Dying Lockerbie Bomber Released — Families of Victims Lose Out
ABC's Nick Watt reports on the release of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, the man serving a life sentence for the murder of 270 people in the Pan Am plane explosion over Lockerbie, Scotland back in 1988. Megrahi is dying of cancer and was allowed out of prison to spend his final days with his family in Libya. He was released on grounds of compassion on the part of the Scottish Justice Secretary:Sadly it's the families of the victims who have ALL lost out this week. They all lose out — the ones who wanted Megrahi to die in jail, as well as those who wanted him released.The majority of American families wanted Megrahi to die in jail. The majority of British families wanted him released, because they don't believe he is guilty. However, those British families wanted Megrahi's second appeal to go to court: Another chance for the "true" facts to out. (They believe Iran commissioned a Palestinian terror group to carry out the attack). Megrahi could have been granted compassionate release and the appeal could have continued. However, he dropped his appeal this week to give himself the best chance of going home. If the compassionate release appeal had been turned down, Megrahi could still have been released under the British/Libyan prisoner release program. But you can't be released under that program if you have an appeal pending. So he dropped his appeal.Ultimately, Megrahi was released on compassionate grounds.Today Scotland's Justice Minister did throw the Americans a bone. He said he declined the prisoner release application because of an apparent agreement (to which he says he is not privy) between the British and American governments, which stated that anyone convicted of the Lockerbie bombing would serve their term in a Scottish jail. Basically he's saying he heard the American's objections to a prisoner transfer and agrees with them on that point. (The Minister pointed out that the Scottish government did not exist at the time of the bombing — it was formed in 1998 and behaves a bit like a state legislature in the US).The Justice Minister was meticulous today in detailing the legal consideration that got him to his decision. However, as has been reported, the grounds for compassionate release are not black and white. The "general guideline" in the prison service is that if a prisoner is believed to be within 3 months of death then they are eligible for compassionate release.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
His victims didn’t get to die at home. Why should he?
Posted by: Alex | August 20, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
“Megrahi is dying of cancer and was allowed out of prison to spend his final days with his family in Libya.” – ABC News
I understand him wanting to be with his family as he dies but what’s wrong with the family spending those days with him in the Scottish jail?
That would be a win win win for all involved.
Sometimes these Justice Ministers just don’t know how to administer Justice.
Posted by: Noz | August 20, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
I don’t understand why so many Americans preach a ‘turn the other cheek’ mentality in the bulk of their daily lives, but when it comes to the treatment of prisoners, they cannot get enough blood. Alex’s comment was correct: his victims didn’t get to die at home. But what does an ‘eye for an eye’ treatment gain in the end? Can’t the state prove that it is fundamentally moral even down to the treatment of it’s prisoners? Couldn’t the state lead by example rather than by fear of punishment? I’m sure the overwhelming answer would be: probably not. And no, prisoners serving such a sentence really shouldn’t be given leniency, though a degree of mercy shouldn’t necessarily be ruled out in circumstances like these. I think the compassion the Scottish government has shown in this case, proves that their moral high ground can be maintained even in the most trying of circumstances. When justice is equated with vengeance, something is definitely wrong. Not to mention, his prognosis of three months to live pretty well rounds off his life sentence. Nature has given him a death sentence, and a short one at that; I’m not sure how you can begrudge their government for not throwing salt into his wound.
Posted by: AFine | August 21, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Why does America think everyone has to answer to them .They have supported state terrorisim for years and have made the world a more unsafe place with their invasion of other countries. The victims families were quick enough to accept compensation from the Lybian government but as always its money thats more important to them. You need to accept you are not the country you once were as the world now seen so do us all a favour and stay out of other countries business. Sort out your own mess before judging others well done Scotland you made the right choice.
Posted by: kdf | August 23, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am