Apr 2, 2009 12:08pm

Does the ‘Lost Little Boy’ Anti-Smoking Ad Go Too Far?

ABC’s Tom Johnson from New York:

A new anti-smoking ad that features a frightened four-year-old boy separated from his mother in a crowded train station has hit a nerve.

The ad, originally produced by the Australian anti-smoking group Quit Victoria, was filmed with a "real-life mother and son acting team," but the child actor, Alexander, burst into real tears when his mother Annette briefly walked away from him.

The boy’s emotional panic — seen in the ad for a grueling 17 seconds — actually only lasted a few seconds, according to the organization; the director used five cameras and edited the footage together to seem longer.
Now running in New York City, the ad is part of an aggressive anti-smoking campaign by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

"The whole point of these ads is to bring home to smokers what smoking is doing and will do to them, their children and their families," said Dr. Tom Frieden, New York City Health Commissioner.

In the ad, a little boy, identified as Alexander, walks into a train station with his mother.  Soon the mother releases the little boy’s hand.  He is alone amidst the crowd.  It slowly dawns on him that his mother is no longer there.  He grows upset and is soon crying.  The announcer then says, "If this is how your child feels after losing you for a minute, just imagine if they lost you for life." The message: Quit smoking now…for your child.

The ad packs an emotional punch and diverges from the anti-smoking ads that tried to gross the viewer out of the habit.  Remember the ad where the man had to breathe through a hole in his throat?

Few cities in the country have taken a more graphic approach in their anti-smoking campaign than the New York City, which has pushed the envelope with the apparent goal of shocking viewers to send a life-saving message.  Another way to do it, raise the price of a pack.  Wednesday, a new tax kicked in raising the price of cigarettes in places such as New York City to above $9.

Entitled "Separation" by the Department of Health, the ad first aired in Australia as part of Quit Victoria’s 2008 television campaign.  The organization has come out in defense of its procedure, stressing that the child actor was safe at all times. Before filming, they say that the actor was well versed in what was going to happen and was told it was going to be an exercise in "make-believe." 

Still, though the child was an actor, it appears that his fear and tears were real, which has raised eyebrows. One blogger wrote, "This spot is atrocious, offensive and irresponsible."

Does this cross a line?  Or do these ads need to cross lines in order to get people’s attention, to awake them to the dangers of smoking?

This ad, along with two others, entitled "Cigarettes Are Eating You and Your Baby Alive," and "Cigarettes are Eating You Alive," are set to air on local and cable stations in New York City through April 15. Due to the nature of content, they will not air during any children’s programming.

User Comments

What line? Showing a child actor crying? Seems like a perfectly reasonable ad to me that focuses directly on the well know and proven dangers of smoking.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Unclear if acting or left alone? How about you do some reporting instead of conjecture? This is a story if he was actually left alone instead of acting, however I have a feeling this was purposefully not investigated just so that innuendo could be dropped like it has. Get some facts and then make a big deal out of it.

Posted by: Ordermonger | April 2, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

That must be New York.. You see how many people stopped to help!????
NONE!

Posted by: ajax | April 2, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

I thought the little boy was lost because of his mother was shooting heroine up her veins, frying her brains on crack or something like this. Or because drinking her brains. Not because smoking a cigarette. I wish to see such a similarly aggressive (if not much more aggressive) campaign against drugs and drinking. Both kill people (not to speak people killing for a fix, pumping money to drug dealers and their armies).

Posted by: Doina | April 2, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Focus on the message – not the ad.

Posted by: Jill Mitchell | April 2, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

It’s cool, can silent scream run too?

Posted by: Reflect08 | April 2, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

I wish they would make ads like these for drug users…it’s America’s drug habit that’s creating violence in Mexico and havoc all over the world

Posted by: Virginian | April 2, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

At last an intelligent TV ad! This is what is needed to get attention to one of our most important health problems. (And it took some Aussies to do it!) Way to go, NY! Let’s see more all around this sad country.

Posted by: Dave B. | April 2, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

@Virginian,
Is the US the only Country that has a Drug habit?
You need to read more.

Posted by: ajax | April 2, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

This add is totally appropriate. I remember being lost briefly from my mother as a child and this is exactly how I felt. Imagine losing her forever due to an avoidable, disgusting habit.
Give us more. Selfish smokers are causing a health crisis in their children. Maybe they’ll stop for the kids.

Posted by: Wanny b. | April 2, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

The ad is completely appropriate. Earlier this year, a close relative of mine died of lung cancer in her late 30′s. She had started smoking in high school. Friends and family begged her to stop smoking for the sake of her children, if not for her own health. Well, she’s dead now and her two children, not yet teen-agers, now have no mother.

Posted by: Alicia | April 2, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I agree with those who say smokers can cause a lot of damage to themselves AND to their families. There really isn’t any arguing that smoking can cause real problems.
But where is the outrage exhibited by the rabid anti-smokers when it comes to other habits, practices and lifestyles that cause similar problems.
Obesity, sedentary lifestyles, alcohol consumption, speeding……the list could go on forever. Apparently the outrage is reserved for the smokers while ignoring more “popular” vices.

Posted by: Kent | April 2, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

The ad is powerful and while somewhat uncomfortable to watch it serves a greater purpose. I would hope it might infuence somebody somewhere to quit.

Posted by: Sally | April 2, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

This is a truth about smoking and probably more effective than any gross out stuff, at least to parents. It’s not even approaching “over the line”.
Smoking is a physical addiction that typically starts before you’re 15 and not a “personal choice” you make as an adult. The choice to quit, however, is. And it requires incredible willpower and sacrifice. Your children’s happiness and future are even stronger motivations than your own happiness and life. So I applaud this ad.

