By David Schoetz

Jul 1, 2009 11:27pm

Closing Arguments: Future of ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said yesterday he is looking to make the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy that forbids gays from serving openly in the military "more humane" until the Clinton-era ban is repealed.

Some military leaders say the policy should not be repealed if it would put more strain on an already overstretched military.

President Obama, meanwhile, continues to be criticized by gay rights activists for not acting on a campaign promise to end the policy.

So tonight, we ask you: What should happen to the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy?

Tell us what you think.

You can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.

User Comments

I feel the ban should be lifted and all worthy soldiers discharged should be reinstated if they chose to..I am for total equality for all…I am all for gay marriage too.

Posted by: Robert Blackwell | July 1, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Who cares. Let them serve! Now the men can be under equal threat for physical assault as women. Maybe somebody will stand up for and protect service women for a change! Ya think?!? That itself would be worth it…

Posted by: hmn | July 2, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Don’t ask don’t tell is nothing more than a slap in the face of people willing to risk their lives for the rest of us. I believe that President Obama is serious about eventually repealing it, but he needs to remember that real peoples’ lives are being affected in the meantime.

Posted by: Jeff | July 2, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

One’s sexual preference should be a personal and private matter when one is sharing living space with others.

Posted by: Julia | July 2, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

It is unAmerican to forbid willful volunteers to serve our country. It boggles my mind that anyone would be against gays serving. How pathetic.

Posted by: Lee McCauslin | July 2, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

It should be lifted.

Posted by: aw | July 2, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

They should keep the ban. Some people are not comfortable being around homosexuals, and some homosexuals don’t want everyone knowing they’re gay. I really think its a personal thing that doesn’t need to be discussed or even come up in conversation while on a deployment or even just training. Some things are better off left alone.

Posted by: Kate | July 2, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

After serving and retiring from the army, I think it could survive. However, there need to be strict guidelines just like there is for the treatment of women. The first thing that has to be changed is the law. Obama cannot just authorized gays and lesbians by executive order. The law has to be changed. When Truman integrated the military there were already blacks serving and there was no law against integration of the military. Homesexual behavior is against the Uniform Code of Military Justice. (UCMJ)

Posted by: Lee | July 2, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Don’t ask, don’t tell must go! The law is the law!
The outrageous policy flaunts criminal deviant behavior…it is wrong and must be stopped!

Posted by: Muckraker | July 2, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

This is ridiculous! Why discriminate and make it hard for young GLBT youth to serve their county? If they are courageous enough to fight for our rights why would we not defend their rights! Let’s move on America, there are bigger issues to argue about.

Posted by: lynn | July 2, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Why is the United States one of the last governments to not allow gays to serve in the military? Most of todays young people do not have hangups about gay people. It really is a shame to lose some great people who are willing to make a sacrifice for their country.

Posted by: jeff miller | July 2, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I am grateful to any man or woman who chooses to serve and protect in the military. However, I do feel that is a job like any other where you are there to do their job, and not promote your sexual preferences. If you are gay and choose to serve, then you choose to serve to do your job, not to put your sexuality out there for all to know. Sexuality should not be a deciding point for joining and no one needs to know what you prefer.

Posted by: ADB | July 2, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Lift the ban, plain and simple. I’m an openly gay U.S. Navy veteran and there is no reason why there should be a ban. The hot racking argument is misrepresented, hot racking is when two people share the same bed at different times, not at the same time, so the bed never cools, therefore the term “hot rack.” Put up curtains in the showers that don’t already have them. Full equality plain and simple.

Posted by: jr | July 2, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Don’t Ask, Don’t tell shoud be abolished NOW. How can the army justify discharging honorable, qualified soldiers because of their sexual orientation? It’s totally discriminatory. Soldiers should be judged by their actions and their abilities, not their private preferences.

Posted by: Drew | July 2, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Gay’s having been serving in the military since there have been military. Why kick out service people whom are doing dedicated jobs for all of us. Too many well qualified members doing specialized duties for the armed services are being kicked out and costing the country the loss of their specialized skills. It’s time for DADT to be kick-out of the service and retired.

Posted by: kent | July 2, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Dont ask don’t tell is the most ridiculous policy. We are losing great talented people because of this. I live in Syracuse, NY and yesterday Sgt. Choi, a West Point grad and Arabic speaking translator was discharged under DADT. Who cares what someone’s sexual preference is? They are at work. How does it affect their performance in the military. It is discriminatory and wrong, and Obama should end it tomorrow.

Posted by: Carrie | July 2, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

We should lift the ban. Heterosexuals and homosexuals are human beings and should not be discriminated. Obama should just make an executive order to stop “Don’t Ask Don’t tell” policy.

Posted by: Juan | July 2, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Don’t ask don’t tell policy is ignorant; men and women work together all the time in a professional way without sex interfering; men who are homosexuals could do the same thing. Work is work. Sexual harrassment could happen in any sexual preference group and should be prosecuted equally in any group. We can’t afford to kick qualified people out of the military!

Posted by: cw | July 2, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Unless you serve in the military or have a family member who serves, you really can’t make an informed or intelligent decision. Ask those who are laying their lives down for your freedom – take a poll in the military ranks. It’s their lives this is messing with not ours.

Posted by: Denise | July 2, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Any sort of gender or sexual practice bias is risky for a freedom-yearning society. A slap in the face doesn’t help anyone.

Posted by: Mike Murphy | July 2, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Repeal DADT. Repeal DOMA. It was wrong back then when it was instituted; it is wrong now. Gay civil marriage does nothing to affect heteromarriages (unless a gay is forced to marry a straight). Gingrich, Giuliani, Sanford, et al are doing a wonderful job on their own without a gay to blame.

Posted by: ec | July 2, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

I think DADT should be repealed. The military needs as many volunteers as it can get their hands on. Since when has America turned away volunteers? I can inderstand being turned away from a job, but if someone wants to fight for your country, you let them! If they have enough pride in their country that doesn’t fully aknowledge them yet, to fight for it, you give them a place. Why wouldn’t you let them serve because of the way they are? Thats like saying you can’t have a black chef in your kitchen. Its blasphemy.

