By David Schoetz

May 29, 2009 11:13pm

Closing Arguments: Latino Women vs. White Males

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor continues to take heat over a 2001 speech where she  said,  "I would hope that a wise Latino woman, with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." For three days the White House defended the comment, insisting that it has been taken out of context. Today, that changed — a bit. President Obama said he believes the judge "would have restated it" if she had the chance.   Though he went on to call the controversy "nonsense."  So tonight, we ask you: Do you consider her comments racist? Tell us what you think. And you can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.

User Comments

Her comments are definitely racist. If a white male would have made this statement the crazed liberal left would have been all over him. The double standards that exist in this country are sickening and only creating more hatred between the races.

Posted by: Jeff | May 30, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Yes, I do think the comments made by this woman are racist. I also think that Obama “blowing” the uproar about the comment off as being “nonsense” is typical and right inline with his own racist beliefs. This man has done nothing but push the socialist agenda down this great country’s throat and continues to do so with this token judge appointment.

Posted by: Matt | May 30, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Of course her comments are racist? Do you really need to ask? Discrimination has nothing to do with people of color. It has to do with placing a less qualified person in a position because of color, and white is also a color.
Equality is what people like Sotomayor and Obama say, but “quotas” is what they do.
Of course it is racist!

Posted by: Penny Mercer | May 30, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

It is not a racist statement and it is nonsense. How can ABC fall for that nonsense?

Posted by: Woodrow Lee | May 30, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Of course it is a racist comment. As you and everyone else is aware if anyone who is not a member of a protected minority group made the identical statement about themselves they unambiguously would be considered a racist.

Posted by: s. a. peoples | May 30, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Of corse she would restate it, now but its out of the bag. If a man made the comment he would have been hung out to dry. Obama needs to try again and try to find someone who is not a racist.

Posted by: Steve | May 30, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I think that Sotomayor’s comments are definitely biggoted. If you substitute “wise white man” for Latino woman in the comments guess what would happen.

Posted by: James Johnson | May 30, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Sotomayor appears ‘Racist’ and is definitely not suited to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court. Just look at her numerous past rulings on the appeals court.
SHE SHOULD NOT BE CONFIRMED.

Posted by: Babsline713 | May 30, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Ms. Sotomayor’s comments were indeed racist. I believe that a judge should not inject her personal prejudice into the decisions he or she makes…it should be decided on the law. there is a reason that the statues of justice are blindfolded…justice should be blind.
She strikes me as an angry woman with an agenda. I believe that the firemen would agree with me.

Posted by: Mary Horsmon | May 30, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

It is unbelievable to me, the double standards that exist in our world. If a white man had said that, he would have had to withdrawl from the appointment for all the criticism he had to face. Reverse discrimnation in its finest form!

Posted by: Ruth | May 30, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

If the statement was reversed and said white man would make a better decision was ok than her statement is ok.
I think rasist. Do you want to go to Highest court to hear your case and not believe your case would be heard impartially? Perception would be you may not recieve a fair hearing. Wrong for highest court.

Posted by: don | May 30, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Maybe not so much racist as it is an indication that she would bring something into the supreme court other than the constitution. This would be a dangerous appointment for those of us who love our constitution!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | May 30, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It is unbelievable to me, the double standards that exist in our world. If a white man had said that, he would have had to withdrawl from the appointment for all the criticism he had to face. Reverse discrimnation in its finest form!

Posted by: Ruth | May 30, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I once read a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr. that I can only paraphrase to state the the oppressed understands the oppressor more than the oppressor understands the oppressed. I can only conclude that those who criticize the comments of Judge Sotomayor have never been part of an oppressed class wherein it was necessary to understand points of view conflicting with one’s own…and, yes, that does make her more qualified to impart justice.

Posted by: Sandra Hosley | May 30, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Absolutley!!! Her comment was as racist as rascist gets!

Posted by: me | May 30, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Sonia Sotomayor is a Racist and unqualified for the supreme court. She does not condider law in her decisions, just personal opinions. Just like Obama.

Posted by: jayson | May 30, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

If you listen carefully Judge Sonyamayor state a desire not a fact. She is including the life experience of a group who have generally had to struggle to get where they are, unlike the Republican elite who came from money. She is not stating that Latino women are smarter than Anglo men. This is so typical of the right wing talking heads, who twist statements to justify their underlying anger and prejudice.