Posted by: John | April 2, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Kent:”But where is the outrage exhibited by the rabid anti-smokers when it comes to other habits, practices and lifestyles that cause similar problems.
Obesity, sedentary lifestyles, alcohol consumption, speeding”
What, a group can’t be upset at a stupid vice without being upset at ALL vices? Obesity is shunned in our society already, the skinny weakling at the beach an image of failure, alcohol demonized by a number of MADD style groups, and speeding is illegal and actively fined. Your complaint that starts as a logical fallacy also seems factually vacant.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I think this is a totally appropriate ad and shows the emotions of losing a parent to tobacco-related illnesses.
While there are other diseases and causes for deaths at an early age, and it’s never easy to lose a parent, this really hits home to me personally.
My own father died from pancreatic cancer on November 6, 1963, the same month that President Kennedy was assassinated. My father was 39 years old when he died. My father had been a smoker since his teens. In those days the doctors did not know that smoking was a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. They now know that it is the main risk factor for it.
I was 13 when my dad died. My two brothers were 9 and 11 years old and my sister was only 8.
Our dad was not at any of our graduations, weddings and never knew any of his grandchildren. My neices and nephews have always been sad that they never knew their grandfather.
My sister started smoking at the age of 13. She died on Oct. 16, 1999 from lung cancer. Her two sons were only 14 and 17 when she died. She wasn’t at their high school/colleges graduations and missed her youngest son’s recent wedding.
My mother also died recently from a smoking-related death. While she was in her 80s, it doesn’t make it any easier to cope with her death.
Yes, you have to die from something, as many people claim, you don’t have to die from tobacco-related deaths if you never start smoking or quit before it’s too late.
I have also lost other family members, related both by blood as well as marriage to tobacco-related illnesses.
Smoking is a very emotional subject for me and I realize alcohol and obesity are problems for some people, but it doesn’t lessen the importance of tobacco-related illnesses and deaths.

Posted by: Laurie Comstock | April 2, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I think it was a very powerful ad. The point made should have stopped a few people who smoke in their tracks. Can you imagine leaving your child alone in this world without a mother/guardian because you wont stop smoking. People sometimes need a really wake for them to understand really what their actions are doing to their families. This ad was well done. It got 5 stars from me.

Posted by: Chawntell | April 2, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

WOW!!! That seems to be going way to far. If you want to communicate to the American people stop with the bullsh*t commercials. We can think for ourselves, & in this economy, what would posess a company to spend that much money on noninformative garbage. Have you ever noticed how much “they” blame smoking on cancer? It is true according to studies, but what about everything else from microwaves to cell phones to all other toxins in the air around power lines and nuclear plants? This IS a free country and if a FREE american wants to smoke isn’t it their right as american citizens?

Posted by: Melody | April 2, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

It’s always amusing how smokers try to deflect the argument that smoking is a precursor to contracting fatal diseases by pointing the finger elsewhere. “What about drugs?” “What about drinking?” “What about eating junk food.”
There’s another ad that’s even more powerful – showing two parents with their children watching tv. The parents are smoking and one of the kids pulls out his asthma inhaler and need to take a puff because of the smoke. No guessing what the message is here – not only is your smoking going to kill you, but you’re making your own kids sick!
If I have a few peices of chocolate cake too many, that is not going to cause physical harm to anyone around me. Unfortunately smokers really don’t care much about what their little “habit” does to anyone else, just so long as they can get their fix.

Posted by: Ravanne | April 2, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

I thought the ad was perfectly acceptable and very powerful. I did not see it as crossing any lines at all. I think the marketing team did a great job with this ad. Too bad it is not being shown in the USA.

Posted by: Cheetah | April 2, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Note – in my last post, I neglected to clarify a statement as saying “Too bad this is not being shown all over the USA”….

Posted by: Cheetah | April 2, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

It does not cross the line. It’s a powerful message.

Posted by: INAROD | April 2, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Smoking is still legal? Yes? I have never, nor wil I ever rob someone to get a fix. I don’t smoke in my house only outside. I knoww what it’s doing to me, not anyone else. If I need a cigarette, I ensure I move as far away from people. I just wish all you anti-smokers would respect my legal habit when I am causing you NO distress.

Posted by: NJBRED | April 2, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

My Dad did die cancer due to smokng. Had the hole in the throat too. I was 40, but it still sucks!! It’s not hard to quit, IF you really want too. I smoked for 10 years and quit cold turkey. Never to return again to that nasty habit.

Posted by: ccmama | April 2, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

My dad smoked. He got cancer. He had to breathe through a hole in a throat. Then he died. He was 65. I miss him.
My mom smoked. She had a debilitating stroke. She was 64.
I see nothing wrong with this announcement.

Posted by: Cindy | April 2, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

This ad make no impression one way or the other on me. It is just what it is, an advertisement with paid people doing the acting. Who cares about it! Smoker or non smoker there is one thing that people need to understand and that is “consideration” for the other party. Smokers should be considerate enough to respect non smokers space, views and rights. By the SAME TOKEN, non smokers need to know where their limitiations are. THEY too need to respect a persons right to choice and, lets say smoke in their own home, in designated smoking areas and wherever it is LEGAL. Give each other space and NO ONE SIDE DICTATE TO THE OTHER WHAT TO DO.

Posted by: LetsKeepItReal | April 2, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

We need more of these ads. I started smoking at age 13 – we kids thought we were sooo cool, just like the Hollywood stars who were so glamorous in our eyes, when what we were was ridiculous. Through the years I was a moderate smoker- less than a pack a day, and during the work day much of any cigarette I lit ended up more as ash in the ashtray. I quit in 1982, but in 2001 was diagnosed with COPD and am oxygen dependent. Smoking is not cool; not for your own health or the health of others exposed to your second-hand smoke.

Posted by: nanameow | April 2, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Great ad. Hard to understand why anyone would think is is over the line. I think there are all kinds of preventable injuries/illnesses that need our attention (smoking is just one of them). This is an important topic. Most of all our healthcare dollars goes to treating preventable diseases.

Posted by: Jim | April 2, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

What about an ad with the parent telling the kid he can’t have food & milk BECAUSE they need to buy cigarettes!!

Posted by: Denisea213 | April 2, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

I have to say it is a very realistic depiction. My father died of lung cancer when I was five years old. I am now 35, married, with two children and not only do I miss him still – he has missed out on many things in my life. Maybe people will think about that more – that they may not be there because of something they have control over.

Posted by: it'sjustme | April 2, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Yes, I’m a smoker and get tired of all the ads on TV, know its not the best for anyones health but what about what comes out of the atmosphere, in our foods ect. My theory to this is get rid of tobacco all togetheir!! Oh, but what would are states do without money that they get pulled in from cigarettes. Again get rid of tobacco and than lets see what comes next!

