By Sadie Bass

Aug 11, 2009 12:38pm

Rep. David Scott’s Office Vandalized With Spray-Painted Swastika

Police are investigating a swastika reportedly spray-painted outside Rep. David Scott's office in Smyrna, GA. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is reporting that an office worker discovered the swastika this morning, and that the Democratic Congressman is en-route to the office now.

On August 1st, Scott was involved in a heated exchange at a town hall meeting in Douglasville, GA.  He accused health care reform protestors of attempting to "hijack" the meeting.

It is unclear if the two incidents are related. 

UPDATE: The FBI released the following statement about the incident:

"The Atlanta office FBI has received information from U.S. Congressman David Scott's office concerning vandalism at his Smyrna, Georgia office. Based on the nature of the reported incident, the FBI is investigating this matter together with the Smyrna Police Department as well as the U.S. Capitol Police."  — Special Agent Stephen Emmett, Media Coordinator, FBI Atlanta

Read the full AP story HERE.

User Comments

The spray paint job was very wrong, and not sanctioned by the majority of people.
Do not confuse people who are concerned about the health care bill with people who do stupid acts such as this.
I hope they do catch the vandals soon, because it only clouds the issue.
Please don’t point to a few stupid people and say that EVERYONE on ‘that side’ is the same. That, in itself, would be foolish, as well.

Posted by: ddg | August 11, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

ddg | Aug 11, 2009 12:48:17 PM—while i agree with you that these are a few bad apples behaving badly it has been a somewhat recurrent theme (i.e. Limbaugh calling Obama a NAZI, the presidents supporters “brown shirts” and “storm-troopers). this NAZI imagery and innuendo is becoming very popular in radically conservative circles. i admire your stance. i hope millions of Republicans come to feel as you do, because this hatred is turning people off: as democrats support is falling, republicans support is even falling more dramatically.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

The swastika was a symbol of German nationalism and the fascist state. We are a fascist state so the symbol may be pertinent, but given its history with the Nazis, fascism should have been used instead of the symbol. The word fascist should have been written on a poster and taped to avoid damaging property.

Posted by: Huh | August 11, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Do not confuse people who are concerned about the health care bill with people who do stupid acts such as this.
==========================================
It is a continuum…When you incite people with false information some people will react violently. Cause and effect. For those who equate Obama to, alternately, a socialist or a Nazi they must take responsibility for those who react to those statements, for and against. But they won’t because they are cowards….Those who would attend a town hall merely to shout down a politician are contributors to any violence that is an extension of such mob behavior…

Posted by: indy_voter | August 11, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Huh | Aug 11, 2009 1:22:24 PM—”The swastika was a symbol of German nationalism and the fascist state. We are a fascist state so the symbol may be pertinent.” the swastika was the symbol for a whole lot more than a fascist state. please remember they physically exterminated over 11 million innocent people. it is a symbol of gutter hatred in its most putrid form. why not encourage people just not to desecrate private or public buildings at all. if you disagree, go to your hometown meeting and say so. no need to tape anything onto a building. and if the US is a fascist state, please don’t let us keep you here. you are not being held against your will i take it? if you are please forgive me and get to an embassy or consulate closest to you and apply for political asylum elsewhere. best of luck.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Paul Wall – Yep I am aware of how people perceive the symbol. The symbols original intent before the final solution’s implementation was to represent the German state’s nationalism. Notice I said to use the work fascist rather than the symbol.

Posted by: Huh | August 11, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

corporatism fascism definition for Paul Wall
Belief that the state in capitalist democracies should intervene to a large extent in the economy to ensure social harmony. In Austria, for example, corporatism results in political decisions often being taken after discussions between chambers of commerce, trade unions, and the government.

Posted by: Huh | August 11, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Paul Wall
If there was a place that adhered to the original constitution of the US, I would apply for asylum. Sadly, the rest of the world is just as bad or worse. I will keep my fight here.

Posted by: Huh | August 11, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Huh—and people are reminded by other behaviors when the word fascism is bantered about as if it has no meaning: The radical rights desire to have books banned, curriculum invaded to represent Christianity, xenophobia, forced displacement of people (anti-immigrant). the fascist “NAZI’ state will always have more in common with Limbaugh and the like. the hardly need to resort to swastikas let us know how he and others like him feel. they are well known.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Huh | Aug 11, 2009 1:45:54 PM—you mean your own personal vision of the original constitution? everyone has their interpretation. that’s why there are courts. the constitution belongs to you no more than me. it is a document that belongs to the people. but there are places with longer life expectancies, civil liberties, homogenous culture (i.e. Scandanavian countries.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

People who toss around the word fascism so loosley at a democratic government have no idea what the term means. More than likely they do that because they are simply too lazy to work through democratic means to change what they don’t like. It is too easy to resort anarchy…which too many right-wing conservatives are….They preach patriotism and practice anarchy.

Posted by: indy_voter | August 11, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

swastika
The moron that sprayed it
has no idea what it really stands for.
Rep. Scott is at issue with him on a medical issue. You can not get much dumber than this half-wit sprayer.

