been going on forever, only now we’re realizing how costly they are in this day and time. I’m an educator. I was given a “bonus” (to be paid after the state test results come in.) to make sure the students are able to pass the test. Who would have thought!!! These execs are paid to STAY where they are…..it’s part of the business game. Like paying the students to stay in school. Yep, it’s happening.

Posted by: JP | March 19, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Len, it wasn’t a “performance bonus”, it was a “retention bonus”. But that’s splittng hairs; why would you want to retain the very people who jeopardized the company? AIG needs to fail…their business model is reprehensibly awful. This will only be repeated without wholesale changes, and that means essentially starting anew.

Posted by: Tony | March 19, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Yes , but this is pecisley why we have relgion…….. Without it, these corrupt people would be promptly elliminated, I’m affraid.

Posted by: Patrick | March 19, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

sure. If you are not ashamed of taking even more money for the horrible job you did, then tell us who you cowards are.

Posted by: david | March 19, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

No. The villains aren’t the AIG employees but Geitner, Sen. Dodd, and the rest of the democrat bozos who voted for the loophole to give AIG bonuses. Now they’re shocked, SHOCKED, that AIG paid bonuses!!! All of the democrats are a bunch of lying hypocrites just trying to put the blame on others while they are the reason for the bonuses in the first place!!! LYING HYPOCRITES!!!!

Posted by: Julio | March 19, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

No they should not. This was not their fault. It is the goverments fault. Why hasnt any company receiving bailout money from the govt been told that it is not to be used for bonuses and that if they do they will not be helped at all.

Posted by: ck2teach | March 19, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

When we go all out to protect terrorist, why would we putour own fellow citizens at risk. No No NO use your brais stupid people

Posted by: Elaine Bradley | March 19, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Yes. Public money paid the bonus, so in effect, they are working for the public. And the public should have the right to know who is working for them!

Posted by: JohnQPublic | March 19, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

yes……………..

Posted by: amber | March 19, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Absolutely, post the names. These creeps are notorious criminals at this point in time. They have hurt millions. Posting the names will help people identify them, and the list of names can be used by employers to screen them out and not hire them. Who would want to hire criminals? Posting the names would also help home buyers avoid locating in the same neighborhoods where these criminals live, in case they manage to somehow stay out of prison. Obama needs to be sure these names get posted, or open himself up to impeachment.

Posted by: Jack | March 19, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

No, I do not need the names of the disgusting filthy rich people who took these bonuses. I just want all of them to return the money immediately! I worked hard to pay the taxes that went to AIG to pay those damn bonuses! If AIG had gone under, these people wouldn’t have a job, much less a nice fat bonus. And those so called contracts to pay those bonuses, would have meant absolutely NOTHING! AIG failed because of those greedy rich people there who took their fat salaries, stock options and outrageous bonus’s. Who cares who they are! Just give me back my money….I could care less if you have to sell ONE of your vacation homes to survive!

Posted by: Kate | March 19, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Absolutely those names should be made public, and if that causes those named to worry about their personal safety, then so be it. Let that be a lesson for tomorrow’s greed-driven executives.
Even more, the names of those 90-some House members who voted against taxing back those bonuses should also be presented on the air and published in every American newspaper. Their choice was flawed and supports the greedy values and the people who got us here. Judgement like theirs should not be re-elected.

Posted by: Stephen Rinkenberger | March 19, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

You better bet ya the names should be exposed if the congress won’t keep tabs on them someone in America that is a tax payer will. There we go again who was watching the barn. no one and they stole the beef. I say the Gov would have been better off giving the money to the American people.

Posted by: Gerry McDowell | March 19, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

No,the names of those AIG employees who received bonuses should not be made public. There are too many crazy people out there. And as mad as I am about the greed of these people I do not want them or their families killed or hurt by some nut.I would say to them that I am angry because their “bonus” is more than I make in two years.. and I have a good job..

Posted by: Ann | March 19, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

No,the names of those AIG employees who received bonuses should not be made public. There are too many crazy people out there. And as mad as I am about the greed of these people I do not want them or their families killed or hurt by some nut.I would say to them that I am angry because their “bonus” is more than I make in two years.. and I have a good job..