Posted by: ARLENE | April 2, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

“What about an ad with the parent telling the kid he can’t have food & milk BECAUSE they need to buy cigarettes!!” – Denisea213
L O L
That’s a good one Denisea.
These cigarette smokers pay a lot of taxes on their product.
The States need that revenue.
Then there’s the Darwinistic Factor of survival of the fittest which is always a good thing.
I’m thinking we should just leave the smokers alone and stop running ads against smoking at all.

Posted by: Noz | April 2, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Although I doubt the commercial will make a difference, I think it was well made with nothing wrong with it. Just wonder if CPS was made aware of this and if they approved.

Posted by: Anon | April 2, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

That commercial is hilarious!

Posted by: Chris | April 2, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

I think that once smoking has been nearly eliminated in this country, only then will people realize that it was not the cigarettes, that cancer still exists, and the major offenders are still pumping the cancer causing crap into the air we breathe everyday. Hello, cigarette smokers are not depleting the ozone. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that A. not all smokers die of cancer, B. that non-smokers still die of cancer and C. the government has been using this tactic to take our attention away from the real problems that are causing most of our cancers, industrialization. Wake up people! You are being bamboozled. It’s not like a government hasn’t used propaganda before to advance their own agendas. I can’t believe that people are still too lazy to educate themselves and defend themselves against these scare tactics.

Posted by: Unfazed | April 2, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

The commercial is good however it did not motivate me to quit smoking. One has to want it and then do it. If you are not ready to quit an ad won’t make you do it.

Posted by: noodles | April 2, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

As a former smoker I am all for getting people to quit. The ad is definately powerful and it will affect someone somewhere and the end result will be someone will quit smoking.
However, it is a choice. It was my choice to smoke knowing full well what it was doing to me. AND it was my choice to quit! It is still my choice not to smoke and no matter how powerful a TV ad is, it will still be a choice.

Posted by: Patricia | April 2, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

This ad is right on target.

Posted by: kathy | April 2, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I think it’s a great ad. Addiction is a powerful problem, and it makes it sufferers believe that they will always be the singular exception to every cancer report, DUI report, heart disease report, etc., etc. The more personal and hardhitting anti-smoking/excessive drinking ads become, the better, in my opinion.

Posted by: Reed | April 2, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

A powerful ad. Now to get it done nationwide

Posted by: Steve | April 2, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

I saw it the other night and it horrified me. I didn’t care what it was for, just that this poor little boy was terrified all for a commercial. While it gets it’s point across, I think it’s ridiculous that a child would be put into that situation, even for a second, for a camera. My heart aches for that little boy and for his mother who clearly has no maternal sense, but a material need for making money at any cost. Ridiculous.

Posted by: Jodi | April 2, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

I’ve heard about the “poor child” all day, but just saw the ad. Much tamer than the liberal feel-good media would have you believe. Thank God the child wasn’t crying because he was spanked!

Posted by: FoolKiller | April 2, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Cigarette smokers who feel this ad should be aimed at drugs are missing the point. The ad IS aimed at drugs. Nicotine IS a drug, and is extremely addictive. Next we will have to make commercials about trans-fats, and then caffiene.

Posted by: bob | April 2, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

That was “GASP spanked!”, indicating sarcasm. Somehow the “GASP” went away.

Posted by: FoolKiller | April 2, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Here are the advertisements I’m outraged by: tobacco company-sponsored “powerwalls” at the front of nearly every grocery store, convenience store, gas station, and pharmacy. In many instances these displays are right next to, or just above, the candy. Ads in these same places deliberately put at eyelevel to attract kids. Gas stations and convenience stores plastered inside and out with tobacco ads. Advertising in fashion and women’s magazines designed to attract girls to smoking (Camel no. 9). Men’s magazines that are replete with models and celebrities smoking. Newport cigarette ads that have the slogan “Alive with Pleasure.” “Dead from cancer” would be much better. Marlboro ads that link smoking with independence and freedom when these products are designed to induce dependence and slavery to nicotine. Those are the kind of ads that outrage me- not one with a child actor crying.

Posted by: Keith | April 2, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Can we do that same advertisement with a fat chick and a candy bar?
Let’s tax JUNK FOOD! Imagine, a $9.00 bag of M&M’s!
How about the same advertisement with a bottle of conventional body soap that shows the risks of the chemicals used that cause breast cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, asthma, hypothyroidism, diabetes, birth defects, etc.
Oops, must be politically correct and don’t want to upset the chemical companies who claim, just like the tobacco companies did, that their toxins are safe – even when dermally absorbed.
phthalates. triclosan. soy. synthetic fragrances. synthetic colorants. chemicals in household cleaning products. propellants in spray products.
Household products harm and kill the kids at a higher rate through accidental ingestion than choosing to use tobacco products kill adults. Where’s an ad for that?

Posted by: Neminly | April 2, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Amazing commercial!!! Brilliant! I don’t think there is anything about it that crosses the line.

Posted by: Meghan | April 2, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

The ad is real. This is the way I felt when I lost my father to lung cancer when I was a young boy. It was a horrible blow to myself and my family to lose such a wonderful man so young. He smoked a couple packs a day and thought nothing of his habit. There are real and terrible consequences.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 2, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

My mom who is 61 years old is currently battling lung cancer. Yes, I believe there are many toxins in the environment but as the doctors told her you have lung cancer because you smoked. I love my mom but I wish she would have quit before this happened. It is a very sad thing to go through and I am 38 years old. Nobody every wants to lose a parent and certainly my mom does not want to die. Cigarettes suck….

Posted by: rnich | April 2, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

The ad goes to far and represents an intrusion of government into personal life choices. I can still hear oxygen molecules scream as they are sucked in by humans and transformed into CO2 to raise global warming concerns. Humans are parasites and kill other living things.

Posted by: Mick55 | April 2, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

this is america people stop trying to force your ideals on people taht want to smoke.. this is still a free country, if we keep leting government tell us hwo to live our lives they will.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I have NO problem with this ad. Smoking does kill and people need to realize that family members will be left behind. I do think that more than likely your “kids” will be older when you die but the message is the same. Smoking is getting very expensive and it does kill. Your best bet is to never start smoking but if you do you should try to quit.

