Closing Arguments: Too Much Regulation in Obama Plan?
As we reported earlier, President Obama today laid out his proposal for increasing regulation over the financial industry to prevent a future economic crisis. The plan would, among other things, give more power to the Federal Reserve and create a new agency to head up consumer protection. But critics, including many conservatives, are already calling the proposal an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. So tonight, we ask you: Is the president's proposal based on sound reforms? Or is it an example of government getting in the way? Tell us what you think. You can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
I think the president is correct in increasing regulation for the financial industry. They have proven they can’t be trusted to police themselves.
Posted by: p butler | June 18, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
WHen the Federal Reserve Bank and Congress were ALL part of the mortgage for nothing job crisis…why allow the Fed MORE power with a man who didn’t even pay his taxes? Can’t trust anyone in Washington…they’re ALL crooks! All of em!!!!
Posted by: Deboorah Wiseman | June 18, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
I find it interesting that the very people that unregulated the financial institutions and ran up trillions in deficits are the biggest critics. Greed has a way of showing its ugly head, obviously the financial institutions cannot regulate themselves. Lets regulate the oil industry and bring the price of gas down before they put the economy on the skids, we did it in the 70′s why not now.
Posted by: Bill | June 18, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I thought we fought a revolution 232 years ago because our founding fathers got sick of government injecting itself in every part of their lives. The more freedom we give up to the government through “regulation” the more of our freedom they will take away. There are natural ebs and flows in business and economic cycles and if you try to “regulate” them, you’re setting up the whole system for collapse.
Posted by: Katie | June 18, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
No where is the President of the United States given the authority to do the things Obama is doing with private business. He and congress need to get out of the way and leave things alone. Obama and the democrats are killing this country a little bit at a time and we the people are so stupid to just sit here and allow them to mess up our country. Vote them all out of office in the next elections.
Posted by: TGray | June 18, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Obama was elected to protect our freedom. Instead, he’s trying to take control of everything. He’s probably a fraud–not even a natural born citizen. He needs to be stopped before he destroys the works and efforts of those he was elected to govern. He wasn’t elected to be a dictator. We have a constitution and need to adhere to it. Our president is making great progress on his promise to “remake this country,” to our detriment.
Posted by: Carla | June 18, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
There needs to be tougher rules on lending and how much risk can be taken on within the financial industry, but we don’t need ANOTHER government agency!! The government is spending us into the poor house already, we don’t need another group of government workers spending money we don’t have!!
Another rule that needs to be put in place is one that forbids Congress from pressuring financial institutions to make risky loans!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Norm | June 18, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
WE are over regulated as it is. The Federal Reserve is run by a man that didn’t pay his own taxes! And you want him to tell us what we can and can not do? Dream on! The government should back off!
Posted by: r wilson | June 18, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
It is because the government deregulated the banking industry that this mess was able to happen. When ronald Reagan deregulated the banking industry way back then, the first thing the banks did was float junk bonds. Remember that? President Bushs’ brother was up to his eyeballs in that S&L scandal. We turned a blind eye and they kept on their merry way. The old saying applies. “Slap me once shame on you, slap me twice shame on you”. Slap me a third time and you might as well hand me a sign that says STUPID
Posted by: Gary Greenberg | June 18, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
It’s about time that irrational Financial Institutions & Stock Market Speculators sober up. Thank goodness for Obama!
Energy & Oil Speculation have bankrupt working American households & Small Businesses.
Hey Big Banks—that’s all there is—-sober up & get real—the average American is Broke—-
A little regulation is long overdue.
Posted by: adewree | June 18, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
All the problems we are having now is created by government intervention and I have never found anything the government gets involved in that don’t get worse. This massive move into socialization of everything will make a third world nation out of this once great nation. I haven’t found anything Obama has done that I think will help this nation.
Posted by: Jerry Mitchell | June 18, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Regulation is Congress’ job, not the President’s. Does anyone read the Constitution anymore? There are good reasons why government works best that way. Read the Constitution. Read the Federalist Papers. Congress could have and should have reined in Fannie May; Freedie Mac; Bear Sterns, etc and they did not. Why didn’t they? Because the average Congressman is uneducated. They aren’t as interested in the welfare of the country as they are assuring their own re-election. They are uneducated boobs when it comes to economics. What should Obama do? Cut Taxes! Business men will do what businessmen do best …. they will jump on the opportunity to make money. They will start businesses and hire employees. Government needs to just stand back. Government caused this recession; why should we believe that they can fix it? Sure, they should have made laws that prohibited banks from gambling with depositor’s money. Bank presidents know what the differences are between investing and gambling. Many bankers belong in jail. Congress belongs in jail for not writing laws that made gambling with depositor’s money criminal.
