Is it Ever Ok for Someone to Take His Own Life?
Were covering a story tonight about a couple who committed suicide together. When Sir Edward Downes and his wife Joan learned that she had terminal cancer, they traveled to a clinic in Zurich and drank a fatal dose of barbiturates together.
Some have sharply criticized the clinic for its openness to patients with a vast array of ailments – and its openness to those who aren’t ill like Sir Edward.
What do you think? Is it ever right for someone to take his own life? Should someone with a terminal illness have the option, and should a member of their family be allowed to die with them by choice?
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
I think people should be allowed to do whatever they want with their own life.
Posted by: Justin Champion | July 15, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
This story would have made more sense and been easier understood about why the husband participated in the joint suicide if you had mentioned at the beginning of the story that he was loosing his hearing and was beginning to unable to hear the orchestra play in practice and in concert.
Give all the pertinent facts at the beginning instead of a aside at the end of the story.
Posted by: paul s | July 15, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
If someone is ‘not’ allowed to do as they please with their own life it is implied that they are relinquishing that control to someone else.
Posted by: MichaelP | July 15, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
It is your life. You alone get to decide what you do with it. No one can feel your pain, suffer your illness, or put themselves in your shoes. I don’t want to suffer unmercifully for years or be a burden to my family. Medicine is limited when it comes to actually curing illness. There is a huge difference between living and just being alive.
Posted by: Kelly | July 15, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
If you have ever watched a family member slowly being eaten up by cancer, and watched the horrific pain endured, and the inevitable outcome of this torture, letting a fellow human being choose not to go through that is a gift. Let those who so choose have that gift. Brian Keith will always be a hero. Look it up.
Posted by: Ken Silva | July 15, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
I think it’s very hard for someone to answer this who is not terminally ill and/or has never been clinically depressed.
Posted by: G | July 15, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
After watching my own two parents continually disintegrate so that currently they are both in wheelchairs, diapers and suffer from profound dementia/brain damage, and it has been six years of this with no end in sight, I say kudos to Edward and Joan for having the ability and intelligence to do what they did. They saved their families from having to experience years of expensive (financially and emotionally) suffering and watching painful and inevitable decline. They chose the most excellent way to go, in my opinion. This should be available to others.
Posted by: karen k | July 15, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
what these questions really force us to ask is “do we believe in a higher authority.” If not then sure people should be allowed to do whatever they’d like with their own lives and itwhy should anyone else care?
Posted by: sam | July 15, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Of course it’s okay, people should be allowed to do what they want provided it does not hurt anyone else. Trying to impose Christofascist control over other people who aren’t hurting anyone is abjectly evil and immoral. If people want to kill themselves and no children are left behind to be emotionally harmed, intellectually and morally superior atheists find no problem with that.
Posted by: Fredric L. Rice | July 15, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
why is it even a debate? if one individual decides when his/her life will end according to their terms, they’re exercising their freedom. who else should have a say on the matter? governments?
not a lot of sense in going around claiming how “free” we are if we’re too scared to accept all its forms. grow a pair, freedom is messy.
dont like it? move to China.
Peace
Posted by: Adrian | July 15, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Author Carolyn Heilbrun decided to take her own life when, in her own estimation, it was no longer worth living. I would make the same decision in a heartbeat, and have announced that decision to family and friends so that they will not be shocked or surprised when it happens.
Posted by: Kim-Anon | July 15, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Everyone has the right and should have reasonable access to end of life. We have progressed through several levels of education and understanding to reach our current state. While still difficult for some to accept, there is no reason we should suffer through a painful, awkward and humiliating death, which serves no useful, reasonable purpose. Ideally we all are tought – or learn – that death is inevitable and at some point it is more intelligent and human to deliberately end life while still able to make that decision and carry it out.
I’ve already made the plans and will make them happen when the time comes.
RCharles
Posted by: RCharles | July 15, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
ABC, no matter how tight deadlines are, you should still proofread, or at least run a spell check right before you upload: “Were coving”?!
Posted by: signseeker17 | July 15, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
No
Posted by: Sad | July 15, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Absolutely.
If i brought a pet into a vets’ office and the pet was in agonizig pain and could not have a quality life. Not only would the vet help me give my pet a comfortable death, they would likely hold me in contempt if i chose to treat the animal in the same way we treat a human at the end of life.