Posted by: Ann | March 19, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

NO, No, NO… come on people!!! This is not the fault of the people getting the cash… its the fault of our system. The tax man will get that money back… I don’t think that the people should be put on blast. I mean a deal is a deal…and I am sure that those people are aware of how pissed of everyone is over this… I have to say NO!

Posted by: Rosalicious | March 19, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

The names and address’ should be posted publicly! These theives of Taxpayer money are as bad as the FOOLISH Congress that gave it to them. These CLOWNS should run and hide The Conress/Dems all hide behind laws they produced, yet they dont have the Balls to stand up and face the average joe they helped put outa work. Their like the President,,, Posers and Jokers

Posted by: ScottyA | March 19, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

as much as i am mad as HELL!!!I say no, because someone just might get hurt.

Posted by: Chris | March 19, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

No. These are people. They have families. This is all so wrong. Put your torches away. Witch hunts are not the way. Judge not lest ye be judged.

Posted by: chollie | March 19, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Yes, we (the taxpayers) now have an equity stake in this company.

Posted by: Bill | March 19, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Dr. Micheal Savage has been saying all along what a JOKE this deceptive Pres./Congress is and NOW we the people are paying the tab. This new Gov. is already showing “It will fail” Without a doubt or second thought these names AND address’ should be made public! Remember that while watching the Poor excuse of a President on”Leno” tonite showing his face on TV instead of doing his job and CORRECTING THE ISSUE NOW!!!!!!!

Posted by: Oregon Hippy | March 19, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

I do not think the name should be made public, but should be given to the IRS. Do you remeber the Exxon executive from NJ who was kidnap and murder, because he had money. I do believe the republicans should stop acting like childern,and get behind the President. George Bush was in office when when the first package went out to AIG, with no regulation.

Posted by: George | March 19, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I don’t think it is entirely their fault – the system of rewarding the so called “gurus” or financial wizards will have to be reviewed. I think the days of excessive bonuses had a place in our system in the last century but those days are truly over. People are more aware and well informed and quite capable of making good decisions.
Can one get rid of human greed by naming and shaming and producing their home addresses? The answer is no. But what the government ought to do is to look through the loopholes and make excessive bonuses a criminal offence.
I am a strong believer of if you have a calling and are good at what you do. The reward you get including monetary reward will be more than enough.
Let us call it what it is what these people in responsible positions keep on doing is no different from a lot of the criminals we have in jail. They should be behind bars

Posted by: Compassionate Advocate | March 19, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Faye | March 19, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

There is nothing to be gained by making the names public. The names should be provided to the IRS and the IRS should then audit these people for the past ten years. All back taxes should be collected with interest and criminal proceedings should be initiated for all that are delinquent. We are a nation of laws. Use the laws that existed at the time of the bonuses. It does no good to write a “feel good” law that will not pass muster. Congress is the problem.

Posted by: Bruce Dumas | March 19, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Publish the names and their phone numbers!! All of those CEO’s should have been fired too before money was given – it’s quite obvious they aren’t doing a good job of running the place or they wouldn’t need bailed out!

Posted by: Julie | March 19, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Yes. If they are not publicly humiliated then this will just happen again and again. In the future this will be a warning to anyone else participating in this kind of fraudulent behavior. You reap what you sew folks.

Posted by: Josh | March 19, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Absolutely not! This would serve no purpose except to allow anger to be directed toward individuals, which is not where the real blame belongs

Posted by: Jo Johnson | March 19, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Not only made public but position with company, how long they worked for company and if they are no longer with company, date of resignation or firing, etc.
As for the 90% tax, that seems to give our government way too much power and it just proves how government can do whatever it whats to the people. What the hell do we have courts for if the government can tax whoever they want, whenever they want.
I think we should see who got paid off first when the Tarf money was given to AIG. I think someone will see a connection between who was placed in a position of authority within AIG by the government and who was paid who first, (MS). That seems much more important than the bonuses which should have been given in stock options.

Posted by: jimmy guillet | March 19, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

….as someone else has already said…
…Hell Yes! …. taxpayers do have a right to know….they are paying for it!