Posted by: J Jones | April 2, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Tobacco is still legal, yet so much money is being spent to encourage people to stop. Go figure!

Posted by: Gerald | April 2, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

whats next banning fat people..funny i watched a rally against smokeing and 80% of the people there were very overwieght,how about they lose soem wieght and live a good life before telling us smokers how to live…i smoke i also jog 5 miles everyday and go to gym three times a week i could run circles around these fat anti-smokeing group.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Yes i agree with the Twinkie comment. There are alot of other things that kill us, guns, drugs, twinkies, etc…. Everyone is trying to push a message that everyone already knows. Smoking is bad; yeah it could kill you but make making ads like this just make you mad at their effort to try to change someones way of life. We can say i hate smokers but I don’t see commericals about what to do with the pedophile that lives across the street.

Posted by: RReid | April 2, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Sure seems to have gotten alot of attention and people talking. So I guess it worked.

Posted by: BOB | April 2, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

gerald—its sad all teh way around as we watch america ripped from our lives to be replaced with government run lives.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

That was so depressing I need a smoke

Posted by: rmgton | April 2, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

I like it- very powerful. Sends a strong message and brings people into reality in an effective and dramatic way. It is painful- so is the reality of what smoking does- slams us into reality which hurts a little. Nice job for those who came up with this. All the stops need to be pulled when iy comes to trying to save peoples lives- this pretty much does it I think.

Posted by: thoughtxchange | April 2, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I am not a parent, but this ad upsets me because ALL parents worry about not living to take care of their kids. Can you imagine the distress caused to somebody terminally ill with young children? The intention is excellent the message too vague and potentially devastating to a lot of innocent people.

Posted by: Anne | April 2, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

The commercial is heart wrenching, but doesn’t seem to me to have any connection with smoking. It is more about child neglect. I would like to see it in some way more related to the effects of smoking. At first I thought it was just showing a child in the presence of smoking, and that is appropriate, but I don’t get the connection between a child whose mother left him alone in a crowded subway and smoking. It is a little strained for comparison.

Posted by: Katie | April 2, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

thoughtxchange—so you wouldbe fine with a fed.law banning smokeing? if so that si un-american as it gets..telling people how to live there lives..

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

katie— so true its almost like they are saying smokers are really bad parents…which is crap.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

This is really good and I agree 100%.Stop smoking…

Posted by: Anthony | April 2, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

anthony —dont want to.. thsi is america i am free to do as i wish…heck so funny even in china they dont tell people they cant smoke but here in land of the free they want to.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I would like to see the rich CEO’s in background laughing at smokers who who pay all that money.

Posted by: Soap | April 2, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

soap–all rich ceo,s sit back and laugh by what you buy from them..noy just tobacco companies.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Too far!!! Period. Make your case but dont use the vulnerability of children to help this or any cause. If my child was lost even for a minute, I might grab a smoke to ease my tensions to prevent me from going hysterical. And this from a non-smoker.

Posted by: CB | April 2, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Ajax–That must be New York.. You see how many people stopped to help!????
NONE!——————————-
BWAAAAHAHAHA!!!:)TRU

Posted by: ctc | April 2, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

here here!!!! do not use kids for your anti-american adds.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

its not what you do to people while you smoke is about what happens to your family when it kills you…
my husband smokes and it wiill be very devastating to lose him young due to smoking and for him not to see our kids grow up
1 thats what the comercial is about and i think it will get throught some people.

Posted by: jan | April 2, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I can’t think of a better way to get through to parents that their smoking is hurting their children in many more ways than just one. My Mom lost her Dad to lung cancer when she was only six years old. I don’t think there is a way to go to far to get through to people that smoking is killing them and their second hand smoke is killing others.

Posted by: Martha | April 2, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

How the commercial makers coaxed those emotions out the boy is, in my opinion, cruel. The message, however, is excellcent. Let’s not haze this over; the irresponsible choices people with addictive personalities make effects us all in the form of higher health insurance rates. And yes, there are other reasons for those rates like “greedy doctors”, “greedy lawyers”, etc etc. I agree. But smokers just somehow don’t make my rates go down, either. You want to leave your family high and dry? Wonderful. You want to be hooked up to a machine to do your breathing? Fantastic. Cancel your health insurance and spare me your stupidity. The message stands firm. Don’t like seeing yourself in the mirror? Tough.

Posted by: Lou | April 2, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Beyond sick!!! How are they going to pay for all the health programs without smokers?

Posted by: Jim | April 2, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

There are so many commercials that various groups within the US could claim step over the line. We yell “free speech” and talk about our rights and the Constitution. Let them say what they wish. There are way too many other worthy things in this world to worry about. Only question the well being of the child during the filming and any aftereffects.

Posted by: kjw | April 2, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

This ad is “totally” disgusting! The tobacco companies should be ashamed of themselves. They have gone “too” far.

Posted by: Debbie | April 2, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Great anti-smoking ad! It is a shame that such ads were not aired years ago. Perhaps my brother would not have died a slow agonizing death from smoking.

Posted by: AJP | April 2, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Whatever it takes to make people wakes up and think about what they are doing to their body it a good thing…. ABC go to Canada to see what really works to stop people from smoking…. Why do they say Canada is so clean? ….. We need to look outside of the US to see what really works because we do not have a clue or the will.

Posted by: Mark | April 2, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Growing up wiht a Father who smoked, I constantly thought about my father passing away before I graduated from 8th Grade, or Highschool, then College and one day when I marry. Luckily something made him stop smoking, he decided to get healthy. I feel so lucky he did! He’s amazing. This ad is really acturate, it’s so upsetting to growup thinking your family member may die anytime, anytime you hear them cough. You never know. So keep up the tough ads and never start smoking!

Posted by: Sue | April 2, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Its completly inappropriate. No child not even a child actor should be made to cry. That is a form of child abuse. You don’t think of the message to quite smoking all you can think of is that poor child crying. It is NOT the proper image. If you want to pick on smoker fine just leave the poor children alone. If you really want people to stop smoking make it eaiser to stop. A carton of cigarettes is cheaper than the help avaliable to stop. Dont use kids to get people to stop that is just plain our WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: AP | April 2, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Kudos for one of the best ads I have ever seen. You smoke. You die. Think about who you left behind and what you did to them. It is that simple and to those who think the ad is offensive…face the truth at what the tobacco companies have done to many millions of people all over the world. This is a quick ad no lesson in reality that is not sugar coated.