Posted by: Steve | June 18, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Yes it is essential that more regulation be in place. The financial services industry is the most corrupt industry in the world, let alone the USA. The leadership of these firms routinely takes an obscene amount of compensation. This industry generates its value through the use of other people’s money and it has been acting like the money was its own. Because this industry has consistently proven itself to be untrustworthy, it is essential that guidelines be established for what these firms can and cannot do, and what the limits are to be for the compensation of the individuals working in them. After all, these are PUBLIC corporations and are owned by the public and as such need to be accountable to those whose money they are using. The biggest problem as i see it, is that there is so much “incestuous” behavior with respect to who gets to be on the board of directiros in these companies. The boards are comprised of people who are on each others’ boards and they take care of one another as a club.
Posted by: guy desrochers | June 18, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Another huge agency is not needed… how much will that cost us taxpayers?
I understand regulation is needed, but do you really think it will control and monitor anything?
The people put in control can be just as corrupt and greedy as the banksters themselves… so I doubt all these czars and new huge agencies are really needed or necessary.
No bank or business should be too big to fail, period.
Posted by: lm | June 18, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Yet another government agency to supplement other malfunctioning government agencies? We are increasingly becoming a country of the government, by the government, and for the government.
Posted by: Ike Aruti, Esq. | June 18, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Yes, I think this is just another example of our government, paying twice for the same thing. We already have the SEC to oversee the financial market. They just did not do the job so fire them and hire people who will do the job.
I also would like to know why the mainstream media has not even began to look into the firing Gerald Walpin?
Posted by: virginia denton | June 18, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am
This is just another example of the government paying twice for the same thing. We already have the SEC to monitor the financial market, if they are not doing the job, fire them and get new people. Don’t duplicate the same service. The administration didn’t have a problem firing Inspector General Walpin! Why have we not heard anything about this on your news network? Or any other mainstream news station.
Posted by: virginia denton | June 18, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
We citizens can only hope that the presidents proposals have been based on sound reforms, if we can trust his Chicago-Clinton cabinet on any given issue…their past track record has been anything but stellar. Congress gave the prime players in the financial crisis carte-blanche to work their Ponzi schemes and frauds…let us not forget, while the principles of the Federal Reserve stood by and silently watched. These are the institutions that need reform. Timothy Geitners nomination to the cabinet sent Obama’s message to the “good ol’ boy’s financial network”, that “Hey guy’s its going to be business as usual.”
Until Obama fixes the malfunctioning and broken parts of the government regulatory and legislative machine, any further empowerment of the Federal Reserve will only serve to create another “out of control bureaucracy”. Some deep thought needs to go into these actions before the president “fires” up his new machine. If you are going to have increased regulation, you need to have people in place capable of enforcing them, and with the wisdom to know when to do it!!!
Posted by: Nachthexe | June 18, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
The government got us in this situation with “regulations” in the first place! Why don’t they start regulating congressional terms with term limits? They could help out the budget by paying congressmen and women the same as the enlisted military. Since an E-5 (1st level non-commissioned officer) in the military only makes around $2500 per month and the low-level congressman makes about $14,500 per month, that will save about $12,000 per month or $144,000 per year per congressman or woman. That’s $77,040,000 saved for the entire year!
Posted by: Kate | June 18, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am
As if the Federal Reserve System doesn’t have enough power already. Don’t forget your show guest came from the the Federal Reserve Bank, and he already has an incredible amount of authority that has been handed over to him with the office he now holds as the Treasury Secretary. I think this is a bit of redundancy which may possibly have significance with some future scenario to insure that the power he now holds remains with him and the President and that they don’t have to answer to anyone else.ch
Let’s Support HR 1207’s (to Audit The Fedreal Reserve System) identical companion bill in the Senate whi is known as S 604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act, sponsored by Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Posted by: John DiStefano | June 18, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
I think before we start granting the Federal Reserve even more powers than they already posses we need pass that bill to perform a complete audit of the Fed. This is an organization most Americans know little about and there just needs to be much more transparency. There are already laws on the books to prosecute fraud, enforce contracts and protect consumers.
Posted by: Jason | June 18, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
I think it’s fairly obvious that the federal reserve along with the federal government actually caused the housing bubble and subsequent financial crisis. I think it’s time to severely limit the power of the federal reserve if not eliminate it all together. While we’re at it, why don’t we also pass the fair tax bill and eliminate the IRS as well.
Posted by: Anonymous | June 18, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
His proposal is both really isn’t it? Reform is needed. We do not necessarily need another government agency, but something has to be done. Someone has to take action. We have to accept the fact that many financial institutions have failed to manage themselves and need straightened out. If not our government, then who? We really should ultimately trust our government, our President, regardless of party, to have the nations best interest in mind. We are, and always have been the greatest nation with either party in charge. We all must have faith. Faith in our President and our government, ALWAYS.
