By David Schoetz

Jun 10, 2009 11:07pm

Closing Arguments: Capping Executive Pay

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner today talked about addressing exorbitant executive compensation on Wall Street — something he called a contributing factor to the financial collapse. In addition to a compensation czar to monitor the pay of executives at companies receiving government TARP money, a broader reform proposal that looks at all compensation practices is expected Wednesday. So tonight, we ask you tonight: Should the federal government have a say in setting the salaries and bonuses of employees at private companies, even if the company does not need government help?  Tell us what you think. And you can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.
 

User Comments

Hi, it should never be the government’s place to tell any company how much to pay their employees. The government should not be using our tax money to bail out these companies, either they succeed and grow or fail and change or die. Government sticking their finger in the pot causes more problems than it fixes.

Posted by: Anthony | June 11, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

This is another example of the government making a power grab. Most businesses had nothing to do with this collapse. Punishing businesses and taking away incentives to work hard will only result in less jobs for the average working American. This is a form of tyranny and Uncle Sam is the tyrant.

Posted by: BN | June 11, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I don’t have a problem with it. In fact, I think it would be a great idea for Obama to go ahead and use the constitution for toliet paper also.

Posted by: Fred | June 11, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Is there no limit to what Obama wants to control? Maybe companies that received Tarp money but beyond that no. Executives of those companies will leave and go to other companies that didn’t receive the money. Those companies will be less competitive as no one will want to work for them. Of course he wants to control all companies as he knows the government run companies won’t succeed. Has he ever heard of free enterprise and capitalism. If he doesn’t like how things are handled in the USA why doesn’t he move to Europe and live under government control and taxation there? He is so much worse than I ever imagined and will bring this country to bottom.

Posted by: Jami | June 11, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

No. the government has too much control and we are going to be like Russia if it continues. We had better stop Socialism now!!!

Posted by: larry | June 11, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

No! The government has no place in the private sector. If it does, it would basically squash the ambition of future workers and students. Let’s face it, we are a money driven society, so if we have government controlling salaries, no one will try hard because there is no reward.

Posted by: Wendy | June 11, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Who is next????? Your boss, you? When are Citizens & the Media going to wake up??????

Posted by: jim | June 11, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Absolutely NOT. The government should not have a say in private company salaries. The federal government is too powerful as it is.

Posted by: Fran | June 11, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

The government should not dictate salaries of companies. And they should not have given irresponsible companies bail-out money. And the government should not have made ‘mandates’ for companies to give loans to unqualified (high-risk) people.
We need the government to get their hands out of more things. (Like health care, insurance [FDIC], and make it more private and less regulated).
With Bush/Congress and Obama/Congress bailing out everyone.. Inflation is coming..

Posted by: Mark | June 11, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

If I want to pay my CEO millions of dollars I should be able to in a free county. However, that doesn’t said CEO should commit fraud or break the law in order to make more money. The government is overstepping its authority. Government power flows from the people up, not the other way around. It would seem that our government is purely capitalizing (lol) on the opportunity to push a socialist agenda creating centralized power which not how our government was setup to be. This process has been happening 90 years or so ever since we adopted a centralized banking system in the 1920′s. So I guess to answer the question more directly….no government has no business setting caps on executive salary, it will break the spirit of the American dream. Shame on them.

Posted by: Graham | June 11, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

What a ridiculous notion! Our federal government needs to stay out of the business of private companies. We should all quiver in fear at the very thought!

Posted by: Buffie | June 11, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

No, no and no. The government nor anyone but the owner or the executives/managers should set the salaries or other policies and procedures for a private or public company.

Posted by: chk | June 11, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Our federal government should execute their newly found dictatorial power to stop their leader, our great president ,from smoking before they delve into the ordinary citizen’s private life. Compensation in a public or private company is the pervue of that company. Federal governence of companies can continue to regulate those companies out of existence.

Posted by: Starr | June 11, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

The government has no business telling anyone how much they can make. Perhaps the voters should decide how much our elected officials should make. Government has no business in the private sector. That includes Banks, the auto industry, mass transit, or health care. In america you can start with nothing, work hard and become rich. With government attempting to limit the possibilities, it seems more like a socialist country.

Posted by: Linda | June 11, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

This socialist president and his cabinet have no business whatsoever sticking their nose in private companies. They can’t even keep track of their so called stimulus money and have done nothing so far but destroy the economy. Stay out of the private sector and clean up your won incompetent internal mess.