Posted by: ellis talbert | May 30, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Yes, her comments are racist. She is not Supreme Court quality.

Posted by: pasrz | May 30, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Judge Sotomayor’s statement is definitely racist. If a white male nominee had made that comment, he’d never live it down, and it would probably immediately ruin any chance he had of being confirmed. I suppose Sotomayor would like to restate her comment.We have all made statements that we’d like to reword. However, she made this comment in a speech that she should have proofed before she read it. So, she had her chance to restate her idea and chose not to.

Posted by: Catherine Ruszenas | May 30, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

This is typical of the distorted picture presented in mainline media to create sensationalism. Refer to the negative. Don’t check facts. Just go with the flow.
Just prior to the broadcast tonight, which didn’t really cover the story, I spent 30 minutes reading various websites. Every source is biased, but look at the report on Media Matters and see if the reports, especially the early quotes from law clerks are convincing. Notice that several justices have also made similar remarks. I continue to be of the opinion that we no longer receive news, we receive entry points for argumentation. The only way to find your way among “news” reports is by reading information from both sides, and then making a jump of faith! We rarely get the truth, since truth is not always profitable. And that includes “news” networks.

Posted by: Over70 | May 30, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

White men have made much worst statement and had been President, served on the Supreme Court, CEO’s and etc. It’s nonsense!!!

Posted by: Woodrow Lee | May 30, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Not ALL republican elite come from money… MOST had to work their way there too!

Posted by: Ruth | May 30, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

No I do not think the comment was racist. But I feel we are all American’s and need to stop thinking of ourselves as black, white, latino, African-American and so on, we need to stop jumping on so many comments made as being racist.

Posted by: Jane | May 30, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Racist Id like to c what would happen if it was a white person that said it. But its o.k. If its not a white person. Because white are the racist.ha

Posted by: e | May 30, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Yes, she’s a racist – with an agenda.

Posted by: T B | May 30, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Without a doubt when the speaker said , she not only identified with race but then stated she was superior. La Raza, NAACP, and other org.s are pure racist and Sotomayor certainly qualifies and I think that she endorsed that when she attended Justice Thomas’a speech years ago. A white person would have been lynched by the press for the same statement and especially the TV news departments

Posted by: Lloyd | May 30, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I find her comment offensive, but I am a white male so it probably doesn’t matter because we are not qualified to be the targets of racism, just the deliverers of it. The double standard is sickening.

Posted by: steve | May 30, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

The fact remains..she said it!..and she should be held accountable for her actions! She is a racist!

Posted by: me | May 30, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Yes her comments were racist and if those comments had been
Made by a republican appointee all the Democrats would have been calling
For her dismissal as a candidate. The media would be repeating it on all channels
However it will go pretty much un noticed and the media will confirm that it was just a poor choice of words that she used. She will be confirmed. Sad

Posted by: George Peveto | May 30, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Of course Sotomayor is a racist. She is also a member of La Raza (the race). Obama is going to throw her under the bus. After all he isn’t like George Bush, in a political knife fight, Obama will always turn on his friends.

Posted by: karntx | May 30, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

The judge might be intelligent but not very smart. Had this been a white male the TV networks and news agencies would have lynched that person, but she will get a pass because of the love affair you have with Obamma and his telepromter.

Posted by: Lloyd | May 30, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

A sitting American Supreme Court judge wrote while ruling on the Dred Scott Decision…..”No black man has any rights that a white man is bound to respect.” Read a book folks……..

Posted by: saveourselves | May 30, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I find her comment offensive, but I am a white male so it probably doesn’t matter because we are not qualified to be the targets of racism, just the deliverers of it. The double standard is sickening.

Posted by: steve | May 30, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

No, her statements weren’t racist. It’s just a reality and some people just don’t like hearing the truth.

Posted by: WC | May 30, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

What part of that statement is incorrect ….. I would “hope” so too. I’m a white guy from New England ….. her experiences should inform her and that information will give her a different perspective, than mine. It is always a matter of perspective, when was the last time you heard President O’Bama referred to as “the first BLACK President” there are too many important decisions to be made to consider his race as
an important factor in those decisions. We were all about HIS race in Oct. Now it’s not on the radar.
Please stop this stupid unhelpful “news cycle”

Posted by: Bill Winn | May 30, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

It is not racist and it is nonsense to even be discussing it. I agree with the posted comments of both Sandra Hosley and Ellis Talbert.