Posted by: pete staff | August 11, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

This sprayer gives good evidence that
there is a need for better second grade education. Some one should buy him a box of chalk. And send him out to mark up street corners. He would be happer than a pig in slop.

Posted by: pete staff | August 11, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

A lot of people are making assumptions.
Keep this in mind – “It is unclear if the two incidents are related.”
I remember a similar case once and it turned out the guilty party wanted to make it look like they were being attacked in order to gain sympathy while directing outrage at their opponent.
Don’t make judgments until the facts are in, and furthermore, one deranged person only represents himself, not other people.

Posted by: cjc | August 11, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Trying too stop any constructive dialog.
My yelling and shouting and not allowing the other side tospeak and make it’s point.Is not the true
democratic way. This the way of
obstruction an is unAmerican. Strange
these meeeting were supposed to be
an exchange of ideas. And have not been
allowed be to so. A lot of flagwavers were yelling loudly,shaking fist and making threats. And not a constructive idea was put forward by the flag wavers.

Posted by: pete staff | August 11, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

case in point.
A lot of flag waving does not make any
one a true AMERICAN.

Posted by: pete staff | August 11, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Paul Wall – The constitution that spells out what government can and can not do. That’s the one I am talking about. I don’t care about Scandinavian countries and the fact they live longer. I want to live free with my liberties intact as defined in the constitution.

Posted by: Huh | August 11, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

pete staff | Aug 11, 2009 2:47:18 PM—ironically i think flag-waving is a sign of being un-American. when someone uses an American flag to make a cheap political point-whether it’s supporting the Iraq War (in Bush’s time in office flag waving=patriotism) or health care (“i don’t want the president to succeed, i don’t want health care so i wave my flag and you are un-american). i am always on alert when i see the flag used for political purpose. the flag-wavers only believe in their causes and everyone else is un-american: no negotiation, no rational discussion, no common ground. some americans these flag-wavers are.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Huh | Aug 11, 2009 3:49:12 PM—the constitution gives me my rights and liberties, that is why i live here. you have the same rights and liberties and are obviously using them. calling the United States a “fascist state” cheapens the true suffering of all those who died in fascist political regimes. when you throw around “fascism” like Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Beck, et al you are simpley using the word as cheap political rhetoric. we can discuss topics without calling anyone fascist that we don’t agree with. obviously i disagree with you but i don’t think you are a fascist at all, i do not think you are un-american. you may think i am a liberal, commie, fascist just because we disagree. i think as americans we can discuss our disagreements without the rhetoric Limbaugh and Co. insist we use. you aren’t my enemy whatever Rush says. i am not a fascist and neither are you. so why not quit throwing a word around that has a very specific meaning and using it for political advantage instead of honest political debate?

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Paul Wall – It is a corporate fascist state by definition. Government control of industries, not allowing them to fail are at the very heart of what corporatism is. I am not throwing it around. It is what it is. I am for free-markets, sound currency, etc. If you are not, just look at how good the opposite has done us. Closing in on that $100 trillion debt amount. By the way the only guy I tune into among those that you mention is Beck and only occasionally. I much prefer to listen to the likes of Peter Schiff and Ron Paul, you know the guys that predicted this meltdown and why it would happen. By the way the soldiers that have died for us take an oath to defend the constitution, at least the one I have been talking about.

Posted by: Huh | August 11, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Huh | Aug 11, 2009 4:30:50 PM—you seem to make some good points. there are economic concerns. i happen to believe that Ron Paul has some very good ideas. and perhaps Obama’s approach to the economy is wrong and we would be better off with 40% unemployment and total collapse of financial institutions. who knows. but Obama is not a fascist. he is an elected official and he can be voted out of office. he is neither prince nor king. the thing i do like about Ron Paul is that he is a decent man with some very good ideas. perhaps he would be taken more seriously if he engaged in a bunch of polemical political rhetoric. rubbing my face in the fact that soldiers take an oath to defend the constitution is un-necessary. it has nothing to do with what we are talking about. i support our armed services and beieve they should be deployed nowhere (like Ron Paul believes). but i won’t rub your nose with the fact that soldiers who die serving their country take an oath on our constitution just to try to show you i’m a better american than you. i won’t desecrate dead maines just to win a cheap political discussion.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

I feel as though I am living in the George Orwell world of “1984.” The radical right wing nuts, who are the lineal descendants of Fascism, are calling good liberal Democrats “fascists.” They are saying that black is white and there are a large number of nuts out there who believe it. Glenn Beck impossibly claimed that Hitler was a “socialist” simply due to the English translation of the German words for Nazi. Without any regard for history and how Hitler took a small political party and turned it into the German version of Italy’s fascism. All this just to claim that any Democrat is some sort of Socialist, which must be (according to their tortured logic) both a Communist and a Fascist. The people who believe this distortion and others like it should see a psychiatrist! Birthers! UFO believers! Scientologists! Black Helicopters!
The nuts are taking over!