Posted by: jim | June 11, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Although compensation for top executives is often outradious, it is not in the best interest of free enterpise to have the government stick their noses in and try to regulate their salaries. Really with all these projects they keep taking on…..will any of them produce the desired results?

Posted by: J Hanna | June 11, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Last I checked the US Constitution, that’s not a power delegated to the federal government. When will the majority of our citizens remember that the government still derives its power from the consent of the government? If we don’t DEMAND our elected officials do the right thing and stay within the boundaries established by our founding documents, it will run all “willy-nilly” over our rights.

Posted by: CAD | June 11, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

No, no and no. The government nor anyone but the owner or the executives/managers should set the salaries or other policies and procedures for a private or public company.

Posted by: chk | June 11, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Why don’t we just turn the country over to the Chinese now and get it over with? If the government is going to come right out and kill individual initiative by telling us how much money we are allowed to make, we might aas well stop pretending this is still America.

Posted by: jon | June 11, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Wow. First the government starts buying out the automobile industry and pushing a 4 billion dollar monopoly gamble to acquire used vehicles and therefore control a large percentage of that market. Now we can look forward this bill being shoved down our throats through the senate. So after they start telling us, the public, how much we should make, when do we start forming lines for toilet paper and other necessities? Does anyone remember ‘Atlas Shrugged’ or ‘The Fountainhead’? Quick, before they close it down Google ‘Ayn Rand’. Pick three works at random and tell me this isn’t predicted already.

Posted by: Avery | June 11, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

The government has NO business interfering in salary schedules at privately held companies. If a company is poorly managed and is paying more in salaries than is prudent, it will (and should) fail. I have always been taught that the entrepreneurial spirit of this country would then prevail, allowing for the failing company to be re-born under better management. If we don’t allow for this “circle of life” in business and if we begin legislating the protection of poorly managed companies, we leave no incentive for true success and achievement – the ideals this country is built upon.

Posted by: Jill | June 11, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

President Obama has already taken our country into 5 times the national debt than when he became president. Now he wants to limit executive pay. Although I agree some executives are overpaid, it’s not the government’s job to determine what their cap should be.
We’re moving more and more into a socialist society every day. Many of the poor people in this country like this idea because it supposedly spreads the wealth. Well, that’s so very short-sighted because if you take away the wealth from the wealthy, there will not be anything left over to give to anyone else and everyone will be poor.
When people just lay back and expect handouts all the time, we get a lazy society that expects handouts and will eventually cause our productivity as a nation to take a deep dive into financial trouble. I don’t disagree that some organizations and people in our country need help, but just handing them (especially those large corporations) a lot of money isn’t working.
I know it’s a complicated problem and there’s no silver bullet that’s going to fix all this, but for heaven’s sake, can’t they see we’re headed for deep trouble? We’re headed in the wrong direction and need to take a step back and think of better solutions.
It took a long time for our wonderful country to get to be such a prosperous and strong nation. But it doesn’t take long to ruin it all, and it’s possible that our best days are now behind us. If people keep wearing blindfolds and pretend that it’s going to all be all right are going to be in for a big surprise!
I hope president Obama starts smelling the coffee a quits blaming all our woes on the previous administration and starts taking responsibility for his administration. I support our president and hope that he succeeds in bringing positive changes to our nation, but you just can’t keep spending and spending because one day soon, we’re going to have to pay the piper.

Posted by: Donald Schuringa | June 11, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

The federal government should not have a say in setting the salaries and bonuses of employees at private companies, and certainly not if the company does not need government help! Obama is moving as fast as he can to turn this into Russia. Where are you America? The changes to a socialist government is abounding at breakneck speed every day! Please stand up and make your voices heard!

Posted by: Barbara | June 11, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I can’t believe this government is dictating such a thing. This is up to the companies’ boards and stockholders. As I understand it, that’s one of the things that distinguishes American private enterprise from socialism..

Posted by: dj in Houston | June 11, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I feel that the governemt has the right to request a cap on executive salaries on companies that have accepted government money. It is the responsibility of the board members of private companies to monitor the performance of its head executives. understandably, the White House is attempting to intervene in the excess and greed that has existed in America for far too long. I have worked in corporations where the CEO’s were reaping a huge profit for poor or mediocre performance. this process has to end ! It’s apparent that the companies who did take tarp money are rushing to pay it back as they do not want the government involved in their pay structure. It is a very interesting conversation her , we’ll see where it goes !