Posted by: Luis | May 30, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

This comment most certainly is racist. At the very least, it has racist undertones. Since when does one ethnicity “reach better conclusions” compared to another ethnicity based solely on their color or ethnic background? Let’s pretend the statement was switched around a bit & went like this, “I would hope that a wise Italian woman, with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than an African-American male who hasn’t lived that life.” Would President Obama refer to criticism of that racist statement as “nonsense”? I think not. Therefore, why is it acceptable for our President to call the criticism of Ms. Sotomayor’s racist statement “nonsense”. This may seem like a small thing to some, but it will get even worse when she is an influence in the highest court in the United States. A judge’s responsibility is to make decisions based on the U.S. Constitution & not their personal emotions or experiences. We are on our way to severing the racist ties that held us for so long. Why go backward by allowing racist statements to go unnoticed & sweep them under the carpet?

Posted by: Concerned American | May 30, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Ms. McFadden you could have posed this question when the question last night when Bonnie Sweeten accused 2 black men of kidnapping her and her daughter. Please do a program of why media loves to put white on camera to falsely accused black men for kidnap, rape, and even murder. Judge Sotomayor didn’t say anything that any other judge gas said before. Nightline needs to put more faces of color to host provide a balance in reporting what America is missing!

Posted by: bbridge4th | May 30, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

No…her comment is not racist it is just reality. She is just stating a fact. A white person can not know or understand what a person of a hispanic background goes through growing up. It would be the same as a white person, a black person or any other race saying that other races cant understand what it means to grow up as a person of any particular race. Why would this be considered racist? It is amazing how in this date and age there still so many narrow minded people…

Posted by: Lucy | May 30, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

No, of course it’s not racist.
But here’s the deal, your “new racism” isn’t like “old racism” ’cause “old racism” tended to involve things like shackles, and whips and the Middle Passage. Attack dogs, Billy clubs and water hoses. Burning crosses and lynch mobs. Confederate flags, liquor and screams of “Kill the (fill in pejorative here)!” “Old racism” was red lining and segregating and “whites only” drinking fountains, schools and country clubs. It was The Dred Scott Decision, Executive Order 9066, and the Trail of Tears. “Old racism” was a blind eye and “all deliberate speed” that wasn’t deliberate or particularly speedy and nonsense about the sanctity of marriage which was crap when it was applied to “race laws” and is crap when applied to “one man/one woman.”
“New Racism?” That’s apparently a Latina openly talking about how “more often than not” she would like to avoid the “conclusions” that allowed “old racism” to thrive. That’s a long way from getting your ass beat for trying to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge so maybe your kids might one day enjoy the right to vote.

Posted by: Barbara | May 30, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

This comment most certainly is racist. At the very least, it has racist undertones. Since when does one ethnicity “reach better conclusions” compared to another ethnicity based solely on their color or ethnic background? Let’s pretend the statement was switched around a bit & went like this, “I would hope that a wise Italian woman, with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than an African-American male who hasn’t lived that life.” Would President Obama refer to criticism of that racist statement as “nonsense”? I think not. Therefore, why is it acceptable for our President to call the criticism of Ms. Sotomayor’s racist statement “nonsense”. This may seem like a small thing to some, but it will get even worse when she is an influence in the highest court in the United States. A judge’s responsibility is to make decisions based on the U.S. Constitution & not their personal emotions or experiences. We are on our way to severing the racist ties that held us for so long. Why go backward by allowing racist statements to go unnoticed & sweep them under the carpet?