Posted by: barbara | March 19, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Yes, their name should be public. Transparancy is what we promised from this administration. These people did not care about our nation. They are dishonest citizens. They chose their own lexury life over our common good. So yes, it should be public.

Posted by: Andy | March 19, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

YES!!!!!!!! And make them give the money back!

Posted by: Z | March 19, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Yes, they should be made public and the IRS must make it a priority to audit their returns to make sure they are taxed on it.
The company wouldn’t have been paid the bonuses if they didn’t get the bail out money.

Posted by: Leung | March 19, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

No – I think it’s important to remember that these bonuses were only available for AIG employees to take because the Congress gave them a loophole; Congress gave them “bailout” money, gave them an out – and then acts outraged and wastes more tax dollars to enact a law to tax them on 90% of the bonuses? This is exactly the problem with government getting involved in the private sector and another example of Washington wasting taxpayer dollars.

Posted by: Brandi | March 19, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Instead of focusing on AIG how about disclosing the names of the real villians: the members of congress who failed to do their job.

Posted by: Steve | March 19, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Heck Yes!By making the names public, we can harrass them relentlessly.

Posted by: swellenj | March 19, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

It would quell a little of our anger to publish the names of the “greedy, self serving and arrogant people”. But lets think a moment about that. We really want to save ourselves from having to look in the mirror. It is so much easier to blame “them” than to look at our role in this whole mess. We love money too. We love “cheap” goods made from, who cares, anywhere!! It felt sooo good to get that house even though our deep inner self told us we really couldn’t afford it. We voted for the incompetent leadership that we have. We’ve enjoyed the lullabye that said “go to sleep America — every little thing gonnna be alright—your insured!!!! It’s wake up time for all of us; it’s time to share in the blame and shame game. Let the government make the “insurance scum ” lives miserable. (taxes, audits..), but lets not forget we helped create the culture we’re living in.

Posted by: colleen | March 19, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

I do agree they should all be fired. However, you don’t want to release the actual names. This would endanger their lives. But you could release the # of people that received X amount in bonuses.
This would provide to $ amount issued and how many received how much. Which I believe is the information that is actually being asked for. Please correct me if I have misunderstood.

Posted by: Symera | March 19, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

No! How many member of Congress would have turned down a legitimate bonus. How many us would have? Congress gave them the loophole and now they are trying to make the public think they have the high ground. Bull!!!! If they make the names public their lives may be in danger.

Posted by: Bill Dye | March 19, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

No, I don’t think the names of the executives should be made public. While I don’t agree with the actions of companies like AIG doling out huge bonuses, these executives have suffered enough public humiliation. They do not need to have themselves or their families put into potential danger. There are too many desperate maniacs out there that are capable of serious harm. If my name was on that list of executives and my family was put into harm’s way because the goverment chose to release my name to the general public, the lawsuit that I would file against the government would be far greater than any lawsuit that I could file against AIG for any nonpayment of bonuses.
These executives are not criminals and should not be treated like the sex offenders that are exposed by Megan’s Law.

Posted by: Caroline | March 19, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

YES – money was given publicly – it should be public info about who got what. It’s only fair; we’re picking up the tab on these bailouts.

Posted by: Teddi Jackson | March 19, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Yes they should! It would be good reference incase some of these names are related to illegal activities. Some victim has a right to know and alert authorities of work practices. It would also be a better prevention from some of our less honorable law makers burying some campaign donations (kickbacks) made by these people.

Posted by: Doug B. | March 19, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

How many of you jerks out there would give back a bonus if your company gave you one? How would you like to have your name released to the public? These people had a legal contract. We are attacking citizens and letting terriost go. Barney Frank (Elmer Fudd) makes me sick. They have you aholes paying attention to 160 million while the politicians are spending trillions. The American people are so stupid. Do you realize the Dems put this in the bill to make these bonus’s possible. Maybe they should actually read these Bills before they vote for them. This is just the beginning. Wait till you see what the carbon tax is going to cost you. Also if you think healthcare is expensive now wait until it is free you jerks.

