By David Schoetz

Jul 21, 2009 11:29pm

Closing Arguments: Does Gates Deserve an Apology?

Prosecutors today dropped a disorderly conduct charge against Henry Louis Gates Jr., a prominent black scholar at Harvard.  Gates was arrested last week after a white passerby reported two black men — Gates and his driver — trying to break into a Cambridge, Massachusetts home. The house, in fact, is his — and Gates grew incensed when a white officer responding to the call asked for his identification. The officer described Gates' behavior as belligerent. Today, the charge was dropped and police called the incident "regrettable."  For his part, Gates is reportedly demanding an apology for what he calls racial profiling. So tonight, we ask: Do you think he deserves an apology? Tell us what you think. You can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.

User Comments

Yes he so deserves an apology! Without a doubt! That’s the least they can do!

Posted by: Wendy | July 21, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

An apology is not nearly enough.

Posted by: Roger | July 22, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

No, the police were just doing their job. There is no need to apologize for that.

Posted by: George | July 22, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Yes, he certainly does deserve an apology and more! That’s his home.

Posted by: C. P, | July 22, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Heck no! He did not obey a lawful order of a Police Officer to produce ID. WHat makes him thiunk he is so special? There is a report of two black men breaking into a house. The PD responds and what do they see? A black man in the house. SHould they have walked away? Just another example of those race hustlers like Jackson and Sharfton.

Posted by: mark | July 22, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Yes, absolutely, he deserves an apology.

Posted by: MB | July 22, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

yes Gates deserves an apology and the officer(s) should be reprimanded!!

Posted by: tiffany | July 22, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

NO! He should be thanking the officer for asking for his ID. I would much rather have someone make sure the home was actually mine than allow someone to break in and say it was their home!

Posted by: Shay | July 22, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

No apology needed.

Posted by: CliF | July 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Of course Professor Gates deserves an apology. In fact, he shouldn’t even have to ask for one. And this officer’s job should be on the chopping block.

Posted by: val | July 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I believe Gates defiantly deserves an apology.

Posted by: Tiffa | July 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Yes he deserves an apology.

Posted by: Chrissy | July 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Does he deserve an apology? What’s to discuss? Only in the U.S. would the question even be posed – that a man who was wrongly arrested at his home and manhandled by the police- does that man deserve an apology? Is anyone as tired of this as I am? The officers should have apologized that night. Their captain should have relayed personally his(her) apology for her officers’ actions. What’s to discuss?

Posted by: Hope | July 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Of course. I can understand being suspicious based on the call that came into their command center. But it makes no sense to me why they would arrest the man after clearly establishing his identity and that they were standing in front of his residency.
He definitely deserves an apology. And the leadership of Cambridge needs to take responsibility for the flaws within their procedures and indicate what will be done to update their procedures so that they treat all people in a fair manner before running them into the squad car (remember innocent until proven guilty and probable cause?).

Posted by: Linwood | July 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

It’s very sad that this sort of thing still happens every day. Yes, he deserves an apology – if he and his driver had been white, this wouldn’t have happened the way it did.

Posted by: Sheila | July 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

No, he should apologize for giving the police officer a hard time. First of all, if I’m passing by a house and see someone trying to get in through a window or seemingly breaking in, I’m calling the police, no matter what they look like. And the police officer simply asked for his identification to verify who he is and that he does in fact live there. That’s standard procedure, and there was no reason to became irate over that. Is the police officer just supposed to take the word of someone breaking into a house saying that they live there? Of course not. That’s ridiculous. The police responded to a reported disturbance, and simply asked for ID. Nothing wrong with that. Unless of course the news isn’t reporting all the facts, which may well be the case, but by the information given, there was no wrong done.

Posted by: Chris U. | July 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

No apology. Regardless of color or number of degrees obtained no one should disrespect/disobey the law and its representatives.

Posted by: Pete | July 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Hell yes he deserve and apology this horrible incident sames to be the norm for so many african american males and hispanic males. A 5ft8 inch black middle age man with a cain who live in the area for a while now and a fellow name call cops this smacks of racism

Posted by: Sidney Albury | July 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

from what i’ve read and heard about the case , he’s the one that owes the police a big apology and very lucky that the charges were dropped ! i think most of us know ‘exactly’ what happened ………..

Posted by: bob | July 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

If I was trying to break into my own home and a police office came by, I would expect him to ask for my id. It doesn’t matter that i am white or what color he or she was for that matter. The whole thing could have been taken care of with an id. I don’t think he deserves an apology – he should be gald the police actually asked – weren’t they protecting his home?

Posted by: tracy | July 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Absolutely, he deserves an apology and these cops need to be disciplined. This incident is outrageous! There is no doubt that this was a case of racial profiling; had he been white I don’t think someone would have called to report him, nor do I think the cops would have treated him with such suspicion. I don’t blame Gates for being incensed.

Posted by: Janet | July 22, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

NO WAY does he deserve an apology! That policeman was doing his job and Gates should be GRATEFUL that someone was “watching out for a neighbor” to report a break in!! WHAT if it really was a burglar?
It doesn’t matter whether Gates or the officer were black, white, red or green. Asking for identity to ensure one IS who he says he is, is done EVERYWHERE, for numerous reasons…. check cashing, check writing, license branch, etc.
This guy needs to get a clue and get over himself!

Posted by: coffeelover | July 22, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Yes, he does deserve an apology…When Prof. Gates showed the officer his ID with the address of the house on it that should of been enough..Gates not only showed one, but two ID’s with the address. Those made up charges about him acting disorderly, which validated his arrest I don’t buy. Boston Police officer please give Prof. Gates the apology he so rightly deserves!!!!

Posted by: Warren | July 22, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

No apology needed, because the police were doing their job asking for verification that the man lived at the house.

Posted by: George Davis | July 22, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

If the officer had seen a white person who appeared to be breaking into the home in question, should he have driven away? Give me a break.

Posted by: Brian | July 22, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Yes and No. If the police officer continued with the arrest, all the while recognizing Dr. Gates owned this house, the officer is a fault.
However, if Dr. Gates humiliated the white officer in place of calmly showing his credentials, the answer is not black or white.
Personal responsibility is the issue here. Both men stand accountable for the behavior.

Posted by: James Sheldon | July 22, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

From what I understand, Professor Gates chose not to provide the officer with the requested identification. The officers wer responding to a possible B&E as reported by a passerby. This incident could easily have been avoided by Professor Gates providing the ID. In my opinion, he should be apologizing to his community for wasting taxpayer dollars by causing this incident to escalate.

Posted by: Mary | July 22, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Professor Gates absolutely deserves an apology. Presenting his identication should have been enough.

Posted by: Betty Terry-Lundy, Ph.D. | July 22, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

He absolutely deserves and apology, however, with the limited information provided, we don’t know at what point he became “belligerent.”
And Dan, people of all different backgrounds obtain jobs at Harvard because of their qualifications, not just because of their skin color. I think you should apologize for such an ignorant statement.

Posted by: Deana | July 22, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Black, white or what ever, there was a report of a break in. The cop was just doing his job by asking for ID from someone that he didn’t recognise.

Posted by: me | July 22, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

A certain human race needs to quit playing the VICTIM ROLE and realize what is standard procedure and quit being little babies

Posted by: Dan | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

No, I don’t believe he deserves an apology. Actually, he probably needs to apologize to the officers. He should have been thankful that police showed up to protect his home, but instead, he was belligerent and obnoxious to them. As an academician, he should have been smart enough to understand that the police needed to do their job by being certain to identify Gates before they dropped their suspicions. Gates should have cooperated with a professional demeanor; but chose the low road.

Posted by: jblue | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Absolutely!! after producing his Identification for the officer, Prof Gates continued to be harrassed by the officer who refused to give his name or badge number. When Prof Gates insisted on receiving the information and rightly accused the officer of racial discrimination the officer then arrested him without just cause.

Posted by: Kim G. | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

YES, he deserves an apology and more. This is an outrage. I understand mistakes like calling the police when believing a break-in is taking place can occur but an arrest should never have been made. The police should have never handcuffed him. They describe him as being belligerent. He was in HIS own home and was being questioned about breaking into his own home. Anyone would be upset if that happened. Once he provided proof of identity it should have been the end of it. I feel more people should be speaking on his behalf such as Al Sharpton and Jessee Jackson.

Posted by: Claudia | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

The only apology that should be rendered is Gates apology to the police officer.
If a white man was standing at the door, the police would have asked for his identification, as well.
The true rasist in this story is the pompous professor.

Posted by: Pauline | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Why did Mr. Gates refuse to show his identification? If the cop on beat beat had a doubt that would have
been a “red flag”. Not a “black flag”.
flag” Mr.Gates ask for. The cop
should get the apology!

Posted by: Pat Shannon | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I think tempers flared on both sides. They should meet and shake hands.

Posted by: Mary Ellen | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Dr. Gates certainly deserve an apology. Has this ever happen to a white professor at Harvard? In the answer lies the truth. The cop could have easily checked the information and apologized. He would have been thanked and the matter would have been closed. There was no need to arrest Dr. Gates. Now the city will have to pay the price.

Posted by: Wilson | July 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

No, he does not. If the police followed procedures they were just doing their job. He simply asked the man for his identification. The real racial profiling in this story is assuming the police would have done anything different if he had been white or that the passerby, trying to be a good citizen, would have ignored this if he thought two white men were trying to break into a home.

Posted by: Tim | July 22, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

No apology needed. If there was a real break-in and the police DIDN”T ask for an ID and walked away, it would still be racial as far as the homeowner would be concerned, “A black person’s home doesn’t deserve to be protected” or some such nonsense. It’s unfortunate that some don’t want “equal” treament, they want “special” treatment.

Posted by: Gale | July 22, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Had a black officer come to the residence would this even be a story? Is this a case of racial profiling or reverse discrimination? Blacks have more rights than any other race in America yet SOME continue to complain and “demand” apologies. It’s not your skin color-it’s your attitude. Police officers were doing their jobs. Be thankful-they were attempting to protect your residence.

Posted by: Chuck | July 22, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes, he does deserve an apology. After he presented his drivers license and his Harvard facility identification,that should have been sufficient evidence for the police officer, not to mention his explanation to the officer of why someone may have thought two black men where breaking into a residence. What other evidence does the police need to see?

Posted by: Samuel | July 22, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Let’s see…two men were trying to break in because he didn’t have his key, then he refused to produce ID w/his name and address when asked. What if someone were actually trying to break in and the police did nothing? Would he cry prejudice then as well because the police did not give a black man’s house the same protection as a white man? Of course an apology needs to be made…from him to the officers who were doing their job!!

Posted by: Molly | July 22, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes, he deserves an apology. If he showed the police officer his ID, that should have been the end of the incident. A white man wouldn’t have been treated like this.

Posted by: Willie Rainer | July 22, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

I don’t think he deserves an apology. This is how it looked from the outside:
“someone is breaking into the neighbor’s house.”
Admittedly, he was breaking into the house, so why is it that he got all bent out of shape? Was he expecting to be instantly recognized because he is on TV? Why is he walking around with the racial chip on his shoulder.
The only thing he needed to do was to show his ID and the address printed would prove that he lived there.
What I hear in all this situation is more in line with “What, don’t you know who I am?” Rather than “this is my house, here is my ID that proves that I live here and if you give me a moment, I have more documentation inside that will prove beyond any doubt that this house is mine.”
Why did he feel like he needed to use the race card? What chip does he have on his shoulder about race? Hello! His neighbor called because his house was being broken into!

Posted by: Lindoro Almaviva | July 22, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Gates definitely deserves an apology! When a person makes an “honest” mistake the offender normally shows his or her regret and sorrow by simply apologizing. If Gates’ arrest is truly an “honest” mistake an apology is definitely just due.

Posted by: Andrew | July 22, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

No, why didn’t Prof. Gates just show his ID? I’ve been stopped leaving work after second shift when I worked overtime a bit. I never got an apology, just an OK – move along! (I’m white)

Posted by: Dave | July 22, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Indeed he does deserve an apology. No matter what accomplishments African Americans achieve; the color of our skin will always be the barometer for the poor treatment, harassment we receive from our communities, we visit, live in, support, nurture. -

Posted by: Cassandra | July 22, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

NO! Absolutely not!!!! When the police are told that two black men are breaking into a house, that is probably all they know at that time. The cops show up, find two black men at the house. They ARE REQUIRED to further investigate. How do they investigate? They start by asking for I.D. This “victim” is telling the police to leave him alone and it’s his house, right? Well show your ID, let the cops verify that he lives there, and guess what? EVERYBODY GETS TO GO HOME! Don’t argue with police who are simply trying to protect the public’s property. It turned out that everything in this case was legit and this guy lived here, nobody, even the police are mindreaders.

Posted by: B. A. | July 22, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Mr. Gates deserves an apology because he was home. The police had to answer the call, but the next action required a higher level of responsibility for them and Mr. Gates. If this had been a two white men the police would not have been called. We can only wonder what would have happened had it been a night call. No one expects to be going into their house with the police coming to check their id.

Posted by: Gigi Edwards Bryant | July 22, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Clearly there were two sides to this story. Is it possible the officer was just trying to do his job? I think there is a distinct possibility Mr Gates was uncooperative and disrespectful. Perhaps Mr. Gates should apologize.

Posted by: Ted Lind | July 22, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Why would the police render an apology, for doing their job? If the esteemed scholar would have remained rational and simply produced identification, instead of getting bent out of shape, it likely would have been a non-issue.

Posted by: Ken M | July 22, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Did Gates have the keys to his apartment? Did the ID have the address of the home the police came to see about? If so, maybe that was a good sign. If ID was given, things could have been handled at the apartment, instead of the county jail.

Posted by: brian | July 22, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

NO!! Gates should NOT get an Apology!! Who does he think he is??? If he were white <he would be in Jail!!!! Gates is ARROGANT!!!!

Posted by: Nancydoris1 | July 22, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

How are the cops to know it’s this guy’s house unless he proves it by showing ID? He brought this on himself. If you’re caught breaking into a house, whether it be yours or somebody else’s, you presumably invite questions. The prudent thing to do, which might be beyond the comprehensibility of a Harvard professor, would be inform the police of the problem, not argue that because you are black you’re a victim of racial profiling.

Posted by: warren | July 22, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

No apology necessary. The police were responding to a REPORTED break-in. The person or persons who reported the call saw two people forcefully entering a home and called the police as they should have done.

Posted by: Shea Lynn | July 22, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

It’s 2009, this is too familiar, why shouldn’t Brother Gates get an apology?