Posted by: Chuck | June 18, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am
John and Jason I’m in total agreement with you…The federal reserve does need to be audited. Shake this one out and see how clean their hands are in this whole debacle!!!
America, call your congressman and voice your support for HR 1207 and S 604. let them know how you feel….In politics silence only begets silence..the squeaky wheel gets the grease !!!
Posted by: pro from dover | June 18, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Obama is taking it upon himself to exert way too much power. Whatever happened to Checks and Balances? Why isn’t Congress telling him that is their job? Progressive Government is just around the corner.
Posted by: Debra Smith | June 18, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
PLEASE MORE RULES. so those people never think of doing it again.
Posted by: connita | June 18, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
That’s probably an example of Government getting in the way and unnecessary bureaucracy, as that seems to be the norm in Government today. They don’t seem to be helping anything to succeed today. Just look at the Auto Industry. They can’t do anything now without Obama and his car czar’s say so. The Federal Reserve System now has too much to do with what’s wrong about America today. Tim Geitner himself came from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York so we know at least that much about him and a little more. Where’s it all going to eventually lead us to with all the uncontrolled spending and further indebtedness today? What all the experts forsee ahead soon is seemingly beyond belief. We NEED REAL CHANGE today! JFK had the right idea so many years ago.
We need to get our Senators to support Ron Paul’s HB 1207′s (bill to Audit the Federal Reserve) companion bill in the senate S 640.
Posted by: John DiStefano | June 18, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am
The Federal Reserve has failed the United States of America. The fiat currency will destroy our society. When debts are demanded to be paid, many people will die and suffer from severe poverty or war as history repeats itself. The unilaterally increasing debt of the past 96 years is absolutely and undenyably unsustainable. Why should such failue be rewarded?
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered”-Thomas Jefferson.
“The last hope of human liberty rests on us… If we find our government in all its branches rushing headlong, like our predecessors, into the arms of monarchy, if we find them violating our dearest rights, the trial by jury(USA Patriot Act), the freedom of the press, the freedom of opinion, civil or religious, or opening on our peace of mind or personal safety the sluices of terrorism(9/11,War on Terrorism, Afganistan,Iraq, Iran), if we see them raising standing armies(Homeland Security), when the absence of all other danger points to these as the sole objects on which they are employed, then indeed let us withdraw and call the nation to its tents.”-Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: Christopher Anderson | June 18, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am
No I think it’s just more bureaucracy.
Posted by: John DiStefano | June 18, 2009, 1:42 am 1:42 am
I thought Obama swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. So far he has totaly ignored the Constitution to ensure his own power. He should be impeached for usurping that power, which is limited by the Constitution. Wake up America! Obama is stealing all of your rights and you are encouraging him to take more.
Posted by: Gerry | June 18, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am
I think that the Federal Reserve needs a good audit; I do not think that it should be in charge of regulating anything given the incredible resistance the Federal Reserve has to being itself audited.
Posted by: The_Yakima_Kid | June 18, 2009, 3:20 am 3:20 am
Yes, there is too much regulation. If Obama wants more regulation he should appoint every single citizen of this country a regulator of his or her own lives.
Posted by: Huh | June 18, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
This title is the understatement of the year.
Posted by: Huh | June 18, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
As a 75-year old Korean Conflict veteran and a voter in Wisconsin’s First Congressional District, I want to say that we need much more government control over big business, Wall Street, and other entities that function in these United States of America. I don’t care if some will call it Socialism. To Hell with them. Gerald , Waterford, Wisconsin.
Posted by: Gerald Hansen | June 18, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Yes, another agency to staff and spend money on. Why have another one continue doing nothing like Barney Frank did to ruin the housing with Fannie & Freddie. Keep up the good work Mr. President.
Posted by: RAGGA | June 18, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Barrack Hussein Obama is ruining this country! What I want to know is whether he is doing it accidentally because he lacks experience as his only experience was from his short term as a junior senator, or whether he is doing it on purpose. His many shady connections with people like Bill Ayers of the Weathermen Underground who bombed the White House and the Pentagon, no regrets, who actually said that he didn’t feel like he did enough, the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense who wielded weapons and blocked polls in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to his spiritual mentor Reverend Jerimiah Wright and the “white-hating”, “America-hating” church Trinity United Church of Christ (& Muhammed) , ACORN, Antoin “Tony” Rezko, his adoration for Malcolm X, who while in prison became a member of the Nation of Islam. Malcolm X stated on December 4, 1964, “God will take this entire continent away from white man. White America is doomed!” Is it any wonder why he nominated Sonia Sotomayer for Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court even though she stated at LEAST three (3) times over the course of a decade that “a wise Latina woman is capable of making better decisions than a white male”? I’m personally upset that Mr. Barrack Hussein Obama can nominate ANYONE for ANY court when he has court cases pending against him and his constitutional eligibility for office.