Posted by: Hank | April 2, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

hank—yep so stay out planes cars and dont go to work dont eat fat food.you will die and leave behind people.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

SERIOUSLY do you really think people want to smoke in front of or near their children…No I don’t think so!!! We love and think more highly of our children then you may think!!!
If they took the money they spent on commercials and anti-smoking ads and put it towards actually helping people to quit smoking, like lowering the cost of the drugs to help quit smoking…..Oh but I don’t know that makes to much since doesn’t it!!!!!

Posted by: Karen | April 2, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

hank—think of what the candy company and beef companies have done to us, how about the fast food comapnies with there evil foods…shoudl we make laws to ban all bad things,lets ban war and swimming you might drown…

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

I can see an ad such as this if the father or mother was walking into the house drunk that is something that would cause a child to act in this manner but to have an ad like this for smoking, give me a break. There are so many more danger to children from parents being drunk and to the entire population such as driving drunk and killing other people as well as themselves also what about the diseased liver, they show the diseased lung. Why aren’t we doing something about alcohol consumption? What is the political agenda against the tobacco companies?
This ad is just rubbish.

Posted by: Dorothy | April 2, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

My parents smoked when it was ‘fashionable’. My father had to have radiation therapy for throat cancer. My Mother was the Patient-Relations co-ordinator for M. D. Anderson in Houston for 13 years. My Step-father (who also smoked) was a bronchial specialist at Anderson. I was in Anderson to see my Mother one day when an elderly woman (before smoking bans) got on the elvator with me. She had a gauze cover over her trach – she lifted the gauze and put a cigarette to the hole in her throat. That cured me – that needs to be put on TV. By the way, my Mother died from COPD – she stopped smoking at 70.

Posted by: schuyler | April 2, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

As a health care worker I am very aware of the dangers of smoking. However, my question is – would it be acceptable to run this ad using the subject of obesity as a death sentence? No – we may offend someone. This is by far a bigger problem. Do we limit the food a person can eat to only 1800 calories? Do you know how many health care workers are hurt caring for obese patient? How about the money now being spent to put lifts in the rooms for these patients. We refuse to allow a patient to smoke but family can bring in any amount of food for a patient they want to. Double standard! I actually can tolerate the smell of smoke on someone vs the body odor in the folds and private areas of an obese person.

Posted by: cp | April 2, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

i am sick of people and government trying to tell me how to live.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Disturbing? Yes. But check out Castrol’s series showing folks being whipped off their feet for forgetting to change the car’s oil. Violent! I’d need a transfusion and a cigarette to recover.

Posted by: A | April 2, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

when all these fat slobs telling me to qyite smokeing stop stuffing there fat ugly faces then i will quit smokeing..

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

I don’t think there is anything wrong with the ad. But it’s not going to stop people who want to smoke. My husband & I don’t smoke even though our parents did,because when we were kids they started telling people about the dangers of smoking. My brother decided, who is a relatively intelligent man decided to smoke and continued to do so because he liked it. He didn’t care about the risk. We have one daughter who doesn’t smoke and one who does. They’ve made a decision that they will have to live with. If they get sick it will be their own fault.

Posted by: Elizabeth | April 2, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

sory to see the sarcasm from T. In 1957 I was 11 and visited my father at Lenox Hill Hospital 3 days after they cut his right lung out. He lived 30 more years and never touched another cigarette. He died of lung cancer. Neither of us was ever afraid to fly or walk outside or eat fast food. I hope you never spend 7 months going to a ward of cancer victims and watch them slowly die. Some with lung cancer sit in the waiting room and smoke or they did in 1986, with the IV dripping medicine into them.
I don’t take life as you flippantly. Legislation doesn’t mean a thing. I still miss my father and think about how he died. His birthday is April 13th the day he died.

Posted by: Hank | April 2, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

hank—sorry for your loss.. but i have a grandpa that lived to 100 and smoked heavy my dad is 82 still smokes..work with aguy never smoked a day and he is dying of lung cancer…i know smokeing isnt good but i like it and will do it and dont want you or the government telling me i cant..

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

hank—what is next? will we fight agaisnt fat foods will our government put us in jail if we are fat..give them a inch and they take a mile—–STAY OUT OF MY LIFE!!!!!!

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

woodrow hunter—yes yes from a far right guy like you taht screams about freedom and your rights..but yet you want to take away my right to smoke…hipocrit.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

T- That is your decision. Not my business. That is why I said the government can’t legislate it away. Life is about risks. If you want to add them to yourself in the face of known medical fact that is your decision. If you have one child or grandchild this ad is saying when your gone they will be affected. You won’t know the difference. I have 4 grandchildren that I want to see grow up and enjoy life. I want to stack the odds in my favor as best I can. My decision.

Posted by: Hank | April 2, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

hank–ok.. we do things everyday that take life span away from us…we risk all getting in car to go to work…we risck when we buy food it could be tainted with soem bacteria..

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Perhaps the children of parents who smoke(d) should have the say in what’s too graphic or emotionally wrenching. My mother was a heavy smoker until she was forced to go on 100% oxygen for the last five years of her life. By that time, she was a mere shell of the woman she had been.
We miss her every day, and her youngest grandchildren never knew her. While I miss my mom, I’m also angry with her because her addiction was more important to her than her family. Who knows what health problems we’ll have as adults because of that exposure to second hand smoke?
That really is the harsh reality, and I’m appalled when I see parents smoking around their children.

Posted by: Pat | April 2, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

pat–and i am appalled when i see fat people with fat kids telling me not to smoke.so by your thinking soemone with a fat kid shoudl get yelled at and maybe put in jail..is taht were you want this to go.

Posted by: T | April 2, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

T I a not in your life. All I have said is the ad is great, straight to the point on a personal level. Must have hit home for you to get so strong in your response. Talk about the ad and it’s message. By the way you can turn your tv off or switch channels.
You have the right to decide what will kill you.