Posted by: PM | March 19, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

No! Absolutely Not! Our representatives have made the decision to give them our money.
Release the names of the legislators that voted for this! They represent the wrong doing. It’s none of our business what AIG or Meryl Lynch people make.

Posted by: Mike | March 19, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Absolutly YES YES YES, and YES

Posted by: edward | March 19, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

No…but the name of the members of congress that introduced the admendment that permitted the bonuses should be exposed. Thats the only way we will ever be rid of these jerks.

Posted by: ed | March 19, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

If one watched the full congressional hearing of Ed Liddy, I can’t imagine any intelligent human being would request that the money be returned.
I can only imagine that the AIG employees must truly understand how our soldiers in Iran must feel…hard working folks trying to rebuild something that their leaders screwed up and are getting no kudos for jobs well done.
But you should be thoroughly ashamed of our country’s leaders after watching the Liddy hearing, what a bunch complete idiots. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed are whats wrong with our government. In 2006, the Democratic government promised change…well they gave it to us and I want no more.

Posted by: Michele | March 19, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Although angered by the AIG bonus payments, I say don’t publish their names and subject them to unwarranted violence. They may be guilty of greed but nothing unlawful. If they have legal contracts approved by AIG senior leadership before the bailout, galling as it is, the contracts must be honored. That Congress would enact a retroactive tax targeting these few citizens is deeply disturbing. Who among us is the next target of their indignation? Our founding fathers fought the British over issues of taxation and capricious use of power.
The guilty player in this case is our government, guilty either of not doing their homework in a rush to provide bailout money or of approving the very bonuses over which they bray so loudly. Enacting fully considered legislation to limit glutinous greed in the future is a more responsible and long overdue course of action.

Posted by: Joe | March 19, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

yes i’d like to know who got some of my hard earned money they are greedy people and should be identified.

Posted by: nan | March 19, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I say yes to this First of all these idiots don’t deserve any bonuses . They are already making way too much money for what they do. They are the ones who caused this mess all for what ? Greed. The government was not strict enough on the propose taxing the receivers. They should be taxed 125%.

Posted by: Michael | March 19, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

HECK NO! NO WAY! I don’t understand how anyone could even consider revealing names! And I’m unemployed. What are people thinking?! And taking 90% of these bonuses through taxes is ludicrous! People are looking for someone to blame the state of the economy on, but they should look deeper.

Posted by: Kim | March 19, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

absolutely not unless you want them and their families put into serious personal risk. Just get the money back and let them think about it for a while and how the rest of the population lives…the ones of us that are not the filty rich. I always thought that bonuses were for people who made money for their bosses and the company that they work for…these guys should have to pay money back to AIG to the tune of $100 billon that they lost last year.

Posted by: Bob | March 19, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Yes. Why not.
Can’t beleive some use the danger excuse. They surely don’t have any fear when they put our money in their pockets.

Posted by: jpf | March 19, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I didn’t realize there were so many Communists living in USA. Count how many people have written that “It’s our money. We have a right to know.”
On the other hand I’m impressed with the astute answers of those who know it is wrong to give out the names.

Posted by: John in NH | March 19, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Yes, decidedly! If they return the money in full, then I would reconsider my vote. But until then, definitely YES!!! They should have calculated the consequences of their actions when they drove the company into the ground, and visited the shame of their actions on their families. The sins of the father fall on the children.

Posted by: jaz | March 19, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

YES!!! They should have thought about their families when they were overcome with greed! Are their families not benefiting from these bonuses?

Posted by: JA | March 19, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

YES, THEY SHOULD RELEASE THEIR NAMES. WE ALL ARE SUFFERING. WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE.
Also citigroup given all that money to buy furniture. give us all a break.

Posted by: bev | March 19, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

NO! Posting the names of the AIG people that got the bonuses would only incite people to go out and hurt them and that would do us no good. The AIG CEO spoke about the so-called “leadership” of AIG who returned their bonuses. THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED FOR LETTING THE “new products division” GET INVOLVED IN THE MESS THAT DESTROYED THEIR COMPANY IN THE FIRST PLACE!! I notice that ABC is taking aim at President Obama. WHAT ABOUT THE $350 BILLION DOLLARS THAT WAS HANDED OUT BEFORE THE END OF LAST YEAR? WHERE DID THAT GO AND WHY AND WHO WAS WATCHING THAT CRIME???????!!!!!