Posted by: Ian MacFarlane | August 11, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Ian MacFarlane | Aug 11, 2009 4:57:33 PM—i think the radical right’s use of language is fascinating if it weren’t so damn scary. words and concepts are bantered arounds by would-be, has-been pseudo-intellectuals. that Limbaugh, Beck, O’Reilly and the like only pass for people who truly understand the concepts and issue. these people have no idea of socialism, have read none of Marx’s work. i think these guys get their concepts from 1950 Cliff Notes and proffer it off as cutting-edge intellectualism. how they have highjacked the meanings of terms, especially complicated ones, and imbued them with contradictory and bogus interpretations is toys-in-the-attick crazy. the best any conservative could do is read, read often and read alot from primary sources and not get the meaning of concepts of pseudo-intellectual charlatans. i mean Limbaugh’s show is brought to us by “The Rush Limbaugh Institute of Conservative Studies”…a guy running around addicted to drugs and holding a high-school diploma.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 11, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

“Please don’t point to a few stupid people and say that EVERYONE on ‘that side’ is the same. ”
Well, EVERYONE on ‘that side’ is pointing to a few stupid people who are yucking it up for the cameras and saying “look, EVERYONE is angry”. You cant have it both ways. Unfortunately, the modus operandi of the neo-conservative movement has been to demonize and dramatize in an effort to sway. Fortunately most Americans see through this, and know there is a better path.

Posted by: CommonSense | August 11, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

“the constitution gives me my rights and liberties, that is why i live here.” – Paul Wall
Excuse me Paul but a clarification is in order.
The founding fathers wrote the following in the Declaration of Independence,
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,”
The constitution doesn’t give us rights.
Our rights come from our Creator, they are just spelled out in the Constitution.
Carry on.

Posted by: Noz | August 11, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Scott’s staff painted that symbol to change the subject.
It’s an obvious ploy to get out of the mess he made for himself at his townhall meeting and on CNN with the doctor he insisted wasn’t his constituent even though he was.

Posted by: Shawn S | August 12, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Noz | Aug 11, 2009 10:40:56 PM—i’m aware of what the Declaration of Independence says. are you aware that it is a separate document than the US Constitution. what the founding fathers wrote about God is irrelevant because it is stated in the first ammendment of the US Constitution (The Bill of Rights) that there is freeedon of religion. whether or not there is a God the constitution gives me my rights as a citizen. The Declaration of Independence is not a law, the Constitution is.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 12, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

mandinka and UncleDon, when you get your evidence get back to us. if you have proof or information that would implicate Congressman Scott, please share that information with police. otherwise, this was a crime more likely perpetrated by radical conservatives. they, after all, use the symbol quite often. and this crime did happen in the South. but go ahead—blame the victim until you have proof otherwise. i mean why even investigate the crime since what you believe is correct for the simple reason you say so.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 12, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Here’s the reality. Regardless of who put the swastika on his sign, Mr. Scoot first reaction is to play the race card. He reports that he has received mail calling him the N-word but offers no proof. He attempts to portray all those who do not support the president’s health care program as racists. This is a common liberal ploy. When you are no winning, call them racist. This will not make them go away this time. The swatika was placed on his sign to identify him as a fascist. A term he has probably used many times against those who do not follow his political ideology. Suck it up, Scott and stop whining like a mule.
You embarrass me.

Posted by: Johnnyboy56 | August 12, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I totally agree-I don’t think it was the right thing to do…

Posted by: joe jones | August 12, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Johnnyboy56 | Aug 12, 2009 1:19:33 PM—the swastika is the symbol of pure hatred. it represents mass deportations, forced immigration, physical extermination. that the radical right has used the symbol to oppose health care legislation is unacceptable and is racist. the swastika is used in the South, as you probably very well know, to threaten black people. if people have a disagreement with Congressman Scott they should state it clearly, not use symbols of extermination. black people have rights, Johnnyboy56. if you can’t handle that perhaps you should quit whining like a mule. wear your swastika with pride, man. stick it on your car, fly it from your house, get a cool swastika t-shirt. everyone will know exactly what’s on your mind.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 12, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

And what more fear could we possibly generate than to think that the unemployed and aging population might be permitted reasonably-priced health care? After all, our health care providers and corporate health care insurers are among the priviledged elite of this country. Why should the status quo be disrupted with the idea of ordinary people receiving check-ups and medications, or (horrors) even organ transplants? The very idea should send violent chills down the spine of every red-blooded American citizen. Most of us know our place. Those sick people without insurance should just learn to heal themselves.

Posted by: B Goodman | August 12, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

B Goodman | Aug 12, 2009 4:38:26 PM—conservatives become liberals when they lose their jobs or retire. of course these fools disrupting town hall meetings with disruptive behavior are the first in line for the “socialist social services programs” once they have chronic kidney disease, cancer, catastrophic medical costs, a disabled child, lose their sight.

Posted by: Paul Wall | August 12, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

This health care debate is ridiculous… what in the world does a community health care plan have to do with fascism… these people have to be the ‘intelligent, informed and dedicated, followers of conservative talk radio. Get a life people… you don’t want your neighbor to have health care because Rush told you it was un-American. The American way is to have the pharmaceutical and medical industries hold you ransom until they’ve drained every last resource while they vacation away on the Riviera… that’s the good ole American way.

Posted by: GoBlue | August 14, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.