Posted by: alston green | June 11, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Although compensation for top executives is often outradious, it is not in the best interest of free enterpise to have the government stick their noses in and try to regulate their salaries. Really with all these projects they keep taking on…..will any of them produce the desired results?

Posted by: JHanna | June 11, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I think somebody should look at all these excutives who get high pay and leave a company in ruins. Just what did they get bonuses for. The Company that was viable, is not. They get paid just for their title.If thing s go wrong it is not reflected in their pay. Yes, if it takes the government to regulate it so be it.

Posted by: Mary Kay | June 11, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

This government is moving faster than the Bolsheviks to socialize this country and is evidenced with this invasion of controlling private enterprise and
dictating corporate compensation. If they are to monitor any compensation they should look in their own back yard where they pay government employees up to 85% of their salaries for a lifetime. All the legacy
costs are bringing down this country and American companies not corporate compensation.

Posted by: harry lowrance | June 11, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

No. The federal govermnent should not regulate wages in the private sector. We are not a socialist nation yet, but it seems we are headed that way. It is time for the common person to stand up and make a change.

Posted by: Glen Ellison | June 11, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Why don’t we just turn the country over to the Chinese now and get it over with? If the government is going to come right out and kill individual initiative by telling us how much money we are allowed to make, we might as well stop pretending this is still America.

Posted by: jon | June 11, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Wow. First the government starts buying out the automobile industry and pushing a 4 billion dollar monopoly gamble to acquire used vehicles and therefore control a large percentage of that market. Now we can look forward this bill being shoved down our throats through the senate. So after they start telling us, the public, how much we should make, when do we start forming lines for toilet paper and other necessities? Does anyone remember ‘Atlas Shrugged’ or ‘The Fountainhead’? Quick, before they close it down Google ‘Ayn Rand’. Pick three works at random and tell me this isn’t predicted already.

Posted by: Avery | June 11, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

If the government caps pay, the people making all the money will leave. Your local bank will be in some place like the Bahamas and there will be some girl or guy that sends you papers to sign and then you will send them back. All payments will be overseas and the government will make no tax. I also see legal issues that would not survive a challenge.

Posted by: Dan | June 11, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Are we living in the US? This is a capitalist society, and the govt. has NO business setting income caps! Profit has become a dirty word. Businesses small and large are being destroyed. What a terrible path we are on. America as we have known it is over unless we stand up and refuse to go down this damaging path. WHO WILL BE PRODUCTIVE IF THIS CONTINUES? WAKE UP!This administration is so, so dangerous!

Posted by: Barbara Lee | June 11, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

sorry that should read the government derives its powers from the consent of the governed.

Posted by: CAD | June 11, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

I don’t agree with government controlling things. But, something needs to change. Corporate America is out of control in this country. Since when is ANY executive worth millions of dollars every year while they withhold fair compensation to employees and cut U.S. jobs. Wake up!!! If they can’t behave themselves then maybe somebody needs to show them the way. To me, it needs to be the American people saying “we have had enough” versus government regulations. I think more needs to get out to the public about Executive compensation. Good example of what is fair: the CEO of Costco. Many examples of what is not equitable are available. It’s not just Wall Street, the banks and the auto industry. It’s all over.

Posted by: vlm | June 11, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Obama, has no concept of what a free market system is or how well it has benefited him. Our children and grandchildren do not deserve the consequenies of what the voters in the last election have allowed.
I made a very bad mistake in voting for him!
It is time for IMPEACHMENT!!!

Posted by: Joe | June 11, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Absolutely not! That form of government has always made the people poor. It steals the incentive out of your labor and removes hard workers from the workforce. The united States has always been a place of opportunity. Look at the years of people coming in to this country. Controlling salaries in the public sector models our country after failed world systems. What a surprise for the American communist party to suggest such a thing. Whats next… take the gold again?

Posted by: Dennis Larner | June 11, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

CEO pay in the USA is, on average, 400 times that of the average worker. In contrast,CEO pay in Europe is only about 25 times that of the average worker. So it is clear that CEO pay in the USA is way out of control. I do believe that Obama is correct in blaming CEO pay as one of the factors that contributed to the financial crisis that has so devastated our economy.

Posted by: Alan | June 11, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Absolutely NOT appropriate in a capitalist society. We are being led down a dangerous & damaging path. WAKE UP! Who will be productive in this environment? This administration is destroying free enterprise, and it makes me sick for the country I have loved.