Posted by: BJINLA | March 19, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

yes indeed…..

Posted by: SAINT RICO | March 19, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Definitely….its about time people are held accountable for their actions.

Posted by: Rosebud | March 19, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Yes they should. The Fed owens 80% of AIG and the government is ran by the people, so we have a right to know.

Posted by: Richard | March 19, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

The court of public opinion wants to know, and because the American people, unemployed (that’s me,and I have to pay taxes on my meager unemployment benefits),underemployed and gainfully employed, are now intricately involved in AIG, we should know to whom we should direct our ire. Surely, not all AIG employees are golddigging, greedy financial professionals. However, the ones that are, need to answer to their new employer-me.

Posted by: kathaleen c collins | March 19, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

If you aren’t ashamed of what you’re doing, you would have no reason to hide it, right?

Posted by: Enuff is enuff | March 19, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Yes they should be published.

Posted by: Sue | March 19, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssss!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: BONUS1940 | March 19, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

No – As angry as I am about the bonuses in view of taxpayer bailouts the audacity of Congress to hide the loophole (In my company, annual merit increases and cost of living increases have been put on hold) – I do not believe the names should be revealed. The money should absolutely be taxed back. But putting the safety of AIG executives’ families in jeopardy is not the right approach. It would even endanger extended family or people who happen to have the same last names, or subject people who randomly have the same names to harrassment by on-line bullies. Let’s not let our anger lead us to irrational vengence. What I really want to know is….if we are taxing the money back how will it be returned to the taxpayers? Rebates? I can’t wait to receive mine!

Posted by: LoriB | March 19, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

I do not think the names need to be published! The government has delt with the problem. The only people who need those names are those who are taxing the bonus money and investigators
responsible for keeping track.
To publish those names would be to put
those people at risk when it is not
necessary.

Posted by: Bill Foley | March 19, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Yes!!

Posted by: Carole | March 19, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

If a person returns their bonus payment keep their names private. If a person believes that they actually earned the bonus payment, they should be willing to have their name made public.

Posted by: Anne Lewis | March 19, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

YES!!!!!
If it was an average citizen, we would had to pay this money back. Yes their names should should be made known to the American public and should be publicized in the newspaper.

Posted by: Doug in MI | March 19, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

I agree that the IRS, at least, should be given the names, and their tax returns should get personal attention. If these people are so proud of their actions, they shouldn’t mind getting a little publicity. They may have to spend some of their millions to see that their families are protected from harm, but money doesn’t seem to be an object with these people.

Posted by: mettahu | March 19, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Offer an option: give each recipient the opportunity to repay the bonus and remain anonymous or keep the bonus (subject to tax, recall, claw back, or other means of retrieval) with name made public.

Posted by: Sue | March 19, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Yes, they should be made public. These individuals are destroying the publics confidence in are financial institutions. People are not going to return and begin investing as long as these greedy incompetent so called leaders are around. They run these institutions into the ground and think they still deserve bonuses. What a joke. And how could our leaders in government think that the public was not going to be outraged knowing these bonuses were likely to be paid out of our tax dollars.

Posted by: Chuck Patton | March 19, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

No! Silly Obama puppets. You’re going to get someone killed. Acquiring names is one thing. Wait until the publicity subsides. BTW, Barak just signed a new book deal a few months ago. Greasing his pockets after his presidency. How is this that any different? They are all corrupt. Let’s see, increase 2009 spending by 1.5 Trillion or so, worry about 164 million in bonuses? Which is really an issue? Should corporations be rewarding those that are incompetent? No. Let them fail like they should. They shouldn’t have bailed them out in the first place. Issue solved.

Posted by: Steve in IN | March 19, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Yes. The individual appearing before congress said he was afraid that these employees might be in danger because of some of the e-mails he has received. Well, the public is mad as hell and these financial managers should know how mad the public is and how their actions have hurt many americans and the country. They do not simply get to walk away like nothing has happened. People are hurting because of their irresponsible action. THEY CANNOT AND MUST BE ALLOWED TO HIDE FROM THE PUBLIC SHAME THEY SHOULD FEEL.

