Closing Arguments: Time to Pay Pilots More?
Testimony continued today about the Buffalo plane crash that killed 50 people in February. Pilot training, fatigue and even salaries have been discussed as possible factors. Co-pilot Rebecca Shaw, who had flown from her Washington state home to Newark before the fatal flight, earned just $24,000 — a salary that would make living in the New York Metropolitan area difficult. So tonight, we ask you: Would you be prepared to pay more for your ticket to ensure commercial pilots and co-pilots were better compensated? Tell us what you think. And you can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
With the coming inflation, everybody should make more….a lot more.
Posted by: Huh | May 15, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
NO I wouldn’t pay more for an airline ticket just to pay a pilot more. The problem is with Regional Airlines that fly for the Mainline. They don’t pay their pilots enough. Do away with commuting long distances. This co-pilot knew her schedule. She should have flown in a day or 2 before and rested since she was originating in Oregon and was flying out of Newark.
There is also no reason why an airline CEO should be paid more than their highest paid pilots. Pilots are the reason airlines exist. Not CEO’s.
Posted by: trvlr64 | May 15, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
No, in the current economy, plane fares and misc. charges are ridiculous. Not only that, but the flights have been cut back and overbooked to the extent that you pay $600+ for a previous $158 flight, and that is without the additional luggage charges.
Posted by: faye | May 15, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
I don’t know if salaries would have much in common with PILOT COMPETENCY…Let’s face it …this pilot made what looks to be a rookie mistake and lost his plane at the cost of many lives…I don’t think his salary had much bearing on what actually happened here…Let’s dig a little deeper in the well and find the true root cause !!!
Posted by: Nachthexe | May 15, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
I might be willing to pay a bit more, However I’d like to see the CEO and middle management’s salary reported side by side with the Pilot Rebecca Shaw 25K per year. I’d prefer to see middle mnagemment stream lined and CEOs take a sizable cut before fares were inceased.
Posted by: lorit | May 15, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
I have often flown commerical, and have not felt that I need to worry about the staff’s ability to do their job. No I am not willing to pay more for my ticket. The airlines should be paying any capable person a reasonable salary. If a person is not capable in scores or academics they should not be hired for this important task. I appreciate the ability of the airline staff, but, I shouldn’t pay more to any airline to ensure my safety. This should be done without question. What would I do? Ask at the check in desk? No, all should be paid well for a job they have acheived. I should not worry as a consumer as to the ability of the staff. I would think the airline would determine this, thus being responsible for the employees that they hire.
Posted by: Sandra | May 15, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Yes, I would be ready to pay more to be sure we have pilots that are better qualified and trained and less worn out by the long hours.
I heard the playback of the cockpit conversation that was going on during the period when the pilot and copilot are only supposed to be discussing the takeoff process (up to 10,000 feet, I think). It is outrageous to hear the conversation that they were having.
But this should not become a fare resetting just to compensate the pilots more. The FAA needs to review the whole situation of airline safety or “unsafety” that now exists due to deregulation, airline greed, and failed government.
The planes are all way overcrowded. The seat spaces are way too small. These conditions are completely unsafe and should be made safer by reducing the seat crowding on planes. Increase the space per person by 50% and increase the fares by 50%. The revenue to the airline would be the same, and the flight would be safer, especially when an evacuation becomes necessary. The flight would also be less painful to the passengers, who are now crowded like sardines. There would also be fewer sicknesses spread on the planes with less overcrowding.
Deregulation of the airlines has been a complete failure–just another government failure. Airline travel was much safer and much less unpleasant, before deregulation. Deregulation was completely unnecessary and a major government mistake. So, come on FAA and government, let’s get up off your big cans, earn your lavish salaries and benefits, and fix these problems that you created by deregulation.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | May 15, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Come on Brashir…use your head…mistakes were made…people died…end of discussion…Let’s keep things in perspective !!! Salaries were probably the last thing on this pilots mind !!!
Posted by: pro from dover | May 15, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I believe that anybody who works should make a decent living wage. There are too many people in this world today who make a lot more than thier worth of contribution to humanity. Rebecca or anybodies pay does not ensure my or anybody elses saftey. Our wealth distribution of in this country and globally is totally off the mark. We as communitties need to look at our basic needs as people and pay for those equally. Why does a doctor get paid more than a farmer, when it is the root of our health of that the farmer cultivates?
Posted by: Mrs. Blankenship | May 15, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
speaking from a pilot view as i am one myself, no one can hardly afford to live in base, its way to expensive and you would hardly be there, so why not commute from where you live and where you have roots. commuting in two days before a trip is ridiculous because most of the time we only have 1-3 days off in between trips, thats taking away from our time off with our families. Ask yourself this, would you go spend the night in a hotel on a saturday to get to work on monday….i dont think so. they need to fork over some more cash to the people that fly the planes and that actually work.