Posted by: Concerned American | May 30, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

she is not a racist. get over it

Posted by: carlos | May 30, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

This comment most certainly is racist. At the very least, it has racist undertones. Since when does one ethnicity “reach better conclusions” compared to another ethnicity based solely on their color or ethnic background? Let’s pretend the statement was switched around a bit & went like this, “I would hope that a wise Italian woman, with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than an African-American male who hasn’t lived that life.” Would President Obama refer to criticism of that racist statement as “nonsense”? I think not. Therefore, why is it acceptable for our President to call the criticism of Ms. Sotomayor’s racist statement “nonsense”. This may seem like a small thing to some, but it will get even worse when she is an influence in the highest court in the United States. A judge’s responsibility is to make decisions based on the U.S. Constitution & not their personal emotions or experiences. We are on our way to severing the racist ties that held us for so long. Why go backward by allowing racist statements to go unnoticed & sweep them under the carpet? We should be concerned…

Posted by: Concerned American | May 30, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

I don’t consider Judge Sotomayor’s statement as racist. It’s pretty simple actually. She letting us know that their are other valid views to consider. What’s not simple is a white man not validating a wise Latina woman coming from a totaly different perspective than his. It’s uncomfortable for sure. No different that a disabled persons perspective. We ALL have differing experiences and perspectives and they need to be heard and validated.

Posted by: Sharee H. | May 30, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

HAHAHA….. these comments are so funny to read. She is not a racist and will be confirmed.

Posted by: carlos | May 30, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

I realize she has had different experiences than me, a white male. It just grieves me that I could not make a similar statement and get away with it. It also disturbs me that many of the pro-bloggers above don’t sense the double standard and they consider me narrow minded for even thinkng that it is. That’s a good one!

Posted by: steve | May 30, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Racism is a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. (Webster) In the United States, the only form of racism has been practiced by people who classify themselves as “white.”
Non-white people seek parity and not superiority. Judge Sotomayor’s comments only show a desire to level the playing field with experiences that most white males in the system don’t have.

Posted by: Sandra Hosley | May 30, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Here we have a woman who was raised by a single mother and lived in the projects. Did not come from money but kept to her studies and excel to go onto the country’s most pretigious universities. She chose a career where I’m sure there were many challenges. In particular a career where there was a high percentage of men, primarily white men. Don’t you think they may have been threaten by her and may it known to her that her goals were impossible? Maybe she chosed the wrong words to say at the time, but something triggered it off. Don’t you think?

Posted by: Jennie Gonzalez | May 30, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Not only was Judgee Sotomayer’s comment racist, it was also sexist. Racism will never not end as long as people continue to have the attitude this woman has. Racism continues in this country on a grand scale and is only being encouraged by the words and actions of people like our president, his wife,Judge Sotomayer, Jessie Jackson,,and the list goes on and on ….

Posted by: SUE | May 30, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Are you people serious? She is not a racist and she will be confirmed.

Posted by: carlos | May 30, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

By both words and deeds, she has proved that she is the most racist, bigoted chief justice nominee since Roger (Dred Scott) Taney.

Posted by: Jack Cannon | May 30, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Are you people serious? She is not a racist and she will be confirmed.

Posted by: carlos | May 30, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am

I guess since I am a white male and incapable of understanding the complexities of those that I have oppressed, which allows them to make superior judgements and decisions — I’ll just go to bed. Goodnight to all the oppressed.

Posted by: Steve | May 30, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am

I do not believe her statements were in any way racist. The mere fact that she would take on the outdated “white, middle-class, male” way of organizing society as a whole makes me want to say Bravo!! White, middle-class, and male is what is racist. Statistics show lesser sentences for white offenders, shorter prison times, and a higher rate of probation. If the offender is of any “minority” (non-white) race, the offender is more likely to serve a longer sentence than a white offender for the exact same offense. Is that really what we call justice? Having a woman with a broader perspective is exactly what we need!

Posted by: Mommy | May 30, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Once again the right wing conservatives take a quote out of context and feed it to the public to enrage the uneducated and lazy people. The press is busy looking for headlines and the rest of us have to listen to all the foolish reteric without the facts.

Posted by: Tom | May 30, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

At no time did Sotomayor say that a latina woman would reach a better conclusion than a white man. Those are lies that come with GOTCHA! journalism and politics. If you are going to repeat what someone said you must include every word or you have perpetrated a lie and a mescarriage of justice. As my father taught me every word must be heard and analyzed and included. She began, not with the words “a latina woman would”, but rather “I WOULD HOPE that a WISE latina woman with the richness of her(WHOEVER THE LATINA WOMAN MAY BE) experiences would MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life. She is giving credence to the experiences of her life, struggles and accomplishments and acknowledging that it is an absolute that a white male can not have those experiences. They are uniquely hers, they are uniquely South Bronx, they are uniquely female and most of all, THEY ARE UNIQUELY LATINO.