Posted by: Thomas White | July 22, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

If Gates had just shown his ID like asked there wouldn’t be a problem. The police were responding to a break in and were doing their job

Posted by: Gordon Young | July 22, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Yes he deserves an apology. However, consider this a fortunate ending to what could have turned into a headline: “Police investigate shooting of burglar, homeowner dead” or “Police shooting justified”

Posted by: Thomas | July 22, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Gates does not deserve an apology. The police were just doing there job. This is just another case of a black person crying race and an officer doing his job. Too often people like this cry race and we are distracted from where the real racism exsists.

Posted by: Dave K | July 22, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

No apology is necessary if Gates did not identify himself when asked. He should thank the officers for checking on the house. In some cases police are not available for that as they are busy at investigation of a car accident; no injuries: move off the road: exchange name and Insurance and get out of the way of others.

Posted by: Tim1 | July 22, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

A genuine apology is deinitely in order. Dr. Gates was in his own home. The correct response for the policeman in question was to immediqtely apologize and get out of the house once identity was established! There are so many power tripping, ego-driven individuals in police uniforms today and these individuals have forgotten (if they ever knew) that one commands respect by one’s actions

Posted by: Jane Powell | July 22, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Yes an apology is in order. A professional person the age of Professor Gates, possibly walking with a cane, would not break into a house because if he is seen, he could not run fast enough to escape. Why is a black person always suspect? Even entering his own home. I believe Professor Gates version. Showing his ID should have been sufficient. He deserved respect.

Posted by: Bonnie Stevenson | July 22, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I would say that an apology should be given regarding the misunderstanding of why he was breaking in to his home. Had ID been produced when asked, I believe the rest of the story could have been avoided.

Posted by: Xandy | July 22, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Henry Louis Gates Jr. Charges were dropped, but do not think white or black or any other person should get an apology. The officer was doing his job and training. Asking for I.D. is something done every day on any call big or small. Being irate etc.. doen’t help cause. would you rather have your home broken into while everyone watches and does nothing or call police for just in case moment we may need because someone was watching.

Posted by: Wanda | July 22, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Yes, most definitely, he was on his own property trying to open his own gate. Not only should the police have used more discretion from the beginning, but they now must apologize for their unprofessional behavior. Fortunately no one was physically hurt, but there was that escalating possibility.
The alleged disrespect by Dr. Gates may well have been provoked and, regardless, cannot justify the earlier police transgressions. How many of you would tolerate police insinuations about your activities on your own property?

Posted by: Michael | July 22, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

The police officers involved did the job they are sworn to do. They are not soothsayers. To confirm Gates was the homeowner, all he had to do was produce I.D. He chose, to his discredit,to resist and obstruct the police and deserved to be arrested. Those who cowardly opted to drop charges because of the loud mouth tactics of an intellectual elitist should be ashamed of themselves.

Posted by: willow | July 22, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

He absolutely should receive an apology. It is very sad he did not get one immediately. The definition of “disorderly conduct” does not include requesting the ID (name and badge number) of someone *in your house* who has just requested and received your ID *in your house* — even if your request is animated by frustration and jet lag from just returning from an overseas trip to find your door stuck and then being confronted by police officers after you finally manage to get in. I think it would be disordered behavior to display a calm demeanor after such a sequence of events. Anyway, doesn’t “disorderly conduct” require a likeliness to disturb or offend the public — it seems to me that would be possible, but extremely difficult to accomplish *in your own house* and from the description of the events in this case, even the description of events from the perspective of the police, extremely unlikely any public disturbance would result.

Posted by: lenaznap | July 22, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Does martin bashir have an alternate version of this story? Gates presented not one, but TWO forms of ID to the police, his Harvard ID and his Massachusetts driver’s license. But the police agenda was clear. This “negro” was going to pay for being in this “fancy house.” After all – how Dare he! Just imagine somebody like him living there… The rest is history. Read Gates account here. http://www.theroot.com/views/skip-gates-speaks?page=0,1 Does Bashir research his content before airing?
An apology from the police gang – you’ve got to be kidding. Those creeps and the city need to be sued for at least fifty million dollars.
Gates himself is not my favorite character. But it could not happen to a “nicer” guy. It takes that type of “wake up” call for people like him to really be vocal. Gates was lucky that he was in “that neighborhood” and have that type of ID that Bashir so interestingly seems unaware of. A lesser personage, in the “ghetto” or somewhere less consequential – the cops would have shot him dead.
Bashir: get a new job.

Posted by: MakeItPlain | July 22, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

As to what went on inside the house, it will be a case of “he said – he said”.
I am VERY interested in hearing from the 911 caller. Does she live in the neighborhood? Does an elderly black man with a cane and luggage normally seem suspicious to her? Answer the phone!

Posted by: Andy N | July 22, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Yes and this is only a relection of our society. The prejudice against African American men is still prevalent.

Posted by: AJ | July 22, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

No, they should not apologize, the man should apologize for not showing ID. Police get into trouble too easy for doing their jobs.

Posted by: Brad | July 22, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

I have heard that if you do not have anything to hide you do not get upset when you are ask a question.

Posted by: CURTIS | July 22, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Yes, absolutely does that man deserves an apology and then some…he identified himself as a harvard professor, but yet was still handcuffed in his own house…and like most others said,if this would have happened to a white man, he would not have been arrested.

Posted by: perola | July 22, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

He teaches African AMerican Studies and is obsessed over the black man’s struggle and thus has tunnel vision assuming ALL police officers racially profile it is sad someone who is suppose to be a scholar is so IGNORANT!!

Posted by: Dan | July 22, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

No I don’t think he deserves an apology.
The police were doing their job by
requesting an ID. He always appears to
think he is superior because he has a
Harvard degree and is black. In fact
he seemed to be put out when he found
out he had ancestors who were from europe on a show he hosted once about where black celebreties ancestors were
from.
black celebreties ancestors were from.

Posted by: marsha | July 22, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Enough! I think the best thing for police to do at this time, is to stop answering these ludicrous calls about suspicious people breaking into a home.
Shame on that professor’s neighbor for calling the police in the first place.
The police should give any alleged suspect who happens to be black and automatic pass. do not stop them for any reason any where.
If the call happens to be a real call oh well, too bad for the victim in that particular case, because it is surely better to not offend anyone.
Or maybe it is time to block all white males from becoming police at all. bar them based on their race. then this will never happen because surely black officers never stop black people based on suspicious activity.
Also why is it suspicious any way for anyone to be breaking into a home in the first place?
And why did the police not realize a block or two away that this was the owner of the home?
And why should someone breaking into a home be required to show ID in the at all? Just leave them alone if that is what they like to do then so be it!

Posted by: joe | July 22, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Why would you pose this question to the general public that, no matter the level of empathy or apathy, cannot grasp how a Black man feels being interrogated at his door. I bet that if you take a survey of the responses, the negative ones will have come from White people. They cannot understand racism, particularly profiling. Although the majority of Black men that I know are all highly educated and fully employed, there is not one of them that has not been confronted by the police at some point. In the 1990s, when pager were in fashion, my girlfriend’s husband, who is a doctor, was arrested because he looked suspicious checking his pager. Your White participants here do not have the historical background to answer your question.

Posted by: EllyBlog | July 22, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Of course Prof Henry Gates deserves an apology. While the police officers might have been within their rights to ensure the Prof was who he proclaimed himself to be, they still should have (and would have under other circumstance) apologized immediately after learning who he was, without even needing to be pressured into it. They would have done so had it been BILL Gates. I’d stake my reputation upon that fact.

Posted by: Edwyne Rouchelle | July 22, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

No Gates does not deserve an apology; he should be apologizing to the police for obstructing the police. They have a hard enough job protecting us. If two men where robbing his property, regardless of their race creed or color he would have been very happy to know the police where there. If someone had called about a possible robbery and they had not responded what would he have to say about that? He should be ashamed of himself.

Posted by: Jeannie Nelson | July 22, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am

No apology necessary. Why must everything be about the color of ones skin and not the basic facts. The officers were responding to a call of two male blacks breaking into a home. Is it incomprehensible that the officers upon arriving to the location might investigate further and upon observing a male black inside would request identification?? Perhaps Mr. Gates owes the officers an apology for criticizing them for doing the very job they were sworn to do. Had they just drove by not actually seeing someone trying to break in and someone was in fact inside burglarizing the home or worse say a home invasion, Mr. Gates would be claiming that the officers neglected to thoroughly do their job. Had he simply identified himself and not had the “it’s because I’m black complex” there would be nothing to talk about! Does/has racial profiling occur? absolutely but I’m sorry folks you’re way off here.

Posted by: Kathy | July 22, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

No he does not deserve an apology. A citizen made the report to police and the police responded as they are expected to do. Even if Gates identified himself as the owner of the property it is still the officers’ duty to verify that he is. If Gates grew incensed when a white officer responding to the call asked for his identification and his behavior was belligerent then he should have been charged. The Prosecutors dropping a disorderly conduct charge against Henry Louis Gates Jr. was in his favor and they did not have to drop the charges. If Gates feels that it was racial profiling then he should file charges against the officer and the city. If it is proved that it was not racial profiling then the court should, in its ruling, require Gates to pay court cost and attorney fees.

Posted by: Wayne | July 22, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Yes, an apology alone is not enough. How the police conducted himself is questionable and this should be investigated to prevent future situations. Why should an arrest have taken place? Indignation or belligerence is not disorderly conduct. That’s why the charge was dropped. Mr. Gates is a world class citizen and if he said it was racial profiling it was. An apology, further investigation of Mr. Gates was treated by the officer who apparently over reacted and further training should be mandated. Furthermore, why should a public servant hesitate to apologize to a law abiding citizen for their inappropriate response to what should have been a simple matter. I thought about the young black man in New York that was shot multiple times by the police going into his home. This issue is another indication of America’s continued denial of racial problems

Posted by: Pat | July 22, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Yes! Will he get one? No! I have several stories of being profiled by police. The officers were laughing 3 of the times I have been questioned. Do I expect profiling to end? Maybe reduced when society admits this a civil rights issue and our government insist on profile awareness training. Then, have manditory monitoring of officers in the field.

Posted by: Brian Hereford | July 22, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Acording to a Washington Post article, when Gates was asked by the police to come out of the house, “Instinctively I knew I was not to step outside.” He was determined that this was going to be a racial issue. The police would have followed the same procedure with a white mane in the identical circumstances. The decision to escalate was made by Mr. Gates. He deserves no appology.

Posted by: ArtemisMoon | July 22, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am

If black officers had showed up and did the same exact thing Gates would not have a single complaint that is the TRUTH that no one wants to face

Posted by: Steve | July 22, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

No way. Racial profiling? How lame! A break in was reported. Regardless of the feelings or motives of the person reporting it, the officer responded appropriately. I would hope that race had nothing to do with why the caller reported the break in. Regardless of Gates’ position in academic circles, that doesn’t mean he can’t be a jerk. He should be thankful that the police responded so promptly to a potential crime at his home.

Posted by: Elaine | July 22, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

yes, cops will think they can just harrass innocent people with no justification.

Posted by: mccoy | July 22, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am

I don’t believe dr gates should be apologized to. I also believe that he should be grateful to the officer despite any ill feelings. Additonally, I suspect that Dr. Gates would feel differently if two black men had broken into his home and burglarized it. And I wonder that if two men had burglarized his home and the police had not taken action would he be crying incompetency to the force? Or, dare I say it, racial disregard? sorry doc !

Posted by: ess rodriguez | July 22, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am

They both need to apologize. They both were wrong in this situation based on the story reported.
Food for thought: “A time to Kill”
Same situation: Now the person is a prominent white, would the cops have been called?

Posted by: Iyesha Irvin | July 22, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Good Lord…I can only pray that someone would alert the police if one or two were breaking into my house…who is the profiler ? The one who reported the incident or the police ,doing their job responding? or either? Was this a simple response of a responsible citizen witnessing a break in? Who’s to say the one who called in this apparent crime was not of a beautiful dark complection to begin with? One who witnesses crimes often regardless of race. PLease forgive me if I am wrong but It seems to me the man that feels he is wronged here may see that the police may have stopped all his worldly belongings from being in the hands of real criminals , which let us face it , we are in the midst of more often then we want to be. I feel that being a white man in America , I have never been given any special treatment in any encounter with the police ,ever. I look at other wordly events that take place and often wonder if these people were Latino, Asian, Black ….Any Race besides white.. would this same flag be raised?… PLease take for example the news I read today about the under cover officer , Today, who followed a white male,his eratic driving, Got into a fist fight/wrestle with, and then shot four shots killing the 24 year old minnesota man, in what appears to be an unarmed man . Read the story and you will find the officer never identified himself as an officer untill after the shots were fired. I have read the excerps of the sympothy some feel Mr.Graves deserves and I wonder…. Does he deserve it? Let us understand Criminals come in all profiles, Those with white hair and a cane to those with youth and a ciggarette hanging out of their mouth , regardless of race. I was harrased ,by the authorities,in my home town as a young white male. I for one have accepted all races in America and I think I speak for a Huge majority……I think Mr.Graves is upset as one would be entering their own home and being stopped. Mr.Graves did you over exagerate at all ? Flying off the handle before the whole thing could be resolved?,,,I honestly don’t think I would have been treated ANY different under the circumstances that I have read

Posted by: David | July 22, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am

No ?, he does deserve an apology, at the very least!

Posted by: P. Wilson | July 22, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

no he does not deserve an apology because he over reacted with the officer. You would have thought that Gates would have had enough sense to just call a damn locksmith and none of this would have happened.

Posted by: dan | July 22, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

No apology, it has nothing to do with being black. We set our medical alarm off by accident and when the police and firemen came they ask for my ID and then ask to see my wife to make sure she was alright. What if in this case they left and in fact the house was being robbed what would they need to do then, pay restitution.

Posted by: CC | July 22, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Tough question, but I have to say no. If he was trying to break into his house, then he should understand and produce an ID. Once they realized that it was his home, they should have let him go, no matter how belligerent the police said he was. I know I would be furious.

Posted by: pat | July 22, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am

no but hell no

Posted by: charlie | July 22, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

I was quite angered but not surprised that this occurred with Mr. Gates. People who take their jobs as a positon of power rahter than that of a posiion of responsibility approach things differently. I stronly suspect that the officer choose the former, had he choosen the latter we would not be hearing about this incident. After finding that Mr. Gates lived in the home, he should have apologized and gone on with his work. To “save-face” he choose to flex his muscle and arrest Mr.Gates. To those “Holier-than thou” people who feel that the officer was correct, maybe they should walk in Mr. Gates’ shoes to see how bias people can be. AFTER ALL, WHO IS HE TO OWN A HOME IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD? YES, THE OFFICER (DEPT.)SHOULD APOLOGIZE!