Posted by: give me a break | May 15, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am
To: GIVE ME A BREAK…….Oh please. You know that when you take a job as a pilot or flight attendant it’s better to live close to the base you are hired out of. If you can’t afford to live in that base then you should find a job that is closer to your income range. I have traveled for work for 11 years now. And YES I have had to fly in the day before I start my job just so I could get the proper rest before I started the next day. I have lost as much family time as any flight attendant or pilot so I’m not going to cry you a river.
Again the problem with this copilot’s pay was she worked for the regional airline. Their pay SUCKS. And who’s fault is that? The CEO and the pilot union.
Posted by: trvlr64 | May 15, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am
The article is asking if you’d be willing to pay more if it meant hiring a higher caliber pilot to fly you around? The way things are now, low quality pilots are being hired at regionals BECAUSE the pay is so low. The high quality guys are staying in the military (or other career fields), never going to regionals.
2) You cant have higher wages and not increase fares.
The airlines operate on less than 1% avg profit margin per year. You have to raise fares to raise wages, or, you could take money out of safety programs, maintenance and training to cover the increased wage costs. You must raise fares to raise wages in the airlines.
Posted by: jr | May 15, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
I would not pay more. It’s rediculous to think the co-pilot could not find somewhere affordable to live that would have been a shorter commute. Plenty of people live on less than her salary and they have to live where they can afford to live.
Posted by: it's rediculous | May 15, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am
ABC. I challenge you to ask why AMR Corporation has taken money from their employees. On average most pilots at AA have taken a 30% paycut while management has seen their bonuses go up 700%…
I dare you ABC to actually do a story on how Corporate Greed at most of the airlines especially American Airlines is the reason why we are we are today.
Posted by: AAGuy | May 15, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am
Ask most people if they would go to a surgeon who had a second job. For all of you people that have never done the job I have lived in planes, slept in hangars and done anything I could do to get to the point where I am. I have never seen a pay increase just pay loss since I have been at AA.. Even before 9/11. You will pay a pro player millions but if your in the back of my plane you dont care if Im tired BECAUSE YES I DO HAVE A SECOND JOB!!!
Posted by: AAGuy | May 15, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am
ABC—- see if you can take on AMR and ask why 8 of our pilots have killed themselves in the last year!!! Dare you!! You wont because you are scared like most press of large corporations… It could affect your advertising dollars..
Posted by: AAGuy | May 15, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
How much is a pilot worth to the passengers they serve when the airplane is flying?
I’d say more than 24k.
Posted by: rogerdodger | May 15, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Better yet email me since I gave it to you and I will give you a story.. The difference is that it will be the truth…
Posted by: AAGuy | May 15, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am
I am a regional pilot. I made about 24k last year. I spent over 300 hours away from home last month. Only during my 87 flying hours was I paid. I have been in some form of training for 9 years. I have 8 different pilot certificates. I have flown over two thousand hours. I have over 60k of college debt. My union is almost useless because a loophole in the law that doesn’t allow us to strike properly for the wages we deserve. Because of the seniority system I can not leave my current airline for fear of starting all over again. My life is falling apart, because I decided to chase my dream. The airlines know this. They know that I want to go to work, and I can never leave. I do not want to make a million dollars. I do however want the respect of my passengers, my nearly homeless brethren, and the FAA. I want to sleep more then 5 hours a night. Everyone should damn the current set of laws that allow the airline to push us around. I recently was on a trip that gave to give my crew nearly 9 hours of “Scheduled Rest”. The “Rest” was scheduled to begin upon our arrival at the airport, not the pillow. Our flight was delayed, then we had to wait for passengers to deplane(including the ones that have to wait up to 10 minutes for wheelchairs), then wait to catch a shuttle bus to a hotel 20 minutes away, try to sleep, then get up early because the hotel van only travels to the airport every 30 minutes, pass through security, and arrive at the gate in enough time to preflight and run 6 checklists. My 9 hours of “REST” turned into little more then 5 hours, during the middle of the day. How could anyone function after six days in a row of that kind of abuse. I think sleep deprivation was used in “Get-mo” as a form of torture for terrorist that wanted to hijack our airplanes. It seems to be more effective when used by crew scheduling to make those same aircraft crash anyway. Public perception is important, behind the shiny wings and fancy epaulets, is a person that makes a fraction of what he or she used to, or deserves to. I am responsible for YOUR life. I deserve to make at least a decent wage.
Posted by: Airliner | May 15, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am
I agree with Airliner!!!!