While it may appear that i am comparing the value of a human life to that of a dog or cat, i am actually not. I am comparing the compassion that we show our pets to the lack of compassion we show our family.
Can you imagine a world where we would force the beloved family dog to spend its final days, weeks, months or years confined to a vet clinic kenel in pain.
Why can’t we show the same type of respect for our family members.
Posted by: Gus | July 15, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
as I got older I’ve become an atheist so it’s easy for me to say that people should be able to take their own lives. what’s starting to trouble me is that (in though) I can come up with a good reason (besides braking the law) why I cant take someone else’s life. Why am I forced to accept social norms or universal morals?
Posted by: sam | July 15, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Why is this even being asked? I think it’s wrong to deny the choice of what someone chooses to do with their life.
It’s arrogant to believe we have the right to judge others’ choices in life, much less if they choose to live or die. When everyone lives, thinks, behaves, and desires the same things we’ve lost our individuality and freedom to be individuals.
Weren’t we founded on give me liberty or give me death?
Posted by: Bonson Yee | July 15, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Absolutely we should have that right!!!!!! I can’t believe the U.S. is that far behind these other countries – -
Posted by: Maureen | July 15, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
I watched my mother slowly die of dementia/alzhiemers. Everyone should have the option of going early if they wish
Posted by: howard_anon | July 15, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Proofing:
“for its openness to patients with a vast array of ailments — and it’s openness”
You got “its” right once and wrong once in the same sentence.
“Is it ever right for someone to take their own life?”
Also–subject/verb agreement.
Posted by: Dave | July 15, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Politically, it should always be “legal” to commit suicide.
Morally, it is appropriate to commit suicide when one can no longer achieve any of one’s values.
Posted by: Jonathan | July 15, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
is it right? – no it isnt right to take your own life. is it one’s choice to take it? well, there isn’t anyone in the world who can make this choice except for the the one who decides to do it.
Posted by: check | July 15, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Some argue that in a health care system that focuses on autonomy, independence and self control, that it presupposes certain ideas such as: the patient is the primary decision maker; the patient has an interest in being in charge; there is a clear understanding of diagnosis, prognosis, and options; the patient has equal financial access to medical care offered; the patient is competent to make choices; and that the patient has a spiritual orientation that does not emphasize divine intervention. There are many patients who are in a situation where one or more of the aforementioned conditions do not apply. This is where many are concerned that those who are at an economic disadvantage may choose PAS to avoid being a financial burden to their families, or because they do not have the same access to health care as wealthier patients. Even worse, patients may feel pushed into a certain direction by their family as a cost containment strategy.
Posted by: gibson | July 15, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Providing one follows a Christ-like lifestyle, then the rule is “Thall Shall not Kill”. However, one who does not follow a Christ-like lifestyle should have every right available to them to do what they wish with their own life.
Posted by: ROlson | July 15, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Its your life…. do what you want with it! You should not need a reason or permission. You did not choose to be born, you should have the right to end it!
Posted by: Michael | July 15, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Adult: Anyone above 21. Can make any decision that does not interfere with an other person. That includes the termination of his or her own life.
Posted by: Paul Lysholdt | July 15, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
yes
Posted by: david | July 15, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Yes, anyone should be able to take their own life. We should set up suicide shops where people can just show up and kill themselves however they want in a nice private environment where their loved ones won’t discover their bodies and it’ll be easy to clean up the mess.
Posted by: Paul | July 15, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
“…. Although in these cases the guilt of the individual may be reduced or completely absent, nevertheless the error of judgment into which the conscience falls, perhaps in good faith, does not change the nature of this act of killing, which will always be in itself something to be rejected…”
Posted by: Howard | July 15, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Come to think of it I will do some online searching now to find a good way to end my own life so I’ll have a plan ready when I need it.
Posted by: howard_anon | July 15, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
I find it remarkable that when an animal is old and suffering we “don’t have the heart” to keep it alive. However, when a human being is suffering we don’t have the heart to let them die! Instead we fill them with drugs and machines to try to drain every bit of life out of them as we can, eve if it causes them nothing but endless misery.
In most cases taking one’s own life is needless and causes more suffering that it ends. But, in cases of the terminally ill where there is no hope, allow them to die with dignity.