Posted by: shari | March 19, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Yes their names should be made public – they took public money
until the American people see repayment no-one should receive a bonus

Posted by: Sharon | March 19, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Yes the names should be released to the public because the money for the bonuses came from taxpayer dollars to a company owned by the public. But don’t stop there. Also include all the names of the public officials, elected and appointed, whether knowingly or ignorantly, who allowed the bonuses to become a reality.

Posted by: leo g | March 19, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Yes their names ,company affilation company position should be made public. I would like to Google them.

Posted by: RDM | March 19, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Two words: Atlas Shrugged. Two more words: tax boycott.

Posted by: leo g | March 19, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Those who voluntarily return the money should not have their names published. Those who keep the money should be named in public. Let them see how employable they are once they are outted as responsible for the crisis and keeping the taxpayer’s money.

Posted by: Bob Evans | March 19, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Lets give them a chance to give the money back. If not, then release the names. Maybe all the politicians names should be released as well, for giving them the money to start with & for all the wrong they have done over the years.

Posted by: Kenneth in NC | March 19, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

People you are crazy! The fact is these employees had a contract. Blame the CEO who approved the contract, blame congress for giving them the money in the first place. If you agreed to work for $xx you’d want your contract honored!

Posted by: Lisa | March 19, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

no. there’s no reason why the names should be shared with the public. The real blame lies with Senator Dodd and The Treasury. They are the ones who insisted that the Stimulus bill include the bonus compensation. If you listened to CEO Liddy’s testimony; he stated that AIG was in regular communication with The Treasury department re: The bailout funds and Treasury was more than aware of the bonus payout. We need to focus more on term limits.

Posted by: mike | March 19, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Yes. They are now essentially public employees, working at the behest of the American government and taxpayers. As such, they should be known to their employers.

Posted by: LD in NC | March 20, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

The funds should be recovered but congress is violating the constitution when they impose a punitive tax on a legal transaction which they approved.
There are legal ways for recovery which should be explored.

Posted by: junk yard dog | March 20, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

No. Those on Capital Hill new full well of the bonuses. Now that the people are outraged, they are back peddling and trying to save face. Hoping if they scream loud enough, we won’t figure out they originally left the bonuses in because they (democrats) received political contributions from the exec’s It is even stated in AIG’s annual 10K filing with the SEC that the bonuses would be necessary to retain the executives.. The executives families are at risk. How would you like it if you received threats your children would be harmed. Leave the names out, require the Bonuses be paid back, and stop detracting from the real focus…TURNING THE ECONOMY AROUND.

Posted by: JS | March 20, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Absolutely they should be released to the public and they bear the shame from their friends, family and general public. They have been given time to give back the bonuses and if they have chosen to keep them knowing how wrong it is then they have to pay the price.

Posted by: Rich Morris | March 20, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Of course they should, If these guys had the balls to take the money to begin with, and then agrue that they were entitled to it…then why now are they ashamed to show there identities?
One thing I hate is a coward afraid to stand up for his/her convictions.
What they are doing is criminal, yet without hesitation headlines will post the names AND addresses of certain law breakers, either way why should these GRAND theives be given better treatment then a common purse snatcher?

Posted by: Jesse Lee | March 20, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Absolutely. I think shame is is a powerful motivator. There should be a list of names of those who were greedy but after being shamed decided to give the money back.

Posted by: David | March 20, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Absolutely, If they are so afraid of the public, maybe they will return the money.

Posted by: Tom H | March 20, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Indeed.

Posted by: The other Larry | March 20, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am

hell yes, I want my pound of flesh

Posted by: californiagirl | March 20, 2009, 1:52 am 1:52 am

This public fury could lead to a tradgedy if the names are revealed. Just get the money back. The fury is enough to make executives think twice about pulling this kind of robbery again.

Posted by: Janet Cruz | March 20, 2009, 1:59 am 1:59 am

No. The names should go to the IRS and the appropriate (legal) tax laws & requirements should be followed.