Posted by: AAGuy | May 15, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am
well said Airliner, well said. ALL TRUE!
Posted by: AV8R | May 15, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Wow! These comments are crazy. You people have no clue when it comes to pilot training, the maze (not ladder) of getting a decent flying job, or how ridiculous an airline pilot’s schedule actually is! Although I don’t see how Ms. Shaw’s crash correlates with this salary topic, it should be noted that she probably was expected to perform a very critical job under less than perfect working conditions for a compensation less than what most folks make at Home Depot! Again, the public has no idea what pilots endure to make a lower class living.
Posted by: FLY027 | May 15, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am
That’s because all they care about is whats in it for me..
Posted by: AAGuy | May 15, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Seems like most of you dont get it. Competence has a lot to do with compensation. Proper compensation means a pilot can afford to have one job and relocate closer to base if necessary. Fatigue is a real problem. The regionals have been giving you the passengers cheap flights at the expense of the pilots quality of life. All so you can save 15 bucks on a ticket. Pilots will continue to be crucified, underpaid and used and reused like a rag. And passengers will be ok with it just to save a buck. All this 3407 crash and regional controversy will blow over soon and everything will go back to being the same, just another story. Meanwhile more and more pilots will leave the industry, tired of being used, and you will see real bottom of the barrel pilots brought in to fill the huge vacancies. And to the person who blamed deregulation, you should educate yourself on the subject because you are so way off it’s ridiculous. I wont even bother breaking it down for you. But I’ll just say that deregulation is why we have more competitive prices and better service, yes it was worse at one time.
Posted by: J-pilot | May 15, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Almost 25% of commercial pilots will be retiring in the next three years. There is going to be a very acute shortage of qualified pilots at that time. When this happens regional airlines in particular will be scrapping the bottom of the barrell to try and find qualified applicants with even 300 hours. The only way to attract young men and women to this profession is to make it worth the time, effort and expense, by raising saleries. Right now no one wants to spend 50-100K for training,then spend another 2-3 years building time, all for a starting job that pays 18-23K. It will take several more years before that pilot even makes enough to actually pay some debt off. If you want some of our best and brightest working in this profession you had better pay them or they will choose another vocation.
Posted by: Regional Pilot | May 15, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am
~~~~~~~~~~
The pilots working at regional airlines now are not the next Captain Sully. The real sharp guys, with the ‘right stuff’ are ALL picking other career fields because of the horrible working conditions at today’s airlines.
Who do you want to pay to fly YOUR family around? You want Sully or Shaw?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Dash8Pilot | May 15, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am
As an regional pilot I can say that I routinely worked 14-16 hour days, with a two hour drive to work (because i made so little that i had move back in with my parents). By the time I got to a hotel room, i had often been in my uniform 18+ hours. Some overnights offered time for only 3-5 hours of sleep. Before crews are able to check out and go home on their last day of a grueling trip, they are often forced to work mandatory overtime(another overnight), or risk being fired. This type of scheduling can keep a pilot away from home for 24+ days per month and lead to a chronic cycle of fatigue.
Adjusted for duty day many regional pilots make less than minimum wage.
Posted by: regional pilot2 | May 15, 2009, 2:23 am 2:23 am
Sully isnt a good example. I feel sorry for the guys at USAir. They have taken a beating in pay. All pilots from the 777 pilot to the flight instructor need to make a stance and say enough is enough. Have a national airline day. Shut the system down. I have been RAPA, TEAMSTERS, ALPA , and now APA until we all take care of each other, companies will continue to take pay, benefits, and retirement. Oops they have already done that. Disrupt the entire system and then the general public will take notice.
Posted by: AAGuy | May 15, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am
That last comment was a little harsh here. Shaw was a Co-pilot, ultimately the Captain is responsible. Additionally, if you listen to the CVR from the last two minutes of flight you will here Shaw making configuration changes and trying to address the problem while the Captain mutters…. uh, uh, uh again and again! Maybe Shaw was on her way to being a “Sully”. As for the salary issue, let’s just say I have more qualifications than both pilots onboard 3407 and I choose to only flight instruct, occasionally flying corporate trips. This is because I actually make more money running my own business (non aviation) and flying maybe 10 hours a week, just for fun. The last time I slept in a hotel and got less than five hours of sleep was on a vacation trip that I flew myself to in my own plane.
I made the decision to pursue a non aviation career as a primary source of income over six years ago and yet to regret my choice. Just a personal example to you young regional pilots. You also have a choice. I hope the airlines learn from my story as well. I am certain you are missing the opportunity to have many talented individuals safely lead your companies from the cockpit because they are too busy applying their gifts on more worthwhile careers. As I always say jokingly with my airline friends…. Maybe when I retire at forty I’ll join you in the airlines for a few years. That’s the only way to happily be an airline pilot.