Posted by: Jeff Vachon | July 15, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
here’s a free lesson, World Newser Editor (if there is one). grammatically speaking, the title of this news article is an abomination. because the pronoun SOMEONE is singular, the plural possessive adjective THEIR which corresponds to it is incorrectly used and should be replaced with the singular possessive adjective HIS. you could also opt to use HER or even the occassionally awkward (but infinitely more progressive/accurate) HIS OR HER. using THEIR to describe SOMEONE’s life is just plain wrong. have a nice day!
Posted by: avg joe | July 15, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
One of the best laws a society can have is to make it unlawful to commit suicide or assist others in suicide.
A terrible thing that you can stupidly do to anyone you can communicate to is to tell them that you’re willing to accept their decision to commit suicide.
I’ve learned a lot about psychology and depression since the time I made the decision to die. I now believe that no one ever wants to die.
If you complain that suicide is a freedom, then it is just proof that freedom is not always desirable. To have pride is better than to have freedom.
Posted by: Kevin | July 15, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Yes, I think a very ill person should have the right and also if old and married many years, I think it is lovely to do it together.
IF it is a legal issue, I do not condone a young person to commit suicide over a seemingly dreadful emotional pain….I tend to believe that it is a serious health issue that should be just okay and noone else should have that control or guilt.
Posted by: Journe | July 15, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I have a better question that should be asked and is never asked. Is it ever OK for a couple to inflict LIFE on a soul?
As far as I understand, NONE of us was consulted or had the chance to agree to be born. Birth and life is something we have NO ability to choose on, so, we are brought kicking and screaming and covered with blood into a world we didn’t make.
The way laws try to run our lives, telling us where to walk, how fast to drive, what to take into our bodies, etc., deciding when our lives should end, is perhaps the most fundamental of rights, and I believe, it should be listed even before the current first amendment. Perhaps the First Amendment should have a Part A and B, with part A saying that every individual past 18 years of age, should absolutely have the right to end their life, as long as they do not take the life of any other being in the process, unless that being is a sentient being and gives consent to ending their life. Jack Kevorkian should have been Surgeon General instead of a convicted felon.
“So it goes.”- Kurt Vonnegut (RIP)
~Code
Posted by: CoDeWaRrIoRz | July 15, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
It’s more ok for an individual to end his life than to publish a story like this with a grammatical error in the title.
Posted by: Aaron | July 15, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
I do believe people have the right to end their own life but I’m not so sure that someone should get assistance when there is not a terminal / chronic illness involved. Aren’t doctors supposed to “first – do no harm”. If someone is not in pain or dying, isn’t it harmful to help them die?
Not a religious thing and I can’t even say these people are wrong, but IF the US is going to consider assisted suicide then we are going to need to start with guideliness that allow this only for people in pain or dying.
Posted by: barbara | July 15, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
yes?
Posted by: mike | July 15, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
As a Christian, I believe in the sanctity of life. However, I do not view the sanctity of life as preservation of life at all costs, as many Christians do. I think this couple made a choice to die with dignity, and in that, have elevated the concept of true living and exercise of God-given freedom.
I have watched family members die in agony and drug-induced stupor, and there wasn’t anything dignified or sanctified about it at all.
Posted by: Bobby | July 15, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
No person should be able to control what I do with my life, anymore than I should be able to control yours. If you don’t believe in the right to die, so be it. By the same token it is not your right to prevent my demise.
Posted by: Bob Browne | July 15, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Yes – it is ok. We make the same decisions for our pets and we call that compassion – so why not show the same compassion to ourselves and families.
Posted by: mike | July 15, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Sir Edward Downes should be given a post humous award for advancing the cause of self-euthanasia. I agree with previous commentors. Why can’t our legislators decriminalize suicide? This is an intensely private decision, many times a logical choice versus years of pain and suffering. I for one would like to see “Euthanasia Clinics”, where people could go for help with this. Think of the poignant experience Edward G. Robinson depicted in Soylent Green – he CHOSE his own beautiful music/service to accompany his demise.
Posted by: PJ | July 15, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
G-d Almighty the creator of heaven and earth has a book of laws called the seven noahide laws which he gave to the whole world. A person’s life, his body and his soul are G-d’s possessions. It is against the laws of Noah to take one’s own life (suicide). the question of life and death in such cases is not up to the person himself.