Posted by: Charles Frazier Sr. | July 22, 2009, 1:55 am 1:55 am

yes , he deserves a personal apology from the police office who wasn’t listening when Gates told him he was on his own house. But on the same page, the office responded promptly to the call and he thought he was doing his job, therefore, he should not be reprimanded. The apology he ows to Mr.Gates is caused by the obnoxious attitude the officer showed when confronted with the fact that there was not emergency and no reason to worry.

Posted by: leo | July 22, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am

people seem to be saying he was a upstanding citizen because he worked at harvard. probably the whole situation could have been avoided by remaining calm and producing an id. which if he didn’t have it, still remain calm and verify that he lived there. nothing is
achieved by acting irrational when someone has the power and authority over you. the police are not wrong or the enemy all the time. no need for race baiters here.

Posted by: clifford rollinson | July 22, 2009, 2:27 am 2:27 am

@ Bob – What do you mean, ‘most of us know ‘exactly’ what happened?’ Most of us weren’t there! There is a saying about the three different sides, pal… That comment right there is the reason that this question was silly to ask anyway!
Does he deserve an apology? Who knows, because we WERE NOT there (let’s hold a trial and find out; show the video footage! Oh never mind… I forgot about Rodney King, hmmm.). However, there ARE regular ol’ citizens (without much clout or money nor have they done anything to warrant police harrassment) who have received worse treatment Gates and they never get an apology.
But these ol’ citizens live in racially profiled neighborhoods, not in upscale Cambridge where these good ol’ educated folks would NEVER profile anyone racially… I mean, how nice of the lady to call about two black men ‘breaking in’. Now, I am sure there are not tons of blacks living in that area, surely she knew the one that lived in a 5 mile radius from her house. Would she have called if it were two other ethnicity males breaking in? This may be a ‘what would you do moment’. Just saying…
In other news, the education system is buckling under itself anyway. Students at the K-12 level and higher education at CSU school systems deserve apologies. Can we get a demand for that?

Posted by: College Student | July 22, 2009, 2:29 am 2:29 am

He absolutely deserves an apology.

Posted by: JRM | July 22, 2009, 2:52 am 2:52 am

NO. Gates could have descalated this entire situation by simply complying with the request to produce ID to the officer. Instead he chose the route of belligerent demeaning behavior towards the officer. He immediately chose to be a victimized black man instead of a respectful citizen who recognizes an officer protecting him and his community.

Posted by: Jim | July 22, 2009, 3:13 am 3:13 am

He certainly deserves an apology. I’d want one if an officer did that to me and i’m white.

Posted by: Eliot | July 22, 2009, 3:14 am 3:14 am

What? It looks like he is breaking in a house and cannot present any identification at the time. What should the police do? Would he still scream racism if the cop were black? Look at the past, Gates has use the race card in the past. Please, give me a break. Next time, stay calm and don’t scream. Open the door and show some identification. Stop being a victocrate!

Posted by: Jean | July 22, 2009, 3:16 am 3:16 am

I’m a gay man. The next time any cop asks me anything at all I will scream and rant that I’m being singled out because I’m gay, even though the cop is trying to protect my home. Maybe it will get me my 15 minutes of fame that I’ve been looking for.

Posted by: Pat | July 22, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

For an unexplained reason, the police seem to be in that group who can do no wrong. Why would any normal person wish to walk around with a gun and the ability to antagonize those they are supposed to protect.
A few years ago I meta policeman in Seattle who was gushing with pride and happiness over the latest police kill – an insane man who was wielding a machete. He asked if I had seen the coverage of the take-down. I asked why didn’t the police use a net or taser instead of shooting to kill an obviously mentally ill man. He replied, ‘the captain has not bought these for us yet, we only have guns’. Wow, talk about not showing appreciation or value for life. We are doomed unless we understand that bullying people and carrying guns does not improve society.
yes, the policeman should apologize and he should be fined.
I am tried of hearing about brutality and sadistic behavior by policemen. They are out of control. We need to think about what we are doing when we give policemen the right to shoot,arrest,and make any accusation they wish about citizens. One girl I knew in Texas had her front tooth chipped when a black policewoman manhandled her and caused her to fall to the group while handcuffed. She had been arrested for outstanding tickets not paid. When she fell, her arms could not protect her and she was unable to get dental help since she was a student. This kind of behavior is wrong. Surely everyone agrees with me?
thank you.

Posted by: Amy brown | July 22, 2009, 3:18 am 3:18 am

People really need to know the facts of the situation and circumstances before assuming this man didn’t present his state and university identification, which wasn’t enough for the officer. Yes, he deserves an apology and vendication by speaking to the public about his experience. Some people still don’t get it…can you say in need of Diversity training, let’s begin with that degree.

Posted by: Danielle | July 22, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Yes, of course Mr. Gates deserves an
apology, and the local police department
needs a crash course about becoming sensitized to the problem of racial profiling! By the way, didn’t Mr. Gates’ neighbors recognize him?

Posted by: Samantha | July 22, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am

NO! An apology undermines law enforcement.It rewards people who think they don’t have to abide by reasonable rules. An apology feeds Gate’s claim that the policeman was racist. Gates, a professor, needs to apologize to Harvard for acting worse than one of his students.

Posted by: Ken | July 22, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am

And once it was ascertained that Professor Gates was indeed in his own home, why did they arrest him instead of apologizing for the mistake? They wanted to assert their racist blue collar power and humiliate this man of good breeding and high standing. This has got to stop. America is rife with problems, teering on the verge of a whole scale depression while so-called third world countries are thriving and leading the world economy and we still are dealing with this divisive, racist,BS. We don’t have much time to get it together!

Posted by: Fahizah Alim | July 22, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

No. The police were just doing their job. Gates should be glad they were looking out for the interest of his home. The break-in could have been real. For Gates to try and make a racial issue out of it is absurd. It implies that Gates is a racist himself. Leave the police alone to do their job and protect us citizens, Gates. They do not have time to waste on Gates outrageous claims. Gates should be ashamed of himself and should apologize to the police. He should then thank them for looking out for his interest.

Posted by: Proud Native American and Independent Voter | July 22, 2009, 3:37 am 3:37 am

Several questions to ponder:
If the responding officer had been black would Gates have accused that officer of racial profiling?
Would Gates have worked himself up into such a frenzy instead of issuing a sincere ‘thank you’ over a simple request for identification had the officer not been white?
Who, instead then, is the racist in this circumstance? A sergeant of police doing his job who happens to be white? Or a black scholar, a sanctioned racist by trade, who projects his own racist views and insecurities upon others and then assumes them for fact?
The answers to these questions would suggest that Gates should be the one apologizing for his ‘regrettable’ actions — not the police.

Posted by: C Cox | July 22, 2009, 3:45 am 3:45 am

Why didn’t this guy do like any law abiding citizen would have done? Simply show his identification to prove he was in fact the home owner. The man sounds like a typical angry black man and shows he is the one that is racist, not the white police officer. This claim of race profiling is getting mighty old.
Next time his house might really get burlarized by a couple of black men, then who is going to call the police? Not me.

Posted by: Tom | July 22, 2009, 3:45 am 3:45 am

No. The police were called they came.They asked for I.D. instead it appears they were asked for theirs.Had the police not awnsered the 911 call they probably would have also been blamed because the house was occupied by a black,,The Police were trapped either way.I have been asked for my ID several times i cooperated.

Posted by: Norm | July 22, 2009, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Yes Prof. Gates deserves a BIG apology and the white officer needs a “history lesson”. The officer should be familar with the residents on his beat. I know Prof. Gates and I live in California. Without a formal reprimand this officer will next arrest the President when he appears in the area of the officer’s beat to purchase burgers and pizza. I don’t believe Prof. Gates was belligerent. The officer realized his mistake and elected to allege “belligerent conduct” to cover up his stupidity and ignorance.

Posted by: GWB | July 22, 2009, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Prof. Gates should be thanking his lucky stars that there are cops around trying to protect HIS house. No doubt if he’d locked himself out he’d be understandably testy. But harassment? It is sad that even with so much accomplishment under our belt we have to grasp at any pretext to reinforce our belief in our victimhood. Or did we just lash out from embarrassment? Either way, if he had a shred of decency he would be apologizing to the officers.

Posted by: Larry | July 22, 2009, 4:25 am 4:25 am

They both need to apologize to each other. I’m black and I feel that both were in the wrong, even though Dr. Gates is at home he has to to be mindful of the situation he goes around preaching about black folks needs to this that and the other, now instead acting live the dignified public servant he is he brought himself to a level that cause certain white people react as if he was some young hoodlum, he certainly knows better after watching some of PBS specials I never thought that Dr. Gates would be race baiter, the problem with officer he needs more culture and realize that all black folks arent criminals and you have got to make yourself get more information to make better decision. Cause you could lose your job and start a cycle problems with one mistake
Both need to apologize and move on.

Posted by: Qt of Chattanooga | July 22, 2009, 4:49 am 4:49 am

A apology is not enough, this ia a prime example of racial profiling and our society is numb to this behaviors of police officers. This is really sad and bad for police officers who are their to truly protect and serve the community. We need to find a way to get the bad apples out of this bunch.

Posted by: Gloria J. | July 22, 2009, 4:55 am 4:55 am

apologize for what???? doing their job? what do you expect police officers to do when they are investigating anything..they ask for ID to verify who you say you are.. or would you like them to take your word for it???? jeeeshhh get a brain people

Posted by: jim | July 22, 2009, 5:04 am 5:04 am

I think it’s sad that in 2009, someone called the cops on a middle-aged black man (let’s disregard the fact he’s a well-known Harvard professor), trying to gain access to his own home – IN BROAD DAYLIGHT. Didn’t his neighbors know who lived there? Did they honestly think someone would be trying to break into the house in the middle of the day, in plain sight? Would it have made a difference if it had been a well-dressed white man instead of a well-dressed black man? Consider this. I’m a well-dressed black man, and I can recall an incident where I was on my way back to my car in a parking lot after giving a presentation, dressed in a suit and tie, dress coat, with a brief case on one shoulder and a laptop computer on the other, when I was approached by two white men, one of whom offered me his keys to park his car. Now, do you think THAT would have happened to a well-dressed white man? YES, he most certainly DOES deserve an apology!

Posted by: Jasper | July 22, 2009, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) when arriving at the scene of a call-in of “suspicious activity” of two men appearing to be forcing their way into a house: Ask for ID, verify wants or warrants of person on ID. Witnessed by others, including Harvard Police department – Gates was being disorderly when the police officer was doing his job. No apology, tell Al and Jesse to stay home and inform Professor Gates to abide by the ethics as an employee of Harvard: Conduct yourself in a prefessional manner as to NOT bring discredit upon yourself of Harvard.

Posted by: Lee | July 22, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am

I think Mr Gates owes the Police Officer an apology. Mr Gates needs to accept his roll in what happened, the Officer was only doing his job.

Posted by: Cat | July 22, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Knowing that he did,in fact, force his front door open, I cannot understand why the professor did not thank the officer who came to his door trying to determine that there had been no unlawful break-in. I don’t care if the person who appears to be breaking into my home is black, white or purple–I hope if anyone sees anything suspicious, they call the police and the matter is investigated. So, no, NO APOLOGY!

Posted by: SV | July 22, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

I sincerely hope that if any of my neighbors sees me or anyone else apparently breaking into my home they call the police and when they get there they ask for an ID. I promise not to be offended.
What an elitest. Are all Harvard professors that full of themselves?

Posted by: George | July 22, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Oh, yes, he deserves an apology, and the officer needs to be reprimanded and have this put in his permanent record. I’ve seen/know too many cops who have the attitude that any “disrespect” by a citizen deserves punishment. The cop was wrong and should have backed off once the ID was produced. End of story.

Posted by: Maple Fan | July 22, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

An appology? Now, absolutely not. Maybe the officer should have went about the situation differently, but the police officer did his job. He (Gates) failed to present Identification. Witness calls seeing what they thought was B&E. Witness stated hearing GATES yelling at the officer. After Gates comments about racially profiling and stating as quoted by the Boston Herald “The only black people who truly live in a post-racial world in America all live in a very nice house on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue”. Sorry. This is pathetic. My own point of view. I’m a very religious person, the past history in America regarding civil rights towards African Americans was beyond outrageous, it was disgusting. All people are equal regardless of color of skin, and in no way do I ever judge someone especially based on Appearance. I can understand Gates’ fury, but the way he is acting, doesn’t seem to fit his “harvard professor” character. I believe there are many individuals black white purple etc. who are racist, without a doubt that exists. But his comments and to be saying a cop “racially profiled” him and he the comments about how all black people are still “suffering” due to racism. I agree that this racism towards ALL people occurs, but I do not agree this officer did such a thing. His job is to protect, and serve. Witness seeing a possible breaking and entering, the officer’s duty is to respond. Sorry it is time to stop jumping to conclusions and using race as a cop-out. Year is 2009 … I don’t buy this racial stuff. Making comments like he has, Fuels the fire for individuals to become enraged. And think about it…apparently a cop is out of line for asking “SKIP GATES” for his ID in his own home so a 911 call could be resolved, this apparently means a cops racist. Pathetic.
Maybe if Mr. Gates was being a bit more professional about it and not calling for such a huge scandal, I could see an apology.
Officer Crowley, You did your job and in NO way do you owe anyone an apology .

Posted by: dj | July 22, 2009, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Gates should apologize to the officer. One thing I have learned in the last few days, we are indeed a racist country. Gates and his defenders can’t see what they have become, the people they claim to despise.

Posted by: Elmo | July 22, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Well from now on since Mr. Gates thinks good police work is racially motivated, the police in his town or district can just ignore his residence and property. That way if for some reason, some crooks do try to break in, there will be NO racial remarks from Mr. Gates. After all, protecting Mr. Gates’ property just wasn’t important to him, only the chance to try to make a racial incident where none existed.

Posted by: Jean | July 22, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

If the black officer shown in the picture asked for the id, then no as he was just trying to protect the guy’s house. If the officer was white, then yes as he is clearly racist,

Posted by: Pablo | July 22, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

He is the one to apologize. He was biligerent and unruly. He would be more vocal if someone really did break into his house and the police were not there. The police were doing their job.

Posted by: Tom V | July 22, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

If cops came to a person’s house because they thought someone was breaking in, I think most people would invite them in for coffee. There HAS to be something else going on here.