Posted by: Barbara Lee | June 11, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I think that the Feds, should take care of there own house, before they tell others, how to do their jobs. They give themselves raises every year, they don’t do their jobs, they barely work for half the year and they don’t even pay their taxs. They have the best golden parashute ever, they only have to serve one term and they get paid for the rest of their lives, and they don’t have to worry about living on SS, like the rest of us. And yet they, act like they are doing, what they are getting paid for

Posted by: Michael M | June 11, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Should the federal government have a say in setting the salaries and bonuses of employees at private companies, even if the company does not need government help? Yes! It is the responsibility of the federal Government to regulate companies for the good of society. Some CEO’s have been robbing shareholders, employees, customers and society far too long. This problem has nothing to do with socialism.

Posted by: Bruce Barnes | June 11, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Absolutly not! It’s repressive,government at it’s worst,dictatorical,tyranical and would be the start of turning the US into a third world nation and would kill the American Dream. I hope this plan of the Obama administration will finally wake up the people who voted for him as to his socialistic agenda.

Posted by: nancy fleming | June 11, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I don’t have a problem with it. In fact, Obama should go ahead and use the constitution as toliet paper while he is at it.

Posted by: Fred | June 11, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

CEO pay in the USA is, on average, 400 times that of the average worker. In contrast,CEO pay in Europe is only about 25 times that of the average worker. So it is clear that CEO pay in the USA is way out of control. I do believe that Obama is correct in blaming CEO pay as one of the factors that contributed to the financial crisis that has so devastated our economy.(

Posted by: Alan | June 11, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Absolutely not! The government has no right to tell a private business what they can pay employees. If someone doesn’t like how the company compensation plan works, then take your business elsewhere. That’s why America is a FREE country.

Posted by: Monica | June 11, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

For what the AETNA CEO gets paid in a week, 10 schools could have music programs like PS22 in Staten Island.

Posted by: BobB | June 11, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

This democratic whitehouse and congress are out of control! We have got to take our country back now before we are the United socialist states of America. We are losing our country more and more each day. It’s unbelievable the path our elected officials are taking us down. Capping executive pay – please!
It does do my heart good to see that most of the responses so far are along the lines of mine. I thought the whole country was liberal by the sounds of the media.

Posted by: Kim | June 11, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

No, Obama should not have so many CZARS, there is no oversight by congress and he has 20 of them. They are unconfirmed loose cannons. Obama has NO business butting into the private sector. His reckless spending is destroying our country. His foreign policy is to give Miranda rights to terrorists in Afganistan and take ours inch by inch.

Posted by: No more please | June 11, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

the government does not belong messing in the affairs of a private business. its like the government’s saying what we can and can not do in our own homes.

Posted by: Kero | June 11, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

How blind does this administration think we are? This is just another way for the elite to become more powerful and the average class citizen to become more oppressed. I am or i should say I used to be a middle class American, however my bills had piled up due to my illness and now I have no electricity, soon to be evicted from my home and now you want to take away more of my money that I work hard for to pay off the American Government’s Debt and Interest they owe to a private bank named the Federal Reserve. Even though I am extremely ill and have been advised by doctors that I should no longer work for the sake of my health, I must remain working and over half of my salary is made by compensation a.k.a. commission alone. What sense does it make to cap my compensation? I can’t even pay my bills now let alone if you take away half my paycheck and for what reason? My main question is: What is the exact purpose of capping an average private workers compensation? What is this suppose to accomplish exactly?
Thank you

Posted by: Katie | June 11, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

It’s disgusting that America is turning into Europe. The fathers of our nation fought against a Government that controled everything. What is wrong with people??? I really don’t understand and obviously the so called americans that are voting for the people that are representing us need to wake up and become informed and not just through the nightly news. If you haven’t figured it out yet, they only follow the networks agenda, not always the truth.

Posted by: Christine | June 11, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

I was willing to give Obama a chance that he was a moderate-I have come to the conclusion that he is a socialist trying to change the country. We may recover if we get rid of him in four years if anybody can come up with a viable opposition candidate.

Posted by: Bigbob | June 11, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

The federal government should have NO control of salaries paid in private businesses. Did you notice that yet another position is being created to oversee this travesty? We have a car czar, a web czar, and now a pay czar. The executive branch of the government is out of control because it is backed by democrat-controlled legislative branch.

Posted by: Margaret | June 11, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Unbelievable-what has been happening since we elected this abomination?