Posted by: FLY027 | May 15, 2009, 2:41 am 2:41 am
I am the wife of a pilot who has worked for a Regional airline for 9 years. I can FULLY attest to the nightmare the current salaries and working conditions create not only for the pilots, but also for their families. (ABC, if you want to profile what a Regional pilot’s salary does to his life and family, give us a call. We’ve got war stories.) But I have to vigorously object to this notion of “you get what you pay for”. My husband has a Bachelor’s in Aviation Science from Baylor University, and 20 years of military service where he received (and still holds) a FAA A&P license and an FAA Air Traffice Control license. He has over 8000 career flight hours. I can assure you, when it come to aviation, he’s as qualified and competent as any 777 pilot in the industry. He was not one of the lucky “golden boys” who got to fly in the military and then step straight into a mainline job. We don’t have friends in high places who can usher us through the “good ‘ol boy” interview system. So we have done what the current system requires: start at the bottom and work your way up. He and I have each worked 2 or sometmes 3 jobs to make ends meet. We have sacrificed and patiently paid our dues in hopes that someday he would achieve his goal of mainline flying. But the system doesn’t reward competence. It’s a SENORITY ONLY SYSTEM. You don’t move up the ladder until every guy above you does. And when that pipeline shuts down or gets flooded with mainline guys who were furloughed back to the Regionals (as they were in our case), there is nowhere to go. Let’s be very careful before we assume all Regional pilots are mainline rejects and are incompetent and unsafe. Chances are, they are more likely to be outstanding pilots who are playing by the rules and are sick of being disrespected and starved to death.
Posted by: pilotwife | May 15, 2009, 7:32 am 7:32 am
Dash8Pilot – Shaw was not flying the airplane. Maybe if she was, it wouldn’t have gotten in the situation in the first place. Who knows? Errors were made by both crewmembers, but why are you picking on the PNF first officer?? By the way, if you are a decent stick pilot, you know that Sully had nowhere else to go and had everything work right for him.
Posted by: yesIamapilot | May 15, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Rebecca Shaw’s salary was just under $17,000/year
Philip Trenary (CEO Pinnacle Corp which owns Colgan): $1.2 million
American greed at it’s best.
Posted by: broke_pilot | May 15, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Pay has 100% to do with safety. If Rebecca was paid more she could live in Newark. Ever try eat at an airport for under $10. All your going to get is McDonalds. Not exactly performance enhancement food. How about flying a 20 million dollar airplane and worrying about paying your student loans, (Most have 100k for pilot ratings). How about the 16 hrs duty day the FAA allows. I routinely fly 14 hr days. Over 8 hrs is legal if the weather is bad. Make sense? How about flying all weekends/holidays/early mornings 4am/ late nights 2am…for $20k. Its pathetic. Ask our CEO how many times he has worked Christmas in the past 10 years. The answer is 0. All’s good as long as the ticket price is $69.
Posted by: Tim Walker | May 15, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
i gotta agree with the other pilot wife. my husband has worked his ass off to make a career of flying. he studied long and hard while training and recieving his certificates. he busted his hump flight instructing and flying his cessna 150 just to build up 1200 flight hours so he could get hired witha regional. he’s not had the good ole boys to rely on to get him in anywhere. he made it to the regionals the old fashioned way… by working hard.
we have about $50k in student loan debt now. because the airlines can’t manage their money, my husband is furloughed from the career that he absolutely loves; the one he – we – sacrificed for him to have.
when he was working, he was making about $21k/yr. how is that supposed to feed a family of four? how is that supposed to house a family of 4? the answer is that it can’t.
ultimately, my husband is changing careers. the airlines are missing out on yet another great pilot; a pilot who would not make the same mistakes that led to that buffalo plane crash.
do i think salary has to do with that crash? i suppose it’s possible. even more than that though, i believe pilot error is to blame for the crash. how tragic.
Posted by: pilotwife2 | May 15, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Pilots should be compensated adequately. The problem lies with the fact that people nowdays expect to cross the country and pay just a couple of ben franklins. To add insult to injury, they expect red carpet service. Pilots wages have not come up to par like in other professions. Even a handful of companies that fly jet equipment(mainline jets not regional jets). do not pay adequately and have recorded record profits. The aviation profession in the USA has gone down the pits unfortunately. As for the Colgan crew I will not make any judgements on them or their actions. I’ll let the NTSB do their job. May they rest in peace.