Posted by: david chaim | July 15, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
My first thought on this is that ‘this should be illegal, and punishable by the death penalty’….C’mon, This to me is a no-brainer.If within your power to stop yourself from going through terrible pain, power to you. Those who are opposed to the concept based on their particular faith needn’t take advantage of what should be a basic human right of self determination, nor would they be forced to, and I can only hope that those who are not opposed to this based on their definition of, or absence faith would be offered the same respectful right to their beliefs.
Posted by: Derek | July 15, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I watched my sister die of cancer and my brother was ill with Amyloidosis for seven years and he took himself off dialysis and died within four days with the help of a doctor that kept him out of pain with medication… My sister was not as lucky… It is so painful to have someone you love die muchless if it is so painful that the drugs can’t touch it.. I agree with ‘gus’ concerning pets….. If we allowed them to suffer as we do our love ones we would be considered horrible… As far as God goes…I thought he put us on this earth to have a mind of our own… I’m willing to be judged on how I feel concerning allowing all humans and animals to have dignity in death…. Why does anyone have to suffer in any manner if they don’t wish to…. also for those of you checking spelling and English….don’t you have something better to do…. Very happy to hear all the positive thoughts on the ‘right to die’…. sometimes one can feel alone in their thoughts……………………..
Posted by: Carole Tombrello | July 15, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
I don’t see why it is not okay. I think restricting people who wish to do so and are mentally capable of understanding the decision is stopping their ability to make life choices, even unto the choice to live. We do this to our pets without offering them a choice (due to ability), yet to those who actually have the ability we condemn it? It does not follow logically. Personally if I was in the same position with my partner at that age I would follow in their foot steps.
Posted by: Plutosams | July 15, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Actually, since “someone” is singular, it should read “is it ever right for someone to take his own life”, “his” being the generic for anyone, male or female.
Posted by: Dan | July 15, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
I think any well-thought-out decision about suicide is legitimate. I worry about depressed teenagers who have the urge without the same motivations as a fatally ill senior citizen, though. They can so easily despair when life can turn around suddenly for them, so it makes the issue more complicated. I’m more uncomfortable with euthenasia, although I see times when that should be allowed as well. I guess maybe we all need to think seriously and put our own desires in writing at some sane time of life for others to access if and when needed. (I don’t think it’s the place of government to criminalize suicide, though.)
Posted by: SherryB | July 15, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
I can’t think of anything more basic to life than the ability to end your own life. Only animals are forced by nature to endure disease and damage that makes life unendurable. Only humans by their intellect can see what the future holds for them and end their torment. Millions of people will “put down” animals that are suffering, those same people will insist that a dying and tormented human life continues. It makes no sense to me.
Posted by: JR | July 15, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
On the surface dual suicides (i.e. man and wife) sound reasonable however, a lot more thought should be given to the subject prior to actually being approved.
For example: My wife passed away over 10 years ago..I would have done anything to take her place but, barring
that I would have liked to go with her.
I continue to miss my wife terribly but no longer consider suicide an option.
Basically put, “beware what you wish for”.
Posted by: Richard Smith | July 15, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
No, this should NOT be a right. Why not?
1) Rights will be violated for convenience of others. This happens now in the Netherlands where older folks are scared of going into a health clinic fearing they will be deemed a burden on the system.
2) In Oregon, a woman recently received a letter stating that her health insurance provider will not cover the needed care she needs for a chronic condition, however, they will cover the cost of euthanasia.
3) Pain management is much better today than it has ever been…and patients aren’t even doped out on the new pain meds available. Anyone who argues otherwise just doesn’t know anything about medicine.
4) Quality of Life as an argument for allowing people to die is totally subjective. People with depression will deem that they have no quality of life, when all they need is good treatment (which is available) for their depression. Ditto for most other ailments.
Opening Pandora’s box for taking one’s life is NOT the compassionate thing to do.
Posted by: Dean W | July 15, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
It appears that every correspondent is in favor of this self destruct program and I fully agree provided that they are fully aware of what they are doing and (hopefully) have good reason for it.
((I’ve often wondered, Did Hemingway have good reason to do himself in?)
Lets take this one step further. Many people have designated a “Health Care Surrogate” to make medical care descisions on their behalf.Should such a person, possibly with the agreement of two physicians, be empowered to end the life of a seriously ill person (dementia, alzheimers, profound unconscious state etc? And if not, why not?