Posted by: Joshua | July 2, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Let them serve. Generally, reinstate those who have been discharged but want back in.

Posted by: Granville | July 2, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

The military has enough trouble recruiting competent men and women, without discouraging gay men and women
whose sexual preferences in no way inherently impede their military performance. The services should just
take their noses out of people’s private
business and work on developing good
soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen.

Posted by: Roberta Pliner | July 2, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

The ban should be lifted and all those individuals that have been discharged should be reinstated with full honors and benefits. This discrimination should end and all those who want to serve should be able to do so. No other group of people continue to be discriminated against in so many aspects of our society as the gay/lesbian community. This needs to stop and this should just be one step to correct the discrimination.

Posted by: Kathy | July 2, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Repeal DADT. There is no evidence to prove what the proponents of DADT claim about “troop morale.” In other countries, the inclusion of gays and lesbians in the military has not presented a problem for the troops, the commanders, or the armed services.
We are losing many talented and competent individuals who can be an integral and helpful part of our military at a time when we need them the most because of the prejudice some have against this group of service people.
We, as a nation, went through the same arguments and problems when blacks were discriminated against in the military. Haven’t we learned how wrong that is?

Posted by: Yagov Sangria | July 2, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I think if gay people aren’t given equal status for civil union then they should tell! Why risk your life for a country that treats “Gays” as less deserving!
Scary how you can put any minority into a war, but, treat them like the enemy when they return home!

Posted by: Tim | July 2, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Keep the ban; Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell needs to stay. I served in the military during a time of war and I can tell you from experience; there is nothing worse that putting you life on the line for your nation and you have no idea where the mind of your other soidiers are. No man wants to be in close quarters, in a ditch, with another dude and having to worry about what he’s think. It’s not natural and alot of people, a whole lot of people will not join the military in circumstances that they consider more immoral or foreign that the countries we have to fight in.

Posted by: John | July 2, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Leave policy as is.

Posted by: Don | July 2, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

….with LIBERTY and JUSTICE for ALL.
End ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’, allow ALL people willing and succeeding to serve OUR NATION.

Posted by: Erin | July 2, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I think it’s time. Let’s follow our hearts, people.
Let’s leave Don’t Ask Don’t Tell behind.

Posted by: Haydn | July 2, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I think the policy should be left alone. The military is not about your sex life, but serving the country. What you do on your own time is your own business, but while your working your sex life either way should not be the issue.

Posted by: RL | July 2, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It’s all about privacy. You have seperate shower facilities and dressing areas for men and women in the military. Will you get rid of those? If the answer is “no” then homosexuals should not be allowed to serve in the military. If you are going to allow homosexuals to serve openly or DADT then you should get rid of seperate facilities for men and women.
Before you scream homophobic, are you saying heterophobic for women who don’t want to be watched by men while changing?
This is yet another example of a double standard for minorities. Women have a right to privacy to the point men on ships are forced to go around certain areas where the women live. Women are given access to quasi-private restroom, shower, and laundry facilities (if you’ve been on ship you know how limited these facilities are), yet heterosexuals are not to be afforded the same privacy from homosexuals.

Posted by: Lynn | July 2, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I feel the ban should be lifted. I believe that originally the ban on gays in the military was out of a fear that they could be blackmailed for military secrets by someone who knew of their sexuality. If they’ve admitted their sexuality, they can’t be blackmailed. I served in the Army and there is no reason they should not be allowed to serve.

Posted by: Steve Gravdahl | July 2, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

As the constitution of the United States says “all men are created equal” It’s sad military policy does not reflect the beliefs of our founding fathers. I believe in civil rights.

Posted by: Althea | July 2, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Don’t ask, don’t tell was a terrible comprise for allowing gays and lesbians to serve with the dignity all service members should have. It doesn’t work. It should be repealed and sexual orientation should not be a factor when someone wants to give their life for their country. We all share the same pride, yet gays and lesbians are still treated with less importance and respect than their straight counterparts.

Posted by: Jeanne | July 2, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

When a government “of the people, by the people” chooses to discriminate against and relegate to second-class status millions of its own citizens, can any of us really be free?

Posted by: R. Burkett | July 2, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

We have soldiers doing 2,3,4 tours in war zones. We are accepting criminals in the military now… turning away people for being gay is just plain stupid.

Posted by: Susan Simmons | July 2, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

every argument made to keep in place D.A.D.T. was used to keep the services segregated a couple of generations ago. hopefully it won’t take a couple of generations to realize how utterly wrong this policy is. how many brave, competent soldiers will we continue to throw away in the name of “unit cohesion” or some other equally vague excuse?

Posted by: jerry mock | July 2, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

The United States Military is much more than a job! The ignorant keep posting their comparisons to a job…well, I served in the United States Military. You cannot tolerate homosexuality in the military for reasons I could write a treatise about.
The bottom line: it is a criminal offense and must be prosecuted. It is a disruption of the order, discipline, and security of the military.

Posted by: Muckraker | July 2, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

The “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy
should be ended.
What is the big deal ?
Gays and Lesbians should be allowed to serve in the military without their sexual orientation even being
considered.
The US is virtually the only developed
western nation that has such a policy.
Many of our strongest allies allow
gays and lesbians to serve openly in their armed forces — with no problems.
And what a waste of potential and skilled “man”-power on our part by restricting their participation.

Posted by: Rob Petersen | July 2, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

It needs to be lifted now…Seriously how stupid do you think the men and women in the military are that they do not know who is gay and who isn’t? It is ridiculous at this point.

Posted by: Susan | July 2, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Yes, the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy should be lifted. There are plenty of gay servicemen already serving and they are doing a great job. Isn’t America about equality and equal rights for all? Of course, African Americans, females, and lots of other minority groups in America have been discriminated against and it took a lot of work to great better rights for them. Why is there so much discrimination in America? Gays need equality too and should be able to serve openly in the military. Most NATO countries already allow gays to serve openly and nothing bad has happen because of this.Even Israel allows gays to serve openly. Gays should be able to marry to. Why do heterosexuals care about whom marries whom? Peoples’ personal lives are not other peoples’ business. Lets give everyone in America equal rights and make America be a better country.