Posted by: Jimmy Doolittle | May 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
You people have no clue just how much it cost to operate an aircraft per hour. These aircraft cost thousands of dollars per hour to run, and you all want the tickets for pennies. Well, if you don’t want to pay, you can always drive your car. Good luck with that. We have the safest, most reliable air taxi system in the world, how about showing a little more appreciation for those hard working pilots and flight crews. Without them, you’d be back to covered wagon speeds..on a Grey Hound bus.
Posted by: Wiley Post | May 15, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
What drives the airline industry? The consumers—”I wanna be carted half way across the globe with unrivaled speed, comfort, and safety. And oh, by the way, I’m not willing to pay for that service!!!”
As the saying goes, “Crap in equals crap out.”
Don’t forget when you’re out there pointing fingers, how many fingers point right back.
Posted by: block30 | May 15, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
I was a regional pilot for 7 years for two different airlines as a Saab captain and a Embraer first officer.
It’s a grueling lifestyle. It’s costs tens of thousands of dollars and years of training and education just to live that lifestyle. Years ago most pilots who put in this money and effort were eventually rewarded. With very little mainline hiring going on the past few years, this is rarely the case anymore.
Working regional airline schedules for regional airline pay definately takes a toll on one’s personal well-being over time. Financially, physically, etc. This is especially true when one is stuck on the bottom of a companie’s seniority where the schedules are worse with less days off, etc.
What I would add to some of the comments by pilots above is my personal example of commuting problems.
In my last pilot job I was hired by American Eagle. As a condition of my employment I was garenteed that I would be based out of Chicago. This worked out well for me since I lived close to Chicago. After starting to fly for them, however, schedules were reduced and I was displaced to New York City. On my pay I could not afford to rent a place in New York, especially when I expected to be furrloughed after moving there, so I quit. Having done that sort of commuting in the past I had no intention of doing it again. The vast majority of pilots in that situation do commute, however, rather than being forced out of a job.
Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
I am also the wife of a regional pilot and agree with all that the first two wives have said. My husband used to work for a decent airline and made good pay. Then they were bought out by a mainline and life has gone downhill since. It’s about about cutting costs, no matter what. Talk about not letting pilots commute anymore is crazy. While I would love it if my husband no longer had to commute to NY, I know that there is no way we could afford to live there. I’m tired of people saying that they should live at base. His company has opened and closed multiple bases over the past three years, do they expect us to pick up and move our family each time? I take most issue with company management and their seeming desire to totally screw over the flight crews in terms of salary, scheduling, and morale. Ask any of them at one airline which is about to have their pass privleges reduced so that they become inferior to mainliners. And I keep hearing that FO Shaw should have called in fatigued – please, most regionals will not allow such an act to go unpunished, regardless of what they tell the NTSB.
Posted by: pilotwife3 | May 15, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Anyone notice that the general public stopped commenting after about 35 minutes?
Only the pilots and their wives have been leaving comments now, the public has already moved on..
Posted by: o290 | May 15, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I think that it should be clear to the general public that the increase in their ticket price does not have to be a significant one. At the regional level a increase in total ticket price of $3-$4 could significantly improve the base salaries and quality of life for all the required crew members. Take for example a 50 passenger regional jet. By regulation to operate that aircraft you need 3 crew members (Captain, First Officer, and Flight Attendant). By increasing the ticket price $3 per passenger and giving it directly to the crew would equal to $150 extra PER FLIGHT for each crew member!!! If a flight crew flies 4 flights a day that is an extra $600. I think First Officer Rebecca Shaw would have been able to move out of her parents house and live comfortably in base on that increase in salary.
So I re-ask the question to the general public: Would you be prepared to pay $3-$4 more for your ticket to ensure airline flight crews were better compensated?
Posted by: Furloughed Pilot | May 15, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
I chased the dream. Got there. I knew the first few years were going to suck. They did. They still do, but are slightly better. Unfortunately the playing field of this game has changed and continue to change. The changes I see coming do not justify the cost I paid or am going to have to pay to keep it going. I gambled. It didn’t pay off yet. I don’t see it paying off. I am going back to school. Working on my MBA. Until then, I will continue to do this job, with approximately the same attitude as a Starbucks barista putting themselves through school so they can make a hopefully have a respectful profession. I’ll do it to the very best of my abilities with my dreams elsewhere.
Posted by: Goingbacktoschool | May 15, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
I agree, the public (non flying) stayed on for 35 mins to turn their nose up at pilots, flight attendants etc, when they have no clue what the heck they are talking about. All they want is cheap cheap cheap, and whine when there is a small maintenance issue and throw a fit like alittle two year old onboard an aircraft and demand they are “silver elite” or some bullcrap, if you dont like it DRIVE, other than that shut up.. i have a family I would like to go home to on my days off.