Posted by: Arnold | July 22, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

maybe BOTH should apologize. Prima donna professor and cop. Battle of the century.

Posted by: Paul | July 22, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

If he reacted with indignation upon initial contact with the police, then, no, he does not deserve an apology. I suspect he would have been incensed if the police had NOT responded to a report that two men were attempting to force entry into his home if those men were not he and his driver.
He likely received the same treatment any other person – white/black/purple – would have received under the same circumstances in the same neighborhood, for which I would have been grateful if I lived there.

Posted by: Michelle | July 22, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Gates asked for the cops ID (name and badge number) information and the cop refused to give it to Gates. The cop was was mad that he was asked this kind of information by a intelligent black man, this is what motivated the arrest. These cops protect each other at every cost. Very seldom are they caught even when the camera is rolling. The camera should be rolling in all incidents so the truth can be told by the unedited camera recordings.

Posted by: Claude | July 22, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

The stories coming out give different versions of what happened. It is the details that matter. If Mr. Gates produced his identification but asked for the Officer’s in return and was refused, the Officer owes Gates an apology. I feel that an Officer who is hesitant to provide identifying information is also unsure that what he or she is doing is lawful or they are just being spiteful. It appears that the Officer was invited into the home by Gates, so that lends some credibility to Gates’ story that he did provide identification. I would be short tempered too if I came home from China…long trip…got locked out of my house and then someone called the cops on me. I don’t know what it is like for law enforcement in that area, but it probably doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out Gates was not in the middle of a robbery. Arresting Gates after he produced I.D., probably because he said something like…”you don’t know who you’re messing with” is an abuse of power and an embarrassment to everyone involved, including Gates. I think it is necessary to have a really thick skin in a stressful job like law enforcement, for which the community rarely rewards or thanks you for your efforts. Getting verbally abused is no one’s idea of fun, but attempting to deescalate the conflict by the Officer providing I.D. would probably have gone a long way in resolving Mr. Gates anger.

Posted by: holly | July 22, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

yes he does deserve one. in fact he deserves more than that for compensation!!!!!! on top of that he has a cane how much damage are you gonna do with a cane? his neighbors knew who he was. I believe it is an out rage and yes racist!!!!! they should do something better with their time like secure this country from all the immagration,illegals that are here and continue to come here.

Posted by: dd | July 22, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

No, he does not deserve an apology. He should be thanking the neighbor who called the police, and he should be thanking the police for responding to the call. The whole incident could have been diffused simply by Mr. Gates producing his ID. It’s disappointing he incited this incident by refusing to identify himself, and then used the race card to fuel the flames. Shame on you, Mr. Gates.

Posted by: Paula | July 22, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

The incident should have concluded with an apology once the police arrived and viewed Gates’ proof of residence. The fact that this misunderstanding ended up with an arrest is enough to warrant, at the very least, an apology.
And let’s not be naive,if there had been two, middle-aged, white men trying to open that jammed door, the neighbor probably wouldn’t have bothered calling the police in the first place.

Posted by: Sylvia | July 22, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Of course he deserves an apology. When Professor Gates complied and produced his identification, the matter should have been resolved and no arrest should have occurred.
Also, because of incidents such as this one that continue to occur, there is no doubt in my mind that Affirmative Action practices must continue.
“Affirmative action practices should never end. Though the mountain has been climbed, and the people have stood on its peak, the realized dream must be constantly nourished by a society who tries to understand how it feels to walk in another’s shoes. If Affirmative Action practices are annihilated, the compassion that partners up with Affirmative Action practices withers away. Human nature reveals to us that prejudice and bigotry are a part of the human condition, therefore there remains a need for Affirmative Action in the USA.”

Posted by: Romancandle | July 22, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Yes, he definitely deserves an apology and if it was two white men they would not even have questioned him. It is racial profiling and I would have been mad too.

Posted by: Faye | July 22, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

YES!

Posted by: Chris B | July 22, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Absolutely not. Who does Professor Gates think he is that he does not need to respond to a police officer asking or even demanding proof of id. What’s the matter w/people. An officer answers a call to a home intrusion and confronts someone breaking into the home that is called about and the person breaking in will not identiy himself. He’s lucky he was not shot on the spot. Should have been. There is no respect for authority. What if Professor Gates had been an intruder. Is the officer supposed to ignore the fact that someone is breaking into a home that he was sent out to investigate a home intrusion? Where’s the common sense here.

Posted by: lollie | July 22, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Gates was already inside his house and had shown proof that the house belonged to him (his ID) but the police kept questioning him. Gates accused the police of racial profiling, while the police accused him of becoming “belligerent.” Frankly, that’s a cop out that police tend to use whenever somebody gets “uppity,” especially people of color. I think much more than an apology to Gates needs to happen.

Posted by: lisa | July 22, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I have locked myself out of my own house and had the police called by a neighbor when I was breaking into my own house. The appropriate course of action when the police show up is to cooperate and show them ID as requested. Despite the fact I had ID, the police pointedly stated that they thought breaking in was a bad approach and that they could still arrest me at that point, considering I could be an estranged spouse with an old ID, I could have a fake ID, or a number of other scenarios. Now, here’s the secret to dealing with this situation. Don’t yell at the police officer! Don’t start a fight, don’t call him a pig or a donut hound, don’t ask him where he was when your car was burglarized or your bike was stolen, and in general don’t be a jerk. If Professor Gates was arrested for breaking and entering after cooperatively showing ID then he deserves an apology. If he was arrested for disorderly conduct after starting a fight with the cops, then he was arrested for something he was doing, and he deserves no apology. And if racial profiling was going on, then an apology is the least of his worries, and the Cambridge police have more work to do. Nothing so far in the press seems concrete enough to prove this one way or the other.

Posted by: Gary Lee | July 22, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

The officer should apologize to Mr Gates…………not every black man is a BURGLAR……JUST like every white man is not a burglar

Posted by: janet ramsos | July 22, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

He does not deserve an apology!
If he had given the police officer his drivers license and said, it was his house and he was locked out..
there would not be a problem..
The police officer was just doing his job and there was a black officer with him..
Get over it !

Posted by: Sandy Anderson | July 22, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

The right think to have done was for the police officer to verify that Mr. Gates was the resident of that house and called his supervisor. Instead he asked for backup from other officers because Mr. Gates was a black man. Not only does he deserve an apology but the whole squad needs diversity training on talking with black folks in an ivy league neighborhood. Some of us do make it but it’s a shame that since we are black we are still considered second class citizens.

Posted by: marilyn diamond | July 22, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Yes, they should have apologized that evening when thry realized, he belong at this resident. To arrest him, after showing his ID, was WRONG, if he were white, they would have apologized that evening, not arrest him. This show racism, disrepect for Mr Gates. There was no need to arrest him after he proved his IDENTITY.

Posted by: MARSHA | July 22, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

The police were merely doing their job and had he not made a racist charge out of it…he should have realized that it was a safety measure of protection for his property. No! He should not have an apology…he should apologize for making the false charge of racism!

Posted by: Paul | July 22, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

And for those people who say no apology needed. If that happened to you I can almost bet you would be outraged!! Bottom line ALL BLACK MEN ARE NOT CROOK’S!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Ms. Detroit | July 22, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Of course he deserves an apology and the officer should get reprimanded if not fired. This exact same scenario played out in a movie called Amos and Andrew starring Nicolas Cage and Samuel Jackson. It was totally uncalled for. The officer could have politely asked if he lived there without the attitude and this never would have escalated. The cops must learn that they have to obey the law, including the Constitution and Bill of Rights. A person must be secure in their own home or else our country is no longer what it once was.

Posted by: CVal | July 22, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

A public apology from the governor on all available media channels, and a promise to teach Massachusetts officers the meaning of the Constitution of the United States would just be the beginning for this hideous step into stupidity.
Massachusetts! Of all places!

Posted by: William | July 22, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Why should he not recieve an apology from the police? Even he was upset, I think the police could have handle this better. Why did the police not go into his house once they were shown the proper ID with the same address they were summon to? Why, because in America the only people who are right is a white person. Today people only see color first. A person of color is always guilty first, because they are a person of color. Our Police Department across the United States need more training in how to handle these situation. Yes, I feel that he deserves a public apology from the Police Department.

Posted by: milique | July 22, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

No apology needed. Just routine police work, H should have cooperated & thanked the officers for doing thier job.

Posted by: joan | July 22, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Gates deserves an apology. The police should have dropped it once Gates displayed his state and faculty id but once again the police took it too far.

Posted by: Nicole | July 22, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Once Gates had provided identification, the incident should have been over with a “sorry for the misunderstanding”…the real issue is that a white cop wasn’t going to allow a Black man to DEMAND his name and badge number.

Posted by: ronnie brown | July 22, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

According to accounts I’ve read in the Boston papers, Prof. Gates DID produce ID and proved that he was the homeowner. The officer still persisted to agressively question him as if he were guilty of something. This appears to be another incident demonstrating an unfortunate pattern of behavior for the Cambridge police – it’s just that this time they arrested a well known and well spoken black man who is not afraid of being vocal about abuse.
As a scholar and professor of African and African American history and American race relations, Professor Gates is well-equipped to know racism when he sees or experiences it. I believe the officer and the city of Cambridge owes him a profuse and sincere apology – as does the neighbor who called police for the alledged break-in. How does s/he not know or recognize the professor?

Posted by: Dee | July 22, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

i am now 68. i am afro-american. when i was in my early 40s and working as a reporter in dallas, texas, i came home one day with an armload of groceries and didn’t disarm the alarm before it called the police. they came. they asked for identification. i provided it. they looked at me, looked at my press pass and my drivers license. i apologized for calling them out on a wild goose chase. they reminded me that if i did that three times i would be fined. case closed. once the officer saw the dual ID Gates provided and the address concurred with where they were standing, that should have been the end of it. this is a town/gown class issue as much as it is a racial one. america, 2009. hang in there, obama…

Posted by: Ellen Sweets | July 22, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

The police were doing their job, but how did they aproach Doctor Gates? “We need to see some ID to be sure this is your house?” “Up against the wall” and show us some ID? “An attempted burglary was reported, and we need to see your ID to be sure this is your house?” If a white man of the same age, dressed the same way, and being assisted by another white man, were accosted, would the police be “rough edged” or polite and business like? It is all in the approach and attitude. I think there was overreaction on both parts, but my sympathy is with Dr. Gates.

Posted by: L Klein | July 22, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

With regard to:
“And the police officer simply asked for his identification to verify who he is and that he does in fact live there.”
After verifying the ID and residence match, that should have been the end of it all, and the officer should have apologized for any inconvenience as a matter of courtesy. Then Gates, the homeowner, could have thanked him graciously for his diligence to duty.
BUT, no, the officer over-reacted and made a bad choice to aggravate rather than to ease out of the situation and keep the peace–which is what police officers are SUPPOSED to do. That officer has issues and needs professional help.

Posted by: Tivette | July 22, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Professor Gates indicated that he tried to show not one, but two pieces of identification. I believe the officer acted overzealously and Professor Gates most assuredly deserves an apology.

Posted by: JWO | July 22, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

He was acting real “uppity” an old Harvard college professor, walking with a cane in front of his own house. How dare he? Sean Bell, Amadou Diallo, Abner Louima, Eleanor Bumper, Ousmane Zango, Khiel Coppin, Timothy Stansbury, the list goes on… What I know for sure is that the cop will lie and those that have never experienced driving and getting your key while black will be eager to believe him.

Posted by: Here we go again | July 22, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Trust. If Professor Gates did not show ID immediately, he would have been shot. The cop would have then said he thought he was reaching for a gun.

Posted by: Yeah right! | July 22, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

My neighbors report that I (their neighbor, who didn’t just move in yesterday) is breaking into MY house (when I come home and find that my door is jammed). I am CONFRONTED by a officer, who has made an assumption, especially since I am black, that I am breaking into someone’s house.
I am absolutely positive that Officer Crowley’s approach was not “excuse me sir do you have a right to be trying to unjam this door and enter this house”. It probably was much more aggressive and quite infuriating to a person who is probably experincing some frustration after a long trip from China.
I think Mr. Gates has had enough experience, as a black man, with blatant racism, to know when he is being exposed to it (as does every black person over the age of two years old). I think this is the part that most people seem to not get. As a black person, living in a racist society, you kinda just know when you experience racism. It is a no brainer!!!! The strange thing about it is the cowards that hide behind their racist attitude never have the guts to admit that they have violated another human being!!!!!!! Mr. Gates definitely needs to receive an apology!!!!!!!!

Posted by: mary | July 22, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

If I (a white man)were climbing in through the window of my house and a black officer asked me for my ID; I would be thankful that the black officer was doing his job. If I became angry with the officer then I am the one who is wrong. I would not feel that the black oficer needed to apologize. Man he was protecting my property.

Posted by: david | July 22, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

I think the President and Mr. Gates owe the Police officer and the Cambridge Police and apology.

Posted by: Joan | July 23, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

No apology necessary. The police were doing their job. In fact, Gates would have every right to be angry if they had NOT been there.
As for the racist aspect? That would never have arisen if he was white and the same thing happened. It’s ridiculous. It’s like the police are being put in the position where they’re darned if they do and darned if they don’t.

Posted by: vm | July 23, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

An apology is in order, but will it happen, that’s another issue.

Posted by: Vickie | July 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

no, he doesn’t. An officer is called into the situation blindly and when anyone is asked for ID they should comply especially if they are doing nothing wrong. If you were faced with danger everyday, and don’t always know where that danger lies, you cannot assume anything. Gates should be pleased that the police responded just in someone was breaking into his home. COLOR MEANS NOTHING!

Posted by: cindy | July 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Here is the deal. Police apologize to him, then will tell him that they will NEVER answer any calls associated with his house, EVER.

Posted by: Charles | July 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Are you kidding??? Of course he deserves an apology!!! This is a prime example of the police OVER reacting.

Posted by: Kelly | July 23, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Yes, he does deserve an apology. One would like to think that we are moving forward in the war against racial descrimination. It’s when you have occurances like this, do you feel as if were taking a step backwards.

Posted by: James Taylor | July 23, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Yes, he deserves an apology. Anyone in their right mind knows this. Once the Professor showed his ID, this should have been enough and therefore, the officer shouldn’t have had any problems providing his badge number either.