Posted by: Alan Ball | July 2, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

The firing of Lt. Dan Choi, the West Point educated Arabic translator, is a betrayal of the US Army’s mission. Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is a threat to our national security. Gays serve openly in the Israeli Army. The British Armed Services recruit gays. The US military is way behind the times.

Posted by: Lloyd | July 2, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

The policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” regarding gays serving in the military should be cancelled. Aside from the civil rights issues for gays, our military needs every able-bodied man and woman available who is willing to serve. Many other countries, including Israel, have gays in the military, without adverse effects. The best soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, Coast Guard personnel, and Nationl Guard personnel should be allowed to serve–regardless of their sexual preference.

Posted by: Wally Salganik | July 2, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I think that Don’t Ask Don’t Tell needs to be repealed. This is suppose to be a free country with all men/women created equal. I was in the military for 8 years and everyone knew and no one cared. It did not interfere with my job or that of others. It is nobodys business what your sexual orientation is as long as you can perform your duties. This form of discrimination needs to be stopped. We are all Americans and are proud to serve our country like every other soldier. If the straight men are scared a gay person is in the military, doesn’t say too much for their bravery.

Posted by: Chet | July 2, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I served and I’am a GLBT person. Total equality for all. lets just get over it and get on with life.

Posted by: Cook-Riley | July 2, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

There is only one solution. Get rid of Don’t ask Don’t tell. It is un-American, discriminatory and a perverted relic of a perverted Congress that hated everyone who was not just like them. All it is going to take is one gay soldier saving his platoon from a roadside bomb or helping capture Osama bin Laden and no one will remember that there was ever discrimination against gays in the military.
The homophobic bigots can quit if they want to. The parents who don’t want to send their kids in the military with gays don’t have to let them go—but if they really want to, well, they are 18. And the fake Christians, well there is a rule against forcing your faith on other people. The real Christians are in or supportive of the gay community.
President Obama has not done one single thing of substance for the gay community since he was elected. He could have at least chastised Californians for their human rights violations committed in the Proposition 8 controversy. He can out stronger against Iran than he did against a travesty akin to Jim Crow against gays.
It is time and past time. DADT should have gone his first week in office. It was a promise. It must be kept. Gays are probably Obama’s largest single constituency and if he wants their full support and money he needs to take care of this yesterday.

Posted by: Rhonda | July 2, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Repeal of DADT is long overdue. At a time when we need more people to join the armed forces, DADT effectively excludes 10% of potential candidates. Other countries have exposed the the falacy that allowing gays to serve would “damage unit cohesion”. Come on President Obama, fulfill your campaign pledge.

Posted by: Barry McCloud | July 2, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

How you have sex should not be a public issue but gays want it that way so the compromise is don’t ask don’t tell. a person’s job should be based on their skills and sex shouldn’t even be on the radar. we have labor laws to protect people from discrimination, we don’t need policies or laws based on how a person has sex, that is so juvenile.

Posted by: Sally Brown | July 2, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

The ban makes us less safe & is morally deplorable. It should be lifted and all worthy soldiers discharged should be reinstated if they wish to return to service.

Posted by: Stana | July 2, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Policy makers are way behind the times. GLBT people teach our children, treat our illnesses, police our streets, fight fires, cook our food–I could go on and on. GLBT people marry, have children, go to church, and share our parks, pools, athletic fields. But in order to serve in the military they must either lie or avoid speaking about subjects that others can be open about? This policy is inhumane to individuals and deprives our military of needed skills and knowledge. Dump this policy now before more lives are diminished and damaged–and reinstate those who have been discharged or modify their discharges to ‘honorable’.

Posted by: CAB | July 2, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Keep the DADT policy in place.

Posted by: MB | July 2, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Don’t Ask, Don’t tell should be left alone. When it came out it pleased nobody and to tamper with it again would inflame deep feelings about it. At this point in time, Soldiers do not need to be burdened with social issues such as this. Many people who are chaptered out of the military use the don’t ask, don’t tell policy just to get out of deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Posted by: Lou | July 2, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

No one cares what a person’s sexual preference is until it is revealed. DADT refers to both the hetero and homosexual. The law ought to remain in place so that the issue is not addressed while the person is in the military. So if you want to be a soldier join up and shut up! If one wants to serve in the military shouldn’t they serve according to the standards already set?

Posted by: Grace | July 2, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Once again, America expresses the fear of the unknown. We are all people who need to realize our similarities instead of our differences.

Posted by: Deb, Virginia | July 2, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Dont ask, dont tell protects those who do not want everyone to know their personal business. Leave the ruling alone.

Posted by: old lady | July 2, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I think they should get rid of it. It makes no sense that people today still have an issue with gays. To the people in the army, gays are already in the army. So what is just ask don’t tell is doing. It is getting rid of qualified people. Which mean now to all the people in the army that don’t want the gays there, they are making you do 4-5 tours in Iraq instead of 1 or 2 and you are the one staying away from your family and friends. And to People that say that are not comfortable working with gays have an issue with their on sexual identity.

Posted by: jay | July 2, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

It is simply a matter of fairness and equal treatment under the law. Although right now there is a military law against homosexual conduct which I believe should be struck down immediately. How can anyone justify making an entire group 2nd class citizens? Re the idea of “keeping their private lives private” – then all service members should be precluded from mentioning their wives and husbands and bfs and gfs! RE asking the enlisted members to vote – that is like asking them in the 40′s if they felt there should be racial integration. It is not something to be put to a vote. Just as Prop 8 in CA should never have made it to the ballot. I am so sorry for Dan Choi and the MANY others – and especially sad about our country’s loss. Too many extremely talented and worthy men and women are being denied the right to serve and we are being denied their service. Blessings to all. Carl

Posted by: carl iba | July 2, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

I’m not sure as to why any person sexual perference has to do with a right or privelege. In the military you are not allowed to show public display of affection in uniform. If I’m in the field fighting the enemy one’s preference is not a thing of discussion, because somebody life might be at risk. Another thing to consider is that you have two individuals living in a space 10 X 14 give or take. Granted you have times that hetersex might take place based on an agreement between the two roommates, and if a gay guys was to say he wanted to have an intimate moment with his partner then I personally wouldn’t be comfortable in sleeping in my bunk bed knowing that my roommate like guys. Our society has been gradually diteriating away due to various sexual advertisements that should really be left in the privacy of the bedroom just as the recent Calvin Klein ad in NY.