Posted by: Bigbob | June 11, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

The executive pay scale has been out of control for a long time. Wall Street executives like to make the argument that they need to stay competitive to attract talents. What talents we have had who led us to the economic collapse! The overpaid executives have the talent to keep workers’ pay low and to ship jobs abroad (that is a no brainer) in order to award themselves for a job well done. What talent does GM’s Wagner have? He was well (or rather over) paid. Look where GM is now.
Whether the government should be in the business of deciding the pay structure of executives is the wrong question. The government has to do something when the people in question cannot do it themselves.
There should be a constant worldwide comparison and monitor of executive pay and compensation of comparable companies, by size, by industry, etc.
Such a study will show that American executives have been overpaid and under performed. If they are real talents, they would not have run their companies to the ground en mass. They are mostly mediocre greedy bunch with low ethical standards.
What is the compensation for anyway? How many beds can a person sleep in at one time? How much food can a person digest in a life time? By excessive compensation, they may succeed in ruining many people’s lives. I remember GM’s Wagner responding to the question if he would accept an annual salary of $1 and give up the private jet at a Congressional hearing. His response was what he was getting then was just fine. Obviously, he didn’t think there was anything wrong with the picture.
The real question is what the Boards of these companies have been doing? Asleep at the job, allowing executives run away with unreasonable pay while the companies are in trouble?
In politics, we practice “checks and balances.” Where is the “check and balance” in executive pay? The executives are insatiable and the Boards are lazy, or worse, incestuous with the executives. A shareholders’ revolt is not likely.
So, the government has to step in. Most of the comments posted so far cry loudly against government control. However, they don’t address the bigger picture.

Posted by: A D Seetoo | June 11, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

It is so heartening to see that the majority of posts on this TV station blog are against the efforts the administration is making to take over business, pay, monetary system, laws, free enterprise, stealing dealerships, etc. This is not America. Obama has overstepped his bounds and is acting very recklessly in fiscal matters.
He made a big deal about pay as you go, but exempted his health care, his pet projects, etc. So what is the big deal… he has a very small opinion of us.

Posted by: anyone.listening | June 11, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

I was in 2 wars, WWII & K, so we could remain free to work our butts off towards that $$$$ dream the constitution says we get to have! Ever since the past election, SOCIALISM seems to be the word on the streets of DC. Get wise folks: if you can’t see what is happening, then listen to what the non-political and non-news are saying. AND, go to church!!

Posted by: Thad | June 11, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

This is absolutely ridiculous. While I don’t always agree with the salaries of some of these executives, it’s up to the companies to make those decisions. This is private sector business. Where does our president get off thinking he can be in control of everything? This is just so infuriating that he continues to take our nation down the tubes and no one stands up to him.

Posted by: dlg | June 11, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am

It should never be a question whether or not the Government should cap executive salaries! I’m not an executive, nor am I even in a place of high stature such as a CEO,COO,CFO, or what have you. However, it has never been the Governments place let alone the right to do such a thing. I fear as an American citizen that this country is headed in the wrong direction entirely way too fast. If we keep moving in this direction an letting the National Government overstep its bounds like this we as Americans will no longer have the right to choose anything for ourselves or our children.

Posted by: Megan | June 11, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Has anyone noticed how this administration spends money… No way would i want them in charge of my employment and my livelihood.

Posted by: Dana | June 11, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Obviously, you folks aren’t shareholders in these companies! Most of them are paying these ridiculous salaries to failing companies, and giving the shareholders nothing, or as little as possible. When we send in our proxies, the Directors tell us to vote “no” on shareholder resolutions. They don’t listen to shareholders, so they need to listen to regulations by the federal government.

Posted by: Dancer | June 11, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Wasn’t it Karl Marx who said “socialism is the transitional phase between capitalism and communism? sounds like socialism is almost in full swing. Ex President Bush has set in place a few laws to easily allow our downward spiral into communism to jump to warp speed. The “patriot act” and our governments private military (Blackwater) that is “above” the geneva convention. and with the government now controlling our credit system and the cash flow it looks like a dark day is quickly approaching.

Posted by: Justin | June 11, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Can you say, Hello comrades! Looks like another step to Comunism. We don’t live in a free country anymore when the government puts caps on your income. I guess there is no American dream worth dreaming about if you work your ass off your whole life to be told, well, you see, you just make too much money, give it all to the guy on his ass playing video games in his parents basement.

Posted by: Robert | June 11, 2009, 1:41 am 1:41 am

I would like to thank my comrades in the media for helping to elect premier Obama and his politbureau. I cannot wait to see Martin’s, Cynthia’s and Terry’s salaries slashed! Six figure salaries for people reading teleprompters is ridiculous! The only person making that kind of money for doing that is Premier Obama. Now lets all open our Chinese language books to page one and get to work comrades!