Posted by: Angela | July 23, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

No way, he was being belligerent, the police did their job. Harvard professors are not above the law

Posted by: Joe | July 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Look at the man. Does he dress like a burglar? And how old is he? I can see my very white elderly father being royally hacked under the same circumstances. And my equally white mother! SHE would be raising a loud and voluble ruckus. He DID produce the ID and they should have swallowed their pride and backed off.

Posted by: Gay | July 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

WoW! so when an officer ask for your ID! I can so “hell no!” curse at him basically act the fool and demand a apoligy because I acted like an idiot. Listen racial profiling Is serious matter but so is stupidity! If an officer ask for you ID then give it to him he doesn’t know you personally and is just doing his job. Professor of stupidity if you ask me.

Posted by: D. B. | July 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

He not only deserves an apology, he ought to consider a law suit. I don’t believe he brought up the race thing first. It is a nasty mess, but I honestly think the cops thought the house was being broken into, but when the man said “I live here” they were not very accepting and it went downhill from there.

Posted by: Lois Griffin | July 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

If all would have followed the story adequately onee might realize that he did indeed offer his “I.D” to the police and he was still arrested.

Posted by: James Taylor | July 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Yes, he deserves an apology. Once Gates produced the id validating his residence the officer should have left, his continued pursuit was an abuse of power and unnecessary to say the least. An arrest was completely unfounded, thus the dropped charges.

Posted by: Natalie | July 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Yes, he deserves an apology. Pres. Obama analyzed it correctly during his press conference.

Posted by: Mimi | July 23, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I would think it is standard procedure for an law officer to acertain the identity of the persons trying to jimmy a door after a report of an attempted burglary.
I think the question the police officer should have responded with was “Would you ask me that question if I was black?”.
Why is everything a race issue?

Posted by: bb | July 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Mr. President, please get the objective facts (not from your good friend) before you comment on the situation. Your victim was asked for his ID by police responding to a possible break in. If your good friend would have understood this and acted rationally, we would have no problem. However, the professor was so appalled that he decided to make a racial issue of it. Do you think that police should tolerate abuse by citizens as they go about their business? That is why this all escalated – because your friend essentially freaked out at the audacity of an officer asking for ID. The only racial profiling that happened here was by the neighbor who saw 2 black men trying to break into a house and assumed the worst. Maybe he should sue the neighbor rather than police doing their job.

Posted by: Keith | July 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

America should be ashamed of the way they treat the african american and the latino community.
My question is: How would the neighbor no know who Mr. Gate was. Was she new to neighorhood or was she angry at him for some reason? Did she want him out of the neighborhood all together?

Posted by: SAS | July 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Let me put in this way, if he deserves an apology, then he does not deserves the protection from the police. Provide ID is basic courtesy anyone should extend given the circumstance. If he does not understand that, he does not deserves the protection from the law enforcement. Period!

Posted by: Charles | July 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

As I understand it, he was NOT arrested for breaking and entering (his own home), he was arrested for disorderly conduct, which can occur anywhere – in your home, in a church, in a courtroom. There is NO location that is exempt from a person performing in a disorderly manner. I laud the police for offering an apology, although I don’t believe one is called for. I question WHO is the person who raised the race card!!! After all, the same arrest would likely have been made regardless of the race of the suspect.

Posted by: Steve | July 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I am a white man in a wonderful racially mixed neighborhood. I see examples of racial profiling just about every day. Mr. Gate deserves an public apology from the police, but he should also apologize for the way he handled the situation.

Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

No apology necessary for doing their job. If Gates had acted sensibly and shown his ID as requested, then the whole situation would have been avoided. After all, the two men were observed and reported to be “breaking” into the house. Who could have known the door was jammed?

Posted by: jeannie | July 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

It’s not hard to envision what happened, based on what has been stipulated by both Prof. Gates and officer Crowley. The officer shows up to investigate a burglary and simply asks to see Gates I.D. Instead of complying Gates gets lippy and suggests racial profiling is in effect. I can imagine the officer saying, “Please sir, I’m just doing my job–I need to see some identification.” But Gates continues harranging the officer, following him to the door as he retreats to his car to call for back up. My goodness, Gates is lucky he wasn’t tased. All he had to do was produce his I.D. when first asked and the officer would have been satisfied. Instead he berates and harrangues the officer and claims prejudice when the officer responds as any reasonable person would. And now for Obama to weigh in on what was obviously a planted question. You know there will be a connection between that last question and the rest of the press conference: “The GOP doesn’t want Blacks to have health care.” Look for it before the week is out.

Posted by: Ken Blake | July 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

He deserves at least an apology. It is an outrage that such things still happen and that people think it’s OK. I totally agree with Obama who, I might add, is in a position to know – which us white folks AREN’T. A white man would have been approached by the police but the misunderstanding would have been quickly resolved. We have got to break out of our little bubble and work hard to understand and care about people who walk outside our bubble. In fact , the bubble needs to start to dissolve – that was the message of the Obama campaign – we CAN come together.

Posted by: Janet Peden | July 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Absolutely not. The picture taken by Mr. Gates’ neighbor shows him as he likes to live – with his mouth wide open. Had he chosen to demonstrate a degree of civility and self-discipline, he would not have been arrested, regardless of his color. Where was he when his parents taught him to respect authority – or did they teach him that he would always be a victim? Poor thing…

Posted by: JP | July 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

He does not deserve an apology! He did not follow a simple police request and became indigent. He got what anyone would expect!

Posted by: Bob | July 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Certainly a police officer has the right, as anyone does, to ask for someone’s ID.
But once he ascertains that a person is on his own property and not doing anything that is inherently dangerous to others, the officer has no more right to question the person, or even remain on his property (Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523).
I would think that it would be appropriate for an officer in the above circumstance to say thank you for showing the ID, I’m glad that there was no crime, and I’m sorry to have bothered you. Any other police conduct is just plain dumb.

Posted by: Eugene Falik | July 23, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

No apology needed. IF he did indeed refuse to produce ID then the officer had no choice but to arrest him. Here is a question no one has asked. Why didn’t he leave a key with a neighbor? Doesn’t he know his neighbors? I know mine and one of them has a key for emergency reasons. If he’d done that then he could have simply used that key to get in.

Posted by: Paul | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

ID or not, yes, Professor Gates deserves an apology.

Posted by: Stacey | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Racism is alive and well in the U.S. This type of incident happens everyday. He deserves an apology but he probably will not receive an apology. We assume that the police officer’s report is correct. Unfortunately many American citizens know that the Police report is not always accurate.

Posted by: JP | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Absolutely NOT. Had he simply complied when asked to show his ID it all could have been avoided. To become beligerant with the officers who were responding to a call to protect HIS property is inexcusable. He should have been grateful for the prompt response. If they ever get another call to protect him or his property, I hope they are “too busy to respond!”

Posted by: SW | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Absolutely NOT. First of all, we don’t really know what happened between the two parties, but what we do know is that the officer was called to the site by a third party and when he confronted the individual, Mr. Gates and asked for identification, Mr. Gates gave him the ID but not without telling the cop he was being profiled because he was black. Had it been a real breakin and the cop did not ask for an ID and believed the person was the homeowner, what would Mr. Gates say then. When an officer request an ID, give it to him . Don’t take it out on the cop trying to do his job. As for Obama, he should have stayed out of it. By weighing in, he took a side without knowing all the facts.

Posted by: Tony | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

I think that an apology would be a very good thing on both sides. I don’t think this was necessarily a case of racial profiling as the police received a report about “two black men”. However I do believe that racial profiling is still a large problem. I also feel that there is a problem with the attitude that most police show towards people. I can understand that they have to be strong towards criminals but I think they seriously overdo it with “normal” people. Of course they will say that they don’t at first know if someone is a criminal but if they are that unperceptive then they are in the wrong job. I think they should approach people with less iniial open aggression!

Posted by: Jan | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes. Mr. Gates deserves (2) apologies in opinion. The first apology should come from his neighbor who made the call to police. I’m sure her biased description of two black males breaking into a neighbor’s home didn’t accurately described (2) middle aged men who were dressed like law abiding citizens and not weaking face masks. The second from the police department for their agressive behavior towards Gates and his driver. If the (2) men were white. I’m sure the neighbor would have assumed it was a wellness check of some sort. The neighbor should publicly come forward and request the police to apologize.

Posted by: Michelle Horton | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Why is it NOT reasonable for police to ask for identification any more? It is almost to the point where police officers have to pull a gun to get respect for their orders. If you have a beef with what they do, you can go to court with your complaint later. You don’t have the ‘right’ to ‘resist’ their actions with physical confrontation, abusive language, inflammatory charges (racism) and refusal to comply with lawful orders, no matter what your skin color is, or what position you hold.

Posted by: Chuck | July 23, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Gates has an attitude problem, he should apologize to the police and the public.

Posted by: Dee | July 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I think an apology is needed on both sides, if in fact Gates was biligerent and the Police had tunnel vision.
My feeling was it was racial profiling. It’s unfortunate that’s the way we still think in America, shame on us(USA)!

Posted by: BiLL O | July 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I find it sad that a Harvard professor is playing the race card. If I had been asked to produce ID at my own home, I would have no problem, and be greatful that our police are doing their job. The professor acted like a thug, by yelling at the officer who was just doing his job. All he had to do was produce ID and say thank you to the officer for his concern; but no, he had to bring the race issue into it. As the white mother of a half-black son, I teach him not to be concerned with color. It is sad a Harvard professor still has insecurities about his race.

Posted by: Kathleen | July 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Yes, he deserves an apology. He should have gotten one from the officer as soon as the officer realized that Dr. Gates was in his own residence. The officer overreacted. I’m curious about the woman who called in the report of a potential break-in. Would she have called the police if the men entering the house had been white?

Posted by: vsgreen | July 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

duh……arrested IN HIS OWN HOME – how does that happen?

Posted by: dunmore | July 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Of course he deserves and apology. Police often embelish their reports to cover themselves as according to The Root article, these officers did. ID or not, I’m sure when the officers entered Gates’ home they saw photos of him. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to make that correlation. With all of the real criminals out there, what a waste of taxpayer’s money and everyone’s time to arrest a productive citizen of our society. If I paid taxes in that neighborhood, I would want the officers involved sent home without pay for as long as it takes to make up for the money they wasted. Cambirdge police=acted stupidly!

Posted by: Becky | July 23, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

No apology should be needed. Actually Mr. Gates should thank his neighbor and the police to be looking out for his property. I would like to have a neighbor like that. Mr. Gates get over it and grow up. Everything isn’t about race, unless you want it to be. What color is the neighbor that called it in?

Posted by: Daisy | July 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I think President Obama is right when he said the police man acted stupidly by arresting someone who had been proven to be the homeowner,just because he is black doesn’t mean he should be humilated by a dump,and I mean DUMP white cop.The passerby is probably white and is the law of the land.Where they all think that whites are in charge of ALL the crime reporting that black people commit.So then,when their neighbor commits a crime they are horrified by it and make stupid comments like,”this just do not happen in our neighborhood”.Its so quiet and decent people live here.Give me a break.

Posted by: Chris Ogbonna | July 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

When is it wrong to not show ID to a cop at your own home? And didn’t this guy show proof he lives there, albeit, eventually? And he wasn’t arrested for not showing an ID, so I don’t understand why the issue of being respectful to law enforcement, or showing an ID is at issue. This is Cambridge, MA… not some small town where everyone knows everyone. BTW, who gets arrested for being “belligerent”… because the officer feelings got hurt? The minute the officer realized that this was a racially sensitive situation, he should have acted professionally. The law is meant to serve the people. Not because you can get away with it. So at the end of the day, the officer will get away with it, because the law says so.

Posted by: Jac | July 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

This guy played the system to his advantage. He’s gonna get his second Ph.D. for this one, write a book and fill the gap that Jesse and Al can’t fill. My bet is he used this situation to make the cops look bad. I buy his version if the cops showed up and and started to just pic on him, but they got a call and responded????? so they do their job and this guy had other alternative motives. Whats the shame in thanking the guys that serve for doing their job. This is what the cops don’t need. Wonder why they hate people that use the system, this guy is the reason. I’d be happy to identify myself to the police if I wasn’t doing anything wrong. REMEMBER, you are only hearing one side of the story. Oh yea, and the President calls the police stupid? He’s just a big a joke. What chief executive talks down to public servents like that?

Posted by: bc326 | July 23, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

no, he does not deserve an apology. The media now need to get the officers side of the story since they have the supreme leaders side of the story. BHO needs to apologize to the Cambridge Police Dept.

Posted by: jl | July 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

When you are a person of color you have to expect an officer to show up in this type of situation. All he had to do is talk to the cop amicably. The rule with cops is always the same if you act up you get locked up.

Posted by: Deepthroat | July 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

If it had been two white men,know one would even called the police.Profiling as usually.The president said the police
was stupid.The man showed his ID.Now it
is the same oh same.He say she say.An
America continues it’s racist practices.

Posted by: Mack | July 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

The President said it best , He should receive a public apology.

Posted by: Angie | July 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I do not think an appology should be given based on what I have read. It depends on how accuarate the news reports are. The President should apogoly to the police officer, the president does not have enough to go on to say the officer acted stuiply.

Posted by: Bob | July 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Are the police totally brain dead??? They unload their guns on black males because they ASSUMED he had a gun and now this. Clearly he entered his own home and clearly the police was WRONG! WAKE UP PEOPLE -it’s not rocket science! Arrest first ask questions later…

Posted by: Kelly | July 23, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Absolutely NOT!! No apologies warranted!

Posted by: kent | July 23, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Whether or not he deserves an apology depends on the tuth of what happened. I have heard several news reports and they are all slightly different, some omitting certain parts. If he wouldn’t show his ID and became beligerant and offensive then no he doesn’t deserve and apology. If he produced his ID and cooperated, then he shouldn’t have been arrested and does deserve an apology. I don’t think the president should have commented at all on the incident. It fuels the fire on both sides.

Posted by: Val | July 23, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

NO gates should have been arrested. boma should get the facts befor he runs his mouth. boma is bigoted in his reaction.

Posted by: david fogle | July 23, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Of coarse he deserves an apology! Maybe they were doing their job, and thank goodness there are observant neighbors who will alert the police to possible robbery but…
It was petulant and unprofessional of the police to arrest him after they knew he was the homeowner!!

Posted by: David | July 23, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Why didn’t they ask for ID in the beginning if the person stated he lived there? Proving who he was would have been out of the question because then they would have to let him go. Not knowing gave them reason to handcuff a Black man on national TV again. I know the Cambridge Police Dept because my husband was on it for 20 yrs trying to prove how racist they were. Dr. Gates deserves an apology.