Posted by: BG | July 2, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Gays have served in military units since the time of Alexander the Great, Spartans, and Greeks. I am told Alexander was also gay. Anyone who thinks that hundreds gay people are not currently serving in the military, isn’t being releastic. In fact, in my 20 yrs of service, I knew of many straight guys that couldn’t take military life, so they confessed to be gay and asked for the gay discharge because it was the easiest and quickest way out. And who in civilian life knew what an “Administrative discharge” entailed.
Repeal DADT. It is being abused by staights and administrators.

Posted by: John Frias | July 2, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

I think most people commenting here have not thought about the issue. This is not M-TV.
This is the US Military and I don’t think the issue of being Gay is as big as the whole…I’m different. They need to make the service people ONE and to be one means you give all away for being ONE as a unit. to allow people to be diffnert means you’ve destroyed that important element…This is not Jr. high people

Posted by: P S | July 2, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is a joke. I know for a fact that many gay men serve our country (I did!) and no one had a problem with it. I am PROUD to have served my country.

Posted by: Dennis | July 2, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

If you did a poll asking military people how they would feel they would first have to know who they are serving with..Many gays dont tell as per the dont ask dont tell policy. You would be suprised how many MARRIED gays there are who are married to the opposite sex serving in the military. lmao. Its heterosexuals fear of the unknown as well as their own self confidence that makes them inhuman however if the shoe were on the other foot they would finally know how it feels. BTW i was in the military for quite some time and all i could do was laugh at their ignorance and prejudice. At the same time it was rather sad. I was privy to conversations about what they would do, what they did to gay people in their lifetime and even on the ship or out in town. What did i think about this? It made me believe that heterosexuals were sick in the mind and completely heartless.

Posted by: AJ | July 2, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Why do gays have a “need” to let the entire world know about their sexual preference. The military is smart to have the “don’t ask – don’t tell” policy because they don’t have the time to get involved in everyone’s sex lives or in this case, the conflicting emotions people have about it. Whether you like it or not – the majority of people are uncomfortable with the gay agenda – it’s the media who’s lying and doing everything possible to promote this lifestyle into every aspect of our lives. Respect everyone – keep your sex life to yourself and stay out of mine.

Posted by: M. Sheldon | July 2, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I think that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy should be change so that people in the military that object to homosexuals in the military should be court marshaled since they pose a bigger threat to society and the military than homosexuals do.

Posted by: Bruce Barnes | July 2, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

The policy of “don’t ask, don’t” is absurd as if everyone should make secret their identity. Would someone exposed for being Lutheran, perhaps spotted exiting a church, an ethnic Hawaiian that participated in a cultural event, or Texan because of his accent suffer reprimand or expulsion? Has our military’s morale and cohesion disintegrated since blacks were permitted to operate along side whites? Perhaps it is the prurient interest of the brass with fixated sexual fantasies fearing they cannot control the hormones of the youth already in the military. Gays have always served in the military, many with valor and honor, and sexuality is never an issue in the heat of battle. Why does the brass feel the need to monitor human feelings and private lives? The Brotherhood of the Warrior does not discriminate.

Posted by: Billie McCrary | July 2, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am

and to the people that say they dont want to be in a fox hole with a gay person because they will be think what the gay person is doing .. just becaseu you are in a uniform does not mean every gay man want to see you with your clothes off .. trust me .. gays go to work to work to put themselves or the other troops in danger

Posted by: jay | July 2, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Being gay is not a right to acceptance that deserves any protection. Keep Don’t-ask-dont-tell, it maintains a strong socially bound military that works well. The gays work performance may be fine but it can impact the performance of many others in this life/death job. Don’t use the military as a pulpit for gay pride. Note: Pride being one of the 7 deadly sins. Life is not fair and military personel will put there lives on the line. If you haven’t served you don’t have a clear vision of this matter. How about my right not to be so openly offended by the gay life style.

Posted by: Peter | July 2, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am

As a Viet Nam Vet who served on a hospital ship that was heavily populated by members of the gay community and having grown-up in LA, constantly rebucking advances from members of the gay community I beliieve
that thier service is detrimental to moral. The truth is I was stalked by a gay executive officer who made my life hell because I refused his advances.At one point he had me code-redded because of his disappoint in my denial and distaste for him despite his rank..I am not anti-gay as long as they don’t push thier agenda on non-gays, but this was not the case in my situation..This officer used his position to make my life hell and when i reported the incidences to psychiatrists after a break-down from his insecent stalking they minimized my case by saying “He doesn’t like the way he is being treated”…Military time is not 24/7 and some of these people misuse thier power, basically becoming preditors..This man actually trolled the decks looking for young boys that he transfered to the focsal where he could stand on the Bridge and ogle us through his binoculars…sure, they deserve rights, but not a free ride to exert inappropriate behavior, victumizing young men with no means of justice..After twenty yearsof VA therapy, i’ve finally been able to tell my story which is now being held in secret files and not being considered as causes of ptsd…Like the increase in rapes since females are more and more entering the military, the dirty story of gay-life in the military is not being fully exposed…My fear is for the innocents if the Don’t Ask Don’t tell program goes on and if it is repealled, it will give more freedom to such preditors like the one I encountered…

Posted by: Dave Miller | July 2, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Why do gays have to have a “need” to let the entire world know they are gay? I can ask the same question about heterosexuals. To be honest i am sick and tired of hearing about someones wife or husband or child and i cannot talk about my family, my wife, my child. What kind of question is that? Why do they have a “NEED”. lol. Ask yourself how many times a day do you talk about YOUR family then ask the question again.

Posted by: Aj | July 2, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Maybe the Armed Services wouldn’t be so stretched if so many gays were not being discharged. It’s ridiculous that they are taking people with criminal records and kicking out gays with advanced degrees. Don’t ask, don’t tell should never have been made into law in the first place. If anyone believed that we didn’t have gays serving honorably before that, they probably also believe in the tooth fairy.