Posted by: Orlando | May 30, 2009, 1:52 am 1:52 am

McFadden mumbled the word “racist” – The controversy is not nonsense. the sOcialist leader’s economic policy is. WAKE UP PEOPLE. read the declaration. military coup time.

Posted by: Brian | May 30, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am

Her own words tell whether she is racist. Why does Nightline bother to ask? Do you only recognize racism when you want to?
Since when do supposed “victims” get a license to victimize?

Posted by: TC | May 30, 2009, 2:22 am 2:22 am

What she ment was, her being a latina has more of a knowledge of what people go through. Being raised in the Bronx and what you have to do to suvive which makes you smarter then the white man or person that have no clue what life is out side the box. Most white person raised with money don’t know what the other side go through, that why they need to learn to think out side the box(out side their safety zone). But again they wouldn’t know how. This is not racist. That why President Obama makes a great President because he knows what us minorities lifes are like and he is not latino. It is not racist it is just knowledge.

Posted by: rosemary | May 30, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am

I totally agree that she is a racist,
if a republican nomenee would have said those comments, the democrats would have had a field day and would have denied comformation!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: hans | May 30, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Of course it was a racist remark. For those who think not, try reversing latina and white male. Can you image the outrage if a public figure made that statement? Being a minority does not give her a free pass.

Posted by: Jombi | May 30, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

If a white male had made that comment
there would have been a FIRESTORM in the media
with White sheets sent to The White House in protest instead of tea bags.
This women is an idiot to have brought up race in the first place. And she is a member of La Raza? A group that promotes
illegal immigration?
Where is Janeane Garofalo?
She should be up in arms over this.

Posted by: Mamie Van Loren | May 30, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Yes, it is a racist statement. I cannot support this woman’s bid for a seat on the United States Supreme Court. Perhaps she should try running for a high court position in a Latin country where her statement would probably would be well received. There is no room for racially biased judges on our Supreme Court. People would continually be second guessing her decisions. I agree with others… she has a predetermined agenda. Does anyone else see the border between Mexico and the United States possibly disappearing if this woman in successfully seated?

Posted by: RLL | May 30, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Racist? Yes. Will she be confirmed? Yes. “We are a nation of laws, not of men.” Yet another illusion shot to hell.

Posted by: Old dude | May 30, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Of course she’s racist what other reason would she have for making that statement.

Posted by: Joe | May 30, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am

The judge is a racist. Being part of a latino family, I can tell you that no one in my family would ever say that being Latino makes them better than a white person. Racism is racism whenever one race is being put down below or being raised above another. God made all of us the same, remove our skin and we all look the same and we all bleed. Mr Obama has a serious judgment problem that he would nominate someone who would say this. How many people did he appoint that didn’t pay their taxes?

Posted by: Lisa | May 30, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

It is sad how as American, we can make a total judgement about a person true value and worth based upon a comment/statement made he/she made on a speech. To truly understand what she was trying to express in her speech, we should truly read the entire speech before passing such judgement. When we pick one sentence out of an entire speech, especially out of context to indicate that person is a racist, then we become quilty of the same racism when passing such judgement.

Posted by: Louie | May 30, 2009, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Yes she is racial and to be experiencing all that I have with the denials of Adminstrative Judges like her out of 50 case of discrimination she saw truth in only 5 but other wise denied them and sided with the Agencys. Now to revail she is the same racial, and she was sworne in to do the right things as Admin Judge and did not do so. She can not do it now Out Her!

Posted by: karen | May 30, 2009, 3:37 am 3:37 am

How anyone can think her comments weren’t racist is beyond me. Simply put a white male in the media to say what she said in reverse, and there would be no question – only an immediate apology demanded!
As a professional female, I’m disgusted at the comment. Her qualifications professionally appeared strong, but her character for the position is rightly needing scrutiny. She’s failing that test big time. Obama indicating that she’d restate the offensive comment if she had it to do over, is political jargon for, “Well, because it’s politically inconvenient to have to address one’s discriminatory beliefs in the press, she would likely restate her position (and would make certain to be out of the eye of the camera when she says what she really believes).” A true Chicago-trained politician he is!

