By David Schoetz

Jun 23, 2009 11:49pm

Closing Arguments: Your Health Care ?s for President Obama?

President Obama said today he is confident sweeping health care reform legislation will be passed by the end of the year. But he has many obstacles ahead and critics are ready to pounce. And tomorrow night, he will face many of those questions when Charlie Gibson and Diane Sawyer host the primetime special on health care — "Questions for the President: Prescription for America" – inside the White House.  So tonight, we ask you: What are your concerns about the president's health care plan? What questions would you like him to answer? Tell us what you think. You can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.

User Comments

I would ask the President why he doesn’t FIRST clean up all the WASTE and FRAUD within Medicare and Medicaid before taking on Universal Healthcare. Medicare is a ticking time bomb and everyone knows it. We are constantly told that the waste and fraud within Medicare is something like $90 million a year. If we could save that Univeral Healthcare might be easier to get through. Please ask him what (in concrete terms) he and others are doing to combat the waste in the Medicare system.

Posted by: Suzanne | June 24, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Amid the chaos health care questions have caused recently my question is this………How much will it save over our present system which now staggers under the weight of the un and under insured for programs such as medicaid?

Posted by: Vioky Learned | June 24, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I am a health insurance professional. I have studied both healthcare delivery systems, gov’t sponsored and private delivery systems. It is well noted by many (including the media) that most of the countries that offer socialized medicine come here to the United States for the state of the art care. How will you insure the United States healthcare system will continue to be the best of the world if you move to a govt sponsored system? Are you also going to provide funding for medical research in addition to national healthcae system?

Posted by: spicard | June 24, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I believe something has to be done about health care. That said, however, having been traveling in Halifax, Nova Scotia several years ago we were able to witness the province making a decision to not cover the cost of a chemotherapy agent that was proven to save lives because the expense was too great. They figured they’d only lose ten or fewer people a year by saving the money, and that was acceptable to them. How do we keep these types of decisions from being made in a government run program? Or, in any program that would decide to weigh costs versus life saving treatments?

Posted by: Eleanor Glavin | June 24, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Ask the President if people who are unemployed and have no minor children will be covered under this health care plan. I ask because I’ve been looking for employment for 3 years now, I even when back to school last year to learn another type of career and still have not found employment here in Chicago or the surrounding areas.

Posted by: Lisa | June 24, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

When I walk into the US Post Office at 11:45 am, the line is 10 deep on any given day. I nervously watch the clock because when the clock hits 12, the window gate folds and you are now asked to return atfer lunch. Tell me is this the same system you will offer when our govt offers healthcare?

Posted by: spicard | June 24, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Good question concerning medicaid….one that certainly needs to be addressed and as you said it would help promote the idea of a better insurance method that would be government run.

Posted by: Vioky Learned | June 24, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I have a comment first-I am gravely concerned that this guy wants the USA to move in a socialist direction,ie:Europe–that is not who we are!!!That being said howcanyou,Charley, with your education background,want to go in this direction—socialism does NOT work–never has!!I do not wish this on my kids!!We need the gov’t out of our lives–they can’t run anything correctly, can they!!and now you want them involved more in healthcare–ouch!!–
Ok let’s get to a question—one would be “why the socialistic direction??
2–we need a healh plan that covers our whole body–you know, our eyes,ears,and teeth–how about comin up with one plan to do that!!diect the insurers and the health industry to come up wit ONE plan to cover us.. the insurers can hadle the money –the cost would be as now as far as payrlool deductions etc.AND group rates for all of us–I would see some type of a watchdog to make sure the plan was run honestly–but I believe after 40 plus years in healthcare running hospitals etc that this can work, if done right—gov’tcan be the facilitater–and then get out..C it is late–

Posted by: chandler ford jr. | June 24, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

The U.S. already has 2 government run universal healthcare plans currently in practice: Medicare for seniors and Medicaid for the poor. I’ve seen both systems are so ridiculously convoluted that they fail to cover reasonable health care goods and services for people that truly need them in many instances, yet both plans are still plagued with fraud. The govt has a proven record of inefficiency in these 2 universal healthcare systems. Please ask President Obama why not develop a federal framework for private sector to compete and deliver care in the same way some other industries are federally regulated (e.g. FAA, FCC, etc.)?