Posted by: Carol | July 2, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Being a female veteran who served my country 20+ years and earned my retirement I’m siding with dropping the DADT. Anyone willing to sacrafice their life for our country and able to meet all other requirements should be allowed to defend our United States. Now, my Christian beliefs would try to turn their personal lifestyle around should I ever speak with them but that wouldn’t affect how they are trained to defend my Constitutional Rights I also defended during war on our national soil and throughout this world.

Posted by: cps | July 2, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Dave,
Im sorry men made a pass at you constantly. Im FEMALE…do you know how many unwanted passes MALES made to me when i was in the military? One CHIEF actually got my home address and came to my house. I had to actually fight him as he pushed his way into my apt. He kept saying,”I can make your life easy in the military”. SO come on Dave…get real..your male..you know how your hormones act up…maybe its a male thing? You tell me. Again, try being female and in the service…you have NO IDEA!! Even with that…i didnt feel that because MEN couldnt keep their hands to themselves that it was detrimental to the service. Nor my job..however, i did notice they did less work because they were too busy rubbing off. Now that is detrimental.

Posted by: Aj | July 2, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

I am a straight 54 year old Mother & Grandmother. I believe that the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy should be revoked immediately.
All soldiers previously discharged under this policy should be reinstated if they choose, with back pay.
I believe there should be no discrimination of the GLBT population by any department of the US government.
I voted for Obama and I strongly support him but I am very disappointed that 6 months into this administration nothing has happened to correct this situation.

Posted by: SML | July 2, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

The ban should be lifted. I know a young gay man who joined the Navy a couple of years ago. A chaplain asked him if he was gay, which apparently they can do within the first 60 or 90 days. He was discharged, but his commanding officer tried to prevent that, and tried to get him reinstated. One person commented that homesexual behavior is against the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This policy does not address behavior, it addresses orientation.

Posted by: Astro1 | July 2, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Peter,
Please dont use the military for heterosexual pride and prejudice. Ive served in the military being female..I can ask the same thing as you did….what about my right not to be so openly offended by straight people? See how silly that sounds. So yeah..i have a clear vision!

Posted by: Aj | July 2, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

I don’t feel you can expect to train them like men then expect them not to act like it. If it’s personal it should be kept to themselves. If you try to FORCE men who are straight to accept them, they may not show it on the outside how they feel, but if I were a gay guy in battle, I would like to leave no room for doubt that my back would be covered by the straight guy. This could pertain to gay women just the same but I think it would be more so for the men. I’m straight and I’m proud of it. I harbor no ill feelings towards those who are gay, but I think issues such as this should quit being crammed down our throats. We have the right to how we feel just the same as any other.

Posted by: Carla Thornton-Rivers | July 2, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

The united states should hang its head in shame,the one country where all people are to be treated equally,other countries are way ahead on equality,get rid of this policy now

Posted by: Will F | July 2, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Things need to be left alone as they are! It is hard enough to be in combat with out wondering if the person next to you is more interested in you or if they are committed to fighting along side of you!! Just as women should not be in combat along side with men. Men are in combat for one reason and one reason alone. They do not need to be wondering if the person along side them will be able to support them. There is too much stress in combat!!

Posted by: Edith Doughty | July 2, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Carla,
No one knew i was gay while i was in the military. Could i say the same? That maybe the heterosexuals might want the (unknown) gay woman or man to watch their backs? The way some heterosexuals treat homosexuals its quite immoral..and unsafe…you see you cant always tell who is gay..but you surely know who is straight> Now you see..that was a silly comment…It works both ways carla. The difference beings is that Many Gays try to be a bit more understanding than A FEW ignorant straight people..and it is a FEW.

Posted by: aj | July 2, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am

They are using the same logic to ban gays as they did for blacks, women, Japanese, Germans and others from serving in years past and we have since realized it was all bunk. Years from now we will look back on history and see this ban was as stupid as it was for all the other formerly banned groups. Its just a question of how long our leaders want to look stupid for our future historians. I can’t believe a black leader would tolerate this ban considering what black people went through! Stop the ban today!

Posted by: Harold | July 2, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am

As long as the military rules are followed that don’t allow for any outwardly affection shown by ANYONE in uniform, it doesn’t matter who serves.

Posted by: Lynne | July 2, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Will someone please add MORE floride to the drinking water of those ignorant polititians? LOL.

Posted by: aj | July 2, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

The time is now to repeal DADT. Other enlightened
countries have already done so without any problems.
The problem with many older Americans is that they are very unsophisticated Puritans who are afraid of themselves. Younger people do not have any problems
with GLBT persons. Americans need to grow up now!

Posted by: Electron | July 2, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Lift the ban on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Too many excellent people have been kicked out of the military for no good reason. No GOOD reason! How is it that one of the most macho armies in the world, The Israel Defense Force, allows gays to serve — no questions asked! If you qualify in every other aspect, you should be able to serve your country in the military

Posted by: Burgess Needle | July 2, 2009, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Repeal DADT. Repeal DOMA. It was wrong back then when it was instituted; it is wrong now. Gay civil marriage does nothing to affect heteromarriages (unless a gay is forced to marry a straight). Gingrich, Giuliani, Sanford, et al are doing a wonderful job on their own without a gay to blame.

Posted by: ec | July 2, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am

AS A 19 YEAR OLD SOLDIER, AND VIET NAM VETERAN, I WAS RUDELY SHOCKED WHEN THIS SARGEANT WHOSE COMPANY I WAS IN AT THE TIME PROCEEDED TO “HIT ON ME” WITH WORDS LIKE “I’M HOT TO TROT” AND OTHER SIMILAR INVECTIVES. I DIDN’T GET VISIBLY ANGRY, BUT MADE AN UNCOMFORTABLE B-LINE AWAY FROM HIM. “DON’T ASK/DON’T TELL” IS THE BEST WAY TO HANDLE A PHYSIOLOGICAL ANOMALY SUCH AS HOMOSEXUALITY…IT’S BETTER IF THAT SEGMENT OF THE MILITARY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO FLAUNT AND SHOWCASE THEIR INNATE COMPULSION, WHICH THEY SURELY WOULD, IF GIVEN AN OFFICIAL SANCTION.