Posted by: Brian Walton | March 20, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Absolutely not. If Congress gets the bonus money back maybe they can donate it to the SPECIAL OLYMPICS!

Posted by: SR | March 20, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Hell yes.
I’m employing them. I paid their bonus. I have aright to know who they are.

Posted by: Civil Serfvant Boss | March 20, 2009, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Even if offered this money under the terms of a pre-existing contract they should have had the simple human decency to say no.
They are not going to be hurting for a crust of bread any time soon.
Unlike those who trusted them and invested in their products.

Posted by: Civil Servant Boss | March 20, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Yes, these AIG executives stole money or got it through illegal means and therefore should be FORCED to give it back. 100% of it, not 95%

Posted by: Bowen Li | March 20, 2009, 3:55 am 3:55 am

These people stole money and therefore should be FORCED to pay it back

Posted by: Bowen Li | March 20, 2009, 3:56 am 3:56 am

I must confess that at times I feel like going after greedy people and their families and I am usually quiet, understanding and contented.
But what people are failing to realise is that when the Country’s GDP graph is plotted – it distorts the reality. It shows us as arich nation whilst many amongst us are suffering.
I don’t like that at all – that extra money a few individuals are making could be released at AIG to take back some of the staff they made redundant. All these people too have a life and a family to look out for and in the current climate where so many are going after a few jobs – a little bit of sensitivity is required.
I think “good descent people” require a break – we have for too long punished the “good” and rewarded the “greedy ruthless” for too long.
May I remind all that we brought nothing into the world and we won’t take it with us when we leave it. So spare a thought for your fellow man.
Two wrongs can not be right we don’t have to turn violence by exposing these corrupt individuals but i think we have got to address this problem aggressively. If not addressed we are going to leave a painful legacy for our children.

Posted by: Compassinate Advocate | March 20, 2009, 7:04 am 7:04 am

No! Silly Obama puppets. You’re going to get someone killed. Acquiring names is one thing. Wait until the publicity subsides. BTW, Barak just signed a new book deal a few months ago. Greasing his pockets after his presidency. How is this that any different? They are all corrupt. Let’s see, increase 2009 spending by 1.5 Trillion or so, worry about 164 million in bonuses? Which is really an issue? Should corporations be rewarding those that are incompetent? No. Let them fail like they should. They shouldn’t have bailed them out in the first place. Issue solved.
—————————————-
Steven in IN you sound like someone with an alternative. I am interested in yyour suggestion – regarding a better approach for addressing the current issue. I am assuming you still have a job to go to .

Posted by: Compassionate Advocate | March 20, 2009, 7:13 am 7:13 am

If you want to post the names of the people who got bonuses – why not look at our own congress. They passed the bill but they also gave themselves raises! An additional $4,700! Tell me – who has the right to vote themselves pay raises! If they think they deserve a raise, their own districts should vote on it. If you don’t believe me – just do a web search.

Posted by: Mr. EW | March 20, 2009, 7:22 am 7:22 am

I don’t see what we would benefit from the names of those selfish, greedy, executives. The companies who gave them these massive bonuses were negligent as well as our government who created a loophole in the bailout plan. Did they all really think we would not find out about these massive bonuses? I think it shows how incompentent Congress is to allow this loophole in the Bailout plan. Instead of giving all taxed money from hardworking people to the already well-off CEOs, they should have divided that money and given back to the hard-working-class people! Then, people would go out and spend money, and the economy would get better.

Posted by: Jennifer | March 20, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

YES,

Posted by: Jim | March 20, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

NO. These were mostly retention bonuses put in place to keep employees from bailing when the going got tough. The people who agreed to stay with AIG to fix the mess should not be punished. The other option would have been to quit and I’m sure there were plenty that did so.
The names I would like to see publicized are those of the members of Congress who passed a law before the Christmas break of 2000 that allowed the use of Credit Default Swaps in the manner that has caused much of this economic mess. I’m sure they would want credit for the huge profits it made possible. Now they should be held responsible for the losses as well.