Posted by: mike | June 11, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

I agree strongly with Wendy above. We live in America! A FREE and democratic society with the best Constitution ever. The City, State and Federal governments do not have a right to dictate how much money a person can earn. The compensation limits are set by a FREE market.

Posted by: Ernie | June 11, 2009, 1:49 am 1:49 am

People were warned about President Obama’s socialist leanings before he was elected. This is just another step to his bringing this once proud nation to becoming a part of the socialist movement taking place in Europe. At this rate, we will soon be a another Cuba, Russia or China.

Posted by: James | June 11, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am

ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!

Posted by: Tucson Jim | June 11, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

The government should stay out of our private affairs. Was Mr. Geithner’s salary capped by the government when he was head of the Federal Reserve? Do unto others as you would like them to do to you. Okay, Mr. President your budget for flying around the country is now capped. You will have to promote your ideas from the Oval office like other presidents did.

Posted by: Mark | June 11, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

I have been a political fence sitter most of my life – but no more. Having just watched the mass media participate in electing a flim flam man as president and now watching this empty suit dismantle the world’s greatest economy is enough to make me physically ill. This executive pay thing is just a continuation of a four yr. nightmare that smacks of socialism. If you want to see where we’re really headed, check-out Mark Steyn’s article in Hillsdale college’s latest issue of the Imprimus newsletter where you’ll learn about things like socialized health care in England where they come into your house and count the Twinkies in your cupboard and base their decisions regarding your healthcare on their findings. Yes they can !

Posted by: mark | June 11, 2009, 2:23 am 2:23 am

It is in the government’s interest to keep the country economically healthy and vibrant. This can (and must!) include putting caps on exorbitant executive salaries. We all suffer when a few people get outrageous salaries while most are underpaid and underemployed.

Posted by: Felicity | June 11, 2009, 3:12 am 3:12 am

No, a thousand times no. A weak case could be made for the federal government’s oversight of executive compensation in companies receiving bail-out money; however, government oversight should not extend to those companies not receiving bail-outs.
For a long time I have felt that executive compensation has gotten out of control; but this should be corrected by the stockholders, not the federal government.
Where does it end? Should we have government oversight of the compensation for media personalities, TV anchors, professional athletes, actors, and the list could go on and on.
Government price controls usually result in the misallocation of resources.

Posted by: Ron | June 11, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

NO Way! This is not the roll of government.

Posted by: Cece | June 11, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Maybe we should appoint a pay/go czar to oversee that the government doesn’t spend money it doesn’t have. He could have power to remove any polititian who doesn’t balance the budget…. Oh wait a second that would mean Obama would be out of a job – since he already has spent a cool trillion (that is all borrowed by the way) in his first 4 months. Second thoughts about electing a “community organizer” instead of someone that actually understands how companies and oh I don’t know government work?

Posted by: Jared | June 11, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

One more thing… Just thing. If the government starts regulating top CEO paychecks then the door is open to regulate Upper Management, Lower Management and even the common workers pay potential. By limiting an amount of money a person can make severly limits your success potential. I do think that companies need to put into place the ability to curb their own greed for the all mighty buckeroo while those beneath their social status sufer. Take some lessons from the past to figure this one out. Ever wonder why Hitler rose to power? or the Czar of Russia was murdered? It’s because the elite became too greedy while ignoring those below. Then along came Charismatic leaders to make it all better…. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin etc. Don’t allow the same to happen to MY COUNTRY! I fought through too many wars beginning with Vietname and culminating with the first Gulf War to watch it all go down the toilet because of a social fascist ideloogy. hidden agenda.

Posted by: Tim Brown | June 11, 2009, 3:22 am 3:22 am

These days, the average CEO in the USA makes 885 times more than minimum wage, and the average CEO makes 364 times more than the average employee in their company. The strange thing is, CEO payment seems to have zero relation to company performance. Here’s the thing – CEO payment is a 100% tax write off for comapnies! There was a bill in Congress that removes the tax write off for CEOs making more than 25 times the company average employee’s wage. Personally, I’d be happy with 100 times. Other countries CEOS make much much less that US CEOS. At 25 times (or 100 times) the average employee’s wage, if the CEO is paid more, so is the average employee – and everybody wins.
- Bill