Posted by: richard hinds | July 2, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am

President Obama declared himself a “fierce advocate” for homosexual rights and promised to end the sad “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy if elected. We voted him into office by a 2 to 1 electoral vote margin, knowing this was his intention. He needs to act on the promise now by issuing an executive order that suspends all DADT discharges until Congress acts to abolish the policy. He’s a cautious man. Understandably he wants to avoid needless conflict, especially before health care and energy legislation pass. But he also needs to step up to the role of commander in chief. There are plenty of high-ranking current and former military people who support DADT repeal – enough to overcome the fear-mongering crowd. He’s yet to figure out that the people who put him in office did so because we want the changes he promised, not because of his many good personal qualities. We have his back. He needs to get it done. He also needs to make sure there is a public option component to health care, that we get cap and trade on carbon emissions in the energy policy, and that a full inquiry (by independent prosecutor or non-partisan commission) into the the knowledge, motives, statements, and actions of the Bush administration leading to the invasion of Iraq commence immediately. He needs to ignore the “Can’t Do” Republican leadership and the noisemakers like Gingrich, Hannity, and Limbaugh. Only Gregory, Stephanopoulos, Schieffer and 24 hour cable news think what they say matters any more. Those are the people the ran America off a cliff. They are discredited and should be treated as such.

Posted by: 6is9 | July 2, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am

I believe those in the military- opinion’s should matter the most. Ask those who are laying their lives down for your freedom – take a poll in the military ranks. Your not in a life and death situation- sometimes daily, with stress and worries of making it back home safely. Why should we decide that a same sex person be there with them to make advances at him or her. It’s their lives this is messing with not ours. Let their choice be heard, it’s their blood their spilling for you and me. May they chose their own distraction, if they want too.

Posted by: JA | July 2, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Any rule or law which does not support full equality for all people must go. Any heterosexual willing to be shot at by insurgents but unwilling to serve alongside a homosexual needs to have their head examined. Really people, grow up.

Posted by: Dan | July 2, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am

Give Obama a break. He has bigger eggs to fry than “don’t ask don’t tell” Although I support gay rights they need to support the president and wait until he can attack this issue politically.

Posted by: Richard | July 2, 2009, 3:10 am 3:10 am

STOP DISCRIMINATING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: c | July 2, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am

They are willing to give thier lives for us an this country, l feel it should be removed and live an let live. We dont’ hear of Gay people raping in the forces but we definetly here of Men Raping Woman so let them be re-instated if thrown out and leave the rest alone. Just because Religion doesn’t believe it, what happened to separation between church an state. l go to church they leave a how to vote on my window so may God help you all. Give all whom serve gay or straight the respect they deserve.

Posted by: PJ Granieri | July 2, 2009, 3:12 am 3:12 am

TOTALLY IGNORANT. AMERICA NEEDS TO GROW UP AND JUST ACCEPT PEOPLE FOR WHO THEY ARE. SERIOUSLY PEOPLE. SCHOOLS ARE NO LONGER SEGREGATED AND NEITHER SHOULD THE MILITARY BE IN “PRINCIPLE”.

Posted by: c | July 2, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Oh Jeeez. Turn the page already, we’re gonna look back on this in generations to come and wonder what took us so long. We can’t afford to keep turning away qualified personnel, it just doesn’t matter what orientation they are. There’s incredible people and ass holes all along the hetero to homo continuum. TURN OVER THE RULE AND LETS MOVE ON!

Posted by: Roxanna - Seattle | July 2, 2009, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Do you hear this? It is the toilet flushing, and that is exactly where this rule should go. Our soldiers are risking their lives out there, and they can be “outed” because they have a “different lifestyle”? Give me a break, I thought we were more progressive than that! Who cares what they do in their personal lives, it’s what they do in their military lives that matter. This rule, I have always thought was completely biased, and discrimatory. I can’t even believe that the supreme court continued this bigoted, hypocritical and discriminatory policy. Our military personnel should be applauded, not degraded into hiding like there is something wrong with them. It’s shameful of this country.

Posted by: Shari | July 2, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

FOR ALL OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT GAYS IN THE MILITARY…WHY DON’T YOU GO VOLUNTEER TO TAKE THEIR PLACE IF YOU HAVE SUCH A PROBLEM WITH IT. …MADE YOU THINK DIDN’T I? IF YOU’RE NOT WILLING TO GO OUT TO THESE DANGEROUS PLACES FOR THE SAKE OF OUR SAFETY, THEN WHY ARE WE GIVING THE GAYS A HARD TIME WHEN THEY ARE DOING SOMETHING THAT WE AREN’T WILLING TO?

Posted by: c | July 2, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

If they want to serve let. Let them, We need every good man & women willing to serve our country. Do you think any other country would turn them away? We work, live, learn side by side of different poeple, why would this be any different.

Posted by: Leo | July 2, 2009, 3:18 am 3:18 am

equalnotspecial Said:
“The primary purpose served by DADT is to perpetuate the very prejudice and discrimination it was designed to indulge. It must be repealed and replaced with a non-discrimination policy. As long as it exists, it teaches that discrimination is acceptable. As long as our government teaches discrimination to new recruits and the general population, we will not be able to achieve full legal equality. The use of our tax dollars to teach discrimination against us must end. Repeal and replacement with a non-discrimination policy should be a priority for the gay population.”

Posted by: losangelbear | July 2, 2009, 3:18 am 3:18 am

The “Don’t ask; don’t tell” Policy should be repealed. President Obama should issue an Executive Order now. President Truman changed the Segregation Policy to give equal treatment to Blacks in the Military. Obama should repeal the Policy NOW to give equal treatment to homosexuals. Separate is not equal!

Posted by: Alice Danielson | July 2, 2009, 3:23 am 3:23 am

Lift the ban now, it’s inhumane to leave it in place. There is no reason not to. The military already has rules in place regarding fraternization, they apply to all…this nation needs to move forward to equality for all. These people put their lives on the line, just like straight military personell. If we don’t lift it, do we then start sliding backwards and start segregating by gender or race, maybe even religion? Why is there a division in our definition of equality?
SA in California

Posted by: Stephanie | July 2, 2009, 3:25 am 3:25 am

HATERS ARE LAME.