When our founding fathers started this country they wanted a very small government. Now the size of our government has grown out of control and the government is trying to control EVERY aspect of our lives and is trying to take away the freedoms given to us in the amendments in our U.S. Constitution.
America we need to get involved with our Congressmen (House & Senate members) or we are going to lose the America that our Founding Fathers created.
In the first 100 days in office Barrack Hussein Obama has managed to rack up more debt than all our previous presidents combined.
Posted by: Sue | June 18, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I am normally a conservative, but this last man-made economic disater has shown what un-regulated capitalism can do. We need more protection from these Wall Street vultures.
Posted by: john | June 18, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Regulation is essential in many aspects of our lives. We count on…
…food regulations to keep us healthy,
…drug regulations to ensure medicine cures rather than kills,
…toy safety regulations to prevent child injury,
…traffic regulations to make sure our roads do not become our graves.
Regulation is a burden that protects us all. While it might be fun to drive as drunk as you like as fast as you like in any direction you like without a single stop sign or traffic signal, it’s clearly unsafe. Saying, “But I’m an excellent driver; you can trust me!” is insufficient. A reckless financial industry is lots of fun, too. It goes real fast, makes a lot of money . . . and ends in a spectacular crash that kills the reckless driver, good drivers, and a whole bunch of pedestrians who never even learned to drive.
We must regulate the financial industry. Things will go a little slower with regulations in place, but they’ll be a whole lot safer for everyone. We can accept a little less speed if it means we all get there in one piece.
Posted by: Utech | June 19, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
When it comes to the financial markets, you could never have enough oversight. We are far past the death of the “Best and Brightest” in America.
Like our president, when you put in the previously drug addicted and dumb, nothing but thieves, con artist and swindlers will follow! And that you can take to the bank…whoops forgot, thanks to Obama we are the bank!
Posted by: crackmeupp | June 21, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Yes! I think there should be MORE regulations on financial institutions, that’s my money and your money that bailed them out and I sure don’t trust those bone-heads after the financial mess they’ve put this country in for the past 8 ears. WHAT? Do they think we’re that stupid that we would turn a blind-eye and let them do it again? I DON’T THINK SO!
Posted by: Vernette Griffee | June 24, 2009, 3:30 am 3:30 am
After watching the President speak last evening I found a couple of interesting facts, first of all physicians do not get paid fee for service. They get a fee for a service. In the state of New Jersey, physicians must acccept most rates of insurance companies as payment if full. However these fees by insurance companies are based on Medicare reimbursements, not fee for service. Also looking into insurance carriers for No fault coverage, as well as Workmans Compensation should also be looked into. Many physicians tend to take advantage of these fees as they are not based (at this time) on Medicare rates. My husband is a physician in the state of New Jersey, we have a small office (he is a single practioner) with a small staff. The President stated last evening if you like your insurance, then keep it. It is not whether you like your insurance or not. It is whether your insurance likes you. We have a 26% increase in our rates for Blue Cross and Blue SHield this year alone. We are able to only pay a portion of our staff’s health care benefits. I hope these will be all addressed. Thank you
Posted by: Janet Cristini | June 25, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
The Obama administration uses “systemic risk” as a buzz word when using the threat of crisis to inflict its will upon our nation. The “systemic risk” that caused the domino collapse of financial institutions then the housing and automotive follow-ons was the over-leveraged dollar. Basically over-leveraging means not enough real money in reserve to back the outstanding debt.
Unfortunately the US is now on a debt based economy from the government all the way down to the family level. When it comes to “systemic risk” and over-leveraging consider that there isn’t enough real money in existence to cover the cumulative public and private debt. So to a debt free household such as mine it would seem clear that the first course of action would be to reduce the debts (public and private). A clear way to reduce debt would be to reduce spending and begin using income to pay down the debt (Larry Burkett, Bill Gather and others used this approach in their family counseling).
The national debt is currently,estimated at, $11,226,807,380,955 and not one elected official has offered a plan to mitigate it. The president and the current congress, instead, continue to drive the debt upward. Every time I read the paper I see where my representative is involved with pulling more “pork” money into WNC.
I have asked more than one new congress to address the national debt, and to begin with cancelling their pay raises and even rolling back their excessive pay. To the person the response (if any) has been one of “feigned” helplessness as if such a task is beyond them. Now let me ask a simple question, IF THIS IS BEYOND THEIR CAPABILITY WHY DO WE ELECT THEM? How can we ever expect them to work on the big issue of the national debt and the “systemic risk” it presents if they are unwilling to begin at their own level? This even when we are all having to tighten our belts!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | June 26, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am