Posted by: Hank | April 2, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

just one more thing that i want to ad for those of you who want to do what you want and its ok youhave the right but people around you that dont smoke dondt need the second had smoke specially kids that dont know whats going on. even if you smoke outside they are exposed to it in the park any- wehere…

Posted by: jan | April 2, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

I have so many issues with this anti-smoking thing. As a child of the 50/60′s we were fed the ads on t.v. Why? because the tax base on the tobacco industry was too good. It was good to smoke then. 40 years later we are the nations Pariahs. The Country that sold and made millions on the taxes of tobacco is now taxing us to literal death.
They have said that Tobacco is just as addictive as Heroin. They have methadone clinics for illegal drug addicts, they have nothing for us. I can’t go get a shot of something that will take away the need for nicotine. Why? Because we smokers are functioning taxpayers. Addicts rarely are.
This leads me to another question. Why are we passing laws for Medical Marijuana? Perhaps a new way to get taxes on others misfortuine? A way to tax, to death, a person who is sick and needs help that is not currently available?
This Country has an ailment. There is no cure for greed.

Posted by: Tamara | April 2, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

The smokers are against the ad..go figure!!! Tired of being a tandem to second hand smoke and paying for smokers’ healthcare.

Posted by: GWhiz | April 2, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

T – this is not about fat people. I am overweight and understand the health risk. Probably 75 % of the people in the US are overweight. I have not made a concious choice to be overweight. I have made a choice not to smoke. We all have choices in life and most of us do things that afect our health and find it hard to stop the overeating or smoking. I don’t have to smoke to live. I do have to eat to live and it is hard to cut back on what I eat as I have gotten older. Therefore I am fat.
Again we cannot all be perfect and their are lots of things in life that could have ads against them. None more easy to correct than smoking…the emotional crutch…that becomes killingly addictive. You can’t stop things that will affect you like diabetes, high blood pressure, parkinsons, alzheimers and many more. You can stop smoking.

Posted by: Hank | April 2, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

It appears cigarette pack is go sell for $100 very soon. Then it will be rich mans’ delight only. People like Donald Trump, Bill Gates will only be able to smoke.

Posted by: Lead | April 2, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

The creators of these ads obviously have no comprehendion of addiction. Addiction is stronger than this and other ads. It is stronger than health threats or potential harm to loved ones. If DHHS wants to effectively reduce the numbers of smokers then learn about the dynamics of addiction. I am a recovering alcoholic with 18 years sober. I have not been ABLE to put down the cigarettes; no matter the cost, health threats or damage to myself or my lovely teenager. I want to quit because I want to breath better, feel better, perform physical activities and save the $150 per month I spend on these little tyrants.

Posted by: cathy | April 2, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Let’s see, the health benefits of smoking are…..? Hello!! Tobacco is a addictive drug and should be banned from being sold to people altogether. It’s unconscionable that it continues to be marketed at all.

Posted by: Sher | April 2, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

O.k., well first this web site is a little screwed up. My post is showing as Jan and the next with my name. We all do things that are unhealthy for ourselves. I don’t smoke around my kids or my grandkids. I learned a long time ago not to make opinions about any one else. You have no idea what they may be going through or if they have a health issue. But believe me when someone how is obviously 100 pounds overweight tells me how bad smoking is, I have a problem with that. One is no less stupiid than the other.

Posted by: Tamara | April 2, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Maybe we should prohibit cigarettes just like drugs. After all they kill people. Anyone care to second me on this great idea? Think of the lives we could save.
JR

Posted by: JR in NH | April 2, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

I imagine many are so upset because the ad hits home. It’s evident that this is an effective add. And I can see that a child seeing that might say something to his/her mom like, “Mom, I don’t want to lose you. Please don’t smoke.”

Posted by: deborah | April 2, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Perfect. It cuts through the denial we’re so very good at.

Posted by: Embee | April 2, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Great simple message. Spot on. Please also remember us non-smokers are forced to breath in your poison as well.

Posted by: Matthew Tsui | April 2, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Isn’t it the mother’s “choice” to smoke? After all, it is her body.

Posted by: Jane | April 2, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

People can’t stand watching it faked in a commercial – but it happens for REAL all the time, to so many children. This is a simple truth – when you smoke – just like when you choose to take any risk with your life – you are indeed risking making your children grow up without you. And that’s what cigarettes do.

Posted by: SusanHelit | April 2, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

jane yes it is and the dads choice also,.

Posted by: real T here | April 2, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

The bloggers shown on the news should have signed Smokers. Only a guilt ridden mother, father, grandparents, guardians, etc.,that smoke would find the advertisement offensive

Posted by: robert s. | April 2, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Loved the AD. About time we see some real emotion as to what smoking does to individuals and families. When Diane said that this AD is graffic and might be hard to take, I was more upset with that comment. So many try to be politically correct which is more upsetting then being real and honest. We need more ads like this for smoking as well as to what drug abuse does. PLEAS stop being so politically correct and lets be real.

Posted by: Janine | April 2, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

This commercial is so wrong on so many levels I can’t even believe it was made– to terrorize that little boy for what –to once again send the message that you shouldn’t smoke. Gee I’ve never heard that before.

Posted by: whathappened08 | April 2, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Entirely appropriate. Moreover, it is incredibly sad how defensive and absurd cigarette smokers become when viewing something like this. What is imperative for all smokers to understand is that the habit is 98% psychological, and is enabled by delusional functionalities engendered by the smokers unreasonable fears, along with a need for acceptance.
Unfortunately, what every smoker fears most is the uncertainty connected to giving up the contorted world which must certainly be discarded when stinky “old faithful” goes into the waste basket where it belongs…for good.
There is not a smoker on this planet who truly respects their self.
One of the most important facts that all smokers must realize is that they are being conned. And not just merely being duped into buying some derelict product, but incredulously fooled into living, and dying, a complete lie.
Yes there are many people addicted to illicit drugs in this world, however, their activities are not so easily condoned. Moreover, drug laws typically alienate people which prevents many of them from truly seeking help. There are many changes that are needed in this world. Using other faults and societal maladies to justify smoking falls under the tried and true analogy that two wrongs do not make a right.
Anybody who truly wants to quit for good and take control of their life. Visit this website and click on the article “quit smoking permanently in less than a week…a journey to freedom” on factbat.com
Rock On…!FREEDOM!