Posted by: Debbie | July 23, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

I think the police were doing their job, and he should be thankful that they were
I would be
it is just STUPID that the president even had to get into it…
just how are they looking at it?
to blame the police for doing their job?
get over it…
color had nothing to do with it

Posted by: Linda | July 23, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Gates should be apologizing to the police The officer was just doing his job. If Gates had calmly showed him his ID without getting so angry, the incident would have been over. The police were called to a possible break in, of course they had to ask Gates to prove he lived there. It was not racism, it was the police responding to a 911 call.
Gates turned it into a racial incident by saying they wouldn’t ask for his ID if he was white. How absurd. Should the police just take the word of every person who is found at the scene of a possible robbery? Gates over reacted and neighbors even said he was out of control. Gatess should just shut up and be thankful the police dropped charges.

Posted by: EITTTS | July 23, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Gates should apologize. Unfortunately he is just another Black person with a chip on his should. These biased Blacks see racial discrimination in EVERYTHING. Like the little boy who cried wolf, they do themselves and all Black persons a disservice by having an automatic knee jerk “racial” reaction to EVERYTHING.

Posted by: Reality | July 23, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

In 2010 my family will have lived in Cambridge in this house for 100 years, I am third generation. I have had 3 sons who at one time or another have had run ins with the Cambridge Police. It is a given, that when you are approached by a police officer and asked for ID that you present it. You never talk back to or disrespect an officer doing his duty. Had Prof. Gates did as requested we would not be talking about this.

Posted by: Angel | July 23, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

not everyone in your audience has the facts, they seem to be making it up to suit them. The professor DID produce hid I.D. and the P.D. DID arrest him AFTER campus security verified his identity so…yes, he is owed an apology.

Posted by: tealites | July 23, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Dr Gates is as well known as Ken Burns from his many appearances on PBS so the Cambridge Police were pretty stupid not to have recognized him.
I can’t imagine how fatigued he must have been, to arrive home from China and find his door had been tampered with And to then let himself in the back door ,disable the alarm, and return to the front door to try to make it open must have been frustrating to say the least. Which means the police had not done their job effectively in the first place so when they arrived on the scene and acted like he might be an intruder was just the final straw that sent him into a rage. He had a right to ask their name and (I guess badge number.) A professional officer in law enforcement would have maintained a calm demeanor. We need to remember, that although the police may not like the way a person chooses to vent frustration by swearing or yelling, they serve us. In other words if we don’t like the way a public servant handles their duties, we can act to have them removed. Fire police to dumb to know a public figure like Dr Gates.

Posted by: Amanda Blue | July 23, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Let me get this straight. If someone is breaking into his house, and that person is black, he wants the police to take that person’s word that he lives there and go away. Since they are black, they should not be bothered while breaking into his house.

Posted by: John | July 23, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

yes he deserves an apology and more i think that he should sue!!!!
i am really tired of people being ignorant and stupid.it’s 2009 and we aren’t goimg any where so get over it.

Posted by: pam | July 23, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

No way, he should be apologizing to the American people for making such a spectacle out of his personal problem.If the police showed up and he acted like a decent human being with cooperation, we would not even know about it.
I could be wrong, but isn’t that a black cop in the picture with him hand cuffed?
Racial profiling, REALLY?

Posted by: Brandon | July 23, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I don’t think the professor should even be asking for an apology…if there was any “racial profiling” being done it seems that it may have been on his part. As I understand it Mr. Gates arrived home after a long day & probably was very irritated with having to break into his home (probably with himself for not getting the sticking door fixed). When the police arrived responding to a possible breaking & entering call, he refused to show the officer his identification. It seems to me that his irritation blossomed into anger and the racial profiling remarks probably started to fly. Just because someone is highly respected and well known doesn’t mean that they can’t behave like a horse’s … when they are having a bad day.

Posted by: Becky | July 23, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

If people saying YES! he deserves a apoligy, think about this
‘someone breaks into your house has you and your family tied UP!
Officer comes to the door ask for this Robbers ID
The Robber says Hell NO!
Then officer says politely no problem sorry to trouble you and walks away.
Are you going to play your little race card when your family is murdered raped or worse live with the fact your an idiot because you actually thinks this person deserved an apoilogy and laws get changed.
This officer did his job period. That is the cold hard truth beyound stupity of people not understanding the full story or what racial profiling really is. If I need to break into my home and someone calls the cops on me, I would gladly give them my ID or show them Mail evenlops with my name. Why is that so hard to understand,.. honestly!

Posted by: D. B. | July 23, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

The police officers deserve an apology from Obama for being called stupid. Gates DOES NOT deserve an apology. He was charged with disorderly conduct because he became beligerent with the officers. Should he get away with that because he’s black? What nonsense. Gates is probably so used to having his butt kissed by students, he couldn’t believe he actually had to answer to some authority.

Posted by: Kathleen | July 23, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Mr. Gates gave the officer his identification, and was still arrested. I think he deserves an apology. This incident is a opportunity for all people, especially blacks, to read, and understand the rules of the law.

Posted by: Donna | July 23, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

The President showed how ignorant he is of the facts involved in the case. Disorderly conduct is for refusing to do as instructed. The officers received a call of a possible burglary in progress, they had the right to stop and question any situation to confirm or deny the suspicions that they have. If the professor wanted to act as if he was somebody and refuse to give his Id after being asked several times or by refusing to comply with the officers directions until they confirm or deny the circumstances then he is guilty of the charge. Who cares who he is. In my past 15 years of law enforcement experience, those that think of themselves as being somebody escalate the situation more than defuse. All he had to do was show his ID showing that he was at his house and that the call was unfounded and they would have been on their way. Thumbs up for the officer, thumbs down for the President who has no idea of the reality of police work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!And Thumbs down for the prosecutor for bowing down to politics.

Posted by: Scott | July 23, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Absolutely! Racial profiling is very much alive and well (might I add) in this country. Just ask the minority members of an Austin, Texas suburb of Pflugerville, Tx — where ther is a sizeable population of professionals (with six-figure incomes) of minority ethnicity. The lesser educated police officers mostly white definitely profile persons of African, Hispanic, and Asian descent. Heart Song

Posted by: Heart Song | July 23, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

The fact that the police answered the call to serve and protect him and his property; the fact that all they knew when approaching the residence is what they were told by the dispatcher; that fact that they found what was reported, i.e., a home broken into by an African American, I would have to conclude that asking for ID was more than adviced and good practice. Wouldn’t anyone…unless they have something to prove or another agenda that would never be reported in the news.

Posted by: gary | July 23, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

This is ridiculous! Most of you including the President don’t get it. This had nothing to do with racial profiling. This was a situation that quickly escalated out of control because Mr. Gates thought that it was okay for him to be an ass to the police because he was in his own home. He didn’t do what he was asked to by the policeman because he thought he was above the law, he was black and he thought that everyone should know him. Things then got heated very fast. He decided to show his ID once he was being arrested for disorderly conduct and not obeying a lawful order.
I had something very much the same happen to me. I thought that the police were in the wrong and I was very upset. I ended up being arrested and had to pay a fine. Maybe I should have claimed racial profiling. Sorry, I couldn’t I am white.

Posted by: Dan | July 23, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

What I want to know is: why is Nightline asking this question? On the one hand there is the claim that the professor refused to show the officer his I.D. On the other hand, it was stated that the officer continued to harrass the professor after he did produce an I.D.
That so many people had a definite opinion, either for or against an apology, shows that we still have strong opinions regarding a persons race.

Posted by: Nancy V | July 23, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I am in my 60′s. My family has lived in Cambridge for over 100 years. I have had 3 boys, and each of them at one time or another has had a run in with the Cambridge Police. It is a given that if a police officer asks for an ID you comply. They are only doing their duty. Had Prof. Gates complied we would not be talking about this. What makes Prof. Gates think he can ignore a request, that was, after all, over concern for his property.

Posted by: Angel | July 23, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

No. He is just another example of a minority (specifically black) individual that expects preferential treatment because of race. He was belligerent toward the officers and they did their job correctly. Now he claims because he’s more white than black that he’s not making these claims because of race, but we know he’s saying that to justify his actions which were inappropriate toward the officers. He should be thankful that these officers responded and made the effort to ensure that he was the owner. The police should put his house on a list of those to not respond to so when a crime is committed they won’t be held responsible and won’t offend the ‘burglar’. Finally, Obama has no business commenting on this situation, as now he is establishing a side he is on.

Posted by: Jake Martin | July 23, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Yes an apology is due the police officer, but definitely not Dr. Gates. He didn’t produce an ID and was rude to the police officer. I would be thrilled if the police cked out me breaking into my house…I’d know they were there for the safety of me & my property. I certainly wouldn’t be rude & disrespectful. Law officers are all that is btn us & a breakdown of law & order. Gates is not so special that he doesn’t have to obey the law.
He was not charged with breaking into his home; he was charged with disorderly conduct. The charges against Gates wouldn’t & shouldn’t have been dropped, but he pulled the race card & he got off.
But I was also saddened that President Obama disrespected law & order/the police by taking Gates side & never mentioning that EVERYONE should produce an ID when requested. I was extremely disappointed in someone who was supposed to be a leader of our nation. He saw nothing Gates did wrong! Unbelievable & disappointing, I expected better.

Posted by: Sunny | July 23, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Let me get this straight. If someone appears suspicious and may be breaking into his house, and they are black, he wants the police to take their word that they live there? They should not be bothered because they are black?

Posted by: John | July 23, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Why should Prof. Gates need an apology from Officer Crowley when he’s already received one from the President of the United States?–who obiously has pre-judged the officer. And how obvious was it that that last question was planted! With it’s justaposition to a news conference on health care, it is very transparent that the next tactic of HBO, Inc. will be to play the race card: “Those GOP honkies don’t want Black people to have health care.” Look for this before the week is out and look for Sharpton, Jackson and the whole gang to make the same claim, and for the MSM to come up with evidence to support it. If you want to know who really has it in for Black people, check out http://www.klanparenthood.com. It’s no coincidence that Justice (“I thought Roe v. Wade was to supposed to reduce the number of undesirables”) Ginsburg was a major player in Planned Parenthood. But we should forget about what she said (and the outrageous mindset and world view behind her words–and Sotomayor’s too, for that matter) and gang up on Officer Crowley and those opposed to Big Brother’s nationalized health care instead! The outrage with respect to Officer Crawley is entirely misdirected. Not only Gates, but Obama, owes him an apology!

Posted by: Ken | July 23, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

No, Gates does not deserve an apology. He was charged with disorderly conduct because he was beligerent to the officers. Should he have been allowed to get away with that because he is black? The officers deserve an apology from Obama for being called stupid

Posted by: Kathleen | July 23, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

He should be thankful that his neighbors where keeping an eye on his house.
Some much for helping your fellow man & now the police take the heet for doing their job.
Give us all a break!

Posted by: PHIL | July 23, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Those officers should be highly honored for performing their thankless job, confronting a potential housebreaker. They, I understand, refused to simply identify themselves, just identify and prove who they were. Would it had been better if they had not responded at all; and supose it was poeple of evil intentions? WHERE DO STATISTICS ENTER WHEN CONSIDERING RACIAL ISSUES?

Posted by: art | July 23, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Unfortunately racism exists in today’s society and this is another perfect example of racism at its finest. Mr. Gates only acted out in a racist manor because the police officers were white. Would he have done the same if the officers were black? Based on the facts given, what gives a black man the right to disregard, disrespect, and disobey the authority of the law. Now let’s reverse the situation. Mr. Gates is white and 2 black officers respond and have the same situation. A beligerant white man answers the door and does the exact same thing as the black Mr. Gates. He would be called a racist. He would still have charges against him, he would be fired immediately from his job, the university would apologize to the 2 police officers, and no other university in the U.S. would ever hire him again. OH, and I believe the President of the United States would not call the police stupid.

Posted by: James | July 23, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Prof. Gates should apologize to Officer Crowley.

Posted by: Sue | July 23, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Police who are well trained know how to listen using “Nonviolent communictaion” methods. Empathy does not weaken authority, and this cop wasn’t able to hear Gates’ NEED and let him know he understood the unmet need. If he had, Gates would have calmed down and produced his ID much more quickly. It’s all about training our “peace officers.” Check out http://www.cnvc.org to learn more. This is way beyond race: it’s about how we don’t “get” how to communicate effectively in ways that prevent violence.

Posted by: Harlan Johnson | July 23, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Yes, he deserves an apology. But any lawyer will tell their client, “Do not apologize.“ Because that opens one up for a lawsuit. Not just the police officer, but the police dept. and even the city government. A settlement, maybe, but an apology, unlikely. There is more here than racism. The police officer knew he would be in trouble. Like so many police officers who find them selves in a compromising situation, they try to justify there actions by arresting the their subject on trump up charges. The original mistake was most likely due to racial profiling. The final mistake – the arrest – was an all to typical police harassment. Race was probably only a minor factor in that decision. If it had been a white Nun, he still might have arrested her to cover his un justified harassment.

Posted by: regis | July 23, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Yes, he clearly deserves an apology.

Posted by: Ms Davis | July 23, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I think the comments by the Cambridge
representative were on point: both Dr. Gates & the lawmen made errors in judgement, comments & reactions to the
situation; both sides should publically apoligize to each other. Unfortunately, racism is very much alive in 2009 in America. God (please) bless America with
better respect for one another.

Posted by: ms dft | July 23, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

I’m amazed by the fact that virtually all of the posters who say that Prof. Gates does not deserve an apology say that he did not produce an ID when all of the stories that I’ve heard say that he produced 2 forms of ID. And the police do not challenge that statement.
Form the accounts that I’ve heard, the police officer appears to have been guilty of criminal trespass in that he remained on Mr. Gates property without his permission, authority, or consent — after being asked by a properly identified property owner to leave!

Posted by: Eugene Falik | July 23, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

James,
You are so right on!!!

Posted by: Dan | July 23, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Professor Gates, ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, deserves an apology! Why is it we must continuosly be validated for who we are. The man was in his own home, he showed ID with verification of his residence. Now please explain, WHY WAS HE ARRESTED ANYWAY? Because the man had the audacity to be angry about his treatment, Protocol is one thing, but harrassment is another. He showed his ID,that he proved his case? WOULD YOU BE ANGRY AGAINST BEING REMOVED FROM YOUR HOME WITH PROOF OF INNOCENCE?! What more do we call it but exertion of POWER! Because he did not like the way this “ANGRY BLACK MAN” spoke to HIM, a White Officer of the LAW? Who’s Law and Who’s Justice?? Yes, we now have an African-American President (After How Long?). Yes, we have made great strides, but the struggles continue, the PROFILING continues, RACISM is Alive and Well. If it had been a White person, would you have called the Police SO QUICKLY?, do you NOT recognize your neighbor????? PROF. HENRY LOUIS GATES SHOULD HAVE HIS APOLOGY. For the mistake? Maybe, ARREST? ABSOLUTELY! President Obama, THANK YOU FOR YOUR STANCE ON THIS!