Posted by: av8 | May 15, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
I agree with “goingbacktoschool”, I have racked up so much debt getting here that I have no choice but to stay here because there is nowhere else I was suppossed to go.. And I really like in the beginning comments about how we knew what we were getting ourselves into and we should have chose different professions. Well, once you spend 60K and get a 4 year degree, and flight instructing, I figured I might as well try it out because it would have all been a waste. Passengers have no idea and I never expect them to, only other aviation professionals know what goes on, and I am glad that now people are becoming aware that its not all working 3 days a month and parking my bmw in the employee lot and flying out to the bahamas to my winter house. give me a break
Posted by: flyer | May 15, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
You know what Im tired hearing in the media and from people? That theres two types of pilots the first class guy and the second class guys. In their arrogant understanding of the industry they believe the first class pilot goes straight to the majors while the rest go to the regionals. This fantasy that the regionals is for second rate pilots needs to stop. We’re all aware that no one can ever guarantee you a mainline job so the myth that the regionals is merely a stepping stone is wrong. It is a regional career which can possibly turn into the stepping stone for that better job. And as a professional career, pilots must be compensated properly. The passengers across this country are just as much at fault for this as the Ceo’s. If you cant afford to fly then you shouldnt fly. We shouldn’t bring down safety and pay for pilots just some broke family can fly. That may sound cruel but its the truth. If you cant afford to fly you shouldn’t. We cant keep cutting cost the way we are for these people while risking our lives and others.
Posted by: J-pilot | May 15, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
what the average passenger dosnt know is that for our 75 paid hours per month, we are away from home over 375 hours a month unpaid. we take you and your family to where you want to go in almost any weather, with a smile, to the best of our abilitys. I do my job cause I do it well and I love it. So you people ask yourself who arnt pilots, would you complain if you were away from home 20 days a month making 20,000 a year? Think twice before bitching out the flight crew cause you cant get to your vacation on time in the middle of a snowstorm. We do our best and ask yourself how much your familys lives are worth when entrusted to us.
Posted by: dash 8 pilot | May 15, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
You know what I have learned through the few business classes I have taken lately? The numbers that these “decision makers” are looking at to increase their profit are a bit deceptive, even to themselves. Employee cost is just one of those line items. Other operating cost that can be reduced don’t trickle into their financial statements so clearly. Just on a day to day operation, I see our airline bleeding money in what may seem insignificant ways, but they add up. The problem is the managers are focused on the wrong performance numbers and don’t enforce the basics. Its the CYA syndrome. They are more interested in not rocking the boat and covering their on asses than actual making the operation smooth and efficient. This is a very real and glaring cause of why many airlines go belly up. Too reactive and not proactive.
Posted by: Goingbacktoschool | May 16, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
THIS CUSTOMER & VERY FREQUENT FLYER will OPEN his mouth for you. YES those of us that live on the airlines to get us to work every week around the globe completely understand the life of a pilot and flight attendant.
Unfortunately I’m not the person you should be bItching at. Your CEO’s have continued to rape yoru work groups until you’re paid very little.
Again we (the very frequent flyer) know that it’s the CEO’s fault and they should have their pay reduced but we all know that’s never going to happen.
Would it take a system wide multi airline work stoppage to get this happen? Probably. I say do it. Then maybe our government and the airline CEO’s will wake up.
Posted by: trvlr64 | May 16, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Do people understand that we only get paid from engine start up to shut down, and the hours spent during preflight and post flight are not compensated? I think most normal jobs include a 40 hr work week, not to mention they go home every night to their house and family while we pay for a hotel room or go to our crash pads on non commutable trips. Try sleeping in a recliner in the crew lounge because a hotel room 12 nights a month is out of the question at 40-120 bucks a night before flying a 20 million dollar airliner filled with people in bad weather at night time. If I got paid 160hrs a month then I would not consider pay a safety hazard. Low pay translates to a lack of sleep, and if that stress leaks into the cockpit, it will degrade safetey.
Posted by: CommercialJetpilot | May 18, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am
J-Pilot says above: “And to the person who blamed deregulation, you should educate yourself on the subject because you are so way off it’s ridiculous. I wont even bother breaking it down for you. But I’ll just say that deregulation is why we have more competitive prices and better service, yes it was worse at one time.”
I blamed a combination of corporate greed, failed government, and deregulation for the miserable ordeal that airline travel now is. You are the one that needs to educate yourself on what deregulation did to an industry that once provided much better service to its customers.
I have been flying continuously since 1974 and I lived through deregulation. There was a noticeable, immediate drop in service after deregulation and it has continued to severely erode ever since. I have flown about 2 million miles and have a good database of observation on what deregulation did to us.