Posted by: c | July 2, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am

When I lived in So.CA, a friend of a friend who was on leave from the U.S. navy came camping with us. This young man was highly funcationing but retarted person who by no means should have been in the matiliary much less carry a loaded firarm but he did. I would much preferred to have a gay person in charge 100x’s over this person. How he got in the service is beyond me.

Posted by: Leo | July 2, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am

Repeal this shameful policy IMMEDIATELY. As Commander in Chief, Obama should suspend enforcement of this inhumane policy NOW.
The recent discharge of Lt. Dan Choi is particularly galling – a waste of a highly respected, dedicated, honorable Army talent.
Focus instead on truth, honesty, equality, tolerance to end bigotry, hate crimes, bullying, teen/pre-teen suicide – let’s celebrate American diversity.

Posted by: DK Leong | July 2, 2009, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Repeal it. This is a non-issue in light of facts:
1. Homosexuality is not a “choice”; it is biologically determined, either by genes or by the wash of hormones during normal growth patterns of the body. Did you choose to have black, curly hair? Hazel eyes? Be short? Nooooo, so ….
2. Religion is mostly not facts but beliefs, so religious injunctions against homosexuality, even assuming they actually exist, don’t count.
3. Biblical passages supposedly against homosexuality mostly disapprove of anti-societal actions and societal decadence; it doesn’t really address sexual relations per se between loving, consenting adults which are neither antisocial or decadent. Read your Bible, folks; the WHOLE Bible.
4. As to “people who don’t like to be around homosexuals,” short answer: Grow up! Long answer: You ARE and have been around homosexuals, as between 5 to 20% of the world population is homosexual, according to the best statistical estimates. What’s the big deal?
5. Pretty much the rest of the world thinks Americans are nutty about sex anyway; such a stupid policy as banning gays from the military only confirms their suspicions. The policy is a phenomenal waste of taxpayers’ dollars by drumming out of the military the highly-trained-at-government-expense servicemen and women.
6. Homophobes are ignorant of reality, so if there are homophobes “serving for our freedom” in the military, then they should be educated by the military about the facts of homosexuality and get with the program!
7. Besides, has one ever reviewed a list of homosexuals in history? Some of the great contributors to mankind have been gay, and while on the topic of the military, being gay apparently didn’t hurt Alexander the Great’s conquering the world!

Posted by: tr | July 2, 2009, 3:38 am 3:38 am

No one should have to hide the truth about their sexuality unless they want to, especially out of fear of discrimination. The bigger problem is that our military allows people who are so ignorant and bigoted to serve that they would discriminate against the civil rights of their fellow Americans and brothers and sisters in uniform. I think it is worse to have a military filled with people who in this day and age are still convinced that being openly gay means “flaunting” one’s sexuality.

Posted by: Karen | July 2, 2009, 3:49 am 3:49 am

Repeal DADT. The preoccupation with sexuality in both military and civilian life in this country is outrageous. In the military, violation of DADT has resulted in the loss of thousands of loyal, effective men and women, a loss we can ill afford at any time, especially in the present, considering our worldwide commitments. Let it go, people, and divert your attention from sexual orientation to productive pursuits for getting this country back on the track to prosperity.

Posted by: Stan | July 2, 2009, 3:50 am 3:50 am

The ban forces gay people to pretend they’re someone they’re not … even after they’ve pledged to lay down their lives for their country! This is insane. We’re lucky they’ve been willing to put up with it this long! Grow up, America. Other countries don’t have this problem. In Europe, gays serve openly in the military and are treated with respect. All this prejudice against gays in America has to stop. I for one am sick of it. Get over it, America, once and for all! … Then we can all move on, TOGETHER, and begin solving some of our REAL problems.

Posted by: Jane Bruce-Munro | July 2, 2009, 3:58 am 3:58 am

As a veteran who served under don’t ask don’t tell it wasn’t a burden then and shouldn’t be now. Gay people were well known, as they are in society. It simply prevented them from being flagrant about it and allowing their being gay to interfere with the environment a soldier lives in. Anyone commenting who hasn’t served, or have immediate friends or family serving, really doesn’t understand and should allow military personnel to govern themselves. It is those volunteer troops that are going to be affected, not you sitting in front of your T.V. watching nightline from the comfort of your home while the soldier protects your freedom. Stop trying to make everything in the United States as politically correct as you THINK you are. The military is about following rules. If you can’t follow the don’t ask don’t tell rule, you should be thrown out of the military, Period!

Posted by: Jeff A | July 2, 2009, 4:02 am 4:02 am

The don’t ask don’t tell policy either should stay intact or thrown out with a policy outright banning homosexuals
as it once was.
The military has that policy because homosexuality was, and still is, listed as a mental defect by the military, though not by the American Psychiatric
Association (APA), which delisted homosexuality as a mental illness not by
conclusive research, but by gay
rights advocates and their pressure tactics.
These same pressure tactics are now being use to force a more liberal
military policy toward homosexuality.
The current policy came into being not because the the military wanted it, but because The Clinton Administration had this policy implemented.
One’s homosexual preference is personal and should not be something forced to be acknowledged by others, especially in an institution that has been vehemently against policies acknowledging homosexuality.

Posted by: Doug | July 2, 2009, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Our military is self destructing by expelling valuable people because they think being gay is a problem for the straight soldiers. However, when those very straight soldiers are asked about the gay soldiers serving with them, they say they already know and don’t care. A guy like Daniel Choi would be a good candidate to work for a military contractor in Iraq, making a six-figure salary along side of his old friends still in the Army. So we pay to train him so he can work for peanuts, but instead fire him then rehire him at twenty times the cost. Brilliant. The British and Israeli armies are quite competent and have included gays for years. This is a stupid, self destructive policy that is weakening our military.

Posted by: Kevin | July 2, 2009, 4:27 am 4:27 am

Please keep this policy. It will be better for everyone all around. There should be no sexual activities during military time on the job, and if “don’t ask, don’t tell” is abolished, this will be very hard to prevent because the gays will claim “discrimination.” Let’s not make is harder for our young men to serve in the military. They are risking everything.