Posted by: factbat | April 2, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Note: The advice on factbat.com, for quitting smoking is free, is not a gimmick, and there is nothing to buy…pass it on!

Posted by: factbat | April 2, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

The truth hurts.

Posted by: DLM | April 2, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

this country was founded on tobacco get over it!
Besides if all us smokers truely were to quit – who would pay the taxes for all of you who have herds of children who need the SCHIP healthcare?

Posted by: jozy | April 2, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Let me introduce you to my little friend!! He only wears white and orange. I make sure he’s there when I wake up and will be there until I go to bed. I always make sure he is there to comfort me when I have problems, in the good times and basically for any emotion I have. NOBODY understands me as much as my little friend. HE loves me more than anyone else!! I will do ANYTHING for my little friend. Guess what? Your little friend is trying to KILL you!! If there really is a devil, he found the perfect disguise!!

Posted by: Michele | April 2, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Crossed the line? What about movies with children crying/upset/scared? What about them? Is that crossing the line too? In my book what is worse that this commercial is Funny Videos where children obvisously get hurt, crash, bang, hit, etc. and America laughs at them? Is that better?
As far as smoking is concerned, this and many other addictions–food, drugs, alcohol, etc.–cost all of us in higher medical care costs. Do the math! If you want to harm your health, go ahead. But we, as citizens of this great nation, have the right and responsibility to thwart children from getting addicted to these killers.
I have the right to get upset with smokers when they turn their head and exhale a cloud of smoke in a direction so the smoke will not enter their nostrils and eyes–but right into mine!

Posted by: oneblindhorse | April 2, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I am on day two of quitting smoking. I know the negative effects of smoking but did it anyway. I think whatever they have to do to get us to quit, they should. Even if it means tugging at our heart strings.

Posted by: Stephanie | April 2, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Good for you, Stephanie!! Don’t let a STICK run your life!! GET MAD and demand to be in control of your health!! There is a great life after smoking. I know this because I kicked it years ago!! I had to get mad and realize that “my little friend” was not my friend at all!!

Posted by: Michele | April 2, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Hats off to Kent, Melody,Jozy,and some others!I’m so fedup with this non-smoking stuff. This is suppose to be a free country but it seems there are more and more of our freedoms taken away by people that don’t have anything better to do than complain. Yes, I’ll agree smoking isn’t healthy for you and that is on a long list of other things. Drinking isn’t healthy for you any more than drugs but I don’t hear about that! My son was killed by a drunk driver and it wasn’t his choise! The driver wasn’t smoking, he was drinking! I never heard of anyone killing someone on the highway because they smoked pot or a cigarette. But I have seen mangeled bodies of children pulled from cars that had been hit by a drunk driver.
You people that think the ad is good…GET A LIFE! you’ve quit smoking.

Posted by: Barb | April 2, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Lets see, first we condem the smokers, and then supposedly every one quits,and after that happens were do we get tax money, I know, how about the alchohol, do you the the politicians will go for that?

Posted by: oldies60 | April 2, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

post – and after the ads for ciggarettes to quit are done what ads will they run to stop people from drinking?

Posted by: oldies60 | April 2, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

It doesn’t cross any lines that haven’t been crossed before. The whole public service drug advertising has been to scare or shock so what’s the difference. It’s actually a pretty good ad.

Posted by: Steven | April 2, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Dad smoked 5 packs a day til he had a “Paul of Tarsus” conversion and thinks no price is too great to absolutely eliminate tobacco. He wants genetic engineering to kill plants and hugh punitive fines/sentences for possession and an absolute ban on anything that can burn or produce smoke including matches and candles.

Posted by: charlie | April 2, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

I think this ad is great and really hits on what most smokers just don’t want to think about. Since I was around 10 years old I was always terrified of losing my parents to lung cancer because of their smoking. It took a while, but when I was 41 my mother actually died of what I was so terrified all my life. Her’s was the most senseless death. She was 71 and in perfect health other than the cancer that killed her. This is not something that is OK to do to your child at any age. I feel the terrible loss of losing her everyday and I still feel like that 10 years old losing her mother, because the fear stayed with me everyday until the day she died. When I see parents who have small children and the parents are smoking I feel so badly for the young kids because I know exactly what they are feeling. I would like to say to all parents who smoke that it is NOT OK to put cigarettes ahead of your family. You are actually choosing cigarettes OVER YOUR FAMILY and rubbing it in their faces while you are at it. Would you take a gun to your head in front of our kids??? I think not, so quit smoking for your kids. I know my mom didn’t think ahead to herself on her deathbed and her family watching her take her last breath. I know she wasn’t thinking everytime she had a cigarette how much she was going to tear her family apart with her death. I don’t think she thought of what it would do to my dad and he watched her wife of 55 years slip away. Just because your life ends doesn’t mean everyone forgets about you and goes on happy as can be. I don’t work that way. Dying from lung cancer kills more than the smoker…it kills the family.

Posted by: Sandy H | April 2, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Humans need targets. Prejudice and discrimination are part of our DNA and culture. The PC police have taken away every other targets, yet they KNOW (with all their research on social engineering and cultural control methods) people need someone to hate and look down on, so they lead the way against one of the last acceptable targets — smokers.
Never mind that your offspring and you breathe in toxins every minute of every day that are produced by all the comforts in your life. Ooo, unless you bought one of those neat expensive air “cleaners”!
No, you’re just part of the mob, not thinking at all, parroting the statements fed to you by commercials. Beer makes you sexy, wine is good for your heart, shop W*lmart live better, someone smoking within 50 miles of your child will kill your child… it’s making someone a lot of money, and helping control you. But if it works for you…

Posted by: Eyes Open | April 3, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

I think it is stupid and if they want didn’t wan’t people to smoke they shouldn’t have never evented cigerattes. and they wouldn’t have to try to make people guit smoking

Posted by: Patricia Lamkin | April 3, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I understand the rights of smokers, but at the same time. But unfortunately, most smokers are inconsiderate of non-smokers. They think if they crack a window, that its ok. well, its not, Usually a portion of the smoke gets blown back in somehow, and then the cigarette butts? Jow many smokers throw their butts out the windows of moving cars, or just toss them in the street when theyre done smoking? I mean look around smokers, you know who you are, Look at the ground around smoking areas, its downright nasty! Im an ex smoker myself, so I know what im talking about. You may think non smokers are inconsiderate, but by far, there are more smokers than non smokers that are inconsiderate.