Posted by: C | May 30, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am

The real problem is that America has never dealt with the race problems that have plagued our country for hundreds of years,so yeah race is and always will be a sensitive subject until we open up the can of worms for discussion.It’s like being in a family that has a secret yet every one in the family is aware of the secret but you live with it swept under the rug.What does that do to the family? It destroys the family.
Until you have lived as a victim of anything,not just racism can you understand what it feels like to live in that persons shoes.I don’t feel that she is racist just because she uses the word “white man ” it’s the context in how you use words that matter.I don’t think she would have made that statement if she was expressing her prejudices towards white men…that would end her career,don’t you think?I think she is way smarter than that.

Posted by: km | May 30, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am

Of course, it’s racist. But that doesn’t disqualify her in 2009. She is brilliant and she got her Princeton/Yale opportunities through affirmative action, not just because she swam upwards from the Bronx. So did Prez & Mrs. Obama. She was in the right place, at the right time. I am a white woman in her late 60′s, from a poor family in the rural Midwest. I got perfect scores on the ACT test and all other predictive & achievement tests, straight “A’s” in high school — and didn’t get a penny from the National Merit Scholarships because they weren’t yet giving $$$ to women. I got a lovely letter telling me I was in the Top 1/2 of 1% of graduating high school students in the U.S. that year. I was too early to get *any* of Ms. Sotomayor’s opportunities. I still resent it!

Posted by: DJ | May 30, 2009, 4:51 am 4:51 am

If a white man or woman had said this under any context and was running for office you can bet that they would be all over them not just 8 years after the statement but as soon as it came out of their mouth. They would be asked or step down themselves. How Obama thinks this is NOT an issue is beyond me.

Posted by: Maurene | May 30, 2009, 5:11 am 5:11 am

She’s probably not a racist, but it is obviously a racist statement. A white male candidate making such a blunder would be immediately 8-balled. But frankly, it’s her pronouncements about her own judicial activism that scare me – she has no problem with “making law”, advancing HER agenda regardless of the law. She is clearly not qualified to be a Supreme.

Posted by: Mike | May 30, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

If a white male made that statement about a Latino Woman,he would be call a lot worst things then just a racist. She is bound by the same rules as whites, blacks and all colors.

Posted by: The Demoman | May 30, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor statement IS NOT RACIST!!!!
“The strongest people in the world aren’t those most protected; they are the ones that must struggle against adversity and obstacles – and surmount them – to SURVIVE”.

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | May 30, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Why should we all have a blind eye and look to see something racist in everything?
It seems real that she was trying to say that she brings her wisdom (rare experience) to the table, remember she is only 1 of 9. If we bring the full document or her speech into open, that is all its going to say.
She may have poor choice of words but her intenet was nothing more than to bring her valued experience on the SC table, its a reason for which we all wanted a Latino on the SC table. Everyone of the 9 SC justices, white or color, white or Latino, male or female bring a new set of experience, SO AS TO BRING DIVERSITY TO SC, so they can collectively get to the bottom of the SC case.

Posted by: haabcnews | May 30, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

racism is racism, regardless the color of the skin of the person who spews the poison. Can she be trusted to fairly judge without regard to race?

Posted by: zeke | May 30, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Racism is racism…she shouldnt get a pass because of the color of her skin.
Isnt correct verbage critical to a Supreme Court Justice?

Posted by: zeke | May 30, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

If a white man said that he was culturally more capable of rendering justice would he not be forced to withdraw? Of course he would and this racist woman should withdraw.
Her comment on the appellate court being the place where ‘policy is made’ is her agenda…judicial legislation is just fine for her without regard to how offensive this is the Article I and II of the Constitution.

Posted by: Richard Leonard | May 30, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

oh I don’t think its nonsense. I think race baiting is all the GOP has left and that is why they are trying to score points off or pretending this woman is racist or that white males are being insulted. Sadly, this seems to play to their base. They are turning into the party of old white people who don’t like anyone but their “own kind.”