Posted by: Chrisann | June 24, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Will health insurance companies make less money in a new economy if trend toward more universal or socalist-like healthcare happens?

Posted by: Julie Todd | June 24, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

I would like to know how this plan will be different than Medicare or Medicaid. As it stands now, the government doesn’t run these two programs well. Second question, why should I have to pay for people who can afford insurance, yet choose not to get it? I realize that not all the uninsured fall into this category, but there is a large number of people that do. Third, is this plan going to be available to the MILLIONS of illegal immigrants who already suck off the system?

Posted by: Jennifer Mehlrose | June 24, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Will doctors and nurses make less money if a trend toward universal or more socalist healthcare ensues?

Posted by: Julie Todd | June 24, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Both my wife and I were laid off this year. I am concerned we will not be able to get health insurance after we exhaust our COBRA coverage, because we have both had some serious medical conditions in the past, but are both in good health now. We would like to see affordable health care made available to us and anyone that is not tied to an employer and is not subject to the exclusion policies that for project health insurance has. We might want to start a small business or do something else, but health care is a real issue for us, so we might need to take some job for the health insurance, if we can find one. I think employer based health care probably hurts the economy by keeping people dependant on an employer to get affordable healthcare. It also forces people who might otherwise retire to keep working solely to keep health care coverage until they reach 65. I know of at least two people in their late 50′s, early 60′s working solely to keep health insurance. This also hurts the economy by keeping these jobs from younger workers coming into the work force. It also hurts the company because these older workers who might otherwise retire probably have a much higher salary than someone younger.

Posted by: Rick Kiser | June 24, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am

I am disabled and receiving Medicare with an additional prescription plan. How will your proposal impact my coverage?

Posted by: Dan Baker | June 24, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I’ve been listening to President Obama over the last few days regarding the many problems with our current health care system. I am a nurse, presently back in school to become an Advanced Practice Nurse, and am very disturbed that the president has not once mentioned individual accountability as a cost saving mechanism. All of the other important factors I think the president has grasped. But, there will be no costs being cut if we do not expect more out of the American people in taking control of their health. I see it over and over again. We can educate our patients about their disease, give them a medication, and hope that they listen to our expert advise. But, people continue to eat what they shouldn’t, thus, we have the most obese nation worldwide! People continue to smoke, despite the known risks and costs to our health system. The list goes on and on. We must include incentives to live healthier to prevent the chronic diseases that are costing our nation hundreds of millions of dollars per year, like Diabetes Type 2 and Obesity. Insurance premiums should be less expensive for those that choose to live a healthy, risk free lifestyle, and more expensive for those that choose to smoke, not exercise and eat to the point of morbid obesity. Having a government controlled health care plan will not save money until it includes preventive medicine and disincentives for bad health habits.

Posted by: dawn davis | June 24, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Two questions I would like to pose out there that I may have missed being asked but have not heard anyone mention. 1. The majority of medical cost is generated in the last 6 months of someones life. No amount of prevention will change the fact we will all die of something, so where is the savings. 2. I don’t have an issue with taking a responsibility of the >250,000 paying more since I am one of them, but what about the responsibility of the patients. The top two preventable causes of death are 450,000 from smoking which are president dose and number two is 400,000 a year to obesity. If these are preventable and affects a significant amount of the population what responsibility will these people have. I am not proposing to not help them but should there not be some sort of accountability since a certain group of the population will be made to be accountable by paying more?

Posted by: Jon Freels | June 24, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Dawn you beat me by a few minutes. I have the same concerns.

Posted by: Jon Freels | June 24, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Will Nightline or anyone post these questions to the President? I understand the situation is complex and not everyone will be happy, but would at least like a responce that is at least logical.

Posted by: Jon Freels | June 24, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

ABC, appears to be the official propaganda wing of the Socialist / Democratic Party. I have now lost all respect for ABC News.