Service is so bad that I now sit in seats with my knees against the seat in front of me and in my face at the same time. I absolutely despise being on airplanes, but have to do so to make a living.
Service has gotten so bad that Airbus is trying to make planes where they can strap passengers to the walls in order to get more sardines in the can. And, some Irish airline wants to start charging to use the toilets. Wouldn’t it be interesting if people starting using their seats or the barf bags as toilets, because they do not have the right change to get into the restroom?
I am all for paying the pilots more, significantly more, as I said in my constructive comments above, in my earlier contribution to this discussion. But, it should be done as a part of a complete revamping of airline travel. You get what you pay for. I am willing to pay a lot more, if I get some space for my legs and space to work. I had these things before deregulation.
In fact, if I got more space, I might even start flying for pleasure trips again (like I did before deregulation). As it stands now, I only fly on business, because I absolutely despise being on planes. There is no such thing as a pleasure trip on a plane anymore.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | May 18, 2009, 6:49 am 6:49 am
Wiley Post says above: “you all want the tickets for pennies”.
Wiley, see my earlier comments. I do not want tickets for pennies. I am willing to pay 2, 3, or even 4 times the current fares, if I get something for it: better service. No more crowding into a cabin that is a sardine can and therefore unsafe and unhealthy. I despise flying because of the way I am treated by airlines. I only fly because my job requires it.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | May 18, 2009, 7:02 am 7:02 am
CommercialJetpilot says above: “I think most normal jobs include a 40 hr work week, not to mention they go home every night to their house and family while we pay for a hotel room or go to our crash pads on non commutable trips. Try sleeping in a recliner in the crew lounge”
You got it all wrong. Most of us are now working 80 hours per week and are on call 24/7. We do not get time with our families. And, have you tried getting some badly needed sleep in a sardine-size airline seat? The main exception to these grim realities is government employees, who just sit on their big fat cans and do nothing. Among the many other things that they should be doing is revamping the airline industry. See my earlier inputs above on this matter.
I am fully sympathetic to the unhappy plight of airline pilots, flight attendants, and passengers–all of whom have suffered big time due to deregulation, corporate greed, and failed government. Unfortunately, I have to fly on business, or I would not poke a ten-foot stick at one of those unsafe, unhealthy, overcrowded flying sardine cans.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | May 18, 2009, 7:17 am 7:17 am
Kind advice to pilots:
I have read through all the pilots’ comments above. Yes, pilots, flight attendants, gate agents, and passengers all have a hard life due to the condition of airline travel–thanks to failed government, deregulation, and corporate greed. The airlines are overcrowded, unclean, unhealthy, and therefore unsafe.
I cannot imagine why anyone would want to work for an airline–especially as a pilot or flight attendant, where one would have to spend so much time on planes. I despise being on planes as a passenger and would despise it all the more as a pilot or flight attendant. At least the flight attendants get to move around during the flights and are not confined to a sardine seat for hours at a time.
I started working as a sophomore in high school and worked as a janitor, a dishwasher, a busboy, a waiter, at a car wash, as a teaching assistant, a research assistant, a student engineer, and an engineering assistant. By the time I finished grad school, I had already been working for 12 years. I would prefer any of these jobs to being a pilot. I also now work in a job that demands very long, hard hours. But, I prefer it to being a pilot, even if pilots made six figures.
For all the pilots that said they are going back to school above, I caution you that education (which I invested very heavily in—3 engineering degrees and an MBA) does not produce the kind of jobs that one expects, based on what you are told in school. Most graduates end up way underemployed, regardless of their field (with the exception of physicians and government employees). And most non-government employers treat you very badly.
But, I still think that you will be far better off getting out of piloting. I cannot imagine why you wanted to be a pilot in the first place. Time spent on airplanes is a forfeiture of part of your life. The less time you spend on planes, the richer your life will be.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | May 18, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
What’s it going to take for our failed government to revamp airline travel and undo the overcrowded, unclean, unhealthy, unsafe mess that they created by deregulation?
Tragically, it is going to take tragedy: when some events occur that make the risks clear even to the stupid–like a plane crash with large fatalities, where the cause is clearly gridlock trying to evacuate the sardine can cabin quickly enough–or like a major pandemic due to spread of diseases in the sardine can cabins.
It is hard to believe that the FAA is asleep at the switch on this matter. But, that is the way it always is with government–failure to pro-act and then reaction in a panic after a crisis occurs that they could have prevented.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | May 18, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
I am a regional airline pilot. I am 80K in debt from training (University and flight training). I must use credit cards to help buy food for my family. I live in the hood where 3 people were shot outside my front door last year. When my wife lost her job we had to go on food stamps. Yet I fly a 70 passenger jet safely and professionally 20 days a month. Not for the money or to be a “cool pilot”, but because I love to fly. My family and I make sacrifices so that I may enjoy what I do. So think about that when you are complaininig about being a half hour late.