Posted by: BRoche | March 20, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Yes Expose them for their greed so no one else will hire them

Posted by: denise | March 20, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

yes print the names and amounts of $–people say that someone may get hurt what about the families that lost their jobs and have health issues? they are hurting already

Posted by: m flynn | March 20, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Yes. If their companies are operating on taxpayer money, the taxpayers have a right to know who is getting a bonus.

Posted by: W McMichael | March 20, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Not only YES, but HELL YES!

Posted by: Ann | March 20, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

I am outraged to hear Charlie Gibson and Betsy Stark tell us twice this week that we must keep
mum
about AIG’s outrages because “we, the taxpayers, are driving its value down”.
Are they receiving kickbacks from AIG to say this?
We the taxpayers must insist that the dirty House of AIG should be cleaned up – and in case you
didn’t know – Charlie, a clean house is more valuable.

Posted by: Anil | March 20, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Yes, why not. What do they care? They will only continue to stuff their pockets anyway!

Posted by: Nan | March 20, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Yes. Criminals don’t have any right to privacy. Shout their names from the rooftops.

Posted by: Gary | March 20, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Yes. Taxpayers have a right to know where their money is going. What happened to a more transparent government? The name of the executives responsible for the demise of their company should have a public “reference” so they don’t get hired to destroy another company leaving more employees on the unemployment lines. What happenned to pay for “merit”?
They should be protected – maybe they can go into hiding …

Posted by: Outraged | March 20, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

No, the legal situation of denying bonuses already contracted for means the subject will go on and on. Making individual names public only gives fuel to the fire. The new respected head of AIG serving for only $1 a year with no stock options, made the decision based on his assessment of risk vs reward to the AIG business which has received far more in taxpayer money. Move on…
Sue B

Posted by: Sue Barth | March 21, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Get the money back somehow, but do not make their names public. I’m as outraged as anybody, but this has consumed far too much of the news cycle and I’m afraid some wacko will decide to take matters into his hands and do something stupid to the execs or (more tragically) their families. There are just too many loons running around, who want their 15 minutes of fame.

Posted by: Alice | March 21, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Yes ABSOLUTELY. In the process of selecting the Cabinet members, they are gone over with a sharp steel comb. Big Business is what runs the country, therefor they are public figures and should be subjected to the same scrutney. This applies to the press and any entity that deals directly with the “public good”

Posted by: patricia ann burns | March 21, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Yes, actually this is public information anyway!
How dare them to even take the money. Let the world know who they are – greedy sob’s. While the rest of us are out here with NO Health Insurance, NO food, barely a place to live.
Maybe they should go to prison for stealing?

Posted by: jossette collins | March 24, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

YES YES YES ….ABSOLUTELY YES!
THEY SHOULD ALL SUFFER AND BE HUNG!!

Posted by: Tracey Gallagher | March 26, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

YES! They are the AIG-MADOFF Company. EXPOSE THEIR NAMES, and tell us how much $$$$$ each one of them received. We have the right to know since we will have to pay the taxes on this Corupted MADOFF Company.

Posted by: sherri | March 27, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Absolutely, each and every name needs to be made public. By making the names public, executives will think twice about taking large bonuses. Since the taxpayers are having to pick up the tab for these CEOs’ extravagant life styles, absolutely “”YES”" the names need to be made public.

Posted by: Versailles | April 7, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Adipex.

Adipex online. Online pharmacy adipex. Adipex. Adipex ingredients. Pillinc buy phentermine adipex meridia online. Adipex p free prescription. Adipex dangers. Search results adipex for sale.

Posted by: Adipex. | September 8, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Viagra side effects.

Viagra. Generic viagra. Free viagra. Viagra london.

Posted by: Online viagra. | December 27, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Amoxicillin acne.

Amoxicillin.

Posted by: Infant amoxicillin reactions. | January 15, 2010, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Refrigeration of amoxicillin.

Dental antibiotic amoxicillin protection period. What are the ingredients of amoxicillin. Recommended dosage for amoxicillin. Kittens amoxicillin. Side effects of amoxicillin. Rationale of amoxicillin and cloxacillin injection. Cross sensitivity to amo…

Posted by: Buying amoxicillin and clavulanate. | January 16, 2010, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.