Posted by: Bill Martell | June 11, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Right now I say “Yes” but only because WE the American People own these companies, our tax dollars are keeping them alive and until they can prove to us that they are capable of managing and bringing the company back to solvency I believe our government has the responsibility to over-see the salaries of the CEO’s and Top Executives. Most of these people were instrumental in bringing these companies to the brink of destruction because of their greed and outrageous behavior and must not be allowed to make those same mistakes and be compensated unduly of it. I also think some people have a warped idea of what “Socialism” is the way the word gets thrown around, it’s was OK when the benefits of if were going in the direction where 1% of the population that owned 99% of the wealth in this country were reaping the benefits but when someone tries to turn it around in the right direction it’s a different story and we’re all going to “hell in a hand-basket” for it. Where were all of you people for the last 8 years when the past administration was gleefully allowing it all to happen?

Posted by: Vernette Griffee | June 11, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am

The government’s job is to protect the people – and protect the weak from bullies.
These days, the average CEO in the USA makes 885 times more than minimum wage, and the average CEO makes 364 times more than the average employee in their company. Other countries CEOs make much much less that US CEOs – and are more competitive because they do not have the insane overhead of our companies.
The strange thing is, CEO payment seems to have zero relation to company performance – bonuses for CEOs of failing companies? Here’s the thing – CEO payment is a 100% tax write off for companies! There was a bill in Congress that removes the tax write off for CEOs making more than 25 times the company average employee’s wage. Personally, I’d be happy with 100 times. At 25 times (or 100 times) the average employee’s wage, if the CEO is paid more, so is the average employee – and everybody wins.
The 25 times thing comes from several sources, including a policy study and (I believe) a Warren Buffett lead group for company reforms. Fair and honest CEOs back it.
- Bill

Posted by: Bill Martell | June 11, 2009, 3:42 am 3:42 am

No…..absolutely NOT! The government has no business telling private companies what they can pay their executives or workers. This is (or was) America.

Posted by: Baxter | June 11, 2009, 3:43 am 3:43 am

Anybody still naive enough to believe the U.S. is not a socialist country? Only a matter of time – and not much of that – before we can ascribe to being “third world.” I hope all you folks who voted for “change” are happy with what you got.

Posted by: Doug | June 11, 2009, 3:52 am 3:52 am

The government should stay out of private enterprise. It is up to the company to set it’s standards not our President. We don’t work for him, he works for us. This also goes for our representatives in the Congress and the Senate! It’s high time we tell them how their constituents feel!

Posted by: c.scafani | June 11, 2009, 4:29 am 4:29 am

NO Way! We are a free country and business should fail or succeed according to the open market and good or bad management which includes how much employees get paid. Government has no business being in private business!

Posted by: DB | June 11, 2009, 5:43 am 5:43 am

If the government is going to regulate anyone it should be itself. The politicians are masters of diversion. Look at what our so-called representative get in salary and perks. They stay a half year to mess up as much as they can and then take the other half of the year going on vacation(congessional surveys) that we pay for. Look at their retirement and health plan. This country is suppose to be ruled by the people not by the politcal elitists. The government is supposed to be regulated by the people, not the people regulated by the government. Look at the politicians first!! If they start truly representing the people unstead if representing themselves thing will take care of themselves. They are not worth their pay. Look at the sessions of Congress on Cspan. One of them will get up and propose naming the post office in Goofyville, New York the Micky Mouse Post Office and they will discuss this for half a day. They waste time and we pay dearly for it. If they would discuss pertinent things we would only have to pay them for maybe three months. This sounds like a pretty good job to me and if I want a raise I will just raise taxes and vote myself a big raise. WAKE UP PEOPLE, YOU ARE BEING MILKED FOR EVERYTHING THE POLITICIANS CAN MILK YOU FOR!!!!!!

Posted by: larry | June 11, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am

I think that there could very well be a executive pay cap set by the federal government. Does government not set the minimum pay rate? So, they can set a maximum pay rate in my opinion, because corporations do have a responsibility not only to their shareholders, but the workers and the people that live from them. In the past they did not have to be reminded of these things, but more and more that falls to the wayside. Most of the corporations have not paid federal income tax according to the GAO, so what does that tell you? Yes, let the government direct their pay. These corporations do right by the people in other countries who have universal healthcare and all the benefits they think will destroy America…

Posted by: planejane | June 11, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Yes, they should cap the pay. There is a federally controlled minimum wage, why could there not be a maximum wage??