Posted by: BSR | July 23, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Maybe the cops use racial profiling because it works,it wouldn’t still be around if it didn’t. When the black folks start acting like the white folks then they will be treated the white folks.

Posted by: Brandon | July 23, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

WOW! A lot of commenters DO NOT know what happened. It was only AFTER he showed his ID and AFTER the police forced there way into his home, that he WAS ARRESTED. Only after the police officers knew they had CROSSED THE LINE and would surely be in trouble – only THEN – did they arrest him. This could have been any one of us – red, white, black or blue. Is that OK?

Posted by: regis | July 23, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

President Obama is correct in labelling the police officer’s behavior as “stupid.” I also believe that it was racially motivated. He and his department should apologize to Dr. Gates and train its officers against racial profiling.

Posted by: Ruth Lewis Bentley Ph.D. | July 23, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Yes – I agree with President Obama = He was in his own home and showed his ID. That should of been enough but NO the cops seem to think they have to much power and arrest him. YES the cops need to apoloize. Plus if I was Mt Gates I would do a civil suit. But that is just my opinion.

Posted by: lpnpeds60 | July 23, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

I am a half Hispanic woman, who is married to a white man. My husband’s first wife was half Taiwanese. We have a half black nephew. I believe that this whole instance is being blown out of proportion. If any individual acts incorrectly when being questioned by the cops, then they deserve to get arrested. If you look at the picture, with the article correctly, he is still being belligerent and there is a black cop involved in what is going on. To me, it seems as if too much is being made about one person acting badly, as so many of us have.
Mr. President, stay out of this. Your job is to protect our country and this ridiculous disagreement is not what you need to spend your time on. How about spending some time correcting our deficit.

Posted by: Nicole | July 23, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

No he does not deserve an apology. The police asked for his ID to prove he in fact lived there and instead he acts irrational and belligerent. The police did what they were supposed to do in such a circumstance.

Posted by: Chris | July 23, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Lets see, any person without a racial agenda would welcome a police officer looking out for the well being of their home. If it were me, and I were locked out of my house and had to “break in”, and a watchful neighbor saw what looked like someone trying to get in my house I would not have a problem with a police officer being there to check out why I was “breaking -in”. Instead of “coping” an attitude with the officer, and pulling the race card, why not just be glad that someone was looking out for your property?? I think this is known as “Community Watch” . Thank the Officer for protecting your home and show him your proof of ownership with cooperation and I am certain all of this could have been avoided. I believe the person with the RACE problem is Gates. Some people just the opportunity to start trouble!

Posted by: Kathy | July 23, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Yes i think he deserved an apology

Posted by: Levoughn Allen | July 23, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am

The situation could have been avoided and I blame Gates for allowing it to get out of hand. I would have been more than happy to show the officer my i.d at his request and send him on his merry way out of my house. Case closed!

Posted by: Elsi | July 23, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am

I say, unless you were there, you cannot make comment as if you were!! And the President should STAY OUT OF IT!! He has enough to worry about running the country!!! He should stick to that!

Posted by: KMR | July 23, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Can anyone say PROFILING….c’mon people. First, HE SHOWED HIS I.D. ok. So EVERYONE commenting/hinging on the fiction that he didn’t your argument is (Of Course) NULL & VOID. Secondly, instead of the report simply stating two men trying to force their way into a home, it was stated as “two black males with backpacks”….so race was automatically associated with the negative ethos, logos, and pathos that America is systemic for. Next, in the time frame that the call was made the Harvard Professor entered throught the rear and proceeded to the front to bring his luggage in from a recent trip and NOT in a clandestine manner AND was notifying the property owner about the jammed lock when the police showed up….NOT removing/burglarizing items from the home. Finally, he established his Identity but by that time he was “irate”, which he had the right to be since any american (especially those NOT of an “ethnic” background) would be as upset, since he demanded the officer’s name and badge number. Now this all happened during MIDDAY and a rational officer OR the OTHER OFFICERS would have noticed (I don’t know) maybe a Photo or two, mail, the call to the property owner, and the fact the he stayed instead of fleeing the scene.
Its amazing how the standard shifts when race comes into play and how OBLIVIOUS the majority are to it since they only know one perspective. Why is the question of should he get an apology existent?
I would love to know if the area has seen a recent rash of crime and if so, has the neighbor who reported this incident or Sgt. Crowley gone as far beyond the call of duty to bring Justice to ALL.

Posted by: Eddie | July 23, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Both parties handled the situation poorly. The officer could have just asked for his license and seen that it was his own home he was breaking into and should have left. Mr.Gates should have kept his cool and not been surprised that one of his nosey neighbors probably would be caling the police, seeing two black men “breaking” into a home. Maybe the neighbor, should have minded her own business in the first place and needs to apologize. Mr. Gates is a smart man and you would think he of all people could see what might occur by losing his cool and how pointless it was to get so defensive. the officer was just trying to do his job.
Its funny, I am a white latino women and I once had to break into my own home by climbing through a front window and no one ever questioned me, even though at the time I lived a block away from a police station. If it had been a man, I’m sure it would have been a different story.

Posted by: nourhy | July 23, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

No, he does not need or deserve an apology. Period. Black, white or other, he disobeyed an order. If a Law Enforement Officer request to see a legal form of I.D. such as a drivers license and the person refuses, argues or does not comply, then that person is violating the law. If the Officer arrests the person, then he is doing his job. Its not harrasment, or racial profiling, its enforcing the law. Instigators like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have kept the race issue alive for their own personal gain. You never ever hear of a white person screaming foul when a black officer makes an arrest. So, Mr Gates, do not lock yourself out of your house and if you do and an Officer of the Law ask for identification, pull up your big girl panties and give it to him. He is only doing his job.
By the way. Working on 17 yrs experience as an Officer. Thank you.

Posted by: Wayne | July 23, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

First of all, how do you break in to your own house? Secondly, once the officer assessed the situation and received the information he needed, he should have thanked Mr. Gates and left. The officer was totally out of line, and an apology is definitely in order!!!

Posted by: SDL | July 23, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am

No, he does not deserve an apology. I am a woman and over 50 and not black and I was arrested for that same thing when I left my keys at work. I did not expect an apology and I was glad to know my neighbors were looking out for me and my house. It was dark and thy heard glass breaking.

Posted by: Linda | July 23, 2009, 1:46 am 1:46 am

No, he does not deserve an apology. Folks are getting far too thin skinned. The police were doing their job and if he would have co-operated with their requests, there would have been no problem. If this would have been an actual burglery and the police did not respond and intercept what they percieved to be robbery suspects, it would have been the same thing. His story then would be, I was robbed, the police knew it and let it happen. I demand an apology. If you expect help from law enforcement, you are expected to co-operate with their efforts. Everything that happens to someone of color, right or wrong, it becomes a racial issue. Lighten up, we’re all in this together and things like this only makes it worse. I don’t care who he is. He is no better than anyone else and only deserves equal treatment. He should be the one apologizing!!!

Posted by: Clyde | July 23, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Yes, he deserves an apology but will he get it only if the President makes them or is he remind in the eyes of the media. I live in Arizona and an officer stopped me in informed me that I did not stop at a stop sign and this car was reported stolen. The office wanted until I stopped at a red light and then went thought green light and requested for me to pull in a dark area. Then refused to get me or let me see his badge information so I called 911 only to find out the he was not suppose to be in the area and then did not call in that he stopped me. I informed him that 911 did not see him in the area and requested to speak with him he requested and his supervisor was called out. The officer then stated that he did not pull up any information on my car stating that the car was stolen. Again it was only because my neighbor (who is a lawyer) stated that he would be filing a complaint in the morning did the officer stated that he was sorry it was a long night in the car did not seem like it was mine.

Posted by: Jessica B | July 23, 2009, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Yes, he deserves an apology but will he get it only if the President makes them or is he remind in the eyes of the media. I live in Arizona and an officer stopped me in informed me that I did not stop at a stop sign and this car was reported stolen. The office wanted until I stopped at a red light and then went thought green light and requested for me to pull in a dark area. Then refused to get me or let me see his badge information so I called 911 only to find out the he was not suppose to be in the area and then did not call in that he stopped me. I informed him that 911 did not see him in the area and requested to speak with him he requested and his supervisor was called out. The officer then stated that he did not pull up any information on my car stating that the car was stolen. Again it was only because my neighbor (who is a lawyer) stated that he would be filing a complaint in the morning did the officer stated that he was sorry it was a long night in the car did not seem like it was mine.

Posted by: Jessica B | July 23, 2009, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Yes, he deserves an apology. This type of action by officers occurs much too often.

Posted by: Mike | July 23, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Hell Yes! Police should’ve used common sense and verified wherther or not he was the landowner. I would sue them for taking away his rights.

Posted by: Charles Alexander | July 23, 2009, 3:08 am 3:08 am

Of course Professor Gates deserves an apology;he was in his own home! Wouldn’t we all be outraged to be so treated?

Posted by: Pat | July 23, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Look at it this way: if two OLD WHITE men had been observed trying to break in the front door, the neighbor would have offered to help. It’s too bad the Prof’s life experience to date caused him to be less than ‘humble.’ It’s really too bad that ‘humble’ is the only way a person of color can interact with law enforcement safely.

Posted by: Marian L. Zaouk | July 23, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

yes, mr. gates deserves an apology. mr. gates did show his identification. the police officer refused to give his name or badge number AND was insolent, unprofessional and stupid.

Posted by: luz | July 23, 2009, 3:20 am 3:20 am

I really don’t know whether EITHER of them owes the other an apology. WE don’t know all the facts because we weren’t there. And even though Gates and Cowley WERE both there (as were several witnesses –the police and apparently other civilians) they tell different versions of the story, possibly due to the intense emotional feelings that came up in the situation.
What I WOULD LIKE TO SEE is for all of the principals (and many of the witnesses) come together, tell their versions IN THE PRESENCE OF EACH OTHER, with professional mediators on hand. What a GREAT opportunity to learn from this one incident, both for Gates and Crowley (who appear very articulate and tuned in to their feeling), but also perhaps for the larger society — learning something that can help us all come closer to healing the great divides of race and class (eg Harvard Prof vs Law Enforcement civil servant) in this society.
Let’s not lose this opportunity!
Auntie Emm

Posted by: AuntieEmm | July 23, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Wow. It never ceases to amaze me that this level of ignorance still exist in this country. Why is there a question about this incident at all? A white man would never even have to dignify this type of scenario with a response of any kind, because this would never happen to him.
In America you are innocent until proven guilty. I am ashamed and worried for us all… red and yellow, black and white.

Posted by: lisa | July 23, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am

No way! If anyone deserves an apology it should be for the police officer by Obama. He gave an opinion on a case which he did not know the facts. He was defending his radical friend ( he seems to hang around with that type). The police will have second thoughts of the commander in chief. I sure do! Why would they respect him with that type of judgement.

Posted by: Joanna | July 23, 2009, 3:31 am 3:31 am

The gentleman should be thankful officers were investigating a reported what appeared to be a breakin and should have stated so. The officers were doing their job. Situations such as this does nothing to entice good men and women to enter the police force. It’s a damned if you do and damned if you don’t situation.

Posted by: Margie | July 23, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am

I wonder if all the policemen coming upon the scene were of the African American race, this whole thing would have not exploded into this racial tenseness. The police were just doing their job of investigation, it wasn’t based on skin color, but maybe white police should be called in for white incidents and Afro American police for Afro American incidents. It may sound silly, but racial tensions run high between blacks and whites as they always have, so break the tension with sending appropriate skin color police. Call it what you will, but the racial tension won’t be a factor.

Posted by: Mark | July 23, 2009, 3:36 am 3:36 am

No. The policeman was called for a break in, and was simply doing his job, adopting standard procedures such as verification of identity, cooperation, and what not. I find it disturbing that some people will always try to pull the race card and never believe its their fault. What kind of example is the President setting up by saying that the Police acted “stupidly”, and that the Police profile Blacks and Latino? Who would the president or Gates call if someone breaks into their homes? Duh!

Posted by: Paul | July 23, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Professor Gates said that he showed 2 forms of ID, both with a picture. He was inside his own home and answered the door. The officer obviously missed the sensitivity and community service training and should have said thank you sir, have a nice evening. Gates became upset being inside his own home and probably did become upset after flying from China and Im sure was exhausted. The officer ordered him outside of his own home and then arrested him for being disorderly. He is a 58 yr. old man with a cane! A what point do we loose freedom of speach???? What is freedom of speach in dealing with authorities? I am a 73 yr. old white woman and have seen Professor Gates several times on tv. He appears to be a very mild mannered man. I agree, the police were stupid to arrest him, what would you do in the same situation? What concerns me is what is the limit on our so called freedom of speech? Think about this, it could happen to any of us. Arresting any of us under this circumstance is an abuse of power and in this case I believe racially motivated.

Posted by: kathy | July 23, 2009, 3:50 am 3:50 am

The officer deserves an apology from Mr. Gates.
It was reported that Glen Campbell was smart enough and proper to go back to the police station and apologize directly to the officers when Glen Campbell was drunk and arrested by the police. When an officer is called to a scene, you always respect the officer performing his job.

Posted by: Matthew | July 23, 2009, 4:29 am 4:29 am

He was irate at being asked for his ID, Cuzing at the officers. In an interview he even cuzed and said Hell! and paused several times to prevent himself form cuzing about what happen. No he didn’t want to present his ID, but it upset him greatly. He did then politely told the police officer where to shove it thats where the charges come into play!
Reminds me of the crazy blackAfircan american) Or just American senator that attacked a surcrity office then played the Race card was had to quickly apoligize because she was recorded on what she said. I’ll laugh my butt off when a recording of this mess comes out.
I mean wow what respectable citizen of this great country to play a victim while being protected by those doing their job. An officer can only tolerate soo much. I’ve seen a huge black woman stop in a middle of the road yelling and making a scene because she gets pulled over for going 80 in a 45, but she wasn’t a professor so the race card thingy didn’t work.
Being belittle, cuzed at, disrespected and failure to follow an officers instructions is breaking the law. I can’t believe they are letting Dr Gates get away with it. I’m a little bit of everything do you think I could have gotten away with it, Hell no I couldn’t I would have been fined tooken away in cuffs, at the very least.
I hope people come to there senses, because I want that officer to protect my family, I think god he handle it correctly.