Posted by: Michelle | July 2, 2009, 5:45 am 5:45 am

Obama and Congress need to end DADT before we lose more personnel because of it. Seems to me the military needs to focus on stopping rapes, which are rampant against women while deployed. It’s not gays who are causing sexual problems – it’s hetero males.

Posted by: CG | July 2, 2009, 5:52 am 5:52 am

THE WAY I SEE IT IS THAT THERE ARE GAY MALES AND FEMALES IN ALL BRANCHES OF SERVICE….SO NO MATTER IF THE DON’T ASK DON’T TELL GETS TOSSED OUT OR NOT THEY WILL STAY, SO JUST THEM BE LIKE EVERYONE ELSE AND BE OPEN WITH WHO THEY ARE

Posted by: BRANDI | July 2, 2009, 5:53 am 5:53 am

Please keep this policy. It is better for everyone all around. There should be no sexual activities during military time on the job. If “don’t ask, “don’t tell” is abolished, this will be very hard to prevent because the gays will claim “discrimination.” Let’s not make it harder for our young men and women to serve in the military. They are risking everything.

Posted by: Marina | July 2, 2009, 6:30 am 6:30 am

I think that it is idiotic to require people to lie about something which has nothing to do with their job performance. The “Don’t Ask – Don’t Tell” Policy would seem more to compromise military discipline because of soldiers fears of being outed. The rules regarding consorting with other soldiers in the military should be the same regardless of sexual orientation. There shouldn’t be two sets of rules based on some archaic notions about homosexuality.

Posted by: bel gazou | July 2, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am

It is time for Don’t Ask Don’t Tell to go the way of other discriminatory policies. The President should end it today. It will not harm the military and will likely strengthen our country overall consistent withthe principles of this country.

Posted by: Edward Faggen | July 2, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Repeal DADT.
Another way to get rid of DADT would be to bring back the draft. Once the officials realize it would be easy to dodge by pulling the gay card, it would be repealed!

Posted by: Mick in Michigan | July 2, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Real Americans come in all varieties.
What matters is not thier gender, color
or orientation. What counts is the size of their hearts and love of country.
Let all Americans be equal and serve
their country honorably.

Posted by: Tom | July 2, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

The ban should be lifted. It just does not hold water, other nations allow Gays and they don’t have any of the problems that are projected. Why do people think that every gay person is out to “get” a straight person. I have found that there are plenty of gays available and more still in the closet waiting to come out. The service has had gays all along whether they wat to admit it or not.

Posted by: Chuck | July 2, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

I’ve always been taught to “Hate the Sin, not the Sinner.” I say go ahead and let them enlist as long as they are required to enroll in a program to help them to overcome their sinful lifestyle. Then everyone’s a winner.

Posted by: Scott | July 2, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” What is that? We need is “Investigate and Discharge.”

Posted by: Iraq Vet | July 2, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

There really is nothing to decide. Gays are citizens too and pay taxes, and they should receive equal treatment under the law. DADT is a violation of civil rights and should be stopped immediately.
Besides the ethical reasons, the military has been damn stupid to get rid of people with special skills most in demand.
Obama has been very disappointing–with the stroke of a pen he could suspend implementation of this unfair practice until something more permanent was done. Why doesn’t he do this? I have been a strong supporter of his, but I begin to wonder if he is ever going to put his money where his mouth is.

Posted by: Myra Jones | July 2, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Im Turning Twenty-One July 15th!
Im Active Army Who Will Be Getting Deployed In March. (So Im Told)
Im Normal Just As You. I Have A Relationship With GOD. Im An Active Church Member. Im “Squared Away.”
To Add To This Artical. I Am GAY.
Single When Joined. Now Engaged. For My Birthday PLEASE??? This Hurts, Not Just Me But MANY others As Well. I’m only risking my life for you…

Posted by: PV2 Me | July 2, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Keep the “don’t ask don’t tell” policy. It’s private information. Each person stands alone with their conscience before God; it’s no one else’s business. I am a Veteran.

Posted by: lrs | July 2, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

enough of it already… get rid of don’t ask don’t tell.. it’s insane.. it breeds discrimination…

Posted by: william robinson | July 2, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

I notice that the only people opposing getting rid of the policy make no sense. Yes, sexuality is a purely personal matter but if someone chooses to speak on it no one has the right to punish them for it. If straight people can talk about their love lives without than so can a gay person. The fact that a straight person may not be comfortable around a gay is not a justification to discriminate. If you apply these same justifications to the presence of minorities in the military you see that whites learned to be comfortable and minorities served admirably. Thus, none of the excuses work unles you can still apply them to all non-white men and all women.

Posted by: Timothy Waddell | July 4, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

@Julia: I doubt you will read this seeing as it is several months later but based on your comment I am under the impression that you are against any expression of sexual orientation while serving in the military. If you are saying we should limit a homosexuals freedom to express sexual orientation we must also limit heterosexual soldiers from flaunting their sexual orientation. If homosexual soldiers are forbidden to speak of their preference, because “ones sexual preference should be a personal and private matter” then I guess every straight male should keep everything about themselves to….themselves. The problem with this country is we use so called “norms” to control every person when every person is not the same and we base every little thing on religious ideals. I’m sorry to break it to you but not everyone practices the same religion and the last time I checked America was not a theocracy but a DEMOCRACY based on the ideas of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all(though we have never actually achieved this). Can you honestly tell me that if you were told you had to hide yourself and who you were just because it made people uncomfortable this would make you happy and believe that you had equal rights and freedom in a country that claims to have said opportunites? I highly doubt it. Everyone preaches their beliefs to take away the rights of others until its their own group facing persecution. When your beliefs affect the well-being of someone else, the happiness of someone else I think its time to either find some new beliefs or keep them to yourself. The entire controversy over the rights of homosexuals is riddled with contradiction, as well as religious institutions that are continuously brainwashing people into believing that one person is worth more than another. All of this religious rant is of course not entirely directed at you for I have no idea if you are religious or not. I’m merely asking you to consider if you’d apply your ideas to everyone or only restrict a certain group because some people think its so “unnatural.”

Posted by: CK | December 14, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.