Posted by: planejane | June 11, 2009, 8:14 am 8:14 am

The recession would have never happened had Bush instituted executive pay caps…

Posted by: matt | June 11, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

It’s not about how much someone makes, it’s how they make it. Oil or any energy product should not be traded. It should be treated as a utility. When is Obama going to stop the speculators on Wall Street.

Posted by: RGeier | June 11, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Capping excessive pay is a great idea.
Let’s start with school superintendents and college chancellors. Those postitions are way over paid with tax dollars. And fire the assistants and the assistants to the assistants. Worthless over paid fools that can’t do their own jobs and need fools to do it for them.

Posted by: Ryan | June 11, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

No. Government should NOT have the ability to control CEO’s salaries….communist? no thanks.

Posted by: Natalie | June 11, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

In the current economic environment, you can’t ask for minimal or zero government intervention and still expect your brother or cousin not to lose their house and/or their job unfairly. It’s a zero-sum game. Interesting how people are quick to talk about socialism, free market, and tyranny, and freely invoke Russia and China. Not sure what all that means (actually, not sure people making these references know either.) I share the premise that government shouldn’t intrude in private life, and I’m also for meritocratic compensation, but executive compensation has gotten way out of hand. I’m afraid government is the only force capable of effecting change in this situation. The “free market” has failed when CEOs like Pfizer chief Hank McKinnell and Home Depot’s Robert Nardelli walk away with over 200M each while their companies stocks had steadily declined over the same period. Both companies then laid off honest, hard working Americans. I’m not for capping compensation but I am for linking compensation to company performance – if a CEO’s comp triples over standard, company stock should triple as well! Otherwise it’s embezzlement. Some would say that’s what boards and shareholders are for (i.e., accountability)- In theory yes, in practice no! Boards an management have always scratched each others backs. And few shareholders have much of a say. In sum, it’s an outrageously unfair situation and someone has to fix it.

Posted by: cut the crap | June 11, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Lets stop the high retirement pay of our congressman because they work for us (The Taxpayers) and their retirement pay is more than the average taxpayer.

Posted by: discgolf56 | June 11, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Even though I think some of the salaries and golden parachutes that executives receive are obscene and the executives should be embarrassed to accept them, the government does NOT need to be in the business of setting salaries for the private sector. That is what private sector means. The government has enough to do without setting up another department/agency which will have it’s own bureaucracy. We need less government, not more.

Posted by: C. Allen | June 11, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

As horribly high as some of these pay levels are these days I do not think the gov’t should try to tell private companies what to compensate people. Shareholders should hold CEOs feet to the fire though and limit the monstrous money grab.

Posted by: Bruce | June 12, 2009, 3:13 am 3:13 am

I notice that Obama does not want to control the salaries of the Hollywood elite or that of the trial lawyers. That would be suicide, killing the Democratic Part’s cash cows.

Posted by: David A. Williams | June 12, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Everyone said a lot about government should not intervene in companies that have not been bailed out. I guess they forgot about the minimum requirements and other things the government does. There must be controlling laws to protect the many that can not fight for themselves. Orginially, unless I am not remembering correctly, unions came into being to stop companies from abusing workers. Now, the pendulum swings back to government. Yes, unions got greedy, but so have CEO’s and everyone else that had controll of the money, now the government is trying to find their fair share. I am all for leveling the playing field. It is just another guideline for companies to follow. Everyone needs laws and guidelines. These and other laws that are not in place need to be. Maybe we would not have such a unbalanced scale of justice.

Posted by: Pati | June 16, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

If a company took TARP money, the CEO’s salary should be directly tied to results based on how quickly they pay main street back.
As for CEO Comp in the private/public sector, let shareholders decide, it is their money on the hook.
As for Obama, this is a kitty cat trying to keep the lions in check…and screwing it up like no other before him.

Posted by: crackmeupp | June 17, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Obama wants all the power and ABC is trying to hand it to him. Why are you not covering his illegal act of firing the Inspector General? Why didn’t you cover the fact that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac received HUGE bonuses? Why didn’t you cover the fact that he dropped the charges on the Black Panthers at the voting booths? Now you are going to cover the Healthcare overhaul in the Whitehouse and not even let the opposing view BUY a spot for rebuttal! You are hand picking people to ask questions in the town hall meeting. This really sounds like non-biased reporting… By the way, if anyone actually watches the healthcare propaganda spree, please make a list of who is sponsoring ads and post them so I can know which companies to boycott!!

Posted by: wheresmymoney | June 17, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.