Posted by: B. Jerome Shane | July 15, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
I am glad you wrote this article; not because of your slant toward thinking it wrong to take one’s own life but because it was nice to read the comments from your readers: most everyone agrees that we all have that right.
I wish humans could also understand though, that (legal or not) we do have the power to take our lives. This is not the case for the animals suffering in factory farms, on Rodeo and Circus circuits, in research laboratories, at bear baiting events, and the list goes on and on. These animals CANNOT commit suicide no matter how dire their circumstances.
For those who advocate that humans should have the legal right to end their own lives please advocate for the animals too. Since they cannot escape their captors and suicide is not an option, let’s do something for them before we leave this earth for good.
Posted by: quantum | July 15, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
I did not ask to be born; therefore, I can choose when and how to die, unless someone else is going to make that choice for me. Let’s say I wanted to kill my self next Tuesday by a very controlled and peaceful assisted suicide but someone violently and slowly murders me the day before. Either way, I still died. Suddenly Tuesday looks somewhat better, doesn’t it? Insurance companies will pay if I get murdered but not if I kill myself. Explain that. Simple: they don’t won’t to reward my suicide if they can pay my spouse to murder me! Go figure! Yes, let the individual decide, if they wish, when to die.
Posted by: keith | July 15, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
It’s my life, I’ll do whatever I want with it, laws or no laws…….
Posted by: Mike | July 15, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Absolutely not! If God didn’t want you to suffer, He would not have given doctors the ability to keep people breathing long after their lives would naturally end. And doctors make a lot of money keeping people alive artificially, so suicide is bad for the economy.
Posted by: Freon | July 15, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Everyone has the option to do as they please. For me I believe in GOD i could never take my own life and think I would still go to Heaven. But i can totally understand not wanting to have your daughters and sons see you suffer. I Have faith and I will go out when it’s time for me to go.
Posted by: Codie McDaniel | July 15, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
yes, every one should always have total control over their own life decisions . . . period
Posted by: anon anon | July 15, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
I watched my mother, one sister age 39 and my two brothers ages 39 and 54 all pass away from different types of cancer. My sister and the younger brother both decided to fight their cancers with chemo, radiation, etc. and they both had long agonizing painful times until they died. My older brother chose not to fight and he lived for only a month after he found out that he had cancer. My mothers lung cancer was incurable. She passed away at the age of 71 in a nursing home with her family surrounding her. All four of them went home to be with the Lord without a doubt. I think what you really want to know is this: will a person who kills themself go to Heaven and will God understand enough to let them in? I have another sister who is going through chemo and radiation for cervical cancer, she is doing all that she can to live. She is 55 years old and she knows the Lord and she knows what God has said, that a person should not kill. I would reckon that if we take our own life then that would be killing wouldn’t it? We have to allow God to choose when we go. My son- in -laws Uncle recently passed away after a really bad fall that left him brain dead. His family pulled the plug but, it was God who chose weather he would keep breathing or not. We can not bargin with God, If you think we can, then when you see Judas ask him what he wishes he would have done!
Posted by: Susan | July 15, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
NO !!!
Posted by: Polly | July 15, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Yes.
Posted by: WilSpeaking | July 15, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Kelley,
Couldn’t have put any simpler. Suffering unabated to live is and watching those that around you that love you see that is even more painful. If it weren’t for my religious convictions i’d agree with Kelley all the way.
Regards,
Tim
Posted by: Tim | July 16, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am
After watching my wife endure her mother’s struggles from a range or issues to include dementia and being confined to a bed for months I am absolutely in favor of making a personal choice. Had her mind not gone before her body she would have chose to go on her own terms and save herself and her son and daugher the agony of watching her slowly pass.
Posted by: Tim | July 16, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Was music their only comfort in this world? Pity.
Posted by: ddg | July 16, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
As a suicide survivor, my husband killed himself, I have experience with this issue. The underlying depression should be dealt with. If the depression is helped, the desire to kill one’s self may be diminished or eliminated. All people should have free will, but the deep depression suffered by many means that they are not acting out of free will. If they were not depressed they would be thinking of their families and other loved ones and their thoughts would not be warped by their illness.