Posted by: John | April 3, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

I think the bottom line is…this little boy was TERRIFIED, FOR REAL. Anyone who is a parent or know kids knows that this little guy suffered to make this ad. It matters little to me what the intended “message” was!

Posted by: Rae | April 3, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

John… Ican see all the beercans and soda cans on the side of the highways better than I see cigarette butts!

Posted by: Barb | April 4, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

When I was a little girl, way back in the 1960′s, anti-smoking campaigns were just being waged. I begged both my parents to quit smoking, but especially my Mom. My pleas went on through high school & college. I hid Mom’s cigarettes numerous times, to no avail. Mom continued to smoke, up to 2 years after her diagnosis of COPD, one of the deleterious effects of smoking. She moved in with my sister for a couple of years, then she moved in with me, the nurse. Shortly after this move, she needed oxygen at home, so I never really left my job as an ICU nurse. This was about 25 years after my pleas for her to stop smoking began. Mom passed away 6 days after her 71st birthday, in 1994, after gasping for air for the previous 2 years. Eating was a tremendous effort, so she was quite thin when she died.
If the controversial ad convinces one person to stop smoking, either for the sake of their kids, or more importantly, themselves, then it has done its job. Lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and COPD are horrendous diseases associated with smoking. Smokers, think about these potential consequences of this habit & seek assistance to quit.

Posted by: Sally | April 4, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I am appalled that people think this is ok.
There are kids that loose their parents daily from many things besides smoking.
This is horrible and it does nothing to encourage to quit smoking.
I am not a smoker and this ad was devastating. Lets cram guilty down the throats of every parent that is suffering a terminal ill disease.

Posted by: Melissa | April 6, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I think that the commercial terrible. To see that little boy crying, when he probably did not even remember what was happening. I was left when I was little, I and still remember it. You say he won’t remember, but how do you know for sure? I know that smoking is bad for you, but what about drugs, drinking, and overeating. You can go into most any restaurant and drink to your hearts content in front of your children, get into your car and drive. How many people are killed each year from drinking and driving? The jails are full of people drinking and driving and using drugs, and the tax payers have to support them. What about all the domestic violence, murders,robberies, etc. are committed because of drinking. You can see beer commercials on tv, race cars, magazines, etc. So I assume that is ok. How would you like to see an ad showing a dad coming home drunk and beating up his mother and possibly him too? I’ve never heard of that happening from smoking, nor killing people from smoking and driving.

Posted by: jan | April 7, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

They need strong ads. I’m currently trying to get my mother to stop smoking for the sake of her grandchildren. The boy was left alone just for a few seconds. It was shot with multiple cameras and edited to look a bit longer, but it was controlled.
Personally if I saw a little kid alone crying like that, I’d help him. But that’s NY for ya!

Posted by: Liz | April 7, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

While I think the message to stop smoking is a good one for everyone’s health. To do that to a little boy even for a few moments is terrible. All this to make a buck. That’s a terrible thing for a child to feel for a message that everyone has already heard and is bombarded with it everyday. There’s already a smoking ban in bars and restaurants, I think we know it’s bad.

Posted by: beth | April 7, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

If ABC’s “parent” company, Disney, stopped promoting actual tobacco brands like Marlboro and Camel in its movies, its purported concern over a powerful anti-smoking ad might be a little more credible. And if people are really concerned about kids, I’m sure there are worthwhile non-profits in NYC, working with and for neglected, abused and abandoned children, who could use their help starting tomorrow.

Posted by: Jon | April 8, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

I quit smoking 6 weeks ago. When I’m stressing, I still want one in the worst way.
After seeing that commericial, I’m done. My kids are worth it.

Posted by: Mistie | April 9, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

I think the ad is powerful but, do we have to freighten young children in order to get our point across? As a parent, each time I watch that commercial and see that little boy cry, it pulls at my heartstrings. It doesn’t matter if the boy cried for 5 seconds or 17 seconds, its unexecusable to do this to a young child.

Posted by: marce | April 15, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

I really do not see the need to emotionaly effecting a child like this!
Or me as a non smoker! It’s mental abuse! I think they took it a step to far! I turn it off the second the com. starts. YOU”VE GONE TO FAR!!

Posted by: Angel | April 15, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Marce I totally Agree. I don’t know how all these people that have made comments not mention how that is child abuse. Reality check people…. Hurting a child physically or mentally is a form of abuse. If you don’t understand that then that is why child abuse is such a big problem because people who dont “Get” it. Alex was abused. And it’s all on tape. Way to go people. way to go.

Posted by: Duh? | May 7, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

i love all of you people, im doing an essay on conflicting perspectives and your thoughts and PERSPECTIVES are definately helping me right a band 6 essay :D

Posted by: Girl | May 19, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am

this add is the reason i quit i love my son and couldnt bare to know that may of been him

Posted by: steph | January 31, 2010, 3:50 am 3:50 am

The point made should have stopped a few people who smoke in their tracks. Can you imagine leaving your child alone in this world without a mother/guardian because you wont stop smoking

Posted by: stop smoking sydney | October 4, 2010, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

What people forget is that people who die from smoking had a choice to smoke the fear in that childs eyes is real no need to put him through any trauma for smokers bad choices. Why don’t you rather torment the smokers not children !

Posted by: King | April 20, 2011, 6:49 am 6:49 am

Totally missing the point here. Yes – smoking is very bad. We get it. We’ve had the anti-smoking ads crammed down our throat for years. But for me and my 11 year old daughter, we feel it is horrible that they are exploiting this baby’s obvious – very real fear! Most of us have had that horrible moment as a child and to see it being used for ANY purpose – is very upsetting! That little boy was truly terrified – I don’t care if it was for 5 seconds or 5 hours – it is unexcusable to exploit his fear & momemtary trauma for thier purpose. The mother should be ashamed of herself for knowingly putting her baby through that! She didn’t do it for the “cause” – she did it for cash! I could not imagine EVER puposely causing my children to feel that sense of panic and terror that comes with that feeling of being lost or abandoned! Shame on them all!

Posted by: Appalled | June 15, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.