Posted by: BN | June 24, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

I sure was glad to hear the President use the Mayo Clinic for an example of better way to do cost effective. He is hitting that nail on the head. If all will listen to him, then we all will have better health care and most cost effective. I would like for congress and the repubicans to go to Mayo clinic and just see for their selfs, how well a team approach really is the less costly way of doing the health care in AMERICA!!!
Alicia,
Georgia

Posted by: Alicia | June 24, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Thank you ABC and Pres. Obama for a great program. I am curious, though, about the public hesitation on a government run health plan. We in the US are very quick to praise our military as the best in the world. Defense is a public plan and it has managed to produce a military to the satisfaction of the citizens. Can you imagine, however, if health insurance companies were in charge of our military?
As a taxpayer without insurance I am willing to take this “chance”. I would like to have it offered. What are my chances of actually seeing it?
Again, thank you. Terrific job all around. Regards to Bo, the First Dog.
Atlanta, GA
June 24, 2009

Posted by: Carole Fetter | June 25, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Mr. President, you used a great example of less expensive health care is at Mayo Clinic, because of the team approach they use. If everyone on the argument of wheather we should do something about health care in America.
Alicia
Georgia

Posted by: Alicia | June 25, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I’m not sure President Obama really understands that those of us who are self employeed, without employees, and do pay for our own health insurance…that if you set up government supported health insurance…the private health insurance companies can make it cheaper to compete with the government sponsored insurance but they will also reduce your benefits…including life time benefits.
My insurance company is not going to give me the same plan I currently have for less money…that won’t happen!
I think the health insurance companies should have to change the way they categorize people. I am healthy, my health insurance went up more than 20% again this year…(and I hardly used it at all last year)…because I am grouped by age and people my age…between 50 and 60…apparently go to the hospital a lot. And, due to the deductible, I hardly get any benefit from my insurance…but the premium continues to sky rocket. Our premiums go up, but we do not get any more service for the dollar!
Nationalizing Health Insurance won’t stop that…companies will continue to offer cheaper plans with less benefits…and then what happens if you really get sick with cancer or some other serious disease…and your benefits expire…or they tell you you’ve already used your lifetime quota. Then what? There are a lot of us out here that will end up with continued high premiums to stay covered…and we will fall through the cracks.
Private health insurance is BIG BUSINESS…and these insurance companies aren’t going to give up their HUGE incomes easily.
Even if people like me could buy insurance through government supported health insurance companies…it might be cheaper…but it WILL NOT be comparable to what I have now. I do not believe that government supported health insurance will drive down the prices of private insurance companies. Private insurance companies offer a variety of plans…but they are not comparable…all based on cost whether you use it or not.

Posted by: Jackie | June 25, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

I think this so called”News Agency has lost every bit of credability it ever had” It is nothing more than a shill, a puppet dancing to the string this cult of personality pulls.

Posted by: Robert Little | June 25, 2009, 2:54 am 2:54 am

WOW! People amaze me. I read that people are traveling to the US for health care but no mention of the stories I see about Americans flying to India for surgeries. You say the two health plans the government currently offers are full of fraud. Do you really not know that most every privately run company is full of fraud too if there is a lot of money to be made. The bottom line for me is our health care system sucks. The insurance companies have had years to get it right but we continue to pay more for very poor care. I am not sure what the answer is but I am sure if we continue to do nothing it will not get any better.

Posted by: Tammy | June 25, 2009, 3:00 am 3:00 am

Not once have I heard anyone in this decision making process mention the high cost of medical care in this equation. Other countries across the globe where state of the art medical procedures are offered [ie,Canada,UK,Germany and most of Europe] pay approximately 50% of the charges we pay. Don’t believe it? Review your last bill for a hospital stay and see what you, or should I say your insurance company paid for goods and services rendered by your hospital and physician. Look at what you paid for an aspirin or a bandage or the per unit charge for your physician, surgeon, or anesthesiologist. These people make obscene profits and salaries.
Also insurance companies are fraught with paperwork snafu’s and over-payments to doctors and hospitals. These institutions keep these over-payments and if they are not caught by the insurance companies and reimbursement demanded, they keep these funds and pay them out to the hospitals and doctors in the form of bonuses. we are talking hundreds of thousands per year to an individual physician or hospital… Fair? I think not…and at our expense!!! Fraud by any other name!!!Until the government gets a handle on this part of the issue we cannot expect any great change in the cost of insurance premiums to the consumer. The AMA has lobbied very successfully for the last 50 years to assure a system of “guaranteed payment” for their physicians in the form of insurance payouts…So fix the broken MACHINE from the inside, Then we can formulate a plan that will work for the majority.