Would more pay make it safer? Not much. Would more pay make it ethical? You bet.
Posted by: regional pilot | May 18, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The Airport bus driver in New York makes $100,000 a year because he needs to be able to live and work there. He’s responsible for hundreds of lives everyday. The Pilots retirements were ransacked after 9/11 in the name of “saving their jobs” and wages slashed. Will highly qualified pilots continue to go to work for airlines now that they’ve seen their fathers lose it all? No, they’ll go drive the bus and make a better living! One mistake won’t kill everyone you’re responsible either, unlike flying. You get what you pay for people. Go pay your surgeon $60K a year and see what kind of excellence you get.
Posted by: Isla | May 25, 2009, 1:59 am 1:59 am
my father is a delta pilot and there was an internal study done in the company that found that if everyone that buys plane tickes, if they pay just five dollars more for their tickets, it would cover two pilots and three flight attendants salleries and as a current resident of buffalo that lives less that a mile from where the crash happened, this is truely a waake up call that these pilots are being pushed to their breaking points. they have hundreds of peoples lives in their hands on a daily basis, we should help them out too every once and a while!
Posted by: Matthew | May 28, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
I am willing to pay more, however in a free market environment we will always be stuck with the least common denominator. We really need the FAA to step up and provide some real oversight. This is an issue of public safety, and the government is obligated to provide meaningful protection. Just paying a little more airfare is not going to change anything. The problem is not limited to the flight crew of Colgan 3407, it is rooted in the management practices of all regional airlines as they are just trying their best to be profitable.
I think we should privatize TSA which is just for “show” anyway and instead spend those federal dollars on improving and enforcing training standards and safe practical crew fatigue/sick/commuting policies.
Posted by: FFlyer | May 29, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“Would you be prepared to pay more for your ticket to ensure commercial pilots and co-pilots were better compensated?”
Yes I would. I’ve done so in the past (after de-regulation) and would do so now. Heck, as much as I complain about it, I still pay more for gasoline and taxes than I feel I should!
But how much pilots are compensated is really not the question to ask or the lesson to be learned from Colgan’s incident–there are so many more reasons as to the cause of this accident, of which, I feel pay was a very small part of. These pilots should not have been flying, that’s that. Hindsight being what it is, they just weren’t fit to fly.
Posted by: jkj | June 3, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
More pay would attract better candidates for the job. You want the best and brightest flying your family around, or not?
Posted by: hiring | June 5, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
It has always been my lifelong dream to be a commercial pilot; fear has stopped me from doing so. I am in a rewarding career and have finished my MBA so I am very proud of where I am but still to this day, when I fly or I come in contact with a pilot, I have a great deal of respect for them. I am 27 years old, single and no children but I could not imagine making the $ that some of these regional pilots are making, I would be homeless! I respect any pilot, whether mainline or regional because they have the responsibility of getting me from point A to point B ALIVE. Yes the cheap fares are great but at what expense? I currently live in Buffalo and although I didn’t know anyone personally on doomed Continental flight, it was a tragedy for the entire region. In my lifetime, I can’t recall a major airliner crash with as many fatalities and to hear some of the comments about those pilots really show the dark and sick side of many Americans. Anyone who has the responsibility of my life had better be alert, competent and well compensated. My hat goes off to all of the pilots out there who carry us safely to our destinations. I pray that the airlines wake up and start compensating you accordingly.
Posted by: Brian | October 27, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Anyone who has heard the cockpit tapes can tell what was on Renslow’s mind and it wasn’t landing the airplane.
Posted by: napacab | February 2, 2010, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Absolutely, yes, IF and ONLY IF the increase goes to their pay and training, not the CEO’s bonuses. I would pay more to increase safety for the passengers and morale for the pilots. Workers with low morale notoriously perform worse. If a pilot has to work as a waitress to make ends meet, or can’t pay his student loans and uses credit to pay for food on his salary, do you feel safe in his hands? I am seeing $38 airfares all over the net, yet people complain about $600 fares. I’m sure they run the gamut. Maybe we need to play around less with the numbers and charge what it really costs to fly. Maybe we need to be honest about this and other industries in the US. Maybe we need to do what it takes to insure safety. Maybe some people can drive or take the buses or trains, or not go at all. What is this anyway? You’d rather die than pay more for safe airfare? That’s BS and you know it!
Posted by: april | March 22, 2010, 11:58 am 11:58 am