Posted by: Livvy | May 30, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

What if she had said a latino decision would have been better than an Asian male, or a gay male, or a black male? It can only be viewed as racist. We have been so politically corrected we can’t admit when a white has been slurred.

Posted by: Gary | May 30, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Yes, her comments are clearly racist. From her comments, it should be clear to everyone that Sotomayor is clearly a racist pig and a sexist pig. She is totally unfit to be a justice of the US Supreme Court and should not be allowed in any government job. Obama’s repeated support of her comments indicates that he too is a racist pig and a sexist pig. He should just admit that he made a bad choice and move on to someone else.
Most of us have been brought up believing and had it drilled into us over and over for the past 45 years that decisions should not be made based on race or gender, and many of us practice that belief. But for someone who made the racist, bigoted comments that Sotomayor did and for Obama who has endorsed them, these are the last kind of people that we need in key government jobs. We need people who are gender neutral and race neutral. These two bigoted racists/sexists apparently did not learn the same lessons that the rest of us had drilled into us for the past 45 years.
Sotomayor should not be a made a US Supreme Court justice. Her decisions would be tainted and discriminatory. And, if Obama continues to make these kinds of blunders, he should be impeached.

Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | May 30, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Just imagine if those words were uttered by a White man about a Hispanic. Hispanic’s across the country would be up in arms, protesting against the White man judge…
It is racist; it is personal. There is no room for those issues on the Supreme Court. Period, Absolutely, No excuses!

Posted by: coco1101 | May 31, 2009, 4:19 am 4:19 am

This comment most certainly is racist. At the very least, it has racist undertones. Since when does one ethnicity “reach better conclusions” compared to another ethnicity based solely on their color or ethnic background? Let’s pretend the statement was switched around a bit & went like this, “I would hope that a wise Italian woman, with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than an African-American male who hasn’t lived that life.” Would President Obama refer to criticism of that racist statement as “nonsense”? I think not. Therefore, why is it acceptable for our President to call the criticism of Ms. Sotomayor’s racist statement “nonsense”. This may seem like a small thing to some, but it will get even worse when she is an influence in the highest court in the United States. A judge’s responsibility is to make decisions based on the U.S. Constitution & not their personal emotions or experiences. We are on our way to severing the racist ties that held us for so long. Why go backward by allowing racist statements to go unnoticed by sweeping them under the carpet?

Posted by: Concerned American | May 31, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

ON SONTOMAYOR
“I would hope that a wise Latino woman, with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
I Disagree “I believe that a wise weight-challenged, gay, dark skinned Mexican goat-roper could reach a far better conclusion than her”
If a comment like hers had been made by Roberts,or any body else, it would have been labeled racist and career over!!! YOU KNOW IT AND SO DO I!!!

Posted by: crackmeupp | June 2, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is definitely NOT racist, nor were her words. She is a Hispanic woman who has experienced a very interesting and varied life, more so than a “regular” white male would have. She definitely would bring a better outlook and thought to Supreme Court decisions. White males are the ones who got the country where it is today–i.e. Bush, Cheney, most of the CEOs of the major companies, etc.

Posted by: Julie A. Roberts | June 2, 2009, 1:44 am 1:44 am

I am sickened and saddened by many of the comments on here. Unfortunately, the uninformed, misinformed, reactionary people who loved Bush seem to be the majority here, while the educated, right-thinking people don’t seem to want to post their comments. Some of us have, and I am glad of that. I just hope that if Nightline reads these, they don’t think that these posts speak for ALL Americans!

Posted by: Julie A. Roberts | June 2, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am

I am not so much concerned about her racist commentary as I am the empathy Obama speaks of. That empathy will most certainly not be for the innocent pre-born children that Obama will have led to the slaughter. If Carville were a republican he might say, ” It’s the constitution, stupid!” Each court takes us farther away from the constitution and a step closer to an Orwellian scenario of redefined values.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | June 3, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I do not understand how anyone can defend her saying she isn’t racist. She is saying a latino women can make a better decision than a white male….Directly saying she has more judgement because she has been “oppressed”. The people that are oppressed are white males because of reverse racism. If your so oppressed go back to your country…

Posted by: crazy | June 9, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Her comments were definitely racist. Did she really need to go as far as to add in “Wise Latino woman” and “white male”?

Posted by: Fiona | October 4, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.