Posted by: pro from dover | June 25, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I do agree with the many people against Obama’s proposed govermental health plan, in that Obama really hasn’t given a solid description as to how his plan will work and the plan’s limitations. On the other hand, I do believe that it is absolutely necessary that something is done to change the current health insurance situation.
As a college student, I have two options for health care. One, I can remain a dependent of parents and access their insurance, as long as I am a full time student, until I am 26. Or I can become an idependent and drop the insurance provided my father’s employer in exchange for the insurance offered by my school at a cost of $2,000 per year. (A heavy price tag on top of tuition, fees, housing, etc) Both plans offer equal coverage (which is severly lacking in my opinion). My friend, who works two part time jobs, is able to buy into Mass Health. Her insurance covers much more than mine and the cost of it is directly proportional to her income. Because I qualify for state funded insurance through my school, I am not eligible for Mass Health.
Thinking about health insurance has made me think about other types of insurance that I must pay for, namely my car insurance. Even in Massachusetts, where the price of car insurance is standardized, resulting in fewer options (can’t get Progressive, Geico, etc), I have more options for my car insurance than I do for my health insurance. My only options for health insurance is that what my employer (my school) or my parents’ (due to my age) employer chooses. I know I am young and (as an English major) I understand very little about the financial and political aspects of this situation, I am utterly baffled as to why I have less options and control in choosing insurance for my own health than I do for the piece of metal I park in my driveway.
So my questions for Obama would be how is this plan, specifically, going to work and will I be able to finally choose my own health plan and not be locked into what somebody else (my employer) has chosed for me?

Posted by: Heather | June 25, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

ABC news is a disgrace. I have watched your news coverage for years, but now can’t tolerate the pandering to Obama. We don’t need his health insurance with his health insurance czar making decisions for the health procedures we will receive. It was so telling in the town hall meeting when he responded to the lady whose 105 year old mother who received a pacemaker at age 100 because she still had spirit and could still live a good life. His response to her receiving this procedure was that judgements could not be made on the basis of the spirit of a patient–there had to be rules. WE DON’T NEED OBAMAS INSURANCE OR HIS CZARS MAKING OUR HEALTHCARE DECISIONS. SHAME ON ABC especially Charlie and Dianne for whom I have lost all respect.

Posted by: Donna Carr | July 7, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

At this time I greatly admire the growing number of states that have the guts to take a 10th Amendment stand against Obama’s encroachment upon their sovereignty!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | July 9, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I disapprove of the dictatorial way in which Obama has been handling Health Care and abortion. I am not in favor of this passing. I do not wish to send or spend any of my money on things that i do not approve of and are against my beliefs.

Posted by: Donna Taylor | July 21, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

This I know. When I started working for a certain company in 1998, the company paid $7500 a year for my health insurance. In 2008 they paid $12500 a year for my health insurance. This is a large company with many employees. They are going to have the employees help pay for some of this next year. I think something needs to be done.

Posted by: Linda | July 23, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am

I am flabbergasted to read some of you say that the healthcare in this country is “one of the best” HAve you been outside the US to make such as statement??? Thankfully I have a european passport to a country that offers great healthcare for EVERYBODY and it is not a busisness thying to nickel and dime you. If I or any of my family were to fall gravely ill, as for example with cancer of smtg like that, I would fly back to Europe to have the best healthcare at my disposal at no cost.
What europeans come here for any treatment?? You guys live in denial!! The US is great for a lot of things but if you keep lying to yourselves that people come to this country for any kind of medical care, then you just plain out dont want to see the reality.

Posted by: Nadine | August 14, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Since my latest trips to the doctor I have been a lot more concerned about my health.

Posted by: Oleta Dostie | October 18, 2011, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.