Posted by: D. B. | July 23, 2009, 4:48 am 4:48 am

President Barack Obama did not know all of the facts when he made such a wrongful judgment of the police. Gates entered through the back of the house leaving a different black man, “his driver” at the front door. Once Gates entered the home he returned to the front door and the two men fiddled w the door to see why it was stuck. When the police arrived (a neighbor saw an unknown person trying to enter the house), they acted on the call they received. Then Gates got all huffy and the police, when Gates yelled he owned the house, requested ID, Gates did not produce it right away and instead caused a ruckus. Thus, doing their job, the police charged him with disorderly conduct as any of us (black, white, brown, yellow) should have been with the same behavior. Gates owes them an apology as well as the public for allowing the flames of racism to be fueled by all the spin!!! Shame on him!

Posted by: samantha | July 23, 2009, 4:50 am 4:50 am

This man when questioned by the Police reguardless of race creed or color acted stupid and there was a witness to his behavior the media and or ignorant president are making themselves look even more like idiots by there remarks. Mr gates should apoligize to the police officer for being such an idiot. Stick to your ethics Officer and wait for this man to apoligize to you for being an idiot he is so smart but has no common sense. Our President should stick to what he know which is obvious not much but looking after his wall street and banking buddies he not for the people just out to ruin our country

Posted by: Tom Mccarthy | July 23, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Yes, he owes the professor an apology…He should have done that voluntarily when he realized his mistake. America, America, when will we abolish, truly abolish racism?

Posted by: NIA | July 23, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

It’s good that a neighbor was looking out for criminals and that the police responded. It’s bad that once they realized who this person was and what he was doing that he ultimately got arrested. Some police officers put their people-skills training to work in those situations and others who are warped by either racism and/or ego do stupid things like arresting a man in his own home. People saying that Dr. Gates doesn’t deserve an apology are short-sighted because if it happened to them, an apology would be least of what they would want. It’s also unfortunate that a white person could actually be a thief, could steal everything right under the noses of some of Gates’ neighbors because they automatically see blacks as a threat and whites as non-threatening, which we know is completely untrue. It just goes to show that some people are still delusional and warped.

Posted by: delena | July 23, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Absolutely. The police officer deserves an apology.

Posted by: sugarpop59 | July 23, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Unless we have a video record of what actually happened, it is virtually impossible to come to a good and fair conclusion whether Prof. Gates deserve an apology. We need to know exactly what happened and how it happened. Nightline did not (was unable) to provide this kind of details; so it’s irresponsible to ask the question. It should have done a better job interviewing witnesses and neighbors before presenting the case. Without more facts, my sympathy is with the Professor. Unless his belligerence is sufficient to cause the arresting officers or himself physical harm, they stepped over the line putting him in cuffs. Would they have done this if he were white? The Professor should take it the Court, if he can afford the price of justice! HPP

Posted by: Hong-Phong Pho | July 23, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Yes, Dr. Gates does deserve an apology. It is this attitude that police don’t have to apologize that condones the racial profiling that definitely exists in America.

Posted by: TriceSweet | July 23, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

The only apology neccesary is one from the President. It is outrageous that, in the same breath where he says he doesn’t know all the facts and that he is biased because he is a friend of “the Skipper”, he says that the police acted “stupidly”. One can only hope that his other actions as the “leader of the free world” have a more solid foundation that this statement. Too many people are ready to hide behind a cop, but are even more willing to berate that cop if it is inconvenient to allow the officer to do his/her very difficult job. I don’t know who is right in this situation, but the president was wrong.

Posted by: Dan | July 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

No. Gates owes the officer an apology. It sounds like Mr. Gates was offended that the officer didn’t recognize his “famous” profile; and his only justification for verbally abusing the officer was to claim racism. I’m deeply disappointed in the President for being so one sided in his support of Mr. Gates. In this regard the President has replied stupidly. Although, overall I’m still glad I voted for Obama. I’m purposely not using the title Professor, because Mr. Gates is “acting up” outside of any academic venue.

Posted by: Chris K., Ph.D. | July 23, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

NO, Gates does NOT deserve an apology,
When the police ask you for an ID , You give it to them…… they are doing their job…..Gates obviously has some delusions of grandeur….. not to mention emotional baggage… so why not yell “racism” it’s works for everything else ! ….. and I’m really bored with it !

Posted by: Lola | July 23, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

No apology. He was asked to produce an ID and got belligerent. The..how dare you. don’t you know who I AM!. Considering that someone was trying to break into his house previous to this incident, Mr Gates should have been happy that the Officer asked for hid ID.

Posted by: RRfan38 | July 23, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Gates should apologize to the police for his inappropriate behavior. I believe his neighbors saw him breaking into a house. And the police should sue him for defamation of character. Shameful, Shameful.

Posted by: Anne G | July 23, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

It is stupid to believe the police owe an apology for doing their job correctly.

Posted by: bobby | July 23, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

By the way I think the police owe me an apology for giving me a speeding ticket for going 80mph in a 65mph zone. I was only doing 78mph! And I’m white!

Posted by: bobby | July 23, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

I have difficulty understanding why Professor Henry Gates wasn’t known in the community by the local police officers. Did he recently move to the area? I don’t see why the police officers don’t issue an apology and we all move on. One has to understand Mr. Gates’ anger and rising frustration at being arrested while entering his own home. If he is the only black living in a predominately white neighborhood area, naturally he would feel he was racially profiled! If he said a few “choice” words, one can certainly understand why! Yes, the police were right to respond to the call. However, once it was proven it was Mr. Gates’ own home, an apology could have been issued right there on the spot! Let’s not dwell on this too long; we have health care and education to reform!

Posted by: jaxlenia | July 24, 2009, 3:37 am 3:37 am

Mr. Gates knew exactly what he was doing, he played the “race card”. He took the situation and is trying to demonstrate what he teaches. Racism is kept alive by blacks! Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are proof of that and
I think Mr. Gates is extremely prejudice aganist white people I don’t care what his title is. He should be apologizing to the officer. Wait did I just assume that Mr. Gates was prejudice without hearing the officers side of the story?? Hmmm, my name must be Mr. Obama!

Posted by: diane | July 24, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Mr. Gates knew exactly what he was doing, he played the “race card”. He took the situation and is trying to demonstrate what he teaches. Racism is kept alive by blacks! Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are proof of that and
I think Mr. Gates is extremely prejudice aganist white people I don’t care what his title is. He should be apologizing to the officer. Wait did I just assume that Mr. Gates was prejudice without hearing the officers side of the story?? Hmmm, my name must be Mr. Obama!

Posted by: Diane | July 24, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

This is not a racial incident! President needs to be careful and stop making judgement.The police handle the incident well. Gates, needs to understand he needs to conduct himeself as a gent., chose his words, and stop acting so ethnic in his remarks to the police officers. Ides

Posted by: joelides | July 24, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Crowley deserves the apology from Gates and Obama and not that lame, long winded, wimpy attempt at an apology that Obama gave today. The only reason that the charges were dropped against Gates is his relationship with Obama. Not being able to apologize like a man to Crowley, shows a big lack of character on Obama’s part. Inviting them all over to the white house for a beer is such a cop out. What a wimp.

Posted by: Barry | July 24, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Obama is the one that should make an apology, along with those at ABC that just made him out to be the hero in the story during the coverage on Nightline. Obama was the one that pumped the thing up. Good grief!

Posted by: Joel | July 25, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Why should the President aplogize George Jr. never did. I would like to commend the press they took something that happens every day in this Cntry and Blew it out of proportion as always. The reason we don’t have newscasters like Walter Cronkite is because these Corperations that control the news are more intrested in making a buck instead of doing the right thing. They have nothing to worry about because there in the back pulling the strings. These Executives are the ones who are making these Journalists who want to do the right thing. But can’t unless they want to lose there jobs. Any person thats a minority already know that the cops will always be the bully and give what the Bush Admin called Dis information ion time the people will get tired and finally do what they did in Iran, China and a few other contries revolt But as long as this I call the T.V generation will not do anything there to weak minded. The Cambride Cops know they got caught with there pants down an now there crying. I do not doubt that Prof, Gates was unrully but those of us that have had experiances with police know they are like the High School Bully. I have family in Law enforcment and they were picked on in High School now they are the Bullies and they know they’ll get away with it. My sister was caught speeding numerous time but was let go because her Husband is a cop. So i really feel the prisident should not apologize because he was right.

Posted by: Ray Pontes | July 25, 2009, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Gates should apologize to the police for his temper tantrum and bad behavior. . .

Posted by: j.d. | July 25, 2009, 6:29 am 6:29 am

Just like Obama, I don’t think we have ALL the facts just yet. We are going by what has been reported in the press. For example, I don’t think the ID was the issue; I think it was Professor Gates WILLINGLY giving the police his ID, but Gates’ having to put up with some verbal abuse from the cops about something else. Let’s get “the rest of the story” before we judge….either Gates or the cop.

Posted by: LOfromMO1 | July 25, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

America should be ashamed of the way they treat the african american and the latino community.
My question is: How would the neighbor no know who Mr. Gate was. Was she new to neighorhood or was she angry at him for some reason? Did she want him out of the neighborhood all together?Posted by: SAS | Jul 23, 2009 12:16:33 AM…………..SAS, it was not a neighbor who reported the alleged break-in. She just happened to be in the area. You are just making a racist comment.

Posted by: LOfromMO1 | July 25, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Gates owes the police department an apology

Posted by: Charlie C | July 26, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

No, he does not.

Posted by: Deb | July 27, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

a phd holding college professor talks back to the police?? mr. gates should have his degree revoked for stupidity. you never, never, NEVER argue with the police. you fight them in court, not in the street. he, and osama, i mean obama, should plead for forgivness on their knees to the officer.
p.s. hey obama, where’s osama??!!??!!

Posted by: mike | July 27, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Heck! I should say so! When anyone makes a mistake like that one, I would expect to be appologized to. It was a misunderstanding by the neighbor who called the police. But if it was dark out, I’d think the same thing of anyone who looked like they were trying to “break in” to a house if I didn’t recognize them trying to get into their own house.

Posted by: Steph | July 27, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

enough already…this is a useless distraction to keep your eye off what they are going to do with your health care and our deficit/debt. We weren’t there and to rely on the liberal media’s filtering of this situation is ludricous.Most likely, Professor Gates got upset that he was being questioned at his house and threw a fit. The officer then responded and arrested him because of a bad attitude.
President Obama should have kept out of this, now, who is paying for the airfare and the beer.
Behind the seens, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are going to take away your health care. It is a classic bait and switch manuever and instead of talking about a very important issue, we are talking about a minor situation. Separate the two.
Once healthcare is approved, businesses will drop insurance coverage in favor of the lower cost option. They must in order to apease their investors. After a few years of this the government will raise rates and there will be no other viable option. If you are OK with that, go back to this debate.
If not, be a part of the health care discussion and forget about your race or political tilt. This will be a massive co-opting of the health care industry. They arent even talking about Social Security which is already spending more than it takes in…WAKE UP! Anyone that is below the age of 45 right now will most likely not be getting Social Security as it stands right now. What is your game plan?
Terry Moran…have some gonads to report on something worthwhile that might get you an Emmy. Forget MJ. Act like the 60 minutes of old and go for it.

Posted by: TJSDC | July 29, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

YESSSS….ABSOLUTELY ….. ALSO… REPARATIONS FOR HOW HIS GREAT-GRANDFATHER WAS TREATED!

Posted by: stan | July 29, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

I think both parties should apologize.
I can’t help but feel that as a scholar of African American history, Dr Gates’ was primed to scream racism too quickly. After many years of teaching about injustice, he was more ready to interpret things through that lens.
When I was recently locked out of my house, I called my brother who helped me break into my own home. As we stood on my front porch at 10:30 at night, trying to pick the lock (without much luck), my brother asked me “you do have an ID on you in case someone calls the cops, right?” Although my neighbors know me well, we knew very well the possibility of confusion. I was certainly prepared to say “I know this looks bad – but really – I live here.” I would never dream of becoming belligerent toward the police who were checking on suspicious behavior. I appreciate neighbors who keep an eye out for suspicious activity and for police who would act to protect my property.
It’s unfortunate that the police officer working to protect Dr. Gates’ property was met with such hostility. I would hope that both parties could apologize and move on.

Posted by: Anna | July 31, 2009, 4:47 am 4:47 am

Not only NO, but HELL NO, Gates doesn’t deserve an apology from anyone!!! As some sensible others have stated, no matter what color either person was, the home owner should have been thankful that the police were checking into a report of possible house-breaking!!! The arrogant old man was the one who instigated the whole damn thing by IMMEDIATELY screaming racism!!! Had it been an actual break-in and the policeman had said OK, you say it’s your house, go ahead, and it was a thief, Gates would have still screamed racism because he wasn’t protected! You that think Gates was wronged need to get a grip and think it out!!! What if it was your house??? Oh, and IDs can be easily duplicated – crooks have a lot of smarts (all in the wrong thing) and it’s nothing to them to get pics, info, etc., needed to show it’s their house, their car, etc.!!!

Posted by: Older Reader | August 1, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I don’t know the whole story but from the comments I’ve been reading, maybe the officer should apologize. I can understand Gates irate demeanor and can also understand the officers doing there job and realizing there mistake. I’ve locked myself out of my car on more than one occasion. Out of all those, the cops did show up once. It was pretty bad because not only where there 3 to 4 squad cars, but also an eye in the sky. Guns were drawn and I was ordered to get on the floor, handcuffed, searched and put in a squad car. All the while the whole neighborhood spectating. In the end, I was released because I did have proof that that indeed was my car. Yes, it was in broad daylight, yes they made a mistake, and yes they were doing there job. I understood all that even though I was a bit mad at first. I was given an apology by two peace officers. Simple… but quick. They acknowledge they made a mistake. Officers can apologize, but I guess in some parts of the country its harder to do so when there is a more dominant race than another. Did I mention this happened in Los Angeles.

Posted by: Domo-kun ^-^ | August 1, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

I absoluteely agree with Bob. The officers were called about a suspected
B & E.. The whole thing, in my opinion was blown out of proportion. Gates should have been happy the the police were protecting his property. No apology needed.

Posted by: Sharona | August 8, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

How a reporter or camera man was there on that specific time? Looks like prefabricated action.

Posted by: Fernando | August 25, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.