Posted by: Pam | July 16, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
I have seen SEVERAL family members struggle with the final stages of cancer and Alzheimer’s. If they had decided while they were still of sound mind, to stipulate a facilitation of ending their life once the quality of that life had completely deteriorated, I think that wish should’ve been honored. I always hear people wail on about how suicide is “the most selfish act anyone can take part in.” So, what do you call keeping a loved one alive for an extended period of unimaginable pain, infirmity and indignity, just for the sake of having them around? I can’t think of anything MORE selfish.
Posted by: Don Normann | July 16, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
It is my opinion only that humans should have the right to end their lives when they have a terminal illness that will cause them pain and endless suffering. We offer humane and compassionate euthanasia to animals when they are at this stage, why do we balk when the patient is human. If the patient wants to end his life this way, by humane euthanasia, then he should be allowed to do it.
Posted by: Janet R | July 16, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
I believe euthanasia should be respected as a personal, reasoned decision.
Posted by: Jessica | July 16, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Once a person reaches what is considered the age of reason, there should be no restrictions on whether that person chooses to live or die. Modern medicine has enabled us to live a lot longer. Some of us develop maladies that make our quality of life a living hell. I see nothing wrong with allowing those of us who are tired of the pain of living to choose the relief of death. It’s not like there aren’t enough people to go around these days. And, there should be no legal or financial penalties imposed either, i.e. from the insurance companies!
Posted by: Donald | July 16, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
No
Our departure time belongs to God. He may have fruitful labor for us to do, making it necessary to remain on earth. Fruitful labor is not defined by what we do, but what Christ does through us. He can work in the infirm just as well as in the healthy. I am a nurse. One time I had a patient with dementia. I walked in her room one day, said good morning, and told her it was raining out. She looked at me and said, “Did you remember to thank God for the rain?” I never forgot her and I often thank God for the rain now as I remember her.
As long as God gives us life, he gives that life purpose and Christ is honored.
Posted by: carol c | July 16, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Paul S
Since when is potential deafness a terminal disease?
Posted by: Tess | July 16, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
you don’t let animal suffer, why should a human being suffer. it is everyone person business.
Posted by: dorothy | July 16, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I believe a person has the right to choose. It’s their life. I would want to die the same way if my husband were termanally ill. I couldn’t think of a better way to go than in his arms and together. How peaceful would that be. It wouldn’t be right to deny someone that.
Posted by: harleybluz | July 16, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Who do we think we are? The question should be who gives us the authority the prevent someone from doing what they want. If it does not physically harm anyone else, no one should think they have the right to interfere with anybody. Maybe try & talk them out of their decision, but not interfere and stop them.
Posted by: Rob | July 16, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
I am expecting that government is going to be encouraging the elimination of elderly and terminally ill people, in the not to distant future, as they no longer want to provide any way for the elderly to survive, financially, or medically.
They want to eliminate medicare and medicaid, and make those people buy the government’s health insurance.
The only way to escape that new “tax”, is to commit Hari Kari.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | July 16, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I seems that they were both elderly and together many years. Would one really want to go on without the other? If you don’t have a chronic or terminal illness that diminishes your quality of life, no one can make that decision for anyone because you can’t understand the pain they are in and the pain they are having on their loved ones. I say leave them alone.
Posted by: Ms Muffit | July 16, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Is our life not our own?
This man KNEW he could not go on without his beloved wife and life partner. Very few people have ever experienced that depth of love and devotion.
How could they possibly understand?
She, on the other hand did not want to die in pain of a horrible disease.
Again, unless you have experienced these things, you can not possibly understand their decision.
Personally, I applaud the clinic and their bravery.
Once you’ve watched a loved one suffer you too will understand.
We are allowed to “pull the plug” and make the decision to end the life of a family member that is considered brain dead. “They are going to die anyway. Right?”
We are allowed to stop the suffering of a pet.
Why is it that we are not allowed to make that decision for ourselves?
HMMMM?
Posted by: Christine Gallagher | July 17, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
No, humans are not animals. But, we should have access to medication to keep us comfortable. And, we should be able to have DNR if someone is terminally ill or will live very disabled for the rest of their life.
Posted by: Bea | July 17, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
How can soembody else have control over your fate and body? If you are not in charge of it, you are not a free person. Nobody needs to know the medical history and stand judge over a person in bad pain. I have watched my father die in such incredible pain it was heartbreaking. Why do we put animals down to prevent suffering, yet we try to justify allowing our loved ones to suffer.
Posted by: Jeannette | July 19, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm